All Episodes
Previous
Feb. 3, 2026 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin
01:08:23
The Hard Truths Revealed by the Epstein Files

Please leave sensible comments in response to this stream.

|

Time Text
Specific People, Not Categories 00:15:23
Hi folks, how's it going?
Hope you're doing well.
This is going to be a nice fun conversation to have, isn't it?
So before we begin, obviously, and it should go without saying, I am going to be speaking of specific people in this stream, not overarching categories of people.
So when I speak about a certain person and the things they have said, that person will be speaking, I will be speaking about that particular instance and not generalizing to all examples of that person, even if that person's opinion is itself a racist opinion.
So I just want to be very, very clear about this.
And I expect everyone who is in the chat and everyone who leaves a comment to be courteous, respectful, and themselves understand that this is a difficult conversation that has to be had.
And the best way to have difficult conversations are maturely and with empathy.
And I think that is the best way for us to approach this.
So I think that there are some very hard truths that have been revealed by the Epstein files that are very difficult to talk about.
They're especially difficult for the mainstream liberal types to talk about because they reveal a lot of what happens behind the scenes.
We have our polite fictions in the foreground that we all deal with.
And then there are the realities of the thing behind the scenes.
And one of the strangest things about all of this is how well, not even how well connected Epstein was, for how intrinsic and how instrumental he was to arranging massive international business deals.
Now, this has been very strange for a lot of people, but actually it makes a lot of sense because when you're dealing in such large numbers with such vast distances between very disparate kinds of people, you need networks of trust.
And networks of trust are not just formed out of nothing.
They are built on something.
And they can be built in many, many different ways.
But basically, you need people that you know you can rely on and who will be able to facilitate the things that you want done.
Because a lot of people have the impression that Epstein is using the disgusting and horrific things that he did for personal gain.
And the fact of the matter is, not really.
Epstein is a fixer, or was a fixer, or maybe he still is a fixer, who knows, right?
Epstein was a fixer, as in he was a go-between.
He was a contact man.
He was a man that connected very important people to other very important people who were in different networks.
And now, these networks are the things that truly rule the world.
And they're not just made up of one kind of person.
They're not just made up of one class of person, frankly.
And or, you know, any one ethnicity or anything like this.
They're very, very complex.
And no one network is in full control of any of the systems.
And so you do get when someone has pushed the boundaries further than the other networks will tolerate, they are the fall guy.
We're currently seeing this with Peter Mandelson, right?
We're currently seeing it.
He's resigned from the Labour Party, he's resigned his lordship, so he's no longer a lord.
And an investigation has been opened into him because he sent Epstein privileged information about half a trillion Euros worth of bailout funds or something like that.
I can't remember what it was off the top of my head.
He sent that straight to Epstein the second he found out about it.
Why would he do that?
Well, it's because Epstein is an important node in a network for someone else.
And this information was given to him because of the friendships that keep these networks together, as well as mutual self-interest.
And in many cases, it'll be mutual self-destruction if this is leaked.
And so this other networks and laws and powerful actors in play have, in a way, kind of checks and balances that there is a certain level of excess you can't go beyond.
But we'll talk about the kind of people that become fixers in a minute.
But Ferris has got a point here, right?
So the reason, I mean, there are multiple networks, right?
And he says Rubio is owned by Ellison, Vance is owned by Teal, and Trump is owned by Adelson.
Now, I don't know how accurate owned by is, but the point that he's making is there are lots of big networks of these, and massive tech companies are often at the are instrumental in these, because this is where power and money is, and so any node of power and money and the people who control that become the essentially sovereigns of these networks,
and to get things done, they need fixers, they need people who do things.
Now, the question then is, okay well, what network was Epstein a part of?
Well, he actually tells us in the Epstein files.
So, as you can see here, with him corresponding with Peter Thiel in 2016, he says, as you probably know, I represent the Rothschilds.
Now, this is, of course, a particular ethnic banking network that he's a part of.
There was also JP Morgan, a couple of others that he is also involved with, and so he is an agent of that particular power network and it interfaces with other power networks.
Here we are emailing Peter Thiel, who is again part of another kind of power network, and this I mean this is just on the Justice.gov Epstein Files website, right?
This is literally from the Epstein Files website.
I've got it up here.
And this is just the nature of these networks interfacing.
They have in each side their reliable men, and their reliable men introduce one another and connect so-and-so to so-and-so.
I mean, we covered on the podcast in Ferenc's segment where Epstein had a particularly irreverent way of doing this, where he'd just say, Mike, John, John, Mike, right, we're introduced, and let's get on with business.
And he would be connecting like the Qataris with someone else in order to create a port in the Congo, or trying someone wants to meet Vladimir Putin.
And so, Epstein is the middleman between that.
And at the moment, the British media is desperately trying to portray Epstein as Vladimir Putin's man, but that's not true.
I mean, it's not like Putin isn't mentioned plenty of times in this, but he isn't part of Epstein's network.
Epstein has told us the network that he is a part of, and he's explicit about it.
And so, you see, right, okay, there is this particular network which has an ethnic dimension, and you can all work out what that dimension is.
And again, I really want to be clear: this is not a universal inclusion in the network, right?
Just because someone is Jewish does not mean they are part of this network.
In the same way, that just because someone is Russian, they are not automatically in Vladimir Putin's network.
Putin will obviously be the sovereign of his own network and will have all of his agents doing various things.
These are power-broking networks that control things that are real in some way.
They might not necessarily be physical, as we'll get to in a second.
They are real in some way, they control, and they are powerful, and they need people to be operated.
And so, they need trustworthy people because remember, these people are dealing with huge amounts of money, massive, massive portfolios, and it would be very easy for these to be leaky, right?
It'd be very easy for lots of money to just go missing.
And it would be very difficult, I think, in many ways for them to recoup major losses.
It would be very, it would, it would require a huge amount of explaining, right?
How is it that, you know, this, this, this ended up there?
You would have to uncover a remarkable paper trail.
Um, so it's one of those things where these they need people that can be relied upon.
And this is a point that we'll come back to in a minute, because compromise, I suppose we call it, is one way of having people to be relied upon, but another way is sentimental and emotional investment.
