What Is The Great Reset? With Harrison Smith & Chase Geiser | OAP #63
Harrison Smith is the host of American Journal from 8:00am to 11:00am Monday through Friday. You'll have to use duckduckgo.com to find it because if I link it here the video will be censored and if you search it on Google it's likely nothing will come up.
Here's the description of American Journal:
Taking a record of the heart and minds of the people, American Journal puts the power of the conversation into the callers' hands. Join us Monday through Friday, 8-11AM CST and call in to talk to our roundtable of rotating hosts on all current topics and stories in the news and on your mind.
In this episode we discuss The Great Reset and other issues facing America today.
Hey, this is one American podcast live with Harrison Hill Smith of InfoWars.com.
InfoWars.com bandad video.
Thank you so much for having me on.
Absolutely, man.
Thanks for coming on and hanging out.
It's really an honor and a pleasure to be with you.
My wife and I watch InfoWars on our Roku.
We figured out that you guys stream on Roku.
And we started watching it.
And you know, we had a baby this year, and for the longest time, I swear to God, the only thing that would make our baby fall asleep was Alex Jones' voice.
It's a very soothing baritone.
I get it.
I get it.
Although I tend to I tend to get fired up when I listen to him, you know, to each his own.
It's a great lullaby.
I know, right?
Me too.
He's like, we we always uh we always uh say that we wish that uh he he he was the he was the grandpa that our daughter Kennedy never had.
Oh man, I mean Alex Jones is everybody's badass uncle, or at least you'd want him to be, right?
Yeah, goes out, shoots guns with you, goes hunting with you, tells you about how the world really works.
And we love your show.
Your segment's great too.
We call you the jet the the Jeffrey Dahmer guy.
Yeah, yeah, the glasses.
Well, you know, everybody says Jeffrey Dahmer.
I mean, maybe maybe there's other stuff that looks like him.
Uh some other people say uh I'm blanking on his name, but uh the guy from Waco, right?
The thing is, everybody had these glasses in yeah, yeah, David Koresh, that's the other one I get.
But everybody in the 80s had these glasses.
Absolutely.
There were they made one style of glasses from 1981.
One serial killer has to ruin it for everybody.
Yeah, all of a sudden it's it's the serial killer glasses.
But look, hey, what are you gonna say?
You look great, man.
You look great.
And I loved the uh recent video that just went viral that you made.
I thought that was absolutely hysterical.
Uh, thank you very much.
Yeah, it's it's really blown up, gotten a lot of great response, which is good.
Humor, you know, I think that's what our side has been missing for a little while.
Yeah, yeah.
It used to be that like I mean, there's a lot of good people not to say.
Oh, of course, of course.
But and and it used to be that all the all the artists and the comedians were just sort of on the left, and it was just something that you just knew.
And then now I think it's kind of they've become the left has become the no-fun side of things.
It's weird how that switch happened kind of overnight.
Yeah, they're so they're just unbelievably lame now, and there's so many talented people on the right, from Tim Dylan to Ryan Long to uh JP something, I can never remember.
JP Sears.
JP Sears, yeah, yeah.
He's he's really good too.
So there's it's like there's a plethora of conservative info or conservative comedy out there now because it's not in the system, it's just people on their own making stuff.
So it's fantastic.
So how did you get how did you get involved with InfoWars, man?
Uh I got involved with InfoWars as a cameraman and editor originally.
So I quite literally just responded to a Craigslist ad.
And uh it was somewhat serendipitous.
I sort of knew it was InfoWars when I applied, but I wasn't totally sure.
But I I just started working for them as yeah, cameraman and editor and just started making reports on my own.
And they're pretty open.
As long as you get you know what you're supposed to do done, you can work on whatever you want.
So I just started working on reports and nobody ever stopped me.
So now I have my own show, which is fantastic and very fun.
That's been awesome.
That must be a wild experience uh for you just to go from being behind the camera to being on camera.
It really has been a crazy because you know, so often with Alex Jones, when he does something, and unfortunately it's been less now because of not just the coronavirus and everything, but we used to travel a lot more and we used to do a lot of stuff, and it was always very fun, like being just on the edge of like national headlines.
You know, to be Alex Jones doing something, and I'm just off screen filming him doing that thing.
So it was very fun getting to like be his cameraman or getting to be you know Schroyer's cameraman and going around and filming stuff.
Because yeah, even if I am not on the screen, it's like, yeah, that video we we just made got 10 million views or whatever.
And man, it was it was very fun at the beginning when we were able to go live on YouTube and had a YouTube account and Twitter account.
So I was there for a couple years when that was the case, and it was absolutely fantastic.
And now it's still great because we saw a band.
It was uh we're we were allowed on those things.
Yeah, I remember I watched uh I watched Alex Jones at his his first appearance on Andrew Schultz when he did the when he did the Andrew Schultz podcast.
Yeah.
Um I think it's called Flagrant 2.
I think that's what the name of his podcast is.
And I remember he was Andrew asked him, you know, have you noticed a spike in your numbers since you've been banned from YouTube?
And Alex was just like, no.
It was just like a really funny moment.
When that happened, I remember it vividly when that happened, and they everybody said, you know, it's Just Alex Jones, it's just gonna happen to Alex Jones, he's crazy, it's just gonna happen to him.
And now we see it happening to like every small conservative account, and it's apparent that it's not just going after the conspiracy theorists.
And I and I'm an Alex Jones fan, so don't get me wrong.
I'm not trying to put him in a category of like crazy conspiracy theorists because I love it.
I do not think of the term conspiracy theorists as a prerogative or a uh you know drug training.
Yeah, right, yeah, exactly.
