Clif High - Al2O3 is some tough shit!

Aug. 24, 2023 - Clif High

33:17

Al2O3 is some tough shit!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans!
	Hello humans!
	Still August 24th.
	It's about 10 o'clock, so it didn't take all that long.
	Heading back out, outward bound, in a largish convoy of road equipment heading out to do some kind of a repair somewhere up north.
	This is pretty isolated, rough country up here.
	And if you head up into the Olympic Peninsula, you know, it's very sparsely settled to say the least.
	You know, there's roads and stuff up there and a few people that live up there, but not very many.
	But it looks like we've got some major road work having to be done just to maintain things here.
	The size of these rocks they're hauling north on the Lowboy trailers are larger than most SUVs.
	So there must be some kind of a hillside that's collapsed or they've got to install a new bridge or abutment or something.
	Thousands of pounds of gravel and rocks.
	Anyway though, so outside of the chaos that's indicated, the huge amount of release language pouring out in September, driven a lot of it by the economics and financial and the fiscal problems that affect everything else.
	But independent of the fiscal stuff, we also still have a continuing data line, a thread of these sets that relate to space aliens.
	So we still have a lot of that stuff building up.
	The data suggests we're going to have some kind of reappearance, a rise of the space alien meme back up into public consciousness here around the 30th.
	And it will be soon, probably by the 6th or 7th or 8th of September, be subsumed in the rising release language that comes to dominate in the latter half of September and then continues to the rest of the year.
	So during this period of time, I expect the, you know, the Ukraine military to collapse.
	That's going to cause all kinds of freakouts.
	All kinds of freakouts.
	No point in even going there really discussing it.
	It's the mother weffers, and they've got some severe issues as a result of their attacks on Russia and the whole Ukraine business, right?
	All right, so in some of the old data sets from like, would have been picked up in about 2013 or so, we had a number of elements that were suggested they would show up in 2016.
	They haven't shown up until this year, so we're looking at a seven, eight-ish year delta on a lot of these in terms of when the reports were issued, but maybe as much as a 10-year delta off of when the data was actually taken up.
	So I would get data that would start in, say, 2013, and it would be persistent, show up as a set, but there might not have been enough information around it to write about it, but I would see that every time I would do the run, that data set would still be there and it would grow, it would alter, it would morph.
	I'd do the referential integrity checks on it to make sure it wasn't an artifact of the programming, which could happen.
	And it would grow over time, and then I would get some level of comfort in saying that this stuff was going to manifest.
	And then there was always the problem of picking out the timing.
	Okay, so in 2016, it was evident in the data that we were going to have issues with Oceania, okay, which includes Hawaii, includes Maui.
	And in 2016, we had reports that said that there was going to be an attack on Oceania by the powers that be, and that was going to create a lot of backlash.
	So that was put out as though it was going to happen in 2016.
	It has happened here now with the attack on Maui by the direct energy weapons.
	And so we have this delta from when the data first started showing up of about 10 years.
	Now, I can't use that 10-year period of time to do timing clues, right?
	I couldn't say that every other set that would develop would also have a 10-year period of time before it would manifest into reality.
	Some sets would manifest within, depending on when the language came in, would manifest within days, weeks, or months.
	And it would be quite clear and we would be done with them.
	Some of these longer-term sets, though, it's like basically a guess.
	We knew that it was going to be beyond 19 months because we were dealing with very long-term data and long-term data was 19 months out to infinity.
	But within that huge range of 19 months away from the time the data was taken, which would have started in 2013, out to infinity, is a big damn range, and it's going to manifest in there at some point.
	So there's all these, not rules, but cautions or design pattern elements or guides to the design pattern or limits to the design pattern that I would try and apply at certain points, right?
	Especially relative to timing.
	And it's always very difficult because the feedback loop was, which would have been something manifesting and then noting the time it manifested, et cetera, et cetera, was always a, in cases a long-term data.
	It might be actual years.
	And so here we had a forecast that was forecast for 2016.
	It shows up in 2023.
	We've got a seven-year delta on that, but actually it's a 10-year delta off the time that the data sets first started coming in.
	And the manifestation now, either 10 years from the data or seven years from the report, because it took three years for that data to grow to the point where there was enough value referenced in the numerics to suggest that it was going to be an actual manifestation, right?
	And then there was some, took those three years to suggest that, well, it's going to be in the future.
	It'll be out at least this far.
	And so in 2016, it appeared that we'd crossed that threshold, and so it was safe to report on the powers that'd be attacking Oceana and the problems that would be caused from that.
	But there was no way of knowing it was out 19 months, but it was out beyond 19 months.
