The Charlie Kirk Show - FDA Advisory Committee Revelations and Explosive Vaccine Injury Data—Thought Crimes with Steve Kirsch and James Roguski Aired: 2022-06-22 Duration: 34:28 === Vaccine Safety Questions (01:37) === [00:00:00] Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, a thought crime episode. [00:00:03] We're not allowed to be talking about these topics. [00:00:04] So text it to your friends and make sure you're subscribed. [00:00:07] James Roguski and Steve Kirsch about the vaccine. [00:00:09] Is the vaccine hurting people? [00:00:10] Is it killing people? [00:00:12] I asked some questions about that. [00:00:14] I take no stance on it personally. [00:00:15] I just ask questions. [00:00:16] You can listen to our guests as they explore these provocative topics. [00:00:21] You can email me directly, freedom at charliekirk.com. [00:00:24] Subscribe to our podcast and make sure that the plus sign is punched if you have an Apple iPhone. [00:00:30] Get involved with Turning Point USA Today and come to our student action summit in Tampa, Florida, tpusa.com slash SAS. [00:00:38] That is tpusa.com slash SAS. [00:00:41] It's going to be an amazing event. [00:00:42] Bring your kids, bring your grandkids. [00:00:44] Come at tpusa.com/slash SAS. [00:00:48] Buckle up, everybody. [00:00:49] Here we go. [00:00:50] Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. [00:00:52] Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. [00:00:54] I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. [00:00:57] Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. [00:01:01] I want to thank Charlie. [00:01:02] He's an incredible guy. [00:01:03] His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. [00:01:11] We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. [00:01:20] That's why we are here. [00:01:23] Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage. [00:01:26] For personalized loan services, you can count on. [00:01:28] Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com. [00:01:35] We're not going to let off this topic. === Moderna Dose Concerns (08:19) === [00:01:37] We spent about a whole year just asking our audience, what's going on with the vaccine? [00:01:43] We're asking not just our audience, but experts, what is this mRNA gene therapy? [00:01:49] And unfortunately, the story is not going away. [00:01:53] We on this program are very disappointed with the FDA, which seems to be approving these phase three experimental gene therapies for babies and toddlers. [00:02:05] It's an inexplicable development. [00:02:07] And with us to help unpack this is James Roguski. [00:02:12] We had James on our program first for the World Health Organization fights. [00:02:18] James joins us right now. [00:02:20] He's an independent journalist. [00:02:22] James, welcome back to the program. [00:02:23] Thank you very much for having me. [00:02:25] There is so much information to talk about. [00:02:27] Where would you like to start? [00:02:28] Well, let's start with this. [00:02:29] I just want to reiterate my disappointment for the FDA approving these phase three experimental gene therapies for babies and toddlers. [00:02:37] Can you debrief our audience and tell us what happened? [00:02:40] Well, first off, a point of clarification, they are not FDA approved. [00:02:44] They are authorized for emergency use. [00:02:47] Got it. [00:02:47] That's important. [00:02:48] And it's incredibly arguable that there is an emergency because children of the ages from six months to four or five years, it isn't an emergency. [00:02:59] It's something that they don't die from COVID. [00:03:02] They rarely, if ever, end up in the hospital. [00:03:05] Anyone who has problems has comorbidities. [00:03:08] They're already sick children. [00:03:10] And people have to realize that the CARES Act made it so that any hospital who gets takes a swab and sticks it up somebody's nose until they get a positive COVID result on a PCR test, which everyone should by now know, you know, is not a way of diagnosing. [00:03:30] It's a way of gaining access to a 20% bonus on the entire hospital stay. [00:03:37] Now, that's something that people may or may not know. [00:03:39] And if they know, they tend to forget. [00:03:42] The CARES Act gives a 20% bonus to hospitals. [00:03:46] Someone could be in the hospital for whatever the reason may be. [00:03:50] And if they keep jabbing them up the nose until they get a positive test on a PCR, who knows how many cycles they ran that test, they get a 20% bonus. [00:03:59] They call that person a