Yeah, yeah, I agree.
And it but everyone thought I was gonna everyone said it was gonna stop there, and and it's got it's only gotten worse and worse and worse.
They're they're banning senators and congress people now.
I mean, it's it's gotten very bad, very, very bad.
And you know, we we also don't like on bandot video, we we actually still get a ton of views, like it's really amazing how well some of our videos can do, especially in the sense that we I don't know if I'm supposed to talk about this, but the way that we count views is much more accurate than the way that YouTube or Twitter or anybody else counts views.
They do a certain thing where if you watch a couple minutes, then it counts as a view.
So one view of a video will actually be counted like four or five, ten times sometimes.
It's it's very strange.
And we don't do that at all.
It's like you have to watch like more than half our video, and that'll count as a view.
So we actually still have a lot of views there, but man, when we used to be on YouTube, it was just like upload and you just watch the numbers go up, watch the comments come in.
It was very fun to like interact with the community.
That's like what it was all about, which is why they kicked us off, right?
It's not for it's not for false information, right?
You know, the ancient aliens is still on the history channel.
It's not about what's true or what's false, it's about uh disrupting social movements, of which InfoWars was one of the most powerful, and they've unsuccessfully derailed it, they've just sort of knocked it off course for a bit.
Yeah, and when I watch, you know, Alex, Alex and Owen, they both talk about a lot of the attacks that you guys are facing constantly.
Um, it hasn't really ended with just being banned from the mainstream platforms.
You guys still face a lot of issues.
Is it hard for you guys to find banking, for example?
What's going on?
And what's the future look like for InfoWars?
Man, I'm uh I'm as far as you're able to speak.
Well, you know, as well, I'll talk about whatever I know, uh, but I'm somewhat blitzfully ignorant about that side of the business just because I mean Alex is running around like a chicken with his head cut off half the time, just dealing with everything.
I mean, he runs the store, he runs the and then the legal lawsuits and going against it.
So I basically know as much as anybody else that watches Alex Jones show, because that's where I get that information.
There's not a lot of like behind the scenes stuff because we're just worried about getting a show out, making it look good, getting the information right, getting good guests.
Like that's what we focus on, and that's what we do.
Uh so I know as much as literally anybody else, and it's always uh it's always an edge of the knife sort of thing because it's a massive company.
The equipment that we use is uh top of the line, very expensive.
The uh bandwidth that we use, we have to pay for all of it since we built our own infrastructure from the ground up.
We can't rely on Google or uh you know YouTube to support all that stuff, which is an immense amount of money.
I mean, it's shocking how much money it costs just to put out video constantly hosting on your own servers.
So uh, you know, it's it's it's a machine that's rolling and it's got to keep going.
And so thank God the InfoWars audience is literally the best audience in the entire world.
I know I use the word literally too much, but this is one case where it's warranted.
They are the most like fanatic and genuinely so, you know, they they understand it, they get it, they've have been watching Alex for as long as I've been watching him right 15, 20 years, and maybe I've watched him that long, but a lot of our our listeners have, and they they really support the hell out of him and it it goes right back into the business.
And so we've they've kept us afloat this whole time.
It wouldn't have been possible without Alex seeing what was coming ahead and building the InfoWars store and then the InfoWars audience keeping us alive.
We don't get big checks from billionaires, so it's entirely, you know, if we aren't doing what we're need to be doing for the audience, they won't support us and we'll go away.
So it's that that's what we're that's what I'm concerned with on a daily basis.
Sure.
Well, my my wife and I, we we we uh we're we we fall into that category.
We bought a thousand dollars worth of uh food during the freeze last year in Austin because like you know, we live in Austin too, just like you, and uh it was scary to not be able to leave the house and not have power, and so yeah, we were watching InfoWars and we bought the we bought the the buckets full of food that lasts 25 years, you know.
And the mac and cheese isn't that bad.
It's really good, it's really good.
I did a taste test commercial for it, and I legitimately thought the the you know mac and cheese that comes in the stuff is actually fantastic.
It's it's like college cafeteria quality, I would say, like a good college cafeteria quality, which isn't bad.
I didn't I didn't go to college, but it's it Would be it's it's much better than nothing.
Let's just say yeah, because I was in the freeze too, and I was literally getting texts from people.
I always saw the story, but texts that were just like, hey man, you know where I can get some food and water.
It's like this is a guy.
You know, yeah, yeah, pretty much just being like, look, there's a jack in the box open on seventh street.
Like it was it was crazy, man.
And uh, you know, it could be 10 years until you actually need the food, but when you actually need it, it's damn good to have it, or else you are literally going to grocery stores and all of the shelves are empty and the trucks can't get in, and uh and that's dorble food doesn't look like such a risky purchase anymore.
Yeah, so how long have you been have you personally been on air on Bandot Video?
We are well on air in general, several years, just because I was all I'd always fill in for hosts or I'd do reports and that sort of stuff.
But American Journal is my show, 8 to 11, 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. central time zone each and every weekday, Monday through Friday, and it's live, it's a live broadcast.
I've been doing that for a little over a year.
I thought I started in January last year, but we looked back and uh it actually started in December.
So what do I know?
Wow.
So yeah.
So how hard is it to go live for three hours straight?
Uh was it hard at first?
It well kind of.
Uh not really, honestly.
I sort of just for me resetting my my clock.
I basically wake up now when I used to fall asleep, right?
I used to love staying up all night and I'd work till four in the morning and fall asleep.
Now I'm having to wake up at four in the morning.
That was a a bit of a shift for me that I one year in and still not really all that used to.
And every weekend I blow I'd stay up all night and throw myself off.
But um, that was a bit of a struggle.
