June 25, 2017 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin
34:29
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| How does someone become a Muslim? | |
| Simply by saying with conviction, ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ Well that sounds easy enough. Perhaps I should conf- Wrong channel. Wrong fucking channel. However, instead I say to you, cheers, ladies and gentlemen, | |
| welcome back to Human Garbage of Akkad. Sangha can't be with us today because he's quite occupied being triggered by Anita Sarkisian and her hateful abuse. He's in bed, sobbing uncontrollably, which I can confirm because he just called me to say, | |
| can you do this week in Stupid for me this week, top hats and champagne? That's me, top hats and champagne. And I said, yes, I can. So here I am presenting to you this week in Stupid for the whatever date it is in North Australia. I don't even know if you're in the same week. The first story comes from my country of origin, | |
| which is Germany. And of course involves some very interesting interpretations of free speech. The story is, Germany raids homes of 36 people accused of hateful postings over social media, says the New York Times, writes the New York Times even. In a coordinated campaign across 14 states, the German police on Tuesday raided the homes of 36 people accused of hateful postings over social media, including threats, | |
| coercion and incitement to racism. As an expat who left Germany exactly for the reasons that, well, you know why one would leave Germany I guess. I have to say it isn't really increasing my trust in the German government if the news headlines that I read from my country of origins are not 36 Muslims deported because they were plotting a terror attack but rather 36 people from Germany, | |
| native Germans, imprisoned because they were inciting hatred against Islam. Because we all know what that means. It does not mean all Muslims shall die, alau Akbar! But it means perhaps we should consider not letting in Muslims anymore because they keep blowing up our cities and raping our women. Well, | |
| it doesn't really garner any trust in me. They continue with, most of the raids concerned politically motivated right-wing incitement, according to the Federal Criminal Police Office, Whose officers conducted home searches and interrogations. | |
| But the raids also targeted two people accused of left-wing extremists or content, as well as one person accused of making threats or perhaps harassment based on someone's sexual orientation. | |
| So three people out of 36 were not of the right-wing variety. | |
| I'm one of those dirty alt-centrists. | |
| I am neither a leftist nor a rightist. | |
| I think tribalism is retarded. | |
| But even I have to say that when you raid 36 homes and only three of those homes are not homes of right-wing extremists, then perhaps there is a little bit of a bias, or right-wing extremists are just so much stupider than left-wingers and Muslims. | |
| Which I can't believe really. | |
| Not from my personal experience. | |
| Which again doesn't give me the impression that the German state is pursuing their hate speech laws, hate speech laws, oh, it's so nice to not live in Germany, by the way, with a very balanced approach. | |
| You know, three out of 36 are not right-wingers. | |
| I think there's a little bit of bias. | |
| A little, a tiny bit of bias. Talking out of the actions of the German police. But there's a good thing also, because even though Germany is cucked beyond belief, not everybody in Germany is cucked and there is always hope. Even for Sweden there is hope. But here comes the hope for Germany. Under German law, social media users are subject to a range of punishments for posting illegal material, | |
| including a prison sentence up to five years for inciting racial hatred. Somehow I think this is another case of Muslims are totally erased, but never mind. But even as Mr. Maas and his allies advocate parliamentary approval, eight of ten experts who testified at a parliamentary hearing on Monday said the law would not withstand constitutional scrutiny. Bernd Holznagel, a professor at the University of Münster and one of the participating experts, | |
| pointed to two constitutional violations related to freedom of speech. The statute gives companies incentives to remove content and it lacks a procedure for users to appeal removals. Our constitutional court will not allow such a statute, Mr. Holznagel said. I think they would crush it, He continued, The statute sets up incentives to take out content if there is any doubt. | |
| So there's an incentive to erase speech, and that cannot be upheld. | |
| Yes. | |
| So what he's saying is that the hate speech law that was applied to those raids is currently under investigation and will be designed by our upper court. | |
