All Episodes
Previous Next
March 27, 2021 - Clif High
58:59
Point of Woo
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hopefully I won't need to use the whiteboard because otherwise I'll have to turn this and everybody will get sick.
This is a funny one, okay?
So there's a real point to this.
It was real small.
It's only a little tiny bit.
There's a whole lot of shit in the way in terms of stuff going on in reality.
And so we've got just got to go through a bunch of stuff that's piling up out there, like the Suez ship.
So the Suez ship is, oh, that's terrible.
Hang on.
Too much glare.
Just where I'm at.
The Suez ship is stuck.
It's run aground in the muck on the side of the canal.
On these narrow canals, the long ships, as they move closer to the edge of a canal, you get this effect of draft, of lift.
Okay, so we've got, can we do that on this?
Anyway, the idea is that as the ship, the big long ships in a very narrow canal, they have to stay as close to the middle of that canal as possible.
If they drift a little bit towards the side, it decreases the amount of water between that side of the boat and that side of the canal.
This means that the water that's flowing along that side of the boat has to move faster to meet up with the water at the back end that it started with at the front end.
So you get a sense of lift.
You get this pull that pulls the boat over to and decreases that already shrunken distance and keeps going until the bow goes point and then you get stuck.
Then the problem is the current comes bashing your bow, pushing it into the bank and keeps pushing it into the bank.
So your little things that are pushing against that boat are not trying to get it unstuck from the mud so much as they're fighting the water current itself, the pressure of that current, which could be considerable, you know, absolutely fantastic levels.
Then there's other issues relative to getting the thing out of there.
So many of them, engineering-wise, right?
The tugboats can't get a good, it can't back up because its big propellers won't have deep enough water to get bite in the water to pull it.
Nor will there be enough distance of water, enough throw of water behind it for those propellers to pull against.
So it would pull the water and cause a suction on the land, eroding the side of the canal and not moving the big boat.
Further, the little tugs face an issue because their angle of attack relative to the tanker, relative to the container ship, is very bad.
The canal is very narrow, so they can't have a long line.
A little tiny tug with a big engine and big propellers can get a good bite of water and do some tremendous pulling if it can get sufficient length of line between itself and the thing it's trying to pull.
If it can't do that, it's pulling at this very sharp angle of attack, which means that its bow ends up dragging into the water and the stern rises, which reduces the amount of bite that its propellers can take.
And bear in mind that all of this activity on water, the only points of pull, your only point of traction, is the surface of your propeller.
So it is the size of the propeller that is meaningful relative to your ability to pull stuff and how fast you can pull that propeller, how powerfully your torque is relative to that spin.
And that's it.
It's not like you can anchor a giant rope on land and pull this boat.
It is just not going to happen, right?
The boat has to be pulled from water on the water because its bow is now in the mud and increasingly there's silt and stuff piling up on the upward side of it on the upside of the canal of it where the flow is coming at it and increasingly but in any event to pull the thing you can't pull it from land because it would increasingly attempt to pull into the earth underneath it where it's starting to run into anyway.
So it has to be sort of lifted to be pulled, which means you have to pull it from the stern and you have to, or the sides.
You could do it that way, but there's no angle of attack.
You can't get your tugs far enough away to do this.
So truly, the only thing that I can see that is feasible is to take the weight off of it and get that quarter of a million tonnage out of there.
And then the thing, at some point, it'll just bob up on its own and then Bob's your uncle, you throw a line on the thing and give it a yank and off it'll go because the water's doing all the work.
Now the water is not doing any work for you and is actively working against you in everything you're attempting to try.
So that's not going to happen anytime soon.
Okay, so that was one thing.
This is going to disrupt the supply chains.
Oil, food, all this kind of stuff.
Everything going to and from China through the Suez Canal or anywhere else in there, Africa and all of this kind of stuff, is all now snonkered for months and months and months, maybe a year, who knows.
So there'll be a lot of traffic around the tip of Africa.
So the Horn of Africa as well, we're going to see a lot of traffic in areas that we did not used to have traffic in volume.
Now we're going to have vast quantities of it.
It's going to increase costs.
It's going to increase times to get things to and from places.
It's going to increase delays everywhere.
It's also going to increase risk fantastically because now there's areas that we used to not really have much traffic running by that are filled with pirates and other areas of disruption.
It'll also increase opportunity along the African coast because there's going to be a lot more traffic there, which will be needing assistance because instead of going through the Suez Canal, they'll have to stop and refuel because they've got to go around all of Africa and that's a big place.
So there's going to be a lot of opportunities, but at the same time, it's going to be a major disruption for a lot of the planet, especially the Europeans in the supply chain there, most immediately, right?
Then it's going to impact everyone.
India, China, Southeast Asia, a lot of industrial goods used to flow back and forth there that now have to get there some other way.
