All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 11, 2021 - Clif High
48:44
Name of the Worm woo - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

Jean Baudrillard & the Name of the Worm Woo

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans.
Hello humans.
There we go.
Okay.
This is the name of the worm woo.
The worm that flies at night.
That should actually have an exclamation point.
All right.
So actually it should be called Jean Baudrillard and the name of the worm that, name of the worm, woo.
Baudrillard was this French philosopher and like social analyst.
He was born in 1929 and he lived to like 2007.
So if you look at his life, his life and death actually were bracketed by major economic crises here in the materium in humanity.
And so Baudrillard had an interesting early life and Baudrillard was a what they call a postmodernist.
All right, so the label postmodernism is applied to philosophers the way that Dadaism is applied to artists and industrial or interior designers and even industrial designers.
Just a period of time in which there was a collective movement towards a particular ethos or a particular hue in thinking, so to speak, right?
And so Baudrillard came along when there was this big examination of shit that had happened in the previous century in the 1800s with Karl Marx and communism.
And so Baudrillard comes along.
There's all of these academics.
He's there, goes through World War II, he's French, and they're thinking about things like communism as communism is taking over and really trying to exert itself throughout the world.
And Baudrillard comes up with this very key insight that Karl Marx was, now Baudrillard, let me stop and say that Baudrillard was commenting on communism, Baudrillard was commenting on Marxism as a organic creation, alright?
So he was not commenting on the fact that Karl Marx himself was a royal sycophant and was nominally writing the anti-royal manifesto, the Communist Manifesto, right?
He wrote it, but he was paid by all these royals to write it.
So he was basically writing the manifesto of the controlled opposition to the royals.
And the royals knew what they were doing, right?
So they were using communism as a tool when they paid Marx to come up with all of this.
Anyway, so Baudrillard didn't comment on any of that history.
He was commenting on the meat and potatoes of communism itself as it related to humanity and what was called the proletariat, which were the lower classes, right?
The non-royal classes.
His critique got people pissed because it was just so biting and so right in there.
And it is the fatal flaw.
And his critique is that communism is all about communism is all about the, sorry about the camera, there's moisture in the air and it's going to keep doing this.
The big storm moved through here last night.
We're probably running it ambient, just walking around like 88% relative humidity just because so much moisture was blown in.
At least the winds are gone and we got power back.
Anyway, though, so communism's nominal goal was the elevation of the proletariat.
Communism's method for doing that was focused on objects.
This will all become pertinent.
This all makes sense, all right?
And so Karl Marx and communism focused on objects.
And so they decided that humanity, regular workers, could seize control of their destiny by seizing control of the means of production of objects.
You know, shoes, cars, all of this kind of crap, right?
Phones, etc.
And so if you, and their rationale was if you controlled the creation of these objects, you were in charge of the economy and thus in charge of the political ramifications and all the social stuff and life would be good, there'd be utopia.
And well, we know that this is horseshit, that no one that's ever attempted to do any of Karl Marx's ideas has ever worked out anything that ever functioned.
It was all led to misery and millions and millions of deaths, right?
Hundreds of millions.
How many, I think there was like 80 million nominally killed by Stalin and others in Russia.
There's been 300 million killed by the communists in China that we were able to sort of tabulate.
In any event, though, so numerics aside, Baudrillard, Jean Baudrillard, says, hmm, this is kind of goofy, right?
That really objects are just a temporary or passing phase in an evolving greater concept.
And so he said, and he was quite right, that Marx and all these doofuses that seized in on objects were digging themselves a hole and that's going to end up in a not being able to in a blockage, not being able to proceed.
And we're there now because we've seen communism morph over time to, nowadays communism is not all about money.
It's about social control and the wokeism and all of this because they've graduated from objects to objectifying humans because their control mechanism is all about objects and knows nothing else.
The descriptions of how to do it, how to work it, the manuals, the manifestos and everything is all about objects.
