All Episodes
Previous Next
March 7, 2014 - Clif High
47:24
20140307 – Clif High Audio #25
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good afternoon.
It's um March 7th, 2014.
216 p.m. Pacific Coast Time, North America.
I'm located in Olympia, Washington, 47.22 North.
Uh degrees latitude.
Definitely the rainy spot of the United States at the moment.
We've just been uh come out of a very large rainstorm.
Uh we have a few minutes of a little bit of blue sky amidst uh chemtrails.
But um the numbers are quite staggering in terms of even of our normal rain.
Um we had a drought until uh 2014 and then started catching up rapidly and in and exceeding things in January.
Our February numbers, for instance, usually February being a short month, we um we get about 5.3 inches here in our little uh microclimate here in uh Olympia, Washington.
And so this February we got the 11.24 inches, so uh a little over twice.
And then um uh our March totals we've already exceeded in the first seven days by an inch and a half.
Uh one point there the stuff was coming down at the rate of uh one and a third inches per hour uh in st whenever when we had the steady rain.
And then some of the squalls would bring us um uh what I imagine these lakes are like, it would bring us uh rain coming down so fast that our rain gauge could not accurately measure it because of its um the dynamics of how it was designed.
It was overflowing faster than it could um uh drain out and and calculate.
No not really good situation.
Well, we've been um quote dry in the sense of no no active rain coming down for a number of hours for since um I was saying maybe um midnight last night, one o'clock, something like that.
So uh a good 12 uh 14 hours at this point.
And uh we still have standing water everywhere.
Uh this is remarkable in our particular area because uh we live on uh thin layer of top sail soil that's over glacial fill, uh interspersed with clay in our local geology.
So it drains rapidly.
Once the water gets through this thin layer of topsoil, it just hits this gravel and it goes.
Um basically right out to Puget Sound.
But there's so much coming through now that all those those natural channels are full, we're we've got flooding everywhere, uh the rivers are running brown from all the um uh sand and soil mixed in uh coming down out of the hills, and there's debris like mad out in the sound.
Which brings up another issue, you know.
The watch out boaters if you're gonna be out and about.
This is gonna be a general trend in the future is more and more debris to uh run into.
One of the reasons I engineered the bows on our proa the way I did with this particular kind of a shoe and a um uh sacrifice uh um northwest prowl kind of a thing, just in case we run into big trees in the at night or or something along those lines.
Uh you can't really see them.
I've done that had this happen before.
I mean, every not every time, but let's say uh uh two out of seven times that we go out, we you know you end up running into something.
Uh usually it's submerged, it's an old log, it's you know, half floating, um, mostly rotten, that kind of thing.
Sometimes it's fresh wood though.
And uh occasionally, I mean uh thinking of this really nasty incident um about 18 or 20 years ago when uh we were out in the night and um uh beautiful uh starry night but no moon.
And um the shorelights were uh up.
There were no uh low shore lights, so we had no background illumination, ran into a damn tree.
It wasn't just any tree, there'd been a big storm like we have now.
And uh the tree had washed down from I don't know where, it was old growth, and it had um oh, probably 30 foot branches and maybe uh 25 and 30 foot uh roots sticking out of the root mass.
Uh I forget now which we impacted first.
It wasn't my boat.
I was out with um this other guy in his boat, actually helping him helping him bring it back.
It had broken down, but in any event, uh it um we smacked into this big tree.
Uh probably 280 plus feet uh long.
Old growth.
Um then washed down from somewhere.
A lot of the the bark was real pulpy and it didn't hurt the fiberglass of the boat when we hit it, but then we got all entangled in the roots or the um or the branches first.
I say first, because since we we'd no sooner gotten loose from one than the currents whooped us around and we went uh uh stern over stem right into the other and ended up spending like five hours trying to cut our way out of these uh and we couldn't really see.
We didn't know what the hell it was that had grabbed us at first.
Took us some time to discover, oh, it's an old growth cedar, you know, a vast quantity of um uh feeder roots sticking out and branches all the hell and gone.
But that was not as bad as the time my dad hit a um dead whale off of the Columbia uh bar in the middle of the night.
Uh that was probably 40 years ago.
His stunk.
Mine didn't, uh so there was no permanent damage to the boat.
Anyway, though, um I don't know why the hell I got up on that.
Oh, yeah, the rain.