Now, the next, I think, this, this is probably the most important one where Epstein just tells us who he represents.
Representation is an important concept, and it means making something that is otherwise absent present.
So, whatever Epstein is there, therefore is the Rothschilds and any and the international money network that they represent, that they are a part of, or that they may even control.
I don't even know, right?
But that's clearly where Epstein's money and power come from, and why he just talks so frivolously to most people.
Now, one thing that's really interesting is he's not being frivolous with Peter Thiel.
When he's talking to The Norwegian royal family or something like that.
They act like supplicants, and he has some sort of potentate.
He is a viceroy that has secure in their own position and could just talk down to them as if they're peasants.
But with Peter Thiel, as you can see, he is actually having-I mean, this is way more than he would normally write.
Like, he is actually, and Teal is the one being terse in this.
So, he recognizes that Teal is probably the sovereign of another network that he is trying to interface with in order to get something done.
He wants to meet him or wherever, you know, wherever it is.
And so, you can see that there is these networks have virtual borders and boundaries, and they are constantly touching other networks, and they have to work together in some way.
People understand that they have their own demands, however, it's pronounced, and other people have their own, and they have to interface in some way.
Epstein was one of the go-between guys, and the thing is, he's probably one of the best go-between guys because he is just constantly being asked by various other people for favors and for help.
And the thing is, for Epstein, it's worth him doing this because it gets him credit later on that he can spend when he needs to.
Anyway, the next thing is, frankly, Epstein's Jewish supremacy.
Epstein was clearly a Jewish supremacist.
And this, again, I just want to stress is not something that I think is representative of most or any other people, but it is definitely representative of Epstein.
And I think that this informs the way that he viewed the world.
As you can see from this email to Roger Schenck in 2009, he says, Quote, This is the way the Jew make money and made a fortune in the past 10 years, selling short the shipping futures.
Let the Goyim deal in the real world.
Now, what he's saying here is, We deal with things that are virtual, that are abstract.
We are not, we as Jewish people don't dirty our hands in these things.
And then he uses the word Goyim, which is a derogatory term for non-Jewish people.
It doesn't stipulate any one particular group, it just stipulates any group in the same way that ancient Greeks would just call all foreigners barbarians.
It's this kind of dismissive, although not individually so.
It's not like a racial slur in the way that the N-word is or something stipulating a specific group.
It is a generally disdainful and not unkind way of describing non-Jewish people.
And what it reveals, and this is just one example, we have many other examples of him using this term in order to suggest, and where he doesn't outright state, that he feels that non-Jewish people are somehow inferior to Jewish people.
Now, like I said, this is not everyone, but this is the case with Epstein.
Now, this actually is not a terribly surprising position for Middle Eastern religions, right?
Epstein's very conscious of his Jewishness, and this informs what he is doing.
And in fact, I think this also informs like this particular and twisted interpretation is the same underlying motive as the Muslim rape gangs are.
When you have an interpretation of your own identity and religion in the same way that the Muslim rape gangs and Epstein's international list have, you literally devalue people who don't belong to your group.
Now, like I said, this is not a universal interpretation from Islam or from Judaism.
I'm not in any way suggesting that.
But there are definitely really twisted and bad people who take their own doctrines, who take their own interpretation of these things and come to these conclusions.
Shared Ethnicity, Shared Trust 00:05:23
And that's why we have this.
I mean, it's honestly almost precisely the same kind of wording.
I mean, this is from one of the rape gang trials.
We are the supreme race, not these white bastards.
Now, that, you can say, is a bit more blunt than what Jeffrey Epstein has said.
But you still have the same.
And, you know, Islam has different words, in fact, for what do they call us?
Kufar.
So, as the Epstein calls Goyen, the rape gangs would call us kufar.
And what this means is just the out-group, just the other.
And if you are this way inclined, you find yourself justified in abusing the women of the other.
This is something that is very, very similar between these two people.
And this is essentially the same phenomenon, just played out in different scopes.
Because one of the main issues that we have, and one of the really difficult things, I think, especially the liberal order, really, and the average centrist liberal person really, really is uncomfortable with dealing with, but is definitely true, is that one of the ways that these networks of power maintain trust and keep people on side is through ethnic solidarity.
And so you have Islamic networks, you have Jewish networks, but you also have other networks that are based on ethnic solidarity.
I mean, one of the ones that people have come to notice, oh my God, look at all these fucking fucking hopefully keep that there.
The Indian CEOs of tech companies.
Indian nepotism has become something that people have noticed because there are, of course, Indian power networks that rely upon familial ties and a shared ethnic component to build, establish, and build trust within the network.
Now, that's not to say you can't have people within the network who are not a part of that ethnic group.
It's not categoric.
It is relational, but part of the relation is built on a shared ethnicity, a shared religion, a shared understanding of the world, and that this builds a shared trust between certain people.
And what this means is that we have to be aware of this.
This is just the reality of what is already going on around us, whether you like it or not.
And honestly, I don't like it.
I'm not a liberal, but I don't like this kind of raw ethnic preferencing.
It does have a kind of grossness about it, especially the supremacist aspect.
I don't like thinking of people outside of my in-group as being just, you know, inferior or anything like that.
I don't think that way.
But there are definitely people who do think that way.
And some of these people are very powerful and are in position.
I'm not saying Sanda Pachai, by the way, or whoever this is.
Yeah, Sandapacha.
I'm not saying him, actually.
One thing that's interesting is the Indian networks seem to be based on preference rather than disparagement, right?
I mean, although you can definitely find it on Twitter that you get Indians who are disparaging.
And so I don't want to say, again, I'm not even saying that all of the people in these networks, I mean, in Epstein's and, you know, the grooming gangs, yes, they're awful, obviously.
But a lot of them will not think of what they're doing as wrong.
And they will think that not forming this kind of ethnic network is itself wrong.
And this is everywhere else other than the West, or at least for the native people of the West.
Like these, you know, Epstein's network is obviously supremely powerful and supremely important in the West, but it's not the only network that is very powerful and very influential in the West.
It's just a very major one.
