Episode 5145: Mass Voter Fraud In Colorado From 2020 Leading Into 2026
Tina Peters, a Colorado election official jailed since 2021 for preserving ballot evidence, is framed as a political prisoner by supporters who allege systemic fraud—over 328,000 voter record changes (2022–2025) and 156,000 in 2022 alone, violating federal certification rules. Georgia’s Tulsi Gabbard, now DNI, investigates foreign election interference, including Iran’s confirmed access to voter databases, while critics like Garland Favarito cite 6,691 double-reported ballots and 4,880 vote discrepancies as proof of fraud. If invalidated, the 2020 election could trigger a House contingent, securing Trump’s victory—yet Democrats may challenge evidence, including Conic’s alleged ties to China and root privilege leaks, risking legal battles over disputed votes exceeding certified margins. Meanwhile, All Family Pharmacy offers generic meds at 47% off, bypassing "big pharma," amid broader debates on election integrity and economic shifts tied to AI. [Automatically generated summary]
Donald Trump just said on social media, quote, there will be voter ID for the midterm elections, whether approved by Congress or not.
That stark warning comes just days after the House passed the restrictive Save America Act, which if it passes the Senate would make it harder for millions of Americans to vote.
Just hours before that post, DHS Secretary Christy Noam said this.
More people were deported under my husband and Barack Obama without killing American citizens and without putting children into detention camps than were in the first Trump term or this first year of Trump's second term.
There is a legitimate reason to have a debate about things like migration.
Do I want enough where it's a net boon to the economy?
Sure.
But to ask me if I support that, I think is sort of a vague and superfluous and really not getting anywhere question because the debate is about how many people we should have.
And my point is we have too much.
It's making American culture into a third world derivative of itself and it's hurting the wages of American workers.
And when you import people in such a high rate of number of people and they all gather in the same community, you turn those states, you turn those communities into, by the way, the countries, the war-torn countries, in some cases, I can't even call them a country because they're a failed state that they left and they shouldn't be importing those policies.
I want to live in America.
The beauty of America is that we can all come together.
But if we're lying about what coming together looks like, then I can't sit here and say I want to live in Somalia and say that Somalia is the same as America because it's not or these people wouldn't be fleeing Somalia and going to Minnesota.
And maybe that's an uncomfortable or racist thing to say.
But I just think that the idea, your depiction of not only Minneapolis, but parts of the United States as nearing a third world country, it feels like the natural conclusion of that is an immigration policy that restricts people from certain countries that are going to turn our country into a quote-unquote third world country.
I think you are arguing for a restrictionist position.
At least for, I mean, that's not a surprise, right?
At least for an intermediary period, because you think for too long we have had too many people come in and there hasn't been assimilation, which is a fair characterization.
I think it's the choice of words that triggers people and makes it sound like you're saying we don't want black people.
The precedent that has stood from the moment Judge Matthew Barrett sentenced her through all this appeal process and her habeas is that you can be imprisoned and denied bail for first-time offenses for your political speech and treated like an absolute prisoner of war.
She is a prisoner of war.
And everyone needs to remember this came down from DOJ.
This was a RICO operation, in my words, with DOJ, with, I'm sorry, the Secretary of State of Colorado and Dominion.
That's why she became such a target starting in 2018.
But the corrupt DOJ under Mayor Garland was involved in this prosecution and this travesty going back to 2021 at least that we have on record.
And Tina Peters, even now, her cry, her war cry from prison is, please, President Trump, we need to get rid of this of these machines because it's shown in the Mesa reports.
This is why Jenna Griswold doesn't want her let out and has urged no one to offer her any solace, any ability to be released, as she should be, is because they're afraid.
She knows that Tina preserved evidence.
And Tina's message to President Trump is: Thank you.
Thank you for fighting.
Please, we need to get rid of these machines because we have very little time before the midterms.
And I'll just ask you all to remember: this is a gold star mother, a 70-year-old who is being tortured psychologically and been denied justice in a show trial, a mistrial.
And you are next.
If this continues to stand, if we do not actually have real elections, Tina Peters' legacy will be the canary in the coal mine that was snuffed out instead of the symbol that she has already been made of what it means to stand up and to fight no matter the consequence for the Republic and for all of you.
So just please go to TinaPeters.us for her show, for her legal defense fund.
Make sure you follow her on social media.
