I've got to transport equipment back and forth from the house into this office in order to do these.
Sorry about that.
Maybe I'll edit.
Anyway, this is a discussion.
This is second in our series here.
Quick discussion to make it easier for people to understand the perspective on what's going on relative to cancer and various forms of treatment for it.
So a little housekeeping.
This series is going to be called Cancer Ward as an homage to Solzhenitschin's novel.
And this is the second episode.
We'll discuss other things in this series that I'm going to present as well as cancer and treatment and so on.
We'll get into cryptos and things that are happening out and about and those kind of things.
By way of statement of function and how this will work, I do understand that my reaction to what's going on that I described in the first episode as the attitude does have, is tinged with PTSD symptoms.
And it's like, well, okay, that's fine.
Yep, yep, I got PTSD.
I've had a shitload of crap happen and I'm going to work through all the stress of it.
Part of it, too, by the way, is getting the appropriate balance of cortisol within your system, which is to say lowering the hell out of that because we have too much of that in our daily lives.
Cortisol is the stress hormone.
Anyway, so yeah, I'll have some episodic inputs of mental aberration, I'm quite sure.
And it's certainly going to affect how I do things because it's like I don't really care so much anymore.
If I'm anywhere in the unfavorable group of cancer survivors, then I won't live long enough for anybody to sue me.
So I can say any fucking thing I want.
If I'm in the favorable group, then I'll enjoy being sued because I'll be alive to fight with them.
So either way, it's a win-win for me.
And I'm just going to not worry very much about it's not like I'm going to be personally attacking people, but when I see bullshit, I'm going to say bullshit.
You know, we just can't deal with this stuff.
I just don't have the time.
Don't have the energy to waste on it.
So anyway, about this series here, the intent of it, the mission statement, if you will, is to provide tips and techniques to people with cancer and people that don't want to get it, and to provide methods for thinking about it that will aid every individual and how they decide to deal with it.
So I'm not offering medical advice.
I'm offering critical thinking tips.
Because I don't know your body, you've got to be, there's the first critical thinking tip.
Every body is different.
And we are able to classify all the bodies of the 7 plus billion humans around into three body types if you're using an Ayurvedic system, into five body types if you're using the Taoist system, and into one body type if you're using the allopathic Western medicine system.
So there's a critical thinking tip for you.
Do you think you fit into that same one body type that the Western medical system has shoved 7 billion people into?
If not, examine some of the other approaches.
I don't think I know more than anybody else about this subject.
That's not my point.
I'm not claiming to be an expert on anything.
I'm claiming to be a cancer survivor to this point.
And that may last as long as this episode and maybe not another one.
And I'm claiming to be an expert on critical thinking, on the ability to think extremely deeply, reach a base of understanding that can be proven from many different viewpoints, and then build up to a conclusion that is rational given the base from which we arise.
And critical thinking is actually a survival skill, right?
Like the universe gives it to us because we can use it.
You don't use it, you don't survive very long.
Critical thinking can be as simple as, you know, looking both ways on a busy street before you try and cross it.
Those critters you see by the side of the road were not exercising critical thinking, right?
Which is something that humans can apply should they choose to do so.
Anyway, so this form of critical thinking that I'm doing around cancer is formalized.
It's not like I'm just going out there, you know, batshit crazy without a structure for the or plan.
I have a structure and a plan.
The structure and a plan has been validated by the sources from which I'm taking the methods.
And I'm taking my critical methods thinking from something that's called first principles thinking, okay, or first principles analysis.
You'll see it both ways.
And basically, it's what you do is you work your way down a subject matter or down a problem to a very base core level in a form of reductionism until you can find something that you can prove to be absolutely true and correct.
And in my case, I'm adding on there practical and meaningful and so on, right?
It does.
So such a thing as this kind of critical thinking, this first principles, comes from, in the Western world, from work that Bucky Fuller did, where he analyzed his own thinking as he was thinking about things and wrote about it.
Feynman, who did the same thing, he's another physicist.
But we also see it in also Harold Percival with his book Thinking and Destiny.
But also we see it with Taoists and we see it in with the yogis within like their literature expresses it continuously because they're like Patanjali's Yoga Sutras was intended to be absolutely not a single extra word.
