Clif High - dojo->faith

April 28, 2022 - Clif High

50:01

dojo->faith

discussion of the up coming global test of faith first tongue http://www.viewzone2.com/expo2002.html http://www.viewzone.com/negev/z.html

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans.
	Damn.
	Hello, humans.
	Hello, humans.
	Machine's giving me issues.
	It's April 27th, and this is an interesting discussion to me, anyway, because we're going to talk about current events, but also future events and how we're all going to have to react to them.
	So most humans who are religious, in my opinion, have never examined the nature of their own religion and their interaction with it.
	Okay?
	So we see things like in religions, you'll see, like in Christian religions, they say, putting on the armor of God.
	Okay.
	Now, bear in mind.
	Okay, all right, so, all right, so what does that mean?
	What does it mean to put on the armor of God?
	How is that a thing in reality?
	Is that to be taken and understood as mentally shaping your thoughts in a particular way, holding a particular thought, getting willpower, getting determination.
	It doesn't really, when you start reading into it, it does not really come across quite like that, right?
	Because they say that these people that have the, if you read through all of the various different texts and stuff, and you see it in other religions as well, notably in Brahmanism, okay, they're big on faith.
	They're big on faith as an adjunct to a human, almost an app, so to speak, right?
	And you take this on, and you put on the mantle, you put on the armor, you put on the cloak, all of these words about becoming embraced by something that is supportive of your self and your efforts and so on.
	Okay, so in that sense, if you start getting into faith, you're going to get in the description of what is this, the religions will take you down all these windy holes and they'll show you different analogs and metaphors and similes for faith.
	They'll try and define it in such a way that you become comfortable with this idea that is basically, as far as they're concerned, after the word salad, it is indefinable.
	If you have faith, you know you have faith.
	If you don't have faith, you may not know it, but you may.
	You know, it's possible.
	No, I have no faith in anything, right?
	Blah, blah, blah.
	And so you don't have faith.
	So that means, if we examine this, people discuss it in such a way as they would have faith the way that I would hold this box, right?
	They would have something that is external to them that they can then take into themselves and have faith.
	And then they become different.
	They become transmuted.
	They become transmogrified.
	They literally change.
	This is the idea of faith.
	If you get into all of these words about it, as I say, word salads, you find that they try and describe it innumerable different ways, right?
	Especially if you start getting into the really deep stuff in Catholicism, even in Judaism, right?
	They'll discuss faith and so on.
	But I've got a relatively simple definition and a simple approach.
	Could be 100% wrong, but it sort of works for me, right?
	And faith is something that you know you have when you experience it.
	Faith can be derived from a number of different sources, okay?
	So we have to examine it that way.
	Faith comes from somewhere.
	Faith is created within you.
	The idea is that, you know, while they say, Wrap yourself in the cloak of faith.
	And that's the same phrase.
	If you go through and look at the translations and transliterations, you get this same phrase saying, wrap yourself in the armor of God.
	Now, the armor of God thing came in in like the 1100s.
	We first see it in places where they actually had metal armor as a defensive or tough leather armor as a defensive mechanism against arrows and projectiles, stones, and that sort of thing.
	That's the first time that we see this phrase.
	So armor had to exist before we get the phrase, right?
	But all of these things say that you put it on.
	You literally put it on like a garment.
	And so-and-so wears his faith like a cloak, wears his faith like a garment.
	He's comfortable in the garment of his faith.
	You'll find all of these lots of mer German or Danish or Dutch, Old English, this kind of thing.
	So they were discussing faith back in like 900s up to 1200s in a particular way that we don't see much anymore.
	And this really dates from Hellenistic thought.
	So pre-Platonic, pre-Plato, Greek thought had a really good discussion of, or a really good understanding of faith in my understanding of things.
	And the pre-Plato Greeks, and even Plato, he understood faith to be this way, and discusses this with others in the various writings.
	But faith was understood to be manifest within the body.
	Okay, so something comes along and creates faith that manifests in the body.
