All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2021 - Clif High
57:35
Woo Fighting - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

Strategies and tactics for legal efforts against the deathjab

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans.
Welcome in Oslander.
Welcome to the outland.
Welcome to the woo.
Okay, so I've got a bunch of stuff to do.
I gotta move gravel and all this kind of stuff.
But I'm getting a bunch of emails from individuals that are involved in legal matters.
I'm not going to offer legal advice.
I'm not a lawyer.
I don't have any claim to that, although I do claim to have some success in legal matters.
But I'm not going to offer legal advice, but a lot of these individuals that I'm interacting with on Twitter and through email have never had a fight before.
They're young kids.
They've never been faced with anything at all like this before, and they have no idea of the strategy and the tactics to be employed.
So this is a uh about how to do woo fighting, okay, how to really fight.
And so and what is important in fighting.
So I'll explain a few things here.
I've got a I've really got to hurry and get to my tractor work while the weather is good.
But okay, so here's the deal.
Um there was this butt head uh by the name of Corey Good, and he was in league with uh David Wilcock.
They were they had a TV show on Gaia TV.
They I I maintained that they stole um they plagiarized information out of my ALTA reports and put it into their Gaia TV shows to boost their ratings and to guide their uh their plot narrative to trends that I was tracking, okay?
And they never acknowledge this or anything.
I I also I maintain, I contend that Cory Good's narrative of being a secret space program, time traveling astronaut over 104 years old, all of this kind of shit is horseshit.
It's bogus, it's bullshit.
And I got sued by him in a RICO suit, very complex RICO suit with all of these other fuckers, and you can go on PACER.
Now uh PACER is the place where it's a government database that costs you 10 cents per page to search and look for.
It's PACER.gov, I believe.
Um it cost you uh 10 cents a page to look for uh uh to retrieve a case um um document.
And so you could go and you could find my case there.
It'd be um uh uh good versus Gaia uh Zavadnik, High, Widener, uh Montalobano, uh and then he's got other cases, alright.
So he he Corey Good suing other fuckers too, other poor bastards, right?
So anyway though, so uh so I got out of that case.
I did a legal maneuver.
I I I had a had an attorney, he wasn't doing shit in the way of getting me anywhere, he's not aggressive, he doesn't didn't know how to fight.
He was a professional attorney, uh and I fired him, right?
Uh I just got disgusted, we were into it for months, it cost a lot of money.
He had other attorneys doing shit with him.
None of this made any sense at all.
It was basically a rape the client kind of uh a thing, and it they were cooperating in essence with Cory Good's suit.
Corey Good had had hit me with a strategic lawsuit against public participation, right?
That's a slab.
None of this is really pertinent, but this is just history on this, okay.
So he'd hit me one of those, and I had to file uh many, many, many, many documents once I fired my attorney.
But these documents from a pro se okay, pro se means for self.
So um, so here's something you need to know.
Uh go to Pacer.gov and get documents to find and track your own court case.
Uh but legal stuff uh uses Latin.
Whereas medical stuff uses Greek.
Okay, so here it's pro say meaning for self.
So if you file documents for yourself, you're filing them pro se.
Now here's the thing about this.
In the United States, anyway, our court system is set up to assist the pro se filer because of the way in which our court system developed, basically.
I'm not gonna get into details, uh, because I'm not getting into the legal advice, nor there's this a law course.
Uh but uh bear in mind that Latin triumphs everything.
And if you can get a get the definition of Latin that's being used, you will understand what is going on.
So bring up a Google translate, put it on detect language and cut and paste the Latin in there to see what they're actually saying.
And then investigate the nature of how they're using the words.
You will find in our legal system that if you can go all the way back to a Latin root, they can't go any further back in trying to interpret that language.
Alright, so that's just a clue for you there.
Now our legal system operates on a jurisprudence, okay.
So this is where it gets it starts getting tricky in this.
And so you'll find that a lot of our uh language, like jurisdiction derives from language like juris prudence.
And so this is a legal phrase, um jurisprudence means a prudent jury, okay, an informed jury, an accurate jury, etc.
etc.
So our system is based on jurisdiction, and the root word here is dict, meaning word, okay.
Uh so everything comes down to language.
That's what is presented on the face of it.
But there's these other elements that are good strategy and tactics for you.
So here's the strategy.
So you're fighting the um uh gonna so you're presented with a problem.
You're a young guy, you're a young woman, you're presented with a problem.
The problem is that they're saying you must take this death jab in order to keep your job, in order to get a license, in order to travel, in order to go to school.
Okay, so so it comes down to death jab, and then whatever is the reward if you do that.
That is the the crux of the situation that they're placing you in.
Now you want the reward, the travel, the schooling, the job, whatever it is, but you're you're not going to have the death jab.
So that's the first thing to decide is that you will win.
This is a strategy and a tactic, all right.
You will win.
You will not take the death jab ere go, even if you have to forgo the reward temporarily and and recoup later, you will win.
So, knowing that you can be calm about this, and you can also understand something.
If you're getting into the situation of where you're going to put in a cease and desist order, whether you're going to put in a uh legal file, any kind of legal papers against whoever is putting you in this position, the school, your employer, the government, whoever the fuck it is, does not matter, then you know right from the beginning you will win.
