Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin - This Week in Stupid (07⧸12⧸2014) LIVE with 6oodfella

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 7, 2014 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin

03:13:22

This Week in Stupid (07⧸12⧸2014) LIVE with 6oodfella

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello everyone, welcome to this week in Stupid for the 7th of December 2014.
	This week we're having a special one where it's live with me and Goodfellow.
	How's it going man?
	Hello man, how's it all doing?
	Thank you for joining us.
	I hope we get a good crowd tonight.
	We've got one watching so far.
	Yes.
	Success.
	Right, so what was the first one that you had?
	Oh the first story I had, all right, this is just right, you know how mankind, right, since the beginning of time has been wanting this information.
	Thank God there's been a study done, right?
	Thank the University of Arkansas, the University of Arkansas have done a study, right?
	This is in the DNA India, right?
	I don't want to post a link yet because I want to read it first, right?
	And remember, this is very important.
	You'll all be glad to know this, right?
	Oh, excuse me just a second, I need to, sorry, but that's another problem.
	The audio of the video just came through my ears there.
	That's how long the ticket delay must be.
	Anyway, this is the headline, right?
	Prepare yourselves.
	Unlike women, men eat less when blue light is shone on the food.
	Well, that is important.
	Because I always have red light on my food.
	I eat so damn much and I just needed a way to eat less of it.
	What the fuck justified this?
	Do you want to go?
	Well, people went to these people and said, look, cancer and about cancer, I'll go away.
	AIDS, piss off.
	World hunger, forget it.
	We've got a study that's more important than all that.
	A new study has revealed that men tend to eat significantly less when the food would be lit with a blue coloured light.
	But women are not affected by the light.
	Researchers state and they post a link because nobody's going to believe this.
	Nobody will believe it.
	Can you do a screen presenting thing?
	How do you do it?
	It's on the left.
	It's just the second icon down.
	It's a little screen share thing.
	So if you screen share it, then people can read it along with you.
	Alright, I see the screen share, but I've already got my thing on it.
	I haven't.
	I would need to stop that.
	And then put that on.
	Sorry about this, folks.
	It's just truly, truly remarkable.
	No, I'd rather not, actually, because I've got too much on my screen.
	If that's okay, it's just because there's a lot of bookmarks that I'm ashamed of.
	Not really.
	But I will put it.
	Where can I post a link?
	What the hell can I post a link in this thing?
	Where could I post a link to you?
	You could post it to me or tweet it.
	Sorry, and it's in the chat.
	I do actually post links in the chat.
	Oh, yeah, you can post this I to you, I just to you, right?
	Just so you can see, so that they don't know I'm not lying.
	What I'll do, guys, just so everyone knows, what I'll do is I'll tweet the links as we go along then.
	And I'll put them in the chat.
	I'll put them in the video description after the video.
	They stated that the reason for the change in behaviour appeared to be that food looks less delicious with a blue light shone on it.
	It's what they call the hedonic impression of the food's appearance.
	I mean, this is just awful.
	But they say it's because blue-coloured foods are usually rare, right?
	So what does that say about women that they'd just be willing to eat it then?
	You know, they just look at it and think, you know what?
	But that's it.
	I mean, I've already got a few stupid stories, but to me, that was just like so stupid.
	Oh, man.
	Blue light.
	What are the names of the professors?
	Researchers at the University of Arkansas.
	It doesn't actually obviously say their name.
	Again, researchers hypothesised they didn't want to give their fucking names.
	No wonder.
	No surprise there.
	Well, I tell you what, I am so glad that the human race is so technologically advanced as to have so few problems, actual problems, that this is something they can research.
	It's wonderful to know.
	And now I'm not afraid for the future.
	If I get cancer, I know I'll be cured.
	This is wonderful.
	What the shit is that?
	Jesus Christ.
	I can't even.
	Oh my God.
	Was there anything else about that one you wanted to tell people?
	No, no, that was.
	I think that's all we need to know about that one anyway, isn't it?
	But no, that was astonishing.
	Astonishing that these people have took the time out of their lives to do this.
	What was the purpose of this?
	I can't believe they get paid for it.
	I mean, how do you get into a position where you can research banal shit like this and make money?
	I hope that I don't get paid.
	I hope it was someone else.
	You know they got paid.
	They probably did, Ty.
	They probably did.
	Bloody sad state of affairs.
	I would guess that it was probably something to do with funding.
	You know, like the department and the university needed to justify their funding.
	So they just did any old research at all.
	You know, what happens when you run into a tractor?
	You know, let's do some research.
	Yeah, no, no, no, that's actually possible.
	That's actually possible.
	Maybe it's because my dad was in the RAF, and basically I did my work experience at the RAF at a base in Germany.
	And when I was there, the guys were basically like, yeah, we've got to sit there and do something with our excess funding, or next year we get less funding because we didn't use the funding for this year.
	And so they literally, I think they bought loads of ridiculous shit and it was just like.
	Okay, well, I mean, if that's how it works, it's a system that incentivizes wasting money, but that's how it operates.
	It corrupts everything, you know?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	That's ridiculous.
	Right, okay.
	Right, I'm going to go on to one now.
	Sorry, let me just fanny around with my things.
	So this is going to be one that everyone is aware of.
	Just right.
	So the long list of sex acts that got banned in UK porn.
	I haven't actually, I have specifically, when this all happened, you know, I basically ignored it, saved the link, and then thought, right, I'll read through it now.
	So I don't even know what's actually banned yet.
	But just this, this is pissing me off already because I'm presuming the stuff that people would actually want banned is already banned.
	You know, things like pedophilia, bestiality, you know, actual, you know, like, I don't know, some kind of snuff, you know, snuff porn or anything like that, rape and you know, actual rape, all that sort of stuff.
	So now all I can imagine is what they're banning is things that have personally offended someone's wife.
	So yeah, I'll just read out a few things.
	Again, I haven't gone through this at all.
	So pornography produced in the UK was quietly censored today through an amendment to the 2003 Communications Act and the measures appear to have taken aim at female pleasure.
	Wow, that's a surprise, actually.
	Why aren't the sex positive feminists up in arms about this?
	Where are they?
	They should be.
	I believe they got a some of them got annoyed at the fact that face sitting was in there.
	I believe I'll let you check on that because on my watch later video list, somebody made a video saying feminists annoyed at the face sitting in the ban because the people who made the ban didn't understand that they were supposed to ban things that heterosexual men like, not things that lesbian feminists like, you know, they're not supposed to ban that.
	Well, that's basically what I've heard, but yeah, I'll keep going.
	The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, which I've never even heard of.
	I mean, who's made this?
	Who are these people?
	It requires that the video on demand online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD, sex shop style porn by the British Board of Film Centres.
	Seemingly arbitrary deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board's ruling on content that is not acceptable effectively bans the following acts from being depicted.
	Spanking, caning adverts, you'd think, wouldn't you?
	Sorry about that, guys.
	Spanking, caning, aggressive whipping, penetration by any object, quote, associated with violence, physical or verbal abuse, regardless of consensual.
	Obviously, all of this is probably regardless of consensual.
	Water sports, role-playing as non-adults, physical restraint, humiliation, female ejaculation, strangulation, taste sitting, and fisting.
	Holy fucking shit.
	This country is being taken over by Puritans, man.
	I can understand some people not wanting to watch some of that, but there's a lot that could get banned because of the language thing.
	I mean, hot and heavy.
	A lot of women like dirty talk.
	You know what I mean?
	But I think one of the important things about this is that there's a good little loophole, right?
	No pun intended.
	There's a good loophole, right?
	Where it only applies to porn filmed in Britain.
	So all the British porn actors can go to France and film whatever the fuck they want and then still release it as long as it wasn't filmed in the UK.
	So we can still watch what we want, but we just can't film it here.
	But why?
	I mean, who is doing this?
	I'll tell you exactly why, right?
	Because if you're fucking a woman and she's telling you to fucking spank her on the ass or something like that, right?
	And you put it on your fucking U-porn or something, some feminist cunt will see it and go, that's encouraging violence against women.
	You know, how to grand theft at all in Australia.
	All the people go nuts.
	As soon as they hear violence against women, they just completely go nuts and go, right, okay, let's ban it then.
	Let's ban it.
	They don't put any thought into it at all.
	They don't even consider the fact that the so-called violence is something that women fucking like.
	No, I totally agree.
	I mean, look at the list, though.
	Spanking and caning.
	I mean, they're pretty damn similar.
	And, you know, plenty of women like that and consent to do that.
	I mean, aggressive whipping.
	Who decides whether it's aggressive or not?
	You know, it's like, no, you're whipping just slightly too aggressively.
	I personally find that objectionable.
	And the ones are, look, I'm fine with it.
	I really like it.
	Would you just piss off and leave me to my porn?
	And no, no, no, no, no.
	We have to meddle.
	We're busybodies.
	Penetration by any object associated with violence.
	Well, that could be if you beat somebody to death with a dildo, that rules dildos out.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Lockstock, wasn't it?
	Where the guy beats to death the black dildo, and it's just it's absurd.
	It's absolutely absurd, and I'm really pissed off there.
	But we'll go through the rest of the article just in case there's any extra information there.
	Well, apparently, the final three listed fall under the acts that they view as potentially life-endangering.
	Face sitting, fisting.
	How is fisting potentially life-endangering?
	I mean, imagine if you start endangering up to about there, your elbow, and you start feeling for the heart.
	You know, I think maybe then you could say it was deadly, but other than that, I mean, fucking fist-sitting is potentially life-endangering.
	It's very, very close to thought control, because what they're really saying is you, as an adult, don't you get turned on by things that are consenting adults.
	Don't you get turned on by things consenting adults do?
	That's what they're saying.
	It's ridiculous.
	Yeah, and it's the term that content that is not acceptable.
	I mean, female ejaculation.
	How is that not acceptable?
	For some women, it's something they can't control.
	So that's basically banning those women from porn.
	I have to say, as well, I would be on the feminist side there.
	That's ridiculous.
	I mean, that is just ridiculous.
	And so is the face sitting.
	I mean, in the majority of porn, face sitting is the lesbian thing or the sitting in a man's face thing.
	You know, it's usually the women doing the sitting.
	You know, every time I've seen a porn where that goes on, I've never seen anybody die.
	No, well, I was going to ask that.
	I mean, how many people a year die from filming pornography?
	How many?
	More people probably die through that fucking asphyxiation bullshit than that.
	Well, do you erotic asphyxiation?
	God's sick, man.
	What drives somebody to get to that point?
	Seriously?
	When do you get to that point?
	You know, this just isn't doing it for me anymore.
	You know what I mean?
	Yeah, I've been wanking for so long I need to choke myself with a belt.
	I just, I don't get it, man.
	I don't get it at all.
	On the plus side, I mean, no, no, I totally understand that.
	But on the plus side, so while measures won't stop people from watching whatever genre of porn they desire, as video shot abroad can still be viewed, they do impose severe restrictions on content created in the UK and appear to make no distinction between consensual and non-consensual practices.
	I actually find that really worrisome because, I mean, again, it really kind of harks back to this sort of, I can't tell that this isn't consensual, or I can't tell that this is consensual.
	It's really weird.
	And like, this country has been taken over by Puritans.
	I can't find any other way of describing it.
	Literally, it's more cowards than anything else.
	They're taken over by cowards.
	Yeah, it really is.
	People who are simply scared to say it are piss off rather than, you know, they've got to give in rather than just saying, go away.
	I'm pretty sure that this council must be made of like conservative MPs' wives or something.
	You know, where they're just like, look, we're going to have to start getting rid of some of this porn because it makes me feel frumpy and insecure.
	I would actually go, I would go the other way and think that it was more likely the Labour side females that were doing it because they're the fucking worst.
	They are worse.
	When it comes to this kind of stuff, Theresa May isn't good, though.
	I mean, they're feminists on both sides of the aisle.
	You've got Vet Cooper and Harriet Harmon, and what was the other one?
	Hazel Blair?
	Is it?
	That's her name.
	A lot of them look good.
	They do, don't they?
	They look surprisingly like, but they're like labour feminists.
	And they've got Theresa May, who's the current home secretary, who's a feminist.
	And it's just like, right, okay.
	So, you know, we've got feminists just on both sides of the aisle, probably all just, and they're probably in competition with each other, who can ban the most anti-woman stuff first.
	Isn't it amazing that you can be in the government and openly say, I'm part of a hate movement and nobody bothers?
	Well, not even that.
	It's not even that they're part of a hate movement.
	I mean, I think they are, but that's not what necessarily bothers me.
	What bothers me is they can say, yeah, I have extreme ideological bias.
	I'm very, very concerned with an ideology.
	And if they were saying that they were communists, or they were saying they were fascists, or they were saying literally any ideology you care to think of, I would find that a cause for concern.
	But anyway, I mean, the article goes on saying, there appear to be no rational explanations for most of the rules.
	They're simply a set of moral judgments designed by people who have struggled endlessly to stop the British people from watching pornography.
	And this kind of harks back to the Tories saying that you're going to have to opt in for your internet porn, doesn't it?
	That's right.
	I remember that one.
	I really want to know if the same people are involved here.
	I haven't looked into it yet, but it probably is something we look into because, goddamn it, someone has to defend our porn.
	You know what I mean?
	I don't mind if I'm not.
	Well, you have to sign into it.
	I think it's more, you just simply have to be an adult.
	Not to say that you want porn, but you have to choose.
	If you don't, you get to choose whether you don't want it.
	I think that's what it is.
	It's not as strict as it sounds, but for getting there.
	It's not, but it's the principle of the thing that bothers me.
	I should not have to say to the government or to any authority that, yes, I want to view adult material.
	Because I am an adult, it should be automatically available.
	If they wanted sort of a function where you could block it because you've got children, fine.
	You know, that's fine.
	You can block anything you want, I would think.
	But restricting it by default, I think, is I know it sounds silly.
	I know it sounds like it's not that big a deal, but it really is the principle that the government doesn't have the right to do this.
	I'm an adult.
	They have no right to enforce rules that prevent me seeing something that's adult content, even if those rules can be lifted if I ask.
	Because the principle is I have to ask them for permission to see something I am legally allowed to see.
	Fuck that.
	I'm not asking them for permission.
	You know what I mean?
	But yeah, it's a really, really strange piece, this, and it really, really pisses me off.
	Feminists specifically want to get into everybody's house and tell them and dictate to them how things should go, whether it be in the bedroom or the kitchen.
	I'm blaming feminism.
	I heard you've got feminists moaning.
	That's what I'm blaming us on.
	Governments.
	The politicians are just cowards as usual.
	I want to blame on feminists, but a lot of this seems like the sort of thing that feminists would not be agitating to have banned.
	I mean, female ejaculation and fist-sitting and probably fisting as well.
	I can't see feminists trying to get that ban.
	I mean, maybe Neither Sarkeesian and the sex-negative Puritans.
	I believe it's backfired.
	I think that is what's happened.
	I believe that they would have pushed right because it's dead easy to find feminists against porn and they would have pushed this idea to the government and said, look, it encourages violence against women, just like everything else does, right?
	It encourages violence against women.
	And so the government went, right, okay, then, and they've been very strict with it.
	There's the rules then.
	They've come back, whoa, whoa, whoa, what are you doing?
	We meant things that heterosexual men, like, what are you doing here?
	You know, and they didn't expect that it would hurt them as well.
	It's entirely possible.
	It's entirely possible.
	I haven't got anything that, you know, I haven't found anything that says this is feminists that have done it, so I can't assume anything.
	That's better enough.
	But that that that leads on to um an another article that um I've I've got but um I don't think this is actually in the UK.
	Um this is um one that I just I just found just just it's just stupid, like everything's fucking stupid, isn't it?
	Um this one is why rape in Batwoman is more interesting than marriage in DC to DC Comics.
	And it's like, oh really, is that a question you even need to ask?
	Why is rape in a con in a story, a fictional rape, more interesting than marriage?
	I mean who wants to see Batman's marriage in Batwoman comics?
	You know how just just that they have to ask themselves these questions really bothers me.
	So it goes into a discussion of how basically rape's a bad thing, but it's like with anything, anything salacious, anything, you know, and I mean you can see the picture, it's like it's far more interesting than Batman's wedding ceremony, isn't it?
	You know?
	And obviously they go on trigger warnings and all this sort of shit.
	And so, yeah, basically everyone's everyone's really, really upset.
	And they're just wondering, why can't they just get married and just have a happy ever after?
	And I don't really think they understand the purpose of fiction.
	It's, you know, to excite people and titillate people.
	Which again, the other people don't really understand the purpose of porn, do they?
	But yeah, anyway.
	Slight conspiracy theory on this then, right?
	People will have to correct me if I'm wrong because I don't know a lot about comic books, right?
	But DC make Batman, right?
	That's correct, isn't it?
	They don't.
	DC McBatman.
	Marvel made Thor into a woman.
	Made Spider-Man into a woman.
	So could this be Marvel's attempt to give DC a bad name?
	Has it be the social justice warriors by claiming that they're more obsessed with rape?
	They've got the word rape in there.
	You know what I mean?
	They got the word rape in there.
	So that's all they need.
	Look, the DC comics, they encourage rape against Batwoman.
	That's all they need.
	That's all an idiotic, gullible woman has to see is you'll go, oh my god, those DC comics are awful.
	You see?
	Quick over feminist.
	Marvel has turned Thor into a woman.
	Oh, I'm buying Marvel comics, so I'm.
	This could be social justice warriors from Marvel doing this easily, but I don't know.
	I'm not an expert on that.
	No, no, no.
	A friend of mine sent me a link.
	He was furious about it because I haven't read comic books for a few years, so I'm not that up on it.
	But haven't they turned Captain Marvel into a woman?
	Again, I'm not an original female character.
	Wouldn't you?
	Wouldn't you just?
	You know what?
	If if if they had like, you know, 90% female superheroes and I was part of some masculinist movement and I was like, look, we want to see more men in comics.
	If they were like, yeah, okay, we're going to change one of the female superheroes into a man then.
	I'd be like, no, that's fucking retarded and that's not what I'm asking for.
	And they're new exciting characters.
	Oh, of course.
	But if the situation was reversed, I'd be like, you know, come on, let's let's fucking let's get new heroes, you know, new stories, new interesting tales to be told.
	Don't just co-opt someone else's heroes for me.
	A, you're going to be pissing off the people who like that character anyway.
	B, it's condescending.
	Oh, yeah, well, we'll make this character a man for you.
	You know, here you go.
	That'll shut you up, won't it?
	You know I can't believe they're happy with this.
	You know, the female thought, oh, yes, brilliant, that's what we wanted.
	Really?
	Is that how high you're aiming?
	It might be a long play as well, though, by Marvel, because not by Marvel, sorry, by the social justice warriors.
	Because, see, once all the superheroes have turned female, right, then they can say, look at her breasts, look at her ass, that encourages rape.
	Then we're back to square fucking one again.
	You need to change all them back to men because you're encouraging violence against women because they get into fights.
	There we go, we're back to square one again.
	We have to, you know what I mean?
	With these people, see if you're ever in a situation with people, feminist social justice warriors, where you cannot win.
	Tell them to fuck off.
	Don't waste any time with them.
	But nobody seems to do that.
	I don't know why you can't win with them.
	Well, it's because it's because they're loud on social media, isn't it?
	You know, they can create a hashtag and a bunch of them, you know, they'll all get together and go, I hate Marvel because, you know, Spider-Woman's ass is tighter than mine and it makes me feel unattractive.
	Although social media is powerful and a lot of them use it, just as many men or anti-feminists could use it as well.
	I think the problem is, or the benefit to them, is the sheep mentality.