So that's one thing there.
We've had first real visible signs of de-dollarization with Putin and Putin and Xi getting together to discuss Russia and China getting together to discuss cross-border trade without the use of the dollar and basically the death of the petrodollar.
And so that's coming.
We need to get prepared for that.
That is going to have a major impact.
It's going to depend on how that de-dollarization actually unfolds.
It could be that we get into a situation where the Federal Reserve sort of actively participates in this and does things to erode the tendency for this to cause hyperinflation on its own because basically what happens is all those dollars that are outside the U.S. borders come flooding back into the U.S. and thus our circulating money supply in a
theoretical sense is going to go way the hell up as a result of Russia and China not using them anymore.
So it has a tendency to cause hyperinflation.
We've seen examples of this in the past, but never with a world reserve currency and the ramifications of that are quite staggering.
So the world reserve currency is currently breaking up.
It may shift over to Bitcoin or something like that, something active, right, that's already in existence.
They may try and do these SDRs and all of that sort of shit, but I don't think that they're going to be able to pull it off now with everything in chaos, wars breaking out all over and this sort of thing.
Basically in this little video here, I'm going through a lot of the stuff I went through with Jay and Mike yesterday.
Jay Campbell and Mike Jacko.
Okay.
All right, so it's possible to keep videos on, for me to keep videos on YouTube, but I'm going to have to increasingly stay ahead of the censorship.
They're going to get to the point where they're even going to start censoring me about Wu, right?
And so it'll be very difficult to maintain a YouTube presence and not end up being thrown off.
So far, I've been pretty good at it.
I've been able to stay ahead of the algos.
This is because I know language and How software works at a deep level and having written vast quantities of it, and am able to stay ahead of the natural evolution of that censorship software, and it's because I know how it must function.
And so I can do things to stay ahead of it.
It becomes increasingly a big burden.
And so one of the things I'm doing is that I'm attempting to build out this piece of antiquated timberland that I purchased.
And so it's not a wise idea to try and save money in dollars.
And so I had to get, I had accumulated dollars, and I had to get the wealth that they represented out of dollars and into something tangible as the political cluckheads are going to totally destroy the dollar over these next few years.
And its purchasing value has already eroded massively from the day of the election.
Just look at how fast Bitcoin has risen.
Bitcoin is a very accurate gauge of how fast the dollar is dying, in my opinion.
So I purchased this antiquated timberland.
I'm going to have to go in and build it out.
I have a lot of reasons to do so.
It was, I say antiquated because it had been in the hands of an estate for a number of years and has not been managed as a forest for over 50 years.
And it's a little tiny thing, right?
It's less than 50 acres of forest.
So in this state, I don't qualify as a timber baron, right?
You've got to have thousands of acres for that.
So we call ourselves baroons.
We have bigger titles for smaller bits of land.
But it's a good little forest.
Now, the reason that I bring it up is that I'm going to be doing a lot of work there, especially through the clement weather periods of spring and summer and early fall.
And so I won't be doing a lot of YouTube.
But also, I'm running into these issues with YouTube as it is and can see the handwriting on the wall.
And so I'm making some other arrangements here.
Now, what I'm going to be doing at some point is to start doing videos that are created during the multiple hour drive over to the property.
And then I'll do work there and I'll come back and upload them and so on.
Those videos are going to go on Patreon and Subscribestar.
So they're going to be behind a paywall.
Now here's the issue.
I don't particularly want to do this.
There is a point for me to do it because I need because the money will be used for specific things, right?
And so it's not retirement money.
It's just used for building out on part of this forest land.
And I'm going to make the videos about that process.
It's a unique process, in my opinion.
I've seen a lot of these, you know, redo house shows and that kind of thing, or build a house in 100 days sort of thing, right?
And this is not like that.
What I'm doing is basically off-grid.
I won't be able to get electricity there.
This is in essential wilderness.
I am going to build a house on this property on an adjacent piece of property to the timberland.
But the whole process here is going to be, the whole video series is going to be about the process and the problems and overcoming them and the way we get through the obstacles.
Now this is a, I'm an old man, so this is a project that's bigger than me.
And so I've assembled a little crew here of my brother-in-law and Kale, the guy who helped me with the PROA.
And at the end of all of this, we're going to have the PROA be able to be at the water at the site of the property that the house is on.
And I'll get into that in the videos that are behind the paywall.
Now, and I'll announce where it is and when I start doing that sort of thing.
So if you want to stay current with it, you can.
Now, one of the other reasons is that to do this is that if you do this, then I can discuss anything I want and not worry about censorship.
I don't have to stay ahead of the language and use innuendo.
I can be straightforward and factual about what I really want to say.
So there's a big benefit to that, in that to me, for me, and for anyone who wants to listen to it, because it does become difficult to get into some of this stuff when you have to tread close to boundary layers that are imposed by terms of service.