| And the upper court may just decide that removing content from online postings, from social media sites, just on the premise that it might be hateful speech, without giving the user any kind of opportunity to explain why his speech, well, their speech is not hate speech, may constitute a breach of the German version of freedom of speech, which is pretty much non-existent, | |
| but hey, progress. Okay? Let's keep the silver lining on the horizon or whatever you say, you fucking yangs and Brits. You know what I mean. In the same vein. Of course, | |
| Germany is not the only country that has big problems with upholding freedom of speech right now. The UK. Also a country that I lived in, in London, by the way. I'm very glad I'm not living under a Muslim mayor right now. The Brits did a very similar thing. Sussex police arrests men for posting hatred for Muslims on Facebook, | |
| says the Sussex Police. Well, isn't that just nice? Arresting a man for posting hate on Facebook. A man is facing more than a year behind bars for attempting to stir up religious hatred in Sussex. Nigel Pelham was charged with eight counts of publishing threatening written material intending to stir up religious hatred against Muslims on dates between February 24th and November the 16th, 2015 on his own Facebook account. | |
| 2015, by the way. | |
| So I think they have a bit of a backlog to deal with because, after all the other terror attacks since then in the UK, perhaps a couple more people have since then posted hatred against Muslims. | |
| But I'm very glad they're beginning to deal with cases from 2015 now. | |
| It's very important also that seemingly there is no such thing as say, old crime or something that doesn't need to be pursued anymore. | |
| No, no, no. | |
| If you ever, if you're ever in the UK in anything resembling hate speech, not bombing people, though, that's totally fine, You will get charged. | |
| The Sussex Police promises that. | |
| The charges are not used very often, Yet I would say, and are so serious they need Attorney General approval to be brought against someone. | |
| They are so serious. | |
| So serious, yes, So serious. | |
| What? | |
| So serious? | |
| What? | |
| So serious hate? | |
| So serious personal opinions? | |
| Because he obviously did not incite anybody to commit a crime or to murder Muslims on the street, or to overthrow the government or any such of thing. | |
| Because otherwise you could have been sure that the Sussex Police would have mentioned this. | |
| No, this seems to be all about a personal opinion, without inciting anybody to commit crimes. | |
| You know, the complete opposite that Islamic hate preachers in the UK do every single day. | |
| But hey, as I said, priorities. The Sussex Police continues. I hope this sentence handed down on the court on Friday acts as a deterrent to others and sends a reassuring message to those who may be directly targeted or are more widely affected by people's use of social media to spread messages of fear and hate. Great, | |
| yeah, this is the typical UK response to terrorism these days. Do not fear the bombs! They are just, you know, the staple of every normal human being in the West right now. And if you're not a human being, you actually fear those attacks. So fuck you. Ha ha ha! What? You don't like Muslims because of what they do to London? Because of what they do to your country? You're in fucking jail, | |
| mate. This is what's happening here. I encourage people who witness such content to report it to the provider of the social media platform. But such reports can also be made to us online. Yes, instead of going to fucking Facebook to tell them that you disagree with a post and want it removed so your feelings can be spared, you should directly go to the fucking police of motherfucking Great Britain to report to them opinions you disagree with. And if you're lucky, | |
| the police agrees and will put that person in jail. I know the comparison is very, very overused. But this is how 1984 starts. And this is also pretty similar to what Papmi Amidala had to deal with. You know, | |
| this whole democracy dies with thunderous applause. This is exactly what you're witnessing in the UK right now. And I hope that there are courts in the UK who will not bow down to this very regressive mindset of just suiciding your own culture in favor of not offending exactly those who want to kill you and who want to end your culture. But come on, | |
| Muslims are not the only problem that we are facing right now, and I've chosen my topics very deliberately today because, of course, I need to reaffirm with the followers of Sargon that I am a Nazi, just like them. | |
| We all know opposing Islam is being the biggest Nazi dom that ever existed on this planet. | |
| Even Nazi Germany has nothing on opposing Muslims these days. | |
| So I thought, what else do I need to reaffirm with the subscribers of Sargon? | |
| And that is, of course, that I am a privileged cis white, hetero male. | |
| Yes, and that is our next news story. | |
| Written on with and by the Huffington Motherfucking POST, | |