Everything reduced down to just the bare minimum, but which in a way of thinking is also the maximum required for correct comprehension of the material without falling into the pareidolia trap of humans and providing just even one more extra word which might get somebody thinking off on some other area.
So it was an attempt to communicate a certain level of understanding and then let the reader take that understanding where they may on their own.
But to be able to always fall back on it as the concrete step from which you step into the house of your structured thinking.
So you can always fall back in first principles thinking to go as deep as you need to from which to rebuild again.
You actually, as an aside, if you do a lot of psychonaut journeys, you do end up with an inbuilt sort of pathway or technology to just that sort of thing as you reintegrate your personality each time in the aftermath of these psychedelic journeys.
And this is just an extended formalized method of the kind of things that shaman and psychonauts have been going through for ages, which led to the same techniques being used by the yogis who were either under Patanjali's Hindu form or under the Taoist.
Because the Taoists were yogis and alchemists.
That noise is my heat.
I've got to have it.
It's extremely cold outside.
Anyway, so these cancer word episodes are going to be based on first principles critical thinking.
And we can always be wrong in first principles critical thinking, but you can always find where you are wrong so that that error does not become a mistake because you can go back to that point, see where you were, correct it, and go forward again.
So by way of housekeeping, the future episodes here of the cancer ward are going to be affected by this shit going on in my life, the now extra amount of work I've got to do in finishing out my office here, as well as weather and other necessary intrusions like strange things going on that I want to go do.
Part of the problem here is that you get PTSD from too much shit happening to you in too tight of a time frame, not allowing your hormonal balance to recover.
And recreation, recreation, is a necessary form of recovery and a fun form of recovery.
So I'm going to go and do some batshit stuff like I'm going to go sneak around to a local UFO conference, that kind of thing.
I say sneak around because I can't talk or people start recognizing me and I've got problems.
But do other things too.
We've got some other things going on.
There are some places I want to go and see and I'm interested in exploring some really wild ass crazy ideas like building my own spaceport.
I have to do it incrementally though.
I can't build a whole spaceport at once.
I don't have that kind of resources.
Plus, people would get really pissed off if I did, I think.
But, you know, just strange things, right?
So anyway, back to our little discussion thing here, real quick.
Next set of notes.
Okay, so taking from our point of departure that vitamin C is a very essential nutrient, and Western science nowhere ever tells humans the level to which they need to get it.
We can't manufacture it in our body the way that our pets do, even like most all species on the planet do it, except for us guys and three others.
So taking as a point of departure that you need to plump up your vitamin C in order to combat all forms of disease and to make your life optimal in all respects, health-wise, but also mentally, you know, and so on, and even spiritually.
Vitamin C is an incredible energizer to the vagus nervous system.
It's used in all of your organs.
It's used in the intercellular cement that binds your body together.
And it's usually that area, by the way, that the cancer attacks.
So you get your vitamin C level up.
It's not a panacea, and it is not an ultimate protection against everything.
However, it does have anti-radiation capabilities as an antioxidant and so on.
The reason that we can to a certain extent consider it to be a panacea is that we're so deficient in vitamin C that many of our conditions are not truly diseases on their own.
They're simply one of the symptoms of not enough vitamins in our system.
This is a fundamental understanding within ortho molecular science.
This is what we're trying to do, by the way.
So those of us in our seven savage samurai survivor group here are trying to shift ourselves from the statistical 14% survival over five years using conventional therapy into the 72% group, which is conventional therapy plus orthomolecular therapy for cancer.
So getting that, getting into this 72% here, the favored group, is the addition of orthomolecular therapy to whatever the hell kind of weird ass shit the allopaths are trying to pass off as cancer therapy.
Many of these guys just don't even understand cancer.
I've talked to them and it's shocking how little they know.
And here they are, they've got all these plaques on their wall saying they're an educated fucker.
And no, they're just a fucker.
And they've been schooled, but not educated.
And that's something else, too.
Please bear in mind in dealing with your physician that these individuals, all of the people in the medical profession at all levels, are operating under a basic prime directive within their brain that says, if I was not taught it, it does not matter.
It's not worth knowing if I was not taught it.
And that's a huge fallacy because their medical schools are flawed and run by the pharmaceutical company that does not make a dime off of vitamin C, vitamin B, or any of these other kind of things, right?
And that's really the shocking part.
It's so cheap.
