Our most recently processed data sets are describing the 'presidential debate' as resulting in the 'destruction of illusion'. Lots and lots and lots of new data around that meme, but very few items in the data to suggest that the debate will take place. Short synopsis of latest data processing. ALTA report |halfpasthuman.com|clif high|predictive linguistics
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Hello Saturday, September 24th, about 5.15. | |
| Rather pleasant day really temperature-wise. | |
| We've had a couple of days of pretty interesting rain, our first October storm. | |
| Our data sets don't have any immediacy data piling up that would seem to indicate that we actually have a presidential debate. | |
| Our data sets in the past, in August, had shown that Hillary Clinton would leave the presidential race at the end of September, citing ill health. | |
| The data sets now, the immediacy data sets, are building very rapidly, but they're not showing anything that I can interpret as a debate. | |
| I don't know that they would, because in the past I've always screened out electoral politics kind of stuff from my model space, and so I don't have many references from which to judge. | |
| I do have a number of very frothy, very immediate immediacy sets that are piling on for Tuesday morning. | |
| These are mainly hitting or expressing in the markets entity. | |
| So there's lots of financial information sorts of references within that immediacy data for Tuesday morning. | |
| None of it appears, though, to have a, to be as the result of a positive debate. | |
| So if I had to choose now as of Saturday afternoon, I would say that for whatever reason ending up being cited, the debates will not happen on Monday afternoon. | |
| And there will be financial repercussions in the markets globally Tuesday morning. | |
| We're actually tracking within the data issues around the bonds and interest rates from last week. | |
| However, from the data sets that are now being processed, that are just being put in the model space today, it appears we're going to have another bigger flush of interest rate bonds prices versus yield related information coming Tuesday morning. | |
| And these are apparently some form of a long bond because we have a lot of long-term data sets that are associated with these that are bringing out negative consequences for the bonds themselves. | |
| That is to say, yields are showing as rising and independent of whatever the central banks may decide to do. | |
| And the central banks, the data that we have around them, are showing that they're not very friendly to this interest rate rise. | |
| They're not orchestrating it. | |
| They're trying to do what they can to dampen it down. | |
| That appears to be visible within the markets by October 8th. | |
| So within the immediacy sets that we have for today that are being processed and, as I say, put into model space now, those immediacy sets are showing a further exacerbation of financial and fiscal chaos that begins Tuesday morning. | |
| And I'm interpreting that as bouncing off of whatever the results are of the non-debate debate on Monday. | |
| So we'll see how it plays out, but as of this particular moment, the immediacy sets are saying no debate that's a debate. | |
| I mean, it may start and end rather abruptly, but it just isn't going to happen. | |
| And the markets are going to react in a very strong way Tuesday morning. | |
| And it's going to affect interest rates. | |
| That's the curious part to me because I don't understand how these bond vigilante guys work. | |
| But it does appear that there's something that's outside of the central bank control that's going to be impacting interest rates. | |
| And that's what we've got up to the moment with the immediacy data just put into the model space probably less than 30 minutes ago. |