So that's your very first strategic thing.
Get that thought in your head that there's no way they can defeat you.
Because in order for a defeat to occur, it must occur with your acknowledgement.
So if they were to defeat you, then you would have to take the jab.
So as long as you're not taking the jab, they can never ever ever defeat you.
And so this is one of those things where no matter what they throw at you, no matter how rough it may get, you will become stronger from this, you will learn a great deal, and you will become very, very, very much more powerful.
Because you're gonna watch them do all of this and you're gonna call them on all of this shit and make them pay up in some form as it as it happens when you win.
When they acknowledge that you win.
So that's how this is going to end.
They will acknowledge that you are the victor.
So there's you there's the first point that's the first element of your strategy.
Now, this is a tactic as as well.
No matter how fierce and and yelling they are, no matter how terrible they are, no matter how devious, duplicitous, uh lying motherfuckers they are, you will always have in your mind, uh you'll you'll use this as a tactic.
You'll always have in your mind that you will win.
You've already won, we just have not Gotten to that point where it has been decided by them capitulating and acknowledging that capitulation that you have won.
So you will in the future win.
You are winning now, and when we arrive at that future, you will have one.
So get that in your your head, and they can never ever defeat you.
So we've already won now.
Now, the only thing that is in doubt, the only question that is is arised here is what strategy or what element of our strategy, which is a tactic, So, let's go.
caused them to capitulate.
Okay?
So that's what is in doubt at the moment.
No doubt that you've won.
Just what is it in the future you're going to do that will cause them to acknowledge?
Oh shit, you know, she beat the crap out of us.
We don't want to get her to really pissed and have her super sue us or anything.
We'd better better, you know, give her whatever the hell the reward is that we were holding out on her, trying to get her to take the death jab.
That ain't gonna happen, so we'd better give her the reward now.
Okay, so that's how this is going to end.
We will discover that's what we're doing.
We're in the woo, we're doing woo fighting.
And so um I always win when I do woo-fighting.
I won against Corey Good, all right.
So I fired my attorney, I filed it.
You can go look up my case there and go and read the documents and see how I laid it out.
And I filed a uh please dismiss me from this case because I do not belong here.
In other words, I said to the to the judge, uh Corey Good has no jurisdiction over me.
He has no uh right of control over my words, and that that everything that he has thrown at me is bogus.
Now, I did this in a in a kind of a tricky way.
I used strategy and I used tactics.
And so I know that all of this is psychological.
Uh so on the part of judges, and so this is what you're gonna face too, right?
Is that all of this is psychological.
So, first off, you will win.
So no matter what they do, do not accept that as a defeat.
So you'll put in some paperwork, and your paperwork's gonna be fucked up.
You're doing this for yourself.
You got no fucking clue as to what you're doing, but you're gonna submit it anyway.
You don't care how ugly it is, how how piss poor it is, you will submit it, you'll pay your $32 to sue them or file the injunction or whatever it is, and you'll submit it.
And they will have to process it.
They will have to use procedure, okay?
And so what they're gonna have to do is because they have to honor their own rules, right?
Their own rules as to how things must proceed.
So, what you do is whatever your court is, whatever court you're filing in, whether you're filing in a in a labor court, whether you're filing in a city court, um, a county court, a municipal court, which is different than a city court,
uh, a um a military court or uh uh a federal court or a state court, uh, any of those courts, the very first thing you do is find out the find out who the judge is that you're submitting it to.
When you submit this, you'll you'll find out.
Oh, judge, the the c uh the clerk of the court will say, okay, this is being filed, they'll stamp it, get the date, take your money, all of this kind of shit, and they'll give you back some receipts.
On there will be the name of the the judge and the name of the court in an exactitude that you can use for a search.
So go and search for the procedures, the rules of procedures that affect that court.
So if it's a state court, you know that you go to that state's uh websites on uh their court and you'll find all of the procedures.
And then each and every one of these judges will have an attendant uh addendum.
And so in my case, the judge says, I'm not gonna take any um filing on uh any motions that are over 4,000 words.
Um and uh in a um uh in this form.
And I want all of the um responses to to these motions to be under 2700 words and so on.
There's word lengths because these bastards have to read this shit and they have to read each and every word.
They can't skip over because each and every word, jurisdiction, the rule, the words rule, um uh the jurisdiction aspect of this, they have to have each and every word understood and everything, all that so procedure and and exactitude dominate the lives of judges, okay?
Then they must follow their own procedure and follow their own rules.
So if, for instance, you find that the people that are um opposing you don't follow that judge's rules, file something right away and point it out, okay, because you can file addendums to any of the shit that they file uh in responses to them and always point out where they fuck up and following the rules.
Even if you're not quite exactly sure, point out to the judge to go and look at this.
Now you have to fit your response into the judge's word list, right?
Okay, but now judges here uh uh okay, so now that is a um a series of tactics that you'll always file uh and always point out where they are screwing up, even if you're sort of uncertain as to the exact part of uh diesel uh uh the the screw up, right?
Uh just because everything you generate must be responded to.
It ties them up.
So the way it works is um you will file a motion, all right?
And this motion means that you want to move the court.
Whatever the hell that court is, you know, the state court, the federal court or whatever, you want to move it with that motion.