And all they did was to objectify humans and start extracting traits that they could apply those techniques and tools to.
In my opinion, communism is insect-like.
It's a true external influence on humanity.
It doesn't derive naturally from communalism.
No ancient societies ever practiced communism.
It's this crafted hive-like understanding of reality.
My understanding of it aside, Baudrillard focused in on the fact that objects were a passing phase in this economic thing that was highlighted at the time that Marx wrote his Communist Manifesto as humans had been moving into the more mature part of the Industrial Revolution, which itself was focused on objects.
And thus Marx's thoughts were on objects and the royals' thoughts through Marx were on objects, and they missed the wider scheme of things.
This is something about the bug's thinking, right, about this kind of thinking is that it zeroes in on a and focuses in on something that is maybe it's important at that particular moment, but they never look at a wider picture, never look at this thing moving through time.
There's just not much of a wide concept view of things.
Anyway, so at the time that in the 1800s, 1800s now, 1860s maybe something like that, Marx died in the 1880s, like 1882 or 83 or something.
At least they buried him then, so he better have been dead.
Anyway, so objects at the time were a big deal in the social order because there weren't many of them and it was a big deal to get them produced and distributed.
Nowadays, there's objects everywhere and who gives a shit, right?
Nowadays, as we have seen, we've actually moved into what Jean Baudrillard saw emerging in his life through the course of World War II.
And that was the systemization of humanity, okay?
And that we would become controlled not by our focus on objects, but our focus on being controlled by the systems that inform and support our lives.
And so he said that objects weren't going to do it, that we were in fact moving into a period in which systems would dominate, but that that would rapidly be followed by a system of systems, which is where we're at now, okay?
Where we've systematized the making of systems.
And so he predicted back in shortly after World War II that we would approach a period of time where we would be able to automate the systemization of complete systems.
And then we would control, use one system of control to control many, many, many other systems.
And this is where we're at now.
And we can look at this flow over time, and we can see that he's quite correct, and that we start with humanity starts with like water is one of our first systems that we make for, you know, just to provide clean water.
Aqueducts in Rome, that kind of thing.
The hanging gardens of Babylon, just recently discovered, we assume it's water, it might be sewage.
Ancient pipes that are 150,000 years old in Tibet, buried in a hillside.
Ancient pipes in China have also been discovered.
So water is one of the first of our systems.
Then in modern time, well, we would go through sewage, necessary as well, to provide public hygiene.
And then in modern times, and we also cannot rule out that it existed in ancient times because we just don't know because we're a species with amnesia.
So much of it has been hidden, so much of our history has been destroyed and perverted and occulted from our view that we can't say.
But the next one up is power.
Now this could be, you know, in the case of like the Middle Ages Vikings, power could simply be a forest with convenient dead windfalls, right?
That kind of thing.
Or it could be peat bogs that you could easily harvest, combustibles that you could use for heating and cooking and that kind of stuff, right?
But whatever, you have a power system, and you're dependent on that, and then you systematize it.
And so you start saying, well, shit, I live near the forest, and my cousin lives near the ocean where there aren't trees, but he's got a lot of fish.
I'll cut some wood down and haul it over to him and swap him for some fish because I got no fish up here in the hills.
And I like fish, right?
So then you become, you know, the purveyor of wood to all of these people, and it becomes systematized.
You get other people that like fish, and you pay them off in fish, and they harvest wood for you, yada, yada, yada, yada.
And we're here now, right?
It becomes a system of systems as we start doing human things with it, right?
Okay, so then we start applying this to our supplies and then our personnel.
Then we start systematizing these individual systems under a system of systems.
So we would systematize the personnel, for instance, with HR departments, you know, human resources so we can track our personnel, health departments so we can keep our personnel healthy, you know, our supplies, we would have inventory control, price controls, or monitoring, et cetera, et cetera.