	And then the Greeks, who were influenced by all of the civilizations to the east of them, which included those that had deep roots in the Sanskrit, where they really went into this stuff,
	the Brahministic areas, India, Kashmir, you know, all the way up into the stands, they had an understanding of faith as a physical thing within the body.
	This physical thing, if you read into the descriptions there and into the Greek, maps very close to the vagus nervous system.
	So those individuals that had faith may also end up having ecstatic, uplifting experiences that are personality shattering and go towards ecstasy in the Greek understanding of ecstasy, okay?
	The ecstatic vision, you can't control it.
	It could be induced by a drug.
	They would actually try and duplicate ecstasy via drugs and inhalation of gases, all different kinds of things, the mysteries that Elysium, you'd drink psychedelics and it was all controlled and so on.
	They'd kill you if you use this stuff outside of the ritual.
	But they were attempting to recreate ecstasy, right?
	To recreate the idea that you had something manifest in you that made you feel very powerful and you knew was not you.
	It's not your ordinary state of being.
	You'd walk around and you can walk around in faith, but that's an extraordinary state of being.
	Most people that walk around in faith in the active sense, the dynamic sense, the manifestation sense, not the late Christian, you know, recent Christian idea of faith as somehow as a thought.
	These people in the old days were discussing faith as an actual feeling, like something vibrating you.
	There's all these words about vibration, about the sparks going down through your arms, the hairs rising up off your body, the hairs on the back of your neck standing out, your skin swelling, the blood pumping, all of these things.
	So if you look at their discussion of faith in that period of time, and you read the Old English and you read, even in Codex Oralinda, you'll see references to this, right?
	In 800 AD, they were discussing these effects that were quite common in humans, common enough to be reported on, discussed openly, etc.
	And so you'd say, oh, wow, I had a faith episode last night, right?
	Now, in those days, you didn't necessarily tie faith in with a Godhead, with an omniscient, omnipresent kind of a thing, right?
	Faith was known to have a number of possible causes, of sources, one of which was spirit, as they describe it.
	That which animates, animate, that which moves matter.
	Because we're qualitatively different as humans from lumps of rock, all right?
	I know people that are like lumps of rock, but they breathe, and rocks don't breathe the same way humans do.
	So humans are qualitatively different.
	What makes them different is the animus, the movement of matter by way of spirit, the non-corporeal.
	So something, usually non-corporeal, introduces faith, which is a non-corporeal thing, but has a quantitatively assayable corporeal component.
	In the sense that when people are in the midst of faith, you can observe it as an outside observer.
	This is a complicated subject, and I'm going around and about because I need to get into some various different aspects of it.
	But I have seen, I have witnessed people being in a faith state, all right?
	Where they're all charged up, they're all spiked up on stuff.
	And we would call this in Aikido.
	We would call this a big key state, right?
	Your body is just flowing with that animus, with the key energy.
	And you have faith, you are in a midst of a faith episode when that is happening to you, even though there's not necessarily a religious component to it.
	So you could have that same faith, that same effect, you know, the flush of blood, the whole body effect on the back of the shoulders and the big muscles of the back going down through the glutes into the thigh muscles, into the quads, right?
	This is where it's usually felt.
	These are the largest bands of the vagus nervous system.
	now the vagus nervous system has all of these tie-ins to the brain and it is the largest nervous system is a okay so you have two separate nervous systems The vagus nervous system is larger and connects all the major organs except the adrenals, the adrenal glands, but it connects all of the glands in the head as well as the major nerves going into the brain.
	Very interesting kind of a critter, these vagus nervous things that we're carrying around.
	Anyway, so when people are in this faith episode from the outside, especially if you're looking for it, you can observe it, right?
	And so there's faith without religion.
	So I could have faith.
	I've done this.
	I've gotten all fired up and I was just charged and ready to go and this kind of stuff when I was working at Microsoft and we had this big contention over a particular way with some software.
	And I knew these fuckers were wrong, that it wasn't going to work the way that they wanted to.
