All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 1, 2018 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin
34:09
Punished Kavanaugh Reveals the Dark Heart of the Left
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So let's have a talk about Brett Kavanaugh and the way he's being treated by the left, because frankly, it's fucking despicable.
Business Insider have furnished us an article that described the sexual misconduct allegations against the judge.
So Christine Blasey Ford says Kavanaugh assaulted her in high school.
Apparently, he was stumbling drunk, pinned her down, put his hand over her mouth and groped her while a friend watched.
And they apparently both laughed at her as they did it.
Well, that's certainly a serious allegation, and it is very strange that after 36 years of this having happened, this is the time that she brings it up just when he's being appointed to the Supreme Court.
And to support this claim of something that happened 36 years ago, allegedly, that we probably don't have any real evidence for, Christine Blasey Ford had a few witnesses.
Well, this is what the witnesses had to say.
The Associated Press report that Mark Judge, the man accused to have been in the room with Kavanaugh while he did this, says, I have no memory of this alleged incident.
I do not recall the party and never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.
Now, the Associated Press believe that that's not a denial that the act never took place.
It sounds like a denial to me, but I'm just a nobody on the internet.
I don't work for the Associated Press.
Someone called Patrick J. Smith, who was identified by Ford as being among those downstairs at the party, said, I have no knowledge of the party in question, nor do I have any knowledge about the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.
Well, that sounds like the party didn't even happen, so that seems like a denial as well.
Ford also claimed that her friend Leyland Inheman Kaiser had seen something, but she said, Ms. Kaiser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present with or without Dr. Ford.
That would seem to be another denial that this party even took place, let alone these people being in the party with Brett Kavanaugh.
In addition to Dr. Ford not being able to tell anyone about where the party was, when it was, or any other details apart from the fact she is 100% sure that it was Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge who did this to her, we have absolutely nothing.
None of her witnesses even agree that the party she claims she was at happened.
And apparently two unnamed men have come forward to say it was they and not Brett Kavanaugh that had the alleged sexual encounter with Christine Ford.
The committee has interviewed two men who came forward about the disputed assault at a summer house party.
Both told the committee that they, not Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of this complaint.
Well, okay, why aren't we hearing more from these two unnamed gentlemen who are at least brave enough to come forward and say, hey, look, we don't think that you've got the right guy.
In fact, we think we might be guilty of that.
That seems pretty bold.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm sure these aren't wonderful gentlemen, given the allegation against them, but you've got to give them some credit for coming forward when they think it was them and not Kavanaugh.
Naturally, more allegations followed because this is the sort of pattern that happens with feminists when they have a particularly powerful man they want to unseat.
And you can see this happening everywhere that feminism is taking root.
I mean, I could give you two examples from the atheist community.
You've got Lawrence Krauss and David Silverman, who are both experiencing exactly what is happening to Kavanaugh.
One woman that they may or may not have had some kind of interaction with alleges something, and then groups of other women come forward with anonymous allegations that again can't be proven one way or another, but we are supposed to take it at their word that all of this is true and that the two men in question, previously who had nothing against their names, are in fact serial predators.
And every sexual exploit they've had with a woman has been completely without that woman's consent.
But anyway, Deborah Ramirez alleges that an incident of sexual misconduct in college.
Apparently at another party during the freshman year, apparently Ramirez, even though she was drinking at the time and has gaps in her memory, says she can recall key details.
I remember a penis being in front of my face.
I knew that's not what I wanted, even in that state of mind, and apparently another student nearby yelled, Brett Kavanagh just put his penis in Debbie's face.
Well, it's certainly convenient as a line that you can read out in a courtroom, I suppose.
But is there any evidence of this?
Well, no.
The New Yorker said that it had contacted several classmates, but that many didn't respond, declined to comment, or said they didn't remember or attend the party.
One classmate said that he was 100% sure he heard at the time that Kavanaugh had exposed himself to Ramirez, and the magazine said that he had independently recalled many of the details Ramirez had outlined, including that a male student ate Kavanaugh on.
Well, what details?
It could be that this happened, it could be that this didn't happen.
Apart from one anonymous classmate who claims that he was 100% sure that he remembers it, he stands in opposition to the other classmates who say it never happened, or that wasn't a party, and that they didn't go to it.