It's so inexpensive to get yourself optimally plumped up and provide maximal amount of protection for little tiny amounts of money.
And yet what they're doing is they're harvesting you, as Catherine Austin Fitz says.
They're sucking all the money they can out of you as they watch you die and they don't give a shit.
Now, you know, I don't know that my individual oncologist, the first one I encountered here who I'm about to fire real quick, is that mercenary.
And he's actually really paranoid about cancer himself, which is the hell of it here, too, right?
Just saying.
The surgeon I had on the emergency thing, he did a good job.
And I go and I see him two weeks later.
The recovery was hell.
Infections, all different kinds of things, right?
But it was because I was so depleted in vitamin C, and vitamin C is a good anti-bacterial agent as well.
But anyway, I was so depleted and stuff that I go to see him.
And he starts telling me that, okay, you know, we've got your pathology back.
This is like two weeks later.
We got the pathology back.
And you've got cancer.
It was this size.
It was this kind, and I'm going to refer you to this oncologist.
And here's my list of, you know, six things, I think it was, or maybe it was five things that you can do.
And one of them was exercise.
And I'm sitting here looking at this list, and right on the top, it says that basically is this little blurb from the American Cancer Society saying that there's a correlation between exercise and long-term survival and cancers victims or patients, not victims.
Cancer patients.
And then I'm looking at my doctor and it's like, holy shit.
You know, do I even look at this document as though it makes any sense at all when the individual handing it to me is probably close to, I don't know, 300 pounds.
You know, all of it this kind of, I mean, he was fat covered.
This fellow had epidermal fat issues seriously throughout his body.
And yet he's, he's, and he, he and I discussed it, right?
It's like, no, you know, I do exercise and I understand how meaningful exercise is.
And I'm not saying don't exercise or anything.
I'm just saying these fuckers need to follow their own advice.
Physician, heal thyself.
And then I get in there with this oncologist.
And the oncologist is a nice enough guy.
He's extremely uncommunicative, doesn't know anything at all about the tests that he's giving me, the reliability, anything that can affect them.
Anytime I ask him any of the parameters about this, he says, I don't know, I don't know, I don't know.
So it's like, well, you know, I do know that he doesn't know, so I'm getting somebody else, right?
And he's the same way.
He tells me, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
No, the tests he's giving me, he does not rely on for himself.
So that's a big kick in the ass.
And he was talking to me about colonoscopies, right?
And colonoscopies, I've examined the things statistically, and it's really a goofy process that breaks in billions of dollars for the, or millions of dollars for the medical industry out of the insurance companies, right?
And it provides no sure and certain protection.
And they say that it does.
They say if you have a colonoscopy, you can go five years, ten years, or something, and you're guaranteed, you know, proof against cancer arising.
And that's bullshit.
If you go and have a colonoscopy, one thing you'll note statistically is that 99.99% of the colonoscopy reports from operators that hit the desk of insurance companies that are then aggregated into data that I can get at show that there's two precancerous polyps in every single fucking colonoscopy on every single human that's ever done in the United States.
So yeah, this is the ones that report no need to proceed to cancer treatment, right?
So out of all of those colonoscopies where there's no real cancer, they always find two precancerous polyps.
Hmm.
I'm not saying that they don't.
And precancerous is very easy to look at and see because it looks like fucking cancer because it represents a local area of scurvy, basically.
And there's no difference.
You can take a piece of scurvy tissue, slice it, put it on a slide.
You can even do freezing microtome slices so they're just super fucking thin and you're looking right through the cells.
But you put it on a slide, you fix it.
Go get some cancer cells, slice them, put them on a slide, and fix it.
Mix them all up and hand them both to a radiologist, cancer therapist, any of these people.
Anybody that's had ever had any experience looking at cancer up close will tell you they're both cancer.
Okay?
So they can't tell the difference between exposed scurvy tissue and cancer tissue.
And scurvy clears up in six days with adequate doses of vitamin C to the very minimum level.
That's how the RDA came about was what did it take to cure scurvy in someone?
The bare minimum vitamin C. I don't want those guys being fit.
I just want them to not have scurvy and die on me because scurvy kills you really damn quick.
Anyway, so here's the thing about that.
Vitamin C is essential at all different kinds of levels.
We don't get enough.
So imagine a situation here in the 1950s.
Nobody's getting enough.