	And I had faith because I had confidence in my conclusion.
	And so even though there was a whole room of people, there was like 60 people in this room saying I was wrong, I was a stupid idiot, blah, blah, blah.
	Now bear in mind, they were prejudiced, okay?
	So Microsoft is a bunch of prejudiced fuckers.
	All these people have in huge degrees, degrees up the yin-yang.
	They're very young, they're prodigies, and they're all like each other.
	And here I was 10 to 12 to 15 years older than most of the fuckers I was coding with.
	I had no degree.
	I was self-taught.
	And so there were actually holes in my knowledge because I'd not gone to school on this shit, right?
	But on the other hand, I had some very intense, deep knowledge because I'd had a lot of work experience and come up through the telephony industry and knew about computers and stuff from the hardware side, from the Ring Zero and the chips and so on, right?
	And so I knew what things would happen.
	So when I was at Microsoft in this one particular episode, there was a big room, there were a lot of people on my case, and I was not going to back down.
	I had to drive all the way up from Olympia to Redmond.
	At that time, it wasn't that bad because I was leaving real early, driving from like 4 until about 5.30 to get there.
	I get on in, I get breakfast, I come on into, I think we were in building number six at that time, the bigger building with a little amphitheater in it.
	And we were discussing this networking issue and which way the code had to go.
	And I kept telling him, you're wrong for this reason.
	You're wrong for this reason.
	And I had to do this for like three and a half to four hours, okay, because they were really, really on my case.
	But the head of the project was doubtful.
	He was a nice guy.
	He was Persian.
	He wouldn't say he was Iranian.
	He was Persian.
	He was an expat.
	And he didn't like groupthink.
	Okay, and he knew he was up against groupthink.
	And the problem with this is that they could have engineered a solution, their approach, but it might have taken them six or eight months and it would have ballooned the code way the hell out and it wasn't necessary.
	And in fact, in the ballooning of that code, they would have ended up with the same solution that I had proposed way back when.
	And I was just confident in my solution because the only way out of this particular latency and concurrency issue with transmitting data across networks.
	Anyway, the upshot was I was correct.
	And after about three and a half hours, the head of the project basically said, well, you guys can't actually show any technical reason that Cliff's wrong.
	So we're going to work his approach until you can.
	Well, we worked my approach.
	It was only about two weeks and it was done, right?
	Instead of this six-month giant cluster fuck that they were all headed towards.
	And so it was good.
	I actually got a bonus out of that job.
	Chopped off about maybe as much as three quarters of a million dollars in coding time and reduced the code base way the hell down.
	This was at the point where Microsoft still had connections to IBM.
	And Microsoft actually had this deal where if you could reduce the code without adding a bug to it, you got a bonus because you shrunk the number of lines of code.
	This was just their ethos in going forward.
	Anyway, so I had faith in my solution and I stood up there and I took all of their slings and arrows, right?
	I just took it all because I knew I was right.
	I had confidence.
	I knew my solution would work, even if theirs would as well.
	I also knew mine was cheaper because I'm a cheap bastard.
	Right.
	So anyway, so there we are.
	We've got the faith.
	I felt it.
	In that meeting, I was charged up.
	I had big key.
	I was doing a lot of Aikido at the time.
	It wasn't that difficult to gin it up, especially for a fight.
	So my experience of faith at that point, I knew as soon as I felt the vagus nerve response, right, as soon as I felt the hairs going up on my back and all of this kind of stuff, all of the effective body clues that you're in a state of faith, then I knew my conclusion was accurate and I would stand by it.
	And I just was not going to back down and there was nothing they could do to make me back down on this.
	It was just a weird situation.
	You know, he could have said, the boss there could have said, screw it, let's do both.
	He could have said, no, Cliff, you're wrong.
	And I would have acquiesced, right?
	But as long as he was not intruding, he let the fight go on until he was satisfied.
	And then it was about three and a half hours.
	Everybody had to pee.
	We had to go get food.
	And so he made a decision.
	We went with mine and it worked out fine.