Who are we to believe?
Who knows?
That's one of the main problems with allegations that are of a kind of wishy-washy nature like this.
I mean, how could you ever prove that Kavanaugh actually had done this 30 years ago?
You would have to have some kind of video or photographic footage to show that this had happened, and they obviously don't.
So what the fuck are we talking about this for?
We can't do anything with this information.
We have no idea whether she's telling the truth or lying.
And we aren't going to sit there and assume she's telling the truth just because she was born with a vagina.
The third allegation from a lady called Julie Swetnik is by far the most ridiculous that you would think there would be dozens of witnesses for, but once again, we can't find a single one.
Swetnik signed a sworn declaration alleging that she witnessed Kavanaugh and Judge display abusive and physically aggressive behaviour towards girls during a series of house parties in the 1980s, where the boys would spike punch with drugs or alcohol to cause girls to lose their inhibitions or ability to say no.
Oh, really?
Really?
Are we going to assume that women don't know what they're doing?
Women can't taste alcohol and punch.
Women don't deliberately drink alcohol-spiked punch so they get drunk and lose their inhibitions.
Okay, that's how we're playing this, is it?
Because Swetnik alleges that this is done so they could be gang raped by a train of boys and that she was one of the victims.
Really?
Gang raped.
You went to a party, you got drunk, and you had sex with a bunch of guys.
And now it's a gang rape.
Okay.
I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their turn with a girl inside the room.
Really?
Okay, it's a gang rape.
You might think that there would be victims of these gang rapes that might want to come forward as well.
Any corroborating witnesses, anyone who felt guilty, any information at all, but it's just Swetnik's allegation.
And a fucking ludicrous allegation it is too.
I do not believe for a second in these middle-class houses, wealthy houses, they were just gang raping women constantly, and nobody has anything to say about it apart from the hero, the brave, Julie Swetnik.
Aha, but Kavanaugh definitely lied on the stand.
He was definitely trying to downplay some of his hijinks from when he was younger.
Sure, I agree, he probably was.
This is quite a long article, but to sum it up, effectively they're complaining that Kavanaugh got minor details wrong about events 36 years ago, but primarily he denied that he was a heavy drinker, which many of his college friends have come out and say, come on, Brett, you were a sloppy drunk, let's be honest.
And honestly, who wasn't when they were at university?
Who's going to cast the first stone on that one?
But secondly, he was lying about the terminology he had put on his calendars in which he recorded his daily life.
Things like to boof, which apparently is, I know, some kind of anal method of ingesting beer and the devil's triangle, which apparently means a threesome with a girl and things like this, that Kavanaugh tried to whitewash over because, yeah, they sound bad now.
They sound bad when 52-year-old Brett Kavanaugh is sitting in front of a Senate hearing when his 16 or 17-year-old self had previously written rude words and slurs on a calendar.
Now he's held to account for these things.
Yeah, these are embarrassing.
But they're not proof of rape.
They're not even a suggestion that he would rape.
These are just rude things that teenagers say because they are edgy and transgressive.
Even back in 1982.
So yes, I am happy to agree that Kavanaugh was probably not telling the truth about certain embarrassing details.
But that is not proof that he's an attempted rapist.
And it's not like Julie Swetnik is without her own controversial past.
I just want to be clear before I go on.
I don't really give a shit about Brett Kavanaugh.
I didn't know who he was before.
I'd heard the name, but I didn't know anything about him.
And so preparing to do this video, I had to look him up.
And it seems that he is a man of good character.
He's been married for decades.
He has children.
He's been serving as a judge for, again, like 26 years, something like that.
And he has cultivated a reputation for fairness and honesty.
And he has nothing but glowing praise from the people who work with him.
He graduated in the top of his classes.
He was an athlete.
He seems to have done absolutely everything right.
He seems to have been a model citizen, even when he was a teenager in college and he drank to excess.
Like everyone did.
He still got his work done.
He still passed all the courses.
He still earned his way in life.
And now when he is going to cash the checks that he wrote with his hard work, he is being accused by the Me Too Brigade.
I'm pretty skeptical.
I'm really sorry.
I don't know Kavanaugh.
I don't give a shit about Kavanaugh.
