Episode 5213: When Does It Look Like The End With The War In Iran; Pentagon Moving More Troops Into Iran
Stephen K. Bannon and guests dissect the escalating Iran conflict on March 13, 2026, detailing a Pentagon surge involving 5,000 Marines on the USS Tripoli targeting mountainous nuclear sites after six crew deaths in a tanker crash. With oil prices soaring past $100 per barrel due to production shut-ins, experts Eric Bowling and Neil McCabe argue that unrelenting bombing is essential to dismantle Iran's ballistic missile capabilities before asymmetric attacks prolong the war, while Bannon urges prayer for enemies amidst a strategy prioritizing legislative passage over political optics. [Automatically generated summary]
Briefing from the Pentagon Day on how the war is going.
Matt Boyle, and I believe, even as we were speaking there, the president, we're going to get this clip pulled in a second, as Matt Bull was saying how he doesn't believe the president's going to endorse Cornyn right now.
That the president was talking, I think, to Brian Kilmead over on his radio show and said, hey, look, I would like to endorse, but the Save America Act comes first.
We're going to get more details in this hour, hopefully, about what's going to happen next week on Stoon Brings It.
But still, he hasn't convinced enough of his colleagues that we need to go to the talking filibuster.
And the talking filibuster is the only way right now, conceivably, this thing can pass.
And the president's not looking for optics.
Clearly, it would be great to force these Democrats, just like the president did at the State of the Union, where he basically set it up, laid the trap, then closed the trap on national TV about, you know, the first priority of someone elected to office is the protection of American citizens, not illegal alien invaders.
And the Democrats couldn't stand up for that.
That was a magnificent moment of that great state of the union.
Next week could be that as you force these guys up to debate, at least maybe for a couple of days, as it looks like that's what's going to happen.
But unless you actually make them defended, because of the filibuster rules right now, you'll never get closure with the 60 votes.
And so it'll just go away.
The president's not looking for optics, although he would love to force these guys into the corner and make them defend it.
Go to the, you're saying earlier about targeting going west because there's no way clarification.
Clearly to the east is the Straits of Hormuz and all this asymmetric warfare that's going on there, whether it's mining operation or some sort of mining operation.
It doesn't look like they want to pursue that because it's pretty evident the regime needs cash money.
And that's why they're allowing the Chinese Communist Party's vessels to go out with their oil.
And now we know our great allies in Italy and France, who I'm sure are going to come out and deny it after they've been outed by the Financial Times.
They're trying to cut a deal to have their oil get out also.
You said that you actually think some of the targeting is going west.
To the west, I think is those mountain ranges.
You got Pakistan, all that.
Is this because of the nuclear program?
Is this because of other basically redoubts that the Revolutionary Guard are dug in at?
The States of Hermuz is the number one most important choke point in the entire world.
And effectively, the Iranian government has replaced Lloyds of London as the insurer of record there.
And so they decide who goes in and out.
And that will be resolved.
I'm sure people are working on that right now.
But on the targeting, the nuclear fuel, the storage, the sort of the borrowed bunkers, that's all in the central and east of Iran, where you're getting into the mountain ranges.
And so you can drop bombs and bunker busters on those facilities, but the uranium enriched uranium is still there and somebody can possibly grab it.
And so I think that's why you're going to see insertions of special operations if you haven't seen it or it hasn't happened already.
Certainly the Russians, certainly the Chinese.
There's a lot of people who could go into those mountains and try to dig out some enriched uranium.
I think they're already as a trial balloon trying to say, hey, we may need to actually go in there and get it.
Neil, just hang on for a second.
Let me bring Eric Bowling in.
So, Eric, you've had a couple of days of called Shots here on the oil situation.
First off, what do you think about allowing the Chinese Communist Party?
I think it's 11 million barrels I've read that they've taken out because they need it.
It's essential to both Venezuela and the Iranians.
And they had long-term output.
