Stephen K. Vance and Caroline Wren dissect a fictional March 2026 war scenario involving Saudi Arabia and Israel, where oil spikes above $100 per barrel due to Wall Street speculation. They propose President Trump leverage public-private partnerships with Iran and Venezuela for energy independence while condemning Senator John Cornyn as a "deep state" operative who opposed border walls, supported Dr. Fauci, and betrayed Texas voters. Ultimately, the episode frames Cornyn's actions as a systemic threat to conservative values, contrasting him with Attorney General Ken Paxton as a true constitutional defender against corporate and establishment interests. [Automatically generated summary]
Whether you like how we got here or you don't like how we got here.
And I'm not crazy about how we got here, but you've got people in harm's way.
In fact, we had another KIA announced last night.
Now, to be brutally frank, I don't remember, and we followed this pretty closely.
It was announced they got killed from injuries on March 1st, sustained in Saudi Arabia on an attack on American military.
I don't quite remember that being reported on one March.
And I realize you have OPSEC.
You definitely have OPSEC.
But if you want to build support and build real support that's going to last more than 24 hours, but I mean, really build support for your endeavor, there's just got to be a different messaging.
There's got to be a different information.
I keep saying CENCOM has got to get more like Norman Schwarzkopf in explaining and giving the big picture of what we're trying to accomplish here.
And let me be specific about that.
And you know, I think the world of Pete Hegseth, nobody fought for Pete Hegseth's confirmation more than this audience and this show.
When they were about to trade Pete Hexes out for Ron DeSantis, we had Pete Hexes back and then we had Pete Hexes back to get to 50 votes, which then Vice President Vance had to put in the 51 to get him confirmed.
That being said, the 60 Minutes interview last night, you just can't sit there and go shine us on about imminent threat.
Oh, yeah, it's not imminent threat.
No, it doesn't work like that.
The people in the messaging department over there got to get serious about this.
This whole thing, short-term pain for long-term gain.
Yo, the American people are not known for taking short-term pain when it comes to economics, particularly oil and gas.
So I'm saying the messaging has to conform with the military strategy without giving away the secrets.
President Trump, as I keep saying, he wants optionality and wants a range of alternatives and never box him in because he's a disruptor and he can pivot hard.
But you're going to start losing people if there's not consistency.
And last night was 60 minutes just to kind of shine on imminent threat.
No, Incorrect, sir.
Incorrect, Mr. Pete Hex said.
It was an imminent threat.
And I'd like to know about that imminent threat because I think you showed last night, I don't think there was not an imminent threat, and now we're in it.
Now we're in it.
Bowling.
And, you know, this thing is going to explode.
So tell me once again why people are misinterpreting what's happening on the oil and gas situation when right now it looks like Kuwait got hit.
There's been a barrage.
As we've come on the air, I think there's been a barrage.
Rabbi Walicki told me there's been a barrage into Israel of missiles from these guys.
And they proved yesterday, and I think the sun's already been hit already.
These guys are the hardcore.
First of all, they're Persians.
So they got an attitude to start with, right?
And then you layer on top of, you know, you take the Zorasterism off and you layer on top of this radical form of Islam, which is martyr-based.
They're digging in.
And look, you can dig them out.
You got the greatest military in the world and they can deliver a punch.
Hey, and the Israelis punch way above their weight too.
But bowling, walk me through the situation with oil and gas.
You're saying it's being totally misinterpreted.
And you've got President Trump has massive leverage.
And if we use that leverage, we're going to see sunlit uplands.
So today is a day I need a sunlit.
I need to be able to see a sunlit upland.
So that's why we dragged out of the race to do this.
If I may just start this off with, you know, one of the things that you probably don't like about me, although I think it goes hand in hand, I believe America first.
I believe Steve Bannon developed America First.
I'm a libertarian, so I hate foreign conflicts to start off.
However, we're sitting right now at a four, we're going to be in $4 gasoline territory within a week or so, no matter what happens down the road.
If it stays, oil stays above $100 a barrel, we're going to hit $5 a barrel.
What about every single product, every product in the world really has a diesel component to it.
Right now, diesel is $450.
Truckers are getting painted the pump.
It's going to be five.
It's going to be six.
No matter how fast this conflict concludes, that's real.
The economy is going to jet fuel jumped 140% three days ago.
And it's not even including the $100 barrel oil right now.
So everything we do to transport food, products, everything will get more expensive.
That's inflationary.
The economy is at risk.
So the libertarian enemy says, well, what do we do about that?