	Which, of course, reinforces my faith from confidence.
	So if I have a conclusion and I'm confident in my conclusion, I have past episodes where I was correct.
	And so it supports the faith feeling even more.
	Now you can get faith from a number of different sources.
	But they all basically come down to something that motivates you to feel a physical response to a mental state.
	This mental state is also emotional.
	And so that's what triggers the whole feeling of faith.
	So faith absent feeling is not faith.
	Okay, it's a thought.
	Maybe it's a notion or something like this, but it's not faith.
	It can be well formed, well thought out.
	You can live your life by it, but it is not faith.
	Faith is an actual physical interaction with universe around something that is non-corporeal, that doesn't really exist.
	So this is why you can have faith from religions.
	You can have faith from basically any kind of a thought.
	we see this misplaced frequently, mostly, we see faith in gamblers.
	Oh, I can feel the luck.
	Ooh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Let's double down.
	Yeah, okay.
	So they have faith.
	Sometimes even they will have the full body experience, the full vagus nerve experience.
	Frequently and mostly, they will trick themselves.
	Gamblers, people that can't help it, that are intrigued and pushed that way by their karma, will trick themselves into thinking that they're feeling the faith, but it's this sort of washed out.
	And there's all kinds of discussions way back in the old text and also in the modern, like modern, I mean like say 16, 17, and 1800s, you get a lot of people that made the conversion out of the Byzantine Empire into Catholicism, and they brought with them this basically Eastern tradition that's more meditative, more contemplative.
	And in those volumes, they discuss weak faith versus real faith and so on, right?
	And so you could have faith in your authority where you're a Nazi in the Ukraine and they tell you, we're winning, we're winning, going out, going out.
	But as soon as you encounter a reality and it shows that you're not winning and all of that, your faith in your authority is gone, right?
	You'll never recover that.
	Because if faith does not survive impact to reality, then it disappears.
	It just evaporates, just fades right away.
	And you're left with this, what do they call it?
	Something like a stone.
	Okay, so I can't remember the exact phrase, but the Greeks had this idea that when faith was shown to be false, you would have the stone feeling, which is like you've swallowed a stone in the pit of your stomach.
	There's just this cold knot down there, right?
	And you know that at that point, it's sort of like the reverse of faith.
	You know that it's not going to work out, that all of this kind of thing.
	So the reason for the whole damn discussion here is that we're about to have a crisis of faith as a result, globally, as a result of the convergence of where we're at now with the upcoming history that's going to be coming out about humans.
	So we're all going to go and meet humans, all right?
	So all us guys are going to meet humans and meet humanity basically for the first time.
	And it's going to be met in the woo because a lot of the stuff we're going to be presented is not going to be factual or maybe factual, but we can't validate it at the point we first come in contact with it.
	And we know that there's going to be a lot of disinformation we have to clear out of the way because we've been sold a bill of goods as to what humanity is.
	So we're going to have this convergence with religion.
	And it is necessary in my mind that we separate the idea of faith, which I find very valuable and want to have in my life, etc., etc.
	We need to, in my opinion, we need to separate the idea of faith from the source.
	So we could have a misinterpretation, a wrong view of the facts of a religion, and yet the religion can still be valuable, and the faith that it produces can still be valid.
	Difficult situation.
	So we're getting into a period of time where we're going to have a collision between the reality of the Christian and Islamic view of the Old Testament is the view of the Old Testament from these two religions, officially and unofficially, is going to be impacted by the history that's going to be coming out.
	This history is going to provide the opportunity for lots and lots and lots of people to actually go and look what was said in the Bible.
	So if you want to do that, now bear in mind, you need to sequester your faith, right?
	Take your faith out of this loop, out of this equation, while you're examining The nature of where we're at and what has happened to us as humans.
	Okay?
	And so if you wanted to do that, if you were strong enough, then I would recommend, and I rarely recommend this kind of stuff, but I would recommend you go and read Mauro Biglino's book, or the book about him, which is actually a translated set of interviews from him.
