All Episodes
Oct. 4, 2022 - Clif High
33:35
Dread

https://purebulk.com/products/clif-highs-pure-sleep TMs popping off all over. Academy going down. Deflation Cryptos

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans, hello humans.
It's Tuesday, the 4th of October.
It's Tuesday, 4th of October.
Let's put that up there.
Ah, crud.
you guys gonna fall I'm in the process of um cleaning up massively and getting things ready for the more active period coming rest of this month through into like June, July of next year, and and beyond.
I've got some um uh decent temporal markers at the moment that um allow me to make some projections now.
I'm disappointed at one level, get into that in a second, but um uh okay, so uh 2022, 2023, 2024.
Alright.
There's only a little bit left in 2022.
Okay, so uh I had suspected for a number of reasons, and actually because I wanted it to happen before I died, that we would get the space aliens um showing up in the um uh 2020 or 2021 or 2022.
It didn't happen, right?
We've had more activity, there's been the burbling, we've had some minor temporal markers along the way, but we haven't had the major ones that I've been expecting out of the ALTA reports.
Uh however, uh those temporal markers for the disclosure for space aliens were bound up in a much larger set.
That much larger set had many, many, many more temporal markers.
Many of those are showing up right now and happening.
Uh so the dread part of this is seen from the World Economic Forum viewpoint.
Their whole shebang is coming apart right now.
Everything from money all the way up through uh all of their layers of abstractions that they place on society and try and control us with.
All of those are breaking down and um and coming apart.
One of the major ones, one that I've been looking for, uh, has been academia, academia, right?
The Academy of Arts and Science, or ass and shit, as it's come become to know.
Um, so the Academy is breaking down because uh and we know that this is occurring, the the this is a major temporal marker, and this is a temporal marker had some aspects and attributes to it, including uh the dropping of population in USA colleges, uh higher education, we'll just put uni for university.
Okay, so the the population is dropping, that's showing up, and now the major uh one that is gonna lead to the breakdown of colleges uh of the academy totally is the peer review process is breaking down.
Now, bear in mind I have always objected to this, okay.
Uh it is a process uh whereby, and I've actually been through this uh in some of the academic journals relative to computers, okay, and so the process is that you write an article, you got a good thought, you want to promote it, uh, you write an article and you submit it to a journal.
And that journal takes that article, copies it 10, 12, 20 times, however many times, and mails it out to all these bastards, and then waits for them to respond, and then some time after that they decide if they're gonna publish it and get to it.
So that might take a year or two years.
I was doing this with uh academic uh journal in computing back in I want to say 81.
The journal had been it was in German, it had been um uh converted over From uh I won't go into the details, but nonetheless, it took like two years to get an article published, and by the time the article was published, it was a completely out of date, right?
In the fast-paced world of developing computer science at that point.
And it had been totally superseded, and it really bummed me out over the whole process.
It just took forever.
I had to keep dumbing it down and dumbing it down in order that it passed the peer review process, which convinced me it's a stupid thing to let the most stupid person in the group decide what can be published.
And in fact, there may be some validity to only publishing those articles that everybody disagrees with, right?
That everybody's bitching at for whatever reason, right?
Because there's probably something there.
If it's irritating your mind, there's probably something there.
Anyway, though, so the peer review process is right now it's breaking down.
We've got a uh major journal that's pulling journal publisher that's pulling 500 articles because of irregularities.
Okay, we'll we'll call this irregularities exactly what it is corruption.
Okay, so later on in my working career, I encountered the corruption of the peer review process through the academy while I was working at Microsoft.
All right, so uh Microsoft was known in the early days as the cult of the smart.
Okay.
And you got in there with meetings, you would have technical meetings in which there were just literally people would come to blows over technical issues.
Big tables, 20, 30 people in there yelling and jumping up and down, various factions want to do the code this way, other people want to do it that way, longer planning, all these different things that intrude, big fights.
But in my way of thinking, at least it was there, it was done, it was not this uh cult of the stupid process, which is the peer review, right?
The Cult of the Stupid.
The Cult of the Stupid.
Okay, so the cult of the stupid did not exist in the early days in Microsoft.
Unfortunately, they had something almost as bad, which was their own internal um extra company politics.
So I started working for Microsoft in like 83, 84, something like that, as a subcontractor.
Um even they were pushing all this wokonian stuff, and there was a lot of business decisions that were made uh absolutely against business logic for a political reason on the outside of the company that that us on the inside could not uh see and would not were not told about.
