All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 7, 2015 - Clif High
01:16:03
20150807 – Clif High Audio #29
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello there.
Today is August 7th, 2015.
It's 2.28 p.m.
Sorry about the delay on this.
This is the webinar, I mean, in lieu of.
I'm offering an audio recording and answering the questions as rapidly as I can that have accumulated.
Those that require whiteboard or screen sharing or those sorts of things, I will do at some future point.
I ran into an issue with Google Hangouts.
It's a very excellent quality program.
My issue is that I run so many background processes on the PC here to cross-connect to our little server garden that it was just impossible to run the Google Hangout software and the background process.
And it's not that easy to shut those off while we're in the midst of doing a processing for the next run, which is being done with the immediacy data.
So what I ended up having to do was to abandon the idea of using the Google Hangout software at the moment.
And we'll try and clean up a machine that we'll be able to set up for that purpose.
And in the meantime, I'll also schedule time to do a whiteboard video session, which I'll put on YouTube for those questions that basically I have to sketch the answer to because it's a little too complex to go into in a word fashion.
So this will be a rundown.
We'll keep it as an audio because I can process it faster and get it uploaded loaded faster.
The time it takes on the video processing to then have to put it into a format to put it up on YouTube and so forth.
That was one of the reasons to use the Google Hangout in case you're not aware of that, is that Google takes care of all that stuff for you simultaneously and basically streams it right on over to YouTube without you having to go through any post-event production kind of stuff in order to get it in a fashion that would be or in a format that would be ready for YouTube.
So the Google Hangout software is really cool.
As long as you don't have one of these machines like I've got that's running.
I think we've got 87 background processes running at the moment.
So it's a, you know, really bogs the thing down.
And the Google Hangout software requires the connection to the internet 100% pretty exclusively.
So you'll find that you can do things that would hang it up in the background by cross-connecting to other sites that it wasn't too compatible with.
I found some I could get away with, but then it would hang up again relative to some background processing that I've got here.
So I ended up having to abandon it.
Anyway, I'm going to grab a cup of tea here and settle into the questions.
We'll go through those fairly rapidly.
If they spark other questions, that's fine.
I'm going to do a Q ⁇ A session after each report and pick up as we go along.
So we are anticipating an immediacy data report sometime after the 15th.
And we'll do a Q ⁇ A after that because I'm sure that there will be a lot of questions as a result of that one.
Anyway, grabbing tea, back in a second.
Okay, so tea having been obtained, we can start in on the questions.
There's a number, as I say, that are going to require some form of sketching on a whiteboard to get the idea across in terms of how the cross-links and the multi-dimensional array work.
And so we'll leave that until a future time.
And at the moment, we'll start in with some questions about the Terra entity.
Right off the bat, we've got this one.
Does the Terra data reference the exploding internet chatter on the scientific and mathematic impossibility or observational impossibility of heliocentrism and our Earth being a spinning sphere in a spiral galaxy?
And see, here's where we're going to start getting into a bit of issues.
Yes, the data certainly does pick it all up.
There's a huge amount of chatter, basically going to the idea that we're on some sort of a platter, a flat disk that's maybe curved upward at the edges or something, rather than a spinning sphere.
And see, I dispute this in terms of my observations at my own solar observatory that I ran from 1998 until 2004, 2005 here in the Northwest.
Was able to, I did a bunch of weird things.
I recalculated the size of the Earth based on a couple of different methodologies, basically surveying techniques using the stars, etc.
And ran, as I say, a solar observatory during that period of time and became convinced that we are in a helical model of the universe, not, or of the solar system, not a heliocentric.
So, yes, I agree that the heliocentric is impossible, that the sun is not the center of our orbit and all of those things.
However, my statement has always been that I follow Dr. Bott in his observations, B-H-A-T, about the way the solar system is organized, and that we are in fact spinning behind a comet, and thus all of the strangeness of retrograde stars and everything, or retrograde planets, become understandable when you think of us in a helical model.
So, you need to look at DJ Sadhu on YouTube and look at his videos, and that'll give you a very good idea of what I think our solar system is organized as.
Now, because I think that, my interpretations of the information coming in within the Terra entity are obviously going to favor that view.
And I dispute the idea of the flat plate, flat Earth, any of those, because it's so easily disproved in so many different ways.
And I've been up in gliders when I was in a kid, very high up in the atmosphere over the plains in Nebraska and Kansas and so on.
And you can observe the curvature of the Earth and the situation firsthand.
So, in that sense, yeah, I'm aware of it at the data level, and it's mostly discarded.
There are some small leaks that are coming through along with that data that are prescient.
So, we keep seeing it show up within Space Goat Farts Entity and within the Terra entity data sets as we go along.
But the reason that it's showing up has to do with the emotional qualifiers that bring along the prescient data that we pick up our detail from, not because of the conscious thought being expressed within the subject matter of the flat Earth, if that makes any sense at all.
Okay, so we've got a number of questions on silver, and it's perfectly pertinent to what's going on here.
Let's start off with this other one.
It's do we get any clues as to what countries in South America young people migrate to?
Yeah, there's actually quite a few pointing to Uruguay, Paraguay in that area, and into Peru and Chile.
So, it's seeming to pick up more that way than Brazil, etc.
But this is this geographic references.
That's merely the larger number that are pulled in.
It's not necessarily a, you know, it's not necessarily meaningful because the internet is so filled with geographic references.
We're bound to get some no matter what kind of data we're seeking.
So, I don't, as a rule, I don't really think of those as being too prescient.
But at the moment, yes, we have a situation where Uruguay is winning out probably about two to one, maybe three to one, to any of the other references that are coming through.
Now, silver, a little confused about silver.
The data shows that the actual price of silver goes up, but not within okay, now let me back up.
We have to understand that our data is dominated by non-dollar discussions of silver.
So, there's actually far more discussions of the value of silver in terms of total number of volume discussions on the internet in variations of Pali, Hindu languages, you know, of the Indian subcontinent, than there are in English.
Now, a lot of those are in English as well, but we find that there's huge discussion levels of silver in other languages and other currencies.
So, we have to be careful about here.
Because the silver situation in the data is shown as being fractured, to where there's an isolated dying empire, fake silver market kind of manipulation that keeps going and keeps going and keeps going and keeps going, even though it's effectively dead, they still try and keep it going.
