Clif High - Redheads!

July 5, 2023 - Clif High

27:50

Redheads!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	It's 11:30 on July 5th.
	Outward bound.
	Got all my chores done, and as expected, the town has been pretty much picked over by tourists, and there were geez, there were like seven or eight different items that were uh not available.
	Uh, so it goes.
	Got uh my other chores done and uh did a little meeting with some people and arranged for a future project here, so it's all good.
	Heading back now, I've got to take it easy today, not being able to sleep and everything, and then yesterday, of course, um while all the fireworks and shit's going on.
	I'm uh setting up a new server.
	Gonna lower the window here, it's hot.
	It'll be a bit noisy.
	There we go.
	Anyway, was gonna talk about space aliens and stuff as usual.
	This is kind of an interesting um wrinkle on things though as we try and uh put together and recreate uh actual human history.
	I mean that's what we're working on is an attempt to uh fill in the gaps, so to speak, right, and to um uh overcome all the deliberate um uh lies and obscuring of uh actual human history here and come up with a um yeah uh a timeline sort of.
	I'm I'm satisfied with just knowing the order in which things happened, right?
	Uh because the numeric year is gonna be open to question.
	We've had any number of uh redoos on calendars and repigging on years, uh, you know, uh through time, so um not really not really uh hot on an individual number being all that accurate as long as we know the sequence of things and an approximate date,
	that's good enough for me at this stage uh for what we're doing here, but we're trying to recreate um something close to a uh historic timeline that reconciles uh historic literature, right?
	So uh we find that um oh like as an instance the Jewish people say that their calendar begins with the creation of Adam and Eve, and there were uh no humans prior to that.
	Never mind the fact that you know in Genesis and all of this we see that there were uh people around, lots of people, and that the gods showed up and mucked about with the DNA and created the sons of God who um uh decided that the women of the uh of the indigenous human population were attractive, and so they they started interbreeding.
	And so we end up with the situation we have now, right?
	And so if you actually go through and read it chronologically, uh basically what the old testament and the um Torah are saying is that in the beginning Earth existed, um doesn't actually say that Earth was created or any of that in the in the actual Torah, right?
	If you go read it in the Hebrew, none of that stuff is in there.
	Um in fact, most of the translated words in English that are there in the in the Bible are not we won't find a Hebrew version of that word in the Torah.
	So um you know, kind of uh interesting situation, right?
	You can go and you can say some quote me some Bible verse, and I'll say, okay, let's go actually see if that verse, if it's an old testament, if that verse actually exists, and if it does, what does it actually say?
	Because it doesn't say that um it actually says that you know the gods came down, uh they found a bunch of humans, um, they GMO's some, and they created what they called the sons of the gods, and from then on we've had GMO humans running around that we're mucked about with uh by the L. Now, this is not the only time our our DNA has been screwed with, right?
	This is just the most recent.
	In any event, though, so um we have these uh this understanding that that is really not quite factual in terms of of when things occur in uh in particular orders, right?
	Uh there we go.
	Anyway, so um there.
	So anyway, I'm working with some people, we're trying to recreate an actual timeline.
	We go and we read all this old literature, we go and read the old literature in the original language, or we find somebody who can come and work with us who knows that language and is willing to do the translation for us because we're quite tedious about this, right?
	Um frequent debates about which word should be translated by which other word in English.
	Now there's this known expansion factor from English.
	English has a uh it's concise to a certain degree, but if you're like translating it into uh Spanish or or any of the romance languages, any of the the languages that are predominantly based on Latin, such as Spanish, Portuguese, etc., uh you will find that there's an expansion from the English.
	That if you've got 120 words in English, it'll probably take 130, maybe up to 150 words uh in uh a romance language to translate that that statement.
	And this also works the other way.
	There are some languages where um uh we find that there's more words in English needed to convey the the meaning than the words used in that native language, and so this is true of um uh Hebrew, it's true of uh Japanese and um uh number of other languages, right?
	You need more words in English to say the same thing, and so we find that there's this expansion factor that can be dealt with mathematically.
	It's a known mathematical formula, a very complex algorithm depending on what you're uh the subject being discussed, but it's uh very accurate, right?
	Very reproducible, it always works, it'll always be within this level of error of um or range of error.
	Uh, you know, so depending on the subject, maybe it's 135 words uh it takes in English, or it's 155 words, that sort of thing.
	There's a small amount of variance, but not much, and it would never be 170 words unless it was a bad translation.
	And so that's what we have here relative to the Bible uh and the uh underpinning Hebrew uh Torah.
	Okay, there's there's far fewer words in the Torah relative to the Bible, and it ex and it exceeds the error range on the expansion.
	So, in other words, if that was translated even badly, you know, like deli not deliberately badly, but just uh like incompetent, if that was translated very badly, we are still way uh above any kind of an expansion factor that would um fit here.
