Clif High - The Force Wants YOU!

Dec. 14, 2024 - Clif High

15:06

The Force Wants YOU!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, humans, hello humans.
	December 14, Saturday, still.
	It's 10, 20.
	Still no power.
	And even after power comes back, it might be hours before we have internet.
	Internet is hung on cables below the power lines.
	So they fix the power lines first.
	Then usually what happens here is a tree comes in between the power poles and takes everything down.
	And that's probably what's occurred this time.
	We've had very strong winds, so probably big trees, so it might be 10, 12, 15 hours, who knows.
	Anyway, though, I wanted to talk for a second about the ontological perspective.
	The ontological model of universe is that we are all basically living in an illusion created by a supreme consciousness that fractures itself and creates the illusion of separation among all of the creatures in the materium, all of us MCs.
	In order that it might pursue an experiment, that we think the nature of the experiment is the hunt for novelty.
	The experiment component is pretty well determined.
	We just don't know what the purpose is, right?
	Anyway, so we're all fractured bits.
	We exist within an ontological envelope, so to speak, not on little lumps of grit floating out in emptiness.
	And so we get an entirely different picture of our universe using this perspective.
	One of the things that's really interesting in my uh opinion is that if you approach things from this perspective, then you understand that you are a small fracture of that and fraction of that um larger uh supreme consciousness, and that you are important to the experiment.
	You're an active participant, you're not just a happenstance, right?
	In grit model, the is like Einstein's model, uh, you know, all of those kind of uh physicists.
	The perspective is that if you drill down deep enough, you'll find this thing they call the God particle.
	And if you find that you can get a bunch of them together and squish them together and consciousness will arise.
	You know, absolute horseshit.
	Anyway, so um from an ontological perspective, from that model, uh participation is important.
	From a grit perspective, no, we're happenstance, right?
	Uh and you can postulate from a grip perspective, you can postulate God and all of this kind of thing, and all of these religions and so on, but there's no uh for sure and certain uh manifestation that tells you that any of that stuff is anything more than fantasy, right?
	You can apply confirmation bias to all of it.
	Okay, so that's not necessarily the case with the ontological perspective, because within the ontological perspective, you have a um an interesting looping effect where you say, where you can say to yourself quite legitimately, all right, why does the ontology, why does supreme consciousness want me to know this at this stage, right?
	And it's not necessarily that it wants you as a personality, because you know from an ontological perspective that you live many, many, many lives, and thus your personality in this life is relatively meaningless.
	Uh, you know, it's not persistent, you won't be the same personality the next time you uh embody uh that kind of thing.
	You're not the same personality now that you were in any of your previous embodiments.
	Um, but we say me in that sense to capture the sense of the personality, the consciousness, the local consciousness, and the embodiment.
	But anyway, so what does the ontology uh directing me to this discovery for?
	Then you always have to examine it from that perspective of it's not meaningful that it is me, but it may be meaningful, quite meaningful, in fact, that this whatever be done, right?
	And so you can apply it to everything.
	And so I you have to apply it to all your own actions.
	A thinking being will.
	And one of the things that I do is I say, okay, so why is it important that I discover that you can uh predict uh things appearing in the event stream?
	Well, it's important to the ontology to the supreme consciousness that we have that perspective and it is important to it now.
	Now it's my postulate that had I not come up with predictive linguistics, someone else would have.
	Probably at any given time, there's you know, 50, 80, 100, 2,000, who knows how many individuals that are working on these same ideas.
	And it's uh it's not a race because mostly we don't know that the other people are even thinking about the same things, right?
	We're just doing this because the ontology directs that in a vague kind of a way that these things should occur now, that the maximum potential for novelty should be created in this moment, and from this point in the event stream going forward, so to speak, right?
	And so, in that sense, we are important, but not as personalities.
	We're important uh not because of who we are, but because of what we do.
	We're the doers in the body.
	And and in my opinion, the best way to conduct oneself as a doer in the body is to take um uh the advice of um Krishna to Arjuna and basically act without attachment to the result.
	You don't own the result.
	You cannot predict what will be the you can predict, but you can't control the uh results of the of uh that will arise from your actions.
	Uh but you do have the right to own the action itself, to do it or not do it, right?
	And so that, and even not doing it is an act.
	So um so even that participates in the greater um search for novelty that we're all in that in this experiment, or whatever, right?
	However, you want to phrase or or imagine or perceive uh the purpose of it all.
	Um that might not even be important to you.
	Anyway, so um so in an ontological perspective, uh you say, oh, is it interesting that uh these things occurred in this way and over this duration, okay, over this period of time.
	And what does that tell us, or what can we postulate in a meaningful fashion from observing this kind of pattern?
	Very much like the grit guys, who were biologists, saw design patterns and uh created the conspiracy theory of evolution.
	Okay, it's a conspiracy theory, it's a conspiracy.
	They all conspired together to create this theory called evolution.
	Uh, it's not factual.
	What they were doing was they were seeing design patterns left by the ontology in the creation of our materium, and they were postulating a theory around it that, oh, these things, quote, evolved from basically from grit, which is not factual.
