Episode 5259: SCOTUS To Hear Birthright Citizenship Case Wednesday
Bannon's War Room Episode 5259 analyzes oil markets defying Trump's diplomatic rhetoric as prices hit $104-$115, while criticizing Senate Republicans for ignoring the Save America Act amid DHS funding delays. The host argues illegal aliens lack U.S. jurisdiction, predicting a loss in the upcoming SCOTUS birthright citizenship case despite the challenge to the 14th Amendment. Additional segments cover Representative Todd Jones's H.R. 1007 bill for ADHD alternatives and AOC's ketamine spending controversy, concluding that political theater often masks legislative stagnation and legal uncertainty. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm 100% right, beyond 100%, because for the better part of the last four weeks, since we've been at this, Trump would come out and say, oh, they're about to relent or the negotiations are going well.
Oil would be down $15 a barrel, $10 a barrel.
This is the time where Trump is saying we've got them where we want them.
And the oil market this time said, you know what?
We're seeing something different in the actual physical oil market.
And they're pushing the prices up.
And they're going to wait for the real all-clear, not the rhetorical all-clear.
So this is the first time that over the past four weeks, Trump would come out and say something very positive.
In other words, positive for some sort of solution, oil would go down.
It would retreat immediately.
This is the first time where we heard some of that same, I don't call it rhetoric, some of that same commentary coming out of Trump and the administration.
Well, every other time the Iranians have disputed, he didn't, we're not doing this.
That's not true.
They did it again, but this time the oil market didn't retreat.
It stayed.
It was $99.60 on Friday at the close.
It ended up, it's opened at 103 today.
It went up to 104.5.
It doesn't believe anything until it sees it now.
And I told you, I spoke to a major transporter and a major refiner when I was in Dallas with you guys, and they are both.
And remember, the refiner is very susceptible to higher oil prices.
They don't want higher oil prices because they need to buy it to run it through the refinery.
Both of those, transport and refiners, are predicting and feeling like oil is going substantially higher, which is tough news.
Now, the CCP, supposedly today, breaking, I think in the Financial Times, are telling in the supply chains, they're telling the people in the supply chains, they're going to be passing on these higher costs to them.
So they're saying costs are going to go up.
Remember, our allies and even our enemies, the incentives are not aligned with ours.
Correct.
President Trump, as we said, his economic plan is predicated upon full-spectrum energy dominance and always led by oil at as low as President Trump can get it.
And we know President Trump had a target of trying to get it to a four handle, try to get it into the 40s.
In fact, it was, I think, 53 or 54 when BB went to Mar-Lago between Christmas and New Year's.
So President Trump's always been that oil's, you know, our Arab allies are having 2x, 2.5x increase in their reserves because this.
The four o'clock at the five o'clock in Real America's Voice Eastern and watch this show lead into the most intellectually sound show, I think, anywhere, really.
Not only on RAV, but anywhere.
If you listen to the war room, like I said, you leave there a lot smarter than when you enter.
President Trump's past emissaries, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, are reportedly hitting a diplomatic wall, with CNN and The Guardian now reporting that Tehran has indicated it would prefer talks with Vice President JD Vance.
You'll recall it was Witkoff and Kushner who met with Iran in February, right before the U.S. and Israel launched strikes.
President Trump issued a 10-day pause to postpone planned strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure.
This remains a truly once-in-a-generation opportunity for the regime to make a good deal with the United States, permanently abandon their nuclear ambitions, and stop acting as the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism.
If the Iranians reject this golden opportunity, the greatest military in the history of the world continues to stand by to provide President Trump with every option available to ensure this regime continues to pay a grave price.
One way or another, Iran will no longer have the credible ability to threaten the United States or our allies, which is, of course, the overall objective admission the president set out when he launched Operation Epic Fury.
The trend remains clear.
The United States is conducting more intense, targeted strikes with devastating combat power with each passing day to destroy the threat posed by the Iranian terrorist regime, as President Trump sought out to do a month ago.
It's no surprise that we are seeing the remaining elements of the regime become increasingly eager to end the destruction and come to the negotiating table while they still can.
Despite all of the public posturing you hear from the regime and false reporting, talks are continuing and going well.
What is said publicly is, of course, much different than what's being communicated to us privately.
