Clif High - Release Language

Feb. 1, 2023 - Clif High

24:14

Release Language

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	February 1 on the outward bound leg heading back out to the coast.
	Nice and relaxed.
	Hopefully I won't encounter any more accidents.
	There were a couple of near misses on the way into town.
	There were a couple in town that I saw.
	So it's getting really dangerous.
	This is an aspect of the big ugly.
	It's also an aspect of the release tension, right?
	So you get in the wreck, all the tension pours out of you.
	There's a sudden building tension component to your body as your body is flooded with hormones just before the wreck.
	And then afterwards, depending on the state of your body, probably pretty clearly instantly, like really close to instantly, you would get the beginning of the release.
	And so that's what we're getting into now at a social order.
	So if we want to think of our projections here that I get from my data, it's kind of like we're looking at all of humanity as a single body and just plotting how a single person would react to the lines of tension and so on that are described within the changes in the language.
	So it's really complicated.
	It's squirrely as shit.
	And it works occasionally, spectacularly, but it works all the time to a degree that it's worth paying attention to.
	So I knew weeks back, six or more weeks back, that February 2nd was going to be a pivoting point, right?
	As I put it, that's the wave cresting.
	The boats and all of this, all the debris and the flotsam and the jetsum from the Naradigme is in the water, floating and sinking actively, and the Wu is about to submerge it all.
	And we won't be coming out for a long time.
	So this process is going to involve us coming to grips with and internalizing to the point that we can get some level of acceptance of it all,
	of what's happened to us over these last three years, but not, in my opinion, as what has happened to us over these last three years, but rather what has been building for over 100 years that expressed itself in the events of these last three years.
	So I'm an old fart.
	It's my 70th year.
	It gives you a perspective on things to survive this long, especially if you've died a bunch of times and come back.
	I mean, there's nothing that's going to clear your system out and give you an appreciation for things, a crystal clear vision, more than dying, in my opinion.
	And, you know, okay, so I'm a comedian, I'm a jokester, so I'm saying, okay, nothing clears your brain like dying.
	You should try it.
	So anyway, no, I know.
	But quite seriously, it is not possible for me to give an accurate impression of what I perceived as the impression going through the data.
	So I could read you off all these descriptors, but you don't have my history with it, and so you don't know the way in which the descriptors lining out and the values and stuff pre-say events that will pre-say emotional responses that are indicators that there's going to be events of some serious magnitude.
	You know, I know I'm going on on it about this.
	I'm really sorry about that part of it because it's probably super redundant and isn't going to mean anything to people.
	But maybe sometime later, maybe weeks from now, somebody will listen to this and then they'll say, oh yeah, fuck.
	Now I know why my last six weeks or whatever has been the way it has, right?
	And so that will give them a perspective that they will be then able to alter their vision of what alter what they're seeing of what universe is presenting.
	And so maybe they can make some better choices as to what's happening.
	So, You know, everybody feels the tension, but if you know that there are people actively doing things to, like, say, you know, assault the Bastille, then your thinking about it is going to be more focused.
	And then you have a bunch of decisions.
	You know, do I go along with Jean-Claude and Glix and we assault the Bastille, you know, figuratively, metaphorically, or do I go do something else, whatever, right?
	So, but you are at least able to start making decisions with yourself in a plotted, so to speak, in a larger view of what's going on, as opposed to being walking along the street,
	swept up by a crowd that is coming in that is just so big and so massive and so emotionally entrained and focused and emotionally high that you just you know that you're swept along with it.
	And so I've been in those kind of situations.
	A lot of people have.
	You go to big concerts and this sort of thing.
	Is a minor tame taste of it, right?
	50, 60,000 people in a stadium, all of that kind of energy.
	This is a minor taste of what's coming up to us in terms of this period of release language.
	Now, I'm actually of the opinion that the release language is going to focus on, which makes release a lot of sense, all of the damage done by the COVID injectables.
	And so we're going to see a turn, an entire flip.