And I won't have those behind the paywall.
And in addition to that, I can say things that are private opinions and not make them public because it's a pay service.
And so there's legal benefits to doing it that way.
It'll be more difficult for people to cause me a hassle with these strategic lawsuits against public participation.
Okay, so that's sort of housekeeping kind of stuff.
I'll just let everybody know via Twitter and I'll probably make another video saying, hey, I've got a Patreon set up and I posted the first video there.
I just closed on the property the other day.
I don't even have the means of access yet.
That's its own big deal.
We got a lot of problems just to, we have a lot of problems with that property.
I've got a lot of things that I need to solve just to even make videos there.
So it'll be a ton of work.
But in any event, so it'll be something to do.
And cool, as I work through it, it's probably a multi-year process.
All right, so now, okay, so another point of business is the magnetic gen sets.
Since this property I'm going to be going to is off-grid, I'm very interested in the idea of getting these magnetic gen sets.
I've made approaches to a bunch of companies, a couple of companies, that have supposed machines in pre-order, and they show the fancy little graphics of the machines with the control panels and stuff on them.
But so far, I've had no meaningful response.
Now, there was a fellow on his own initiative that made contacts with one of these companies.
But that company did not respond to me.
They haven't responded to my emails asking for how they're going to set up distribution and stuff.
And that company, there are some funny aspects to it.
They claim to have an operational unit and have six-year history with it and be in pre-order and be soliciting money to the order of about 50 million and be constrained by a rare earth issue.
And they claim to make their own magnets.
All of which could be factual, right?
And perfectly valid, but there's just something odd about their approach to this in the sense that as somebody that's delivered product and done that kind of thing in the past, I wouldn't approach it that way.
I just wouldn't approach doing business that way.
I would not set for pre-order until we actually had piles of material sitting out in front of a factory and had a stopwatch ready to go as the factory started and a firm date for the first ones to roll out.
And we'd already done a prototype run.
You know, we'd already produced 100 or 250 and given them out to select individuals.
So I wouldn't even announce that we had these things until we'd gotten that far for lots of security reasons.
Also for proof of concept kind of reasons.
They'd better not be honking for me.
Hang on a second.
i don't think that's for me but hang on
probably tourists trying to get one of the bears to move Anyway, so I wouldn't do it that way, right?
I'd be all set, ready to go into production and so on.
Now I understand they've got issues if they're making their own magnets.
I love the idea that they'd be making their own magnets here in the USA.
I've got a lot of other stuff.
The whole point of this thing is a little tiny talk of magnets, and we might get there in a goddamn hour, I guess.
Anyway, so the firm, it's just approaching things oddly, right?
I'm not saying they're fraudulent.
I'm not saying anything of the sort.
I'm just saying that it's not the way that I've done business in the past.
It's not the way I've seen successful businesses launch absolutely new products in new spaces in the past, right?
Some companies don't patent anything until they're actually in production, and then they throw a huge slew of patents out there.
They don't patent because they want to keep it all a trade secret.
They don't want anybody to know what they're working on until they're able to deliver such that they can get that first mover advantage.
There's a lot of reasons to do these kind of things in a technical environment.
But in that technical environment, you don't announce the thing years because this website apparently has been there for a number of years.
You don't announce the thing in pre-order years ahead of time of being able to deliver in my past experience.
So it just didn't sit well with me.
And I've got to get all NDA'd up before I put any person I know that has money that wants to put money into these projects, right?
So I know a lot of people that have crypto money that want to buy one, like myself, they want to buy one.
This company, by the way, wants to do a lease.
They want to lease the machines to you.
It's okay.
I don't care.
You know, I once leased a hot water tank.
I understand how these things work.
And they want the steady income.
They've got their own needs for that on a factory level, all of this sort of thing, right?
That's okay.
I'd prefer to own it outright, but I don't care.
The lease is fine.
But they want to do it based on how much your electrical savings are.
That, in my opinion, is a stupid way to price your product.
And it makes me question the viability of your approach, right?
For a lot of different reasons that are economic, that kind of an approach breaks within like the first year of a new technology coming out.
And it's been proven since like 1930s and 40s to not be a very viable pricing mechanism.
And people that have been through business schools know about that sort of thing and they just don't do it.
You know, it's like using fixed cost accounting against a growth model.
You just can't do it.
It's mathematically unsound.
You know, I know math is racist, but you still got to earn dollars, right?
You got to earn your bucks.
So anyway, so at this point, I told the guy that, well, I can't put time into video meetings with these people.
There's no point to that.
If they had something solid that can be tested and so on, they could provide me with an introduction.
I could get one of these money guys that's interested in putting their money into the production of these devices together with them, and I could just get out of the way until they're ready to sell me one, right?
But, okay, so that's where we are with the Mag gen sets.
