All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 9, 2013 - Clif High
01:01:11
20130213 – Clif High Audio #31
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good morning.
It's 7.21 a.m. on February 9th, year 2013.
This is Pacific Coast Time North American continent.
And today's discussion is basically picking up and using up all of the notes that I had for the interview with Sean David Morton that we never got a chance to get at.
Not his fault.
I mean, there's just so much you can do in the format of two hours with a radio and all of that kind of stuff.
Anyway, I just want to step down through all of these to fill in all of the gaps or any holes we may have left in that discussion.
And I'm just going to start and run through them.
First off is Thrive and this Foster fellow.
It's my opinion that Foster didn't want free energy, does not want free energy.
And I state this because he spent $11 million and eight years to produce a very bad movie full of old material that's just chalk full of Illuminati symbolism.
They just smashed all kinds of symbols in there and twisted it every which way they could to just jam them into that film.
I found 13 symbols, distinct, separate Illuminati symbols in the poster alone, in the All-Seeing Eye poster alone.
So it's my opinion that he spent $11 million and eight years of time to get exactly what he wanted, which is the organization, not the free energy.
He could have spent the $11 million and achieved something in the free energy world in a significant way, as he spent $11 million and crapped out in the video world.
He didn't go viral like he thought.
I could tell from the language they never were going to make it.
There's no real there there.
It was this veneer language that you see so frequently from advertising where they think they're describing something real and they're not.
They miss all of the salient points that get people excited.
So the only people they really get involved are the extremely shallow that don't research any of the subject at all.
So it's my opinion that Foster and the Thrive Movement want to do exactly what they've done, which is to corral any kind of a free energy device and keep it off the market and go for total ownership on it themselves.
And then in fact, it's just this big scheme.
And if he's got any objections or objections to my statement, he's welcome to give me a call and we can thrash it out.
Personally, I think he's full of shit.
Okay, so next one up is the.
I was telling this to Sean.
It's really funny.
Because I had a really cool insight.
And that really cool insight was: gee, notice how the powers that be are not really screwing around with our radio broadcasts anymore.
There's like too many people that are awake, was my intended goal in that statement, was to point out that there's just too many of us.
The awakening wave has gotten to the point where the powers that be simply can't keep up.
You remember the old days where there were two or three people that knew what they were talking about.
They'd get on Art Bell or Coast to Coast, and there would be mysterious things that would happen.
Or they'd go on Mysteries of the Mind or any of these other early anti-establishment radio shows, and they end up being censored by denial of service attacks and so on.
And so here I was going to point this out to Sean about how cool it was we didn't have to put up with that shit anymore.
And there you go.
It backfired on me.
And we apparently were hit by an extreme DDOS attack out of a telecom in China that was aimed at the servers of the radio host.
So, so interesting observation that went all the helm with our radio show.
And then here's something else.
Just a little point to keep in mind.
If you want to find out who really rules the planet, find out who you're not able to criticize.
Thus I say to myself now, uh-oh, it used to be just that it was Zionists that were hidden.
Now they know they're exposed, and so they know they're we know that we know that they're insinuated in the body politic of Jewish people, so now they're saying, uh-oh, can't criticize Jewish people at all, way, shape, or form.
And you're not able to criticize Israel without going to jail or getting a lot of heat for it, and therefore these are the people that are ruling over us.
I wonder who rules over them?
Who are they not allowed to criticize?
Now, personally, again, I think most of them are all full of shit.
And I'd love to have somebody come and try and take me to jail for my words.
It'd be really interesting.
And here's an interesting little note.
It used to be in the early days of this work, I was being, as Igor and George Ure were, we were being, let's just call it in a nice way, probed.
We were linguistically probed by the powers that be.
That is to say, people were contacting us, and I don't know if the point was to let us know that they were keeping tabs on us or really to try and find out information.
It's just difficult to tell with these guys.
However, that kind of has stopped.
They don't do that so much anymore.
And I've got a backhanded compliment and found out that the reason they're not doing that anymore is because of how much I'm able to learn on the few words that their minions are actually expressing out to us.
So now they are aware of their own vulnerabilities in how much they're communicating non-verbally to their minions and how much their minions are inadvertently leaking out when they communicate to us the way they should not.
So just a little bit of interest there on that.
And then some other things here.
The timeline business of corporate development.
One of the things I wanted to bring up was that there's, having worked in the software business as it was maturing, I saw that the relationship and the ratio of work on current projects at a commercial level to what was going on in the RD world to what was actually being available.
And so it's easy to say that there's a development cycle of X number of months for software, but if you're actually talking concept to market, you may be looking at 20 years.
So in that sense, Microsoft, Oracle, all of the major guys are working 20 years ahead of what they've got on the market now.
And they must, in order to be able to maintain this.
Now, I've noticed that there's been a shift in the way in which the corporate guys must do business among themselves, sort of against the technology wave, not as a mechanism of their consuming public.
In other words, as far as the public is concerned, we are not demanding there's no demand draw on the particular approach that the megacorps take in their research and development world.
Let me restate that so that we get this really clear because it's sort of a key point.
The consuming public 20 years out won't have devices that we now will envision.
This is because the consuming public now is not being polled for their vision of what the world will be like 20 years from now.
This is unlike the way the corporates used to work relative to humanity in the 1900s.
If you go to virtually any of the world's fairs that were held, especially in the United States, but basically all around the planet, throughout the 1900s, you'll find that there was a consistent effort to elicit the future from the populace as opposed to direct the future.
Now, we know ever since Bush came in and as El Presidente du Corp, the United States, he came in and said, you know, no, we are the ones that control the shape of the future, as opposed to simply allowing the future to mature and everybody react to it.
