Oct. 22, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
56:29
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Six days after the major news networks called the 2020 race for Joe Biden, the former mayor of New York City stood before reporters as hair dye streamed down his face and declared the election was stolen. | ||
| He said he would prove it in court, but he never produced any of that proof. | ||
| Not in Wisconsin, not in Arizona, not in Michigan, not in Pennsylvania. | ||
| Of the more than 60 lawsuits challenging the 2020 results, Trump got a favorable ruling in just one case. | ||
| And it was only procedural and it only affected a few hundred ballots, not enough to sway any results. | ||
| The other cases were either dismissed, settled, or voluntarily withdrawn. | ||
| But the myth of the fraud, that dead people voted, machines were hacked, a foreign government interfered, and votes were flipped, well, that myth lived on, promoted ad nauseum on conservative media. | ||
| But the myth even lost there, and it was costly. | ||
| After trashing Dominion voting machines, Fox News was forced to pay one of the largest defamation settlements in U.S. history, $787 million to keep that case from going to trial. | ||
| And yet, the myth of a stolen election still lives because the President of the United States, despite being back in the Oval Office, can't let 2020 go. | ||
| He refuses to accept he lost. | ||
| And not accepting it has become a litmus test for anyone in the Republican Party, be they a lawmaker or a member of President Trump's second administration. | ||
| It's not just refusing to accept the loss, it's investigating those who publicly stated the truth about the election, like Chris Krebs. | ||
| And now it's also potentially continuing investigation into the loss itself, and maybe even using the delusion to gain more power over the next elections. | ||
| President Trump's new election integrity team at the Department of Homeland Security includes Heather Honey and Marcy McCarthy, two election deniers who worked to overturn the results in Georgia and Pennsylvania. | ||
| Honey is now Deputy Assistant Secretary for Election Integrity at the Department of Homeland Security, and McCarthy was named Director of Public Affairs at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA. | ||
| According to the New York Times, Honey hosted a call with election officials from nearly all 50 states last month. | ||
| The paper reports many of the officials left that call alarmed. | ||
| Five people familiar with the call say Honey spent much of her time repeating claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent, questioned the mission of CISA, and made multiple references to a report that election machines had been hacked and could not be trusted. | ||
| Ms. Honey and Ms. McCarthy did not respond to the New York Times request for comment, and the Homeland Security Department declined to give specifics about the department's election work. | ||
| But it is because these individuals are now responsible for laying the groundwork for the upcoming midterm and presidential elections that many election experts are even more alarmed today. | ||
| Well, she has broad authority to investigate through the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
| And then, of course, if it's accompanied by the Department of Justice, then they have broad authority to prosecute. | ||
| And I promise you, that can potentially disrupt an election. | ||
| And if nothing else, it will make a number of election administrators nervous if they're simply calling spades a spade and saying, no, the 2020 election wasn't stolen, or no, the 2026 election wasn't stolen, or the 2028 election wasn't stolen. | ||
| And so now, I think for the first time ever, we have a number of people within these government offices who are willing to indulge the most fanciful of claims. | ||
| And that simply did not exist in President Trump's administration in 2020, by and large, with the exceptions of people like John Eastman. | ||
| Heather Honey should know better because in 2022, well after the 2020 election, and Stephen knows this probably better than anybody else, she was a witness in litigation brought in Arizona where she claimed that certain procedures used by a particular county could have allowed false ballots to be counted. | ||
| And again, I'm reading from the New York Times story right now, but as she was questioned, she acknowledged she had no evidence that this had occurred on a widespread scale. | ||
| She was fully discredited as a witness in that Arizona litigation. | ||
| And a judge found, and again, I'm quoting from his decision, would not come close to clear and convincing evidence that the election outcome was affected. | ||
| But nonetheless, Heather Honey has it in her mind that more people voted than were entitled to vote across a number of states in various counties, et cetera. | ||
| And she is not letting go of that idea, joining forces with people like Cleta Mitchell to say that they are the true defenders of election integrity and they will get to the bottom of why there are discrepancies between voter rolls and the number of votes cast. | ||
| They believe there is widespread fraud in who is registered to vote and who is actually voting and that they themselves are the only ones who are willing and able to get to the bottom of the state. | ||
| All right, if there are National Guard troops on the ground and people are concerned about feeling intimidated to go to the polls, or what if there is another argument that these election machines are all being hacked? | ||
| I know there's transparency. | ||
| I know people like you and people like the Secretary of State have been going out and trying to say these things are not attached to the internet. | ||
| I mean, Chris Krebs has said that over and over again. | ||
| They're not attached to the internet. | ||
| They can't be hacked. | ||
| But that myth, that lie is still pushed. | ||
| So there's that, but then there's also just the physical aspect of it. | ||
| If there's national troops on the ground in some of these polling places, what's the advice of local officials? | ||
| Well, I would say if you're in a state like Nevada or Arizona, you can certainly vote ahead of time. | ||
| You can vote no excuse early and you can vote by mail. | ||
| As for machines being hacked, not only are they not connected to the internet, but 97% of voters in the United States use a paper ballot. | ||
| That means that there is always a non-hackable, auditable paper trail. | ||
| And to my fellow conservatives and Republicans out there, I would say continue to believe in the rule of law and the rule of law. | ||
| The courts have shown consistently after 2020, after 2022, after 2024, that despite what people like Heather Honey have alleged, our elections have been fair and they have been lawful and they have been accurate. | ||
| And if the courts rule such in 2026, then I hope and I trust that people will abide by the results of those elections. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies because we're going to medieval on this people. | ||
| You're going to not get a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann. | |
| Wednesday, 22 October, the year of our Lord 2025, Heather Honey, the great Heather Honey, is now deputy over at DHS for Election Integrity. | ||
| They're full meltdown, baby. | ||
| Full meltdown. | ||
| You got Cleta Mitchell's wingman, Heather Honey, and Heather's one of the toughest and the best, now in charge of election integrity for the United States government. | ||
| Does it get any better than that? | ||
| They're losing it because they understand no more stolen elections. | ||
| No more. | ||
| None. | ||
| The null set. | ||