However and whenever this war in Iran ends is anybody's guess right now, but what is becoming less of a guess is what it's doing to the Republican Party.
As Politico puts it, the president is taking a highly unusual twin-track approach to this war.
On the one hand, he's trying to find the fastest off-ramp to a conflict he knows voters do not like and could mortally wound Republicans at the ballot box, arguing the war is basically over.
You've heard it.
On the other hand, he is also arguing to escalate by taking the oil, sending in more troops, seizing uranium, and repeating his ultimatums.
Quote, if for any reason a deal is not shortly reached, which it will probably be, and if the Hormuz Strait is not immediately open for business, we will conclude our lovely stay, in quotes, in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating all of their electric generating plants, oil wells, and Harg Island.
I think the American people are smart enough not to take the word of a terrorist regime that has chanted death to America for 47 years at their word.
And I hope the journalists in this room are wise enough not to take an Iranian regime that has repeatedly lied about our country, about our values, about everyone in this room, frankly, for nearly five decades.
So I think the American public are smart enough to understand that.
unidentified
The president posted this morning about his threat that on leaving Iran, he said we might be blowing up and completely obliterating all of their electric generating plants, oil wells, Harg Island, and possibly all desalinization plans.
Under international law, striking civilian infrastructure like that is generally prohibited.
Why is the president threatening what would amount to potentially a war crime with the U.S. military?
And how do you square that with the administration repeatedly saying that the U.S. does not target civilians?
Look, the president has made it quite clear to the Iranian regime at this moment in time, as evidenced by the statement that you just read, that their best move is to make a deal, or else the United States Armed Forces has capabilities beyond their wildest imagination, and the president is not afraid to use them.
That's not what I said, Garrett.
And you're saying the word potential for a reason, because I'm sure some experts are telling you that in your ear to try to ask me that question.
Of course, this administration and the United States Armed Forces will always act within the confines of the law.
But with respect to achieving the full objectives of Operation Epic Fury, President Trump is going to move forward unabated, and he expects the Iranian regime to make a deal with the administration.
unidentified
Try then.
Try that.
Which of those objectives would destroying the desalinization plant most help?
Every time the president says something that seems completely contradictory, it's Caroline Levis' job to go out there and pretend that it's somehow consistent.
And this is the trick for this war, right?
He says one thing, as you rightly point out, one minute and another thing, another.
It wasn't that long ago we were talking about unconditional surrender.
Now we're talking about negotiations, which are, of course, conditional.
And it's, in some ways, it's the uncertainty, which they say is intentional, may have some strategic purpose.
Nobody can be 100% sure what Donald Trump might do next.
That's, you know, there's an advantage to that in some way.
But it also means that, you know, even he doesn't seem to know what he's doing or what he's going to do next.
And because it seems to be so conditioned on the impulse of the moment, the thing he happens to see on TV, the thing somebody happens to tell him most recently.
And I think that that's the kind of thing that has, you know, really concerned both the Allies and a lot of American officials who are not certain where this war is going.
unidentified
Thanks a lot, Carolyn.
Two questions regarding the financial costs of the war.
Back during the Persian Gulf War, 1990, 1991, Arab countries paid for the vast majority of the costs of the war: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the UAE.
Who's paying for the cost of this war?
Will those Arab countries step up to do just that?
Okay, we've been pressing those two points in this total war.
Number one, you have to seize the financial assets of the Persians.
And a lot of those financial assets, the ones not sitting in Switzerland, are sitting, the bulk of them, we are told, are sitting in Dubai.
Think about that for a second.
A nation that we defend, UAE, and they can make that decision.
Now, there is all types of chatter in Arab media that this is being done because that would be a big move.
The pirate code they're used to having the pirate code is a double deal everybody, even double deal themselves.
And I think even some of the Arab nation is a little surprised about the level of assets they have, but this should be seized immediately.
Also, they're absolutely correct in the Gulf War.
I think the vast amount was paid by the Arab nations.
This should be 100% paid for.
Iran, remember, one of the war objectives, make sure they can't have power projection regionally.
And obviously, a big part of that is Israel, but it's also on the Arab nations.
And one of the reasons you've seen some folks go wobbly is that they've hit the Arab nations, the desalination plants, some of the oil refiners.