	So the iceberg is going to rotate, right?
	And all of us guys that have been on the bottom of the iceberg, now we're coming up into the air.
	Now we're going to start being able to say things that is going to be part of the overwhoo, that will have an emotional attachment to our words that we will not be able to understand in its effect on other people at the time we're uttering those words.
	So it's an issue of, you know, if you're in a really agitated mental state, then you're going to take my words a little differently than if you're not.
	And depending on that agitated mental state, some of my words may act as prompts or triggers for you to take action that I'm totally unaware of.
	And universe is just prompting me to say that particular word, you know, orangutan or tangerine or whatever the hell it is.
	It's going to set you off for your purposes, for its purposes within you.
	And I have no knowledge of that, right?
	So every that's what I'm saying.
	Everybody that's a pundit, everybody that's out there flapping their gums and wagging their tongue and spewing out words and all of that kind of stuff right now has no fucking clue of the impact of those words as we go forward once we trip past February 2nd.
	I can get into the dates and all of that kind of shit at some other point.
	It's not really meaningful.
	If you're interested in how I do it, I could maybe at some point I'll sit down with some programmers and we can discuss it and I can lay it out as though we were doing a software project.
	And if you wanted to try and emulate it, maybe you could.
	Not opposed to that.
	I'm not patenting anything.
	So I've had very bad experiences with the U.S. Patent Office.
	I've had these bad experiences for all of the patents I've had.
	I've had patents going back to 1987.
	Okay, so my first patents, my first, actually my first participatory patents were in 1985.
	Okay, I participated with groups that got patents.
	And then I started acquiring some on my own.
	And I don't do it anymore.
	Just, it's not worth the trouble.
	Because the patent office, in my opinion, is either corrupt at its core or has corrupt individuals within it that are being paid to funnel stuff to the big corpse and delay your app, your application, so that other one, someone else gets that patent.
	And that's happened to me nine times now.
	And so I just don't bother, right?
	So I've come up with other mechanisms, such as this one, for introducing my conclusions into the social order to see what happens, which is, you know, sort of a way of what the patent is supposed to do, is to protect your inserting your intellectual property into the social order where you're going to attempt to make money or whatever it is, right?
	So anyway, though, the process of my software predictions here give me a, at this stage, they're very much reduced because of the nature of the censorship and the control of the language everywhere.
	Even though Twitter has come back and Elon's doing cool shit there, there's so much about Twitter and its code and these, I guess we could say hidden, obscured, occulted algorithms that are in place that are causing behaviors that are not in the best interest of the users, but may have been in the best interest of the society controllers at the time that they were input.
	A lot of those are going to go away as you take one or two or three out, you expose others.
	A lot of them are cooperative algorithmic processing of the data.
	And so we're starting to see some of that as we go forward.
	So at this stage, I'm basically operating as though my predictions from February 2nd onward are going to be accurate and that we will have a large wave of release of tension that will come from, you know, seemingly triggered by the events of the moment.
	As we are in this period of time, I expect a very large percentage of that, maybe over 90%.
	This will be a very focused change.
	So it's not going to be like people are bitching about and release language about new rules in baseball, right?
	There may indeed be a bunch of new rules in baseball, and there may be a few individuals that are all whipped up about it, but the main focus here of the data and the descriptors is all going to the, obviously, the whole COVID injectable thing.
	And now we're in a situation where our social order, the powers that be, the evil Jews, as Rafi would characterize them, I assume, that are in control of the social order, are, well, they're sweating it, okay?
	So they're a little freaked out.
	They don't know what they're doing anymore.
	Their underpinning of support is crumbling from them.
	And they have dozens and dozens and dozens of initiatives and things they're trying to do, all this commie shit, tied into the COVID injectable.
	So the weaponization of public health never lasts long, never lasts more than say three or four years, because there is never any real public health emergency given the nature of public health in the human immune system.
	I'll get into that some other point.