| So that was announced this afternoon. | ||
| They're a full meltdown. | ||
| We may go to the Oval Office here shortly. | ||
| The Secretary General of NATO is there. | ||
| Not that we care about that. | ||
| The president may take questions. | ||
| We definitely care about that. | ||
| So it could be open. | ||
| We got a lot to get through. | ||
| We've been making a lot of news here at the worm today. | ||
| Steve Robinson from Maine. | ||
| It's got that great news site up there. | ||
| Steve, you've got a breaking news story that's quite important about the Maine elections. | ||
| Talking about election integrity, we've been warning about people that it's not the foot soldier you see in the streets of Antifa or these protests, the ones that are getting violent. | ||
| It's the people that train them, particularly folks in the military. | ||
| And people would know nobody in the military. | ||
| They're all patriots. | ||
| Well, that's not actually the case. | ||
| Steve Robinson, what is this breaking story coming out of Maine, sir? | ||
| Hi, Steve. | ||
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| We actually reported this morning that Graham Plattner, the progressive darling who's been endorsed by Bernie Sanders and received universally positive, just gushing coverage, right up until Governor Janet Mills decided that she was going to run for the U.S. Senate seat for a chance to challenge Susan Collins. | ||
| He's been active with a group called the Socialist Rifle Association. | ||
| It's a playoff of the NRA, but it's a group that's linked with Antifa and also the group out in Salt Lake City, the trans paramilitary group that is connected with Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk's assassination. | ||
| So that's how the Socialist Rifle Association first kind of popped into the national consciousness, at least for me. | ||
| But we found that there was a main chapter and started digging into it. | ||
| And then when this Graham Plattner story broke, we found Reddit comments that he'd posted, which are now deleted. | ||
| But I think everyone now agrees that P. Hussell is in fact Graham Plattner. | ||
| He hasn't denied making any of these comments. | ||
| In some of the comments that CNN missed when they broke the first story, he says that he provides training, including defensive handgun training, to the Socialist Rifle Association. | ||
| He's, of course, an ex-Marine, ex-Army Reserve, former private contractor in Afghanistan doing close security for the ambassador. | ||
| So he knows his way around firearms and his tutelage would be invaluable if you were a bunch of LGBTQ leftists who didn't know how to use firearms. | ||
| And when we went looking at the social media accounts for the Socialist Rifle Association chapter of Maine, we found tons of pictures of multiple cases of paramilitary training out on the range, including pictures where an individual who looks just like Graham Plattner with red hair and a red beard is seen playing range officer for them. | ||
| So it's clear that Graham is a little bit more of a far-left radical than he's led on in some of his campaign appearances. | ||
| And this, combined with revelations that he has a literal Nazi tattoo on his chest that he never got rid of for 17 years, I think is making it a very, very bad week for Graham and a good week for Maine Governor Janet Mills. | ||
| Look, the reason he was embraced is that anybody that comes across as a populist, they're going to jump on. | ||
| And of course, there's no populist over there. | ||
| It's all phony. | ||
| I'm less concerned, too, about the tattoos, a typical thing the left jumps on. | ||
| But I'm more than concerned, but what your reporting has shown. | ||
| I have to ask you first, in doing this research, Steve, it strains credulity to think that CNN did not see this, sir. | ||
| They just didn't want to report it because this gets a lot harder. | ||
| This gets down to the T5. | ||
| I mean, walk us, take your time. | ||
| We're going to get some space for you here unless we got to go to the Oval. | ||
| Walk us through your process and how the great investigative team over the CNN got really the unimportant comments and they forgot the meet, sir. | ||
| Yeah, well, Steve, that's excellent. | ||
| That's my first thought as well, was leave it to CNN to focus on him saying the word retarded instead of the paramilitary training that he was doing with Antifa super soldiers. | ||
| I mean, that seems like they buried the lead a little bit. | ||
| That seems like the first place where a journalist would go. | ||
| But I managed to get my hands on the opposition research file. | ||
| I don't know this for sure, but I don't believe that CNN did this investigative work themselves. | ||
| I think this was handed to them by opposition researchers. | ||
| It's too convenient. | ||
| It was just two days after Janet Mills declared. | ||
| I think this is Chuck Schumer playing dirty. | ||
| And what leads me to believe that is that I received the same exact file. | ||
| Somebody had found a way to archive 800 of his Reddit posts that he'd attempted to delete. | ||
| And we were scanning through those and just, you know, Control-F, Socialist Rifle Association, and bing, right there. | ||
| There's two posts where he says, we do range days, we do these trainings, we do this. | ||
| I taught, I put on a defensive handgun training. | ||
| It's very clear that he's involved in this and he considers himself a member of the Socialist Rifle Association. | ||
| Hang on for one second. | ||
| I'll hold you through the break. | ||
| We have Joe Allen here. | ||
| Tons of updates on the proclamation today about artificial general intelligence and artificial superintelligence, the dangers, and what the nation needs to awaken to of the dangers. | ||
| Also, Kenny Cody is going to be with us. | ||
| A great piece about Charlie Kirk and the new revival in the United States, Christian revival, particularly among young people, and how that's raising some alarms. | ||
| We have a scalp, a big scalp over the small business administration. | ||
| The great James O'Keefe is on the road. | ||
| He's going to be calling in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
His investigative report has already borne fruit. | |
| We're going to get to all that. | ||
| Also, Dr. Brian Hooker, now we're going to try to get all this in while the president may open up in the Oval Office. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course, we'll go to that, particularly the QA with the media. | |
| I know the president's got a lot to say. | ||
| Birch Gold, text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at 98-9898. | ||
| Get the ultimate guide. | ||
| This guide is free to investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump. | ||
| A little turbulence today? | ||
| We told you it's going to be turbulent times. | ||
| Turbulent times ahead. | ||
| Short commercial break, back in the warm in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I saw, Mr. President, that you said as recently as yesterday that you still believe that Putin wants to end the war. | |
| I do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You took his staff to rash up the sanctions and put more pressure on him. | |
| What else are you going to do to encourage him to get there, or can you explain why you do believe that he wants peace? | ||
| Yeah, it's a good question. | ||
| Today is a very big day in terms of what we're doing. | ||
| Look, these are tremendous sanctions. | ||
| These are very big. | ||
| Those are against their two big oil companies. | ||
| And we hope that they won't be on for long. | ||
| We hope that the war will be settled. | ||
| We just answered having to do with the various forms of missiles and everything else that we're looking at. | ||