In fact, I've heard that he has made many judgments and decisions that I personally wouldn't agree with.
And I believe that's true.
I imagine that he's more Republican than I'd be comfortable with, and that he would make decisions that I would not agree with.
But even if I don't like the man, this is an unacceptable way to treat anyone.
And so it's no surprise to me that there are many women lining up in support of Kavanaugh because from all accounts, apart from these politically motivated accusers, and that's another thing, people saying, oh, what's she got to gain?
The point of all of this, and she said it herself, that she felt that she couldn't in good conscience just let this go, was because this was going to be a Republican nomination to the Supreme Court that was going to secure a majority of the Supreme Court for the Republicans for decades to come.
It's going to change the course of American justice.
It's going to change the course of American society.
And the Democrats are well aware of this.
That's what she has to gain.
And she knows it.
And they all know it.
In fact, Lindsey Graham, who actually came out like a hero in defense of Kavanaugh, pointed out that they had said it.
They had even said it to him.
So that's what they have to lose.
And they know it.
This is why it's important that many women line up in support of Kavanaugh.
You know, all of the women that he's worked with over the years and who have nothing but glowing things to say about the man.
Female voices have echoed throughout the US Senate this week demanding male senators justify their support for Brett Kavanaugh's US Supreme Court nomination despite an allegation of high school sexual assault.
Well that's easy.
It's an allegation.
There's no credible evidence to suggest that it happened.
None of the witnesses who are alleged to have been there even think that the party happened.
There's no reason to believe that this is anything.
And other women have spent hours calling the Senate officers in support of Kavanaugh condemning what they saw as an anti-Republican ploy that's damaged not only Kavanaugh's reputation and his livelihood but also his accusers.
Well frankly, I don't think this is going to damage his reputation as much as it's going to damage the reputation of the left.
But we'll get to that in a minute when we look at the response and the way that they're treating Kavanaugh just based on these flimsy allegations.
The Democrats, of course, were calling for an FBI investigation.
Kavanaugh wasn't in favor of it, unsurprisingly.
Not that they're going to be able to find anything.
What possible evidence of this happening could they find?
It would have been difficult to prove this a day after it happened, let alone 36 years.
But either way, Jeff Flake got absolutely railed by a bunch of SJWs, completely cucked to them, unlike, again, Lindsey Graham, who when he was confronted by a bunch of squealing SJW protesters, were going, I was raped, don't you care about my rape?
He just turned to them and said, call the cops.
The only thing that he didn't do correctly there is say immediately.
This should remind you very much of Nicholas Christakis at Yale when he was accosted by a group of screaming SJWs two or three years ago and they used exactly the same kind of language, tone and demands.
What do I mean when I'm talking to you?
You're telling me that my assault doesn't matter.
Listen, love, your sexual assault matters to you, your friends and family, and the cops.
Go to them.
It's not his fault.
It's not his responsibility.
And no, even if he is saying that he doesn't believe Christine Blatchy Ford, that doesn't mean that your sexual assault does not matter.
This is transparent.
There is nothing to these allegations.
There's nothing that the FBI are going to find barring some fucking miracle.
And this is obviously being done for political reasons.
And not only that, it's being done using emotional manipulation.
And of course, the people protesting Kavanaugh are wild, rabid leftists who hate men, white people, and everything else they consider part of the white supremacist capitalist patriarchy.
I'm here because the Republicans are trying to nominate a rapist to the Supreme Court.
Because Kavanaugh is a sexual offender and we don't think he should be a Supreme Court justice or a federal court judge or even like roaming within society.
Don't believe that somebody who has where there's credible evidence of multiple sexual assaults and complete denigration of women should be sitting on the highest court in the land.
There's no one to directly corroborate her statement other than the other man, Mark Judge, who was in the room at the time, who will not step forward or has denied it.
He said that he does not recall that party or anything like that happening.
Yeah, they should investigate him.
He needs to resign.
He needs to withdraw and not do this to his family.
And we need to find out the truth.
So you think he should withdraw even before we find out the truth?
If I was his wife, I would want him to withdraw.
You don't get a presumption of innocence when you're interviewing for a promotion.
Do you worry that in the court of public opinion, if he is innocent, that this could destroy his life?
