Clif High - clifwujo4152016

April 15, 2016 - Clif High

24:05

clifwujo4152016

clif's wujo for April 15, 2016. Discussion includes Bitcoin, Bitcoin to Silver, and Bitcoin to Gold links as upcoming temporal markers; also heat wave in USA and Siberia, and storms. Also UV rays and blindness caution.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello there.
	It's um April 15th.
	It's uh 1244 p.m.
	Uh April 15th, 2016, 1244 p.m. here in the Pacific uh Northwest of USA.
	And uh this just gonna be a brief little discussion about uh just a few topics because there's so much stuff going on that everybody's all aware of the um Deutsche Bank uh admitting that they were bastards and you know are complicit along with all these other bastards in manipulating the uh tiny little gold and silver markets uh to the detriment of all the savers of the planet, uh that kind of thing.
	So there's all that sort of stuff going on.
	The uh political fracturing is continuing, all of these major memes are still rolling uh along, so there's not a whole lot uh of new stuff to report there that's not in our uh latest Alta uh report, but there is there's a couple of new things that have shown up in the post-processing.
	What I actually do when I do the reports is that after the report is released, I run reconciliation routines.
	Uh these reconciliation programs um go out and uh look for um basically look for the hits from the previous report series so that we can get those out of the way for the next report.
	It's a way of the I've got a cleaning up the um uh the database of of uh uh uh pending uh lexical structures.
	Anyway, and so in the doing the post-processing frequently, I'll bring up uh new data that uh you know hadn't been captured at the time that the uh previous report was out.
	So that's what we've got here at the moment.
	Uh, one of the new bits of data is about uh Bitcoin and its relationship to silver and then Bitcoin and its relationship to gold.
	There's an emotional link to uh silver at the moment, or between silver and bitcoin within our data set.
	How this arose, I'm I can't say.
	I mean, I what came in naturally through the through the data wasn't anything that I that I structured, and it linked up.
	Now, when I progress model space forward uh through June-ish into July, so sometime at the end of May and through June and into July, this set builds up that shifts Bitcoin from its relationship to silver to a relationship with gold.
	Uh it does it on an emotional uh sum basis.
	So I have all these numbers that represent human emotions that are attached to words in various different kinds of categories, um duration of the emotion, intensity of the emotion, spread of the emotion, all these different values.
	And when these various values are summed according to type, we come up with what's called an emotional tone for that uh particular uh subset, that particular lexical structure we're dealing with.
	So there's an emotional tone that's associated with silver, and it can be represented by a uh basically a complex number, a um uh a structured number that that has a series of values in it that are the sums of all of these uh values that are associated with all the words that are associated with silver within our work.
	So it gets it gets um uh complicated, but it's not real complex, it's just basic arithmetic adding up all these numbers and then averaging them across the uh various different uh components of our multiple dimensional array.
	And so we come up with an emotional tone for silver that's a numeric value.
	And coincidentally, back in maybe it was September of last year, maybe August, uh Bitcoin shifted its emotional tone to the point was very, very, very close to that of silver.
	Uh it was I don't know, maybe uh a tenth of a of a point off of that of silver, so so close that they might as well have been identical.
	At that point, uh there was this association between Bitcoin, the numbers uh uh of 428, the floor of silver, and silver's escalating price.
	And so uh there was a bunch of other data in there that said that the various different components of the 428 to 408 that Bitcoin was gonna loop around in this range of 408 down to 420 or up to 428 and bounce around, and then when it when it hit 428 and then took off and Never saw 428 again, didn't repeat that.
	That would set a firm floor, whatever the price silver was at that particular point, that would set a firm floor for silver.
	And that that would be a floor that silver would never come back to test again.
	That would just be its its you know, bottom um launching spot from that point on.
	There's also an association between uh 428 and Bitcoin in the past for Bitcoin, you know, and Bitcoin goes through 428 and holds it and not only just simply stays there overnight but continues with it, uh you know, larger than 428 USD US dollars, and there's an association there in this emotional tone of silver, and then the shift into this emotional tone of gold.
	Now, this is where it gets a little bit complex, okay, because as I if I move model space forward uh through the year and I am tracking Bitcoin, then I can see how model space is projecting Bitcoin to behave.
	It doesn't give me numbers as to what it's going to be on any particular day.
	My system doesn't work that way.
	It does come up occasionally and give me numbers, insofar as uh they are uh interspersed with the other data that tells me how Bitcoin is doing on an emotional level.
	And so I know Bitcoin is likely to go up in US dollars when it's doing well on an emotional level numerically.
	So I can sort of plot that, but I can't say where it's going to be unless the data just accidentally you know uh happens, not accidentally, but happens to spit out a uh a number for us to fix it on, like 428, and then the it assigned it uh uh association with the floor for silver lexically within this lexical structure.