You get 60 micrograms of vitamin C out of a very good, healthy, organic orange of the old style oranges, not the new style that have been bred since the mid-50s.
That 60 micrograms is a small fraction of what you need.
You probably need at a bare minimum, let's just say you're my size, and I'm not all that big.
You might need 2,500 micrograms per To maintain that in your system.
And in order to maintain 2,500 micrograms, you might need to eat 4,000 micrograms of vitamin C because the absorption rate isn't all that great.
It's not 100%, depending on the form.
And so then you need to eat a bag of oranges every day, just like gorillas do, just like all of the primates that can't make vitamin C do, right?
They eat quantities of this stuff.
So humans have not been doing this.
So in the 1950s, we had a situation where the population was not eating enough vitamin C. And so cancer rates really started to rise as the population started to express all of these and encounter all of these cancer-causing conditions.
And those are really conditions that change your epigenome and cause epigenetic changes to occur thereafter.
And prior to that, prior to the influence of cancer-causing chemicals and cancer-causing radiation, a low level of vitamin C, maybe it wasn't that, maybe you weren't that healthy, but you weren't walking around as basically a cancer magnet, so to speak, right?
But once there's all this stuff around you that's impacting you, chemicals and so on, the natural response of your body without the vitamin C and other and other vitamins, which we're going to get into later in this series, is going to be to present you with an opportunity to deal with cancer.
And so we had this situation.
1950s.
Cancer starting to rise.
People starting to freak out.
Lots of doctors encountering it in a way they did not prior to maybe 1947 or so.
So in the 1920s, it's thought that there was one in 20 to 1 in 27 people that would present with cancer.
We got down to like, we cut it in half by the end of World War II.
And so one in 10 or so, right?
People presenting themselves to doctors.
Now, along comes this guy, Gearson.
And Gierson says, well, you know, what they were doing at the time, the early forms of radiation and the very early forms of chemotherapy, was just flat out killing people and making their lives miserable.
Even more than that, it was making their death process, which was at that stage more or less inevitable, much more miserable, much more suffering involved.
And so Gierson, being a compassionate fellow, he was a doctor, medical doctor, he comes up with this idea over time.
It wasn't like he had a single idea and that's what took off.
And he developed this thing called the Gearson therapy, which includes getting yourself organic foods, getting off of any form of meat.
Because now bear in mind, in the 50s, we had a lot of stomach cancer and stuff, right?
And that was a result of there still being large portions of the population that did not have adequate refrigeration.
So meat was really a risky thing to eat in the early and mid-50s, depending on where you were, because refrigeration was so spotty.
And so all kinds of cancer-causing bacterias and other processes within the meat were there.
So Gierson's thought was go 100% vegetarian.
And at that time, we didn't have the pesticides on the vegetables the way we do now.
So the vegetables were much more safe than they are now relative to cancer-causing material.
So it was smart of him.
And then he came up with some other stuff as he went along, including things like coffee enemas and some of these other things, right?
And there is some small benefit to some small amount of people, even in the 50s, to these practices.
And here's why, okay?
It's not a cancer cure.
It was never intended to be a cure.
It was intended to be a baseline therapy up until 1958 when he ran into problems with the legal people and he had to get hard relative to his approach that he was right about this and things snowballed from there.
But it was intended to be a therapy.
The reason it worked was because here was a population that had been basically eating meat and potatoes and was starved for vitamins, being told to switch over to a vitamin-rich diet.
That's it.
No magic, nothing.
They just started getting more vitamin C. Started getting more vitamin B, more vitamin D, more E, more K, etc., just by increasing their, taking over their total diet to organic vegetables.
And then, as I say, there was some small benefit to flushing your bowels out, and you could have just used water, coffee as an acid, had some small effect in probably removing some level of what were the precancerous polyps.
But Gierson had no concept of why it was working, right?
He just knew that in some patients it did, so he recommended it to everybody, and then it became a fetish.
So Gearson therapy works sometimes to some small level in aiding people with cancer, but it's not a cancer cure.
The reason it worked in the 50s was because the vitamin C and vitamin deficient population.
You'll note in the 50s, we didn't have supplements the way we do now.
Yes, there was the health food industry, but that was the nut jobs, the small fringe elements, right?
And it wasn't a significant portion of the population.
You'll also note that a lot of that stuff has moved into the mainstream.
