All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 25, 2012 - Clif High
50:10
20121125 – Clif High Audio #25
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good morning.
It's uh 7.55 AM on the twenty fifth of November Pacific Coast Time.
North American continent.
There's a lot of Pacific Coasts.
My apologies right up front.
Um the these wu-jos are becoming annoyingly frequent.
I never intended to do this many of them, but this particular one has been um urged on me by circumstances and a number of requests.
Uh before I get into it though, the um uh business of the day.
Uh yeah, we have been in crisis mode with some complications from Kathy's health.
I think we're able to see our way through the um problems of the last week or two, and things will gradually return to you know, whatever's gonna be our new normal for a while, and in the meantime, uh you'll just have to bear with me on uh my absence in uh in being able to get at emails.
So my apologies to that.
Now uh I still read them uh as the opportunity presents itself because I can uh flip vortex on and plow right through them, but uh the ability to respond to them has been limited by uh the demands placed on me uh here at home.
Anyway, though, uh I I've gotten uh shocking number of emails about this uh coast to coast show the other day, which is really why what prompted me to do this particular wujo, and I've got a couple of other subjects to quickly cover as well in it.
But let's get to the coast to coast interview.
It was with this fellow by the name of Drunvallo, uh Milchis Dick, I think is his last name.
Uh Drunvallo is an interesting name in and of itself.
You rarely see it anymore.
Uh it is a um uh variously described as uh uh l Romanized or Latinized uh German Teutonic, or it's uh described as Germanized uh or Etruscanized uh Latin or old Latin.
And uh Drun means uh the place in the center of your chest from which the noise of your heart emanates.
And Valo is the root for uh valaris, so it means good heart or uh you know heart of valor.
So love the name, Drunvallo, it's quite nice.
And of course it also sounds to a certain extent, uh as it means the Drun of your um of your heart.
Anyway, though, um and just as an aside, this particular uh that particular word predates German even and comes from an area of the black forest uh in the old uh Teuton, and maybe one of the maybe one of really one of the older words in terms of the uh primacy of its relationships back to what is called Sumerian.
So uh just as an aside.
Anyway, so uh Drunvalo, he had a uh an interview um which I've heard part of uh with um George Nori on Coast to Coast, and it brought up the subject of the uh December twenty-one and the crustal shift.
And apparently uh I I've actually lost some of the PDF files when we were kicked off of Earthlink.
I dv we also had a crash here which was qu uh simultaneous, and uh we'd had some people besetting our servers, and so I lost a couple of files.
I'll see if I can recover them.
I think I've got them on a backup somewhere.
It's quite tedious to go through all of these.
Um but in any event the one of the files addresses the alternative hypothesis to the idea of a crustal shift.
And this is what Drunvalo was bringing up.
He was uh bringing up from his perspective what's supposed to go down on December 21 relative to how the Earth is um now and how it'll be in the future.
And he's uh uh speaking um to the idea that we're gonna have a magnetic crustal shift uh or magnetic pole shift, and uh this will induce a crustal shift.
He doesn't call it that.
They they refer to it in different terms in the interview, but basically he's talking about all of a sudden the magnetism will go away and the mantle of the earth will become liquid without m um the magnetism and the crust will uh that's all of us guys up here on the tectonic plates, will go uh walkabout some great distance, and it'll cause all kinds of problems.
Now I also used to be, years ago, uh uh under the impression that this was a very valid theory, because all the evidence pointed to it.
I stopped uh started questioning the elements of the theory late 90s when I came across a number of other facts and started thinking about things differently.
And some of the the uh facts in the matter are that the evidence that that is cited by Drunvallo goes all the way back to people like Charles Hapgood and others, uh his Path of the Poles was one of the seminal works about our weird uh magnetic um tracery that's left on our planet that apparently suggests that our crust goes walkabout periodically,
and that periodity, uh there's no real word there, but that period is actually uh about thirteen thousand years, coincidentally, you know, half of the processional cycle at all.
Okay, well, um, and all of this evidence is valid.
Charles Hapgood, all of the people that followed him, those few that preceded him along this line are all looking at valid evidence and they're making valid conclusions.
Uh the problem is, in my view, they're wrong.
Now, they're wrong because their thinking, in my view, is not open to the idea of an expansion of the planet.
If you view all of the planets as being a uh growing media, so to speak, and a being that will uh grow over time, it brings a new element into play that explains all of the evidence without there having to have ever been a crustal shift.
And you can get into the details with me any time you care to, any detail that you can find that suggests that the crusts of the planets actually rotate uh and have ever rotated, can be explained by the expansion of the planet as well.
Further, there's a really cool thing that just convinces everybody, which is Neil Adams has done some remarkable videos that can be found on YouTube that show the planet expanding.
And it's like, well, duh, this all fits.
And third, there's this other element involved, okay.
And here's where it really the uh scientific uh fat hits the the fire.
