Episode 5155: War Brews In Iran; Preventing The Failure Of 2020 Election In Fulton County
Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join
Aired On: 2/19/2026
Watch:
On X: @Bannons_WarRoom (https://x.com/Bannons_WarRoom)
On the Web: https://www.warroom.org
On Gettr: @WarRoom
On Podcast: Apple, iHeart Radio, Google
On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews
Prime Minister Orban of Hungary, who has my complete and total endorsement for election.
Not everybody in Europe loves that endorsement, but that's okay.
He does an unbelievable job.
He's done an incredible job on immigration, unlike some countries that have hurt themselves, but they're working on it.
But I just want to let you know you have my total and complete endorsement, and I'm putting it out.
I already did, but I'm putting it out again.
And you're coming up with an election, and I think you should be good.
I'll tell you, Millé did pretty well.
He was a little down, right?
And then he ended up winning in a landslide, so that's pretty good.
You're going to do great, Victor.
Thank you very much for being here.
I appreciate it.
You run a great country.
Prime Minister Sharif.
I like this man of Pakistan.
Because there was some fighting going on when I got to know him and your field marshal, general, great, great general, great field marshal, a great guy.
And I got to meet the Prime Minister.
And he said in front of our chief of staff, Susie Wells, who's right here, he said, you know, nobody knows this, but I believe that President Trump saved 25 million lives when he stopped the war between us and India, right?
You made that statement.
They said 25 million lives could have been much more, actually.
But it was really a beautiful thing.
You said that in front of a group of people that they walked out.
They don't think about it, but you're talking about that kind of lives.
But this meeting today is proof with determined leadership nothing is impossible.
When I took office, the war in Gaza was raging with thousands of people being killed and no end in sight.
Today, thanks to unrelenting diplomacy and the commitment of many of the great people in this room, we have 59 countries signed up on Gaza.
Think of that.
We have, it's amazing.
But all the people, many, really so many in this room, the war in Gaza is over.
It's over.
There are little flames, little flames.
Hamas has been, I think they're going to give up their weapons, which is what they promised.
If they don't, it'll be, you know, they'll be harshly met, very harshly met.
They don't want that.
We're going to be working with the United Nations very closely.
We're going to bring them back.
I think the United Nations has great potential, really great potential.
It has not lived up to potential.
The eight wars, I never even spoke to them about one of them, and I should be speaking to them about all of them.
Someday I won't be here.
The United Nations will be, I think, is going to be much stronger.
The Board of Peace is going to almost be looking over the United Nations and making sure it runs properly.
But we're going to strengthen up the United Nations.
We're going to make sure its facilities are good.
They need help, and they need help money-wise.
We're going to help them money-wise.
And we're going to make sure the United Nations is viable.
And you have some very good people that the United Nations can do a good job.
But as I said, I've said it for years.
United Nations has tremendous potential.
A lot of people didn't like what I said it.
They said, oh, you shouldn't say that because, you know, we don't care about the United Nations.
No, it's really very important.
And I think it's going to eventually live up to potential.
It's uh thursday, 19 february in the year of our lord, 2026.
Okay, we're going to keep.
We're live streaming the UH Georgia Election Board.
We've got Jason Frasier, we've got the Joe Hoft and we have Harry Hari.
Uh, we're all going to go back to that in a moment, on exactly what happened in Georgia, the implication, what it means for 2026.
Uh, but I want to pivot now.
President Trump broke tons of news today.
I told you right there he's looking at this Board OF Peace as a overall uh infrastructure guidance for uh, or an infrastructure kind of over oversight layered on top of the United Nations.
This is like San Francisco in 1945.
You're seeing the creation of a new institution.
They said president Trump's just there to destroy institutions.
I don't think so.
He's there to, I think, rejuvenate institutions and get rid of the ones that are not working.
I was hoping that Kurt would be right but um, right now it looks a lot like Trump is still leaning in the direction of military strikes.