	And here we are, certainly beyond the 19 months when that was put out as a report.
	And it's now manifested seven years after that report.
	So one might think that there might be some form of a consistent difference between the proposed manifestation date and the actual manifestation date that could be analyzed and determined.
	And maybe indeed we could do that, but it's not, it's very, it's variant, okay?
	It varies greatly.
	So within the nature of the language, the subject matter, etc., etc.
	These one-off episodes that are not part of otherwise building trends are very difficult to predict.
	So it was a one-off, a unique kind of a thing.
	We hadn't had a lot of language.
	It wasn't about Hawaii, about Maui.
	There wasn't a long-standing public awareness of any forms of contention within the social order there that would pre-say that this was about the point where tensions were going to boil over, a threshold would be crossed, and something would manifest.
	So this was a, these are not unique events, okay?
	They have an aspect of being singletons or singularly self-contained kind of events.
	So this is an interesting thing in and of itself, right?
	Is the nature of the sets that sometimes the data would present, oh, this is going to happen BOINC, and that's it.
	And it's not surrounded by longer-term data in any meaningful fashion.
	It's not part of any other set.
	It just appears.
	It's standalone.
	It has enough value that it grows over time and it shows to the manifestation threshold and you're just left wondering, okay, what?
	Now, there were a number of those within the data sets.
	And in the main, mostly they have indeed manifested.
	Mostly they indeed have shown up.
	The language has been met, although, of course, within the manifestation.
	So, I have probably had 50, maybe 80 words about the attack on Oceania.
	Not a description of the beaches, not a description of the directed energy weapons, you know, or Oprah or Obama or any of these fuckers being involved.
	Now, they were involved.
	We knew that they were involved.
	They were in the category of the powers that be.
	So, there are elements that are indeed accurate within the forecast.
	But the forecast at the time could not include all the really weird language that might have guided us more towards directed energy weapons.
	Nor would it have done us any good, so to speak, in the sense that even if we had known that there was going to be a directed energy weapon attack, there wouldn't have been anything you could have done about it, right?
	It's not like you can put on metal roofing and have it reflect the directed energy weapons.
	Now, I'll finish with this on the timing and then get into that for a second.
	But the timing aspect has always been a bitch.
	It's always just been terrible in terms of trying to manage this.
	It's obviously a much more complex problem involved there than solving the issue of manifestation thresholds for emotional language.
	You know, at what point does the emotion reach the threshold just ahead of the manifestation of that thing into reality?
	Like with a fight, you know, at what point do the words cross the threshold and the fists start swinging?
	And if you knew the nature, if you could read the emotional tension in the people that you were looking at, if you had like an emotional tension meter that you could aim at them and get a reading, you would probably be able to see it escalate up and then you'd say, aha, you know, the threshold was 144.
	Whenever it got to 144 on this particular meter, the fists would start swinging.
	You know, regardless of the nature of the words, it's the emotional tone underneath them that pre-says what's going to occur.
	And so timing is something that is variant within that threshold being reached within each and every situation.
	So the situations themselves are all unique relative to that, although they're all common.
	They all share this common happenstance of the reaching a threshold and then something manifesting into our reality.
	So anyway, so big problem and so on, but nonetheless, the language is there, even though the timing clues are way off.
	And of course, you know, like we're inventing this stuff back in 1990s and 1993, got the idea and started inventing this stuff.
	So it can be expected that it's going to take us a while to figure out what the hell we're doing.
	Anyway, though, so getting on to the directed energy weapons for a minute.
	So these are not like lasers.
	They may involve lasers at some point, but the directed energy weapon itself is what's known as a nanometer wave.
	Okay, so it's like smaller waveforms than you get in the microwaves.
	But it's very much of a microwave kind of radiation that's coming out at you.
	And they shoot these things out of tubes that have waveguides on them.
	The tubes are either in airplanes, or you could put them on a balloon, but you'd have to have all kinds of power to support it.
	That sort of thing, right?
	So this is a known technology.
	We know who invents them.
	We know who's building them.
	We know who has the patents on them, right?
	So if you wanted to go look up nanometer waves or nano waveguides or sub-millimeter waves, you'll see that you're going to end up with a bunch of patents that are going to Boeing,
	Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, any number of these very large corporations are involved in various aspects of this.
	So you can easily see how Boeing airplanes could carry these things.
	You know, you open up a side door or a back door on a C-130, you maybe not even have to open the door.
	Maybe they're just mounted on the bottom of the plane.
	And you have a generator that provides the electricity, and then you shoot out all these waves.
	The waves come down and they interact with the material down here.
	So they'll boil water if there's enough moisture in the air.