In order for uh Drunvalo's uh hypothesis to be valid, and it's not his, I mean he's basing it on other evidence and things that people have t told him, uh they have to postulate a whole series of of events that we do not see occurring around us.
And there's this particular maxim in science that says basically if you don't see the shit happening now, it never ever happened.
And I buy that because I understand that there was no big bang.
That's just a wild ass theory that explains part of the facts of reality and creation, and part of, not anywhere near the totality, and it does so to the extent that it keeps some of the academic minds and some of the sheeple content with this idea that at one time there was nothing and all of a sudden there was something in it and it happened with a big damn bang.
Well, we don't see any evidence of the Big Bang continuing.
If it ever happened, it should be continuing now, and there's absolutely no evidence of it.
All of the ideas of the red shift, how they postulate the expansion of the universe, all of this stuff is all uh hammered into fit the big bang theory after the fact.
So they're trying to make their observable evidence that they see around them uh fit their theory instead of throwing away their theory when all of the facts disagree with it.
So in my world, my understanding of universe, we never had a big bang.
We had an initial bloop as the first atom was created, and thereafter it's been going on ever since.
And so it's not the big bang theory, it's the little bloop bloop bloop bloop bloop bloop, as all these atoms come into existence, some of which are in your body.
So the idea that you were ever made of stardust is bullshit.
Uh those atoms, atoms don't work that way.
They have a lifespan of their own, they deteriorate, they don't hang around forever, they're not little rocks, they're intersections of energy vortices as you are.
And so until you view the planet in an appropriate manner, in the universe an appropriate manner, you're likely to come to some erroneous conclusions.
In my opinion, Drunvalo, in spite of his good heart and his well-placed name, has come to some erroneous conclusions.
And these conclusions are that the crust of the Earth is able to shift.
In order to support that theory, that somebody at some point had to postulate all these wild ass things like uh all of a sudden all the rock going uh over the course of fourteen days becoming molten due to no magnetics holding it together.
Um there's you can argue I could get into details and argue why that couldn't occur and and why if it were ever going to occur it should be occurring now and we should be able to find evidence of it occurring.
And uh you can dispute every single item that they bring up in terms of the people that are suggesting a crustal shift.
And as long as you maintain the view that the Earth is an expansion mode, you have a rational argument that explains what's going to occur And what's happening under our feet.
Now, further, about the idea of the the rock going liquid and the planet shifting, we see no evidence of any of the academic view of tectonic plate theory or any of this on our planet around us.
There's no evidence that the tectonic plates go shift about by a few millimeters every year away from each other on a sphere that does not increase.
There is evidence that the tet that the uh continental masses shift away from each other from the center of the planet because the planet grows little incremental uh movements all the time.
The little blue bloop loop loop is still ongoing inside uh all of universe and including the inside of our planet, which makes our planet get bigger.
And this is actually what's going on, and this is accounts for both the rapid rupt as well as the small incremental uh measurements that they see between the tectonic plates that they are assuming is on a uh stable sphere whose uh circumference and diameter does not change.
As soon as as soon as you allow into your thinking the idea that the circumference and the diameter of the Earth does change, it grows over time, then you can have a different view of things, and that and none of it postulates or suggests at all a crustal walkabout.
So, no, I do not think that Drunvalo is correct, and no, I don't think on December 21 there's going to be any kind of a 14 day period that's going to lead to a crustal walkabout, nor do I think that the Mayan evidence that was uh written down in the long count or on any of the stelli uh in any way relate to any of the idea of a crustal walkabout, although I do think that they are indeed talking about all the other kinds of crap that's going on at the moment.
And a lot of the stuff that they are talking about relates to how uh Morris Cottrell uh uh suggests that the um symbols be translated, and being in the symbol business, I've looked at a lot of these, and I agree with a number of his conclusions.
There are many I don't agree with, uh, such that the as finding the Merkaba there indicating that the uh that uh Judaism was rampant uh in pre um Mesoamerica.
In fact, the Merkaba is a symbol that was adopted by the Rothschilds uh and the uh Kabbalist uh uh late in the or um yeah, late in the last millennia, and so the Maya's use of it predates it as does the Hindus et al.
Um it'd be like saying, Oh, okay, because we find the Merkaba symbol, the intertwined uh tetrahedons in some Sanskrit literature that that we see dating back uh uh at least in terms of its own internal references to uh eclipses and stuff and alignments, it appears to be dating back uh twenty-three thousand years, and so are we to presume that Judaism existed twenty-three thousand years ago just because that symbol?
No.
That's a misidentification of the symbol and the uh uh you know the cause and the and the effect.
So again, we have that, I think, in the case of Drunvalo's uh understanding of what's going to occur.
We are indeed in a period of crisis for the planet insofar as us screwing little critters across the to the surface of it.
This is relates to the uh problems that the Earth itself is undergoing in its own expansion, and as the solar system changes.