He has moved even more air force assets into the region.
Then he's gone in and he's now positioning the USS.
Gerald R Ford uh, that's going to be on station, they're saying as early as this.
Uh sunday, the Abraham Lincoln is still in the Arabian Sea, looks like it's been tucked again behind the the?
Uh Mountains of Oman, which means it's in a strike position kind of.
But it looks to me that the the president is going to go in, or rather he's going to let Netanyahu, like he did last year, initiate a strike.
Then we will come in and sort of mop up whatever the Israelis can't get and in the meanwhile um, you know the I would expect the price of oil to spike.
I would expect this to have very significant consequences, not only for our position in the region, because the Iranians are not just going to take it lying down, but I would expect this to have negative consequences for the president in the midterms, because this will hurt.
But the president just said right there something else very powerful.
And by the way, we're streaming the Board of Peace, and people want to dip into that.
He said, hey, the Board of Peace was set up initially for Gaza.
He says, I've got peace in Gaza and we're going to figure it out, right?
Tony Blair, I think, is there today.
He's going to be named executive director.
You've got Qatar, you got Turkey, you've got everybody.
If he's got peace, and the Guardian has a, and if Elizabeth and Grace and Moe can make sure people see it in the chat, the Guardian's got a story where the United States is working with the international, what is it, security group of Qatar, Turkey, you know, Egypt, UAE.
They're building a 5,000, they're going to build a 5,000-man security, they're going to build a 5,000 troop and/or other logistics personnel, intelligence personnel in Gaza, a base that's going to be the headquarters of the international security group, not peacekeeping, but security group.
President Trump said today, look, he says you're going to have flare-ups and you're going to have Hamas and kind of dismissing Netanyahu as over they haven't, you know, they haven't laid down their weapons, so there's no deal.
I mean, he completely smashed that.
Given everything that's going his way in his mind in Gaza, why would he now turn when he's got people like Qatar and Saudi saying we're not ready to, our gas fields are not ready, our oil fields are not ready to take particularly potentially stray ballistic missiles from Iran.
You know, they're going to shoot back and we could lose control of our gas fields.
I think Qatar's telling people five to seven years.
Why would he risk that given the fact he's pulled?
Let's be blunt.
He's pulled a miracle that now, if you support a two-state solution, which we don't, but it's a two-state solution.
He's pulled a miracle in Gaza.
Why would he risk that by putting by putting all the chips back in the middle of the table in Tehran?
And the reason I say that, I think he made a decision to go in long ago is it goes back to that true social post in the early January weeks when he said help is on the way.
I think Trump is being moved emotionally by that.
I think that Trump is being moved into this position by Netanyahu.
I agree that the Gaza situation has gotten better, but I don't believe that's any longer the primary driver here geopolitically for why the two are getting into this situation, that Israel and the United States.
I believe that the president has decided he's going to go in.
He wanted to go in January 15th.
As you note, he was called off by the Arabs and the Turks.
He wanted to go in three weeks ago when I was last on the show, but the Navy said we're not ready yet.
But now those factors are no longer as much of a concern.
The Saudis have indicated that they are willing to participate in shooting down any stray missiles that might be fired by Iran in retaliation for strikes.
The Israelis are indicating they are going to go in no matter what, which is going to drag us in.
And the Navy and Air Force are saying, okay, we're basically ready to roll.
And I think Trump wants to have Israel's back.
And this is something I think is a mistake.
But I do believe that he has made this decision irrespective of what's going on in Gaza.
Because it's going to have negative, excuse me, negative impacts on the economy here during the midterms.
I have no problem saying let's get rid of the regime in Iran.
I just don't think right now is the time to do that.
And I don't think the way we're talking about doing it is going to be good.
It's not going to be a quick, easy thing.
This is going to drag us in, and we're never going to be able to break ourselves free.
And people are going to be blaming Trump for this like they blame George W. Bush for Iraq.
