All Episodes
Previous Next
July 20, 2024 - Clif High
39:47
Language and circumstances...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans.
Hello, humans.
How are you doing?
Saturday, July 20th.
7.40 in the AM.
This is a talk about language and circumstances.
So it's been a while since I've done any of the audios or videos or anything.
The circumstances of my life have been radically altered by the progress of time.
Anyway, at the end of last month, a series of events occurred that have changed the direction and the circumstances under which I'm going to be conducting my life from this point forward.
I don't want to go into detail.
Within these circumstances that changed, there were assaults by stalkers and some damage as I'm fighting them.
I'm 71, so it's uh it's an issue.
And uh that has impacted that's impacted a lot of things, right?
Uh so anyway, uh in the future I'm going to be doing some audio stuff, uh putting that out in that format because of the damage to my hands and the fight, etc.
And I just am reluctant to type it.
I just don't want to write the book, right?
It's it's very tedious to do that level of typing.
Anyway, uh but I'm going to examine a lot of the uh ontological model and and um a uh uh basic framework for protocol to examine it and to make conclusions.
It's extremely fascinating.
I've made some uh breakthroughs which I'm not gonna get into at the moment.
I'm gonna go into some other stuff here, uh relatively more mundane, uh, but we just need to get through it all.
Um how do I want to get into this?
...
So my um forecast from months back about uh my description really of the uh events of this past week since the 13th uh was pretty good, pretty accurate.
All of the disputed stuff, the the fact that we were in indeed had it all recorded, but we didn't understand it.
There was stuff that we were gonna be arguing about for years, and all of that, and indeed was the situation.
It did occur that way.
Uh we even had the UFO in a strange way, okay.
So you'll note that both uh Dick Algyre's uh in several instances within Dick Algyre's future uh forecasting or future um uh remote viewing group, uh they had UFOs, and in some cases, like Dick Algyre had directions, speed, uh relative size, all different kinds of things, and they described it as though it was a UFO.
In my data, it was a UFO.
Okay, it was an unidentified flying object because at the time that it showed up in the data, it was not identified.
It is now, okay, and so what what I'm speaking of is the uh I now iconic photo of the um uh lead slug flying past uh Trump's head being captured by the guy with the extremely high uh shutter speed setting, right?
Like 8,000 frames per second or something in order to capture that.
And he gets this photo that absent the um assassination attempt, it's it's uh something speeding through the sky extremely rapidly, okay, and scale is not um uh it was neither pertinent nor known.
It was just an unidentified something in the sky, right?
Now, my data sets never never had that as a um uh sky event, okay.
Uh there was the potential that we were gonna be looking at something from Project Blue Beam and all of that kind of stuff, but the the descriptions I've gotten of the event itself uh track pretty well with all the language I put out over the intervening months.
So you now have to understand the situation here that uh because I use the ontological model, I'm able to extract stuff from data that others are not able to do.
Um that data extraction is has proven itself prescient.
Uh my inability to get the 13th versus the 15th correctly is just an artifact of the timing and the and the amount of values or the numeric values I've signed as specific words, which even so a day and a half is pretty um or two days is pretty close, right?
And so it's like, yeah, okay, uh, I can say that that was a pretty good hit.
Now the um the language that is the okay, so it's the ontological model that allows one to make uh sense out of things like psychicness, uh time, the progression of events, separation, isolation, all of these things that don't make sense in any other way that quote science has abandoned since Boscovich.
You've got to go all the way back to Boscovich to get an accurate description of the etheric world uh or our world seen through the etheric um lens, okay, because that's basically what we're doing.
We're we're discounting current modern science because it's a gritology view.
Um, but in any event, if you don't use that view, and this is pertinent in a second, if but if you don't use the grit first grit only grit always view of the Einsteinian uh collective, uh then things make sense to you and or are able to make more sense when you examine them with the idea of if this ontological model were uh extended, would that account for XYZ?
And if so, how?
And you can actually figure it all out.
Or at least get a close enough working approximation to be able, as I have, to make accurate forecasts, okay.
And so um Dick Algyre is and his RV group are experiential forecasters, okay.