All of these systems are piled onto these basic support systems, such that we have a ever-growing social order that is, insofar as our systems are concerned, is this vast spider web, right?
It's not a power pyramid.
The power pyramid is trying to overlay itself on this vast spider web of interrelated systems.
And that's why we have collisions and contentions and no harmony in humanity.
And that's because we have this system of systems.
And if we look at it graphically, it's this sort of a thing where there's all these systems that are joining each other and interacting.
And this is an organic kind of a development over which somebody's trying to lay a power pyramid of control.
And we see this happening everywhere.
Now, this cannot stand.
This can't work.
Humans cannot organize themselves in a bug-like power pyramid with the chief bug on top and everybody else taking orders.
We simply don't function well that way.
This is antith antithetical to our basic core as a human.
So this will bust up.
It's assured that the power pyramid will fail because there's too many humans to suppress.
And that's why they tried to kill us off in this depopulation thing with all of the spike protein and all of that kind of shit.
Because they know, the power pyramid knows that it's at this point where our system of systems is growing beyond its control and starting to multiply and create other systems that are joining in, etc., right?
And so pretty soon they can see the handwriting on the wall, the power pyramid's going to be subsumed by our ability to work outside of its control.
And it doesn't like that.
That's why all of this lockdown, that's why all of this shit is happening now.
They were freaking out by where we were going.
This great awakening kind of a thing, right?
Okay, so at this point in this particular war of humanity against the bug, we can say that the bug systems,
the power pyramid being imposed over the organic growth of a system of systems, is vulnerable to the same kind of flaw, or is as vulnerable as communism, because actually it is basically communism.
The bugs approach to things in communism are 100% in line, and what they're attempting to impose on us is communism, where they're on top and we're the worker bugs underneath and we can be harvested at will, have our organs taken at their whim, etc., right?
Just because for the greater good.
That's like a bunch of horseshit.
You know, the greater good can go fuck itself.
I've got shit to do.
So anyway, our system of systems, according to Baudrillard, will prevail.
It cannot not prevail because of the nature of its method of growth.
And I agree that we're right there.
We're at this cusp in this war where the system of systems is going to just bust out everywhere to the point where it subsumes the power pyramid structure.
And we're seeing that now in the loss of the power pyramid's ability to control those few systems or to control all of the systems that it must control in order to survive.
So now bear in mind, the power pyramid, in order to survive, has to control all the systems, all the people in all the systems.
And as a new system develops, they must figure out a way to get on top of it.
This is why cryptocurrencies come out and they must start figuring out a way to get on top of it because they can't have any system operating outside their power pyramid framework.
Now, as I've been saying for months, the power pyramid paradigm is busting up all over.
It doesn't have much left.
It's in the process of fading.
And what will remain is the system of systems when we're done.
But we've got to go through the death of this power pyramid.
And this is the dangerous time because they're going to freak out.
They don't know what to do.
They're not very intelligent, really, okay?
So they're going to be swayed by their emotions and react that way and so on.
And so we see them doing things like the COVID concentration camps.
Now, so just as an idealized mental exercise, let's consider this, all right?
You can look at what they're attempting to do with a COVID, let's take out all of this here, okay?
What the communists, the power pyramid guys are attempting to do with a COVID concentration camp in a system of systems, in a Baudrillard fashion.
And if you do, many things are revealed.
so let's look at the idea of a concentration camp okay and what systems does a concentration camp depend on
Well, it depends on, you're going to have people there, so you're going to have to have water, you're going to have to have sewer, sewage handling, going to have to have food, supplies, you're going to have to have power.
You're going to have to have personnel.
Each of the personnel are going to have to have their own grouping of this basic set that goes to support them at a personal level as well as a collective level.
So this is your first system of a system, system of control of another system.
So the personnel system is used to control the rest of this, including the inmates.
And even if the inmates are isolated, they will have to have all of these things provided to them.