COVID patient. [00:04:02] And so, all that being taken into account, what happened at the FDA vaccine advisory committee meetings last week, I think is out and out fraud. [00:04:16] It certainly would be considered incompetence. [00:04:20] I felt so outraged by it that as I was watching the eight-hour meeting, right, at 11 a.m. my time here in California, it was so obvious to me that the fraud was occurring. [00:04:34] I published my article right then and there before they voted, documenting the fraud that was occurring. [00:04:42] Because, you know, normally I take my time, I sleep on an article, I ask people for their feedback, but it was so blatant that I published it mid-meeting just to point to the fact that if I could see the issue is that what happened in that meeting should have been obvious to absolutely everybody. [00:05:05] Okay. [00:05:06] And what happened is the FDA essentially became a marketing team, a cheerleading team, a sales pitch team for Moderna and Pfizer. [00:05:20] To get into the details of it, if you want, I don't know how much time we have. [00:05:25] The biggest problem is that they started out, you know, just one of the four groupings, right? [00:05:32] Little children in the Pfizer study between six and 23 months. [00:05:36] What they started out with was about 1,200 children. [00:05:41] And before the end of the data collection on April 29th, they had whittled that down to 277 children. [00:05:50] So, you know, question number one is where did two-thirds of the children disappear to? [00:05:55] Why is the follow-up not happening with those two-thirds of the children? [00:06:00] But it actually gets worse. [00:06:02] They threw out all of the information. [00:06:05] They didn't actually talk about the data. [00:06:07] What they talked about was something called immunobridging. [00:06:11] It's too involved to get into in a brief radio show, but they only ended up doing blood tests on 80 of the participants in that group. [00:06:23] And they've changed the definition of a quote-unquote vaccine. [00:06:27] A vaccine used to mean that you were immune, that you would not get the disease, that you were fully protected. [00:06:34] Now it just means that you get an immune response. [00:06:38] Well, you can inject chicken soup into somebody's arm and you're going to get an immune response. [00:06:44] It doesn't correlate. [00:06:46] And the FDA has argued amongst themselves in previous meetings that there is no way really to say that when an injection based on the Wuhan strain causes you or your body to create antibodies, that that's going to have any protection against variant Omicron, BA12345, whatever it may be. [00:07:09] The level of fraud involved here is amazing. [00:07:14] But they also overlooked things like Moderna having eight times as much mRNA as Pfizer and therefore also having far more side effects. [00:07:28] Let me ask you really quick, and this is important. [00:07:30] Some of our audience is new to this topic, believe it or not. [00:07:33] They've been following us and they come in and out. [00:07:35] They're not an expert like you do. [00:07:36] Just two things. [00:07:37] Can you talk about how the actual technology of this vaccine is different than some vaccines that people might have received 10 or 20 years ago, whether it be the polio vaccine or whatever? [00:07:50] And number two, can you please elaborate on what is an mRNA vaccine? [00:07:55] It might be actually the same answer. [00:07:57] Absolutely. [00:07:58] In previous years, the idea was that you would take a pathogen, you would damage it or neutralize it or attenuate it in some fashion, and then you would inject that into the system. [00:08:09] The body would see the full-fledged organism that has been made so that it won't kill you. [00:08:15] And your immune system response to that is based on actually the pathogen. [00:08:21] mRNA is just a genetic sequence that is wrapped up in a little particle of fat. [00:08:28] They refer to it as a lipid nanoparticle. [00:08:32] They argued that it would only go into your arm and your immune system would recognize it and have an ability to identify it in the future. [00:08:41] But unfortunately, that isn't the reality. [00:08:43] It actually goes everywhere in your body. [00:08:45] And the mRNA is the genetic code that gets the cells in the human body to actually make the spike protein. [00:08:55] And so you're not just injecting the pathogen, you're injecting essentially the blueprint. [00:09:02] So the factories inside every cell in your body can then make the