	So we know that they added shit, that they added a lot of shit, um, because the expansion factor is like uh almost twice as what it should be.
	Uh so you get that many more words in the old testament, and then if you start looking at the various different versions of the Bible, you see that the uh old testament varies hugely, and we get into understanding that the Torah itself is variant, that there's you know different versions of the Torah existent uh through uh what we think is the Middle Ages,
	but from like 800 AD onward, but we even find that there's variants going back to 100 AD, and then the supposed um history for an oral Torah.
	Okay, so in any event, this all the Kali Yuga, we we didn't know how to type, we didn't have machinery, we had to write shit down, we had to put letters in clay and all of this because we were so stupid.
	And but in any event though, so if we look at all this language, we find that shit does not add up.
	Okay, so we know that the the Jewish people um uh that Adam and Eve were uh 4,191 years uh uh BC, right?
	Uh that's when that happened.
	And so the Jewish people have a history that's uh about five or six thousand years old or long, and we know that there's millions of years of history of humans prior to that.
	What I'm doing is I'm working with a lot of other guys, a lot of old retired fellows here, and we're all trying to figure out you know what happened and when did it happen in the various different places.
	We're trying to recreate uh actual history based on uh like a detective story based on clues and uh fitting all the clues together, and so there are some things that that we're trying to reconcile to.
	So we have lots and lots and lots and lots of Sanskrit literature um that discusses the period of time uh that that uh all of us old Ralphs are interested in.
	And uh the Sanskrit literature has definitive statements.
	Now, what's really cool about Sanskrit and the way that they wrote the literature at the time was that they were very much um uh probably they influenced the Egyptians to do the same, but these guys were very much into uh astronomy,
	okay, and uh thus also astrology, and they did it from a sidereal perspective, okay, from a solar perspective, not an earth perspective, and this makes a big difference if you examine um uh astronomy and uh astrology, right?
	And so we're sort of in a way, all of us old guys are trying to do like um decipher Astro uh archaeological clues and come up with a timeline for when certain things occurred, and uh we have definitive statements, you know.
	So, like you have the Jewish uh old testament or Jewish uh Torah that says uh when Adam and Eve uh or when Adam was created that that marks the beginning of time uh for the for man, and then later on they sort of fudge that and say that marks the beginning of time for the Jewish people.
	Um we know from from facts that Judaism did not exist uh at the time of any of the people in the Bible, right?
	They had a religion that was based on uh the Canaanite or Akkadian religion, which was um uh all of this ball worship, right?
	Only we were missappropriating a term.
	Baal is a label, it was not a god's name or any of that.
	Uh Baal was a category of person within the uh invading um force, just the way that uh Satan is the word for lawyer in the for that force, and so we know uh if you go and read the book of Job,
	they talk about a particular individual L having to serve as the Satan in a particular court, and so we even have our courts, our attorneys, the references, all of that take from the L. Okay, so once again, emulating our space alien masters, right?
	But anyway, so um we know from the from the statements that um within the Old Testament where to pig one point about you know 4,200 years uh before um the current era.
	Uh we have other clues in Sanskrit that that we don't rely on them giving a date and then having a perpetual calendar that keeps that date, uh, which was something that was sort of unique to the Jews and the Mesoamericans, all right?
	They both kept track of time that way, and it's very much a mechanistic way to keep track of time, it's very much a um like a computer approach to keeping track of time, like counting all the clock ticks, right?
	So you can go ask a computer what time it is.
	If you want to ask it in programming language, you can ask it what clock tick are you on, and then you do the math to convert that to you know day date and uh time.
	Okay, but it's actually counting of uh the number of clock ticks based on the number of times that electricity pulses through a particular chip.
	And the way in which the Jews and the way in which the Mesoamicans both kept track of time was very much like that, as though they were emulating or trying to replicate that form of timekeeping.
	Now, we do not see that form of timekeeping in the other societies that had not had the L ensconced within them.
	Okay, so we don't see that kind of timekeeping in Vedic cultures in the in the Hindu cultures uh at all.
	They they have an astronomical, a sidereal astronomical approach to keeping track of what day it is and time and stuff, right?
	So you don't worry about it anytime you want to know what time it is, you look at the stars and uh and calculate from there.
	Uh so a different approach entirely.
	You let universe decide what time it is, and you just ask it, so to speak.
	You query the machine by by asking universe what time is it based on uh these stars, right?
	As opposed to trying to keep track of what day and and time it is based on keeping track of each individual day and the hours and so on.
	Um, because you you know, you could forget your timekeeper keeper could die, you'd have to restart.
	All of these things have happened.
	Uh so anyway, so um we have within Sanskrit um astronomical uh calendar uh markers for very specific things that we know occurred, and so we have the the knowledge of this thing occurring in dozens and dozens and dozens of uh various different books, none of which of these books are dependent on any of the other books for existence.
