Clif High - IDIR4282014

April 28, 2014 - Clif High

48:32

IDIR4282014

Immediacy Data Intelligence Report for April 28,2014 covering Ukraine, dollar, gold/silver outlooks for May into June. Images from our boat shop and my Pacific proa build (Nuc Squaxin), kayaking, Dragon boat races in Olympia WA Budd Inlet 4/26/2014, and Port Townsend WA Wooden boat festival from a few years back (2011?)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	It's uh 10.05 a.m. on April 28th, 2014.
	It's a nice sunny day here at the southern end of the Sailor Sea in the North American continent on Planet Terra.
	This is the Immediacy Data Intelligence Report for this last week in April and the first two weeks in May.
	These reports, by the way, are based on data sets that are most effective three to four days out from the time of the data capture and interpretation out through the end of the uh third week and its maximal uh range of the immediacy data.
	We also do have some short-term data as well because we've gotten another server operating.
	It's not very voluminous relative to the immediacy data.
	So we've got a number of subjects to cut cover.
	We're gonna go through them relatively quickly.
	I don't have a whole lot of time to devote to each and every one of these.
	No matter what I do, they're gonna end up taking uh considerable part of a day, uh several hours in the morning, and and uh then all the processing time ahead of that.
	These are being done uh are supported by donations.
	We're uh probably going to be able to maintain the ability to do these over the months of May and June.
	June is questionable depending on how much we can uh raise in uh cash to uh pay for server time and T3 rental and all that kind of crud, bandwidth and such.
	Uh however, uh in any event, uh I don't want to spend days and days and days on each report.
	We've got tons of stuff to go through.
	There's lots of immediacy data.
	Uh you may have noticed there's been a fairly uh significant swelling in a lot of texting and such things as Twitter.
	Uh that's where we get most of the immediacy data, it's not from things like email and and that sort of a deal.
	Uh we do gather some off of um uh fora as well, and uh that are uh fairly high churn rates.
	So um we'll start by going right into our data on uh the Ukraine and the situation there.
	Our uh all of our data sets, by the way, from uh all of the uh discussion from this point on, uh I'll try and use as declarative and as clear a structure as I can to describe what the data has provided us.
	The immediacy data has some details, but it has a tendency to be less structured, less uh tied together.
	And so you have a tendency to skip around a bit more in terms of the interpretation.
	It's like sort of uh an open Twitter feed in that regard in terms of the subject you know, changes, not as rapidly as Twitter though.
	Uh anyway, though, um so uh we start right off with Ukraine.
	Uh we have uh data sets indicating that the situation will build and that that a war will break.
	Uh we think relative to our data uh that um uh major warfare, if you want to think of it that way, uh, will take place on the um or about the summer solstice uh near the end of June.
	Uh so June 20th this year, 21st.
	Anyway, um so that'll be the actual outbreak of the war if you want to think of it that way.
	Um we have a lot of data about the uh progress of that, all this stuff comes from the short-term data, it's not as voluminous as the immediacy data, however, because it's uh high priority subject with a lot of emotion around it.
	We have tons of uh cross links between the short-term and the um immediacy data on this subject, so we could go into uh some level of specifics.
	If I was writing this up, we might spend uh six or eight pages on it.
	We just have that much in the way of potential details in an audio report.
	It's less pertinent to get into to that.
	Uh the idea is to give sort of a um uh news report for uh all you people up uh early in the morning and all the ships at sea kind of a thing.
	And uh our data would suggest from a news report headline viewpoint that the Ukraine war will pop off on or around the solstice.
	It'll be relatively short.
	There will be a merging uh more or less harmoniously uh with the victims of the CIA's problems in the Ukraine uh back to Mother Russia.
	Uh this won't be the end of things.
	Uh it won't be um it's not the beginning.
	Uh it's certainly going to be the end of the beginning, though.
	And so uh there won't be no prelude after that.
	And um the uh Ukraine war is gonna have profound effects.
	The number of cross links that go back between that particular set subset of the data and a lot of the other data is quite extensive as one may uh anticipate.
	We have uh thick ropey masses of crosslings that lead from one part of our model space uh back over to another.
	Let me take a second to quickly describe that.
	Our model space is built in a uh freeware version of AutoCAD, where each and every pixel in a uh basically an aquarium tank uh cubicle form that's uh 60 million pixels on a side.
