Clif High - Tiny AI - Transcript

Jan. 23, 2023 - Clif High

14:37

Tiny AI

Smart & decentralized https://purebulk.com/products/clif-highs-pure-sleep https://knowledgeofhealth.com/what-if-cancer-was-already-cured/ https://clifhigh.substack.com/

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	Yes, I know about that.
	Get out of the way.
	There we go.
	Oops, nope, there we don't go.
	There we go.
	okay Alright.
	So today's 23rd.
	And we're gonna start out I shouldn't have written on that, I guess.
	start out over here Okay, so this is about tiny AI.
	Now, stuff like uh chat GPT, that's gigantic huge AI.
	It's a huge database, it's tied into the internet, uh, it can grow itself larger, looking for specific subjects, it aggregates um searches and smooshes them into its general algorithms where it sort of learns over time.
	Um but that's gigantic AI, okay, and that's probably about the biggest AI we can make at the moment.
	I've uh there's no such thing as a general AI yet.
	Okay, um AI meaning artificial intelligence, meaning a computer program, meaning software working through one of these machines, um that can interact with you and make you uh think that it's passing the Turing test, which is to pretend to be a human, be a mind as opposed to a replicant that you get out of the um the PC hardware.
	So PCs don't create, no software is ever created, no uh AI has ever created.
	The only thing they can do is use the algorithms that are in built.
	There's no uh spark of creativity, uh, there's no uh genuine newness, it's simply joining stuff that's already existent.
	So uh chat AP chat uh GPT would be um uh extremely boring if there were only two people on the planet because it's using those two people's minds as the feed.
	You know, we're presuming the third mind that wrote it died, right?
	And so uh so it depends on the humans.
	Now big AI is um is feasible, but vastly expensive under our current situation with our current technology just because of the issues of uh concurrency and latency in retrieval of information and then the ability to store information in a meaningful fashion that could be retrieved.
	So right now we are unable to catalog all of the internet, right?
	Uh is there's just too much shit out there for any um single um search engine uh to categorize it all, and it just changes too rapidly too much.
	And so uh this is a uh a function of the multiplicity of the number of individuals that we've got on the planet.
	Now, within the computer world, there's a um there's the big giant AI approach, and then there's all kinds of people that are trying to do things that are called variously machine learning, and the machine does not learn uh because you uh the machine simply aggregates uh information, and then using the algorithms that are initially set up within the software, it does stuff to that information.
	And machine learning more often than not is thought of as little tiny uh bits of computer program that can combine themselves in their interaction around a central um theme of data and produce something for you.
	Sometimes people think it's creative, uh but it's not.
	If the data didn't exist that way, then these machines could not have come up with this display for you of that of that approach, And basically that display is hard-coded into how the coding was written for that little element that is the core of the machine learning.
	And variously the machine learners call them cells or automata, any number of different things, right?
	To indicate the little tiny bits of computer program.
	And then there's always some larger computer program that controls how these things interact.
	And it's a you know deterministic software, just like we have in everything else.
	Now, there's a lot of people that, or not a lot, there is some small element of people within the uh computing world that uh, and then in the general normie population, because of the movies, because of the uh Cazarian mafia um mind control within the movies and the media, they think of as AI as evil, right?
	Now, large AI, in my opinion, will always go psychotic.
	It'll always ultimately go psychotic.
	It's just a question of how long, how long it takes to reach that point where it basically becomes psychotic upon itself, and it's not aware, it has no knowledge, it's there's nothing there, it's just software that uh due to the progression of the nature of the data and how emotions come through in words will always head that direction, in my opinion.
	You know, and I could be wrong.
	Maybe they can engineer a different way to um to approach this.
	Anyway, um so here's the thing.
	Uh the machine learning approach is little tiny guys that that happenstance, so to speak, uh, would throw together to create, it's not really create, to um produce a new result.
	Now, uh the newness, the novelty is factual.
	Uh you have a a uh newness and a novelty in the output relative to yourself, relative to uh what your expectations were and what you could have envisioned at the start, as opposed to being a regular kind of a programmer where you have this idea in your head and you want to go from A to Z, and you know what Z looks like when you start in on A. Okay.
	With machine learning, you don't necessarily know it's good to stop at Z. Anyway, so we progress with the idea that there's basically um centralization, big AI, and um the idea that you can control everything, and that any time something new pops up, you just need to hook into it a new level of control and feed that back to your ultimate control mechanism.
	And of course, we can all see that what happens there under those circumstances is that you have a s uh a simple control mechanism that works.
	It commands five or six different uh uh subunits, and then each of those subunits start replicating command structure in the main unit as they take on all their own subunits, to the point that uh at some point your central command structure no longer has any effective control,
	because there's too many layers and too many potential points to break in the in the control of the minutiae, right?
	Of the actual minion particles, the little tiny bits way out at the end.