	I'm actually going to be talking to somebody with extensive medical knowledge and years working in the med business as a good person, like a physician-level kind of stuff, right?
	And we'll get into it then.
	We'll get into a lot of this stuff about the nature of our species and protecting yourself and how it all works.
	So the changes that we're going to be seeing and the emotional releases that we'll be seeing focused on the vax damage are going to have a,
	it's going to be a strange kind of a, okay, my data sets in terms of how it is plotted shows it in a very odd way relative to my previous 20 plus years history with this same process.
	So usually we get like the pig in the python kind of an image when I graph this, right?
	I don't often graft it.
	I can do it with my spreadsheet program.
	I can kick out fairly sophisticated graphs and I've got some programs that help me shove the data in there and massage the stuff around in order to get a graph out, but I only do it for my own purposes occasionally.
	And I've always assumed for years and years now because of 20 years of a history with it, that I'm going to end up with this, you know, pig in a python, a big bulge of language, maybe multiple bulges.
	It might look like the back of a camel or something, or it might be lots of little bulges, but it basically bulges upward.
	This time is quite odd.
	And we're talking about the range, the spread of language, okay, the extremes on one end and the extremes on the other, and the more or less neutral middle.
	And usually in the analysis of the language, our more or less neutral middle rises to the highest part and is the sort of the focus of the seeking because that's where all of the rich language descriptors are to be found within the data set.
	I sure hope that's clear.
	So mainly I get a large Rising section within the graph, and I can go and locate the words that caused that to occur, and then I snoop around in those words to hunt for the descriptors that may be predicting the nature of certain events that would be occurring in that period of time.
	Now, so this time when I run that graph, because I wanted to do this in order to go and look at the language, but this time when I run that graph, I don't get the bulge in the middle kind, right?
	This thing looks more like a yo-yo in the sense that I have a very high bulge at both ends of the extreme and a very low middle.
	In fact, I've never seen in all I'd have to go back and re-graph some of those that I don't have kicking around just to make sure to compare.
	But I've never seen this formation in my data sets in all the time I've been running it.
	Now, that could be my own error.
	Computers help you fuck things up really badly.
	So maybe I'm just, you know, overlooked something.
	And I don't think that's the case.
	This part of the process is relatively simple, but it could happen.
	You know, sometimes you forget a file or whatever.
	I don't have the time to go back and rerun that graphing part because we're getting into this stuff tomorrow.
	But nonetheless, it's quite odd.
	And it points to the nature of the release language period maybe being dominated by conflicting or aggressively combative elements, so to speak, at each end.
	So we may find that we're going to have lots and lots and lots of people pile on to the idea that they've been damaged by the vax.
	There must be reparations.
	We've got to do things.
	We've got to stop the vax now.
	We've got to stop all the injectables, all of this stuff, right?
	So we're going to have all that kind of language as all these people express their angst, fears, anger, all of this about what's been done to them.
	So that population is turning.
	So the vaxed population is showing up with enough damage now and enough worry now that they're going to be very, very, very participatory in this next wave of reactions that we will see in the release language.
	There is probably, in my opinion, the other end of the spectrum, we're going to find a decreasing but highly vocal, a decreasing amount of people, but a very highly vocal group that are going to be trying to maintain the even strain on society focused on the COVID injectables.
	In other words, these are the people that need the lockdowns, all this kind of stuff in their mind in order to go forward.
	So, you know, it's like, why not end it now if you know you're going to end it on May 15th, that kind of thing, right?
	And so we're at that point where those people feel that they need to maintain this just so that things don't come totally unglued around them too fast.
	But all of these projected views and evaluations on where we're at are going to be, in my opinion, subsumed by the speed with which the turn takes over the populace.
	And so this is the effect I'm going to describe, okay, is how it will go through the populace, because it's not obvious.
	It's not going to be a, there's a period of time when the overwoo is simply sitting there eating on the narrow dime.