| But we don't think that's going to be necessary. | ||
| We would like to see them just take the line that has been formed over quite a long period of time and go and let's go home. | ||
| Last week they had almost 8,000 soldiers killed. | ||
| Many Russians were killed last week. | ||
| Many Ukrainians were killed last week. | ||
| We think it's ridiculous and would like to have it end. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why do you think he wants peace, though? | |
| Why do you still believe that? | ||
| I think they want peace. | ||
| I think they both want peace at this point. | ||
| It's been, you know, it's almost four years. | ||
| You're going into four years. | ||
| And if I were president, it never would have started. | ||
| But it's time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, President, on the shutdown, do you plan to meet with Democrats before you head to Asia? | |
| And if not, why not meet with Democrats? | ||
| Well, I think it's a shame that it's shut down because we have the greatest economy, as you were saying before, we have the greatest economy in the world right now by far, the United States. | ||
| We have almost 18. | ||
| Now it was 17, now it's $18 trillion being poured into our country, and it's no time for shutdowns. | ||
| I don't think it's affecting what we're doing, but it's too bad for a lot of people. | ||
| We have a lot of good people that are working right now that should be, and it's because the Democrats want to try and renegotiate a deal that they had negotiated. | ||
| They want $1.5 trillion given to illegal immigrants who came into the country, and it's going to hurt the health care of citizens of our country that have been paying into it, that have been working hard for it, that really deserve it. | ||
| So we're never going to do that. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| And I will tell you, there are a lot of good Democrats that really want to make a deal. | ||
| And all we need is five Democrats, because we have great support on the Republican side. | ||
| So I think we need five Democrats, and there are a lot of them that want to make a deal. | ||
| So I think at some point, common sense will prevail. | ||
| Go ahead, you can finish up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
On the drug boat strike in the Eastern Pacific, can you explain to us what that was about, how it was conducted? | |
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| Well, they had one today in the Pacific. | ||
| And the way I look at it, every time I look, because it is violent, and it is very, it's amazing that the weaponry, everyone, you know, they have these boats that go 45, 50 miles an hour in the water. | ||
| And when you look at the accuracy and the power, look, we have the greatest military in the world. | ||
| We have the greatest weapons in the world. | ||
| And you see a little bit of it there. | ||
| One shot, everyone dead center. | ||
| And the only way you can't feel bad about it is you realize that you won't feel badly about it, is you realize that every time you see that happen, you're saving 25,000 American lives. | ||
| Every one of those boats that gets knocked out is saving 25,000 American lives, not to mention the torn-up families all over the country. | ||
| And whenever I see that, I say to myself, I just saved 25,000 lives. | ||
| I will say that there are very few boats traveling on the water right now. | ||
| Actually, that includes fishing boats. | ||
| That includes any other kind of boat. | ||
| But there are very few boats traveling on the water. | ||
| So now they'll come in by land at a lesser, to a lesser extent, and they will be hit on land also. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| In the back, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you have legal authority if they do come? | |
| Yes, we do. | ||
| We have legal authority, right? | ||
| We're allowed to do that. | ||
| And if we do buy land, we may go back to Congress. | ||
| But we have, this is a national security problem. | ||
| They killed 300,000 people last year. | ||
| Drugs, these drugs coming in. | ||
| They killed 300,000 Americans last year, and that gives you legal authority. | ||
| We have a national security really, I will say this. | ||
| When you look at the people we're dealing with, and we know them. | ||
| We know the people coming in. | ||
| We know the boats. | ||
| We know everything else. | ||
| We're allowed to do it. | ||
| It's in international waters. | ||
| If we don't do it, we're going to lose hundreds of thousands of people. | ||
| Now, they'll be coming in by land a little bit more because they're not coming in by boat anymore. | ||
| There are no boats in the water. | ||
| There are no more boats. | ||
| We know the boat almost immediately. | ||
| You know, it's pretty unusual when you see somebody with a fishing rod and five engines on the back of the boat. | ||
| You know, you don't need that to go fishing. | ||
| Wait, wait, wait. | ||
| And we will hit them very hard when they come in by land. | ||
| And they haven't experienced that yet, but now we're totally prepared to do that. | ||
| We'll probably go back to Congress and explain exactly what we're doing when we come to the land. | ||
| We don't have to do that, but I think, Marco, I'd like to do that. | ||
| You may respond to that if you want. | ||
| Well, I mean, the question is, bottom line, these are drug boats. | ||
| If people want to stop seeing drug boats blow up, stop sending drugs to the United States. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But does it matter if it's in the United States? | |
| Well, these are all in international waters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did you do a strike in the United States or if we're the one? | |
| Well, that's a different matter. | ||
| Now you're talking about a law enforcement matter. | ||
| In this particular case, there are people traveling on international waters headed towards the United States with hostilities in mind, which includes flooding our country with dangerous, deadly drugs. | ||
| And they're going to be stopped. | ||
| And that's what's happening. | ||
| And in the case last week, you saw there was a submarine. | ||
| It was a submarine. | ||
| It was a submersible. | ||
| That's a drug boat all the way through. | ||
| We know what these boats are. | ||
| The President just said it. | ||
| We tracked them from the very beginning. | ||
| We know who's on them, who they are, where they're coming from, what they have on them. | ||
| And if you're running drug boats, you're in grave danger. | ||
| And drug usage is way down. | ||
| And drug usage coming from the sea, they call it ocean drugs, a little term that they use, the ocean drugs, is very close to non-existent right now. | ||
| I wouldn't want to be in one of those boats heading away. | ||
| They're driving happily to destroy the lives of people and they end up, that's the end of them. | ||
| So the ocean drugs and the sea drugs, drugs by sea, they call it also, that's almost down to nothing, as you can imagine. | ||
| So they continue to come in by land at a little bit less because they see something is going to happen. | ||
| They don't like it. | ||
| And they're right. | ||
| Something very serious is going to happen. | ||
| The equivalent of what's happening by sea. | ||
| And we're going to Congress just to tell them what we're doing, just to keep them informed. | ||
| But we have to do it for national success. | ||
| We have to do it to save lives. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Secretary Breston said that Vladimir Putin had not been honest and forthright in his talks of you. | |