And the more they are isolated, the more you're going to need personnel in order to provide these things to the inmates, even if all the personnel does is to check automated system that provides these kind of things.
Now, there's other things you need in a concentration camp that you wouldn't in a hotel or something, right?
You're going to need alarms.
So you need a security system that, you know, has alarms, Maybe has monitoring.
It would have to have that to trigger an alarm.
Maybe it's going to do some recording, you know, records and stuff of what they're alarming about, and so on.
So, here's a security system that will depend on personnel to run it.
The personnel themselves, because they're messing with the security system, thereafter have to be checked that they're capable of doing it and are not going to fuck things up, etc.
And so, the personnel have been subsumed into yet another system that they have to run.
So, we've got another one of these systems of a system here that has to control the personnel, but the personnel have to control it.
So, it's this little circuitous system.
You get one bad personnel in there and everything goes fucked.
So, for instance, one real good strategy would be to get a job at a concentration camp in the IT department, work there for under a fake name, get a fake ID and stuff so they can't come and get you afterwards, work there for a week or two and fuck over all their databases and all their control systems and leave, never show up again.
Or put in back doors.
They wouldn't and do both.
You know, put in the back doors into the system so you can hack it at any time and fuck them up at any time, but do it in such a way that you give them so much other mess they never even look for the back doors.
And so, so they're vulnerable to all of these.
So, this concentration camp is vulnerable to any and every one of these systems continuously.
So, for instance, how is the power delivered?
Now, around here, we have a lot of land and no real prohibitions against it.
We got a shitload of trees, so we make a bunch of poles and we hang our power lines on these poles so we can get at them when the weather takes them down.
We can fix them.
Our ground is geologically unstable, so it's unwise for us to bury power lines in the ground because if there's an earthquake, we wouldn't know where to find the brake and take us forever and it'd be very costly.
Plus, our ground is not easily disturbed in order to do such burying, so we've got to go overland.
Now, in some places, like maybe Australia, maybe that's not the case.
Maybe they have underground power systems.
Well, underground power systems have a complete system of systems that keep them working.
So, someone could, on the outside, for instance, maybe find a convenient junction spot buried underground that was well away from anybody and wasn't being observed.
And they could take a backhoe there, dig the thing up, and do some mischief without injuring themselves and then go away, depriving the concentration camp of power, which goes for every other system, right?
If you deprive them of water, the same thing happens.
If the personnel can't effectively flush a toilet, shit happens.
You got stuff to deal with right there, right?
So, if they don't have water flowing in from the sinks, you know, then they're instantly going to be, you know, it's a crime against humanity.
It's not, you know, it's a concentration camp like they've got in China.
Pretty soon they'll be harvesting organs there in Australia if they're not already.
And so, you know, so people will fight back.
They'll do things.
They'll start depriving these systems of the effectiveness that they depend on, which is brittle.
So, these guys are brittle to the interaction of a system to a system.
So, you can screw up any of these systems if you get at the interaction of one system to another.
So, you've got a supply system where they've got invoices and inventory and this kind of thing for the concentration camp.
And who are they buying from?
Who are they buying the bread from?
How are they paying that company?
Is it possible to interfere with this process so that the company says, No, I'm not supplying you anymore.
We're not getting paid for this.
You know, you've got to go and talk to so-and-so.
And so, you deprive them of food.
Or, you know, you find out that the food for the guards is separate and you do something, you know, to the guards.
You introduce something into the food that puts them all to sleep or whatever, right?
I'm not saying to do this, I'm not saying to damage individuals.
It's not necessary to work that way.
It's much more effective to damage a system than to attack an individual human, even groups of individual humans.
So, violence is not against a human, is not the solution.
That's what the powers that be want.
They actually want us to fight each other so they can sit back and then send in the cleanup crews when everybody's too exhausted from killing to continue on anymore.
This is a pattern they've had for centuries.
We're busting out on that pattern now.