And in the meantime, we find that indeed on other markets and exchanges, the price of silver itself is going up.
The mechanism that we have within the central bank empire led by the Federal Reserve is that they will control the price of silver, and thus we see within that area the gray market of the escalating premiums.
So the aggregate was that we would see between $62 and $68 as a result of going through the fall wall.
Now, that aggregate was independent of whether we were talking premium or actual price of silver in Russian rubles or whatever currency they use in Lithuania or Zlotels in Poland.
The issue is that they will have a representation that will match the $62 to $68 price for silver.
And we'll have some, we may have silver here that's $10, but then we'll have a $52 to a $58 premium on top of that just to be able to get hold of it.
So it's going to vary depending on where you are on the planet in terms of what actually is premium or actual cost.
The timeframe on these is through the fall wall, through this period of coagulation, which is a three-week long process.
It begins in the second end of the first week in September.
And so far as I'm able to determine in model space, bear in mind that's a scatter graph kind of an approach, a display.
So I see some early indicators as early as last week in August, but the majority of them come on into where I feel comfortable stating that the coagulation as a meme should be felt by everybody at the end of the first week in September.
It runs for three weeks.
And then that basically is our fall wall, is this period of time from the last two weeks in August all the way through, actually from August 8th all the way through to the end of the last week in September.
Now when we come out of that on the other side is where the data sets are pointing to this price of the silver.
So does it occur in September?
I don't know.
It does occur in October.
The data sets would seem to indicate that it has occurred by the end of October.
And that's about as good as I can get in terms of timeframe.
Let's see.
We have questions about whether or not we're looking at in the USA section of the report whether or not we're looking because of the long periods of contention, internal and international, whether we're looking at martial law, war, other attempts by Gus to control the U.S. population.
This is where we're going to get really where we have to be very careful in terms of how we answer and how we conceptualize this.
Part of the question is, does the international contention involve direct military confrontation with either Russia or China?
And I'd have to answer that very easily.
No, we don't have a direct military confrontation with either Russia or China in the data sets insofar as the normal range of the long-term data, which would put us out about 19 months to three years.
So within the data sets, no, there doesn't appear to be a direct U.S. military to Russian military or U.S. military to Chinese military confrontation that we would consider direct, full-on military kind of thing.
Okay, so while there's no direct military confrontation that's seen within the data sets in terms of battles or anything like that, there are all kinds of skirmishes that are noted within the data sets and forecast within the data sets for nasty little mercenary corporations,
basically, doing the bidding of the Kabul to try and stir up problems from which the central banks can springboard their warfare model.
So it's not to say that we're not going to have a very tumultuous time with all kinds of contention and small scale, ongoing, continuous violence at a paramilitary or corpo-military.
It's actually corpo-military level, because that's going to continue as long as the Kabul is able to pay these guys in any meaningful way, which runs out around 2020, maybe 2021, 2022.
There's absolutely not a structure by which the current powers that be are able to maintain their power structure.
So, if I look at the powers of the B entity, it fades over these next few years, runs into some huge problems, has all kinds of hiccups.
There's violence and all kinds of disruption that are related to it, and then its influence and its ability to manage disappears through the 2020s.
I haven't plotted any of that.
I haven't gotten into any detail of it.
It was just a quick scan.
So, I'm saying 2020, but it could be 2018 for all I know, because I didn't get in and actually look at the data.
It was just a quick movement of model space while I was looking for some other stuff relative to answering questions that we've got here.
So, getting back to the issue of the U.S. population being controlled by Gus.
Gus is government U.S. They attempt, and it's not government per se, it's government as stooges of the cobble.
And again, the yes, they attempt to do all of this.
I don't use the term martial law, I can't pick it up because it's too hot.
That is to say, emotionally, whenever anybody mentions it, good or bad, it brings in too much of an emotional slam, and there's no nuance that's all black and white.
So, there's no real prescient level of data that comes along with it.
So, we don't have a tendency to track that particular subject.
I've got some creep-in, so to speak, of that terminology and other subjects and other entities, but again, I don't know how meaningful it is, so I have a tendency to shy away from it.
Now, that's not to say that I don't have solid evidence that the Kabul that currently the criminal gangs that currently run the U.S. government aren't going to try their control mechanism stuff.
However, we can lose the term martial law, and it may or may not happen, but as I say, I can't forecast it because of the emotional hotness, the emotional intensity of the word.
But if we lose that concept and look at what is in the USA pop relative to government, we find some very interesting things that their ability to control again seems to break down through the U.S. populace over these next five years.
That is to say, from 2016 through 2020 inclusive.
And some aspects of it breaking down I find very interesting because they appear to be related to the destruction of the dollar as a control mechanism, as power.
And thus, when, as I keep, as I noted, you know, when Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, multi-millionaires, when all the rest of us decide that a dollar is a piece of shit, then these people are simply holding on to big mountains of shit.
They don't have any real power.
Once the dollar doesn't have purchasing value, they can't pay people to do their bidding, and thus people will not.
And that's really what we see going on.
So, the data sets are in the main not describing Gus versus U.S. population.
If I were to look at it from a particular angle within the data, then it would seem as though the better description would be Gus internalizing or fracturing and the factions fighting each other for a shrinking level of control as we go forward.
And one faction defeating another, making Gus less powerful, shrinking its level of control, and they're putting their energy into trying to stay alive at the bunker stage.
So, it's like everybody in Hitler's bunker all squabbling to see who's the Führer after they supposedly assassinated him.
And you could say that at that stage, it doesn't really matter.
So, I'm thinking that Gus is no longer really a pertinent entity in the next four or five years.
It'll be radically changed.
There's a lot of language we could apply to it.
I don't know how prescient any of it is, so I think we'll just stop there.
The international contention, as I say, is more corpo-military confrontation, and it fades as well as Gus loses the ability to bribe people, basically, and to shove its will around.
Now, the next question is: will the breakdown of the just-in-time systems in the U.S. be ubiquitous, or will a few areas still see some commerce continuing?
And the answer to that question is yes.
It will be ubiquitous, and yes, a few areas will see commerce continuing, but it will not be as a result of the just-in-time delivery system.
So, the commerce that will be continuing won't be delivering goods from China cheaply.
Once the Walmart runs out of those supplies in your local area, that Walmart is shot.
It's done.
It won't be restocked.