| the shining beacon of journalism in our dreary world. And the headline is, North Korea proves your white male privilege is not universal. I'm not gonna cite the article for a very long time because it speaks for itself. That's what the hell he gets. Good for him. My mother had uttered those words in her typical matter-of-fact tone one morning as she watched the news. He was Michael Fay, | |
| an 18-year-old from Ohio who had confessed to vandalizing cars in Singapore and was subsequently sentenced to six lashes from a ratting cane. I must say though, six lashes from a cane for vandalizing cars in a country that you do not live in? Sounds kinda okay, | |
| truth be told. I was in sixth grade and all I could imagine was how horrible the pain would be. My mother was unmoved at the thought, remarking, he earned that. I thought about my mother's words a few days ago while watching a video of 21 year old Otto Wambio. By the way, | |
| it's an awesome German name. It literally means auto warm beer. Awesome. Another man from Ohio who last week was convicted of subversion for stealing a propaganda banner in North Korea and sentenced to 15 years hard labor. Just in Faye's case, | |
| I was shocked by the severity of the punishment. I've tried to imagine spending a decade and a half performing what the North Korean state deems hard labor and I can't. But I'm not 11 anymore. And now my mother's callous reaction to Michael Fay's sentence is my reaction to another young white man who went to an Asian country and violated their laws and learned that the shield that his cis white male identity provides here in America is not Teflon abroad. If you're vomiting right now, | |
| by the way, because of all the hatred that you feel coming from this article, I can totally understand you. I will join you with a glass of vodka. A glass of vodka for all of us. And I encourage you to do the same. To just take a step back, | |
| to not give in to the hatred that you feel right now for this, what is probably a woman. And just have a drink with me. Oh. Excellent. Yeah, | |
| I'm willing to bet my last dollar that he was aware of the political climate in that country. But privilege is a hell of a drug. The high of privilege told him that North Korea's history of making examples out of American citizens who dare challenge the original legal system in any way was no match for his alabaster American privilege. When you can watch a white man who entered a theater and killed a dozen people come out unscathed, | |
| you start to believe that you're invincible. When you see a white man taken to Burger King in a bulletproof vest after he killed nine people in a church, you learn that the world will always protect you. I've made a few bullet points as to what I want to talk about regarding this article, | |
| but having read this article out loudly, words almost fail me. I do actually consider myself to be triggered by this article because it betrays such a lack of compassion, | |
| such a lack of sense of reality and such a lack of understanding how actual human beings outside of the social justice club work. This is of course written by a fucking millennial who has never heard of anything like a real hardship, | |
| which would explain why they would wish hardship upon another human being who has committed what is basically a prank, gone horribly wrong in a country that should never have been pranked by him to begin with, | |
| who was seemingly not aware of the consequences or said consequences be damned, which is nonetheless a damning and inhumane sentence. You know? 15 years of hard labor for stealing a flag. Oh my god, That is horrible, And it doesn't matter if he's a communist, if he's an anarchist, if he's white, if he's black, if he's whatever. | |
| It is just horrible and everybody should feel compassion for that person. | |
| I'm pretty sure that the writer of this article would be quite up in arms if it was a communist going to a Catalist country and tearing down a pro-capitalist sign from somewhere and then getting sentenced for 15 years. | |
| I think the article would have been written quite differently. | |
| These people are so blinded by their own ideology that they cannot fathom that there is such a thing as egalitarian, | |
| Unitarian human compassion regardless of a person's political stance or even more superficially speaking, fucking skin color. Yes. And this is a bit disheartening knowing that the writer of this article is so involved, So completely consumed by the hatred, either for themselves, if they're white, or of the white race, that they cannot muster that compassion that I just talked about. | |
| Especially because the point that they're trying to make is not the point that they are trying to make. | |
| Let me explain that. | |
| They're trying to make the point that white privilege is not universal. | |
| But the point they're making is that white privilege doesn't exist. | |