So this is a real key thing.
Sometime, let's say, probably in the early to late 50s, shifts started taking place within corporate RD that I think also coincides with the shift from exploration of space alien technology contracts to exploitation of space alien technology contracts within the Federal Register.
That occurred in 1956.
So I think that this sometime in the early 50s, we see a corresponding movement that occurred within the corporations where they were no longer attempting to meet the demand of the public 20 years out with their RD work, and they shifted over to basically trying to engineer the future for some unknown party or for some unknown reason.
I can say this because I've seen the RD components of these big companies from the inside.
And I know that they are not, that they're actually working on all kinds of cool stuff, but very, very, very little of it relates to any of the existing technology, any of the existing trends in satisfying consumer demand, or any projected or polled version of consumer demand.
So it's to say that the corporations have a 20-year vision of their own that is an overlay or a template that they're attempting to, or actually are laying across the rest of humanity.
A very interesting thing indeed.
Not many people are aware of how the business shifted from the days of Tesla, Edison, Even up into Buckminster Fuller.
Excuse me.
Fuller died in 85, and I think the technology change stuff was well underway, and he had started to note it and had made some comments about directions in RD work that he found to be relatively disturbing.
Because basically, the corporations up until this point, in terms of a capitalist society, are there to serve consumer demand.
That's how you make your money.
You don't make your money, well, okay, all right.
Now it's true.
We've got to acknowledge that the British, who never allowed slave owning in their own country, were the one of they and the Dutch were the primary purveyors of a world in which you made your money by capturing humans and selling them to other humans.
So we have to acknowledge that there is a way to make money in slavery as long as you're outside the slavery system.
Now, since we're a global planet, though, a global populace, that's going to be a little bit more difficult for the minion class to stay out of the vision that is being foisted on us by corporate RD.
And anybody who's in corporate RD should stop and examine the projects they're working on and see if, indeed, I'm not right, that if they were all meshed together, they fit somebody else's overall vision rather than the eclectic, naturally occurring,
organic, disconnected millions of people executing their own individual needs and desires kind of vision that used to prevail, that made really life so exciting in the 1900s and the exploration period, as long as you got around all the wars, which that was what they were engineering.
You know, it was a great time to be alive, unlike today with the constraints and so on.
And that brings up this other issue.
Why is it that you find the children, you know, the 20s, 20-year-olds, the 20-somethings in the late teens, why are they so disaffected and disconnected?
Not merely the technology, but there has been a huge level of change all around them.
And I've noted that these individuals only, at least in the American society, apparently have only internalized about 80,000 words or less if you're in a restricted education environment.
So you're really quite stupid because as people remove words from you or from your potential, they remove the ability to think and to concentrate on those ideas and examine and so on.
So many of these 20-somethings, I think, are disaffected and disconnected because they are and have been educated to be so.
Many of them are unaware of why they feel the way they are because they've never been trained to A think.
It's a difference from being schooled to being educated.
And in order to educate yourself, you must learn to think.
It's the very first requisite.
So a lot of these poor kids, in my contact and my experience here, I find have an internal malaise that is a combination of many, many, many factors.
The bad diet, the exposure to television, the electro-smog, the total oppressiveness of the environment, the constraint of the police state as emerges around us.
And then somewhere in, and also all kinds of other nasty things like mind control programming and vaccines and all of this, poor schools.
But beyond all of that, there is a cohesive vision for the world that we're in now.
And many of the people that we see that we would label the sheeple are in fact living out that vision as an active victim in a passive role.
They're unaware that they're the victim, and they are in a way that's more profound than the rest of us are simply walking around and then one day wake up to the terrible conspiracies that run the planet and realize we were victims all along.
We at least participated to some extent in the sense that we were busy, we weren't looking, we had the capability to examine our own situation.
Now I'm thinking there's been a real expression of a technique towards engineering a human that is incapable of understanding their own situation, incapable of being self-examining.
And thus we have the mucking situation that I had described a number of years back in early ALTA reports, where you get these poor kids that just go crazy and go and kill and kill and kill until they are killed themselves.
The next escalation of this is not the Police officer, former police officer running amok in California, which may be a psyop designed to bring in drones and deal with guns down there.
But rather, the next escalation that our stuff saw was, if you will, super warrior muckers, where individuals that are going to go crazy and going out on killing sprees because they, for whatever reason, let's leave the why out of it.
What they will do is they're going to load themselves up on some designer drugs, if you will, that are presently available, just not used in a particular combination, and make themselves into basically super soldiers.
They'll burn out, and they'll know this, or at least some of them may know this, that the combination of drugs will kill them, even if they're not taken down by bullets, but they will be, you know, superhuman, unable to feel pain, can climb walls with, you know, the fingernails being left behind, that kind of thing.
Truly gross, what it does to the human body.
But these drugs are available.
The military's been perfecting, or not perfecting them, working them, because they're not perfected and they'll never become perfect.
And they're an aberration and an abhorrence on the planet.
But the problem is they've escaped the jar.
There's so many people within the military themselves that are disaffected that the RD structure within the military has broken down, and a lot of these drugs are now coming out into, I won't say civilian use, but let's say black ops or commercial merck use.
And so they're about to hit the commercial population and we'll start soon seeing a couple of instances of these muckers.
And these are going to be truly something that will shock the mainstream media.
In one instance, I know that the data is suggesting the media is going to be the target of it.
And boy, that's going to set things to moving.
But of course, right around then is when we get this huge set of earthquakes and the beginning of the global coastal events.
So I don't have any other data suggesting how long that effect is going to last or what the media outlet involved, how it will respond or any of that sort of thing.
We just know that in the midst of all of this, one of these super psycho muckers is going to go run amok, and one of the targets is going to end up being media.