Steve, here's the solution.
Now, Trump has developed a lot of influence.
He's got a lot of cards to play.
He's got a lot of Trump cards to play, Venezuela and Iran right now, specifically.
Venezuela has the ability to produce, and they used to produce 3 million barrels a day.
Right now, there's one because of all the corruption over the last 20 years.
Iran has the ability to produce 7 million barrels a day.
They're producing three because of the sanctions and whatnot.
There's a very, very smart solution, but it takes guts, it takes cajones, and you got to go in there.
And Trump's the only guy that can get this done.
I would love to help him do it.
I know he could do it.
There are public-private partnerships right now in petroleum.
Saudi Aramco is mostly owned by the Saudi government, but partially owned.
Petro China, Petro Bras, Brazil, Gazprom in Russia, public-private partnerships.
You have Venezuela and you have Iran on their knees right now.
Put your foot on their neck like you are, and then say, I'll tell you what, the American boot comes off your neck the minute you sign a relationship with the United States or our oil companies achieve you.
We get your additional production that we can get you to.
There's 7 million additional barrels between and Venezuela that we could help them produce.
They would still own it.
We would produce it.
But guess what happens then, Steve?
I told you earlier, we use 20 million barrels of oil a day in this country.
We produce 13 million barrels a day.
The gap between what we produce here and use is 7 million barrels.
We can guarantee for our lifetime never having to need another outside force with the exception of Iran and Venezuela, which we would own as a partnership going forward as part of a deal to let them go back to being sovereign countries.
Very simple.
They get what they want.
They get their country back.
We get we want what we want, oil independence, real oil independence.
Venezuela, but people tell me that the infrastructure has been so decayed under the mismanagement of the Venezuelan Marxist that it will take us years to get up to speed.
This plan of yours, if you go and tell President Trump you got the leverage, actually, if you started this afternoon, when's the first time you could actually get this type of production up?
It's not going to ramp up to triple the level it was at one point in the late 90s, but you start to start the process.
Steve, there's no reason oil should be $100 a barrel today.
The reason it's $100 a barrel, maybe goes to $110, $120, who knows, is the news and the media and the hype and the speculators and the Wall Street guys pushing the price up with it.
Everyone is panicking.
And when there's panic, the vultures, the Wall Street folks, the vultures add to the panic and push prices up.
They always come back down.
This is not a supply.
There's no reason, supply reason, supply and demand reason for $103, which it just traded $103.
There's no reason for that.
When you eliminate that, because you say, you know what, the United States is the big dog in the space.
We use more oil than any other country on the planet by far.
And so when there's a fear of disruption of oil, Kuwait says we have to force majeure oil today.
They declared force majeure.
Price spikes $10.
Kuwait, it's a couple million, it's a million barrels a day at the very max.
It's not a permanent force majeure.
It's temporary until the strait of Hormuzo.
Here's a way to eliminate all these stupid news stories, all these stupid talking heads that are talking a huge, you know, end of the world game on television.
We fix it.
Here's what should be important.
We're never dependent on another foreign drop of oil in the entire history of America.
You're just in some joint, you're in some partnership where you're the controlling entity or somehow you've got a working agreement where you're calling the shots.
The oil itself itself is not exactly from the right.
The reason why Coolway declares Force Majeur and maybe some of the other Arab countries that are getting hit are going to declare Force Majeur is because those oil barrels that they were going to ship and transport were traded at about $55, $60 a barrel.
They're seeing a $100 price that they can declare, legally declare force majeure.
Okay, we're going to pivot and we're going to pivot.
We come back.
You're going to have a long cold open.
Caroline Run is going to join us, but we've done a mashup of John Corner and it's going to take some time, but the audience needs to see this, particularly the great folks down in Texas.
Natasha Owens takes us out.
Take your phone out and text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N at 989898.
This gets you to the Birch Gold Ultimate Guide.
It's totally free and there's no obligation.
What it does is get you access to Philip Patriot and the team, but read the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
That I believe you're a good and decent man who's been dealt a very difficult hand.
President, I was listening with interest to our friend and colleague from Minnesota talk about the Russian investigation, and I agree with her 100% that it is our responsibility to get to the bottom of what exactly happened due to Russian involvement in our elections, much as they got involved in the elections in France using a combined process known commonly as active measures.
It's a combination of cyber espionage, it's propaganda, it's use of social media through paid trolls who can actually then try to raise the visibility of some of this propaganda such that it then becomes part of the mainstream media and becomes accepted and part of the debate in democratic societies.