They had an amazing output deal with Venezuela that virtually looked like they were paying undermarket for it almost.
And they've got a very special long-term output deal with the Mulas.
They used to pay with their own currency.
We understand they're making them pay in dollars now.
But what do you think about this situation where the Chinese Communist Party get theirs out?
As Besson said, hey, it's not mine because there are certain vessels with certain flags getting out.
And now the Financial Times of London is reporting that Italy and France are separately in direct negotiations to get their ships out with their oil, sir.
Again, Steve, you and I have been texting through the night.
These are all band-aids.
Some have Disney characters on them.
Some have, I don't know, Looney Tunes.
They're small fixes.
None of this is moving the oil market.
Brent is still up over $100 a barrel.
West Texas intermediate is unchanged today, which is, I guess, a plus.
I think if you watch, I'm sure you talked about it in the first hour, but Pete Heckseth, something very, very important happened today.
And I was texting Pete afterwards.
I'm like, that was the best things I've heard so far.
What we've been talking about for a week now, Steve, we needed to up the pressure on Iran, right?
And the only way you really get them to negotiate, and you never negotiate with terrorists, I get it, but you put them to the point where they either come to the table or they're dead.
They're wiped out.
And Pete basically said today, watch what happens today.
Trump said it too.
Watch what happens today.
The most kinetic force dropped onto Iran will happen today.
So they're not scaling it back.
They're increasing the pressure on Iran.
I think it's important because look what else is happening.
Iran has no defenses right now.
They're depleted.
Their military is depleted.
They don't have defensive missiles.
They don't have their navy is sunk in essence.
But what they do have are these sleeper cells in America.
In the last three weeks, Steve, there have been four Iranian-friendly or slash ISIS attacks happening in the United States.
Yesterday, we had the synagogue in Michigan.
We have old Dominion shooting one dead, the two IEDs thrown in New York City.
And let's not forget in Austin, Texas, about three weeks ago, three and a half, yeah, three weeks ago, there's a man who killed three people with the Iranian flag on his chest.
So this is their only fight right now.
This is a fallout, yeah.
But like I said, I think we really need to up the pressure.
What we're doing here with the straight of Hormuz, I sent you the video yesterday.
I hope maybe if you didn't get it, your audience would love to see it.
There's a video on one of the things I sent you.
We talked about it yesterday.
The Iranians have, well, the United States has sunk their big vessels that lay mines in the waters.
Those are big, above-the-sea level vessels.
They have submersibles that are basically mines.
They're unmanned, and they're underwater submersibles that carry mines in them.
And they have thousands of them.
Look at the video.
It's incredible.
It's confirmed that that's their video.
We need to really put our foot, our boot really hard down on the Iranian IRCG because I don't think many Ayatollah is, I don't think he's capable of making any decisions right now from some faraway bunker.
We actually said, and Pete and then the General Kane re-emphasized today is going to be, and this is day 13, and they've already had, I think, four or five, hey, this is the most, this is the worst day they're going to get power.
So they're powering up again.
This is going to be, as Pete said, and then General Kane reaffirmed it.
This is going to be the most intensive day of kinetic warfare.
Also, they implied or essentially said in so many words, we have air supremacy, that now we're just over Tehran picking targets and going in on those targets.
And we don't have to use the standoff weapons anymore, the high, the very expensive, high-tech.
You're back to a lot of it's back to WW-2 gravity bombs, right?
Maybe a little more sophisticated.
But as Pete said, we have an unlimited stock of them.
Do you think that that military operation has now changed to the objectives of degradation or destruction of their military capacity is changing through actions, maybe not so words right now, back to regime change that they figure since these guys are going asymmetric in the Persian Gulf, in the Straits of Hormuz, that our Arab allies and our European allies are saying, hey, we got to have this open.
If we're not going to have gasoline and oil that blows through the roof and topples our governments or monarchies, you've got to get it.