That is to say, you know, commercial mainstream propagandists.
Okay, so other things here.
I've noticed an appearance now, very few times that I'm able to get out in the winter.
I mean, this is the horror of it here in terms of the sky we've got in the summer.
They chemtrail us all to Hellengone, and I never get a chance to look at the sky.
Plus, we have atmospheric conditions here in the summer that really, if you don't get out on a boat, there's too much loom from the light trap between the Olympics and the Cascade Mountains.
And in the summertime, it has a tendency to reduce the ability of viewing what's up there with these goggles, these night vision goggles.
By the way, I have third-generation night vision goggles.
I got mine from a guy by the name of Ed Grimsley.
You can get him through Google.
There are other generations available now, so you need to talk with somebody like Ed who's an expert on these.
I am not.
I simply use them.
One of the things I wanted to say about these, though, was that the last few times in the winter, when I have had clear skies and have been up at the appropriate time and had the time to use the goggles for a bit, in probably less than a half an hour, the last three times.
So this is extraordinary.
Each of these three times, I've seen what I call the drive-in movie spaceship.
And I call it a drive-in movie spaceship because I'm an old fart.
Most kids won't understand the concept of a drive-in movie.
A drive-in movie is basically you sit in your car and they project the film you're going to watch, the movie, from behind you onto a giant screen ahead of you, sort of a huge version, a collective group version of a projection TV.
Well, this spaceship is sort of like that, because what happens is you see this flash of light in the sky that is basically rectilinear.
That's what is really interesting about it.
It is atypically straight-edged.
Not hard-edged, but straight-edged.
And cambered corners.
So in that sense, it's a little on the fuzzy side.
Anyway, there's this sudden bright flash, and it's as though you're sitting in the middle of a dark night in the car, snuggled up to a nice cuddly human, and all of a sudden they turn the lights on on the movie theater, and the screen is illuminated.
Big white flash.
This is the milliseconds before they start actually showing them the film or their commercials and then the film.
So you see for a second, you just see this just pristine white.
And that's what this looks like.
And the curious part of this is when you see this white flash, it's ahead of the spaceship.
And the spaceship is kind of, I want to say it looks like a very sleek version of a truncated Stainless steel kind of water bottle and with its with the blunt end of the water bottle the bottom end aimed at the screen and what actually happens is there's a gap you can see the gap because the spaceship is actually illuminated with
some of the reflected light from the screen or a big hole of light that's been opened up and then the spaceship just suddenly jumps into the light and the whole light closes behind it and the spaceship is gone.
Now, the interesting part for me is that as this spaceship is around, this is not a one-time occurrence.
In order, I counted the other day, it does this very, very, very rapidly, so it's extremely hard for me to keep up with it.
But I am certain that there were over 16 of these little flashes of lights in order for it to cross the entire arc of the sky from my particular view here.
And it's true I'm hemmed in with some tall furs, but I still have a from the northeast to the southwest, which was the direction that these ships take, I still have a good enough view that I've got probably, oh, I would say, 60 degrees of the complete arc.
So it's a good, goodly distance.
And in 16 of these little flashes, the ship is across that distance.
Obviously, there's no noise or anything, but it is just extremely fast.
If you were going to make this into a cartoon or something, you'd want to have some kind of a noise just to indicate how fast it is.
And these little flashes occur, you get to see for the millisecond as the ship jumps into the hole, and then the next flash occurs ahead of where, not in a necessarily straight line because it was able to curve.
It took this sort of curving arc across the visible sky here that one night, or that one early one morning.
All the three times that I've seen these this year, they've all been coming out of Cassiopeia and heading to the southwest in terms of my orientation terrestrially.
The last time I'd seen these in I think probably 2010 or 2011, I had a couple instances where I happened to catch the appearances of these ships.
They were headed from the southeast to the southwest, so their path now is entirely different.
I'm assuming they're an intelligently operated thing and not an organic life form, but I would have no way of determining this from my view down here.
It's just very fascinating.
I also know that when these guys show up, any of the little triangular floaty craft that are up there will scurry, scurry, and get real close to the big box craft as these light ships go through.
So I don't know if they're scared of them in the sense of they don't want to let them know they're there, you know, cat and mouse kind of thing, or if there's some kind of external energy that flows out of them that presents a risk to these triangular guys, but they sure move when these drive-in movie spaceships show up.
Okay, so page after page of crud.
Let's see.
Oh, okay, here's just an aside.
I'd had a lot of people ask me how they can deal with their physical health and stuff ahead of the global coastal event.
And a lot of it turns out to be related, at least in the emails I've received, a lot of it turns out to be related to either, well, basically something that's habitual.
Either they're smokers or they have weight issues that they suspect the weight issues are due to stress eating or something along these lines.
And thus it's a habitual problem, not a bad diet selection sort of an issue.
Anyway, though, here's the thing.
In my experience, what you need to do to transition out of this is to make this a conscious effort.
And so to quit smoking after 17 years of being addicted to tobacco, what I did was I took a stack of 3x5 cards and swore to myself that it's okay that I could smoke.
It wouldn't make any difference.
But every time I did smoke, what I was going to do was to write down all these facts about the smoking and elevate the process of smoking to my conscious mind, as opposed to letting it stay an unconscious habit.
And over the course of probably three months, it was gone.
I mean, the smoking was gone.
Because it became so conscious, I was able to say, oh, oh, look, there's a trigger for that.
And I know that if I had this cup of coffee, it was a trigger for smoking under these circumstances.
But I also discovered that if I simply waited three minutes, if I told myself, I'll wait three minutes.
If I want the cigarette in three minutes, I can have it.
Well, after three minutes, frequently, I would not.
