All Episodes
Previous Next
June 1, 2025 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin
01:23:55
How Bad are Things Going to Get?

We have a lot of problems in our future.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, folks.
I think I'm live.
I'm not late.
I'm not late.
Chat.
Thank you very much.
I think everything is in working order.
Check.
There we go.
Hello.
How are you all?
Hope you're all doing well.
Been a long week, hasn't it?
It's always been a long, bloody week in this country.
I thought that tonight what we would do is just have a read through Dominic Cummings' latest substack post that he posted a couple of days ago because Dominic Cummings is of the spad class, the political insiders who are not themselves elected politicians, but are swallowing around with them.
He's probably the most perceptive, and he actually seems to be giving a fairly solid analysis of what's been happening from an insider's perspective that I thought might actually be useful to us.
I don't think the audio is boomered.
Don't say it if it's not true.
Because, I mean, what he's saying aligns with a lot of the things that we see from the outside.
And so I thought we'd just take a casual breeze through this blog and just see what we think.
So there's not a huge amount of presentation in this one, but hopefully there's a lot of good information.
So do feel free to chime in if you have something to say because I won't be in a great hurry to get through things here.
So this is the blog post, and he prefixes it with a bunch of quotes from various important people throughout history.
And then he gets to his actual text.
Inside the intelligence services, special forces themselves under attack, bits of Whitehall and those connected to discussions away from Westminster, there is a growing, though still tiny, discussion of Britain's slide into chaos and the potential for serious violence, including what would look like slash racial, slash ethnic, slash mob gang violence, though the regime would obviously try to describe it differently.
So this is a serious concern because I don't know whether anyone's noticed, but we have allowed, at this point, just fully fledged colonies from various ethnicities and nationalities to sprang up on our soil.
And we have funded this ourselves.
We have had absolutely no oversight.
And now they are terraforming the landscape to more properly represent their home countries in England.
We have allowed this to happen.
And people are starting to realize: oh, wait, this is turning into something like a Lebanon situation.
Where this in Lebanon they had quite a delicate balance of powers constitutionally around the different ethnic groups that lived in Lebanon.
And this was thrown out of whack because of Palestinian immigration to Lebanon, Muslim immigration to Lebanon.
Now, we don't have the same constitutional setup, obviously.
But the point is, things are changing in a direction that is going to create great and deep ethnic tensions that have already, but are definitely going to boil over into what I think people just genuinely think is just going to be serious violence.
And The way that people are terming this is civil war, but civil war is not the correct term for this because civil war is what happens in a single polity, a single ethnic polity, where two factions of that polity that recognize each other as being a part of it have a war over something.
It could be a succession, it could be ideology, it could be whatever.
But the point being, a civil war is necessarily internal to a single political system, a single group's political system.
And we are just not getting that here.
What we are getting is ethnic groups that are kind of verging on almost a kind of autonomy, sort of self-governing autonomy in their enclaves.
And outside of these, it's normal because, you know, if you're living in a place that hasn't been incredibly diversified, well, where else would the people come from?
And so within the enclaves, well, they're just very much their own thing.
I mean, there are areas in England now, they're just small areas, but there are areas where they just don't speak English.
Like, there was a GB News presenter who went to them recently, went to one recently, and he was trying to just find someone on the street who spoke English.
And of course, they were like, no, speak English, no speak English.
But right, okay, this is the world we're creating.
And so they're worried that there's going to be racial/slash ethnic mob slash gang violence, as Dominic points out.
And it's like, yeah, I think that's a real worry for the future, actually.
It's something that looks like it's going to happen.
Gerald says, you get violence if you invite ethnic enemies to become new neighbors.
Well, it's not just ethnic enemies.
So there's a chap, a professor of war studies, the Imperial College London, I think it is, called David Betts, who's been doing the podcast circuit recently saying Britain's really ticking all the boxes when it comes to states that are likely to have a civil war.
But again, I don't think civil war is the right term because there isn't a clear leader in the opposition to the state.
And that's not really what the issue is because the state, of course, in Britain is 100% behind every ethnic minority group and against the majority group.
So it wouldn't be a civil war like that.
It would be a kind of low-level racial conflict, basically.
And they don't know what they're going to do about it because the legitimacy of the state is predicated on it actually being the thing it's supposed to be and actually being the political expression of the British people.
Now, what does that mean when you're trying to be the political expression of the English, the Scottish, the Welsh, the Northern Irish, the Pakistani, the Indian, the Bangladeshi, the African nations, and various Various other places, like various other peoples from everywhere else.
What does it mean to be the political expression of the British people when you are trying to be a multicultural state?
And the answer is that the British state has absolutely no idea.
They don't know what they're doing.
They don't know where they're going.
And as Dominic is pointing out here, essentially they live in a land of delusion and things are just getting worse, which is obviously true.
Anyway, he carries on.
Part of the reason for the incoherent forcefulness against the white rioters last year from a regime that is in deep surrender mode against pro-Holocaust marchers, rape gangs and criminals generally, which is basically an accurate description of how the British state considers all these groups, is a mix of A, aesthetic revulsion in SW1, which when he says SW1,
what he's saying is the machinery of government and the apparatus that surrounds it.
So this is like the center of the political area of London.
We would just call it, I guess, Westminster to the Westminster bubble area to summarise it.
But the people who occupy this despise the, as he says, the Brexit voting white North, and B, incoherent white hall terror of widespread white English mobs turning political and attracted talented political entrepreneurs.
Well, like political entrepreneurs who've recently been released from prison, for example.
This is a deep concern of theirs because the English are still something like 70 to 75% of the population of England.
And so if there was some kind of ethnic consciousness that took hold in them and they decided we've had enough, there's not a lot that the British state would actually be able to do about it.
And they know it.
So naturally, they are very, very afraid of this.
And they don't know what to do.
They do not know what to do at all.
Woot says, my wife never understood this issue until she came to my hometown of Oldham and was the ethnic minority in certain areas.
Well, you know what?
Let's get the 2021 census map up and have a look at Oldham, shall we?
So when you're using the census map, what you need to do, see how many English people are in England, go to identity, ethnic group, and then more categories, because of course they hide this down as many clicks they can.
Then go white, English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, or British.
Then you can search for wherever you want.
So we're going for Oldham.
Huh, interesting.
So you see the sort of outs of the periphery.
They're very, very English, because that's the people who live in the Shires.
But when you get into the center, 16%, 12%, 14%, 12%, 7%, 28%.
So this is the sort of thing he's talking about.
Where you can narrow in.
Look, look at that.
0% in this neighborhood.
There are no English people living here.
This is what we have allowed.
2%, 0%, 0.6%.
It's probably like one guy.
Just insane that we have allowed this to happen.
Just, it's just madness, isn't it?
What are we doing?
Why are we literally giving our country away to foreigners?
It's like we don't understand that there is a world outside of our own country, or we think that that world is somehow so benighted that rescuing foreigners from it has become some sort of national duty.
It's absolutely maddening to watch this happen.
But this is the future that we're delivering to our children and grandchildren, by the way.
Our government is so kindly making sure that they have real problems coming up.
Madni says, an American with an English ancestry, my heart goes out to the British people.
Is the UK too far gone or is it still time to turn the tide?
Of course.
Nothing's over.
We just have to understand how bad things are.
And things are pretty bad.
and look at just like 0.9 there this is just it's the it's just the most immoral thing you can imagine What a complete and total betrayal of the voting base of the United Kingdom, of the people of England.
What a complete betrayal.
Can you imagine showing Henry V this?
You're like, what's happening?