	Uh and it's very rare to get numerics.
	I just don't get those in my work.
	They have to go through all kinds of processing to get a numeric to go all the way through.
	Anyway, so uh very rare condition.
	So here we are with uh 428 forming a floor for Bitcoin once or for uh silver once bitcoin is through 428.
	Now Bitcoin, as we move model space forward, as Bitcoin as we go from um where we are now through all of May, all of June, and into July, there's a cluster of data that appears that shows that Bitcoin is gaining a lot of attention and a lot of emotional value as capital controls are implemented as a result of the currency crisis that we're about to go through a couple of weeks from now.
	Go watch Greg Hunter, USA watchdog on YouTube, uh, and uh his most recent uh interview with Rob Kirby, and you'll get some hint of what's coming.
	Uh, because no one will know.
	I mean, uh, anything anything any of us say about it is just a little tiny bit of the words that are going to hit uh as a result of this huge crises.
	So, anyway, um bitcoin's gonna go through there in our data, and it shows that by about the time it reaches into July-ish somewhere, and these aren't firm lines of days.
	We get a it's a scatter graph, so you get all this data clumping up, and you have to make a judgment as to when it's gonna be most effective.
	And so my judgment is that sometime before, say, oh I don't know, the 11th or 12th of July, sometime in there, we should see Bitcoin rising up to the point where it's about $650 US.
	Now, at that point, its emotional components, it's its emotional tone, Bitcoin's emotional tone, its summation values, insofar as our model space is concerned, will have shifted from being close to that of um uh silver to being close to that of gold.
	Sorry, there's some kind of disturbance going on outside.
	Anyway, um so it's gonna shift from an emotional tone that's similar to silver to an emotional tone that's much similar to gold in terms of the uh numeric values.
	Now, it may be at that point that we end up getting a link up between Bitcoin and gold in future behavior.
	We don't have that just yet.
	We may have that in our next report here that will produce uh for May.
	Uh no promises, it may show up in the data.
	We got our first links of the um uh connection between the emotional tone of uh Bitcoin and silver, as I say, maybe August, September of 2003, certainly by September of 2015, maybe as early as August.
	I just don't remember.
	I it's it's a bitch to remember all this stuff.
	Anyway, though, and then but then we got our hints on the 408 and uh to 428 number range uh October, I think.
	So there was a slight, you know, one report to the next, there was a time delay in getting that link up.
	So anyway, so we may we may find some similar association with gold.
	I as I say, no promises.
	We'll see.
	But we will see this association between we do have an association already between this arrival at about 650 US per Bitcoin and the um uh takeoff, if you will, in US dollars of the silver price.
	Now, not to say silver isn't gonna go way up before we get to this point sometime in July.
	And sometime in July, when Bitcoin is about 650 and it's making this emotional transition over to be more like gold, then we're gonna see silver coincidentally.
	I mean, it's they're not linked, but temporally they're linked, they're gonna happen about the same period in time.
	Then silver is showing as just basically lexically taking off and is going to keep going uh for the rest of this year at a bare minimum, if not for a number of years, and we have a lot of reasons to suspect that it'll go uh you know fairly upwards for a lot of years before there's any kind of retracement.
	Uh but in any event, so that's our silver to gold to Bitcoin stuff.
	Now, as I say, we don't have a price on Bitcoin to action on gold link yet.
	We do have a connection that shows that Bitcoin is good is in the process of transitioning over to more of a link up uh to be more like gold in in how people emotionally react to Bitcoin.
	Uh and so that's that's um uh a very positive association in my in my way of thinking.
	We'll see how it all works out.
	Um, but we do have a um hint, a little tiny hint that's worth reporting on, that our um transition to gold will come uh at a period of time um as basically as a result of let me put it this way there appears to be uh enough evidence in the data to postulate that that what the data is forecasting is that that Bitcoin will shift into a position emotionally more
	like gold as a result of gold becoming unavailable in terms of its uh availability to people on the street.
	So it may be that we hit this drought, this dry-up period where all the coins of the world are sucked up and they go hide in dresser drawers and you know stuffed in um the underwear drawer and that kind of stuff, right?
	Um and so disappear, and there's just are none, there's just no trading.
	That that hint and that that connection in the data does exist.
	The data shows that the uh availability of gold will be so constrained uh that Bitcoin will get a boost out of uh its gold-like properties and its ease of use.
	So um uh and just interesting.
	So again, that's July-ish.
	We think that some of this stuff's gonna start happening in terms of the connection to Bitcoin and gold.
	Uh that's pretty solid, early July, as it seems to fade over in shade into that.
	All right, now uh a couple of other things.