And some of these business decisions were in the category of really fucking stupid, but we did them anyway, because that's what we were told, right?
But but the good part about Microsoft was that they had a culture that did not support um academia in the in this particular part of the process, although most of the people were academics, in the sense that I was a rarity.
I had no college degree, and I was working with people that had advanced PhD degrees in multiple disciplines.
I worked with a guy that had seven PhDs, and he was a youngster, had spent his entire life in school.
He was like maybe I was older, okay, so I was like 10 years older than most of the people I worked with, at a bare minimum.
Sometimes 15 to 20 years older, depending on which project I was put in.
Um, because youth had a tendency to gravitate towards specific projects.
But in any event, though, so um uh this guy was he was younger than me.
Uh he had a um uh you know it wasn't stupid or anything, but he had a particular um uh political uh position uh within the structure of things, and uh well it's gonna get too complicated if I explain that, but basically here's the deal.
Uh I encountered the peer review process through individuals at Microsoft, even though Microsoft Did not promote or or um uh uh their internal process in no way uh went along with the cult of the stupid.
They were all inculcated into it so that all of the people that were there, all these people in the multiple degrees, you know, six and seven PhDs and and in college until they're in their in their mid-30s, and I was only like uh, you know, four or five years older than this guy at that point.
Um and all they'd ever done was college and this sort of thing, so all they ever thought was they thought in terms of this cult of the stupid approach, right?
And we would get in there and I'd jump up and down and I'd say, Well, fuck you, blah, blah, blah.
I don't accept your credentials, I don't accept your credentialism because I can prove my code works, because I wouldn't go into the meeting without checking it, right?
And I was a really good C coder and a really good assembly language coder, so I could do things down and still can at a very low level within the machine, and demonstrate to these people, yes, I was correct.
Anyway, though, so um so the academic review process.
I get my article published, but it had to be uh dumbed down.
Later on, they came back to me.
I had them uh wrote a three-part article for him on SQL Server.
Uh and um they published it without peer review at that stage because things were moving too fast.
They just couldn't do the peer review process.
And they'd started opening this house, this publishing house had started opening up other journals for um uh uh taking advantage of the speed of development within the academic or within the the working computing environment.
Anyway, back to academia.
So the guys I'm working with at Microsoft, even though we're having fierce knockdown down fights that that basically are anti-peer review, right?
Because the in this case, these fights, the smartest person with the loudest fucking voice and the most compelling arguments and and the most strong personality would win.
You had to have all four.
So you'd get women in there that were brilliant, but they didn't have the uh aggressive personality necessary to um get their idea across, and so they would fall by the wayside technically, right?
Or you'd also find people that were very brilliant but extremely shy and couldn't get their ideas across.
And so uh those ideas would not survive.
And so this was a battle of the of the fittest.
This was evolutionary computing uh thought happening right there.
It was the evolution of the thought happening in the moment uh during those days in the 80s and the 90s, right?
Now even though these guys are inculcated in it, but not practicing it, they still wanted to have this happen.
So all these guys I was working with, all these PhD fellows, were writing articles for peer-reviewed uh computing magazines and some ancillary magazines as well, uh journals, and they were um uh trying to get him published.
Well, uh long process, it's daunting, you know, most of them fall by the wayside.
I think that this one journal I heard about at the time was getting six or seven hundred submissions a month, and this is before generalized acceptance of computers, so a lot of them were actually typed out or printed out on paper and mailed in.
Uh, and was only publishing like four a year.
Uh so not very many at all, right?
Anyway, though, so I run into the the process of the corruption that is that hit the review peer review process.
And I'm gonna say I'm gonna say it was 87.
Okay, something like that, 1987.
1987.
So it had been going on forever that it was established, and I ran into it then.
Never dawned on me that the peer review process was corrupted and corruptible, and you could get beyond it relatively easy.
Now there's these 500 articles being pulled by this uh peer review journal uh publishing house because of errors in the process, right?
Well, the errors are actually corruption, because in 1987, I I was working at Microsoft where a guy literally, as a Microsoft employee, he was an employee, I was a subcontractor, and he had Buku books, he'd been there, he had a very low employee number, right?
It's like in the three or four or five hundreds, something like that.
So he'd been there a long time, and he had Buku bucks, and he just bought.
He just went around and bribed the fuckers that were holding up his um uh article, and it got published.
So he found out who The list of people were talked to them all, found out who the ones that were objecting, and he and he paid them off.
