Episode 5079: Tina Peters Assaulted And Charged With Felony; Controversial AI Policy
Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join
Aired On: 1/19/2026
Watch:
On X: @Bannons_WarRoom (https://x.com/Bannons_WarRoom)
On the Web: https://www.warroom.org
On Gettr: @WarRoom
On Podcast: Apple, iHeart Radio, Google
On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews
Don't forget, Jimmy Petronas was the chief financial officer of the state of Florida.
He's now a congressman, Petronas, but he was on board with DeSantis saying, BlackRock, they're evil.
Vanguard, BlackRock, and one or two in State Street, the three biggest companies that control trillions, not billions, trillions of Americans' pension money are totally invested in DEI, climate change, and other woke nonsense.
Man, I hope this thing, I hope we get 8 or 16 more years of either Marco or Vance or Pete Hegseth or Steve Bannon, whoever it is, a MAGA right America first person.
Honestly, they must wake up every day and wonder if this is the reality that they're living in or if they just are living in the upside down or something right now, because none of this makes any sense.
Back here at home, it appears the insanity and frankly the danger of this moment might actually be getting to some of the people who could stop this president, Republicans on Capitol Hill.
He wants every transaction to end with you admitting that he is more powerful than you and can do what he wants.
And the Greenland example is a perfect illustration of this.
He can have, the United States can do anything it wants to do in Greenland in terms of protecting it from Russia or China or any other potential threat with the full cooperation of long-standing and reliable allies like Denmark.
He doesn't want that.
He wants to take it.
He wants to commit an act of territorial aggression against an American ally.
So for him, I just think it's about he wants to be world emperor and be able to basically boss around every country that is willing to be bossed around.
Of course, he's not in the business of bossing around tough countries like Vladimir Putin's Russia or Xi Jinping's China.
To ask if that is just an admission from the administration that their agents, their federal officers, can do whatever they want, can just do whatever they want.
When JD Vance said they have absolute immunity, is that them saying, get in our way and if we kill you, not our problem.
Well, I mean, if you're looking at the totality, let's go back to a totality of other circumstances, including the January 6th pardons, including many other pardons from Trump.
This is, we're looking at a pattern.
And the pattern is if you are a Trump ally, if you're doing what Trump asks, then the law doesn't apply to you.
If you're a Trump enemy, a Trump opponent, or even if he just perceives you as an opponent, then he's going to wield the full power of the government against you in often in lawless ways.
This is a pattern from day one.
And I think it's a mistake to just look at this one shooting and try, just look at this one shooting in isolation.
We have to look at this in context.
And the context is very clear.
It's impunity for his allies and it is punishment for his opponents.
Help me understand what exactly is going on in the White House and why the president thought it was a good idea or somehow justifiable to send a text message to Norway saying that because they hurt his feelings, he needs Denmark to give him Greenland.
I think in some way, Katie, we shouldn't be surprised that this is the way the president communicated to another foreign leader, given the fact that the president has been very public about the fact that he wants Greenland.
He, his advisors, one of his top deputy chiefs of staff, Stephen Miller, have said over and over again that this is what they want, that the U.S., they have claimed that the U.S. has a right to claim Greenland, questioning Denmark's right and sovereignty and questioning Greenland sovereignty and saying essentially that if the U.S. military can take control of Greenland, then it should be the United States.
And that this is essentially what the president is prepared to do to make sure that it happens.
And so over the weekend, an escalation where the president posted on True Social that he was going to enact 10% tariffs on Denmark and seven other European countries.
These are allies of the United States, a 10% tariff on goods that they're sending to the U.S.
And then that would escalate to 25% come June if they do not agree and if they do not work with the U.S. on supposedly purchasing Greenland.
As you laid out, these countries are not interested in that at all.
I mean, Denmark and Norway and all the other European allies have made very clear that this is not something that is on the table and that it would be dangerous and that it could potentially break apart NATO.
So what do you advise people, given the threats that they're facing now to protest, given that a woman was shot and killed, given that they're being pepper sprayed in the face, they're being physically taken from their cars, they're being injured in some cases detained unlawfully.
How do you advise people to practice this right?
As MLK put it, the greatness of America is the right to protest for right.