So, in my way of thinking, much, much better to put your brain to attacking the weaknesses in all of the various different systems.
and I'm not going to go into it, but I've looked at some of these concentration camps that are being built in Australia, for instance.
You can see the things on satellite images, lots of pictures, and you can see all kinds of vulnerabilities in the way that they constructed them.
You know, it's like these people must not have watched Stalag 17 or some of these other World War II movies in the way that they built these.
And you're going to have people on the outside that don't like it.
Okay, so around here, for instance, in the power systems, we've had sabotage by Antifa on our regional power systems here in Washington State, right?
And Antifa are stupid.
They're really, really stupid.
They could have killed themselves.
They would have killed themselves had they been successful.
We have power systems where you have a pole and it has these cross beams and you have the wires that run on the cross beams to the next pole, right?
And so looking at it from a side, you'd see a pole and you'd have a crossbeam on it and a crossbeam on it, and the wires would run like that over to the next pole and so on.
What Antifa did was come along and cut the poles with a chainsaw, not grasping that these power lines at the poles they were cutting They're high tension lines, all right?
They're high tension lines, very high electricity and They also have support lines from one to the next to the next and these poles and the whole system is hardened against trees falling on these guys and taking down many poles at once so there's resilience built into the system and they'd cut through the pole and the pole would just stand there wouldn't fall over or anything had it fallen over they would have probably been killed not from the pole but from the from the electrical discharge
to the surrounding area because it's all wet.
These are out in the woods.
These are way the hell away from humans and out in the woods and stuff along the sides of major freeways.
So anyway, it was noticed and there's people out there now saying, you know, taking care of this kind of stuff.
This was back some period of time when they were having all the riots here in the United States when the progressives were doing all their riot shit.
Anyway, so they were trying to attack our power system but they don't know what they're doing, right?
And I'll tell them how to do it.
They would not have been able to do that in this particular position.
But they would have to be smart.
They have to be clever.
And all you have to do is get a line up over the power lines that has a little loop in it.
Let it fall down and put this end through that loop.
Attach it to a car, crude car here, and drive away.
And the big noose you've made over the power lines is going to squeeze all the power lines together and short the fuck out of everything.
If you're not careful, if you have a conductive line and you don't choose the wrong plastic or rope, you'll electrocute yourself because all that juice will go into your car.
But hey, so if you're a stupid antifa, you'll fry yourself trying to do this.
But things like this are done.
You can do that.
You'd have to know what you're doing.
You have to understand this.
There's easier ways even to do this to disrupt electrical functioning.
You can even disrupt electrical functioning without causing permanent damage, but you can do it in such a way as to drive people so batty that they shut systems down.
So imagine this situation.
You have proximity sensors, motion sensors, on the guard towers in the concentration camps in Australia.
All right?
You can see how they've got it set up so the people that are guards can look way away.
They don't have to concentrate on what's right underneath them.
This is the standard in the way that the prisons are being built all over the world now, right?
And so you've got a, let's just say it's a crude kind of a guard tower and the guard stands up here, right?
There's his two little legs and he's out here looking with his binoculars out that way.
These guys, the guard towers, will have proximity sensors down like this that fan out and look for stuff like movement down here.
And they report by beeping or some other alerting mechanism, another system.
They do that to get the guard's attention so he'll stop looking far out and can look down close.
So it's sort of a way of protecting the towers from mischief, but also enlarging the scope of the area that the tower itself can control just by being there.
And you'll see these towers all along the double fence things on the Australian concentration camps.
All right, so these things are going to be going off continuously at night.
Bats and this kind of thing, they're going to have to adjust the threshold for what triggers them way up.
So it'll have to be, so it won't trigger to little stuff.
It'll have to be something fairly high up, fairly massive, right?
And so from the outside, it'd be very easy to disrupt these things with like a softball, just throw a softball through.