	It's just eating away gradually, just breaking off little chunks of the officialdom bullshit naradigne and replacing it with the woo, which we saw eloquently described, although he didn't understand he was doing that, in Rafi's discussion with me yesterday when he talks about his own mind becoming unhinged from its reality that the vax was good.
	Okay, there was a little brief moment when he talks about that particular aspect.
	And the emotions that you get out of his face is basically what's going to be happening to all of these people that were VAX supporters, that were weaponized medical, you know, weaponized social medical infrastructure supporters.
	And so they're going to turn.
	And the effect that we're going to get is very much like the fire in a theater kind of thing, right?
	So I've described this for years and years and years in my reports, started describing things this way back in like the 90s.
	But here's what's going to happen.
	So we're all sitting in a large theater.
	Everybody settles down.
	We're going to watch a movie.
	Maybe there's going to be a play or something.
	Everybody's attention is focused on the front.
	The lights come down.
	Everybody quiets down.
	There's that gentle little hush as we all stop fiddling with our bodies and stuff and settle in, anticipatory to the reception of whatever it is that's coming our way, movie or whatever.
	It doesn't matter to me.
	It could be concert.
	Okay, the effect is the same all the way through it.
	All of us in this large, darkened room, all anticipatory.
	And then down in a like back, about six or ten rows from the front, there's a woman there, and she sort of feels something brush up against her, up against her ankle, and she reaches down and she sort of pushes it away, right?
	It doesn't know what it is, you know, just a slight brush, an impression of something on her ankle.
	And so she brushes it away.
	And then it sort of comes back.
	Now, it's dark, she can't see.
	She has this feeling.
	Now she's starting to get a little anxious.
	What is that that's touching her?
	And so she has building tension at that stage, right?
	Because she's getting into sort of a sense of worry, potential danger.
	She doesn't know what it is.
	Our bodies are designed to provide us these clues.
	She's just reacting to her body and going along with the sensory impressions that are being provided by the experience sitting in that darkened theater with whatever the hell brushing up against her leg.
	Anyway, so at this point, we're getting close to the opening act or whatever it is, and everybody is very much more anticipatory.
	And she's getting even a little bit more anxious.
	So for the third time, something touches her in this general area of her ankle and she's brushed at it twice.
	And then she looks down.
	So she moves her leg over and pulls her skirt aside a little bit and looks down.
	And she thinks she sees a rat, okay, down by her feet, between her feet and the guy she's with.
	That's what she thinks she's seeing.
	Now, it doesn't matter that it's really the guy's scarf or one of his gloves or something that's dropped down there.
	There is no rat, but under the circumstances, with her heightened emotional input and focus on that sensory input, her mind instantly goes there.
	Boom, boom, boom.
	It's a rat.
	And so she reacts.
	So she stands up suddenly and she's going to scream.
	Well, somebody else who is paying attention to her fidgeting, a guy who happened to be watching her, because maybe she's good looking, busty, or something, and he's like three or four rows back.
	He's watching her and he sees her suddenly stand up.
	Now, he doesn't know what the hell's going on.
	He doesn't know what's triggering her, but his instant reaction is basically to stand up and shout fire.
	Okay, because he thinks that she's alarmed because there's a fire down there.
	And then just as he shouts fire, she starts screaming because of the rat, which doesn't exist.
	And of course, the whole theater goes fucking batshit.
	Everybody goes pouring out of the doors as fast as they can.
	And we have ourselves a generalized melee, people damaged, all of that kind of thing.
	So right now, we're sitting there with all of that tension, everybody getting ready to, you know, to participate, to receive whatever the hell's coming.
	And this is the way it's going to go.
	And so he, so, so, at this stage, we're getting into the, we've got to get us a hang on, I'm doing some tricky driving here.
	Got to get us out of this emotional tension thing.
	And it's going to be pouring out rapidly.
	And it's going to be all about, in my opinion, the public health weaponization.
	Okay, guys, sorry on the briefness of this.
	I had some other stuff to cover.

▲