	I mean, an anti-feminist doesn't always agree with an anti-feminist.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Whereas a feminist with another feminist because they're fucking sheep.
	Yeah, ideological orthodoxy.
	If one feminist says it, they all have to get behind it.
	Otherwise, suddenly they're going to start splitting off into various groups that aren't supporting each other and they know they'll lose.
	So they've got to be very much in each other's corner, regardless of whether they're actually angry with each other or not.
	But yeah, Christ, I had a point there, though.
	Sorry, man.
	I hate when that happens.
	That happens quite a lot.
	See, during these bloody hangouts, especially when there's more than one person, more than two people, I mean, I get lost.
	Sorry.
	So what was your next one then?
	Right, I'm going to send you this link so that you can see it firsthand, right?
	Maybe you could put it on the screen.
	But this is a guy who I want to punch in the face, but I wouldn't dare.
	Anyway, it is, of course, it is Daisy Buchanan, a feminist who writes for The Telegraph.
	It's her favourite feminist.
	And it's a man.
	It's former NFL player.
	What's his name?
	Terry Cruz.
	The guy out of the expendables and Chris's dad and everybody hates Chris or whatever.
	And she goes on to say that he's the best, but fuck which, forget her.
	It's what he says, right?
	It's just like, I don't know.
	He must have been brought off.
	I know who this is.
	I know who D. Buchanan is.
	Is that her in that video with Neil, with Mike Buchanan?
	Is that the same one?
	The guy, the MRA guy, and the woman who looked like a slack dog troglodyte.
	But was she not wearing glasses on that?
	Yeah, she was.
	Yeah, she looked, yeah, yeah.
	And she had a lisp.
	She kept talking like a little girl.
	Yeah, yeah, that's it.
	That's a.
	It says here, I think the big thing about feminine, this is him speaking, right?
	I think the big thing about feminism is that it scares men.
	You know, the big deal is that people are scared of being controlled.
	He doesn't even see what he just fucking said.
	Well, of course they're scared of them.
	Feminists want to control everybody and people don't fucking like that, Terry.
	But you're still a feminist, may I?
	Fucking idiot.
	Jesus Christ, right?
	Yeah, the big deal is that people are scared of being controlled.
	I want to be clear that feminism is not saying women are better than men.
	No, it's not.
	You're literally saying feminists want to control men.
	That's what you're talking about.
	I'm not worried about women being better than men, you know.
	I mean, that's literally my furthest fear.
	It's being controlled by feminists, by women who hate men that bothers me.
	And he's completely fine with it.
	Jeez.
	Listen, it's right now.
	I have been that guy where I felt I was more valuable than my wife and kids.
	Well, this was obviously not in the fucking view of the courts, was it?
	Fuck.
	Why what happened to him?
	He felt more valuable than his wife and kids.
	But as soon as he gets to fucking court, he's not going to be of any value.
	Do you see what I mean?
	He's not more valuable than his wife and kids.
	I don't know why he felt like this, but he certainly was not standing in a fucking courtroom when he thought like this, that's for sure.
	Pisses me off.
	He's ignorant to the world, completely ignorant to the world.
	That's because he hasn't been divorced yet, isn't it?
	That's the issue.
	Well, no, I've not been divorced and I know what's going on.
	You know what I mean?
	Yeah, but you're not an idiot.
	He's fucking ignorant and stupid.
	I mean, if he was sitting right here right now, I would say to him, How are you doing, big man?
	But I'll say right now, he's a fucking idiot.
	And I love the way she's responding to it.
	In all seriousness, Crewe's words on feminism are thrillingly smart and sensible.
	Of course, you would think that.
	You're a feminist and you see you would benefit from what he's suggesting.
	You know, women controlling men.
	That's exactly what you would want, obviously, you dumbass.
	They're using the celebrity angle because they think men are stupid, where they think, hey, that celebrity says he's a feminist.
	I think I'll be a feminist too.
	But look at who they use.
	They use him, idiot.
	They use fucking Radcliffe out of Harry Potter.
	Who man wants to be like him?
	They use Robert Webb out of Mitchell and Webb, who says, and now I don't fucking like him.
	I didn't know he said that.
	No, I don't like him.
	Prince Harry, I do like Prince Harry, but I don't think he actually called himself a feminist.
	But they probably broke my heart.
	The one that broke my heart was Charlie Brooker, man.
	He's gone full social justice warrior.
	And you can tell by his fucking hair.
	Yeah, he has.
	He wrote this goddamn thing for The Guardian a few years ago, and it was just the most embarrassing social justice warrior bullshit ever.
	And I just had to tweet him.
	I was like, fucking, come on, Brooker, what's going on?
	And someone had seen it, and they were just like, oh, for fuck's sake, Brooker, we expect better.
	You're an intelligent guy.
	How can you do this?
	It's about going up their analysis.
	It's so they can feel superior to other people.
	I'm sure of it.
	But yeah, this article, the rest of this article is pissing me off.
	I don't think male feminists have easy.
	And it's like, of course, they don't.
	They've got to deal with female feminists.
	It's hard to be an ally without being accused of co-opting the cause.
	And those men who have taken up the label haven't always covered themselves in glory.
	One of the most vocal male feminists in the US, Hugo Schweizer, was forced off the internet following accusations of violence and racism.
	Oh, thanks a lot, feminism.
	Thanks, you know.
	I mean, I was sticking up for you, but that's bullying me off the internet.
	That's exactly what I expect from feminists.
	I can't believe Charlie Brooker, though.
	I've not seen anything from him for years.
	I mean, he started doing that black mirror shit, and I've not really been interested.
	But he used to be really funny and too intelligent.
	I know.
	It must be doing an experiment for TV and then he's gone to expose them or something.
	Surely he can't be that fucking stupid, man.
	Maybe there's a drug.
	Maybe there's a drug they get or something.
	I don't know.
	It is some kind of conditioning they go through, I swear to God, because Black Mirror is really good.
	Really good.
	I've never actually watched it.
	I just called it shit because I couldn't be annoyed watching it.
	But it has actually been genuinely brilliant.
	It's about presenting like, you know, it's kind of almost thought experiments with, you know, where he tells a story about something in the near future.
	They're kind of like morality tales for the new technology that we have.
	And it's genuinely good.
	It's really good.
	And so it really breaks my heart that Brooke is going down this fucking stupid road because I really thought the world of the dude, you know, he was one of my favourite celebrities.
	And I'm not a big fan of celebrities in any stripe.
	But you just look at his hair.
	Just look at a recent picture of his hair.
	And it's gone completely like Matt Lee's.
	And it's just, oh, shit, man.
	It's just best not to like any celebrity because they're going to say something to, you know what I mean?
	They're going to say something to the music.
	I think it's peer pressure.
	I think that's what it is.
	They find themselves like in a culture of social justice warriors where there's loads of feminists around and they're all pressuring them.
	I bet they always use the same refrains, just like you don't hate women, do you?
	You don't agree with violence against women.
	And obviously no one can agree to this.
	And they're like, oh, great, you're a feminist then.
	And it's just, oh, I guess I am then.
	Yeah, why don't we be nice to women and treat women special?
	And it's like, yeah, but that wouldn't be equality, would it, Brooke?
	But yeah, so astonishing.
	Do you want to carry on going through this article?
	No, I've actually closed that page now because when I've seen Webb on it, it annoyed me.
	Oh, Daniel Radcliffe.
	Sorry, I'm still looking at that.
	I know Daniel Radcliffe and all, but then he is young, though, and he did work with Emma Watson for a few years, so she's probably hen-pecked him.
	All right, okay, fuck it, okay, I'm a fucking feminist going in.
	Shut up, man.
	God.
	I do think that that's why a lot of them do it.
	Just, you know, just fucking leave me alone.
	I think there's Daniel Radcliffe.
	Female approval.
	Daniel Radcliffe seems like a really solid dude.
	You know, he seems a really sound guy who doesn't take himself very seriously and is happy to prat around and tell jokes and stuff.
	And it's just, ah, they've been brainwashed.
	He was good in extras, you know.
	If you can go on extras and take then you're all right.
	But maybe, is it not maybe one of those things where somebody in an interview somewhere said to him, say, Daniel, do you believe women should be equal to men?
	And he's went, well, of course.
	Oh, you're a feminist then.
	And that's what they do.
	Because they do that a lot, by the way.
	They do that a lot.
	Do you believe in workers' rights?
	You're a communist.
	Do you believe in economists for women?
	You're a feminist.
	That's just what these people do.
	But can I talk about this story here?
	I know that everybody is absolutely sick of this story, right?
	Because feminists have not shut up about this story.
	I'll just post you the link.
	All week, they've just not stopped talking about this story, right?
	So it's from ABC News.
	Saudi extends detention of women drivers.
	Two Saudi women detained nearly a week ago for violating the kingdom's female driving ban were ordered held for 25 more days on Sunday.
	The women who were arrested after driving into Saudi Arabia from the United Arab Emirates are supporters of a grassroots campaign to oppose the ban.
	The two women have a combined Twitter following of more than 355,000.
	Do you see this is what I mean?
	This is why feminists have been talking about this for a solid week.
	I mean, I haven't heard any of them mention anything else but this.
	Fucking feminists, my fucking ass.
	This is very interesting.
	So they went to United Arab Emirates, where presumably women can drive and then drove into Saudi Arabia knowing that they're from Saudi.
	So driving in Saudi Arabia, they must have known they weren't.
	Oh, they would have known her.
	They would have known.
	Yeah, so this is a deliberate provocation.
	I mean, you know, this is one of those cases where I'm not actually against the feminists here because, you know, I think women should be allowed to drive.
	My point was none of them have actually fucking mentioned this.
	That was my point.
	Oh, haven't they?
	Not one feminist has mentioned a story.
	And you'd think feminists would be all over this story.
	Not one has fucking mentioned it.
	It's astonishing.
	This is the kind of thing feminists should be talking about.
	But they don't say a word about it.
	The only time they talk about shit like this is when you say to them, hang on, there's not a rape culture.
	And then they'll say, oh, hey, women in Saudi aren't allowed to drive.
	That's the only time.
	It's the only fucking time they'll do it, man.
	But I covered a video a few years ago now, and it was about a woman in Afghanistan, the Taliban-run section of Afghanistan, where she defied the rules completely and opened up a driving school for women.
	You know, they're not allowed to drive there.
	But she was just like, no, fuck it.
	Women should be allowed to drive.
	And of course they should.
	Of course.
	But no feminists mentioned that story either.
	I really do.
	Honestly, feminism is just first world white woman problems.
	I mean, Jessica Valenti the other week, I was going through the article from her and she was literally saying that feminism has a serious problem with racism, homophobia, and transphobia.
	It's like, well, why would you want to be a feminist then?
	You know, I'm not joining any movement that has a serious problem currently, a contemporary problem with racism, sexism, and racism, homophobia, and transphobia.
	Why would you want to be part of that movement?
	I mean, that's probably how I describe the Ku Klux Klan.
	So, you know, that's why I don't join them.
	But yeah, I mean, it's all about self-interest, clearly, because otherwise they absolutely would be I mean they would they should be all over this 355,000 followers on Twitter as well between them.
	So that that really should be something that they're blowing up about.
	But I'm surprised that I see Twitter.
	Yeah, me too actually.
	That's a good point.
	But the thing is, I mean they're probably complaining about something really, really pointless.
	Definitely.
	Yeah, yeah, let's not bullshit ourselves.
	We know they're complaining about something pointless.
	Let me get on to the GTA 5 thing then, because it's something that everyone's talked about, but I think we should do.
	So the GTA 5 petition in Australia, obviously 40,000 hysterical feminists got up in arms about it.
	Absolutely just do you want to take the lead on this one?
	Because you know much more about GTA 5 than I do.
	Well as I said I covered it all my last video but these are just disgusting cretons.
	I wasn't surprised the game got banned.
	But what made me furious was when I actually read the genuine petition that got it banned, the genuine petition that does really look like satire, written from some men's rights activist or something.
	You know, I have the petition, I'll just smoke.
	There we go.
	The lies in it is despicable.
	Okay I'll, I'll read out and you tell me what the lies are.
	Okay it's, it's a game that encourages players to murder women for entertainment.
	Right away, lie right away.
	It doesn't encourage anyone to murder women for entertainment.
	If you find it entertaining, then you can murder anyone.
	You can murder animals if you want, if you get a thrill out of it.
	But that says more about the player than the game.
	Yeah, because it's a sandbox game, isn't it?
	I mean, you can go to the top of a building and jump off.
	Does that mean it encourages suicide?
	I think it might do.
	I think it might do.
	The incentive is to commit sexual violence against women.
	Right away, another one.
	No, it's not.
	There is no incentive at all because there is no sexual violence within Grand Theft Auto V at all.
	Is it not possible to rape a woman in Grand Theft Auto V?
	I'm sure that eventually some sick, twisted maniac will make a mod in which you'll have to pirate the game and all that stuff.
	That's not something Rockstar does to account for.
	Nothing you can do in the game to rape anybody.
	And believe me, I have really tried to rape people in that game.
	So they don't then abuse or kill them to proceed to get health points?
	No, you don't get health points for killing people.
	You only get health points by picking up first aid kits or being spawned back at the hospital.
	You do not get health points at all for killing anybody anywhere in the entire game.
	Okay, right, okay, so this game means that I have some better...
	I've not been keeping a count here, sorry, but that's quite a lot so far.
	Well, that's everything so far.
	So this game means that after various sex acts, players are given options to kill women by punching her unconscious, killing with a machete, bats, or guns to get their money returned.
	Technically, right, that's true when it says you're given the option.
	It says various sex acts.
	The hooker can either give you a blowjob or have sex with you.
	You don't actually see anything that's kind of cartoony and stupid, right?
	But the option to go and kill Ludgina to death in order to get 10 pence off her or something is completely up to the player.
	At no point in the game does it say, by the way, you can go and kill her now if you want.
	Because it's a standbox game, isn't it?
	You give money to the character and then the character's inventory of money goes up and then you can kill them and get that money back, right?
	The same identical option is there, right?
	For see, after you have sex with a prostitute, you can kill her and get your money back.
	Or one of the other options is you can go and do a triathlon.
	Or you can go and take some flying lessons or maybe say do some stunt jumps, you know, or maybe go parachuting.
	Why not go parachuting?
	Why not go deer hunting?
	Maybe do that.
	Maybe go on a bike race.
	Maybe go on a jet ski race.
	Maybe go on a car race.
	Why not do any of that?
	Rather than go and murdering people for 25 bucks, why don't you do something else?
	You've got many options.
	Yeah, but the thing is, that doesn't went into their rape fancies very well, does it?
	Nah.
	Nah.
	But I suppose you could give them its correct on a technicality because you have the option to do it, but you have the option to do many things.
	Many things.
	Then they're wrong because it says the sickening game encourages players to do it.
	Yeah, if it's a standbox game and it's just something you can do in the world because you're an actor in the world and you are capable of murdering people and there are women in the game.
	Well, art imitates life.
	You can do it in real life.
	So you can do it in the game.
	But what else you can do is see after you have sex with a prostitute?
	When she leaves your car, you can walk next to her, right?
	And if anybody tries to hit her, you can protect her.
	So it encourages the protection of women.
	It encourages you to be the goddamn white knight.
	That's disgusting.
	And by the way, there's something about this game that I didn't point out, and I should have mentioned it in my video, right?
	It's very important, right?
	See, if you start a fight with somebody, like say there's a man in the street and you punch the man, right?
	He will either run away or he'll fight you back, right?
	But sometimes the police will come after you, sometimes they won't see you hit out of a woman in the street.
	White knights come and attack you.
	Do they?
	I'm not fucking if you catch a woman in the street, right?
	Any male pedestrians that are there will attack you for it.
	It's true to life.
	It's very true to life.
	Yeah, that's so that is actually an act of discouragement from attacking women.
	Exactly.
	And plus the police killing you.
	There's always that, you know.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I mean, you know, forget police killing you.
	I mean, I don't know why you would, but let's forget that for now.
	So if you're attacking a man and other men see it, then it's like, fuck it, I don't care.
	And it would have to, on a rare occasion, another man might come in and help, but not as often as it happens if you get into a fight with a woman or something like that.
	I mean, I don't go around hitting pedestrians for fun, right?
	But there was one time I was playing Grand Theft Auto IV, different game, right?
	Nico, right?
	And I was walking past the university part, and I'm not kidding, right?
	It's like feminist strike, and there were two women, two pedestrians talking, and one said to the other, men are such dogs.
	And I just thought, fucking what?
	I just beat the shit out of her just because she said that.
	And it's obviously I wouldn't do that in real life, but no, I'll give you a reason to hate men, bitch.
	But things like that are just fun, you know.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Okay, that's interesting because, yeah, so it says this misogynistic GTA 5 literally makes a game of bashing, killing, and horrific violence against women.
	I mean, that's obviously true.
	Well, when you consider throughout the whole game, you genuinely lose count of the amount of men you kill.
	Of course.
	Women die in the entire game and you have no input in it.
	You don't get to decide how they die.
	This happens during cutscenes, two cutscenes, right?
	Well, do you want to tell us about those quickly?
	Well, the first cutscene, this probably pissed feminists off more than anything because it was a feminist.
	She's definitely a fucking feminist, right?
	The way she talks, the way she acts, the way she dresses, she's a feminist and she gets angry with Trevor.
	She pulls a gun out on Trevor and tells the two of them to get out of the house and then you don't pull a gun on Trevor, you know, and not expect to get sliced up for it.
	But then when whatever happens, the camera just pans away.
	You don't see it.
	All you see is the outside of the house.
	And then that's it.
	And he comes out covered in blood.
	So you don't actually see the woman getting murdered.
	And you don't actually know if she is murdered.
	You know?
	And so what's the fucking thing in the house?
	The second one is when you chase a woman, she's got a film that you're trying to get off her.
	And she runs right directly in front, or is it behind, not front, of a jet engine, and it sucks her right through.
	It was totally her own fault.
	And see, when you're chasing her, you're not chasing her to kill her.
	And you even say that in a phone call on your way to get her.
	You say, I'm not going to fucking hurt her.
	I just want that film back, you know?
	So she killed herself with stupidity.
	And the only other one I could think of is there is a woman that was cut up into parts, but this was in the past.
	And it's when you collect all the letters.
	There's like 50 pieces of letters all over the place.
	And when you collect them all, put it together, it tells you who the murderer was.
	This murder took place years ago, you know, before the game.
	But again, you don't see it.
	There's nothing, you know, it's just I'm really scraping the barrel trying to find the violence against women.
	And if there is violence, if you do it, you can do it if you want, but you don't have to.
	Right, so, okay, so when they say something like games like this are grooming yet another generation of boys to tolerate violence against women, it's fueling the epidemic of violence experienced by so many girls and women in Australia and globally.
	How accurate do you think that is?
	Well, it's for a start.
	Do you notice the word another generation?
	Oh boy, did you notice that?
	Because all the previous ones, they've already been, you know, told women is fine, you know.
	This generation being encouraged.
	But I mean, as I said to you earlier, if your fetish is killing women, you know, Grand Theft Auto V is not the game for you.
	I mean, it's there's other games.
	I would go for maybe Silent Hill, one of the Siren Hill games with the nurses, you know, stuff like that.
	Maybe, you know, I can think of one.
	There's a game called Killing Flaw, and for the Commando class, one of the you get this kind of enemy that's an invisible woman.
	They're monsters, so she's a monstrous sort of harpy sort of style thing.
	But they're invisible and they run up to you and then they become visible and attack you and you've got to shoot them.