pathogen. [00:09:07] The issue at hand here with Moderna is they've put eight times as much of this mRNA as the Pfizer injection. [00:09:18] And children are being given the same dose, whether they are a six-month-old, tiny little child, or a five-year-old. [00:09:28] And so what the data shows is that kids who got the placebo compared, I'm sorry, kids who got the injection versus the placebo were five times as likely to have severe adverse events. [00:09:42] And within the children who got the placebo on top of that, the smaller children were three times as likely to have severe adverse events as the older children, just because of the size difference. === Texas Political Shifts (06:42) === [00:09:57] We're blessed to live in the greatest nation ever to exist in the history of the world. [00:10:01] Luke 12, 48 says, quote, to whom much has been given, much will be required. [00:10:06] We as Christians can shape our world. [00:10:08] One of these ways is how we steward our finances and our money. [00:10:11] If you have money and stocks, you have the power to affect change through your investments. [00:10:15] Jesus spoke about money in roughly 15% of his teachings and 11 out of 39 of his parables. [00:10:21] How do we follow his teachings about money? [00:10:23] Well, my friends at PAX Financial can help. [00:10:25] I've opened an account with them. [00:10:26] I think very highly of them. [00:10:27] They are fiduciaries that will make sure you have a responsible plan to retire. [00:10:31] I trust them with my money, and I hope you will as well. [00:10:34] But look, they'll also help you invest in companies that align with your beliefs. [00:10:38] No companies that engage in pornography or in excessive drinking or in a degenerate lifestyle. [00:10:45] If you have $150,000 to invest, please text my name, Charlie, to the number 74868. [00:10:52] And even if you don't have $150,000, maybe they'll make an exception for you. [00:10:55] I don't know, but just learn more about them. [00:10:57] Look, text Charlie to 74868. [00:11:00] Take advantage of the power to make a difference with your money. [00:11:03] PAX Financial. [00:11:04] It was great for me. [00:11:05] I think it will be terrific for you. [00:11:10] So I'll be very honest. [00:11:12] When it comes to Georgia, I don't get it. [00:11:16] Today is the Alabama primary. [00:11:19] And Alabama and Georgia are two very similar states where there's kind of this southern good old boys network where they're Republican, but a lot of Republican in name only. [00:11:30] And this is an interesting phenomenon. [00:11:32] And it's an open, it's a moving theory, if you will. [00:11:35] I am open for correction, But I'm pretty close to writing a pretty substantial piece on this and doing a whole podcast on it, where my theory is that it's actually unhealthy for a state politically to be too Republican or too Democrat. [00:11:55] I actually think a state ends up being freer if it's right near the 50-50 margins. [00:12:02] Now, the case in point example I use is Florida. [00:12:05] I believe if you have to compete for your votes, and then it's not an automatic that you're going to hold on to political power the next time around, you actually have to be more accountable, you have to be more transparent, and you have to be better. [00:12:22] You have to be a better leader. [00:12:23] So Florida is a great example of that. [00:12:26] Now, Texas is a very interesting state. [00:12:28] Texas absolutely and totally has a good old boy network. [00:12:33] So Georgia has a good old boy network that got Brian Kemp past the primary. [00:12:37] How? [00:12:39] I don't quite understand it. [00:12:41] I believe Alabama has that good old boy network that is going to make Katie Britt the nominee. [00:12:45] I hope Mo Brooks wins today, but the polling doesn't look very good. [00:12:48] I did a teletown hall for Mo Brooks. [00:12:51] I hope everyone goes out and votes for Mo Brooks today, but I'm trying to be realistic as well. [00:12:55] Donald Trump has come out and endorsed Britt, but we'll see what happens. [00:13:00] The southern states have kind of this, we're all Republican, and if you are kind of a moderate Democrat, you might as well run as a Republican. [00:13:09] Texas used to be like that. [00:13:11] Now, Texas has its smoke-filled rooms and its backhanded deals, but the Bush family ran the Texas Republican Party for a long time. [00:13:25] The good old boy network of Texas was run by the Bush dynasty. [00:13:30] Now, trust me, there's a cartel of insiders in Austin and in