| Because when has anybody of us ever witnessed at SW say that white privilege is a very, you know, concentrated issue that is only a thing in certain circles when it comes to racism in a very small segment of society? They always say that white privilege is very universal. This case proves that it is not. You're destroying your own narrative, | |
| my good sir, lady, dragonkin, Xerxia, whatever. It's disgusting what you're doing. It is disgusting. I, as an egalitarian who believes that every human being has the right of freedom if they not forsake their freedom, and it doesn't matter if you're an SW or not, or a communist or not, or an anarchist or not, I cannot fathom how you cannot extend that same compassion to a fellow human being. Wow. Wow, writer of that article, | |
| wow. You are the human garbage. Let us continue, otherwise I'm just gonna ramble on and on. The next article is a little bit less serious, but still pretty stupid. That article was reposted by the ABC, | |
| coming from another kinda journal kind of thing. I mean, we're talking about the social sciences here, so I'm a bit reluctant to call anything published science. It's about objectifying women. The headline of the ABC story is, Hey Sexy, objectifying catcalls occur more frequently than you might think. | |
| I'm going to give you a spoiler alert here. | |
| No, they don't. | |
| The ABC quotes a study from the University of Melbourne. | |
| And this is, by the way, the city I'm living in right now. | |
| It is SJW Central. | |
| It does have awful, I mean awesome, awesome cultural life. | |
| So I'm quite happy to be here in Australia because you don't want to live in Sydney. | |
| Trust me. | |
| Sorry, Sydney Satis. | |
| They start out with objectification. | |
| Sorry, let me try that again with more wine and maybe another shot of vodka. | |
| If you haven't guessed by now. | |
| my channel identity is pretty much based around alcohol, rationalism, pissing people off, being funny, failing miserably, being insulted by people who hate my kind of humor. This is, by the way, the pluck that you're getting in this video. I'm not going to plug myself again, I promise. Do subscribe to my channel. The article starts out with, objectification occurs when individuals, typically women, | |
| are reduced to the body parts they come to be valued more for how they look rather than who they are as a person so just how often do these types of experiences occur Yes. | |
| Just how often does no. | |
| Not enough vodka, no enough vodka okay, yes. | |
| Just how often does this occur? | |
| How does how often does it occur that somebody starts an article out with such an incredibly biased statement that objective objectification occurs when individuals, typically women, are reduced to their body parts? | |
| Seriously, why? | |
| Why did you start the article out like that? | |
| Why is there any reason in your head that you can think of that you think is logically um supported that doesn't involve men? | |
| Do you mean to say that women are incapable of objectifying men or that women are far less likely of objectifying men and even if they are far less likely to objectify men, you? | |
| why do you think it needs to be pointed out? Oh hey, you're my wife. Yes, I am. What a coincidence. Wow, in this video my wife was just jump-cutting away because I didn't know what to do. And here you are. That's amazing. Well, | |
| since you're here, can I ask you a question, please? Sure. Do you think that women objectify men? Oh yes. Do you think that lots of women objectify men? Oh yes, the young serving girls in our basement, | |
| they have a calendar of firemen hidden to the wall. Oh my god, do you mean to say that sexual objectification is not just a thing that happens to females? Wow. Well, since I now have an equal amount of people that have valid opinions about this topic as the study I was just quoting, I think this topic is done. Thank you very much, my wife. If you're doing a scientific study, | |
| Perhaps you should not bring your own bias into it. | |
| But we are talking about the social sciences, by the way. | |
| So, I mean, after all, so it's definitely to be expected. | |
| They continue. | |
| We set out to build on the existing literature and find out just how common the different forms of objectifying experiences were in the lives of young Australian women. | |
| Because nothing screens egalitarianism and equality more than just examining 50% of the population and completely ignoring the other 50% of potential sample sizes. | |
| But hey, In collaboration with researchers from Australian Catholic University, we ran a study of 81 young women across metropolitan Melbourne. | |
| 81 young women across metropolitan Melbourne. | |
| You know what that says to me? | |
| That you couldn't be bothered to buy a ticket for the public transport to get out of your 5km CBD zone. | |
| You couldn't be bothered spending more than what? | |
| Two hours actually conversing with people. | |
| You know what else that tells me? | |
