Clif High - Parallelsprache

April 25, 2023 - Clif High

29:20

Parallelsprache

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans!
	Hello humans!
	April 25th, it's around 9.15 a.m. or something.
	Wanted to talk language for a few minutes.
	Taking a coffee break out here in the brush cutting.
	So yesterday we had Don Le Mon and Tucker Carlson let go, you know, along with a few other people at the Fox News in the last few days.
	And it's just struck me as being a having historical analogs that are worth talking about here, right?
	And so we have if we thought of the Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson as being the face of particular kinds of language at the moment, then we have analogs to this that occurred back in the 1930s.
	In the 1920s and 30s, we didn't have electronic media to the extent we have today.
	We had telegraph, etc., but they were inventing television and so on, but we had radio, but we didn't have the level of instantaneous communication we have now.
	So things will progress faster now than they did in the 30s.
	Nonetheless, though, it's really interesting as to how we are sort of echoing what's going on then in the 30s in the actual language itself.
	So of interest to me is the changes in the language that are coming out at the moment.
	And we have the potential that we're going to get in, that this is an echo of what occurred in 19, I want to say 28.
	Okay.
	So it's my contention, my premise here, that the language is reflecting a change in the activity of the Kazarian mafia at this point relative to language.
	And so the Kazarian mafia is hugely into language.
	They're into propaganda, all of this kind of stuff.
	The Tavistock Institute studies, marketing, and all that sort of thing, right?
	They know this down to psychological operations.
	They know this down to the gnat's ass.
	Anyway, so whenever you see things happening within the media, it's not by accident.
	When a lot of big things happen all at once, you've got another 1928 kind of moment going on.
	In 1928, we had some major changes in the German media structure that reflected what would be occurring or that presaged what would occur between 1928 and 1933.
	So, all right, so let's see.
	Let's have a little description of our terrain.
	In the 1920s and 30s, Germany was in chaos.
	They had gone through the Weimar hyperinflation in 1923 and the government collapsed.
	The social order collapsed as well in the sense of structure, order, regularity, you know, justice, economy, banking, all of that.
	But people still had to do things.
	They still did things.
	And the German society kept going along.
	Everybody didn't kill themselves when the money went bad, right?
	But it took them forever to work their way out of it.
	In the process of doing so, if we look at the newspapers and just taking newspapers, most of the radio broadcasts at that time were reflective of what was going on within the daily and weekly newspapers.
	There were more weeklies than there were dailies because of the cost.
	And it's sort of the analog to today's major news media, right?
	So we could say that Fox News is the equivalent of like Berliner Zeitung, which was the main newspaper, right?
	It's the Berliner newspaper, basically, is the name.
	And it had been started in 1877 and was cooking right along.
	And in the 1920s, it occupied a role, sort of, similar to what Fox News does.
	Fox News is still progressive, right?
	Fox is still a progressive state station, progressive network, and Berliner Zeitung to a certain extent was progressive.
	But anyway, so here's the situation.
	There were a number of major newspapers in Germany.
	A lot of them came out of southern Germany and Berlin.
	The newspapers could broadly be broken up into Jewish newspapers and nominally non-Jewish newspapers.
	So there were Jewish newspapers that were created for, writing was for the Jewish community.
	It was circulated in the Jewish community and not very widely beyond that.
	And, you know, so like there was Der Morgan.
	Now, Der Morgan was a little bit of an interesting Jewish newspaper because it had a wide circulation up until it closed, right?
	Outside of the Jewish community, because it handled politics very well.
	There were some very influential thinkers, a lot of good writers for it.
	And it had some serious prestige that it had garnered by the nature of the people that wrote for it.
	So I became aware of it because of a guy by the name of Walter Benjamin, who was a writer in language and who had some language and politics and literary stuff and all this kind of thing, but who had some really key insights in language and power.
	And some of his work was later on taken in and inculcated into propaganda and how that all works.
	So I became aware of him because of his impact on the discussions around language.
	And he was a writer for Der Morgan.
	He wrote for other newspapers as well, including the Berliner Zeitung.
	So he was writing for, now the Berliner Zeitung was a general circulation daily publication, not for the general Jewish community, but like almost all the other newspapers, it was owned by a Jewish family.
	They were the Mosses.
	First thought as Moses, and then later on it was changed to M-O-S-S-E.
	This family comes from, you know, hang on a second.
	That was the Berliner Tokblat.
	Okay, the Berliner Daily that was owned by the Moss family.
	It was the Ulstein family that created the Berliner Zeitung.
	Okay, and so they were Jewish, the Ulstein family, and they kept owning it all the way through the war.
	They were actually Khazarian.
	Okay, so here's where it gets into the tricky stuff.