Court, get in motion, go do something for me, all right?
And so you're gonna file a motion, and so you'll find out that maybe your motion has 4,000 uh uh word limit on it, and they will have the right to respond.
So they will have a response, and maybe that response is gonna be 2800 words.
And anything over that 2800 words, that judge cannot consider.
So if they write a uh 2900 word uh response and the last and the real bang is in the last hundred words, the judge cannot legally look at it, can't take it into consideration or any of that.
Now they may, but anyway, and you get to reply to that, right?
So you get so you're you file the motion and you get to reply to their response.
And maybe you get 2800 words.
Now each of these things, you file the motion, and there's a clock that starts ticking, and they got 15 days or 20 days, whatever's in that procedure.
They've got some level, it'll be in the procedure rules.
It'll be in their rules as to when all this shit happens.
It's real straightforward, it's easy to read, it's tedious, but it's easy, right?
Uh okay, so you get 15 days to respond, they get 15 days to respond to you.
As soon as they respond, you can reply.
So that was where my that was one of my tactics, okay.
My tactics was alacrity.
Alacrity.
Alacrity.
Okay, which means speed, it means exact speed.
So any time uh Corey Good's uh uh the butt head who sued me, and I was the victim in this, right?
Cost me a shitload of money, they threw me in a RICO case, which is uh racketeering and and corrupt organizations act, and you know, and I don't like any of these other fuckers that I don't even know any of these other fuckers that are being sued.
I never did shit with guy, any of that stuff.
I didn't belong there.
That was legit.
But anyway, one of the things I did was I filed with alacrity.
So if if um if they respond, so whenever uh Corey Good's attorney would respond to me, uh would file something and like a response to my motion or or a resp a reply to my thing when I had a reply of available, I would respond that same fucking day, because that starts a clock on them.
And so if if uh Cory Good's uh uh uh attorney had other shit to do, she was still shit out of luck.
She had a 15-day clock to get back with the reply to my response to her motion.
That kind of thing, right?
So because I was doing it pro se, I had nothing better to do.
I would just sit here and go through and and decide, okay, I'm gonna do it this way, I'm gonna use these four or five points.
So it was just one of my tactics here To be uh alacritus to be very fast to respond in order to keep the time pressure on them.
I didn't want to stretch out the 15 days and then give it to them and keep this whole thing going months, so I boom boom boom boom boom.
So every time I did that sort of thing, it caused big problems for for uh Corey Good's attorney.
Okay, and then as part of my tactics was I pointed out, pointed out uh her bad behavior, her bad behavior as an attorney.
She was doing all these things wrong.
Okay, she was violating their rules, and so I pointed it out each and every time I'm I took some of my words, some of my words that very precious words, but I made sure that I wrote wrote this and so on.
Another thing is I used every single one of my words that I could except in when I filed a motion, and I'll get to that in a second.
Um if I had 2800 words to respond, I used every single word, and if I if I got my main point across in 1200 words, I did not repeat because judges don't like that.
I didn't waste their time.
I used my extra words to point out in in um uh detail where she had screwed up on either their procedure or their rules, all right.
And the rules are in general all about the procedure and how to file and so on, right?
But then also uh she had had violated um uh the like the ethics that an attorney should use in filing cases, and so I got on her on her case, this rule 11 thing.
She was violating rule 11 all the time of federal procedure.
And so I'm I made certain that I pointed that out in there, right?
And so that was one of my tactics was to use reply and response words to the maximum wherever possible.
Now I did not do that on motions.
I filed a motion.
Okay, so these guys in the courts have to do things based on timing.
Uh so alright, so you're gonna win, we'll take that out of here.
I'm gonna need a little bit of room.
Uh they're they're bound by the rules.
I made a a single motion in here, and I did it deliberately as part of a strategy because I observed something.
That um, okay, so I was a defendant, so plaintiff, uh, which was Corey Good, uh, would file something.
They would file like uh a motion or um uh they filed their uh basically the case document.
And then I got to file something, so I was a defendant, and I got to file a reply or a response, okay.
Now there are a shitload of defendants, and so we all got to file responses here to whatever the fuck um uh she had done, his attorney had done, and then they had the court has to work through each and every one of these as and in the order received.
So it gets real complicated, but you can use that scheduling against your opponent.
You can use that scheduling against the court.
That's what I did.
So one of my tactics was alacrity, as I as I wanted to say.
Another tactic was pointing out her bad behavior, and another tactic was using all of my words, right?
And so I those were all tactics here.
Now I had a strategy to which I applied these tactics, and my strategy went like this.
That I observed that they were stuck with their own rules, their hide bound, they have to, they must do this.
And so that here's a couple of things.
Uh, until the case is cured, so they don't adjudicate a case until it is cured, until all of the procedure has been met and is checked off okay.
When that's done, then they'll start looking at these individual documents here, right?
And uh now this is an active ongoing thing, so it actually looks like this.
So defendant files a response.
Maybe this defendant, though, is filing a motion, which is different from a response, and then maybe that same defendant gets to file uh file their response here, and then another defendant uh filed their response, and maybe another defendant is filing a reply,
and maybe the plaintiff is filing uh a motion again, or maybe the plaintiff is filing a uh reply or a response.