Texas. [00:13:34] Trust me. [00:13:35] I'm not saying it's been displaced, but it has been severely weakened. [00:13:42] Where the Texas Republican convention was this last weekend, and it's evidence, and it's something that should give us hope for the Republican Party across the country, that there is a new movement that has taken over the Republican Party. [00:13:56] Texas was used to kind of walk around on eggshells and Texas Republican Party kind of be moderate Republicans. [00:14:05] It's anything but that. [00:14:06] The grassroots, thanks to Donald Trump's leadership, have taken over the Republican Party in Texas. [00:14:14] Best example of this, when John Corey went to go speak at the Texas convention, gets booed off stage by the Texas grassroots because of his outright support of gun control, Play Cut 51. [00:14:40] The Republican Party is being revitalized. [00:14:43] It finally has a new grassroots center that we've been waiting for for so long. [00:14:49] And honestly, I have to give Ron DeSantis a tremendous amount of credit for this. [00:14:54] Florida pushed Texas to start acting like Texas. [00:14:57] Now, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia, those and Utah, South Carolina, I got nothing for you. [00:15:06] But I think it's because they're actually very Republican. [00:15:13] May I make a provocative argument? [00:15:16] The more Democrats that have moved to Texas, the more conservative the leadership of the Republican Party has become in Texas. [00:15:28] The more Texas has become like a battleground state, Texas has now reasserted itself in leadership. [00:15:35] And I believe it's out of self-preservation. [00:15:41] South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, still okay. [00:15:46] Those other states, I got nothing for you. [00:15:48] I don't get it what's happening. [00:15:49] They might as well be Democrats at times. [00:15:51] But Texas, it's no longer the Bush dynasty. [00:15:55] It's a people-centered grassroots party that has taken over the Texas Republican Party. [00:16:02] That's good news. [00:16:05] Hey, everybody. [00:16:06] As you know, our friend Mike Lindell has an amazing passion to help everyone get the best sleep of your life. [00:16:11] He didn't stop by simply creating the best pillow. [00:16:13] Nope, you know, Mike. [00:16:14] He's got lots of energy. [00:16:15] He's done it again by introducing his My Slippers. [00:16:18] For a limited time, you'll save $90 on a pair of MySlippers. [00:16:21] This blowout sale of the year won't last, so order now. [00:16:23] Mike has taken over two years to develop it. [00:16:25] The MySlippers are designed to wear indoor and out all day long. [00:16:28] Made with MyPillow, foam, and impact gel to help protect fatigue. [00:16:31] Made with quality leather suede. [00:16:33] I love Mike Lindell. [00:16:34] I know you do too. [00:16:35] Support him and get something comfortable in return. [00:16:37] Call 800-875-0425. === Disability Survey Data (15:08) === [00:16:40] Use promo code Kirk or just go to mypillow.com and click on the radio listener square and use promo code Kirk. [00:16:46] This offer will not last long. [00:16:47] So order now with promo code Kirk at mypillow.com. [00:16:50] Mypillow.com, promo code Kirk. [00:16:55] When I first asked our audience about whether or not they had adverse effects or events to the COVID vaccine, I did this right before I got married last May. [00:17:07] And I got flooded, overwhelmed with emails, freedom at charliekirk.com. [00:17:12] Charlie, I took the vaccine and now my right leg is somewhat paralyzed. [00:17:17] My dad dropped dead and just one after the other, after the other, thousands and thousands and thousands of emails. [00:17:24] I said, there's something going on here that isn't being reported. [00:17:27] And unfortunately, I think we are just starting to see some of the adverse events start to pop up. [00:17:35] There's one man who's trying to find an accurate number of what the heck is actually going on. [00:17:41] And that is Steve Kirsch. [00:17:42] He does a wonderful job and he's been in our program previously. [00:17:45] Steve, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show. [00:17:47] Thanks, Charlie. [00:17:48] It's good to be here. [00:17:49] Steve, so you are trying to do a real poll, an actual data analysis of the damage that this vaccine has potentially caused. [00:17:58] Tell us about it. [00:18:01] Sure. [00:18:01] You know, there are lots of different ways that we can assess what's happened to people. [00:18:07] I think one of the