And so it's one of those things where this is just a very uncomfortable thing to have to talk about, a very uncomfortable thing to have to deal with, but it is very obviously real and influential.
And again, it's not that any one of these networks is all powerful.
They do have to still worry about the law, as Epstein found out, because he went to jail over some of the things he did.
But not for the underlying network work that he did.
He went to jail for the sort of those really heinous crimes that came up, but not the other stuff.
I mean, I don't even know necessarily if a lot of the other stuff he did was criminal, frankly, but it is disturbing to think that this is how the world works.
And it's one of those things that we're just not comfortable with.
You know, nobody in the media wants to talk about any of this because I don't think they know how to talk about this in a sensitive way and or in an honest way.
Network Crave Influence 00:09:34
And so I think they're like, oh, right, Epstein.
He was in contact with Putin.
Therefore, he's a Russian asset.
It's like, no.
Ghislaine Maxwell's dad was Robert Maxwell.
Epstein was going out with her for a reason.
He represents the Rothschilds.
There's no doubt that Epstein would have been part of an Israeli network.
There's just no doubt about that.
In the same way that any of the Indian CEOs are bound to be part of an Indian network.
Rishi Sunak, part of an Indian network.
He marries into an Indian tech family that has billionaires.
this is not surprising.
Uh, and so, uh, where is it?
I had, there we go.
So let's talk about the kind of people that we're dealing with.
Now, what I think we're dealing with here is the same kind of thing as Hunter Biden, frankly.
Obviously, Joe Biden and the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, that sort of type, the Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer types, they're all part of a network as well.
They're a power network in the United States.
And Hunter Biden seems to have fulfilled the same kind of role as Jeffrey Epstein.
Hunter Biden spent his time going around fixing deals, managing money, giving 10% to the big guy.
Like, each of these networks is going to have their own norms and customs and whatnot.
But what I find really interesting is that Hunter Biden and Jeffrey Epstein seem really similar in their character.
They're both wacko degenerates who love partying, who love taking drugs, getting underage girls, and just prostitutes and whatnot, going wild.
They are licentious and hedonistic.
And they're also fixers.
And I was thinking about this, like, right, okay, what is it about this personality type that makes them essentially good for this job?
Because, I mean, Hunter Biden, we know all about this because he left his laptop at some repair shop in Delaware, right?
And Like what a ridiculous, retarded thing.
And yet here we are.
So what I think it is, is that essentially these kinds of personalities, they're party animals.
And so they're very social, right?
They're very social people.
They are good at instantly making connections with people.
They're often very charming, funny, and they enjoy being in the company of other people, right?
And so if the, right, you can, you have to go to, and of course they like status and jet setting, right?
So you have to go to here and arrange a business deal with so-and-so or whatever kind of deal with so-and-so.
And in exchange, he'll give you X amount of money.
And then you do this and you do this.
And so they get to spend their time flying around the world, jet-setting around the world, going to high-class places, having high-class parties, disgusting degenerate parties in the case of Epstein and Hunter Biden, and doing drugs and drinking and whatever, and satisfying, slaking their lusts, while also being important in making things happen.
Now, what this does, I think, is essentially binds them irrevocably to the network.
Because fundamentally, if they were to leave the network, they lose everything, right?
They lose their status, they lose their source of money, they lose their source of hedonistic pleasure.
And it's going to be very, very easy for their previous employer slash patron to ruin them.
Absolutely ruin them.
And that's assuming these aren't networks of such seriousness, they don't just have them like bumped off like Robert Maxwell after he was trying to extort Moss had, right?
Like it's on the assumption they're not just murdered, it's basically impossible for these people to leave.
Now, of course, with Hunter Biden, it's his own father who is clearly like the, or possibly the sovereign of their network.
So it's one of those things where it's like he can't really go anywhere.
And you can feel the rage in the text that Hunter Biden sends to Joe Biden.
He's angry about this.
He doesn't like it.
And he feels he's constantly getting stiffed by his own dad.
And you can actually call him PDOP.
So maybe he literally was.
But financially, I meant.
And morally and personally.
But with Epstein, he loses access to the lifestyle that he had become obviously accustomed to.
And so you can't just leave the network without leaving all that behind, which I think for their kind of, like I say, licentious, addictive personalities, I think they can't do that, right?
I think on a personal level where they crave things.
I mean, apparently, Epstein would have three girls a day giving him massages that he would rape and sexually assault.
And so, I mean, are you giving that up if you need that?
I don't think they do.
I don't think they want to.
Right.
So it's one of those things that for them personally is very difficult.
Obviously, once they leave the network, they can be easily compromised.
They can be easily shown to be a degenerate psycho who a normal person wouldn't ever want to associate with.
So not only if you leave the network, you leave the good things that you like behind, good quote unquote, but that means you're basically out in the cold forever, right?
Good luck being on your own.
You're not going to get anything.
You're not coming back into the club.
That's it.
And so these kinds of people, I think, actually make quite reliable fixes.
They're good at networking.
They enjoy networking because networking, of course, involves a lot of partying.
If you want to be like, look, I need to persuade this guy from this other network to come over here and do this deal with that guy over there that I'm working for, whoever it is.
Well, there's definitely gonna be money involved, but there's money involved in any of this, right?
So, another thing I think they do is worldly pleasures.
I think, yeah, we've got loads of girls.
I mean, this is what Epstein would like.
He was trying to get Elon Musk over, and Elon Musk is like, you know, don't get me wrong, had us to come to the party.
But honestly, there's a part of me that thinks Elon Musk was just a bit fucking autistic and didn't understand what the like, because all of this is, of course, done via an innuendo, right?
All of the people understand what is being said between the lines.
I kind of get the feeling that Elon Musk didn't, because at one point, Epstein was like, come over here for a business deal or something.
And Elon just replies back, going, Well, I'm a bit busy running all these companies, so I just don't see the point of going all of their.
And Epstein's like, listen, retard, basically, it's going to be a massive party, and none of the girls will be over 25.
As in, I'm going to show you a really good time.
You're going to come out of this, you know, very satisfied.
And also, we'll be able to get a good deal done.
So, it's all of the temptations that you can imagine to draw them in.
And, of course, a fixer like Epstein or Hunter Biden is the perfect guy to get them to do that.