The other companies that I've found have not contacted me at all.
They have not responded at all.
So now, we're still, myself and a bunch of other people that are loosely collaborating up to the point that we can relative to new discoveries, non-disclosure agreements, and commercialization of this technology.
We're still collaborating.
We're still doing things online, still having meetings, and still growing our understanding of all of this.
And I've actually become been contacted by a number of individuals, and I'm trying to work out the arrangements such that I can cooperate with firms that are not in the United States.
There's strategic reasons for that because of the nature of the basic monopolistic government heavy-handedness of things here, right?
So in any event, though, so we are, I say we, myself and a bunch of other screwy radical etherists and a few companies.
And the companies is very key, right?
Because these people have engineering staffs, research and development teams.
They have assay equipment of all kinds, you know, electrical meters that can sense and manage and measure all of this stuff so that after you've made it, you can prove that it works the way you say it's working, right?
And so they've got all of that, and they've got manufacturing facilities, and they've got their own source of funding to power that part because they're interested in it for their own markets.
You know, this is like the boon that everybody's after.
You know, basically, let's be real factual.
Fuck free energy.
I don't care about zero-point energy.
And a magnetic motor is a magnetic gen set is not free energy.
I would expect reasonably to pay on the order of $30,000 to buy a 20-kilowatt, 80-amp magnetic gen set motor, about 30,000 on an operational unit.
That would be the idea that I could buy that machine and it would run for an operationally designed number of years.
15 would be fine, but I would like to get 30.
But if I could get 15 out of it, even if it had to have X amount of its parts replaced in that 15 years, that would be perfect.
Because that $30,000 would represent a small fraction of what it would take for me to induce the electrical company, for instance, in my particular property, way the hell over on the other side of these mountains, to run a line down into this area for my off-grid house build.
And so, if I could just set this machine down there and produce electricity, we could use it to build the house and then we can use it to power the living at that house.
You could do this all over the planet.
We need a distributed, decentralized electrical system in order that humanity might survive these next 100-plus years as we get into this cold period of indeterminate length.
Okay, if we're lucky, it's only going to be a short one, 30 or 40 or 50 years.
A single person's lifespan might cover it and have warmer periods on either side.
But it may not be that we may not be that lucky.
But in either case, we need to deal with the fact that we're going to be in, we are in a much colder environment now.
It's going to continue to get that way, get more cold.
So we need to not be brittle and fragile to the changing climate.
So you can piss and moan about the climate changing all you want, but everybody stopping all carbon production right now is not going to change the fact, or is not going to alter our climate change.
It won't stop it, it won't delay it or anything.
Even if I believed that humans were the cause of it, the process is initiated.
That's their thinking, right?
That 99.9999% of this is environmental, but then humans have that 1% that triggers it into this catastrophic process.
Well, even under that logic, it's triggered.
It's going.
The process is happening.
Ain't shit we can do about the process, right?
We can't roll ourselves back.
So we'd better adapt to what we're dealing with.
Only it's not global warming, it's ice age.
So anyway, so we got to deal with that, and these magnetic gen sets are going to be tremendous.
It'd just be absolutely fantastic.
And I know that we can do it.
It's simply a question of overcoming some material limitations.
And there's some engineering issues.
So this is why I'm enthralled that I've got this very large non-United States-based engineering firm prepared to go into this.
Because once you've got the basic torque issue solved, and there's a number of ways that it can be done and has been demonstrated, we just need to engineer them into something more than a crude prototype, right?
But then here's part of the problem.
As you engineer these, okay, so say that we were just going to do it where we were going to have a spinning magnet motor that just turned a regular gen set that we can buy now.
You can buy tremendously effective, and I found some just beautiful.
They're very expensive.
You can turn the things by hand and spin them and make electricity.
They have such low torque requirements for such tremendous output.
So we're really getting good at engineering smaller and smaller, more and more efficient electrical generators.
Now, if we can match that, made it up to a magnet motor, then the magnet motor has to deal with whatever torque is required by that gen set.
There are other ways to get this.
You could actually merge the electric production part with the magnet motor as it's going.
But I'm just saying in a simple, easy-to-fashion, put it all together with parts off the existing parts.
This would be the way to go approach.
Then you've got one big issue, though, right?
The big problem that the closed systems have to deal with is heat.
Because heat kills magnetism.
It actually stops the magnetic, the magnet from being that magnetically outputting.
And this is the whole point of this talk.
It will eventually get to this thing.
We've still got other stuff to get to.
And so I've had some breakthroughs on that part of it.
But nonetheless, we're going to have to engineer around some deficiencies in our understanding of how to work with magnets.
And once we do that, then you just set the thing spinning, but it's not free energy because you had to make the magnets, which is pricey.
You had to get the magnets in position.
You had to build the framework for them.