So in that sense, they're in the very long ancient tradition of shaman uh who would induce altered states in their minds.
He does as well, while that without drugs, um, in order to retrieve information that is not um uh linearly or generally linear uh generally available within the linear progression of time as our minds see it.
And so in that sense, Dick Algyre and his group, you know, their their history, their lineage goes back tens of thousands of years into the distant past in our uh previous uh uh travels through the Yuga.
And so he is an experiential, he he literally can look out, it's like um uh he sees he walks along and he experiences and he sees uh the pile of change on the road, right?
The nickels and dimes and quarters that someone has dropped.
Okay, now my approach is not that.
My approach is not experiential.
My approach would be akin to uh having a um like having a recording or a microphone uh and hearing a big pile of change being dropped, and from that making inferences as to the amount of coins and their individual makeup, right?
So I'm in that sense I'm an analyst, not an experiencer.
Now, obviously, Dick Algyre has the benefit, his crew has the benefit of not having to invoke those mental filters to do the analysis and all of the Fucking tedious work of it all, right?
He experiences it and then he interprets it and tells you what they experience.
Obviously, again, going through his gray matter, there will be differentiation between what his mind thinks it perceives and what it actually perceived relative to the thing he experienced.
So just because you know it's the old thing about an elephant.
If you're blind and you grab the elephant's balls, you're not knowing that there's a trunk on the other end, right?
You're going to interpret it through your experience.
So it can break down that way.
And that's why they are amazingly accurate and also continuously a little bit wrong, a little bit off, okay, or that it is difficult for them pre-event, pre-manifestation, uh to determine the overall nature of the event.
Just like with this last forecast where I pointed out everything that was going to happen on the 13th, but I was doing so from the effects that would manifest, all right?
Not a description of the event itself, but rather how we would all be dealing with it afterwards, because that's what I have, the language describing our reactions, our emotions, and the subsequent um chain of actions that would occur from the event itself, but without really regard to the event itself.
And here it makes sense.
And while it should, you would think it would be logical that there should be the word assassination all the hell and gone within the data pre-event.
It doesn't work that way, okay, because the assassination is not a the word assassination or assassination attempt as a phrase is not a descriptor, it is a label.
Labels are applied after the manifestation.
Descriptors are those like that that language that appears in my language field ahead of time from which I may, or in this instance, may not uh be able to uh determine the nature of the event itself.
And here you have the the uh the additional aspects of this particular event, which was the very sh sudden sharp spike up, and then all of the release language.
At the time the release language is coming out, um, you know, the the amount of unknowns is significantly larger than the amount of nodes.
The uh so the amount of descriptors going to this is an unknown aspect, but it has these characteristics, vastly outnumbers the number of descriptors that went to uh this would occur, and here are the implications.
So it is a very difficult task.
Now, I'm not uh alibiing the work involved, right?
I'm I'm not saying, oh, it's just so difficult I wasn't able to do that.
I'm trying to tell you an aspect of the language in a very confusing situation that goes to how the process works, even more so.
It goes to how language and psychic leaking and psychic impression work within our reality.
Uh basically one way to think about it would be that we all had a psychic impression that there was some uh big bad um uh juju magumbo coming, right?
And we knew this juju magumbo was gonna come on in and kick our guts and make our nads feel bad and there'd be anxiety and all of this kind of shit, and that's why we're leaking it out of our psychicness.
But we didn't know the nature of the Juju Mugumbo, because those people that were plotting the Juju Mugumbo were um deliberately doing so as secretly as they possibly could.
So that adds to our issue.
There's obviously emotive leaks from those people that trigger the people around them, etc.
etc.
All this shit goes out in ripples, uh, but they're not using language that we would be able to pick up.
Now they may have, I don't have access to you know, sweeping uh texts or internet emails or any of that, right?
My actually my data stream is quite limited, and I'm very proud of what I'm able to achieve with this very limited data stream.
So, in that sense, I'm very jealous of Dick Ongyer's uh remote viewing group because they do not have those limitations.
Once they set their minds to this altered state, um uh there are not those kinds of uh bandwidth limiting features.