And so if you had a guy inside the fence and a guy outside the fence, they could just throw a softball back and forth through these things, triggering alarms all fucking night, driving these guards crazy.
But there's even easier ways to do this with magnets and so on.
So these guys in Australia are on metal towers.
So someone could just come along with one of these high-power neodium spherical magnets and pitch it right up there or use the slingshot and get it right next to the proximity sensor.
And anywhere in this particular area, it's going to start distorting that field to the point where there will be a continuous whine coming out of the fucker.
So you can do all kinds of stuff to disrupt the system of systems and ultimately erode this.
Now, there's also other kinds of systems, right?
And this whole power pyramid depends more on this other kind of system than any other kind of system that it works.
And this other kind of system, we can think of as like the morale system for all the personnel.
Okay, the powers that be, the power pyramid, must have mind control in order for this shit to work.
Because so for instance, in the concentration camp, those guards, if their morale gets real low, they're not going to be real effective.
They're not going to try and do things.
Maybe they'll start sympathizing with the people they've got to abuse.
It'll change their mind and they won't work as hard and your whole concentration camp goes to hell.
Efficiency is no good, etc., right?
So you've got to worry about the morale of the people.
And so the people that work there are vulnerable to having their morale fucked with by on the outside.
You know, so they've got to go back to, or they've got to go to work every morning at the concentration camp.
And so in this situation, they count on the powers that be count on the guards being able to, or the camp personnel being able to go back to a normal environment with wife and kids and family and sports and all that kind of stuff to some extent and then go back into work.
And so if you disrupt them in their normal environment, you're going to degrade their performance really quick because then all they have is work.
So in other words, if it becomes known that they're a concentration camp guard and they can't go anywhere, now anyway, they're locked down and that kind of shit in any event, but they can't do anything because people are going to give them shit and they're ashamed of themselves, so to speak, then it degrades the whole performance.
They'll quit, the whole system will erode, and it'll start getting, you know, start crumbling even faster.
So morale is a big issue.
The powers that be depend on this at another level too, and that is that all the subcontractors, all of the people that maintain the water systems, the power systems, the security systems, all of this kind of stuff that don't work in the camp are a vulnerability.
You must maintain a morale that these people don't sabotage this.
You know, if someone's in there working on a security system and their cousin Al is in there, they might make that security system not work, right?
So you can't have that from a powers that be sort of thing.
And this is where we're getting now because so much of this stuff is subbed out.
And the subcontracting systems are dependent on their own personnel systems and so on and so on.
So you could find out what company does the security system work at the concentration camps and go get a job there with the deliberate idea that sooner or later you're going to be in these camps and you'll start doing sabotage.
And they'd have no way of knowing about this.
That their system was being used against them, that you were just slotting yourself in to a particular company on the outside such that you knew the likelihood was that within the next number of months you'd be working on something at one of these camps, right?
And so the powers that be have real problems that way too.
So there are dependencies of a system on a system on a system on a system such that somebody in constant, okay, so you could deprive a concentration camp of power if you knew where the primary substation was from the high-tension down lines.
Now, even if they're underground, the primary substation has to be above ground or it has to be in a facility because these are big.
These are giant transformers.
Transformers are basically batteries in cans that take direct current and make it into alternating current.
And so in World War II, for instance, there was the two ride three, okay?
Two ride three.
It was said in Dutch and it was said in French.
It was a phrase that meant you were going to go out and do sabotage with bicycles.
And it was a situation where you had bicycle one here, one person riding it, and these are the handlebars and there's the front wheel, and another bicycle and another bicycle.
And so you had two people riding bicycles and they would hold the third one in between them.
And so you would have two people riding down the road with three bicycles, basically one bicycle between them.
So you would hold your handlebars.
You'd have to be coordinated to do it.
But it wasn't that difficult, right?
And then you would ride past a substation where electricity and stuff was being converted.
One person, they'd stop.