And they published it.
So, okay.
So much for you know, uh truth and science and stuff, right?
And and I happen to think that his article, while it had two or three good little points in it, um, was seriously flawed.
Uh I thought that there was a uh technical reason that that it was flawed, and in reality, when we get into the networking now, because this is way back when and it was projecting into the future, which we're we've now passed.
Indeed, his f the flaw showed up, and had we actually gone his route, it wouldn't have worked.
But we would have known that soon enough and abandon it.
Anyway, though, so our peer review process is failing.
The journal is pulling 500 articles, going back long fucking time.
Just last week, we see uh Brett Weinstein and Heather Haying in their uh podcast um of this past week discussing how you cannot trust peer-reviewed uh articles and journals anymore.
There's no scientific journal out there that is trustworthy.
The Lancet is killing people because of the shit they published.
Uh, medical journals.
Um New England Journal of Medicine.
You name any fucking publication, and I can root through there and show you where there's corruption and where it should have been published that should not have been, and I bet you there was money behind it.
This is part of the dread that's affecting the World Economic Forum, right?
The mother wefers.
These mother wefers have dread now, because their dollar money scheme is breaking down.
Um we've got uh the temporal markers showing up, and I think they're aware that some of these temporal markers, as I am, are very key uh points in our journey.
And the mother wefers are worried, they've got dread now because we also have the dreaded deflation showing up, right?
Get into that in a second.
Okay, so I think deflation is going to be a phenomenon of the latter half of 2023 and all of 2024.
So we'll have deflation at that time.
We actually have it showing up here now, very minor way.
Uh, it'll accelerate through, and and I think it'll be visible from like let's say June onward at a at a serious level.
Deflation is the central bank killer.
Uh deflation can be thought of as the inability to print money and have it accepted.
That's the easiest way to look at it, right?
Uh, there's all different kinds of technical descriptions for it uh relative to financial systems and so on, but at a at a monetary level, if you have sound money, you don't need currency.
Uh you have a tendency to spend currency use.
There's a rule out there that says you spend the crappiest money you've got first.
And so if I've got uh gold, silver, cryptos, and dollars, I'm gonna get rid of dollars, you know, and I'm gonna save the gold and the cryptos and so on.
Uh the dread for the WEF is escalating very rapidly, and today we have all these temporal markers showing up that are relative to my uh disclosure um uh UFO kind of stuff.
So the UFO kind of stuff had always shown up in the reports as being in the summer, and I had and bec for certain reasons I thought maybe it was 2020, 2021 or 2022.
It's probably gonna be 2024.
Okay, I don't think we're gonna get the major uh UFO thing next year.
I think it'll show up here.
Uh actually, let's just move that over ever so slightly, and we'll just say August of 2024 should be the UFO appearance.
I'm saying that now because of the temporal markers that we've got showing up here now.
Okay, this uh academy breaking down is serious, it's gonna disrupt the uh the tenure system, the hiring system, the corruption in the colleges, it's gonna contribute to the further breakdown of the population in colleges and universities here in the United States because of the corrupted nature of them.
Why would you uh go to a corrupt institution, end up with vast quantities of debt for a degree that does not get you anything when you learn that the institution and the people teaching you are corrupt enough to have bribed other people in order to get into that position to where they can claim authority to teach, right?
So if so I you know I don't give any money from this, I don't need money, I'm not motivated by my money.
Um if I want money, I can make money.
Uh so it's not a problem for me, but it would make a difference to everybody watching my videos if you found out I was being paid by you know Kellogg's or you know, or or um Winston tobacco or something, right?
I mean, some being paid by somebody to do this.
I'm not.
So uh so you can at least accept it that I have no monetary um, I'm not trying to make money off of you watching this from that viewpoint.
I want you to buy pure sleep if you need to sleep, but that's my only commercial activity here, right?
It works.
I discovered it I when I was uh coming out of the cancer problems, and I thought to pass it on to everybody.
And there's people that are are making this here, and they deserve the support of being able to sell it and keep their jobs and you know, and that kind of thing, right?
So so I promote the pure sleep, and I'm very proud of it.
It it really fucking works, and you don't have melatonin hangovers.
But in any event, though, so the corruption in the colleges is going to appear, and it will appear in such a way as to cause huge problems for those people that are attempting to sign up and go to college, right?
So there's a lot of different reasons for going to college, and but if you ever come up to one of them that's saying, Oh, I'm gonna get a degree and so on and make money, well, no, fuck that.