And uh it makes it, in my opinion, a much superior process if you've got their appropriate minds involved.
And that's the real key, of course.
And then also, once you've got the appropriate minds involved, the way that this shit works, you've got to keep those minds tuned.
They've got to work inside tuned bodies.
So one of these guys changing, you know, from one brand of vitamin C to something else uh may induce all kinds of ripples in their thinking that was unanticipated, and it would affect their work just because of the biomolecular nature of that particular vitamin C over another one.
I'm using that as a trivial example, but the point being, it is the nature of the consistency and constancy of your body that allows you to do that work um uh in an accurate fashion with the consistent results that that we all really need in this environment to work on.
Okay, so that having been said um uh okay, so it is the nature of language itself that I explore as it expresses itself through humanity.
So in that sense, I'm I'm attempting to uh uh interact with uh or or analyze a uh the larger collective consciousness uh as it expresses it through itself through our individual components.
And so if one wanted to look at it a particular way, we could uh think of uh humans as being the um neural net uh bots and that uh are being used to train an AI, and that our collective consciousness uh could be considered to be that AI uh training itself uh on itself.
So somewhat so circuitous, but nonetheless, it gives an idea of the the uh delicacy and the nuances uh involved in the process here.
Uh this is uh so we're always going to be wrong.
I'll always have big chunks of stuff that I miss uh simply because it's not manifesting in a way um to be able to pick up in the uh data that streams into my bandwidth for this particular process.
Okay, so um acknowledging that wrongness, probably the best way to look at these things at a practical level, if I was outside the process and was into this, I would I would read the shit that I write, and then I would uh join and follow uh Dick Algeyer's future forecasting group, and I would I would fuse them, right?
I would make a determination as to where uh the Dick Allgyer guys are all um where their little holes are in their process, and then uh see if those could be overlaid with the larger patterns that I I come across, and it would present uh a much more accurate view, the fusion of the two.
Now, um there's things we need to understand about language in very serious ways, right?
Because uh we can use that to coordinate life on Earth and our exploration of the material.
And just by having the ontological view, just by understanding how universe is actually structured.
So now uh I'll tell you some uh some secrets here, or not secrets, but some things that have happened um in the in all of this process of the last month or so uh that um I find interesting and that uh may benefit me by other people knowing ahead of time, right?
Um so one of the things was that um uh I was approached by a very large firm and and and or a firm, a company, a corporation, uh, to buy my code.
Um I was feeling Really down as a result of all of the uh physical uh deeply disturbing physical problems that I'm dealing with in my physical reality, and um uh so I I heard them out and listened to their offer.
And then I investigated them.
Okay, it turns out they're Israelis, uh and they're really connected to the whole black rock crew and so on.
All right, but they offered me an obscene amount of money, and then when I told them, uh, piss off, I'm not interested in dollars, they came back with a um a big bucket of Bitcoin as an offer.
And so what I did was I didn't really want to sell to them, didn't want to fuck with them because of the actually I would not have mind taking their big chunk of um their big bucket of Bitcoin uh in exchange for my code, but they wanted something else, which is the they wanted uh up to a year my time to teach them how to use it.
Okay, and then I discovered they was were Israeli, and I knew instantly at that point that they would never be able to grasp the concepts that uh that are inherent in the code, and I would be uh working very hard for a year to fulfill my part of a contract, should I have entered into it with them against a probability of failure just because of the way that their minds work.
You have to understand that the Israelis are ritualists, okay.
They they think that if you stack the grit in an appropriate way, you can get the golem to come alive, the Frankenstein to become alive if you just zap it with the appropriate energies.
Okay, they do not grasp the ontological model, and they are their minds are hardened against it through ritual, which which deprives their minds of a uh flexibility and a freedom uh to consider uh other um aspects of things.
So it it becomes a uh something of an issue.
So I made a test.
So in my uh test there, I provided the the potential buyers uh with three examples uh of old uh language, right?
And uh the way it works, I get this like uh less than a hundred words, usually on the order between 30 and 60 uh words that are the uh key encapsulation or key um descriptors that encapsulate the core concept of a particular data set from which I was able to extract more information.