	My contention is that the Khazarians have decided to change the language and are in another one of their, let's freak out and maybe sacrifice Jews kind of a thing, right?
	Because in 1928, we had a significant shift in the language, and all these newspapers started attacking the Jewish community linguistically in ways that led up to the assumption of power of the Nazi Party in 1933, and then the shutting down of all of these Jewish newspapers.
	They became illegal at that stage and were all banned and shut down.
	Now, they were trying to counter the Khazarian language.
	But here's the thing.
	The language of the regular newspaper circulating in Germany, the nominally non-Jewish newspapers, were still owned by the Jewish community.
	They were just owned by Khazarians.
	Now, the Khazarians also owned some of the other Jewish newspapers, but not all of them.
	So Der Morgan was the morning, was out of business in 1933, and it was owned by non-Khazarian Jews, right?
	These people were Jewish, but they're not in the club of the Khazarians, and they were hunted down and kicked out of Germany and all of that.
	Der Morgan is interesting because it had four really influential writers, all of whom are Jewish, and all of whom had the same fate in the sense that they all wrote for this newspaper.
	They all wrote for other newspapers, including the Berliner Zeitung and all these other literary gazettes and that kind of thing.
	But these four writers, Walter Benjamin, the language guy, Kurt Cholosky, I think his name was.
	He wrote about, mainly he did like plays and that sort of thing, but he was very much anti-Nazi, anti-authoritarian, anti-Khazarian mafia.
	And then there was Ernest Taller and Joseph Roth.
	Okay, now Joseph Roth came from a Khazarian family, and he kept in 1928 through 33 in the rise of Nazism, he kept pointing out all of the Khazarian connections to the Nazi Party.
	And here's the thing.
	He was talking about people he knew.
	So there's a famous newspaper called Der Stürmer, The Stormer.
	It became the quasi-official newspaper for the Nazi Party.
	It was started in the 1923, I think.
	Almost at the height of the hyperinflation, this newspaper starts up.
	It starts up by this guy, Julius Streetscher.
	Streetscher, S-T-R-E-I-C-H, I think.
	Anyway, he's an interesting character because he comes out of nowhere, but he comes out of a very particular nowhere, which is a place called Flein Fleinhausen.
	Fleinhausen.
	Okay, and that's in Bavaria.
	It's a little village in Bavaria, very nice.
	They've got some good cafes there.
	When I was there, they had excellent coffee.
	But Fleinhausen means flax house.
	Okay, and the whole village existed, used to exist because of its nearness to a tributary to this particular river.
	And they would process the flax and turn out fiber.
	And so you find that Fleinhausen in that particular part of Bavaria is a center of all kinds of money that was Khazarian money that took from the flax and cereal growing that was, you know, they got their money from the flax and the cereal grains growing in Eastern Europe and Eastern Germany.
	And it was concentrated in Bavaria because that's where a lot of the processing of the foods as well as the fibers was done.
	And then ultimately, there's this connection between Fleinhausen and all these newspapers.
	And you have to understand it was because of the connection to fiber, okay, to the actual plant fiber.
	That little whizzy noise is a hummingbird that's a little pissed at me.
	Anyway, so Streetser came out of Fleinhausen.
	He was just this little Bavarian kid that had extremely anti-Jewish views.
	And this was because of what happened to him when he was a kid.
	Okay, so he was basically assaulted and beat up by a gang, a Jewish gang that he intruded on them in an illegal act in the hills of Bavaria, and they beat the crap out of him to the point that as a kid, maybe he was 11 or 12 years old, he ends up crippled for life with a couple of injuries to his legs that really did impact the rest of his life.
	Now, he ended up being executed in 1946 in the denazification programs that were run by Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin, okay, except for Churchill, all Jews.
	Stalin was a Jew, Roosevelt was a Jew, right?
	Anyway, so it's just also really weird.
	But again, my contention is that the Khazarians have shifted the language, and this may be a prelude to them once again trying to sacrifice the Jews in order to aid their own escape of the consequences of their acts for these last hundred plus years, right?
	Or thousands of years, depending on how far back we want to go.
	Okay, so Streetscher starts Der Stürmer.
	Streetscher comes from Fleinhausen in Bavaria, on the road to Switzerland, basically, from southern Germany.
	He starts Der Stürmer in Frankfurt.
	Frankfurt was the center of publishing, one of the centers of publishing, along with Berlin.
	He starts it with money from a buddy of his that he got the money in Bavaria.
	This guy was, Streetscher was not from a wealthy family.
	He didn't have a lot of dollars at all.
	And he's plumped in 1923, unexpectedly, gifted with all this money.
	And he moves from Bavaria down into southern Germany into the Flatlands and starts this newspaper that was very much anti-Jewish.