It just doesn't make, and then you have another defendant filing stuff.
And so this is how it looks in the database in PACER.
You'll see all these documents racked out this way.
In between here, you'll see the judge doing things with these documents, mainly based on procedure, mainly assigning them to another judge.
So, all right, so we have to quickly get to another thing here.
Um judges work in the United States.
We've got um uh district judges and magistrate.
For our purposes of this discussion, you can think of a magistrate as an intern judge, right?
A judge who's learning on the job, OJ T, uh, on the job training.
All of this procedure shit gets shunted down to this magistrate judge, the district judge might have a bunch of these magistrate judge judges handling all different kinds of cases.
And so the district judge that I was uh dealing with was also handling other Corey Good suit against other people with this particular magistrate judge, but that district judge could have had other magistrate judges handling other cases because that's how they roll.
They got to do all this shit because there's bazillions of court cases being filed, so it's all been you know systematized to this, and everything's got to be in the groove.
It's all electronic, though.
So you can file all this shit electronically.
Once you get your pro se uh uh ability established with that court clerk, you just file it off electronically, zoom zoom zoom, they send you back a response, it gets posted on the database, you get your your dates and so on.
So, anyway, getting back to my strategy.
My strategy centered down to this.
Judges don't ever want to be overturned, okay.
That's their that's the worst thing that can happen to a judge is to have uh something that they adjudicate be overturned, saying that okay, that fucker made a mistake.
A higher court says that that fucker made a mistake.
They don't want that.
So that's your first thing you do is find out where your enemies' boundaries, constraints, and weaknesses are, and where are the boundaries and constraints and weaknesses of the overall fighting that you're doing.
This is woo-fighting tactics, right?
Observe the terrain, see what's going on that you can use as a natural augmentation to your strategies and so on.
And so I determined that judges, so judges don't want, do not want appeals, and they don't they don't want to be overturned.
That's really what it comes down to, right?
So they want to avoid situations where they might be overturned.
And so they they want to make cautious.
They don't ever want to be in a position to make something that is a precedent.
Anything that is precedent-setting, you would think as a judge, oh hey, man, that was my the highlight of my career.
I did this precedent-setting constitutional adjudication.
No, they don't want to do that shit.
That because it gets overturned and there's all these problems.
Okay, so they want to be not middle of the road, but they want to be straight and precise and legal in there and not cause to have cause to do anything precedent-setting, especially in bullshit cases about blue chicken cults suing people for RICO and damages and all of the kind of shit that they were suing me for and all these other people, which all of which is 100% horseshit, right?
And sooner or later, the judge has to look at the actual facts that are being written up in all of these these things and make an adjudication.
So sooner or later they've got to hear that Corey Good was was saying he's a time-traveling um uh astronaut that's uh been doing business with uh eight-foot-high uh blue space chickens, and and the judge is gonna have to say, okay.
You know, anyway though, so the judge doesn't, no judge wants to make a precedent-setting decision.
So I put the judge in a bind.
All right.
So wherever you can bind the circumstances to you, not your opponent.
And so what I did was this.
I saw that the judge had to adjudicate these things, and that if I filed appropriately, so if I decided to file in a particular way, I could have this happen, where I could file my motion to dismiss, which is what they ruled on, okay.
I'd I'd filed a couple of them up here.
I'd filed these MTDs, these motion to dismiss up here.
But I'd filed them to an original case, and that was struck down because they have to cure the case.
They cured the flaws in the case against us.
She dropped a bunch of shit, rewrote it a bunch of times.
We went through three of those, took months.
Anyway, so I'd filed this motion to dismiss a couple of times.
And then the last time I thought, okay, I'm gonna get tricky, it won't cost me anything because I'm pro se.
I was feeling cocky about it anyway.
So what I did was I I filed the motion to dismiss to the last to the number three case that was finally accepted.
They got their check mark, that was the one.
It was cured.
We were gonna we're gonna fight over this particular set of claims against all of the defendants.
And then I I ended up getting to file my motion to dismiss, and then I filed a motion for injunctive relief.
Okay.
Now defendants don't usually file those.
So this was unusual, all right.
Um it's very, very, very rare that a defendant files one of those.
And I did it this way because I knew that that the odds were that it would be thrown out.
But I put a line in there that said, as long as my motion to dismiss is being adjudicated, I would like to have a level playing field between myself and butthead Corey Good.
I didn't call him butthead Corey Good, I called him plaintiff.
Because the plaintiff had had this website out there claiming I was a uh uh uh involved in in uh trafficking humans, okay, by inference.
And this was written by one of his uh batshit attorneys, right, who are all now suing him.
Um anyway, but they were using this as a fundraiser, and uh all of us dark alliance guys or are into you know uh intergalactic sex slavery, that sort of thing, right?
Real batshit claims.
And I wanted to have the judge tell him to take that website down and and stop uh funding his lawsuit with this website.
And that was what was in my injunctive relief.
Now, what I did was I you can go and read it.
I wrote it up in a particular way where I ended up pointing out all the evil that he was doing with this website, calling all these people terrible names, uh hurting their digital reputation forever, um, and um that he was basically uh a butthead and doing and she was doing uh or that he was doing uh violating Rule 11,
all of these different uh procedural rules with the way that he had this website set up and not discussing it with a court and all this other stuff, and that I wanted the judge to render such relief as the judge might see fit.