One person would get off their bicycle, take the bicycle from the middle, and throw it over the fence into all of that electrical gear for big explosions.
And then they'd ride off on their bicycles.
And so two ride three.
So anyway, this kind of stuff can be expected to occur as we go forward.
But that was a way of attacking the systems, right?
And you can do that.
It's quick, it's there, it works, and so on.
But we're at a situation here now where over these next few weeks, we're going to see the emergence of the worm, right?
We're going to get to the name of the worm here in a minute.
The powers that be, as I was saying, the power pyramid depends on a system of system of system of systems, everything becoming much more systematized as we go forward, which is its vulnerability.
It thinks of it as its strength.
So few can control many because they have the power of the system, you know, between them and the many.
But the power of that system now is dependent on mind control, which is dependent on media.
More than anything else, it's dependent on control of the media.
And so we see that the term even, great awakening, indicating that humanity is leaving the mind control, is itself just the fact that that term is out and about and even being tossed up in the generalized media versus the great reset language is an indication that we've got a breakdown in the mind control.
Thus, there is a breakdown in the media.
Because without the breakdown in the media, the mind control would still be strong.
So we have all of the devices, all of these kind of things that support the media in the mind control.
The satellites, the, I mean, it even goes down into the, you know, entertainment, movies, art, sports, all of this stuff.
It's all intertied in the power pyramids attempt to control those systems.
But it's all breaking up now because we're in the world of systems of systems where systemized growth is the predominant form of growth.
Instead of creating new systems, we now create systems that themselves create new systems.
You know, franchising and all of these different kinds of methods for incomes and all this sort of different thing, right?
But basically, we're at a point in time now where the critical mass is going to leave the media.
Now, we don't know what day that will be, but it'll be one person, and it's stupid to think of it this way, but it is accurate.
One person is going to make a decision.
Now, I don't believe CNN.
And that will be the last person within the main mass of humanity.
And thereafter, there'll be more people that disbelieve them actively than believe than any way, shape, or form could be believing in what they're saying.
That one-person effect has probably occurred, probably occurred months ago, but we're going to have a situation where we will have a demonstration that the media control, the mind control, is failing.
This is good news for places that do, in fact, have concentration camps, because here's what's going to happen.
The whole reason for the concentration camps is predicated on public health and the COVID narrative.
If the COVID narrative collapses and all the air goes out, so if Falke is removed, if NA here in the United States, if NIH is shut down, National Institute of Health is shut down, CDC is raided, and all this stuff is taken, and FDA has all their records taken about all these kind of all of the stuff about the vaccines and so forth.
And we saw this publicly, even if, and especially if the CNN and these people were denying it, doing everything they could to spin it and deny it, you would know that the narrative is collapsing right then and there, and that the people that are trying to support the narrative have even less emotional or authoritative claims to be the authority there, right?
And so there's one key factor for mind control, the way that it's structured here in our current current milieu.
All right, it wasn't this way in previous times, but it is this way now, and it's changing very rapidly.
So when it changes, it'll happen extremely rapidly because it will communicate itself because it's just communication, it's just an ideas.
So if we started saying, hey, they arrested Falke today, and then CNN denied it.
Oh, no, they didn't arrest Falke.
You know, he's over here.
They can't show you any pictures of him, but he's over here.
And then keeps building, they arrested Fauke, they arrested Falke, that kind of shit, right?
And that started spreading throughout the country.
Then, and the more they denied it, the more it spread, they would have to deny it more and so on, but they couldn't substantiate it because they actually did arrest him.
The minute that that happens, then you find, for instance, that the moral authority in Australia goes just shits itself all over the floor.
And they've got real problems and they're going to start scrambling.
They know that time is close.
We're very close to that.
When social themes change, they change very, social states change.
They change very, very rapidly.
They can change rapidly.
If you're trying to engineer them, it's a problem, okay?
You have to engineer the fear to get everybody to do the mask.
You have to do all this engineering.