The relationship of the planets to the sun is much more complex than anybody would think.
We have evidence of this continuously now in how the moon is no longer the way it was even two years ago, in terms of its lunation.
The lunation has changed, this can be tracked because the lunation is extremely complex, most people are not able to do this, but it is ongoing.
Those people that are telling you, hey, look, the moon is is in a weird position and so on, they're quite correct.
The moon's orbit has not changed because the moon spirals around behind us the same way we spiral around behind the sun.
And in that sense, its spiral relative to our spiral has indeed changed.
And these are all relative to the conical section that we occupy in the coma that is behind our sun as it transits through uh the solar system or through the uh through the universe.
So my supposition uh is um that indeed there may well be magnetic poles uh go walkabout.
We see evidence of this all the time.
And this is a natural phenomena.
In the year 2000, at one point the sun had a number of south poles, and then it had no south poles and a bunch of north poles.
And then finally it decided, okay, I'm gonna have a north pole and a south pole, and I'm gonna put them right here.
And it got done with all that business in relatively short period.
Uh I think it totally encompassed like thirteen or fourteen months.
Uh so it's not unexpected that we might have the same kind of thing occur Here on Earth.
And as a matter of fact, our magnetic field is ever anything but stable, and this is to be expected.
So let's look at that for a second.
A lot of suppositions are based on the idea a lot of the projections, excuse me, a lot of projections and that also are used as evidence for the crustal displacement theory at all.
A lot of these projections and forecasts are based on the idea that Earth should have a magnetic uh field that is stable.
I don't see anything in universe that suggests that that is the case.
There's no evidence that that stability is the nature of universe, and in fact, any time I find something that is stable, usually it's dead.
So let us presume the opposite and see where the thinking leads, and it opens up an entirely new view of what is likely to occur and what should be occurring around us and how we should react to it.
And a lot of the fears that were generated by the discussion on coast to coast would go away if we examine the idea that Earth is never ever supposed to have a stable magnetic field that persists at a particular uh gauss rate, which is a measurement of um magnetic intensity over a long period of time.
Rather, I find it uh it would be exceptional should that ever occur, and it rather be uh I think it would be a little bit scary.
Uh the opposite is really the case.
As any kind of a living being, the planet should have a magnetic field that just goes fluctuating all the time based on all the shit that's going on all around us in the universe, just as it does with the uh humans.
So here's kind of a little um dig at Drunvallo, uh a nice one, I mean I'm not being too nasty.
Uh I find it interesting that he is able to perceive the uh continual variance in the magnetic fields of the humans around him, yet does not expand his thinking to apply that idea to the magnetic field of the planet upon which he walks.
You know, there's no reason that anything should be stable in this universe since we've never seen stability.
In fact, it's kind of stupid of us to even postulate it.
So, uh long way of saying, no, I don't think we're gonna go walk about, but I think yes, there's all kinds of weird ass magnetic effects that are going on, and instability is the nature of the planet, it's the nature of the way.
And so really this is you know, this is what uh martial arts and uh discipline is all about.
In uh in the sea around you, you need a stability internally or you're uh under your feet that allows you to navigate, so as it will put it in the sailor terms here.
So I need a rock solid boat, so to speak, but I don't want my boat to be a rock, I want it to be flexible and float with the with the water, and uh react to the circumstances in which uh uh that the universe will throw at us.
And so uh our point of stability has to be basically internal, since we're talking about uh metaphorically us navigating the seas of universe, uh our boats are our bodies and our thoughts, etc.
And in that sense, the stability that we would gain can't be achieved by a rigid shell, because that's antithetical to the way that universe works, and so we'll never see anything that's antiqual to the way that universe works pop up.
Uh it just uh if it does pop up, well, it's part of the way universe works and isn't antiqual.
So it's one of those weird little um d uh debating points that drives you crazy.
But there is a factual component to that.
The nature of the universe supports continual instability.
We need to recognize this and get our minds wrapped around it.
Because that allows us then to say, okay, if I'm going to be uh buffeted continuously by instability both within my own body and within the bodies of the people around me and within the body of the planet and within all the magnetic fields of the solar system in which I exist, where can I go for a a core or a center or a point upon which to base my navigational um uh abilities within this media.
And many of us choose to to go to a discipline, uh yoga, meditation, uh Tai Chi, you know, any of the martial arts.
Any of these things uh uh and painting, music, uh cooking, um hairdressing, I mean anything pursued with the intent of mastery that becomes a center upon which you can base your navigation is an effective core for you.
It need not be uh basically you what I'm saying is the esoteric, meaning the internal uh perception of universe and projection of ourselves upon universe can be achieved through any vehicle.
It could be uh as bizarre as you know the magnificent sand sculptures, you know, that uh the Buddhists put all the labor into and then destroy when it's done.
Uh, because they're they understand the nature of instability.