So, not only do you have people who like socializing who can offer a great time in the highest of high-class societies, so the money that they have to spend, they can't really leave.
They are basically trapped in the network and have no choice but to do what it is that they do.
So, I suspect that's why you get the kind of Epstein-Hunter Biden personality types coming out of this.
So, anyway, I thought we'd talk about some of the copes that have come out of this or some of the comments that people have made.
Now, this is a very small tweet, obviously, but it represents a kind of strain of thought that I've seen because I've seen a lot of people on the right basically downplaying or defending Epstein.
I'm like, why would you do that unless you were somehow connected to his network?
Like, there's if you're not in the network, there's no particular reason to defend Epstein at all, and every reason to just go, yeah, he was evil.
And it would be, I bet it was a massive loss to that network to lose him as well.
Like, he really felt like he was a very important person within the network that was relied upon to do a lot for them.
So, if you want the network weakened in some way, yeah, good.
Glad he's gone.
So, I just don't see the need to do this.
But anyway, I thought I'd knock down just a few things that people are saying about Epstein, so I just don't think they're correct.
Epstein was cool, also discussing pedophile murder.
Yeah, of course, he was that, but I don't think he was cool either, right?
Because, like, you've seen the interview with Steve Bannon, and Epstein comes out as basically a retarded nerd.
Like, I'm sorry, this guy, this guy's a fucking moron, doesn't really know anything, and just seems really dorky.
I mean, he's got the weirdest, like most stereotypical voice in the world.
And I'm sorry, I just don't think he was cool, actually.
And so, this attitude of Epstein's cool saying, no, what he was was rich and powerful, and part and the mouthpiece, like the mouth of Sauron for a network that lots of people wanted to be a part of.
And so, this gives him a kind of position of privilege and influence that is very useful and that he can't really be dislodged from.
Socrates vs. Aristotle 00:04:07
And so, he can afford to just be a nerd, a dork, a prat, and an awful person in addition to all of this.
But I actually don't think he does seem cool.
I mean, we'll watch just a bit of this just to give you the impression of what I mean.
And one of the things that people won't enjoy, it turns out that potentially one of the bad things to teach children is how to write.
Writing, reading, and arithmetic was supposed to be, everyone's supposed to be taught, but writing forces you into a very narrow channel of thinking.
You have to write certain in a certain form in a certain way in a certain linear pattern.
So your thinking becomes somewhat narrow.
The reason I brought up writing is one of the recent discoveries of mine with respect to Socrates, Plato's, and Aristotle is they never wrote anything.
Right.
Wrong on all counts.
Writing doesn't necessarily force you into linear thinking.
The idea of that the necessary fact that we have to compose words in our heads to arrive at certain definite conclusions through propositional logic will do that regardless of whether you write anything down.
And this is a point that Herbert Markusa actually points out in One Dimensional Man.
He's like, look, really, the origin of the total system that we've arrived in now lies in Aristotelian propositional logic, whether you agree with him or not.
This is, I think, is a fair, an interesting observation and one people don't really think about.
But not being able to write, not being literate, doesn't help with that because that is just a necessary component of thinking.
Even if you cannot write, you can still form a syllogistic proposition in your head and follow it through to its conclusion that is necessary given the premises that you're using.
This is literally just one of the things about logic.
And having a much smaller vocabulary and a much less developed way of expressing yourself, like not being able to write, doesn't restrict the amount that you can think and the different ways in which you think.
It actually does the opposite.
It allows you to set down thoughts and go beyond them if you need to.
But anyway, right, that's all beside the point.
fucking full of shit and there are previous that in 2019 you had all of the depositions and stuff like that And I'm pretty sure it was in that where I would, I first really started getting into Epstein's life and what he was doing.
And of course, he would invite loads of scientists to his island.
Now, a lot of this, I think, probably wasn't about getting them to getting compromat on them with pedo-non stuff, right?
I think a lot of it was that he wanted to be seen to be part of a kind of intellectual vanguard in the high status society.
And a lot of it will be about ethnic solidarity with a lot of these people, which is why you have people like, was it Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, who appears to have been a very good friend with, and various others.
But then you also have people like Stephen Hawking who went there and Richard Dawkins.
I don't think Richard Dawkins actually went to the island, but like he would hang out with like, you know, scientists and pop stars and whatnot, you know, because these were the people that he found cool and wanted to be a part of.
And I can't remember which one it was, but basically, you would get those ones who want money off of him, and he would often patronize them, give them money.
And the ones that he would give money, he would think, they would go, oh yeah, yeah, he's a really brilliant guy, yeah, really smart.
But the ones who weren't trying to get his money were like, this guy's a retard, and he thinks of himself as a great thinker, but he's clearly not.
And this is obviously the case, because he is correct that Socrates didn't leave us any writings, but Socrates was still literate.
But Plato and Aristotle, especially Aristotle, wrote voluminously.
Socrates And The Nerds 00:09:39
He's just fucking wrong, right?
He's not cool.
He's a dumbass nerd.
And he's a dense nerd at that.
But also, he just happens to be able to carry on a kind of lifestyle that you are envious of.
Like, he's actually not cool.
Anyway, the next thing.
Weirdly, Tristan Tate.
It's terrifying to think that maybe Epstein was just a rich guy hiring hookers who all turned on him when the opportunity to get richer was presented.
This is far more important than any mainstream media outlet will ever report.
No, sorry, sorry, bro.
And I just want to be clear.
I'm going to criticize a bunch of people on the right here.
And they're all people I don't dislike, right?
There are people I think are in some ways correct about stuff and in other ways incorrect.
But this is a really bad take from Tristan because that's not true.
We've got more than enough evidence to know that that's not the case.
For example, I mean, don't get me wrong, Epstein hired a lot of prostitutes in his day, a lot of prostitutes, no doubt.
But that's just not the case.
Here's Nick Fuentes saying, well, it shouldn't be labeled as pedophilics.
It didn't involve very young children, but instead barely legal teenagers.
Well, no, that's not correct either.
And then you've got the same thing from Megan Kelly, which again is not correct.
And then, BAP, almost all the girls at Epstein Line were 18 or over.
