All Episodes
Nov. 6, 2021 - Clif High
23:00
The Innocents a'Woo - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

language....how you will know the normie is having a mind fritz

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans, hello humans once again.
And once again, okay, back again.
Alright.
So I once was a young man named Clemens.
Okay, so no, I'm not going to do limericks.
But uh so Samuel Clemens is the fellow we know as Mark Twain, uh his gnome de plume.
And uh comes from the saying that the river boat guys used to use when they measured the depth of the river underneath the hull, and they would swing out the lead and let it fall, and as it comes back, it would say Mark Twain, and you know, mark all of the different depths as they were going underneath them.
And so uh having worked on the river boats, he takes uh his nom de plume uh Mark Twain from that experience.
So uh so Samuel puts out a book, a story called The Innocents Abroad, The Innocents Abroad, and it's about these people, and uh basically it's about uh people from the US traveling in Europe and doing what was known as the Grand Tour.
And the grand tour was um you'd go and see like basically all the major capitals and go look at all the culture and the art and that sort of thing.
Kind of shit my parents used to haul me through in uh when we were over there, right?
You'd always go to the capital of the prefecture or the province or you know, that little little area, find the museums and go look at the cathedrals and stuff.
And uh you were the innocent there.
You were your innocence was in the process of being alleviated by the uh doing the grand tour, supposedly.
Um and uh in an underlying metaphor within Mark Twain's or underlying theme within Mark Twain's story, it's um not only these people, the you know, the backwards people from the US from the provincial um uh uh barely hardly an uh a country for you know a hundred plus years uh moving in and seeing this ancient stuff,
but it is also the um uh his the way he presents it to you, it's also includes the uh issue or the concepts of the um the defining nature of the innocent themselves in the language that they use to explore the theoretically non-innocent,
more cultured, more um uh full world of of old Europe at that point.
Uh and Mark Twain's uh literary style itself is part of the story.
Okay, so basically uh a sub-theme, a subplot within the story is an unspoken and it is revealed in the language of the characters that he presents.
He went through and did this grand tour, and he's telling you all about it in a series of um uh surrealizations.
Serialization was where as a as a person who wanted to do something back when, back before we had a great deal of uh corporate stuff, you would go and you'd find yourself newspapers to sponsor you.
So it's fine, kind of like finding a corporate sponsor, right?
Only instead of wearing their their hoodie or whatever, uh they would pay you to provide services to them in a unique fashion.
And so if you knew in a time of uh not very many people traveling that you were gonna go and do travel, you could arrange to um uh write articles and mail them back from your travels to various newspapers and in essence form your own syndicate around this process and pay for your trip as you went.
And that was the whole um journey that Mark Twain took was this this um multi-layered, multi um leveled uh interaction with himself in Europe, in which he writes the this series of um uh articles and observations that we compress into the innocence abroad, as he did.
Now his language that he uses to explore Europe is based on United States in the 1800s.
It's based on the language of English then, and one of the points that he makes within his character speech is how poor Mark Twain thought at that time his language was expressed through these characters to describe how they were interacting with and absorbing the experience of the Grand Tour.
And of course, by the end of the grand tour, the upshot is that they that it's revealed slowly that part of that process is acquiring the new vocabulary.
Okay.
Okay, so uh so throughout the story of the innocence abroad, the characters become more sophisticated.
They grow in their appreciation and in their expression within the bounds of the constraints of that story as it's unfolding.
And that is an aspect of the story itself is that the author is showing you through the maturation of the language of the people, the maturation of their thought and the more sophistication of uh sophisticated their minds become.
So now this brings us up to the innocence a woo.
So right now we're in this process of this um uh grand upheaval in humanity.
And uh there are many levels to it.
I frequently focus on the self-organizing collective and its battle against the minions of uh oppression, tyranny, and um uh genocide, all of these things, right?
And so I I characterize all those as the bug, this inhuman thing.
And we discuss the uh woo arising around the minions of the bug, as well as around all of the normies and what's going on, and we make our observations about what's happening.
One of the things we should observe is the maturation and the sophistic increasing sophistication of the language of the normies as we proceed.
Because we will see that the innocence here, the normies, are becoming more sophisticated as they are presented, they're they're starting to absorb, they're going into learning mode, and their minds are becoming more sophisticated with what they are seeing because they're seeing so many uh shocks in the Wu, right?
Shocks to their paradigm.
And within each and every one of these, they absorb a blow to their very very rigid mental constructs of reality.
And as those blows are absorbed, the paradigm breaks and falls away in their mind, and thus, as it breaks in any individual, it breaks in all individuals because that individual no longer supports all the other individuals within their construct of that paradigm.
And so there is this like interactive continual crumbling effect as the paradigm falls away from us, as away from the normies.