	And it's called the Naked Bible.
	And his name is Morrow Biglino.
	He's Italian.
	The reason to understand that Mauro Biglino is the perfect person to do this work that he's done is because of this is the man that the Catholic Church goes to to get translations of their source material in Hebrew and Aramaic, okay, in all of these languages.
	So Mauro Biglino knows more about the Bible than anybody in the Vatican.
	When the Vatican wants to know anything about the Bible, they go and talk to him.
	It's even more impressive than that because he's talking about the whole Bible, but he's talking about the Old Testament specifically and written in Hebrew and various shades of Hebrew over time.
	Morrow is the translator that the Jewish rabbis go to when they want Hebrew to be translated effectively for themselves.
	So he's that good, right?
	He's the top dog on the planet.
	This is the biggest, baddest dog for translation in these languages that you're ever, ever going to run across.
	And his naked Bible will totally change your understanding of the Bible and where humans are related to the history of all of this.
	Now, you need not read this because, in my opinion, we're very, very close to that history coming out independent of the Bible.
	And so we're going to have this collision.
	And we're going to have a collision of the religions, the main monotheistic religions, against their own history.
	And that collision is going to cause many people to lose faith.
	And I'm of the opinion that if they sequester their faith and just say, I will weather this storm, and when this information comes out, which I find disturbing now, I will find that at the other side of it, everything will be okay.
	That there will be a greater understanding that I can apply to my life, and I will actually be better for the experience of going through all of this history and everything that we're all going through because we're coming to an understanding of reality.
	And we've been lied to for so long, and so much has been deliberately changed and garbage spewed out to us.
	So in my way of thinking, if I were to be a religious person, I would want to know what was in the religion that I was actually practicing, right?
	I would want to know every last detail of it and the why about it.
	But a lot of people may not.
	They may just decide, nope, don't want to know that, right?
	But they will still, unfortunately, have to deal with the generalized history that is expressed within this is going to be coming out and it's going to affect the religious structures gigantically, like totally remove the foundations for them and totally spread them all out for everybody to examine, you know, get into the gooey parts and smoosh it all about just so we can see what's going on.
	That's going to happen independent of this particular initiative that's been going on for a number of years.
	Now, Mauro's been working on this stuff for decades.
	He's got a number of monographs out there.
	I may have even produced a book.
	He's got a YouTube channel if you want to go and listen to him talk about it in his interviews and so on.
	So you can really get into it, right?
	So now, as I was saying, I think faith is valuable.
	I use faith, right?
	I used it at Microsoft in that.
	I use faith in my ability in Aikido and actual fights with people, right?
	Someone comes to assault me.
	I don't care how big they are.
	I have faith in my ability to really fucking fight.
	So, and as soon as I'm in that situation, instantly I get the faith.
	I get the armor of God.
	And, you know, and you're in for some deep shit.
	Even if you win, you're going to take some serious crap.
	So anyway, now there's a lot of things that are related here, okay?
	And so the reason I know that we're about to have this historical upwelling of information that will affect the religions, but it's not directed at the religions.
	So in other words, we're going to find true human history about, or true history about humans, and in so doing, getting the true history about humanity, we are going to naturally disturb the mythos of all of the major monotheistic religions.
	Less so Judaism than all others.
	If you read this book, you'll understand why.
	But in any event, this is occurring because there's been a confluence, a convergence of events going on around the planet.
	Now, I'm not going to get into the deep history of it all.
	You can go and investigate this yourself.
	But there is another language discovery out there.
	Okay, so we have discovered a language that is called first tongue.
	Okay, first tongue.
	They're also calling it Proto-Hebrew.
	I don't like that so much because I don't find it is the case.
	I think it's, I don't think it is a Proto-Hebrew.
	But the point of this is that they've actually got it mapped to Hebraic lettering, characters, and they've got it mapped to them pretty consistently from the pictographs down condensed.
	And I agree that the pictographs could be easily condensed down into this, what they call Proto-Hebrew.