But Tina Peters is the symbol that they made her out to be.
It wasn't the 2020 election.
It was the municipal election because her own constituents told her, pay attention to this, please, Tina.
It's Monday, 16 February in the year of our Lord, 2026.
It's President's Day.
We're going to have the historian Larry Swikert on later in this show to talk about President's Day, particularly Washington, Lincoln, and Trump.
I want to put up, this whole thing is about power and about who's going to have it and who's not.
The midterm elections are coming up.
Of course, they're maniacally focused on turfing out President Trump with an impeachment.
And you can tell this by everything they're focusing on and coming to.
Let me, Christian Heinz, I think it is, put up a map over the weekend.
A lot of people have been talking about this, about what's going to happen in Virginia 21 April is his referendum of the state by Spineberger.
And Andrew Colvette had a great tweet he put up that said, hey, you can see with Newsom and Clinton, particularly the way Clinton, we headed up there, she's softening on migration.
So is Newsome.
That what they're trying to do is a Spamberger.
Can I get that map back up?
I just want people to see it.
Thanks.
That they're softening this and Spamberger, and this is Spamberger.
This is what the map would look like if Spamberger can see Virginia, they come with Virginia up there.
This map represents a 230, I believe, Democratic majority in the House.
That is what they're targeting on.
Now, I've talked to a lot of people behind the scenes over the weekend on the math, and this is not, people don't believe this, but this is where it could be headed.
So the point is: Georgia, Colorado, Arizona, it is more important than ever to get to the bottom of the 2020 election and to get people fired up on: hey, the 2020 election was stolen and they're trying to steal this one.
Unless we get voter ID, unless we get the very basics out of the Save America Act, which looks like the Senate went to the Munich conference, left town, and now they're on a one-week recess.
They're not back.
They have no incentive, no priority to do this.
Let's bring in, I want to bring in Joe Hoft.
Joe is the twin brother of Jim Hoft over at the Gateway Pundit.
Amazing article up this week.
Plus, Harry Hari from United for Freedom.
Joe, thank you very much.
That piece was amazing.
Talk to me about the piece.
I want to bring in Hari for the details.
This is about Colorado.
It's really about Tina Peters.
We did the special over the weekend.
It went on fire about Tina Peters' 500 days in prison.
This is the 501st day.
So, Joe, walk me through what Hari is with United for Freedom.
He's been one of these data guys who's been all over this.
Walk me through what this article says about Colorado, about where we stand on actually getting to the bottom of voter fraud.
And really, thanks to Harry for sharing this with me.
We put it up over the weekend at both JoeHoff.com and GatewayPundit.
And it received some attention.
I appreciate you bringing us here today to talk more about it.
The issue that Harry raises is that not only have we had all this other files, mountains of evidence that shows of election fraud in the 2020 election and really moving forward, he and his team put together some analysis where they've looked at the numbers from those elections going back to 2020.
And he's seen that the records are changing after the fact.
After the elections are certified, then they're changing records after that.
And I'll let Harry talk more about that, but you know, my background's in audit and finance.
And I oversaw billion dollar, multi-billion dollar entities overseas in both those functions.
And I've never seen anything like our election process.
This is the key to me.
And Harry now just adds more weight to this entire position, which is our elections are not certifiable.
We wouldn't accept this in the real world, which I call the corporate world.
Nothing in these processes seems to be controlled.
I've written three books about it.
As you know, you've had me on each time I broke one of these books.
But as I'm looking at the 2020 election, every area that I looked in was not certifiable from a corporate perspective with real auditors and people that are independent, objective, and professional.
What we have going on right now is a facade.
It's a joke.
We learned it in 2020 like never before, and it's still in place.
And we're seeing now not only are they manipulating data before the elections and during the elections, but now after the elections.
And I got to tell you, in the corporate world, you don't mess with prior period numbers.
They are locked down.
You can't do anything to them.
If you're going to make any adjustments related to prior periods, they're going to hit this year's books with some sort of adjusting entry, ultimately probably hitting retained earnings or some account like that.
This is outrageous what's going on.
It's just another layer of the massive corruption that's taking place in this country.
And then, as Harry points out too, and I'm sure he will hear in a minute, it's about Colorado.
This piece, he starts with the state of Colorado because he wants to help Tina Peters like we all do.
Those elections there are corrupt.