	And to level up your class, you have to kill a certain number of these women.
	I mean, that is actually encouraging you and incentivizing you to kill a certain, I mean, it was female, so technically it is violence against women.
	It is encouraging people to kill women who are invisible up until the point they're right in front of you.
	So I can see why that's a serious problem for women, you know.
	God, these people are idiots and then they could find anything to complain about.
	Well, they make it their life's mission to complain, don't they?
	But Target's statement was: Target Australia will stop selling the R-rated video game Grand Theft Auto V.
	Now, that in itself, it's an R-rated video game.
	So it's not exactly teaching the next generation of kids to do anything because they shouldn't be playing it.
	That's true.
	If parents are letting their children play GTA 5, then they are the ones to blame.
	It's nothing to do with Grand Theft Auto V.
	It's an R-rated game.
	It is for adults.
	Everyone knows Grand Theft Auto is for adults.
	It's not for kids.
	Why are you letting your kids playing it?
	But anyway.
	I don't have anything against teenagers playing these games, by the way.
	I mean, to me, that's, you know, but not fucking, not too young getting right into the game.
	And, you know, that's.
	I mean, most teenagers, you know, like your 14-year-old boy playing it, yeah, he's going to be like, oh, my God, I'm so edgy playing GTA 5.
	But come on, he knows that you're not meant to hurt people for fuck's sake.
	Of any Stripe, it doesn't matter who they are.
	And he knows the pixels.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And he knows it's not real.
	That's another thing.
	But yeah, following feedback from customers about the game's depictions of violence against women, which are few and far between.
	So, you know, moral panic ahoy.
	The Target General Manager of Corporate Affairs, Jim Cooper, giant man Gina, obviously, said the decision was made following extensive community and customer concern about the game.
	But no one who actually investigated the game, you know, he obviously just thought, I don't know anything about it.
	Clearly, you know, oh my god, there are loads and loads of whining feminists, though.
	But we've also had customer feedback in support of us selling the game, and we respect their perspective on the issue.
	However, we feel the decision to stop selling GTA 5 is in line with the majority of you of our customers.
	It's like, hang on, I'll stop you there, Jim.
	You dip shit.
	How many of these feminists do you think bought GTA 5?
	How many of them?
	None of them, obviously.
	None of these 40,000 whining, hysterical feminists bought GTA 5 from you.
	So you are, in fact, not helping your customers in any way.
	These are not people who are going to your shop and buying GTA 5.
	They are not your customers of this game.
	So you have just capitulated to a howling mob, a howling, misinformed, witch-hunting mob.
	Well done, Target.
	You should be proud of yourselves.
	There's no way that anti-fun mob are going to play Grand Theft Auto, one of the most fun games.
	But then I was asking in another video as well: who buys physical games anymore?
	I mean, really?
	Especially if you're like a PC gamer anyway, but most things these days, who buys physical games now, really?
	I guess it's people who are buying them as presents, maybe.
	That makes sense.
	That would make sense.
	That's the only sort of person I can think of, though, because, yeah, I totally agree.
	I mean, practically everyone buys them over the internet, really, don't they?
	Or downloads them.
	I do like the backlash, though, because a lot of people have then created other ones to boycottly tend they should be banning what is it?
	All two-made video games for all gaming systems, all cookbooks and kitchenware, all canned sugar drinks like cola and lemonade, and the children's toys called Nerf guns.
	All of these they sell, including they also shouldn't sell like the Bible and you know, just loads of.
	Well, yeah, I've got the Bible one here.
	Withdraw the Holy Bible, because this sickening book encourages readers to commit sexual violence and kill women.
	And it absolutely does.
	I mean, right?
	It's a book that encourages readers to murder women for entertainment.
	The incentive is to commit sexual violence against women, then abuse or kill them to proceed to get God points.
	And Target is stocking it and promoting it for your Christmas stocking.
	This is the Holy Bible.
	The book means that after various sex acts, readers are given options to kill women by stoning her unconscious, setting them on fire, cutting off their hands, and killing their children.
	One of the many passages in the Holy Bible depicts women being set alight for having sex.
	And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father, shall be burnt in the fire.
	Leviticus 21:9.
	I mean, that is literally advocating violence against women.
	It could not be any more accurate.
	And it's definitely more violent than Grand Theft Auto V.
	I mean, more people dying at Bitcoin, surely?
	Yeah, millions of people dying in the Bible.
	God's a raging psychopath.
	doesn't care he he gets god god in the bible and he amazes me he's they The Israelites are traveling through the desert, and God gets so angry with them.
	He's like, look, I've just got to go away for a while because I'm so angry with you.
	I can't be sure I won't kill you all.
	And I'm thinking, holy shit.
	Why would any of the Israelites ever do anything to piss off God?
	People are like, no, no, literally, he might actually kill us all.
	Just don't.
	Whatever you're going to do, just don't do it.
	Just don't.
	But yeah, following this thing, Kmart as well decided to do the same thing.
	And they made a statement to Kotaku Australia, which in my opinion is embarrassing enough anyway.
	Where they say, following a significant review of all content in GTA games, Kmart has taken the decision to remove this product immediately.
	And they apologise for not being closer to the content of this game.
	Come on.
	You know, whereas, again, it just feeds into the Puritanism of things that are going on.
	All of these hyperactive women who are just like, oh my God, I'm just so offended by all of this.
	And then on social media, I think they reinforce each other.
	They bolster each other's hysteria and just, oh my god, we're all so offended, we're all just so, so offended.
	It's just like, yeah, okay, what now?
	Well, we're all gonna go on a hashtag campaign to get this thing banned.
	If they were even close to the truth, right?
	How many, say, boys, right, in of primary school age, right, would be hospitalized after bashing their head of a brick trying to get a coin out of it.
	Do you know what I mean?
	It's so absurd, but yet people take it seriously.
	And I don't mind idiots taking things seriously, but when it's like different companies and you know, and you think, why are you listening to these?
	It's all good, it's all about sales, right?
	They don't want to upset feminists.
	Australia is a very feminist country and they know that shit upset them.
	Although Australia had Julia Gillard, who I think, and I think she got removed from office or something for being an annoying feminist twat.
	And I would have thought that she would have been a warning, an inoculation to the Australians against this kind of nonsense.
	Because I've seen a video of her in the Australian Parliament just shrieking, Oh my God, they're all so sexist and misogynist and all that sort of thing.
	And it's just like, oh, come on, Julia.
	you know really, do you just, do you honestly think it's about you being a woman or do you think it's about you being a shrieking harpy?
	You know?
	Did Margaret Thatcher ever tell anyone that they were sexist?
	God's sake, man.
	No, man.
	No, it would never, it would never happen.
	See the thing about Julia Gillard?
	You know, I put her in a gender studies class, right?
	One, one reason I put her in that class, right?
	I don't know if you've ever seen the video where she fell.
	Have you ever seen that video before?
	It's on YouTube, right?
	She falls, right?
	She slips on the grass and she falls, right?
	Okay, she fell, right?
	But see when she's talking about it directly afterwards, right?
	She said, basically the reason she fell is because women have to wear heeled shoes and men get to wear flat shoes right into the class.
	She went as soon as she fucking did that.
	Shit man, you are a leader of a country and you are saying those words and meaning them.
	Women have to wear heels, though they have to.
	It's matter.
	That is the law and, to be fair, it is the law in Australia that women must wear heels and scientists must not wear certain shirts.
	Oh good god, I just so, just fucking.
	I hate Julia Gillard, but um yeah, so the the uh, just at the end of the uh GTA article.
	Um, my favourite was another change.org petition, but it's only got 61 supporters, which is a shame.
	Right, but create new guidelines on change.org that ethically restrict any petition campaign where the stated aim is to demand censorship of any individual group or institution by any other individual group or institution, either public or private.
	This is something that has to happen.
	This is from apostasy now, which I've heard of but haven't checked out.
	I'll say I signed the yeah yeah, the 50 sheets of green one.
	I sat, I signed that one, I would sign that one.
	But I mean, I'm not for these petition things, but if they're going to want to know, then I mean the.
	The text of it is um.
	Petition.org has become a factory for petition campaigns, on the belief that petitions reflect public support for positive change.
	We call upon change.org to demonstrate this belief by respecting our petition and effectively restricting change.org from supporting campaigns aimed at pressuring for censorship of targeted people.
	Freedom of speech/slash expression is a vital human right, and by permitting campaigns that call for silencing people in the public or private domains, change.org not only fails to defend basic human rights but takes part in facilitating others to attack them.
	Place this restriction on change.org's terms of service and enforce it by deleting such campaigns when they are reported.
	This is a chance for change.org to make some important positive change of its own and show that you put stock in your own petition system.
	Now, I actually would totally, totally support this because, again, it really is.
	There was a feminist the other week, I can't remember her name, but she was saying how feminism is in danger of becoming toxic because it's turning into an online mob that targets individuals rather than ideas or organisations or institutions.
	This was due to Shirtgate, obviously.
	And it absolutely has been.
	I mean, it's been this way for a while, but it's absolutely become this.
	I'm amazed that they can see it themselves, to be honest.
	It's quite interesting that the shirtstorm thing, because what shocked me was I actually seen a few feminists saying, right, this is getting a bit ridiculous.
	Even Julie Bindle said that it was ridiculous.
	I mean, I think that might have been refers to herself as a radical feminist, right?
	She has called herself that for years.
	And even she was saying, oh, for God's sake, this is getting ridiculous now, you know.
	So maybe, maybe it's feminism is just getting the big kick up the asset needs.
	Maybe it was the shirt gate or shut storm or whatever.
	I have to say, I'm tired of gate getting put at the end of everything.
	Just saying.
	Yeah, no, me too.
	It should be, you know, I understand that it's a play on the Watergate thing, but then it should be reserved for incidents involving the press.
	You know, instances of press corruption or collusion or censorship or something like that.
	That's where it should be used.
	It shouldn't be just hysterical people get angry at something and cause a controversy.
	What's the next one you've got?
	Well, let's see here.
	This is dynamite, right?
	Let me send you a link to this.
	This is about the BBC radio show called.
	I'm sorry, I haven't a clue.
	I don't know if you know the show.
	I personally don't listen to radio shows, but I know what the show is, and I know the people on the show.
	Sorry, I'm posting that in the bloody YouTube.
	Get a fucking grip yourself.
	Sorry, man.
	I'll give it to you.
	And this one, right, I got posted to you.
	Right.
	It says here, I'm sorry, but why the first overfictional Samantha, right?
	After complaints about sexism, BBC chiefs are taking a long hard look at the I'm sorry, I haven't a clue's resident scorer, the lovely Samantha.
	Now, the lovely Samantha, the lovely Samantha, does not exist, right?
	The whole point of Samantha is that they'll say, and now we'll get the scores.
	Oh, no, we can't, because Samantha's popped out with one of our gentleman friends, right?
	That's the joke, right?
	And then they come up with workplay and innuendo.
	I'll give you an example of some of the innuendos, right, that they say, right?
	Like, like, do do do when I just did.
	Oh, Samantha has to nip out now to meet her new gentleman friend.
	They're going on a driving tour of Wales, and he's looking forward to showing her Cardiff and Cardigan Bay before going on to banger in the back of his van.
	That's one of them, right?
	Another one is Samantha has to nip out now as she's meeting her new Birdwatcher gentleman friend.
	The last time they were together, he showed her 12 finches.
	Which is a good point.
	Just for our foreign listeners, British puns are notoriously bad.
	And the worse you can make them, the better the pun is.
	There's one more, just for the three, and I'll give you this last one.
	This last one.
	This is the kind of thing that they would say every day on a show as a running gag, right?
	Samantha's away to a horror film with her two gentlemen friends because she likes nothing better than sitting in the back row being given the willies.
	See?
	Now that's funny.
	It's just clearly funny.
	And the thing about the innuendo in wordplay is they can always claim that, well, we didn't say that, right?
	But anyway, it's funny, but the complainant alleged that the whole thing was contrary to the United Nations special rapporteur on violence against women.
	I mean, seriously, violence against women?
	It's a fucking comedy routine.
	Holy shit.
	I mean, it literally says here, like, where is it?
	Yeah, to most listeners, this all belongs to the gloriously smutty tradition of British humour.
	Under the, I'm sorry I haven't a clue, founding compare, the late Humphrey Littleton, the Samantha jokes were widely recognised as masterpieces of wordplay and innuendo.
	Yeah, they are deliberately trying to be bad, just so everyone is aware.
	The current host, Jack D, has found things tougher.
	And I love Jack D.
	I think he's excellent.
	I love his demeanour and his delivery.
	For one thing, we live in an era of sanitised speech.
	And for another, the BBC has culturally aligned itself with those who claim the right not to be offended.
	Now, there are two really, really bad things here.
	The sanitised speech thing really pisses me off.
	What they're effectively doing is teaching people to self-censor.
	And that really bothers me because that's worse than someone else doing it to you.
	Because if someone else censors you, you at least become a martyr for it.
	They can say, oh, look, what happened to so-and-so?
	He got banned, he got censored.
	That can be used as a precedent in future of what to look out for and how to attack.
	But self-censorship means that that never happens.
	So there is no one who becomes a martyr.
	So it's so much more dangerous.
	And secondly, the BBC has culturally aligned itself with those who claim a right not to be offended.
	Fuck people's right not to be offended.
	There is no such thing as a right not to be offended.
	It just doesn't exist.
	It really drives me up the wall.
	I've had friends say this to me and they're like, but what about her right not to be offended?
	I'm like, what right not to be fucking offended?
	How do you qualify this?
	I mean, literally, I mean, that offends me.
	What's happened to my right not to be offended?
	I don't know.
	The very existence of the right not to be offended, I'm offended by.
	Oh my god, it's some terrible paradox that is going to tear apart the universe because it can never be fucking solved.
	Such a thing cannot exist.
	There is something that people can say that does offend me, though, and that's when they say, hey, you shouldn't be allowed to say that.
	That offends me.
	But I have to say, hats off to Jack D, right, the host.
	He said he has been in the chair since 2009, has reportedly threatened to quit if the show is cleaned up.
	But here's another interesting thing.
	For a programme that's defiantly different to be still pulling in 2 million listeners a week, a majority of them women.
	Now, if this was offensive to women, what the fuck are they listening to for?
	Well, you know why, don't you?
	They're listening because they're waiting to be offended by something.
	I am absolutely certain that like half of my Twitter followers are probably feminists who are waiting to be pissed off with something else tweet.
	It's exactly the same thing.
	Well, I'm actually glad that I'm glad I don't pay my licence.
	I've never paid a TV licence, and I'm not paying.
	No way we've got a TV license.
	Did she pay the law?
	Yeah, no, no, there's nothing in British law that means they can actually enforce it, so they have to pay tax.
	It's not exactly exactly, they have to make it look like you should pay it, but they can't actually do anything to actually enforce it, if I'm correct.
	I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure.
	In this day and age, right, they have the ability to make sure people who are not paying don't get it.
	Sky TV can do it.
	How the fuck can BBC not do it?
	But here's the thing, as well.
	Absolutely.
	They can send threatening letters through my door all the time, right?
	But people will shit themselves.
	Oh, shit.
	I don't want to get fine.
	They threaten you with a fine, you know.
	And most people, I wouldn't pay it.
	I would take it to the highest of what I could take because it's the equivalent right of me opening a shop near you, right?
	And I'm selling, I don't know, fucking donuts, right?
	And every week I post five donuts through your door.
	And then at the end of the month, I come round, right?
	Money for the donuts you didn't order, that you didn't want, that you didn't ask for.
	Give me the money for them.
	That's what the BBC are doing.
	They're giving people and then saying, give us the money for that.
	I don't fucking want your product.
	Don't give me it.
	What annoys me about the most is the way the BBC operates.
	And in the article, they say it perfectly, they've aligned themselves with these Puritans.
	And that really, really fucks me off.
	I do not want the BBC to censor themselves based on these hypersensitive crybabies.
	I don't care about any of that.
	I'm not interested in how offended they are.
	In fact, I want them to be offended.
	That's my comedy.
	I find that highly amusing.
	So, you know, I'm not paying for people to sit there and censor the content they're putting out and tell me that the content that I want to see is offensive.
	Fuck their offense.
	I just don't care.
	There's a video on YouTube.
	I can't recall the name, but this is what happened in it, right?
	It was a clip from Question Time, right?
	You know, David Dimbleby, right?
	And Harriet Harmon is sitting next to him.
	Oh, God, God.
	And then somebody brings up an issue, right?
	That obviously she didn't want to talk about.
	And just as Dimbleby was like, right, okay, Harriet Harmon put a hand over, tapped his arm, and went, no.
	And he didn't talk about it.
	And it was like, whoa, what the fuck?
	What the fuck?
	Who's in control of the BBC here?
	Is it the government?
	Because she actually went as if, no, no, no, no, as if to say, no, no, we're not talking about that.
	Seriously?
	And it's like, I need to try and find a video.
	I don't know.
	It's on question time.
	Harriet Harmon was basically telling him it was the way she'd done it.
	It just made it look like, no, no, no, no, we're not going to talk about that.
	No, no.
	You know, and it was fucking serious.
	If anyone can find that, I would like to see that.
	I seen it on YouTube a few years ago.
	I'm almost still there.
	It's about five seconds long or something.
	You know, sorry, anyway, but that is unreal, man.
	But I think it's run by the government.
	I do believe the BBC for years has been a government propaganda machine.
	It is.
	It fucking is, man.
	Oh, it absolutely is.
	The thing that did it for me, right?
	Do you remember when Gaddafi was currently in the process of being overthrown by our military?
	And one of the there was a BBC reporter somewhere in Libya, I can't remember where it was.
	But basically, Gaddafi and his Senate had agreed because Gaddafi had tried to push through a bill where every Libyan would get £250 from Libya's oil wealth.
	And Gaddafi, being a complete dictator, had actually been blocked several times by his own Senate and Parliament, whatever they call it.
	And I'm thinking, well, that's an interesting autocrat there that can be blocked by his own parliament.
	But because of all the unrest, people were getting pissed off.
	So they had finally agreed to it.
	And the BBC guy, he was filming a long line of people who looked quite happy and jolly.
	They were just like, yeah, the camera, you know, pulling stupid faces.
	And the guy was like, here is a queue of people lining up around the block to get £250 of Libya's oil wealth.
	What you can't see out of shot is another queue of people lining up for bread.
	They asked us not to film them.
	And I'm thinking, bullshit.
	Is there a queue of people lining up for a loaf of bread?
	And a queue of people lining up for 250 quid.
	And the people that read like, no, don't film us.
	It makes us look undignified.
	You'd be like, no, please pay attention.
	Look, we can't get the money for whatever reason.
	We are desperate.
	We are squalid.
	We want the world to know.
	It was just complete bullshit.
	I just, no, that was the day where I was just like, fuck you, BBP.
	You know, I don't know how stupid you think I fucking am, but fuck you.
	No, they definitely think that the majority of the population are stupid.
	But to be fair, the majority of the population are fucking stupid, don't they?
	Well, that is true, isn't it?
	They are actually dumb as all shit.
	Right, I've got a video.
	I'm not sure if we can play it over the stream, but I'm going to try just because I think it worked before, didn't it?
	So I'm going to do a screen share.
	I haven't watched it either, but it really, just the title made me think, well, this is something that we'll have to watch.
	Do gender toys impact domestic violence later on in life?
	And again, this is something from Australia, I think.
	So get on, you Australia.
	You're looking dumb as fucking a bag of spanners.
	I feel sorry for Australians, I really do.
	Can you hear that?
	Yes.
	But it's low back in here.
	OK, I'll try and...