I believe that we do share a bipartisan and universal commitment to get to the bottom of what happened in our last election.
Senator Feinstein has said recently that there is no evidence of collusion between the administration and Russia.
But I think she would share with me a commitment to not stop there.
People are concerned, and I share that concern.
And we need to come up with a program of countermeasures to deal with this because the Russian government has been amping up their game for some time now and now they are operating at certainly dangerous levels when it comes to trying to interfere in our most basic democratic institutions like our elections.
Rod Rosenstein was confirmed by this body by a vote of 94 to 6.
It's because of his distinguished record, most recently as the United States Attorney in Baltimore.
That's why the investigation of the bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is so important, in addition to the hearings we're having on the Judiciary Committee, which the senator from Minnesota and I happen to be on as well.
So we do need to get to the bottom of what happened, and I'm confident we will.
It is our duty, and we will get the job done.
unidentified
You still have confidence in Dr. Fauci after his testimony yesterday.
So, I mean, reassure Republicans who voted for Trump that none of this is being slow walked.
I know a lot of people who work on Capitol Hill who are Republicans who did not vote for Donald Trump.
They voted for Hillary Clinton.
Some of them are in your office, by the way.
Are you sure that your staff, it's true, are you sure that your staff and the staff of other leaders on the Republican side of the Senate and the House are really supportive of this agenda?
Madam President, ours is a nation with the split screen of a battle on two fronts.
One is the pandemic that we've been fighting now for many months, and the other is to continue the fight to defeat racial injustice that has sadly divided our nation since its very inception.
One week ago today, George Floyd, a native Houstonian, was tragically died in the custody of a law enforcement officer.
As the gut-wrenching video of his death spread, So has the passion and the anger among all of us who wonder how can something like that happen?
Our Constitution guarantees every American the right to protest injustice, and I believe we all have a responsibility to stand up for what's right and condemn what is plainly wrong.
People of all color, backgrounds, and ages are demanding that justice be served in the case of George Floyd.
The first step in that process came on Friday when the officer who had him in custody was himself arrested and charged with third-degree murder.
This morning I had a very good conversation with Judge Merrick Garland, who President Biden has nominated for Attorney General.
Judge Garland's extensive legal experience makes him well suited to lead the Department of Justice, and I appreciated his commitment to keep politics out of the Justice Department.
That is my number one criterion for who should be the next head of the Department of Justice as Attorney General.
And I think both sides should support a depoliticized Justice Department.
And that's what I hope Judge Garland wants confirmed with the White House today with the number, the Speaker, the Majority Leader of both houses trying to figure out how to advance the President's agenda and get it accomplished.
Well, the Texas border, and one reason I took my colleagues to Texas was to show them this 1,200-mile border, some of which has 3,500-foot cliffs in the Big Bend area where no wall is really necessary.
There are other areas where infrastructure is important, barriers, so to speak, but it's really a combination of personnel, technology, and infrastructure.
We're working right now with the Department of Homeland Security to come up with a plan to actually implement the president's goal of securing the border.
I don't think they, I think they voted for border security.
How we accomplished that, I think they expect us to use our best judgment to try to accomplish.
It's really just a matter of political will.
We know how to do it.
The problem has been we haven't had a president who actually believed in border security.
We do now, and we're fully trying to support and implement that effort together with interior enforcement, which represents people who come in and overstay represent 40% of illegal immigration.
When they voted for Trump, they weren't voting for the wall he promised.
They're voting for Republican senators to figure out how to secure the border, but they didn't really mean a wall when they voted for a guy who promised a wall.
They expect us to use our best judgment and our experience to accomplish that goal, I think.
And a wall, I have to tell you, Chucker, is not going to stop illegal immigration if you don't have the personnel on the ground to catch them, if you don't have the technology, the eyes in the sky in order to detect them so Border Patrol can actually get there in time.
There are places where a physical barrier is entirely appropriate, and we ought to be putting them there.
But we ought to come up with the right combination that allows us to accomplish the goal efficiently and effectively without wasting taxpayer dollars.
That's been my goal.
unidentified
Where Texas Senator John Cornyn was addressing the immigration issues now in the national spotlight.
City officials and business leaders from across the valley gathered Friday at a luncheon to hear U.S. Senator John Cornyn deliver the State of Congress address.
Well, you know, in politics, unless you can win an election, you're pretty much irrelevant.
And I just think it's critical that, given the direction of the country now under the Biden administration, that Republicans nominate somebody who can win a general election.
President Trump has a very enthusiastic following among a lot of his base.