It can be, as I say, hairdressing, because you know it's there and it's gone, or nail painting or uh even tattooing, because tattooing alters and you understand the nature of the growth of the body and so on.
Uh all of these things point to the ability to navigate through the instability that is around us.
And if we remove from our uh perception and our goals the idea that stability should be there, then first off, it eliminates all kinds of anxiety.
It's like, ah, screw it, you know, um shit happens, and it's bound to happen, and we just need to be able to figure out how to deal with it rather than attempt to say uh try and fend it off because we think there should be some other natural state of existence.
Makes sense.
So in that sense, uh go and look at all of Drunvalo's arguments and his evidence, and I would have invite him to do the same.
Uh postulate a different view of reality in which instability is the norm and not the uh the exception, and uh that therefore instability just simply is a matter of degree and change is uh uh an inherent nature of it all.
And you can start postulating all or and you get it actually a little bit more settled about it all, because yeah, we're gonna have a magnetic uh pole shift because the magnetism flips all the time.
But there's never been any real evidence of crustal shift, and um there's no real worry about that.
Yeah, there's a reason to fear the earthquakes, because we would get big ones because there's all kinds of evidence that the earth rips itself apart periodically, creates new uh separate land masses in jerks and fits, as well as doing uh little separation growth uh in the little bloop bloop bloop approach as it gets new matter internally.
Uh the two are not mutually incompatible because we see both violent eruptions on the sun and steady growth.
Uh we see this all around us uh continuously.
It is just a nature of um the universe that there is an expression of this level of duality.
I imagine it's gonna be very catastrophic, but the idea that we're going to have the any kind of a crustal shift in terms of the planet going walkabout and having a new axis uh uh i is rather difficult to fit into my point of view.
Uh further, there's other evidence that suggests that everything in universe tilts at a specific angle relative to the little bloop approach of where it popped in.
So the idea that our uh Earth is tilted over at a certain angle relative to the orbit and all the other planets are, and that the that angle should change, is all I also find that uh difficult to comprehend.
Now in Drunvalo's uh evidence and in his discussion they were discussing about the amount of tremendous amount of energy required to have uh a crustal shift occur, and I agree.
The energy required would be on the order of a moon hitting us or something along those lines, and there's never ever been any evidence that such amounts of energy were input in um uh to our planet uh at all, and in fact, there's all the evidence pointing to the energy going the other way.
Uh and it's kind of like uh you can go to any academic on the planet that that uh talks about tectonic plate theory and say, okay, guys, show me a subduction zone.
And they'll say, well, there's a subduction zone off of the Strait of Wanda Fuca where the Pacific plate goes under the the US plate.
And you say, okay, how will it look different than any other part of the planet where we're gonna have, say, the volcanoes and the expansion and so on?
And they cannot describe to you any single thing you can go down uh uh and look at and find that would allow you to think that the area you were seeing was a subduction zone.
You don't see any uh subduction of one plate under another, you don't see any lines in the sediment that indicate that, you don't see any heat lines, you don't see any melting points, you don't see a continuous long uh ribbon of um uh grinding material against each other showing up in any form or another.
There's no heat signature to that effect or any of that.
In fact, when you go to the the rupture off the uh point of San Juan Defuca plate here off the coast of uh North America, you discover, hey, why it's an expansion zone, it's just chalk full of volcanoes and all kinds of stuff popping up all the time as it expands, not as it contracts and gets crowned underneath each other.
So there is no such thing as a subduction zone.
It's a theory that was plotted to support the other theory, which was that the tectonic plates go walk about on a relatively stable uh sphere whose diameter and circ circumference don't change.
Again that's not happening.
So uh we'll see on December 21, and I'll be uh doing an interview on that day with um Dan and uh some of the other guys, and we'll just see how it happens, but I I don't think that'll actually be the case.
Um, but Jordan Velo's wrong um in the interpretation of the evidence, not in his approach.
Uh okay, so now uh a couple of other things here.
Um I've gotten uh some criticism for the uh world government of world citizens because a lot of the people that are on some of the commissions and some of the other individuals that have the passports and stuff are part of the problem.
You know, the the Obama and uh uh agenda twenty-one guys from the UN.
Plus, there's all kinds of words referencing the UN all over the world government of um world citizens site.
And I would uh beg to point out a couple of things.
If you go and read Gary Davis's book, you see why that is the case.
He uses the UN to throw their words right back at them.
Uh UN made these proclamations, well, hey, we can use their their tools, their weapons right back at them.
A weapon turns both ways.
And also, that's the point of giving these passports to all of the heads of state and all of the uh uh creepy guys at the top end of things.
Because it adds to the legitimacy of these each and every time that they're used um any other spot.
And here's the whole point of this.
It is impossible in my understanding of things for a small group to hijack the world government of world citizens, because of two things, or three things really.
Can't exclude anybody.
Everybody is de facto and de jure uh uh if not declared citizen of the planet.