And within those three months, I got down to where I just got to the point where I was, oh, five, six cigarettes a day, screw it, I just quit.
And so it all went away.
I've given this same suggestion to some other people, and basically what I do is I tell them, take the 3x5 cards, take a couple of these, take a little piece of a pencil and a rubber band and strap them to your pack of cigarettes and never touch the cigarettes until you've gone through this little ritual.
And the thing is, actually, what you do is you take it out of the ritualized reptilian part of the brain where it only operates and you don't ever consciously think about what you're doing as a smoker or an overeater or whatever.
And you add an extra level of ritual there.
In essence, harmonize with the ritualized nature of that part of your brain and insist that it always perform this other ritual, which undoes the first ritual, if you will.
It raises the first ritual out of the habit stage into a conscious mind where you can get at it and control it.
And that was basically my thinking, and it sort of worked.
I don't know if it would work on everybody, but there have been a number of people I've told over the years, and many people have reported success, at least in stopping smoking.
And a few people I've told about this in terms of a diet approach, they've also reported that, hey, this makes a lot of sense.
And I had this one fellow who was really addicted to sweet fizzy drinks.
He loves the carbonation and he loves the sugar.
And he addressed his sugar needs by, it turns out he went to a doctor and the doctor found out he was very low in the amino acid group that includes triosine and phenylamine.
And so he took those and he didn't want the sugar anymore and he dropped lots of weight simply because he was taking amino acids and not consuming the extra sugar because he happened to be low in those.
And he made up for the lack of those amino acids by taking the sugar in order to get the energy to get through his day.
It was not good for his body and he was degrading even in his early 30s.
And he was, like I say, very addicted to these fizzy drinks.
Now, he did not understand that they actually make the fizzy drinks to be addictive and that the high fructose corn syrup that is in the core of all the fizzy drinks, whether they tell you that or not, is combined with three other chemicals in there to produce a specific chemical response in a specific part of the brain that keeps you addicted to the things.
It doesn't matter if there's caffeine in them or not anymore.
They've got you hooked at a different level.
The caffeine adds that extra boost and that extra addictive quality.
And they get a better bang for their, they get more bucks for their chemical bang out of you if they put the caffeine in.
But I've talked to a soda engineer and he says it's just not necessary anymore.
So anyway, the same approach works for the fizzy drinks and for habitual overeating that's caused by mental conditions.
I can't say that it would work for those where you have a desperate need for you overeat because your body wants a specific kind of thing that it can't easily find in your diet.
Or I don't know that it would overweight would work for those people that are overeating due to pH imbalance.
And that's a real issue.
If you find that you can't lose weight, I actually think it may be more effective for women than otherwise, or for men.
But if you find you can't lose weight and you have no energy, you may want to look into your pH balance issue.
A very subtle change in the acid to alkaline ratio can cause huge levels of weight loss and alter your diet very rapidly.
And an easy way to do this is to simply add a green drink to your diet daily and then ultimately you'll add two and three and some of the other stuff will fall away.
But getting back to using the three by five cards as a method for controlling any habitual activity, basically the idea is this.
Again, you overlay a ritual on top of this ritual that has emerged out of your habit.
And I say ritual because the habit is the part of the brain where it simply defaults to the path of least resistance.
But the ritual component of it is where there's a part of the reptilian brain that forces you to experience that habit when you would not necessarily otherwise wish to.
So in other words, I know people that are truly addicted to tobacco to the point where the reptilian brain demands that they wake up in the middle of the night and smoke a cigarette.
And you can get through the night as a smoker without you can sleep without having to have that addiction fulfilled.
You can go eight hours without smoking or however long you sleep.
And so you don't have a biochemical body addiction at that level because otherwise it would wake you up every three minutes or however long it is that, you know, every 30 minutes that you need your usual nicotine fix.
So we know that it's a habitual as opposed to ritualistic or true addiction at that level.
But there are those people that get that way.
And I also know people that have eating issues that way where they're forced in the middle of the night, in spite of the fact that they don't have a blood sugar issue, to get up and go and eat stuff.
So those couple of individuals that have contacted me have had good effect with this 3x5 card approach.
That is to simply force yourself to overlay this other ritual, which A delays the instant gratification part that is necessary in the underlying ritual of smoking or whatever.
It delays it.
But because the delay is small and it's under your control, it's no big deal.
It's only long enough to write down the date, the time, and what drove you to that particular action.
So as a smoker, you would note the date and time as exact as you could, and how you were feeling.
What was the trigger that caused you to want that cigarette?
And then it's okay to go ahead and have that cigarette.
And then you would note how much of the cigarette you smoked and its impact on you and how long the whole process took.
And that was it.
And by doing this, by sealing the ritual, as they call it in the mind control process, front and back, with your other rituals, you gain control on it, and you're able to elevate that core addiction out of that ritualized, habitualized part of the brain into a more conscious area where you can get at it and you say, oh, oh, am I really feeling that?
Or is this merely a conditioned response?
And a conditioned response you can let go.
And so you actually are able to shift these patterns of your life from one part of your brain to another, and then you can apply control to them and change them.
And that's how change occurs in humans, at least in my experience.
And those people I've told about this with the 3x5 cards indeed have had some success with weight and diet control.
But what really helps is to just go through the pH approach and change the alkalinity of your diet through green drinks, which is, you know, juice.
You blenderize this juice and, you know, some greens like kale and wheatgrass and that kind of stuff.
And just drink some of that a day, five to seven ounces.
Eventually you get to where you're drinking two or three or four of them.
Okay, so here's some things.
We have these comets approaching.
You're going to hear a lot of basic BS about how the comets have circled through infinite space and come back to find us and hit us again, find our solar system.
