All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2021 - Clif High
25:22
The Innocents a'Woo - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

language....how you will know the normie is having a mind fritz

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans.
Hello humans.
Once again.
And once again, okay, back again.
All right.
So there once was a young man named Clemens.
Okay, so no, I'm not going to do limericks.
But so Samuel Clemens is the fellow we know as Mark Twain.
His nom de plume.
And it comes from the saying that the riverboat guys used to use when they measured the depth of the river underneath the hull.
And they would swing out the lead and let it fall.
And as it comes back, it would say, Mark Twain.
And, you know, mark all of the different depths as they were going underneath them.
And so having worked on the riverboats, he takes his nom de plume, Mark Twain, from that experience.
So Samuel puts out a book, a story, called The Innocence Abroad, The Innocence Abroad.
And it's about these people.
And basically, it's about people from the U.S. traveling in Europe and doing what was known as the Grand Tour.
And the Grand Tour was, you'd go and see like basically all the major capitals and go look at all the culture and the art and that sort of thing.
Kind of shit my parents used to haul me through when we were over there, right?
You'd always go to the capital of the prefecture, the province, or, you know, that little area, find the museums and go look at the cathedrals and stuff.
And you were the innocent there.
Your innocence was in the process of being alleviated by doing the grand tour, supposedly.
And in an underlying metaphor within Mark Twain's, or underlying theme within Mark Twain's story, it's not only these people, the backwards people from the U.S., from the provincial,
barely, hardly a country for 100 plus years, moving in and seeing this ancient stuff, but it is also the way he presents it to you.
It also includes the issue or the concepts of the defining nature of the innocent themselves in the language that they use to explore the theoretically non-innocent, more cultured, more full world of old Europe at that point.
And Mark Twain's literary style itself is part of the story.
Okay, so basically a sub-theme, a sub-plot within the story is an unspoken, and it is revealed in the language of the characters that he presents.
He went through and did this grand tour, and he's telling you all about it in a series of serializations.
Serialization was where, as a person who wanted to do something back when, back before we had a great deal of corporate stuff, you would go and you'd find yourself newspapers to sponsor you.
So it was kind of like finding a corporate sponsor, right?
Only instead of wearing their hoodie or whatever, they would pay you to provide services to them in a unique fashion.
And so if you knew in a time of not very many people traveling that you were going to go and do travel, you could arrange to write articles and mail them back from your travels to various newspapers and in essence form your own syndicate around this process and pay for your trip as you went.
And that was the whole journey that Mark Twain took was this multi-layered, multi-leveled interaction with himself in Europe and in which he writes this series of articles and observations that we compress into The Innocence Abroad as he did.
Now, his language that he uses to explore Europe is based on United States in the 1800s.
It's based on the language of English then, and one of the points that he makes within his character's speech is how poor Mark Twain thought at that time his language was expressed through these characters to describe how they were interacting with and absorbing the experience of the Grand Tour.
And of course, by the end of the Grand Tour, the upshot is that it's revealed slowly that part of that process is acquiring the new vocabulary.
Okay, so throughout the story of the Innocence Abroad, the characters become more sophisticated.
They grow in their appreciation and in their expression within the bounds of the constraints of that story as it's unfolding.
And that is an aspect of the story itself, is that the author is showing you through the maturation of the language of the people, the maturation of their thought and the more sophisticated their minds become.
So now, this brings us up to the innocence a woo.
So right now, we're in this process of this grand upheaval in humanity.
And there are many levels to it.
I frequently focus on the self-organizing collective and its battle against the minions of oppression, tyranny, and genocide, all of these things, right?
And so I characterize all those as the bug, this inhuman thing.
And we discuss the woo arising around the minions of the bug, as well as around all of the normies and what's going on, and we make our observations about what's happening.
One of the things we should observe is the maturation and the increasing sophistication of the language of the normies as we proceed.
Because we will see that the innocence here, the normies, are becoming more sophisticated as they are presented.
They're starting to absorb.
They're going into learning mode.
And their minds are becoming more sophisticated with what they are seeing because they're seeing so many shocks in the woo, right?
Shocks to their paradigm.
And within each and every one of these, they absorb a blow to their very, very rigid mental constructs of reality.
And as those blows are absorbed, the paradigm breaks and falls away in their mind.
And thus, as it breaks in any individual, it breaks in all individuals because that individual no longer supports all the other individuals within their construct of that paradigm.
And so there is this like interactive, continual crumbling effect as the paradigm falls away from us, away from the normies.
Now, those people that already see are stepped outside of that.
They're already outside of the normie paradigm.
They're watching this from the outside.
They're absorbed in their own parts of the process as the sock is waging war against the minions and the minions are fighting back.
But the view of the non-normie, the view of the awakened people, the wu people, is a little bit more encompassing of what's going on.
And we can see, the wu people can see, and we can hear in the language of the normies that the shells are cracking, that they're indeed waking up and starting to examine and ask questions and make statements.
And sometimes their statements are a little bit hesitant, but then they get it and then they're more forceful and so on, right?