And so the actual intention is to continue this unrelenting bombing for how many weeks it takes to make sure that we've absolutely destroyed root and branch, whatever remains of this regime.
I think no matter what we say we're going to do in the Strait of Hormuz, the threat of what the Iranians still have the capability of doing will prohibit the Strait from being fully opened until there is some sort of either surrender or deal cut.
And I prefer the deal rather than the regime change surrender as we've been talking about.
But maybe they're listening to us, Steve.
I've been sending them the videos every day of this discussion that you and I are having.
And we've been saying, step it up, get them to relent, get them to their knees, and then they'll be much more willing to negotiate on your terms.
And maybe they are.
It is always the better strategy if you're going to do it.
It doesn't matter what the original strategy was, what the original plan was.
You know, they say the enemy of a perfect plan is a good plan.
Maybe they had an idea, and now it's changing.
It's evolving as they go.
But with the superiority that we were showing over them, I think there's an opportunity where we do get, whether it's a mullifaction or the IRCG to come to the table and say, okay, enough.
What do you want?
That's the point where you cut that oil deal.
You cut the deal where we control the additional oil barrels and we win.
Sure, the implication is the longer it stays here, the longer you're going to have a $4 gallon of gasoline at the pump.
It's going to hit it there at some point in the next 30 days.
Brent is the European, mostly the European model.
A lot of other foreign countries use the Brent.
It's pulled out of the North Sea of Northern Europe.
West Texas Intermediate is West Texas, obviously.
And the reason why those are irrelevant, they are a finer, a lighter crude oil.
They're easier to refine.
Venezuelan crude is very heavy.
It's very thick.
It takes a lot more refining.
You get less gasoline out of those.
You get heavier products from the refining process out of the heavier crudes.
So our crude, the West Texas Intermediate, is about the best in the world, with the exception of maybe Brent, which is a little bit lighter.
That's why there's a $5 difference between the two of them, but they run about the same price together all the time.
They're benchmarks also.
So there are crudes produced in different countries and whatnot, but they're all benched based on West Texas Intermediate or Brent.
Those are the two major crude oils.
But to stay at a hovered $100 a barrel when we were flushed, remember this three weeks or four weeks ago, we were $57 a barrel for West Texas Intermediate and about, I don't know, $61 a barrel for Brent.
And that was on its way down.
So we can get back there and we will.
I sent you a chart where the longer it stays at 100 or 110, the longer it's going to take for it to get back down to reasonable prices.
Another thing that no one's really talking about, Steve, is with the threat in the Middle East, there's a lot of shut-ins.
So in other words, we talk about shut-inshams when a country that produces oil pulls it out of the ground or someone who refines any of the processes.
So we actually 119.48 in the West Texas intermediate and Brenton got to 125 on Monday night, briefly.
So the reason why it matters is the reason why it is at $100 a barrel, Brent, 95 WTI, is because of the shut-ins that are going on in the Middle East.
We had plenty.
We were kind of well flushed.
The world was well flushed with 100 million barrels of oil production a day.
And we were in sync.
Supply and demand were in sync.
That's why we were retreating towards the $50 a barrel area.
And then this thing started.
And so the Kuwaitis started to pull some refining offline.
The Saudis are pulling some of their production offline.
There's a couple of Middle Eastern countries.
And don't forget, we've talked about this all week.
I've been on this show for, I think, starting last week, six or seven days.
And Steve, I really would love people to understand that as much as the Saudis and the Middle Eastern countries say they're our allies, want to be our allies.
Of course they do.
They want to be enemies of Donald Trump.
Absolutely agree with that.
They also like the $100 price tag on oil because it greases their economies.
And so when they have a reason to pull production off.
So it's not just the straight of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz can open tomorrow.
It'll take time for the refineries and the production to ramp back up because they bring the production down quickly because they have cover.
They've got news cover.
There's a war going on in the Middle East, a conflict going on in the Middle East.