This implies a couple of things if you really think about it.
It implies that there's absolutely no movement in the relationship of any solar system or to any other solar system or any galaxy to any other galaxies.
They're not allowed to spin.
They're not allowed to shift in any way for a comet to go whizzing off into infinite space, be influenced by all the gravitational influences that it would ever encounter in that infinite space and be redirected back to us.
Why should any comet be in a circular orbit ever anywhere outside of perhaps circling large things like galaxies?
Why would a comet necessarily want to circle our solar system if it actually left our solar system?
There would be no reason whatsoever for it to consider us the center of its orbit and to go whizzing around and come back to us.
So the idea that comets circulate through space is just bogus.
The comets that are coming back to us are trapped within our own solar system.
And it is the complexity of our trailing behind the sun that causes these comets to reappear occasionally and work their way up through the spiraling system close to the back end of the sun where we are.
And it's also something I need to point out.
If you stopped, so that, by the way, the comet issue settles the issue of the heliocentric universe.
If that's the case, there's no movement in the universe because the comet couldn't come back and find our solar system if we shifted at all.
It wouldn't necessarily be attracted to our gravity, given all of the other gravitational influences it would encounter along the way.
And we know this to be bogus.
We know that all the items in space are constantly moving in relationship to each other.
And so I find that it's just inconceivable that someone can claim that comets go whizzing out of our solar system and come back to us without ever postulating a method or a mechanism whereby this can be achieved.
Now, something else about the heliocentric system.
We know that our sun is moving at huge rates through the space interstellar space.
And so again, how could it be, since we know that our sun is moving, even if it were a heliocentric model, even if we were in a flat disk like a frisbee around the middle lumpy sun and that whole thing was going through space that way, even if that were the case, how could comets ever come back and find us?
They couldn't.
The gravitational influences of everything in all the space that they would transit, as well as our own movement, would make that an impossibility.
So there'd never be such a thing as a periodic comet in a heliocentric model, ever.
And there could never be, because that would demand that a heliocentric model be stationary.
Now, we know that that's not true, that the sun moves.
Also, we know that there is no such thing as a heliocentric model, that all of the planets are in a collapsed cone behind the Sun, as well as all the comets and debris we'll ever encounter are within our own solar system now.
We may encounter some others and suck them into our solar system, but they're not periodic comets.
There'll be a new critter that we would encounter at some point and just pull right in out of the interstellar media.
That's certainly doable.
So, all these comets are rotating around or spiraling around in a complex fashion within the cone behind the Sun, which, of course, as you will note, is narrower closer to the Sun and wider further out.
So, comets can go out to the far end of the solar system in the very wide part and go circulating around for a long time before mechanisms exist that cause their spiral to gradually work its way back to the center of the Sun, or center of the solar system towards the Sun, and we would perceive these comets then.
So, point one.
Point two, if you actually examine the heliocentric model and you were to examine the idea of retrograde in any planetary structure, and you plot this out on paper, you can see it's physically impossible.
The only way it would work in a heliocentric model for a retrograde condition to exist is if, for instance, Mercury being retrograde to Earth would demand that Earth and Mercury have virtually the same orbit except for these eccentricities.
Because if Mercury was to go retrograde, so to speak, as it was going on the other side of the Sun, there would exist a period of time that would be equal to two-thirds of Mercury's entire orbit when Mercury would never be visible to us because the Sun would be between us.
Again, there would also be a further 35 days in addition to that on either side of that period where the gloom or the loom of the Sun would be too bright for us to perceive Mercury.
So, Mercury would be something we would only see for a brief period of time.
In a year, we might see Mercury for a few months here and there.
Actually, it would be a space of a few days here and there, a few days here and there, a few days here and there, if the heliocentric model was accurate.
In fact, in the heliocentric model, we would never really know what these outer large planets were because their orbits are so large relative to our orbit that the conjunction of these would be so irregular and infrequent that from our viewpoint, we could never see them when we were looking in any direction towards the sun in a heliocentric model because the sun would be so much brighter that we would not be able to perceive them.
The only time we would be able to perceive them was basically when they're directly behind us, so to speak, in the heliocentric model.
And that would allow a viewing of the larger planets only about 33 days in any given year for any given of the larger planets.
And we know that this isn't the case.
We can always see all of the outer planets, and we can almost always see all of the inner planets.
And the reason that that is the case is because Mercury, for instance, spirals not around the Sun, but it spirals eight times in its, it moves in a circle from our viewpoint eight times for what we would call one of its annular orbits in a heliocentric model.
And this is what causes the retrograde motion.
From our viewpoint, retrograde really is it's spiraling back the other way before turning and spiraling back the other way, before turning and spiraling back the other way in a much smaller spiraling arc than what we have behind the Sun.
And this is compounded by our doing exactly the same thing.
So all those planets out from behind us see us the same way we see Mercury, and that they see the planet Earth in retrograde frequently, which is an interesting way to think about it.
And again, more and more evidence coming all the time that BOTS model and the heliocentric model, or BOTS model is correct, heliocentric model is not.
This is actually pertinent because the nature of the cone, the width of the cone behind the Sun, which I think, in my opinion, is determined by the density of the interstellar media and the speed of the Sun through the interstellar media, is what affects our relationship of the planets as they spiral around each other.
It also affects how often we'll encounter comets and all this other stuff.
And it's also a huge impactor on our climate and the expansion event.
Now, as I mentioned on the interview with Sean David Morton, it's my opinion that the expansion event will probably be caused by, so to speak, I put quotes around caused by the cracking of the Pacific Plate.
When that goes, we'll see all kinds of events as we did with the Banda Achi, only on a much larger scale.