So uh I didn't ask for anything specific, right?
But I asked for injunctive relief.
So these two things being filed right next to each other, put them into a procedural bind.
If they came and they denied my motion to dismiss, uh saying you've got to stick in the case, the very next thing they would have to do is they would have to adjudicate a motion for injunctive relief filed by a defendant in a federal case with cross-state um implications because I was in Washington and he's suing me out of Colorado,
they would have at that point had to, if they can skip this, they could have skipped this in a particular way and just jumped right to here, but then that referred them back to this.
Uh but then they would have had to have set a precedent, no matter how the judge ruled.
If he ignored it and just held it off to the end of the case, that would be precedent setting.
If he ruled in my favor, that was a precedent setting.
If he ruled against me, it was precedent setting.
All of those would have allowed for appeals in the middle of their fucking case.
They hadn't even gotten to adjudicating anything other than all this procedure shit, right?
And so it put them into kind of a bind.
No matter what they did, if there was there was only one path that would get them out of uh setting a precedent, and here's the deal.
I knew I hadn't won when I saw that months before they got to it.
So uh when they uh when the district judge uh when this is received by the the clerk, this motion to dismiss, it's put on the calendar and it's assigned to this magistrate judge to do the actual work on, right?
To do all the procedure and the initial kind of stuff, which is render an initial opinion that the district judge then validates and uh stamps and says, I agree with this, or or he does it differently.
Usually they do not override their their magistrate judges in adjudication of stuff.
Uh they may overwrite them on some subtle procedure things, but they don't usually overwrite them in stuff.
So I knew now, so when they assigned this, uh so when they were when we were down here, I I noticed that he assigned this right away to this judge.
It happened like the very same day.
When I filed uh this motion here, it did not ever get assigned to this this judge.
This fucker held it, okay, so he knew the bind he was in.
He knew that he could not put it on this magistrate judge because then it would have to be processed.
Now bear in mind, I got out of this like in August of this year, uh 2021.
That's when they uh granted my motion to dismiss.
But I'd filed this shit back in oh geez, maybe it was 2020, I don't know.
It was a long time ago.
I haven't done anything for months once I filed these two things.
So I filed my motion to dismiss way the fuck back when.
And so, but I knew, and then I filed the very next day.
I filed this, or it's like uh I filed that on a Friday, I filed this on a Monday.
Um, you know, so but it was still the the very next day, really, for insofar as the court clerk is concerned, and basically all the by the way, the attorneys for all the other defendants take the amount of time allowed to get it right and so on, because they're paid to do this, right?
There's no um they're not so they're not using alacrity or speed as part of their strategies because they're it's actually um uh against their interests.
They need to be absolutely correct in in filing and so on.
As a pro se guy, I could just sort of wing it to a certain extent.
But in any event, so he never he never gave the um motion for injunctive relief to the magistrate, but this was months before uh they got around to finally adjudicating this because they got to work through all the other defendants before they get to mine.
But I knew at the time that they did not file it, that he did not give it to the magistrate judge, that boom, I had a strategy, I had an effective route that he had to deal with something.
And I so I I knew I'd put him in a bind.
I also knew that he would get to my motion to dismiss, which was 100% valid.
It was factual, it was uh polite, it was thoughtful, it was well worded.
It was I worked out all of the things and rewrote it many times over about five hours and finally put it in, right?
Takes me about five hours to do the uh a motion to dismiss or these kind of things.
Um, but I'm likely to make mistakes in there.
The first time I did it, they they threw out a bunch of stuff.
This magistrate judge threw out a bunch of crap.
The when she finally got around to doing this one, she there was one part in there she disagreed with, which was my assessment of the RICO.
She I won't go into that, I won't go into detail, it's not pertinent.
Um most people are not ever going to be sued for being involved in a racketeering organization.
So it's not pertinent, all right.
Anyway, though, so she disagreed with that, but she agreed with all of my other stuff, and she said, Grant it.
And and hooray, this guy here said, Oh fuck, phew, I don't have to look at this because she granted that, so this bastard's out of here.
So what you want to do for a strategy is get to the point where you make it in the adjudication person, the judge or the panel or whoever the fuck it is, put them in a position to where it is in their interest to make you win.
Okay, this is part of your strategy.
You're already you've already won.
It's just a question of you don't know which of these uh elements you're gonna put in is going to cause you to or cause them to actually agree with you that you've won.
But you will put in something that will do so.
And so the thing is that here's here's the deal, right?
Um there is no penalty to putting in a lot of shit.
There's no penalty to gaming the system.
In fact, the people that, as we, as we know, those people in real life that game the fuck out of the system, they usually win.
So uh file speedily.
File often.
File diversely.
So all right, so uh you've got a school uh that's threatening you for the death jab and you can't attend.
Okay, so think of all of the different places that that school is vulnerable and file in a court case against them in every single one of these things, okay.
So let's say that you're at the U of Dub.
You can file at Seattle wherever there is fair housing.
So I would file all of the fair housing courts, right?
I'd I'd get the fair housing involved because they're denying you the right to attend school and uh and uh stuff with fair housing.