But but three hours is never enough, man.
With the number with the amount of news that comes out on a daily basis, I have a hundred stories that each could I could spend an hour on digging into who's involved, what they're up to.
So it's really not a struggle.
Plus, I do a call-in show, so we take a lot of calls.
That makes it very easy for me because we have fantastic callers that just you know start talking and for four or five minutes, it's just like we get to the commercial break, and I'm like, I'm sorry, I have to cut you off, but that was amazing, you know.
So uh, so I didn't I you know it's it's really one it's the easiest job in the world, man.
I just I just talk for three hours and then I have a crew that does everything behind the scenes, so I it's it's really fantastic, actually.
Man, I'm happy for you.
That's gotta be an awesome experience.
The longest I ever streamed, and I sent you a link.
I don't know if you had a chance to take a look, but on January 6th.
I did let's go, Brandon, for seven and a half hours over and over again.
You s you sent me that video, and I didn't look at the title before I clicked on it, and I was doing something else, so I just clicked on it and I said to the side, and I was like, Oh, this is a funny intro.
He's gonna keep saying it.
And like I just I was just doing other stuff, and like Jim McLeod, I'm like, he's still no way.
There's no way.
And then of course you so you did it for like seven and a half.
I admit I didn't watch the whole thing.
I'm sorry I didn't watch it.
I know I don't nobody did.
I mean, I hope not anyway.
I don't I yeah, it's seven hours and twenty-eight minutes.
Um it is a world record, I'm sure.
I don't know if Guinness is gonna recognize I mean, no, I I just came up with the idea.
I don't think anyone's even attempted it, but I've said let's go brandon over 25,000 times.
I think that means it's a world record, and I think I will sign the petition to get you in the Guinness Wicker Records, which would be you know, you are worthy of the esteem of being in that great book.
It was a wild experience, man.
But but to go three hours straight every single day, there's an art to that.
And you know, Alex is the master of it, you do a great job of it.
But I it just the amount of the amount of knowledge and and I start like I said earlier, I started doing this podcast back in May, and I really started getting serious about my Twitter at that time, just because I was using Twitter as a primary tool to get guests on the show.
Uh just like I got you on the show.
And um I my awareness with current events in in in politics is is is like 10 notches better than it ever was before.
And that's really all it takes is if you if you know what's going on, and it and like little stuff like like the names of people, like who is the you know, the director of the CDC, right?
Or just the little stuff that you like when you're a kid, you like have no idea what's going on, but you start to learn these things.
Uh and and the more knowledge you have, the easier it is to just go and go and go.
I mean, uh it it's easy enough to do a three-hour rant on the Supreme Court ruling the other day.
Everybody's celebrating it, but at the same time, it's like, well, everybody has rights except for healthcare workers.
Like, that doesn't seem to really make sense.
So it's like you don't know whether to celebrate or scream, you know.
Yeah, well, and of course, then you have Joe Biden, because it's what I always say.
I mean, uh, I don't know what it is, but there's gotta be some mechanism for punishing the attempt to exceed constitutional authority.
Because what happened was as soon as the Supreme Court decided Joe Biden goes out and is just like, well, we missed the target this time, but we'll get them next time.
And it's just like, no, you don't just get to keep re you know, rewording things until your tire your tyranny passes muster.
Like that that's not how this is supposed to work.
But yeah, again, we could go off on a three-hour tangent on that.
Well, and I'm with you, and the thing that's so bothersome to me about the um uh this particular Supreme Court ruling and the mandates is other than the fact that they were just blatantly tyrannical, okay, is is that if you look at footage of Saki, uh Kamala, Biden from during the campaign, they acknowledged that they were they knew mandates were impossible and illegal at the federal level.
They were say they were saying this.
And so what that implies, uh, really beyond reasonable doubt in my mind, is that they passed the mandates, they forced the mandates knowing that they were illegal, knowing that by the time the Supreme Court ruled on the legality of them, it would be too late and the damage would already be done.
And that's exactly what happened.
So that the fact that they knew they were illegal and didn't just disagree or think that they were legal and they were they were wrong, like you know, past rulings have been and uh Supreme Court rulings have been the fact that they knew that it was illegal and they pushed it anyway to me seems like grant grounds for impeachment.
And I don't like to throw that word around because I hated it when the left did so much for Trump, but it really really seems like a gross over overreach and abuse of power.
Look, you know, these two impeachments would not be made of the same caliber, right?
They had nothing on Trump.
The the stuff that Joe Biden has already gotten away with doing or you know, lying about or falsifying, I mean, it's pretty outrageous.
I I mean the latest one, of course, was him saying, like, I'm you know, this here's an out here's a call from the president of the United States to big tech companies, social media companies and news companies to get this type of, you know, get the information that contradicts me off your airwaves.
I mean, that's an obvious violation of you know, strictures within the government uh within the constitution, but also it's reflective of the great reset, which is rule by corporation, really.
So even if the Supreme Court, you know, even if they couldn't do it through OSHA or couldn't do it through uh some sort of governmental you know apparatus, they put the the thought out there and they have their corporate stoolies do it for them.
So this is this is how we'll be operating from now on, right?
Who you vote for won't matter, who's on the Supreme Court won't really matter.
What the corporations and the politicians decide in their secret conclaves, that will be how things go, and what you have to say about it uh makes you a domestic terrorist, actually, if you disagree.
Uh it's actually incredibly troubling where we're going.
And you know, I think the Supreme Court, I mean, the big story, the big headline from the Supreme Court, forget how they decided, the misinformation they were working off of, the complete lies they were going off of, which is 100,000 children on ventilators.
Absurd.
Completely baseless and absurd, right?