	So you won't get an energy attack, you won't get a dew attack on a day when there's lots of chemtrails.
	Because that would dissipate the energy and eat it all up and cause heating at a level right there in the atmosphere, not on the ground, right?
	And so it just won't occur.
	You won't have those on non-clear days.
	I'm going to stop here for a minute.
	I'll put this on hold, I think.
	Anyway, though, the nanometer waves, when they react with the buildings and stuff, they react off of the metal.
	And in organics, they're reacting off the flesh.
	And so that's why we have the particular kind of damage to the bodies that we have.
	They were not burned.
	So I've seen animals that have been caught in forest fires, okay?
	And so you would see, like, there was a picture of a dog from Maui.
	And the dog's perfectly preserved.
	He's dead.
	He's lying on his back.
	His legs are out and stiff and contorted and twisted.
	But the body is there.
	The hair is gone.
	It's not burned, though.
	Okay?
	And there's no sign that it was incinerated by heat.
	Because I've been in, I worked for Department of Natural Resources up here and went in with a couple of crews.
	I was an IT guy, but I would always go out whenever I could.
	But I worked with a couple of crews that went out after forest fires and cleaned up.
	And you'd come across the bodies of animals, you know, small squirrels, raccoons, possums.
	Didn't make any difference, really.
	They all had the same effect.
	They were all burned.
	They were, like, cooked.
	The fats were rendered out of them.
	None of that has happened in Maui.
	So, anyway, I'm going to put this on pause for a minute, get this, and then head back out on the road.
	Be right back.
	Anyway, back again.
	Let's stop and get a little can of portable fuel here.
	Anyway, so the directed energy weapons interact with the power lines.
	They're going to interact with electricity.
	They're going to not interact with a tree, right?
	There's not a lot of metals in a tree.
	Far more metals in your body than you'll find in most of the trees.
	Also, they're attracted to the water, right?
	And so this is why the boats melted.
	This is why the railings on the docks melted.
	This is why there was all the metal melt.
	This is why the power lines fell down.
	And this is why we see all of these effects.
	And so I'm of the opinion that you could get some forensic engineers, engineers that examine things after the fact, like bridge disasters, that sort of thing.
	And you could do that with biologists and energy people like Ken Schwartz at C60 Purple Power, right?
	He could probably go through there, and he could probably do an analysis.
	He's got the skills and the schooling to be able to stand up in court and say that he has standing.
	That is to say that he's got a history examining these things.
	And he could say that, you know, it is unlikely that in the extreme that a fire over on the shore is going to melt the metal handrails on a dock that's sitting out on the surface of the water some hundred feet away.
	And even if the boats are melting and burning, they're still so far away that the distance from the fire to the metal railing would be such that the metal railing that melted, which would require, you know, well, if it was aluminum, to get through it, it would require 3,100 degrees.
	So there's the thing, guys.
	If you're a welder, you know that when you weld aluminum, you've got to get through the aluminum oxide, that aluminum melts at a reasonably, it welds at around 1,200 degrees.
	But to get there.
	you've got to get through the aluminum oxide, which is really tough stuff.
	And that requires that you go through 3,100 degrees.
	And all aluminum that's exposed, especially on the ocean, especially near the water, where you've got an ionic balance that's different over the land, will have thick layers of aluminum oxide.
	So you're really going to have to work at maintaining at least 3,100 degrees to get through that.
	Then, of course, it'll melt rapidly, right?
	And so 20 or 30 or 40 or 50 feet away from a boat fire from a boat that is melting on the water.
	So that matters because the water is going to suck up and dissipate side heat from the fire itself.
	As the water dissipates it away, it'll provide moisture in the air, which will further degrade the ability of the heat to travel through the air to affect that aluminum railing hundreds of feet or 50 or even 20 feet away, right?
	And so the pattern of things here is definitely a directed energy weapon.
	And like I say, I know scientists that can get out there and they could provide you with an understanding of what actually happened, of what actually went down.
	That it was not a wildfire, it was not electrical lines, none of that was participatory.
	It was all ancillary to the effect itself and was used by the media and the powers that be to try and lay off the blame and create this and muddy the issue so that no one knows that this is a directed energy weapon attack, right?
	And so this was Pearl Harbor, thousands of people, a thousand people missing, 500 of them children, hundreds dead.
	This was, in my way of thinking, this was worse than the original Pearl Harbor because A, they're also trying to keep it secret.
	That I think is a very evil part of all of this, right?
	And then the insurance company is not paying off on it.
	Why aren't they paying off on it, right?
	Well, their excuses are bullshit, but they know that it was a targeted hit.
	And so they can't come out and say it's a targeted hit because those are actually excluded.