You know, take your multivitamin, so on.
Take a multivitamin.
And also with your vitamin C therapy, guys, take a multivitamin with every meal.
I can't take it at a multivitamin at night because they have a tendency to keep me up.
So I take two with breakfast and one at lunch.
Again, critical thinking.
You know, pay attention to what your body's doing.
If the shit keeps you up at night, you're not sleeping well, not good.
Why is this not good?
Because sleep is when your body repairs itself.
My body is not going to repair a single fucking thing other than bare minimum maintenance during the day.
It's when I'm lying down and I'm on the rack, so to speak, you know, that I'm there and the mechanics get to work internally.
So you've got to get really good rest.
I have noticed something, by the way.
Here in the cancer ward, since I've really gotten serious about my vitamin C, the amount of sleep I need is really dropping.
And so this is a good sign, okay?
You can use sleep as a metric for how your body is doing.
If you need a lot of sleep, something's going on.
Especially if that's been creeping up over a number of years or whatever.
If it's going down to a certain level, hey, pretty good.
I'm not talking about anything drastic.
I'm not talking about sudden jumping up four hours early or anything like this.
I'm talking about noticing this kind of shit over time, right?
This is a concept.
I didn't want to bring it up now, and I'll be more elucidating on it later.
But the concept is called Wu-Wei.
W-U-W-E-I.
Wu in Chinese is the negative or no, okay?
So in this case, it means no force.
Don't force nature, basically, and just observe and then harmonize.
And as the Taoists say, it takes but a fan of a leaf to create a hurricane if you know what the fuck you're doing.
So anyway, so you don't force it.
And so as the sleep starts lowering, I actually know that I'm on a progressively better run and I've adjusted my med, so to speak, right?
So anyway, that's why the Gearson therapy worked, was because these people were basically starved of this.
And so the population that he presented this information to benefited simply because anybody would have benefited from our social order at that time by his advice in reducing animal meats in your diet because most of them were preserved at that time with chemicals that cause nitrosamines to form or already exist in the meat and those are carcinogens.
So, you know, so we sussed out a lot of this shit in the 70s.
We reduced stomach cancer appreciably over the 60s and the 70s as refrigeration became more standardized and the state started enforcing really rigid refrigeration supply chains, so to speak.
And all different kinds of things changed.
Then we started legislating out cancer-causing chemicals.
And now we're in the state where we need to really look at radiation because that's what's getting us.
There's also a shitload of cancer-causing chemicals still.
We need to always be vigilant about that.
But basically, your Gearson therapy is not a cure.
If you want to do it, that's fine.
But bear in mind, your body's going to have a lot of demands that it's going to be placing on you.
And the Gearson therapy, at best, is an adjunct towards moving you into a more healthy lifestyle.
And if you like coffee enemas, what the hell?
I don't care.
It's not a cancer cure, though, guys.
And I really resent, you know, little fucktards like, well, I won't say it, but I resent little fucktards who proclaim that the Gearson therapy is the ultimate cancer cure and they've seen it work.
Bullshit, they've seen it work.
Cancer is not a thing of a day or a week.
Their observations of a person over a month or two or three is bullshit.
You know, cancer is this life thing you've got to realize.
And if we're heading into the future that the powers that be want here in the Western world, we may be looking at a one-to-one correspondence that everybody in the United States, you know, 20 years from now, will have cancer in their life, just as a fact of life.
I'm no longer really, well, obviously, afraid of it in that sense, but I'm still pissed.
So anyway, so that we're off of Gearsome Therapy.
We're off of the fuck tards and the buttheads that think that's the be-all and end-all of cancer therapy and there's a big collusion to keep it from not happening.
Okay, so now C60.
C60 is an antioxidant.
Vitamin C is an antioxidant.
They are not the same.
They don't work the same.
They don't do the same kind of stuff.
C60 is, or vitamin C is intensely needed in the manufacture of collagen in your system.
Collagen is part of this intercellular cement and does other things as well.
And vitamin C is used in all of your different cells and all kinds of different processes as an electron donation vehicle that is consumed and the consumption part of that is very necessary within those chemical processes because what is left out of that chemical is used elsewhere.
Now bear in mind, vitamin C is not that different from sugar.
Okay, humans could make vitamin C, as much vitamin C in our bodies as we wanted if we had one more enzyme group.