But sort of uh planted in her mind by the mainstream media.
So these are three of the arms of the apparatus, right?
Of the of the octopus currently strangling our the face of humanity, is the media and the corporate corporatocracy, the corporate world, and then the political world, and they're all just operating on the same timeline and the same narrative in cooperation with another with each other, in coordination with each other, using, you know, the information from the media one to justify the uh, you know, uh political actions of the political one, which is then translated to the corporate one, who they support the certain politicians that the media tells them to.
It's just one big disgusting spider's nest uh that Joe Biden is the decrepit corpse on top of, I guess, is the big spider.
Yeah, I'm with you.
And it's it what it really boils down to is that the government has outsourced the violation of your rights, namely your First Amendment rights to big tech and other corporations.
And they they can't do it, they can't quite they can't silence you themselves, and so they they they they apply pressure to these corporations by things like what we just saw with Biden's speech.
That is that is a very subversive threat.
And that's frankly, it's a dog whistle.
And anybody on the board or in leadership positions at these major companies understand that if they don't comply with those sort of demands, as subtle as they are, they're gonna Face things like antitrust litigation uh or antitrust legislation from people like Elizabeth Warren.
These these politicians openly call out specific businesses in their in their messaging.
And it's like it's threatening.
And so the the fact that we live in a society where our politicians can threat specific businesses, threaten uh specific businesses, implies to me that these businesses aren't really private businesses.
I mean, this it's this is exactly what fascism is, right?
When government and corporations work together, and and and if the government's actually pulling the strings on what these major corporations do or do not do, then it then how can you say they're private?
And how can you say that they don't have to observe uh or respect our our our rights as they're protected in the constitution, namely the Bill of Rights.
I'll tell you, I'm hurting my neck from nodding so much.
I mean, it's exactly right.
And I, you know, I keep calling the great reset the the great cooperation, right?
Because that's that's all this is because in a way, you're almost thinking of it in a in a in an old school sort of way where the government is sort of pressuring these companies, but we know that the companies don't need pressure.
So what the government is doing is either giving them the Casas Bell I, right?
Or the the justification for doing what they're already gonna do, or giving them the cover to say, hey, if you do this and you get sued, you know, the message is going out to the legal system or the department of justice that actually this is this is our policy, this is how we're gonna move forward.
So it's almost like I would love if the company, if the big tech companies were like, we don't want to censor anybody, and the government was like, oh, but I'm gonna put pressure on you, and they were being forced to do that.
Then at least you'd have one side of the equation was on the side of freedom.
But unfortunately, they're both on the same side, which is of censorship and segregation and diminishing, you know, their enemies by uh eliminating their voices from the public square.
And they're both like, yeah, totally, we're both in favor of that.
We're both gonna do that.
We'll both share messaging.
I mean, the best example would be the fact that it was just revealed that the Secretary of Education was the one that asked the school board to write the letter to the Justice Department to call the protesting parents uh terrorists, basically, right?
So the government wants to do something, but it can't just do it or everybody's gonna be mad.
So they just go out to their partners in the non-government organization sphere or in the corporate sphere, and they go, hey, ask us to do this, and that'll give us the justification to do it.
And so they're playing it both ways, right?
Ask us to do this, and then we'll send the FBI to go kick down the doors of concerned mothers, or hey, encourage us to do this, and then when we censor people, we can say, hey, we're just going along with what our government is is asking us to do.
It's it's soft power, and man, is it deep seated?
Yeah, that's that's a really good, that's a really interesting perspective and a really good point.
I was relieved just just to add a shred of optimism.
I was relieved to see that General Electric re electric revoked the uh vaccine mandates today.
Uh so we do have some businesses that push back.
I think some of them have to, man.
I think some of the hospitals are being forced to because they're so short-staffed.
I think uh, you know, it's I don't know.
It's because I I have other people, you know, people DMing me or people calling into my show saying, hey, I work for this big bank and they're forcing vaccine mandates anyway.
So I don't know how effective the Supreme Court ruling will even be in the long run if the corporations decided decide they're above American law, which is the ultimate goal of this whole great reset.
Yeah, so tell me a little bit about the great reset, because I'm not intimately familiar with it.
I know that Klaus Schwab is sort of depicted as this like evil mastermind at the top of it.
I know there was a great reset report, and I know about the famous line, you know, you'll have you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
So I'm familiar with that, but I'm less entrenched in the like overarching conspiracy of the Great Reset.
Uh what's what's the scoop, man?
Come on, tinfoil hat on here.
Uh, that's cool.
It's anything's not a conspiracy theory at all.
It's actually a conspiracy fact.
They're quite open about it.
Klaus Schwab wrote a book called The Great Reset where he lays this uh out.
But uh Klaus Schwab has been a uh I I like to call them world controllers.
That was the that was what they're called in Brave New World, right?
These people that ran the world and and knew all the stuff that was hidden from the people underneath, like that's essentially what we have unelected billionaires, either they made their money through hooker crook or through you know family largesse.
But regardless, you have this guy Klaus Schwab, who is the head of the Davos group and head of the World Economic Forum.
And remember, the Devos group and the Bilderberg group used to be these secret conclaves of royalty and nobility and corporate masters and you know banksters and economic masters, and they would get together and basically plan for the next year.
Here's what we're gonna do, here's how things are gonna progress, here's how we're gonna manipulate things.
And people noticed this and called them out, and they said it doesn't exist.
It's not happening.
What do you think?
Are you a conspiracy theorist?
All these world leaders meeting in secret.
Why would we ever do that?
We're open democracies.
Then, of course, you know, through the works of people like Alex Jones and others, it was revealed, okay, they actually are meeting every year.