That's gonna go by the wayside across these three years here, the remainder of this year and these these next two.
The the deflation that we're gonna have a period of massive hyperinflation that will occupy us through here.
Um through the first half of uh the year here.
We'll still have hyperinflation in some things, even though we're gonna be entering a deflationary period.
We actually have the dreaded D word showing up here now in a small way, right?
The deflation appearing now, you can uh look at and find uh locally by looking around at things like housing prices and um uh used goods.
Okay.
So uh when people move from one house to another, there's a uh process of shedding some level of of crap you've accumulated.
And the amount of crap that you've accumulated that's in circulation is the used goods market.
Uh, when people die, there's an infusion of crap that has to be sold off.
Now we're finding that the great die-off has impacted housing.
It's not just the interest rates going up that's dampening the housing demand.
Uh there are uh serious measurable and noticeable trends in the real estate market demand that are suggesting that we're in the early days of a major, major downtrend for uh real estate demand because of people dying off and the types of uh and the kind of people that are dying off.
So in my family now, in the extended family, uh there are uh three out of four um parents and and stepparents uh that are deadly ill from being vaxxed.
So three out of four.
Uh I've talked to other old people, right?
I know more old people than I know young people.
Uh I Talk more with old people than young people as a rule.
And all the old people I know are in the same situation where they have relatives of theirs or friends of theirs, and uh those people's relatives who are dying off as a result of the vax.
It's also neurological problems hitting really hard, and in old people, it's raging cancers just a few months after the injections.
And like they were saying, you're 133 times more likely to get myocarditis if you've had all four shots than if you've had none.
So, you know, I don't know why they keep doing this, other than the mother wefers want to keep killing people.
But that killing people is starting to work, it's starting to produce deflation.
I I don't know that these people understood that what deflation was gonna do to their power base, because it's just gonna erode it right away.
In deflation, you have fewer dollars chasing goods, so the price of goods drop.
They don't want us using their resources, but at the same time, they must have inflation at a serious level just in order to maintain their power and their ability to control the system.
If we so you can think about it this way, we're all in the WEF boat at the moment of central banking, and the central banking has a power source, which is the printing of money that it's spewing out the ass end of the boat in order to drive us down the stream.
And one thing you need to know if you don't have speed greater than the current, you can't control, you can't steer.
Okay, you have to be moving faster than the current in a moving body of water in order to have uh and this is not true out in the ocean.
If you get stuck in a current that's moving faster than your boat, you cannot steer.
Um you're at the mercy of the current, right?
And so the WEF has got us in a boat, and the way that they keep us moving is that they shove out lots of money out the ass end of this boat to give us propulsion.
Only now we're in a period of time where the they've got very little oomph in their money, so we're not getting much for our uh for the amount of effort, and we're sort of slowing down as a result of all of this.
They're having to hyper hyperinflate in order to, or or super print in order to cause massive inflation in order to keep any motion forward, and deflation is the inability to for that money to be accepted, and all of a sudden, in a deflationary environment, you have no steerage, you cannot control.
You're a hundred percent at the mercy of the deflationary currents, and that's what these fuckers are dreading.
It just suddenly dawned on them or something, I don't know.
It's always been uh um an assumed in my frame of reference uh uh aspect of the the die-off is deflation.
All these old people are dying, all their shit's got to be sold.
There's a lot of other people that are dying, all of their shit's got to be sold.
Too much shit in the market means that the prices are being dropped.
Same thing is true of all of the housing, these people's houses have to be sold, and the market is falling because and also because there's no bank uh intervention pumping up um free money to get people to buy the houses and take on debt and so on.
So we've got a confluence of events that's gonna just crash the real estate market down to 1930s kind of levels.
I mean, totally destroy it.
Uh, you can think, you know, uh Japan and the early um 19 late 80s and early 90s when they hit their big real estate problem.
So we'll have have that.
We'll have commercial real estate, which is already in the shitter, uh get worse.
All of this is going to happen as we are having deflation.
In deflation, okay.
So now also the mother wefers have a problem because today Russia, uh, the Roost people have announced that they're all okay with cryptos for any industry.
Okay, so Russians will allow any any industry to s to buyer trade in cryptos.
And uh basically what they're saying is they're figuring out a way to tax the business activity of the stuff within cryptos without intruding on the crypto process.
And uh, and they're I've read some of their stuff, and it's it looks like a workable.
Anyway, though, so um this is another problem for the WEF.