Yes, there will be commerce as people locally start filling the necessary needs there.
So, if you really want a model of what happens, go look at any references you can get to life in Cuba during the harsh years of transition after they were abandoned, or after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and they had no more income from outside.
It'll be very much like that on a giant scale.
So, at that stage, the areas of just-in-time kind of stuff in terms of the breakdown.
Now, the breakdown will be ubiquitous, but it won't be ubiquitous everywhere simultaneously.
So, it might take a Walmart in some place in Alaska a lot longer to run out simply because of the way that their just-in-time delivery system has a tendency to warehouse a little bit ahead of it, simply because they're able to, you know, the length of time of transportation and they're able to anticipate demand and so on.
So, they may find goods in Alaska last longer than in New York City simply because of the supply and demand ratio and what's going on there.
Let's see.
Okay.
Some elements indeed of the government will be around in 2020.
This is a new question.
Will Gus still exist in 2020?
We do have that.
We do have some elements of GUS, but it's as though, again, a bunker mentality.
You know, when Germany was defeated, we're not talking there's going to be a war here in the United States, but you could look at it in the same kind of a way in terms of the organic disruption and death of a large-scale government like this.
When Germany was defeated in World War II, all of Germany wasn't defeated all at once.
They had to fight their way, the Allies had to fight their way all the way to the center of the power base, and then the center finally died.
They tried repeatedly to nip the head and kill it at that level, and they had not succeeded, so they had to do the hard slog.
In the case that we've got now, the death will be very similar to that, although the causes are entirely different.
And basically, the causes in the death of Gus is going to be internal in that the dollar will hemorrhage and die as a purchasing vehicle, and that is their power.
And as the dollar goes, then a lot of people will hang on for some number of months, maybe even years, because they'll be in a position where they don't care about being paid or they've got some other compensation-you know, a bunker somewhere filled with food, that kind of a deal.
But the effectiveness of the government to go on out and cause wholesale problems for people disappears as the dollar wanes.
Let's see, we're just going to put this up on the as soon as I can get it done.
I'll go through as many of these as I can.
I've got several hundred question sets, though.
A lot of them are duplicates.
see.
Okay, it says your reports appear to postulate the degeneration of both super-states, that is the federal United States and the federal European Union, into a loose network of micro and city-states like those existing in ancient Greece.
True, that is a good characterization of what the data does show in the aggregate.
Are there similar changes envisioned for China and Africa?
No, China has a different set of issues entirely.
China is not going to, at least within our long-term data sets, is not breaking down.
It's in this weird consolidation growth phase.
So, it is true, it would make sense to think of China as perhaps getting ready to come out of their 19th, they're going to go through their 1940s and then hit their 1950s in only a few years.
So, rather than take a decade to go through all the warfare and all of this kind of stuff of World War II as in the 1940s and end up with this huge giant pile of gold as the United States did as a result of that war, which then led to power lasting for almost a century from that period of time, the Chinese are not going to do that approach.
They have the pile of gold, they're just not telling everybody at the moment.
They're going to get more gold as they go forward.
And so, they're going to do the 19, you can think of it as doing the late 1930s.
So, they're almost into their bond crash now, 1932, 1933.
So they're going to be doing from, say, 1933 through all the rest of that decade, all through the 40s, and up into, say, 1952 or 53, something like that.
And they'll do it all in like four or five years.
So it's going to be just one hell of a head rush as everybody tries to stay up with what's happening within China as it goes forward.
There's going to be all kinds of social disruptions and social unrest, riots, populations heaving about and so on.
But again, the main theme for the Chinese is not dissolution.
It's actually a coming together kind of a setup.
Africa is also the same sort of thing from different, entirely different emotional propellants, if you will.
Those things that will propel Africa into a more tighter and cohesive union of states will be sort of ancillary to what's happening in China.
So we could think of Africa as a continent as achieving a grand vision the way that we had here in the United States in, say, the 1830s, you know, continent to continent and the whole thing, right?
So the emotional quantifiers and qualifiers are arguing for a more cohesive and better functioning Africa over the next 20 plus years, with the next three or four years being pivotal as several different political and social memes all intersect with some financial stuff connected to China that provides a big boost to both China and
Africa.
It's going to be a really good partnership for both as they go along.
Talking about mass production here, concept becoming passé given the coming evolution in 3D manufacturing.
That's correct.
We're not going to be seeing mass production anymore done by humans.
As we go forward, even in China, the data sets are pointing towards mass production being done robotically, especially on anything at all that could involve human health in a negative fashion or involve a lot of error rates.
So the big impetus is going to be anything that has a 29% or somewhere around in there error rate.
They're going to try and shift those factories over to robotics as rapidly as they can.
So we do have that.
And the 3D manufacturing is going to take such huge jumps that pretty soon you'll have software that will allow you to print a 3D printer from your 3D printer and so on and so on and actually make the 3D printer better than the one before based on being able to use better materials, etc.
So it's going to be magnified or an aggregation of a synergistic effect really of open source software, new materials, and a desperate need.
So the collapse of the United States is going to be a good thing for 3D printing, although it'll be a bad thing for the people involved in the United States.
Some real genius is forecast to be arising out of this pushdown population over the next 15 years or so that will springboard some huge technological innovations.
And these will be like organic.
They won't be imported space alien back engineered things like transistors.
Yeah, in general, as I say, in general, I'm very optimistic about the future here.
You know, we have the years of the struggle, the years of the transition, the chaos of all of this.
But on the other side of it, it's going to be one hell of a renaissance in ways that we cannot even anticipate at this point.
Whole areas of science will be created in vision and, you know, new art forms, all different kinds of cool stuff.
So Space Coat Farts is just chalk a block full of things.
I hardly even want to bring it up.
It takes so long to load.
Let's see.
No, I'll bypass on anything that's philosophical.
Interesting question.
Could your software working backwards detect whether or not the pre-Vedic Sanskrit was actually a language of both Atlantis and Lemuria?
No, my software doesn't do anything remotely like that.
It's not like it goes and Like we can analyze backwards linguistically, all the linguistic aspects of it is a giant database that's used to translate words into emotional numeric identifiers that are then linked back to the lexicon.
And we choose the best words within there to represent the prescient value that the emotional quantifiers represent.
So it's entirely future-oriented.
Sorry, can't do anything about anything in the past.