There were people telling Tina to do things that were wrong.
And Tina found that the numbers were changing back then.
This entire piece by Harry supports exactly what Tina found and supports, again, her innocence.
The wrong people are in prison in Colorado.
It's never should have been Tina Peters.
She's an innocent woman who did her job at both the federal and state level.
And Harry's evidence now even supports that further.
Well, in the corporate world, we make sure that all the controls are in place.
We have to check controls and numbers and the processes that are surrounding those controls.
So we have this thing called Sarbanes-Oxley, which came in in the early 2000s that mandates every corporation have not just their numbers perfect, they have to be perfect, but the process supporting those numbers must be perfect too.
So every activity that leads to a financial result has to be reviewed to make sure there's no way of inserting information or taking information out or manipulating information.
This is all tested.
Systems are a big part of it.
We're not going to allow systems that are not secure, like we found in Georgia in 2020.
That's all you got to say is the systems are secure and they're done.
They're removed.
You don't touch them anymore until they're fixed.
This is the real world, the corporate world.
We don't adhere to these same practices in our elections, as you know.
They're coming hard for Tulsi Gabbard and DNI over what?
Georgia.
They are absolutely freaked out that the key to the 2020 election lays there.
Short break.
in a moment.
Okay, now you see what this fight is over in Georgia and in Maricopa County.
I want to go to Harry Harry, United for Freedom.
Harry, everything, the story you put out, I want you to take a minute and walk through the data and what it shows us.
Because a lot of people on the left are just going to come in and say, hey, this is more of the same wing nuts that were arguing this back in 2020.
Nothing happened there.
They got thrown out of court.
This never got any traction.
And they're coming back again because they're worried about the midterm elections.
And now that they've got, you know, Tulsi Gabbett at DNI and other people in the intelligence community that are interested in this and looking at this, besides the FBI, this is the only reason they're resurfacing this.
And they're doing it.
They're starting with the Tina Peters of it all because they want to make a case that that should be federalized.
She should be out.
She should the DOJ and Bureau of Prisons should go out and really take her to a federal prison and then let her go.
What's actually going on is our election system is broken beyond any kind of systematic recognition at all.
Getting back to Joe's earlier comment, if you found these out-of-period adjustments that were hidden in a regular corporate audit, the next persons that you would call would be police officials or the IRS to complain about the bar on the corner that's doing money laundering.
In this case, it's vote laundering.
When we do this analysis, we use the data from the states.
We don't start with our own data.
We do simple queries, actually sometimes very complex queries, but we look at whether they comply with the voter registration rules, whether they comply with disallowing people that violate the voter registration rules from voting, whether or not they have real counts that agree with their count of voters.
And then now what we've done is a horizontal analysis is the best way to describe it.
We've made period to period comparison of the people that are shown to having vote as having voted in particular elections.
In 2020, in Colorado, there's over 328,000 changes to the record of who voted from the period of December 1st of 2022 to December 22nd of 2025.
These are called out-of-period adjustments, if you were looking at it from a financial perspective, but they're completely disallowed.
This is tampering with a federal record.
What is the reason that they're washing these old votes out?
It's specifically either to hide tremendous malfeasance or some sort of nefarious, difficult to explain error in the systems, or more likely, in all frankness, because of the fact that they're hiding it, is that there's actual malice involved, that this is election fraud.
And getting back to your comment about certification, the federal definition of certification is that something is accurate or compliant.
The Supreme Court decides in 1888 under COI, in 1888, that the duty of the election officials is to be obedient to the law.
It doesn't matter if you're guilty of malice, if you're just ignorant or stupidly and sickeningly apathetic about running a fair election.
We don't know whether the votes that they submitted were even counted in all truthfulness.
And the problem is much worse where you have open voting with mail-in ballots.
And we don't have any indication at all that the vote counts are actually accurate.
They do everything they can.
And you'll be talking to Garland, who is a close friend of mine.
I've helped him on a lot of things.
The fact of the matter is that they can't certify, you know, legally they can't certify because they don't know if the system is accurate.
As a matter of fact, we have proof that the system is grossly inaccurate.
And now we have proof that they seem to be trying to make things disappear two years after the election was counted.
So we see in 2020, Colorado has 328,000 plus changes to the voter history.
In 2022, it's 155,000, almost 156,000.
This is enough to swing elections easily.