I think that we should be avoiding this, drawing down our forces in the Middle East and starting to focus, as you know, on Western hemispheric defense and space dominance.
We do not need to be in the middle of this fight.
Let the locals figure it out and they will.
But if we keep intervening, we're going to keep distorting the geopolitics and it's going to give Israel all kinds of ideas that they can do more than they really can.
And it's going to cause us to get into a major regional war.
You get access to strategic intelligence predicated based upon predictive analytics.
Jim, if you sign up, and this is what chairman and CEOs throughout the world read, if you sign up, he throws in a free book on fiat currency and artificial intelligence.
Brothers and sisters, fans, friends, and good folk from coast to coast, we are living through dark, disturbing, and dangerous times, but do not despair.
The Calvary is coming.
Bruce Brinkstein and the E Street Band will be taking the stage this spring from Minneapolis to California to Texas to Washington, D.C. for the land of hope and dreams American tour.
We will be rocking your town in celebration and in defense of America, American democracy, American freedom, our American Constitution, and our sacred American dream, all of which are under attack by our wannabe king and his rogue government in Washington, D.C. Everyone, regardless of where you stand or what you believe in, is welcome.
So come on out and join the united free republic of E Street Nation for an American spring of rock and rebellion.
I think with the culture, what they're arguing for, let's just cut to it.
They want the 25 million illegal alien invaders to stay, full on.
You think you can negotiate with that?
It's not negotiable.
One side's going to win and one side's going to lose.
One side's going to win and one side's going to lose.
It's not negotiable.
I want to go back to Jim Rickards.
We're going to go back to Georgia.
Does everybody keep sorted?
We got to get to this, understand this war.
Rickards, give me, let's pull back the camera for a second because this is what you're best at, the combination of geopolitics, finance, capital markets, economy, all that.
What is the hurry?
On a nuclear ballistic missile, they're years away from having anything close.
Come on, man.
They're not even close.
The ballistic missiles almost took out Tel Aviv in the first war.
This is one of the reasons Trump stepped in with that expeditionary force to end the 12-day war.
It's the biggest guy saying they don't want to do this now is Qatar and UAE and the Saudis.
Well, maybe not UAE, but Qatar and the Saudis saying we're not prepared with our oil fields right now to protect them against not intercontinental ballistic missiles, but the interim ballistic missiles that the Revolutionary Guard has.
So what is the logic that's driving this now, particularly given everything in the United States, the world economy?
You've still got Ukraine where you got 3 million dead.
I mean, what is the drive of doing this?
Besides the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu and the Imperial Israel Expansion Project wants to go do it?
Well, they are years away from a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile, make it small enough, reliable enough, durable enough, et cetera, to fire at Israel.
So that is correct.
However, they don't have to go that far.
There's something called a nuclear device.
It would basically be a bomb, you know, like a truck bomb type of thing.
You have to figure out a way to get it in there.
But I don't think that's the driver.
What's driving it is Iran's ballistic missile production, I'm not talking about nuclear missiles, just regular missiles, is at a point so robust that it could overwhelm the Iron Dome.
And that is a more, that is, that's probably the case.
And Iran is making great technological advances in undersea, autonomous undersea drones.
Their drone factories are huge, and their missile production is enormous, hundreds of missiles a month.
So the point is, they can actually overwhelm Israel without using nuclear weapons.
That's what we'll get dragged into this immediately.
We saw part of that in the 12-day war.
I mean, Tel Aviv, it's never been fully disclosed how much Tel Aviv was getting hammered because David Sling and the Golden Dome, all these, they work, but they can't work against that kind of mass.
Why is it, though, that the people that are putting the most restraint on this were the people years ago that want to take out Tehran?
I'm talking about Qatar, the Turks, I think, Saudi.
They're all sitting there going, hey, I don't know if we're ready for this, sir.