Let's see.
Credit freeze questions.
Sporadic breakdown of infrastructure, extremes and climate on the debt system, the banks.
Yes, the question comes down to this.
Do you see a time where people won't have to pay their mortgages because the bank is no longer functioning?
And yes, I do.
It's going to happen sporadically.
It won't be the for all the banks and also all the regions, it's going to happen in different ways.
So we may see, for instance, that the top five banks go bluey, which would remove Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Chase, and I'm talking about North America, the questioners from Canada.
So yeah, we could have the top five banks go, and that right there in one fell swoop might remove 80%, 90% of all the mortgages.
Now, because these mortgages are tied into and support things like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Canadian equivalents and then cross-border funding sources and all this sort of thing, there would be a claim on those mortgages.
Don't get me wrong.
But you would not be making a mortgage payment to the bank because Wells Fargo would go bust and there wouldn't be anybody there to collect the mortgage.
There's a further wrinkle in this that many people don't really anticipate and that is that the money wouldn't be worth anything even if you had it to mail it in.
So because people will be quitting in droves because they won't be being paid to sit there anymore in a meaningful fashion.
A lot of this, if you want a historical analog, go and read about the very rapid breakdown of the what little there was at the time, corporate social structure in the Weimire Republic.
Or go and look at what happened in Zimbabwe with corporations in that country when they hit their real problem.
You'll note that the only people that really had employment were foreign, were employed by foreign-based corporations that had outside sources of non-Zimbabwe bucks.
And so we find that there are many different factors relating to paying the mortgages.
And there will be claims on these mortgages by other parties downstream, so to speak, that have derivatives that are based on them.
There will be any number of attempts to collect by any number of organizations.
The question is, is any of it going to be meaningful?
And at this point, the data sets are arguing that no, it won't be meaningful.
That once the bank goes, there's probably no reason whatsoever to respond to a collection agency or some other corporation that claims that it owns that mortgage.
At that point, you would have to, the best approach, in my personal view, would be to tell them to put up or shut up.
And that is to say, sue me and prove you have title, that you have standing, that you have jurisdiction to make this claim.
I don't care that you bought this debt from defunct corporation because defunct corporation and I weren't getting along anyway, blah, blah, blah.
I'm not paying you.
What are you going to do about it?
And if done in the millions and tens of millions, you're going to see an entirely different reaction this time than we saw in the previous depression, no matter how much the political guys this time are being told it will be the same way as the previous depression.
So bear in mind, there's a lot of indicators saying that the Council on Foreign Relations view is that when we go to the big bust here, everybody will go broke, and then the properties will be seized and owned by the government through the acquisition of these failed banks.
It'll probably have to be nationalized.
So their thinking is that when Wells Fargo goes bust, the U.S. government says, oh, hey, well, we're taking over.
You know, send out your mortgage notices.
The very next day, just like usual, we'll keep paying you all the employees and so on.
And basically, we own the bank the same way we own GM Motors.
But the data sets are arguing it won't go down that way, that at that point, the ability of the federal government to meaningfully pay anybody rapidly breaks down.
And in many cases, the wholesale Disillusion stepping out of the corporate world will occur fairly rapidly within these organizations, and that we'll see areas where headquarters that might employ tens of thousands of people will have one and two and three people per floor showing up for work, and it just won't occur.
It just simply will not be able to be managed.
Once Gus takes it over, it's going to break it down anyway just because of Gus's own inability to manage anything.
So, yes, the banks won't be functioning, and then the other claims are, eh.
And so the next questions are all based on not showing up to work and so on, and you get the idea.
People will not.
Crash, okay, new subject here: China should be crashed by the first or second week in September.
I would agree with that in the sense that the 1929 crash, however, if you go and look at how it's running and its replication in the current Chinese aggregated stock market, it's tracking pretty well.
But that crash in 1929 has already occurred.
It occurred in June in China.
That's when it reached its top, crossed over, and started heading down.
So it has already crashed, and it's done so by now.
The first or second week in September are moot relative to what's going on with the Chinese stock market.
It'll continue to go down for at least another 10 to 12 years, the way we're looking at.
Maybe they'll go through all of it, and they'll be able to pick it up in the four or five years when they move into their 1950s kind of mindset, trying to get some sort of an analogy, populace to populace.
But the data sets really don't show a major move back into the stock market at all.
Longer term, does the electrical grid look okay?
No, it does not.
Electrical grid here in the, I'm assuming, North America, electrical grid in North America is going to just get the shit kicked out of it as a result of the dollar dying because there's been delayed or non-existent or lip service paid to repairs, maintenance, and growth of the infrastructure.
We're screwed.
We're hopelessly screwed.
Here's the actual mathematical dynamics involved.
Let me see if I can give a flavor of it here.
There's two aspects of this that you have to consider.
The first is that from 1989, say, until about the crash in the real estate market in 2008, until that crash, so 1989 to 2008, there was a period of time in there that peaked about middle 90s,
late 90s perhaps, in which our commercial property construction rate was five times faster than the growth of the population, even if you added in the growth of the illegal aliens, undocumented workers.
So even if you add them in, the growth rate in construction of commercial real estate of all kinds was five times faster than the rate of the populace growth.
This includes malls, strip malls, all this kind of stuff.
That's why we've got so many of them empty and around.
These guys are a drain on our electrical grid, just keeping them operating, just keeping them from being broken into by turning on lights at night, all of these kind of things, just keeping them heated in those places they have to be heated or the pipes will break, are going to be a huge drain on the electrical system.
They're going to be let go as the electrical system infrastructure starts breaking down.
The infrastructure breaks down because we put no investment into it.
And as this goes along, we'll have accidents because people won't be there to prevent them in the numbers that are required.
And the numbers that are required are being squeezed even as we sit here and talk about it.
They haven't really been staffing up any of the electrical companies for years.
Plus, we're going to have other issues that relate to the planetary environment in terms of the stretch of the planet.
So in some areas, we're going to find cable breaks that simply won't be repaired.
And I'm talking major cables are indicated here.
So we'll get regional blackouts that might last for months or even years, according to the longer-term data.
I haven't looked at that level of Terra entity in detail because there's so much else to go through.
And I have a finite limit to the amount of time I can put into the preparation of the ALTA reports.
It was my intention to stay on top of that and hit it with the next ALTA report to go into the electrical system if I got a chance.