And the affirmative duty is on the place of the election officials.
We call it MIA.
The election officials are MIA.
It doesn't matter whether it's malice, ignorance, or apathy.
The fact of the matter is under the definition of law in 1888, it's election fraud.
There's a complete bastardization of the word fraud because we talk about bank fraud and contract fraud.
Election fraud is something completely different.
It was designed from the 1800s to prove obedience to the law, and we can't prove it.
Joe would say clearly, if this was a financial audit under Sorbanes, Oxley, or SOX, as it's called, you would just fold up the books and say we can't render an opinion about whether this was accurate because there's so many errors and so many problems with this data.
It just needs to be thrown out.
They should have thrown out the election in 2020.
They should have thrown out the election in 2022.
And the fact of the matter is 2024 is a problem.
Now, that doesn't mean that President Trump wasn't elected.
It doesn't mean anything other than our election officials are unlawfully and in an untrustworthy manner running our elections.
And this has to stop.
I mean, the American public has a right to trustworthy elections.
It's the law.
It's not labeled as some sort of decision that Jenna Griswold gets to make in Colorado as to whether or not we're going to do the law today, or are we going to do it the way she wants to do it?
These are the official records of the state of Colorado that we analyzed over time.
They just simply don't know that they have this problem.
Actually, it's not true.
They seem to know that they have the problem in 2024 because this particular data would show that these types of changes are not occurring at scale anymore.
If you're getting this from public data, it's not just the Secretary of State who's obviously a hard Griswold wants to keep Tina Peters in prison for the simple reason she can't come.
This is her 500 first day.
She can't come out and talk about it.
Like you have Garland Favarito or Clita Mitchell, people that can come out every day and talk about what's going on here.
They don't want, they want her suppressed.
So we got about a minute in this block, and then I'm going to keep you guys around and bring in Garland and Clita.
But if it's public data, there are a lot of counties in that state that are Republican.
Why is no one stepping up on your data and saying, yeah, this is a problem?
And they're cleaning this up after the fact.
Why has it been silent, except you guys coming out?
Do you think that your evidence, your data is enough to make this a federal offense that Tina Peters, they can then intercede with Tina as a witness in a federal crime?
Well, Tulsi Gabbard, as the director of national intelligence, has a responsibility to identify whether there are foreign adversaries interfering in the United States and our processes in our government, et cetera.
And that's what she's been doing.
And she was present at the president's request, as I understand it, in Fulton County during the FBI's raid to seize all the election materials that Fulton County has been hiding for five years.
And that is perfectly appropriate for her to be involved in that, to be able to understand whether or not, and she's been investigating.
I'm anxious for her to please issue her report.
At which point, once Tulsi Gabbard says, and she has said twice publicly now, and I think that this report, if it ever gets published, will go into more detail about the threats to our election infrastructure by our foreign adversaries.
And we know that Iran has already, we know for a fact that it has accessed illegally some of our state's voter registration databases.
At that point, it is then the responsibility of Christy Noam as the secretary of Homeland Security to then come in and help to mitigate and establish procedures and protocols to mitigate against that threat and all of those threats.
So this is all perfectly within the responsibilities of Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence, and then of Christy Noam as the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Now, the Democrats, if you go back to 2019, you had Ron Wyden on the floor of the U.S. Senate giving a speech about how Republicans were not taking seriously the threats to our voting systems by foreign actors.
And I think it was right about that.
They introduced a bill.
Actually, that bill should be reintroduced with bipartisan support.
The fact of the matter is, we know that there have been foreign adversaries trying to interfere with our elections.
I want to go through because they're criticizing the actual war in itself.
They're saying Kurt Olson just rehashed all the wingnuts material from 2020.
And this I'm going to go in a second, but I want to bring in Michael Kunzler's with us.
Michael, I want to get you in here early because the sale that you have put forward is on fire.
I've talked to people all weekend.
They absolutely love it.
Just give us a second, give us a minute on all-family pharmacy.
What is the concept?
Because people focus on big pharma with Bobby Kennedy.
He's out today talking about ultra-processed food and everything HHS is doing.
But your theory of the case is you're not going to have medical freedom just by going after big pharma.
You have to go after the distribution system.
If you want medical freedom, you have to have the ability to talk to physicians that can actually prescribe things for you that you can get from a pharmacy.
Walk me through the basic concept of all-family pharmacy.