	Each each pixel represents a word cluster that the data set is found, and the such things as um uh intensity hue, color, uh, etc.
	Uh denote um emotional components, and then we have another view of model space that shows the crosslinks absent the uh individual uh data pixels.
	So, in other words, um in that view it would look like a bunch of um uh earthworms in a bucket.
	And you'd be able to just uh we can from the software pick one end of one earthworm and follow it to the end of that earthworm and see where he terminates in our um linguistic structures.
	These uh crosslinks are very, very extensive between the uh Ukraine war subsets and the greater financial war that's being waged uh overhead, if you will.
	It's not in the background.
	The financial war is the war, and the uh elements on the ground in the Ukraine in Ukraine from the solstice nearer near the solstice and onward will be reflections of what's going on in the financial war rather than uh instigators or triggers or catalysts.
	So the elements on the ground, when you see things occurring in the in the sense of an old-fashioned war, uh by that time the war will have been uh decided or well advanced on the financial end,
	and so the elements that that are going to be um in play in the form of you know territory seized uh you know, resources and all that kind of thing uh reallocated uh these sorts of um on the ground uh people stomping around moving atoms about are really an after-effect of the war itself, uh insofar as at least uh what our data would suggest.
	Uh now, further, there's very large, so we have uh just as way of um uh housekeeping details, the Ukraine war uh subset, even in the immediacy data has well over a thousand uh uh originating cross links within this subset.
	Some of the larger ones terminate in uh dollar um uh gold silver as may be expected.
	Uh we also have them uh terminating in subsets about panic.
	Uh we have them terminating in subsets that uh a very interesting one that I found quite uh fascinating was a uh a crosslink over to a the crack up boom concept in the uh Austrian uh economics thinking of it.
	It's not described that way in the data, but or not without that language, but it's quite clearly being described as uh crack up boom in the sense that we have uh um desperate drunken, and there's also uh within the subset of the drunken, we have other language to that effect, intoxicated, out of your mind, feverish, and so on and so on and so on, hallucinating.
	Many many different words implying a some kind of a fugue state of the brain, along with the idea of a desperate attempt uh to uh bail on the dollar, to basically spend paper, to spend out all of your paper before it becomes worthless.
	And so this crack up boom kind of language within the immediacy data is very clearly indicating that 2014, this year, in January, that that's when the uh feverish pace began to accelerate.
	The crack up boom subset is also cross-tied back over to the gold, silver, dollars, EU, all different kinds of currencies, the EU economy to a subset of diaspora, and to another subset, which is itself cross-tied back to the Ukraine war, which is a gold sell-off.
	And this is cross-tied back over to the central banks, and another subset we'll get to in a minute, but the Ukraine war subset.
	Here, let me, I gotta have some notes I need to get back to.
	The Ukraine war subset is directly tied to this idea of a gold sell-off that will occur that is in is going to be um uh initially met with um a sense of uh despair or uh angst or anxiety by the uh populace that is uh emotionally invested in gold as well as you know,
	financially invested in gold, because there's going to be this um emotional uh pressure to feel as though the price of gold in various currencies is going to be driven downward by people trying to unload uh precious metals in order to uh potentially pay for war kind of things.
	It's a it's an interesting concept here in terms of the data set.
	It's not clear that that's uh in fact going to occur, but it's rather stating a whole series of fears.
	So let me see if I can describe this in a way that'll be meaningful.
	We have these data sets that are immediacy data.
	They're effective from uh zero days after we get through the interpretation, many times it's already happened by the time we get through that, uh, most effective three to three days out to about 14 uh days or so.
	And so here we have a data set about a say an industry fear of an announced gold sale just shortly before or in the midst of uh an outburst of um activity in uh warfare around uh and about Ukraine.
	This announced gold sale is being described in the immediacy data as an emotion-crushing blow.
	I'm laughing, and you'll see why in a second, to the um uh gold aficionados, people with an uh an emotional investment in gold, and these um uh people are very much uh distressed uh about all of this because it's a fairly large uh gold sale announcement, and they figure it will uh suppress the price of gold just when no one wanted that to occur.
	Now, uh the interesting part of this is that the data set that links into that uh gold auction uh provides us a uh terminating data set that indicates the results are anything but what the central banksters might want.