All right, we're getting away from their their uh bleeding currency that's bleeding out now in deflation, but they're gonna still still have to to essentially Try and hyperinflate.
Bear in mind here, too.
In 1930 or 1932, so 1932 to 1933.
So 100 years ago, minus 10.
So we've got an episode of bonds crashing, okay.
And that's what brought us into the Great Depression.
We're at that point now with all of the other bonds that we've got here.
So our bonds are crashing, and we've got it getting a 90 year echo off of the uh the combination of the bonds and the uh uh degradation of the money, the debasing of the money has contributed to where we're at now, all of the quintrillions of uh derivatives and all of that shit is not helping.
And okay, so the dread for the WEF comes from the breakdown of their control structures in the form of the Academy of Arts and Sciences, their peer review, their ability to censor what's getting printed, and so on and so on.
It's it's breaking down from the effect that we're all leaving the dollar, that we're now starting to see deflation show up here relative to many different local environments.
That's not good for them.
They can't fight deflation in 1932 and 1933.
They rated safety deposit boxes in banks across the nation using the FBI and federal marshals.
They seized gold, and uh they left you a little piece of paper in there that said we've taken your gold coins.
Uh it's illegal for you to have them now, referencing this particular act that of um Congress that they had done.
And then they uh caused inflation by taking the price of gold from uh $20.35 up to uh $35.
I think it was actually 32 something initially, uh, but it settled at 35.
So they created inflation to to artificially in gold in order to come over and try and deal with deflation.
I think that they will uh try that again.
I don't think it's gonna be the Federal Reserve, I think it'll be China for a lot of different reasons.
Uh now that Russia has put a peg of gold under energy sales and everything in our life relates to energy.
Um it is a fallacy, it is a fantasy, it is a psychopathic lie from the mother wefers that humans cause climate change and that we need to get off of uh of diesel, right?
Uh that's another another video to get into that.
I gotta get some work done here anyway.
So uh, but this is where we're at.
Uh everything runs on energy, everything on the whole planet runs on a price of a barrel of oil.
The uh WEF Biden regime, all of these motherfuckers trying to get you into green energy or trying to kill you off because they're trying to deprive you of energy, and they're trying to uh sell the normies on the idea that humans in some way somehow cause uh weather to change, and which is you know 100% horseshit.
But in any event, so here we are at these primary temporal markers.
The academy is failing, and it's coming out in a big way as the peer review journal uh has to wrestle with the corruption of the cult of the stupid uh being bribable, right?
We've got other T temporal markers showing up as the population in colleges is way down, and uh advanced booking, so to speak, for 2023 is way the fuck down, even more so than 2022.
So people are starting to wise up or running into money issues, etc.
Uh, we've got the deflation and uh we've got the cryptos showing up.
Uh these are all huge temporal markers relative to silver, okay.
And so silver, I suspect in 2023 is gonna be the the year of the silver activity.
Um this will be a price rise, and I think it will be in relation to what's going to be happening to gold relative to what China needs to do with the with the price of gold.
Anyway, guys, that's where we're at at the moment.
It's gonna be a um uh very interesting period of time.
Uh, rest of this year and these next two years.
I don't suspect we're gonna get the UFOs until August of 2024.
So I'll kind of chill out about that.
It could happen in 2023, depending on how rapidly we get to the food riots and that sort of thing.
Uh and that it's still again that still looks more for 2024, but it's gonna be a rough couple of years.
But on the other hand, as we see that with the breakdown of this kind of stuff here with the uh Academy of Ass and shit, uh arts and sciences, and the universities, as that breaks down, the mother wefers lose a huge level of control, and uh their indoctrination system breaks down completely.
So this is all good.
So we're we're winning, things are good, but this is part of the big ugly, as you can see, it's gonna get uglier, and um the best thing that one can do is to follow the trend.
In this case, the trend is your friend.
I actually expect that cash and dollars temporarily will strengthen, and they'll strengthen relative globally to other currencies, but only other currencies, they won't strengthen relatively against gold and silver, nor cryptos.
So, so you know, in that sense, it'd be better to have uh an American dollar than uh a peso or a euro, but it wouldn't be better to have than silver or gold or cryptos, and that's just the developing world that we're in.
Anyway, guys, uh these are gonna be few and far between the videos.
I've just got tons of stuff trying to get all this crap cleaned up and get my biodigester into the greenhouse and all this other stuff going uh to complete, get ready for winter because we're gonna have a fairly harsh winter.
Export Selection