	But I think that the first tongue existed, and then from first tongue, we get the formation out of that of Hebrew.
	Okay, so I'm not saying it's a proto-Hebrew.
	I'm saying it was a remnant language.
	So I think of first tongue as actually first in the previous, right?
	So it comes from a previous level of humanity.
	This previous level is a remnant.
	A remnant that has left the planet littered with this first tongue.
	I say littered because we're finding it all over in the western part of the Americas.
	We find first tongue pictographs and engravings in Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and California.
	They may exist up here, but I haven't gone over east of the mountains to the Badlands to look for them.
	Trying to work that out in a few weeks to go to this particular site.
	Anyway, we won't go into that.
	This first tongue is a complete full language, very much like Hebrew in the early Hebrew, from which we think Hebrew came out of first tongue.
	No vowels, but a consistent constant, constant language showing up in all these places.
	It's also in Sinai, it's in Turkey, it's in Russia, it may be in Siberia, and it's kind of interesting.
	Now, there's a guy that produced a single-page web application that will translate this stuff for you, right?
	You can type it in and look at it and see the various forms of the letters.
	And so you could also go and take your laptop and go take pictures of some of these pictographs and then map them to the language and start to understand some of the things that are scratched in the rocks all around us out here in the desert, this kind of thing, right?
	And as I say, now it's in Mexico, it's all the way all up and down on the west coast in both Americas, in all three Americas, North America, Central America, and South America.
	You find this stuff scratched in the rocks everywhere.
	So here is a language that existed around the planet.
	Find it in Sinai.
	Find it in Africa.
	I don't know about Australia, likely, and that region, and nor do I know about the Polynesian islands, but I know that Polynesian islands are filled with pictographs.
	Now, are they the same?
	I don't know.
	Anyway, though, so pretty soon the emergence of first tongue will have more support behind it, academic as well as the technical support to allow for translations.
	There's a lot we don't know about it in terms of how it's organized.
	And a lot of the writings in it are not organized.
	They're scratched on rocks.
	Some of the rock has fallen away.
	So we've got a lot of learning curve there, right?
	But we think, a lot of us, and I don't know how Morrow feels about this.
	I'm going to have to ask him about how he feels about First Tongue.
	But I'm of the opinion that it is a remnant and that it was a sort of a method of continuance, that it is the bridge language from the previous Ice Age civilization, pre-Ice Age, last Ice Age civilization.
	So we had a civilization here that was wiped out or destroyed by the Ice Age that itself ended 12,000 years ago.
	That previous civilization built pyramids, all of these kind of things, and created, you know, all of the massive monuments, the monoliths, all of these kind of constructions.
	And what we have of them is stone, basically, but up until this point, none of the ephemera, right?
	None of their thoughts or these kinds of things.
	Now we find first tongue scratched into stones all over the place.
	And so we're getting into a period of time where the information from First Tongue is going to come on out.
	And I'm quite sure because it so far predates the monotheistic religions that it is going to provide us with all different kinds of information about what was going on here as we made the transition, as humanity made the transition out of the last ice age.
	Now, basically, our history is that we had the last ice age and it ended approximately 12,000 years ago.
	And so we can just take that number and run with it at the moment.
	And so we have 12,000 years ago.
	We get these comets or whatever the hell, and the ice is destroyed.
	Now, 12,000 years back.
	Okay, well, basically, shit happens, and then approximately 5,000 years ago, the Elohim come down.
	The El come, right?
	The El get here.
	The Elohim, which is many of them, show up and start fucking with humanity.
	This is why the Jewish calendar is the age it is.
	This is why a lot of Christians say that the earth is that old and so on and so on.
	They actually haven't read the Bible, so they don't know what it actually says.
	They're just going on the stories they've been told about it.
	So we know that these people came down here about that period of time.
	But we had a civilization here long before these guys fucked around with these remnant people.
	The remnant people are the pre-Adamites who are described as hunter-gatherers.
	But these hunter-gatherers are very sophisticated remnant civilizations from the Ice Age and that catastrophe that hit humanity at that point.