And there's a couple of them, the Davos, the Bilderberg, and a few others.
And so now they're like, yeah, we are meeting in secret, or but now it's not secret anymore.
Now we're telling you what we're doing, and we're actually advertising it because we're getting together in conclaves and discussing in secret and setting priorities for the next year for you, for your benefit, because we're good people.
That's the strategy they're going with now.
And so he, Klaus Schwab has been head of the World Economic Forum, head of the Davos group, and the World Economic Forum is this one.
And you can call it agenda, uh, it was originally agenda 20, wait, gender agenda 20, agenda 2030 from the U, Agenda 21.
It was sorry, originally agenda 21, then it became agenda 2030.
So again, the UN, the World Economic Forum, these are international globalist, you know, think tanks that come up with this stuff and put it in, put the plans into place and then operate on the plans.
And so they've had they basically influence almost anybody who's anybody at any point, right?
It's been revealed that you know, I think the Dutch prime minister posted his letter from the World Economic Forum.
So essentially, what their plan is, I mean, you can get way down the line, but what they want to do now and what they're implementing now is what they call stake uh stakeholder capitalism.
So instead of shareholder capitalism, where you're trying to make the most money with your business.
Now the most important thing for your business is to serve certain social and economic and environmental goals.
So they have the ESG score, and this is like the social credit score for corporations, and that's how corporations will be graded now, not by how much money they make, but by how much they provide to the service of the greater narrative.
ESG is environmental, social, and governance scores.
And so these are things like racial quotas for your the governance of your company, as well as you know, how much you give to climate change uh operations and you know how many how many rainbows you put on your commercials.
Like literally, it's like the more rainbows you put, the more money that the banks will send to you.
It's a very, very sick system.
And Klaus Schwab's at the head of this, and he's sort of the one that coined it.
And you can uh another one of his lackeys, like his underdog is or not underdog, but like right-hand man is Mark Binioff, who uh created Salesforce, right?
And one thing that Salesforce did, they had massive operations in, I believe it was Idaho.
Idaho wanted to pass a law where they I think it was something like they were not banning conversion therapy, something like that.
It was something that having to do with homosexuality, but it was a very sort of tame law, wasn't anything extreme or anything.
But Salesforce said the Idaho people voted on this, the Idaho legislative voted on this, they passed it, but Salesforce doesn't want it.
So Salesforce will withdraw this billion dollar industry from your state unless you veto this bill and the governor vetoed the bill.
So that's that's what stakeholder stakeholder uh activism basically is, or corporate activism, where they flex their corporate might.
And of course, we saw this with So stakeholder fascism, basically.
It is quite literally fascism, right?
Because these are the same companies where they're uh boycotting the MLB game in Georgia over voter rights there, racist voter rights, while simultaneously lobbying to continue to do trade with the Uyghurs in China with no oversight with the slave camps.
So they don't exactly have your best interest in mind, but they will use your largest, your your you know, capitalist system to manipulate you to their will.
And that that's what the grace reset essentially represents.
You remember the TPP, the gold standard of trade agreements that Trump luckily got us out of.
One of the main contentions of that was that you would have a corporate court system that would decide cases that would be superior to national courts.
So these corporations could sue other corporations in an international court that superseded rulings of the national court.
And that's sort of the ultimate goal is a globalist unelected technocratic government over all of the national governments, and then actually can manipulate and use the national governments to their will.
Uh back to Mark Binioff.
So he used Salesforce to do this in Idaho, and uh he also owns Time magazine.
Time magazine came out with a big spread about the Great Reset, telling you how wonderful it was.
They'll also tell you it's a conspiracy theory and not to look into it.
So you can take that for what it is.
But so they admitted to manipulating the election in 2022.
And it was also Time magazine.
Right, exactly.
And I'm you know, I'm sure they have some man as woman of the year.
I mean, they're they're all in, right?
And it's because they're philanthropists.
They love philanthropy, you know, and he'll and so Mark Benioff will uh donate millions of dollars to a hospital.
And what do you know?
Two months later, the hospital has a brand new clinic for transgender children.
Isn't that wonderful?
Don't you love their uh philanthropy that they offer you as they chemically castrate your children?
It's very sick stuff, but it's all very well coordinated, it's all very well, it's all open in public now, uh, in the most bizarre way, right?
On one page, it's the great reset is wonderful, it's here, you'll eat bugs, you'll live in a pod, you won't own anything.
And the other side is the great reset is conspiracy theory, don't look into it, ignore it, don't pay attention to it.
Uh so again, I can go on and on about it, but if you just the best thing to do if you want to start finding conspiracy theories, just go to Wikipedia and start clicking on names.
That's what that's all you gotta do.
Just click Klaus Schwab and just start clicking his friends, you know, go to Mark Binioff and just see what he's up to and start clicking around his family and his friends and who he's hanging out with.
And uh it all starts to come together very simply.
I need to make a point to read his book too.
And you know, when you were talking, it reminds me a lot of some of the um advantages that the gov that that that major governments see in implementing digital currency, right?
So one of the one of the main things the Chinese are going to do with their digital currencies, they can control which dollars gets spent on what, right?
So if you if you create uh X number of digital uh yen, then you can set them to be specifically only used for oil or only used for agriculture.
And so this idea that we're making the switch, this this the social credit score switch juxtaposed to like total economic control of a of currency is really scary because even if you have money, you won't be able to spend it on on anything unless it's pre-approved, which I find very alarming.
And of course, they already have that with the social credit system in China.
You can't get on certain trains, you certainly can't get a house.
But you know, and again, all of this is is tied in very intimately together, right?