Well, I think you're focusing way too much on the life of somebody who's managed to be a district justice for many years and is potentially going to be on the Supreme Court.
His life is just fine.
These lunatics actually think that Kavanaugh is a rapist.
Despite the fact there is no evidence he even sexually assaulted a woman, which is the allegation, not that he is a rapist.
They think he is now a rapist.
And that's how they're treating him.
This is ludicrous.
These people are living in an alternate reality.
And they are basing all of their actions and their beliefs off this, off a false statement, off an alternate fact, something that wasn't true.
And apparently, you're not allowed to even question whether Christine Blasey Ford is even credible when she is making these kind of wild allegations.
The New York Times posted a Twitter poll and said, hey, do you find her accusations credible?
A completely normal question.
You would think everyone would want to have a say in that, but instead, they got browbeaten by a bunch of SJWs, were forced to take the poll down and apologized.
I didn't get to see the poll, but I can guess how it went.
And it's not just whack job far leftists who are going out into the streets and protesting about this.
They're the ones saying that Kavanaugh did it without any questions asked.
Here is an email I got from the ACLU because once upon a time, I was a supporter of the ACLU, but those days are long gone.
They say, ACLU supporter.
Imagine an America in which a man who has sexually assaulted women sits on the highest court, wielding the power to judge the whole nation.
Why would I need to do that?
There has been no credible testimony.
There has been no evidence.
There aren't even any fucking witnesses.
Why would I need to imagine that?
Fewer than 24 hours after Dr. Christine Blaseyvord's testimony accusing Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault, the Senate Judiciary Committee decided to plow through the confirmation process and vote to confirm him as our next Supreme Court justice.
At the 11th hour, they finally agreed to the FBI vote.
But Thursday's hearing, along with the inadequate investigation of the allegations of sexual misconduct, have made this much clear.
Kavanaugh cannot sit on the highest court of the land.
We have high standards for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.
That standard is not met when there are credible allegations of sexual assault against a nominee.
The burden of proof is on the nominee, and Judge Kavanaugh has thus far failed to prove himself fit to serve.
Are you insane?
How could he prove this didn't happen?
I mean, I can't believe he stole calendars from 1982.
What the hell else could he pull out of his asshole to prove that this didn't happen?
Ford didn't even give a time or date or a location as to where she thinks this happened.
So anywhere that he could prove that he was at any point in 1982, she could say that was the place, that was the time, he was the guy.
He can't prove he wasn't there.
This is unbelievable from the ACLU.
Nothing but raw partisanship.
This is a fucking disgrace.
Random allegations from over 30 years ago are not credible.
End of story.
And if you want me to believe that they are credible, you're going to have to come up with a better reason than, but she's got a.
And of course, this opens the floodgate to the far left's bullshit.
Lindsey Graham, Brett Kavanaugh and the unleashing of the white male backlash.
Lindsey Graham said, I'm a single white man from South Carolina and I'm told I should shut up, but I will not shut up.
Well there we go.
That tells you everything about the current climate in the United States.
White men should shut up according to the left.
And this is not something they're afraid to tell us.
This is in fact the primary platform with which they approach politics.
That is their entire core fucking message.
And so no, I don't think Lindsey Graham should shut up.
In fact, I would never, never normally defend Lindsey Graham.
And I would never normally laud him for anything that he does.
But when he sat there in the Senate saying this is a disgrace.
If you wanted an FBI investigation, you could have come to us.
What you want to do is destroy this guy's life, hold this seat open, and hope you win in 2020.
You've said that, not me.
You've got nothing to apologize for.
When you see Sodomire and Kagan, tell them that Lindsey said hello, because I voted for them.
I would never do to them what you've done to this guy.
This is the most unethical sham since I've been in politics.
And if you really wanted to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn't have done what you've done to this guy.
Are you a gang rapist?
No.
I cannot imagine what you and your family have gone through.
Boy, y'all want power.
God, I hope you never get it.
I hope the American people can see through this sham.
That you knew about it and you held it.
You had no intention of protecting Dr. Ford.
None.
She's as much of a victim as you are.
god i hate to say it because these have been my friends but let me tell you when it comes to this you're looking for a fair process You came to the wrong town at the wrong time, my friend.
There's no evidence for any of this.