	Um, okay, but we're going to do this sort of the same process.
	We're going to see things that are out in that we think we're observing as patterns within the ontology, and then we will apply a connective logic to them that allows us to view these things and model them in our brains in particular ways, right?
	And so in this way I can I can see a pattern arising even within my own life, but it's not limited to me.
	Some of the things I was doing with computers and predictive linguistics, uh, other individuals like um uh Martin Armstrong were doing with computers and um other metrics within our social order.
	Okay.
	So some people used uh um numerics that were arising, so they would follow stock trends and make predictions on that and so on, as opposed to following language like I did.
	Any event though, so I look at the stuff I've done over these past uh 20 plus years, since 1997, really, when I started doing this, and I can say, oh, look, in this year I predicted this, and then five months later it happened.
	And in this next year I predicted this, or in that same year I predicted this, and this happened, you know, eight months later in that next following year.
	And then also we made predictions in that year that took five years to appear.
	And then uh two years later, there were these predictions that appeared in that year that they were made, but there were also predictions that appeared in uh a pattern of two years, five years, ten years, right?
	But we at the time we were making the predictions, we we thought we had the timing nailed, but it was like we were looking, I was looking at various different layers, seeing them all through the same uh duration and time metric, and uh sort of pulling these images forward.
	So we had sun disease, which turns out to be um uh COVID, right?
	And all of the effects of the sun disease on the social order, which we're still not through.
	And that starts appearing as far back as the year 2000.
	So we get a 20-year delta on that.
	And uh some others you only get five months.
	You know, I got data that showed Costa Concordia falling over on its side and people dying uh five to eight months ahead of it happening, uh, but not in any of the runs that previous year.
	And so that kind of stuff tells you things, that there are short duration um and uh very immediacy duration kind of events that appear in our event stream and through the eternal now that we're all sharing.
	And then there's also much longer-term events that uh take a long time, but we get precursors to them a long time ahead of them actually manifesting.
	Then we can ask ourselves a bunch of other questions that all go to the idea of why.
	Why should there be this differentiation between uh things within the event stream?
	We can observe it, uh, we can even take advantage of it, we can even game it to some extent.
	Um, you know, and that's what people that are going to do stock market predictions are trying to do.
	They're trying to game the event stream coming into the eternal now such that they benefit as that now uh matures.
	Okay, so you can ask yourself, why should all of this stuff occur?
	And at some point, uh on a grander scale, I can postulate that, oh, we've lived in a grip perspective for 120 years, and it didn't take us anywhere.
	And um, as we say, uh universe provides and guides, and the uh universe did not want uh, you know, the ontology needed to have that grip perspective kicked out, needed to have it knocked off of um uh its dominant position, and that's what we're going through in this process now, among other things, right?
	In the eternal now as it's maturing, uh, through the woke mind virus, through the um the stolen election, the political hip cups, the you know, the uh communist invasion of America, the breakdown of the uh globalist new world order, yada yada yada yada yada for all of our current sets of ills.
	And within that uh we're seeing the ontology model emerge.
	Now, this is uh very much not a uh scientific materialism, all right.
	Matter is uh doesn't exist even in the ontological model.
	Matter is an illusion.
	And so it's the reverse of the scientific materialism.
	We're gonna have science, they're gonna have really kick-ass science, and we're gonna do a lot of things with matter, uh, but we're not going to approach it from this grid-only perspective.
	Um, and we will get very much further along because that's not the way that we should go, right?
	Now, it is coincident that we've got all of these um, you know, with a 20-year history.
	So, all right, so in the past 20 years, I've had many successes on this.
	Uh, some lots of timing issues, but many successes in the descriptions of what would hit the event stream.
	And it is that part of it that will be used as part of the uh ontology, like presenting itself, so to speak, to be seen and understood uh by our officialdom.
	In my view, this is uh interestingly coincident.
	So this is a coincidence theory here.
	It's interestingly coincident that the ontology has emerged through my work here with time, as well as people like Martin Armstrong and others.
	Um, just at the at this point where uh we're having this uh rise of encounters with the other, the other mind, the non-terrestrial intelligence, right?
	Uh NTIs.
	And um uh it's just real interesting that emerging into that uh mix is our our new understanding of hey, there's this other paradigm through which you can look at the world, which presents you a much better focus and much more practical and realistic um understanding of what what the fuck's actually going on.
	And we need to like adopt that, especially since the space aliens are coming here not using our grip model, right?
	They're using the O physics, the ontological physics, the great physics.
	And uh it now is time for humanity to get in on that.
	And it's interesting that we're seeing it arise basically naturally within humanity as we're we're getting into this period of time where it's going to be needed.
	Ontologically, it's very much a confirmation of universe provides and guides as we as it's uh thinks we need.
	And damned, isn't that the case?
	Anyway, guys, just uh an interesting thought there.
	You've got to start factoring yourselves and your own actions into what's going to emerge.
	This is sort of like the uh the Jedi uh uh way of thinking about things.
	Factoring in, you know, may the force be with you.
	So anyway, all right.
	I'll talk to you later.

▲