| Just wondering if you could tell us a little bit more about your feelings about that. | ||
| And also my mates on the deer Rutzer. | ||
| Just your thoughts on whether Ukraine should get tomahawks. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Well, I think that in terms of honesty, the only thing I can say is every time I speak with Vladimir, I have good conversations, and then they don't go anywhere. | ||
| They just don't go anywhere. | ||
| So, in that sense. | ||
| But now, look, he's fighting a war. | ||
| He's in a war. | ||
| It's two very competent sides. | ||
| And that's the way war is. | ||
| You never know with war. | ||
| But I would say that it's time to make a deal. | ||
| A lot of people are dying. | ||
| You know, they're not Americans, but they're people. | ||
| They're souls. | ||
| And they're dying by the thousands. | ||
| Worst since World War II. | ||
| And we really should stop it. | ||
| To your other question, Steve. | ||
| Yeah, please. | ||
| Sorry, to your other question. | ||
| This has been consistent from this president when we first met again after your re-election in Mar-a-Largo in November. | ||
| You said we have to stop the killing. | ||
| This is close to your heart, and this is your vision. | ||
| That's why this war needs to end. | ||
| When it comes to tomahawks, whatever system, it's up to individual nations to decide whatever they want to supply to Ukraine. | ||
| NATO doesn't take a position, but I can assure you this. | ||
| When the President called me in July and said, we want to, again, send weapons into Ukraine, paid for by our allies, the Canadians and the Europeans, that was an important moment. | ||
| And that is now taking place. | ||
| And the ambassador, myself, we're working hard at this. | ||
| Already a couple of billion dollars of weaponry into Ukraine from the U.S., paid from our allies. | ||
| So I'm not going to comment on the tomahawks, but when it comes to the U.S. and all the support of Ukraine, it is there and it is close to the President's heart, and I know this. | ||
| I will say this, and Mark can say it better than anybody. | ||
| The European nations and Canada have really pulled together. | ||
| And it's beyond even that. | ||
| I mean, it's really beyond that. | ||
| And especially Australians and New Zealanders, Japan, they're all... | ||
| If you want to really add them up, we could really add them up. | ||
| But NATO, basically, European and Canada and a lot of other nations, they've really banded together. | ||
| They are not happy about what's happening with Russia and Ukraine. | ||
| They're not happy at all. | ||
| Neither am I. Mr. President, Jeff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, just changing this topic slightly. | |
| I see you've got the model of the White House and the ballroom. | ||
| Many people were surprised that the entire East Wing is being demolished because you had said initially that the ballroom would just touch COVID-19. | ||
| Well, certain areas are being left. | ||
| We determined that after really a tremendous amount of study with some of the best architects in the world, we determined that really knocking it down, trying to use a little section. | ||
| You know, the East Wing was not much. | ||
| It was not much left from the original. | ||
| It was over the course of 100 years. | ||
| It was changed. | ||
| The columns were removed. | ||
| And it was a much different building. | ||
| Then a story was added on in 1948, 1949. | ||
| There was a story added on, which was not particularly nice. | ||
| And the building was very, very much changed from what it was originally. | ||
| It was never thought of as being much. | ||
| It was a very small building. | ||
| And rather than allowing that to hurt a very expensive, beautiful building that, frankly, they've been after for years. | ||
| You have that. | ||
| I brought these along so people could see. | ||
| But it's, you know, there's a relative, nobody's actually seen anything quite like it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it'll be one of the great ballrooms anywhere in the world. | |
| It's about $300 million. | ||
| It's set to do many, many things, including meetings of foreign leaders, including the honoring of foreign leaders. | ||
| You can see this. | ||
| This is a plan. | ||
| If it's got tables so that you honor a foreign leader, we have a proper space. | ||
| Right now, we have a space that with tables holds about 79 people. | ||
| And this is a proper kind of a thing. | ||
| Now, what the White House was doing, as you know, is they were putting tents out on the lawn. | ||
| This is an interior shot of the ballroom. | ||
| I think there'll be nothing like it. | ||
| And it's being paid for 100% by me and some friends of mine, donors, to it. | ||
| The government's paying absolutely nothing. | ||
| We're also working with the military on it because they want to make sure everything's perfect. | ||
| And the military is very much involved in this. | ||
| They want to make sure everything is absolutely beautiful. | ||
| You can see the kind of interiors that we're talking about. | ||
| That's an interior of the ballroom. | ||
| And it's the highest level. | ||
| And you see, it goes beautifully with the White House. | ||
| I mean, the mix is beautiful. | ||
| So over the years, many presidents have made changes. | ||
| This obviously would be the biggest change, but this was something they've wanted for at least 150 years. | ||
| Many of you have gone to the events where they had, as an example, President Xi, or they had a leader of one of the countries, including the king and the queen from your favorite country. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Frankly. | ||
| But where they'd be honored, and there'd be in a tent out on the lawn, and it would rain, and it was a disaster. | ||
| Brian's shaking his head, you know what I'm talking about. | ||
| And so I thought I'd bring this out because this is going to be probably the finest ballroom ever built. | ||
| And we're doing it, no cost to the country. | ||
| It's being put, the money is being put in by me and donors, very great patriots, actually. | ||
| And the spirit on the building of it is amazing. | ||
| We are using little sections of footings and various other things, but that's sort of irrelevant. | ||
| In order to do it properly, we had to take down the existing structure. | ||
| The way it was shown, it looked like we were touching the White House. | ||
| We don't touch the White House. | ||
| That's a bridge at Last Bridge going from the White House to the ballroom. | ||
| Then you get into the lobby of the ballroom, and then you go into the magnificent, the main room. | ||
| and it's something that has gotten incredible reviews. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And your opinion is Quickly following up on that, just quickly following up on that, sir. | |
| I just want a quick follow up on that question. | ||
| Your response to people who say that you haven't been translating anonymous operators. | ||
| I haven't been transparent. | ||
| That's some of your feelings. | ||
| I've shown this to everybody that would listen. | ||
| Third-rate reporters didn't see it because they didn't look. | ||
| You're a third-rate reporter, always have been. | ||
| So third-rate reporters didn't look. | ||
| But anybody that asked, these pictures have been in newspapers. | ||
| They've been all over the place. | ||
| And, you know, we're very proud of it. | ||
| It's gotten great reviews. | ||
| It's gotten really great reviews. | ||
| I think we've been more transparent than anybody's ever been. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why do you believe, Mr. President, that the sanctions that you're announcing today will push Putin to the news? | |