You have the story of BlackRock last year that really came out of them buying up entire neighborhoods, right, to rent out really undercutting new homeowners who are trying to build their credit, who are trying to work their way up to perhaps a bigger owner, ownership in general, right?
Well, that goes back to what you originally said of circumventing restrictions of government through corporations.
If you don't own your home, who says the police can't search it?
You don't own it.
The owner says the police can search it in the same way that if you know, if they want to search your Google drive, well, that's not your information.
The server is in California, so they're gonna search that drive, whether you like it or not.
So it's it's all tied in together.
And the idea is um creating a class of basically a neo-feudalism where you have a class that's approved by the system and they are rewarded for their participation in the system, and those that are kept permanently in an underclass through permanent debt that prevents them from ever owning anything, therefore ever building anything.
And so they're kept in a constant state of dependency and uh really debt.
So I don't know how the debt plays into like the cryptocurrency stuff, but obviously the control of currency is like their main weapon and has been for the last couple hundred years.
So I don't know how digital currency is going to either disrupt it or be folded into their plan, but it definitely is a is a uh a set of rapids in the river, I guess you could say.
Yeah, that's that's really interesting and ultimately really alarming.
And it just goes to show that like for a long time, I'm a I'm a big fan of Ayn Rand.
Um, I'm a big fan of La Say Faire Capitalism, but for a long time, you know, one of the main practical criticisms against Ayn Rand was you have to have some government involvement in the economy in order to regulate things that most almost everyone agrees with.
So things like building codes, right?
So make sure that a building's not going to collapse, right?
Like what we saw in Florida, for example.
Right.
Uh things like that.
Most people kind of agree, like, yeah, you know, that makes sense.
But the you know, the funny thing about it is like now that we've now that we've seen how a mixed economy plays out and how much leverage it catalyzes for government over major corporations, and how they're able to use that leverage in order to violate your rights without actually breaking the law, then it really makes the case for law-safe or capitalism.
I mean, the the worst things get, it seems to me, the the more obvious it is that the government should never have had to do anything, had it should never have had anything to do with the economy whatsoever.
Yeah, it's almost like a it's almost like the Chinese finger trap.
Like the more you pull, the worse it gets, right?
Because uh, you know, regulatory capture is probably the single biggest issue with the American government right now.
Like we have, you know, we have uh the FDA, but if the FDA is funded by the pharmaceutical companies that it's overseeing, how effective is it gonna be, right?
So, okay, the bigger, the bigger you make the organization, the more power it has, but the more valuable it is to the corporation, so the more money they pour into it, it's like a it's a feedback loop that is, yeah, incredibly destructive.
At the same time, you know, I mean, government these days is just completely off the rails, right?
The most basic thing that government is supposed to be instituted for, like if you if you could boil it down to just one thing, like what's the one if you're gonna have a government that just does one thing, what's it gonna do?
Well, it's gonna be to protect your borders, probably.
It's gonna be to protect the people inside the nation from those outside the nation.
That's the whole point of having an army, the point of having a government.
If you're gonna boil it down to one thing, that's it.
And they're not doing that, they're doing the opposite of that.
They're bringing people in.
They're they've completely shredded the border.
So it's like, yeah, I I like the idea of government because I like the idea of people getting together, and so I don't have to go out and try to fight somebody on the border, like that makes no sense, right?
You need to have an organization that can do that sort of thing, but they're not doing it now.
So it's just like, and it's sort of the same thing to me with with corporations.
I would be in favor of a trust busting government.
I'd be in favor of you know, action from the government that defended our rights from corporations, because my interpretation of uh the constitution or just natural law is that you don't get to violate my rights if you're a corporation or uh the government.
And so the government is supposed to be there to prevent the corporation from doing anything, and our system is supposed to provide for the people to replace the government if they do anything.
Unfortunately, both of those seem to have stalled.
So I I'm a I'm a bit, I'm a bit blackpilled.
So it goes, it goes all it all goes straight back to John Locke's second treaties of government, right?
The purpose of a government is to have an unbiased third party that can protect your rights from being violated by anyone else, whether it's the mob or another individual.
So when somebody breaks into your house and steals from you, there's a reliable third party that you can call that's gonna come, they're gonna investigate, they're gonna press charges, and they're gonna establish justice for that infringement on your rights, right?
That's the novel idea, Chase.
That's supposed to be the idea, but then but they don't do any of this shit anymore.
Like if you own a store in San Francisco and you sell anything for less than a thousand bucks, they can just come in and take it and the government's not gonna protect your rights.
It's like the it's like our our leaders have totally lost sight of the whole entire like justification for any government at all.
And I think that's why we see this like this major uh um growth among the anarchists, right?
Like you have the Michael Malises and you have the others, these other intellectuals that are really pro-anarchy.
And I'm not an anarchist, I'm not there yet.
But I understand how one could get there because it seems to me that any government that is ever established always outgrows its britches and ends up being the one infringing on your rights instead of the one protecting your rights.
And it seems that all democracy leads to tyranny.
I've tweeted before that the number one cause of tyranny is democracy.
Right.
It's it's and it's it's it's you know, it's I don't know what the solution is.
It's like and and I love the constitution, and there's a lot of people on the right who worship it like an idol, you know, like it's this perfect thing.
But if it was really perfect, then we wouldn't be where we are.
Like obviously it wasn't good enough to stop it.
This is the right, this is the this is the crux of the issue, right?
Is that all we want is to go back.
Like all the things that we want had were enumerated in 1776, like or 1789, right?
That we we knew what the deal was, and we've strayed so far from that.
So it's almost that's that's why I feel like conservatives can't really figure out how to deal with things because you're we're trying to preserve something that already exists in in a conceptual uh, you know, uh uh form.