I think that the plates, or rather, an ominous new development is the emergence of this bulge of Molten lava just under the ocean basin in the Pacific along a known fault line near these 80 earthquakes, and this new lava dome is bulging the bottom of the ocean, and it is apparently between the mantle and the ocean bottom.
And this is interesting because it implies that we're going to have a new Hawaii, a new island chain forming if there is a puncture.
Hawaii is the Hawaiian Island chain is based on this little hole in the ocean bottom through which magma comes on up and forms the islands, the volcanic islands.
And then over time, as the Earth moves and shifts and the plate pressures and so on, that hole gets shifted a little bit relative to the island that's formed on top of it.
And suddenly it pops out from underneath it and a whole new island is formed.
And that's why we have the island chain of Hawaii.
And each and every one of the islands were created by the volcano that is currently now on the big island.
And there is going to be yet another island further away from the big island in that same arc caused by that same hole.
Now, the lava bulge that's out there near the Santa Cruz Islands in the Solomon Island chain, that lava bulge is not yet ruptured.
If there were a pinprick, so to speak, into that bulge, we would see a new volcano form and a new landmass form that would be very much like the Hawaiian Islands.
I don't know that that is in the cards, though, because we have so much data suggesting a global coastal event, and because this bulge is new, and because it's near this particularly distinct fault series, and due to a lot of other factors, I'm of the opinion that what will most likely happen is that that bulge will cause a rupture and a crack in the Pacific plate rather than a hole.
And so the effect of the crack will be different than if there was a hole and we were forming an individual island like the big island of Hawaii.
I would suspect that we could say it'll probably be a lot more violent and a lot more intense in a shorter period of time as all of the magma is released.
This would account if a large enough rupture was to occur, even if the plate itself didn't sever hugely, the onrush of lava would cause steam explosions.
It would be quasi-nuclear if enough lava came out in the sense of the amount of energy that was released.
This would account for a huge amount of virtually instantly vaporized into superheated steam water, which when it finally came up as a giant bolus out of the ocean, would erupt as a giant steam volcano, so to speak, that would spread.
It would do a couple of things.
It would actually alter, if it were a large enough event, it would alter the level of the ocean because so much of the ocean would be turned into steam that would then bubble on up through what was left on top of it in milliseconds, of course, wouldn't take any time at all.
And we would have a steam event in which vast amounts of the Pacific Ocean would be vaporized into steam and hurled into the atmosphere.
That would cause certainly the effects we're seeing in the continuing parts of the global coastal event where inland areas are inundated with huge amounts of water beyond our level of understanding that cause inland seas, floods, all different kinds of things.
Because it was difficult for me to understand what would cause that to occur, absent, for instance, a meteor hitting the planet.
What would cause so much water to be sent up into the atmosphere unless the water was coming in from outside space?
So we had all these different theories.
Oh, we're going to run into an area of interstellar space that's going to cause our solar system to be flooded with water.
That's happened in the past.
Or we thought, okay, it'll be a meteor impact that will, you know, basically vaporize a bunch of the ocean from the top as the meteor burrows its way down in towards the bottom of the ocean.
But with the presence of this new magma bulge, the fact that we're in the expansion events period, I suspect that the mantle has parted due to the internal pressure of new matter being created, and that that new matter is going to come on out in a form of a new mass.
It may even be a new continent-sized mass that will appear in the Pacific basin.
And that this will be a component of the global coastal event.
It may be the proximate cause in the sense that, you know, just as it ruptures, there we go, there's the event.
But the real cause of it is the internal energy is building up and creating more matter to where the planet has to expand.
So that, I think, is the part of the global coastal event.
From our data viewpoint, once it occurs, we're isolated here in the northwest, and I won't ever really find out any of the details.
At least those are not forecast for me to know within the data set we've got at this point.
It shows us being disconnected for some period of time and having problems with data gathering and so on after that.
An interesting couple of notes here.
The climate migration, the diaspora is now official.
We have weather refugees being officially acknowledged now by the UN and a lot of discussion coming on out.
This was a first forecast by us in 2003 for this period of time.
So that is, again, yet another part of that data, long-term data set that's now appeared and manifest.
The language has hit some 73% fulfillment.
So we can say that that's pretty much fulfilled.
Okay, now the polar vortex collapse and the nor'easter storm.
If the polar vortex is going to collapse, we'll see it at the point, in my estimation, when the maximal low pressure is at its maximum point north before turning and going in towards the turning, going towards the Atlantic.
So I think that would be Sunday.
So if it hasn't collapsed by early Sunday morning, it likely won't, at least not with this particular storm.
We would still have some potential for a couple of days, but the potential would be waning as it would go along.
The polar vortex is a soft cone structure.
It used to be hard in the sense there used to be a very rigid magnetic structure that held it in place.
Over these past 30 or 40 years, the magnetosphere has gotten to the point where it's saggy and full of holes, and the polar vortex was allowed to soften, if you will.
And the cold component of the vortex was taken into Russia this year.
It is these kind of effects that trigger and cause the actual first year of the ice age, or the first day which leads to the first week, which leads to the first month, which leads to the first year.
For instance, 90% of all of the ice age activity happens in the first 10% of the entire ice age span.
In that 10%, 90% of that activity happens within 10% of that, and so on.
You can actually track this back and find an individual day in any given ice age when conditions flipped over, and the ice age could be said to have begun from that day forward, because there was a huge storm that was so atypical it caused these situations to persist from one day to the next and off you go.
And so the polar vortex is seen as a proximate trigger for the ice ages.
It's seen this way because what they postulate is that as we have now, the magnetosphere becomes so sieve-like, so full of holes, that its magnetic structure is very weak and very loose.
