All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 7, 2015 - Clif High
01:16:03
20150807 – Clif High Audio #29
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello there.
Today is August 7th, 2015.
It's 2.28 p.m.
Sorry about the delay on this.
This is the um uh webinar.
I mean uh in lieu of uh we're I'm offering an audio recording and answering the questions uh as rapidly as I can that have accumulated.
Those that require um whiteboard or screen sharing or those sorts of things, I will uh do at some future point.
I ran into an issue with Google Hangouts, it's a very excellent quality program.
My issue is that I run so many background processes on the um PC here to cross-connect to our little server garden that it was just impossible to run the Google Hangout software and uh the background process.
And uh it's not that easy to uh shut those off while we're in the midst of doing a um uh uh processing for the uh next run, which is being done uh with the immediacy data.
So uh what I ended up having to do uh was to abandon the idea of using the Google Hangout software at the moment, and uh we'll try and clean up a machine that will be able to set up for uh that purpose.
And in the meantime, I'll also schedule time to do a whiteboard um video session, which I'll put on YouTube for those questions that basically I have to sketch the answer to because it's a little too complex to go into in a uh in a word fashion.
So uh this will be a um uh a rundown.
We'll keep it in a as an audio because I can process it faster and get it upload loaded faster.
The uh time it takes on the uh video processing to then have to put the um put it into a format to put it up on YouTube and so forth.
That was one of the reasons to use the Google Hangout in case you're not aware of that, is that Google takes care of all that stuff for you simultaneously and basically streams it right on over to YouTube without you having to go through any um post-event uh production kind of stuff in order to get in a fashion that would be uh or in a in a format that would be ready for YouTube.
So uh the Google Hangout software is really cool, as long as you don't have one of these machines like I've got that's running.
Oh, I think we've got um got 87 uh background processes running at the moment.
So it's uh you know really bogs the thing down.
And um uh the Google Hangout software requires the uh connection to the internet uh 100% pretty exclusively, so you'll find that you can do things that would hang it up in the background by cross-connecting to uh other sites that it wasn't too compatible with.
I I found some I could get away with, but then it would hang up again relative to some background processing that I've got here, so we I ended up having to abandon it.
Anyway, I'm gonna grab a cup of tea here and uh settle into the questions.
We'll go through those um fairly rapidly.
Uh if they spark other questions, that's fine.
I'm gonna do a QA session after each report uh and pick up as we go along.
So we are anticipating an uh an immediacy data report sometime after the 15th.
And um uh we'll do a QA after that because I'm sure that there will be a lot of questions as a result of that one.
Anyway, grabbing tea back in a second.
Okay, so tea having been obtained, uh we can uh start in on the questions.
There's uh a number, as I say, that are gonna require some form of um sketching on a whiteboard to get the idea across in terms of how the cross links and the um uh uh multidimensional array work.
And so we'll leave that until a uh future time.
And at the moment we'll start in with some questions about um the Terra entity.
Uh right off the bat, we've got this one um uh does a Teradata reference the exploding internet chatter on the scientific and mathematic um impossibility or observational uh impossibility of heliocentrism and our Earth being a spinning sphere in a spiral galaxy.
And see, here's where we're gonna start getting into a bit of um issues.
Yes, it the data certainly does pick it all up.
Uh there's a huge amount of chatter, basically going to the idea that we're on some sort of a platter, uh flat disk that's maybe curved upward at the edges or something, rather than a spinning sphere.
And see, I dispute this in terms of uh my observations at my own solar observatory that I ran from 1998 until 2004-2005 here in the Northwest.
I was able to, I did a bunch of weird things.
I recalculated the size of the Earth based on a couple of different methodologies basically surveying techniques using uh the stars, etc.
Um, and uh ran uh as I say a solar observatory during that period of time and became convinced that we are in a helical model uh of the of the universe, not uh or of the solar system, not a uh heliocentric.
So, yes, I agree that the heliocentric is impossible, that the sun is not um the center of uh our orbit uh and all of those things.
However, my statement has always been that I follow Dr. Bott and his observations, B H A T about the way the solar system is organized, and that we are in fact uh spinning behind a comet, and thus all of the um strangeness of retrograde stars and everything, or retrograde planets um uh become understandable when you think of us in a helical model.
Uh so you need to look at DJ Sadhu on YouTube and look at his videos, and that'll give you a very good um uh idea of what I think this the our solar system is organized as.
Now, because I think that my interpretations of the information coming in uh within the Terra entity are obviously going to favor that view.
And uh I dispute the idea of the flat plate, flat earth, any of those because it's so easily disproved in so many different ways.
And I've been up in gliders when I was in a kid, uh very high up in the um atmosphere over the plains in uh Nebraska and Kansas and so on.
And you can observe the curvature of the Earth uh and the situation uh firsthand.
So um so in that sense, um, yeah, I'm aware of it at the um data level and it's mostly discarded.
There are some small uh leaks that are coming through along with that data uh that are prescient.
So we keep seeing it show up within uh Spacecoat Farts Entity and within the Terra entity uh data sets uh as we go along.
But uh the reason that it's showing up has to do with the emotional qualifiers that bring along the prescient data that we pick up our detail from, not because of the conscious thought being expressed within uh the subject matter of the flat Earth, if that makes any sense at all.
Okay, so we've got a number of uh questions on silver, and it's uh perfectly uh pertinent uh what's going on here.
Uh let's start off with this other one.
It's uh do we get any clues as to what countries in South America young people migrate to?
Yeah, there's actually quite a few pointing to um Uruguay, Paraguay, um in that area, and into uh Peru and Chile.
So it's seeming uh to pick up more that way than um uh Brazil, et cetera.
But this is this geographic references uh that's merely the uh larger number that are pulled in.
It's not necessarily a um, you know, it's not necessarily meaningful because the internet is so filled with geographic references.
We're bound to get some no matter what kind of data we're uh we're seeking.
So I don't as a rule, I don't really think of those as being too prescient.
Um but in at the moment, uh yes, we have a situation where Uruguay is winning out um, oh, probably about two to one, maybe three to one to any of the other references that are coming through.
Uh now, silver, uh a little confused about silver.
The data shows that the actual price of silver goes up, but not within um uh okay.
Now let me back up.
Uh we have to understand that our data is dominated by non-dollar um discussions Of silver.
So there's actually far more discussions of the value of silver in terms of total number of volume discussions on the internet in variations of Pali Hindu languages, you know, of the of the Indian subcontinent than there are in English.
Now a lot of those are in English as well, but we find that there's huge discussion levels of silver in other languages and other currencies.
So we have to be careful about here.
Because the silver situation in the data is shown as being fractured to where there's an isolated, dying empire, fake silver market kind of manipulation that keeps going and keeps going and keeps going and keeps going.
Even though it's effectively dead, they still try and keep it going.