And the other people are offering change, but it's already changed so much that what we're trying to preserve is already unrecognizable.
So actually we need like a revolution to re-establish where we were back then, and uh because yeah, nothing about what we want, nothing about what you just said is complicated At all, it's difficult at all, is even controversial at all.
Somebody breaks in your house and steals your stuff, there should be cops there to try to arrest them.
Like, is that so is that so hard to understand?
But we've fallen so far now, it's insane.
But unfortunately, the people making these changes are the ones saying everything is terrible.
And so the more they change things, the worse things get, and the better their argument gets because they're the ones saying everything's terrible and it needs to change.
So they're advocating in favor of I'll tell you one thing.
Uh I've never been closer to being an anarchist than when I was about halfway through uh the real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy.
Because when you understand how deep the rot goes, and you think about like, okay, if I was given power to fix this bureaucracy, and you think about it, you go, nope, nope, there was there'd be nothing I could do.
It it would just have to all go away because it's that broken.
So it's that infiltrated and it's that rotten to the core at this point.
Uh man, I I got about halfway through the Robert F. Kennedy book and just put it down and just go, nope, there's no fix in this.
It's like like looking at the Gordian knot, right?
It's just I'm you can't untangle that.
It's too complicated.
It won't work.
So that being said, what do you think the solution is?
I mean, what are we supposed to do as Americans?
Uh wait for God, perhaps.
No, I think um I mean, I think the thing is that they have been working this conspiracy.
Uh, this great reset conspiracy didn't spring up in 2020, right?
This is the ultimate goal that they've been talking about and planning for and working towards since 1913 or even earlier.
So they've had decades to try to sow these seeds.
And it really happened without people noticing, without really paying attention.
That's why Alex Jones was called a conspiracy theorist.
He saw what was happening.
He said, Here's what they're doing, and here's where it's leading, and everybody called him crazy.
And so it went on behind the scenes and happened and happened.
I think Donald Trump was a major interruption of their plan.
I think it the election of Donald Trump in 2020 was unexpected to them and forced them to change their plans.
So much of what we see going on is orchestrated behind the scenes, is pre-planned.
You know, they'll cause a problem and then provide the solution for it.
It's it's a very simple but very effective formula they've come up with.
Um, but at the same time, they're not gods, they're not omniscient, they don't control everything, they don't control me.
I don't think they control you.
So, like, we're free, we can make a difference, we can open up other people's minds, we can cause them to panic, we can cause them to make mistakes, we can cause them to slip up and then reveal their slip-ups and then call them out on it.
We can get people like Donald Trump elected, maybe not ever again, but we did once, so hey, there's that.
And um, so you know, none of this is predetermined, none of this is uh pre-established.
And, you know, I always get the question, like, are we doomed?
And my answer is always like, I'm not doomed, you're not doomed.
People listening to us aren't doomed.
So no, we're not doomed.
We might just have a very lengthy fight ahead of us, and unfortunately we're routine, but several rocks and several other very hard places right now, from China to Russia to internal turmoil.
It's uh it's a sticky situation we find ourselves in.
But at the same time, man, look what's happened since the beginning of this year, since then the last 14 days.
It's been a total collapse of the narrative.
It's been a total collapse of the Democrat Party in a lot of ways.
Uh things can turn around very quickly, very rapidly, and it's all about the mass of the people awakening to what's really going on and understanding what's really valuable, what's really worth it, and what's really uh driving the the forces that they see around them every day.
That's what I think.
I'm pretty hoped, honestly.
Yeah, yeah.
And yeah, I and I always I always like the notion of enlightenment being the answer.
I just hope that enlightenment is enough, right?
Um and maybe maybe it is.
It seemed to have worked wonders uh several centuries ago.
And so maybe that maybe that's as simple as that, just making people aware.
Uh, but I did notice you you made one quick comment about 1913.
Do you think that this all started with the Federal Reserve?
Oh, amongst other things, my friend, uh I did a um report about 1913, and so that year, the Federal Reserve was created, the income tax was created, the 17th Amendment was passed, which uh made the uh made senators instead of being appointed by legislatures, elected by popular vote in their state, you know, increasing democracy, decreasing how much we were a republic.
The Rockefeller Foundation was created, the ADL was created, the and Henry Ford invented the assembly line.
So yeah, 1913 Was a very, very big year.
And then, of course, World War One starts the year after that.
So I honestly think, like, especially with the invention of the assembly line, I think the powers that be at that point, the Robert Barons, sort of saw the assembly line and were like, oh, we can do this for society.
We instead of having artisans who know how to make a car, you have one guy who stands there like a machine working at as an ant, but he's not going to like that.
So how do we, you know, drug him to make him okay with with living that life?
And this idea of like the you know, Brave New World is the most important book of all time, perhaps, because Aldous Huxley was actually around the people talking about this and deciding this and planning this.
So he has said in interviews, Brave New World was not so much a fantasy of his.
It was just the novelization of the world that he saw being created by people that he knew, like his brother and his uncle, who was Darwin's um understudy kind of guy.
So yeah, 1913 was I think a major change.
And the same thing, you know, war is very useful for these for these massive changes.
And there were places in Texas I know that still spoke German in 1913 and 1914, and the US Army decided that wasn't good because if we go to war, we need to be able to train these guys, so they need to be able to speak English.
So we better have a public school system to fold these guys into a larger society rather than being sort of independent pockets, which is how the West had been settled in the previous 50 to 7 uh 70 years or so.
So I I think I think there was a major change right around 1913.
I think that was the year, and the Federal Reserve was sort of the capstone on it, but it was really uh very many things and very many changes in the minds of the people that were that were operating the this pulling the strings as it were.