	Most of the insurance policies, if you go read the insurance policy on your house, you'll find out you're not covered for acts of war.
	And so if your house were to be destroyed in an act of war, or even most people's houses would not be paid off if it was an act of terrorism.
	And so in either case, if the powers that be were, you know, had officially declared war on the people of Oceania, which includes Hawaii, and then they attacked Maui, none of the houses would have been expected by the insurance companies to have to be paid for.
	But even in this situation where we've got this secret war going, even if they were to declare that this was as a result of an act of terrorism, that would also be an out for the insurance companies, right?
	So they're there for accidental kind of stuff, not for deliberate acts on the part of another person, especially the evil motherfucking WEF and, you know, Hillary Clinton and Obama and Oprah and all these other fuck tards.
	Anyway, though, so the directed energy weapon signature is quite clear.
	No, I don't think it came from space, right?
	There's issues with beaming stuff, including nano-meter waves, and having them be cohesive enough to be able to be effective.
	So your source for this has to be reasonably close.
	And if you look at Raytheon's patents on directed energy weapons, you find that they are anticipating that these things would be put into airplanes so that they could get close enough to actually make it work.
	The nanometer waves are sent out through a long tube that aligns them and then it goes through several waveguides to emerge as a very tight beam weapon that then will be anticipated to spread on distance.
	And so you would know what your spread would be.
	So you know that if you turn on your machine and start shooting this ray out your airplane, that you know 500 feet down that leaves the weapon and the size of the aperture hole for the for the beam for the directed part of the energy weapon is maybe that's as small as a millimeter across.
	It's not very big, right?
	But at the time that it 500 feet out, that thing that started off as a millimeter wide might be 100 yards wide, right?
	And so you would know that, oh, if I want to incinerate something, you know, 100 yards wide, I just have to fly my airplane 500 feet up and turn this machine on and fly over back and forth over the area I want to incinerate.
	It's not going to harm trees.
	It'll obviously fry a dog, you know, probably killed squirrels, probably killed vast quantities of insects in the area, may have even damaged stuff on the shore that got, or offshore slightly that got hit by it because the nanometer waves could be expected to penetrate some small distance into water.
	Small distance, right?
	Not many feet, but maybe a foot.
	So if, you know, close to the tide line, you may find that, you know, all the, if you had oysters there, maybe all the oysters are cooked, right?
	So all of the shellfish and the indigenous life along that shoreline that accidentally got touched by it under the water even would be affected.
	And so it's not boiled or anything like that.
	It's just dead and killed because it was like incinerated internally without any fire.
	So again, you'd have evidence that this is not a, you know, there's not a brush fire.
	It was an attack.
	And now we're in this point where the media is fighting.
	And pretty soon they'll probably have to come out and get some kind of officialdom support in this fight that will say that if you say it's a do weapon in Hawaii, we're going to have to arrest you.
	Or we're going to have to, you know, throw your account off of Twitter or whatever the fuck, right?
	Some kind of officialdom support for the narrative because so many people are now climbing on this and saying, hey, you know, shit ain't right here.
	This was not a brush fire.
	You know, that somebody did something to these people.
	And we think it was this stuff that we're calling a do, a directed energy weapon.
	But of course, you can go and look at Raytheon.
	They've been building these fuckers.
	They've got patents on this, on the nanometer waveguide stuff that goes back into the 60s.
	So, you know, this is not a fantasy.
	These guys have this technology.
	They probably have, you know, they might have hundreds of airplanes fitted with this shit for all I know.
	But it does exist and it's now being used against us as the communists decide that they're going to, you know, fight the people.
	They always do this, okay?
	So communism rises and it's always against the people.
	It's always called a communist dictatorship because it's always a minority that gets the majority fractured to the point where they can assume control and then the majority has to eventually come together to get rid of them.
	And in the Soviet Union, it took them 72 years to do that, to throw out the revolution and get rid of all these fuckers.
	We're going to do this much more rapidly.
	They've been working on us, well, actually, it was 72 years in Russia after they had succeeded.
	The communist revolutionaries had started settling into Russia in the 1890s.
	So the Russian Revolution, you know, 20 years later was done by people that had been seated in that 20-year period of time within the population to do exactly this.
	So we've been under attack since for probably like the last 50 to 60 years, since the late 50s, since McCarthy, the McCarthy hearings and all of that, they were talking about the communist infiltration that was overtaking the U.S. at that point.
	And then it went deeper to the point where we didn't see it.
	But they're also not using the traditional communist stuff, which is class warfare, economic class warfare.
	Here, they're trying to get it over racial warfare.
	The problem is that you don't have a solution for racial warfare.
