Welcome to this week in Super for the 25th of March 2018.
This week's video was recorded in Hyde Park, so I apologise if the quality is a little lower than usual, but I was asked to speak at Speaker's Corner as part of a kind of continual free speech push to have a presence for alternative media voices there who wants to actively promote free speech instead of the recent wave of censorship that we've seen across my country.
So I was happy to do it and I did my best with what I could do at the time.
It was done at fairly short notice, but I'm actually really quite happy with how it came out, apart from how fucking fat I look on camera.
Also, everyone found out to their surprise and mine as well that the venue that I was going to host the acid Corbynism talk at in Bristol decided to cancel, not because of anything I had done, but instead because of their fear of antifar, which I mean, maybe isn't unfounded given what happened at King's College London and that Bristol is a Corbynite stronghold.
This is a message I received.
I'm extremely sorry to inform you of this, but following a conversation with my boss who owns the venue, we are not able to host your event here on Friday the 6th of April as it poses a risk to our venue and staff that the owners are not prepared to take following recent events.
Referring to King's College London.
I'm deeply sorry about the inconvenience of this, knowing you have already sold tickets for the event, but I'm able to transfer you a full refund if you can supply the correct bank details.
Please pass along my apologies, this has been outside of my hands and a suggestion for alternate venues.
I am trying to rearrange this particular event because it's going to be a lot of fun.
I've spent quite a lot of time working on this Corbyn presentation and I definitely want to be able to give it.
My event for Scarborough Spa is still going ahead because I guess people in the north are made of sterner stuff.
And I'll leave a link in the description and in the comments if you are interested in seeing me there where I'll be talking about British identity.
But that's enough preamble from me, so please enjoy this week in Stupid live from Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park.
Right, so I haven't really got a speech, but I do have a bunch of things that happened this week that I'd like to talk about.
If that's okay with you guys, this week is stupid!
It's stupid!
Absolutely.
Right.
Now, before you start, tell us, are you gay or strict?
Do I get some points this time?
Yes!
Pansexual!
I'm going to get away with a lot of stuff then.
Right.
So the first one is from the Sunday Times.
Parsons Green Tube Bomber told to study Quran during life sentence.
It gets better.
Right, so he's got 34 years in prison, and the judge, the judge, told him to learn the true meaning of the Quran as a book of peace.
Mr. Justice Haddon Cave said that Hassan, who was born in Iraq, claimed asylum in Britain, cynically exploited the full generosity and naivety of the system after harbouring dark thoughts.
Right?
So, I just can't go to this, right?
He literally said, You will have plenty of time to study the Quran in prison for years to come.
You should understand that the Quran is a book of peace.
Islam is a religion of peace.
Did the judge know that he probably couldn't read?
Judge is the ultimate.
No, he's an intelligent guy, but the thing is, when did our judges become Islamic sculpts?
How does he know?
Has he read the Quran?
What does he know about the Spanish?
Quran 2005, apparently.
The reason is, it gets better.
The Quran and Islam forbid anything extreme, including extremism in religion.
Which maybe wants to tell ISIS this.
Maybe, just maybe, he doesn't know what he's fucking talking about.
Nah.
Strap a rifle to him and make him charge.
Did the judge commit a hate crime by telling a Muslim how he read the Quran?
Well, how is it in any way his business?
But you've got Lord Pearson in Parliament saying, look, we're going to start encouraging Muslim groups to issue fatwas against grooming gangs.
It's like, okay, so we're going to have to actually start implementing Sharia for Muslim communities.
So it's going to have to be a double-speed legal system because otherwise, what choice do we have?
Using a bulldozer to open a fucking door.
Exactly.
It doesn't work.
It's unbelievable that this is something that we have to do, but this is where we find ourselves.
Personally, I would like to see the outlawing of Sharia courts entirely.
I think English common law is a universal system that should apply to everyone in the country without prejudice, without discrimination, without choice.
Secularism.
Absolutely.
Missed out.
See you again, Rocker.
And just to really nail home the judges' thoughts on Sharia law, which are obviously extensive.
The Independent reported this week that Saudi women should be able to choose whether to cover their head in a black abaya or just a regular head covering.