We've got three out of the four that are necessary to convert basic sugar into vitamin C. But we don't have it, so we're fucked.
So we've got to eat the vitamin C directly.
But because that's the case, your body is burning vitamin C as part of its fuel source and making other stuff out of it when it liberates these electrons off of it.
All of your health is basically is 100% controlled by the electron flow throughout your body biochemically.
And so this is why radiation, which induces electrons and changes, resonant changes in the electron flow within your system from external sources carried in on carrier waves cause you problems.
This is why radiation can cause cancer, because it fucks with the electron flow within your system.
So, and I'm talking electromagnetic radiation here, not particulate matter from decaying radionucleotides.
So anyway, so C60 has some properties that aid you in anti-cancer as a result, or let's just say in a broader sense, at an anti-radiation level, both electromagnetic and radionucleotides, because it also helps strip out the heavy metals.
But when it does its job, it does not have any residue chemical left over.
Because bear in mind, vitamin C is this little complex of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen, and it all goes together.
Now I'm going to have to think about it.
Carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
And it goes all and when the electrons are donated, it leaves carbon, it leaves these other materials for use by the body.
Whereas carbon C60, when it donates the electron, it's still there in its original form in a non-usable form whatsoever.
So it does not participate in any chemical reactions at that level.
Its function in your body is entirely different.
Carbon 60 is there to donate an electron to the oxidative stress residue of your body building proteins or using other stuff for energy.
It produces waste.
That waste is basically some form of hydrogen peroxide.
And you donate an electron and you alter the hydrogen peroxide from a positive into a more neutral state.
It basically goes into water and then you pee it out.
And so C60 is helping your body shed all of these waste products from the oxidation process that gives you energy that allows you to move and so on, right?
But vitamin C, while it also does that, there's a significant difference because it leaves behind these other chemicals that the body then breaks up and is using in other processes, unlike C60.
Plus, every time a vitamin C donates its electron, it's no longer a vitamin C, and it's some other process, it's some other chemical set being used now, and so that vitamin C molecule is gone.
It's also a very big molecule.
C60, when it donates an electron, it can reuse.
I mean, it can be like recharged, so to speak, because of its inert nature and the fact that it's got so many to donate, and the fact that it can recycle these and grab stray electrons as it needs.
And so, and C60, by the way, is mono-atomic, very, very, very small, so it can go in areas that vitamin C itself can't go.
And as I say, C60 performs an entirely different function within your body.
It's not being used the same way that vitamin C is.
So you need them both, in my opinion.
I'm going to go and take my C60, by the way, so I get done here.
Because I spaced on it this morning, and I've got to give the dogs theirs as well.
I just squirted on their tongue, and they're quite happy to look it up.
Okay, now C60 seems to have some effect on both apoptosis, which is killing off bad cells that are dead mostly, rejuvenating other cells, making them pop up and start doing work, and so your body can decide if that cell needs to go or not.
And C60 brings in hydrogen and takes it areas.
It helps clean out the debris in areas of your body that vitamin C can't reach.
And as I say, vitamin C, while it provides an oxygen or an antioxidant effect, it is more than an antioxidant.
C60, while it provides an antioxidant effect and is more than an antioxidant, it does not provide the residual chemicals that are thereafter used within the body.
And at some point, the C60 itself will be excreted.
And so that's basically the difference.
Now, I'm going to be talking about C60 in relation to telomere lengthening and stem cells and blood plasma when I get connected with these pirate scientists.
And we're going to do, that should have said this earlier in this whole thing.
I'm going to do some of these things and bring people in, and we're going to discuss various different aspects of cancer treatment and just general science, you know, fun stuff.
So that's it on Gearson Therapy and C60 for the moment, because we get a lot of stuff there on C60.
We'll be going into it over and over and over again.
Okay, so this is a non-cancer part of this thing, and I'm going to wrap it up and go get my C60 and have some coffee.
There have been some significant temporal markers that have fallen.
A temporal marker is this concept that I came up with 25 years, 30 years ago.
And it is a particular group of a set of forecast things that might appear.
There would be like one key or two key elements within a set that if they appeared, then each and every one of the other ones within that set would have a higher probability of also appearing.
And so a temporal marker was like a tag for a particular set of things that may happen in the future.
And we've had some very significant temporal markers that were part of long-term, long, long, long, long, long-term forecasts.