| That your sample size is shit, your study is shit, your approach is shit, and I'm pretty sure that your results will be equally shit. We found that women experienced objectification on average 3.69 times over the week. I have not quoted a very important part, by the way, | |
| I should probably add that. They did not actually interview them. They gave them a customized app that would give those women a notification every couple of hours and that they had to reply to a notification with, | |
| have you experienced sexual objectification in the last couple of hours? And they could click yes, no, don't know. And if they click yes, it could tell them what kind of sexual objectification they were objected to. Never mind. We found that women experienced objectification on average 3.69 times over the week, | |
| equating to more than once every two days. The most common form was the objectification. I can't, I can't. I'm sorry. I will admit I'm getting more drunk as we speak. But It's so hard telling you about this and taking this serious in any kind of way. The most common form was the objectifying gaze, | |
| making up 55% of objectifying experiences. The objectifying gaze, I repeat, the objectifying fucking gaze. Cat calls and wolf whistles, there's lots of zoophilia going around here by the way, Were reported in 11% of women's experiences and sexual remarks in 10. | |
| Right. | |
| Objectifying gaze. | |
| Objectifying gaze. | |
| Do you know what that means? | |
| That means somebody looked at you in a way you didn't totally approve of. | |
| This must be the most subjective bullshit that I've ever seen in a fucking study. | |
| Study, Study. | |
| Wow. | |
| I might just be smiling at you and you think I'm trying to fuck your ass or something. | |
| How can that possibly qualify as sexual objectification? | |
| I am not sure. | |
| In social justice, everything is possible, of course. But now, the big finale. Because I'm not sure if I have not already overstated my welcome. The big finale is Anita Sakisian calls Zargon of Akad a garbage human. Awesome. Sargon, I hope you accept that I'm going to talk about you in my very guest video on your channel. My name is Dobbin Champagne. I am breaking now the promise that I will not whore myself out. Come subscribe to my channel. I'm very funny and drunk. Not funny, | |
| but drunk. But this is the best thing ever. Sagon of Akad went to VidCon. He met all the other shitlords and he seemingly went to a panel hosted by Anita Sakisian and other do-no-goods about the harassment of women on the internet, | |
| online, whatever. Because as we all know, nobody but women ever gets arrested on the internet and only women are deserving of a panel, which is a pretty common occurrence on these kind of conventions. And he said there, | |
| from what I can gather, quietly, this is what basically everybody, even his detractors, are saying. And then Anita Sakisian said the following out of the blue. I am sure we've each dude who are making these dumbass videos that just say the same shit over and over again. And like I hate to give you attention because you're an arbitrary human. Whatever. Before I say anything about that, | |
| before I say anything about that, here, for you as a reminder, here is Anita Sakisian in front of the UN, the United Nations. To recognize that harassment is, as someone had mentioned, it's not just what is legal and illegal, Right? | |
| Harassment is threats of violence, but it's also the day-to-day grind of you're a liar, you suck, you, you know, making all of these hate videos to attack us on a regular basis and the mobs that come from those hate videos, etc. | |
| And yet it's 2017 and we're talking about teaching people how to deal with their fucking emotions. | |
| The most obvious thing for all of us, but not for them, is the hypocrisy of declaring, criticizing anything that Anita Sakizian has ever done as harassment, and then her telling a viewer from a stage, | |
| from the position of power, and you know that these people always like to use positions of power as an argument against us from a position of power that they are human garbage. Completely eliminating their human worth or even eliminating their status as a human. This is not only an insult like you stupid, | |
| you dumb. No, she is taking away his status as a fucking human being. And that is most amazing. But that is okay. That is absolutely okay. That is what social justice is all about. Social justice is all about it's okay when we do it because the other ones deserve it. And without ever going into any sort of retrospective saying, | |
| perhaps you shouldn't have done that. Perhaps you should, you know, deal with everybody equally as we want to be dealt with. That doesn't cross their mind. And this was confirmed by various tweets. I have compiled a few for your convenience and here they are. One of them, | |
| for example, says, oh my god, Anita Sakisian calling Sargon a shithead and a garbage human right to his face gives me life force. Now imagine if that would have been somebody using the hashtag Gamergate and swap out the word Sargon and Anita Sakisian. So, | |