Now, um those people that already see are stepped outside of that.
They're already outside of the normie paradigm, they're watching this from the outside.
They're absorbed in their own parts of the process as the SOC is waging war against the minions and the minions are fighting back.
But um the view of the non-normy, the view of the awakened people, um, the Wu people, is a little bit more encompassing of what's going on.
And we can see the Wu people can see, and we can hear in the language of the normies that they are indeed that the shells are cracking, that they're indeed waking up and starting to examine and ask questions and and uh make statements, and sometimes their statements are a little bit hesitant, but then they get it, and then they're more forceful and so on, right?
They get the reassurance they need that you're not gonna jump down their throat about this wacky idea they've got that you know um uh you know that uh Biden likely cheated his way in and and on top of that he's likely a pedophile.
Okay, so um uh such things are difficult concepts to express for the normie because of the construction in which they live and and they've held their entire lives.
And this is a very um scary time for all of the normies.
The scary time is gonna go on for in a in a very deep way for November, December, and January as stuff comes out that will affect uh the normies view of the world and their place in it.
So uh most people are not scientists, okay, and most people that are in academia as scientists should not be there.
There is a um key element that a scientist should have, in my opinion, right?
I'm um an opinionated fucker, there's no question.
Uh but see I've thought about this.
So scientists must have the ability to take a thought in and examine that thought, put it in in the slot, accept that thought within the slot within their um overall description in their mind of the paradigm they're living in, and examine it and see how it changes their their thinking and their paradigm and stuff without a hundred percent accepting it.
They must have the ability, a scientist must have the ability to sandbox ideas and concepts such that they can take them in and integrate them in a safe way into their thinking and and see if it fits and it's valid and so on, right?
So most people cannot do this.
Most people are um almost at their DNA level, almost at their epigenetic level, incapable of opening up their paradigm to accept in a new thought, and then later, with the potential of later rejecting it when it doesn't fit.
But most of them are not even capable of opening up their their paradigm to take in a new thought, especially if it conflicts with anything that's already there.
That sets uh sets up this thing that we call cognitive dissonance, where you have these two thoughts that that collide that cannot work.
They're just basically just simply not going to function with each other.
Uh, you know, and um uh and it the cognitive dissonance means that the the mind does not work.
It any time it encounters one of those thoughts and then has to deal with the other thought, it it's sort of short circuits and sits there dithering for a while because it doesn't know which way to go.
And cognitive dissonance is a real obviously a real um productivity, anti-productivity tool, right?
Makes you really slow and and you just don't get stuff done.
Uh, but it affects all different kinds of things relative to questioning your own actions and these sorts of things, right?
So most of the people it's safe to say that most of the people that are scientists today are basically regular normies that were fascinated with science, but as a regular normie, they have a hardwired in their head, a hardwired uh version of a reality paradigm, and they're not going to examine thoughts that cause conflict within that.
So thus we see how it is naturally occurring that academics in the main would not examine the ideas of UFOs, because they conflict with every bit of uh things within their already established paradigm, you know, their physics, evolution, whatever, right?
So you run into this with PhD with with very, very, very uh intelligent, very, very, very knowledgeable people that are incapable of examining um a thought that in any way conflicts with the um structures in their mind already.
So now I'm lucky in that sense.
Um, you know, I can certainly model an idea and then pitch it out if it doesn't work, or integrate it in and throw out those ideas that it causes to kick out.
I don't care.
I do not have the um normal, and that I use that word uh deliberately.
I do not have the normal bias to emotional weight to ideas and concepts.
That emotional bias comes from, in my opinion, and I've read uh Sopolski's uh behavior and I've I've extracted from that book, very very beautiful book.
Um I extracted the or behave, it's called uh the concepts of the um uh what I want to think of as a uh weighted average for emotions uh relative to the underlyings of your paradigm.
And these come from a basically from insecurity, from uh the insecurity of life that all humans have.
And the academics and will and those people that have rigid views of the paradigm uh take a great deal of security from the rigidity and the seeming uh inviolate stance of those uh concepts, those abstractions.
So you know it's just the same academics take the same uh level of um and give to give to the these ideas, the same level of sanctity that religion gets from the tenets of a religion.
And so once an academic, you know, uh has signed on to evolution or you know Einsteinian view of of relativity or whatever, it's almost impossible to get them to change because they are are usually most of these people are usually not um natively adaptable to new ideas at a later stage in life.
And this is true of almost all the people, and so this is um a fact of aging is that as you age you will get uh certain conservatism, a certain uh rigidity that creeps into your thoughts.
Uh you have what's known as crystallized knowledge, uh not dynamic or new knowledge, and uh and as that occurs, you have a tendency to fall back to a position of defense of the paradigm no matter what.