And in the meantime, we find that indeed on other markets and exchanges, the price of silver itself is going up.
The mechanism that we have within the central bank empire led by the Federal Reserve is that they will control the price of silver, and thus we see within that area the gray market of the escalating premiums.
So the aggregate was that we would see between 62 and 68 dollars as a result of going through the fall wall.
Now that aggregate was independent of whether we were talking premium or actual uh price of silver in uh Russian rubles or um uh you know uh whatever currency they use in Lithuania or zlotels in Poland.
The the issue is that um uh the they will have a representation that will match the 62 to 68 dollar price for silver, and we'll have some uh we may have silver here that's $10, but then we'll have a $52 to a $58 premium on top of that just to be able to get hold of it.
So uh it's gonna vary depending on where you are on the planet in terms of what actually um is premium or actual cost.
Uh the time frame on these is through the fall wall, through this period of coagulation, which is a three-week long process.
It begins in the second end of the of the first week in September, and so far as I'm able to determine in model space, bear in mind that's a scatter graph, kind of an approach, a display.
So I see some early indicators as early as um last week in August, but uh the majority of them come on in to where I feel comfortable stating that the coagulation as a meme uh should be felt by everybody uh at the end of the first week in September.
It runs for three weeks, and then and that basically is our fall wall is this period of time from the last two weeks in August all the way through, actually from August 8th all the way through to the end of the last week in September.
Now, when we come out of that on the other side, is where the data sets are pointing to this price of the silver.
So does it occur in September?
I don't know.
It does occur in October.
The data sets would seem to indicate that it has occurred by the end of October.
And that's about as good as I can get in terms of time frame.
Uh let's see.
Um we have questions about uh whether or not we're looking at in the USA um section of the report, whether or not we're looking because of the long periods of contention, internal and international, whether we're looking at martial law, uh, war, other attempts by Gus to control the U.S. population.
This is where we're gonna get really um uh this is where we have to be very careful in terms of how we answer.
Um and how we how we conceptualize this, okay.
The part of the question is uh does the international contention involve direct military confrontation with either Russia or China?
And I'd have to answer that very easily.
No, we don't have a direct military confrontation with either Russia or China in the data sets, insofar as the normal range of the long-term data, which would put us out about 19 months to three years.
So within the data sets, no, there doesn't appear to be a direct US military to Russian military or US military to Chinese military confrontation that we would consider uh direct full-on military kind of thing.
Okay, so the while there's no direct military confrontation that's seen uh within the data sets in terms of um you know battles or anything like that, there are all kinds of skirmishes that are are noted within the data sets and forecast within the data sets for um uh nasty little mercenary corporations basically uh doing the bidding of the cobble to try and stir up problems uh to from which the
central banks can springboard their warfare model.
So it's not to say that we're not going to have a very tumultuous time with all kinds of contention and uh small scale ongoing continuous um violence at a paramilitary or or corpo military, it's actually corporitary level, uh, because that's going to continue as long as the Kabul is able to uh pay these guys in any meaningful way, which runs out around 2020, maybe 2021, 2022.
There's absolutely um uh there's not a structure by which the current uh powers that be are able to maintain uh their uh their power structure.
So if I look at the powers of the B entity, it fades over these next few years, runs into some huge problems, has all kinds of hiccups, there's um uh violence and and um all kinds of uh disruption that are related to it, and then its influence and uh and its ability to manage uh disappears through the 2020s.
I haven't plotted any of that.
I haven't gotten into any detail of it.
It was just a quick scan, so I'm saying 2020, but it could be 2018 for all I know, uh, because I'm I'm didn't get in and actually look at the data, it was just a quick movement of um uh model space while I was looking for some other stuff relative to answering questions uh that we've got here.
So uh getting back to the issue of the uh U.S. population being controlled by Gus, um, Gus is government US.
They attempt um, and it's not government per se, it's government as stooges of the cobble.
Uh and again, the yes, they attempt to do all of this.
Uh there, I don't use the the term martial law.
I can't pick it up because it's too hot.
Uh that is to say, emotionally, whenever anybody mentions it good uh uh or bad, um, it brings in too much of an emotional uh slam and there's no nuance that's all black and white, so it's there's no real prescient level of data that comes along with it.
So we don't have a tendency to track that particular uh subject.
I've got uh some uh creep in, so to speak, of that uh terminology and other subjects and other entities, but again, I I don't know how meaningful it is, so I have a tendency to shy away from it.
Now that's not to say that I don't have solid evidence that the um uh the cobble at that currently um the criminal gangs that currently run the uh U.S. government aren't going to try their control mechanism stuff.
However, uh uh we can lose the term martial law, and it may or may not happen, but as I say, I can't forecast it because of the emotional hotness, the emotional intensity of the word.
Uh but if we lose that concept and look at what is in the USA pop relative to government, we find some very interesting things that their ability to control again seems to break down through the U.S. populace over these next five years.
That is to say, from 2016 through 2020 inclusive.
And uh some aspects of it breaking down, I find very interesting because they appear to be related to the uh destruction of the dollar as a uh as a control mechanism as power.
And thus when uh as I keep as I noted, you know, when Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush um multimillionaires, uh when all the rest of us decide that a dollar is a piece of shit, then these people are simply holding on to big mountains of shit.
They don't have any real power.
Once the dollar doesn't have purchasing value, they can't pay people to do their bidding, and thus people will not.
And that's really what we see going on.
So the data sets are in the main not describing Gus versus uh U.S. population.
If I were to look at it from a particular angle within the data, then it would seem as though the better description would be Gus internalizing or fracturing and the factions fighting each other for a shrinking level of control as we go forward.
And one faction defeating another, making Gus less powerful, shrinking its level of control, and they're putting their energy into trying to stay alive at the at the bunker stage.
So it's like everybody in Hitler's bunker all squabbling to see who's the Fuhrer after they supposedly assassinated him.
And you could say that, you know, at that stage, it it doesn't really matter.
So I'm I'm thinking that Gus is no longer really a um uh pertinent entity in uh the next four or five years.
It'll be uh uh radically changed.
Um there's a lot of language we could apply to it.
I don't know uh how prescient any of it is, so I think we'll just stop there.
The international contention, as I say, is more corpo military confrontation, and it fades as well as Gus loses the ability to bribe people, basically, and to um uh shove its will around.
Now the next question is will the breakdown of the just-in-time systems in the U.S. be ubiquitous, or will a few areas still see some commerce continuing?
And the answer to that question is yes, it will be ubiquitous, and yes, a few areas will see commerce continuing, but it will not be as a result of the just-in-time uh delivery system.
So the commerce that will be continuing won't be delivering goods from China uh cheaply.
The once the Walmart runs out of those supplies in your local area, that Walmart is shot, it's done, it won't be restocked.