Mud progressive, much progressive.
I go forward thinking that.
It's like, how would you like to be covered up, ladies?
You know, would you like an entire body cover or just something that covers everything but a little bit of your face?
They're getting really weird tan lines.
But the thing is, this isn't even something that's happened.
This is something that should happen.
This is just, I mean, at least it's the crown prince of Saudi Arabia saying, you know, I might want something a little more progressive, but don't go too far, mate.
Stephanie.
Yeah.
You know, calm down.
That, yeah, the laws are very clear and stipulated in the laws of Sharia that women wear decent, respectful clothing like men.
Well, again, that's a bit subjective.
It's like, I hate speech laws.
That could be anything that you interpret it to be.
Mini skirts are great.
Well, yeah, don't show any skin you're blaming.
That's not modest, is it?
How can I be expected to control myself if you wear a mini skirt?
Honestly.
You're blaming the victim now.
I can see loads of flesh.
HM does some great things.
HM Shorian.
Can I just say cardigans are a timeless classic?
What happened to me to cut us to get that?
Oh, yeah.
Let's get them clothes.
If you're living in a desert, you probably don't want to be nude, especially with your complexion.
Naturally, which side do you think Jeremy Corbyn was on on this argument?
The wrong one!
Well, it's interesting you say that because that's where we're going.
So the Times reported this week that Jeremy Corbyn's drive for tolerance has unsurprisingly given a platform to extremists.
Calm down, I know you're shocked.
Jeremy Corbyn with extremists, enemies of Britain, Islamists, terrorists, no.
Let's fucking perish the thought.
Yeah, right.
He's banned from Golders Green.
He's banned from where?
Golders Green.
Oh, good.
That's one place now.
This was a campaign against Islamophobia that was launched in Parliament by Jeremy Corbyn that gave a platform to supporters of jihad.
That's really fucking tolerant, Jeremy.
Good job.
Fuck yeah.
So the Islamophobic Awareness, Islamophobia Awareness Month was celebrated in council buildings, universities and schools and featured extremist speakers.
For example, a man called, They don't actually list his name, but a defender of Jihadi John, the famous English-accented jihadi who was in the video cutting off a man's head in Syria.
He's just a poor soul.
Well, he didn't do nothing because he was apparently a beautiful young man.
Didn't fucking homosexuality.
Of course it is.
How can you tell his father?
How the fuck does that work?
He might be beautiful and gay.
So do they both get thrown off a roof then?
Police, please.
Why are they going to accuse me of racism?
Wait, you're a racist.
He's too bad.
The moves are too spicy.
The memes are too spicy.
You can't be gracious yourself.
Actually, yes.
So obviously, this was done by a group called Muslim Engagement and Development, a lobbying organization.
I can't say anything about you.
I can't.
Sounds like a militia.
I'm too terrible.
I can't say that.
But a lobbying organization whose senior figures included a campaign who supported killing British soldiers and whose activists have made statements regarded as anti-Jewish.
Oh, imagine my fucking shock.
Why are there no Jew fiddles?
Make up your own world.
Well, it's because they were purged.
We've got that was in the Quran.
Maybe, maybe Matey Boy will learn about that in prison.
He'll come out as a real pro-Israel guy, won't he?
So, the campaign gave mainstream respectability to individuals with high-profile extremist histories, according to the Henry Jackson Society.
The hate preacher Shaquille Begg starred at an event for I Am at Deptford Lounge, a community centre owned by the London Borough of Lewis.
The evening was arranged by a Stand Up to Racism campaign.
Mr. Begg was found by a judge to be an extremist for saying that violence in support of Islam would constitute a man's greatest deed for endorsing a fatwa and that it is a religious duty for Muslims to be hostile to or hate non-Islamic states.
This is being sanctioned by the people at the top.
They are the ones organizing it in your universities, in your councils, and in your schools.
This is the problem that we have to deal with.
And by the way, you're all racist.
That's what I shouldn't attend.
I've driven a race.
Yes, this man is.
Great.
So, um.
Yeah, honestly, I'm not going to continue reading this after you pissing me off.
Did you find exposure to kill people?
I did.