	I don't want this to be too long.
	They've got all kinds of people babbling at us, and and I don't need to add my babble to everybody else's babble.
	Umso far as the Terra entity, the collection of data that shows how uh the planet is gonna behave in terms of its forecast, which I've got to say that there are people out there that consider us weather gods, because we've been so accurate with this uh and very long range.
	Um first off, no, uh the data does not show we're not getting any um fulfillment in the language in the reconciliation uh on our uh forecast for a large earthquake in the region of China and what's recently happened to Japan.
	It may be again a case of earthquake masking.
	So it may be that we're in one of those years uh like 2003 where there was um uh the earthquakes at the beginning of the year in California that caused a lot of uh verbiage uh to hit the internet, and then the major banda achi quake that hit at the end of the year.
	Uh we may very well be in a repetition uh of that uh linguistically because we've had these earthquakes this that are strong, uh very much um a lot of uh of the linguistics, but a lot of it doesn't fit.
	Uh so this is not what an earthquake that the the um uh data seemingly was forecasting.
	Uh oh, we and if I'm gonna I actually have to back off a little bit and say that I could certainly be off on the geography.
	Uh but uh we don't have the damage reports Yet, and uh there were a lot of very specific linguistics in the in our sets as to a forecast of the types of damage.
	So when those show up, uh the damage reports of these the current quakes that are going on in the last couple of days here in Japan, then I'll be able to say, okay, it looks like I was originally I was off in my forecast, and it should have been Japan, not China.
	Uh but at this point I'm still saying that we we still have a forecast for a very large damaging earthquake in uh China.
	Uh anyway, so that aside, um the Terra entity.
	Uh we're getting forecasts now, not from the from our entities, but from um uh the powers that be, you know, the uh the NOAA uh and other weather people uh for a very hot summer along the eastern seaboard.
	Now, this is kind of what I was afraid of, okay, because here's our situation.
	Our data set uh had come in with a forecast were just killer heat waves, just monstrous killer heat waves.
	Uh heat waves on the order of the stuff that was seen in uh France a few years, you know, a decade back, uh, where uh I don't know, thousands of people died, tens of thousands.
	Um so we're seeing that level of heat waves, um, and they're in the northern hemisphere.
	The way the data describes them, they they're heat bubbles really, they're sort of tear-shaped, they're all in the northern hemisphere.
	And initially, I thought that that one of the bubbles would form along the west coast, and then another one would uh wrap around and form in um uh particular part of the joining between Europe and uh Russia, okay.
	Um just given the geographic references and geographic references are this is where we always fall down.
	They're all very vague because you see so many people referencing geography on the net that you know any given reference has to be discarded.
	So, but in any event, we had reasons to think that it would maybe be the the um the left coast and not the right coast of the North America.
	The reason it's bad if it's the right coast is because the way the data was um talking, uh it's gonna be a percentage of the populace kind of um impact.
	So the more uh metropolitan, more dense an area you live in, the higher the level of impact of heat that's gonna hit.
	And if it had hit out here in the west, we've got so many areas that are empty space, so to speak, that uh we would not have had the level of um uh damage, potential fatalities, hospitalizations, etc.
	Uh that we're going to have uh if indeed the heat wave does develop along the east coast and not along the west coast.
	Further, if it does develop along the east coast, then our geographic references were off by this factor, and it means that the heat wave that's going to hit in um Eurasian continent is going to be more towards Siberia and over this area of northern China.
	Again, um the Chinese references are close to where we think our are uh large earthquakes could have hit as well.
	Now, something to be advised that if that is the case, if we do get the eastern seaboard uh uh heat uh wave this summer, it's gonna be really nasty for the US, but even worse for the planet will be the heat wave that'll hit that part of uh basically the far western edge of Siberia, because then it really pretends very badly for the forest fires.
	I mean, forest fires at a level that maybe uh we might get uh uh a blanketing effect of so much smoke from the fires off of such a large area that whole continents are are covered by the smoke for a while.
	I mean, worse than the chemtrails are uh so the the geoengineering.
	Uh anyway, so that's that was it's like oh no, I didn't really want to see that.
	It's actually would have been better if the um uh if it was the west coast of the US that gets the heat wave because then our geographic references would have put the the heat in the Russian uh sector on the far eastern edge of Russia, not the far eastern edge of Siberia.
	Um it we would have had you know potentially more suffering in Europe, I think, or in Russia from um uh by people as a result of the heat wave, but the damage to the planet I think would have been less.
	But it's just an opinion on my uh part, you know, it's the just the way things are going to develop.
	Anyway, so uh continuing on with this with the uh heat bubbles and something to be advised.
	Um there's a uh a level of intensity increase in the um uh perceived apparent light uh hitting Earth.