	There's tons of history, okay?
	Tons and tons and tons of history that's going to be coming out.
	The particulars about First Tongue and whether it predates, whether it goes back beyond that, I think we'll be solving those relatively shortly, like within the next 10 years.
	We'll find some evidence in some places where it could not have existed from 12,000.
	So we may find a cave that's been sealed up longer than that that has first tongue markings in it.
	We may even find such things as books with first tongue written in it.
	That's not beyond the realm of possibility.
	You know, we've got the Dead Sea Scrolls that go back thousands of years.
	We've got metal tablets, lead, copper, and so on that survive and go back even longer.
	And we've got stone carvings.
	So I suspect that we'll find that it does indeed go back before and that it is a remnant.
	It came forward with the people here that survived through the ice age.
	Anyway, so this convergence of the convergency that's going to hit religion is going to come out in a number of different ways.
	At the same time that all of this information is going to be coming out and making its self known, because we're getting into truth now.
	So even if it hurts, you've got to examine that truth to find out really what the fuck's going on because so much has been obscured, right?
	But so we'll face all of these things.
	And as I say, my personal impression of all of this information is that it is supportive of faith in your religious view, okay, if you're a religious person.
	And I say this because I know that there's all this other shit that's coming out as well.
	Okay, so all different kinds of other things are going to be emerging.
	But what we're going to have to go through is this destruction period.
	So we will see the Catholic Church destroyed.
	We'll see the Protestant churches destroyed.
	Not because of the first tongue or their articles of faith, so to speak, right?
	But rather because of the corruption of the people running it and the history of that corruption.
	And so people will, the adherents will leave the churches because they are so corrupt and they are so evil.
	And the church structures will dissolve.
	They'll also dissolve because the money will be taken away as the central banks fail.
	Bear in mind, basically, the Catholic Church is supported by central banking around the planet.
	All churches are intimately tied to the central banks, and they don't exist absent debt-based funding.
	I won't go into the details about that, but we're coming up to this point of a convergency, an emerging emergency as a result of a convergence of our history, actual history, coming on out at the same time that we're going through this crisis of corruption globally that's affecting all institutions.
	And so we're in one of these major, major kind of periods.
	We could conceive of the time we are in now as being every bit as chaotic and eventful as the Revolutionary War here in the United States.
	Actually, much more so, much more so eventful, much more activity than that period.
	This is the equivalent of all the revolutions that have ever happened before.
	So the revolution in China and in Russia and all of this.
	The period of time we're in now will last for a long time, I think at least 18 years, and will be much more eventful in terms of the changes that will affect humanity.
	In my opinion, we're coming up to an interesting one that is going to be involving this first tongue and the ability for us to glean information from way deep in humanity's history and to even find out what is history and what is not, which is very important to us because we need truth.
	We need facts.
	Because faith is not supported by myth.
	Faith is supported by facts, however dirty and gritty.
	So one of the things about that Microsoft thing was that nobody wanted to hear what I had to say because of the crisis that it caused in the situation.
	It was an ugly truth they had to hear.
	And I hammered that ugly truth for three and a half fucking hours.
	And finally, they accepted it.
	And once we accepted it and dealt with it, we were beyond it in like two or three weeks.
	But if we hadn't done that, we would have been, it would have been one of those projects.
	I'm convinced of this.
	I have faith in this conclusion.
	It would have been one of those projects where they would have thrown more people, more money, more people, more money, and we would have ended up with an operational failure.
	It worked, but half-assed sort of constantly needed maintenance, constantly being tweaked, etc.
	And it had to do with object-oriented encapsulation and the need to bust the hymen, the encapsulation barrier, okay, which long and involved.
	You don't care about that.
	But anyway, so the faith was justified, right?
	And it worked out for everybody.
	So I'm at that point now where I'm having faith in the emergence of a rebirth, a refeeling, a reconnection to faith within humanity.
	Okay, not faith in humanity.
	I have faith in humanity.