They get the reassurance they need that you're not going to jump down their throat about this wacky idea they've got that, you know, that Biden likely cheated his way in and on top of that he's likely a pedophile.
Okay, so such things are difficult concepts to express for the normie because of the construction in which they live and they've held their entire lives.
And this is a very scary time for all of the normies.
The scary time is going to go on for in a very deep way for November, December, and January as stuff comes out that will affect the normie's view of the world and their place in it.
So Most people are not scientists, okay?
And most people that are in academia as scientists should not be there.
There is a key element that a scientist should have, in my opinion, right?
I'm an opinionated fucker, there's no question.
But see, I've thought about this.
So scientists must have the ability to take a thought in and examine that thought, put it in the slot, accept that thought within a slot within their overall description in their mind of the paradigm they're living in, and examine it and see how it changes their thinking and their paradigm and stuff without 100% accepting it.
They must have the ability, a scientist must have the ability to sandbox ideas and concepts such that they can take them in and integrate them in a safe way into their thinking and see if it fits and it's valid and so on, right?
So most people cannot do this.
Most people are almost at their DNA level, almost at their epigenetic level, incapable of opening up their paradigm to accept in a new thought and then later with the potential of later rejecting it when it doesn't fit.
But most of them are not even capable of opening up their paradigm to take in a new thought, especially if it conflicts with anything that's already there.
That sets up this thing that we call cognitive dissonance, where you have these two thoughts that collide, that cannot work.
They're just basically just simply not going to function with each other.
And the cognitive dissonance means that the mind does not work.
Anytime it encounters one of those thoughts and then has to deal with the other thought, it sort of short circuits and sits there dithering for a while because it doesn't know which way to go.
And cognitive dissonance is a real, obviously a real productivity, anti-productivity tool, right?
It makes you really slow and you just don't get stuff done.
But it affects all different kinds of things relative to questioning your own actions and these sorts of things, right?
So most of the people, it's safe to say that most of the people that are scientists today are basically regular normies that were fascinated with science, but as a regular normie, they have a hardwired in their head, a hardwired version of a reality paradigm, and they're not going to examine thoughts that cause conflict within that.
So thus, we see how it is naturally occurring that academics in the main would not examine the ideas of UFOs because they conflict with every bit of things within their already established paradigm.
You know, their physics, evolution, whatever, right?
So you run into this with PhD, with very, very, very intelligent, very, very, very knowledgeable people that are incapable of examining a thought that in any way conflicts with the structures in their mind already.
So now I'm lucky in that sense.
You know, I can certainly model an idea and then pitch it out if it doesn't work or integrate it in and throw out those ideas that it causes to kick out.
I don't care.
I do not have the normal, and I use that word deliberately, I do not have the normal bias to emotional weight to ideas and concepts.
That emotional bias comes from, in my opinion, and I've read Sapolsky's behavior and I've extracted from that book, very, very beautiful book, extracted the, or behave, it's called, the concepts of the, what I want to think of as a weighted average for emotions relative to the underlyings of your paradigm.
And these come from basically from insecurity, from the insecurity of life that all humans have.
And the academics, and those people that have rigid views of the paradigm, take a great deal of security from the rigidity and the seeming inviolate stance of those concepts, those abstractions.
So it's just the same, academics take the same level of and give to these ideas the same level of sanctity that religion gets from the tenants of a religion.
And so once an academic has signed on to evolution or Einsteinian view of relativity or whatever, it's almost impossible to get them to change because they are usually, most of these people are usually not natively adaptable to new ideas at a later stage in life.
And this is true of almost all the people.
And so this is a fact of aging, is that as you age, you will get a certain conservatism, a certain rigidity that creeps into your thoughts.
You have what's known as crystallized knowledge, not dynamic or new knowledge.
And as that occurs, you have a tendency to fall back to a position of defense of the paradigm no matter what.
And so as we're going forward here, we're encountering a period of time where we will be able, as the awakened ones around them, to be able to examine the normies as they stumble through and encounter the same kind of cognitive dissonance, of mental stumbling blocks developing in their reality that Mark Twain wrote about with his characters in The Innocents Abroad.
Now, in our case, our innocent people are walking around and they're a woo.
They're awash in the sea of woo.
They have no idea what the woo is going on.
They don't know that woo exists.
You know, they're like a fish.
They don't know the fish does not know water exists.
It knows air exists because it can't live up there and it dies.
But it doesn't know water exists because it's a fish.
And so, but these people are swimming in the woo and they don't see it and they don't recognize it.
They just know that their world is crumbling, that their world is totally falling apart and nothing makes any sense.
Now, so my vision of this from looking at data and analysis is that we're going to go through this really rough period of time that's November, December, January, that will extend some point into February, but then should ease fairly, I hate to put an adjective on it, but it will ease at the end of February.
And we will start an emotional, a different emotional trend line near the end of February.
But over the next period of time, it's going to be best to have a good vision that does not stop and focus on the now because there's going to be a lot of people running around in the now that are just totally losing it with cognitive dissonance over all of the stuff that's going to be coming out, that is coming out now.