This is weaponized political allegations.
This is the Me Too movement run and muck or whatever it is he said.
I can't help but fucking applaud the man.
Lindsay fucking Graham.
I am now on his side because he thinks that the burden of proof should be on the accuser.
That's it.
That's what all of this is about.
We are not going to just believe her because she said it happened.
Women can and do lie.
This is a facet of reality that we have to accept.
We can't just pretend that women are angels and they will never lie because the ones that do will ruin it for the ones that don't.
We have to think of the evidence and whether we should believe based on that.
And yes, that means that we will grant the benefit of the doubt to the people being accused.
Because honestly, it would be better that 10 innocent men go free than one innocent man be condemned.
And I know that the left doesn't think this.
They think the complete reverse.
They don't care if 10 innocent men are condemned as long as one guilty man is caught.
Kavanaugh has revealed the insidious force in global politics.
Toxic masculine shut up, Jonathan Freeman.
Why do you have a platform in The Guardian?
Why does anyone need to hear from yet another straight white male Jonathan?
Sit down and shut up, you specky prick.
Oh, didn't like that.
Didn't think you would.
But there's a good reason why young white men are abandoning the Democrats is because they seem to be the primary enemy of the Democrats.
It does not surprise me at all that the Democrats are hemorrhaging the support of white men.
Why the fuck wouldn't they?
What possible reason could you have as a white man to support the Democratic platform as it stands?
That's why I walked away from the left.
The fuck am I going to be treated like I'm the boogeyman that needs to be attacked?
I'm not going to sit there bend the knee and say, oh, well, yeah, I'm the problem, actually.
Whip me harder, mummy.
Christ.
This is incredible by the New York Times.
Brett Kavanaugh and America's hypothy reckoning.
Thank you.
Thank you for coining this word hypothy because it shows us that empathy is reserved only for women according to the far left.
And you can't even imagine empathizing with a man.
And so you have to create a new and gendered word to describe what we're going to say and the way we're going to feel when we're expressing sympathy for a man who appears to be falsely accused.
This is an author called Kate Mann who authored a book called Down Girl the Logic of Misogyny.
So you know where her political biases are.
We're not going to read it because holy fuck, I'm not wasting any more time than I have to on this.
Because The Guardian are actually right on this, the Kavanaugh and Ford hearings are a moment of truth for me too.
The hearings about whether Brett Kavanaugh is fit to be a US Supreme Court judge feel like the finale of this education, the test.
Will what we have learned matter?
Or will a Republican Party that has, with minor exceptions, made itself one with rape culture prevail?
Okay, that's it.
If that's how you want it, if you want it that this is it, if you want it to be that this is the pinnacle of the Me Too movement, this is it.
To get a man who has no evidence against him to be just condemned because of an allegation of a woman.
That is the absolute goal of the Me Too movement, isn't it?
To make it that a single allegation can be uncritically believed anywhere at any time, even reaching to the highest levels of government.
It doesn't matter.
This has got to be a weapon that any woman can use at any time whenever she feels like it.
That is the kind of raw, unfiltered, and unchallengeable power that the left wants to imbue into women.
And I'm telling you, that is a fucking scary thought.
I think it was this post on Facebook that I saw going around that really got my fucking goat.
52,000 shares on this, right?
I don't know who CJ Bergen is.
I assume he's a lawyer because he says, I'm seeing a bunch of pseudo-lawyers speak on my Facebook feed.
I want to clarify a few things.
The Kavanaugh hearing is not a criminal prosecution.
It's a fancy job interview.
Well, let's be honest, CJ.
It is trial by the public opinion, isn't it?
This is not some kind of neutral setting where we can just say, well, I mean, it doesn't really matter either way.
It's only the man's public reputation that's on the line.
He's either going to be a rapist or he's going to be falsely accused.
I mean, they're basically the same thing.
Come on, CJ.
If it were you, I'm sure you wouldn't want people going, well, don't worry about the outcome of it.
It's not going to affect his life either way.
But two, and this is the bit that I really fucking love, Kavanaugh is not entitled to a legal presumption of innocence.
No one has to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt.
Oh, that's where we're at, is it?
That's where we're at.
Saying, well, I mean, you know, legally, he's not entitled to a presumption of innocence.