That's really interesting.
I I didn't realize that it was such a big deal.
I mean, I knew that the Federal the establishment of the Federal Reserve was a really big deal.
Um, but I didn't realize that there were so many other variables that were that were that were going on there.
That's absolutely fascinating.
It could always be a coincidence, Chase.
Maybe it's a maybe it's a crazy coincidence that all these things happened at the same time.
But I tend to I tend to find that a little bit suspicious that they all came about at exactly the same time.
Well, the the interesting thing is that you know it was only if it was only 16 years after the establishment of the Federal Reserve that we had the great collapse in 1929, something that hadn't happened for the previous 150 years, right?
So it seems like there's some sort of a correlation between the the the establishment of that fiat system and that central banking and what ultimately happened to the stock market in 29.
And and but that crash, like like you said, like people don't want to work in factories, but after the Great Depression, people were grateful to do anything.
Yeah, yeah.
And so when you when you when you show people what real suffering is, then a little suffering seems like a luxury.
Yeah, well, absolutely.
And I hey, you know, the Henry Ford is as far as all accounts go, treated his workers extremely well.
So I don't think they were mad about being on an assembly line by any means.
But I think the, you know, it's almost like the fiat currency is like is like the ring of power from Lord of the Rings, right?
It it actually gives you great power.
You're you can double your money, you can build all sorts of things on nothing, but at the end of the day, it it corrupts you from the inside out and it it plants the seed of your own destruction.
And that's been the case for empires throughout all of history.
It's kind of a trend now on Twitter.
I love seeing it, but it's it's pretty well established phenomenon that as empires die, you can almost track it by how much their money's actually worth.
And from the the British Empire to the Roman Empire and really any big world global spanning empire has ever had, they start adding, you know, non-precious metals to their coins.
They start, all right, this coin's gonna be 50% silver.
These coins are gonna be a little bit smaller.
You know, now we're just gonna, you know, they start doing fiat back then.
It's not a new, you know, it wasn't invented in 1913.
It was just sort of uh, you know, created as a permanent feature in 1913 in a very sophisticated way that's kept it kept it going, but kept it destroying this entire time.
Yeah, well, and and you know, a lot of people criticize Keynesian economics, and I'm a critic of Keynesian economics too, but a lot what a lot of people don't realize is that with the establishment of the dollar as the global reserve currency after World War II, uh Keynes himself was under the impression that that would only be the case as long as the United States remained on the gold standard.
So a lot of the stuff that we're seeing, a lot of the economic fallout that we're seeing because we're we're fiat, is really because we're fiat and not backed by gold anymore, right?
And so I I'm not a huge fan of of uh John Maynard Keynes by any means, but I'm not as critical of him as some are are likely to be because he would not have been pro what is happening today because what he agreed to and and supported in the 50s after World War II was a was a was a gold-backed central currency, right?
It wasn't this BS that we've got going on right now, and I think people lose sight of that.
And of course, one of the one of the most eye-opening websites of all time is what what the F happened in 1919, right?
Because that was when we went off the gold standard, and it's just everything fell apart.
Absolutely.
We don't have any gold, man.
No, well, we don't have anything.
Uh, one of the most amazing things is when um Pal, uh Jerome Powell, Jeremy Powell, I never know how to pronounce his name.
Jerome, I think, pal, was being questioned on the floor of the Senate or wherever it was, just a few days ago, and he's talking about inflation, and and at one point he says, you know, there's a lot of demand for our paper.
And I thought that was kind of a that was a little bit of a Freudian slip because we when you just think about what he's actually saying, that is literally what he's saying.
He's like, well, there's a lot of demand for this paper that we make.
And it's like it really is.
This is all that a house of cards.
This is all a big you know, slight show of sleight of hand.
Like it's all a trick, and you he kind of lets it slip.
Well, the dollar, you know, there's still a lot of demand for our paper out there, blah, blah, blah.
It's like that would make sense if you were creating some sort of great paper that everybody, if you were talking about iPhones, you know, talking about the demand for the iPhones.
Yeah, yeah.
It's really nice embossed cardstock.
We uh I could understand that.
But it's just like Patrick Bateman.
It's called Bone.
Dude, so yeah, there's a lot of demand for our paper right now, and it's like this is what our economy is built on.
Fantastic, amazing.
It all does come back to that.
Where can people find you?
People can find me at InfoWars.com and band dot video.
They can find me each and every weekday morning, 8 a.m. to 11 a.m.
We do a live show, call-in show.
So if you want to call in, I encourage you to do so.
Tell me that you saw me here and uh give kudos to Chase.
And you can find me on Twitter at Harrison underscore of underscore tx.
And yes, it is an inconvenient name, but yeah, I've been kicked off Twitter several times.
Oh, you can also find me at Blackpilled.news.
We just got that URL, and the crew told me to say it.
So blackpilled.news will take you right to the American journal page.
You can watch all of our old shows.
We do we put up the daily show every day.
It's a three hour video.
We also do smaller segments of the individual uh blocks of what I'm talking about.
We take calls all the time.
It's very fun.
I encourage you to join us.
Band.video, InfoWars.com, blackpilled.news is where you can find it.
And InfoWarsstore.com is where you can support us.
Please do.
Very good.
We'll hang tight for a second.
Stay on for a second.
I'm gonna end the stream.
I just want to say thank you so much for coming on the show.
It's an honor and a pleasure to have you on the show uh today.
And uh I'm I'm a I'm a big fan of your of yours.
I'm gonna continue to watch your segment uh on band.video.
Um thanks again so much and uh hang tight and we'll do this again sometime, okay?