So I gave them uh the initial descriptors that showed me that the 2008 uh financial crash was coming and the nature that it would uh express.
I showed and I gave them the uh language that uh I used for blondes on boats about the cost of Concordia sinking, and then um one other one for uh extreme weather events.
And I said, okay, here's the these things.
Uh, in order I've got, you know, if you want to involve me in this and and are asking for some level of time, I was not committing to a year, but that was what they were asking.
Then I said, then you've got to show me that you have the ability somewhere within your organizations to suss this stuff out.
Uh in other words, you know, let me see the nature of the minds I'm going to have to interact with.
Uh give me an analysis of these three groups of language and what they uh point to.
And I, you know, uh uh they worked at it, they they had five days, and they worked at it, and then they came back and uh they missed all three, a hundred percent missed all three.
And were um, you know, so it was a no-go.
There was just, and it was a real good excuse uh at the time for me to just tell them, no, piss off, I'm not interested in dealing with you.
Um I would sell you my code, but it's not going to aid you.
Your mind simply can't grasp what uh or do the work that's necessary.
This has to do with um the nature of language, how language itself functions um in the mind and the brain.
Okay, there's it's a big dim issue there with the brain itself.
And the impact that that functioning has on the tools you use, your mind and your brain.
In other words, uh uh Hebrew is an extremely limited language.
It's not only harsh and guttural in terms of how it is expressed, but it is a small corpus language.
There's not uh uh uh uh hundreds of thousands of words in Hebrew.
At the time the Bible was written, there were over 300,000 words in Greek, while there were only 8,000 words that existed in Hebrew.
All right, so it shows you the limitations of the minds.
And the nature of the structure of the Hebrew and how um it is a primary language used for thinking, the nature of that structure is hierarchical and um bottom up, so to speak.
Okay, so it forms certain structures and frameworks in your mind that are very difficult to overcome, that it is very difficult to uh step outside of and see around.
Now, there are other things about language, and well, just as an aside, okay, so uh if we look at Greek at the time that the uh first Bible was written in Greek, so it was originally all of the Bible was originally written in Greek, including all of the Torah stories, right, in all of the various different forms.
Bear in mind that there's over 1,300 versions of the Torah.
Nowadays we only have this one or two or three or nine, you know, not very many official versions, right?
But there were uh family Torah the same way we get family Bibles.
Uh the and many of those were historically able to exist up until like a couple hundred years ago when they were snatched up by the Elohim worship cult that made a deliberate decision to own what was known as the rag trade, which was the used books, and um they would buy all these books and and keep them and uh not let them be resold.
And so they were able to restrict history that way.
Anyway, okay, so um we in our current time, I call the space aliens that invaded the Elohim.
That is a Hebrew word that is the Hebrew plural uh applied to the word L, okay.
And um, and that's that's a current name, it's useful to use under the circumstances because of the appearance of it in the Torah.
But here's the thing.
Before we had a Hebrew Torah, so it was originally in Greek, then it was translated, transliterated into Hebrew, and then from there it's translated literated back out to Hebrew or back out to uh Greek, Latin, and English and German, etc.
etc.
So it was this double transliteration that lost all of the uh nuance uh and technical aspects of the Bible in the in the of the Old Testament in the process of um the Torah's creation.
Now, we don't have any officialdom that's gonna ever agree with me on any of this shit, and it's all deliberately done so that uh we have this ambiguity and um uh questions about all of these things and disputes, okay.
So anyway, the language at that time uh in ancient Greek had an interesting uh feature to it that we don't acknowledge now as that's often overlooked by current modern linguists, and that is that um so uh so Hebrew at the time, uh Hebrew is an 8,000-word language, had no vowels.
The vowels are these little um dicritic and uh subcritic marks that are made on the consonants, and it tells you by the position.
But we don't know how it's actually pronounced.
We don't know if they're pronouncing them as a long E, a soft E, an A, this kind of thing.
Usually we can tell things like O's, right?
Uh but in any event, so Greek had, and that's a hidden assumption that in Hebrew that you need to know about in order to read the language effectively.