Imagine showing Alfred this.
And he'd be like, yeah, well, I knew.
I knew this sort of thing could happen.
Anyway, so the point is that the powers that be in SW1 are terrified that the English are just going to say, you know what, we've had enough of this and it's going to change.
And it's going to change on ethnic lines.
And so they say he carries on.
They're already privately quaking about the growth of Muslim networks.
How is this possible?
How is this possible?
I was told that they would integrate.
I was reassured that they would become part of British culture.
They would shed their old culture.
Well, of course, that just hasn't happened.
And how exactly would someone living with zero English people around him ever possibly even think about integration?
What do you mean integrate?
Integrate to what?
How could it be possible that they could do that?
Anyway, the last thing they want to see is emerging networks that see themselves as both political and driven to consider violence.
Well, that's the last thing any of us want to see, isn't it?
Nobody wants to see political networks that think violence is an appropriate answer.
So why did you bring these people here?
Isn't that the question that we need answered?
Why did you bring these people here if this was a possibility?
Anyway, he carries on.
In number 10, which is the Prime Minister's house, meetings with the Met Police on riots, I saw for myself, A, the weird psychological zone of how much order rests not on actual physical forces, but perceptions among a few elites about such forces that can very quickly change.
And that's interesting, isn't it?
How much order rests on not actual physical forces, but perception among the elites.
Like, right, okay, that's very interesting.
So what that says is that they're living in a fancy land, basically.
They don't have control of the situation.
And they just think, well, as long as people think we have control, as long as we think things operate as they do, then we should be fine.
I'm very much reminded of the out-of-touch Athenian aristocrats that Demosthenes was raging against, saying, look, Philip is making actions.
He's taking territory.
He's becoming an increasing threat to Athens.
And they just laughed at him.
They just mocked him.
And it's like, okay, and look how that turned out.
Anyway, B, how scared the senior police are at the prospect of crucial psychological spells being broken.
We can see on the streets that various forces have already realized that the regime will not stop them.
What if this spreads?
Whitehorse pathology has pushed it to the brink of this psychological barrier and many of them know it.
So they don't know what they're going to do.
They don't know what the solution is going to be if people realize, well, actually, they don't really have control of the streets.
They don't really have control of what's going on.
And we can basically just do as we please.
What do the people in SW1 then do?
And this is the root of Stalma's crackdown on the rioters.
We will have 24-hour courts processing you.
We will make sure that every single one of you is in jail.
Because if we don't, then you'll realize that actually we're afraid.
And we don't know where we're going with this.
We don't know how to stop what appears to be on the horizon.
Dominic carries on.
This aspects of the situation are tragic comic.
If you talk to senior people in places like the UAE, so Arab countries, they'll tell you that big shots in the region now tell each other, don't send your kids to be educated in Britain.
They'll come back, radical Islamist nutjobs.
So this is a fascinating thing here, right?
The idea that we have decided that no one in Britain is allowed to regulate the kind of teachings that can be, that are permitted and permissible in Britain.
And so 48% of our mosques, probably more now, actually, of Diabandi.
The Diabandi School of Islam is the same school of Islam as the Taliban.
And it was formed explicitly in opposition to Britain and the British Empire.
So why would we allow them to operate in our mosques?
It would be.
I mean, it's just deeply irresponsible that we've just allowed Britain to become a hotbed of radical extremism, right?
It's really, really, really irresponsible.
And the Arab countries are like, I don't know why they're doing that.
And you've seen the clip of, I don't know, some Saudi bureaucrat, whoever it was, saying, I'm going to say this in English because I want the West to understand, you guys don't understand Islam and you don't understand what you're doing with it.
But for some reason, we're fostering the most radical strains of it, which is just really bizarre, isn't it?
Really hard to understand why we would do this.
But of course, anyone who does know anything about this knows that this is being done because of political correctness.
this is being done because frankly we are afraid sorry i'm just gonna saw the super chats going by and i don't want to miss them Don't want to be rude.
We've done this because of political correctness.
We've done this because we are afraid of making them feel discriminated against.
And so this has created a complete open field for the most radical forms of the ideologies.
And no one in Britain is empowered to stop them or do anything about them.
And so it's okay.
Well, that's not smart.
I mean, that's obviously going to create major problems going down the line and into the future.
Thank you for doing that, you absolute cowards.
This doesn't help at all, does it?
Anyway, Dominic carries on.
Our regime has spent 30 years, A, destroying border control and sane immigration, including the home officers jihad against the highest skilled, whom they truly loathe, discussing and try to repel the stupid fees, etc.
And again, if our immigration system was literally, we're taking, we are actually taking brain surgeons and rocket scientists, then just on the sheer number of those people in the world alone who want to move to Britain, our immigration would be in the thousands.
It would be really low.
But instead, we bring in 300,000 workers and then 700,000 dependents and students.
So it's okay, brilliant.
Anyway, so and then B, actively prioritizing people from the most barbaric places on earth, hence immigration from the tribal areas most responsible for the grooming slash rape gangs keep rising.
Be the Mirpur area of Pakistan, which, as I understand it, is considered a total backwater by the standards of the other Pakistanis in Pakistan.
And C, funding the spread of those barbaric ideas and defending the organization, spreading them with human rights laws designed to stop the return of totalitarianism in Europe.
And these are just the most outdated things in the world.
They were designed for Europeans to deal with other Europeans, frankly.
And they've clearly outstayed their welcome.
We clearly don't actually need them.
In parallel, they've started propaganda operations with the old media to spread the meme of that our real danger is the far right, code for white people.
This is interesting because when he says that our real danger is the far right, well, I mean, in a way, yeah, actually, the real danger for the SW1 consensus is indeed the far right.
And this is why Keir Starmer and the rest of them are so insistent on cracking down on the English working class.
Because these people, and they still have decision-making power, right?
They can select otherwise.
And so, like, I was in Germany recently, and they were like, look, it's basically it's built into our constitution that we have to be liberals.
And I was like, oh, right, that's interesting because we don't have a written constitution.
And so there is no dead hand of treaty on our neck forcing us to be anything.
And as Parliament is sovereign and literally has the power to do whatever it wants, could legislate the sky green tomorrow if it wanted.
We aren't entrapped in that kind of constitutional system.
And that's why they're worried.
Because they could vote for anyone.
We could vote for just anyone, any kind of person, any kind of radical, and that person would have the power to do whatever they wanted.
They'd just have to go in with a wrecking ball and just take out all the quangos and a bunch of laws that were put in in the late 20th half of the 20th century and the early half of this century itself.
And then they'd just be open-rained to do whatever they want.
And everyone knows it.
So as Labour and Tories have continued their deranged trajectory, they've provoked exactly the reactions they feared, including the spreading meme that our regime itself has become our enemy and the growing politicization of white English nationalism.
Well, going back to the map, the darkest parts are those parts that are still mostly English.
You can see like East Anglia sort of region, southwest.
In Wales, obviously, it's Welsh.
And in the north of England, it's mostly North.
But you can see in the Midlands and sorry, in the north here, and then all around the Midlands, it's just like a cancer that's growing through the country.
The total abandonment of areas of our country to people who are just born abroad.
And yeah, no wonder English nationalism is on the rise.
No wonder people, and I swear to God, you talk to regular members of the public about this.
They'll bring it up, right?
I was on the train the other day and I was sitting opposite just some gentleman who looked at his about 55, 60.
He's in a suit, he's a businessman of some sort.
And the woman walking by with a tray of sweets and teas and stuff banged him.
And he, you know, he had a little back and forth.
He was very polite with her.