You had to build the bearings and all of this.
So you have an inherent capital per input cost to the magnetic motor, as well as your now also very pricey gen set.
Because you want to get one very highly efficient with low torque and high output in multiple phase that you can deal with the phases of electricity on your own and you're not creating vast quantities of resistance.
This is because all electrical gen sets are essentially like a washing machine in the ether.
They're just sitting there grinding the ether for us to get a little tiny bit of electricity out of it.
But it's like really torturing the ether, vast quantities of ether disruption by a traditional gen set with big magnets and big coils and stuff.
And there's a lot of resistance in that because of Steinmetz.
You've got to understand Steinmetz's diagram and the way that electricity passing through a current passing through anything really, but a current passing through wires as we structure them causes this rolling effect in all of ether.
along that wire well and that's what we call resistance or in sound it's called impedance because of the waves of the sound they encounter this impedance as they're going along and that's the resistance of the Steinmetz kind of a role to the electrified sound going through that wire
or whatever you know whatever kind of electrical signal you're putting through the wire doesn't necessarily have to be sound all right so anyway so that's the point get those magnet gen sets but we're in an engineering world at that stage once we get the breakthrough in the concepts on overcoming the torque issue then the rest of it is just straight engineering the rest of it is just controlling the heat you know and all the other aspects of putting it together and doing it at a cost effective level but
our first units probably will cost us on the order of 30 or 40 thousand dollars to put out the door they won't be handmade or anything we'll have to do it at a factory level but even so 3d printing and all of this we can get to the point where they are not free energy but they're very very very inexpensive forms of continuous electricity without fuel and that's the big issue right 30 thousand dollars over 15 years if you don't have any fuel
cost is is nothing i know people right now that are buying thirty thousand dollar uh gen sets um you know guys that run logging camps for instance they buy these thirty thousand dollar gen sets on wheels put them behind a truck they run them on up there in order to provide uh 20 kilowatts 80 amps and uh for all of the machinery for the harvesting of trees and this kind of thing in logging camps or mining or fishing camps where they have to process fish or whatever right and
uh then they but they always have the continual now three dollars and 99 cents a gallon or whatever for diesel lean or uh which is the refined version of diesel that we now have um or you know even like dollar 89 up to 279 for biodiesel and i'm quoting local to pacific northwest prices in small bulk um so the not being able to you know not having to screw with the diesel the smell uh the the containers
the extra effort all of that such a huge savings that thirty thousand dollars for such a gen set is trivial it is it is a non-issue so um and that i think is a very good break-even point from what i'm seeing out there you can get kits that you supposedly can assemble yourself and get 10 kilowatts i haven't bought one they want like um 16 or 17 thousand dollars it's a closed clamshell kind of system i don't see how they're dealing with the heat and i don't see how they're dealing
with the torque issue and they don't have any uh demos online with machinery attached to it that i've been able to see that provides running output right so anyway so i don't i don't know about those but as i find out i'm about
them I'll put it out here now just because I'm going to do the property and all of that that stuff and put those videos out that's going to impact being able to do these that's why I'm trying to cram in a bunch of them in this short period of time now I'm becoming more active on the other property these will drop off but I'll still do updates and I'll still do what I can with videos relative to time and censorship and it'll be censorship that'll be one of the big issues Okay,
so, boy, working through all this pretty good.
All right, so there's, let me do my, no, I'll do that business later.
Okay, so there's, we had some woo stuff, right?
How do I want to do this?
No, let me do this first.
Okay, so I ran across a I was going to say an interview.
It's not an interview, all right?
So I ran across this video in which Kerry Cassidy bitched out Robert David Steele.
And Robert David Steele, you know, stood his ground and biffed for every pow that he got, right?
It was an interesting video in that regard, that Carrie was just a bit, you know, ticked off.
She just lost her channel.
This is Carrie Cassidy.
She just lost her channel, Project Camelot channel on YouTube.
So, you know, she was understandably in a high emotional state, but she took it out on Robert David Steele, or she was pissed at him.
Anyway, okay, so here's the thing, though.
During the period of that time, in this interview, he talks about this unrigged campaign.
And I'm all for Robert David Steele's concept of this unrig the elections.
I'm all for honest elections.
I'm all for this whole approach to it there, right?
And I'm just sort of flummoxed.
I have to be careful about what choice of word I use here.
I'm puzzled.
I'm very, very puzzled.
Because Robert David Steele was a CIA officer.
He was by his, you know, self-proclaimed, right?
He has some acumen.
He's not a stupid individual.
And yet he is associated with people of dubious provenance and intent.
All right, so he cites as great truth tellers that he has big affection for and great confidence in and is happy to work with Simon Parks and Charlie Ward.
These two individuals in particular, I've got real issues with their behavior, right?