Reported to police immediately.
So, um, weirdly, this is it's it's all it's amazing how much you see this time and time again.
So, the women's march in the United States.
I'm sure you've all heard of it, massive march led by Linda.
Nobody cared who I was until I put on a hijab and asked for women's vaginas to be taken away, so progressive.
And you're going to be surprised to learn that a bunch of their top staffers are leaving the organization because of anti-Semitism.
Well, yes.
Imagine my shock.
Thank you.
He needs to make up his own one.
What's wrong with Jews?
I love Apple Jews to meditate.
Oh, my God.
So, yeah.
So, apparently, their speaker, Tamika Mallory, attended a rapidly anti-Semitic speech by the Nation of Islam leader who railed against the Jewish community with conspiratorial claims that they ran the government.
Didn't see that coming.
What's the conspiracy?
You're Jewish, you're part of it.
Yeah, that's right.
You could be quiet now.
Where's my show money?
This is actually great, right?
So he accused the Jewish community and governments of the United States and Mexico of spreading the use of marijuana to feminise black men.
Tell that to Bob Marley!
Yeah, it's not part of their culture.
It's a Jewish conspiracy.
Louis Farrakhan, is it?
Yeah, that's it, yeah.
So Farrakhan gave out a shout out to Mallory, who sat in the audience for his three-hour rant about Jewish people.
That's a fancy Jewish woman.
Well, stupid, sexy Jews, that's the problem.
Yeah.
Oh, now you're fucking focused.
So, yeah.
Again, I'm just going to stop this one because it's kind of pissing me off.
And because there's an ambulance coming by.
You think it's an ambulance?
You're against them, right?
So you're a gangster.
Right, I didn't know that.
It's interesting.
Well, it depends what he's doing.
I mean, you know, I'm against them banning someone like Lauren Southern for speaking, but she's not inciting terrorism.
So it depends what the...
I'd have to look into it, wouldn't it?
Yeah, but it's cool to be banned from the UK at this point.
Well, yeah.
All the cool kids are doing it.
Well, you say that.
There are a lot of business who aren't on the banned list, aren't there?
So, you know.
They're not cool enough.
So, the next Labour leader, according to Harriet Harmon, should be well.
It would be a fucking improvement.
Do you mean Stalin?
Harriet Harmon wants the next Labour Leadership contest to be women only.
Diane Ebbetts!
Diane Abbott!
Diane Abbott!
She's got the first Diane Ebbers.
Well, yeah, Diane Abbott's going to win the first.
What about traps?
How about a trans woman?
Well, that's actually a...
It's open up for today.
Believe it or not, yeah, that is actually part of the debate they're going to have to have about that.
So basically, lads, we can just claim to be chicks for a day.
But the thing is, the problem that I have with this is not just that it's discriminatory against men, but women, you should have a problem with this too, because she's literally saying you can't compete.
That's what she's saying.
When they need an all-woman-only shortlist, they're saying you are not good enough.
They're looking by that.
Exactly.
And if they're, I mean, Labour's, it's not like they don't have a history of this.
How many categories of women do you think will compete?
Well, that's the question.
The thing is, they do this constantly.
They're literally.
It's this kind of condescending, sort of, honestly, you could call it patriarchal nature of them.
Where they're sitting there saying, right, okay, white men, they can pay full price.
Of course.
Brown people, they're poor.
They're not capable.
They can't do these things.
This isn't it, they just...
It's all assumption and it's all coming from a position of superiority on their part because the people who organize this are obviously white people.
It's like, so literally that's, I mean, her comment is literally the men can jostle amongst themselves to be the deputy.
Oh, yeah, you're not man-haters.
But you're not man-haters.
Got it.
Right, okay.
It could possibly be because she's the only somewhat competent woman in.
Harriet Harmon?
That's a somewhat generous assessment.
Does she make a Jujo compared to most of the women in Labour?
What do you mean by competition?
She advocating for paedophile, for fuck's sake.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, but like the young man said, look at the competition.
That's um...
Cathy Newman for PM!
Lobster Lives Matter, that's all I'm saying.
Yay!
I like eating lobster.
Yeah, so I'm saying...