| Well, I don't know that they will. | ||
| I think that they'll certainly have an impact. | ||
| They're massive sanctions. | ||
| It's sanctions on oil. | ||
| The two biggest oil companies, among the biggest in the world, but they're Russian. | ||
| They do a lot of oil. | ||
| And hopefully it'll push. | ||
| Hopefully he'll become reasonable and hopefully Zelensky will be reasonable too. | ||
| You know, it takes two to tango, as they say, and we're going to find out. | ||
| They've had, they hate each other. | ||
| These two people hate each other. | ||
| You know that better than anybody. | ||
| And it makes it more difficult than it should be. | ||
| This should be easier to do. | ||
| But the level of hatred between Zelensky and Putin is very substantial. | ||
| Could I add both of you to the same thing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Could I add one thing? | |
| Could I add both? | ||
| What the president is doing today with these sanctions is putting more pressure, of course, on both parts, in this case, on Russia. | ||
| It's all about changing the calculus, making sure that Putin understands that the president's vision this weekend of having a ceasefire, stop where they are, as you literally said, that this has to be step one now. | ||
| And for him to really accept that vision and to come to the table. | ||
| And then you have to put pressure, and this is exactly what he did today. | ||
| Along with Europe. | ||
| I mean, Europe, look, these are become, they've actually become friends of mine. | ||
| I think all of them. | ||
| We have a very close relationship, and they want to see it end too. | ||
| They really want to see it end. | ||
| But I can say they're totally committed. | ||
| If this went on for 10 more years, Europe is behind them. | ||
| They just can't let that happen. | ||
| You can't let what's been going on. | ||
| Now, it should have never happened. | ||
| It would have never happened if I were president. | ||
| But it did happen. | ||
| I inherited. | ||
| This was Biden, a man who was, without question, you take a look at the new walkway, the presidential walk of fame, we call it. | ||
| Biden is the worst president we've ever had, if he was even a president. | ||
| The people that surrounded that desk made those decisions. | ||
| But this should have never happened. | ||
| It wouldn't have happened. | ||
| But it did happen. | ||
| I inherited it. | ||
| We're going to get it ended, hopefully soon. | ||
| I'm going to ask you some Chinese statements. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, please. | |
| You had a Treat Social Post earlier this afternoon talking about a Wall Street Journal report as a fake story. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal is fake. | ||
| Less fake on financial than it is on gossip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can you just confirm that my understanding of what's happening is accurate? | |
| As I understand it, that story framed it like we had just lifted the U.S. a restriction on intelligence. | ||
| No, it said that I gave Ukraine permission to shoot missiles deep into Russia. | ||
| I didn't do that. | ||
| Second of all, they're not using our missiles. | ||
| They're using, I think, European missiles from someplace, but they're not using ours. | ||
| And what they do, I don't control that. | ||
| But I do control our missiles. | ||
| They're not shooting our missiles in. | ||
| It was a fake story. | ||
| Wall Street Journal does a lot of fake stories. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you so much. | |
| The President of Colombia, in a recent interview, said that if you won't change, he thinks that people should get rid of the United States. | ||
| We're talking about now Colombia, the country, not the university. | ||
| He said what? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He said that if you won't change, then perhaps you need to be gotten rid of. | |
| Do you view that as a threat? | ||
| Well, he's a thug and bad guy. | ||
| He's a guy that is making a lot of drugs. | ||
| We've just, as of today, stopped all payments going to Colombia, the country, Colombia. | ||
| Also, the school of Colombia, no, we settled. | ||
| We made a settlement with him. | ||
| But no, he's a thug, and he's a bad guy, and he's hurt his country very badly. | ||
| They're doing very poorly, Colombia. | ||
| They make cocaine. | ||
| They have cocaine factories. | ||
| They grow all sorts of crap that's drugs, bad drugs coming into the United States goes generally through Mexico. | ||
| And he better watch it or we'll take very serious action against him and his country. | ||
| His country is, what he has led his country into is a death trap. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. Prince, I just have a question. | |
| Please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Has the Secretary General presented his Ukraine peace plan? | |
| There is no Secretary General peace plan. | ||
| But I'm here for no, no, I really want to correct it because I saw some of that in Of course, many people are thinking how to bring this terrible war to an end and supporting the President in doing that. | ||
| Why I'm here is to dialogue again with the President how I can be, how NATO, my colleagues and other colleagues in NATO can be of maximum support to get that done. | ||
| But there is no peace plan on the table. | ||
| I mean, if there is a peace plan, it is what the President said last Friday and Sunday, which is stop where you are. | ||
| Stop the fighting. | ||
| This is about NATO. | ||
| We're a very proud member of NATO. | ||
| We have a great relationship with the countries of NATO. | ||
| I think made much better by our visit a few months ago when they agreed to, they agreed to 5% instead of 2% of GDP. | ||
| That was a big concession. | ||
| I think that was a concession that two years ago nobody would have said even a year ago. | ||
| Even nine months ago, before you were elected. | ||
| Yeah, they would have said that's not possible. | ||
| And the difference is they're paying 5% as opposed to not paying 2%. | ||
| A lot of them weren't paying. | ||
| With the exception of Spain, I think you're going to have to talk to Spain because they're not. | ||
| Spain is not a team player. | ||
| So other than Spain, everybody's 100%. | ||
| And you could solve the Spain problem very easily, I think, if you want to. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| We'll take Brian. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Yeah, well, they do. | ||
| So what's happened, you could say with that, you could say with beef, with all of it, the beef, the ranchers, let's say, who have done a great job, have lost their shirts for many, many years. | ||
| They've really been decimated. | ||
| And I helped them a lot. | ||
| I put tariffs on things coming in to the country, including beef. | ||
| And that gave them a chance to finally have a decent industry. | ||
| We are going to be talking to them. | ||
| They're great people, but they've been hurt for 25, 30 years they've been losing because other countries have taken advantage of them. | ||
| And by putting tariffs on, they've been able to make a few dollars. | ||
| They've been able to have an industry. | ||
| But I also want to keep the beef prices low. | ||
| So I'll be talking with the ranchers, and I'll be speaking with a lot of different people, including Scott and Howard, and we'll do something because prices are way down in our country. | ||
| Energy is way down. | ||
| I think you're going to see $2 gasoline very soon. | ||
| I see that it's $2.50 in a lot of places. | ||
| $2.50. | ||
| We were heading to $5, $6, and $7. | ||
| If Biden didn't go back to my policy toward the end, you would have seen it. | ||