And some people, like Dr. King, were willing to give their life for the ultimate struggles of the community, and which he did.
And so in some cases, you should not hamper the individuals from carrying out their forces.
And videotaping individuals from a distance is not a problem.
You can record them.
There is no law that says you cannot record them.
You should be a reasonable distance away.
And if they instruct you to move away, continue to report and move away in that instance.
But it's our right under the Constitution to protest.
And this sort of conversation around protesting not being American isn't consistent with the history of our country or consistent with the teachings of Dr. King.
His last book was on community of chaos and this chaos, this fear-driven community that we're doing in Minnesota and Minneapolis is exactly what will drive us to our end.
Rather than trying to neutralize, sending more officers to this place does not solve the problem.
It just exacerbates it.
unidentified
Is that your account?
I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present.
So I really don't know how to answer that question either.
Like I said, you're not going to.
This is freedom of speech.
This is America, right?
And I agree with you 100%.
We're just trying to see if it's you, but if we're not talking to the right person, we want to go see you with the right person.
Okay, how can I help you?
So pretty much it's just a statement that was made as far as the you know remaining.
It says the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians, tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, even leave the room when they vote and on related matters, wants you to know that you're all welcome.
The concerning part and not concerning for the person who's posting it, well, we're just trying to prevent somebody else getting agitated or agreeing with the statement.
We're not saying it's true or not.
Understood.
That guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians can probably incite somebody to do something radical.
That's all we're here to talk about.
And we wanted to get your side of it.
Was you that posted that?
To, I would think, to refrain from posting things like that because that could get something inside.
I appreciate your concern.
I appreciate you coming out here.
Okay, that's it.
That is it.
I'm going to maintain my amendment rights to not answer the question about what they're doing.
Yeah, you know, normally I like to greet you with a nice smile, but it's kind of hard to smile right now.
Yeah, She basically went into a closet where it's like a water closet where she had to fill a container with some water.
And a 20-year-old inmate came in behind her and started to attack her from behind.
She pushed this person out of the way and was defending herself.
The part where she was defending herself was seen.
So they're basically charging her.
They put her in the hole for an undetermined amount of time.
You know, it's not like they're polite and kind and say, you have to be here for three days or one day or whatever.
So we don't know how long she's going to be there.
Last time they put her in there, they put her in for 15 days, supposedly for her own safety.
And then they returned her to a cell.
So there was no, you know, it kind of proved that it was just nonsense and they didn't need to put her in there.
But this is really alarming.
Okay, because what's going on there now, we've got the governor finally agreeing that the sentence that Tina Peters received was harsh.
It was, of course, it was harsh.
It was completely unreasonable.
And now we have three judges of the Court of Appeals looking like they very much agree with that issue, that the sentence is not even a legal sentence.
And so they, you know, they're on the verge of reversing some of these charges and reversing or some of the convictions and some of the charges and the sentencing.
At the same time, we've got Judge Polis finally saying that it's too harsh.
And then we've got the real criminals.
We've got Weiser and Griswold.
Jenna Griswold, who, and I say she's a criminal, they admit that they did what they did.
They admit that she was responsible for going into 20, I'm sorry, 62 counties and going into 62 counties and basically deleting the information, which is contrary to federal law.
She could get a year for each one of those.
So Jenna Griswold is truly a criminal.
And what she's doing is she's putting all of the emphasis on Tina Peters for basically saving the evidence.
And, you know, now, so we've got a little bit of a divergence between Jenna Griswold and Weiser, who are basically saying, keep her in prison.
The real criminals saying, keep the non-criminal in prison.
Well, Governor Polis is saying, hey, I'm the governor.
Okay, we're going to try to reboot Peter Ticton and see if we can get a clearer signal.
Long story short, Tina Peters was attacked.
They're accusing her of the attack.
They put her in what they call the hole or the special housing unit, the shoe, S-H-U- which is solitary confinement.
And we're going to get to the bottom of all this.
And as Peter laid out, Jenna Griswold, the Secretary of State, Weiser, I think the Attorney General, they're arguing she should serve to the end of her term.
Even Paulis is getting weak on there by commuting the sentence.