	And the reason is that uh this one gold sale alone, which is described as a panic buy, uh an active auction with active being described in the sense of uh fisticuffs,
	uh battles to get a seat, uh all kinds of mockinations to undermine other bidders, a nasty, uh brutal kind of a situation, and it's sort of like um oversold, if you will.
	Uh, there's so many seats at the table or in the auction house, and the clamor in terms of the description in the data to get in is overwhelming to the process as a whole.
	So the description goes on to provide, as I say, uh a panic buying uh situation where the sellers of the gold, and this may include central banks.
	I don't know if it's government.
	We could say that basically uh if we wanted to make a um uh uh a further interpretation of it, we could say that it's probably a corporation for a government, but the end result is anything but what the central banksters would want, because apparently this single auction has the effect of driving up the price of gold simply because of the uh scenes coming out on uh independent as well as mainstream financial media about the frenzy to own and
	the uh uh links that people went to to get a place uh in this auction.
	Now, or or major sale or something.
	I don't know that's an auction per se in that format.
	Now the data sets go on to suggest that there's some quavers, and a lot of people are in the sense of delivery, and so it apparently at the last minute or even after the auction is over, those people that thought they that or the sale thought that they had some of the gold uh will be told that oops-oops, we changed our mind, we're not gonna sell after all, here's your fiat currency back, which is gonna cause a lot of problems in and of itself, apparently later on.
	So to start back at the beginning of the trail again and lead us back up to where we're at.
	We've got a uh Ukraine war going hot on the ground uh on or about the solstice in uh end of June.
	Prior to that, we have an escalation in the financial war, that's the real war going on overhead.
	During that period of time, certain events occur.
	Uh some connected cross-connected to a diaspora, a movement of people.
	And so it may be that that is part of the Ukraine war in the sense of people being dispersed and uh moving out of the way of the thing.
	In any event, there's a an announced gold sale.
	Um there's some hints in there that some of the gold may be antique, it may be uh jewelry, uh, this kind of thing.
	There's some level of descriptors seeming to indicate that, but in any event, there's an announced gold sale and something of a panic buy to get in on it.
	It may or may not have an auction format.
	It has an unanticipated side effect in that the panic itself is just uh being viewed on the alternative media and mainstream media uh as a point of human interest, you know, just the same way that we see, you know, fist fights and various um uh legislatures around the world.
	Uh uh so it gets a wide audience, and that causes a something of a price uh spike.
	The um okay, so now going back to the Ukraine war and its uh start in the uh uh beginning of summer more or less, we find that uh this uh process is transformative,
	that the uh initially um that the uh advent of the war around uh the uh solstice ends up with a uh I want to have to I'm gonna have to say a positive impact uh from the data sets uh on a large percentage of the global population,
	and even on a large percentage of the population uh within the um uh capitalistically controlled Anglo-American empire.
	Uh this is trans described as being transformative, and we have some level of detail in terms of you know uh people merging uh uh some diaspora stuff going on, uh but in the end, uh generally a positive things thing for the locals.
	It brings a boost in um investment capital back into Ukraine.
	There's a lot of um uh uh infrastructure rebuilds and so on uh that occur as a result of this process.
	And it um has a real cross-connect, a series of cross-connects, from the start of the war through to the point of the beginning of the transformation.
	Now, both of this uh both of these bear in mind are processes, they're not uh single events.
	This so the war doesn't start on a day and end in a day.
	It's not that kind of a deal.
	Uh the uh on the ground warfare is very short, but it's just one in a long series of um uh manifesting battles that really are reflecting what's going on in this financial war uh as the cobble uh uh that's controlling everything, the blood sucking pedophilic run um uh guys uh basically have run into a wall, a number of walls, and that's covered in some of our data, but I won't have the time to go into it today.
	Anyway, the transform transform transformative process of the Ukraine war is uh that part of it is um uh very much cross-connected back over to the uh dollar.
	And this is cross-connected.
	Uh, we're able to get a good read on the dollar here because of some other work I'm doing, which I'll discuss at the end of this uh IDIR report.
	Uh sorry about that.
	There will necessarily be uh interruptions here that I'm not even going to take the time to try and edit out.
	They're doing all kinds of uh road work and and uh large trucks rumbling by and attempting to destroy our property here.