	Can. Can. Can.
	All right, I...
	And these are words.
	It does lead to a problem of stereotyping because when you get toys like Action Man and fucking Hey Man, women expect men to be tall and muscular.
	So it makes it because I'm depressed because we're all fucking big babies.
	Yeah, men are just boys are looking at that going, I'm never going to look like that.
	I can't live up to those standards.
	This toy's making me feel insecure.
	Fucking, honestly.
	Let's go hard.
	The Australian campaign against gender-specific toys was started by parents' groups saying unlimited.
	Their website points to American research showing strongly gender-type toys appear to be less supportive of optimal development in children compared to neutral or moderately gendered toys.
	Optimal development in children.
	What does that mean?
	I mean, how do you quantify that?
	How do you qualify?
	What is optimal?
	It depends what your goal is.
	What are they doing, right?
	Are they going to say, are they going to like female prisons and male prisons and getting specific criminals and then going, right?
	What toys did you have when you were seven?
	Is this what they're doing?
	You know, I can only imagine.
	I still understand this.
	They haven't provided their sources.
	They haven't provided anything else other than this annoying video.
	It's only like, of course, you know, why would they provide their sources?
	You know, you might be able to unravel their bulls**t.
	Exactly.
	How does it work?
	How does it work?
	I just, although there was that time, oh no, I suppose they've got a point because remember when Margaret Thatcher said, oh, fuck this, I can't do this anymore because I had Barbie when I was eight.
	Fucking hell.
	What the fuck is wrong with these fucking lunatics, man?
	Honestly, they are just, but it's all weasel words.
	Everything is like a can maybe possibly might do.
	And it's just like, yeah, well, if it might possibly maybe do this, but we can't be sure.
	Who cares?
	You know, get me some conclusive research.
	And even then, I doubt you can, you know.
	Bullshit.
	Just in fact, that's probably that is probably a statement that does have some truth to it in a sort of really insane way because what they consider gender equality is absolute parity.
	They're not talking about legal equality, which is something women have, and then freedom of choice, which, you know, I think women should be free to choose whichever life path it is they want.
	And a lot of women do tend to choose the life of being a homemaker, which I think is completely legitimate because I really think kids need stable family lives, you know, and women seem to enjoy doing the homemaking more than men do, and they seem to be better suited for it.
	Because one of the things I've had, you always hear about like the stay-at-home dad, and then you'll read like something on the Huffington Post where a woman's like, you know, I agreed to be the high-earning breadwinner in our family, and my husband stays at home and looks after the kids.
	And now I find myself resenting my husband and not finding him attractive.
	And it's like, oh, really?
	It's not like, you know, hundreds of thousands of years of evolution have prepared you to expect a strong masculine breadwinner to come home with a lump of mammoth to feed you in the family.
	It's nothing to do with that.
	It's nothing to that.
	Feminism knows best.
	It really knows best.
	I do feel sorry for the children of these people, you know, because imagine you were a little girl, right?
	And you genuinely did want the Barbie dream house and you wanted the Ken doll and all that.
	And that's what you like to play with.
	You wanted my little pony.
	That's what you liked.
	And your mum was like, no, that will stop you from getting promoted or something.
	How much fun?
	How much fun would you have?
	It's just soaked the fun out of everything, man.
	And vice versa.
	I mean, when I was a kid, I loved playing with Action Man.
	I had Action Man Skeletor.
	I had the cat he rides around on.
	I can't remember.
	But, you know, I used to love all that stuff.
	You know, it was Thundercats.
	She.
	Thundercats as well.
	Fucking awesome.
	If I was told as a kid, well, you know, these are masculine power fantasies, you see, and you're not allowed these anymore because they lead you into being a stereotypical man.
	I'd be like, well, I don't care.
	They were fun.
	Or even worse.
	Even worse, playing with Skeletor and He-Man, and then your mum coming along and going, oh, that's going to encourage you to be violent towards women.
	Give it in.
	Oh, God.
	No, I want to be violent towards women.
	Fucking you.
	Jesus.
	Yeah, I'm starting to buy into your conspiracy theory.
	The feminists are having a lot of people.
	I'll talk about that.
	I'll talk about that later.
	I'll put that out to people after this video.
	I'll put that out to people and see what they say, right?
	Yeah.
	We unfortunately also know that gender inequality is one of the drivers of domestic violence.
	Bollocks!
	Oh, God.
	It's always the fucking same.
	I can just imagine it.
	I can just picture it.
	You know, you've got Australian man and woman, and the Australian woman's like, you know, you you don't satisfy me, all this sort of stuff.
	And he he's, you know, he's getting so so pressured, so up and he's like, you know what, right?
	Because you don't earn as much money as me, I'm going to punch you in the face, just square in the face, right?
	Like bam.
	And she's just like, fuck, this gender inequality has come back to bite me again.
	Just oh, sorry, it fucks me off.
	Just lippy man.
	Let's just complain about everything.
	Oh, gender pay.
	Oh, there it is.
	Had to come up, didn't it?
	Had to come up.
	Always has to come up.
	Excuse me, feminists, is there any chance you could tell me when the next bus is due?
	I get paid less than you.
	Oh, for fuck's suspicion.
	Yeah.
	And then you've got Jessica Valenti saying, well, why don't we just pay men less?
	Because that's illegal.
	She's another one.
	She goes along on a theory.
	Think of everything she's ever said.
	Oh, would not surprise me, but it's only a minute left of this.
	Children's toy marketing isn't entirely at fault.
	I think the more you reinforce gender divide, and there's evidence for this, the more likely it is that you will have violence against women and gender pay gaps.
	Well, I would like to see any of the evidence for this.
	Any of it at all.
	Just a study.
	You could tell me the name of the study and I will find it myself.
	I know the evidence, right?
	See, that woman that was just speaking there, what she does is she says to men, right, that, hey, see those toys, they lead to domestic violence.
	And the man goes, fucking slap, stop talking shit.
	And she thinks, because you're troubled, he needed a good slap.
	Yeah, fuck it.
	This shit pisses me off.
	It's just completely unsubstantiated by looks.
	You know, none of this is proven.
	And they just say, well, there is evidence.
	So go on then.
	You know, come on, I'm waiting.
	I'm always open to evidence for Christ's sake.
	Let boys be boys, like girls be girls.
	That's always been my philosophy.
	That's a fine philosophy.
	Let kids be what they are, you know.
	Put under the tree this year is a simple decision for independence MP Bob Cather.
	All of the presidents I've gotta do with all the boys get guns and all the girls get dolls.
	Even though they're not.
	Yes, yes, but but did the girls want those dolls?
	Yeah, that's the difference.
	And the boys want the guns.
	You know, the girls wanted the dolls, they got what they wanted.
	Oh, imagine that.
	People being happy and feminists not.
	That's awful.
	That's oppression, probably.
	That is just that's misogynistic, if ever I've heard it.
	Boy marketing parents and manufacturers would do well to be a little more imaginative when it comes to gift giving children.
	Don't force them into stereotypes because we spend a lot of time afterwards trying to disentangle the mess we've made by forcing girls into being princesses and boys and big heroes.
	You, you spend a lot of time because you are a feminist and you hate gender.
	That's the issue.
	And don't don't be more creative with your gift giving.
	Yes, get kids presents they don't want.
	That's what you should do.
	Get them presents they don't want to have because of your political agenda and your ideology.
	That is perfect.
	That's not going to ruin anyone's Christmas.
	It's ironic.
	It's ironic that the stereotypical feminist who stereotypically acts like a stereotypical feminist says, hey, you should avoid stereotypes.
	Take your own fucking advice, you stupid clown.
	Fuck's sake, man.
	Unreal, but yeah, no, no, absolutely.
	It really is.
	Right, do you want to go through your next one while I grab a cup of tea?
	I'll just talk about my theory.
	I already told you earlier, so I'll just tell everybody listening, right?
	Theory I have about feminists, right?
	Yeah, I'll be back.
	Okay, no problems.
	Well, it was just simply listen to that pile of shit that they just said there, right?
	Which is clearly a pile of pish.
	And then you think about Schutzdorn, think about the Gamergate situation, think about Jessica Valente and anything she's ever said.
	Think about Anita Sarkasian's tweets.
	Think about the woman who got PTSD from Twitter.
	Think about the woman walking 10 hours in New York and people telling her she's beautiful and tells that that's harassment, right?
	Think about all of these things, right?
	Obviously, it's all bullshit, right?
	That's not a real case of discrimination and oppression, right?
	My theory is that these feminists are actually trying to get men to hate women so that they then get justification for their cause.
	Because right now, they don't have it because they're the most privileged demographic on earth.
	It's very difficult to refute that.
	And it's very difficult to convince people that you're a victim or oppressed when you're actually part of the most privileged demographic.
	So I think they're actually working to get men to hate women.
	And the reason I say that, right, is like I say, the PTSD on Twitter, right?
	At first, the average guy, right, who doesn't look into feminism, doesn't look into men's rights or anything like that, right?
	The average guy sees that story and goes, my God, that woman is an idiot.
	And then that same guy sees a story about a woman walking 10 hours getting called beautiful and then saying it's harassment.
	Then goes, my God, that woman's a fucking idiot.
	And then he sees a woman complaining about a shirt.
	And then eventually that man starts to go, my God, women are fucking idiots.
	And they're really unlikable.
	I really cannot like those people.
	They're so horrible, idiotic.
	And take feminist frequencies tweets, right?
	Something bad happens, like a comet hits the earth.
	Well, that was because of toxic masculinity, and we all know it.
	So that's the narrative that gets pushed.
	And guys seeing this shit, you know, as I say, not people who actually study feminism and that, but just your average Joe, he's going to think to himself, my God, man, women are fucking idiots.
	And then eventually he's not going to like them.
	Then feminists have got a case.
	Because then they can say, look, men don't like women.
	I fucking wonder why.
	God's sake, man.
	But anyway, that's my theory.
	What do you think?
	Do you think their whole agenda is basically to not for we know it's not for equal rights?
	We know that's not the agenda.
	But when I think of everything that they do and I think, right, if that was their agenda, that actually makes sense.
	Jessica Valenti saying, pay men less than women.
	Now, equality, that doesn't make sense.
	Fairness, what's right, doesn't make sense.
	Trying to get men to hate women.
	Well, that makes sense.
	I can see why she's doing that now.
	It makes sense to me.
	And when you see everything that they're saying, It's like, I don't know, and almost every day there's something else, you know.
	Every day, something else new leads to violence against women and men being rapists and toxic masculinity.
	It's just that that's my theory anyway, you know.
	And then you've got the whole Zoe Quinn thing.
	Got loads of people in the probably thousands developing games, and they go to these people.
	Could you review my game, please?
	But she went to those people and said, I survived, wear game in hand, and then claims the industry hates women.
	And so, why would you say that?
	They don't like corruption.
	It's pretty clear.
	Maybe they're saying it because they want men.
	Mostly, most gamers are men.
	Real gamers, not fucking badu piss.
	They just want men to hate women.
	And that's the reason I mentioned the PTSD one, right?
	Was because when that woman put that out, she didn't just say Twitter gave me PTSD.
	She said, Twitter gave me PTSD, which is just the same as what soldiers go through in a war zone.
	Who are mostly soldiers?
	Men are mostly soldiers.
	Most soldiers are men.
	Most soldiers with PSD, men.
	She's having a goat men in order to make them angry at women.
	And then they've got a justification for the corrupt, vile, disgusting cause.
	Can you hear me?
	Oh, yeah.
	Yes, I can hear you.
	Just checking.
	Yeah, just the chat.
	Sorry, the ban on the block in the chat doesn't seem to be working.
	I'm trying to block Ben Garrison.
	I guess he's got nothing better to do.
	So I'm trying.
	Because it's pissing everyone off in the chat, you know.
	No, but if anybody's getting pissed off in the chat with that person doing that, don't just let them.
	You've got to understand that I don't know where this Ben Garrison is, but they are wasting their life literally at this moment.
	You should be laughing at them.
	That person is sitting on a computer copy and paste, copy, paste, paste, paste.
	These rude wasting his life.
	What the fuck?
	Go and have a wank.
	Jesus.
	Well, I've just gone to his channel on YouTube and blocked it, so hopefully that'll work.
	But yeah, if you know, fuck him, it's his life he's wasting.
	If he wants to put his time writing cock, and he's not even writing the full word, you're missing the bottom bit out.
	You're an amateur.
	It's a fucking amateur.
	I think I've got rid of him.
	But you would think, I mean, I can't imagine what must be going through.
	But right, okay, I really hate.
	I mean, you know, social justice feminism.
	I wouldn't go to a feminist podcast and then just sit there spamming the chat in a feminist podcast.
	I'd just be like, you know, just, I have got better things to do.
	I think that's more likely.
	I'm not big on this, but I'm guessing that that's more likely anti-gamergate than feminist.
	Just saying.
	Without a doubt.
	Without a doubt.
	I think right now, right, you're more well known with the Gamergate than the feminism thing at the moment.
	And I think that that's anti-Gamergate.
	It's probably that.
	Was that McIntosh?
	Is that his name?
	McIntosh?
	Oh, Jonathan McIntosh, yeah.
	That's probably him.
	And what I mean is it'll be a meet up like that, like a puppet, right?
	Josh, George, type that.
	Naughty boy, you've made a message.
	Just to Diogenes of Cinepe.
	David Draymond from Disturbed is apparently posting in favour of Game Agate, which I heard of, but I don't know anything about it.
	Yeah, the band Disturbed.
	To see the song Stricken.
	Oh, it's fucking brilliant.
	Yeah, I like Disturbed.
	I've been a fan of stuff for years.
	That's the only song I know of theirs, by the way, but it's fucking brilliant.
	If anyone wants to tweet him and get him to come on my podcast at some point, then do ask him to, because I would love to talk to him about it.
	I absolutely would love to talk to him about it and see what his opinion is.
	Just so it can be made public.
	But yeah, so right, have you got another one?
	The last one was mine, so this is from the Independent, right?
	This is from the Independent.
	Let me just a quick link here.
	This is one people probably already know about, but let's go to it anyway.
	It's breastfeeding mothers stage mass nursing outside Clarity's after hotel told women to cover herself with ridiculous shroud.
	Oh my goodness, how could they do this to a woman?
	A woman as well.
	Keep leave at the nerve.
	Of all people.
	Of all people.
	Right, got it up now.
	So you can see that.
	Yeah.
	I think it's crashed on my bloody thing.
	What the hell is this?
	I'm in the wrong page.
	Sorry, it's crashed on me.
	Oh, I've got a back sorry.
	I've got a back.
	Aye.
	Right here stage, the mass breastfeeding protest outside a hotel in London after it told her mother to cover herself with an oversized napkin.
	The mass nursing was coordinated by some mob to apologise and to get into apologise and change its policy.
	She was labelled a tramp.
	No, no specific for public breastfeeding.
	We are here today because Clarity's has yet to issue an apology.
	Well, who labelled her a tramp?
	Someone else that doesn't believe Clarity's sake?
	Someone that is entitled to an opinion?
	It has yet to change legal.
	Illegal?
	This is one of these things that keeps coming.
	It keeps coming up on women's rights news and I keep attacking them for it as well.
	There's certain times when you don't want it to be happening.
	Oh no, this is also.
	This is amazing, right?
	The little picture, that's what breasts are for, stupid.
	That's brilliant because my ass is for shitting.
	So if I walk into Clarity's and just drop my kex and take a nice big dump on their fucking in the carpet, they're all like, excuse me, could you do this to us?
	But like, that's what asses are for.
	Don't get all offended, for Christ's sake.
	I have to say, though.
	It's fucking pathetic.
	They're not asking what Clarity said.
	Of course we allow women to breastfeed.
	We just ask them to be discreet now.
	I don't see anything wrong with that.
	I mean...
	Ah, that's because you have standards.
	That's the problem.
	Think about the situation.
	You know, you're in a restaurant.
	There's a couple over here.
	The man's about to propose.
	There's a couple over here.
	It's the first a family, it's the first time they've been out in years.
	They've scraped together all their money.
	Proud moment for them all.
	And then there's a reuniting over the side, you know.
	And they're all trying with their business.
	I wanted to open in the box and all that.
	Will you?
	Whee!
	Whee!
	What the fuck is that noise?
	You know, baby crying, and then you've got fucking the family over here, you know.
	Hey, look at us, we're all getting together for a meal.
	This is the first time we've been out in years.
	Let's enjoy this.
	Oh, here we go.
	Here's the meat.
	What the fuck is that smell?
	Jesus.
	Oh, nappy.
	Phone happy.
	I mean, a baby enter a restaurant.
	How is it so difficult, man?
	You don't need to do that.
	It's a complete lack of respect for other people.
	And, you know, you know what pisses me off most about this, right?
	Look at these pictures.
	This is pissing me off because, I mean, I imagine that a lot of these women are probably on benefits.
	You know, it's the middle of the day.
	They've all traveled there to get, you know, who's paying, yeah, or the husband's wife.
	Who's paying you to sit there with you know, breastfeeding your kids as some sort of quote-unquote protest?
	Just fuck off, you know.
	I'm not considerate of other people.
	I'm no expert on it, but I have a son, he was breastfed for the first six months, right?
	And at no point was there ever a situation where, oh shit, he needs to be fed, and I'm conveniently in the middle of a very busy shopping centre.
	I mean, here's what I think, right?
	And I know lots of women will say, oh my god, you just hate women, right?
	I think a lot of women do it for attention because there is no reason in this day and age to be caught short, right?
	You can use formula for the one-off occasion where you're caught short.
	How often does it happen, though?
	Because the thing with children, with babies, is you know when you get used to the time when they're going to be fed, and you know, you plan ahead.
	These people don't want to plan ahead, it's simple as that.
	And to go into the middle of a restaurant where everyone else is eating and there's a baby on your tip, you know, it can put other people off.
	How can people not be considerate, man?
	God.
	Well, this article just gets even better, right?
	This is excellent.
	Businesses may ask mothers to perhaps sit in a corner.
	He suggested, Nigel Farage suggested this, which obviously means he's a racist and a sexist now.
	And a number 10 spokeswoman said, the Prime Minister shares the view of the NHS, which is that breastfeeding is completely natural and it is totally unacceptable for any woman to be made to feel uncomfortable.
	Oh, God forbid.
	God forbid a woman feels uncomfortable.
	Made to feel uncomfortable.
	I mean, it's not like this is all about consent.
	I mean, you have to consent to feel uncomfortable.
	And if you're feeling uncomfortable, maybe that means you're doing something that lots of other people find inappropriate or impolite.
	You know, no one's saying it's wrong to breastfeed.
	No one's saying that.
	Just like no one's saying it's wrong to take a dump.
	But there is a time and a place for it.
	And it's not always in public in restaurants when other people are eating.
	I mean, come on, you selfish bitches.
	You know, just for five seconds, think of someone other than yourself.
	Yeah, but I feel slightly uncomfortable.
	Yes, I'm sure you do, but you are making everyone else feel uncomfortable now.
	So why don't you just, you know, just leave or go to the corner or go to the just or just put a napkin over.
	Just something.
	Just a little deference to other people.
	It's inconsiderate.
	It's not really the sight.
	You can avoid the sight.
	It's the noise.
	You know, and remember, these people are trying to eat.
	And remember, Clarity's is expensive.
	A lot of people who go there would probably save up a lot of money to go there.
	Yeah, look at these women.
	There's no way these women can afford to go to Clarity's, is there?
	Fucking plebs.
	So yeah, another protester said, we're encouraged from the minute our children are born to breastfeed them, but then there's no one for us to do so in comfort.