Because there are some subtle differences.
If there's this particular kind of a vowel indicator in this position as opposed to that, it changes the meaning of the word.
All right.
And so we find the same thing in ancient Greek, even with all of its 200 and or 300,000 words, right?
Um the number of words in Greek uh at the time of the Bible than in Hebrew.
And Hebrew was a very much restricted constrained uh language, and was really uh uh uh barely functional outside of its um little niche, okay, which was the whole Babylonian money magic thing and the uh the ritualization of uh religion.
Okay, so now that being said, in Greek, the in ancient Greek, uh the letter etta was prepended to almost all words that began with a vowel.
So in Hebrew, they don't have the concept of a of a vowel beginning word, right?
Uh in um in uh Hindu uh in the Hindi language, uh we have the uh the prepending of the sound a to make mean the antithesis of whatever the rest of the word is.
So if it's himsa, that means to harm or hurt.
If you say ahimsa, that means to do no harm or do no hurt, right?
That's the way the language worked.
There was a similar function in ancient Greece or ancient Greek, okay, and it was around this the letter etta, which was pronounced as an aspirated H. So if you don't know this, then you don't know how to express ancient Greek um versus modern Greek.
You would see it written with a particular um vowel beginning the word, and you would just start speaking the word at that vowel, and you not being um uh cognocenti of the uh nature of the language at the time it was being used, you would not know to put that H sound in front of it.
And so um, because all right, so the Elohim uh were as much as a bunch of fuckers to the Greeks, and they harvested as many of the Greeks, or much more many more of the Greeks than they did of the Hebrews, okay?
And so they were they've been a problem to Germans, to Russians, uh to uh Chinese, everywhere.
There's very few places on the planet that did not suffer, that humanity did not suffer the uh the Elohim.
In um in ancient Greece, they knew these people as the L. Okay, that's so when the when the motherfuckers landed here and the humans were, you know, had gotten the shit kicked out of them, and they said, well, what do you want us to call you?
Uh, you know, hey boss, what do you want us to call you?
The the Elohim said that we are L, okay, EL.
Well, in ancient Greece, that's going to be prefaced by the aspirated H. It is from that affectation, from that uh aspect of the Greek language that we get the the word hell, okay, because that's how the Greeks would have pronounced it.
With the aspirated H, it would just be harder than I'm saying it.
And it would fall uh, you know, following that would be the E L. So it was um, so uh hell is not a place.
Hell is a description of the beings, right?
Um that is how their name was said by the ancient Greece.
And so you would be in, we took that as a physical place of maiming and torture and everything, uh, because that's what these motherfuckers did to humans, and that's that's all we ever as humans received from them.
None of the Elohim are loving gods, none of them do anything other than cause uh pain, misery, and uh death, an excruciating uh uh mind fucking um problems for humans.
That's just that's our history with them.
The reason we have the word hell and all of its implications in all of the fucking books is because of that aspirated etta uh in front of the L. So they were called hell by the ancient Greeks, right?
Umway, uh we have to examine and understand the limitations of the language that we use to express our thoughts, and also the constraints that the the language itself puts on our thoughts in order to do a lot of this um kind of work.
Now, Dick Algae's iris I say he does not.
He he can just render it in our current language and um uh be done with it because of the experiential nature of his view into the future there, right?
So uh hang on a second, let's see.
All right, so anyway, um so the the firm, the company never did um uh uh get their stuff together, and I broke off negotiation with them because they're uh, you know, it's just not possible.
It's just a waste of my time trying to get them to understand how language expresses um itself through humans and what it means relative to time.
And from that viewpoint, um, you know, it was just it was a non-starter.
And this is good, I didn't want to fuck with them.
And it turns out uh the circumstances that I'd thought might require the money uh do not, okay.
So I don't really need to worry about the um uh that particular aspect of things here.
Uh basically it's like, oh, okay, you know, I've got I've got uh sufficient resources and good, I'm not for hire.
I've got other work I want to do.
Now uh in the future, my circumstances are such that I won't be doing the driving.