| oh my god, Sargon calling Anita Sakisian a shithead and a garbage human right to her face, that gives me life force. Instant Nazi. Instant Nazi. Next one, such a fragile ego, | |
| you poor little child. I find this one pretty cute because what these people like to do recently, or probably for about a year or so now, is to try to appropriate our kind of language. Calling other people snowflakes, | |
| calling other people fragile, saying that they can't handle their fee fees and stuff like that. I am a fan of appropriating language to your own needs if it has a ground to stand on, If it has a base to stand on. | |
| Because people, but black people reappropriating the term nigger, for example. | |
| I find that good, I find that very good. | |
| I'm calling myself a Nazi because I'm a German. | |
| I find it hilarious. | |
| This takes power away from the term and makes it your own. | |
| But the difference is between the difference between the examples that I mentioned and this is that they are still the ones who are whining, They are still the ones who are bitching. | |
| They are still the ones who demand all these changes in society to accommodate their feelings and we are not. So when you appropriate a term but cannot really return it to your original accuser in the way that your original accuser accused you in the beginning, | |
| then it's powerless. It's completely powerless. Because if your original accuser is not doing the same thing that you are doing, you're just proving that you don't understand the criticism. Do you know what I mean? I think you do know what I mean. Another one, it's not an opinion, | |
| it's fact. Carl is a pile of garbage animated to human form, like a golem. You're a Jew, aren't you? Same thing. Just swap out words. It's not an opinion, | |
| it's fact. Anita is a pile of garbage animated to human form, like a golem. Everybody would be up in fucking arms. But this time it is not, because Zargon is part of the outgroup. He has no special protection. He has even not a protection, a single protection, a basic protection from being dehumanized. If you do not agree with them, hive mind, you can be dehumanized at any point and nobody fucking cares. Right. And the last one. Mummy, | |
| the big mean lady called me a bad name. Wah! This is by the way, Wooly Bumblebee, also known as Wooly Flip-Flop. Becoming part of any every movement that will give her a little bit of attention. And this falls back to this whole thing that I was talking about, that people are trying to appropriate terms but don't understand them and why people use those terms. I mean, we call people snowflakes because they're literally trying to say that they are all unique, | |
| they're all special and they deserve special treatment. Sargon does no such thing. Therefore, the appropriation of those terms are completely meaningless and just betrays that you don't understand them. At the same time, It's gonna be my last point for my guest video here on Garbage Human Officer CARD. | |
| My name is Topen Champagne. | |
| Do subscribe to my channel. | |
| Is that some of his supporters did not understand what he was doing either? | |
| Because it was so obvious when I looked at his tweet storm last night that he was cosplaying. | |
| He was cosplaying an offended snowflake in order to point out the horrible hypocrisy of his deterrence. | |
| I'm not saying this because I'm having a guest video here, because I'm pretty sure that Sargon Of A Guard would still have me have this guest video if I said the Opposite. | |
| But so many of you fucking snowflakes, and now I mean the Sargon followers, were not able to discern that he was indeed doing that. He was just playing a character in order to make them look even more ridiculous. So many tweets were saying, oh my god, Sargon, you're turning into an NSUW now. Oh my god, | |
| are you really triggered? Are you really offended? Oh my god, you're using the exact same language. Yes, fuckers, that was the point. Oh my god, unsubscribe from him and me if you just subscribe. If you think that this was nothing but a showcasing of what they are doing. Doing 180. Or as Rax said, | |
| basically, if they go low, we go to the middle of the earth. Duh, get, get, get, get, get your shit together. Seriously, guys, who don't understand what Sargon was doing. Because that's almost like saying, hey, look, This guy was drinking milk. | |
| He's a bite of premises. | |
| Peppy the frog is now a symbol of the right. | |
| You just don't get the message. | |
| Anyway, I'm finished. | |
| And I thank you very much. | |
| If you actually sat through this video up to this point. | |
| I'm amazed. | |
| You must be very drunk. | |
| And thank you very much for watching. | |
| This was this week in Stupid, for whatever day it is. | |
| Do subscribe to my channel. | |
| Do not unsubscribe on Sargon, because he's still the same shitload as he was before. | |
| I am losing my ability to speak. |
Export Selection