Uh yes, there will be commerce as people locally start filling the um uh necessary needs there.
So if you really want a model of what happens, go look at um any references you can get to life in Cuba uh during the harsh years of transition after they were abandoned or after the collapse of the Soviet Union and they had no more uh income from outside.
It'll be very much like that on a giant scale.
Uh so um uh at that stage uh the um areas of uh just in time kind of stuff in terms of uh uh the breakdown.
Now the breakdown will be ubiquitous, but it won't be um ubiquitous everywhere simultaneously.
So it might take a uh Walmart in uh someplace in Alaska a lot longer to run out uh simply because of the way that their just-in-time delivery system has a tendency to warehouse a little bit ahead of it simply because of their able to, you know, the length of time of transportation and they're able to anticipate demand and so on.
So they may find goods in Alaska last longer than in New York City simply because of uh the supply and demand ratio and and what's going on there.
Uh let's see.
Okay.
Some elements indeed of the government will be around in 2020.
This is a new question.
Will Gus still exist in 2020?
Uh we do have that.
We do have some elements of Gus, but it's as though a um uh again, a bunker mentality uh uh, you know, when Germany was defeated, we're not talking there's gonna be a war here in the United States, but you could look at it in the same kind of a way in terms of the organic disruption and death of a large-scale government like this.
When um uh Germany uh was defeated in World War II, all of Germany wasn't defeated all at once.
They had to fight their way, the Allies had to fight their way all the way to the center of the uh power base, and then the center finally died.
Uh they tried repeatedly to nip the head and kill it at that level, and they had not succeeded, so they had to do the hard slog.
In the case that we've got now, uh the death will be very similar to that, although the causes are entirely different.
And basically the causes in uh the death of Gus is going to be internal in that the dollar will hemorrhage and die as a uh purchasing vehicle, and that is their power.
And as the dollar goes, then a lot Of people will hang on for some number of months, maybe even years, because they'll be in a position where they don't care about being paid or they've got some other compensation, you know, um, a bunker somewhere filled with food, that kind of a deal.
Uh but uh the effectiveness of the government to go on out and cause wholesale problems for people disappears as the dollar wanes.
Um let's see, uh we're just gonna put this up on the as soon as I can get it done.
I'll go through as many of these as I can.
I've got several hundred question sets though.
A lot of them are duplicates, let's see.
Um it says your reports appear to postulate the degeneration of both super states, that is the federal United States and the Federal European Union into a loose network of micro and city states like those existing in ancient Greece.
True.
That is uh uh good characterization of what the data does show in the aggregate.
Are there similar changes envisioned for China and Africa?
No, China has a different set of um issues entirely.
The um uh China is not gonna uh at least within our long-term data sets is not breaking down.
It's in this uh weird um uh consolidation growth phase.
So it is true it would make sense to think of China as perhaps getting ready to come out of their 19th, they're gonna go through their 1940s and then hit their 1950s uh in only a few years.
So rather than take a decade to go through all the warfare and all of this kind of stuff of World War II as in the 1940s and end up with this huge giant pile of gold as the United States did as a result of that war, which then led to power lasting for um almost a century uh from that period of time.
Um the Chinese are not gonna do that approach.
They have the pile of gold, they're just not telling everybody at the moment.
They're gonna get more gold as they go forward, and so they're gonna do the 19, you can think of it as doing the late 1930s.
So they're into their almost into their bond crash now, 1932, 1933.
So they're gonna be doing from say 1933 through uh all the rest of that decade, all through the 40s, and up into say 1952 or 53, something like that, and they'll do it all in like four or five years.
So it's gonna be just one hell of a head rush as everybody tries to stay up with what's happening uh within uh China as it goes forward.
There's gonna be all kinds of um social disrup disruptions and social unrest, riots, uh populations heaving about and so on.
But again, the main theme for the Chinese is not um uh dissolution, it's actually uh a coming together uh kind of a setup.
Uh Africa is also the same sort of thing, yeah, from different entirely different um emotional uh propellants, if you will.
The um those things that will propel Africa into uh a more tighter and cohesive um union of states will be sort of ancillary to what's happening in China.
So uh we could think of um Africa as a continent as achieving a um a grand vision, the way that we had here in the United States in say the 1830s, you know, continent to continent and the whole thing, right?
So uh uh the emotional quantifiers and qualifiers are arguing for a uh more cohesive and better functioning Africa over the next uh 20 plus years,
with the next three or four years being pivotal as several different um political and social memes all intersect uh with some financial stuff connected to China that provides a big boost to both China and Africa.
It's gonna be a really good partnership uh for both as they uh go along.
Um talking about um mass production here, uh concept becoming passe given the coming evolution in 3D manufacturing, that's correct.
Uh we're not gonna be seeing um uh mass production anymore done by humans as we go forward.
Even in China, the data sets are pointing towards mass production being done robotically, especially on anything at all that could involve human health in a negative fashion and or involve a lot of error rates.
So the big impetus is going to be anything that has a 29% or somewhere around in their error rate, they're going to try and shift those factories over to robotics as rapidly as they can.
So we do have that.
And the 3D manufacturing is going to take such huge jumps that pretty soon you'll have software that will allow you to print a 3D printer from your 3D printer, and so on and so on, and actually make the 3D printer better than the one before, based on being able to use better materials, etc.
So it's going to be magnified or an aggregation of a synergistic effect, really, of open source software, uh new materials, and a desperate need.
So the collapse of the United States is going to be a good thing for 3D printing, although it'll be a bad thing for the people involved in the United States.
Some real uh geniuses uh forecast to be arising out of this um uh pushdown population over the next 15 years or so uh that will springboard some huge tech technological uh innovations.
And these will be like organic, they won't be imported uh space alien back engineered things like transistors.
Yeah, in general, I'm uh as I say, in general, I'm very optimistic about the future here.
Um you know, we have the years of the struggle, the years of the transition, uh the chaos of all of this.
Uh but on the other side of it, it's gonna be one hell of a renaissance uh in ways that we cannot even anticipate at this point.
Um whole areas of science will be um uh created in vision and you know, new art forms, all different kinds of cool stuff.
So uh the spacecoat farts is just uh chalk a block full of things.
I hardly even want to bring it up, it takes so long to load.
Let's see.
Um bypass on anything that's philosophical.
Um interesting question.
Um could your software working backwards detect whether or not the pre-vet was actually language of both Atlantis and Lemuria?
No, my software doesn't do anything remotely like that.
It's not like it goes in um uh can like we can analyze backwards linguisti linguistically, all the linguistic aspects of it are is a giant database that's used to uh translate uh words into emotional um uh numeric identifiers that are then linked back to the lexicon.
Uh and uh we choose the best words within there to represent the present value that the emotional quantifiers represent.
So it's entirely future oriented.
Sorry, can't do anything about anything in the past.