Uh I won't be doing those driving talks, I'll have to do some level of driving, but um I'll be usually traveling with other people, it won't be convenient to do them.
I I will be doing some audio uh uh projects here around the uh ontological model and what we can learn from it um over these next weeks and stuff, uh, as I evolve into whatever the uh new format of my um my life will take.
Uh so this is like unknown, you know, parts unknown.
Uh so anyway, um uh that's pretty much it for now.
And um I did want to say though that in the data sets that uh were around for uh the immediacy data for the this past week.
Uh I also have hints in that data, and I haven't explored it, uh it's just been a hellacious uh what 28 or 29 days.
Um anyway, there are hints in the data set that at least at some point here in the future, maybe two months, three months, something like that, we'll start to see the cessation of these fucktards that are out there ripping people off with all of their QFS and all this other Nasara Gasara horseshit.
So the data sets are saying that the scammers are gonna be uh face retribution.
Um in places like England, they're gonna have picked into a wrong community, so to speak, and their people will be uh disappeared uh for the QFS and the Nasara kind of uh scams, right?
And the Zimbabwe RV and all of that sort of horse shit.
Um these um, and this'll be good.
You know, these guys have got to stop this, they're ripping people off.
There's a fellow I learned about there's a bunch of them actually, but there was one guy I learned about that charges 10,000 fucking dollars uh to sit and interview you over a weekend for practice for your supposed interview at the bank to claim your Nasara wealth.
And it's like holy shit.
People are willing to pay big money to have someone come on in and abuse them mentally and and look at their quote plans, and there's you know uh it's a scam, and then the scam, in order to get your wealth uh to become so mega wealthy that you can buy Montana, you've got to have some plan for self Helping some um you know helpless group somewhere.
And it's like, holy shit.
And of course, now bear in mind QFS, Nasara, Gasara, they're all fiat schemes.
They're all central bank schemes, right?
And they're basically they're ripping you off for the deep state.
Uh, you know, there are scams organized and run out of Israel.
Anyway, though, so uh the data sets are showing that there's gonna be um um comeuppings, you know, no compensation for having been ripped off by the guys, but at least you'll see them go to jail or suddenly disappear and never be found, or suddenly disappear and then turn up floatering uh in a pond somewhere like Obama's chef a year later, that sort of thing, right?
So a lot of the scammers are gonna get theirs uh on this business.
Uh as I say, the interesting ones to me are the the really uh you know people that really fuck up and get into the wrong community with this scam in England.
And um, you know, it's gonna end badly for them.
And you know, they deserve it.
There's just no getting around that.
So uh that's coming on up in our very near future here.
The beginning of it, it'll take a long time to go through and and clean up all of this bullshit and uh put the social order in a correct and um uh operating fashion.
And I'll do some more discussions of that because a lot of it, of course, is going to involve language.
One of the interesting things for me about all of this is that the data sets are now starting to uh pop up uh uh supporting sets indicating the uh emergence uh of our um sci-fi world uh through this period of uh chaos and troubles,
and in so doing, are pointing out the vast numbers of um new forms of opportunity uh that will be available to humans.
So uh so we're finally gonna just uh shit can the whole Jew dys dystopia thing, right?
Uh hopefully somebody will buy Netflix and shut it down, get rid of all that dystopia propaganda, Elohim worship cult horseshit.
Um, in any event, though, uh we're emerging out of it as an overall world.
So when Trump comes on in and globalism starts dying, bear in mind globalism is Elohim worship cult.
And so the Elohim worship cult is going down, and it will, and we will drag out all of the tendrils of um language control and everything else that's been put on the social order uh as a result of those uh motherfuckers.
And it will be good.
And then we'll have to deal with the space aliens, but hey, uh then the the adults will be in charge and we'll get a much better approach to this because we'll understand um that the nature of contact is uh the ultimate expression of contention within ourselves, between ourselves and universe, between ourselves and uh those with whom we would be in contention.
That's very complicated shit, dude.
And this is why we've got to have the adults here is because these gratologists do not have a fucking clue.
So anyway, uh the world will be better uh in many regards, but it's gonna take us a long time to clean it all out.
▲
Export Selection