	And the people that gave him the money, the people out of Bavaria, so he thought, were prompting him to continue that anti-Jewish tirade within his newspaper, which he did from 1923 on.
	It was 1923 he started.
	And he gets into the Nazi Party and yada yada yada.
	Off we go with that.
	But what's really interesting is that ultimately, if you trace it, you find out that his money came from the Moss family, right?
	M-O-S-S-E, which was, Rudolf Moss was the owner and the creator of the Berliner Talkblot that was a very progressive Jewish daily newspaper out of Berlin.
	It was basically their version of the New York Times.
	Whereas the Berliner Zeitag might be thought of as a more conservative paper, right?
	It was not as progressive as the Tokblat, okay, which Daily Speak, right?
	The Day Speak, the Daily.
	Okay, but Rudolf Moss was an extremely progressive Jewish guy that ends up I don't know what his family was.
	Okay, so he converts to Christianity in order to fit in with things.
	Later on, he's no, that was, sorry, I'm getting him confused with the Zeitung.
	Okay, so it was Leopold Ulstein that was the starter of the Berliner Zeitung, the Berliner newspaper.
	This guy gave money to his supposed rival, Rudolf Moss.
	Now, it was actually the Ullstein family.
	It wasn't actually Leopold.
	He started it in 1877, and his children were running it at the time that we get into the 1920s.
	And it was a pretty good empire.
	It was a very big publishing empire.
	So it had analogs to Fox News.
	Now, these are all analogs.
	They don't swap over.
	But basically what happens is that Leopold's family, the Olsteins, Jewish guys, convert over to or give money over to Rudolf Moss, who had his family also Jewish, had started a newspaper, so two Jewish families starting newspapers.
	Rudolf Moss is very progressive with his newspaper, and he ultimately converts to Christianity.
	Now, later on, the Nazis accused him of converting to Christianity in order to save his money, and they took his money and took his empire and all of that stuff anyway.
	So it didn't do him any good.
	But he was the conduit for money from Ulstein over to Stryker.
	So Olstein had his hands in his own opposition.
	There's a lot of talk that Ulstein family also financed part of the Moss family's expansion to create the Tokblot, the progressive version of the daily newspaper in Berlin.
	Where we find that there was continuing work by progressive Jewish writers that would be the equivalent of like Don Lemon, all right, in terms of actually much more.
	No, they're not the equivalent.
	He's just a news reader.
	These guys actually wrote and could think and shit, right?
	He's just, he can read.
	That's about it.
	Anyway, though, but we do find analogs in the language itself.
	Okay, so let's not get really confused here.
	Berliner Seintung, owned by the Ulstein family, which they kept their newspaper.
	They didn't get denazified.
	They kept up into the 50s.
	They still had their empire.
	They were Jewish.
	They had some small issues with the Nazis, but mainly not.
	From the Ulstein family, we have connections to those Jews that worked for the Nazis, such as Soros and Klaus Schwab's father.
	So Klaus Schwab's father is related to the Ulstein family from Berliner Zeitung.
	Okay, so he's deep into the propaganda all the way back before World War II.
	The family is.
	Now, the Todblat, started by Rudolf Maas, was bought out in the 1920s by Jewish bankers.
	And they held it until 1929 when they sold it to Olstein.
	He actually at that point was, Olstein had enough money that he was a major banking guy as well as running all these newspapers.
	Now, the Olstein family came out of Bavaria.
	They came out of Fleinhausen, the same Bavarian village that Julius Streetscher came out of.
	And they end up financing him through their acquisition of Moss's newspaper.
	Okay, so it's just really curious.
	I don't know why Streetscher would take money from Jews if he had, and he must have known he was.
	It was, in fact, reported by other Jews in Der Morgan.
	Both Ernest Taller and Kurt Cholosky commented on it or wrote opinion pieces about it.
	So it must have been known at that time.
	Nonetheless, you didn't have the conspiracy understanding then that we do now.
	Floyd, no.
	So, anyway, it's just my point here that we're going to get a, that we've had a language shift that yesterday, Mark, with the firing of Lemon and Tucker Carlson leaving, and he can go off and create his own billion-dollar empire really damn quick.
	you know, start rivaling Elon Musk kind of thing.
	But this is all reminiscent of a lot of the shit that went down in the consolidation and changes of the language in the 1930s.
	And it was actually begun in 1928.
	And if you go back and start reading articles translated from the German, from these newspapers, and you contrast the stuff that's being reported in Der Morgan and some of these other Jewish newspapers, and there were like four or five of them out of Berlin that were just really on the mark as to what was going on.
	And they reported on, I guess, the other aspect of the Jewish community.
	So the Jewish community at that time had progressive newspapers, but they did not have a great deal of conservative newspapers.