Okay, again, not necessarily correct and not actually indicated by the evidence, right?
So there are lots of stories.
But let's begin with the girls who are like 16, 17, 18, right?
That's age of consent upwards.
Yeah, it's true that a lot of the girls would have been of legal age, but that doesn't mean they weren't also vulnerable.
And that doesn't mean that he wasn't also exploiting them, raping them, forcing them into positions where they simply didn't have a choice and doing other kind of horrible things.
I've been reading Virginia Guffery's Nobody's Girl, and she was a very damaged person.
She had been molested by her dad when she was young, according to her.
And then essentially, Maxwell and Epstein kind of used the fact that she was completely impoverished and took advantage of her to drag her into this network.
And the thing is, once you're in the network and once you're being taken advantage of, well, if you're a 17-year-old girl and you have Jeffrey Epstein, billionaire connected to unbelievably important people, what are your options here?
Like, you know, do you get to say no?
Do you get to go against all of this?
And the answer is probably not, right?
And also, we get from this her repeatedly saying, well, look, he wanted me to look as young as possible and as blonde as possible.
And she was one of the, when she was first picked up, she was one of the only English-speaking girls around as well, because a lot of them would come from Russia or Eastern Europe.
As in, what was happening is Jeffrey Epstein's network was picking up European girls, preferably blonde and preferably as young looking as possible, and sexually abusing them.
And so it's like, okay, well, I can't believe that Nick Fuentes is letting the ethnic aspect of this go in the same way that the Muslim rape gangs would deliberately target either Sikh girls, Indian girls, or when those communities essentially closed ranks and were like, right, okay, these guys can't have access to our girls.
They would specifically target English girls and then say things like, we're the master race.
Right?
It's the same here.
Were any of Epstein's victims Jewish?
And the answer is no.
They were Goyim, as he describes them, for a reason.
So, guys, I don't know why we're just, are we really just being like, yeah, well, you know, actually, these were just barely legal prostitutes.
No, this was a network of abuse.
And even then, right, there are lots of photos that, I mean, sorry, guys, I'm not sure that actually it was just that he was into teenage girls of like, you know, 15 to 18 or something.
I'm not sure that's the case, actually.
And I don't really see why we give Epstein the benefit of the doubt.
I mean, he did go to jail for soliciting a 14-year-old for prostitution.
Now, you know, I've got a teenage girl myself.
14 isn't it, man?
Absolutely not.
You know, maybe 16, you could argue, 17 or something like that, but 14, definitely fucking not.
And like I said, there's lots of evidence to suggest that it wasn't just that, right?
So, guys, what are we doing here?
You know, I just don't agree with these takes at all.
And I think you guys are just wrong.
And I really don't understand why you'd be downplaying this.
Again, especially with like Nick Fuentes in particular, but also the takes.
I thought you hated the Jewish power network.
Like, isn't this what you made your bones on, man?
You know, so being like, oh, actually, Epstein's cool.
Actually, this wasn't really a problem.
It's like, no, no, guys, it is a problem.
He's not cool.
And he probably was doing the sorts of things that he is commonly thought to have been doing.
Right?
There's literally no reason to downplay this.
And there's no particular reason that we shouldn't think that that's the case.
And then you've got the sort of Pizzagate-style implications, which honestly, they're all over the place.
They're all over the Epstein files where there's pizza and grape soda repeated as a particular thing between him and Mark Fish, I think his name was, and a bunch of others where it's like weird Pizzagate style, what sound like innuendos, and it's being used in a really weird way.
And then Curtis Jarvin is like, oh, I mean, this one, right?
Like, I'll be sending fresh muffins down with Kanya.
Kanya, yeah.
You currently have two steaks left on the island.
Would you like new ones?
And Curtis says, totally normal way to talk about food.
Remember, there are no refrigerators on Little St. James, a rustic paradise.
So the steaks were literally getting old.
Yes, aged beef, but you don't age a steak by letting it sit around in the tropical heat.
No one likes stale muffins.
Am I gone mad?
Is this some sort of performance art piece?
And again, Curtis is something I quite like, and I find his thought processes usually quite interesting.
But this is such obvious, preposterous bullshit that I'm just like, what am I listening to?
Right?
One, do we think Jeffrey Epstein did his own grocery shopping?
The man, when he died, had $660 million worth of assets, including multiple private islands, private jets and yachts and whatnot, and $60 million in liquid cash in his bank account.
I don't think he was actually managing his own shopping, right?
I get the feeling he didn't do his own laundry either, right?
I think he may have paid people to do that for him.
But the thing is, why would you say there are no refrigerators on Little St. James?
Like, sorry, mate, this is the mansion complex that he had on this island that he'd spent tens of millions of dollars on.
Like, he'd bought this for what is it, $8 million?
And then Great St. James for $22.5 million.
And he'd spent a huge amount of money kitting these out.
I mean, it's the tens of millions, the New York Times thinks.
They don't even give us a figure, so they don't know how much it is, right?
But it's a huge amount, and he had hundreds of millions in assets, right?
And so, why would I think for a second that there's no refrigerator in this complex?
But what's even more ridiculous is if we go to the Epstein files themselves, this is just this.gov slash Epstein files slash data set nine slash EFTA002724640 dot PDF,
and we can get the housing planning from a company in New York called Robert Courtier, and this is for the design of the kitchen of Little St. James because he used the same company over and over to do all of these things up.
And so, if we just have a look at the kitchen plan, we can see two fridges and a fucking freezer here, man.
Why would we think for a second it was some rustic paradise that didn't have all the mod-cons?
Like, why would you say it?
Why would you say this?
Unless this was some sort of performance art, or unless you were part of a network that was designed to mislead people, right?
I just don't understand what you'd say.
It's not true, right?
And then, again, coming back to a bunch of things.
Sarcastic Online Revelations 00:15:18
So, I've seen a lot of people being like, there's something weird going on with the online right.
Why is Nick Fuentes taking a seven-figure sponsorship from the company, the gold company that sponsors Mark Levin?
Because I'm absolutely certain that Nick Fuentes would have described that as a Jewish network.