And so here we are on the 6th of November.
I went in from messing about with my tractor and I was going to make lunch and stuff.
I examined some of the headlines and I find out that the Brandon regime has just gotten X number of Republicans to sign on to the idea of let's spend a trillion plus dollars doing some kind of bogus criminal actions here, bribing, corrupting, bombing or whatever, right?
I didn't know all the details.
It doesn't matter.
What is important is that the key thing is that it's passed and it's over a trillion dollars.
Now, this means that this now bakes into the cake a further, greater, calamitous impact on the economics of things, right?
And the prices of things.
And so this also means that just maybe one more of these kind of moves and then we'll have to see them, or we will see them in a desperate attempt try to clamp down on hyperinflation.
And the only thing they know how to do is going to be price controls.
And so we'll see them talk about that language and so forth, right?
Now, all of this stuff is breaking down for them as well, because along with that was another headline that, you know, an appeals court judge has said, let's go, Brandon cannot do mandates, and that it all has to be held until courts can examine it and see if it's all legal shit, which, you know, is coming.
We know it.
They can't, it's not legal.
They're not going to be able to do it.
As soon as you get into some court that isn't 100% owned by the Chinese, you're going to get a different result on all of this and they'll throw it all out because it is unconstitutional, etc.
It's all at the behest of the CCP.
It's all an attempt to kill Americans so the CCP can take over yada yada yada.
And so all this is going to come out in the Wu here.
Now, so this the dual nature here of the crumbling of the pandemic narrative at the same time they're ramping up the new economic narrative is a coincidence.
They are coinciding with each other, but they are interlinked and not happenstance.
And they're going to play out over the next 11 to 15 days here.
We'll start seeing the impact on the financial as we start going down that particular path and degrading there.
And we will have to look to the language of the normies to see how that is impacting them.
This is going to be the very large level of impact coming from the Brandon regime is going to wash over the normies here at an economic level.
And that's going to amplify all of the negativity towards the Brandon regime.
And all of the, and it's going to escalate both the intensity and the amplitude of the resistance and the visibility.
Now, this is going to cause some major social cracking around, like, say, the 15th of November.
Okay, so say from the 15th, maybe until the 21st or so, we're going to have in there, we're going to have a social cracking in the sense that the rising intensity and rising volume and rising pressure of pushback,
resistance to the Brandon regime is going to have the next major impact during that period of time on the Brandon regime's last remaining weapon, which is within the mainstream media, the corporate media.
So that's going to break down in a big way over these next few weeks in this next, in the, how do I want to say, the pressure wave that the Brandon regime has to push out at this point is going to cause this almost, or very fast blowback that will undo their efforts and also cause further cracks in their tools, their ability to get these messages out.
So it's going to be a very interesting month.
It's going to be a very draining month on resources as all these people that around us die, all of these individuals like the fit athletes and the kids go into these rap concerts, as all this shit starts coming out and these connections are being made.
It's not being made right now to normies, but maybe in 30 or 40 or 50 days, something like that, normies will come across articles maybe of medical people saying, hey, what's going on?
We've got a very high death rate in large crowds.
And it's never happened before and all these are young people.
Somebody will start making the connections and that'll start infiltrating into the language.
All of these things are going to start affecting our innocence in their woo state, right, where they're just sort of sploshed with the woo and they don't know what's going on.
They're like a farmer out of Missouri taken to Paris in the 1800s and seeing the glory of Paris then, having virtually never been out of backwater, Missouri, right?
And you're just like, whoa, mom and pa kettle time, what's going on here, right?
And you don't even have the sophistication of mom-and-pa kettle, who at least had an exposure to a wider world through radio.
Here we're running into normies that will not even have that exposure because they've never investigated any of the conspiracy stuff, any of the thinking along those lines.
In that sense, this is where you'll find their language breaking down.
They won't have the words.
They won't have the language to express it.
They will be hesitating and using conspiracy words because they just, you know, let's face it, they're going to have a hard time calling authority figures, you know, reptilians.
Or getting in and start talking about shit like that.
So you may have to provide them with some linguistic clues as to where to go, you know, what direction they need to be pushing in on this stuff.
But November is going to be interesting.
I've got the third part of the data set running now.
I'll be able to get at it in the next few days after I get off the new tractor and have a look and see if there's anything that's available to be gleaned out of it.
As we're deep into the Wu here, there's going to be less and less.
Basically, my linguistic analysis was able to detect the structure of the paradigm breaking down against the Wu.
But as we're overblown with the Wu and everybody is censored, the ability to pick that stuff up is fading away.
So maybe I'll get something interesting, maybe not, no guarantees, but I'll have a look at it.
Anyway, guys, so watch out for the normies.
They're going to need a lot of help.
You'll have to supply the terms and the language of what's going on.
Boy, I got to get moving, I guess.
All right, so I guess I'll go ahead and I'll call it World War III too.
Everybody else is.
▲
Export Selection