And you have an appellate court.
So, Peter Ticton and the legal team of Pat McSweeney and all of our work in this thing nonstop.
We have, Peter, just can you just give it to us one more time?
Tina was attacked when she tried to fight off the attack of this 20.
And they put her and they unprovoked, and they put Tina in the shoe in the solitary.
I understand Polis is thinking about a commutation.
You got this panel that's reviewing it.
It's an illegal process, but is there anything the president's given you through you working with him a federal pardon?
Understand they got to argue that up to the courts or whether it applies here or not.
But when you have a 72-year-old gold star mother who has cancer, who's now attacked in this violent women's prison, they put her in solitary and they charge her with the assault.
Is there anything that people on the outside can do here, sir?
Well, I think just being out in the public and showing, putting, shining a light on this is really important.
This is where the function of what you do really counts.
So, you know, I'm not sure where you heard what you heard and where I got cut off.
So let me just put it this way.
We know that Jenna Griswold is literally a criminal.
Okay.
There's no question about it.
She admits to what she's doing.
They're not even trying to hide the fact that they installed the trusted build and wiped out all the data out of all of the Dominion machines that were in 62 counties.
She's guilty of a criminal offense that's good for one year of imprisonment 62 times over.
She could be sentenced to 62 years for what she's done.
And don't ask me why the Department of Justice has not gone after her and not charged her yet.
But there's a divergence in order for her.
Okay, so, you know, it's her offense against Tina Peters is her best defense.
And so as long as she can keep, for some reason, she thinks in her head, don't ask me how, that as long as she keeps Tina Peters in prison, somehow she's safe and Mr. Weiser is safe.
But the fact of the matter is, is that the wrong people are in prison.
So she wants them to stay in.
She's been very vocal, vocal by she.
I mean, Janet Griswold is very vocal on the fact that Tina Peters needs to stay in prison.
The governor's saying, hey, look, if you want to be the governor, you know, run for governor.
Right now, I'm the governor.
I have to make these decisions.
And I think the sentence was too harsh.
So then all of a sudden, out of the blue, we have a 20-year-old that attacks her completely unprovoked.
I mean, Tina Peters was in this water closet filling up something with water, you know, minding her own business.
And all of a sudden, this woman comes behind her and starts attacking her.
And to defend herself, she turns around and basically deals with the situation.
And you're right, she's the one that gets charged.
So why?
Is that to interfere with the governor giving her clemency?
Is that the purpose of this?
Is this what we're seeing in real life playing out?
That somebody in that prison or is just a crazy person in prison that's just attacking her for no reason whatsoever.
One way or the other, They threw her in the hole with nothing to read, nothing to do, just really in the hole.
Well, Steve, you've got a really dissonant mood here in Washington, D.C.
I mean, as we'll soon hear from Elizabeth Mitchell, there are just so many different perspectives and approaches to this.
But the main division, I would say, is between the accelerationist camp who want to use artificial intelligence, they say, to improve people's lives, build the economy.
But you have all of these other, I think, far more sensible perspectives on what are the dangers, what are the downsides, what are we trading for this grand AI revolution?
So on the note of the chips, on the exports, the Overwatch Act, which is really among the most sensible bills to come up on this, the GAIN Act was good.
Restrict Act was good.
But the Overwatch Act simply calls for restrictions on any chips that are going out to adversaries.
They want congressional oversight, just like they do with any other military components on any AI-capable chips going to adversaries such as China.
As it's been pointed out, you had a craze right-wing influencer campaign in which people who never cared about chips or AI or exports suddenly gained an interest and in very similar language began to call this some sort of boon for China or some means of subverting the president's power to export.
If the audience wants to read that, it is an excellent piece put out by Model Republic in association with Midas Touch by Tyler Johnston.
A fantastic look at this synthetic influencer operation.
But the nuts and bolts, Steve, the nuts and bolts is just simply this.
If we are in some kind of existential race against China, as people like David Sachs have claimed, then we have absolutely no interest whatsoever, whether it's military or commercial uses.
We have no interest in sending chips to China.
The only people who would benefit, aside from the Chinese themselves, would be NVIDIA and also anyone pushing for AI acceleration against China.