And so, suddenly, he's like, Yeah, but seven figures, multi-million dollar sponsorship from that.
And then you have like Tristan Tate being like, Yeah, my girlfriend's in Zeraine.
So, oh, is she?
And suddenly, right?
Okay, I mean, again, I don't know, but this is what a lot of people are saying, as you can see by this going around.
And it's like, But why are you guys ruining your own reputations in defense of Epstein?
Like, what is to be gained here?
Like, what's the point of that?
I just, I just don't understand what is happening.
And so, I would like an explanation.
I'm not trying to attack anyone.
Like I said, a lot of these people I've met, and a lot of them I quite like, but this is just weird.
And it, like, there are a lot of people online saying, Oh, right, the online right is essentially being bought out by Israel.
And it's like, well, I don't know, man.
I genuinely don't know, but I'm getting some bloody strange takes out of this.
And going back to these are just massive, powerful networks of money and influence, and they have the money to just buy people out.
How do I know that they don't?
How do I know that they haven't?
And so, anyway, like I said, I think these things are real, what we're talking about here.
What Epstein has said, he is part of networks, blah, blah, blah.
These things are all real.
Again, just to be specific, it is the people involved who are saying and doing these things, not the general group or anything like that.
There are going to be lots.
In fact, I know lots of people in these groups, like Muslim and Jew and whatnot, who abhor this kind of behavior and think it's terrible and hate it, you know, who don't have supremacist views.
But Epstein was not one of these people.
Epstein was one of these people, one of the people who held these views.
He acted in atrocious ways.
And it's one of those things that we have to admit has happened.
And this is a reflection of the world, and we need to take it into account.
That's just honestly the hardest truth that I think has come out of this, and the most important point.
Anyway, I guess we'll leave that there.
I don't know.
I'm going to leave this up, frankly.
I don't want to get in trouble, right?
Cause I'm not trying to get in trouble, but man, there's, there's a lot here that is just, it has to be explained.
Right.
And.
And it's uncomfortable for a lot of people to be confronted with this sort of stuff.
But it is also something that is clearly happening behind the scenes.
And so, you know, we either don't talk about it or we carry on in ignorance, right?
We just pretend that nothing is the way that it is.
And so, I don't know.
You're on the right side of this, Carl, but Curtis is obviously being sarcastic.
Well, I mean, let's assume that he is, but I don't know, man.
Like, I guess that's an easy defense.
I don't know.
Like, feel free to point out some of the ideas.
But the thing is, you saw the people arguing with him.
Nobody seems to think he's being sarcastic.
So I just, that's very bizarre.
Celest Temple says, even as a shitlib that often disagrees with you, I relate on a spiritual level with what the fuck are we doing to the public reaction to this?
Yeah, Russian, Curtis is being sarcastic.
I mean, maybe.
And look, man, right?
I'm happy if he's like, yeah, you know, I was obviously just joking.
Fair enough.
You know, fair enough.
Like, but the thing is, with this subject, it is difficult to know who is speaking, you know, when you're just tweeting.
By context, it is not necessarily obvious that you are being sarcastic.
So who knows, right?
You'll have to forgive me, but it seemed that the gravity of the subject was such that just being sarcastic about it was probably not wise, right?
It's very, very easy to be open to misinterpretation on that.
Anyway, like I said, I don't know and I'm happy to be corrected.
Have I read Attack on Titan?
Very relevant to what's happening in the world today?
No, I have not read Attack on Titan.
KarnTramp says, Lord, have mercy on us and help us to work through what...
Let me zoom in on this bit, actually.
And help us to work through what has come with wisdom and grace.
God bless you and the team for the thank you.
I appreciate it.
And like, I don't.
I don't enjoy covering this stuff, by the way.
I really don't.
Well, I've done a bunch of videos about this sort of thing in the past, and it was just horrible.
Because you end up having to look up horrible things and like contemplate horrible realities where you're just like, and I can see why a bunch of people fall down rabbit holes as well.
I can see, I can totally see why people fall down rabbit holes and become prejudicial and become like, oh no, it's all of them everywhere, like with Muslims or Jews or with whoever, like the Democrats, you know, whether it's, you know, I mean, the thing is, I'm not saying that there isn't like a cabal, a power structure in the Democrats that is like one of these power networks.
There definitely is.
I definitely think the podestas do dodgy things.
I think they're the kind of fixers that Epstein and Hunter Biden were.
You know, I definitely think that these people are of the same sort of stripe because they enjoy it, because they're the kind of, you know, satanic people who like that kind of thing.
But that doesn't mean that everyone in the Democrat Party is a part of this, right?
For whatever reason, the power structure has come into being and the network that controls it controls it.
That doesn't mean that everyone involved in the thing is implicated in the thing.
And I'm definitely trying to hammer that point home.
That's not what I'm saying.
Ross says, why are we being respectful or courteous to people who are deliberately destroying everything about our civilization while partaking in satanic rituals against children?
I'm missing something here.
Yes, we're on YouTube.
Don't know why I have to say that.
You should be aware of that.
But also, because I don't want to cast a net that's too wide, right?
I want to particularly stipulate that person, that person, and that person, excuse me, are definitely part of a wider net, and there are people connected to them who are paying them.
So it's like we can identify these things, but I don't want to fall down rabbit holes and get schizoid about it.
Okay, I really don't think that's helpful.
And I don't think being bigoted or prejudicial when you're dealing with a subject that's difficult is actually very helpful.
And I think it's one of the reasons why talking about this sort of thing is often so easily dismissed is because people start making claims that I'm not even saying are not true, but are not necessarily supported by the evidence.
And if you are making claims that are not directly inferred from the evidence, then you can just easily be dismissed, especially when you get a bunch of things that are, again, they might be true, but are a couple of steps down the line of what may well be.
And honestly, things might be worse than we're saying.
But when you get to that stage, it's just very easy to say, oh, that person's a kook, right?
That person's a kook.
So focusing on Epstein saying, yes, I'm, you know, I'm with Ghislaine Maxwell and I work for the Rothschilds, puts him very firmly in a particular network.
And then his racial supremacy shows you the kind of valence of the people operating in that network and the opinion that they have of people outside of that network.