Uh the rain's been pretty good for us uh for the um for the moment simply because it's washing away all the radiation.
We will have a high click count, one of these storms will come through, and we're good, it's clean.
I mean, a very low um click count.
Anything that's like residual gets washed away in the main.
I was very concerned there through October, November, and December, as we had uh exceptional for us exceptionally dry period of time, and there was clearly a build-up of um clickable material on the soils and um the roof and this kind of a deal.
Uh not a good situation with the the Fukushima radiation.
So we're quite quite pleased to see the rain.
Looks like we're into a very uh definitive rainy pattern.
Um this pattern is likely for uh from our data sets to continue to oscillate, and uh it's part of the pattern that is producing these very large storms on the east coast, um, and also the storms on the west coast of Europe.
The the new it may indeed be part of a new pattern that may persist for a number of years, but we actually have some reason to think that this pattern will uh be disrupted or break sometime in uh August, uh maybe September of this year.
Uh not that the pattern that will replace it will be any better uh for us in in terms of how it the impact on us individually from the climate.
Uh at that point we expect uh a number of rather severe uh out-of-season storms.
So, in other words, um in some parts of the planet, the the data is suggesting that in August, primarily in the northern hemisphere, uh we'll get um uh winter-like storms uh in the midst of what should be summer.
And this will be very disconcerting for everybody, especially as it appears that we'll just sort of jump right over fall in some areas and go into this really nasty uh cold state.
This is part of the oscillation into the um ice age uh that we're gonna experience.
I don't know if this will persist.
Uh that's what we're waiting for, is the what we should call the day of persistence.
And a day of persistence is when or it'll be a month really, um, when it snows in say uh June, July, or August, and it doesn't melt.
And there's no further melting of that, and by the time we roll around into the next summer, uh that persistence will have been the pattern, and it will have basically been snowy and um start forming glaciers over the course of that year.
Now, an interesting thing about a lot of these uh particular kinds of events, um a lot of things in nature happen in a particular rhythm.
The rhythm can be expanded, it can be stretched out, um, it can be compressed, and uh as you compress the amplitude the frequency, the amplitude grows.
And so uh just as with radio waves and so on.
So, in in nature, what we get is uh we sometimes get these patterns, in fact, invariably really, that um it can be expressed uh from our view viewpoint in distant history as being able to say that 11,000
years ago an ice age began, and it took uh say um years for it to progress and mature uh to the point where there was essentially um no after effect.
We've lived in that 1,000 years of the the if you will, the valley uh of this particular cycle.
This this uh unique warming period.
Now, if we go back to the beginning of the ice age from which we are now um uh losing our um neutrality, so to speak, and starting to go back into an ice age, good.
Uh we don't want the the go into a heat wave and end up like Venus.
We need to get frozen again and purify the oceans and such.
But 11,000 years ago when the ice age or 13,000, uh whatever number is uh you know resonates with you.
When that ice age began, um it's safe to say that the seed or the beginning uh of that ice age can be traced back in the following kind of a statement about that pattern.
That even though the whole pattern cycle, that whole top uh peak of the wave down to the bottom um uh valley, but bottom of the trough was a thousand years, and we call that say an uh half cycle in an ice age,
then um, or excuse me, was uh was 13,000 years, uh and we call that a half cycle in the actually the great year, and but also a half cycle in one of these little ice age um um patterns, then uh most of the activity of that ice age came about in the first year.
90% of all of the glacier building that later on uh accumulated to huge mass occurred within a single year, the beginning year.
And um of the seed material for the glacier, uh 90% of that occurred in a single month.
And so really it's a situation of where we can say that the ice age begins in you know, the particular month of persistence, and that's this seed month where we get this uh snow uh that begins, continues for you know some period of time, and then stays, and it starts this chill effect, and from that point on we get a glaciation in that particular area.
We had such a thing occur uh at the time that the um you know the guy they found uh frozen in the um uh on the border between Italy and Switzerland, the caveman fellow.
Uh during his age, there was a glaciation period that began in um South America, and that was when the seeds of many of the glaciers that are now disappearing were initially planted.
And we can look from the ice cores on them that a lot of that activity that began that that glacier all occurred within this more or less single lunar month, about 28 days.
And from then on it packs on and you get more and more and more.
But it's not as though you uh you enter into an ice age where, for instance, um you might think of it as well, winter just becomes longer, and instead of getting into spring in March, maybe you have uh winter out until uh you know May or so, and then a regular summer.