Let's see, um uh credit freeze questions, uh sporadic breakdown of infrastructure, extremes and climate, um uh on the debt system, the banks.
Um yes, uh the question comes down to this.
Do you see a time where people won't have to pay their mortgages because the bank is no longer functioning?
And yes, I do.
Uh it's going to happen um sporadically, it won't be the um uh for all the banks and also all the regions, it's gonna happen in different ways.
So we may see, for instance, that the top five banks go bluey, which would remove Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Chase, and uh I'm talking about North America, the questioners from Canada.
So, yeah, uh we could we could have the top five banks go, and that right there in one fell swoop might remove 80%, 90% of all the mortgages.
Now, because these mortgages are tied into um and support things like uh Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and uh Canadian equivalents and then cross-border uh funding sources and all this sort of thing, there would be a claim on those mortgages.
Don't get me wrong, but you would not be making a mortgage payment to the bank because like Wells Fargo would go bust and uh there wouldn't be anybody there to collect the mortgage.
Uh there's a further wrinkle in this that many people don't really anticipate, and that is that the money wouldn't be worth anything even if you had it to mail it in.
So uh because people will be quitting in droves because they won't be being paid to to sit there anymore in a meaningful fashion.
Uh a lot of this, if you want a um historical analog, uh go and read about the very rapid breakdown of the uh what little there was at the time, corporate social structure in the Weimar Republic, or go and look at what happened in Zimbabwe with um uh corporations in that country when they hit their uh real problem.
You'll note that the only people that really had employment were foreign were employed by foreign-based corporations that had outside sources of non-Zimbabwe bucks.
And so we find that uh there's there are many different factors relating to paying the mortgages, and uh there will be claims on these mortgages how uh by uh other parties downstream, so to speak, that have uh derivatives that are based on them.
Uh there will be um uh any number of uh attempts to collect by any number of organizations.
The question is, is any of it going to be meaningful?
And at this point, the data sets are arguing that no, it won't be meaningful, that once the bank goes, uh there's probably uh no reason whatsoever to respond to a uh collection agency or some other corporation that claims that it owns uh that mortgage.
At that point, you would have to uh the best approach in my personal view would be to tell them to put up and sh or shut up, and that is to say, uh sue me and prove you have title, that you have standing, that you have jurisdiction to make this claim.
Uh I don't care that you bought this debt from defunct corporation because defunct corporation and I weren't getting along anyway, blah, blah, blah.
I'm not paying you.
What are you gonna do about it?
You know, and if done in the millions and tens of millions, uh, you're gonna see an entirely different reaction this time than we saw in the previous depression.
No how no matter how much the political guys this this time are being told it will be the same way as the previous depression.
So bear in mind there's a lot of indicators saying that the uh council on foreign racial relations view is that when we go to the big bust here, everybody will go broke, and then the the properties will be seized and owned by the government through the um acquisition of these failed banks, it'll probably have to be nationalized.
So there I think is that when Wells Fargo goes bust, the U.S. government says, oh hey, well, we're taking over, you know, send out your mortgage uh notices the very next day, just like usual, we'll keep paying you, you know, uh all the employees and so on, and basically we own the bank the same way we own GM motors.
Uh but it the data sets are arguing it won't go down that way.
That at that point the ability of the federal government to meaningfully pay anybody uh rapidly breaks down, and in many cases the uh wholesale um disillusioned stepping out of the corporate world uh will occur fairly rapidly within these organizations, and that we'll see areas where uh headquarters that might employ tens of thousands of people will have one and two and three people per floor showing up for work, and it just won't occur.
It just simply will not be able to be managed.
Once Gus takes it over, it it's gonna break it down anyway just because of Gus's own inability to manage anything.
So uh yes, the banks won't be functioning, and then the other claims are eh.
And so um uh the next questions are all based on not showing up to work and so on, and you get the idea.
People will not.
Uh crash, okay.
New new subject here, China should be crashed by the first or second week in September.
I would agree with that in the sense that the 1929 crash, however, if you go and look at how it's uh running and its replication in the current Chinese aggregated stock market, it's tracking pretty well.
But that night that crash in 1929 has already occurred.
It occurred in June in China.
That's when it reached its top, crossed over and started heading down.
So it has already crashed, and it's done so by now.
The first or second week in September are moot relative to what's going on with the Chinese stock market.
It'll continue to go down for at least another 10 to 12 years, uh, the way we're looking at.
Maybe they'll go through all of it and they'll be able to pick it up in the four or five years when they move into their 1950s kind of mindset, uh trying to get some sort of an analogy populist to populous.
Uh but uh the data sets really don't show um a major move back into the stock market at all.
Um longer term, does the electrical grid look okay?
No, it does not.
Electrical grid here in the, I'm assuming uh North America uh electrical grid in the North America is gonna just get the shit kicked out of it as a result of the dollar dying.
Because there's been uh delayed or um non-existent or lip service paid to repairs, maintenance, and growth of the infrastructure, uh we're screwed.
We're hopelessly screwed.
Here's the actual um mathematical dynamics involved.
Let me see if I can give a flavor of it here.
Uh, there's two aspects of this that you have to consider.
The first is that from 1989, say, until about uh the crash in the uh of uh the real estate market in 2008, uh until that crash, so 1989 to 2008, there was a period of time that that in there that peaked about middle 90s,
late 90s perhaps, in which our uh commercial property construction rate was five times faster than the growth of the population, even if you added in the growth of the um illegal aliens, undocumented workers.
So even if you add them in, the the growth rate in construction of commercial operators or commercial uh real estate uh of all kind was five times faster than the rate of the populist growth.
This includes malls, strip malls, all this kind of stuff.
That's why we've got so many of them empty and in around.
These guys are a drain on our electrical grid, just keeping them operating, uh just keeping them from being broken into by turning on lights at night, all of these kind of things, just keeping them heated in those places they have to be heated or the pipes will break, or are uh gonna be a huge drain on the electrical system.
Uh they're gonna be let go as the electrical system uh infrastructure starts breaking down.
Uh the infrastructure breaks down because we put no investment into it, and as this goes along, we'll have accidents because people won't be there to to prevent them in the numbers that are required.
And the numbers that are required are being squeezed even as we uh sit here and talk about it.
They haven't really been staffing up any of the uh electrical companies for years.
Plus, we're gonna have other issues that relate to the planetary environment in terms of the stretch of the planet.
So in some areas we're we're gonna find cable breaks that simply won't be repaired, and I'm talking major cables are indicated here.
So we'll get regional uh blackouts that uh might last for months or even years, according to the longer term data.
I haven't looked at that level of Terra uh Terra entity in detail because there's so much else to go through, and I have a finite uh limit to the amount of um time I can put into the preparation of the Ulta reports.
It was my intention to stay on top of that and hit it with the next Ulta report to go into the electrical system if I've got a chance.