	And I've got to go out and deal with that occasionally.
	In any event, so we have a crosslink back from the transformative process at its very initial uh stage.
	Um these are from our shorter term data, uh, which takes us out to the end of June.
	Most of the other data you understand trails off about mid-May or so.
	Uh the short term in this regard stands out fairly easily, but we don't have a lot of volume.
	Uh again, I'll discuss that in the new work here at the end of this IDIR report.
	Anyway, the crosslinks go and they terminate in a subset that drills down basically to the dollar through three or four different uh header sets.
	So we're coming at it from the Fed, we're coming at it from government, coming at it from a corporate view, all end up at the dollar that's that's crosslink back over to the transformative process uh begun in the world with the uh boots on the ground section of the Ukraine war.
	And um uh which is part of, as I say, the larger financial war.
	Anyway, it terminates here within the dollar in a very uh key subset that indicates a uh small error uh has very great consequences for the Federal Reserve.
	A very small error in some way is going to uh bring about uh dispersion of the Fed itself.
	I'm not noting if I don't know if the Fed's gonna end now.
	I actually think it ends up finally uh dissolving itself on an in a November month, but um in any event we have this uh small error that brings about a dispersion of assets or uh presumed assets in terms of the debt of the Fed.
	And so um as subsets of the dispersion, we find there's repetition of sets going to the idea that these guys just can't do anything correct anymore, that nothing they do works out from this particular point forward.
	The small error may have already happened, by the way, because it's so close to the beginning of the movement of model space.
	It's just that we may not really notice it now.
	And it'll magnify as it goes forward.
	In any event, what it what we end up with is a dispersion of the presumed assets, and I put mental quotes around the word assets that the Fed has because they have nothing except for debt that they've in essence decided to monetize by printing quote money behind it.
	We have a lot of uh poetic language about strong winds or uh sweep away strong winds create giant waves they can't overcome uh strong winds, um uh prevent sailing, uh basically a strong headwind kind of a thing.
	Uh all kinds of poetic language, which we always get, and that's a certain measure of that is uh used as an idea uh to give us an idea of how strong the archetype is relative to the strength of what's going on in the emotional indicators.
	And we have a very strong archetype, and we have a very strong subset of emotional indicators that are already over our 59, uh they're into the 59%, and this is not percentile, but 59% of the emotional uh response um range.
	And a staggering success for us was the uh Concordia that uh ocean liner that fell over, and it had a 35% uh correlation with the linguistics uh ahead of time.
	And it was a really good success.
	So here we are at 59, so I think we've we've got a real hit here pending.
	The uh question whether is when it manifests, it there should be a lot of activity on or around the solstice.
	But but prior to that is when the small error really starts building and then cross-links over into the transformative process in the in the Ukraine war.
	So that's why I'm saying the small error may already have occurred.
	They may have already created the situation that's going to later on just royally ream the Fed, leading to a dispersion of these presumed assets.
	Maybe they'll be forced to do, you know, uh some kind of staggering reappraisal revaluation of their assets, and they'll end up being uh seen as you know uh empty, hollow.
	We have all these kind of words, empty, hollow, uh expired, dead corpse, um uh all it just goes on and on and on and on.
	And uh basically uh about the paper tiger uh component of the Fed and how they're just have printed themselves into the point where they sit on a mountain of paper and no one wants the paper anymore.
	And we have these uh crosslink saying that when this dispersion occurs, which is by the way, uh as I said, we already have a 59% correlation, but when the dispersion occurs, that is heavily cross-linked back over to the beginning of the uh period of let's just say the great confusion or the grand confusion uh that's going to exist within the Anglo-American Western world.
	It's not limited to uh the United States of America, it's not it's not limited to these United States of America, it's not limited to the United States of America, the corporation formed in the late 1800s that's been a pain in the ass and ruling us ever since.
	It's not limited to North America, it's not limited to the Canadians, and it's not limited to the um uh United Kingdom and its commonwealth.
	It's all of those.
	The confusion is in all of the Anglo-American Empire, as the dollar takes this uh spike through the heart, as the vampires are finally uh uh put back into their grave.
	Now, in uh direct crosslinks from the uh dispersion subset of the dollar encountering the spike through the heart, go back over to the uh uh precious metals um control or suppression, which is crosslinked back all the way around over to the uh gold panic thing, which occurs later actually.