Well, I just talked about the Iranian ballistic missile capability and the drones, et cetera.
They don't have to be aimed at Israel exclusively.
They could be the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Arabian oil fields, gutter, natural gas fields.
Those are all targets once you, if the U.S. attacks, the U.S. and Israel attacks, everything's on the table from the Iranian point of view.
And I want to kind of make one point, Steve, about why I think this is more likely than not.
The United States has 11 so-called carrier strike groups, basically aircraft carriers with kind of large armados around them.
But at any given time, seven of them, they're in maintenance, repair, crews get a break, et cetera.
We really only have four good to go.
It's the Lincoln, the Ford, the George H.W. Bush, and the Teddy Roosevelt.
Trump's putting two of them in the arena.
That's 50% of our ready nuclear, or sorry, carrier strike group capability.
That's huge.
That's not a bluff.
That's not for show.
You do that when you're getting ready to attack.
Now, the other point is, what kind of attack will this be?
They're not going to be boots on the ground.
Iran is one of the largest countries in the world in terms of land mass.
Population of over 70 million.
This is one of the largest populations in the world.
It's mountainous, the desert, et cetera.
You're not going to invade Iran in that sense.
This is going to be a decapitation strike.
This can come in two waves.
Number one, you take out the air defense, you attack the factories, the factories making the drones, the autonomous undersea drones, et cetera, that I talked about.
Attack those factories, take out the air defenses, take out the missiles.
That's phase one.
Then phase two is a decapitation strike, kill the leadership.
Are they going to capture the supreme leader?
Khomeini, like we do with Maduro, seems unlikely, but they may.
They may try something like that.
But basically, get Iran past this theocratic leadership and then let the Iranian people decide kind of.
Having been, you know, sailed the straits of Hermuz back in 79 and 80, if they close the straits of Hermuz, that's slitting their own throat.
They never get another cargo.
The Chinese, there's no real pipeline.
You've got to ship it out in these kind of ghost fleets.
I hear people say that, but isn't that the Ayatollah basically just taking Besson in Trump's economic warfare strategy, slitting their own throats?
If you block it, no Iranian oil gets to the Chinese Communist Party.
Therefore, 80% of your cash flow that you've got right now is, and I think President Trump's talking about anybody that trades oil with them, any saying you're blocked from the United States, like 100%.
So if they did that, doesn't that exacerbate their economic problem, which has brought them to virtually their knees right now?
Right, but that kind of proves my point, which is if we're going to use economic sanctions and oil embargoes to choke them off, then they don't lose anything.
In other words, if we've economically closed the Straits of Hermuz by cutting off Iranian oil exports, then physically, kinetically closing the straits doesn't cost them anything because they're already out of the oil market.
But yeah, I agree with you.
If we want to let the Iranian oil flow, then cutting off the Straits of Vermuz would hurt them.
But if we do it anyway by seizing the vessels or tracking ghost fleets, we can do all of that.
Steve Stern's with us on a big announcement of what's happening today in the precinct strategy.
Rickards, we got about two minutes here.
Jim, part of the discussion of the three-hour meeting when Bibi was over here, Bibi saying, look, if you guys can't get it together or you don't want to do it, I'm going in.
And we're going to need some traditional help on air defense, right?
Which is Egypt's cruisers last time.
And people don't realize how much Tel Aviv was getting hammered.
If Bibi decides to go it alone, is Israel try to go alone?
What logistical and defense capacities from the United States will he need?
And is there any way the Iranians will not interpret that as us being a combatant, sir?
Could they lead the attack, you know, fire the first shot, et cetera?
Absolutely.
They probably will.
But without U.S. air defense, the U.S. ability to suppress, you have to suppress Iranian air defenses.
And they've been supplemented since the last attack with Chinese help.
And don't underestimate, I'm sure you don't, the extent of Chinese and Russian help.
Now, they're not going to have boots on the ground either, but surveillance, intelligence, don't rule out electronic warfare, electronic cyber warfare.