Does not matter that the fair housing does not trump the um uh public health, right?
You just want to create churn.
You want to create noise at a at a legal level.
This is part of your strategy is to file speedily, whenever you can file, file often to give yourself more opportunities to file, file diversely to give you more different courts to get the ones that will do you good, because you're not like an attorney.
You don't you can't pick and choose which court to choose to go to by virtue of knowing which judge may be sympathetic to your position.
So you will assume that most of your filings will be dismissed, most of your filings will be uh denied, but you don't care because it doesn't cost you that much other than your time and your energy to do it, you're gonna get better at it as you get as go along.
You'll be able to cut and paste from one into the other frequently, and so you'll be able to generate a lot of this to game their system to overwhelm them to the point where they acknowledge that you have won.
And so if you're in the U of Dub, you can file Seattle for housing, right?
You can file um sexual harassment.
Because you, and you can state this, it doesn't matter if you can't, you don't have to prove it or anything in these court cases, you can file sexual harassment um against these people because of the way that they're uh the gestures,
uh the language and the demeanor that they're using to suggest that you take that death jab is a form of predatory um sexual harassment because of all these lew gestures and stuff that they keep using and their inferences and things, right?
Does not matter if it's it's a hundred percent provable or true at this point, it is factually able to be filed this way.
So you can file that way.
You can if you're um uh student, go and look at all of the go and look for all of those laws and areas that affect students, okay.
Um I'm not a student, so I haven't ever investigated it, but uh there's dozens and dozens and dozens of areas of law that affect any given uh point of contact with law.
So if you've got a housing dispute, maybe you've also got an employment dispute, maybe you're a part-time employee, uh, maybe you're there on a grant, uh maybe you're there on a scholarship, uh maybe they're you're there on um subsidized money, go and get each and every one of those pieces of paperwork.
You can find them online, I'm sure.
If you can't, get them to mail you a copy right away, whoever it is.
So if you've got a student loan, get the actual loan language, get the loan contract, read through there because the they're a participant, okay.
If the school sends you to a bank to get a loan, they are a participant in that process and therefore must also be affected by and can be sued on the terms that are in that contract.
So, for instance, if your student loan contract says that you're guaranteed fair housing, and fair housing says no discrimination, sue them under the discrimination, uh, the fair housing act of 1964 and get it into federal court.
And see, each and every one of these things costs them a fucking fortune, right?
Costs you $32, $28, depends on some courts, uh couple of hundred dollars maybe in copy fees uh sometimes, but very relatively very little dollars.
But if you're gonna sue the U of dub, you're gonna get all of these state attorneys involved, you're gonna cost that university thousands, tens of thousands of dollars out of its legal budget, and it doesn't want to spend those dollars ever.
And so you're instantly on their radar.
The more suits you file, the more they have to respond, because they have to respond.
So if you've got uh 30 suits you've filed against the U of Dub, each one of those has a uh 30 to uh 15 day, 15 to 30 day response time, and then you've got how many attorneys tied up for how many months responding to your shit because they're gonna take their time in responding to this.
They will respond on the 15th day, they will respond on the last day they're allowed, usually within the last couple of days, because there's no percentage, there's no profit for them to file early, including state attorneys.
And so you will get um you will get a response.
It'll probably be very negative, but that's what you want.
Then you're irritating them, then you're you're um pissing them off, okay.
So first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then you piss them off, then you've won.
All right, so that's that's just the way this shit works.
Uh so anyway, so every single case you can file hurts them, cost them right now, okay, even if they nominally win in that.
Every single time, now, never ever, ever accept defeat.
So if any of these courts come back and say you don't have standing, or in any other way uh uh dismiss or deny your uh uh motion or your case or whatever it is, appeal that some way.
Kick it back to them right away.
Especially if it's a state court or a federal court.
You can go to the state court and you can go to the federal court and you can say, where are the pro seventh things here?
So if you get uh denied, you've got a certain number of days to appeal that denial, and that causes a whole bunch more flurries, okay.
And you can get the state to help you fill out the paperwork to do these appeals, to do these um uh claims against the state for uh all of this stuff, and you can always keep filing a new case with new wording.
Unless they come at you and they say you can't do that, okay.
They'll say words like prejudice.
All right, so this is dismissed with prejudice, meaning that uh you are denied the ability to file this and you can't file this language in this court again.
Usually that takes three times of getting thrown out of a court before they get that irritated that they'll go to that language because you can even appeal that.
Okay, and you can sue the judges individually.
So you can sue a judge personally.
So if you get thrown out on a court case, then uh on a on the grounds or on the um uh the the theme of I'm not gonna take the death jab because of XYZ, then you can also sue those same people that are causing you problems individually,
and this causes a huge amount of problem for them because each and every one of those individuals that you might sue as an individual has to participate, makes that court case drag on, has to go get their own attorney, starts costing them money.
So if I were in a situation where I was a student at, say the U of Dub, and they were telling me I had to have a shot in order to get my housing, I would go in and uh file a fair housing um 1964 federal lawsuit.
I would also file with the city fair housing, I would file with any state fair housing, I would also file with any state uh um organization that supports housing in any way, shape, or form that has ever sent money to the U of Dub.