Uh the documents once issued can't be uh withdrawn.
And uh the third component is that there's just too many of us, and we are too fractious.
So the idea that uh this is a an organization in the sense of, you know, like a political party or something, is erroneous.
And in my mind, it'll never ever get there.
And if we got to a global parliament, that would be great because in its nature you would almost have to have that global parliament be global, and that is to say, every single person in the parliament, the space of speaking, uh, would have a voice.
Therefore, uh by its nature, you would not have representational government.
Uh the world government of world citizens, by its nature, cannot be allowed to become representational.
It must be um ubiquitous.
And uh probably the internet is the basic vehicle that would allow this to occur.
But because of the ubiquitous nature of this, everybody being their own representative or having the ability to just point to somebody who is uh articulate and so on, and you want to speak for you at that moment, saying, You be my speak uh speaker, um then that allows us to get around the I the situation that has occurred in the United States where uh the uh uh factions have arisen and driven out everybody else by setting up barriers to entry and representational government and pyramidical structures and so on.
By its very nature, the world government of world citizens is it not pyramidical.
It is um uh a neural net in that fashion.
And we just are around the whole planet.
That's the symbol here, a man reaching or being a human being reaching around the whole of the earth, because that's the case.
It'll it's all of us joining hands.
And there then the last component of this, why it'll never ever end up being representational government and a pain in the ass, is because the admonition that you take when you walk uh come on into this to live in the present.
And uh that is an extremely powerful thing when placed into the hands of debaters.
So yes, I agree, there's uh there's a bunch of um uh individuals that uh could be characterized as UN stooges or agenda twenty-one stooges or primps or promulgators who have shown up on the commissions and so on at the world government of world citizens.
But you'll also know they ain't done shit with it, and that's because the type of organization that it is, they're not able to uh to take it over.
All they've done is to get themselves a certain level of um prominence within that particular uh commission page and note when it was last updated at all, and you'll see that this is not a particularly effective organization, that is to say the world government of world citizens.
Nor should it ever be.
We don't want a real government that way, we want a flattened neural net.
And so the effectiveness should be limited to uh getting the individual citizens in the and the countries out of the way, or out of the get the individual citizens out of problems and get the countries out of the way of uh the bigger issues, allowing the individual citizens to get in there and and take them over.
And I'll be discussing the methods that uh the world government of world citizens offers to us in uh some debates with some uh really interesting radio guys over these next uh few weeks.
And I actually think it'll be quite exciting to get in there and uh present this viewpoint and defend it against perfectly valid other viewpoints, such as the De jure Citizen Movement.
Uh and many of the tactics are the same and and most of the goals are the same.
I just think that this is a brilliant uh opportunity uh to basically subsume the um uh uh UN and and uh the new world order from within and uh take them over.
So we can get into some of those details as we go forward.
But believe me, anything I would ever join, I don't join organizations.
I'm I belong to my dojo and that's it.
Uh so any organization I join, I will uh bend to my will or not be a part of it.
And my will uh would have the world government of world citizens be absolutely flat, non-pyramidical, uh nobody's a boss of me.
That's one of the precepts of this thing is that you are not beholden to anyone, you have the right and and uh you have the right to express yourself as you choose, and that means leaving your country and coming back into it, the place of your birth any time you choose, regardless of the fucktards that have declared themselves the rulers of that particular chunk of land.
I mean that's bogus.
You know, you got all these uh forty-one million, I think, displaced Palestinians that were kicked out because the um uh Brits decided that they owned that area of turf turf and they were gonna give it to uh some people to cause problems and and uh be a uh thorn for other individuals uh later on and they used as a basis the uh quote historical uh BS of the uh Bible uh to valid v uh you know invalidate the rights of the individuals
living on that land, and they kicked out forty-one million Palestinians uh and killed who knows how many more uh uh over the fiction, and they were also, by the way, you note, not living in the present, in the present, there ain't no God here saying that the Jews own that area of g of land, right?
And in the in the present there's no one saying that Korea's gotta be split in half uh in terms of some external force.
The these are all fictions and abstractions that are placed on the mindset and allow the politicians and these other fellows to twist the situation around.
By living in the present, you c if you were in a debate with any individual, you can always bring them back to the circumstances that exist now.
Someone comes on up and tells me that, hey, uh, you know, God told t uh God says the Jews own this land, and I say, okay, in the present and reality in which I live, there ain't no God.
I ain't never seen no God, uh never had God come on down and kick my ass.
If you've got this uh alien being you c and you ask these people, well, where is your God?
And they say, Well, he's all over, and I say, Well, is he on Mars?
Oh sure, he's on Mars.
Oh, okay, so he's off world.
Well, no, he's here too.
And I say, Well, I don't see him here, so he's uh obviously absent now and he's spending all of his time on Mars.
Uh and by the way, why the hell does God have balls anyway?
Uh you know what's God gonna mate with?