It's got to be Diane Abbott.
Come on.
Dynabbit's not.
But literally, I mean, her statement is, I think we have to be quite clear about this and basically say that there are lots of fantastic men in the Labour Party who'd be more than capable of being leader.
There's no doubt about that.
I think the men should be measured by the length of your cock.
Well, any length is too much length.
Well, yeah, but it doesn't matter.
If you've got a cock, you're out of the running.
Even though, like she says, there are lots of fantastic and capable men.
Not that there are, but not in the Labour Party anyway.
But this is the point, it doesn't matter.
It's about categories.
It's about making sure you play by their rule book and them having dominance over you.
That's all this is about.
And you're going to be, if you're a Labour voter, which I'm sure very few of you guys are, ex-Labour voters maybe.
But it's all about making sure that you are whipped into action.
You're whipped into line.
It's just what they want to do.
But this has a negative consequence because in the law, gender is a protected characteristic.
And I don't even mind that, actually.
That's fine.
Because as Newsweek report here, a man has won $390,000, a man from Australia, because he was discriminated against in favour of a female colleague who was called backpacker.
Basically, he was put, he was way more qualified than her, but she got the promotion anyway.
And a court in Austra- oh sorry, Austria, not Australia.
I apologise!
Hey, look, honestly.
Risky business.
It's going to be both at one point.
Joseph Fretzel, the offers Marmite.
But yeah, no, that's exactly what happened.
The case, obviously, this case has been going on for seven years, so it's nice to see that the guy won it.
But it was the Austrian Minister of Transport, Innovation and Technology, led by a social democrat politician who's currently the second president of the country's parliament.
Now, I read that because this is important.
This is literally social justice nonsense at the very top of countries.
This is the power and influence they have.
I mean, who are you guys?
You're not in parliaments, are you?
You're not in parliaments.
You're just regular people who have seen all of this happening and have had the effect on your lives directly.
The people in the top all agree with this, and now they're using this for their own benefit.
They're using this specifically to discriminate against each one of you.
There's nothing you can do.
Meritocracy.
Oh, fuck, we've got meritocracy.
That's gone.
That is gone.
In fact, the reason that this guy's suing is because that's gone.
Literally.
How do you find the thing?
So yeah, three candidates came forward and they're all judged to be highly qualified for the role, but this other woman got it.
Even though this guy was rated 25% higher than her, she was still selected for diversity reasons, presumably.
And finally, we have a wonderful piece from the Huffington Post.
I saved this to last because I knew I'd get it grown like that.
I work there.
Really?
I drank soy on a live stream and got a voice.
This is not the American one, it's the UK one, which instantly has offices in London.
I can honestly hardly believe the title.
It's a direct call for censorship.
Get these far-right extremists off their online platforms.
Naturally, it's a picture of Tommy Robinson that they have.
The only way to tackle the stem of the flow of extremism and abuse on social media is to tackle it at the source.
Press the block button.
Yeah, exactly.
But no, but no, but that's not the problem.
Their problem is that they're being heard.
That's the problem.
Like Tommy put the video the other day, million views.
They can't have that.
They can't have millions of people hearing of dissenting opinion, which is why they literally are just calling for them to be censored.
That's it.
That's their end goal.
They just don't want you to speak.
And that's because you are doing damage to their control over the narrative.
And it's this narrative that has to be broken.
This is what everyone, like everyone sharing stuff, posting stuff on social media.
You might end up in jail, but it's doing good.
Exactly.
In every social movement, there will be people who get in trouble with the ruling authorities.
You are challenging their power directly.
There is no choice.
It's going to happen.
I'm probably going to end up arrested one day.
Let's be fair.
You probably are.
Let's start the Kickstarter now.
On the 1st of April, Nazi Pog means on social media.
1st of April, if he has no extra protection, would you support that?
I will not support Army.
I made the pay to liberalism.
The idea is to silence.
And I'm the one that stitched 200 guests lists all the three days.
Hopefully, but I can make it a lot of fun.
I'll definitely support it.
Yeah, definitely.
Sargon, when you get arrested, which prison will you go to, male or female?
He can change his mind anytime he likes.