So fuck the spirit of the thing.
Fuck the principle of presumption of innocence.
Fuck the spirit of that pervading our society to create a fair and just society.
We don't have to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt.
We can just claim to the entire fucking world, this guy's a rapist, and we don't even have to be sure about it.
Because why not?
It's only a man's life we're ruining.
It's only his family.
It's only his career.
Didn't take him that long to work for it.
Oh yeah, 26 years.
Never mind.
But fuck him.
He's a Republican.
And point three is even better.
Kavanaugh is not entitled to any due process during his confirmation hearings.
Yeah, that's another principle of our society that I think we can just lay by the wayside.
We can dump that with the presumption of innocence because we're not going to need that where we're going.
And I tell you what, where we're going is a fucking terrifying place.
Imagine arguing against the ideas of the presumption of innocence and due process and thinking that you are anything other than a giant piece of shit.
Kavanaugh's life won't be destroyed by this confirmation process.
Really?
Really?
So if the public at large just thinks he's a rapist, that's not really the destruction of his life, not his public reputation.
And I mean, it's not going to affect his career.
He'll remain a federal judge on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.
Yeah, I'm sure he will.
I'm sure he will.
If we all agree that he did it, I'm sure that they'll be like, well, yeah, I mean, okay, maybe he's a rapist, but he's still the judge.
I mean, calm down.
No, they're going to fucking carry on.
It's not going to stop here.
It's going to carry on.
You fucking apologist.
The rules of evidence do not apply.
Again, brilliant.
I mean, this is clearly some form of trial.
They're digging up evidence.
We're making judgments.
There's just no judge or jury.
The jury is the public.
It's a trial by public opinion.
But it's okay.
No, fuck the rules of evidence.
Neither Kavanaugh nor Ford is entitled to any of the protections typically given to witnesses.
Except Ford is.
Except you can't even criticize or question Ford's credibility.
Because if you do, what are you blaming the victim?
Fuck off.
Victor David Hansen wrote an amazing piece for the National Review.
We are living in 1984 and he is correct.
Truth, due process, evidence, rights of the accused.
All are swept aside in pursuit of the progressive agenda.
And that's it right there.
The dark heart of the left.
Exposed for all to see.
The grasping, power-hungry, megalomaniacal, fanatical progressive left.
They will destroy any standard to achieve their goal.
And they know that Kavanaugh is at a particularly pivotal point in American history and it's all or nothing.
And they're breaking out the biggest guns they can.
A woman was raped by this man.
There is nothing more important to the left.
Nothing is more important than protecting the sanctity of a woman.
They're all victims.
Every single one can come out and say, well, I'm a victim.
Believe me, I'm progressive.
For this goal, they will sacrifice every standard that makes our societies what they are.
Hansen absolutely nails this.
Statute of limitations does not exist.
An incident 36 years ago is apparently as fresh today as it was when Kavanaugh was 17 and Ford 15.
Actually, in Maryland, where apparently this happened, there isn't a statute of limitations, but 36 years is a ridiculous amount of time for any of this.
Even if the allegations were actual rape, it would still be too much and we wouldn't be able to prove a damn thing.
Presumption of innocence?
Not at all.
Kavanaugh is accused and thereby guilty.
The accuser faces no doubt.
In Orwellian America, the accused must first present his defense, even though he does not quite know what he is being charged with.
Then the accuser and her legal team pour over his testimony to prepare her accusation.
Evidence?
That too is a fossilized concept.
Ford could neither name the location of the alleged assault nor the date or time.
She had no idea how she arrived or left the scene of the alleged crime.
There is no physical evidence of the attack, and such lacunae in her memory mattered no longer at all.
Details?
Again, such notions are counter-revolutionary.
And I tell you what, Hansen is so on the money when he describes it that way.
Ford said to a therapist six years ago, 30 years after the alleged incident, that there were four would-be attackers, at least as recorded in the therapist's notes.
But now she's claimed there are only two assaulters, Kavanaugh and a friend.
And all four people, including a female now, named in her accusations either as witnesses or assaulters, have insisted that they have no knowledge of the event, much less of wrongdoing whenever and wherever Ford claims that the act took place.
Testimony?
No longer relevant.