Who's he gonna fuck?
So, you know, tell me that this space alien owns any part of the mid east and has the right to give it away, and show me the documentation that proves that.
Show me proof of this.
Uh, you know, the self-referential uh book that you wrote, I can write my own book that's self-referential that uh negates everything that you guys have said, and basically that's what the world government of world citizens is.
It is all of us writing our own books that negate the bullshit in the new world order and saying that my documentation and my book is as valid as your book, prove otherwise.
And they haven't been able to.
And that every time they are f faced with this, they cave.
Now they've tried to subsume the organization.
This is clear.
They've failed.
Uh the organization is uh as a self-organizing collective is r is uh continuing and growing and will alter and and flow and as more and more humans uh join in, it will become more and more different and uh more and more expansive, and they will not be able to control this.
And again, every time they run into by they, I mean the powers that be within the western part of the planet.
And uh actually any other part.
Look at how many uh governments have been confronted with this, and they've caved uh many times after putting Gary in jail.
Uh he was the one of the first ones to do this.
And this was actually my series of conclusions.
I came to the the absolute same conclusion that Gary did, that uh by creating my own series of documents and insisting that they were as valid as anybody else's document and arguing that there is no authority on this planet that makes any document any more valid than any other document, and that if they can prove that there is an authority, um then let them do so, and I'm willing to stand up and take the consequences of that.
Uh i I got to that same set of conclusions.
And then I go out and research, and lo and behold, he'd already done that for me.
Which makes it all ever so much easier because I I have official dom in the sense of documentation that looks cool that I don't actually have to fabricate.
And my sense of graphics is terrible anyway.
So I'm sure that there's a lot better.
Uh so um basically we'll be doing a lot of uh uh debating over that kind of stuff over the next uh few weeks and various different radio shows.
I don't think anything's gonna be happening on the um twenty-first of December.
I actually think we've got until some time in uh uh uh according to our data, the global coastal event uh and the loss of the uh data sets, the dropping out, the holes, the silence, really picks up sometime late February and ramps up in March and then is pretty settled by May.
So uh we could say that well, the solar events or expulsions or whatever the hell we're gonna get into will occur likely in that period.
This would coincide with the uh farsight.org stuff as well.
So I think that's it really.
Just wanted to address those two uh particular things there.
Uh there's just one other element here, and that was the level of um uh I don't want to say comprehension, uh, but the level of uh political savvy,
if you will, personal political savvy required to use the uh world citizen or world government of world citizens documentation for your own uh benefit against the powers that be is decreasing daily as more and more of us pile on on this.
So this truly is one of those things where the masses will make uh a difference.
At some point there is going to be a it'll have a PC-like effect or a or a phone effect where there will be the early adopters, we've already had all of those.
Now we're gonna get into uh the visionaries first.
We had the visionaries, Gary and then his uh first followers there that adopted the idea of world government and uh his passports at all and their passports at all.
And then we've had the um uh the move from the uh visionaries into the early adopters and will cross the chasm here.
Uh so the technology that is represented the political technology, and I use the word political advisedly, that is represented by the world government of world citizens, will cross the chasm, and we will have a large enough collective that the status will change virtually overnight.
And everybody will want to have their their world government on uh ID just because they'll see that that's the thing.
You know, and it's not the lemming effect or any of that, but at some point uh you have to spread the benefit uh picture wide enough for people to get excited about it.
The more people that get excited about it, the further that benefit picture spreads.
And we get that that crossing of the of the chasm there, the chasm, when uh the benefit picture has spread out far enough that people are reacting to it because they've heard it two and three times.
So in many cases you can look at the uh spread of uh Moore's laws and the spread of computing and technology through society in a slightly different way.
I always like altering the perspective.
In other words, you know, um open up your perspective to see that magnetic fields should never be stable and it opens a different way of thinking.
In this case, look at uh the spread of uh technology not as the technology itself or the even the idea, but rather as the uh ripple uh going through the society of the number of times that people hear about something with a good benefit picture.
So you'll find that the visionaries, for instance, they've got a real sharp mind and they jump on these things real early because they can see the benefit picture even ahead of the item appearing.
In other words, there's a lot of people that wrote science fiction uh ahead of the items that they were describing appearing in reality.
And that that would be one of the it'd be an instance of these individuals.
And so you so then then you would have the other kinds of visionaries who read their stories and were prepared for that technology to arrive, instantly knew the benefit picture and adopted the technology because they'd been prepared ahead of its appearance in reality.
Then you'll find that there's other individuals that have to hear about the benefits and have a certain level of over uh inertia overcome.
And they might have to hear about the benefits two or three times, and then they adopt it, and so on.
And so you see a um uh once again a ladder diagram or neural networks uh uh spread pattern appear as uh the number of times that people hear about the benefit pattern of a particular meme or technology before they decide their inertia is overcome and they adopt.