You go on our website, fill out the medical forms, pick the medication that you feel is necessary for you.
We're going to send that order to a physician for them to prescribe it.
Now, they're not going to prescribe every order.
They do have to look at the medical guidance of what your health profile looks like.
Based on safety and effectiveness, they're going to prescribe it.
We're going to ship it out to you.
We do have to collect allergies, medication, and food allergies to make sure we don't have any reactions.
But everything goes to a licensed medical professional, whether it goes through our physicians and then it comes to us and it goes through our pharmacists.
So we are double checking everything and making sure the medication is not going to hurt you.
It's only going to help you.
Once we process your order, we ship it out FedEx Today or we have overnight delivery.
Because I think the response so far has been overwhelming because you guys said, hey, look, we'll give you 47% off on certain products and medication to get you to come and try us.
I think people are quite open to that.
So where do they go today?
What's the number they call or where do they go on the website?
So, and Kurt Olson, by the way, in the White House.
And you've got the war room.
You got all these other people who are pushing what they call the big lie.
I think that's even in our cold open.
So Garland Favarito, they've gone through, I guess, the application for the warrant or the subpoena.
And a lot of it is Kurt, I think Olson, obviously, he works as a special assistant to the president over at the White House compound, is a key part of this.
Walk me through that because now they're saying this thing's totally phony.
And this is what they're going to use to go to trial to try to get the evidence back.
They got to get their hands on the ballots.
They got to get their hands on the tapes in the machines in Fulton County.
If they can't do that, we're going to see that President Trump definitely was the winner of the well, let's say this: Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election, could not be certified.
It'd be gotten kicked to the House of Representatives.
And President Trump would have won on a vote in the House in a contingent election.
Garland Favarito, the actual what is it, the warrant, the subpoena?
What did Kurt Olson draft up that they're saying is all wing nut ism?
I'm so glad you asked me that question because that Hill article, Tulsi and Kurt, that's a diversion of the only real question here is: what was the probable cause that the FBI had to conduct the search warrant?
And there were five elements of probable cause.
The first one was the vote count discrepancies.
And I think, as Harry McDougall explained last week on your show, that the vote count discrepancies that were found were confirmed by Governor Kemp's own study.
And you mentioned this, and he actually sent a letter that you mentioned on your show last week over to the Secretary of the State Election Board, excuse me, to investigate the vote count discrepancies that we had originally found in the audit.
And Joe Rossi had taken all the way forward through to the governor's office.
Specifically, what Joe and the team found was 6,691 double reported ballots in the audit, in addition to another 3,466 vote difference between the audit and the original count.
And then you top all that off with 4,880 different vote difference between the machine recount and the original count.
They kept telling us that all of the counts added up.
There's no way not one count matched another count.
It was all a facade.
Now, that's the governor's own report.
So that's not a debunked conspiracy theory.
That's just the first one, Steve.
The second one, that was the double scan ballots.
3,930 ballots were not just double scanned, they were double counted.
We know that because all the cast vote records, with the possible exception of 128, were certified votes.
So that was proven in a state election board hearing with expert witness testimony from Philip Davis, a 30-year career image analyst.
So, and also thanks to David Cross and Philip, have done a lot of work on that.
The third element of the probable cause was the counterfeit ballots.
Caroline Jefferson and I were there the day on November 14th of 2020 when Susie Vols found the counterfeit ballots.
And her team, they actually ended up with six sworn affidavits, four senior poll managers, and two audit monitors, all signing sworn affidavits that they saw counterfeit ballots in the hand count audit in addition to the discrepancies.
So we knew that these were counterfeit.
And I was there as well, that we knew that they were counterfeit because they were mail-in ballots.
Well, they're trying to divert the attention from facts to people.
Kurt and Tulsi really are involved maybe, but they are just not relevant.
The issue is the probable cause.
So they have created this diversion to attack the messenger and hopes that their people who they're trying to propagate to are so stupid they don't understand enough facts and are going to listen to them.
I don't think that's going to hold up.
unidentified
Most people have enough brains to look at a few facts older than just, we got to go to break real quick.
We're going to try to break it out and make sure you can read it this afternoon.
But it talks about it connects national debt, artificial intelligence, and the dollar as a safe haven, which it has been.
We've argued, the reason we've argued that you see the deterioration under the Biden years, the 25 to 26% devaluation or lack of purchasing price of the dollars because the massive federal spending.