And then the next year the winter gets out into a little bit into June, and then then and you get regular summer from that point on.
It doesn't work in that sort of a pattern.
There's truly an oscillation between hot and cold, and then you get caught in one of the two cycles uh regionally, and there will be different uh examples of this all over the planet.
Most of the northern hemisphere is for the ice age, you'll get caught into the cold.
Uh some areas of the southern hemisphere as well.
There will be equatorial bands and tropical bands that will be stuck in um in sort of a heat vortex, the opposite, because there won't be the heat flow that normally goes to the poles that starts all this uh convection current kind of stuff.
Instead, we'll see an outpouring of the uh fractured polar uh magnetic polar um uh magnetic pole, which will cause numerous polar vortex vortices to form.
These may be widely scattered.
Uh there may be thousands of miles in separation between them.
We may end up with a North Pole in northern Scotland and one in uh Canada and yet another in uh Siberia, all of which are sucking down vast areas of cold and creating their own uh miniature Arctic environment.
Um the same thing may occur in the South Pole, and in some of these cases, these poles may fracture and be off by several thousands of miles from what we might think of as the as a usual resting place for these magnetic fields.
And so that may be the bulge in Brazil, might end up being a cluster of South Poles, and so we may end up with part of um uh you know now tropical regions suddenly becoming um uh uh near Arctic or Antarctic conditions.
Uh this this oscillation, this pattern has been clearly evident, developing since about the 1940s.
Depending on how you look at the um material the the uh science that we used to have, you can't trust anything coming out of government anymore.
So all of our if you're reading anything in terms of modern last 10-15 years, 30 maybe even data sources out of government, you're going to be fooled into various different conclusions that are not accurate because all these numbers are politicized and reported from a state's viewpoint, and you don't need that.
You need to look at it from the planet's viewpoint.
In any event, so here we are walking our way um more or less uh certainly although indeterminately into this new ice age.
We just don't know when it's going to occur, but it certainly will.
We're also at the end of a 100,000 year cycle by 8,000 years, so we're 8,000 years overdue for one of these very long-term ice ages.
Based on where our orbit is, uh, you know, a presumed orbit on a uh heliocentric model.
In any event, though, so um we've got that.
Now we're getting yet more proof of um uh expanding planet model here, which is part of our ice age and part of the fracturing of the magnetic poles.
As the planet expands, by the way, you see that the internal magnet inside is also gone wonky as all this plasma is pouring in from these high energy particles from the sun that go right through us through the the core right into the core of the planet where they get trapped in this um uh what well plasma reaction,
which is like one stage beyond a nuclear reactor, in terms of intensity and so forth, and these high energy particles get trapped in there, they add more energy, it grows, it's got a it produces matter, makes the inner core grow, which ruptures the outer mantle, and we get all kinds of things from sinkholes, volcanoes, and so on.
But at the same time, this growth pattern within the plasma, which is what generates our magnetic field.
Uh there is no ball of lead down there or ball of iron rotating, it's a plasma uh source for the magnet uh for the magnetic field.
Um as the high energy particles come on roaring on in and the plasma gets disrupted, the magnetic field does as it is um uh wont to do, it becomes uh unquiet, uh reduces itself as the planet expands because everything's like separated.
There's like areas of insulation and disruption that didn't used to exist, and it uh goes uh a little wonky, so it produces multiple north poles, multiple south poles, etc.
These show up in our magnetic um uh surface uh fields, and we experience them.
They're generated by the plasma as a result of all of these things uh concurrently, and one of the things is the that the planet itself is actually expanding from the input of new material way deep inside.
Uh, we know this from any number of different um metrics, but yet we've got another one, which is there's a big huge crack in a dam along the Columbia River with all kinds of nasty noises coming out of it.
And this crack is probably not a good thing.
The dam is um uh upstream of Hanford, if it lets go, Hanford is at risk.
Hanford is a giant nuclear hellhole that would wash all this nuclear hell hole down theoretically past uh Washugal and Portland.
Um Portland would be a big jam-up for it.
Uh if there was any kind of debris to speak of, there's also downstream dams that would suffer.
Uh so it'd be a big huge mess if this if this thing goes.