| But he didn't go back to the full policy, and he missed the most important thing. | ||
| So we were up to, you know, we were way up. | ||
| I think you're going to see $2 gasoline. | ||
| We could even break that number. | ||
| That's a big difference. | ||
| The only cost that's really up is beef. | ||
| And the fake news only wants to talk about beef. | ||
| And what I did is I made it possible for those people to survive. | ||
| They're incredible people. | ||
| But they were being decimated by other countries. | ||
| And I didn't want that to happen. | ||
| So prices are way down. | ||
| Groceries are down. | ||
| Everything's down. | ||
| Energy's way down. | ||
| Even interest rates with a bad chairman of the Fed. | ||
| He's terrible. | ||
| He's a fool. | ||
| But even interest rates are down. | ||
| So our country has never done better. | ||
| We're going to take in, I think, $21, $20, $21 trillion this year. | ||
| No country has ever taken in more than three. | ||
| And we're going to take in $21 trillion of investments because of the tariffs. | ||
| If we didn't have tariffs, we would be a mess. | ||
| We would be a national security problem. | ||
| And we've done a job. | ||
| So I'm very happy about that. | ||
| We're going to do something very quickly and easily on beef to get it down. | ||
| The ranchers understand that. | ||
| They're so happy for what I've done. | ||
| I saved them. | ||
| I don't think you'd have any beef in this country if I didn't do that. | ||
| So we're very proud of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Brian? | |
| Yesterday in Los Angeles, immigration officials were attacked by some protesters in an attempt to arrest an illegal alien. | ||
| Gavin Newsom, other Democrats, have used very aggressive language in terms of how to address high states out in the field. | ||
| Is there any responsibility that we can place on Gavin Newsom and other elected officials for using such aggressive language? | ||
| Well, Gavin has to be careful. | ||
| Remember that when I first came in, they had a terrible riot in Los Angeles. | ||
| They had the fires, which shouldn't have happened. | ||
| They didn't have the water for the fires. | ||
| They should have had the water coming in from the Pacific Northwest. | ||
| They didn't have the waters. | ||
| They didn't have water in the hydrants or the sprinklers. | ||
| So they had the fires. | ||
| And then they had the riot. | ||
| And if we didn't go and take care of that riot, you would have lost Los Angeles. | ||
| You would have canceled the Olympics, which is because of me in Los Angeles. | ||
| And the police commissioner, the head of the police, said, if the president didn't come in, we would have lost Los Angeles. | ||
| We did not have the capability of taking care of it. | ||
| And he said it very strongly. | ||
| And we did a great job. | ||
| And within a week, it was all done. | ||
| Within one day, it was done, but within a week it was all done. | ||
| And then they go back to their normal practice of weakness, of not taking care of criminals, meaning taking care of, putting them in jails where they should be. | ||
| Washington, D.C., and you all are the best people for that, because Washington, D.C. is now one of the safest cities. | ||
| It was one of the most dangerous cities in the country. | ||
| Now Washington, D.C., believe it or not, I'm embarrassed to say it in front of you. | ||
| But Washington, D.C. went from one of the worst, most dangerous cities to, you can walk down the street, you can send your child to meet you at a location. | ||
| Your child is going to be fine. | ||
| We have a very, very safe city, one of the safest, and, you know, very proud of that. | ||
| Memphis, by the way, is coming along fantastically. | ||
| We're in Memphis right now. | ||
| We had the FBI in Chicago. | ||
| We're doing things. | ||
| We haven't served Chicago yet. | ||
| When we do, Chicago will be very quickly a very, very safe city. | ||
| But if you look at what's happening in Memphis, it's great. | ||
| But you've got to look at Washington. | ||
| People are coming up to me. | ||
| People that work in the White House are saying, thank you, sir. | ||
| And I immediately know what they're thinking to me about. | ||
| It's thank you. | ||
| They can walk to work. | ||
| They would never walk to work a year ago. | ||
| They can walk into work and they feel safe and secure, and it's beautiful. | ||
| And I'll tell you what, it's really an honor to add that great ballroom to the structures in Washington. | ||
| It's going to be one of the great ballrooms of the world. | ||
| And I think it's going to be something you're all going to be very proud of. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's in relation to the meeting that's coming up with President Xi. | |
| What do you hope comes out of that meeting? | ||
| What deliberables come? | ||
| I think we'll make a deal. | ||
| I think we're going to make a deal on the rare earth is the least of it. | ||
| Look, the tariffs are much more powerful than the rare earth. | ||
| The rare earth is a disturbance, but there's a lot of rare earth around, I'll tell you. | ||
| I've had more calls on rare earth. | ||
| We've got it. | ||
| Everybody's. | ||
| We'll make a deal on, I think, everything. | ||
| I think we're going to make a deal on soybeans and the farmers. | ||
| I think we're going to make a deal on maybe even nuclear. | ||
| You know, President Putin in his call mentioned to me about nuclear, where we do a de-escalation, and I'm fine with that. | ||
| I think it's good. | ||
| I think it's a very appropriate thing. | ||
| We have the most nuclear weapons. | ||
| Russia is second. | ||
| China is actually third by a long way, but there'll be even within four or five years too many. | ||
| And we are talking about de-escalation. | ||
| That's already being talked about. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can you say family? | |
| And I think we'll probably add China into the mix. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, can you convince President Xi to stop purchasing all of that Russian oil that's funding this war against Ukraine? | |
| Well, I think I'll be talking to him about it. | ||
| I think it's a little bit of a different talk. | ||
| India, as you know, has told me they are stopping, you know, it's a process. | ||
| You can't just stop it. | ||
| But by the end of the year, they'll be down to almost nothing. | ||
| That's a big thing. | ||
| There was almost 40% of the oil. | ||
| India, they've been great. | ||
| Spoke to Prime Minister Modi yesterday. | ||
| They've been absolutely great. | ||
| China's a little bit different. | ||
| They're a little bit different relationship they have with Russia. | ||
| It was never good, but because of Biden and Obama, they got forced together. | ||
| They should never have been forced together, but they're a little bit forced. | ||
| But by nature, they can't be friendly. | ||
| They can't be friends. | ||
| By nature, I hope they are friendly, frankly, but they can't be. | ||
| You should not have forced Russia and China together. | ||
| And Biden did that, and Obama did that. | ||
| They forced them together because of energy, because of oil. | ||
| And so they are closer than they would normally be. | ||
| I think I'll probably be talking about it. | ||
| What I'll really be talking to him about is how do we end the war with Russia and Ukraine, whether it's through oil or energy or anything else. | ||
| And I think he's going to be very receptive. | ||
| He would now like to, I'm not sure that he did at the beginning. | ||
| He would now like to see that war end. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, do you think Xi plays an important role in terms of inserting himself and convincing who he speaks to regularly to stop the war right now? | |