Simon Parks is selling, he's associated with people and he's pimping out and acting as a sales agent for a USB device that costs about $2 or less.
And they're selling this as a 5G antidote.
And you don't even have to plug this thing into the computer.
It's absolutely marvelous.
It's so magnificently magical that they're charging you 365 pounds or 365 euros for this.
But to their credit, this is no ordinary black plastic USB device.
It's a USB memory stick that's got a nano coating of magical material that in its mere presence, 5G, wilts and runs away.
And further to that, it's got these crystals on it, one or two crystals.
You can buy the double crystal model if you're into heavy 5G.
And the double crystal model is going to just send the 5G running away even further away from you.
And you just have to have this in your presence, and your blood changes and this kind of thing, right?
Now, I've seen the video that Simon did with this guy, and they're using simple hydration effect on blood cell samples taken hours apart and claiming that's the presence of this 5G inhibiting USB device that you should pay 365 euros for.
And this device has been examined.
It is a typical USB storage device.
It has no operating software.
According to them, it need not even be plugged into a computer in order to actively aid your blood.
You just have to hold it in your hand like a magic rabbit's foot and put it in your pocket or any other magic talisman or something, right?
So on that sense, they should just be saying, pay us 365 pounds so that you will believe that it will work.
And Ergo, it will work because there ain't shit here that should work.
And so this is somebody that Robert David Steele holds up as a source, as a truth teller, as a good human being.
It's like, well, okay.
All right.
That's his call.
And the same thing can be said about Charlie Ward and his past.
I needn't get into it.
There's a lot of videos out there that detail a rather interesting history.
The guy probably is making a lot of money, like on the order of a couple of million a month or something, from his insider circles and that sort of thing.
But for Robert David Steele to try and connect a legitimate political movement, he's planning on spending a million and a half dollars on this 84 city tour to unrig the U.S. elections this year and every year until they're unrigged, right?
And he says, do this this year with all these speakers.
He's got Cynthia McKinney.
He's got other individuals.
They're making a big splash.
They're doing a lot of work.
They're putting a lot of money into this.
Everybody's, you know, they're spending big bucks on this, musicians, venues, buses, the whole damn thing.
And putting this all together.
And it's like, okay, but you're connecting it to Charlie Ward and Simon Parks.
And you want it to be a legit political movement?
Neither one of those guys are A-American or B, adding credibility to the situation, right?
So Simon Parks is in the Wu business, and he's in the experiencer side of the Wu business.
And those people usually don't add a lot of credibility, right?
It's like having your politician says, oh, yeah, I believe in, you know, XYZ kind of space aliens.
So it just strikes me as really odd, all right?
Very, very, very puzzling that such a link up should occur and that Robert David Steele should be so wedded to these two guys, especially those two.
He's got other people around him that I've got problems with, that I've got issues with, not only their history, but also their intent, right?
He's got, well, I won't go into it.
I just won't go into it.
It's not worth it.
Anyway, though, so finally, at last, well, we got into 40 minutes.
All right, so there's this fellow.
He makes videos.
His name's Ken Wheeler.
He does videos about energy, light, cameras, cool stuff, right?
He's done a video recently about light, and he talks about light being at it.
When it's condensed, it becomes hydrogen, a hydrogen ion.
So Ken's another radical etherist.
And what I'm going to talk about now is the point of all of this, which is magnetism again.
So this is the inchoate materium.
Inchoate is disturbed, is differentiated.
It's not random.
Random implies a whole different set of things that it is not.
The inchoate materium is like having a fabric where part of the weave of the fabric has separated and there is activity coming through that part of the weave, okay?
And that inchoate materium is the materium itself, which is the fabric itself, becomes differentiated.
It becomes uncohesive.
What other good word for that?
Disturbed, well, it becomes disturbed after the process of becoming inchoate, right?
And this is an uncodified bit of the materium.
Now, the reason to bring up incoate materium is that this is an understanding that relates to the Wu ships.
It relates to magnetic generators.
It relates to magnetism at all levels.
If you go and watch Ken Wheeler's video on light, which is really, really cool.
He does very good videos on these subjects.
De Lumina, he talks about the condensate of light and becoming into matter.
And at that level, at that, he also talks about black holes too, I think.
I think he's got one about black holes recently.
In any event, so a black hole is this, it's actually, it's not a hole.
There's stuff there, right?
If you tried to fly a spaceship through a black hole, you'd run into something solid and splatter yourself all over it.
It would never happen because of other conditions, but that would be the net effect if you could undo those other conditions, the other magnetic conditions that would prevent that.
Because it is actually the black hole is matter that has become a point of universe that has become so inchoate, so disturbed, so uncohesive as to no longer deal with light effectively.
So it no longer reflects.
Now, bear in mind, we don't see light.
We only see stuff that light reflects off of.
We only see the illuminated things, right?