Uh, we're not particularly in any risk here at the moment uh that I'm aware of from this, because we're so far north of the event that even if it becomes um you know a plutonium radioactive nightmare from that point onward, uh, we're still at a uh considerable distance, um 120 miles uh north of uh the Columbia at that point.
So I'm not personally at risk.
Uh thanks for asking, guys.
I've had a number of people inquire.
But um uh the whole region is at risk, and yet another pollution source for the Pacific would not be good in terms of this radioactive crap.
Uh so we should all hope that they figure out what the hell they're doing and uh fix this dam or drain it.
Okay, so there was that.
And let's see.
Let's go back to oscillations real quick and some of our data and the silver and the gold and stuff.
We have a chart that shows Bitcoin progress from way back when.
Maybe 2011 when it first topped over a dollar.
And that chart was what I used that chart and shifted it about so it was accurate in its alignment with days and times in model space.
Such that the beginning of the chart aligned over model space as it should.
And we had a projection that we would have Bitcoin prices at $34.05 when silver and gold were free of manipulation and began on their own.
To seek and discover price.
And this was a period that's going to exist everywhere as we get into what we might call the grand price discovery.
As a result of the collapse of or trashing of or ignoring of I don't know what the occurrence is.
is all government numbers relating to anything economic nobody believes it anymore it's a subset of the hyperinflation stuff that goes on uh so anyway I had taken that chart and progressed it in uh the the Bitcoin chart and or you know progressed it uh measured it against model space and it looked like we would come out with 3405 sometime in January through February.
Uh now what occurred was that we ended up with the Mount Gox debacle and we had yet another crash.
All the Bitcoin crashes by the way can be put to Mount Gox uh temporally so they're probably causally related to Mount Gox as well.
But in any event we had this uh Mount Gox debacle with um a beginning and uh so Bitcoin um uh prices uh were just blown out of that particular pattern that we'd been using.
Nonetheless, the linguistics showed that in the second week in January, we started picking up all these linguistics about the end of the Fed.
And that was when the London Fixed became a known, talked about activity of all the big banksters.
And it just goes on and on and on in terms of the amount of information coming out about gold and silver manipulation.
So linguistically, it was accurate, which is to say the underlying model space.
but when I did my matchup to the uh Bitcoin chart I screwed it up I wasn't prepared for the outlier which was that Mount Gox would come on in.
had Mt.
Gox held steady in their previous pattern, we would probably hit something like $34.05, about the time in February when that stuff, the linguistics really took off.
Now, we still have linguistic price descriptors that go to nearly the same number for Bitcoin.
We don't have a date of occurrence, though.
We have the period of time from which those descriptors are examined in the media.
So, in other words, I've got a numeral representation as text for a number over $3,000, referencing a price per Bitcoin in U.S. dollars that will show up in the more or less mainstream media, as this particular occurrence is discussed.
This appears to begin or show up in publication at some point in April.
now because it was short-term data that uh holds this particular forecast we have a uh three-week window in which that particular thing may or may not uh show up I mean which it should show up and it may not uh our issue is there's uh also a three-week um uh error rate in in the um short-term data but in any event uh the initial uh data sets would suggest that there's this discussion about a $3,000
Bitcoin price that will be in the media and it should be here let's just say by this time by the 21st or so of April sometime in that time frame April 20th you know 420 or onward and in the
initial data initial time I plugged the chart against that I'd already had that 3405 and in when the chart was pressed against the model space from initial
uh points of attachment it appeared that it would come earlier in the year so it was somewhat confusing we still have this um issue of a discussion of it though so the occurrence is probably on track and it'll probably occur over the next uh 30 plus days as we get into this next little debacle uh which brings us up um into the silver and gold thing.
Now, here's the thing about um uh the silver and gold relative to what the data says.
As the data was describing this period in which silver and gold become untethered from their manipulators, it's also in essence it also is explicitly describing a the end of a period, which might be a week, it might be two weeks, maybe three.
Uh I really wouldn't think it would last three weeks, and if in two two weeks might even be a stretch.
But what causes the breakup or of the um manipulation scheme is a um uh if you will, a pressing of the uh objectives of the oppressors onto gold and silver in an extreme fashion as they are reacting to uh the events that occur, and as the pressure on gold and silver uh exerts itself.
Rather confusing, but basically, here's what here's what I'm describing.
Describing a situation where uh the data suggests that um there might be pressure upward on gold in the amount of say $15.
And so in a particular day, it should rise $15.
