Our most recently processed data sets are describing the 'presidential debate' as resulting in the 'destruction of illusion'. Lots and lots and lots of new data around that meme, but very few items in the data to suggest that the debate will take place. Short synopsis of latest data processing. ALTA report |halfpasthuman.com|clif high|predictive linguistics
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Hello. | |
| Saturday, September 24th, about 5.15. | |
| Rather pleasant day, really, temperature-wise. | |
| We've had a couple of days of um uh pretty interesting rain or first uh October storm. | |
| Uh our data sets don't have any immediacy data piling up that would seem to indicate that we actually have a presidential debate. | |
| Our data sets in the past in uh August had shown that uh Hillary Clinton would leave the uh presidential race at the end of September, citing uh ill health. | |
| Uh the data sets now, the immediacy data sets are building very rapidly, but they're not showing um anything that I can interpret as a debate. | |
| I don't know that they would because in the past I've always screened out uh electoral politics kind of stuff from my model space, and and so I don't have many references from which to judge. | |
| I do have a number of uh very frothy, very um uh uh immediate immediacy sets that are piling on for uh Tuesday morning. | |
| These are mainly hitting uh or expressing in the uh market center. | |
| So there's lots of uh financial information uh sorts of references within that immediacy data for Tuesday morning. | |
| None of it appears though to have a uh to be as the result of a positive debate. | |
| So if I had to choose now as of Saturday afternoon, I would say that for whatever reason uh ending up being cited, the debates will not happen on Monday afternoon, and there will be financial repercussions in uh the markets globally Tuesday morning. | |
| We're actually tracking within the data issues around the bonds and interest rates from last week. | |
| However, from the data sets that are now uh being processed, they're just being put in the model space today. | |
| It appears we're going to have another bigger flush of uh interest rate bonds uh prices versus yield uh related information coming Tuesday morning. | |
| And these are apparently some form of a long bond uh because we have a lot of uh long-term data sets that are associated with these that are bringing out um uh negative consequences for the bonds themselves. | |
| That is to say, uh yields are showing as rising and independent of whatever the central banks may decide to do. | |
| And the central banks, the data that we have around them, are showing that they're not very uh friendly to this interest rate rise. | |
| They're not orchestrating it, they're trying to do what they can to uh dampen it down. | |
| That appears to be uh visible within the uh markets by October 8th. | |
| So within the immediacy sets that we have for today that are that are being processed and as I say put into model space now, those immediacy sets are showing a um a further exacerbation of uh financial and fiscal chaos that begins Tuesday morning, | |
| and I'm interpreting that as uh bouncing off of whatever the results are of the non-debate debate on Monday. | |
| So uh we'll see how it plays out, but as of this this particular moment, the immediacy sets are saying no debate that's a debate. | |
| I mean it may start and end rather abruptly, uh, but it just isn't gonna happen, and the markets are going to react in a very strong way Tuesday morning. | |
| And it's gonna affect interest rates. | |
| That's the curious part to me because I don't understand how these uh bond vigilante guys uh work, uh, but uh it does appear that there is something that's outside of the central bank control that's going to be impacting interest rates. | |
| And that's what we've got uh up to the moment with the immediacy data just put into the model space, probably less than 30 minutes ago. |