	Is breastfeeding okay because it's best for the baby or is it just best for the baby behind closed doors?
	Just there's loads of spaces to do it.
	There's loads of spaces to do it.
	Why does it have to be in the restaurant?
	Why couldn't it just be anywhere else?
	And again, the spokesperson clarity is, of course, we allow them to breastfeed.
	We just ask them to be discreet.
	No, sorry, that's too much.
	We have got Tracy Orms here, just, you know, stig of the dump, who wants to get her tips out and have a suckling infant in the middle of a fancy restaurant.
	Thank you.
	Think about it, Mr. Standards.
	There are no standards.
	But think about it as well, right?
	Okay, so she's caught short and the baby's hungry and she has to do it, right?
	Well, sometimes babies unexpectedly have a fucking big stinking shit.
	Sometimes they have a massive puke, you know.
	This could have happened in the restaurant.
	That's what I mean, that's why people, a lot of people don't like babies, not children, but babies in the restaurant.
	Because if they puke, all of a sudden it's like, right, I'm done with my pasta.
	You know what I mean?
	And you don't want to eat it.
	And again, it's not that anyone's saying there's anything wrong with breastfeeding or that you shouldn't breastfeed in public.
	It's just have some fucking decency and consideration for others.
	Just for five minutes.
	They should put a sign up on the door.
	Nothing to do with breastfeeding, right?
	But just put a sign up saying no attention seeking.
	They won't like it.
	They don't want to eat that.
	So I've got one here that I'm just going to load up because I can't remember exactly what it was now.
	Oh yeah, that was it.
	This was a Gamergate one.
	So just so everyone else knows, how caught up are you on Gamergate and whatnot?
	Me?
	Yeah.
	Well, I'm not really into the Gamergate thing.
	It's got to the point now where on my YouTube video feed, almost every second or third video is about Gamergate.
	You know, it's became the kind of thing that people want to talk about and they've all got an opinion on.
	I've just never been really and to be great.
	I said to you a while ago that from the very start I have never understood why anybody listens to a person that is paid to give an opinion about something.
	I just don't understand that.
	I understand being annoyed at the corruption, but the Brianna Wu thing, I think she's saying, I know some of that.
	Is the thing you're going to show all Gamergate has done is ruined people's lives?
	Is that the one?
	No, no.
	Zoe Quinn would.
	I was thinking maybe you've not found that, but that's okay.
	But no, I know what's going on and I just personally don't really get involved.
	No, that's completely understandable.
	I'm on Gamergate side, by the way.
	But I just don't want to party in it, you know?
	No, no, I completely understand.
	And I think that there are literally tens of thousands of people like that.
	I think that a lot of people are just like, you know what, just fuck him.
	I don't go to Kotaku or wherever, all these places anyway.
	I mean, but for me, it's not just self-interest either.
	I'm developing a video game.
	I want to have relatively unbiased coverage, which would be nice.
	But for me, I'm just absolutely sick of these fucking social justice worries, the goddamn feminist ideologues who are just obsessed with pushing their goddamn genitalia into everything.
	And then the beta mangas who are just like, well, can we not talk about that woman's vagina?
	It's like, no, we're trying to talk about video games.
	Yeah, but vaginas.
	Shut up, you little pussies.
	I know you never get to see one.
	I know you know nothing about vaginas other than what you see on the internet.
	But seriously, for those of us who are actually normal men in the real world, we get enough of that anyway.
	So we want to keep it out of fucking what we're doing.
	But anyway, so this isn't necessarily like Important, but it's just one of those, it's just one of those things that's just fucking stupid.
	Son of a geek in a world of gender-exclusive esports, sexist cosplay shaming, and hashtag gamergate.
	How can a nerd mum protect her son from being an becoming a misogynistic asshole?
	Well, that is a fucking good question.
	But I love how desperate this whole thing is to portray that she is genuinely a geek.
	I mean, you know, look at this, look at the Star Wars moon there and stuff like this.
	Oh, yeah, you don't look like you're trying too hard, you know.
	So she says, as I'm writing this, I'm eight months pregnant with my first child, and it's a boy, huzzah, which puts her head and shoulders above most, you know, a lot of feminists who are like, if I'm if I realize I'm having a boy, I'm going to get aborted.
	So she's not an awful person, which is great, you know.
	But funnily enough, I was convinced I was having a girl.
	Why would you be convinced you're having a girl?
	It's, you know, it's not like you're a gender ideologue who's obsessed with the female gender.
	And was mentally preparing to raise the most kick-ass, geeky girl imaginable.
	Just raise the girl as she wants to be raised.
	Anyway, right.
	Her room would be vintage sci-fi fixed with all the geeky baby gear I could get my hands on.
	I would empower her to stand up for her rights and fight the impending battles that come with being a woman.
	What fucking battles?
	What rights don't you have?
	You're on the women feminists are in newspapers everywhere all the time talking about feminism.
	They're doing petitions online.
	They're in governments.
	They're running businesses.
	Well, they might not be running businesses because that requires merit.
	But what battles?
	I'm still waiting for a feminist to tell me what rights in the Western world, just one, just one right in the Western world, that women don't have that men do have.
	What is that?
	The right to walk down the street without feeling afraid.
	A woman said that to me once, right?
	She said, because I asked her that, I said, well, tell me what right you don't have.
	Well, I don't have the right to walk down or the privilege, unlike men.
	And I said, I stay in the east end of Glasgow, sweetheart.
	Try again.
	She was like, okay.
	I lived in Coventry.
	Walking the street.
	I went to Coventry for two years, and my house was on the front page of the local newspaper because there was a fucking gang shooting outside.
	Some guy got shot.
	And it was just like, right, okay, you know, nothing to do with gender, everything to do with psychos.
	I mean, me and you could walk right through Ferguson right now, just whistling, and we'd be fine.
	Pair of white guys, of course, we'd be fine.
	Totally safe.
	Totally safe.
	There would never be an issue.
	I mean, hell, you know, we wouldn't even be scared at all.
	Not even a little bit.
	I mean, it'd be the same if we went to like South Africa or the Congo or something.
	We'd walk around knowing that everything was going to be just great.
	They'd be like, oh, excuse me, you're a white man, aren't you?
	Yeah.
	Would you like to come this way, Still?
	We've got a limousine waiting for you, in fact.
	That would be wonderful.
	Thank you, Jeeves.
	But granted, she might not take to my geekiness, and that's okay.
	But that's how I was raised.
	So naturally, it's going to influence my parenting style.
	I know no way.
	Then, a few weeks after we started, after starting our planning, I assume she's got a husband or a boyfriend.
	The ultrasound technician told my husband, oh, she does have a husband, that we weren't having a girl.
	It made that woman, husband.
	That's true.
	But, you know, she was told she wasn't having a girl.
	So that must have really destroyed her world, really.
	And all her worries about how to protect her daughter from sexism vanished.
	A boy, okay.
	Well, I guess that will make things easier.
	At least we didn't need to change our nursery theme, which is fine, you know.
	That sense of ease did not last long.
	Of course, it didn't.
	If there's one thing feminists can't be, it's set at ease.
	You know, they're not happy unless they're worrying about something.
	Because as it happens, my pregnancy coincided with a particularly vitriolic gender war in my community.
	Now, again, I don't know how much you know about this, but Gamergate is most certainly not a gender war.
	It doesn't really mean to do with gender at all.
	The only thing that it's got to do with gender is the anti-Gamergate mob keep fucking mentioning gender all the fucking time because they're fucking obsessed with it.
	Yeah, and then you know, the thousands of women who support Gamergate are like, look, shut up.
	Just shut up.
	Just shut up.
	They don't take evidence.
	All those thousands of women, clearly existing photographic evidence.
	They're on the social networks telling them that no, you don't fucking speak for me.
	I'm a woman.
	And they still don't see the fucking evidence that's right in front of them.
	I don't want to see it.
	It's worse than that.
	It's worse than that.
	They literally say that these women don't exist.
	And the women who own their own Twitter accounts, they're all sock puppet accounts of men.
	Is it us we make up on?
	Exactly.
	That's really convincing sock puppet accounts.
	And that's honestly, they literally deny the existence of these women.
	It's like, wow, that's kind of misogynist, isn't it?
	I mean, yeah.
	But it all started with the game.
	So she goes on, what?
	Okay.
	In July, organizers of a tournament featuring online card game Hearthstone announced that women would not be allowed to compete.
	Did they?
	Did they actually do this?
	I haven't read through this article properly.
	Maybe there's a specific tournament.
	Maybe there was a women's tournament.
	There was a men's tournament.
	There was a kids' tournament.
	There was an elderly tournament.
	And they tried to enter the men's, you know, and they were told, no, no, no, no, women can't go to this one.
	There's the women on over there.
	Maybe it was some special event like that.
	No, I don't know.
	I can only imagine.
	I've never heard of this.
	And I hope someone in the chat can fill me in on this because seriously, that sounds like the most bullshit I've ever heard.
	I cannot imagine Blizzard, who are the people who make Hearthstone, turning around and saying, you know what, this tournament isn't for women.
	Just women, why don't you stay at home and bake some cookies or something?
	That would be suicidal.
	The feminists would come down on them like a ton of bricks.
	Definitely.
	I just can't believe it.
	And no, it's no link, no evidence, no proof.
	Nothing like that.
	But so, yeah, not only are the prizes impressive, $250,000, but the audience and fandom is huge to the point that some universities now recognize video gaming is a vast sport.
	So to exclude women from these tournaments is no small matter.
	Yeah, but you haven't proven that it's a real matter either.
	But the organizer, the Finnish Esports Federation, cited the regulations put forth by the International Esports Federation, which didn't allow women to compete with men.
	Right, so it's exactly as you seem to have seen it.
	Yeah, it's a men's tournament and a women's tournament.
	I assume that's the case.
	I'm looking forward to getting more information about that.
	But the reaction from fans and players was loud and direct.
	Unsurprisingly, they responded quickly, opening tournaments to all genders.
	So, I mean, that was probably something like something that a carryover from real-life sports, where men and women obviously cannot actually compete in the same sports.
	There is some where they should be allowed, like darts and snooker.
	I think they should be allowed to compete with each other in there.
	Formula one, they should be allowed to compete with each other in that.
	But not really physical, you know, sports.
	Yeah, yeah, not like boxing or something.
	But that's the thing.
	I think this is just like a convention that's carried over from real-world sports.
	I guess they probably didn't do that.
	But as soon as someone complained, they were like, okay, they responded quickly and opened the tournament to all genders, which is wonderful.
	I think that's great.
	So you would think that that would have appeased me.
	You know what, love?
	I wouldn't.
	I absolutely wouldn't.
	I think that's not good enough.
	But I couldn't get past all the online commentary.
	I read too many remarks defending ISF's original rule and expressing anger over its amendment, which created two types of tournaments: some open to all and some for women only.
	Holy shit, no wonder they're pissed off.
	Now they still have the women-only tournaments, and now they have the mixed-gender tournament.
	So they can win two tournaments then, but men can only win one.
	You see?
	It seems that way, doesn't it?
	And for example, one commenter on the GameSpot website accused the new rule of inflicting absolutely disgusting sexism against men, which it does.
	You know, it prevents men from entering the women-only tournament, but allows women to enter the men-only tournament.
	So that is obviously sexual.
	That reminds me that there's an author's award, it might be in Britain, and it's like author of the year or something, and there's a female author of the year award as well, so that a woman can win both awards.
	You know what I mean?
	It appears that way.
	It appears that way.
	So I'm just blocking Ben Garrison again.
	I don't know who this person is.
	They're going to keep coming back.
	They're going to keep coming back.
	They are.
	They are.
	Sorry, guys.
	I don't know who you are.
	I don't know what the beef with me is.
	They knew you were going to be on live.
	They've prepared for it.
	It's definitely anti-gamer gate.
	Definitely anti-gamer gate.
	I'm telling you.
	I'm sure it is.
	I'm sure it is.
	And it won't be a man, by the way.
	Oh, probably not.
	Probably not.
	Or maybe it's an incredible beta faggot, you know.
	But yeah, so it was fine before.
	Men and women have their own little playground, but now it's some sort of PC abomination, which is, you know, it's a fair comment, I think.
	You know, it was fine before.
	Men had their own thing, women have their own thing, and now it's, you know, after feminists got hysterical about it, now men don't have their own thing, which is how feminists like it.
	If men have their own space, feminists become terribly afraid that suddenly men are going to go there, congregate, and get this idea in their head that maybe they should commit some sort of gendered genocide against women and just, you know, just overrun everywhere and just, you know, take women into slavery and start whipping them and forcing them down the mines or something.
	I don't know what they think is going to happen if men have their own spaces, but I can only assume that that is the case.
	It's similar to the Wimbledon thing, where the way these women can win two tournaments, right?
	In Wimbledon, because women play fewer games, they can actually win the singles and the doubles and the mixed doubles.
	They've got lots more energy.
	Whereas the men have to play best of five, you know?
	Yeah, and the women only play best of three, don't they?
	They can make more money because they're getting the same money, remember?
	They get the same money.
	So they're doing less work.
	They're getting a lot more money than the male winner of Wimbledon.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Tell me that's not a fucking double standard.
	You know what I mean?
	But the thing is, this commentary that now it is sexist against men because, I mean, I don't know why they still run a women-only tournament.
	Why would they need to run that if there is a co-ed tournament?
	You would think there would be no need for it.
	It's so that they've got women on the same place or something.
	No, no, it's so a woman can win the tournament because let's be fair.
	It's going to be a man who wins this tournament.
	It's going to be.
	Unless farm bills, the game they choose to.
	But if it was, men would be more dedicated to winning.
	But anyway, the commentary failed to recognize that women have been tormented and alienated for so long that many women would feel unwelcome and unsafe in co-ed tournaments.
	Holy fucking shit.
	Who cares if you feel what you feel?
	Who cares what you feel?
	Why do you think people care what you feel?
	They would feel.
	They absolutely would feel because they've been tormented and alienated for so long.
	Tormented.
	tormented who is just come on Can you substantiate that bullshit?
	And they'd feel unsafe in co-ed tournaments.
	I mean, they'd be sat there thinking, my God, I'm surrounded by men and women competing in a tournament.
	I think I'm going to be raped and murdered.
	I think I'm going to get killed here.
	This isn't safe.
	I need to call the police.
	And the arguments were dumbfounding.
	I mean, they're dumbfounding, obviously.
	Is this the kind of community I'm so eagerly preparing to raise my son in?
	Well, a community that has a co-ed tournament and a woman's tournament.
	Why don't you raise them in your home?
	God bless.
	But a community where boys are taught that women cannot compete on an intellectual level with men.
	They're taught that by men.
	Yeah, but is this on an intellectual level?
	I think it's playing games.
	Is that intellectual, or is it no reflexes?
	I think it's like you said, determination has all got a lot to do with it.
	Men are more determined to win than women are.
	It's as simple as that.
	It really is that simple.
	They generally are.
	I mean, you do get women who get the occasional woman who is very, very driven, you know, and she's very into what she does.
	And she understands that there are no half-measures, you know, that results speak for themselves.
	And it's that volleyball phrase in the iron doesn't lie.
	It's that.
	You put the work in and you get the results.
	Exactly.
	A lot of women make excuses because they're allowed to make excuses.
	But thankfully, there are some who don't, you know, thank God.
	But they need to be allowed to.
	Yeah, they absolutely do.
	They need to start telling these idiot women who just want an easy ride.
	Look, shut up and do the work.
	You know, everyone's doing the work.
	You want to be treated like a man.
	Men do the work.
	So you need to do the work too.
	Stop making people dislike me with your stupid nonsense.
	That's what they should be doing.
	And that's the thing, isn't it?
	You know, if women as a stereotype were, you know, they knuckled down, did the work, and they cracked on with it, men wouldn't have stereotypes about women looking for an easy way out or an easy ride on it because it would be inaccurate.
	You know, they'd be like, well, shit, you know, women seem to be fucking powering on.
	In fact, we need to work a bit harder because look at them, they're showing us up.
	But she goes on to say, it's difficult for me to believe that all these male gamers lacked female role models or peers who could disprove their misguided beliefs.
	What misguided beliefs?
	She has said, you know, like a community where boys are taught that women cannot compete on an intellectual level.
	No one has said that.
	No one has said that at all.
	And then she's like, well, we need to disprove these misguided beliefs.
	You made them up, you idiot.
	But yeah, there they were, blatantly defending sexism within the gaming community.
	No, they were attacking sexism.
	The sexism was against man.
	Fucking hell.
	So as she dealt with the joys and pains of pregnancy, the discouraging news kept rolling.
	For example, the artist of the new Wonder Woman comic came out saying he didn't want her to be a feminist, which is in itself obviously terrible.
	Cosplayers from San Diego were verbally attacked for rebuking sexual harassers by stating cosplay does not equal consent, which I'm sure that no one thinks it does.
	And most famously, a sexist movement called Gamergate emerged, trying to defame women in the gaming community.
	Holy fucking shit.
	I mean, yeah, that's what's getting that.
	I mean, I do think if you go to like Gamergate.me, that is literally the banner headline.
	We hate women and we want them out of our games.
	That's what they say.
	But they have to say that though.
	They have to say that because if they don't say it and they say anything else out with that, gullible people might actually think, oh, hang on, that's not the gamergate out.
	So they have to say it.
	They have to keep the gullible, you know?
	Well, they absolutely do.
	I mean, it's not like Gamergate for its official mascot has taken on, I thought they'd have a picture of it.
	They've taken on this mascot called Vivian James, who was designed by people on HM for the Fun Young Capitalists, who are a radical feminist group who are trying to get women into games.
	And what they basically did is say, look, we'll make the game if a woman designs it, and we'll have a competition.
	And the main sort of character that was designed for it was a woman.
	You know, it was a girl, like a girl wearing a purple and green shirt and a kind of like disaffected Generation X expression.
	She's awesome.
	Absolutely awesome.
	But that is the mascot the gamers created for themselves.
	Male and female gamers.
	It pisses me off when they say that this is some sort of sexism thing.
	It really does.
	So it all adds up to this fact.
	The community I've always held so close to my heart is failing us.
	Hang on.
	You have in no way shown you are part of a gaming community in any way.
	You've got no interest in it.
	You've never tried to do it.
	You've displayed nothing.
	Every new story seems to highlight how far we have yet to go towards gender equality.
	How much more equal can you get than having a man competition and a woman competition?
	That seems equal to me.
	But I can't help but think of these families of the offending geeks and wonder how they were raised.
	They were probably raised in egalitarian households.
	Do you see what they do there?
	Do you see this is what they do, right?
	And one breath she says, a community which I hold dear to my heart.
	And then in another breath, she says, those fucking geeks.
	Do you know what I mean?
	You're part of that community that you're calling geeks in a derogatory fashion?
	Yeah.
	And it's always the way.
	It's always the way they really want to be a part of this thing until someone offends them and then they hate them.
	And it's just like saying, come on, love.
	You just want to be cool.
	That's the thing.
	You want to be in with the in-crowd because you're a fucking sheep.
	But yeah, she says she's always been aware of sexism and misogyny within the geek community, of course.
	I mean, obviously, it's misogynistic.
	But my awareness stems from the fact that I'm a woman, the embattled.
	Women are embattled.
	But now, as I'm dealing with all the fears and uncertainties with parenthood, I've been thinking about my arriving son and re-examining things from a more masculine perspective.
	I believe.
	Yeah, I doubt she can, but no, no, let's pretend that she can.
	A daughter would need to know how to protect herself from sexism and fight injustice.
	A son does not require this protection.
	His privilege allows him to ignore injustice.