So they can pull back their production.
And what that does is once the straight opens, they'll work through some of the oil that's backlogged, but the production has been lower for, like I just said, the longer it stays at $100 or $110 a barrel, the longer it's going to take to ramp up the production to meet that supply again.
So it'll come down.
It just will take longer, depending on how long we stay at the elevated levels.
President Trump was all about full spectrum energy dominance and it got to as low, I think, 50 bucks or 52 bucks.
And he wanted even lower.
I mean, he's all for lower oil.
I think it's 60 bucks is what the industry said.
Do you anticipate post this?
Because the industry always wants higher prices and it'll do anything to kind of, you know, head fakes or whatever to get prices higher.
Do you see that happening?
Or do you see eventually coming back to the full spectrum energy dominance level of President Trump?
Because the economic turnaround here, I mean, we had $120 a barrel during the illegitimate Biden regime because of all the madness he had throughout the world, plus his Green New Deal scam and all this, you know, everything he had about hating basically hydrocarbons.
Do you see us going back?
Do you see an ever?
I mean, right now.
Do you feel that like Scott Besson and Treasury are even in right now actively trying to like make sure that they suppress the price here so it doesn't blow up the American consumer and gets President Trump's economic turnaround back on track?
So he, unfortunately, not even Donald Trump can tamp down the price of oil.
You can do things that bring oil down.
Donald Trump is the only human being ever to bring oil to a zero.
In fact, it went negative $20 a barrel during his first term, during your term at the White House.
First time it ever happened, never happened before.
Look back, folks.
If you don't believe me, trust me, it went negative $20.
They were paying people to take the oil off their hands.
Here's what will happen.
The whole emphasis of the Trump midterm strategy was affordability going into this war.
That got blown out of the water with the war because oil prices are tied to every single thing in the world.
We just had an inflation number come out today that showed tame inflation.
But guess what?
That was through January.
What happens when March numbers hit when oil prices jumped up to $100 a barrel?
Inflation is going to rip.
It's going to rip to the upside.
What he will do, I believe he will do, he will do everything in his power to get the oil price down and he will be successful.
He did it once.
He'll do it again.
That means opening up more federal lands for drilling, opening up more LNG terminals, opening up more areas that they can drill deeper and further for natural gas, liquefied natural gas.
He has the tools to do it.
I'll tell you what else he could do.
Just do a fast approval process.
I know he's talked about it, but do a super fast approval process to open up nuclear plants.
There's a lot of nuclear plants that were shuttered that are sitting there.
They're siloed.
They can be restarted very quickly, maybe within six months.
I'll tell you what, though, the minute this thing, the conflict ends and oil starts to settle down, he will throw everything at the price of oil.
You have any idea how much diesel they have to burn to mix that much concrete or make that steel and haul this out here and put it together with a 450-foot crane?
You want to guess how much oil it takes to lubricate that thing or winterize it?
And it's 20-year lifespan.
It won't offset the carbon footprint of making it.
And don't get me started on solar panels and the lithium in your Tesla battery.
And never mind the fact that if the whole world decided to go electric tomorrow, we don't have the transmission lines to get the electricity to the cities.
It'd take 30 years if we started tomorrow.
And unfortunately for your grandkids, we have 120-year petroleum-based infrastructure.
Our whole lives depend on it.
And hell, it's in everything.
That road we came in on, the wheels on every car ever made, including yours.
It's an tennis rackets and lipstick and refrigerators and antihistamines, pretty much anything plastic.
Your cell phone case, artificial heart valves, any kind of clothing that's not made with animal or plant fibers, soap, hand lotion, garbage bags, fishing boats, you name it.
Everything.
And you know what the kicker is?
We're going to run out of it before we find its replacement.
unidentified
It's the thing that's going to kill us all as a species.
We do it because we run out of from Landman, Billy Bob Thornton, explaining, I think that was to his daughter, how oil and gas, petroleum, hydrocarbons, and everything, everything we do.