It doesn't matter.
I think my wife would probably prefer if I went to a male one.
If you identify as a female, you'll get a lesser sentence.
Yeah, but I'll get in the neck from my wife for the next 20 years, mate.
You want to be a martyr.
It's not worth the hassle.
So, um, but yeah, I mean, like.
The Guardian were calling for silencing poison.
Of course, they were.
Of course, the fucking Guardian was calling for that.
Jesus Christ.
Lord, the Independent actually had one that supported free speech.
No, they had an article against the one.
But it's on the fair national balance.
We really hate these people, but we should let them speak.
We've got a history of being a free speech platform, therefore, we can't just abandon that.
But, I mean, it's hardly proportional.
It's about free sex.
It normally is, isn't it?
Admittedly, I have to pay for dates.
Get a blow job in return.
They start by saying, it's now been publicly acknowledged at the highest level of British policing that as a country we have a serious problem with far-right radicalization and the threat of far-right terrorism.
Okay, yeah, exactly.
But this is the thing.
Why?
Fucking why would the regular person want to become a far-right extremist?
There must be something compelling them to do what they're doing.
Autism.
No, mate.
Honestly, I wish this was an epidemical autism.
Then I would just, I would be laughing at it on the internet.
There would be no greater problem.
But there is a greater problem.
No, but we know that this is the problem.
This is coming from the grassroots because people on the ground in working class communities have a real problem.
They're being specifically told to shut up about their problem and deal with it.
It can't go on.
It can't go on.
You can't just keep stigmatizing these poor fucking working-class white communities and telling them, no, shut your mouth, you fucking racist.
That can't go on forever.
And it's no wonder that people like Britain First had 2 million followers on Facebook.
It's no fucking wonder.
They're the only people brave enough to stand up and actually say something about it.
Whether you agree with them or not, you're going to follow them because you want to hear about this kind of information.
Exactly.
And literally no one else is doing it.
And therefore, the progressive left are giving control of free speech, the impetus, the activism to it, to the racists.
They couldn't ask for a bigger boo.
That's fair.
No, I mean, look, this is actually an incredibly diverse crowd, and I don't imagine there are actually many people who would admit to being a race or even think of themselves as racist.
I hate everyone in Bali!
But again, power and privilege, though, that's the thing.
But this is the point.
You know, we're all stigmatized because there is a genuine problem with grooming gangs in this country, and we need to do something about it.
And honestly, all we really need to do is make the authorities employ the laws without discrimination.
If you see a 30-year-old man dating a 12-year-old girl, I don't care what his fucking race is.
And I don't give a shit how much of a racist you are.
That's a crime.
Honestly, that's common sense.
I mean like what kind of retard do you have to be to actually need to have to say that?
But you're unjustified, right?
Far right now.
Grossly offensive, farmer.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Grossly offensive, far right.
We want the indiscriminate application of English common law across the entire country.
These radical extremists, what lunatics they are.
Radical moderates, don't you mean?
He talks to Regina.
Radical moderates.
That's what we are, mate.
Yeah, exactly.
He talked to Spencer to their best friends, obviously.
So, yeah.
It's literally, I mean, Tommy Robinson obviously comes up in this 101 times.
We're never told what Tommy Robinson has said that's racist, obviously, but why would they?
They just say it and say it.
I mean, Robinson was one of several hate preachers.
He's a legitist now.
Yeah, exactly.
You know.
And for fuck's sake.
Yeah.
And the call, the entire article, is just a call to have everyone who disagrees with them censored.
That's the point.
And shamelessly, absolutely shamelessly, a media publication calling for censorship.
Can anyone think of anything more counterproductive than that?
Because I tell you what, if they're concerned about the rise of right-wing radicalism and it's happening at the grassroots, it's inevitable.
Like in Austria, like in Poland, you're going to see right-wing parties rising.
Who are they gonna come for, Huffington Post?
They're not gonna go for the fucking, they're not gonna go for Breitbart.
They're not going to go for Fox News or the Daily Mail.
They're going to come for you, you fucking idiots.
If you legitimise, like, legitimize the point and purpose and make it acceptable to censor, then you will eventually be censored.