Because I'm somewhat concerned with that myself, because there's so many indicators that it's going to break down and there's going to be large-scale regional breakdowns, including in my area here, which is not something that we would have anticipated simply because of the what we usually think of is the safe and secure production of electricity from water, from hydrology.
But because we've had the drought, because that's going to affect things, because of the planetary expansion and the heat and so on, we're going to get cables breaking.
And so I might find myself in a region where there's no power for some considerable time.
because there won't be the dollars to pay people, expertise is going to fade away and so on.
And all these things are going to compound to making the electrical grid in North America resemble that of a Cuban's nightmare, Cuban electrical engineer's nightmare for perhaps the next 15 years, maybe even longer, at a national level.
Now, on the other side of that, four or five years from now, there's indicators that a national grid won't be needed, that there will be a safe, effective, portable, plug-your-house-in kind of device that will have a capital expenditure, but virtually no operating costs thereafter, and that these will start to propagate throughout the planet.
And so at some point, those overtake the need to have a national grid, and you just don't anymore.
You just don't have a service provided that way.
And we're headed there.
When they shift over is problematic at this stage.
And we can get into some forecasts for that later.
As I say, I will track that and get back to people.
Okay, so new question, does a credit freeze affect retailers, just affect retailers who are using short-term debt to fund their inventory, or does it affect all retailers?
It affects all retailers.
And the reason is that it's going to affect not only retailers, but first and foremost, it's going to affect transporters.
So much of the transportation of goods is done on a credit basis where you're paying for fuel three months from now that you're using today.
And so that's going to shut down fairly quick.
There's going to be the same thing as going to be true for dock space, all different kinds of things as the credit squeeze gets into it and the credit freeze gets into it deeper.
We'll see it seizing up all over.
So the data sets actually describe it in a way that's more akin to something out of like a mummy movie where the person or zombie or whatever gets the disease and all of its blood, you can see all of its blood vessels just all shriveling up all over the place.
And so as they shrivel up, some areas are isolated and exist for a little bit longer, that sort of a deal.
So it's not, it is ubiquitously applied, though.
Retailers are going to get hit everywhere because it's going to affect all the transshipment of goods even internationally, especially internationally.
Let me put it that way as well, since all of that is fronted on credit.
No, Greece does not have anything to do with the credit freeze.
They're just a victim of it like the rest of us.
Okay, so we've been noticing the temporal markers that are in place during the seven weeks of chaos, which we're in.
Do you still see the potential for being developed by 8-8, which is tomorrow, the 8th of August, for the rise in PMs in September, precious metals?
And certainly I do.
We've got these data sets that go to, in a very prescient fashion, they're long-term data sets.
They've had a number of manifestations already emerge.
And so we know that this set in general has a high hit ratio, so to speak, as it's progressing.
And one of the main themes in there is that Mrs. Wong gets freaked out by Chinese currency.
And she controls the household finances.
And she starts deciding that, well, she's going to buy precious metals.
That, you know, she thought she liked them in the past, and she thought she had bought some in the past.
But it's nothing compared to her emotional intensity and drive to acquire these now.
Now, the way that this plays out is that we've seen other data sets that indicate there's going to be some kind of a currency hiccup within the Chinese currency or within Chinese currency to other currencies.
So maybe it's going to be a hiccup in the dollar, but something is going to send a signal today or tomorrow morning or the day after we have an error ratio, error range in here in terms of the error rate, actually, because it's short-term data.
It could be up to three weeks, although I'm pretty certain we're going to start seeing indicators of it tomorrow.
But Mrs. Wong is upset.
She's emotionally agitated, and she's starting to become anxious about purchasing value of currency.
And so she's going to react perfectly sanely to this and decide to buy precious metals.
Only because there's so many Mrs. Wongs, it's going to create something of a run.
So we're going to see, if you will, it won't be a bank run, but it'll be a run to precious metals, unlike what we have seen before in China.
So we thought we had seen major Chinese buying at the popular level of precious metals, but apparently we've seen nothing at all like the wave that's going to come.
In fact, it's described within the data sets as being so fierce that it leads to the sucking dry of all of the possible channels for gold and silver.
You know, stores are absolutely drained and the employees are told they can just go home because there's nothing to sell.
And then the people turn to Bitcoin.
And some of the smarter ones turn to Bitcoin ahead of this as they run up against the competition to buy precious metals.
And so that starts driving the price of Bitcoin up as well.
And all this is all merged together.
It doesn't all happen discreetly the way I'm describing it.
So there's going to be a turning to silver as a result of gold starting to dry up.
But some people will get to silver ahead of time because they won't want to mess with the competition for gold.
So you see how it works that way in terms of the data sets.
I can say it occurs on this particular day, but of course it's occurring across many different days.
However, I'm fairly certain that something's going to pop on the morning of August 8th that will start relating us to this generalized meme of Mrs. Wong or the Chinese population in general turning to or tending towards an anti-currency bent that will continue for a number of years.
Let's see.
Okay, questions of whether or not Russia or Canada are going to enter into inflation and hyperinflation or deflation or something other.
And we see that there's a debt destruction situation going on around the planet, but there's no indication of deflation per se.
So when we get to the, as we accelerate into this, Russia gets a period of inflation.
I wouldn't call it hyperinflation.
And then because it's able to do a resource backing deal with the ruble, and I'm not saying gold, it may be that they back it with diamonds or oil or something.
But in any event, because it's resource-rich and because of some other new discoveries there, the Russian ruble is relatively stable and does not encounter the kind of problems that the dollar does.
And also the Russians turn out to have been very smart and sneaky and gotten rid of almost all of their USA dollar or their dollar denominated debt.
Probably a really good deal that they were pushed into it by the Ukraine mess and the Kabul trying to take over the criminal guys trying to take over and give Russia a hard time because they end up avoiding a lot of the problems that are associated with dollar-denominated derivatives and other U.S. issues.
So Russia does real well in the future.
They weather the whole inflation, hyperinflation issues really well.
Canada doesn't do so well.
Canada's experience with currency issues are going to be lumpy.
They're going to go through periods of quiescence and then really periods of major levels of disruption.
A lot of that is because of their ties to what's going to happen in the city of London as a result of the banks going bluey there and the problems that will ripple back to them from derivatives and other problems associated with their government.