	Uh the underlying from our data set, it even though the panic buying at this sale creates a um an emotional wave that goes around the planet relative to precious metals and uh sets off a new price uh revaluation uh for gold um but also silver.
	Even though that's the case, the real uh underlying story is in the financial warfare going on over our heads at the moment, if you want to think about it metaphorically, and that uh within there we have a crosslink from the um end of the suppression.
	Oh, we have a cross-link that let me put it this way, where a cross link that I discovered within the um dollar hit and within the subset of the dispersion that's way up there within the primary supporting layer for the dispersion, and from that subset, if you look at that subset, you've got this crosslink that goes directly over to the uh silver suppression, and then actually into the gold and other precious metals.
	And um actually it's only really silver and gold.
	There's there's some kind of suppression on rhodium, why I don't know, but in any event, uh there's uh the silver suppression shows that it ends um with the dispersion that uh occurs with within the central bank structure as it encounters the magnifying problems of this small error that's in existence already,
	perhaps, or will will shortly be seen, that then runs smack into the problems that are going to be encountered in the financial war, from which we'll see a manifestation sometime around the solstice uh in June on the ground In Ukraine that is a manifestation actually of triumph.
	Okay, so in our in our descriptor set, the quote Ukraine ground boots on the ground sort of war is more of the uh kind of a parade one might see in the conquering of Paris or you know the the liberation of Rome or even way back when a more of a um returning of the you know Caesars from the foreign wars kind of thing.
	In the sense it's uh a lot of people welcome it, it's uh a joyous kind of a deal going on, and the victors are feeling pretty good about it.
	And so here's the thing.
	Uh our data sets show that when that is actually occurring, they in fact are victors already at a certain level within the financial war that gives them a very large boost up.
	And to those who have eyes to see, this is a clearly uh stabilizing new relationships within global power politics.
	So that all having been said, the silver suppression ends with this dispersion point of the of the uh Fed.
	Now there's no time connection within the subset or within the uh cross links that go from the dispersion back over to the uh silver suppression that that cracks.
	When the silver suppression cracks, the price just goes whoosh.
	I mean, the uh it's no longer like restrained energy, it's like energy let loose.
	Uh the subsets within the supporting uh chain for the end of the silver suppression include descriptors in the immediacy data that are springs let loose, um all different kinds of basically, you know, uh shooting to the moon rising really fast, uh all different kinds of language to that effect.
	Now and it's basically uh the overriding descriptor for that is energy so long restrained uh knows no bounds.
	So if you get into the poetic of it, I I like that part of it.
	Energy, you know, and uh knows no bounds, it's like hmm, you know, it gives you an appreciation for where it could go.
	Uh but nonetheless, of course, it is all relative to the dollar dying at that point.
	And uh what actually goes on is apparently this dispersion of assets uh uh ends up in a vaporization of the Fed or or vaporization of their assets, and um at that point, silver is taking off.
	This there's some indication to think that this might be before the June solstice.
	I say that because we have another subset, hang on.
	Um we have one uh the dispersion subset from the dollar is and that's different from the dispersion subset that's within the silver suppression.
	Each are individually held by those larger uh dominating sets, although they are cross-linked.
	Uh so the dispersion subset uh is the same uh primary descriptor or same descriptor, primary support and secondary support as we find in the silver suppression, but uh tertiary support and all those change uh from the silver suppression and the so it's not truly it's not a um uh an identical copy or anything like that.
	We do get those occurrences frequently.
	Uh, but there's a lot of uh cross links over to the from the primary and secondary levels in the dollar section over to the silver suppression.
	This is meaningful because it allows us to differ differentiate the dispersion within the silver suppression and how it will react as well as what its triggers might be.
	And we find that the dispersion subset within the silver suppression is actually focused on the suppression itself, and in other words, the language is indicating that the ability to suppress silver disperses into vapors when the assets of the suppressors are run into this headwind, uh all these strong winds sweeping through, cleaning things away, uh all of those that kind of language.
	When that occurs, then the effect is a literally a vaporization.
	Uh, and they'll say it's saying here within the subsets that it's uh instantaneous, uh takes no time at all, it's gonna be uh uh no no real barrier.
	So So basically, when the suppression goes, then the price lifts off in this restrained energy that did basically to the moon, Alice, kind of a thing.