Of course, the Israelis hit the gas plant, which I say the inflection point.
But the point is that the Arab nations got to write checks.
First off, their value of their oil has over doubled already, just off the profits, just off the wealth increase.
And they're all jumping on force majeure.
The Saudis the other day, Force Majeur, they want to break the contracts with the West.
They want to break the contracts of oil that's at $50, $52, $55 a barrel.
And the Qatar already, I think, invoked on the five-year contracts for gas or liquefied natural gas after they liquefy it.
These guys are making a fortune.
It's time to get the checkbooks out and stroke the checks.
I don't know why we would go to Capitol Hill, ask for $200 billion until we go around and pass the hat there and say, hey, you in for that, you in for that, you went for get your checkbook out.
I want to see a bunch of zeros at the end of this.
Then whatever the net is, maybe you have to throw something in it.
I don't even know why you would throw something in it.
You know, maybe you got to go to Jerusalem too and say, hey, get the checkbook out.
Let's write a check here, guys.
A little something for the effort, as they said in Caddyshack.
A little something for the effort.
I think it's what Bill Murray told the Dalai Lama after he caddied for him.
He was about to get stiffed.
We can't get stiffed over there.
Scott Besson's up.
He's giving a talk about families and what President Trump's doing for tax cuts and what refund checks are coming and about Trump accounts, all these great things that President Trump's doing for the economy.
Well, this pressure of paying for this Gulf War could wipe out a bunch of that.
It shouldn't have to happen.
We're saving people.
It's completely indifferent to us.
Get the NATO Navy, get the Royal Navy down, keep Hormuz.
Let's see their big plants keeping Hormuz and the Red Sea open.
We talked about this last summer.
If we're going to do this, which I don't understand why we're doing it, why are they not down stroking checks?
And what they should do is just replace us.
You know, all these guys, they're all great allies until it comes to actually either writing checks or sending people in harm's way.
Like our young men and women are volunteered by the political class daily to go into harm's way.
Mike Davis is going to join us.
There's so much more going on that we're going to get to all of it.
We're also going to get back to the war and we're going to cut into Scott Besson if he talks about what's happening in this war in the Gulf.
So from the turnover I did with Eric Bowling, just remember today, right in your number two princil, that it was the first time that President Trump had talked about, and he was some specificity and backed up by the Secretary of State or the National Security Advisor.
The markets did not respond.
The oil market did not drop like it has dropped.
In fact, West Texas Intermediate finished, I think, at 105 and 115 or about for Brent.
It's not these specific numbers.
It's kind of the pattern recognition.
Trent did not back off.
I think the markets need to see a little more information because the Iranians are coming out and pretty much saying, well, first off, nobody can figure out who's negotiating.
Actually, we're doing it directly, but a lot of different elements.
Remember, they're probably shattered into several different elements or denying it.
Of course, the entry room also reports that, you know, I keep talking about Arian's land, this history of the retreat back from India of Alexander the Great and his army.
They took the land route right on the rim, right there on the North Arabian Sea, and then into the Persian Gulf as he put 50% of his troops on the ships and had them go through her moves.
And it's just horrific.
You got to read about this expedition.
But they said, hey, Arian in the morning and Caddyshack in the afternoon.
That's range.
That's what you come to the war room for.
Mike Davis, I got two things for you.
One is very disturbing.
And there's some good guys over there too, and I think they went along with this.
The Senate, you agree to a deal that carves out ICE and customers of border.
Now, there is some theory.
Of course, Rosemary Jenks says she's talked to appropriations, and she says this theory doesn't work, that somehow in the Big Beautiful bill, they got loaded in there somehow, but it's still not clarity of that.
Although TSA somehow started getting paid today because CNN went to Houston's airport and they went to Atlanta's airport, which were two of the worst, if not the two worst.
And it's like two minutes in there.
I hope it's because ICE agents that were there not getting paid were arresting illegal aliens.
I don't know, but they're breezing through.
Tell me about that.
That's bad enough.
Also, you know, we spent all this time.
I could tell, and Warren Posse understood it.
Mike Lee is up there being a hero on the Save America Act and try to seize the floor and force this.
But besides him and Eric Schmidt and a couple of good guys, you just didn't feel the heat.