And the polar vortex is allowed through this weak magnetic structure to only run into the resistance of the atmosphere to hold it in place.
The atmosphere changes due to some component of temperature and pressure.
A low system comes on up, and a low system acts as a bubble, if you will.
And once the membrane of that bubble of that low is merged with the polar vortex, the cold from the polar vortex is allowed to infiltrate the entire size of that low-pressure system.
And so you'll see the thing just sort of bulge out in a pseudopod fashion over Russia, as though an amoeba kind of a like structure seen from space.
And this is what is postulated as causing the ice age, because what can occur is that the magnetosphere can reform through pressure and through magnetics over the situation and cause that newly frozen area that's outside of the usual Arctic circle to stay frozen.
And it acts as a heat sink in reverse, so to speak.
And you've got a situation where there's a perpetual cold or perpetuation of cold that goes from year to year, extra-seasonal, and that acts as a seed, and then off you go.
Plus, of course, during that period of time, you have other polar vortex collapses, which continue to contribute because it's a very dynamic system.
Anyway, so it's my understanding in terms of looking at the 800 millibar and 600 millibar data so far that while the direction of air is disturbing in terms of how it's coming from, we're not yet close enough to where we'll be able to determine if this would occur.
It's going to be sometime probably 24 hours from now, early Sunday morning, that would be the point at which the air at the 800 millibar level should shift.
And if it shifts in its appropriate pattern, we'll be out of any kind of a risk.
But if it doesn't, if it keeps on going north, there would be a continuation of the risk and maybe even some level of certainty that we would get into a polar vortex collapse.
What would that look like?
Well, it would look like these poor people are already in cold, and all of a sudden, you know, cold at the level of merely freezing weather would go sub-zero, and then it would go very much sub-zero temperature, you know, minus 20s, minus 30s, minus 40s, minus 50s in Fahrenheit.
And we would see effects of non-hardened plastics would crumble.
You'd get infrastructure issues like the hoses on cars would freeze and not be able to be unfrozen.
You'd have plastics and rubbers damaged.
Might even have some metals damaged.
The wind issues would be terrible.
And then you would get into a freezing state that would be quite severe because a number of things would become really cold.
And a lot of our buildings are not set up for this.
They're not insulated.
to that level, so it would be very, very dangerous.
It also would mean potentially, as we saw in Russia and China, frozen oceans where the ports would freeze up in the sort of sloshy salt-laden ice, and all these ships would become locked up, and you'd have all kinds of transport problems.
Again, if we're going to get that, we'll know sometime early Sunday morning if that's going to be a potential.
And so far as the new subject area, insofar as the real translation of the Bible, if you really want to get into that, there's just an excellent linguist out there, Mauro, M-A-U-R-O, Big Lino, B-I-G-L-I-N-O.
He's Italian.
He's got a series of videos out with English subtitles.
He's a brilliant fellow.
He worked for years for the Vatican and actually translated the original works of the Bible, which they kept secret, and then they fired him when they heard that he was going to go out and start talking about this.
And I think it's called The Unexplored or the Unexplained Bible.
And you'll see it on YouTube.
It's just quite fascinating.
Anyway, along those lines, after you've watched that, go and look up this place called Gobekli Tepe.
If you go and look it up, it's G-O-B-E-K-L-I-T-E-P-E, two words.
There's an umlaut over the O because it's Turkish.
It's in Turkey.
It's on a hilltop.
It is not a religious site, in spite of what everybody is saying, oh, it's the world's oldest religious temple and all this bunch of horseshit.
What it is, is an attempt to convey knowledge as to how we were originally created.
It is the Nummo myth inscribed in stone, an elegant, beautiful stone that was either cultured or laser-cut with precision we couldn't match today.
These things are ethereal.
They were put into this park.
It was a park that people would go through and examine the cultural history of our species and where we came from and our relationship with our progenitors, the species that came here and made us.
It is not a religious site.
It does not in any way go towards religious worship or those kinds of feelings.
It is a scientific site, a museum site that you would sort of like a museum of natural history.
And what they did, what makes this astounding, was the people that built that knew that the planet was going to get the shit kicked out of it in one of these transitional cycles like we're in right at the moment.
And they thought, aha, we need to save this, if we can, for all the future humans so that they too will know what we know, the true nature of our species.
And so what did these guys do?
They meticulously buried it.
I mean, they went to the trouble of, you know, arranging the dirt in it to bury the thing so that it would be protected.
So they covered it with earth such that it would be protected for our generation.
Now, unfortunately, we should have dug it up 13,000 years ago, kicked the crap out of anybody telling us that, you know, the Anunnaki and these off-world god people or off-world aliens are actually gods and understood who we really were, and we would have progressed to the point where, you know, we would have Star Trek would have occurred about probably 11,000 years ago.
We would have been off our planet and moving.
But we didn't find them until just now, another cycle.
Who knows how many cycles this thing has been buried, at least two.
And so what I think we ought to do is to put all the stones right back where we found them and cover the thing up again because we're in the middle of a cycle, or in the midst of the beginning of the cycle, and leave all kinds of notes as to where to find it.
Because if we don't, it's going to be destroyed by the cycle we're going to be going through, and then we will have undone all the work that those magnificent beings did way back when.
And by the way, it has nothing To do with religion.
It is, again, a science museum site telling you where you come from.
Absolutely fascinating.
And it describes the NUMO myth down to incredible detail.
And if you want the real NUMO myth, go look up G-R-I-A-U-L-E.
That's the author.
And it's called Conversations with Ogotomeli.
And he's a Frenchman that wrote all this stuff up.
Just fascinating.
And anyway, so Gobekli Tepe is also fascinating.