But one thing I've learned through numerous elections is, yes, that's fine in a primary, but the goal is not just to win the primary, it's to win the general election.
And to do that, you have to appeal to a broader range of voters, not just your base.
So as a tactical or practical matter, I have concerns about the president's ability to win in November.
Any decent person that gets booed by their voters, any decent person that all of a sudden gets rebuked by the very people that gave them political power would stop and say, maybe I'm heading in the wrong direction.
And they'd back off.
Instead, John Cornyn gets in front of the entire Texas Republican Convention and gets booed.
And then he goes back to D.C. and says, I'm going to show those people.
I'm going to show the deplorables.
I'm in charge.
Not you.
I'm the senator.
Not you.
I'm in charge.
I have never, in my 10 years of doing this, seen such an intentional, brazen, and defiant mode of action as what I have just seen from John Cornyn.
I'm not saying it's the worst bill I've ever seen.
That's not true.
I'm not saying that it's the worst vote I've ever seen.
That's not the point.
The point I'm making is I have never seen in my 10 years of doing this someone so openly rebuked by their voters and then so quickly turning 180 degrees around and saying, I don't care.
I've never seen it.
Usually when you show up to a town hall and you confront them, they say, okay, I'm done.
I'm going to change my vote.
Cornyn doesn't like you.
And he jokes about it, actually.
Cornyn hates you.
He knows he'll still get money from his corporate donors.
He knows that.
Instead of being allied with his voters and be like, maybe there's something I could learn here, he pokes him in the eye and says, no, I'm the senator.
And as you were just saying, you can find a clip of anyone saying something.
For example, let's go to the Fauci clip.
There was a lot of people, including Donald Trump, who in the beginning of the pandemic, when it was scary, you know, who were saying nice things about Dr. Fauci.
That clip, though, just so we're clear, when John Cordyn called Fauci a national hero, that was in response to Donald Trump had just come out and said, Enough is enough, Fauci.
We've got to open our schools.
We've got to open our businesses.
We've got to take the mask off of our children.
And John Cornyn runs the CNN, is asked about that, and that is his answer.
And that is over and over again.
So even with these clips we're finding, we're being pretty fair to Cornyn.
It's not like we're, I mean, Lisa Monaco, too.
By the Lisa Monaco, it didn't fully come out her involvement in Russia Gate.
That speech that he gave was on the Senate floor when Biden had nominated Lisa Monaco to be the deputy attorney general of the country.
And we knew he is the head of the judiciary committee.
He knew everything that Lisa Monaco did in relation to Rushgate and still went on the Senate floor to give a full-throated endorsement for her nomination.
I mean, sorry, half of his staff that works for him voted for Hillary.
I mean, like those, the Senate staff, this DC establishment, they despise Trump.
They despise everything that MAGA stands for.
You can so tell, I mean, with Cornyn, he just reeks of it, right?
And people have asked me, they're like, Carolyn, where are you finding all this opo on Cornyn?
I put this for those of you watching at home, if you want to help with this, it's pretty, there's five steps: one, Google Donald Trump controversy, two, pick a controversy, three, Google that controversy plus John Cornyn.
Then four, sift through dozens of statements from Cornyn criticizing Trump for said controversy.
Step five, repeat the process.
That's how easy it is.
And, but I just, you know, there's endless the amount of floor speeches that he've given, he always runs to go do interviews with C-SPAN, PBS, MSMEC, and they're all out there.
Everyone loves to say that they voted 99% with Trump.
The whole premise of that answer is ridiculous anyway.
Most of those are like procedural type of votes.
And especially when you have someone like John Cornyn, who, again, with every single time the media or anyone has criticized Donald Trump, Cornyn has run to a television camera to pile on and criticize Donald Trump as well.
So when you're faced with the facts here, which his campaign is, I think, struggling to deal with right now, there's just no justification that you can make for any of this.
And I wish more of this had come out earlier, but the problem too is just the amount of money, right?
They're running television ads that are just Corning Trump, Corning Trump, Cornyn Trump.
And they're putting tens of millions of dollars behind it.
And so if you're a low propensity voter who's not going out and searching for your own information here, and you just kind of tune in right before elections and you go vote, maybe you wanted to vote in your county race and you just see the incumbent senator.
Like that's why it's very hard to take out incumbents.
I've mentioned it's no Republican or actually either party, no incumbent senator has lost their primary since 2002.
That is 25 years since an incumbent senator has lost a primary.