So look at how many how long it took some people to adopt uh computers and then look at how some people got into it right away, same thing with telephones or any technology, gaming, um, you know, any of the music technologies, anything you can care to name.
Now what's interesting in our fractured world where there's people that are video focused, other people that are audio focused, etc., is that you will get these uh neural network patterns that will cross these individual um and collective um uh areas of mental interest.
So you'll find that some patterns will suddenly leap from the video world into the audio world, take that by storm and go on to the kinetic world, you know.
So you may see a a meme appear in uh video that goes through audio and into yoga, or vice versa.
I mean it's just they appear and and float around uh various different um uh from various different perspectives influencing each other.
And so I suspect that that's what's occurring right at the moment.
The reason that that I suspect that this is occurring is because we have solid evidence of it, some of which I put up on my site.
If you go down into the middle column and look down far enough, you'll see this um thing about this guy who discusses why the future is valuable.
And that's a very uh incredible meme, seeing where it's coming from and where it's going through.
And of course, we see a lot of the um development of fringe stuff come out of music and the creative artists, who are, by the way, being hugely influenced by the Sololunius in a way that the sheeple is now reacting to more sluggishly and dully.
The artists had been reacting to years ago.
And so here we see the artists now, uh some of the groups I've put on my site intermittently that are exhibiting the language of revolution and everything that I've been discussing a number of years back.
It's now appearing in the mainstream, which is basically the internet.
And we're seeing it in music and in gaming and all these themes appear.
And so the spread of the uh particular language and in its benefit picture follows particular neural network patterns, also known as ladder diagrams, uh, which really mimics like the spread of disease through population, and frequently the example cited is the spread of a disease through an orchard, how some trees remain untouched uh until very late in the process and others uh uh succumb very early.
And if we look at it a different way, that's also the same mechanism whereby the spread of information goes through society and alters and changes things.
And so we see these patterns exist over and over and over again in all of universes, just these basically the same pattern, the same fractal pattern, uh interlaid on itself, made more complex and shifted to a different area of focus.
This is why I am able to say with some certitude that we've we've never seen a uh liquefication of the uh of the um mantle of the planet uh by then I mean as far as I'm able to determine, it's never occurred, And that we've never ever seen a situation where there's been no magnetics.
They've been very low, but there's never been a situation of none.
And even if we had none, it wouldn't cause the effect that's being postulated because of the energy issues involved.
Because the universe doesn't work that way.
It doesn't work in big bang, it works in little bloops.
Ergo, we have the following situation where we're gonna get a lot of little bloops, the planet's gonna grow, there's gonna be some ruptures, uh the result of the growth will cause us some disturbances up here, but it won't shift me to the position uh in the from the Pacific Northwest down to the equator.
It just doesn't work that way.
Never has.
We're interpreting evidence to that effect, and our interpretations are valid and our conclusions are valid on based on that evidence, absent certain pre um uh examination of the assumptions.
And the assumptions th are invalid.
The assumptions that they make are that the magnetic um uh stability of the planet is uh long lasting, that it's not perpetual and uh but uh very long lasting, and further that we're in a period of instability, which is rare, and I don't think that is true.
And also the universe doesn't support that view.
So, in any event, um the uh spread of the world government of world citizens um uh meme, whether it's that organization or not, I mean we can create another one.
We could call it, you know, uh old dogs government for old dogs and start all over again.
Doesn't matter.
And see that's the beauty of it too.
The world government of world citizens, uh if as an o if an organization arose that was pure medical in structure and it pissed everybody off, well everybody is certainly free, as the UN and all of the uh everybody states we have the free to put our political uh we have the freedom to put our political allegiance where we want.
We can just tell the world government of world citizens to piss off, we're gonna form another one that's different and that's better, and so we have this revolutionary capability within it continuously.
And I think that is great because it is the struggle that keeps the purity going.
Um in any event though, uh it's a worth uh worth the experiment.
And between now and uh the collapse of the or the global coastal event, which is not the end of the world, but it's the beginning of a uh significant series of changes that'll slap the sheeple upside the head and cause a major mental shift to occur across the planet.
Uh but until then, I figure the world government of world citizens is just the proper vehicle to go in out and cause problems for the powers that be.
And yes, there is that one last nagging bit of stuff.
If I were to act in a capacity and join the uh, you know, sovereign order of world guards and going out and arrest some of the uh nasty bastard banksters, just what the hell would we do with them?
We don't have any process nor place to put 'em.
Uh actually, I've I've thought on that thought about that.
You wouldn't really have to do anything.
You would uh would be not necessary on this planet to incarcerate them.
Uh would not be necessary to impede on their freedom in any way, shape, or form, an arrest for the world uh government has a different nature anyway.
Because there's no place on the planet for them to to flee, uh, in a global society based on uh the world government of world citizens, uh they would actually have to exit the planet to be able to extricate themselves from the authority of the planetary government.