And these were the firing of the archbishops out of the church, the purge of the church and the breakup of the Catholic Church, the use of Bitcoin as intergovernmental debt settlement.
We've had that occur in South America between Argentina and Paraguay.
Huge deal there, giant, huge deal there.
This means that if you want to think about it in the strange woo-woo language form, okay, that people like David Wilcock, I'll get to him in a second, uses.
He uses the concept of timeline a lot, as though we're on a timeline and we can jump over here to this other timeline and we'll all be in the Bahamas and super rich and stuff and get ascension or the sun's going to flash at us and send us all to these other timelines and stuff.
But if you just use that language, these crypto or these temporal markers are indicators of a specific set of future developments.
And the David Wilcock kind of people would think of this as a timeline.
But the temporal marker falling for the Bitcoin settlement is giant.
And it pretty much cements the rest of the future relative to that particular set that was forecasting those way back when.
And so we can expect certain developments on a crypto world this year that should favor the forecast in which we had that forecast of the sovereign state settlement.
And now we're going to start, and then we'll start seeing more and more and more countries start getting into the Bitcoin use as cross-border settlement.
Because you have to understand, guys, this eliminates screwing around with SWIFT.
You don't care about some other country's third-party money-moving system, which allows them to find out who you're paying and all the other information about what you're doing and take a fee.
You just buy cryptocurrencies and give it to the other country, and they have it, and you're done.
And there's no passing it through the United States for approval, you know.
Anyway, so this was a tremendous one there.
There was one other one, too.
Well, there was the atmospheric rivers and a bunch of the other weather things.
We'll get into some of the weather issues as we go forward here.
Acute at the moment because, as I say, it's really cold.
Okay, so one last thing here.
Or sort of as an example of my own PTSD coming out, you know, and not wanting to take shit about stuff anymore or let crap go by, I have to note that David Wilcock has done some really serious,
weird social engineering kind of shit here the other day, where he had this video about the synchronicity of the quite rotten tree blowing over in the slightest wind and falling on his property.
In that video, at the very end, 20 plus minutes in, he's stating that these sealed indictments are being opened and then there's military tribunals going on and all of this kind of shit.
And he's perfectly free to state that, and I'm perfectly free to say it's 100% bullshit and he doesn't, you know, he's talking out his ass, right?
But what's really irritating to me is that he's using Nuremberg trial photos, using the photos of Eichmann and all these people sitting there with the Russian flag and all this kind of stuff.
Now, he doesn't say those are pictures of the tribunals he's talking about, but he doesn't also say it's an example or this is probably what it might look like or something like that.
He just ignores that part of it and presents the photos.
In my way of thinking, he's trying to get you to infer that he's got actual physical photographic evidence of something.
See, he never presents evidence of anything.
Although I've got to admit, he did indeed have a dead tree in his lawn.
He had absolute proof there was a dead tree on his lawn.
And I agree that was a staggering dead tree that was on his lawn.
Also wanted to note the synchronicity aspect of it.
He just contradicted himself because he said the first synchronicity on the branch falling caused XYZ to happen.
Well, why did this tree falling mean exactly opposite of XYZ?
You know?
It's like, get some consistency, some protocol and some methodology there.
But you know, his thinking is not good.
His critical thinking skills are poor, although he's got very good salesman abilities.
But his critical thinking skills are very poor because there's this video way back when, and I'm sure somebody out here on the internet can find it, where he's talking about why he doesn't take vitamins and why he doesn't take supplements.
And the reason that David Wilcox won't take vitamins is because he ran into some random dude at an airport, was sitting down talking to him about woo-woo and space stuff, and the random dude said, oh, you should never take vitamins because your body will get addicted to them.
Now, never mind that you don't produce those vitamins in your body.
And if you're not eating adequate amounts of the source material food, so if he's not eating two and a half bags, 25 pounds of oranges a day, he's not getting enough vitamin C, no matter what he does.
And, you know, quite frankly, bra, you look at, have you ever lifted?
I mean, guy, you know, you're not going to get through the rest of your life.
Well, let me put it this way.
In my estimation, as somebody who's old and seen a lot of people do getting old badly, you're headed in that way.
Your body is not in good shape, especially for the rest of the aging.
You know, bear in mind, guy, after you're 40, that's when it gets difficult.