That's why what Paxton has done with almost $0 in the most expensive state, a massive state like Texas, is so unbelievable and impressive.
And also why he is a more electable candidate in the general.
I think for a second, I want to touch on, we've talked a lot about why Cornyn's unelectable, but I want to speak to why Ken Paxton needs to be elected.
Why is DC so against him?
And of course, you have to follow the money.
Go look at the money behind this primary.
It is all the major corporations and the lobbyists.
And you know why they don't want Ken Paxton?
Because Ken Paxton does not answer to money.
He, as a fact, sued every major corporation in this country as a Texas Attorney General on behalf of the people of Texas.
He has sued BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street for conspiring to manipulate the energy markets.
He sued Meta and forced them into a $1.4 billion settlement for violating our privacy rights.
He took on the CCP by suing Sheen Timew for toxic products at spyware.
He sued the opioid companies, securing billions.
He sued all the major insulin manufacturers.
He sued Eli Lilly.
These are the same companies that fund groups like Senate Leadership Fund and the NRSC and others.
This is why they're pouring millions in.
And this is why you, the people, have got to step up to fight these corporations, to fight the DC establishment, get Ken Paxton in so that you actually have a senator.
It's very rare to have this, a senator who is going to fight for you and not for the pharmaceutical companies.
And this is why, you know, Paxon or Cornyn as a central defender of the deep state and Paxon is the, remember, when all these comments were going on, when Cornyn was rubbing up on Biden and telling you how great Judge Merrick Garland was going to be, and we have to take politics out of the Justice Department.
Look at those brazen lies to tell you how dumb he thinks you are.
At the exact same moment, in early 21, in those confirmation hearings, where Cornyn's glazing them and confirming Lisa Monaco and Merrick Garland and everybody, all these demons, all these demons that we're now finding out with the investigation of Solomon and what's going on in the FBI, all these demons that weaponized the Justice Department against President Trump and his followers to try to destroy this Republic on an illegitimate regime that stole it in the first place.
Cornyn's their lapdog, glazing them.
At the same time, remember what you were doing, having the back of a guy like Ken Paxon.
Ken Paxton came on the show as the first guest after the phony inauguration of Biden.
Remember, he had the circles drawn in and like 50 people showed up.
We were up on the roof for the first part.
We went back into the war room for the five o'clock show.
First guest, Ken Paxon.
What did Paxton say?
Where they're inside the Constitution, I'll support them.
Where they're outside the Constitution, I'm going to go to court.
I think Paxton was court the next day on the executive orders he signed to start the freaking invasion of our country.
And Cornyn saw it and Cornyn supported it and Cornyn glazed them.
This is not even close.
This is an outrage.
Go back in time.
You have to remember the history here and you have to remember the people that stood in the breach.
Paxton stood in the breach.
And what did they do to Paxton?
They didn't impeach him.
This show was the platform to stop them in their tracks to try to destroy Paxon.
They knew Paxon was going to come and run for the Senate.
You have to understand what's going on here.
You want to drain the swamp.
You want to beat down the corporations that are destroying this country.
You want to beat down this political class, this ruling class that sat there.
And this is why I say, don't blame it on the Democrats.
The Republican establishment is just as guilty as controlled opposition in the destruction of this republic.
And exhibit one is John Cornyn.
So if you don't stop it here, I don't want to hear any whining afterwards.
Remember the history, particularly this audience that was there, particularly this audience that fought it every day.
Remember when President Trump exiled to Mar-a-Lago?
Remember that?
Remember, and then Cornyn was all puffed up during the interview.
Well, you know, elections are about, you know, being able to screw you.
Don't want to hear your happy talk.
Trump not only ran the tables in the primary as we said he would, he then came back and won the presidency in the greatest victory probably in American history in 2024.
Disgusting.
Does Ken Paxon have faults?
Absolutely.
President Trump has faults.
Caroline Wren has faults.
Stephen K. Bannon has faults.
Ken Paxson has faults.
Sobic's going to join me.
He's got faults.
Praise the Rosary to try to pray to God to overcome them, but we all got faults.
That there's never been a more organized, integrated command structure for targeting between the Israeli military and Air Force and IDF and the American, that they're in the same room, the same common.
And yet we have on Saturday night an Axios which is totally dialed in.
And people say, why are you putting the left wing?
Hey, you know why I put it up there?
Because they're totally dialed into the White House.
You see it all the time.
With Caputo and those guys.
The White House leaks directly to them.
And then they're totally tied in to the IDF and to Netanyahu's office.
So they're pretty dialed in.