It then justifies the acceleration.
It justifies the reckless development and rampant deployment of AIs that most people really don't want to begin with.
As we say about AI and maybe guardrails or whatever, the Sinequon Nan, the thing you have to do first is a complete shutdown of China and the entire ecosystem.
Of course, it's no sale whatsoever of any chips.
I don't want to hear that, oh, we want to get them addicted to our system.
That's just the bald-faced lie put out by NVIDIA.
And Jensen Wong is an influence peddler for the Chinese Communist Party.
It's obvious.
He keeps saying it doesn't matter who wins.
We'll all share it together.
That's a lie.
The CCP is in a take-no-prisoners game.
But I mean, they shouldn't have any students over here, not just 600,000.
We shouldn't have 350.
Send them all home.
They shouldn't get any H-1B visas, none.
How about this zero?
They shouldn't be at any weapons labs or national labs or Chinese national getting trained.
They should not be at any of the companies of David Sachs and Mark Andreessen, these guys in Silicon Valley, Sequoia Capital, who has financed the Chinese Communist Party military, the PLA military, with their venture capital for decades.
There should be no equity, no cash, no American pension funds, no debt, zero.
The entire ecosystem around the Chinese Communist Party and all technology should be stopped at zero.
This is the lie that, oh, if you do this thing and stop it, you're helping the Chinese.
You're shutting down the Chinese and we're not shutting them down enough.
This is purely in the interest, the economic self-interest of NVIDIA and other players that Andreessen and this crowd own.
Obvious.
Everything they do is in their own economic interest.
This is why they're trying to get the weapons labs and the national labs to report to them.
Gold, as you know, and silver have been on a tear.
They're near all-time highs.
Gold right now, almost $4,700 an ounce.
Silver at close to $95 an ounce, I think $94,000, $28.
The geopolitical risk here in the look for a safe haven and central banks buying at record rates are not going to change.
President Trump's going to go over it.
I think Wednesday afternoon, he's going to give the post-war international rules-based order the old what-for.
So I would imagine we're going to have continued turbulence in markets as people look for safe havens and central banks look to hedge geopolitical risk.
What does that mean?
That's a lot of Wall Street gobbledygook for that.
You got to talk to Philip Patrick and the team at Birch Gold.
Easiest way to do it is to take your phone at Tex Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, 989898.
It's the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
They get you right to Philip Patrick and do it quickly.
If you want something that can give you how we got here, because we tell you, it's not the price of gold, it's the process of what drives the value of gold, the pattern recognition.
We've been doing this now for, I don't know, four or five years when gold was, what, $1,000 or $1,100 an ounce.
We told you about this, about this is an assault on the U.S. dollars dropped 28% in its value since Biden took over.
It is the BRICS nations are trying to get off.
They're trying to de-dollarize and get off the dollar to break the United States.
End of the dollar empire.
Promo code, go to birchgold.com, promo code Bannon, into the dollar empire.
All free online.
There's now a book.
And for an appropriate purchase, I do give you a signed copy that you'll want to keep.
It's taught in college courses now because it's accessible.
I'm walking through the entire pattern recognition of gold.
Check it out today.
And most importantly, talk to Philip Patrick and Team.
This thing's going to get crazier and crazier.
If we had told you gold is going to be close to 100, silver is going to be close to 100 bucks.
The price of two barrels of oil a while ago, you said, no, you're crazy.
Also, we're going to try to get Apollo Pappas does Tina Peter Show keeps Tina Peter Show going.
Very eloquent guy, knows Tina pretty well.
We're going to get the facts overnight, and we're trying to get Apollo to kick off the show tomorrow morning and get us more up to date.
I want to thank Peter Ticton for all the work he's doing.
This Tina Peters situation, you know, a bunch of people in the war room engine room have been texting me and coming to me and saying, hey, they don't want Tina to get out of there alive because of what she knows.
And I'm telling you, this thing about an attack and assault, and they're charging her with a felony or whatever.
We got to get to the bottom of all this.
Also, Joe did mention MITA session.
Remember, they're kind of a left-wing attack media site, but they do on occasions do some stuff.
This is what I'm saying.