So, no, the Canadian currency is not going to do too well over the longer term.
And short term, it's going to sort of bob around a bit.
Let's see.
Housing prices in the UK, I don't have price information per se.
The trend line is going to be affected because of the bank issues that will be going on over these next four or five years.
The bank issues are going to be USA or criminal corporation bank-centered and central bank-centered.
So there will be organizations, thrifts and savings and loans and credit unions and stuff that even though they're caught into the currency problems for a while will operate even though major banking structures have not.
In some areas in the UK, we're looking at the trend line, okay, the emotional trend line is for a very disruptive 10 to 15 years.
So as currencies fail within the larger American empire, it's going to be a repeat for the British of the British Empire failing, only it's going to squeeze them a lot more.
And they're going to find that with immigration and the other issues there, that the social cohesion is very basically lost.
And you'll see that in the near term, housing prices are going to react as though you're looking at an economy that's swooning and the banking system is swooning.
So the housing prices can be expected to fall over the short term and the long term.
However, longer term, Britain comes into something of a period of social discord that we have not looked at anything on the other side of it.
The social discord does things like places the concept of royal property into the public domain.
This may mean that the populace just debates how much property the queen owns, or it may mean that the populace seizes the 87% of the country of England that the queen won't let anybody live on and just decide, oh, up yours, Queenie.
I'm going to go over here and stake out two hectares and that's mine.
Piss on y'all.
That seems, a lot of that language is coming through.
A lot of those prescient areas were coming through.
There's going to be a huge level of contention, though.
The contention really in England starts in very serious ways in 2016.
The riots and the social disorder, it's fed by the dying bank system attempting to disharmonize the populace in order to control them, and it kind of gets out of hand.
So we run into those kind of situations.
So a whole lot of questions here about the United Kingdom.
Let's step through them fairly quick.
How will the welfare state in the UK be impacted by the credit freeze?
It's going to have a real hard time.
Austerity is going to come on in a major way over 2016, late 2016 into 2017.
Food availability and prices, oh, the austerity, by the way, is triggered by stuff that happens here in 2015.
And then there's a shutdown over the early part of 2016.
And then severe hardship, like getting to the next stage here, food availability and prices in the UK.
By the time we get into, let's say, the last quarter of 2016, the UK is in this period that really resembles Berlin in the airlift, only without all the people bringing stuff in.
So there's just a severe shortage of goods.
In some areas, well, lots of crime increases.
I mean, food theft, all this kind of thing, including people that are roving around apparently trying to steal from food stores that the government has seized.
So I'm not sure if we want to talk about in the sense of martial law, because I don't think it's the military, but the government has decided that food's a critical element by the third quarter of 2016 and is in the process of taking over and running the distribution system and it's not going well.
Okay, so riots in the UK starting, yes, riots in the UK are starting in early 2016 as a result of the credit freeze all over.
Various different reasons for the riots in terms of in some cases it's racial, in some cases it's gangs, other cases it's religion, in other cases it's food availability.
But in general it's because the whole population is being squeezed through the credit freeze and the mass numbers of layoffs and the sudden, fairly sudden shutdown as we see globally in the circulation of currencies and the availability of the currencies to buy things.
Terror changes in the UK, severe permanent flooding, etc.
Yeah, we see a number of those.
Oddly enough, a number of earthquakes and damaging earthquakes.
Those appear 2017-2018, along with some severe earthquakes here in the West Coast of North America at that same time.
Permanent areas of flooding.
The ones that are standing out primarily at the moment seem to be hitting in Ireland and on the western coast of England.
But that's really, again, geographic things are somewhat unreliable.
UK at war?
Yeah, but again, it's at the corporate level.
It's not UK military and mass stuff that silver prices for the UK can't say.
Not following anything in pounds.
Will the UK be affected by shortages of medicine?
You bet.
Scotland independence.
Yes, but not in a formal kind of a thing.
It's just as a result of the breakdown of the banking system and the breakdown of government in general as there are various subdivisions of the government start freezing up because they don't have the credit to run things.
People desert as employees.
There's a breakdown in the generalized civil authority in terms of the areas that they can claim.
And thus you get a reassertion of how people feel about things.
Make sense?
I sure hope so.
Okay, on to new question sets.
These are kind of duplicated all over.
I get a lot of these, like in what location is it going to be safe to move to for food and water?
And we don't get that kind of thing.
So it's not like I can dial into the data and say, well, you know, Pahrump, Nevada is going to be safe.
It may well be, but I have no way of knowing, and I discount geographic references.
So I'm sorry, can't answer that.
So it goes on to those whose conditions were maintained by pharmaceuticals as sources of drugs as well as foods dry up rapidly.
How long, and it says, how long will there be no prescription drugs and then when will production of prescription drugs resume?
Well, according to our data sets, once we get into this, prescription drugs, as we understand it, go away.
Because the credit freeze affects the ability of the just-in-time system, it collapses because the credit freeze affects the ability of the people to purchase, because those people that, you know, the pharmaceutical companies to produce, to purchase raw materials,
because the people producing those raw materials won't want to take the currencies that are offered, and et cetera, et cetera, for dozens and dozens of reasons that all combine together, as well as what we're calling the credit freeze, which is really the cessation of circulation of currency, as well as its reduction in purchasing power simultaneously, and the reduction of the ability to do things on credit.
Prescription drugs producers, big companies, go out of business.
And so they don't resume.
So if you're talking about a particular brand of a particular kind of a product, as far as I can tell, it doesn't happen.
Could be wrong.
I mean, the data sets are not perfect, and there's no way of know exactly what companies go under and what products come through because we have to look at everything in an aggregated, industry-wide kind of a situation.
So maybe one mega pharmaceutical company goes bust and that's where we're getting all of our data sets and then everybody else is fine.
Could be that everybody else goes bust as well.
And I really couldn't determine the difference at this stage within the data.
Production of alternatives start immediately.
So there's going to be an attempt to fill the gap, but you'll find a lot of things people just don't even bother trying to replicate.
In some areas, you'll find that people are hell-bent for whatever reason to try and replicate certain kinds of prescription drugs.
And so they go to great lengths to do so.
But I can't say which drugs are the types or so on.
It just doesn't show up that way in the data.
Migrations towards central Canada, why head north out of the USA?