	In other words, any all of these references to this particular event uh were all independent of each other and existed separately and were non-referential, except for a couple that you know, where they referenced, oh yeah, we think that this occurred here and this guy did this, but also look, this other guy in this other book here says the same.
	And so one of these uh things that we do have an astronomical pig for uh in the Hindu society is a particular um group of rishi, okay, of knowledgeable people, of people that had skills.
	Uh we're not going to provide them with an academic label that's something that comes from the L. And as we know, those are all bogus, like fake news, you know, you have fake professors, they don't really know shit.
	Uh, just part of the system to keep you controlled.
	Um, they're not really teaching you anything.
	Anyway, though, so uh the the Hindu societies record a whole group of individuals uh coming down and laying knowledge on the Hindu people after a um localized uh catastrophe.
	Okay, so this this was not after a great flood, this was after a period of time when the Indus Valley had flooded very, very, very severely severely and displaced a lot of the Indus Valley people and disrupted their social order.
	At that period of time, shortly thereafter, we get um this group of red-headed Rishi, okay.
	So you have to understand, you know, really go and explore how the Hindus think of Rishi and so on, right?
	Because they think of them as oh, enlightened beings, you know, uh people that are ahead of the uh generalized curve in spirituality, that kind of thing, right?
	Um in that sense, they are divine beings, but they're no less and and no more divine uh than any other person, right?
	Any other being.
	And so uh so they're not canonized like a saint.
	We don't hold them up um in that manner, right?
	As as like um some kind of uh spooky uh uh uh state of existence.
	We know why we like these guys is because they were nice people, they came down, they told us shit, they didn't ask for stuff, they weren't trying to control us, they were just trying to be uh helpful humans, uh, and a group of them for whatever reason, under whatever circumstances,
	uh, arrived in the Indian subcontinent at a particular time, and we see that these people took up residence in Nepal and Tibet, Northern India, um uh Pakistan, Iran, all throughout this entire region.
	And there we know that, okay.
	So if we look at the literature, it is possible to confuse some of these individuals to the point where we can't say if this Iranian literature is talking about the same guy as the the Hindu literary as the Indian literature, right?
	We can't tell.
	The timing is pretty close.
	Uh they could be talking about the same guy, the words they're using to describe Them are all the same, basically red hair, uh pale, uh red beards, and so on, right.
	Uh, but is it just a group of these individuals, or is it just one guy uh uh that was very, very, very productive going around and visiting a lot of people.
	There's a lot to suggest it's a group, and we actually have differing names and so on.
	So at this point, our guys uh they're working on this.
	We've all assumed we we've all decided we're going to assume it was a group, and we have other reasons for this assumption as well.
	Um but what's interesting is a lot of interesting things about these red-headed rishi.
	Okay, uh the red-headed Rishi show up, and then everybody they talk to, they are very, very, very forthcoming.
	All right, these Rishi do not hide, they don't prevaricate, they don't lie, uh they are um good guys, and they're here to be helpful, they're not uh trying to exploit, they're not trying to take advantage of anybody, and as I say, as far as uh I mean, we have lots of reasons to think that these guys were not in any way lying or covering up their um uh their story, right?
	Because they all said that they came from this great civilization in the far north, and that in some of the um Tamil literature and some of the non-uh Hindi literature that was still associated with the Indus Valley and with Sanskrit,
	uh so you know, slight variants, uh more ancient and so on, as well as in uh literature in um uh Tibet Nepal that a lot of the monasteries there uh held.
	Now, so a lot of the monasteries uh that existed that exist now were created as a result of these rishi guys.
	We don't have it anywhere where the rishi guys said you had to do this, these were not instructions, these were like uh sort of a good idea.
	All these red-headed Rishi guys came down and told the Hindus basically all about the Yuga system, all about science, about consciousness, uh the difference between consciousness and grit and how grit comes from consciousness, not the other way around, and all of these other bits of what we would think of as enlightened wisdom.
	Okay, and so um they came and they laid all this knowledge on us, and then some of the peoples uh took the understanding of the yugas very seriously, and they created monasteries such that uh knowledge would be preserved, sort of like um Asimov's foundation trilogy, right?
	Where the foundation is to preserve and shorten the time between great galactic empires to reduce the amount of suffering on all of humanity spread throughout space.
	That's what these guys were doing on Earth.
	The Rishi didn't tell these guys to build monasteries, they did that on their own and of their own volition, and they were uh their own form of knowledge keepers and history keepers, and that and they would write this shit down, and then they would collect vast quantities of books, and then they would store and hide the books.
	That's why we keep finding all of these caches of you know, 10,000 Sanskrit books hidden behind a wall in a particular monastery in Nepal.