	Anyway, so the small error within the dollar may or may not have already occurred, but we do have a very clear pointer here to the solstice in one, two, three, four major sets,
	all of which have uh crosslinks back over to the end of the silver suppression, as well as uh all of those sets having cross links back over to the uh dollar, and it looks like an before the end of June.
	Uh we also have uh other sets that are independent of the suppression set, but are nonetheless within the silver and precious metals collections that indicate that silver, independent of gold,
	uh both of which are moving, but in in each in their own uh movement, are cross-tied uh themselves back over to the transformative set of the Ukraine war manifesting uh before on or before the solstice.
	And um uh they also have a their own internal set, independent, no cross links, uh, directly held uh within the larger subset, their own set of energy too long restraint, uh basically going to the moon again.
	And these are uh all cross-linked back over to the transformative period within the Ukraine war, which as I say is the boots manifesting on the ground, but by then things have already occurred.
	The data sets are quite clear that that's a um an aftermath, not a prelude, not the main event, it's just the parade after the main event kind of a deal.
	Um, you know, the guy in the ring stomping around uh holding up the belt all sweaty and stuff.
	Only in this case, he's not so sweaty because he didn't have to do that much.
	Um because they're doing this thing on the background.
	Now we have all kinds of data sets for uh other activity.
	Let's see, we're running about 35 minutes here.
	Um, so we've got a bunch of notes here that go into the state of confusion that's going to exist as a result of these events uh on or before June 21 or the solstice.
	Um I guess we'll have to just table them for later.
	We just can't keep going.
	I've got too much activity going, and they're gonna shut our uh power down.
	Not that that's a big deal to me, but it means I've got to go and cross the turn on the generator and so forth.
	So um I don't think that there's anything within our other notes here.
	Okay, so anyway, we've got a uh lot of information relative to weather.
	None of it's gonna be good anywhere, basically.
	There's gonna be a few nice spots around the planet.
	Uh, but most of the language we're getting is for extreme weather all the way through spring into summer, including uh hailstorms, uh out-of-season um wind and uh rain uh conditions.
	Uh apparently there's gonna be another battering of the uh California coast all the way down into Baja, uh extra seasonal storms.
	Maybe we're looking at the Pineapple Express that we usually get up here in the Northwest, slipping further down there because our data sets for our weather are showing things that are more Mediterranean-like.
	Uh a little bit uh nicer than we usually see, although our our spring has just been terrible because we've been getting winter storms, and we're probably gonna get one in uh in the next day or next uh half day here.
	Uh these are uh horrific levels of rain that we don't usually get at this time of the year.
	In any event, the weather around the planet is also showing that we've got some uh atypical conditions developing in northern Africa that may go all the way up into the Middle East.
	The wind pattern appears to be from the viewpoint of the linguistics, the wind pattern appears to be more key than any of the trans transient manifestations like um uh tornadoes, dust storms, um water spouts, a lot of references to circular winds.
	Uh maybe we're gonna have a very nasty hurricane season.
	Uh if so, I would also expect to see some kind of like quasi-hurricane things in the region of the uh Red Sea in the Mediterranean.
	Uh very very again, very atypical weather as we go through uh the rest of the year, uh, but this is uh over the next two months or so based on short-term data.
	Okay, diaspora gold, silver, gold sell-off, uh, panic buy.
	I suspect that we'll see the panic um uh sale of gold uh sometime in uh mid to late June.
	There's just no telling when it's gonna actually go off because I don't have a it's an entirely um uh separate subset of details that's cross-connected back up into the gold uh subset, but without any indication as to timing, and within the Media C data, I can't really shift the model space so far as to be or widen it out so far as to be able to see when it occurred, when it got picked up in the data set.
	Okay, so we've got all of that.
	I think that that's it.
	Let's see.
	Um these are uh this is my little donation spiel.
	Uh, you know, if you got a few um uh satoshis, maybe you can kick them our way.
	Uh it costs us some money to do these weird ass things, even though you know it it even though it doesn't seem like it, it there's a lot of activity involved in this, and uh a lot of electricity, and my poor guy Igor, and uh he costs money and so on.
	Actually, we're trying to get his butt moved back uh out of uh fracked up um uh parts of the US over here to the coast.
	He's uh thinking of relocating to Oregon Coast.