We don't participate, we can't see the light, or we don't in any way alter our eyes.
We're not in control of our sensory apparatus at that level.
And we only have the four senses here, and they're all in the cranium.
What we call touch is a sensation that interacts with our body-mind, but it is not a sense in a number of different ways.
All of our sense organs are all subsystems that deliver to us a quality of experience that is not raw, it is processed.
So I don't see light.
I see the reflection of those objects that reflect light.
I won't go into it in any greater detail because I need to get onto the inchoate materium aspect of this.
But so basically, a black hole is a solid thing.
It's just no longer reflecting light because of the nature of the magnetism at that point.
Now, magnetism is all we have.
It's all of the universe, all of the materium.
So the materium is held together by magnetism.
All of my cells, all of my atoms, all of the supposed particles of my body are held to each other with this stuff that we act that we call when we see it being expressed.
We call it magnetism.
So this is where we, I'm going to get into trouble here because of the language that I have to use.
It may be very confusing because we have consistently mislabeled something.
So magnetism, as we describe it, is in fact a spot of active inchoate materium.
That is to say, it is a piece of the materium itself that magnetism at this point here in each of the otherwise coate, otherwise consolidated, condensed matter in the center of each one of these is a spot that is inchoate, okay?
It is dynamically inchoate.
Instead of, okay, so all of the stuff that makes all of the material stuff, the atoms as we call them here, that make up the material of the magnet here, are basically just a stable matrix.
And there's only a little tiny spot in the bare minimum, or bare middle of this, in the very middle of it, that is the inchoate materium, and that causes what we call magnetism.
But the magnetism expressed, the pull of it, the dynamic activity of it, is the materium being broken at the middle of this particular little object of various different chemicals mixed together in a slurry, put into a ball shape, dried out, then baked, then zapped with electricity and then coated with a thin coating of chrome.
So this little matrix itself is consolidated, concise.
It's all solid.
All the atoms align, they stay together, they know what they're doing, and so on.
But because we zap it with electricity and because of the nature of the matrix itself here, the material itself, we get this inchoate materium response, which is the materium breaking, so to speak, and letting through the actual dynamism that powers all of life and all of the materium.
That dynamism is the same actual force that binds all of our cells.
And so at this level, there's only the one force in the universe, and it is what we call magnetism.
But we must understand that magnetism itself, in a static sense, is expressed in my cells, keeping all my cells together, keeping all of the parts of the glasses together.
You know, the plastic itself, all those particles have an affinity for each other, and they stick with each other because of the same force that, when expressed in an inchoate materium point, is described as and called magnetism.
And so, Ken casually made the statement that all of reality is magnetism, and he's perfectly correct.
It's just that we've inappropriately decided to use that word across its dynamic phase as a part of broken reality, where the materium is broken and that force is leaking into the materium.
And we've also not identified that force as the central bonding force for what we call atomic level processes.
And it is.
It is the that magnetism accounts for that.
It accounts for how my heart beat.
It accounts for how my blood vessels respond and moving the blood cells.
It accounts for all of that.
It accounts for how the blood cells line up.
And to that end, there are these little bracelets you can buy.
Those little dots are neodymium magnets of a definitive strength.
You buy these little bracelet things by level of strength.
And you wear them.
And if you are like me and you have a carnivore diet or a high iron level and you wear these bracelets for a number of hours during the day, it has a tendency to align all of your red blood cells and they're slicker.
They're smoother.
They're not all wonky trying to go through your blood vessels.
So it actually aids the cells in dealing with things.
In that process, the magnetism imparted as it's on your wrist, which is a key area for the passage of the arteries, is that there's this extra magnetic attraction, if you will, and affinity for dealing with oxygen and carbon dioxide.
So you have a better level of respiration.
So these are, this is a martial arts thing, right?
We've been doing this in martial arts for who knows how long, is wearing magnets.
Because of course, in martial arts, you want to get strong, and there's, you know, you can get magnets that are so strong a human can't pull them apart.
And it really is a big effort to pull even these small buggers.
And I've got some over here that I have to get into very embarrassing positions to remove off of this metal framework.
I mean, I've got to sit down and put my feet up there and pull and pull and pull.
And, you know, I got to have the framework attached, anchored to this other thing with a lot of heavy crap in it because the magnets are very, very strong.
So inchoate materium is how we power all of our objects.
So all of our electronic gear, even our physical motion, is basically being powered by magnetism.
But all the electronic gear is just all electronics are based on Tesla's interaction with copper and magnetism.
And we've just refined that process and getting really good at refining it.
But we're now starting to make some interesting discoveries about the underlying thing, that force, the key force or whatever, which we see in an incohate materium point as magnetism and its use.
So really, this is the, I'll actually get it done in an hour.
Damn.