The Save America Act, this trying to go and get it and do the break the filibuster and do a standing film seemed like a couple of people trying to force it.
And then the Senate just powered, they took off in two weeks.
They're gone in two weeks.
So make this make sense for the audience exactly what happened and who's accountable.
Even Johnson, the speaker said, I can't do this.
They passed something totally different.
So, you know, people are kind of outraged about this.
Well, the senators have two crucial tasks that they have to accomplish.
They need to fund our homeland security so our DHS workers are not going for more than 40 days without their paychecks.
They also need to pass the Save America Act in the Senate that has 80% support among American voters, including a supermajority of Democrats and even a supermajority of minorities.
These Senate Republicans failed those two crucial tests.
They are on their second paid vacation in just about 40 days, while at the same time, these DHS workers were not getting paid.
We have DHS workers going to food banks.
These families are working paycheck to paycheck, and these senators thought it was a good idea to take their second paid vacation in 40 days while DHS workers are going unpaid.
What the hell is going on in the Senate?
I want to say this to these Senate Republicans.
Do your jobs.
Your job is to protect our homeland.
Your job is to make sure that only American citizens are voting in American elections.
have brought bipartisan support and you want to go on your second paid vacation they they know all that hang on you you work for a guy you revere grassly right you know the senate as well as anybody hell you led confirmations and some of the hardest confirmations in american history see what's going on here correct me if i'm wrong by somehow they're treating president trump as a lame duck they go on recess and they don't actually go in a technical recess so he can't do recess appointments Grassley and these guys still abiding by the rules.
So there's not breaking the filibuster.
By and by, we're still blue slipping people like crazy.
President Trump's still only got 14, I think, U.S. attorneys, which you know are the shock troops over at DH.
And we got nobody at DOJ.
You got a handful of great people, but they're barely hanging on.
They got cases, you know, every day they're going into federal court.
They were down in Georgia the other day.
You've got this situation of the Save America, where they have no, you know, and I know they have no intention of ever passing that.
In fact, Tuberville said, hey, you couldn't even get, if there's no filibuster, we couldn't get 50 votes to make JD the 51st.
He says, you wouldn't come close.
You're a couple of short there.
So what is President Trump to do?
The Senate has basically said, hey, sorry, not sorry.
Jon Thune, isn't it time that we actually get Article 3 and the War Room posse and get up?
Because you only need 27 votes to change the leader.
And John Thune is a good guy.
He's a nice guy.
But clearly, you know, in wartime, you need a wartime concigliere.
You need people prepared to take it to the mat and he's just not going to do it.
So shouldn't our focus be on, instead of things that are clearly going to be performative, we just go back and say, let's change the leader and let's get somebody in there that's prepared to have President Trump's back and go all in, even if we lose.
I think what the Warren posse and the people at Article 3 that support it, they want to see a fight and a real fight.
As Mike Lee said, it was going to take a fist fight on the Senate floor to get the Save America Act to make it real.
And we didn't even come close as great as Mike Lee and Eric Schmidt and a handful of others were.
The Senate Democrats are fighting like hell for their key constituency, illegal aliens, right?
They want to, Senate Democrats want to defund ICE, defund Homeland Security, make it easy for their illegal aliens to rig and steal elections.
And how do Senate Republicans respond like giants?
Because that's what they are.
And I would say this to Jon Thune, nice guys finish last.
You need to get these Senate Republicans back in the Senate and grind the Senate Democrats to a halt.
If they want to filibuster the Save America Act, make them stand on their feet and talk until they run out of gas.
And then you can pass the Save America Act with a simple majority.
And on DHS funding, you really can't get the support to pay our TSA workers.
You can't get the support to pay our ICE agents.
What the hell are Senate Republicans doing if they can't lean in on these two crucial issues that deal directly with our sovereignty with the Save America Act and our national security with the funding of DHS?
This is shameful.
These Senate Republicans are cowards.
They need to get their asses back to work and get out of Disneyland.
Mike Lee has a good proposal, which is using a provision of the Constitution for the president to call these senators back in session to pass this extraordinary measure to pay our DHS workers.
They've gone without paychecks for more than 40 days.
They're not Senate Republicans.
They don't have trust funds.
They actually are working Americans living paycheck to paycheck.