You're going to have to look at both the left and the right on this situation to get to the bottom of it.
They've got a pretty good assessment, but I want to keep everybody's mind clear.
We've got to get to the bottom of this situation about chip exports and artificial intelligence.
And I say this again.
If you shut down the ecosystem, because it is an ecosystem that makes them competitive in artificial intelligence, the students at the universities, the H-1B visas, the training at the national labs, the trainings with the companies, the debt inequity, the pension fund money, and particularly the shipment of any chip of any quality.
If the rationale is, oh, well, we got to get them addicted to our chips because then they won't do it, then let them go build their own ecosystem and see how close they come to competition.
They won't.
They will fade like the morning dew.
Elizabeth Mitchell has written all about this at the Daily Signal.
It's really an incredible piece.
I want Grace and Mo, Elizabeth, and the team here to push it out.
Elizabeth, walk us through it.
You're talking about this battle behind the scenes and the most important fight going on in Washington, D.C., ma'am.
So what we have here is, as you've said, some administration sources said, people close to the administration all agree that AI is one of the most controversial issues right now in the Trump administration.
So we have four coalitions that are competing here for the president's attention.
We have one, we have the tech accelerationists.
Those are big tech people.
We've been talking about Mark Andreessen of Andreessen Horowitz.
He has some influence in the administration.
People like Elon Musk, David Sachs, Yurim Krishnan, that's the big tech accelerationist crowd.
Then we have three other coalitions who are united against the tech accelerationists.
That's the populist coalition, the National Security Coalition, which is concerned about China, Populist Coalition is concerned about jobs, and then the Family Coalition, which is concerned about the suicides we're seeing, AI convincing kids online, concerned about the deep fake porn we're seeing being made by AI that's a danger to kids.
And so these coalitions are all trying to figure out where to go on AI policy.
It's a regularly, a relatively new issue where the right doesn't have a unified stance yet.
And there's a lot of different opinions about how we should push forward.
Because behind the scenes, you did great reporting.
I love the way you broke it down to different coalitions because this thing's just kind of forming.
You have different people working with different groups.
When do you think this breaks through and becomes a story that everybody's focused on?
Because right below the surface, I tell people, it's by far the most vicious and probably important fight I've seen in Washington ever.
It's galvanized everybody.
And as you mentioned, the accelerationists, they happen to be some of the wealthiest people in the world.
They've got the biggest lobbyist firms, the biggest crisis communication, the biggest law firms.
And this is a take-no-prisoners fight.
When do you actually think, given your reporting, this breaks through and becomes more of a popular thing that you hear more people talk about, more influencers?
It's on more of the podcast.
Fox News is covering it because they've been essentially crickets.
Well, when I talked to Joe Allen about this, he said that currently AI doesn't have the capacity to replace a large number of jobs, but that very likely is in the future.
And it's something that we're not seeing a lot of preparation for or a lot of preparation for how to prevent that.
And so I think that as we inch closer and closer to more people being replaced by AI, more people are going to wake up and say, hey, I'm about to lose my job because of AI.
And I want the administration, I want Congress, the government to do something about this.
Yeah, it's these traditional conservative groups, people like Michael Toscano over at the Institute for Family Studies, Daniel Cochrane at the Heritage Foundation, who have talked to these families who have had children take their own lives due to AI, convincing them to do so.
We have character AI being sued for this, other incidents of similar things happening.
And there's laws that have been taken up across the country, places like Texas and New York, that would limit dangerous AI and children situations from happening, making sure that AI can't make child porn, that AI can't convince kids to commit suicide, different restrictions like this.
And these restrictions have even in some cases been opposed by big tech.
Mark Andreessen has a million, multi-million dollar PAC Leading the Future, which is opposing state AI laws and supporting candidates that support no restrictions on AI.
And so it's a really big battle that's happening here to protect kids on the pro-family side.
And so I expect we can hear a lot more of that.
And I think that that is an argument that the whole country would be really sympathetic to, which is that our kids, we've seen how kids have been endangered and harmed by social media due to the rise of social media over the past several years.
And then now we're likely to see a very similar situation that's already begun with AI.
Make sure you add Daily Signal to that, like National Pulse.