	In class warfare, communism could take over with class warfare on an economic basis because the solution was that the communist system made everybody equal, okay, and it removed the egregious corruption that had led to the point that it had to come in.
	Now they're not trying to bring communism in based on economics.
	They're trying to bring it in on race.
	And it's like, well, okay, after the communists take over, is Obama going to make us all black?
	Are we all equal thereafter?
	You know, are we all Mexican?
	You know, Hispanic, Latino?
	Are we going to be Asian?
	What's the deal?
	You know, there is no solution that the communists can offer other than continual constant strife and ultimately a race war.
	And there, they've already told everybody so that if you're black or brown, we're going to go and kill all the whites, so you guys stay on our side.
	And yeah, we sort of look white, but we're really Jewish, or we're really Kazarian.
	We're not really white.
	So you don't have to worry.
	We'll be in charge, but we're not white guys.
	Okay.
	So anyway, this is the state of the situation relative to communism and the attacks here.
	That's going to be coming out.
	So I think that as we get into September, maybe a lot more on this directed energy weapon stuff is going to come out.
	And a lot more people will start feeling that, uh-oh, we're being attacked by the powers that be, and they've got these secret weapons that can do this shit to us.
	And we'll never even see it coming.
	We just have to survive it and then retaliate afterwards.
	So now I'm waiting to the at this point, we haven't had the retaliations yet.
	Okay, those are coming, in my opinion.
	So the data sets had always had that.
	It was difficult to tell where the threshold would be crossed, but at some point there will be a threshold here, and I think we're very close to it.
	Maybe we're within a month or so.
	After that threshold is crossed, there is individual retaliation against these guys.
	And this is where it gets really interesting for the rest of the public, myself included, because we will get to the point where I don't know how soon we'll find out about these attacks and stuff that will come out.
	Maybe it'll have to be a month after, two months after.
	Maybe there'll be rumors.
	Maybe it'll come out because it'll be public.
	But we'll have situations where, like, pick a powers that be guy, pick a WEFONING.
	It doesn't matter.
	You know, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Bill Gates, Obama, Oprah, any of these fuckers that are in the quote good club, they will be being attacked at a personal level.
	Their security people will be shot at.
	They will be shot at.
	Their cars will be attacked.
	There will be deliberate car crashes against them.
	There will be people that will try and burn their houses down while they're in them.
	All of this stuff's going to be going on.
	Now, a lot of this is also going to extend over to, now that it's going to be coming back up again, the shotgivers.
	And so we're going to have a lot of people that will reach this pain threshold where it will distort their mind and they know they're dying from having taken the shots.
	And they're going to start acting out.
	And then we'll have individual retaliation.
	So they'll shoot, go and shoot, you know, a local pharmacist that was given the shots, right?
	They'll go and shoot a doctor.
	They'll go and try and take over a hospital and shoot multiple doctors.
	And it's not a generalized, the powers that be are going to make it out to right-wing extremists.
	They're going to say it's a, you know, domestic terrorism and all of that.
	They're going to try and sell it.
	But you'll see very quickly with these things that the individuals chosen as the targets for this are scaling up to the powers that be.
	They're scaling up into the WEF.
	And that marks the opening of the, or that marks the beginning of the opening war, of the open war between the quote rulers, the elite, and the rest of the populace.
	Then we'll start seeing plane crashes, you know, and a lot of these fuckers are going to die simply because they can't cover everything.
	And their security systems and security people, they have to have those people allied with them.
	A lot of them won't be anymore.
	But also, they're going to have to, they can't handle everything.
	So a security guy right now for, let's say, Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates gets on a private airplane and he flies somewhere.
	His security guys go through and they do their regular routines and stuff.
	They can't monitor the fuel that goes into the plane.
	They can't monitor the guy who does the maintenance on the plane.
	And he knows it's Bill Gates' plane.
	And he's got a shot because he was forced to take it and he's ill and he's dying.
	And he says, oh, fuck it.
	You know, I'm going to just shave 1,200 feet off of this altimeter under this certain range.
	So once it drops below 3,600 feet, all of a sudden 1,200 feet goes away.
	Then what's the pilot going to do?
	Major freak out.
	Ultimately, there's going to be a crash because he can't land because he doesn't know how high he is.
	And so that would be the kind of thing we're going to see is these crashes and stuff that will be, quote, unexplained, but it'll start taking out a lot of the powers that be guys.
	Anyway, guys, I'm back home now.
	I'll get this stuff uploaded.
	What a day.
	Anyway, talk to you later.
	It's going to be a really strange fall in next year as we get into sci-fi world.
	And this is really the transition into that over these next couple of years.
	All right.

▲