	You know, I know we're a bunch of idiots and bumbling toads, but we keep progressing, right?
	So I have faith in humanity, such as it is.
	But we're going to have faith within humanity that will survive what's going to be coming up.
	And I think that people just, in my opinion, because I'm through this, right, I've gone through this information as much as I'm able to get at this point and see how things are shaking out.
	And so I have faith in the conclusions that I'm coming to about this situation and how it's going to play.
	You'll see this over this year.
	You'll see large chunks of this information come out over this year.
	Many people will not be paying attention to it because of all the political and economic problems that will be going on.
	So it may be 2024 before we see the first cracks appear in the, maybe 2023.
	It's hard to estimate as to how rapidly the impact will spread once it reaches certain key areas.
	So it'd be like in a congregation in any faith, you'll find, say, three or four people that are the anchors, okay, in that congregation.
	They're the steadfast, the continuously there, etc., etc., right?
	You know these individuals.
	And so we can't anticipate how this will work out because we don't know how long it will take for the steadfast to encounter this information and then decide to examine it and then decide to incorporate it into their understanding of the reality, of our reality.
	And when that happens, that's when the cracks appear in the institution that we call the church, right?
	And so I can't anticipate how long that will take because those same steadfast individuals are also the conservative ones that are going to be out fighting the culture wars and attempting to retrieve the conservative nature of the social order in order that that social order may go forward.
	And so they're going to be occupied.
	They're going to be busy.
	But we also have other things that are going to intrude in on this.
	One big wildcard is whether or not, or rather when, because I think they will, when will the current powers that be who are dying, who are losing their power, when will they play the UFO card?
	At that point, that could cause cracks in institutional religion as that institutional religion comes under the assault of the space aliens.
	I'll just leave it at that.
	It's a weird subject, guys.
	I'm just basically doing this because I know people of faith, right?
	I know a lot of Christians.
	I like them.
	They're good guys.
	I know Muslim people.
	They're good guys.
	The people of faith are good guys.
	They're attempting to do good, right?
	They're not attempting to necessarily constantly further their own aims like the fucktards that are running things now.
	And so I value faith in myself, but also in other people.
	And I'm concerned that what we're going to be going through, if they don't have any warning that this information is coming out and so on, may be an assault on their faith that might be overwhelming.
	And it need not be, okay?
	Because if you have a vision of coming through it, if you have the faith that you will come through it with your faith on the other side, then you will do so.
	It won't be the same.
	It'll be an entirely different understanding of reality, but the faith itself will be the same.
	The same feeling, the same armor of God kind of approach, that sort of thing, right?
	And so, as I say, I was concerned.
	I thought to bring it up, sort of a heads-up, guys, a fair warning on a situation that's developing.
	And basically, here's how I know it's developing.
	And I'm seeing a lot of activity in the first tongue stuff and in other areas that I know will be propelling this information along.
	And it won't be able to be resisted at some point.
	It'll be out there and everybody will, or lots of people will be discussing it.
	So other people, especially the people of faith, will run into it.
	And then they'll have to decide.
	You know, are they going to deny that it is factual or what?
	And so on and how they're going to adapt to it.
	But you should think about it now.
	And faith is valuable in my understanding and is something to be preserved independent, independent of the facts as you understand them about your religion, the nature of that religion that you share with other individuals.
	Your experience of that religion and your experience of faith is valuable.
	It's a necessary part of being a human.
	I couldn't imagine living without it.
	And it is valuable.
	And I'm just saying, don't let the shit that's rolling down on us here crush that, right?
	Separate it and just say, in my way of thinking here, you know, this too will pass.
	I will be changed as a result of this passing, but faith will remain.
	To the new me that's changed, it'll still be my faith, right?
	So anyway, though.
	One of the few times I'll get real preachy about this.
	I actually wanted to set out to do some other stuff here, but the religion convergence is coming out pretty quick.
	I suspect we'll be starting into it in a real way in July or August of this year.
	And then it's going to run for a number of years, percolating in the background as we go along as more stuff comes out.

▲