Because I'm somewhat concerned with that myself because there's so many indicators that it's gonna break down and there's gonna be large-scale regional breakdowns, including in my area here, which is not something that we would have anticipated simply because of the um what we usually think of as the safe and secure production of electricity from uh uh water from hydrology.
Uh but because we've had the drought, and because that's going to affect things because of the uh planetary expansion and and the heat and so on, we're gonna get cables breaking, and so I might find myself in a region where there's no power for some considerable time.
Uh, because there won't be the dollars to pay people, expertise is and is gonna fade away and so on, and all these things are gonna compound to making the electrical grid in North America uh resemble that of a Cuban's nightmare.
Um Cuban electrical engineers nightmare uh for perhaps the next 15 years, uh maybe even longer, at a um uh national level.
Now, on the other side of that, four or five years from now, there's indicators that a national grid won't be needed, that there will be a safe, effective, uh Portable plug your house in kind of device that will uh have a capital expenditure but virtually no operating costs thereafter and that these will start to propagate throughout the planet.
And uh so at some point those overtake the need to have a national grid and you just don't anymore.
You just don't have uh uh uh service provided that way, and we're headed there.
When they when they uh shift over uh uh problematic at this stage, and uh we can get into some forecasts for that later.
As I say, I will track that and get back to people.
Okay, so um new question does a credit freeze affect retailers, just affect retailers who are using short-term debt to fund their inventory, or does it affect all retailers?
It affects all retailers, and the reason is that that it's gonna affect not only retailers, but first and foremost it's gonna affect transporters.
So so much of the transportation of um goods is done on a credit basis where uh you're paying for fuel three months from now that you're using today.
And so that's gonna shut down fairly quick.
There's gonna be the same thing is gonna be true for uh dock space, all different kinds of things as the credit squeeze gets into it and the credit credit freeze gets into it deeper, uh, we'll see it's seizing up all over.
So the data sets actually describe it in a way that's more akin to um uh uh something out of like a mummy movie where uh you the m the person or zombie or whatever it gets the disease and all of its bl uh blood, you can see all of its blood vessels just all shriveling up all over the place.
And so as they shrivel up, some areas are isolated and and exist for a little bit longer.
That's sort of a deal.
Um so it's not um uh it is ubiquitously applied though.
Retailers are gonna get hit hit everywhere because it's gonna affect all the transshipment of goods even internationally, especially internationally.
Let me put it that way as well, since all of that is fronted on credit.
Uh no, Greece does not have anything to do with a credit freeze, they're just a victim of it like the rest of us.
Um, so it's uh we've been noticing the temporal markers that are in place during the seven weeks of chaos uh which we're in.
Do you still see the potential for uh being developed by 8-8, which is tomorrow, uh the 8th of August for the rise in PMs in September, precious metals.
And certainly I do.
We've got these um data sets that go to in a very prescient fashion.
They're long-term data sets.
They've uh had a number of of um uh manifestations already emerge, and so we know that the set in general has a high hit ratio, so to speak, as it's uh progressing.
And one of the main themes in there is that Mrs. Wong gets freaked out by Chinese currency.
Uh and she controls the household finances and she starts deciding that well, she's gonna buy precious metals.
That you know, she thought she liked them in the past, and she thought she had bought some in the past, but it's nothing compared to her emotional intensity and drive to acquire these now.
That there's gonna be now the the way that this plays out is that we've seen other data sets that indicate there's gonna be some kind of a currency hiccup within the Chinese currency or within Chinese currency to other currencies.
So maybe it's gonna be a hiccup in the dollar, but something is gonna send a signal today or tomorrow morning that or the day after we have an error ratio, uh error range in here in terms of the uh the error error rate, actually, because it's short-term data could be up to three weeks, although I'm pretty certain we're gonna start seeing indicators of it tomorrow.
But but the Mrs. Wong is upset, she's emotionally agitated, and she's starting to become anxious about purchasing uh value of currency.
And so she's going to react um uh perfectly sanely to this and decide to buy precious metals, only because there's so many Mrs. Wong's it's gonna create something of a run.
So we're gonna see if you will, it won't be a bank run, but it'll be a run to precious metals, unlike what we have seen before in China.
So we thought we had seen um major Chinese buying at the popular level of um precious metals, but apparently we've seen nothing at all like the wave that's gonna come.
In fact, it's described within the data sets as being so uh fierce that it leads to the sucking dry of all of the possible channels for gold and silver.
Uh you know, stores are are absolutely drained and the employees are told they can just go home because there's nothing to sell, and then the people turn to Bitcoin.
Uh the and the some of the smarter ones turn to Bitcoin ahead of this as they run up against the competition to buy precious metals.
And uh so that starts driving the price of Bitcoin up as well.
And this all this is all merged together.
It doesn't all happen discreetly the way I'm describing it.
So there's gonna be a turning to silver as a result of gold starting to dry up, but some people will get to silver ahead of time because they won't want to mess with the competition for gold.
So you see how it works that way in terms of the data sets.
I can say it occurs on this particular day, but of course it's occurring across many different days.
However, I'm I'm fairly certain that something's gonna pop on the morning of August 8th that will uh start relating us to this generalized meme of Mrs. Wong or the Chinese population in general, uh turning to um or tending towards an anti-currency bent that will continue for a number of years.
Let's see, um, uh questions of whether or not Russia or Canada are gonna are going to enter into inflation and hyperinflation or uh deflation or something other.
And we see that there's a debt destruction um situation going on around the planet, but there's no indication of deflation per se.
So when we get to the um uh when we as we accelerate into this, uh Russia gets a period of inflation.
I wouldn't call it hyperinflation, and then because it's able to do a resource backing deal uh with uh the ruble, and I'm not saying gold, it may be that they back it with diamonds or oil or something.
But in any event, uh because it's resource rich and because of some other new discoveries there, the Russian ruble is relatively stable and and does not encounter the kind of problems that the dollar does.
And also the Russians uh turn out to have been very smart and sneaky and gotten rid of almost all of their uh USA dollar or their dollar-denominated debt, uh probably a really good deal that they were pushed into it by the uh Ukraine mess and the Kabul trying to take over the criminal guys trying to take over and uh give Russia a hard time because they end up avoiding a lot of the problems that are associated with um dollar-denominated derivatives and other and other U.S. issues.
Uh so Russia does real well in the in the future.
They weather the whole inflation hyperinflation uh issues really well.
Uh Canada, uh Canada doesn't um um uh do so well.
Um Canada's experience with uh currency issues are going to be um lumpy, they're gonna go through through periods of quiescence and then really uh periods of um uh major levels of disruption.
A lot of that is because of their ties to what's gonna happen in uh the city of London as a result of the banks going bluey there, and uh the problems that will ripple back to them from uh derivatives and uh other problems associated with their government.