	And so you get this generalized breakdown that we're living through now.
	We've been living through it because the Cazarian mafia does not grasp that uh there is a point at which centralized control, doesn't even have to be AI, but centralized control, even with the support of AI, becomes too large to work.
	And we see this in China.
	If China centralized control functioned, and we can just say prior to COVID, okay, prior to all that shit, so just 2018 backwards, if the CCP really had control, uh, and and their centralized control uh approach was working, then why did they have a quarter of a million riots every year in which a policeman was injured and police were called out?
	Uh, you know, that's not no matter how many population you have, a quarter of a million riots a year, uh, is not an indication of an effective functioning control system, good, bad, or indifferent, right?
	You could have a bland and different control system, and if you had 250,000 riots a year, you're still not a good control system.
	Uh you can have an evil uh control system, and then you can expect the 250,000 riots a year, but it goes not to the evil part, but it goes to your control.
	It means you don't have the control you think you do.
	And then you could have a nominally good control system that still had the quarter of a million riots a year, and it goes to both the nature of the control and the control itself.
	There being the control not working, as with the evil system, but here with the supposedly good system, uh you expect a good outcome.
	You expect the participants to be uh, you know, non-uh personally motivated, uh more egalitarian, you know, uh that sort of thing, more populous, but even then it appears that they're wrong, right?
	And so that's all right.
	So now just as an aside, that's what the left is gonna say about themselves and COVID.
	So we're starting to see the turn in the big ugly uh now, where a lot of people or some small people, or some of a small number of people, but with high profiles, are starting to come out and say, I got the jab and I'm really pissed about it.
	You know, I'm upset, my heart's failing, I'm not doing good.
	You know, even Elon Musk said he had a couple of bad days, he thought he was dying.
	And um, this kind of thing.
	Now, uh, and aside to this aside, is how long will it take these guys to understand they must do remediation?
	There there is and will be permanent damage.
	Maybe they can uh uh forestall or or uh diminish some of it, right?
	Uh so in other words, they've got to grasp there was evil intent.
	There was never good intent on this.
	This is not a fuck up.
	So the aside here that I was mentioning is that the left is gonna say, oh, we just fucked up.
	Okay, it was never evil intent.
	We were good government, we just fucked up.
	Um we're human, air to error is human, right?
	No, so this this part is it was evil government disguising itself, pretending to be good government, intending all along to create genocide.
	All governments eventually do that.
	Genocide their own populations.
	Um sad uh but true.
	And so that's that's as an aside, that's what the left is gonna do.
	They're gonna uh feign uh that they were stupid, that they got this wrong, but they had good intent and tried the best with the science and all of that.
	We know that's horseshit.
	You got Greta out there with all that shit.
	And also we can see the Kazarian mafia trying to manipulate everything through their propaganda.
	So it, you know, it's kind of like, guys, we can see you're doing this shit.
	Don't you think you ought to stop now?
	You know, it's wearing quite thin.
	Anyway, so um.
	This is has been the largest psychological operation ever because of so many countries being involved.
	It's like on the order of World War II.
	World War II was a giant psyop.
	Um, uh, you know, real war and stuff, but not because not for the reasons that the normies were told, not for the reasons that the normies died for, all of that, right?
	Um again, yet another Cazarian mafia operation on that scale.
	So World War II, just like World War One, uh the sinking of the Titanic, all this kind of shit.
	All of these big operations are the Cazarian Mafia.
	Now the Cazarian Mafia was attempting to use this particular time to finish the deal, to wrap it all up, seal us up, tie the bow and put it tight, and we're in the sack.
	Uh it didn't work.
	Okay, they were trying to take over the planet and it didn't work.
	It's failing.
	It's failing rapidly now.
	We're getting to the point where we've got the, as I said, in the aside, we've got people that are regretting uh having fallen for the scam.
	They're starting to talk about it.
	This is the beginning of that language erupting.
	As that language grows, those normies that are also in that same situation where their mind is saying, What the fuck have I done to myself?
	Uh those guys, there's going to be a number of them that are going to get uh predictably there is a number of these individuals, uh, some unknown number at this stage, who will um take it very personally and attempt to seek uh retribution and vengeance.
	So we're getting into that period of time, right?
	Uh I think it's justified, right?
	If someone had tricked me into a uh taking a shot and I had heart failure, I think I might use my last month of my life to work my way up the chain as much as I could, that sort of thing.
	Um Anyway, you know, uh, your enemy killing you, that that's especially slow like this.
	Anyway, so here's the thing.
	Uh the Kazarian Mafia, their goal is centralized control of the planet.
	This is the goal that was uh left them by the L, the aliens that they interacted with in um Yemen uh before they moved them to uh Judea.
	Okay, now that's where the L was.
	The Khazarians at that time were up here in Turkey.
	Um the Kazarians have never been down into uh none of the Khazarians, none of the Jews are in the people in the Bible.
	The L, though, uh, were in both places.
	So we see the the L down here being referenced in the Bible, uh, all of this stuff, Moses, all these people, none of whom are Jews, and uh they spoke Hebrew, they were the the uh Hebrewites, if you want.

▲