most reliable ways, and it's in plain sight, but the media has completely ignored it. [00:18:14] It's government, it's official U.S. government data. [00:18:17] It's called the Fred database, F capital F-R-E-D, just like it sounds, Fred database. [00:18:23] And when you look at it, it's unambiguous that we've added 1.8 million people to the disabled list since the vaccines rolled out. [00:18:37] And it's correlated with vaccine rollout. [00:18:41] And so I did a survey, and I had a professional survey organization do it. [00:18:48] So there wasn't a survey of my followers because my followers are pretty much all unvaccinated. [00:18:55] So the survey goes out to 500 Americans that are selected to be representative of the population of America. [00:19:05] And so what we find out is confirmation of that. [00:19:10] So the 500 people basically, of the 500 people, we found that 1% of the people who get vaccinated end up unable to be able to work, to be able to hold a job. [00:19:27] And so this isn't, this confirms that, so that's that's essentially 2 million Americans. [00:19:33] So that confirms the number from the FRED database, which is the official U.S. government data of the 1.8 disabled. [00:19:40] So those 1.8 disabled are, we're looking at basically 2 million people who are now unable to hold a job because they got the COVID vaccine. [00:19:53] And this is by their own admission. [00:19:55] This isn't by somebody else saying that they were injured or making an assessment. [00:20:01] We don't like a misinformation spreader making an assessment that the vaccine caused this disability. [00:20:08] These are the people themselves, not judging other people. [00:20:14] These are people who answered the survey themselves saying, and these people are vaccinated, of course, because they're vaccine injured. [00:20:23] So they're not anti-vaxxers saying this. [00:20:28] These people, the first question was, hey, you know, how many doses of the vaccine did you have? [00:20:34] So nobody knew what was coming down on this survey. [00:20:37] So it wasn't like people were faking their answers. [00:20:40] And so the fact that the number that we derived from the survey, the 2 million disabled, was the same as the disabled in the FRED database that are newly disabled since the vaccines rolled out, can pretty much suggest only one thing. [00:20:59] The vaccines have disabled at least 2 million Americans. [00:21:03] Now, we also, by that same survey, we found that there are 25 million. [00:21:12] We can extrapolate from the survey, that 25 million Americans had a vaccine injury, which required a doctor or hospital visit or both. [00:21:24] 25 million. [00:21:25] And there are 35 million Americans who believe that they were vaccine injured in some way. [00:21:32] So we have 35 million vaccine injured, 25 million of which had to either go to a doctor or a hospital for their injury. [00:21:41] And we have 2 million, basically, that are so injured that they cannot hold the job. [00:21:49] So let me ask you a question just to kind of play devil's advocate here. [00:21:52] A 1.8 million increase of people in the disabled, is that an abnormal increase? [00:21:58] Is that something? [00:21:59] What would be an annual increase to the disabled roles over a 12-month period? [00:22:08] Yeah, you know, it was actually going down during the pandemic. [00:22:14] It was going down. [00:22:16] You know, so you'd expect it to be relatively stable. [00:22:19] People are dropping off, people being at it, but it was going down before they rolled out the vaccines. [00:22:27] And so it's really hard to explain this. [00:22:31] And there was a great substack by Elgato Malo, otherwise known as the bad cat. [00:22:41] And he basically looked at all the evidence and did a great analysis, just showing that the timing of the additional disabilities were all correlated to the timings of vaccination. [00:22:58] Do you think? [00:22:59] Okay, so but some of the skeptics would say it might be long COVID or it might be any increased disability, you know, payments from the government. [00:23:10] Is there any other possible explanation? [00:23:13] No. [00:23:14] Okay. [00:23:15] Tell me. [00:23:15] Yeah, no, not, you know, not that anybody's been able to find. [00:23:20] You know, so if there is, hey, I would love if you've got someone who wants to come on your show and debate me on this, I would love to debate that alternate explanation. [00:23:33] But, you know, it's all these people. [00:23:35] I have just, we've never been able to get anybody who wants to debate