Because really, there's no particular reason to have a negative opinion of people outside of a power network.
That is not one of ours.
You know, I'm sure he's a decent chap, but not in the club.
But that's not the case with the rape gangs.
It's not the case with Epstein and his operation.
So it's worth just being aware of this.
My price is apparently £4.99.
Thanks, Jupiter.
I have to admit that this is a point.
At this point, I care far more about the Open Rebellion Minnesota.
Let's save the West than go after the elites in the Epstein files.
Well, the thing is, I just don't see how they can be dislodged, right?
We don't control anything.
We're just a bunch of very small-time people dealing with webs of power and money that are so much further, so much greater in magnitude than anything we control is.
I just don't see how we would be able to dislodge them even if we wanted to.
Like, we're talking about global finance networks.
We're talking about global technology networks.
We're talking about, of course, global transit networks.
All things that just millions of people rely upon, hundreds of billions of dollars flow through every day.
I just don't see what we can do about the global elites.
But we could at least demand they stop preying on us.
Like, I mean, Epstein literally uses the word cattle to describe Madonna because she's not Jewish.
And it's just like, sorry, man, that's horrific.
And, you know, we can at least object to that, right?
There's no disguising it now.
William Conquest is right.
The simplest way to explain the behavior of John Conquest.
But the simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume it's controlled by a cabal of its enemies.
Yeah, basically.
Thank you, Gimtor.
I'm not suicidal, of course.
Do I keep up with Lulavai?
Well, I'd love to, but he's rarely, he never messages me.
The people upset about the G-word spent the last 10 years calling their own countrymen sheeple.
Wow.
What's new under the sun?
Yeah, I know.
I know.
Yeah, I saw the Gmail interface of Epstein's emails.
Thing is, though, it wasn't even, it was actually more easy to go on the Department of Justice.
It's just easier.
What network is Trump or Black Rock a part of?
You know, I don't know.
I'm not even saying I'm an expert on the networks themselves, but they clearly are.
I mean, Larry Fink is obviously the sovereign of a network of his own and will have fixes of his own setting things up behind the scenes, no doubt.
So, like I said, I don't know, but I think what I think we're seeing with, and again, I wouldn't make such a big deal about this if we didn't see also Mandelson, Hunter Biden, in the same way.
I think Mandelson was actually a part of Epstein's network, but clearly has a network of his own in Britain.
But Hunter Biden was clearly fulfilling the same role.
And I suspect that this is just the way the game is played.
You've got to have your public-facing stuff, but you need the dirty guys in the background who do the fixing, who do the partying, who do the illicit stuff, who do the harmful stuff.
Just to make sure the deals are done securely and everything is done properly.
And actually, things get to where they're supposed to be.
Personal obligation is the glue of politics.
And Epstein was a premier favor merchant.
Yeah, exactly.
That's exactly the kind of thing that I think we're talking about.
It's, you know, that's what these people are for professionally.
And, you know, the way that the system works.
This is just how, you know, business is operated.
Dana Dana Rogan says, I think V is right about Fuentes.
He is just controlled opposition.
I don't know who the Dem candidate is, but I know Fuentes will endorse them.
Also, wasn't he the one guy on January 6th that Biden admin didn't go after?
Yeah, but the thing is, on the other side of that, I mean, he was put on no-fly lists and stuff like that.
He was debanked and de-platformed from everything.
So it's really difficult to say, right?
You know, like, there are weird things about Fuentes, but there are also things that stack up.
So I don't know, right?
And I'm not pointing fingers.
I'm not trying to say anyone's affair.
But there are a lot of people who are like, have our guys all been bought off?
And, well, if they had, you get a lot of these reactions, right?
So I don't know why we have this opinion about things collectively, the online right, I guess we'd call it, whatever it is.
And I just don't agree with basically anything anyone's saying on this.
I think Epstein's a terrible guy.
I hope he's dead.
I don't think he killed himself.
And this is just the way the business is done.
Anyway.
Yeah, again, more stuff about Fuentes.
Prostitution abuse is awful.
What the files reveal, the files reveal the system being, sorry, I'm getting a migraine coming on.
And so, you know, you get like the flashing bits in front of your eyes and it's like breaking up words as I'm trying to read them.
The files, I shouldn't do a late-night stream, really.
The files more reveal being the system assumed to work ultimately isn't because of those who just select winners slash force events arbitrarily.
And most seem to overlook this.
Yeah, like we knew about Epstein's behavior with women and young girls, right?
We knew about that.
It was always kind of assumed that there was a racial supremacist aspect to it because of who the victims are.
And so getting that all explicitly out, okay, just confirms what we already assumed.
But it's the way that they do business, I think, is the most important part of this.
And I think it's just important to remember.
And the thing is, I don't even know, like, can it be done another way?
Like, when you're dealing with this kind of international networks of power, is there a sovereign that they would be able to appeal to to adjudicate laws and judgments in their favor if one party screwed the other?
You can't just make these massive business deals on blind trust.
You have to have, you know, out of the blue, you have to have some kind of fixer.
So is it even possible for it to happen in another way?
You know, these are all questions I don't have answers to, you know.
Finnegan Fox's Confession 00:08:57
Thank you, Boom Brolife.
Much appreciated.
What I don't understand is...
I've just lost that for some reason.
There we go.
While the so-called distance are suddenly in support of deep state agents, I signed up to support these people, not play defense.
Yeah, I know.
I just don't get it.
I really don't get it.
And like I said, I'm not trying to call anyone out or anything.
But this is just stuff that I just don't agree with.
I just kind of want it on the record.
No, I don't agree with any of these takes.
You know, I'm way past the days where I want to start internet beefs or anything.
But I hope the curse of the other one was sarcasm.
It must be really.
Maybe, you know.
The thing is, I've been reading through these Epstein files for a while now because I've been focused on the Epstein stuff.
And I guess it makes you less inclined to be frivolous, right?
Because actually the gravity and the magnitude of what's happened, you know, you just, it's not funny, you know?
So I just, I just haven't felt very jolly in the past few days.
Not because I'm personally affected by anything, but because it's psychically damaging, man, to have to deal with all this.