The Russians, Russians, Chinese, and Iranians are all pretty advanced in that could all of a sudden systems in the United States start to go down.
Don't rule that out.
So this could escalate in a lot of different ways, but I agree that the Iranians would not really distinguish between an Israeli attack and the U.S.
And the U.S. could help them without sending B-2 bombers, but that would prove that would involve.
The precinct strategy, which was one of the underpinnings of President Trump's amazing come from behind victory in 2024, is under massive assault throughout the country.
In Texas, we're actually going to do a special tomorrow in Wurham, Texas, to talk, show you people how the Republicans, this is not the left, the Republican, the left is actually picking up the idea of precinct strategy.
This is one of the reasons they're getting more powerful.
On the right, the Republican establishment is trying to destroy the precinct strategy because it's giving working class and middle class people too much power in these states.
We're going to have a special tomorrow about what's happening in Texas.
You will be shocked.
Steve Stern, under the great chairman emeritus, our brother Dan Schultz, you've launched this new site.
A very important meeting this morning.
I think you got almost all 50 states this afternoon at 2 o'clock.
Walk through what's going to happen.
The precinct chairs, you're bringing people together throughout the country to talk about a plan to go forward.
This is every state is now in and multiple people from the states, many new people.
We're going to get 200,000 new committee men, committee women.
We're going to have monthly newsletters so everybody can see what's going on.
Videos posted, training, manuals, everything's going to be gone there.
Go to precinctprojectusa.org.
Email me, sstern1054gmail.com.
If you're a committee chair or vice chair and want to come on today, I know we don't have a lot of time today because we got cut off by President Trump, but this is going to be exciting.
And I'm going to get you on tomorrow to give a summary of the thinking of all the precinct chairs and all the people you have on.
It's not open to the public today.
You can go to the site.
Give the site one more time to sign up.
We're going to have Stern back on tomorrow to give an assessment of where the thinking is.
I will tell you, I know many of the people who joined the precinct strategy across the country understand that the establishment played smash mouth.
They've tried to destroy a lot of people.
But it's now in Texas, you can see where it's actually formalized.
They've actually gone and raised money to come out and look like you're actually supporting the precinct strategy when you're actually trying to destroy the precinct chairs and the people that have signed up.
So Stern, where do people go today to get to your new site?
And then you'll be back on tomorrow to report on this meeting you're having this afternoon.
So there's been reporting in the Times, the UK Times, that one of the reasons for President Trump coming out so clearly and strongly yesterday is that the UK has, as the headline says, been blocking Trump from using Royal Air Force bases for strikes on Iran, especially there's the key base, RAF Fairford, which is where the U.S. heavy bombers for all of Europe are stationed.
There's quite a few of them there.
And apparently they've been using legal arguments to say that a strike on Iran would not necessarily be legal, and so they're not going to let the U.S. use the bases.
And this legal argument is something that they brought up before with not supporting the strikes on the drug boats as well.
So this raises a whole bunch of questions, some of which we started with yesterday about where the UK stands in terms of an ally and if it's really a five eyes quality partner.
They're talking about a 20-year security guarantee in Ukraine and that the UK and France would be the frontline troops and they put troops in there.
There's stiffany right there.
I am against an airstrike into Tehran because I think there's many other ways we can get there.
But the president of the United States has got to have every alternative on the table because he's got a thousand million times more information than we have.
But an ally, and you're talking about an ally now that's absolutely central in Diagrasia.
They're saying we came and used the bomber bases.
How can anybody take anything seriously about Ukraine and these people, sir?
The idea of dumping U.S. treasuries is overstated.
It's not really happening.
You can't dump U.S. Treasuries because there's nowhere else to go.
I mean, what are you going to do?
Buy Italian bonds?
Okay, there are a lot of them, but is that really a good substitute?
So that's not going to happen.