Well, under the circumstances being described, within the data set, a large river shifts course.
Some areas have become mushy marshes and forced people out.
And then a very large river shifts course, which causes one or more nuke plants to go crazy and go fuq you on us all.
And the population can't go through that radiation barrier to get to the marshlands, nor would they want to, so they head north.
That's the only alternative to get out because of the radiation hazard or developing or presumed radiation hazard.
I can't tell if it's real or not because we get, because we're dealing with linguistics, not a view of actual events.
And so that's the impetus for them to leave.
In some cases, some people will head to South America, but the immigration to there is not associated with the diaspora that forces people out due to the change in the course of this very large river or river system.
I mean, it might be multiple rivers.
We can't tell.
Will USA borders be controlled or become totally open?
Yes, to both of those.
They're going to be heavily controlled as the government, as Gust gets into factional fighting, and then ultimately they won't exist anymore.
It won't matter.
Will the USA, that ultimately is sometime after 2019, how long I can't tell you.
Will the USA Fed government collapse and break up into regional city-states, smaller regional governments?
No, it won't work that way.
The state government, regional government, city governments are all going to collapse on their own as part of the credit freeze, and the federal government will wither and pull back with harder, with the hardcore people staying loyal to a dwindling command structure and still attempt to exert claims of authority over large regions.
Make sense?
Will silver medical device treat diseases like cancer?
Can't say it's non-determinant within the data.
Will the sun disease cause more skin cancer?
Sun does not cause skin cancer now, so no, it's not going to.
If you're buying into the idea of sunscreens, please examine the whole concept of slathering yourself with carcinogenic chemicals in an attempt to prevent a carcinogenic situation.
Let's see.
Southeast, here's a guy who lives in the southeast near a nuke.
Sure, yeah, we do have data sets showing problems.
It's all over the shorter-term data, but that's because we get all kinds of reports of nuke problems continuously that are existent in the now.
So the large-scale problem when the river shifts is still insofar as I'm able to determine.
I haven't really examined it recently.
I mean, I haven't looked at it in like the last three months.
But the last time I looked at it, it was still in the long-term data.
I can't speculate as to where.
The data really would tend to point to Tennessee being the river originating or flowing through Tennessee.
There's a lot to suggest that.
But other than that, I don't have too much in the way of a clue as to which river and where it goes, that kind of thing.
Let's see, damage to Australia, Nuke subject here, coastal communities.
Yeah, Australia is going to go through a interesting situation.
The data sets are pointing to these tall areas, and tall is a relative term, okay?
So tall might mean 100 feet to somebody.
In other areas, it might be 10 feet.
But what we're looking at is within Australia is actually a lot of damage in the West.
So there's a bunch of different causes to this.
There's also going to be some solar issues for Australia.
Not really sure how we really phrase this, but maybe even interplanetary lightning kind of things with Australia and or an Earth rupture because of the Earth expanding.
And so there's going to be, there's indications in the long-term data that we end up with something akin to a Grand Canyon, and it's going to be over in the far west of Australia.
But that land over there is due to be changed due to new lands rising further west of it, impacts on continental shelves, impacts on ocean basins between the two of them, and impacts on the oceanic currents.
So insofar as the sun disease impact on Australia and New Zealand and New Caledonia and the whole of the South Pacific, it's going to be quite severe.
So insofar as the questions about sun disease hitting Australia, this is much more than people are being told, okay?
So let me take a moment here and present a hypothetical idea.
It's hypothetical because I don't have proof for all of the necessary solid evidence.
I've got some proof for some evidence, but not enough to state that this is the case generally and completely.
But the sun disease has got a cooperative element on planet Earth within our atmosphere.
As the Earth's atmosphere, or as the Earth expands, we can expect a couple of different things to occur within the atmosphere, one of which I believe we're experiencing at the moment.
And that is this thinning.
So you can imagine that as the Earth expands, that the atmosphere would have to expand along with it, which it does.
But it does so initially by collapsing the depth of that atmosphere and bringing the outer atmosphere closer to the planet.
I say initially because over time, new gases will emerge from within the planet Earth, but also within the oceans that will, over the course of time, alter and change and grow the atmosphere.
They may grow it in a way that's not good for humans, and that's what a lot of the powers that be fear, and that is a giant methane release that runs around the planet and makes everybody fall over and die because you can't breathe methane.
But at the moment, what we're discussing is the impact on like Australia, New Zealand, and a lot of the other areas of the planet.
For reasons that I don't need to go into at the moment and be too long anyway, there's a reason for me to suspect that as the Earth expands, it does so in a sort of like a pendulum manner, and it doesn't do so evenly.
So for a while, it's going to expand more in the North hemisphere than it does in the Southern Hemisphere.
And then it'll expand larger in the Southern Hemisphere to make up for it and go a little bit further, and then it'll go back to the Northern Hemisphere and so on.
Sort of if you wanted to think about it as a rocking motion between the expansion.
And that's going to affect the atmosphere.
So there will be times, for instance, that the atmosphere is thicker in Sweden than it is in Australia.
And then there's times that it's going to be reverse.
But now, at the moment, the atmosphere in general is thinning over the entire planet.
It's thinning also not only from expansion of the core of the Earth, and thus the atmosphere has to go across the bigger surface area of the planet, at some unknown, probably mathematically determined rate, but we just don't know what it is because no one shares the kind of data we need to determine that with us.
So we can't determine how fast the atmosphere is thinning or flattening.
Let's call it flattening.
Now, there's also reason to believe that the atmosphere is also thinning in oxygen and thinning in oxygen in a very appreciable way that is causing problems because it is oxygen that is going.
So I'm not talking about breathing issues just yet, although some people are going to start noticing in the, and this is within our immediacy data and as it was going to be discussed in there, that we'll suddenly find areas of the planet where you'll be at something close to sea level, say within a thousand feet of sea level or less, but it'll feel like you're in the Andes in terms of trying to breathe.
Hopefully it'll just be temporary.
But in any event, it's going to cause some widespread problems.
Now, the atmosphere is thinning, and we're losing oxygen because of all the cars and the internal combustion engines.
So for every minute or every second that your car runs, it's the equivalent of 800 people on average, 800 people, respirating, breathing in the oxygen and destroying it and converting it to carbon dioxide and breathing it out.