And that's why it has such a big impact on the economy.
I just want to make sure, although there has been a downtick in some of the numbers, some of the growth numbers from the fourth quarter.
And I'll hopefully get into that this afternoon, or if not, I'll get into tomorrow morning.
Although this afternoon, I am going to focus on this mass deportations remigration issue, particularly as it's tied to these attacks now happening in the United States of America and what is specifically going on in Texas.
But the economy, particularly the affordability, this is what I kept saying over and over again.
Don't get too weirded out on affordability.
Your plan is hitting.
It's working.
Just stick to the plan.
Affordability is going to take care of itself.
It's growth, it's jobs growth, and it's wage growth.
That's what's going to drive it.
Just stick to, you know, finish what you started.
That happened.
We now know in the January numeration now, just to be, you know, it's all bets off.
This is a roll of the iron dice of war.
And in doing that, you up geopolitical risk.
That's one of the reasons I keep telling people now more than ever, you got to go talk to the Birch Gold guys just to get more information and understand how all this fits together.
Dr. Thayer, your assessment, and I want to thank you for the great work you've been doing for the War Room posse.
But your assessment, you heard Pete today.
And here's why they're, I think, a good combo.
Pete is like in your grill.
He's coming over the podium.
He's getting up in the face of the mainstream media, particularly, and he called him out.
And look, whether you love Pete's style or maybe you think it ought to be toned down a bit, he's 100% correct.
Like on this ABC and some of this false reporting that, and this is what I admire, not just about Caroline Levin and the team at the White House, but Sean Parnell and the team over at the Pentagon, they're all over people.
You're going to put out lies or not backed up.
We're going to force you to retract it.
Then you got Raisin Kane.
And just one more time about General Kane.
President Trump met him and President Trump, it's never really discussed as much as it should be.
We had a major military operation in the first year of the Trump administration, and that was the physical takedown of the ISIS Caliphate, which was a physical entity, not some online.
We're recruiting ISIS guys to go in and try to kill ROTC students at ODU.
This was a physical caliphate.
Mattis was obviously at the Pentagon, but the guy who ran that was General Raisin Kane.
That's where President Trump met him when President Trump went in theater and then developed a relationship.
And General Kane is very, it's no brag, it's just fact.
They get a plan, they execute on the plan.
And you just see it, the ISIS situation was the same.
Every day, there's just new developments, but here's the plan.
And of course, there's guidance, and we'll shift if we have to, if the circumstances on the battlefield required.
But I think we took down ISIS in four months.
Whereas Obama and these guys told him was generational.
That was Raisin Kane.
Then, number two, on the ending of the 12-day war, a magnificent expeditionary operation of the United States, flawless.
And then in the Venezuela situation, even probably maybe more complicated, flawless.
So the president has a lot of confidence in General Kane.
He has a lot of confidence in Admiral Cooper.
You can see that.
And these guys are all the same.
They kind of said their boom, here's what we're going to do.
Here's how we're doing it.
If things come up, we'll deal with it.
Bradley Thayer, your thoughts and assessments, sir?
And General Kane really gave an exceptional one saying we're now over 6,000 targets that have been destroyed.
Steve, we're talking now about war termination from our perspective.
What's going to cause this war to terminate?
And what's been consistent in President Trump, as well as Secretary Hegseth, General Kane, Secretary Rubio, has been when Iran no longer has the weaponry to threaten the U.S., Israel, or other allies.
And so that has been identified as ballistic missiles, their launchers and production facilities, production capabilities and storage capabilities.
And in the briefings today, as well as in the last couple of days, we've made great progress in destroying each of those target sets.
So that's very positive.
The president also said that we're going to defeat Iran's hegemonic ambitions.
And he said that earlier this week.
And that begins to elide into leadership targeting.
That begins to elide into a political consideration as well.