And so the powers that be freak out and they push it down $16.
The next time it rises, uh next time uh, or when they let up on the pressing, so to speak, the data shows that it will bounce back not only the $16 press down, but maybe an additional three, four, five or six dollars on top of that.
And so you would get into a position where all of a sudden, rather strikingly, gold went up twenty plus dollars in a day, and then they would push it down those twenty plus dollars and one or two dollars more.
And this pattern would repeat itself with the oscillations always increasing on the peak or on the point towards uh increased uh price.
And so they would be able to press it down, and they've got to really exert it, and they're trying each time to wipe out 100% of its gains up and then reduce it by a dollar.
And I'm just picking this, it might be 22 cents or whatever, they've got some target there that they want to reduce it, all the gains plus this little tiny amount.
The effect of all of this relative to the to the data set is that as it gets to a certain point here, and I can't speak to that at the moment.
Uh we're I'll get into that in a second, but um uh we're gonna get to a point here where it will press up on a gold pressure, will put up, you know, twenty dollars, they'll push down twenty, it'll go up thirty, they'll push down thirty-one.
Um it'll go up uh forty-one, and all of a sudden the the oscillations will start really gaining the attention uh of the investment uh market, and then everybody else in short order, such that we see this period where we might get a hundred dollar oscillation, hundred dollars up in one day, and a hundred dollars down in the same day, uh hundred and one dollars down in the same day, and then uh the very next day it'll go up um you know 105 dollars.
And it and the point that is described in the data, there's sort of like a hesitation because all of a sudden there's no push down, and so tentatively it goes up another ten dollars, and then tentatively another thirty dollars, and then by the end of the day, it might be up two or three or four or five hundred dollars by the time that we get to the end of that particular uh trading day within, and we're looking at New York and London markets, uh, which I'm not sure in terms of time frame.
Um, but probably New York.
But doesn't really matter.
The the impact is going to be I know gold trades 24 hours a day.
That isn't the impact, uh, that isn't the point.
The point is that there will be a definitive market like New York market or London market, and I don't think it'll London, but in any event, in which we'll get this effect where there's just sort of like a little hesitation at the at the as they pass the previous day's peak, and then off it goes, with these little hesitations in between because everybody's waiting for the pushdown, and all of a sudden it doesn't come.
And that'll also happen with silver.
Uh within that same part of the data set, we have um uh language that indicates that I'm gonna just be seriously uh under characterizing the price of silver when I said it would go to six hundred dollars an ounce.
So we have language suggesting silver at a thousand an ounce, we have language suggesting silver at twelve hundred dollars an ounce.
Um this is not necessarily in a market near you.
Okay, so this is the issue here.
As we get into this period of time, uh there's gonna be all of this chaos going on socially, politically, globally, and there will be chaotic markets everywhere.
So the data is describing things where very much like um uh previous centuries in which there were major social um migration pattern changes in terms of people moving and and nation states moving, like say um the Franco-Prussian war.
Uh, some of these particular periods in which the the populace was shifted around willy-nilly, there was a uh tendency for there to be uh a wide discrepancy between in commodity prices uh based on where you were locally, because there was uh effectively all inner uh empire communication was controlled by the military at that point and had been broken down relative to the civilian population.
So you might ask for you know twelve hundred dollars an ounce for gold in your area simply because you're ignorant that it was going at uh you know 5,000 an ounce uh 40 miles down the road.
And and that's the kind of situation we're gonna end up with globally relative to markets in which one might uh expect to be able to buy or sell gold and silver.
Okay, now there's the other component to this.
At the same time that all this is going on, we have a uh chaotic uh global uh climate environment, a number of uh the or a large percentage of the population in denial of the impact on it uh of this on their lives in the future, but uh larger awakening population very much aware of this and starting to act very jittery.
And so we get a situation in which uh the data is describing twelve hundred dollars uh an ounce for silver in one location, and uh third of that somewhere else, uh depending on local conditions, and also is reporting that we won't have anything close to the idea of anything of a of a functioning market structure uh across the continents.
So it means that you know you may have an effective market on the east coast for gold and silver that's somehow separated electronically, physically by weather uh or adverse conditions from central US.
And that central US market again might be separated by electronically, adverse conditions, who knows, from the Western market.
So there might end up being three separate market uh bases, if you will, within the continental US, and those might even be further subdivided based on even uh more locally fracturing conditions as we go forward.