And because I've been sat there for about, I don't know, 45 minutes or something.
And then, for some reason, shortly after that, we just started talking.
He mentioned, you know, he must have said something like, oh, you know, like, happens every day or something like that.
And then we just started talking.
And then he didn't know who I was.
And then with a couple of minutes, he's like, God, the state of this country.
And it just started coming out of him.
So, you know, I started, oh, what do you mean?
And it just started coming out of him.
How, obviously, like, he probably would have been a Lib Dem voter or maybe like a wishy-washy conservative.
But like at this point, you could tell that he was like, yeah, I know, something has seriously got to change.
And this is just some rando I ended up talking to on the train.
Like you find, you have these sort of conversations everywhere.
People realize this is so far gone and so bad that this something really drastic has to change, right?
Or else we all end up like Luton, right?
Something really drastic has to change.
And so I'm not surprised they're worried about the growing politicization of English nationalism.
Yeah, but I bet they are.
I bet they are.
I don't.
The idea that the regime itself has become our enemy is just so self-evident to most people.
The government, and this is the way I phrase it, it's just the government has set their face against us.
And so when Kierstama came out and said, right, protesting, you're going through 24-hour courts and I'm going to make sure every single one of you white devils is in jail.
Yes, we can see the government has its face set against us.
We are the enemy of the British state, which is meant to be the political expression of the British people, which has now decided it's the political expression of everyone but the British people.
And it's going to cram as many of those people into the goddamn country as it's capable of in as short a period of time as possible.
And unsurprisingly, this has created the conditions where professors are like, God, I think a civil war's coming, boys.
You know, I don't think this is good.
It's like, yeah, no, it doesn't look good, does it?
Anyway, let's go through some super chats just to take a break quickly because this is fucking stressful.
I just hate.
I hate what they've done to our country.
Hate it so much.
It's like, why?
I don't know why they've decided that we deserve this either.
It's so baffling.
What did we ever do to them?
What do we do to the government to make them do this to us?
Anyway, I'm just going to go to anything that's relevant, if that helps.
I live in Batley area in Northwest Yorkshire.
It's been bad for a very long time, but it's definitely more noticeable since the Boris wave.
A lot of random Africans have appeared out of nowhere.
Have you noticed that, like, there have been South Americans wandering around?
Like, what the hell are they doing here?
Why would they want to come here?
So weird.
Are we, we were naive after the Brexit/slash Boris premiership?
I mean, nobody expected Boris to do what he did.
Like, nobody expected that.
If there is actually no democracy in Britain, it's just the will of Midwits, but I'll vote regardless.
Yeah, no, that's exactly the problem that we have at the moment.
We're not a democracy.
We are not in any way represented.
i don't know man like there's there's no there's like the this the people who run the state have to so dramatically realign their own priorities as to create a kind of psychic um like almost psychic inquisition on themselves you Like, they think they're here to serve foreign peoples.
They think they're here to serve minorities.
They think that is their job.
That's what they in their brains.
They genuinely think this.
And this is creating problems like this.
And they don't know what to do.
Anyway, let's carry on.
These deep state discussions about the growing prospect of violence, like the focus group discussions about civil war, have seeped through to a few to few MPs or hacks.
So most of them aren't even aware that this sort of stuff's going on at this point.
And the evolution of the cabinet office in recent years has excluded ministers, SPADS, and the PM from almost any visibility inside the NSS, the National Security Secretariat of the CO, which has acquired power from the rest of the intelligence security/slash intelligence system and runs a failing empire within a failing empire.
He said, he says, when I said that in 2020, that among the general changes, the dysfunctional number 10 CO system, the oversight of NSS must change so it became visible and legible again to the PM's office.
So he could participate in debates like what are the actual priorities of the intelligence services vis-à-vis Putin and Z, some senior officials tried to pretend that zero political scrutiny of NSS was somehow a constitutional principle.
So they don't want oversight from the elected government.
What are they doing?
What is their job according to them?
He carries on.
After I left, this system became even more closed and dysfunctional, hence the total lack of true strategic thinking connecting ends, ways, means over Ukraine and all things defense procurement, becoming more Kafka-esque as the Ministry of Defense ships stuff to Ukraine.
I repeat, the lack of legibility of the NSS without historic precedent in the UK for centuries and is related to broader issues of White Horse dysfunction, the disgraceful shambles of the Ministry of Defense, etc.
So this is obviously a massive problem because you probably saw today that Kirstama is looking at getting planes that can drop nukes.
It's like, oh, okay, brilliant.
And we've been warned that we will likely have to fight a war that we absolutely have to win.
Okay, but what happens if we lose?
What do we lose if we lose?
I mean, I just, I have no interest in fighting a war for this system at all.
And I think many other people would feel the same, which is why you can't recruit, which is why you never hit your targets.
Remember, at the beginning of the First World War, a million men just volunteered to fight.
A million just came out and like, yeah, I'll fight for Britain.
Now, we can't even get 80,000.
An army of 80,000 men.
So it's just crazy.
As L. Quakey has asked, is 2025 England like 1913 Austro-Hungarian Empire?
Well, I mean, I'm not an expert on the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but it's more like the late Roman Republic, late Roman Empire, the late Roman Western Empire, where there was huge amounts of money and manpower.
It was just the state was unable to tap any of it because none of it wanted to interface with the state because the state was just viewed as a kind of predatory organism that was here to steal your livelihood.
And here we go.
So SW1's OODA loop.
So the OODA is the mechanism.
I remember what it means.
Observe decide something.
I can't remember what it stands for.
But basically, it's a mechanism for deciding what the actions are going to be, what executive action is going to take.
And so this loop has operated for years as a massive denial of service attack on its own perceptions of reality.
Constant cycles of thermal emotional hysteria and narrative whiplash, while number 10 has no capability to execute priorities.
A great recent example: Professor Ansel saying that the Zelensky Oval Office interview meant Farage's prospects have peaked, widely blue-skied approvingly.
An emotional spasm entirely in tune with SW1's NPC network, reflecting OODA as a DDoS attack.
This is, I have argued for years, made it more and more vulnerable to history's remorseless pattern, slow rot, elite blindness, fast crisis, sudden collapse.
So, yeah, they thought that Farage would never get past like 20% or whatever it was.
Now he's at like 32% regulated polls because things are just not getting better and nothing can improve under the regime that we have.
And they refuse to admit that they are the problem.
This is the thing.
They're all saying the right things in many ways, but their poll numbers are just not improving because it's too little, too late.
None of them were in any way ahead of the curve on this.
And the public, I think, at this point is just using Farage now as a giant protest.
Just say, you know what?
I'm going to vote for just something else.
Because, I mean, you can say what you like about Nazi Farage, but he didn't bring us to this point.
He didn't create this state of affairs.
He didn't create the circumstances on the ground.
He is not responsible for what is happening now.
They are.
These are all the concepts.
Everything, everything bad that's happening is just the consequence of government policy.
It didn't have to be this way.
It could quite easily have been elseways.
And yet, here we are, where the old, in fact, this is what Dominic goes on to now.
Where the old guard on both sides of the aisle have been shown to be such inveterate traitors that they just can't be trusted at all.
He carries on.
The old party's lost their chance to fix things in a normal sort of way when the trolley and his girlfriend, he means Boris, and what's her bloody name?
Not Candace.
I don't know why I've got the word Candace on my mind.
I can't remember his name, her name.
What's Boris's girlfriend's name, chat?
But anyway, they told everyone in 2021 they're going back to normal politics.
SW1 cheered, including the Tory MPs, who got cold en masse in 2024.