So what's going to cause war termination for us?
We're making great progress on the ballistic missile front.
We have on the Navy.
Their air defenses really have been largely destroyed.
Their air force has been largely destroyed.
What's the weight that we're putting on defeating Iran's hegemonic ambitions?
Additionally, we need to think about: well, what's going to cause this war to end for Iran?
When is Iran going to say enough?
We've incurred enough.
Or is Iran going to say that?
Are they just going to continue to try to draw the war out, inflicting pain on us at Hormuz or by attacking allies in a scattershot way, right?
It may be that a week goes by and there's no attack, but then one day there's going to be a large attack.
So the asymmetric tool that Iran has may ensure that although our conception of what's going to terminate this war is quite clear, the Iranians are going to do their utmost to ensure that it's drawn out, that perhaps it never ends.
It becomes some type of a cold conflict.
So how much is enough?
How much is enough to destroy their military capabilities?
How much is enough to ensure that they no longer have regional hegemonic ambitions?
And is Iran going to accept it?
Those are the critical questions today.
And we're reaching this point because of the great success of the U.S. military, right?
The U.S. military has gotten us to a point where we can talk about war termination.
And now the issue is going to be, can we get Iran to accept war termination or not, right?
Are they going to, Dr. Thayer, Dr. Thayer, there's breaking news that just came across our desk from the Wall Street Journal, and I think it's been confirmed by the Pentagon.
And I'll go also to Neil McCabe on this.
Breaking news.
Pentagon is moving additional Marines, warships to the Middle East.
The Pentagon, this is quoting the Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon is moving additional Marines and warships to the Middle East as Iran steps up its attacks on the Straits of Hormuz, according to three U.S. officials.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has approved a request from U.S. Central Command responsible for American forces in the Middle East for an element of an amphibious ready group, an attached Marine expeditionary unit, typically consisting of several warships and 5,000 Marines, the officials said.
The Japanese-based USS Tripoli and its attached Marines are now headed for the Middle East.
Two of the officials said Marines are already in the Middle East supporting the Iran operation.
The move comes as Iran's attacks on the strait have paralyzed traffic through the strategic waterway, disrupting the global economy, driving up gas prices, and posing a major military and political challenge for President Trump.
A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment for this story.
Your thoughts on this situation with sending a Marine ready group, which we had off the coast of Venezuela, obviously the Tripoli home ported in what, Yokuska or Yokohama, heading out.
It's signaling Iran that these Marines can seize territory.
That could be Karg Island.
They could be involved in a force protection mission for special operators who are working against Iranian highly enriched uranium or other leadership targets, or it may be used for pinpricks essentially to keep the strait open, the strait of Hormuz.
So it's a very powerful signal to Iran that the U.S. is prepared to deploy U.S. Marines, either force protection mission or to seize territory or both in the area.
So it signals the U.S. is escalating, willing to escalate, to take territory in Iran.
And so I think we need to think about that Marine.
What I think is important is we just had a Pentagon briefing a couple hours ago.
This was clearly in the works.
I think that would have been best to put forward to the American people because this is a major escalation.
First off, you're signaling with the heaviest kinetic activity today, air supremacy, the ability to pick targets at will and continue to destroy the regime.
And as Neil said, also go to look like some of their redoubts in the mountains.
Pete's kind of, it wasn't glib, but it was kind of a tossaway about the Straits of Hormuz to say that you're just not going to go with naval forces to ask his escorts, which is still a couple of weeks away.
The reason for that, as I said, my brother was part of the tanker war in 87 and 88.
I was there earlier, but those days was much simpler.
It was hard, but much simpler back then because you just had the difficulty of the radars working and being able to track.
Now you have drones, which puts the combatants at exposure.
It's just not simply putting a combatant on a tanker and, oh, we got a destroyer on a tanker.
It's going to be fine.
It's much more complicated than that today.
But this is, you're right.