So just because I say they're gonna be $1,200 silver, do not rejoice because it may be that that $1,200 silver price is 5,000 miles away from you, and you have no way of getting your silver there to take advantage of that price.
So the situation is not uh cannot be construed as having anything close to our normal social infrastructure as we go on into these periods of the hyperinflation.
Hyperinflation is going to change everything in and of itself, the just in time supply system is going to be negatively impacted by uh the global cost structures, the issues with uh obtaining uh oil, gas, etc., as well as the um uh degrading uh climate environment and other uh man-made uh disasters that will result from the um degrading climate environment.
So, in essence, we have a man-made disaster here with the dam uh happening in slow motion.
If it breaks, you know, it causes a huge level of catastrophe and downstream damage, and if the dam hadn't existed, uh the issue would not exist.
So it's not as though we're causing it, but we cause the conditions that uh result in the uh net effect.
These things will also include nuke plants that are going to be negatively impacted by climate.
So we have stuff in the data that suggests that rivers in the southeast may get so little rain at one point that the ability to pump water out of the rivers and cool nuclear reactors is jeopardized to the point where in some extreme cases, convoys of water trucks are seen hauling ass to move water in there to cool the things.
So it gets rather challenging over these next few years.
okay so uh uh that was the part about the silver and gold the oscillation the peaking on it uh April's gonna be the beginning of a lot of this stuff there's also another uh temporal echo in um uh late September that goes through late September and through October.
That may be like the 29 crash, and this may be the 1928 crash, although really the crash we're going to get now, I think, replicates more 1914 and the economic pressures that began problems that led to the War of 1812.
I think we've got this echo going on in the early part of the centuries with century definitions, you know, how the century is defined.
So anyway, so here's the thing about the silver and the gold prices relative to Bitcoin.
At the moment, Bitcoin is like gold but unsuppressed.
They can't suppress the price.
They're trying to suppress the mindset that deals with the price and everybody who might be attracted to it, but they can't really suppress Bitcoin itself.
You know, you can't get in and cause the value to go lower or anything.
Okay, so the impact of a lot of the social unrest that we're seeing especially as regard to the brouhaha around Ukraine is going to end up, as far as our data is concerned from the previous run, is pointing to the beginning of this hyperinflation period, which is going to hit us in April.
Now, we didn't know at the time we did the run with the data stretching back into October and November.
This was to produce the report that was shipped out in January that the hyperinflation would start as a result of a Ukraine invasion.
We knew there were going to be shocks to the system.
We knew that the Kabbalistic empire that controls Western, what we call Western civilization, would be getting huge shocks that would send it reeling and begin the hyperinflation.
Now it appears that what will occur is the unleashing of an asymmetric financial war upon the U.S. as a result of the U.S. basically bluffing against Russia.
And Russia and China will start their asymmetric warfare against the dollar.
And that will induce a planetary dishorning of the dollar, and that leads to the repatriation of the dollar to the U.S. That leads to the decision of the Federal Reserve later to try and cull digi-dollars.
That is to say, they'll try and take it out as it comes in, but they end up screwing over a lot of people that will take it very badly.
This is concurrent with a rise in the language that questions whether we need the Fed and its existence, whether it should be replaced, and so on.
So that will occur, as I say, we'll have those things in place by the third week in April.
They may start in on the first week in April and may even begin this month in March, but they will be in place in all these elements by the um third week in April and that's when we can start looking for our hyperinflation now you won't see $600 silver in a single day you may see you know 400 you may see a hundred dollar silver and then have it crash back to 20.
The oscillations are going to be extremely severe as we go forward.
It will be that's the severity alone that will draw attention to it they'll have to comment on it in the um mainstream media and that particular commenting is part of the temporal marker series that we're looking for for particular actions to occur.
When those actions occur it basically means that the suppression of um it fundamentally means that the suppression of gold and silver is gone that they just can't do it anymore.
And as I say we get that period of time where it just goes up and then tentatively goes up much further and much further and there's no pushback.
And then the next uh period time that market opens uh you're looking at full blown chaos and uh you know politicians uh shitting bricks and you know sweat and blood and their eyeballs bulging out, you know, their ears wanting to twist around on their own and all of this kind of thing.
For the male politicians and the male banksters, you know, their uh their penises are going to shrivel up and try and crawl back up inside them.