And yeah, that's funny as well, isn't it?
Like 300 MPs down, nearly.
Sorry, 250.
But just absolutely brutal.
Absolutely brutal.
And they deserved it.
After Salama won, SW1 MPCs tweeted to each other that they now had serious grown-ups would return to normal carry.
That's it.
Thank you.
We'd return to normal government.
I mean, just incredible.
But this was just another cycle of delusional SW1 narrative whiplash.
The Starma project blew up on contact with the reality of Whitehall.
Now both parties are led by dead players.
Both old parties are structurally knackered.
And the NPCs tweeting, hurrah for the grown-ups.
Sue Gray is the Jedi we need a few months ago and now blue-skying the disgusting rhetoric from Starmax.
Starmer, of course, came out and said, well, immigration is an unforgivable uncalculable damage to Britain.
And yeah, I mean, he's right.
It has absolutely done uncalculable damage to Britain.
But what are you going to do about it?
Seriously.
What are you going to do?
So, anyways, he carries on.
Starmer is speedrunning Sunak's demented combination of A, massively raising the salience of immigration and boats with B, a set of policies that everyone knows who understands the details cannot possibly do what he's promising.
He goes on to just essentially point out that this is an obvious contradiction between the Human Rights Act and the European Court of Human Rights and the desire for them to say, Look, we're going to stop the boats, boys.
We've got the Rwanda plan or whatever they've got now.
It's not going to work because the Human Rights Act and the human rights lawyers will just intercede.
And the law will force them to keep these people in the country.
And so Starmer is at this point, as it says, a dead player, optimized to defend the institutions at all cost.
And so he's arrived at a point where he can't do anything.
And this is an interesting bit.
If you're not in the meetings, you can't accurately estimate the relative levels of dishonesty and self-delusion involved.
Obviously, there are officials and lawyers in the meetings who understand reality and are happy to feed ministerial delusions as they did with Cameron, May, and Boris Sunak.
And there are odd, unusual officials who bluntly tell the truth.
PM, so there is no confusion.
What you're announcing cannot possibly cannot possibly do what you claim.
I know Sunak was super delusional, not lying, only because I spoke to him in person twice.
And of course, many politicians develop weird superposition personalities where they sort of know and sort of lie to themselves, such that an impartial observer can rarely conclude either they're lying or they're deluded.
It's a bit of both.
It's how many cope when promoted to jobs far beyond them.
And it's very poorly understood amongst business elites who always overrate the rationality of political players and underrate the prevalence of this superposition personality phenomenon, which means widespread avoidance of the real issues in meeting after meeting to an extent that the median business elite has little experience of outside companies heading for bankruptcy.
That is a brutal paragraph.
Say, listen, right?
The people in charge are fucking incompetent.
They are not bright.
They do not know what they're doing.
And if anything, like now, no, I was going to say nice but dim Starma.
No, he's not nice.
He's a brick.
But Starmer's clearly a blockheaded ignoramus, right?
He knows one thing, probably very well, and nothing about anything else.
Okay, great.
So Starmer, the intransigent human rights lawyer, has decided that he's basically just going to be a bureaucratic tyrant.
And then you've got, what's her name?
Rachel from Accounts, who is obviously not our best and brightest economic mind.
And yet, somehow she's setting economic policy for the country.
And then you've got other retards like Ed Miliband, who's like, look, Britain is just in the worst possible shape it could be for energy.
Ed Miliband's like, you know what we need to do?
Make that worse.
And then when you've got, I've got a lot of mine in here.
Then you've got other geniuses like known brainiac David Lanny, who's somehow in control of how we deal with other countries.
And it's like, yeah, like, even if there wasn't this weird problem that Dominic is describing of them lying to themselves and deluding themselves at the same time, these people clearly would not be capable of dealing with the problems that are springing up and moving along in the country.
And so we're just, we've got the kind of position where the governments of this country, successive ones now, on both sides of the aisle, have just been filled with people who are just kind of not in control.
Right.
And they, like Hitler in the bunker, are deluding themselves that another regiment is going to turn out of nowhere and save the day right before the Russians arrive.
And it's oh, great, you know, just great.
And he says, look, I suspect there's more conscious dishonesty with Starma than Sunak, but the result is sure to be the same political disaster.
Honestly, I mean, like, I don't.
There's no mechanism for us to remove Starmer from power.
There's no mechanism for us outside of the Labour Party to force a general election.
It would have to come from within the Labour Party itself.
And it's unlikely to, because the Labour Party rarely gets a sniff of power because they're such destructive and irresponsible children when they are in power that people are like, oh, God, yeah, no, that was a mistake.
And they only allow the public generally only allow Labour into power once the Conservatives have really screwed things up in some way.
And so the Labour Party now being back in power, they're just going to complete, they're going to cling on to it for as long as they can because they know it will be a generation before people forget how bad they were and let them back in.
It will literally be a generation after Stalman.
So anyway, Cummings carries on.
I repeat what I predicted about Sunak when in 2023, the old media regurgitated endless nonsense on how number 10 plans stop the boats that are dealing with the HRI and judicial review because hand wave.
And now I'm going to skip this bit just because you know exactly what this is, right?
This, in fact, he summarizes here.
Operationally, stopping the boats is very simple and could be done in days.
Yes, believe it or not, actually, physically, we are capable of stopping small boats from crossing the English Channel.
I mean, we've been capable of stopping entire armadas crossing the English Channel.
But legal advice endorsed by external experts is that the PM cannot do this simple thing lawfully because the courts will stop him using the Human Rights Act and the ECHR.
Of course they would.
He says, in simple terms, if the PM tried to order the Navy to stop the boats in a serious way, the courts would state that this was unlawful.
Yes, he would.
They would.
And so, as he points out, you must choose between our priority to the ECHR over stopping the boats, or is our priority stopping the boats, and therefore the Human Rights Act regime must be changed in primary legislation.
It's not a secret, right?
It's crystal clear that this is the issue.
The laws that allow the lefty lawyers to come in and override the actions of any British government that are in some way reflecting the will of the public just have to be repealed.
They just have to be repealed.
There's no, it's not in any way a murky issue.
It's very clear that this is the issue and it has to be changed.
And if it's not going to be changed, then the issue can never get better.
We can't stop the small boats if we can't do it lawfully because the other parts of the system just won't respond because we don't have an executive presidency or anything like this.
Anyway, so Dominic carries on and points out to like he told Sonek this was not going to work and it didn't work and the superposition personality politicians developed helped him avoid the reality of this.
And he says, look, Stalman will fail in just the same way whether he's lying or deluded or in a superposition himself.
Correct.
So it cannot be done in the system as the system stands because the system is set up to prevent it from being done.
Gone.
Ironically, this farce is generating not a return to normal government, but the resurrection of SW1's hate figure, Nigel Farage, to champion what voters said in 2016, 2019, and 2024, which is, we hate Westminster and we demand huge changes.
Yeah.
Why is our country being held hostage by a bunch of civil servants and whatever spads and lackeys and whoever else is around them?
Why are these traitors allowed to continue to do this to our country?
Again, it's not like we don't know how bad it is.
We're living in it.
Excuse us for demanding some kind of political representation and accountability, but we were under the mistaken impression we were living in a democracy.
And so actually the country, the British state, as in the political expression of the British people, was meant to be democratically arranged so it served our interest first and not the interests of whoever you've allowed to come and live in the very f ⁇ ing center of London at our expense, by the way.
Like, it's just not, it's not even conceptually difficult to see why people are so angry about all of this.
I mean, the other day, we learned that a billion pounds a month is spent on benefits to people who are born outside of the UK.