I would file suits against with each of these various courts.
So I'd have a federal court case going, a state court case going, I'd have a city court case going, I would go to all the state agencies and file complaints against it on the fair housing.
That would just be the start, okay?
So I'd have like five.
So this would be my full-time job.
I would every day I'd get up and see which cases I would have to attend to by going to PACER, I'd pay my 10 cents to see what new documents they had filed, get all of this stuff.
They have to give you a copy of it, right?
By the way, you can if you want to wait for them, they have to mail you a copy or send you an email copy of everything they file.
So you don't actually have to pay the money at PACER.
It just is a little quicker because they have that hits usually gets filed there before the emails and stuff get sent out to you.
However, uh, so I would do that on the fair housing Side, right?
Then I would do it on uh on in my case I would use Americans with Disability Act.
So I would file a suit against the U of Dub saying I won't take any fucking medicine and you can't make me because I'm a protected class of person under the American Americans with Disabilities Act because I am officially a fucking paranoid.
Let them dispute that.
Okay, and paranoid, paranoid schizophrenics are a class of protected individual.
You can't discriminate against me because of my paranoia.
And so I'd file that suit, right?
And I'd do it through the state, I'd do it through all of the every single place that I could file, I would file.
And they will get you of dub by say, if I started this on a Monday, so today would be Monday, I would be a student, I would start filing this shit today.
It would hit their knowledge by Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.
By Friday, they would get the understanding because I would also be filing new cases on Tuesday, new cases on Wednesday, new cases on Thursday, new cases on Friday.
And then the next Monday, I'd really start getting into it because then I they would they wouldn't have had a chance to respond, but it would become official, and then I would start using my court cases as PR against them.
Okay, so that's the other aspect of this.
As you have filed, this becomes an asset.
Alright?
And you can use that for PR.
And with social media, so much of our lives are um uh ruled by the social media aspect of this, you're a fool not to use PR.
And every time you use PR telling uh the horrors of how you've been treated by these evil bastards that you have dub, you would always, always, always tag the fuckers so that they would know that they are facing a PR nightmare.
This is fighting, this is woo fighting.
You know, we're gonna we're gonna knock that fucker off that horse with a rock.
Uh you know, they've got all the weapons, they've got big spears, they've got armor.
We're just a poor bastard down here with a with no tools whatsoever, just being victimized.
So we've got to do woo fighting.
All right, because we don't have the armaments, we don't have the organizations.
So we have to look at the terrain around us and use that terrain as our weapons in order to undo our enemy.
And so in this case, our terrain is all of these hills.
So I would use all of these little hills to to get that horse to just be fucking exhausted and not know what he's doing just by chasing me all over those little hills, right?
And so that's what I'm gonna do.
I would have them chase me through all of these courts, uh filing constantly because they've got to respond.
They can't not respond because of the legal process, is bound by procedure, and they are ruled by their own rules.
And the the book of rules is really really thin.
I've got it around here.
I actually bought a physical copy so I could peruse it if the computers went down because it happens so often here.
Um and so the federal uh rules of federal procedure in federal courts.
Uh and you know, so you can get these things on Amazon.
It was like $13 or something, very cheap.
Anyway, so I'm using the terrain.
So I'm gonna knock the fucker off of his horse with my rock, all right?
And so in this case, maybe my rock is the fair housing.
Maybe they can't dispute fair housing language.
Maybe the rock is going to be the um uh you know the debt, right?
The student debt.
Because maybe the language in that contract states that these that they that the bank can't collect student debt unless I can go to school under fair housing law.
And hey, that bank's gonna get really upset if this word gets around in your PR campaign that nobody has to pay their student loans if they don't get to school because of this shit.
You can just keep the money and say fuck the bank because the bank is hamstruck because they can't collect because of the fair housing.
Now I don't know that that's factual, right?
But maybe that's the case, and maybe you can file a case stating just that, and and demand that they adjudicate that and prove you wrong.
So when you file shit, basically you're saying, this is my position, prove me wrong, you fuckers, and you get fierce about it.
Don't take any crap from them.
Every single one of the attorneys I've dealt with did except for one.
I I've got to give him uh really uh top dog um uh uh respect here, and that's uh that's uh Daniel, the chief attorney there that I had contact with uh for Gaia TV.
That guy knows how to fight, okay?
And so, but very few of these attorneys know how to fight.
And and what you need to do is you need to get passionate, you need to get concise, never waste a word.
Remember you're under those word limits, but Be uh every single time you can use a word indicating passion or feeling, do so.
Um, because attorneys never do so.
So it stands out in the judge's mind.
And the whole goal of your filing any of these things is to change the mind of the fucker looking at them, right?
To make them understand what your position is and why they must agree with you.
That's all you have to do.
And so when you get into legal battles, here's a truism.
This is factually true.
As a pro-safe filer, I did not give a shit about legal references.
I don't care about any points of law.
Why is this?
Because the whole point of all the courts is to find fact in law.
That is the that is what juris means, okay, is to find fact in law.
So to find lawful fact, to find legal fact.
So I all of the other attorneys were trying to frame their facts in law.
That's why they keep citing law constantly.
So-and-so case, such and so language, so-and-so case in this year, overturned here, all of that shit, right?