	The privilege of not having his own competition to fight, you know, to compete against other men in.
	The privilege of having no male-owned spaces.
	That's the sort of privilege men have.
	But sexism is still a threat to him, of course, in that he could very well become a perpetrator of it.
	And so, how can she protect him from being a perpetrator of sexism?
	Well, this keeps going on forever and ever and ever.
	And as you can imagine, she talks a lot of shit.
	This is brilliant.
	Using the Gamergate hashtag, people in the community have actually forced multiple women out of their homes via death threats, rape threats, and leaked personal information.
	Which it's total bullshit.
	None of these threats have been linked to GameGate.
	None of these threats even used the Gamergate hashtag.
	But not only that, people in Game Gate obviously, I mean, they've got their own harassment patrol where literally they've got hashtag harassment patrol where people literally bring it to their attention so they can report it to Twitter to get it banned.
	It's just it's so it's just the opposite of reality with these people.
	They have to lie and also ignore certain things, otherwise they don't have a case.
	That's why they don't mention the Gamergate crowd who are looking out for harassment and getting it banned.
	They don't want to hear it.
	They don't want to hear females playing games.
	They don't want to hear it.
	They ignore that.
	And then they say, it's all about sexism.
	They've got to lie, otherwise they don't have a case.
	This is why they're full of lies, because they're out of a job, they're out of a job.
	It undermines everything.
	I mean, Quinn and Sarkeesian and others have been actively pushed out of their homes, apparently, which is probably why they've gone on media tours.
	Zoe Quinn's appeared on MSNBC, the BBC, and Each Sarkeesian has appeared on hundreds probably of newspapers, TV.
	She was on the Colbert report.
	And it's like, yeah, that really strikes me as someone in hiding.
	It's not like you couldn't Google it and find out where Stephen Colbert does his show and then go down there if you were threatening Sarkeesian.
	She's going on a university speaking tour and shit like that.
	And it's just like, this is not someone in hiding.
	These are people on tour to promote their wares, their bullshit.
	But yeah, so it just absolutely pisses me off beyond all belief.
	But look how long this article goes on for.
	Just look at this absolute waffle.
	So it's just, I just can't believe it.
	I can't believe these people are given a platform.
	I don't get threats and death threats, but if I got a rape or death threat on Twitter, I would copy paste it, put it on my Twitter and say, can anybody give me a better threat than this?
	This is shit.
	Make some fun out of it.
	Make a game out of it, you know, and then the next thing you know, you make it that you've got that many threats or threats that theirs just looks ridiculous, you know.
	And that's what I would do.
	But each to their own, if you would rather not inform the police, go on Twitter and claim you've moved house and all that in order to be a victim, then I'm sure that's what you prefer to do.
	But I would just play games with them.
	Well, the FBI absolutely says absolutely that you shouldn't publicise threats against you.
	Exactly.
	It encourages others because what they're looking for is attention.
	And if you give excessive attention, public attention to these threats, then that just encourages other people who are searching for attention.
	It's retarded.
	It's literally the worst thing you can do, which leads me to conclude that they are obviously not credible threats.
	I mean, the fact that the police have said these are not credible threats is not the only reason that I think this.
	But I really, really like this comment from Sarah here, right?
	As a female and hopefully one day a mother, I hope I am never like you, Tara.
	You are either batty or so concerned with your own selfish needs and identity that you are forcing your son to be carved into some sort of geek.
	The worst part is that you don't even go into a STEM, that you don't even go into STEM that I can respect.
	But all your parents care about are Death Stars and comics in your desire to raise a geeky son.
	What if he loves football and fishing?
	What if he wants to be Derek Jetta?
	I don't know who that is.
	It doesn't sound like you leave much room for approval.
	And I won't even go into your misrepresentation of Gamergate.
	Those who are very smart and discerning can make their own judgments, but you, my lady, seem very immature and come across a lot more like Kim Kardashian viewing her child as an object/slash plaything to dress up for her own gratification than an expecting mother overjoyed by the life she's about to bring into the world.
	That is an amazing comment.
	Yeah, I mean, and just below that, my best friend's sister makes $69 an hour, which I think is wonderful.
	Good for her.
	You get that all the time, don't you?
	Or is that not one of those?
	I thought that was one of those.
	It's one of those stupid spam things, isn't it?
	Yeah, it is.
	Do they work?
	Do they possibly work?
	I've just sent you the link did I send there?
	Ah, there you go.
	The other Gamergate one that I thought if you missed this, I'm very surprised.
	Did you miss this one?
	The Zoe Quinn interview.
	I think I saw it, but we'll show everyone.
	I kept this.
	I thought this would interest you, to be honest.
	Yeah, okay.
	She's just so full of shit, man.
	I've got it up here.
	Let me let me see where they are on it here.
	No, I can't see it on the screen here.
	No, it's speak for everyone.
	Just you should be able to see that now.
	I could see Twitter.
	It's Twitter.
	There it is.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	See, I find this quite funny.
	Zoe Quinn, she's got kind of fat recently, which amuses me because if her boyfriend's this rich kid called Alex Lifshitz, and he goes on Twitter by the handle Big Waffle Fan or something, and it's like, yeah, I could tell.
	He seems to be a fucking feeder.
	Maybe.
	But yeah, what did you want to say about this?
	I just thought it's probably the typical nonsense.
	It's pretty much been covered to death with the Gamergate crowd.
	But it's again, when I speak to her, Quinn has been in the UK for four days.
	She doesn't know what she's doing next.
	She's been staying on friends' couches or hotels.
	There is no destination.
	How could I go back home?
	I have people online bragging about putting dead animals through my mailbox.
	I've got some asshole in California that I've never talked to, hiring a private investigator to stop me.
	What am I going to do?
	Probably to investigate you, not to stop you.
	And just wait until someone makes good on their threats.
	What shows one of them?
	That what it's going to take to stop this is the death of one of the women who's been targeted.
	But do you know something?
	Do you know what pisses me off about these scumbags, right?
	See if tomorrow, right, it was headline news, breaking news all over the world, right?
	There's been a massive shooting at cosplay, right?
	Some man shot 20 women, right?
	Most people like us would think that that was tragic.
	People like this cunt would go, yes!
	You're beauty!
	I can throw that in the faces of everybody forever.
	And they would actually get pleasure from such news.
	The same way they get, I've actually got one of these up today.
	This has been in the papers all fucking.
	Here it is.
	This is something to keep going on because this is what they've done with this one.
	25 years after Montreal massacre, gender-based violence persists on Canadian campuses.
	Lepine shot 15 women or something.
	I can't remember.
	I can't remember.
	But they tried to.
	See when that happened with the Markle Pine?
	When that happened, I bet feminists fucking loved it.
	I bet they didn't think, oh my god, that's terrible.
	I bet they thought, oh, you're beauty.
	I'm going to get so many articles out of this.
	I'm going to get so much victim status out of this.
	You're beauty.
	I tell you, this article, I think, have you ever heard of a guy called Virmo?
	I've not.
	I'll send you a link to him.
	He's this Romanian guy, and he's got the funniest accent in the world.
	And I think he coloured this one.
	He's on YouTube.
	Yeah, yeah, I'll send you a link.
	He's really good.
	And basically, he grew up in communist Yugoslavia, I think it was.
	So he's like, you know, I know that name, I think, I'm sorry.
	Sorry, Kyron.
	Yeah, no, no, sorry.
	He's like, all of this stuff sounds incredibly communist to me, you know, incredibly communist.
	But the thing is, if you look at this, there is so much cognitive dissonance in it.
	It's unreal.
	Like, you know, you've got like, she's sitting uncomfortably on a plastic chair.
	It's like, why would I care how comfortable she is on her plastic chair?
	Why is that personal information?
	Exactly.
	It's to try and make you feel an original question.
	But, I mean, look, she looks like she's an attention seeker.
	Everything about her looks, it's drawing for attention.
	Look at all her tattoos, the V-neck thing, the dyed hair.
	It's attention.
	That's what she's after.
	And it says she's collected 16 gigabytes of online abuse.
	It's like, well, go and release it then.
	I want to see the 16 gigabytes of online abuse you've had, Quinn.
	I really want to see it.
	Her version of abuse, it won't actually be abuse.
	It'll be people disagreeing with her and her ethics.
	That counts as a point.
	See, when you disagree with bad ethics, that's abuse.
	Oh, it is definitely abusive to disagree with her ethics.
	So she says, Quinn is in the UK to talk about her work as a games designer.
	And it's like, really, I thought she was on the run from these terrible threats.
	Make your mind up.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Make your fucking mind up.
	Yeah.
	So it keeps going on.
	So, I mean, it kind of represents it correctly.
	The vociferous video game protest movement that exploded across the internet in August, leaderless and chaotic, this ragtag community of self-identifying quote-unquote hardcore gamers sees its culture under threat from insidious outsiders, usually feminists and academics, who are challenging the industry on its sometimes questionable representation of violence, minorities, and gender.
	Gaming Gangst wants video games to be left alone.
	That's quite accurate.
	I mean, it doesn't say anything about the corruption of the press, but there is a lot of truth to what's been written there.
	I think people really do want these feminists and academics to just piss off, you know, or make their own games and watch them fail in the free market.
	But so, yeah, the undercurrent, however, has always been darkly misogynistic, of course.
	So she goes, when I speak to her, Quinn has been in the UK for four days.
	She doesn't know where she's going next.
	She's been staying on friends' couches and hotels.
	There is no destination.
	You said you were in the UK to talk about her work as a games designer.
	So there must, I mean, what?
	She's standing on a street corner with a megaphone or something saying, I work as a games designer.
	Someone listen to me.
	This just bugs, right?
	And then she's like, she's teary and shaking as she talks.
	But through it all, she's also funny and engaging.
	What sort of maniac is laughing at this poor teary-eyed girl who's shaking with trauma?
	It's just like, yeah, that's hilarious.
	That's just hilarious.
	Yeah, but I have never, ever seen a woman pretending to cry and shake.
	I've never seen that before.
	Yeah, that has never happened in the history of mankind.
	I know history of man.
	That's never happened.
	Never happened.
	But this is the thing, isn't it?
	She's tearing it.
	She's steering and shaking, but she's also funny and engaging.
	That speaks more about the author's psychosis than anything else.
	Why are you laughing at this?
	Or she's full of shit.
	I mean, it's that one or the other, really.
	But yeah, this whole thing is just bullshit.
	But sorry, I'll let you continue talking about it.
	This was your one, wasn't it?
	Oh, no, I actually got saved it for you because I thought you'd be more interested.
	No, that's about the main bit I wanted to cover was the bit where she said she can't go home because people might put dead animals through her.
	You know, and what dead animals fit through her letterbox?
	Do you know what I mean?
	Now, what is her real concern here?
	You know, I guess you could probably get a rat, maybe.
	Well, there is an interesting story here, right?
	What I would like to see, I'm going to send you this link, and you'll understand why I'm saying this, right?
	I would really like to see the talk, you know, Sharon Osborne talking about this.
	And it's a jealous woman breaks into Love Rival's apartment and cuts off her breasts with scissors because she was wrongly convinced she had stolen her husband.
	Now, when I read this and heard about this, I thought that is fabulous.
	Well, obviously, I fucking didn't, because I'm not a fucking sick fucking psychopath who should be locked in a fucking mental home like the viewers of the talk, like the audience of the talk, and the hosts of the fucking talk.
	But I'd like to see them talk about this and laugh their asses off at this woman getting her tits cut off with a pair of fucking scissors, only to find out she fucking picked the wrong woman.
	God, Jesus Christ.
	It was a wrong woman.
	She completely made a mistake.
	On fucking belief.
	Fucking horrible.
	But take this story.
	Just imagine, right?
	A show on TV, four or five men posting men all in the audience, and they bring this up and they're just in stitches of laughter, making jokes and Sharon Osborne laughing at that bullet thing.
	And then people complain and say, hey, that was distasteful.
	Well, first of all, there wouldn't be a show on TV with only men on it, obviously, because that would be sexist.
	But after people complained about it, they then done another show where they apologised for it and all throughout the apology, they laughed their asses off.
	I would love to see the reaction from American women if that really, truly, genuinely happened, the way it actually happened when it was a man getting his cock cut off by a psychotic woman.
	But somehow, this is just a guess now, but somehow I don't think the people at the talk audience and viewers would find this funny.
	Yeah, funnily enough, I think that they would find it massively offensive.
	I mean, you know, call me crazy.
	Call me crazy.
	Just a guess.
	Just a guess.
	Yeah, not what I know.
	You know, I.
	But yeah, apparently it was impossible to reattach her severed breasts, which is horrible.
	Well, fucking woman.
	That's just.
	Absolutely sure.
	Especially since she didn't even do it.
	She didn't do it anymore.
	Not that that would have made it okay, but she didn't actually fucking do anything wrong.
	Yeah, of all the things to happen to this poor woman, she's just having a nice day.
	And then some crazed psychopath bursts in, starts mutilating her with scissors, and we're not here laughing about it.
	We're here thinking, oh my god, poor woman, that poor woman, that is fucking awful.
	There probably is a show in China on daytime TV where they're laughing their asses off about it.
	Well, not really, because even there they wouldn't fucking do that.
	But I think this story shows the difference between, well, men and women, I'm going to say it.
	I'm not even going to say feminists.
	I'm going to say men and women because women think it's okay to laugh at something like that when it happens to a man.
	There's no fucking way they would laugh at that.
	No fucking way.
	I don't think anyone should laugh at this sort of stuff.
	Oh, no.
	Of course, unless some sick joke is made about it, then fair enough.
	But the actual incident, you know, that's not something to laugh at, or you know, that's not funny.
	But for some reason, if that was a man and a penis, that would be hysterical to a lot of women in America.
	A lot of them.
	And here, by the way.
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, it was Sharon Osborne's English, isn't she?
	Yes.
	So, you know, the cackling old hag, you know.
	Fucking how many fucking face laughs does that fucking cunt had now?
	Jesus fucking Christ.
	Not enough.
	I've just sent you one about the Scottish National Party.
	And this was a favourite of mine.
	I'll let you read it out because it would be better coming from a Scottish actress.
	Okay, let's click on this link here.
	I'll just tweet it for everyone to be able to read it at home.
	Open up Aberdeen journals.
	It's too much.
	I've not seen this, so I don't know what it is, but it's UKIP accused the SNP of Nazi-style behaviour.
	Interesting.
	Isn't that just the most perfect thing?
	It's like they accuse them at some point of xenophobia.
	It's like UK Independence Party accusing the Scottish National Party.
	They accuse each other of xenophobia.
	It's like, really?
	Are you honestly both going to start levelling this accusation?
	But why were they accused of it?
	I'll start reading this right, Steven.
	Yeah, yeah, go ahead.
	Yeah, it's alright.
	A row has broken out after the right-hand man of Scotland's only UKIP MEP, David Coburn, accused the SNP of behaving like Nazis.
	Arthur Misty Thackeray claimed Nicola Sturgeon's party was in danger of returning to the 1930s fascist roots.
	The UKIP Scotland chairman condemned the party's tolerance of so-called cybernets, keyboard warriors who shout down any perceived online criticism of SNP policies.
	He spoke out after the launch of a new independence leaning newspaper and what he termed the Nuremberg-style rallies, recently led by the First Minister.
	The speaking tour was sparked by a spike in the membership, which has rocketed to more than 90,000 since the referendum.
	But why is he calling them Nazis?
	What is it they've done?
	Try to get to the bit to see what they've done.
	I think he's worried about the fact that they're holding rallies and stuff.
	And it's starting to look like the rise of the Nazi party, which, again, it's worrying, but it's more the fact that it's the two people who are fighting.
	You know, the UK Independence Party, quite xenophobic, and the Scottish National Party, who are obviously xenophobic.
	And it's just like, go on, you guys go at each other.
	I mean, the SNP spoke and said, these are ludicrous and offensive claims that have absolutely no place in our politics.
	They won't disguise the fact that the people of Scotland completely reject the UKIP's intolerant xenophobic agenda.
	Come on, Scottish National Party.
	You know, you are obviously xenophobic against the English.
	Are they though?
	Because, hang on, wait a minute.
	Can the Scottish National Party run in England?
	Well, I imagine they could if they wanted to.
	There's kinda a difference in political systems, kinda, because there's some different rules that apply across the border, but like college tuition fees, something like that.
	Yeah, I don't know if they can actually run all over Britain.
	I'm not sure about that.
	Not sure.
	Well, I think that they probably do have an option, but yeah, exactly.
	They're trying to get independence from England because, you know, and you know, and then they're going, Oh, UKIP is intolerant and xenophobic.
	It's like, yeah, yeah, because they want to be free of the continent.
	It's beautiful.
	It's watching a pair of hypocrites go at each other for the same thing.
	Well, I can speak from experience that during that independence referendum, there was a lot of anti-English nonsense coming from that side.
	Not officially, of course, but there was a lot of it in it.
	It's it's actually it's actually embarrassing.
	That's just you know, it's not.
	Tell me about it.
	Tell me about it.
	What sort of thing?
	The whole there's things that were doing the rounds on Facebook, for example, you know, and it'd be put up by certain newspapers or whatever.
	And it would maybe it would say something like, You must vote yes for independence 'cause those in Parliament have been running and busting us around for too long and it's like, well, wait a minute, they've not been bossing you around.
	You fucking hated them in clowns.
	And it was all this.
	And it was all this kind of going away back to the past as far as they could to bring something out that could make you hate English, you know.
	Thatcher.
	And it used to bug the shit out of them when they tried to bring Thatcher up with me because as anybody that knows me knows I like Thatcher and you can't get that one past me.
	So they try that shit and I wanna I don't hate Thatcher so you can't really make me anti-English it's not going to work.
	That wasn't the only strategy but it definitely was one of them and it was there was like a few mobs.
	There was the old firm that's Rangers and Celtic, and you had certain Rangers fans who went, I'm gonna vote no.
	And then you had Celtic fans who went.
	I'm gonna vote yes because of the team I support.
	Then you have this other crowd, which I call the SNP crowd right, and it's the crowd that go, like this, oh, my favourite documentary is Braveheart, that's that's.
	They are the fucking worst man.
	They, those so fucking much Brave Heart, great film.
	But it's not true.
	It's so fucking inaccurate, for God's sake, man.
	But although, by the way, Mel Gibson's accent top class, oh yeah, and let's, let's be fair, that Longshanks fucking badass he's.
	He's one of my favourites 'cause he's in a a lot of Columbos.
	I like that actor anyway.
	But see, but see that line where he says the problem with Scotland is it's full of Scots.
	So that's just fucking brown.
	That's a brilliant line, that sort of is.
	Sometimes I'm, sometimes I'm thinking that is the problem with Scotland.
	Actually, just sometimes, you know, just sometimes honestly I I, when I ask Scottish people like, what's so great about Scotland?
	They're like, you know it's, it's, it's full of Scots, you know it's, it's where Scots live.
	It's not like you know Scotland's blessed with massive natural resources or you know it's.
	It's just where you guys live, isn't it?
	So it must be great.
	You know, that seems to be the good thing about Scotland, which is fine if that's what you're.
	That's Billy Conley's theory.
	But Billy Connolly's theory on the Scots is why we eventually got to Scotland was because he said the Scottish people said, Hey, I know an even colder place.
	Let's go there.
	And that's how the Scottish people, you know, it may be right.
	That's always what I've wondered about, like, Eskimos and stuff.
	I mean, can you imagine the first Eskimos to ever reach the Arctic?
	And, you know, the leader of the tribe must be right, okay, this looks good, doesn't it?
	And they must be, what the fuck are you talking about?