	The conservative newspaper or conservative thought in the Jewish community at that time was somewhat restricted to individual writers.
	There were no platforms for it, if you will, right?
	It was an aspect of their individual work that brings certain writers out because they were commenting on what was going on in the Jewish community that they did not like, some of which seemed to point to them to this weirdness of Eastern European Jews from Ukraine,
	aka Khazaria, involving themselves with the Nazis and getting this whole thing going.
	Obviously, the Jewish community at the time didn't like Der Stürmer.
	And so to have it reported that it was being financed by, and a lot of the writing was being done by Ukrainian Jews didn't go over well.
	So here's the thing about this, right?
	As I say, there were these four writers, Ernest Taller, Joseph Roth, Walter Benjamin, who was just this great language guy and really did some key work in what is language, how it works with humans, etc.
	And then also Kurt Cholosky.
	All these people came to a bad end.
	They survived the war.
	They were kicked out of Germany, you know, for being Jewish writers.
	They were forced to emigrate.
	One of them, I don't know which one, I can't remember.
	Maybe it was Taller, Ernst Taller, or maybe it was Kurt Cholosky.
	But one of these four guys was put in a concentration camp for three or four months and then let out and told he had to leave the country, which he did.
	Maybe that was the one that one of the four writers tried to make it to America and was turned back in New York and ended up having to stay on the steamship and went to Spain where he was incarcerated in a Spanish fascist concentration camp.
	Now, he died there.
	And again, I'm sorry I can't remember which one of these four.
	All four of these guys ended up being suicides.
	Okay, that's their official, except for one of them.
	It was, I don't know if it's official or not, but three of them, it's their official cause of death if you look into their biographies.
	They all suicided, supposedly.
	And they all suicided within a very short period, like within days or weeks of encountering officialdom.
	The one guy in Spain, another guy in Sweden, he was in exile.
	He lived the longest, I think.
	He lived until like 38 or 39.
	So there was one guy.
	Okay, maybe it was a guy in Sweden.
	So maybe that was taller.
	One of them in Sweden had had health issues.
	And so they say that that's why he killed himself, was for his health issues.
	But it was just curious that he had been visited in his place in Sweden at that time by what we can only assume are some kind of Nazi officialdom, which is to say, you know, controlled by the Khazarians, right?
	Much of the Nazi empire was controlled by the Khazarians.
	We find Klaus Schwab worked there.
	We see George Soros worked there.
	You know, they worked for Hitler.
	There were a great number of Khazarian Jews working for Hitler.
	You just don't ever see these guys mentioned.
	You don't see the discussions about them.
	And it's like ignored and denied by historians.
	But nonetheless, it's quite factual.
	Anyway, so I'm seeing some indications here locally.
	I mean, in the United States, and I'm seeing some just today in some other parts of other countries.
	And I think that the Khazarians are really freaked out.
	And I think the Khazarian mafia is just like kind of losing it.
	And in my opinion, the language changes I've seen recently here over this last couple of weeks and then yesterday, as well as the major changes in the face of language, Tucker and Lemon, are kind of like signs on the path, right?
	And I think we're taking a path that the Khazarians are going to want to have agitation against Jews to kind of sort of give them a way out.
	I don't see how it does.
	I don't see how that's going to work.
	But the language, as I say, is very reminiscent of what happened in the shift in language in the Berliner Zeitung that took place from 29 and through 30 as the rise of the Nazi Party, even though the newspaper was 100% Jewish-owned, et cetera, et cetera, right?
	They could have at that time just simply done what the New York Times has done, so to speak, and they could have just not gone along with the Nazis.
	But they did.
	So sort of like Fox News maybe has caved to the U.S. government and got rid of Tucker for that particular reason in order to save their hide.
	Who knows what's going on there?
	But it is somewhat reminiscent of what was going on in these newspapers in Berlin during that time.
	Just curious, guys.
	You know, I think everybody should be really paranoid.
	But I think also that if I were Jewish, I would start really looking at the language that's being printed and to see what comes out.
	Bear in mind that Khazarian Mafia, they don't consider themselves Jewish, right?
	They're all Satanists, and they know explicitly that they're hiding in the Jewish population, and they explicitly will sacrifice that population to save their own hide.
	I just think something like that is sort of shaping up here, and it may take a while to develop, but nonetheless, I find linguistic parallels between what was written in these newspapers in the 28 through 33 period of time and what we're seeing now, especially arising in these last few weeks.
	We've gotten some temporal markers that are specifically elevating intensity and shifting over emotions relative to direct and tangential Jewish-associated linguistics.
	Anyway, I got to get moving.
	It's going to rain on this hair.
	I still got to get some brush cuts.
	So just thought to mention that, especially after yesterday.
	Take care and, you know, keep an eye out.

▲