| Yeah, I do. | ||
| I think he can have a big influence on Putin. | ||
| I think he can have a big influence on a lot of people. | ||
| Look, he's a respected man. | ||
| He's a very strong leader of a very big country. | ||
| Yeah, I think he can have a big influence. | ||
| And we will certainly be talking about Russia-Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Mr. President. | |
| Liam Kosker, Pasero. | ||
| My question is actually for the Secretary General. | ||
| Mr. Secretary, I don't know if you've seen this, but polling out of Ukraine shows a massive collapse in Ukrainian support for the war. | ||
| A GALPOL had it just 23%. | ||
| That's less than a quarter. | ||
| Zelensky came out today praising President Trump's proposal for freezing the front lines of battle as part of a ceasefire. | ||
| He said that's a good compromise. | ||
| So people view your coming here as you're lobbying the U.S. government to continue its involvement in the war. | ||
| You're obviously lobbying for more NATO weapons to be sent to Ukraine. | ||
| But Ukrainians themselves don't want to fight the war. | ||
| So how do you justify that morally? | ||
| Well, I'm lobbying only for one thing, and that is to make sure that we end this war. | ||
| And I don't have to lobby the president because we totally agree on this. | ||
| And this is what he has been doing from day one. | ||
| Everything he could do to break the death focus Putin, get a dialogue going, dialoguing also with Zelensky, and getting this war done. | ||
| It's crucial. | ||
| And the fact that the U.S. is now supplying weapons into Ukraine, paid for by allies, is extremely important. | ||
| And that's now happening since two, three months. | ||
| That's about two billion moving into Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The war hasn't wind down. | |
| Why do you think how to wind it down now? | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| Do you think more weapons will wind down the war? | ||
| No, I mean, there's more to be done. | ||
| So what you need, what the president said this weekend, stop where you are, to basically do a ceasefire and then have all your discussions about territory and whatever. | ||
| But first, stop the war. | ||
| This is what you said on Friday. | ||
| And on Sunday, we're going to go to the next one. | ||
| It's a war. | ||
| I mean, your question is really a fair one. | ||
| It's a war that should have never started. | ||
| And you know how I feel about it. | ||
| But it's a war that should have never started. | ||
| And we're not selling any weapons to Ukraine. | ||
| We're selling them to NATO, which is different from before. | ||
| With Biden, he just gave $350 billion worth of weapons and cash right into Ukraine. | ||
| And that was so foolish. | ||
| But we sell them to NATO, and in theory, you can do what you want with them. | ||
| It doesn't have to be Ukraine, but probably it is mostly. | ||
| No, what nations are doing now is buying from this program and making sure that the supplies in Ukraine. | ||
| So Europeans are Canadians. | ||
| And for example, these are interceptors for the Patriot systems, crucial to protect the cities. | ||
| Today, again, a Russian attack has killed children, at least seriously wounded children, in kindergarten in Ukraine. | ||
| So we need to make sure that the air defense systems are in place. | ||
| And we need the U.S. systems to do that. | ||
| And the Europeans are paying for that. | ||
| And this is exactly the type of actions we needed. | ||
| And the President is doing that and trying everything to get this work to. | ||
| And I'm starting with the ceasefire. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you still believe that Dorton wants to take all of Ukraine? | |
| I always felt that way. | ||
| I always felt he wanted to. | ||
| When I was in my first term, I was with, you know, I was very close to him, relatively speaking. | ||
| It was harder because of the Russia-Russia-Russia hoax. | ||
| But I would talk to President Putin about Ukraine, and it was the apple of his eye. | ||
| I'd say it was the apple of his eye. | ||
| But it would have never happened. | ||
| He knew the consequences were too great. | ||
| When we had a rigged election, and all of a sudden I wasn't there, he said, wow. | ||
| I think he looked at Afghanistan, how horribly that was handled so stupidly. | ||
| And I think that really gave him a little additional incentive. | ||
| I always felt he wanted the whole thing, not a piece of it. | ||
| But I think now he's willing to negotiate a little bit further, and I think he's willing to make a deal. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| We don't want him. | ||
| We don't want him to have the whole thing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, please. | |
| Thank you, Mr. President. | ||
| You have this big terrorist case before the Supreme Court. | ||
| It's November the 5th. | ||
| You suggested that you might actually show up to the Supreme Court. | ||
| Yeah, I'd like to. | ||
| I think it's one of the most important decisions we'll ever have from the Supreme Court. | ||
| With tariffs, we're a strong, sound country. | ||
| We're a nationally secure and internationally secure country. | ||
| We're a very rich country. | ||
| Without tariffs, it's a slog for this country, big slog. | ||
| I think it's one of the most important decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. | ||
| And I might go there. | ||
| I really believe I have an obligation to go there. | ||
| We are doing so well as a country right now because of tariffs. | ||
| And you have to understand, tariffs have been used against us for many years, decades. | ||
| And I'd be just slowly but surely hurting our country so badly. | ||
| That's why we owe $37 trillion. | ||
| We owe that because other countries have taken advantage of us over many, many decades, over many decades. | ||
| And now we're a rich country. | ||
| We're taking in money like we've never done before. | ||
| Without tariffs, that would not be happening. | ||
| And also, I solved, as you know, eight wars. | ||
| Of the eight, five of them, maybe even six of them, are because of tariffs. | ||
| The threat of tariffs on these nations, if you want to fight, that's okay. | ||
| India and Pakistan, if you want to fight, that's okay. | ||
| But you're going to pay tariffs and they're going to be very substantial. | ||
| And we're in the midst of a trade deal. | ||
| And they said, we don't want to do that. | ||
| Two days later, they call up and they're not going to fight anymore. | ||
| They have peace. | ||
| But I've done that out of eight, I would say six times, five times, six times. | ||
| Tariffs are vital to this country. | ||
| And tariffs have been used against us by China, by every other country. | ||
| And all we're doing is using them to negotiate fair deals. | ||
| And as you know, we made a fair deal with Japan. | ||
| We made a fair deal with all of Europe, the European Union. | ||
| We made a fair deal with South Korea. | ||
| These are countries that were taking so much money away from us. | ||
| They're not sustainable. | ||
| And now we're taking in hundreds of billions and even trillions of dollars. | ||
| If this country is not allowed to have tariffs, if this country is not allowed to have the President of the United States negotiate on behalf of it with tariffs, we are put in a position where we're going to be a third world country. | ||
| We can't let that happen. | ||
| I think it's the most important case that we're going to have for many, many years to come. | ||
| One of the most important cases we've ever had. | ||
| With tariffs, we're a rich, secure country. | ||