	This looks good.
	Well, let's stop here and build a settlement, shall we?
	It's like, no, we fucking won't.
	You know, we'll either keep going or go back.
	I mean, why here?
	You know, just fucking come on.
	But yeah, what's the next one?
	Have you got another one or quite a few?
	Yeah.
	I've got quite a few.
	Yeah, I've got one.
	I've got one.
	All right, right.
	This one here is.
	I think this is good for women, right?
	This one, because I think, honestly, it's quite a good article, and I think women would do good to listen to the advice in this article, right?
	I apologise because I can't remember who sent me this.
	You know, that way, I don't know if you're like me, you get sent that much stuff.
	You can't recall who said that.
	This looks good.
	I'm taking E-Harmony, right?
	And it's men's 10 biggest complaints about women, right?
	And the very first one, I'll go through them.
	They're short and sweet, right?
	But ladies, pay attention to this, right?
	Just simply pay attention.
	Well, ladies that like men, pay attention.
	Things that buggers, you like to play coy.
	If you like us, let us know.
	If you don't, let us go.
	This game where you pretend you don't care and secretly hope to chase you down is for teenagers.
	You think men like the chase?
	Perhaps.
	You think we like guessing whether we're wasting our time?
	No, we don't.
	That's the first one.
	You like to play coy, stop it.
	The next one, you fixate on what we're thinking when you should be watching what we're doing.
	You ask, what are you thinking?
	And we say, nothing.
	You figure this must be a lie and decide that we aren't willing to communicate with you.
	The problem is, this is the wrong question to ask.
	We're action-oriented.
	You don't need to ask what we're thinking.
	Just watch what we're doing.
	Coming home late every night, we're not happy at home.
	Uninterested in sex, probably crushed by stress.
	Not calling you back, even though we said, I love you, we don't love you.
	You can save the questions about musings until you see a change in our behaviour.
	That's the surest sign that something needs to be discussed.
	Now, this is a challenge.
	That's really because that is a classic.
	Is something wrong?
	No, no, nothing.
	You sure?
	No, no, no, nothing.
	And then it's like they try to decipher what you're thinking.
	I'm not thinking anything.
	You know, stop fucking into my head.
	There was a great cartoon, like in one of the newspapers that I saw when I was a kid.
	And it was, you know, a man and woman sat on the sofa.
	And in her mind, he's like, oh my God, he hasn't said anything.
	He must be thinking about this.
	And it's this huge block of text.
	I've seen that one.
	I've seen that.
	Yeah, and then the man's like, you know, I wonder how I can fix my motorbike.
	But she's all stressed and thinking all these other things.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	Bro, I've seen that one.
	That's a good one.
	The third one is: you don't understand and/or like our need for alone time.
	Another good one.
	This often expresses itself with regard to hobbies.
	Say a man likes to play golf and has played for years.
	Many a man has gotten into a relationship only to have the woman complain about the time he spends playing golf.
	So true.
	She's jealous of time.
	Of course, if she loves him, she should know that he needs this time on the golf course.
	It's his passion.
	It's his release.
	Without it, he will burn up with anxiety and frustration over life's little indignities.
	Why does she get involved with a man who has a hobby she doesn't like?
	And then see, you see us as projects you can fix.
	That's another one of the problems.
	And that's one of the future ones.
	Another classic, you have a complicated set of double standards.
	They probably knew this anyway.
	I could write a novel on this one.
	We only need to look at the example of going Dutch on a first date.
	You offer to spot the check, and if we let you, you hold it against us.
	Really?
	You demand, quite rightly, to be in an all-important relationship decisions.
	Yet, when we take you out and ask, what would you like to do tonight?
	You're angry that we haven't taken charge of the situation.
	It's a confusing set of double standards and antiquated rules that make it very difficult for us to know which move is the right one.
	That's women all over.
	But I mean, that's let's be honest, that's women all over.
	Another one, the next one is: you want us to change and then lose respect for us when we do.
	You mentioned this earlier, actually.
	You mentioned this earlier.
	It's an interesting phenomenon.
	No, remember you're saying about the stay-at-home dad, and then she lost respect for him.
	Remember?
	It's an interesting phenomenon.
	When a man and a woman get together, it's likely that he will have some hobbies, tendencies, or habits that she doesn't like.
	For instance, I have a friend that met and married a woman who wasn't thrilled that he played in a band.
	She was a bit threatened by the attention he received and his time spent pursuing this.
	What was she, Yoko?
	She told him, I really wish she didn't play in this band.
	And because he loved her, he quit.
	What a sad.
	Oh, that's awful.
	Within a few months, this woman was confiding to her friends, I'm a little less attracted to him because he quit the band and just did what I asked.
	Now he just hangs out at home.
	It's a specific example, but a common problem.
	Clearly, the man should do what he feels he has to do, but we try to be accommodating and to have that count against us is infuriating.
	What sort of person does that?
	What sort of person you fall in love with someone and they've got a hobby that they love and you go, you know what?
	I really want you to quit your hobby.
	I would never ask that of someone.
	I absolutely know.
	I would be supportive of the hobby.
	I imagine it stems from something like if he's in the band, he might be getting female attention.
	But still, if she knew that when she met him, you know, she should have, you know, but I don't know.
	You can't just go with a woman that reads books and then say, look, I don't want you reading books anymore.
	You know, it's awful.
	It's just awful.
	It's just that's terrible.
	Yeah, the next one.
	The next one is, you see us as projects that you can fix.
	You meet us, you like us.
	You date us, you marry us, and somewhere along the way, it might seem that you love us just as we are, but really doesn't work out that way.
	Women see potential, they see rough edges, and they want to send them off.
	This makes us crazy.
	We don't want to change.
	We have chosen our car, hair, friends, home, and hobbies because we enjoy them.
	The knowledge that you're thinking, if he could only, is a deeply disturbing thought.
	And perhaps more sinister is the idea that this behaviour is so common that even if you aren't the kind of woman who wants to change, we expect that you do and are only biding your time.
	This is true as well.
	Even if a woman isn't trying to change you, it's probably biding her time, you know, until she's far more comfortable.
	I can honestly say, I have never met a woman or dated a woman that didn't want to change something about what I do.
	Most of the times about the clothes I wear, because I tend to buy cheapo clothes because I'm cheap.
	There's nice ways around it.
	For example, she could buy you the clothes that she would prefer you to wear.
	I wouldn't wear them.
	I wouldn't wear them.
	I'd just carry on wearing my jeans.
	She could do that little trick, you know, where this is a trick for men to get away with looking at other women, right?
	But you look at another woman, if you get caught looking at her, you say, You would suit that, whatever she's wearing, right?
	And you get away with it, right?
	Just there's a little trick here for the guys, right?
	But women can do that as well.
	They can look at a handsome man who they like, who's dressed sense of the light, and say, You'd suit that girl, you know, and to make the guy think, Oh, maybe.
	It's just there's ways to go.
	That's clever, yeah, that's clever.
	Your expectations are set by Hollywood and sky-high.
	True.
	Hollywood strikes again.
	I have a buddy that has plans to attend a Nicholas Sparks book signing so he can tell the man to knock it off.
	Most women know at an intellectual level that their man isn't going to be like George Cluny or Bradford or that Italian guy from under the Tuscan sun, but in their heart they want it.
	They've been fed a fantasy about romance and passion for so long that when a real act of love comes down the pipe, he notices that the tread on your tires is low and buys a new set, it hardly even registers.
	This is something that drives me crazy.
	I swear to God, Disney is so guilty of this shit.
	If you go on a dating website like Plenty of Fish, just do a search in your local area and see how many women describe themselves as a princess looking for their prince.
	And it's just like, listen, bitch, you're not a princess.
	We also, we may live in a monarchy, but there are only like three princes.
	So you are very unlikely to be one of those women who land.
	One of them's already married.
	Yeah, exactly.
	One of them's already married, and you are better than his wife, and the other two are probably going to get much better women than you.
	So get some realistic expectations.
	Look around your councillor's state and realize you're probably getting a guy from your councillor state.
	That's probably what's going to happen.
	By the way, do you ever watch a show called My Fair Wedding?
	You ever watch that?
	It's a guy, it's a reality show.
	I actually watch it because I think it's quite good.
	There's a guy, David Totero, and it, and I think he's gay, it doesn't matter, but I think he is anyway.
	And he basically goes to this bride to be, and she plans out our wedding, you know.
	Now, I've been watching this for like a couple of weeks now, it's on every night, right?
	And almost every time, this man will talk to these women and they'll all say a similar thing.
	Oh, I have been planning my wedding since I was six or seven or eight.
	And they don't see anything wrong with that.
	When I was six, seven, and eight, I was planning on being a fucking ninja.
	It didn't turn out fuck's sake.
	I grew up.
	Jesus.
	But not only that.
	It's worse than that, though.
	It's worse than that.
	Because if you are planning your wedding at six years old, you do not know who you are going to marry.
	Well, so the man is in time.
	That man does another thing about this show, right?
	He goes to meet the couple, right?
	And within less than a minute, the man, he's out the picture.
	He is not in the show again until the end where she's getting married.
	It's all about her, what she wants.
	And you'll never, I think I've only had one of them say it, to be fair, but you'll never hear the woman say, I'm looking forward to marrying this man.
	They're looking forward to the wedding.
	They're not looking forward to being married.
	Big difference.
	That's exactly.
	And the man is irrelevant in the situation.
	There just has to be a man there.
	What his thoughts are.
	Exactly.
	Him as an individual, doesn't matter.
	Irrelevant.
	It doesn't even factor in because she can't possibly know.
	She can't possibly know.
	It's irrelevant.
	It's beside the point.
	What he might want, what he might think, what he might feel, completely.
	None of none of his none of her business.
	She doesn't care.
	No, oh no.
	She she's got plans for her wedding, you know.
	And this is fully encouraged.
	It's completely encouraged to this.
	Oh, definitely.
	Yeah, i i d i it's encouraging them to be fucking selfish.
	But uh sorry, carry on.
	Anyway, I did another thing about that show.
	I'll go back to this lesson a wee second, but another thing about that show is when they're talking to the bride to be, sometimes now and again, very rarely, but sometimes someone will mention the groom and they might say something like, Oh, the the groom would like that and the bride will go, eh?
	Oh, I the groom.
	Oh, I can tell that she who's the groom or what?
	What's this?
	Oh, I the man I'm married after God.
	I God don't care who this yeah groom that does sound useful.
	I could do with one of those.
	Right, the next one on the list.
	You're always looking down the road.
	Women tend to think about the next major step in life.
	Men tend to think about the next major meal.
	Certainly part of this is driven by a pile like that.
	A 34-year-old single woman who wants to have children has to think about the future.
	That's okay, that's a fair point.
	She has to think about finding a quality partner where they're going to live.
	Is there enough room for the baby to study?
	A 34-year-old single man has far less interest in planning or pushing towards some future major life goal.
	This difference in paradise is true.
	I think that a 34-year-old man is looking for his career prospects.
	He's thinking, how can I grow my business or get that promotion or something like that?
	I think they do still have goals.
	I just think they're different.
	But frankly, I think a 34-year-old single woman should worry less about finding a quality partner and just worry about finding a partner.
	It is a fair point, though.
	If you want to see a big difference between women, if they want to have a family, they do have to spend a bit more time finding a partner because men can't wait.
	We've got what almost could have possibly triple the time women have to do that.
	Yeah, that's true.
	That's true.
	This difference in priorities often leaves women in the unpleasant position of saying, next, next, next when it comes to relationship events, there is a female drive to get answers to questions like, what are we?
	Are we exclusive yet?
	Are we going to get married?
	That makes it seem like they aren't enjoying the now and only worry about the future.
	Another good point.
	That's true.
	But I do still think that's quite a good point.
	I'll give women that one because it must be shitty to be a woman.
	Say, especially if you're like mid-twenties, you do want to have a family and you don't have a man.
	I mean, you're going to need a couple of years at least to get to know a man.
	I'll give them that one.
	Oh, God.
	I agree.
	This is one I've done videos on before.
	It's one that yeah, I'll do this one because this one oh, I hate this.
	You use your emotions as a weapon.
	You don't mean to.
	I suppose it isn't your fault that during an important conversation about the future of our relationship that you start crying, but surely you understand that this derails the ability to pursue the issue at hand.
	You've essentially played a kind of trump card.
	If we continue to advocate our side, we're bullies.
	If we give in, we're weak.
	And this does this and what's more is that they use a man's desire to make the woman happy as a failing.
	You know, they'll be like, well, that doesn't make me happy.
	Oh, well, I've done this to try and make you happy.
	Well, I'm not happy still.
	And the guy's like, oh, Christ, you know, now I have to try something else.
	And they could it gives the woman the ability to keep moving the goalpost if she is that kind of woman and is so inclined.
	I'm not saying they all are, but there are plenty of women who are like this and I've dated plenty of them.
	And it really it is abusing a man's good nature to do this.
	It really is.
	It definitely is, but in a way Men can prevent it by simply making it clear that no, no, no, no, do not bring feelings into debates.
	You do not talk about feelings.
	And another thing as well, when my girlfriend would say, one thing that I would not would never happen with is her crying because I didn't stand for that.
	As soon as any crying started early on in our relationship, stop that.
	I'm not talking to you anymore until you stop that.
	You can't resolve anything.
	And I would walk around and not talk.
	I don't want to hear it.
	I don't want to talk to you.
	The crying stops.
	I will not be manipulated with tears.
	Basically, the tactics of a child.
	I will not be manipulated like that.
	But men can do it.
	They can prevent it from happening.
	But it does happen a lot.
	Yeah, it really does.
	And it does put my head in.
	The thing is, I think a lot of women don't realise that they're doing it.
	In their defence, I don't think they understand what they're doing necessarily because it's second nature for a lot of them.
	Well, in a way, I don't really blame the women because I actually blame their fathers, but I don't blame the women because since they were little girls, that tactic has worked for them.
	And it's not stopped working all the way up until they became an adult.
	That's why they still do that.
	Because men continue to let it work.
	And the reason I blame their fathers, by the way, is because fathers do not discipline girls the same way they discipline boys, which is a major problem all over the world, in my opinion.
	Oh, absolutely.
	Again, like all things, I think it comes down to a biological drive, you know.
	The masculine urge to protect the feminine, I think.
	But it doesn't do it.
	I understand that urge, but it doesn't do the daughter any favours.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely.
	You know, to let her do to teach her to use these things, she should be teaching her to be stronger than that, you know.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	No, I don't like that crying, but in a way, I don't blame the women because it's worked since they were two.
	Why would they not keep doing that?
	I suppose if it worked for me, I mean, if I could cry right now without being called every time I was crying, then maybe I would keep doing it to get my way.
	See, that's what the feminists are trying to free you from.
	You should be able to just burst into tears whenever you want.
	That's what Emma Watson says.
	This is a classic Emma Watson.
	Men should be able to talk about their feelings.
	Okay, well, I'd like to discuss my feelings.
	I'll stop whining.
	I can't win, man.
	There's no winning.
	There's no winning.
	And that's another thing about Emma Watson.
	It's like men should be able to discuss their feelings.
	We do, just not with you, because we don't want to.
	With you, we discuss them normally with our own mates.
	And unlike you, Emma, it's not all we talk about.
	There's other topics.
	Yeah, I tell you what, I would much rather discuss my feelings with another man, you know, just because, A, I know that he's going to understand the perspective that I'm coming from.
	But B, I really don't feel like I'm being judged by my mates when I'm like, if I'm feeling really down about something or something like that, and I need to, you know, I want to talk to my mates, my mates are fucking supportive.
	You know, they're like, oh man, that fucking sucks.
	You know, what are you going to do?
	What can you do?
	They'll propose solutions that I can try and take control of the situation again and so I can be the master of my own destiny.
	They don't mock me.
	I also know a couple of things as well.
	You know with your male friends that not every other male that they know and have ever met is going to find out what you just told them.
	That's another thing, isn't it?
	And the most important thing, the difference between men and women, sorry ladies, but I've got to say this, is that you can openly say something to a man without thinking at some point in the future this is going to get thrown in my face.
	I've said it before with if you use the example that you've got a fear of clowns, right?
	And you opened up to a woman, you're crying.
	I've got a fear of clowns.
	I was molested by a clown when I was younger, right?
	I guarantee two, three, five years down the line, when she's in a bad mood with you, she's going to throw that in your fucking face.
	So she is.
	And that's why I do not tell a woman anything.
	I hate using these blanket statements, but there are some that are genuinely true.
	And the fact that, you know, in my experience, in my personal experience with, and I'm not trying to brag, I'm old, which is why I've dated so many women, but there are some consistent threads that all women seem to share.
	And having an exceedingly long memory and no real compunction about using your weaknesses against you when it's favourable for her is definitely something that's come up way too many times to be coincidence.
	You know, it just, it really has.
	The thing that bugs me about them is that, I mean, I mean, telling them things is that if you do tell a woman something, you don't know who else is going to hear that.
	You know?
	You really do not know who, especially in this day and age where you can tell the world in two seconds.
	You can tell all your friends on Facebook private message.
	You know what I mean?
	Oh, you never believe what this fucking clunk told me he was molested by a clown.
	You know, did you do all that?
	The next thing you know, so, and then when you meet their friends, you're then thinking, shit, do they know about the clown thing?
	Oh, God.
	You know what I mean?
	It's like, just don't tell them anything.
	No, I totally agree.
	When I tell my mate something, I know that the individual that I have told is not going to tell someone else.
	Or I would be very surprised if they did.
	They might joke with you, though.
	They might joke with you about it.
	Oh, yeah.
	But they make fun behind your back and fucking tell everybody.
	I mean, God.
	At least, you know, the friends that I have, I'm absolutely certain they wouldn't do that.
	I'm absolutely certain.
	And again, I hate stereotyping all women in this category, but it seems to be all women.
	It really does.
	To be fair, I'm sure there's some men that gossip as well, and there's some women who don't.
	But it's very difficult to tell the difference between the ones that do and don't when it comes to women, you know.
	It's such a common trait.
	That's the problem.
	Yes.
	It's a very common trait.
	It's not that all men have to do this, but it is such a common trait that you can't not bring it up.
	It's wrong to gloss over it because, frankly, it's something they all do.
	But yeah, the next one.
	Oh, the next one is you have a tendency to be critical.
	I've tried to avoid using the word nag, but there seems to be some internal mechanism that makes women predisposed to criticism in the same way that men are predisposed to seek their man cave.
	It's almost a cliché.
	The wife that complains and makes demands and the husband that just wants to be left alone to watch TV or work out in the garage or garage.
	So well, women tend to be critical.
	No, really?
	Never.
	Women won't believe that either.
	That's the last one.
	That's the last one.
	But anyway, I hope I would like women to read that because they're quite pretty accurate.
	You know, I mean, they're pretty accurate.
	So they are.
	No, no, I think that I'm really, really surprised how astute all of that was, actually.
	A lot of it really, really was on the ball.
	You know, and it's just like, for Christ's sake, you know, and the things, I don't even blame them because a lot of these things, if you think about it, a lot of them are probably evolutionary traits.
	You know, it's like, of course, if you're a cave woman and you've got your caveman husband, you're not going to be the one who goes out and does the dangerous or hard work.
	So you need to nag him to do it for you.
	Obviously, it's sensible.
	It's dangerous.
	You can't personally, you're physically not equipped to do it.
	You've got to nag him to do it.
	See, nagging, right?
	I think nagging is something amateur women do, right?
	For me, right?
	Women, the greatest women excel, right, at manipulation.
	Nobody can manipulate like a woman can't, right?
	Especially manipulate a man, a heterosexual man.