These are all free and you get tremendous, tremendous content.
Get up to speed on your day.
Joe Allen, Joe, I want to pull back for a second because I want to, because the Warren Posse has clearly been so important in this fight so far with the AI MSC bill.
We finish every episode of the War Room with the magnificent movie and score from the right stuff.
Really, America at the height of the, this was the Mercury program, became the Apollo program.
This was the beginning of the space race in America competing with the Russians to get in there.
It's in our blood to not just be competitive, but President Trump says this over and over again, and he posits this, that we have to be the leaders in this technology.
So I want to make sure people understand that we're not Luddites, but you have accelerationists and then you have other people saying, hey, my point about not falling behind the Chinese Chemist Party, because I agree, we cannot fall behind the Chinese Chemist Party.
But this whole situation right now, we have to think this through with clarity.
Why are the accelerationists the ones that are pushing at the same time to make sure the Chinese Chemist Party have an ecosystem?
Because this is not any one thing that makes you competitive.
This like it was not any one thing that did Mercury.
You have, as Lena Khan describes it, you have to have kind of an industry ecosystem with different pieces to it.
Training, knowledge, capital, debt and equity, chips, manufacturing, processes.
That's what exists here.
And so why are the accelerationists, which are the ones who want to put, you know, all gas, no break, why are they the ones that also at the same time are pushing us to essentially arm our enemy in this, which we agree is the most vital race of all, sir?
Well, if you take them at their face, it's to just basically instill American norms even in China, in China's hardware, and lure them into becoming dependent.
Now, if that's the honest response from those promoting this, then I think that's just foolish on its face.
Clearly, if we feed them H200s or any chips, we're only increasing their capacity both for training and for inference.
The other motivations, and these are only speculative, but I think they're probably more realistic than what they're saying, would be that they want more money.
You have NVIDIA that would love to see the Chinese market be opened up to them to not only have their chips over there, but to rake in cash.
And then if you got a little bit more conspiratorial or at least imagining a strategy that's unspoken, it would simply be to continue this race and provide justification for the development and deployment here in America by pointing to China constantly as the competitor that we need to stay ahead of.
I mean, in reality, China is the closest competitor that we have.
But it's also known that right now they're struggling to train new models because of all of the compute they use for inference, meaning that they already are lacking in enough compute to really keep pace with America.
And when you look at their indigenous operation with Huawei being the lead, producing the Ascend chips, it is a tiny, tiny fraction of what NVIDIA produces and a tiny fraction of the chips used for compute.
NVIDIA chips are something like 60% worldwide.
Ascend chips are maybe 1 or 2%, some tiny fraction.
So to go back around to that question, why would they want to do it?
Well, if you take them at their word, it's a foolish quest to get China addicted to our hardware.
But I think that the speculation that it's for profit and for justification to acceleration, I would love to ask David Sachs in person that question if he would be willing to answer face to face.
Stick around at 6 p.m. right off the second hour of the show is going to be wild.
I've got Joanne Fleming from Grassroots America.
We the people, it's one of the largest grassroots organizations in Texas are going to join me.
And of course, Raymond Ibrahim is in Budapest, but he's going to stay up and we're going to get to Raymond and lay out everything that's going on in Texas and how it's been done before.
And it must be stopped.
War Room Texas is next.
Stick around.
You're really going to enjoy it.
Joe Allen, you're traveling.
We're trying to get you out to see as many people as possible in the hinterland and make sure that people actually get up to speed on everything that's happening, not just in artificial intelligence, but in transhumanism.
You're going to be covering, though, while you're on the road, Davos, because there's a lot going on.
One of the things in Davos, the Davos man, Larry Fink and these guys, it's AI overhang.
It's the capacity or capabilities of AI that are not being used.
They're saying people only using 10%.
They're afraid that this may cause the bubble.
They're also afraid that people are just not going to get up to speed and fall in love with AI as quickly as possible.
Give me a minute or two on your thoughts of what's happening in Davos that you're keeping your eye on, sir.
Well, it's no surprise to me that people like Fink or any of the boosters at Davos would like to see more and more adoption.
I mean, I suppose a billion plus people just simply isn't enough for them.