And it's shameful that these Senate Republicans went on their second paid vacation while these DHS workers are struggling and going to food banks.
Senate Republicans are acting shamefully, and Jon Thune needs to bring the Senate back in session, fund DHS, and pass the Save America Act.
And I want to remind these Senate Republicans, because I used to work with these cowards when I confirmed judges.
They're the biggest, they are, it seems like the Senate is the only swamp in the world where the reptiles lack backbones, and they are really, really proving that this week.
I need to remind these guys, these senators, you would not have a Senate majority but for Donald J. Trump and his landslide victory.
Do you think that, by the way, I'm asking you to stay through the break because we're going to talk about the Wednesday 14th Amendment debate at the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship.
Do you think you could do that, Mike, unless Dune thinks his job's in jeopardy?
I mean, is he going to do it?
And like everything in Washington, it takes a crisis or it takes somebody think they're going to get thrown under the bus until any action takes place.
Do you think Dune will do anything just because Mike Davis and Steve Bannon at the war room are yelling at him?
Or is it going to take somebody to say, look, let's move on this guy?
Court is set to consider President Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship, excuse me, a centerpiece of his agenda.
In a post this morning, the president repeated a claim that he's made before, calling the constitutional amendment establishing birthright citizenship, having more to do with slavery than equality, he said.
He also seemed to take a swipe at the justices themselves, saying dumb judges and justices will not make a great country.
Donald Trump and his solicitor general and a few conservative scholars are bringing to the court are some fringe arguments that have been rejected for more than a century.
As you said, the 14th Amendment clearly says all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States.
And that term subject to the jurisdiction has been held not to include diplomats and invading armies and initially Native Americans, although that was changed later.
But now Donald Trump and his allies are trying to say that that should also not include people who are here illegally.
And look, he's already predicting he's going to lose.
Most legal scholars think he's going to lose this.
And this will be the second major defeat after tariffs.
And politically, it will allow him to blame the court and say that he tried to fight the good fight and he lost.
And it's going to further poison his relationship with this court, which is one of the most conservative courts in decades.
Again, most people do not think he has a prayer here, but there are an increasing number of fringy legal scholars who have come to adopt the idea that maybe it is time to take another look at this, that maybe that initial decision was wrong.
So I don't think he can completely rule it out.
But some conservative justices have hinted in previous arguments that they have very little patience for this argument and that they're, you know, it would just, it would just throw 100 years of jurisprudence into chaos, for one thing, Katie, because you're supposed to be able to rely on decades and decades of settled precedent.
Well, I'm glad that Jack Smith's spokesperson is weighing in on this important Supreme Court case.
I would just point to Ken to look at the Wong Kim Ark case from 1898, where the Supreme Court very clearly ruled on the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship clause.
And the Supreme Court said that in order for you to have birthright citizenship in this country under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, you have to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
And in the Long Kim Ark case, the Supreme Court said that lawful permanent residents are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
But American Indians in a separate case were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
So you have to ask this dispositive question.
If American Indians are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under the 14th Amendment, how the hell would illegal aliens be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?
If you follow the plain text, textualism, or the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship clause, originalism, these constitutionalist justices on the Supreme Court should find this to be a very easy case.
There is clearly no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens, for Chinese birth tourists, for example, should not have birthright citizenship.
I would just say this to these six Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices.
If you're actually going to follow the law, this is a very easy case.
There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens.
They're not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
They're subject to the jurisdiction from the country from which they came, right?
And so if ambassador's kids do not have birthright citizenship, if invading armies do not have birthright citizenship, if American Indians do not have birthright citizenship, this is such an easy legal decision for them to make.
Clearly, illegal aliens do not have birthright citizenship.
That is, if they have the courage to follow the plain text in the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment, we'll see.
You know, who knows how these justices will rule?
Courage is in very short supply in Washington, D.C. right now.
Okay, so we're going to be covering all of that live.
It's on Wednesday.
Of course, we'll have a whole team as their Rosemary Jenks, Mike Howell, the entire team will be there right before I let you go, because the process is, you know, Mike Lee puts out something, President Trump puts it up on True Social.
Just explain to the audience, just take a minute.
How do we actually get them back here?
Is President Trump calling back?
Has Mike Lee put some resolution up?