	And another cache that was as maybe is I've heard it's 150,000 volumes, some of which are so old they're in um tubes, they're in uh scroll form, not leaf books, uh, which were leaf books were uh easier to store and uh you know um uh take care of etc.
	etc.
	So, anyway, though, so these rishi gave all the knowledge, and a lot of these people built um monasteries and decided to preserve the knowledge because the rishi had told them what was coming, and so we have reason to believe that these rishi showed up uh after this particular local uh catastrophe period uh in India uh that really disrupted the Indus Valley civilizations,
	uh really devastated them, and uh the Rishi brought knowledge there, and then it and we have a particular reason for suspecting the date, and we think that that's date that date is about 6,000 BCE, so about um 8,500
	years from our date, uh so about 8,000 years back that this occurred, and um Anyway, so what we're trying to do is to build a timeline that references these contacts with our current society and you know all of the things put in there like uh the Tartarian Empire, uh its evolution, and all of this.
	The thing about Tartaria, by the way, that's really fascinating to all of us um radical ass uh linguistic fuckers is that Tartaria had an alphabet that was 202 uh letters, okay, contained 202 letters, but the Tartarian alphabet clearly grew, uh was clearly altered, uh uh whether it was an organic or whether it was by design in in three specific um chunks, so to speak.
	So you can basically chop it up into thirds, but we have a have a period when they had an alphabet that was in the order of uh 35 or 36 letters, and then it expanded over time, and this is most fascinating, okay.
	Just from a linguistic viewpoint, this is most fascinating.
	Um, I won't go into that, take hours and hours and hours on our discussion of that kind of stuff.
	Nonetheless, though, uh, we're trying to put together this this timeline and fill in all the gaps.
	You know, we're retired, we got nothing better to do.
	And it and it actually has yielded all kinds of very interesting um observations from which we are coming to specific conclusions.
	Now I've come to some conclusions uh based on my personal history, and I'll be getting into those at uh some point here once it's all as I say fleshed out, I've got enough evidence to support this uh in someone else's mind, right?
	So I think that the my premise is factual, it's certainly believable.
	Uh now I just need to get the evidence to so someone else can say, yeah, uh it's believable, and it may be factual because of this following, right?
	And so I want to find all of those because of the following and present those at the same time.
	So this is a bit of work, um, not a real quick knock it off kind of a thing.
	Anyway, though, so um the red-headed Rishi coming from the North Pole, which is a couple of couple of the citations for it uh in the Hindus suggests that that was indeed the case.
	Uh there in the Iranian literature, there's like very specific references that take this uh to an area um in uh western Siberia.
	Okay, so they were coming from the very far north, and and you know, how did they know?
	What was the point?
	We don't there's so much speculation about this.
	We're just tracking on what we know right now and what we can deduce, especially relative to um uh the potential for timelines and years and stuff.
	There's reasons for us getting into that math, um, independent of just wanting to know.
	There's we've got a couple of goals here.
	Um, and actually the goals relate to um uh North America and some stuff that that we think we're on the hunt for.
	So anyway, you know, not being mysterious, I just don't want to put it out there for a lot of reasons.
	Um don't want to get people whipped up if we're nowhere close, and you know, we have to adjust all the time because we come across new information, somebody translates a new book and says, hey, look what this says, and then we have to redo everything, right?
	So uh just the nature of the kind of thing we're trying to do.
	Uh in any event, though, it's from uh for our perspective, it's quite fascinating.
	I've got uh I set up a new server yesterday, uh four terabytes in one drive, and I've got a 16 uh or I've got an array of 16 terabyte drives.
	I mean, my first computer had 2k of RAM, and it had a um uh uh I think I had 10k on uh uh on floppy discs.
	So not much on the way of storage, but anyway, so um uh we're still working on it.
	Um it may be that we're gonna get really heavily involved in this, and I'll have to reduce um other activities because I've got to do my my house construction while it's summer here.
	I've got to get at this stuff, right?
	And so uh that part is really pressing.
	I can put these talks off and put exploration and research off uh while I do uh the necessary construction stuff, but I can't do the other way.
	Anyway, guys, so um we'll have more later this year on this.
	Uh history is not what we've been told.
	All this stuff's gonna be coming out in this in this period.
	I will get around to doing an emediacy data discussion for uh the USA the way I did for Europe.
	Uh I'm waiting for the next uh bit of the run to finish.
	And as I said, that's one of the reasons I set the server up.
	So maybe a couple of days from now, maybe tomorrow, it just depends on when it's done.
	This machine is very fast.
	Um, but anyway, so then I'll go ahead and and do a discussion on the um immediacy data for uh North America and probably Latin America got some of that too.
	Anyway, take care.
	Summer, get your chores done uh before this terrible winter hits.
	It's gonna be brutal.

▲