	And so if a woman nags, she's a very amateur manipulator, in my opinion, because there are plenty of other ways you can manipulate a man to do something without making him feel bad about it.
	That's true.
	And if you make him feel bad about it, you're not very good at your manipulation.
	But if you make him think he wants to do that thing for you, you're very good at your manipulation.
	Especially if you bolster his self-esteem by doing it, then he's going to be more inclined to do it next time.
	But no, I think that's quite a good observation, actually.
	Amateur women are the ones who nag.
	Ah, they're the naggers.
	They haven't got the first clue.
	I mean, their mother did not teach them how to manipulate.
	In fact, I would be willing to bet that they don't have a father at home and they've never witnessed how the mother manipulates the father.
	They've never witnessed it.
	And that's how they don't know how to do it.
	So when they do get a man, they think, right, I'll just tell him then, hey, you do that.
	And they think, you know, perhaps that works, right?
	No, it doesn't.
	That's probably true.
	Okay, I've got one.
	We should probably wrap it up about now, really.
	No problem with me.
	No problem with me.
	It's getting a little bit late, so I'm starting to feel a bit tired, but we'll go off on a funny one.
	You know who Lena Dunham is, right?
	Yes, yes, I know who that is.
	You know, the child-molesting feminist.
	The one that was raped by a mustachioed conservative.
	Well, that's interestingly what I've just tweeted.
	That's exactly the one.
	Sorry.
	Yeah, that's not.
	That's all right.
	Sorry.
	This is flamboyant Republican Conservative who Lena Dunham claims raped her in college does not exist.
	Now, who would have thought that this flamboyant Republican conservative sounds like a good description of Milo Ioiannopoulos from Breitbart?
	But he's gay, so I'm not going to suggest that he was this one.
	Love you, really, Milo.
	But yeah, so the media investigation into the allegations of rape featured in Lena Dunham's recently released memoir.
	She's 28.
	She's 28.
	Why is she writing a fucking memoir?
	You know, and she looks like an old woman, so maybe that's the reason.
	But yeah, it's refuted the claims of sexual assault made by her.
	The writer and actor director dedicates a chapter of her book, Not That Kind of Girl, for which she received a reported $3.7 million advance to a boy she met at Oberlin College in Ohio, identified as Barry, who she alleged raped her one night after a party.
	She admits in the home to drinking alcohol and taking Xanax and cocaine before inviting Barry back to her on-campus apartment, but says the accounter quickly turned aggressive and that Barry twice removed the condom during intercourse without telling her.
	I never gave permission to be rough to stick himself inside me without a barrier between us.
	This is her rape fantasy, basically.
	Dunham's description of Barry is similarly explicit, explaining him as a mustachioed campus Republican with a mustache that rode the line between ironic Williamsburg fashion and big Buck Hunter.
	This is sounding like complete bullshit, isn't it, already?
	She said that he also once punched a girl in the boob at a party following a consensual sex encounter.
	And another girl worked to find blood splattered all over a wall like a crime scene.
	Jesus Christ, this is sounding absolute nonsense.
	Breitbart, incidentally, an investigation by John Nolte from Breitbart, undertaken at Oberlin Campus, which was published Thursday, concluded that the Barry Dunham describes is a ghost and that no such person appeared to exist at the college during the years she studied there.
	What a fucking surprise.
	Lena Dunham is a goddamn liar.
	You know, for $3.7 million, though, I probably would be too.
	But under scrutiny, her rig story didn't just fall apart.
	It evaporated into pixie dust and blew away.
	And this doesn't surprise me at all because did you read the bit about her abusing her sister when she was one years old?
	Oh, I read that.
	I heard about that.
	Yeah, the claim that a one-year-old child can push pebbles into her vagina at some time.
	That's so absurd.
	It is so absurd.
	But not just that, right?
	A one-year-old child, she was what, seven at the time?
	Why were those two alone for that long?
	It's a one-year-old child.
	What the fuck?
	It sounds like bullshit to me.
	And honestly, right, Lena Dunham, she sounds like a sociopath.
	She sounds like someone who is incapable of empathizing with someone else and is, frankly, a compulsive fucking liar.
	That is overwhelmingly the impression I get just reading anything about her.
	And just the way that she has reacted to everyone going, are you suggesting you molested your sister?
	And then she was 17 years old with like the 11-year-old treating her like a, you know, acting like a sexual predator and all this sort of stuff.
	And it's like, holy shit, Lena, you are just an evil fucking person.
	Imagine that was a man that wrote that, though.
	When I was 70.
	My one-year-old brother, you know, blah, blah, blah.
	He'd be in jail.
	He'd be in jail by now, wouldn't he?
	If her one-year-old sister had pebbles up her snatch, she, Lena Dunham, fucking put them there.
	Yeah.
	A, a one-year-old would be wearing a nappy.
	So definitely.
	There's no way a one-year-old is going to do that.
	I know children are curious, like, you know, about putting things up their nose or in their ears and stuff about that.
	One-year-old.
	No.
	I don't think that's.
	They don't have the fucking dexterity, the manual dexterity to perform such a feat.
	And that's the thing as well, right?
	So we've got a one-year, we've to believe, right?
	We've got a one-year-old baby, and the parents have thought, I'll leave it there next to those pebbles.
	Yes.
	Yeah, it's just absolute bollocks.
	But the thing is, her sister, Grace, jokingly said, because she used to, like, you know, bribe her to kiss her and like lay next to her while she masturbated and stuff.
	Bro, totally not at all.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	Nothing weird, Lena.
	You're not a weird child molested.
	We've all been there.
	We've all been there.
	Who hasn't done that?
	Who hasn't?
	Grace was sitting up smiling, babbling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina.
	Who hasn't done that to their one-year-old sibling?
	We've all been there, Lena.
	Don't worry.
	But her sister jokingly says stuff like, oh, yeah, it's Lena's fault that I'm gay.
	And it's like, many a truth said in jest.
	That really sounds like Lena's abuse has actually turned her sister gay.
	What's that said in jest, though?
	Well, that's the thing.
	She does apparently say in jest, but I think that there's a lot of things.
	Although, to be fair, though, I don't think that could turn anybody into a lesbian.
	I don't think that's how it would work.
	But that is very strange, that whole thing.
	You can't question it, otherwise, you're a misogynist.
	They already think we're misogynists anyway because we're critical of feminine.
	Regardless of what else we did.
	See the fact that she said that it was a Republican, right?
	Is there any way that the Republicans could somehow sue her for trying to give their party a bad name like that?
	I mean, I know I think it's an obvious attempt at definition.
	I really don't know.
	Why mention it?
	Why mention his political leanings?
	I mean, what's the problem?
	How does she even know?
	How does she even know?
	Does she ask him?
	Does she does she you know does he go around saying how right wing he is?
	It's fictional.
	It's totally this whole thing's fucking fictional and it just it just makes Lena Dunham and the people who support her look like pathological liars.
	So I thought you heard the recent University of Virginia rape fantasy the University of Virginia rape fantasy.
	It's been it's quite recent where this woman claimed that part of the initiation, you know, the fate, the sorry, the hazing of new students is to perform a gang rape on a woman, right?
	And she was the victim and she got thrown on a table that smashed.
	So all these people in a dark room had sex with her, but she was able to tell they were all white.
	And you know, it's funny that in the broken glass, that didn't seem to bother these guys.
	And anyway, this whole thing's a load of shit, right?
	But again, it's this idea that a man goes to college, right?
	I'm going to set my future up.
	Oh, no, you have to do a gang rape.
	Oh, okay, excellent.
	I mean, seriously?
	You think that's how it works?
	You know, it's what we have to believe, right, is that the entire campus is behind it, you know.
	But anyway, the point, the point I wanted to make about this was regarding the Lena Dunham rape in the University of Virginia rape.
	I have heard just this week women say, right, that it doesn't matter if it's true or not.
	These things still happen.
	So they don't give a fuck if it's par lies because it still goes on.
	Maybe that one's not true.
	That doesn't matter.
	It still goes on and it's a serious issue.
	And it's like, well, I don't think lies are a fucking you know, we should take it as a serious.
	They're trying to justify it to themselves.
	You know, see, when at first they were all over it saying, oh my god, this is terrible.
	But when the more of the story comes out and it's obvious that it's bullshit, that's when they then say, well, it doesn't matter if she's lying.
	The important the important thing is that we talk about rape culture, you know what I mean?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I know what you mean it, but that really, really does my head in.
	I mean, the the idea that you know, she's made some shit up, but that doesn't matter because we think that it still happens anyway, even though you know, we've got no real proof that and the example we were using is false.
	But I mean, that's oh, fuck me, these people, these fucking people, just the worst.
	It's not a worst.
	And the thing is, they're the people in control of the fucking press, you know.
	They're the people who are knacking the government.
	They're the people who are knacking.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	It's and and the thing is, right, what what kind of annoys me is that I find myself siding with right wing outlets like Bright Brighton.
	It's not that I've got anything against the right wing, but you know, I I'm I'm not right wing and it I'm not left wing either apparently.
	I'm I I I consider myself quite a centrist, but that's only because I used to be left wing and the left showed themselves to be fucking bonkers and so now I'm like, I'll just sit in the middle because you know sometimes I agree with the right, sometimes I agree with the left, but you you know, the the e the extremities of either side are just way out there and I can't be they're they're you know nothing to do with anything that I want to have anything to do with.
	And it's it's examples like the Lena Dunham thing that really piss me off.
	But all the right wing has to do these days is just be factual, you know, just report the facts.
	And A, it makes the left look like crazies because they go, no, no, no.
	It doesn't matter if that's true or not because we have our ideological agenda.
	And the right wing doesn't, they don't even need to be right wing.
	They don't even need to do anything.
	They just need to present the facts.
	And suddenly they make the left look fucking ridiculous.
	So many people as well, whether left or right, don't want to talk about the very sensitive subject of rape.
	So when people look hard in the University of Virginia, you know, they come out and they go, oh, there's this big rape.
	The people who doubt it are scared to say it because, you know, it's like, oh, I'll just not say anything, you know, and that's why so many people are tired of it.
	It's like they're a rape apologist and a rape defendant.
	And rape is a sensitive issue.
	Yeah, it's true.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And that's sort of like bully boy silencing tactics.
	If you criticise us for talking about our quote-unquote lived experiences, Lynn Dunham, then you are suddenly a bad person for wanting facts and proof and evidence.
	Like, wow, that is insidious.
	You know, good job on making looking for evidence a bad thing, you fucking sociopaths.
	It's almost as if they were trying to get men to hate women, wouldn't you think?
	I'm convinced of that, by the way.
	It's just this week I thought it as well, and I just thought, I think that's what they're doing because it's too much.
	What the stuff they're doing now is so ridiculous that it's went too far.
	Yeah, honestly, I can understand why it looks that way.
	I mean, and it does look that way.
	That's the thing.
	It genuinely does look that way.
	For me, it was Jessica Valenti with the, you know, men should just be paid less than women because they were born as men.
	And it's just, you know, and then she's got legal advice that was, oh, you know, that would be against the Equal Pay Act.
	And instead of being like, why am I arguing against the Equal Pay Act?
	She was just like, oh, bummer.
	You know, bummer.
	Oh, it just sucks that we can't do that.
	It's like, I'm sure that you fucking think that's the case, Jessica.
	In fact, let's end on Valenti because, you know, I think she deserves it.
	Hang on, I've got an article from her, which obviously is crazy.
	Jessica Valenti, hashtag criming while white is exactly what's wrong with white privilege.
	And now, did you see this?
	This crime on the white night?
	This was in the wake of Ferguson.
	A bunch, and the other guy got choked to death, which don't get me wrong, you know, I've got no doubt that there are elements of US police who are racist.
	I've got no doubt about it.
	It's got nothing to do with racism, though, just maybe bad policing, but nothing to do with racism.
	But I know you.
	They're on down the yard.
	But the thing is, Jessica, you're writing for The Guardian, which is a British paper.
	So you really should sort of pay more attention to what's going on in this country.
	Whether America is racist or not isn't really that pertinent for us.
	But basically, this criming while I'm white is this terrible, terrible thing where white people are basically self-flagellating.
	It's literally like the amazing atheist sort of, I'm sorry I'm male, I'm sorry I'm white.
	Literally just apologizing because there are racists in the world, even though they might not be racist.
	And it's just, it's the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.
	Don't get me wrong, no one's in favour of racism.
	I doubt even the people who are racist would go out and say that racism is good.
	I think they know that it comes from their own bigotries.
	But yeah, it's just Jessica Valenti covering it, which is just embarrassing.
	Everything, I mean, white people acknowledging that white privilege is important in the midst of national tragedies, tweeting about how you got away with criminal acts feel like a performance of awareness that you are privileged rather than what we really need.
	A dismantling of power obtained through that privilege.
	So even white people going out and saying, I'm so goddamn sorry that I'm white.
	I am so sorry that being white gives me all this privilege.
	That is not enough for Jessica.
	In fact, in her mind, that is a brag.
	In her mind, that is a performance of the awareness that you are privileged.
	And it's like, for fuck's sake, Jessica, they are grovelling on the floor saying, I'm so sorry.
	I mean, there have been pictures of like these fucking white kids wearing shackles and with t-shirts wearing, I'm sorry.
	And it's just like, well, why don't you just get a black person to whip you now?
	You know, that's all you're missing.
	But for Jessica Valenti, that is not enough.
	That, in fact, is probably a demonstration of white privilege.
	So I think what you said earlier was exactly right.
	Don't try to placate these people.
	Nothing is good enough.
	There is nothing you can possibly do.
	I mean, nothing you can do.
	I'm thinking of this country in America, right?
	And I always hear about this white privilege and male privilege.
	But the funny thing is that I've never heard one genuine example of either.
	I mean, what, for example, in America, and it has to be a specific thing, not some vague anecdotal nonsense, right?
	What specific thing can black people are not allowed to do in America or in Britain, right?
	In Canada, Australia, that white people can do.
	And what is it that men are allowed to do in those nations that women are not allowed to do?
	All I'm asking for is an answer on this.
	I've been asking for years now.
	I've still not got one answer.
	Instead, I get told things like, shut up, white it, fuck off, cracker, shut up, misogynist, go away, rape apologist.
	But I've still not heard an actual fucking example and not an anecdote.
	I don't want to hear, well, I'm black and I don't know, I can't walk down the street without blah, blah, blah.
	I'm not.
	A specific thing is there a law in place that states you're not allowed to do something that white people are.
	If so, you have a case of white privilege and it's against the fucking law.
	Get something done about it.
	But this is the thing, though, isn't it?
	This is the thing.
	All they can talk about is social things.
	And social things are contextual.
	For example, if you or I went to Ferguson and sat there with these protests going, yeah, yeah, we're against the cops as well, we would probably have, you know, have people do racist things to us.
	It would be based on the fact that we're white.
	You know, it wouldn't be based on anything else because it's contextual.
	In that situation, the very concept of white privilege would be absurd because we would be being victimized for our skin colour.
	That's not any kind of privilege.
	In fact, in that context, what they would have is black privilege.
	Or if you were to go to like the Congo, you know, you don't have white privilege in the Congo.
	It would be black privilege at best, you know.
	But yeah, so I mean, this comment sums up the entire article.
	Because Jessica says, of all the people's experiences we should be listening to right now, white people are at the bottom of the totem pole.
	Agreed.
	By the way, Jessica, have you looked in the mirror lately?
	Yes.
	Jessica, why are you writing an article for The Guardian?
	Why does she have a job?
	I can't understand it.
	What's the point?
	Is this equality?
	Is this her version of equality?
	White people now need to go to the bottom of the totem pole because they're white.
	That's the reason.
	You know, it's it's that simple and it's like fuck's sake, Jessica.
	Everything matters.
	Imagine the message, right, for people who believe us.
	Okay, they're blaming white people and men for everything.
	Okay, right.
	But imagine the message it sends out to women and well, non-whites, but specifically blacks.
	You're basically telling them, Well, there's no point in trying.
	There's no point in trying to do anything with your life because the white man or the man will hold you back.
	And it's like, why don't you tell them that they can do shit with their life rather than telling them that they can't all the time?
	God.
	One thing that annoys me about all of this, and always has, right, is who gives white men anything for free?
	Apparently, other white men were all looking out for each other because we all love each other so much.
	Oh, yeah, it's a white male conspiracy.
	It's not like white men aren't in competition with each other.
	But that's the thing, isn't it?
	You know, no one, no one, like, there are no affirmative action schemes for men.
	There are no affirmative action schemes for white people.
	So I don't want them either.
	I don't want them either.
	No, no, exactly.
	Of course you don't.
	But as a white male, there is one way to get ahead in life, and that is work hard.
	And fostering a good work ethic is the only way to really get ahead in life.
	And so while everyone else is going out and complaining about privilege, complaining about this, complaining about that, male, black, white, whatever, white men are there knuckling down and doing the work and learning the skills because they know no one is going to give them a free pass.
	And so that gives the white men an advantage in the job market.
	You know, they have no choice but to be good at what they're doing.
	So it's like, you know, all of these affirmative actions, all of this, all of this claim of privilege is actually benefiting white men at the end of the day because they have no choice but to practice.
	It's funny, you know, that she talks about white privilege, right?
	So therefore, that means black men aren't privileged, but yet probably the week before she was saying that men were privileged.
	You're not familiar with the progressive stack, are you?
	Didn't that mean that black men were privileged then?
	Oh, God, I don't know.
	I don't know how it works.
	I don't want it.
	That's the thing.
	It's something called the progressive stack.
	So you've got basically at the bottom of the stack, people who should speak very last.
	Females.
	No, no, no, no.
	Obviously, it's white men who should speak last.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And the ones who should speak first are probably black disabled women or transgendered women, in fact.
	Because women have got like non-transgender privilege or something.
	I don't know.
	God knows what goes on in their fucking retarded heads.
	But this is basically the world that they want.
	And frankly, this is fucking Marxism.
	This is what they're talking about.
	I would say Marxism.
	It's what they want.
	They've also got a very convenient way out where, see if they are hateful.
	Say, for example, a black person was racist or a woman was sexist.
	They then say, oh, no, we can't be racist or sexist because we're not privileged and we don't have any power.
	You see?
	That's us.
	So they can be as racist and as sexist as they want and yet never be racist or sexist.
	You know, it's so convenient, right, to belong to a demographic that isn't capable of hate but yet gets a lot of hate.
	How convenient.
	It's almost like it's a fucking privilege.
	Almost is.
	God.
	But yeah, but this is this is the thing, and one thing that they never talk about is, like someone in the comments said, it's financial privilege.
	Because ultimately, that really is the only real privilege that is actually universal.
	Money talks.
	Exactly.
	It doesn't matter where you are, doesn't matter what you look like.
	If you've got stacks of cash, you have stacks of cash.
	And that is the thing that ultimately...
	The only thing it can't do is buy your health.
	But, you know, but...
	Well, even then, you know, you can get all the finest medical treatment in the world, can't you?
	True, true.
	No guarantees, hope.
	No, no, no, no guarantees.
	But yeah, we should probably wrap it up there.
	So, honestly, thanks a lot for coming off.
	I wanted to do this live for a while, actually.
	I thought it'd be a laugh, you know.
	I enjoyed it anyway.
	I thought it was fun.
	Yeah, me too.
	And I haven't done a podcast with you for God knows how long, because there's been so much goddamn going on.
	But yeah, I always enjoy having you on.
	It's always a really good laugh.
	And I really hope that everyone listening had a good time too.
	So let us know in the comments, and we'll speak to you all later.
	Thanks for watching.

▲