It's £12 billion a year spent on benefits to foreigners.
It's like, what are we doing?
This is mad, but again, it's the HRA regime that we labor under, where for some reason, if they manage to set foot on British soil, we need to give them money.
It's like, no, we don't.
Just deport them.
Anyway, Farage hasn't built a campaign machine in the professional team on any scale.
Agreed.
Reform remains essentially Farage plus an iPhone.
Agreed.
But he plays a consistent main character in the show while the rest of the cast are writing their roles out of the script.
And that's an interesting way to put it is like this is like a TV show.
Because in many ways it is.
And it's an interactive TV show, but it is in many ways like one.
And he is right.
I'm not impressed with what Farage has done.
I mean, Farage hasn't done anything.
He hasn't democratised the party.
He hasn't, you know, he hasn't prosecuted.
He said he was going to have a lawsuit against some guy who was insulting him.
He said he was going to do a rape gang inquiry.
He hasn't done anything.
I don't even know what he's doing at this point, really.
Going around campaigning against them.
But again, that's just the character on the TV show.
What would a set of reform policies actually look like?
And the thing is, at this point, they would have to be brutal.
Like, Farage, if he were serious, would just come out and give a list of everything he's just going to destroy.
I'm going to destroy the SW1 consensus.
I'm going to destroy the Human Rights Act.
I'm going to destroy the ECHR.
I'm going to destroy any institution that stood in our way.
I'm going to liquidate the institutions and then create something new that will do the job in future.
So none of the people involved with it gets to be in the new order.
That's what Farage should be saying.
He should be saying truly radical stuff at this point.
Everyone involved in this is going to go on some sort of treason trial.
Like he should be hard on this, but he's not.
He's become remarkably soft for some reason.
And no one can understand why.
Maybe a treason trial might be a bit far, but you know what I mean?
Like, this is just too much.
And people have been betrayed for too long.
And we're not happy with this.
Anyway.
And on the politics, I repeat again the central argument that SW1 en masse cannot absorb but is crucial to grapple with when considering what comes after the collapse of the Labour and Tories, which is they don't know how to cope with the nightmare.
Well, I mean, like he says it, that Starmer has a truly nightmare situation because the issue of what to do about immigration is no longer susceptible to the post-1991 SW1 politics as usual.
Rich Graduate London, crucial for what Labour has become, has radicalized itself like the Democrats, such that it is on principle hostile to border control and treats arguments made by Bill Clinton and Obama as racism.
Yeah, I mean, Bill Clinton had a perfectly sound border policy, which is none across no illegals.
And Obama was the deporter-in-chief, but now these are racist positions.
But he carries on.
But keeping them happy enrages most of the country outside of London.
Starmer has done a Senak and enraged everybody.
Rich Graduate London now rages at Starma for his appalling rhetoric, and Knock London hates him because it knows his rhetoric is just more lies and delusions and nonsense we've seen from SW1 for 25 years, and everyone can see the boats keep on coming, video, keep it, keep coming on video every day, proving we're right.
Yeah, I mean, yesterday was it, 1,200?
1,200.
And it's like, well, I mean, the ECHR, I just wrote the Human Rights Act.
Like, dude, I am so beyond whatever they, whatever you think those pieces of legislation say, I don't give a flying fuck.
He said the trajectory has caused incalculable damage, yet he self-evidently does not even believe his own words given his trivial proposals.
Yeah, and the thing is, nobody thinks that Starmer is going to be hard immigration.
What everyone thinks Starmer is going to be is defensive towards the current status quo.
If immigration is going to damage the state's quo, then he'll do something to reduce it, maybe.
But he'll do nothing structurally, which means he will never actually solve the problem.
The problem cannot be solved structurally as things stand at the moment.
Anyway, so he carries on.
So things could have been otherwise, but he says, the last thing any part of SW1 outside of some of the deep state now, I don't know who he's talking about here.
I don't know who in the deep state would be based.
But no one outside of any SW1 wanted to see the Tories transformed into a different party that was super tough on crime and immigration, super focused on productivity and science, technology, startups, investment, super disruptive of Whitehall's core institutions and supported by a national coalition uniting parts of the working class and middle classes.
Now, that sounds like a fucking fancy, doesn't it?
Because that would be wonderful.
That would be what good governance would look like.
As he says, super popular outside of SW1, but a nightmare for SW1.
Well, then it is SW1 that is the problem, isn't it?
Why are these people holding our country hostage?
So both parties cheered by the NPCs have doubled down on a trajectory that is deeply unpopular to almost every constituency.
The mainstream has alienated everyone except Whitehall, some other London/slash university characters desperate to prop up the rotten edifice.
They've revived their boogeyman Farage.
Sonek and Starma are the last of the old party leaders who have clung to the dead scripts of the hollow SW1 simulacrum.
The hollow leaders optimizing for pats on the head from permanent secretaries and government lawyers, even when it leads to their own implosion.
Seems to be the way.
Seems to be the case.
Well, the new government imploded, the Tory Party could not benefit.
The new party couldn't, the Tory Party could not benefit.
It has disintegrated in all areas.
Its membership has either defected to reform or retreated in disgust from politics.
Its donors have gone on strike.
Its local networks have collapsed.
It cannot generate good ideas.
It cannot campaign and communicate.
Its communication is so self-sabotaging, they disintegrate faster when they try harder.
And networks on which it depended for people and ideas have either themselves died or defected.
Now, that is fascinating because, like, I'm shocked that nobody I know has been approached by the Conservative Party.
I'm part of a very vital, like, beating and alive right-wing network in Britain and overseas.
And not one person I know in this network, and it's full of really intelligent, really well-read people who know exactly what the problems are.
Not one person I know has been approached by the Conservative Party.
Say, hey, could you help us?
Could you help us out?
Because we are fucking dying on our asses and we don't know what to do about it.
Isn't that weird?
Isn't that so crazy?
How you've got a party where they're literally so out of touch that they're like, all right, yeah, everyone hates immigration.
Okay, let's put an immigrant in charge and we'll see how it goes.
We already gave them the first unelected Indian prime minister.
I'm sure that in this nativist era that's coming along, that's not going to like not one person I know has been approached by the party that has led us to this point and seems to want to actually kill the country off completely.
It's very interesting, very revealing of the kind of closed-mindedness of the Westminster political system.
And really, I don't, like I said, I don't support Farage because there are, well, for lots of reasons.
But I do support Farage destroying the Conservatives and Labour, right?
I support clearing out the debris of the 20th century.
I mean, parties of the last century just have to die at this point.
They just have to go away.
Nobody needs the old ideas of the past when the problems of the future are so much more salient and so different to the ones we face then.
None of the questions of the 20th century provide answers to the problems that we're having now.
Nothing like this now happened to us in the 20th century.
It's completely different.
We are totally new terrain.
And so these old parties, they can just go.
They can just go.
The inherited institutional knowledge that these parties are apparently desperate to squander is of no use anyway.
What possible use would it be to have a Conservative Party in charge?
Conserve what?
This state of affairs?
I don't think so.
This state of affairs is fucking atrocious.
Anyway, yeah, so the Conservative is utterly useless.
Utterly useless.
There's a completely correct analysis of it.
In the recent elections, councillors got Thanosed.
And if Kemi is still there in a year, in a year, most of what's left in England, Wales and Scotland will get Thanosed.
The party is now just 100 English MPs and a few thousand councillors rattling around in a hollow historical institution.
Next bay, it won't even be that.
And that's true.
That's absolutely true.
So he gives us a few questions to answer.