Therefore, you don't have to throw 'em in jail.
All you would have to do is to serve papers on them.
In essence, a summons to appear to defend yourself, and absent that uh, you know, ex uh uh be prepared to accept the consequences of um failure to show up and defend yourself or f or showing up and failing to defend yourself adequately against the charges.
And that m that might mean incarceration, it might mean the confiscation of your wealth, this kind of thing.
And see, there's the rub.
Even if they're even if they uh don't show up and don't submit to incarceration and all that, the world government and world citizens, all of us, we would have the authority and the power to crush their lives.
You know, even if it got to the point where taxicabs wouldn't stop for 'em, you know, their the drivers of limos wouldn't open the doors, you know, the doormen wouldn't open the doors, the bankers wouldn't cash the check, the teller wouldn't cash the check, because these people would be branded as having been guilty and and all of us would know about it.
And where would they flee to?
Uh yes, there would probably be places on this planet that would set themselves up as um uh havens for the convicted among our population, but that means almost self incarceration if these people go to those particular areas.
And we could, if we wanted, and I think it's necessary that redemption always be possible.
And so I would offer that if uh the world government of world citizens got to the point where it was submitting summons to appear to defend yourself and then issuing the consequences of uh failure to defend yourself from a world court and though there were sanctions levied against an individual, I would suggest that those sanctions should never include violence because it's not necessary anymore.
That's an uh an anachronism of the nation state.
They have to use force.
We don't and that further that we should have a path of redemption.
Someone who is convicted and is guilty should have a method whereby they can redeem themselves in our eyes.
That may be some form of coventry, self-exile with risk of death or something.
I don't know.
I don't know what the mechanism should be, but it needs to exist because all humans are redeemable, even the worst among us.
So we need that.
And also, like I say, rest is going to take a different form.
And if you had to, so for instance, say that the government of world citizens decided based on a petition brought by Max Keiser.
I'm just using Max as an example.
I don't think that he would even participate in this.
But say that he brought forth a petition for the arrest of Jamie Dimon for crimes against humanity using the vehicle of money.
And that the appropriate body within the world council, world government decided, okay, you know, Max Keiser has a really damn good point.
And he's presented enough evidence here for us to go through the process of indicting Jamie Dimon.
We do so.
We produce a document that, you know, in a document of basically saying we suspect.
that you're guilty of these crimes here's some of the evidence against you you have the rights uh to defend yourself and we're presenting you with a summons and if you fail to defend yourself you'll have to be um uh censured because uh you will have been found guilty by us as having been a right royal bastard who's been out fucking people and killing and causing problems with money and this is not to be tolerated.
And then at that point we would all have to decide what those sanctions would have to be and how they would be enforced and so on.
But again violence isn't necessary.
There's no need for incarceration in a in a planetary government.
The only incarceration or separation we would need would be for those people that are so violently mentally ill that we are unable to cure their mental states and make them you know and assist them in becoming part of the planet.
And also again anybody who refuses to be um to participate in curing their mental illness has a perfect right to that.
I I enjoy my mental illness and I would never ever ever allow myself to be subjected to the cult or religion of psychiatry to cure that.
There's a virtue in being mentally ill and we need those mentally ill around us.
However we also need you know the vehicles that allow people to get out of the situations that we find ourselves in because life is tough and uh we need all of us even uh we need to redeem all of us.
So, you know, I'm just offering that out there, that just thinking about it, a sovereign order of world guards who had gone out, they wouldn't have to do much, really.
They're not going to have to be violent.
They're not going to have to be cops or policemen.
Policemen, by the way, are policy enforcers.
Our guys are not even going to have to be law enforcers because they're not enforcing the common law.
They're merely acting as messengers of the will of the world government of world citizens.
in that case any citizen would have the right to uh put forth arguments that any other citizen had trespassed or caused a crime and and that this should be addressed.
It's gonna be hugely chaotic uh especially since lawyers wouldn't be allowed.
This is a situation where common law prevails and so no legalistic bullshit precedent blah blah blah is going to get you out because it doesn't get doesn't get argued that way it's uh done in the present moment common law exists in the present moment.
All the abstractions of the legal system and precedents and so on exist in some other moment, past or future.
Aragor wouldn't be allowed.
And therefore the the discovery process, all of this sort of thing would be relatively quick once it was in enjoyed.
Again it would be difficult and chaotic especially at first as we felt our way forward with all of this but you know as they observe all things are difficult in the beginning and we got to start somewhere.
So you know hey uh you know Max if you want to put together a uh uh a petition to arrest Jamie Diamond and present it to the world government um of world citizens and they accepted that petition I would volunteer to to present the summons to him even though I don't travel I would I would present that summons to him in a dignified and adult manner without force and uh hopefully act as a good example on how such things could be conducted uh with the guilty among us.
So thanks ever so much for listening.
Uh once again I've taken up way too much of your damn time.
▲
Export Selection