It's going to be that severe.
These guys are going to be that afraid of the consequences once this thing begins relative to the hyperinflation.
And now I actually do suspect that the um West will force uh Russia to do simply as Putin says, you know, react asymmetrically and take the dollar out.
But at the same time they do that, I expect a very large release of uh damaging information against all kinds of um civil servants, um celebrities in the US and all, you know, uh like media celebrities and um Hollywood guys and uh anybody with a certain level of profile and a certain um uh cachet,
if you will, uh, will have find that there'll be all kinds of uh legitimate, you know, honest uh honest, but real uh dirt uh leaked out about them.
And this will compound the situation relative to the um uh politician shit and brick and and you know, and uh sweat and blood and their eyeballs uh bulging out and their ears turning.
Um because it they'll they'll be hamstrung by having to deal not only with a huge uh monetary crisis of which they have no concept, nor of its scope, nor its ramifications, nor its um nature.
Uh and at the same time that that's going on, they'll be um uh embroiled in their own individual uh horrors of uh all of their past uh dirty deeds coming out.
So uh it's gonna put things in a chaotic state that um, you know, um uh uh Sun Su would have uh been proud of.
Um his art of war, you know, never attack your uh enemy the way uh where they're strongest.
Uh you know, look and see what what really holds them uh, you know, where they're where their nads are held, and then go for that.
And we've got a situation where I think that's going to be um done this year, uh shortly, and uh it'll be at the level of the dollar, which of course, you know, is going to influence things like the price of Bitcoin and the price of um uh gold and silver and everything, property and and all this kind of stuff.
Um I guess that's it.
I've got uh I've been doing a lot of sourdough baking.
I've got to deal with uh a couple of sourdough loaves I've got here.
Uh reason is I'm getting away from this recent experiment that we call uh commercial yeast.
Uh turns out it's failed experiment.
I think it's the yeast and the interaction with the wheat that causes the problem, uh, GMOs aside, not uh the wheat itself.
Uh we were dealing with basically all different this same strain of wheat for or nearly the same strains of wheat uh for a number of generations prior to the introduction of uh commercial yeast.
And we used uh sourdoughs for leavening, and they have an entirely different uh set of properties than commercial yeasts do.
The bread's better, etc.
Anyway, for um just for the palate for the tongue, um, much more rich and varied and flavorful, but they release more minerals, they alter the nature of the proteins, they get rid of the uh phytase and other uh um stomach annoying chemicals uh that that wheat has.
Uh it's uh if you want to think about it this way, um uh the bees uh pre-digest uh with the introduction of uh beneficial uh bactofloras, uh the sugars, and we call it and put them into a repository that we call honey.
And so for us, honey is a pre-digested form of sugar, as uh yogurt is a predigested form of uh milk.
And so uh sourdough breads are a pre-digested form of wheat.
And it's uh probiotically digested, it's uh really good for you in any number of ways.
Just go look up the nutritional component of it.
But it's really tricky stuff to bake.
You know, you have longer raise times, uh, 10 and 12 hours.
In the case of a 100% rye bread, if you're gonna follow some of these Swiss recipes, it's incredibly light rye bread.
I mean, it's the the best damn rye bread on the planet, probably.
I don't know many others, perhaps maybe uh some of these really cool Russian ryes.
But anyway, the sourdough uh rye bread uh takes two weeks to raise.
You know, it ferments for two weeks.
So it's hugely uh digested, very light, very fluffy, not like your your usual deli ries.
Um anyway, though, the sourdough is um intriguing.
It's something we need to look at, especially in a high radiation environment.
I think we need to get back to uh more sustaining and um uh supportive kind of um uh lifestyle um elements uh and less of the uh commercial uh recent inventions, like as I say, cake dece or commercial yeast, which is a single strain.
Um anyway, so it's quite fascinating to deal with the sourdoughs and the many things, and you end up with all kinds of cool things to eat, sourdough breads, pancakes, etc.
And it's of course quite sustainable, and you needn't involve yourself with the yeast, and then you get the health benefits out of it.
And it may also, because of the nature of the um uh components that come along with it, the minerals, the broken down kinds of proteins, and so on.
Uh, there's some suggestion that sourdough may be uh slightly good for you if you're uh in a high radiation environment in other ways in terms of helping to eliminate the radiation.
But it's not like you can rely on sourdough bread to you know exp expunge the stuff from your system.