	Okay, so uh we can use a few um satoshis or a few dollars if you want to throw them our way.
	That may be less of an issue as we go forward because uh this next section I wanted to talk about, which is this new development that we've come up with that I'm calling at the moment a potentiometer.
	I I don't really have a better label for it.
	What we have done is something I was presented with a unique um ability this year to track um data sets relative on a day-by-day by day basis on the uh short-term data,
	or excuse me, on the immediacy data and the sh and the short-term data of what little was coming in in a way that I have not in the past, and this is because I'd been doing reports and so on, but I was sort of hamstrung here by uh our having to move servers and all the stuff that's going on at my place here as well as at uh Igor's.
	And so I took the opportunity just to fill some time and do some experimentation to track language on a day-to-day basis.
	And it's been probably well, last time I did it, I think was 95 or 96, 1995 or 1996 when we were building up the when I was building up the lexicon before it really did that first run.
	Anyway, though, in doing so, I did it in a different way, and I've looked at the emotional components in a uh different fashion.
	And so I think what I've developed is a potentiometer.
	Now, here's what this here's how this relates.
	Um let's take a uh description of the situation.
	Uh let's say that there is a uh prediction within our data sets for an event, and we know from uh outside indicators that there's a very discrete uh definitive date for the event.
	So uh let's like the Super Bowl.
	Uh number of years back I predicted that the Super Bowl was gonna lose electricity, and indeed that Super Bowl did lose electricity.
	If I'd had the potentiometer at that particular time, I would have been able to predict the amount of certainty that the electricity would have popped off before the um event occurred.
	Um I would have been able to say, oh, there's a 68% or you know, a 50% or something like that likelihood that that this particular uh Super Bowl will lose electricity and it looks like it'll have this kind of an impact.
	Now, our potentiometer works by being able to track events that we know are discrete and separate and have a fixed occurrence date relative to language that builds up and swells around it and so on.
	So one could say um let's talk about something really arcane so that we don't get involved in the subject matter.
	Okay, so no one gives a rat's ass about um uh tennis anymore.
	And so we could say, for instance, that we're gonna bet on Wimbledon and who's gonna win in Wimbledon.
	And um uh we're gonna discuss that here relative to the potentiometer.
	If we knew if that we wanted to bet on Wimbledon and we have our potentiometer here, then I could run a uh data gathering focused on that in a deterministic fashion, some months out, and I could put could predict, okay, at that point the women uh the winners of Wimble Wimbledon in these particular categories will be the following individuals uh described by characteristics.
	They might may not show up as their names, but we would get things, you know, Hungarian born or you know, uh tall redhead, that kind of thing.
	Descriptors that would allow us within the relatively limited field involved in the Wimbledon to pick the winners, and then we could go and place our bets.
	Now what we need to note though is that we've discovered that the language changes over time.
	Now we've always known that language changes over time, but we've never been able to quantify it and qualify it.
	I've been able to do that in this uh condition over these past couple of months that uh I've been able to take a specific case and general and move it out and push it out into the general state of things, and we'll see how well it hangs together here.
	But the potentiometer would allow us to say, okay, three months out from Wimbledon, it looks like this red-headed guy's gonna win at this particular category.
	And then we do it again in at the end two months.
	Two months out, we find out, oh, look, you know, things are shifting around this red-headed guy.
	We don't know anything about who the redheaded guy is.
	We don't investigate him, we don't look at his uh track record.
	Uh we may find out who he is just because there's only one red-headed guy, you know, gonna be in this particular category of um uh playing, you know, uh left-handed um uh tennis in uh Wimbledon.
	And uh so we could find out who he is, but it's not pertinent to us because what we're doing is we're tracking the the emotional changes in the language over time leading up to this known fixed event.
	And so we could at that point go and hedge our bet two months out and say, hmm, looks like red-headed guy has dropped his emotional components by a third.
	So maybe he's not quite so certain.
	So maybe we'd better hedge that he and bet against him, and so on.
	That you know, he won wouldn't win.
	And so by the time we get down to uh, you know, one month out and then uh three weeks out and so on, we could do this run each and every time and watch the emotional componentry uh of this whole process change over time, and that's our potentiometer, because it clearly shows decreasing and increasing values and specific emotional components within this multi-dimensional array,
	I've got hooked all these words within the lexicon, shift over time to the point where we would be able to say with some certainty by the time we got down to the immediacy language, which is three days to 14 days.