	So uh it is as though uh we're living on Mars in terms of the ultraviolet, okay.
	And uh ultraviolet is a damaging uh a blinding light at the levels that we're now starting to receive.
	So we've gone through the I was born in a on a planet that had a yellow sun, and Superman had powers, and he could kick the shit out of Batman.
	Now though, we live in a white sun, Superman hasn't got any powers, and Batman can come and kick the uh crap out of Superman.
	Okay, so because a white sun it certainly is.
	Now it's starting to get a very agitated white sun that's sending out a lot of the higher level frequency uh radiation.
	It's boosted the frequency of the UV, and so we now have a UV A, B, C, and uh what appears to be a developing UVD classification.
	And these are all classifications in the minds of humans.
	The sun doesn't care, it just spits this stuff out.
	It's very intense, and this stuff um the new levels of light uh can and will uh be causing blindness uh in near term and also uh further down the road.
	So I I'm not a big fan of sunglasses personally, uh, because they throw colors into your system and alter your view of reality.
	Try trying uh light green sunglasses, uh yellow sunglasses, um rose glasses or purple or something, all in succession and fee see how you feel from it.
	And you'll see that indeed your body reacts to the colors, and so the filtering from sunglasses uh it's not a natural state.
	So as a rule, I tend to not use them.
	However, from now on, I'm going to simply because the anytime I'm out because the um the UV levels are so intense.
	And uh our own UV monitoring is uh with uh local in local conditions here, uh shows that the um uh heating capacity of this uh new um burst out of the sun is uh uh is quite intense, something we haven't seen before.
	So I can see why we're gonna have such a hot year.
	Anyway, so uh just be advised, even if you don't normally wear sunglasses, might be something to consider.
	But if you're gonna get them, might as well spend the money and get something decent that filters out as much UV as you possibly can uh because it's that's that's gonna be causing the problems.
	And then one last thing here before I sign off uh on this short little deal, is that uh we're gonna have a bunch of early storms.
	So the uh east coast, if it gets hit by the heat wave, it will find that that we'll find that the language shows this shearing uh force relative to the weather.
	Uh I had I had actually thought that maybe the interpretation should have been, and spoke about it earlier, that we would get a heat wave on the west coast where we would have our normal soggy spring, and then there would be a shearing effect, and we would jump right into heat.
	Uh we've had that, but it's been intermittent and and sort of bursty, it hasn't continued the way that the data described it, into this long heat bubble that causes all these problems.
	If, on the other hand, uh indeed we get it on the east coast, then the shearing effect was misapplied to the beginning of the system, and it'll probably be at the end of the uh the heat bubble as it shears away into what we previously described as popcorn storms coming across the Atlantic and coming up through the southeast.
	And those storms are going to be um sort of like squalls, but not quite, they're not quite described that way, but they're apparently something to uh be advised of and they are gonna cause some series of problems, and they should be fairly early, again, maybe as early as July,
	an abnormally early uh storm season for the lower um half of the eastern seaboard uh has been forecast regardless of whether or not it gets the the heat bubble, but if it does, then I can see that that heat bubble may indeed uh break and shear off in a series of storms.
	And I think that even fits how the French uh heat bubble dissipated.
	I think it was a series of offshore storms that came on and blew it away.
	Okay, and you know, uh speaking of blown away, uh I'm blown away.
	I've got a lot of work.
	I've um uh taken on a real big huge giant project.
	Uh so I'm gonna go into some different work and be doing a lot of the videos uh on the road in the uh truck and and up at the uh boat yard in Tacoma.
	It's a nice spot, it's a good spot to work.
	So I'll set us up a nice little um area up there and we'll do background shots from the the boat and I'll get some uh some good video and uh we'll use that as our entrance or to these kind of things in the future.
	Uh anyway, it's gonna be a real interesting project.
	Uh take care, guys.
	It's gonna be one hell of a uh the rest of the month, and then May and June is the is the um lag period, so to speak, while government, what I call Uncle Gus here, you know, government US, uh basically um, you know, hauls itself up by its cajones and uh you know quickly uh yanks its trousers back up because it's gonna get caught with its pants down,
	and um uh comes up with a reaction and a response to the huge crisis that we're gonna go through over the rest of April and and through May.
	Uh so um and then we get into hyperinflation.
	And the data says that's gonna be all kinds of fun.
	So we at least have something to look forward to.
	You know, it's gonna be a hot, brutal uh summer.
	And you know, um in the end, hey, we're still here.
	Uh so I'll see you guys later.
	And that's the end of this particular Wujo.
	Uh I'll I'll try and post more uh and shorter videos as we go along.
	Hey, but hey, this is well under an hour.
	Hooray!
	Gotcha beat there, Joe.

▲