What, if anything, does Farage build and who does he recruit in the next few months?
And I made a video about this a little while ago called Dear Mr. Farage, pointing out, you haven't got anyone around you.
What does your shadow cabinet look like?
What does your chancellor look like?
What do you do if you're in government?
And the answer is he doesn't know.
This is something that Farage, frankly, I don't think is prepared for.
You would think after 30 plus years in politics, Farage would have dozens and dozens and dozens of the best and brightest that he would be able to just tap and say, look, I've actually found myself where I'm looking like I'm going to form the next government of the country.
You, you, you, you, you.
I want you all in.
I want you to do this, this, this, and this.
This is going to be great.
But Farage has got clearly quite an unpleasant personality when it comes to working with him.
As those people who have worked with him tell us, going back to the late 90s, to like the Kilroy Silk era, clearly Farage does not play well with others.
He needs subservience.
It's like, okay, well, that's great, but that's all and good.
And it's not such a big deal when he's just a campaigner for a problem like Brexit.
But when he's going to be forming government, that's a massive problem because nobody wants to be thrown under the bus by Farage.
And so he's not going to be able to attract the talent that he needs to actually fix the problem.
So we're in a position where it's like, great, the only option we have, and the British public, their minds change glacially, as in it's slow, but then it starts going.
So you notice this kind of snowball infect with reform, which may well put Farage in charge, but he won't have the ability to do any of the things he needs to do to fix it, unless he personally thinks he can do all of this himself.
And I just don't think he can.
But the question is, does he blow the chance and let the energy be captured by others?
I think that's what's going to happen, frankly.
Do the Tories bin Kenny this year and try to save themselves or leave her and watch the rest of their party get Thanos next May?
Yeah, maybe.
The thing is, though, Jenrick isn't actually very popular.
He's the only guy that they've got.
Because, I mean, look at the low human capital as well that we're dealing with here.
Like, there's no one good in the wings waiting to take over the Conservatives.
And so they're just, okay, well, okay, we'll have the most bland guy in the world who is fine.
I mean, I don't dislike Robert Jenrick or anything, but like, he's not an inspirational leader.
He's the last hope that they've got, basically.
But, or has the party already crossed the invisible event horizon into oblivion?
Entirely possible, frankly.
It's entirely possible that people are like, you know what?
I have had enough backstabbing from the Conservatives.
They've backstabbed us.
For everyone's lives, everyone's entire lives.
They've backstabbed us.
Like, going back to my grandparents, well, my dead grandparents, like, there is no way the Conservatives, I think, can be redeemed at this point.
What do Labour MPs do when they realize their PM has done a Sinek and machine-gunned both London Remain and non-London Leave?
Yeah, I mean, like, remember that Sinek, Sinek, Starma, came in on a general approval rating of 50%, right?
And he's now 22%, like the party at 22%.
Like, that is, he has more than half the share of votes they're going to get.
But it's entirely possible that the next election, it's like Thanos snapping the Labour MPs out of existence, like with the Conservative MPs.
It's entirely possible Nigel Farage has over 350 fucking MPs.
Who are they going to be?
Like, total normies.
He's just recruiting normies.
350 Normies find themselves in Parliament.
What do you do?
Don't know.
I'm not a politician.
What would I know?
But anyway, yeah, the point being, their party is looking like it's a hollowed out edifice as well.
How do parts of Whitehall prepare sabotage Farage, copying their friends in Europe who routinely sabotage political threats to the old system?
That's right.
Farage basically is going to be completely the same position Trump was in, in that the deep state, whatever we want to call it, the civil service, are just in total revolt against Najah Farage because they've demonized him for his entire career.
And then they'll just stonewall him at everything.
They'll betray him on everything.
They can't be trusted.
How do other parts of Whitehall, particularly security and intelligence, respond to disintegration?
How do voters respond to the meltdown of the old system and creeping chaos?
Probably not well.
What new crises accelerate collapse?
As I said in 2021, prepare for the grid to collapse and infrastructure everyone relies on stop working.
Well, on the plus side, we're getting some experience of this, right?
I mean, like, you know, if you ever try to use the trains, they go to the train.
Okay, which ones are late today?
All of them.
Which ones are packed to the gills today?
Oh, all of them.
The immigration Ponzi is blowing up.
The Ponzi scheme of the modern financial system could blow at any time.
How fast do violence and no-go areas spread?
Do we start seeing networks emerge combining explicit anti-Islam, explicit violence sabotage?
Competent organization as the deep state fears.
Well, I mean, I hope not, but I'm not my well-wishing isn't something that's particularly influential in this regard, so it's something that has to be worried about, doesn't it?
He finishes with, I think there'll be another SW1 spasm, and Kenway will get the heave-ho this year.
After this, the social media show changes to either the Tories are sunk and closing down and sorting into Labour Lib Demo reform.
And B, oh my goodness, there's a last gasp at revival.
How will Starmer and Farage, neither of which have political machines worth the name, cope?
Well, who knows?
Like, there's no point making political predictions at this point, um, because we're in uncharted waters.
I don't think anyone knows what's going to happen in any way, shape, or form.
And like, there's there's nothing reliable about where we're going either.
Um, apart from the fact things are going to get worse.
Apart from that, there's nothing reliable.
Um, anyway, let's see what you guys think about that.
Uh, Joel says, oy mate, you've got a license not to be painting Warhammer off to jail with you.
Cheers from Yank.
I hope Seely Chat helps brighten your day.
Well, thank you.
I appreciate that.
Uh, Blazestone says, recently discovered your back catalogue on an internet archive.
And given your recent videos, I think I think it's worth listening to them again.
Could you convince 2014 or even 2020 you of your current positions?
Well, I am 2014 and 2020.
The thing is, that version of me didn't know as much as this version of me does.
So, if I were to just sit there and spend the time to explain to those versions of me why these things are as they are, I think I would have to concede that I was right, which is why I've arrived at these positions now.
Ryan says, please research Nicholas Van the Nicholas Van Rensburg prophecies.
I don't know what this is.
Let me Google it.
There's a boa from the South African Republic, 1864 to 1926.
Okay, I'll look into that.
I'll leave that in an open tab.
It ends with No England.
Yeah, I believe that.
I totally believe the sense of No England.
And that's one of the reasons I keep going on about it, right?
That's one of the reasons I'm really concerned about it.
There's just, there's nothing else to be done other than this.
This is like the great struggle of our time is going to be making sure that our grandchildren get to live in England.
That's what this is going to be.
Cameron says, I live in the Battley area of West Yorkshire.
Oh, yeah, no, I've read that one.
Generica says, possibly unrelated, is the trivium your equivalent to King Alfred translating the Bible into English and distributing it throughout England?
Spoken previously about the unifying effect of it.
It's part of it.
The courses, so on loads, if you go to courses.loadseas.com, we started producing courses.
The first one is Nima Pavini's Trivium, because I badgered him into creating this, because I think that the proper education that was deliberately denied to us is the sort of thing that we're just going to have to manually reconstruct ourselves.
And his trivium is superb, by the way.
Stellios is currently working on a course about ancient Greek virtue ethics, which the purpose of which is to how to lead a good and virtuous life.
Because again, the information that you think you would know just normally has been deliberately withheld from you.
And so we're just going to have to manually reconstruct it ourselves.
So this is just the way that this is going to be and how we're going to have to do things in the future.
E.H. says, read Unholy Alliance, Muslims and Communists, an introduction to Ben Fawkes and Boulet Goke.
Communists using Islam to destroy the West.
Well, bro, I don't need to do.