And so as we're going forward here, we're we're encountering a period of time where we're we will be able, as the awakened ones around them, to be able to examine the normies as they stumble through and encounter the same kind of um cognitive dissonance of mental stumbling blocks developing in their reality that um Mark Twain wrote about with his characters in The Innocence Abroad.
Now, in our case, our innocent people are walking around and they're a woo.
They're awash in the sea of woo, they have no idea what the woo is going on.
Uh they don't know that woo exists, you know, they're like a fish.
They don't know that fish does not know water exists.
It knows air exists because it can't live up there and it dies.
Uh, but uh it doesn't know water exists because it's because it's a fish.
And so uh uh but these people are swimming in the woo and and they don't see it and they don't recognize it, they just know that their world is crumbling, that their world is totally falling apart, and nothing makes any sense.
Now, so my vision of this from looking at data and analysis is that we're gonna go through this really rough period of time uh that's November, December, January, that will extend some point into February, but then should ease uh fairly hate to put an adjective on it, but it will ease at the end of February.
And uh we will start an emotional, uh a different emotional trend line near the end of February.
But over the next period of time, it's going to be best to have a uh a good vision that does not stop and focus on the now because there's going to be a lot of people running around in the now that are just totally losing it with cognitive dissonance over all of the stuff that's going to be coming out that is coming out now.
And so here we are on the 6th of November.
I went in from messing about with my tractor and I was going to make lunch and stuff.
I examined some of the headlines and I find out that the Brandon regime has just gotten uh X number of Republicans to sign on to the idea of uh let's spend a Trillion plus dollars doing you know some kind of bogus uh um criminal actions here, you know, bribing, corrupting, bombing uh, or whatever, right?
I I didn't know all the details, it doesn't matter.
What is important is that uh the key thing is that it's passed and it's over a trillion dollars.
Now, this means that this now bakes into the cake a further greater uh calamitous impact on the economics uh of things, right?
And the prices of things.
And so this also means that just maybe one more of these kind of moves, and then we'll have to see them, or we will see them in a desperate attempt trying to clamp down on hyperinflation, and the only thing they know how to do is gonna be price controls.
Uh and so we'll see them talk about that language and so forth, right?
Now, all of this stuff is breaking down for them as well, because along with that was another headline that, you know, an appeals court judge has said uh uh let's go, Brandon cannot do uh mandates, and that it all has to be held until courts can examine it and see if it's all legal shit.
Which, you know, is coming, we know it.
They can't, it's not legal, they're not gonna be able to do it.
As soon as you get into some uh court that isn't 100% owned by the Chinese, uh you're gonna get a different uh result on all of this, and they'll throw it all out because it is unconstitutional, etc.
It's all at the behest of the CCP, it's all an attempt to kill Americans so the CCP can take over yada yada yada.
And so all this is gonna come out in the woo here.
Now, so you this the dual nature here of the um crumbling of the pandemic narrative at the same time they're ramping up the new economic narrative is is a coincidence.
They are coinciding with each other, but they are interlinked and not happenstance.
And uh they're gonna play out over the next um 11 to 15 days here.
We'll start seeing the impact on the um financial as we start going down that particular path and degrading there.
And we will have to look to the language of the normies to see how that is impacting them.
This is gonna be the a very large level of impact uh coming from the Brandon regime uh uh is gonna wash over the normies here at an economic level, and that's going to uh amplify all of the negativity towards the Brandon regime and all of the and it's gonna escalate uh both the intensity and the amplitude of the um resistance
and the visibility.
Now, this is going to cause some major social cracking around, like say the 15th of November.
Okay, so say from the 15th uh maybe until the 21st or so uh we're gonna have in there, we're gonna have a um uh a social cracking in the sense that the rising intensity and rising um volume and uh rising pressure of uh pushback resistance to the
Brandon regime is gonna have the next major impact during that period of time on the Brandon regime's last remaining um uh weapon, which is the within the mainstream media, the corporate media.
So that's gonna break down in a big way over these next few weeks in this next um in the uh how do I want to say the uh the pressure wave uh that the Brandon regime has to push out at this point is gonna cause this almost uh or very fast blowback that will undo their efforts and also cause further cracks in the their tools, their ability to get these messages out.
So it's gonna be a very interesting month.
It's gonna be a very um draining month on resources as all these people that around us die, all of these individuals like the fit athletes and uh the uh kids go into these rap concerts, as all this shit starts coming out, and these connections are being made.
It's not being made right now to normies, but maybe in 30 or 40 or 50 days, something like that, normies will come across articles maybe of uh, you know, medical people saying, hey, what's going on?
You know, we've got a very high death rate in large crowds.
And uh it's never happened before and all these are young people.
Some somebody will start making the connections and that'll start infiltr infiltrating into the language.
All of these things are going to start affecting our innocence in their a woo state, right?
Export Selection