What has to happen to get them out of their vacations, get them back here on Easter weekend to set things right here, sir?
Yeah, to Senate Republicans, I realize that you're in the most exclusive nursing home on the planet, but I would just like to remind you that recess is for kids.
You need to get back to work and pass the Save America Act and funds DHS workers who are living paycheck to paycheck and have to go to food banks.
So they don't have the same luxuries that you have with these two paid vacations in 40 days.
If you're not willing to do that, President Trump should invoke a provision of the Constitution that allows him to call the Senate back into session during extraordinary times.
I think this is an extraordinary time when DHS workers are at food banks because they're not getting paid.
It's the first of its kind, and we're hoping for more throughout the country.
But it's basically on Eisenhower's Abel Childs.
And we have the checklists of the ADHD child and how it mirrors that of the gifted child.
So our presentation is going to be to educate lawmakers.
It's open to the public.
It's from 8 a.m. to 12 noon in the south wing of the Capitol building.
And people can find information on FultonCountyspeaks.com in the events section.
It is going to be wonderful.
I mean, basically, we are working to help support a bill, H.R. 1007, sponsored by Todd Jones, a House Representative, regarding our arts for health initiatives for improving mental health outcomes.
So basically, it is to work on alternatives instead of psychiatric drugs for children.
It's to really look at the validity of the label itself because President Eisenhower wanted the children, the able child, to flourish.
And where the ADHD child is a disease model, President Eisenhower's child is a gifted child.
And when you lift up the child, the entire country flourishes.
This disease model of ADHD isn't real.
It's a checklist.
It's subjective, where the gifted are the ones like Beethoven and all these wonderful people in history.
I could go on and on.
Einstein and Steve Jobs.
So these, it's really looking at this label and saying, why are we putting an ADHD disease label on these children when in fact they're gifted and they're able?
We need to flourish through President Eisenhower's National Defense Education Act.
A lot of this is just little boys being little boys.
Next thing you know, they got thrown on drugs.
This whole thing's so corrupt.
It's so awful.
It's big pharma in your life.
It's disgusting.
And that's why I think you guys are doing such a great job.
Let me just change the topic.
I don't want to get, I don't want to be accusatory, but this has popped up all over, and I know you guys have tracked it.
Explain to me this AOC situation with, I guess, her, the FCC, the federal elections, they got to put out once a quarter where they actually spend the money they raise.
And there's some issue about she and some spending item.
They've actually paid, I don't know, what is it, $19,000 to one of these doctors that's also a guy that I guess he prescribes ketamine?
Is there anything there or it's causing a big media storm?
And I know you looked into it and you didn't want to jump to conclusions because you were the first one to alert me to this weeks ago or a week or so ago.
What is actually going on there?
That her campaign actually pay for ketamine that she would take?
Or do we have any, what are the specifics of this?
And that's why we didn't want to jump on it is because she hasn't admitted to taking ketamine.
But right now, we're working on a story that just came out on the Gateway Pundit about a mom who used ketamine, which is not FDA approved for use in children.
It's not FDA approved.
So it doesn't have any warnings on it.
So we're working on a case where a mom killed four of her children.
She was on ketamine and another psychiatric drug.
So this is all experimental.
And so we didn't jump on it because number one, we have to find out two things here.
One, if she's using ketamine and she's declaring herself mentally ill, she can't run for president.
Come on, that's for sure.
Number two, if she's working with somebody who's influencing her to make ketamine accessible to the public, I think that's questionable to have on your campaign.
So, and this guy has very deep international pockets with the ketamine and the other article we did on the TMS where they hook your child up to the wires to their head and put magnetic electric pulses in it.
This is all experimental stuff.
And so we need to get it clarified.
Did she take ketamine?
Question mark.
Is she being influenced by somebody who wants to push ketamine on children?
Okay, so 8 a.m. to 12 noon in the south wing of the Capitol building, first of the kind exposition here.
And if people want us to come to their state, we're happy to do that.
They can go on FultonCountySpeaks.com events section and learn more about it.
But we are very much interested in helping get this art building, art bill, HR 1007 by Todd Jones, House Representative for Art for Children Instead of Drugs.
One, if you get in touch with Philip Patrick and the team, I think now more than ever, find out what central banks have been on a roll of buying gold at record rates.