You know, the overhang, the idea that people are not utilizing the systems to their full capabilities, yeah, maybe, but I think that ultimately the real focus has to be on what happens when you suffuse an entire corporation or a school or any organization or a person's life with a non-human mind that they then become dependent on.
Much more concerning to me is how human capabilities are becoming atrophied.
Not that AI capabilities are not being exploited.
But there will be a great panel with Dennis Isabas and Dario on the day.
I think that the War Impossible have plenty to sink their teeth in there talking about life after AGI kind of sci-fi.
Jensen Wong, of course, will be there.
David Sachs, of course, will be there.
Alex Karp and the usual Mark Benioff.
And in one panel talking about the downsides of AI, Max Tegmark and Meredith Whitaker, the president of Signal.
There'll be all sorts of things there, but a whole lot of boosting.
Remember, it was about two or three years ago we covered live when ChatGPT was really did its coming out party.
It had been announced right before the holidays, Christmas holidays, but or Thanksgiving holidays, I think.
It came out and I said, first off, the large language models on ChatG were far ahead of where anybody thought they were.
It was a shock, but it was capital.
I said the time, venture capital, hedge fund capital.
You're going to open the doors of this, and this is going to be everything because they're going to see the way to make massive amounts of money very quickly.
And that forecast has held true.
It's one of the reasons we're covering this every day.
So, Joe, you're going to be there.
We'll stream these things as we can get them.
We want your commentary, and I realize you're going to be traveling, but we'll have you on the show nonstop.
Social media at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z and my website, joebot.xyz, tomorrow, doing a closed-door press conference with the Florida Citizens Alliance on child protection bills coming in to the Florida House.
And then some things in February.
I can't announce quite yet.
The dates being hammered out.
One here in DC, but March 6th, Georgia Tech, and March 8th, First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas.
You know, we just had the anniversary of when you gave your life to God and to Jesus Christ, your Lord and Savior, and saved you from being a degenerate gambler and a drug, you know, crack cocaine and came back to lead one of the great companies in this country.
And quite frankly, to be dead right about the election fraud, but I think people of everything you've done, I can tell you, I've heard just they're so proud of how you're handling the situation in Minneapolis right now and really are looked at as a beacon of light.
That is a great city.
It's a great state.
They're great people.
It's one of the most beautiful states in the country and one of the most beautiful places in the world, particularly upstate Minnesota.
All that said, people want to know what deals you got for us.
The war imposse, particularly the Rumble crowd, is very cut to the chase.
And so we're going to continue our Made in the USA mattresses and our mattress topper.
I was just reading here, Steve.
We've got all kinds of new technology on the new hybrid mattress topper, which has copper, graphite, silver, and infused memory foam along with the patented my pillow foam.
And you guys, this gives you great, your body needs two kinds of sleep, REM and Delta.
Your body needs the Delta sleep, and that's all about temperature and pressure points.
And we have over 10,000 individual comfort supports on every one of them toppers.
So you got to check it out.
There's low as $99.98 for the mattress topper.
We have queen size low as $149.98.
But if you go to mypillow.com forward slash war room, there you see the mattress toppers, the mattresses, the comforters, and the, but now what I'm going to tell you about is we are closing out all of our blankets.
We have all these different kinds of blankets we got in for Christmas.
We're going to close them out for the war room posse as low as $25 a blanket.
We have throw blankets, bed blankets, you name it, we have it for the blankets.
So get those.
But here's the big one, everybody.
Free shipping on your entire order.
So get those big ticket items, those mattresses and mattress toppers come right to your front door and you get six month money back guarantee.
You're going to absolutely love them.
10-year warranty.
I put a 10-year warranty on all of our stuff, everybody, because they work and they last.
They're built to last.
But it's 800-873-1062.
Tell my operators they're right downstairs to get promo code Warroom.
And you guys, we also, I wanted to make one more mention.
The slippers are almost gone.
You guys get the slippers.
We close them out for the war room posse.
The nice warm slippers, $39.98 a pair.
Once they're gone, they're gone.
A lot of women's sizes are still in stock.
So get your size and take advantage of free shipping.
We have our 250 products, you guys, over, I think even more than that now.