And it really annoyed it.
Let me tell you, it annoyed the piss out of Cory Good's attorney that I did not do that.
It annoyed her so much that she cited that I was not putting in legal citations in my documents.
She put in in her documents twice.
She wasted language in her, she wasted words in her documents trying to use my own tactic against me of pointing out where I had failed, only it was not a failure, because as a pro se person, all I need do is to present the court with fact that is in law.
Since I lived through it, I just had to present my version, my understanding, my actions as they were affecting that law and the facts about them.
I need not cite any other cases or any of this stuff because I was pro se.
I was involved.
It was personal.
And so it's not an attorney saying, my client and this other law applies to my client in my thinking, right?
So I didn't have to cite any law.
There were a couple of times I did because early on in the process, I hadn't tumbled to the actual understanding of how this was going on.
So they have to find in this mess of law what is factual.
If I've got fact, if I can say factually that on this date, I did this.
That's a fact.
So Corey Good's attorney said that I threatened him on Twitter, threatened to beat him up.
And I said, no.
In fact, I responded directly to that and said, no, I offered to fight Corey, David, and Jay.
Corey Good, David Widener, and Jay uh Jay Widener and David Wilcock.
Okay.
I offered to fight them to settle my grievances with them.
That's not a threat.
And and uh, you know, it's just an it was an offer, and that was the term.
So I just point out the language.
So I point out the fact of the matter, not the way that they construe it, and then the laws that they think that they want to apply to that.
So you just have to present fact.
So I actually think it's a good tactic to check the um the student um loan contracts, because there's all kinds of shit in there about the the schools have to abide by these federal government stuff, including fair housing and all this kind of stuff, especially since there were a bunch of schools in like the 1990s that went bust.
All these little fly-by-night schools that were trying to get in on the new college debt debt um rodeo and and suck in a lot of money.
And so they caused the debt language contracts to be redone between the federal government, the schools, and the banks.
So there's undoubtedly shit buried in there that you can tease out that will get you a new standing in some other court to file a case against the school or your employer or whoever, right?
So in your employer's case, you would use um you know all the employment law.
I I really like all the fair housing and employment law of the 1960, because all of these, all these death jab things violate it just so clearly.
Um and it's awful hard to dispute because it's been so well adjudicated, and no judge is going to want to say, oh, well, that 1964 law that that made fair housing uh for black people applicable can't be used by a black person saying that they don't want a death jab and the school's denying them housing that they paid for.
You know?
So, you know, so so you see what I'm saying?
They're really kind of hamstrung if you do this.
So file speedily, file often, file diverse court.
It'll be a full-time job until you win, and then you just let all the shit go.
Once you win, you don't have to pursue any of it unless you want to get vengeful and try and you know recover money, time, and so on to make yourself whole for them fucking with you, right?
Uh so anyway, and then use the PR.
Use the social media.
Um a lot of this stuff is quickly adjudicated in the uh court of public opinion, and that court of public opinion can be used.
So if you've got the U of Dub really freaking out that they're thinking that everybody that's got a student debt that's tied to the U of Dub could legally file against them to not pay that debt, they're gonna shit their pants.
Everybody in the the provost office there, all of the people in the housing, all of the administrators, they're just gonna shit constantly until they get that taken care of.
Because they can't have that.
They've got to have these funds flowing through.
So if you can touch the money, you touch them.
Um if you can get get at them through these different ways, then you can just you know come up with a tactic, file a few pieces of paper, uh, throw it down there, get um denied a bunch of times, then get it right, and then you win.
Uh God guys, sorry it took so long.
Um, but this law shit is it's um complicated.
It's not really complex because it's all comes down to words.
And if you can prove to them that that word means this, then they're fucked, basically.
Um so this is this is woo fighting.
Uh and that that's how I would go about it.
Uh, just a tactic, just a legal tactic.
And it's sort of the same thinking that I did when I when I saw how they were hamstrung by the procedures and decided, oh, okay, let's try this, right?
I meant no loss in terms of anything you do at a pro se uh basically you can always plead ignorance with a judge and apologize.
Jeez, judge, I'm sorry, I didn't know.
I thought this meant that, you know.
And they'll they have to basically go along with a certain amount of that.
Um, because they they run into this shit with a lot of bumbleheaded idiots like myself.
I fucked up a couple of my my papers and um uh the judge called me out on it, but it's no no big deal.
It's not like they're gonna slap you down and you you can't file or something.
So, anyway, guys, um uh, you know, this is woo fighting, look to the terrain, um figure out a way to make the people that do the adjudication uh take your side.
You know, if you can put them into a bind, if you can put them into a PR versus their uh PR bind, that will work.
If you can do any of these kind of things, then you just then you win.
So you have to game the system because the attorneys are, because the opponents are, and the opponents have everything um uh stacked in their favor, except they're not fast, they're not agile, and they don't really look around, and they're using paid mercenaries.
They're they're attorneys, right?
Who don't have your passion, your intensity, your uh need to get it done, and will lose.
And so basically that's that's where it's at.
So you've decided you're gonna win, and the only thing that's not known now is which of these tactics within your overall strategy is the one that will have one for you.
Anyway, okay guys, uh go find out.
▲
Export Selection