I don't need to read that.
I know that.
It's been very self-evident for quite a long time.
Davy Verse, were we naive about Brexit and Boris?
Yes, we were.
Spasmatica says, what kind of lib-brained logic explains immigrants being more radical than the country they came from?
This just feels like a declaration of war by the upper class with a mercenary army.
Well, I can't say that's incorrect.
The lib-brained logic is that, oh, well, you know, they're a precious native culture that we white supremacists can't incede in, because otherwise that's us being oppressive.
And so, when left to their own devices, it turns out that actually a lot of radical Muslims will move to an area to congregate and become more radical.
So, even if it's not a declaration of war by the upper class with a mercenary army, certainly the kind of consequence of what happens.
Neo Morton says, mass immigration is a calculated attack on the low-fertility West.
We didn't give the country away.
It was sold by elites to sedate and profiteer.
Yeah, I mean, that's true.
They themselves, I still think many of them, as Cummings was pointing out, sort of self-delude into thinking what they're doing is preserving a set of institutions.
But the thing is, I would rather every single one of these institutions die a slow and painful death than give up my country in order to preserve them.
The institutions didn't predate the country and they won't succeed it either, frankly.
The institution, if they have to die, then they have to die.
We'll just create new institutions.
We have done this before.
will do it again taylor says hi carlo I was wondering if you'd ever looked into the building of the Jewish-Hindu Alliance.
From my perspective, as a non-religious person, it would seem that Abrahamic religions are incompatible, and some groups have noticed that already.
I have never looked into the Jewish-Hindu alliance, I'm afraid.
Obviously, the Abrahamic religions are incompatible because what they're claiming is that they have the correct interpretation of a particular religion from a certain given and the same god.
And therefore, that naturally puts them in conflict with one another.
They can't possibly agree that one of the other religions has got the correct interpretation of what this particular god's opinion on how things should be are.
Whereas if you have religions that are essentially agnostic towards each other, we don't really believe your God exists, then actually it doesn't matter what Vishnu thinks to Jewish people because they're like, okay, that's just delusional fancy.
So who cares?
Or if you're a Hindu, you're like, yeah, well, I mean, Yahweh can just be one of billions of gods.
Who cares?
Yeah, okay.
I mean, fair enough.
That's pretty compatible, actually.
But you're absolutely right.
The Abrahamic faiths are obviously not compatible, definitionally.
Rubber Leg says, what's your AI video and your talk?
The factories remind me of a Philip K. Dick story called Autofac.
The plot is a man-created sorceress apprentice mop scene, but with the AI factories, and we can no longer tell them to stop.
It's genuine concern, isn't it?
It's genuinely worrying.
Deadpool Kidd says, Carl, I don't mean to sound doom, doomerish, but if Parliament and business continue to import more migrants, allow the washaway of native ethnic European culture, escalator, and it's only a matter of when, not if.
Yeah, this is what David Betts' point has been, which is the downgrading of a people from being the rulers of their own civilization to just one party in the civilization usually is followed by a civil war because actually that's not desirable and there's no reason that you'd want it.
The question that a lot of people have asked is why is David Betts telling the podcast circuit about this?
Why isn't he going to the government about it?
Why isn't he going to SW1?
Why isn't he going to the civil service or the intelligence agencies or something?
Because he's a professor of war studies, civil war studies.
If anyone's going to be credible on this, it's going to be someone like him and they would theoretically listen to him.
And I'm guessing that actually Dominic Cummings has given us the answer to that, which is these people are deluded.
These people aren't listening to anything outside of their bubble.
And maybe David Betts, I haven't spoken to him, but maybe he went to them and asked them and tried to tell them, look, I need you to listen.
And they told him to fuck off, maybe.
Again, I don't know that, but it seems entirely possible that we're in a position where they just aren't capable of listening.
Ryan says, Nicholas van der Rensberg's visions foretold of civil wars in England, Germany, and France start and end before World War III.
Well, Jesus Christ.
I'm going to read up about this guy afterwards.
Jub says, I live in a small town in mid-Wales and I'm starting to notice the changes more and more here.
It's not even a lively area.
Why are they here?
And moreover, who put them there?
Right?
I don't, the Boris Wave, when they're in fucking villages in Africa or wherever, in India, Pakistan, farthest reaches of Asia, they'd never heard of your little Welsh town.
They weren't looking at a map going, one day Ahmed will arrive in Aberystwyth.
They weren't doing that, you know?
Like, they had no idea you were there.
Someone has put them there.
Someone has shown them where to go.
Gerald says, Samuel Huntingdon was right.
He just didn't think it would come close to home, clash of civilizations.
Yeah, well, I mean, like, in his defense, it didn't seem that there was ever a possibility that the British government was just going to import millions and millions and millions of strangers and then just allow them to do exactly what they wanted in our country, right?
But that never seemed to be on the horizon right up until about 1997.
Just nobody thought this was going to happen.
Mac the Knife says, I would argue this is all deliberate and done by design, Carl, an archo-tyranny.
Screaming from the hills, that and the turning of the key.
We talk of these events, but don't come to this realization.
The thing is, when you know who is involved in this, it doesn't feel like it is deliberate.
The people, and I think that Cummings is right.
There is a great deal of self-delusion in the upper circles of the people who are controlling all of this, in that I think they think that there is a positive outcome that can come from all of it.
But this just isn't borne out by reality, right?
It's delusional nonsense, obviously.
But I do think that the people involved think they're doing the right thing, which is worse, frankly, because that just means they're fucking delusional liars.
If they were just evil, it'd be way easier to identify.
Gower Gura says, big fan of your work.
Well, thank you very much.
That's a generous donation.
Rubber Leg says, continued from my last chat, man is trying to tell them that the need for them to control production is no longer needed, but the AI interprets otherwise.
All right, from the sci-fi Philip K. Dick one.
Yeah.
El Kwakey, no, Redon.
Generico says, is it better to be an English nationalist or to have a broader conception of the people, which includes the rest of the settler colonies?
I mean, I think it depends on the context.
Obviously, I think all of the men of the West should be concerned about the other men of the West.
Like, apparently this weekend, there were massive migrant riots in France.
Big up the French.
Viva France.
Come on, lads.
You know, you've got to save your fucking country in the same way that we've got to save ours.
And I would rather us go back to being the old enemies.
I'd rather us have countries to be enemies with after all of this is over.
I think the men of the West have to be at least sympathetic to one another at this point.
But in England, yes, it's England that we have to be most concerned for.
Omega Supreme says, as an outsider, the idea of American conservatism is so foreign and vulgar to Europeans, your Tory party is to the left of Hillary Clinton.
A joke, but you need we're not going to get Kanye to snatch the Overton window.
That's not the way that works over here.
Weirdly enough, it's Keir Starmer who shoved the Overton window to the right with his rivers of blood speech.
Hilariously enough.
I've had a sort of chesty cough for the past week and it's been really annoying.
Sorry, I'm coughing so much, but it's very frustrating.
Ofenave says, please chat with Dave Smith.
Yeah, I would happily chat with Dave.
So the thing is, he'll probably want to talk about Israel and Palestine.
I just have no interest in talking about Palestine.
So anyway, some Radam S says, America is ultimately a bunch of English mutts pretending to be Rome.
That's not an insult.
That's what makes us so damn powerful.
You had to send some mutt.
Why would you have to send some mutt?
How's that a word that's on YouTube's naughty list?
How is that a word that's on YouTube's naughty list?
No, no, it's not an insult at all.
Good for the Americans.
I'm glad it's working for them.
Lee Ferrikson for 500 ARS.