You've got to just pound, pound, pound, dead, dead, dead.
All these people dying, dying, dying, dying, dying.
Okay, so you've got to create that in order for this thing to happen.
So you've got to put a huge amount of energy into it.
However, when, and it takes time and a lot of effort, but when this changes organically, there's already a quivery state in the quivering in the state of humanity, and then it changes very rapidly because it's already in motion.
And so we're at that point right now where their narrative will fall apart far faster than it took them to build it up.
And it'll fall far deeper than they can anticipate because it's going to take with it their entire medical dictatorship, the allopathic medicine, all of this stuff.
It's going to expose the crimes against humanity.
It's going to rupture their system completely.
It's going to rupture the system of systems that they were using to control humanity completely as a result of the errors that they've made in their progress so far to date.
This, as I had said some other times, I think it'll take less than three weeks for all that to occur.
So I think once the crack starts going in the narrative At a particular emotional level, it'll basically go around the planet in less than three weeks, and those places that are dependent on it will be fractured and fumbling and so on.
And other places will be piling in on it.
So, once we start accepting stuff in terms of the once our public starts accepting that they've been had and this sort of thing, information will come out from everywhere, will pile on, and we'll just keep piling on with this as we proceed in this war against the power pyramid attempting to overlay itself over the organic nature of humanity working shit out.
I think we might be within three weeks or so of that jump-off point where all of this stuff happens very rapidly.
Now, we're still going to be in a very stressful time, we still have many challenges and so on, but we at least won't have the pandemic and all of that kind of stuff on our backs.
It may take some time for this to fracture to the point where the Australian concentration camps are opened up and basically destroyed and this kind of thing.
But that process, once begun, won't be, in fact, already has begun and is not stoppable.
It's just a matter of the continuing pressure and then basically looking for that particular day when it comes on out.
This was discovered by Jean Baudrillard.
He did it, he came into the discovery, according to him, of the vulnerability.
He didn't look at it that way.
He wasn't trying to destroy systems or anything, right?
I'm looking at this from a strategic analysis viewpoint in our milieu now.
He did not, but he just glancingly, so to speak, provided the insight that systems of systems are vulnerable to systems, and you can find the key system from your opponent, and then within that key system, you can find the key component that allows the contention to continue.
So, in the case of a COVID concentration camp, maybe the key component might turn out to be water in some places, might be electricity in other places, might be invoices or stamps or IT department in some other places.
So, it'll vary in terms of the key component in a given situation.
But the idea is that all of their systems, because they're interrelated, will become vulnerable to crashes in a single system.
And you just have to find the single system that is most easy for you to get at and find its point of vulnerability, and there you go.
Now, I think that the key system that controls it all is mind control and through the media.
So, let me put that back up again.
All right.
And I think that the media that they have, as we all know, it's fracturing, but it's going to fall completely apart as we get to this next period, maybe a week, maybe two weeks.
And that we're going to be set on a path that even the normies are going to have to endure the worm that flies at night.
Now, this is a phrase, a literary phrase, but it reflects what Jean Baudrillard really had discovered.
Because even in his day, he noticed that World War II was sort of a put-up job.
He's in France, he's got all this shit happening around happening around him.
But his comments are that he saw certain patterns that didn't jive with an organic expectation for this to emerge.
But he knew that at the end of World War II, he was certain that all systems of the power structure, those people that paid for Karl Marx, that paid for communism, that was using all of this against humanity, all of those systems are vulnerable to the worm that flies at night.
And Baudrillard and myself know the name of that word.
Lots of people do.
But rarely do you hear anybody discuss it.
But this worm gets into your brain at night and it twists and it twists and you can't do anything about it and it keeps you awake and it keeps you thinking about this shit, right?
And it makes this whole system come crumbling down.
This is the name of that worm, Doubt.
The whole thing is built on confidence.
Take away the confidence.
▲
Export Selection