any of these statistics on camera with a, you know, on any show that's got any kind of viewership. [00:23:52] Nobody wants to go on camera to talk about any of these statistics. [00:23:58] And it's not just, you know, this particular survey that's problematic. [00:24:06] You know, there's a Google search results. [00:24:09] I published a Substack article in my Substack at stevekirsch.substack.com. [00:24:15] And I published an article on Google searches. [00:24:19] And I was searching for various search terms like vaccine injury or sudden death or blood clots. [00:24:30] And it's amazing that there's no interest in these terms in Google until these COVID vaccines roll out. [00:24:42] And Google has search history going back to 2004. [00:24:46] And so all of a sudden, since the vaccines rolled out, it's amazing the number of search terms, which have never been searched before, which have never been searched to that extent before, nearly that extent. [00:25:00] And now all of a sudden, you see these peaks in these search terms. [00:25:04] I mean, it's very troubling and very, very hard for anybody to understand. [00:25:10] And today, I got, just to amplify that point, I got a text message about a very prominent woman who's miscarried three times. [00:25:26] She's got nothing wrong with her, and the doctors can't figure out why she's miscarried. [00:25:32] Now, I wrote a Substack article about a week ago about the, there's this famous paper done by a CDC author where they looked at the miscarriage rates and it was only had partial data at the time. [00:25:50] And they claimed, oh, there's nothing to see here. [00:25:52] There's no, this rate is not over the top and everything is normal. [00:25:59] And they eventually got the paper, they forced the journal to correct the paper to say, well, okay, so we actually can't tell whether it's good or not. [00:26:12] But you see, that paper was published more than a year ago. [00:26:17] And the miscarriage data would have all come in by now. [00:26:23] But the thing is that there's silence by the authors of that paper on the miscarriage data. [00:26:30] So why would a CDC author not publish the miscarriage, the final miscarriage data in the study? [00:26:44] Why would they withhold the miscarriage data? [00:26:46] Why would the CDC withhold the miscarriage data? [00:26:50] The only reason that the CDC would withhold the miscarriage data is if it's devastating. [00:26:59] There's no other explanation. [00:27:02] Why haven't public officials called for autopsies? [00:27:05] Why hasn't a single public official, Charlie, called for any autopsies? [00:27:13] Not even Ron DeSantis is calling for autopsies. [00:27:19] What are these people trying to hide? [00:27:23] You know, and you know, I credit DeSantis. [00:27:25] I mean, he's spoken out. [00:27:26] He said, look, kids under five shouldn't get the vaccine. [00:27:31] And he said, healthy kids five and over shouldn't get it either. [00:27:37] You know, I credit him for that. [00:27:38] But look, nobody should be, no kid should be getting these vaccines. [00:27:41] I would like to see the data that backs up DeSantis's claim that if you're an unhealthy five-year-old, that you should get vaccinated because there is no data. [00:27:54] And he has a really good surgeon general, Joe Ladapo, who knows there's no data to support the claim that, oh, if you're not a healthy kid, you should get vaccinated. [00:28:07] So the point is that there isn't any data. [00:28:11] There's no risk-benefit data for any of these vaccines. [00:28:15] And we're not talking just the COVID vaccines, Charlie. [00:28:18] We're talking every single vaccine in America today, there is no risk-benefit analysis showing that these vaccines are helpful. [00:28:33] And so this is why people like Andrew Wakefield have done studies that show just the opposite, that show that if you're vaccinated, you're going to be about 10 times less healthy. [00:28:49] It was not a trivial thing in terms of overall health. [00:28:53] So Steve, what is SADS and what do you believe is causing it? [00:28:58] So SADS is the euphemism for vaccine death. [00:29:07] So when you hear about somebody dying from sudden adult death syndrome, what it means is that they were killed by the vaccine. [00:29:20] And so we're seeing a lot of this. [00:29:23] If you go and do a Google search of sudden adult death syndrome, you know, and I, so I looked at the Google trends on this. [00:29:31] So this is just going like off the charts recently. [00:29:34] And that's because all these people are dying