It doesn't matter that Kavanaugh and the other alleged suspects both deny the allegations, have no memory of being there, and I guess because none of the other people do either.
The rights of the accused, well, they too no longer exist.
In the American version of 1984, the accuser, aka the more ideologically correct party, dictates to authorities the circumstances under which she will be investigated and cross-examined.
She will demand all sorts of special considerations of privacy and exemption.
Kavanaugh would be forced to return on faith cameras and the public to prove that he was not then and has never since been a sexual assaulter.
In our 1984 world, the accused is considered guilty if merely charged.
And the accuser is a victim who can ruin a life but must not under any circumstances be made uncomfortable in proving her charges.
This is exactly how the left is treating Kavanaugh.
And again, you don't have to like him.
I don't even know if I like him.
I don't know anything about the man.
But what I do know is I feel fucking sorry for him being in what is effectively a kangaroo court of public opinion and getting absolutely pilloried with not one shred of evidence or even a fucking coherent set of stories or a single fucking witness.
We of course have the memory holes.
Shortly after Ford was named, suddenly her prior well-publicized and self-referential social media revelations vanished as if she'd never held her minor league but confident pro-Sanders anti-Trump opinions.
Well, here we go.
Now we get to the meat of it.
What could she have to gain?
Much of her media and social media accounts were erased as well.
Similarly, one moment the New York Times, who's coming off on this embarrassing lie about Nikki Haley, reported that Kavanaugh's alleged accomplice, Mark Judge, had confirmed Ford's allegation.
Indeed, in a sensational scoop, according to the Times, Judge told the Judiciary Committee that he does remember the episode, and there's nothing more to say.
In fact, Judge told the committee the very opposite.
He does not remember the episode.
40 minutes later, the Times' embarrassing narrative vanished down the memory hole.
Victor Davis Hansen is absolutely correct, and I have corroborated all of his allegations with evidence in this video.
This is an Orwellian show trial that Kavanaugh is on.
There is no way for us to prove this.
I can't imagine the FBI going to dig up a single fucking thing.
And at the end of this, we are obligated to believe that Kavanaugh did nothing wrong.
And there is a surprising amount of dissent even within the media who are the ones leading the charge calling him a rapist and putting it in the minds of radical young leftists that he definitely raped everyone involved.
In the Sunday Times, Kavanaugh's accusers are political puppets.
In the National Post, the most obvious creeps in the Kavanaugh circus are the journalists.
And in the Federalist, Washington Post authors punish Brett Kavanaugh for the sins of him and all the people like him.
They view this as a way of attacking white men.
They are doing it because they are seeing the very last chance that they have of securing power and influence over the entire country of the United States for the next 10 or 15 years is slipping away and they won't stop at anything.
They have pulled out the biggest and worst allegation they can think of.
He raped a woman.
There's no evidence.
Kavanaugh appears to be a man of good character.
Sure, he got drunk when he was in college, but who didn't?
Why wouldn't we think that he, like everyone else, was a drinker?
That doesn't make him a rapist.
None of the people involved can remember any of this.
They don't even believe that that actual party even happened.
This is nothing but a political weapon.
And it is incumbent on us, the public, to treat the Democrats like the low-life scum that they have become.
If you support any of this, you are part of the problem.
You are the reason that the United States is clearly spiraling towards some kind of social civil war.
You are the ones doing this.
There is no question.
On either side of the aisle, Brett Kavanaugh must be treated as innocent until he is proven guilty.
It doesn't appear that he's going to be able to be proven guilty.
Therefore, Brett Kavanaugh must be treated as if he is innocent.
And if you can't do that, then you are a disgusting, despicable ideologue who is grasping after power in the most illegitimate means possible because you can't gain power by fair means.
So all you have left is foul.
And I'm sorry, there are certain standards in society that we should maintain, regardless of who we are, regardless of the political party we vote for.
This is for the benefit of everyone.
It's not just a benefit for me or Kavanaugh or anyone else, it's you, every single one of you watching this.
The idea that this is allowed to continue, that the left are allowed to tear apart the US democracy like this, is unconscionable.
If you're an independent, if you're a moderate Democrat, and if you're a Republican, you must unite against the radical fringe of the Democratic Party that is taking it over.
They are the problem.
▲
Export Selection