So no, the Canadian currency is not gonna do too well over the uh longer term and short term, it's it's gonna sort of bob around a bit.
Let's see.
Um housing prices in the uh UK.
Uh I don't have price information per se.
The trend line is gonna be affected um because of the bank issues that will be going on uh over these next four or five years.
The bank issues are gonna be USA or or uh criminal uh corporation bank uh centered and central bank centered.
So there will be organizations, uh thrifts and savings and loans and credit unions and stuff that even though they're caught into the currency problems for a while will operate even though major banking structures have not.
Uh in some areas in the UK, we're looking at um uh the trend line, okay.
The emotional trend line is for a very disruptive 10 to 15 years.
Uh so as currencies um fail uh within the larger American empire, it's gonna be a repeat uh for the British of the British Empire failing, only it's gonna squeeze them a lot more, and they're gonna find uh that uh with immigration and the other issues there that um the social cohesion is very basically lost,
and you'll see that um in the near term uh housing prices are gonna react as though you're looking at an economy that's swooning and the banking system is swooning.
So the housing prices can be expected to fall over the short term in the long term.
However, longer term Britain comes into something of a period of social discord that we have not looked at anything on the other side of it.
The social discord does things like places the concept of royal property into the public domain.
This may mean that the populace just debates how much property the Queen owns, or it may mean that the populace seizes the 87% of the country of England that the Queen won't let anybody live on.
And just decide, oh, up yours, queenie.
I'm gonna go over here and stake out two hectares, and that's mine.
Piss on y'all.
That seems a lot of that language is coming through.
A lot of those pressed areas were coming through.
There's gonna be huge level of contention, though.
The contention really in in England starts in uh very serious ways in 2016.
Uh the riots and the social disorder.
Uh it's fed by the dying uh bank system attempting to um disharmonize the populace in order to control them, and it kind of gets out of hand.
So we run into those kind of situations.
So a whole lot of questions here about the United Kingdom.
Let's step through them fairly quick.
Um how will the welfare state in the UK be impacted by the credit freeze?
It's gonna have a real hard time.
Uh austerity is going to come on in in a major way over 2016, late 2016 into 2017.
Uh food availability and prices.
Oh, the austerity, by the way, is uh triggered uh by stuff that happens here in 2015, and then there's a um shutdown over the early part of 2016, and then uh severe hardship, like um uh getting to the next stage here, food availability and prices in the UK.
By the time we get into the let's say the last quarter of 2016, uh the UK is in this um uh period that uh really resembles Berlin in the airlift, only without all the people bringing stuff in.
So there's uh uh just a severe shortage of goods uh in some areas um uh well lots of crime increases, I mean, food theft, um all this kind of thing, including uh people that are uh roving around apparently um uh trying to steal from food stores that um uh the government is seized.
So I'm not sure if we want to talk about in the sense of martial law, because I don't think it's the military, but the government has decided that food's a critical element by the third quarter of 2016, and is uh in the process of taking over and running the distribution system and is not going well.
Okay, so riots in the UK starting uh, yes, riots in the UK are starting in um early 2016 as a result of the credit freeze all over uh various different uh reasons for the riots in terms of in some cases it's uh racial,
in some cases it's gangs, other cases it's religion, in other cases it's food availability, but in general it's because the whole population is being squeezed through the uh credit freeze and the mass numbers of layoffs and the sudden um fairly sudden uh shutdown as we see globally in the circulation of currencies and the uh per uh availability of the currencies to buy things.
Uh terror changes in the UK, severe permanent flooding, etc.
Yeah, we see a number of those.
Um oddly enough, a number of earthquakes and damaging earthquakes, uh, those appear 2017-2018, uh, along with some severe earthquakes here in the west coast of North America at that same time, uh permanent areas of flooding.
Uh the ones that are standing out primarily at the moment seem to be hitting in Ireland and on the um uh uh western coast of uh uh England.
But that's really, again, geographic things are somewhat unreliable.
UK at war, yeah, but again, it's at the corporate level.
It's not UK military and mass stuff that silver prices for the UK can't say, not following anything in pounds.
Will the UK be affected by shortages of medicine?
You bet.
Scotland independence, yes, but not in a formal kind of a thing.
It's just as a result of the breakdown of the banking system and the breakdown of government in general as their various subdivisions of the government start freezing up because they don't have the credit to run things.
People desert as employees.
There's a breakdown in the generalized civil authority in terms of the areas that they can claim, and thus you get a reassertion of how people feel about things.
Make sense?
I sure hope so.
Okay, on to new question sets.
uh these are kind of duplicated all over I get a lot of these like in uh what location is it going to be safe uh to move to for food um and water and we don't get that kind of thing so it's not like I can dial into the data and say well you know um Perump Nevada is going to be safe.
It may well be but I have no way of knowing and I discount geographic references.
So, sorry, can't answer that.
So it goes on to those whose conditions were maintained by pharmaceuticals as sources of drugs as well as foods dry up rapidly.
How long, and it says, how long will there be no prescription drugs, and then when will production of prescription drugs resume?
Well, according to our data sets, once we get into this, prescription drugs as we understand it go away.
Because the credit freeze affects the ability of the just-in-time system, it collapses.
Because the credit freeze affects the ability of the people to purchase.
Because those people that, you know, the pharmaceutical companies to purchase raw materials.
Because the people producing those raw materials won't want to take the currencies that are offered.
And et cetera, et cetera, for dozens and dozens of reasons that all combine together.
As well as what we're calling the credit freeze, which is really the cessation of circulation of currency.
as well as its um reduction in purchasing power simultaneously uh and the reduction of the ability to do things on credit uh prescription drugs uh producers big companies go out of business and so they don't resume uh so if you're talking about a particular brand of a particular kind of a product as far as I can tell it doesn't happen.
It could be wrong.
I mean, the data sets are not perfect, and there's no way of knowing exactly what companies go under and what products come through because we have to look at everything in an aggregated, industry-wide kind of a situation.
So maybe one mega pharmaceutical company goes bust, and that's where we're getting all of our data sets, and then everybody else is fine.
Could be that everybody else goes bust as well, and I really couldn't determine the difference at this stage within the data.
Production of alternatives start immediately, so there's going to be an attempt to fill the gap, but you'll find a lot of things people just don't even bother trying to replicate.
In some areas, you'll find that people are hell-bent for whatever reason to try and replicate certain kinds of prescription drugs, and so they go to great lengths to do so.
But I can't say which drugs are the types or so on.
It just doesn't show up that way in the data.
Migrations towards central Canada.
Why head north out of the USA?
Well, under the circumstances being described, within the data set, a large river shifts course.
Some areas have become mushy marshes and forced people out, and then a very large river shifts course, which causes one or more nuke plants to go crazy and go fukyu on us all, and the population can't go through that.
that radiation barrier to get to the marshlands uh nor would they want to, so they head north.