just unexpectedly from unknown causes. [00:29:41] Nobody can determine the cause. [00:29:43] So the medical community is frustrated by that. [00:29:46] So they have to come up with a new disease called sudden adult death syndrome. [00:29:53] And the term has actually been around for a while because it pops up in Google in the past. [00:29:57] And so they associate this disease with a vaccine injury or vaccine death because they can't call it a vaccine death because that would be counter narrative and they would be deplatformed or they would lose their jobs or it's just not allowed. [00:30:22] And so the sudden adult death syndrome is the cool term that the medical community is using. [00:30:30] And so if you're one of us, you know to associate that, that means, okay, they admitted the death was caused by a vaccine. [00:30:42] And if you don't, if you're not clued in that the vaccines are dangerous, then you just think, sudden adult death syndrome. [00:30:50] What is it about this vaccine, though? [00:30:52] I mean, do you believe that all vaccines might have these characteristics or is there something different about the technology in this particular vaccine that might make it more likely to kind of have these adverse events? [00:31:05] No, no, it's specific to this vaccine. [00:31:08] This is why when you look at the various data, for example, you see it's flatlined the entire 32 years in terms of deaths. [00:31:18] And then there's this huge spike where instead of like 200 deaths, we now have over 13,000 deaths in the United States alone in the various system. [00:31:33] Now, why is there suddenly this huge increase in the amount of death? [00:31:41] And that's because the vaccine itself is causing this death because it's creating all sorts of inflammation. === Immune System Confusion (02:39) === [00:31:48] And it's also causing your immune system to attack your own body, especially in your heart, which is why we have this myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart muscle. [00:32:03] And this wasn't happening before. [00:32:04] And so what's going on is that these vaccines are not staying in your shoulder like a traditional vaccine would. [00:32:13] And traditional vaccine, you inject it in your shoulder, it sticks around in your shoulder, and all of the antibodies come and attack it, and they attack some of the muscle tissue around there. [00:32:24] But they're actually attacking what was with a foreign substance. [00:32:30] So what's different about these vaccines is they're going into your cells and they're changing the genetic makeup of the cell so that it now expresses it. [00:32:41] That's different than like what the TDAP vaccine would have done. [00:32:44] Oh, yeah. [00:32:45] Okay. [00:32:45] So what is the technical difference? [00:32:47] I mean, I'm just a layman here, so we have about a minute remaining. [00:32:49] Sorry. [00:32:50] Yeah. [00:32:50] So the technical difference is that if you think of your cells as, you know, my little fist here, and you think of a vaccine, the vaccine comes in and it's this new cell and it looks like this. [00:33:04] It looks like a foreign invader. [00:33:05] It doesn't look like my fists at all. [00:33:06] So the body attacks the new cell. [00:33:08] Okay. [00:33:09] So what the COVID vaccines do is something different. [00:33:13] They said, hey, we can cut corners here. [00:33:15] Instead of having to manufacture this vaccine with all of these antigens and then inject you with the antigen, let's make the body, let's fool the body into expressing the antigen on the surface of the cell. [00:33:31] So instead of it being, hey, these little business cards floating around and we'll put that in the bloodstream, it says, if my head is a cell, let's go and have the cell basically sprout a horn that has the antigen so that the body will learn to fight it. [00:33:48] But the problem with that, and so all of our cells are now spouting these spikes, you know, so instead of being like a normal person, you know, I got spikes coming out of my head, it's going to attack it. [00:34:03] And the problem is that the immune system gets confused and attacks the normal cell because it thinks it's a foreign invader. [00:34:14] So it's like overtrained to say, oh, now I'm going to attack your heart cell because that looks like a foreign invader. [00:34:20] Steve Kirsch, everybody. [00:34:21] Thank you, Steve. [00:34:23] Thanks so much for listening, everybody. [00:34:24] Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com. [00:34:27] Thanks so much for listening.