They're making the same case.
I've been arguing.
We're going to have some AI guys on here in the second hour to talk about this tectonic plate shift that's taking place in artificial intelligence over the last 10 days.
Our nation's business model right now is a highly leveraged bet on artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence transforming the economy.
Full stop.
If you don't understand that, you're not understanding where America and the world's going.
And we're going to drill down into that.
This is why I think now more than ever, go to Birch Gold, end of the dollar empire.
Understand it.
We're coming out with an eighth free installment.
If you make a qualifying purchase over at Birch Gold, promo code Bannon, you can get a free copy on the Patriots edition of the first seven installments we put into book form.
But most importantly, to talk to Philip Patrick and the team like today.
Make sure you make contact with them.
Gold's around $5,000.
Not the price is the process.
And what we've told you about the economy has come through over the last five years, six years.
I think we've nailed this.
And I think CNBC, their analyst, and I think it's a Deutsche Bank analyst, they walk through about is the dollar a safe haven anymore?
You have to have to ask that question because we are the prime reserve currency.
Cleta Mitchell, here's why, if you can get that map up of the red map again, here's the game they're playing.
This map is after Spanberger on the 21st of April.
If that referendum passes and the state and the Commonwealth of Virginia judges don't stay in the middle, you're going to have a 10 to 1 in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
And what this is projecting is 230.
Now, I will tell you, for many people I've talked to, they don't agree with this, but this is what they think the House could look like.
And that's why they're trying to moderate their pitch like Spamberger did when she ran, but she was a radical after she got in.
And what she's doing here is a radical.
This is why we've got to get to the voter ID, all the voter issues.
The best way and the clearest path to do that is to show you all the cheating that went on to steal this from President Trump in 2020.
And the evidence is there.
And we've been on this from day one, and we're not going to stop.
Cleta Mitchell, this is my concern.
This judge's order, and I don't know who's focused on this.
The judge's order is not just let's have some hearing on probable cause and did they have probable cause?
And you had Garland Favarito and his five points, all that.
This is a trial.
And I hope that that is at the level of DOJ and others understand they want to do a quick trial with Abby Lowell, right?
And Norm Eisen and other heavy hitters and basically take the ballots back and take the tabula's back.
This probable cause hearing, the judge issued this order last Tuesday, Wednesday.
And it is a, he said it's an evidentiary hearing.
And the parties are supposed to put on witnesses.
They're supposed to decide on what exhibits and documents to be introduced.
And so what I'm concerned about is just making sure that all of the data and the information and the things that we have learned and documented over the last five years with people like Garland and Kevin Monkla and Harry McDougall and David Schaefer and on and on, people who have painstakingly identified all of the problems from 2020.
There were well over 11,779 votes, which was the final margin certified as between President Trump and Joe Biden in Georgia in 2020.
We have so many thousands more illegal votes that we can identify.
I just am praying that the lawyers for the DOJ who have not been living this for five years are realizing this is not your run-of-the-mill probable cause hearing that they're used to if they've been criminal prosecutors.
This is a very different beast.
The Democrats know that, and they're coming in loaded for bear.
So the California case was a case of contract fraud associated with a claim that Eugene Yoo had committed perjury on the contract associated with whether or not any data was being held overseas.
My company or company I'm associated with did the cyber forensic recovery in East Lansing, Michigan from the Connick arrest warrant.
Eugene Yu was arrested and then some shenanigans occur behind the scenes at the California state level, not only to set Eugene Yu free and cancel the case and make a finding which is highly irregular of innocence.
Data was destroyed.
Evidence that was collected was destroyed.
But the fact of the matter is the findings of my company showed clearly that Conic was connected to international corporations and sending information overseas, most particularly to Hangzhou, China, to a company that the naturalized U.S. citizen Eugene Yu had founded this company originally.
There's also very troubling other issues associated with this.
Anybody that wants to find it, they can find my affidavit regarding this matter.
It should have been sealed, but the judge, the corrupt judge in Houston decides to, or Harris County decides to release it.
The fact of the matter is we found extensive evidence of interconnection with the Chinese and actual root privileges exposed on the Conic system in America to the Chinese company in Hangzhou.
And this company was clearly a darling of the CCP.
So based on clear evidence that was found on the internet, that's been wiped out since.