That's the only alternative to get out because of the radiation hazard or developing or presumed radiation hazard.
I can't tell if it's real or not because we get because we're dealing with linguistics, not a view of actual events.
And so that's the impetus for them to um to leave.
Uh in some cases, some people will head to South America, but the immigration to there is not associated with the diaspora that's forced out that forces people out due to the change in the course of this uh very large river or river system.
I mean, might be multiple rivers, we can't tell.
Uh will USA borders be controlled or become totally open.
Yes to both of those.
They're gonna be heavily controlled as the government as gust uh gets into factional fighting uh and then ultimately they won't exist anymore.
It won't matter.
Uh will the USA that ultimately is sometime after 2019, how long I can't tell you.
Uh will USA Fed government collapse and break up into regional city states, smaller regional governments.
No, it won't work that way.
Uh they're gonna the state government, regional government, city governments are all gonna collapse on their own as part of the credit freeze, and the uh federal government will wither and pull back with harder with the hardcore people uh staying um uh loyal to a dwindling uh command structure uh and attempt still attempt to exert claims of authority over large regions.
Uh makes sense.
Will silver medical device treat diseases like cancer?
Can't say I uh it's it's non-determinant within the data.
Will the sun disease cause more skin cancer?
Sun disease uh sun does not cause skin cancer now, so no, it's not going to.
Um if you're buying into the idea of sunscreens, please examine the whole concept of slathering yourself with carcinogenic chemicals in an attempt to prevent a carcinogenic uh situation.
Uh let's see, um uh Southeast, here's a guy who lives in the southeast near a nuke.
Sure, yeah, we do have data sets showing problems.
Uh it's all over the shorter term data, but the but that's because we get all kinds of reports of nuke problems continuously that are existent in the now.
So uh the large scale problem when the river shifts is still insofar as I'm able to determine.
I haven't really examined it recently.
I mean, I haven't looked at it in like the last three months.
Um but it was the last time I looked at it was still in the long-term data.
Um I can't speculate as to where the uh uh it the data uh really would tend to point to Tennessee being the river originating or flowing through Tennessee.
Uh there's a lot to suggest that, but other than that, I don't have uh too much in the way of a clue as to which river and where it goes, that kind of thing.
Let's see, damage to Australia, nuke new uh subject here, coastal communities, um yeah, the Australia is going to go through a um uh an interesting situation.
Uh the data sets are pointing to these tall areas, and tall is a um a relative term, okay.
So tall might mean a hundred feet to somebody in other areas it might be ten feet.
Uh but what we're looking at is um uh within um Australia is actually a lot of damage in the West.
Uh so uh there's a bunch of different causes to this.
There's also uh going to be some solar issues for Australia.
Um not really sure how we really phrase this, but um uh maybe even interplanetary lightning kind of things with Australia and uh and or an earth rupture because of the earth uh expanding.
And so there's gonna be there's indications in the long-term data that we end up with something akin to a Grand Canyon, and uh it's gonna be over in uh the far west of Australia, but that's gonna that land over there is due to be changed due to new lands rising further west of it, uh impacts on um uh continental shelves, impacts on uh ocean basins between the two of them, and impacts on the um uh oceanic currents.
So uh insofar as the um uh sun disease impact on Australia and New Zealand and New Caledonia and the um uh whole of the South uh Pacific, it's gonna be quite severe.
Uh so uh insofar as the questions about sun disease hitting Australia, it's the um this is much more than people are being told, okay.
So let me let me uh take a moment here and present uh a hypothetical idea.
It's hypot uh it's hypothetical because I don't have uh proof for all of the uh uh necessary um uh solid evidence.
I've got some proof for some evidence, but not enough to state that this is the case uh generally and completely.
But uh the sun disease has got a cooperative element on planet Earth within our atmosphere.
As the Earth's atmosphere or as the Earth expands, we can expect a couple of different things to occur within the atmosphere, one of which I believe we're experiencing at the moment, and that is this thinning.
So you can imagine that as the Earth expands that the atmosphere uh would have to expand along with it, which it does.
But it does so initially by collapsing the depth of that atmosphere and bringing the outer atmosphere closer to the planet.
I say initially because over time new gases will emerge from within uh the planet Earth, but also within the oceans that will over the course of time uh alter and change and um and grow the atmosphere.
They may grow it in a way that's not good for humans, and that's what a lot of the powers that be fear, and that is a giant methane release that you know runs around the planet and makes everybody fall over and die because you can't breathe methane.
Uh so um, but at the moment what we're uh discussing is the impact on like Australia, New Zealand and a lot of the other areas of the uh of the planet.
For reasons of uh that I don't need to go into at the moment and be too long anyway, there's a reason for me to suspect that as the Earth expands, it does so in a sort of like a uh pendulum manner, and it doesn't do so evenly.
So for a while it's gonna expand more in the north hemisphere than it does in the southern hemisphere, and then it'll expand larger in the southern hemisphere to make up for it and go a little bit further, and then it'll go back to the northern hemisphere and so on.
Sort of if you wanted to think about it as a rocking uh motion between the expansion.
And that's going to affect the atmosphere.
So there will be times, for instance, that the atmosphere is thicker in Sweden than it is in Australia, and then there's times that it's going to be reverse.
But now at the moment, the atmosphere in general is thinning over the entire planet.
It's thinning also for from not only from expansion uh of the uh core of the earth, and thus the atmosphere has to go across to bigger surface area of the planet, uh at some unknown uh probably mathematically determined rate, but we just don't know what it is because no one shares the kind of data we need to determine that with us.
Um so we can't determine how fast the atmosphere is thinning uh or flattening.
Let's call it flattening.
Now, there's also reason to believe that the atmosphere is also thinning in oxygen, and thinning in oxygen in a very appreciable way that is causing problems because it is oxygen that is going.
So I'm not talking about breathing issues just yet, although some people are going to start noticing in the, and this is within our immediacy data, and as it was going to be discussed in there, that we'll suddenly find uh areas of the planet where uh you'll be at something close to sea level, say within a thousand feet of sea level or less, but it'll it'll feel like you're in the Andes in terms of trying to breathe.
Uh hopefully it'll just be temporary.
Uh but in any event uh it's gonna cause some widespread uh problems.
Now uh the atmosphere is thinning and we're losing oxygen because of all the cars and the internal combustion engines.
So uh for every uh minute that or every or every second that your car runs, uh it's the equivalent of 800 people on average, 800 people, uh respirating, breathing in the oxygen and destroying it and converting it to carbon dioxide and breathing it out.
So every time you turn your car on and you're sitting in the in the um traffic uh anywhere using your car at all, uh any vehicle that uses an internal combustion engine that runs on gasoline and diesel or kerosene or any of these combustible fuels, you're basically uh out There with uh fundamentally acting like a thousand people breathing uh and destroying uh the oxygen.