If the Epstein files have recently been released are a fact and are in fact real, and it turns out we've all been governed by anti-God Christianity Satan mushrooms.
Yeah, I mean, what a weird thing that Epstein would call his bank account BAL.
And then in his interview with Bannon, which who knew that Bannon and Epstein were so tight, that he would be like, oh, are you Satan himself or something?
And Epstein kind of fumbled the answer.
Like, it just weird, man.
Really, really weird.
And then it connects it to the Podesta stuff where it's like, right, okay.
I mean, you know, just saying, I don't like where this is all going.
Harry says, unironically, very literally, if we were in the Warhammer 40,000 universe, we're a planet of emperor worshippers being ruled over by Sinesh cultist elites, and I hate it.
I don't know what, I mean, I don't know what the, I mean, you know, with Bill Gates or something, yeah, it turns out, you know, like he knew all about Epstein.
There was one interview where he's like, oh, I couldn't live the way Epstein lives.
It's like, oh, right, so you know how Epstein lives.
And then him catching an SDD and trying to give his wife antibiotics secretly, surreptitiously.
And Epstein will be like, oh, God, you can't surreptitiously give your wife antibiotics to prevent the STD.
That's immoral.
It's like, mate, you rape children.
Like, you're going to be, that's the line though?
Oh, okay.
That's the line.
Very, very strange.
But yeah, sorry.
What was it?
Yeah.
Like.
Mental.
And it's, like I said, is not pleasant stuff.
And I'm nervous talking about it because I don't know that the powers that be won't just be like, oh, right, okay.
Whack.
You know, you're fucked now, bud.
And maybe, I mean, I don't know.
You know, I feel like I'm taking a risk, is what I'm saying.
So, basically, guys, if I do get whacked, I expect you to fucking save me.
Is Louis Lou Levi alive?
Yeah, he is alive.
I just don't know why he doesn't post.
I wish he would.
It would be much more interesting if he did.
I stopped looking into all this after realizing none of it was surprising.
It just damages the soul, staring at the face of the devil as he laughs at us.
And Christ have mercy on us all and protect us.
Yeah, I know.
I did the video years ago, the reality of child trafficking rings, and it was that was fucking horrible to do.
Really fucking horrible.
Just, I mean, just some of this stuff.
I really try not to get deep into that bit of it either.
Like, I've been really focusing on the political aspect of it, just because it's less painful.
You know, but it is annoying knowing that there's a huge section of the global elites that just view the regular person and not even necessarily the regular person.
I mean, like, Epstein was like, oh, yeah, JP Morgan's full of like, you know, intelligent goyam wasps or something like that.
You know, white Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
And, you know, they're Goyam in abundance.
So it's not even that he didn't recognize them as capable or something like this.
It's just that they were in the outgroup and they would be, you know, they were derogatorily contained in that label.
And it's not really acceptable, is it?
I mean, I just, you know, it's not on.
You know?
Anyway, the point being is that, yeah, no one, we don't seem to have a network, right?
There's no network, there's no power network that's looking out for the native peoples of America or Canada or Europe or Britain or Australia or whatever.
Right?
That's what we were relying on is our governments to enforce fair and equal laws that we could feel that we could live under and prosper.
And I just, I'm not seeing it, right?
I mean, if Epstein is an evidence of anything, these power networks can definitely subvert these.
And it takes a great deal of effort to get them to at least do something about someone who is provably evil.
So remember, I mean, Epstein, when he got arrested, he got, oh, what was the guy's name?
It was the Attorney General of Florida at the time.
He was getting part of the power networks, one of the elites.
I can't remember whose brother he was.
We covered it the other day.
But the point is, he gave him such a sweetheart deal where it was like he was, you know, he didn't have to be in jail during the day and he only had to turn out there at night for like 13 months or something.
It was just the most mild punishment.
And, you know, such it's a formality we have to, or else, you know, essentially, you start unraveling everything if you, you know, when you cross certain thresholds.
And it was, it was just one of those things.
It was over.
Okay.
So here, here we are.
The rules for thee and not for me.
Do we think the Clintons will face any consequences?
No.
No, obviously not.
Even though Bill Clinton's culpable and implicated in it as well.
I love how Bannon and Epstein talks about how using Alexander Dugan and how he was useful, Dugan is deep in the occult and is the architect of the Russian geopolitical plan.
I don't know anything about Dugan.
I haven't actually seen that bit of the interview or that bit of the email exchange, wherever it was.
So I can't comment on it.
But they definitely have esoteric thoughts about things.
Thank you, National Razor.
Finnegan Fox.
I don't know who Finnegan Fox is.
Finnegan Fox has apparently passed away.
Let me look that person up.
I don't know who that is.
Sorry.
A wildlife advocate.
You should check out a million Amelias by Skybrows as you and Gammonzilla, along with great representation of British Pride.
Yeah, I did see it.
A bunch of people sent me it.
How kind and flattering that is, right?
Carl, you seem to be one of the few legit voices in the West.
Satan's biggest trick was convincing us he did not exist, and your video on Anglicanism is revealing.
These elites view everything spiritually.
Yeah, I think they do.
I think they genuinely do view these things spiritually.
I mean, like they are religious, just not for your religion.
I think it's the important thing to remember.
They are so greedy and short-sighted, they can't even treat us how a rancher would.
They can't help but mess with us and our kids.
It will end them.
Well, I mean, you know, maybe, maybe.
But it would make sense for them to reign in the people who abuse the cattle, right?
That would make sense.
Anyway, just saying.
Right, I guess I'll leave that there.
I'm reasonably sure I haven't said anything that is actually untoward in this or prejudicial in this, right?
I've tried to be very specific about if there is a network of interest and, in particular, networks of ethnic interest, these are contained and not universal.
I'm pretty sure I've emphasized that point.
So I don't want lots of DMs, angry DMs yet tomorrow about things because I'm not saying something anti-Semitic.
I'm not saying something Islamophobic.
I'm not saying any of these things.
But I think we have seen a good peek behind the curtain here into how these things really work.
And, well, we have to be aware of these things, right?
You have to be honest about these things.
These are hard truths.
Anyway, thanks for joining me, folks.
Export Selection