This sends a signal to Iran, but it also sends a signal to the American people.
This is a major escalation.
Now you're talking about 5,000 Marines in the area.
We already have Marines obviously stationed and naval personnel and Army in these bases throughout, but you send an amphibious ready group.
And specifically in the Wall Street Journal, they have three U.S. officials saying it is for potential activity around the Straits of Hormuz.
That's you're all of a sudden that's an escalation.
I think that would have been best to fully put that out at a morning briefing where you can actually answer some questions about it.
Anyway, we're going to go to commercial breaks.
Stick around.
We're also going to the White House.
We got Neil McCabe breaking news out of the Pentagon at Amphibious Ready Group 5,000 Marines.
Remember, we talked about this a lot off of the coast of Venezuela that led up to the operation there.
We're going to take a short commercial break.
We'll be back in the war room in a moment.
Do not forget Birch Gold now more than ever.
Immerse yourself in the information and avail yourself to all the different methodologies you can do this with Philip, Patrick, and their team.
in a moment here's your host stephen k man uh Pentagon just announced through Wall Street Journal, they're moving 5,000 fleet Marines, combat troops into the general area.
They imply it's, or didn't imply, but said that it was about the Straits of Hormuz.
Well, it's a threat of major escalation that we would seize territory, Karig Island or points straight of Hormuz or other missions that the Marines might fulfill.
So that introduces, of course, the danger of turning this into a war against the Persian people if the seizure of territory is seen to be U.S. essentially grabbing territory rather than in a limited way.
So, Steve, major escalation, the threat of major escalation.
And the points about war termination, I think, might be a bit premature.
This is going to go on for a week's, at least weeks to come.
So just heads up, we are currently running our St. Patrick's Day sale.
So you can use code Patrick at checkout for 20% off any one-time order.
Of course, our talent moisturizer has been extremely popular.
If you do want to compare it to most commercial skin creams on the market, unfortunately, those are usually filled with synthetic ingredients, fragrances, and alcohols that can actually damage your skin barrier over time.
So it's essentially why we created the product.
But the formula is just clean and simple.
And again, it's made with the 100% American grass-fed and finished beef tallow and then the raw manuka honey.
And each jar is handmade, so we really don't skip anything when it comes to quality.
And like I said, it's been flying off the shelf and it's great for things like dry skin, irritated skin.
And you can use it pretty much anywhere on your body.
So definitely encourage people to check out the reviews.
There's been some amazing success stories.
And of course, if you have any questions, just let us know.
So tomorrow, okay, I just want to make sure tomorrow with 17 inches of snow, we're going to get you live on your factory floor and hang out for a while.
Thanks, E. Actually, we'll try to get Mike Lindell this afternoon.
A couple of special, by the way, Charlie Kirk and the Charlie Kirk show next.
Charlie Ryden Shotgun, his co-host Andrew Covet will be up posto after that.
Gruber bowling back to us at five o'clock.
Then you got John Solomon.
You have Stench, and then Studio 6B.
What a lineup.
Don't miss it, particularly today.
Major escalation.
I want to talk about CPAC.
They've invited Cornyn and Paxson.
I think Paxon may have hit a bid to have a live debate at CPAC, and they're going to do many, many more things you'll hear about.
Go to, what is it, CPAC.org slash Warroom, $17, four days.
You get a ticket.
They're also going to have, I guess if Cornyn doesn't show up, they'll do something with Paxon.
Very interesting.
Is that now looks like Cornyn's not going to get the, at least now, right now, is not going to get a not going to get an endorsement until President Trump sees what's happening in next week in this massive fight over the Save America Act.
I want to make sure everybody go to Tax Network USA.
I've got to get this number they just created for the War Room posse, Tax Network USA.
They give you a free discovery call, okay?
A free discovery call.
Make sure that you know the bid in the ass between you and the IRS.
A number just for the warroom posse, 866-513-5516.
This normally costs hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars.