All Episodes
Previous Next
May 2, 2021 - Clif High
32:01
You Woo? - Explorers' Guide To SciFi World

Temporal markers appearing (maybe) - if so major & significant

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello?
Okay.
It's the second of May, which is a very serious month, and we're still cold.
It was 39 degrees when I get up this morning.
Unusual on the coast, right?
So this is another one of these cold spells that's moving in.
Part of the weather that's uh going to accumulate into climate that everybody's making all the mistakes about.
Anyway, so um this is about um the some temporal markers and time and that sort of stuff, right?
Because we're coming in into an interesting time.
May is a very um, as I say, it's a very serious month.
And uh we're gonna have serious things occur in May, and then even more serious things occur in June.
But the things for May had been forecast within a very large data set that we've had a very large number of temporal markers show up in if you wanted to go back and read the old reports, and we're seeing yet more of those things pile in.
All going towards confirmation that the rest of the data sets values, the descriptors would um would also appear.
That's sort of the way it worked, right?
Uh let me get rid of this.
Um this is basically also this also involves time.
Uh I think of I describe time as moving that way, but really time flows and it flows like this, and because we have this aspect of the magnetism in the dielectric plane here, we get this impact on the way that time flows, because then it would instantly go down to the next one of these over there and flow again.
And so we get the waves of time, and time is not time isn't linear if you want to think about it that way.
We can perceive differences in time.
Uh time slowing down all of our perceptions and stuff, and we actually understand in our brains that there has been a change in our relationship, our personal relationship with time in that period of it, in that experience of it.
And so, since experience is our guide and all of this stuff, we can actually uh manifestly say that time is malleable.
We can't travel in it, we can travel outside of it in my opinion, but um it's not um it's not like time travel exists, but it is something we can mess about with.
Um, so uh the way that the data set process worked was set theory.
And in set theory you have items, and some are in your set and some are not.
Maybe they're in some other set, maybe they're not associated with any set at all.
Maybe there's another set that includes some that's in your set and some that's outside your set.
And so then this is where we get like Venn diagrams and all this kind of stuff.
It's from set theory.
All right.
So in the the way in which the alter reports data worked, I would go through this process and I would eliminate a lot of sets as being garbage, conscious thinking, etc.
Then I had a process for extracting prescient words out of the remaining millions, tens of millions of words.
And then I would place them in temporal alignment.
Okay, I would cluster those that by the process of by the algorithms that I wrote that controlled the processing of my data, I would cluster them into into groups uh based on immediacy, short-term, or long-term uh application in terms of time.
How far away were these things likely to be if indeed the language was prescient.
And so we might have now sets span time.
Okay, so the temporal influence influence might be very large, and the set might be here, so that you had immediacy data, short-term data, and long-term data.
And you had your scattered throughout all of it like that.
Uh That was the more usual way.
Sometimes you would get sets that were very delineated and you know just had a little bit and were very specific to a time, those were very nice, they were easy to interpret, because there was no no potential for data masking where a large event out here would appear when you're interpreting the data to be very close up here.
Or vice versa, right.
And so in the in the interpretation of the data, those little sets were very very easy, but they were not the norm.
The norm was these large sets that spread over and sets like this one where there were conflicting or where the descriptors were in one set but may have been a primary descriptor or a or a primary attribute to a bunch of other data in another set.
And if this is how it appeared when it would be diagrammed in basically all I ever saw were long columns of words in their association in the lexicon.
So I didn't see it diagrammed like this.
The likely, okay, so I developed a rule for my processing that said that if I had say uh a hundred primary descriptors in here and um and there were 15 here and uh 30 here and the rest out in long term,
then I would say that, oh look, if if these 15 here showed the majority of them showed up in that time frame, then I would get all whipped up and I would say, okay, then that increases the likelihood that that some majority of these 30 here would show up in their time frame, in their short-term time frame, which was the end of three weeks out to the end of three months.
And then you could then at that point I would say if I had this occurrence here, and okay, so then I would project that the likelihood of this occurring would be substantially appropriate to the average amount out of here.
So if I had like 12 out of here, out of this group of 15, and say I had 24 out of the 30 here, that would be a very good data set, really robust, right?