I guess the bad news, good news situation is that there's no shortage of oil.
Even if you close the Straits of Hormuz, it would hurt China.
It would not hurt the United States.
We've got plenty of oil, plenty of natural gas.
And even Europe has been able to get natural gas from the United States to make up from Russia.
And Russia is still supplying the world.
So it's not really an oil glut.
It's more like a decline in demand.
I mean, supply and demand go together.
Demand is collapsing for not good reasons, which has to do with the fact that the U.S. economy is slowing down and the European economy is in recession.
So I don't think you'll see the super spike in oil prices that people predict, even if the Iranians take steps to close the Straits of Formuzz, because there's plenty of oil bounds, a little more difficult for China.
The treasury market will do fine.
Thank you, there's a dollar shortage that's propping up the treasury market.
So, I don't think it'll be a financial catastrophe.
There might be other problems unrelated to Iran down the road, but I don't think the Iran war will be one of them.
You've got four Chagossians, including one that was so Chagos.
So Diego Garcia is in an archipelago of islands called the Chagos Archipelago.
And again, I'm concerned that the focus has really been on Diego Garcia and not all of these other islands, which are forming a protective barrier around, along with their territorial waters, around Chagos, around Diego Garcia.
And four Chagosians, including one that was forcibly expelled from the islands when he was 14 by the British, have now gone back home.
And those are the four people.
And they're very pro-American.
They want to name an island after President Trump.
They actually are pro-American and they're getting deported.
But the haters in London, 20% now Marxists and jihadists, and scared the British government, they're telling us, hey, this huge airbase that we kind of use jointly, you can't use it when it comes to Iran.
I think that we really need to look at this very carefully.
And again, remember that Kier Starmer started off as a human rights lawyer and with that whole kind of conflagration around it of NGOs that are burning things down in a whole different range of ways.
This thing is a real mess.
And it would be somewhat ironic if the Iran planning is what saved Diego Garcia for the United States.
But we're finally really seeing who you're dealing with when you're looking at the current Starmer government in London.
I mean, I've been showing these issues for four or five years now, showing people double registered, people living and being registered in multiple states.
People, one of my favorite ones is the parking lot where you go to serve jury duty.
There's somebody registered to vote there.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
Fulton County is not cleaning the voter rolls.
They're not, they admitted yesterday they don't even have a data analyst to look at the voter rolls.
Essentially, they just take what the Secretary of State gives them and they kind of work some of those.
Jason, don't they pay $10,000 a year to keep you off?
Aren't you kind of like already, aren't you elected or kind of a commissioner somewhere, but they pay $10,000 a year so that you can't be involved, sir?
When we look at the data, we see lots and lots of noise, things that get obfuscated in a cloud of confusion.
But the fact of the matter is, we find something extraordinarily disturbing in 2020, and it's associated with the mail-in ballots, essentially, the early voting.
The fact is they didn't follow the law at all.
And the other thing that people need to understand, though, about it is it was correctable.
It was always correctable.
They did not scan them properly.
They didn't maintain the digital signatures that are required by law.
Follow me at joehoft.com, real joe hoft on Twitter, certainly at the gateway pundit too, the gateway pundit, where we continue to just blast out the truth no matter what you know barriers they try to put in front of us.
And this goes back to when I came, when we had all this evidence, you know, Steve, five years ago, and that's why it got canceled at all the box stores.
What we're finding, my pillow is moving into a new factory as we speak.
We've found all of these products that have been sitting there.
Like back then, I had to help save our country these mugs.
You get one free today for anything you order.
And what we're having is if you go to mypillow.com forward slash war room, you guys were having a factory sale.
We're closing out an overstock.
We were going into a whole clothing line.
Check out our clothing line there.
All these from pants to shirts to sweatshirts, 80% off for the war room posse.
So it's, and you guys check it out.
We're doing the overstock of 80%.
You guys are the only ones that are getting this right now.