And they say, hey, the American command was dismayed.
In fact, the president's so upset, he's going to call the senior guys over there and say, what in the hell is going on?
I don't want oil assets hit because it's going to take this in a different direction.
It is impossible, Pasobic, for then to be any miscommunication in this command center unless something was hidden from the Americans, sir.
Well, Steve, of course, when you talk about joint targeting, this is something that we also, it harkens back to the Ukraine war, where we remember that in the auspices of Ukraine, that there was a targeting center operated out of a gymnasium on one of the U.S. bases outside of Stuttgart in Germany, where a lot of the Ukrainian general staff, the targeteers would be sitting with American targeteers.
They'd be sitting there painting Russian targets, Russians in the field.
And of course, many have pointed out, although President Trump says that he hasn't seen evidence of this, that some of those rumors that Iran, or excuse me, Russia has been providing targeting of American forces and American bases to Iran, that of course harkens directly back to that.
Who have we also seen providing targeting information is the Chinese Communist Party and the CCP with their satellites are putting up near real-time imagery again and again of American targets, American shipping, American bases.
China is filming, for lack of a better term, in real time the American war machine and the Israeli war machine to understand everything about our refueling times, our reloading times, our tactics, our procedures.
They could see everything from their eyes in the sky.
However, when it comes to the issue of strikes, and of course, I read the Axios article as well from Caputo and Ravid.
These guys have been dialed in from before the start of this.
They called the start of this.
That it talks about that the expansive nature of the specific target packages that Israel hit over the weekend.
And everyone saw, of course, those striking images, the plumes of smoke, the oil fires, the gas fires, reminds a lot of people of the images of 1991, the Gulf War, when the oil fields of Kuwait were set on fire.
That once again, we're seeing those stark fuel fires, and this time again, right over the skies of Tehran, that this article saying that, you know, you've got White House officials saying that the U.S. was not aware that the scope of the Israeli strikes, these 30 fuel depots, which are hit on Saturday, went far beyond what the U.S. expected when Israel notified its advance, sparking the first significant disagreement between the allies since the war began.
And of course, this is something that the president has talked about and has been tweeting and truthing about all throughout the weekend: the impact on oil prices, the impact on the fuel supply to the world, the impact of all of this.
We've seen gas prices, oil now over $100 a barrel, looking at $120 very rapidly.
We haven't seen a steep escalation in the global price of crude, the price of crude per barrel like this in decades.
It reminds people a lot of 2007, 2008, the surge hit, coupled with the financial crisis of when gas prices were topping $4 a barrel.
And keep in mind, that was $4 a gallon.
And that was $4 a gallon in 2008 dollars.
So you're looking at $5, $6 a gallon here in 2026 numbers.
And so with President Trump saying, well, wait a minute, we wanted to have access to the oil.
We wanted the United States hopefully be able to receive the oil, similar to the Venezuela model, which has been pushed out again and again since this conflagration began.
And it also, Steve, speaks to the ability perhaps of Mission Creep, the situation of Mission Creep, whereby in the initial hope and initial planning was for a quick collapse of the regime, decapitate and delegate, just like in Venezuela.
This is what the Wall Street Journal called it.
But instead, what you're now seeing is attacks on the oil infrastructure.
And as I said here the other day, this is something where Iran could very quickly retaliate because the one country in all of this that is not an oil-rich country is, of course, Israel itself.
And Israel's military is fueled by oil that comes predominantly 50% to 60% from Azerbaijan.
That's why you saw those attacks early on by the regional commanders, we're told, of the IRGC when they were given that independent control and fire control that they're targeting was directly on oil supplies that flow from Azerbaijan through pipelines into Turkey and then down into ports at Ashkelon and Haifa, where they are then refined and then given out to the IDF.
This is, we're running this special just for the war room posse.
You guys, free shipping on your entire order.
Go to mypillow.com forward slash war room and check out everything, all the up to 80% off the stuff that's still in that factory floor as we move to our new factory.
You guys, we're not going to move them.
These are for you guys.
That's why we're giving them these heavy discounts, up to 80% off our sleepwear, our clothing line, our slippers, couch pillows, bed pillows, you name it.
We've got it there at that factory.
So whatever you get, free shipping on your entire order, you guys call 800-873-1062.
You can check out the website and call one of our agents to help you if you have any questions on what's there and what and what you can get with that promo code war room.
Use promo code war room.
You guys take advantage of this free shipping.
I'll see you tomorrow from the factory floor and we'll show you everything that's left plus our new factory.