Like the one I'm dealing with at the moment.
Um from way back when that I'm analyzing for occurrences.
All right, so that would suggest at that stage that I'm looking at something on the order of 90% maybe of the language that was in the long-term data set showing up.
Now, bear in mind we're out here living in the long-term data set when this was in 2016 and 17.
Uh so this is why I'm doing these analyses now.
And and so I'm doing temporal influences and seeing where our temporal markers are and where we are relative to that forecast.
By we I mean the planet, right?
And so the temporal shifts, the timing, the timing of it all is a bitch.
Okay, it is terrible to get the timing correct.
If I can if I could achieve the timing relationships between the three groups of data within that particular data set in an analysis, I figured I was, you know, that that was that was a huge amount of work.
And if any of these things happened to land on a time frame that was initially suggested in the interpretation and showed up on that time frame, then it was like spectacular hit.
Okay, but otherwise it was a pretty good hit.
Even if, say that I say that this was projected to show up in December of 18, right?
And it didn't.
But if later on it shows up in December of 20, and all these other relationships are still held valid to that new start date, that's fine, because that's still validating the appropriate data relationships, which was the majority of the work involved ascertaining within these descriptor sets that were presciently linked, which were in the short term, which were immediacy data, short term or long term, right?
And so the timing aspect of getting that particular date, that was always a guess relative to where we were when I was analyzing the data and how clustered it was, how much mass was in what area.
So If we had a lot of mass in the immediacy data, then I would feel very confident of some kind of a date forecast here.
But if a lot of the mass is back out here, well, that that was a little bit on the who knows how long that period of time is is going to stretch out, and who knows when that thing is going to start.
But the relationships of those data sets within that period of time, once that process started, was what the goal was within the original part of the processing to arrive at that.
And so here we find ourselves with stuff that started in 2020 with the actually 19, okay, and so that was the sun disease, and so that was a temporal marker, and we had the sun disease show up in uh 2020, right?
So we had the sun disease.
And it's 20 really 2019.
Because that's when I first became aware of it, and some other people, and that's when it actually was released.
And since then we've had all these other temporal markers roll along, um, you know, antifa showing up in fierce numbers, the the the emergence of discussions about the Wager genocide, uh, all of these things, all these things are temporal markers from these old reports that were part of this major long-term data set that I had termed as leading us into sci-fi world.
And so the long-term data set here was just really packed, and it is sci-fi world.
Um we entered into this data set about two years after the forecast suggested that it should.
I think that was the result of the data pollution that was going on because of the the blue chicken cult people, and the um uh then later on, in as we got past 2017, we started getting into very heavy censorship that compounded that.
But but the initial problem was the data pollution that was occurring, and it shifted the time frames.
Uh I won't go into the mechanics of how that occurred, uh, but I think I've got it pretty well nailed now.
Anyway, though, so here we are, uh, and I'm looking at temporal markers from within this very large set here, this very large set that was sci-fi world, as they are appearing in real time.
And so we've got some new temporal markers here for our sci-fi world that are really major ones.
Now we don't know, then these are in development, we can call them, right?
Because we don't know which one is this.
Okay, so one of them is the China.
No, that's the old one.
I gotta get rid of these old guys, they go too quick.
Um, so is the CCP rocket, which may have taken the launcher with it.
That's that seems to be the story that's being put out.
Seems unlikely, seems very bizarre that the rocket, I mean, it's a huge damn rocket, and the launch in the the gantry thing wouldn't let go, and so the rocket takes the gantry thing with it.
And uh so now we've got uh 21 metric tons, headed back to Earth sometime in the next two weeks, and we don't know where.
X marks the spot, but we don't know where.
It'll be south of New York and north of New Jersey, that's or New Zealand, that's all we know.
South of New York and north of New Zealand, so most of the fucking planet.
Um north and south of the equit of the equator, north and south of the tropics, up to 40 degrees latitude something, and down to 40 degrees latitude something.
Um this is really interesting as a temporal marker.
Hopefully it'll just come straight crashing back down and won't cause any problem to anybody and it'll hit the oceans.
We we got plenty of them.
They'll be happy to have it land.
All right.
However, we had a we had a uh forecast in that large set that would appear in the period of the sun disease where something was going to cause Earth to become uh uh encased in a um uh shell, an egg shell kind of a thing,
like a broken egg shell of debris, of some kind of debris all around it, such that we could not launch through that, that there'd just be too much crud and we'd have a bunch of launches fail and people die as a result of this, and then it would take us a number of years to clean up.
Now, here's the thing.
at the time that that forecast was made so so this this is the encapsulation of earth right
When the forecast was made within that larger set, and it showed up this this we I presumed at the time that that started that this set was based on a starting date of 2001, in which case encapsulation Earth would have been 2020.
That is to say, about three years from the incept date.
Okay.
So if 2019 is the um insept date and not 2017, well, it shifts it a bit.
And if it if it's in mid-2019 is when the the sun disease came out, and all of this kind of stuff, then maybe we're in this encapsulation earth period right now.
Plus, as I say, our timing is is always estimates, never accurate, you know, never precise.
So this encapsulation Earth thing, so we can just change that to 2019, make this 2021, is a real probability of happening in this period in here.
Uh, and of course, now we have a temporal marker showing up that is a could be a proximate cause.
Because we never know in the data set, it gets the idea that there's something that's going to crash down, something that's going to crash into a satellite, it's going to send the satellite spinning off into another satellite, which is going to hit some debris and send that spinning off into some other debris and some other satellites, and it just cascades until we got GPS satellites, communication satellites, all different kinds of things are wonkier than hell, um, because of this cascading thing in the near Earth orbit.
Anything way out won't be affected, right?
So it won't hit like uh, well, initially though, it there those satellites won't be affected, but the the ability to beam stuff back through this debris field will start causing problems as a result of the encapsulation.
And thus we have to, and it'll really go to piss off Elon Musk because he won't be able to shoot up any more rockets, okay, because they'll be destroyed running into the debris.
Because bear in mind the debris could be moving at 30 or 40,000 miles an hour, like a super bullet would just go right through you.
Um, you know, just slice you into ribbons.
And so here we have 21 metric tons of what should have been on Earth, now desperately trying to come back to Earth, and it may come back and it may initiate this whole process.
A while back, like um, maybe it was early, maybe as uh late 2018, early 2019, I had a um a thought uh as a result of seeing the dispersal of the Starlink stuff.
Oh, maybe I had misinterpreted encapsulation Earth and it and it wasn't a debris field, maybe it was a Starlink satellite grid.
Okay, because from the data sets, there's not a lot of difference between the descriptors of how the the Starlink uh you know, stream out and then spread out over uh a debris field streaming out and then spreading out.
And so, oh okay, I thought, oh, alright, well, you know, I screwed up.
It wasn't a disaster, it was a uh an organized plan thing that would still end up encapsulating Earth, but in a nice pleasant way, right?
However, now we got a potential that maybe I was more right than I thought uh in the original interpretation.
But we'll find out apparently within the next two weeks.
Now, here's the thing of this.
Even if, even if this one comes falling right back down into the ocean, psst big hiss, no problems, and everybody gets lots of video, uh, the Chinese are are planning to do eight more of these damn things to get a space station into into orbit.
So if number one really screws up this bad, I'm not feeling too comfortable about the next uh the next uh few of these things shooting up.
So we still have the potential for debris field uh Earth or encapsulation Earth at any time going forward in this period of time, and maybe we are indeed approaching that point.
That was a necessary part, or it wasn't necessary, but it was a component.
It was a long-term continuous component of sci-fi world that we earthers would have to clean up that mess and figure it out.
And we would.
And it would only take us a couple of years, and we'd come up with a solution, and we'd have two or three failed solutions, two or three failed attempts to do it, and we'd come up with something, and we'd set about doing it, and it wouldn't be a problem thereafter.
So I have no idea what how we're going to approach that or what our what our solution is going to be.
Hadn't thought about that.
But the um but it is interesting that here the Chinese are setting us up for just that temporal marker.
Now, also um in Sci-Fi world, we had uh a big push on um in the original descriptors of sci-fi world, there was this big large chunk of the data that was going to um do-it-yourself bioengineering is probably the best way to describe it.
Or super advanced biochemistry, however you want to think about it, and that we would have connections to Chinese or Asia in this, and that would be uh an Asian thing.
They would get in to really get into genomic messing about.
Um also tainting all of that was the uh overlay on that uh data set of the problems that we went through with sun disease.
Now, sun disease, we had two aspects of it the actual disease of the sun, uh, you know, the big scary balls in the ski in the sky, and um uh sun disease as in the corona uh affecting us, uh corona around the sun, that kind of thing, and the corona around the around the virus.
Now, in um in the descriptors leading into sci-fi world, uh we get to the point where the sun disease is not a problem as we move into sci-fi world.
It's not a major problem, it's not the problem, we don't care about it much.
It's no more uh of an issue because we than common cold kind of thing because we develop protocols to deal with it.
So I think we actually will, I think we are, and I think we're seeing the pushback to the authoritarian use of the the politicization of the virus first, now the politicization of the vax.
And I think that the powers that be have a real problem, and that this is what is going to cause this um or has caused, is causing the change in the planetary populace.
So the the humans the humans are um uh on moss starting to get a little twitchy, right?
Uh they're starting to hear the reports, people are starting to know people that have had bad reactions, people getting together have had or starting to get into conversations about bad reactions, it's starting to happen at grocery stores and you know uh produce marts and uh you know dry cleaners, all of these kind of things.
And so um there's still the big push, and it's coming out really shrill.
And so this is gonna contribute to the political issues the globalists have within the uh giant popular uprising that's up welling now throughout the Western civilization.
And this popular uprising is another one of those things like um that period of time that led from the American Revolution to the French Revolution, etc., you know, ultimately going through the Russian Revolution and Chinese revolution, all of these things were as a result of a period of time.
Now we're into another one of those periods of time where we're moving into as we've moved into the age of Aquarius, and this is starting to bring knowledge to people, and we're actually getting into a uh a period where we will have education, which is an individual responsibility for knowing shit, being able to think.
And um, and that's really now emerging, and it's been uh fostered really by the powers that be.
And so we're seeing the backlash the powers that be propel this the rest of uh the propel us into sci-fi world in a in a new way, as per some of the temporal markers that were also along with encapsulation Earth.
And so the um the vax going bad is uh a sign of their errors.
I don't know.
Uh okay, so I've been talking with a couple of people that also agree with me that the um the powers that be uh did this too early, that their original plan was to have done this in in 2030.
Okay, that was the great, that was the period where there was going to be the great reset.
And I had heard earlier that it was supposed to be even 20 years after that at 2050.
So these people and I are talking.
Uh two of them are academics, one teaches, one's a research guy.
And um they're talking about 2050 and the idea that, oh, maybe they brought the 2050 agenda forward to 2030 because they heard about 2041 being when the ice age really clamps down on us.
And so they thought, oh, well, we've got to get our shit together ahead of that.
So they move it down into 2050, and they move it down to uh forward 2041 uh out of um or uh 2030 out of fear of the 2041 ice age.
I don't want to confuse people.
Hang on.
All right.
And so they moved it to Agenda 2030.
Now I became aware of Agenda 2030, and I can see how if they were aware of the Ice Age component that they would they would want to move that forward and get their agenda stuff done uh by then.
Uh but uh they've moved it drastically forward to where they really began it in 2019.
And this doesn't make a lot of sense because that is there isn't enough human mass uh generated here, so massive humans is less than we would have in 2050 if they'd had those two succeeding educational generations of about 15 years to inculcate two more generations of wokeans via the Confucius
Institutes and via the Wokian religion and all of this kind of stuff, it would have been very much easier for them in 2050.
Now they could have probably pulled it off maybe in 2030 without as much opposition as they're getting back here in 2021, because the opposition is now rising up.
Wokeans and the and the globalist um stooges, the GSs are less than 20% of the population.
The rest of them have been going along with them because the globalists were smart, they controlled the media, they're using the mind control.
But the mind control is relatively fragile to real-world encounters, right?
Once you're sick, boy man, your eyes really were sick with the vax.
You your eyes really wake up as to what's going on, and you start becoming rabid to get more information about things, and you're just not buying any of this other shit.
So that's a real danger to them because there's so many problems showing up here in 2021 relative to the vax that it has screwed their idea of the of the what was it, the spars document.
If you go look through their document that they had planned and worked from 2012 onward, uh that describes what we were going through in with the virus and the vax, um tons, tons more problems way too early in the process, making people really question what's going on, not only those individuals that are ill, but those people around them.
And I don't think that these vaxxer guys are accurate.
I don't think they've got 1.25 billion people vaxxed.
Uh I I really question whether they've got the 35% they claim of the US population.
So yeah, there are a lot in concentrated areas, But I think they're trying to use the persuasion of uh size of numbers to try and sell it to the rest of the people, right?
And I don't actually think that they've had that many people willing to take this.
And tons of the people that they're saying are vaxxed are not because they only had one of the shots.
They got too ill, and they said, fuck that, you know, the next one would kill me.
And then they're probably quite right.
The next one probably would have killed them.
And so they're not taking it.
And they're still ill.
I know people that got one shot and they're ill a month.
Uh now almost six weeks later, they're still flu-like, uh, you know, can't keep food down weak, sudden exhaustion, all different kinds of shit hitting them.
So uh, you know, it is not a good thing.
And we have um uh we're starting to see the evidence of that.
Uh so now there's the big pushback against that.
Uh, it is dominating bit shoot now.
It's gone to the point where if you go and look at trending for uh vax-related crap, you'll find it in every single category of trending.
It will dominate.
It will be the majority of trending items, and even those that are not associated with the vax are ancillarily associated with it because they're dealing with the political ramifications or the economic ramifications of all this bullshit or something along those lines.
So here we now have entire uh media bit shoot, rumble, um, parlor, gab, mines, you know, you you name it, uh, you know, telegram, Instagram that is starting to become dominated by uh pushback against the globalists.
And that basically is they're being dominated by what um a lot of the people in the woo-woo world are calling uh the Great Awakening.
And um I don't like that word that phrase so much because of many connotations around it.
However, we're gonna be living with it, and it probably is going to be accepted as the descriptor for what we're going through in this period of time.
Uh uh, you know, we're into the age of knowledge and it's just a natural outgrowth of that.
Uh what's happening to us.
And I think maybe that is uh more of more of a driving force.
I'm hoping that was it was something as sidereal as um uh the movement into the age of Aquarius that motivated the the guys to move forward from 2050 to now, or something like the ice age, something in other words, that they were afraid of something that was happening here on Earth.
I would hate to think that they shifted things ahead so many years, you know, so many decades, four decades ahead, uh, because of something that's coming from space.
Uh, you know, that brings the the paranoia out as to what do they know that we need to beat the crap out of them to find out now.
Um, you know, and and are they right?
Because they're frequently not.
They think they're all knowing, but their their level of knowledge is um uh constrained.
At best, it's constrained.
They just don't know how to think about things.
Uh they've got a lot of facts, but they don't know how to think about much of them.
All right, so then basically that's it.
The rocket launch and the um debris fields uh potential in two weeks through this next two weeks.
We don't know where it'll come down.
Keep looking up.
Uh let's see.
And the harmonization of the vax going bad, uh harmonizing with the strange energies from space.
That could also have been motivating them if there was some kind of an energy that they thought or they knew was going to trigger um awareness growth in the Vegas nervous system via the Vegas nervous system.
Uh, they might have moved early because you know, they don't want everybody, they don't want to be there where all of a sudden the general intelligence of the herd rises, you know, 10 or 20 points because of strange energies from space.
They're gonna have a lot of shit then, because they count on a lot of people basically being stupid and following orders uh or being uninterested and following orders.
Uh but here we go.
Um I think that's about it.
There are tons of other stuff, but um uh mostly the vax is going to dominate everything for this month for the month of May, as uh the backlas builds, and in that time we may see this other temporal marker.
If we do, then I'll make another get into the description of the encapsulation of Earth and all of the other stuff.
Uh, it may be premature.
I mean we it's not ever going to show up, or you know, because maybe it actually is the Starlink satellites being arrayed out the way they are, and we won't ever have a disaster debris field kind of incident.
However, uh the Chinese are setting us up for it with all these uh giant rocket launches where apparently they're taking the gantries along with them.
Maybe someone should tell them it's not necessary.
▲
Export Selection