It validates the NUMO myth and also speaks to the issue of the mistranslation of the Bible.
And it validates everything that Morrow is saying about the biblical sequence being taken over by these mind-control people when originally the Sumerian text was once again an attempt to tell us, hey, watch out for these Rauch, for these things that you people in the future would use English to call holy ghosts because they're a spaceship and they come down from a mothership and they abduct you and nasty things happen to you when they abduct you.
And by the way, the Rauch, unlike these other things called the, I'm going to mispronounce it, I'm sure, the Swaft, but the Rauch can hover over water, so you're not safe on boats.
Whereas with the Swaft, you are.
They can only hover over land.
And so you get over water, you're safe.
And also, these are the Anunnaki and not our creators.
These are the interlopers that came on in here and they've been screwing with us and we don't like them much.
Basically, the whole, if you go and look at Mauro's real translation, the stuff the Vatican is keeping secret from you, and you want to read it a particular way, as I do, you can say that basically all of the Old Testament has been perverted from its original intent, which was a warning saying, hey, watch out.
Rauch come and they do anal probes.
And we don't like them much.
So I'm going to get on to doing real work here and we'll wrap this up.
But a couple of minor points to finish up here on our global coastal event.
The fact that we're seeing the language show up from the UN about the idea of climate refugees and the legalistic formalization of a structure in which people will be designated as climate refugees, climate migrants, this kind of thing, in an attempt to structure how the UN is going to handle them.
It was foreseen in our data set in 2003.
It was a key component ahead of the next set of occurrences in the global coastal event.
So this was a big internal temporal marker.
So I suspect again that the February 27th, let's just say from the week of the 27th.
So that last week in February, I'm expecting another large quake in the middle of the Pacific.
If we get that, it should be at the relative zone around that pocket of magma.
If we get that, that's yet one more confirmation that we're in lockstep down towards the global coastal event.
And if you're in a position of vulnerability at that point, you may seriously want to examine where you're at.
You'll have some amount of days, I just don't know.
And this is from the end of February on.
If we also have satellite damage, by the way, next week, while not in that 2003 data set, this does go to the loss of our ability to, you know, if you get certain satellites taken down, you're going to have impacts on the internet.
And if we have that kind of thing occur, then yet again, more holes popping up that lead to our Swiss cheese that lead to the cessation of the ability for us to gather data that was seen about May.
And that I went back and double-checked as close as I can since I don't have the original data sets anymore.
And our original notes do just peg it as May of 2013.
Bearing in mind, we didn't really care about a day, a specific day so much back then.
We don't really have day-level intelligence in long-term data sets anyway.
But I wasn't really concerned about it because at the time, that was 2003, and this was a number of years off.
10, in fact.
And now here we are, 10 years later, and we're going to be living through this.
And again, everything seems to be pointing towards a May time period for this event to have occurred.
That is to say, it has occurred by late May.
That's when our data shuts down is sometime in May, and that's coincident with the June 1 timeframe that was shown in the remote viewing.
So I suspect that I suspect most of March is probably, let's put quotes around this, safe from the event occurring.
It could occur as early as late March and still meet all the other criteria that we've got for our global coastal event as well as the remote viewing kind of stuff.
We're not 100% out of the woods with March, but I would say you've got the rest of February and probably up until maybe mid-March.
And then from that point on, we get into a decreasing window that's going to be very difficult to navigate in because if we are correct, we'll see a number of things all occur at the same time that will restrict our ability to get ready for the global coastal event.
A number of these things will include the breakdown in social order at an economic level and the just-in-time delivery system will start experiencing real problems.
So, if you've got something ordered or you need something from far away, you better get it now.
And you'd better get those things now that you are pretty sure you'll absolutely need.
I'm not suggesting that you go out and spend money and buy stuff because, personally, I think that there's indicators that this whole idea of safety being placed into objects is inappropriate.
That the events are going to be so severe that even if you've got a house and it's got an underground bunker, you may be forced out simply by events you hadn't taken into consideration, like suddenly you're in a 20-year stream of volcanic smoke and you can't breathe, and you just got to go, or the ice age comes and moves you next year, that kind of thing.
So, I'm not advocating that, but it wouldn't hurt to have a real good pair of shoes.
There's a lot of indicators that people are going to be walking, and most people don't know how to walk.
And if you're not a really good walker and you don't do a lot of it, you won't have those shoes on hand.
And so, you know, maybe we're going to spike a big purchase wave through Zappos or some of these other online places.
But, you know, really, if you get a one thing I could think of is that we keep looking at all the RV stuff and all of our stuff, and it shows people walking.
So, you know, it's a lot easier to walk in shoes than not.
And hey, the good news is in all of this, it happens in summer or spring anyway.
Even though the weather will be crappy, it's not like it's going to be happening tomorrow and forcing all those people to try and evacuate under the circumstances of these incredible storms in the northeast.
At least, insofar as that goes, up here in the northern hemisphere, we caught a break.
It'll happen in weather when we can survive out of our houses after we've been forced out of the rubble.
So, anyway, I hope I'm totally wrong, and I hope I'm a huge laughingstock by June 1.
And I'll see if I can't connect with Courtney Brown and we'll go down and go surfing in Mexico or something.
I don't know.
But I actually, the way things are working out, I don't think so.
Every day, new stuff going on towards it that says, Oh, yeah, yep, that's right, that's right.
We're heading towards this global coastal event.
You know, get your button gear.
So, I'm going to go do that.
I'm going to get my button gear.
I hope this was helpful, and I hope we filled in some of the gaps from the Sean Morton interview.
It weren't his fault that we got hit by all of the problems.
For whatever reason, there are guys that just don't want me to blab around, probably with good reason.
▲
Export Selection