I don't know what that is.
Says, and Argy, I'm enjoying the current state of affairs in the UK.
Yeah, fucking thanks.
Thank you for providing a cautionary tale.
Yeah, I know.
I know.
I know.
At least Malay's doing cool things, you know.
At least Malay's doing good things for Argentina.
Like, we're so fucked, man.
Omega again says, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube, trying to repeal the laws that left abuse.
The judges would simply block that as well, unfortunately.
No, they wouldn't have the power to block that.
The parliament is the executive and legislative.
So they're the ones who choose what laws we have and what gets actioned.
So they could absolutely remove.
Jeff says, you're not voting this away.
It's like, well, you know, at the moment, the power of decision still is in the hands of the public.
They just need to use it.
Ofanave says, has real republicanism not been tried?
Is there a single conservative who can counter Lysander Spooner?
Starting over leads to the same result, yes.
It's a long thought experiment I don't want to get into, just to save time.
But I don't think conservatism is what we need.
We need some sort of nativism, frankly.
It has to because the question that really underpins all of this is just to whom does England belong?
And we know that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians.
We know that India belongs to the Indians.
And the question of to whom England belongs is just left hanging in the air.
Corungill has sent me something in Latin, which I don't speak Latin.
Pro vadis via Britannicus.
i mean where is britannicus why won't you let me Where are you going, British man?
Means good question.
Very good question.
Sapien Unglerground says, you get paid to complain.
Oh, well.
So you don't want anything fixed, do I?
Sapien Underground.
Good point.
There's nothing I could do that can make money other than complaining about the state of my country.
And you're right, it's all about me.
It's all about me.
It's just me that I'm concerned about.
See, I know that you don't have kids because you've said that.
You think that I am the only person I'm concerned about.
And I love the way that you think.
Like, I don't know whether you've noticed, but if you look at the other videos on this channel, like, most of them are just philosophy videos where I'll take a subject that I think I can talk about for 10 minutes and talk about them.
And I could do that forever.
I don't have to do politics.
I would like to do something else.
Like, I would like to do aesthetics more, actually.
But no, you're right.
I get paid to complain.
I just care about myself.
And so, therefore, somehow I'm perpetuating the state of affairs by going through Dominic Cummings' blog and talking about the problems.
Somehow, I'm perpetuating.
The point being, Sapient, is you're a fucking moron and get fucked.
I hate when people are like this.
Like, oh, you just get paid to talk about the problem.
Okay, good.
Aren't I fucking lucky?
It would be better if we didn't have a problem that I wouldn't be able to get paid to talk about, wouldn't it?
Fuck's sake, man.
As if that solves anything.
So, what I mean, and the thing is, what's the point?
Am I supposed to be like, okay, yeah, good point.
I won't do that then.
So, I'll just make esoteric philosophy videos and I'll not talk about the issues.
Is that good?
Should nobody talk about the issues?
What's your fucking solution, you prick?
Don't act as if, like, farmer paid not to fix.
I'm not the one, I'm not the author of the fucking problems.
Jesus Christ, man, use your brain.
Stop being a fucking idiot.
Fuck's sake, man.
Ofa says, conservative ends are achieved by libertarian means.
Oh, I don't know.
That's a much longer conversation about the issues that I don't have time for now.
But I don't know about that.
I think, honestly, that's an American perspective because this is your sort of tradition.
Whereas countries, this is not your tradition, not their tradition, not the same thing.
This is the argument I have with Razorfist every now and again on Twitter about.
He'll give a very sensible interpretation of the American tradition and not understand that this is not universalizable.
So, Spen says, vote reforms.
Here, Yusuf for Prime Minister.
Lawak Bar.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The Emperor's Champion says, Golden Throne Party, let's go.
Policies, Galactic Dominance, No Aliens, Mutants, or Heretics.
Slogans, the Emperor Protects.
Yeah, I mean, like, anything that would be more useful would be good.
And honestly, you know, the God Emperor of Mankind would do a better job.
Travel to New England if you want to see old American pretentious leftists.
It's weird how the area and Florida are in the same country.
Yeah, yeah.
So Charles conceded that the Canadian government is illegitimate on unceded lands.
Yeah, I know Charles is woke.
Charles is woke.
He's as much a part of the problem as anything.
Like, there are people who are like, oh, can't the king do something?
I'm like, well, yeah, technically, the king could do anything he wants, really.
And he would just have to have a fight with Parliament over it.
And the thing is, the Parliament at this point is so dilapidated that they'd never be able to raise an army on their own merits.
So, like, he would be able to just go in and disband them and say, fuck off, you twat.
I'm dissolving parliament and you're never going to get recalled.
Now what?
But what good would it do?
Because he's an insane woke globalist.
So why would he want that?
He's got a parliament full of woke globalists.
Why would he want to get rid of them?
All of our families died for nothing to defend an empire that has forsaken us.
Yeah, that's true.
It's absolutely true.
Unfortunately.
YouTube bias says, asylum is outdated.
In World War II, some English moved to the countryside for safety.
No leaving the country needed.
Give them pre-fab poems to go for Norris.
Most of them aren't asylum seekers.
That's the thing.
Most of them are just taking advantage of the system we stupidly set up because we thought the rest of the world, for some reason, wouldn't have access to it, even though it clearly does have access to it.
So, you know, the whole thing just needs to be scrapped.
Totally fucking scrapped.
Dutch Tulip says, I'm joining the Royal Marines in a few weeks.
Possible civil war really scares me because I can see being deployed against my own people.
I'd refuse and the military would likely turn on the government.
Love from South Devon.
Well, I would never put money on that.
Because remember, they're paid by the government.
So.
We are looking forward to your visit to Australia.
Is there anything in particular you'd want to see?
There are lots of things I don't want to see.
Like poisonous spiders, snakes, crocodiles.
I don't know.
I've never really wanted to go to Australia.
Just because of the distance involved.
I don't want to spend 24 hours on a fucking plane.
Nick says, I know a Burmese girl who claims refugee status in London.
Her father is one of the generals in the junter, and she hangs out at places like the Reds.
I'm just so done with it.
Anyway, let's refresh this quickly.
Saw a couple come in.
Stop cursing, you limey.
Well, sorry, but this stuff annoys me.
All the evil being unleashed on the world, especially in the UK, are a left-wet dream.
Well, this has been the entire point.
This has been the entire point of the leftist project.
It's to destroy the things.
Ian says, Christ is the first and last.
Civilizations rise and fall.
Yeah, I know.
We are living through a terrible spasm.
If we can't get control of it, then we're totally fucked.
Anyway, thank you, everyone, for joining me.
I will be on the podcast tomorrow, so make sure you podcast the load seaters.
Tune in, and what we're going to be talking about.
I don't actually know what I'm going to talk about.
But, well, part of what we're going to be talking about is going to be just recently there have been revelations about just the amount of money we've got to spend on immigrants, and it's just unbelievable.
Just absolutely unbelievable.
And so, we're going to be talking about that and various other things.
Oh, no, I actually know there is so.
Ferris is going to talk.
He wants to talk about how actually a bunch of old fairy tales are actually really based.
And so, we're going to break down some of them, which is see, this is the kind of stuff I actually really love doing.
Sort of textual narrative critiques of things.
That's one of the things that we've had on the back burner for a couple of weeks now.
And tomorrow's the day we're going to do it.
So, tune in because that's going to be well, Herv, we're going to be talking about aesthetics on the podcast.
But it's going to be good.
I've been looking forward to it for quite a while.
So, thanks for joining me, folks.
▲
Export Selection