It's just that coincidentally, like oats, they have a tendency to help strip the colon of material and that kind of thing.
So, anyway, it's um uh really good.
And I've got uh got that, I've got to get a um uh Vitamax chocolate pine here real quick.
And then all the other chores.
Uh, we're about ready to begin our um round square feet adventure here at Half Past Human.
Uh we're decided to well, we have to relocate, there's just uh no question about it.
Um too many issues to go into, but this decision is irrevocable.
We think we've found a chunk of property.
It is like raw land, and I've got a whole lot of work involved there.
But we're gonna see if um Cale and I can't set up some cameras and capture some of this stuff as um uh videos as we push forward with it.
And uh the housing market is just hugely confused here in the in the Northwest.
Uh uh go into the details some other times, but valuations from the county are all over the place because they don't know whether what's up and what's down.
You know, if they listen to the federal government or the mainstream media, you've got recovery.
But every single sale seems to be bringing in prices lower than the ones before.
And so you don't have recovery.
And so the their taxation policies are just all over the map in terms of what the assessed value actually uh what they think it is, uh, which adds yet another element to the uh to this whole thing.
Actually, this is not the time uh to buy property.
Uh if I had my um uh druthers, as we used to say, uh drrother that we um uh bought property later this year after the housing uh market fully crashes with the hyperinflation and the uh dollar going 100% bluey.
Um we're just not in the luxury of being able to wait.
Uh we just don't have that uh capacity.
So uh, you know, universe uh moves as it chooses.
So I've got to deal with some people that think that their property really is worth that kind of money.
They don't they uh encountered reality quite yet.
So who knows how it's gonna go there, but uh we've got everything staged.
Uh you know, we've got both yurts here.
I ended up not selling that one because of the conditions that ended up existing here at the time.
And uh Kathy's uh okay with the uh workload that's gonna be forced on us and the um uh uh austerity and all the other conditions that we'll have to undergo uh to make this happen.
And so we're we're bound and determined to go with the round square feet plan, uh the large deck.
We're gonna alter the deck to have uh if we can get this chunk of property that I'm I'm um talking to some people about tomorrow.
Uh we'll alter the deck to include a hemispherical approach so that we have a better view.
And it will be suitable for some of the other stuff that we want to do uh under the heading of 10x labs.
We'll set up a couple of webcams for um naturists, and then we're gonna set up some uh uh experiments uh that uh people can uh tune into, so to speak, as well as other fun stuff.
Trying to figure out a way at the moment of uh funding um a rather interesting proposal and project that has no benefit to anybody except for the very few people involved.
And so I'm sort of noodling around on ideas with that.
Um at the same time, uh it's uh not a necessary precursor, but we'll be able to do some uh testing work if we do this project that would put us ahead when it comes to devising the molds for the hard yurt.
We've got one of the molds done for the sides of the 30-foot dungeoness hard shell yurt.
But we are ending up still having to engineer this very complex mold for the top piece.
And I wanted to stop as long as we're relocating.
We're not going to be able to continue with the mold work here until after all our yurts are set up and we've got them kitted out into houses and the garden planted and the domes moved and all of the other thousands of tasks necessary to get this to occur.
But I kind of want to add another one into it there with this particular kind of engineering for this constant camber uh pump system for uh production of um basically uh hard shell yurt parts or boat parts or whatever.
We'll see if we can't figure out a way to um fund it.
Get a place to do it.
One of the things we were thinking of doing was uh having some workshops where people interested in in building their own um material along this technology could come on down and we'd show them all how it all worked and put them through the um design process for how you build the molds, etc.
Uh obviously later in the year, probably if we can get our shit together here, it'll probably be November.
And that assumes that you know uh there's still enough social cohesion to allow meaningful travel and all of this sort of thing.
Um anyway, I gotta get moving.
Uh mini chores, so uh we'll keep you informed as the round square feet thing uh gets moving.
Oh, by the way, we're doing another report.
Uh should be done maybe the end of this month.
Uh we have 31 days here, maybe the end of this month.
If not, certainly it'll be done in the first week of April.
Uh so you can look forward to that.
We've had the data sets running here for the past couple of weeks.
And some uh interesting wrinkles coming up.
Uh, I haven't gotten into any of the interpretation stuff, so I haven't uh seen much of that.
Well, okay, I guess that's it.
▲
Export Selection