And we hear that maybe a couple of three central banks, maybe even in the Gulf Emirates, like Saudi Arabia, have been selling gold to make sure they can generate some cash to pay some bills since they can't monetize their oil like they used to.
End of the dollar empire.
The eighth free installment is up.
Make sure you get that and study it.
Seven installments are incorporated.
First, I can get those all free on the online at birchgold.com, promo code Bannon.
Also in print edition, the End of the Dollar Empire with all the graphics, all of it.
Most importantly, talk to Philip Patrick and the team.
Talk to them today.
Another free, this is very important, this company that helps you get through the confusion of Medicare because we know it's insanely confusing because it's a patchwork system, but put together over many decades.
Also, I don't know if the confusion may be a feature, not a bug.
These guys are coming.
They're data guys.
They came up at data.
And you have to understand all the different perturbations that are available to you.
That's one of the things.
That's one of the reasons behind big data.
845 War Room.
You couldn't get simpler.
845 Warroom.
Call that number.
You get a free consultation right now.
If you've signed up for a Medicare plan and you don't think it's the right one, or if you haven't done it yet, call them.
Even if you have a plan, they can work through your plan and potentially maybe even get you something better.
It started because a guy's mom got wrapped around the axle on a deal, and she was very upset.
She understood that, hey, the reason she signed her, the things are going to continue to go up, and she realized she didn't understand it.
That's where her son, who had no experience in healthcare, really started to drill down on this to solve her problem.
Also, in the next hour, I've asked because of everything that's going on in this war, also what's going on in Israel with the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
asked Raymond Ibrahim, a Coptic Christian, Egyptian, sword and scimitar, which is, I think, one of the best.
And Victor Davis Hansen wrote the introduction and was his mentor or his thesis advisor when he turned his thesis into about the military history.
This is a military history between Islam and the West.
And of course, he wrote then Defenders of the West, which are the Christian heroes who stood against Islam.
Incredibly powerful.
He has out now the two swords of Christendom or the two swords of Christianity about the Knights of St. John.
And of course, the Knights Templar, the military, the military orders are the monks who were military roles.
Fascinating story about the Crusades and thereafter.
So, and Raymond's going to be on for the whole hour.
We're going to go through all of this.
And maybe even talk about the new Christian state of Jerusalem.
How you like that?
You signed up yet?
Nothing to sign up yet.
I'm working on it.
So much going on in the six o'clock hour.
I couldn't be more excited to get Raymond on and talk to him.
Mike Lindell, get us the, what's the status of the factory?
And to tell a little bit of the backstory, I want to make sure people understand this because sometimes it's lost because the audience doesn't hear it all the time of the heroes like yourself that stood in the breach.
Got to remember, Mike Lindell was not a political guy.
He's like so many people out there, and particularly so many people until President Trump came on and we started to really get down to the, to really find out the problems in this country.
The 2020 stolen election, Mike, was one that triggered you particularly.
You said, hey, look, I can't live in a country and just steal an election.
It's once you got engaged in that, they really came after you.
And people have no earthy idea.
And I've had the privilege of getting to know Mike for a couple of years of how they've come out to try to destroy his company, try to destroy his charity, which is a Christian charity to make sure people that are addicted can use the word of God to help them in their addiction and turn their life around.
Of course, you got a Muslim Attorney General of Minnesota that's after him relentlessly.
They've come after him on everything.
IRS, it's just insane to destroy Mike Lindell after he put all this money in to really, and this is why Georgia is so important.
It hadn't been for Lindell, we wouldn't have been anywhere in any of these cases.
But they don't understand behind the scenes what happens.
Somebody bought the factory you guys had specifically to make sure they could throw you out.
And this happens so much to people.
You can't, the tricks, the tricks, the left, they're Bolsheviks.
This is what they do.
If you see the no kings over the weekend, it's so vicious.
So Mike Lindell, tell me the story and what are you doing about it and how can the world in in January of 21 actually Steve, your show was one of the few places that gave me a platform and I shot it to the rooftops and then came lawfare with all these machine companies and then suing me and my pillow, my employee-owned company.
But then Arctic Frost took over.
That was our own government coming after my pillow and the most attacked company in history starting in January of 2022.