And so we've we've depleted oxygen at a at an incredible rate as a result of the uh transformation of the planet into uh the auto house or the auto zone, although that's a commercial uh company.
But in any event, um there's also the uh depletion of the atmosphere at a much greater level with all of the uh rockets coming out of uh the US and Russia and everybody, all of our tests and the space shuttle and um uh all the airplanes.
So you can feel bad about the 800 uh people that uh were breathing along with you continuously as you drive your vehicle, but recognize that if you fly in an airplane for every person flying in that airplane, uh you're using uh oxygen at the rate of of 10 to 20,000 individuals per person.
So the pollution from the atmosphere uh to the atmosphere and the destruction of the oxygen as a result of the airplane um fuel consumption is such that that uh you know 100,000 if you've got um uh uh 200 uh people in an airplane, you're looking at two million people breathing for the for the duration of that flight.
Not a good thing really.
So uh so those those elements are going to impact the sun disease.
It's gonna, in the data sets, it shows as um uh being a magnifier to the uh sun disease and assisting in causing some of these uh issues in terms of the mini strokes and some of the other things that were discussed in the recent report.
Uh and that's about really all I'm gonna go in on that.
I'm gonna start running out of steam here.
Uh as I say I am running out of steam.
It's been a rough day and a previously rough night.
Uh so I'll go a couple of more questions and then the uh shut down and put and get this processed and made available.
Uh a couple of questions about public colleges.
It says public colleges remaining open and available, affordable uh for those who've stacked a few coins.
No, colleges are gonna die as we understand it and be reborn in a new structure as we go forward.
The idea of sending people off and paying money to stick them into an institution for four years for education is gonna die relatively rapidly with the credit freeze, causes all kinds of problems.
Uh large animal veterinary profession, sure, we're always going to need those as long as we have large animals.
I don't know how you're gonna be uh paid or how you're gonna get educated in it uh as we go forward, but internships and that kind of thing might make a lot of sense.
We're gonna go to an entirely different uh structure for education based in the at least in North America, based on the collapse of the uh purchasing power of the dollar and it and the credit and its ability to uh fund stuff.
Uh it's gonna be a big hard halt.
Now you'll note that in Cuba their college system really took off after they hit their uh transitional wall because they needed to have the uh populace become educated enough to overcome the many difficulties, and so the government put a big effort into that, uh, even though they had little money.
Uh that little money paid off in many ways in terms of how they invested it.
Will our government do that?
I don't know.
Uh, what will our government look like?
Uh it's gonna be the criminal cobble fighting it out among themselves as the purchasing power dwindles and dwindles and fewer and fewer people take the dollar, their power will shrink, and then something will replace them.
We have many different indicators for the something, but nothing that I would say is um sure enough for me to suggest that it's gonna go this way or that.
Uh we have many years of tran of uh struggle uh during this transition, and basically once the gus uh starts going away and stuff starts collapsing, the world is your making.
It's whatever you make of it because you won't have people trying to push you down uh for attempting to do stuff.
Uh and the world is gonna insist that you do things because of the environmental damage and so on.
You have to understand that that for instance the credit freeze is going to affect nuke plants, it's gonna affect coal plants, it's gonna affect uh production of electricity, it's going to affect everything globally.
Now, in some cases it's gonna be a lot more dire than in others.
So the North America is so so dependent upon uh fake money and the um uh uh uh giant uh you know how they talk about privilege.
Well, North America has a giant privilege based on the dollar, and as the dollar goes away, that North American privilege, that USA privilege goes away as well.
And so all of a sudden, USA in in populace is basically no different than if you're Hindu or if you're Chinese or Mexican or Uruguayan or that kind of thing, because we'll all be struggling with the same level of issues, the same level of difficulty.
Only the United States is it becomes so dependent upon the uh the largesse of the planet and keeping going that we will crash harder than any of those countries have.
As I say, we will crash as Cuba crashed.
Uh will we be as smart as Cuba?
I don't know.
There's a lot of indications saying that we're going to go through some struggles that will make theirs uh look um uh like a day at a uh five-star resort on the beach uh compared to what we have to go through.
But we do get through it, we do come out on the other side.
Uh it's uh 10 years plus.
So um uh that kind of thing in terms of professions and all of that.
Once we get into this uh fairly serious stuff here in 2016 and beyond, you'll be able to see that indeed I'm correct.
As the political structure breaks down and we get into the infighting and the factionalism and so on, uh you can easily imagine that we're facing a uh situation worse than Russia went through in its breakdown.
And let's see, uh tire and pea money investments for the future.
Sorry, guy, it's gonna be locally dependent.
Uh so it's gonna be dependent on where you're at as to what's needed.
In the far north, for instance, you may find that people that um are able to stash uh wood for heating do really well uh in areas that are wood deprived, if that makes sense, right?
Uh as the electrical system breaks down, you may find that people are that are able to provide electricity do really well.
So there's gonna be all different kinds of issues.
If you're in an isolated area, um any of the dependent areas, Guam, Hawaii, I don't know about Alaska.
It's so large and has so many different resources.
I'm uncertain of its uh its um of the impacts on it anyway.
But some of these areas that are uh seriously dependent on electricity, you're gonna find vast uh levels of changes to the life.
So there's gonna, if all of a sudden we find a situation where Hawaii can't generate electricity to any significant meaningful extent and has to ration it and so on, well, there you go.
There's gonna be issues there.
Uh same thing as may occur in Phoenix, but the issues are gonna be radically different.
And you'll see a diaspora out of Phoenix really fast once the electricity can't be um maintained through the summer.
Same thing is true of probably a great deal of the Southwest.
Uh I guess that's gonna have to be it for the day.
I've got to feed the dogs, I've got other things going.
Took too long to discover I could not overcome the um hangout issues, uh, so it kind of delayed these.
But we got through a fair number of the questions, and I think it was uh somewhat representative.
There was maybe another 80 or 90 that weren't um weren't addressed, but some of them may have been addressed in what uh we've covered so far.
I'll try and get to some of the others as we get into the reports uh later in the month, the IDIR report, and then as we start prepping for uh our September uh Ulta report.
It's gonna be a little chaotic.
We think we've got some um possibility for uh uh relocation and stuff, so but I'm pretty sure we can maintain the schedule of Ulta first part of the month, IDIR, somewhere near the middle.
And I'll be getting back to everybody as to our uh next posting date on the IDIR.
Track us on Twitter at the moment.
Uh we may shift over to Google Plus as we start uh trying to move towards the hangout thing.
But at the moment we're I'm still fairly uh Twitter focused.
If you want to uh track for uh the tidbits we're able to extract from the data and fit in the 140 characters.
So that's all folks.
Best we can do for the day.
▲
Export Selection