| Without tariffs, we're a laughing stock. | ||
| We'll be a laughing stock. | ||
| And I don't want to have anything to do with that. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you, President. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The president, wow. | ||
| A press availability, basically dropping the hammer that right there he included more sanctions today on Russia, saying he's going to get them to the table. | ||
| So, Of course, you saw the Secretary General of NATO is right there, because let's be honest, let's be brutally frank. | ||
| NATO has been absolutely worthless in this. | ||
| I hate to be so blunt, and I'm going to turn back to show you how worthless they are. | ||
| Back to my financial times, if I can find it. | ||
| Right here. | ||
| Europe rallies to Zelensky's aid after tussle with Trump. | ||
| Now, I did not hear about the EU cease deal on frozen Russian assets. | ||
| This is part of the situation to actually steal the Russian people's assets and use that money, $350 billion, which is all in European banks, in Euros. | ||
| It's one of the reasons that the gold has kind of been on fire in the last couple of weeks, caused a big run-up in gold, and then some profit-taking as gold goes back and forth. | ||
| But one of the reasons, underlying reasons, we told you the European banks, or excuse me, all the money center banks are starting to recalculate their asset mix, and they're not including Euros in that to a large extent because they're quite frankly worried about this stealing of the Russian people's assets by going to the European banks, and it's all denominated in Euros. | ||
| So what President Trump is doing there, he told Zelensky on Friday, we're not going to give you Tomahawk missiles. | ||
| It was a big blow up. | ||
| The president came out afterwards. | ||
| I thought I was a real gentleman and said, hey, it's not as bad as it's been reported. | ||
| But you should understand some of those were kind of eyewitness accounts that eyewitness accounts of people in the room were voices raised. | ||
| And once again, I don't know why Zelensky is even coming close to raising his voice to the President of the United States, although he came over here thinking he was just going to get the Tomahawks. | ||
| The Tomahawks proving they're devastating, just asked the Persians. | ||
| They had, I don't know, at least a third of their whole nuclear enrichment program taken out by the good old United States Navy submarines in the North Arabian Sea that launched and wiped out at least a third of that, did damage that the B-2 bombers took care of the enclosed spaces in the caves. | ||
| President Trump said total obliteration. | ||
| Zelensky saw that and said, hey, I want me some of those tomahawks. | ||
| President Trump right there just going in and knowing the detail. | ||
| This is the level of detail the president has. | ||
| He says, hey, it's going to take him six months. | ||
| It's going to take him six months to get there, six months to train them how to use them. | ||
| And by this time, the war is going to be over. | ||
| The war is going to be over. | ||
| And so President Trump right there saying, hey, no need to give them because I'm going to have this war. | ||
| President Trump trying to negotiate that had great answers about she trying to horn in on this. | ||
| Still, we're not putting the restrictions that shouldn't be lost on anybody that the Saudis are selling unlimited oil and gas to the CCP. | ||
| Iran, we're allowing Persians to sell sanctioned oil to them. | ||
| The Russians are selling oil. | ||
| If you want to cut down the CCP and cut them down to size and maybe stop them in the artificial intelligence race, cut off their oil. | ||
| President Trump interceded and got the Indians to dramatically reduce their output. | ||
| He was asked that question right there about Xi and about she trying to be a player in this war to extend it. | ||
| I think President Trump said he didn't think so. | ||
| Anybody's going to meet with Sheikh. | ||
| Scott Besson's over there right now. | ||
| So we're going to get tomorrow's show is going to be absolutely in the morning. | ||
| I can already tell you back to what Steve Robinson came on. | ||
| What is it? | ||
| Plantier? | ||
| This guy was the second coming up in Maine before the 77-year-old governor, current governor, who smack talked President Trump in the White House about men and women's sports. | ||
| She tried to stand up to President Trump. | ||
| Of course, he ran the tables on her. | ||
| She's announced she's running. | ||
| She's announced she's running. | ||
| And all of a sudden, they want to offload this guy. | ||
| They're leaking like crazy on him. | ||
| This is why I said that there are military personnel that are training these radicals and training these paramilitary groups. | ||
| The Socialist Rifle Association of Maine and the Socialist Rifle Association, this is a dangerous group. | ||
| And they're trading bad ombre. | ||
| The armed queers of Salt Lake City, I think that's how Steve Robinson got into the story researching that. | ||
| So you have some of those groups up in Maine also. | ||
| This guy's a trainer for it. | ||
| The buried lead in the story is that CNN went and what CNN put up was about using the term retard and other throwaway terms like that. | ||
| They had access to this and refused to show it. | ||
| Took Steve Robinson going to the exact same sites and pulling it down because it's all right there, including photos of this Senate candidate on the firing range training people. | ||
| The Socialist Rifle Association of Maine. | ||
| And also, he believes, you know, he thinks this guy's parameter trains many paramilitary groups. | ||
| One of the reasons that Antifa has been designated a terrorist organization, people are looking into it, because of these paramilitary training groups. | ||
| People are very worried about that. | ||
| We're going to try to get Steve back on. | ||
| We're going to be in Idaho about this situation with Qatar and the Muslims going out to this base to be trained. | ||
| We're going to have, I'm going to start, I'm trying to get Adam Ren. | ||
| Bunch of news coming out of Indiana. | ||
| North Carolina Senate voted to redistrict and take that other seat. | ||
| Indiana, as much time and effort we spent there, they're saying it's too hard. | ||
| It's just too hard. | ||
| We don't know if we can get it. | ||
| Well, you've got to get better and you've got to get tougher. | ||
| We're going to get it. | ||
| So might as well give it up now. | ||
| That seat, it's 9-0 in Indiana. | ||
| 9-0. | ||
| We don't want an 8-1. | ||
| We want 9-0. | ||
| I'm going to try to get Adam Ren a politico. | ||
| Maybe he's done some amazing reporting out there. | ||
| This thing's going to be a fight in Indiana, but they're all going to be fights. | ||
| Okay, stick around. | ||
| We've got another hour to go. | ||
| Ben Harnwell has got an incredible show for you. | ||
| President just right there talked about these really tough sanctions. | ||
| He's trying to show Putin there's going to be an economic penalty here if you keep dragging feet. | ||
| Birchgold.com, promo code Warham, the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| You see it all around you. | ||
| The dollar has been the basis for the post-World War II economic and financial system, and everybody's coming after it. | ||
| Find out why, understand why, and understand what impact has. | ||
| BirchGold.com, promo code Bannon. | ||
| You get it all free, and you start to understand this historic move gold is making. | ||
| We're not here to tell you to buy gold. | ||
| We're here to tell you learn something about it. | ||
| We're here to teach you. |
Export Selection