Okay, so this is the point of this whole talk here: was that if you understand, as Ken does, as I do, as other radical materialists do, or materium, radical etherists do, that the materium is based even at the atomic level on magnetism, then we all agree with Feynman that it was not a nuclear explosion that they set off.
It was an electric explosion, that those atoms are still in existence.
All we did in that explosion was to tear the magnetic bond between the various elements of those stuff at an atomic level.
We simply destroyed the magnetic bond in those atoms.
We didn't destroy the atom, right?
There's never been a nuclear force.
There's never been an atomic destruction of any atoms at all.
The closest we can come to that is the separation of the atoms at the electric or electron level, what we describe as an electron, which is really just another expression of magnetism, which is the dynamic leakage of that force that creates the materium and holds all of us together into the materium in a raw force, in a raw fashion.
Without that, we would have no technology in the universe.
We would all be dealing with the crudest form of expression of energy, which would be fire.
So we'd have hot water, and that would be about it.
You know, we'd be steampunk.
We might get really good at things at steampunk, but we're not going to other planets in steam-powered rocket ships.
So anyway, the, okay, so now here's the whole point of this.
In the Mag drive, these Wu ships, these UFO ships, the Tic-Tacs, all of this kind of stuff, including the recent description of the Tic-Tac drones that followed a whole swarm of them followed a bunch of Navy vessels and flew exactly at levels designed to attract attention.
So they wanted to be seen.
All of these ships fly, fly, by understanding how the magnetism works that binds all the air molecules together, that binds the tree molecules, that bind the paint and all of this kind of stuff.
They understand what we call magnetism at that level.
And in so doing, they are able to magnetize at a great, huge level of power a random spot in universe and push their vessels off from that using a repulsive force within their own vessel, which is also magnetism.
So it's extremely simple as to how they're working this and in concept and everything, once we grasp the idea that magnets are no different from any other matter in universe, except that they have within them a center that is a point of inchoate materium.
And that if we had this same understanding that the Wu ships do, we would be able to do exactly what they're doing.
That all we really need is the understanding of what materials are being used and how those materials are being applied, which is another video in the future.
So, all right, so that was the whole point of it, was that incoate materium, remember that, we're going to get into it later on.
There's a lot of other, tons of other stuff going on.
It's been a very eventful couple of weeks.
The UFO drones are very spectacular because they are telling the U.S. military by their actions, in my opinion, the fact that they had a drone fly at the bridge level, at eye level, of the people in that bridge and maintain that position is a way that these guys are sending a message to the U.S. military that they're about to have disclosure, whether the military likes it or not.
And thus we see the military probably going to come up with significant amounts of information to divulge to Congress, critters, and El Pretendency Biden, right?
So they don't have to tell us anything.
It was not to tell the American public.
The executive order was to pass this information into the political realm on the understanding, of course, the politicos are a bunch of blabber mouths and they're going to just leak it all over.
But I think the U.S. military has a reason for wanting, especially the Navy, has a reason for wanting disclosure to happen at this time about everything they know because they suspect it's likely to happen whether they do anything about it or not.
And I suspect that they want as many of us to be mentally prepared for this as may be possible ahead of that developing situation.
So this was what I basically went through, went through some of this stuff with Jay and Mike the other day.
And they're behind a paywall for a lot of obvious reasons because we went into stuff we cannot say here.
But this stuff, I think, can get through the censorship issue.
And that's why this Wu series guy, guys, because they're going to try and censor all different kinds of stuff, especially about the ether, and especially about ancillary thinking about the UFOs and how disruptive it's going to be for our entire social order.
So I've got to also do my show and tell here.
From the other day, I had a bunch of questions about that.
What was your show and tell?
So I was out on the beach with the dogs.
We do this little hike.
And we found this before.
And I just found something very interesting.
And I thought I would show it to people.
And it's a curious little bit of stuff.
And let's see if we can get this and show it here.
Here is a sand dollar enclosed in this rocky thing, right?
And we see the rock bits grasping hold.
So it's kind of fused.
It's starting to fossilize.
You can see the little bits of the fossilization start to occur as the material in the sand dollar and the other stuff really fuse and so on.
But the real point of all of that is this right there.
That is a 50 caliber explosive-headed anti-aircraft round fused in with all of this.
This is the stuff we've got that the Navy dumped off our beach out here.
I think it was the end of World War, the end of the Korean War, but this was World War II ammo that was not used in Korea, that kind of thing.
Something along those lines.
So we still keep finding it out here.
I'm going to be very gentle with this, because it is potentially explosive.
We've had a couple of them blow up.
The idiots thought it was coal and they threw it into a fire.
Sidiots.
Sidiots.
Anyway, I mean, really, well, I don't know.
They should know.
But I don't know why they should know or how they should know, but they should know.
In any event, though, so silly humans aside, kept it under an hour.
▲
Export Selection