So every time you turn your car on and you're sitting in the traffic anywhere using your car at all, any vehicle that uses an internal combustion engine that runs on gasoline or diesel or kerosene or any of these combustible fuels, you're basically out there with fundamentally acting like a thousand people breathing and destroying the oxygen.
And so we've depleted oxygen at an incredible rate as a result of the transformation of the planet into the auto house or the auto zone, although that's a commercial company.
But in any event, there's also the depletion of the atmosphere at a much greater level with all of the rockets coming out of the U.S. and Russia and everybody, all of our tests, and the space shuttle and all the airplanes.
So you can feel bad about the 800 people that were breathing along with you continuously as you drive your vehicle, but recognize that if you fly in an airplane, for every person flying in that airplane, you're using oxygen at the rate of 10,000 to 20,000 individuals per person.
So the pollution to the atmosphere and the destruction of the oxygen as a result of the airplane fuel consumption is such that 100,000, if you've got 200 people in an airplane, you're looking at 2 million people breathing for the duration of that flight.
Not a good thing, really.
So those elements are going to impact the sun disease.
In the data sets, it shows as being a magnifier to the sun disease and assisting in causing some of these issues in terms of the mini-strokes and some of the other things that were discussed in the recent report.
And that's about really all I'm going to go in on that.
I'm going to start running out of steam here.
As I say, I am running out of steam.
It's been a rough day and a previously rough night.
So I'll go a couple of more questions and then shut down and get this processed and made available.
A couple of questions about public colleges.
It says public colleges remaining open and available, affordable for those who have stacked a few coins.
No, colleges are going to die as we understand it and be reborn in a new structure as we go forward.
The idea of sending people off and paying money to stick them into an institution for four years for education is going to die relatively rapidly with the credit freeze.
It causes all kinds of problems.
Large animal veterinary profession, sure, we're always going to need those as long as we have large animals.
I don't know how you're going to be paid or how you're going to get educated in it as we go forward, but internships and that kind of thing might make a lot of sense.
We're going to go to an entirely different structure for education based in the at least in North America based on the collapse of the purchasing power of the dollar and the credit and its ability to fund stuff.
It's going to be a big hard halt.
Now, you'll note that in Cuba, their college system really took off after they hit their transitional wall because they needed to have the populace become educated enough to overcome the many difficulties.
And so the government put a big effort into that, even though they had little money.
That little money paid off in many ways in terms of how they invested it.
Will our government do that?
I don't know.
What will our government look like?
It's going to be the criminal Kabul fighting it out among themselves as the purchasing power dwindles and dwindles and fewer and fewer people take the dollar, their power will shrink and then something will replace them.
We have many different indicators for the something, but nothing that I would say is sure enough for me to suggest that it's going to go this way or that.
We have many years of struggle during this transition.
And basically, once the gus starts going away and stuff starts collapsing, the world is your making.
It's whatever you make of it because you won't have people trying to push you down for attempting to do stuff.
And the world is going to insist that you do things because of the environmental damage and so on.
You have to understand that, for instance, the credit freeze is going to affect nuke plants.
It's going to affect coal plants.
It's going to affect production of electricity.
It's going to affect everything globally.
Now, in some cases, it's going to be a lot more dire than in others.
So North America is so dependent upon fake money and the giant, you know how they talk about privilege?
Well, North America has a giant privilege based on the dollar.
And as the dollar goes away, that North American privilege, that USA privilege, goes away as well.
And so all of a sudden, USA in populace is basically no different than if you're Hindu or if you're Chinese or Mexican or Uruguayan or that kind of thing, because we'll all be struggling with the same level of issues, the same level of difficulty.
Only the United States becomes so dependent upon the largesse of the planet and keeping going that we will crash harder than any of those countries have.
As I say, we will crash as Cuba crashed.
Will we be as smart as Cuba?
I don't know.
There's a lot of indications saying that we're going to go through some struggles that will make theirs look like a day at a five-star resort on the beach compared to what we have to go through.
But we do get through it.
We do come out on the other side.
It's 10 years plus.
So that kind of thing in terms of professions and all of that.
Once we get into this fairly serious stuff here in 2016 and beyond, you'll be able to see that indeed I'm correct.
As the political structure breaks down and we get into the infighting and the factionalism and so on, you can easily imagine that we're facing a situation worse than Russia went through in its breakdown.
And let's see, tire and p money investments for the future.
Sorry, guy.
It's going to be locally dependent.
So it's going to be dependent on where you're at as to what's needed.
In the far north, for instance, you may find that people that are able to stash wood for heating do really well in areas that are wood deprived, if that makes sense, right?
As the electrical system breaks down, you may find that people that are able to provide electricity do really well.
So there's going to be all different kinds of issues.
If you're in an isolated area, any of the dependent areas, Guam, Hawaii, I don't know about Alaska.
It's so large and has so many different resources.
I'm uncertain of the impacts on it anyway.
But in some of these areas that are seriously dependent on electricity, you're going to find vast levels of changes to the life.
So there's going to be, if all of a sudden we find a situation where Hawaii can't generate electricity to any significant, meaningful extent and has to ration it and so on, well, there you go.
There's going to be issues there.
Same thing as may occur in Phoenix, but the issues are going to be radically different.
And you'll see a diaspora out of Phoenix really fast once the electricity can't be maintained through the summer.
Same thing is true of probably a great deal of the southwest.
I guess that's going to have to be it for the day.
I've got to feed the dogs.
I've got other things going.
Took too long to discover I could not overcome the hangout issues, so it kind of delayed these.
But we got through a fair number of the questions, and I think it was somewhat representative.
There was maybe another 80 or 90 that weren't addressed, but some of them may have been addressed in what we've covered so far.
I'll try and get to some of the others as we get into the reports later in the month, the IDIR report, and then as we start prepping for our September ALTA report.
It's going to be a little chaotic.
We think we've got some possibility for relocation and stuff, but I'm pretty sure we can maintain the schedule of Alta first part of the month, IDIR, somewhere near the middle.
And I'll be getting back to everybody as to our next posting date on the IDIR.
Track us on Twitter at the moment.
We may shift over to Google Plus as we start trying to move towards the Hangout thing.
But at the moment, I'm still fairly Twitter focused.
If you want to track for the tidbits, we're able to extract from the data and fit in the 140 characters.
So that's all, folks.
Best we can do for the day.
▲
Export Selection