	Oh, yeah, you know, redheaded guy, hey, he's got no chance at all.
	We've been tracking him for two two months now, and you know, that's not gonna happen for this guy, in spite of the fact that by that time he may be the crowd favorite.
	And so we would know to bet on Haughty Handwarmer, the the uh uh guy from you know Crackheadistan, who no one gave a damn about, and and this fellow's gonna uh uh with black hair is gonna win the um uh this particular category and redheaded guy we know at that point had had gone from a value of 846 down to 25 in his emotional components.
	So from our viewpoint, that would be relatively certain a predictor on something as wildly uncertain or as certain.
	I mean, I don't know in terms of tennis.
	I don't know how evenly matched and how predictive it is.
	I'm just using that as an example.
	Uh so uh you could apply it to anything relative to the potentiometer, anything that we can catch a uh uh level of uh deterministic hunt on.
	So this is a rather interesting bit of uh insight for us and will allow us over time, as we especially now, even as we're moving in towards the solstice, so we'll run a uh another uh set of data here fairly quick, and we'll point again now that we have a target to shoot for, which is the solstice, we know it's going to occur.
	Then we'll we'll do another little bit of a twist and see if we can't use this potentiometer to track certain data sets to see how likely some of these things are to occur and see whether those individual things shift between now and um the uh solstice, and at what point we would say, okay, it's continuing to trend this way and it's gro gaining, or in fact the interpretation has shifted because we've dropped these two key um emotional indicators, blah, blah, blah.
	We just don't know uh how it's gonna play out.
	But we do have a potentiometer now that has got a uh two serious levels of track record underneath it, and it's given us a new insight as to how the language shifts ahead of the actual manifestation in reality.
	I've done some noodling and thinking uh mainly on this Saturday, paddling my uh four shoulders off uh all over the the bay out here, but I was been thinking about the cross correlation between events, time, templates, and our data sets that um uh may provide some insight, more insight as we go along.
	But this is going to be a very interesting and unique period, especially if any of the data that we're getting as the uh longer and shorter term is true, then it would tend to indicate sometime before the solstice and 21st, uh we're gonna see this manifestation of the um breakout of the boots on the ground kind of component in the sense of the Ukraine war,
	and by that time the uh financial war will have gone through one battle that would have had the uh uh Kabbalistic pedophilic uh bastards in the West losing, and that the as a subset of that, the Fed is going to have made a small error that's gonna come and ream them seriously, uh leading to uh an investigation and a dispersion of their assets, which in turn leads to a dispersion of their ability to control the precious metals market.
	And that's pretty much how it would lay out.
	And so the indication is that you know, by some time in summer the suppression of the of the precious metals market should be over uh within summer itself, not necessarily on on the day of the solstice, although the process because I don't know how long the process of that suppression is uh ending is going to take.
	Is it a week long, one day, even though the vape it all vaporizes instantly in terms of the assets for the Fed and the suppression vaporizes and these things take off, I don't know how long it would be before uh we're gonna see that in terms of um uh uh the prices shooting up.
	So, but I but it does suggest that this is gonna be in summer.
	And that I guess is a recap here.
	I don't have any more notes on that.
	Okay, so that's the end of this particular uh independent uh immediacy data intelligence report.
	Let's hope there's some intelligence in it.
	Certainly is a lot of immediacy data, and we've gotten uh uh fair number of um uh uh recent hits on the immediacy data, so there's no reason to suppose that this uh set is any uh less um accurate available.
	If this is the case, it ought to be a good summer for the precious metals bugs.
	And basically, um I guess that's it, guys.
	The new track here on the potentiometer, we've already got some people interested in applying that to their technology.
	I just happened to be discussing it with a competitor, and uh they were quite intrigued with this idea.
	And so we may um may be able to end some of our uh financial problems here by going that route.
	Uh, but in any event, we'll for sure keep on with the immediacy data reports here through to uh we can get them all for sure um uh through the next month through May.
	I'm I'm certain we can do that.
	Uh beyond that, it becomes a little bit um fragile, and we'll just see how it all uh lays out.
	But um nonetheless, the potentiometer has some uh some potential behind it.

▲