Oct. 21, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Breaking news out of Portland, the Ninth Circuit, breaking news about Portland, I should say. | ||
| The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned Judge Immergut's order blocking the federalization of the National Guard, which means President Trump can deploy the National Guard into Portland, Oregon. | ||
| That is a big, big, big deal. | ||
| It is a big deal. | ||
| And I want to just correct one thing and then explain why functional is the same. | ||
| This is a stay of Judge Immergut's opinion. | ||
| And that's why it reached the Ninth Circuit as soon as it did, because this is an emergency motion to essentially pause her order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But as a functional matter, you are absolutely correct. | |
| It has the function of overturning her order and thereby allowing the president to send the National Guard back onto the streets of Portland. | ||
| And Katie, I want to read, if I can, just from a little bit of the beginning of this 93-page opinion. | ||
| It says, after considering the record, and by the record, they mean all the factual evidence at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. Section 12406. | ||
| That's the statute we've been referring to as Title 10 when we have conversations about the National Guard deployments, which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States. | ||
| And this is the important part. | ||
| The evidence the president relied on reflects, quote, a colorable assessment of the facts and law within a range of honest judgment. | ||
| We thus conclude that defendants are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal, basically saying that when and if a court considers all of the record in this matter is tried and it gets back to an appellate court through an ordinary process where they have full briefing and full evidence, that they still think Donald Trump is likely to prevail there because he has the discretion to determine as the president within a range of honest judgment when it is reasonable. | ||
| This is what I are doing. | ||
| So we're going to be here to talk about lots of different things and we might take a few questions before, but we are discussing critical minerals and rare earths and we're going to be signing an agreement that's been negotiated over a period of four or five months. | ||
| And it was sort of good timing that we got it done just in time for the visit. | ||
| And we work together very much on rare earths, critical minerals, and lots of other things. | ||
| And we've had a very good relationship. | ||
| We've been working on that for quite a while. | ||
| In about a year from now, we'll have so much critical mineral and rare earths that you won't know what to do with them. | ||
| They'll be worth about $2. | ||
| But in the meantime, we're working with Australia and other countries. | ||
| They're working with us too. | ||
| But other countries also on that. | ||
| But we're really working on anything having to do with military, military protection, military ships, vehicles, guns, ammunition, everything, the whole thing. | ||
| We've been long-term, long-time allies. | ||
| And I would say there's never been anybody better. | ||
| We fought wars together. | ||
| We never had any doubts. | ||
| And it's a great honor to have you as my friend. | ||
| It's a great honor to have you in the United States of America. | ||
| We're seeing a peaceful opposition against Trump, the likes that our country hasn't seen in a long time. | ||
| And it's infuriating him. | ||
| He's threatening to potentially deploy the National Guard into San Francisco, which is why things like No Kings are so important, because this isn't a sprint. | ||
| It's a marathon. | ||
| And getting people on the ground gets people connected with those community networks, which gives them the ability to resist against Trump's regime every single day. | ||
| And more importantly, it gives people the courage to stand up. | ||
| There was a poll that went out that four of five U.S. troops understand their duty to disobey illegal orders. | ||
| Using the military to crush peaceful dissent, using the National Guard to crush peaceful dissent is illegal. | ||
| It's fascist. | ||
| It's what Trump wants to do. | ||
| It's what he already did in LA. | ||
| And it's what he's trying to do in Chicago and Portland and Memphis and in D.C. And what he's going to try to do in San Francisco. | ||
| And things like No Kings give both elected officials and potentially pillars of this regime, people like the military, people like civil service employees, the courage to stand up to risk their own jobs and livelihoods because they know that we, the people, are backing them and that together we can stop this regime before it harms and destroys our entire country. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on this people. | ||
| Here's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
| Monday, 20 October, year of our Lord, 2025. | ||
| Another historic day. | ||
| By the way, the last speaker, if he's saying that No Kings is going to give back up to pillars of the regime to like work against President Trump, the military, or the just what? | ||
| No Kings was an epic fail. | ||
| Now they're breaking it down to a couple of hundred thousand people showed up in New York and Chicago and places like that where you can have any kind of protest and get a couple hundred thousand to show up. | ||
| It's no $7 million. | ||
| That's a joke. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| It's just a bunch of old white, you know, a bunch of old white liberals, teachers, college professors, other irrelevant people wandering around, wandering around. | ||
| If that's what you're counting on, George Soros' money not well spent, should have taken it out in a barrel out into the front yard and just burned it. | ||
| No, I don't think that's going to give anybody any, oh, I feel so, no Kings was so massive. | ||
| I think I can go and countermand the Commander-in-Chief's orders. | ||
| Yeah, I don't think that's going to be. | ||
| I don't think you see a lot of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If that's what you're hoping for, epic fail. | |
| Also, the courts, yeah, go to Portland. | ||
| And you heard the big, these are the same people that said, oh, you know, this is going to be backed up by the appellate court. | ||
| This is going to be backed up all the way to the Supreme Court. | ||
| And now they run around for all the reasons that, oh, yeah, well, you know, really, they're just trying to get through this. | ||
| And no, President Trump's got full power. | ||
| Article, you heard this one before? | ||
| Article 2 power. | ||
| In fact, can we pull? | ||
| I think I got it too. | ||
| It's up on Getter. | ||
| Maria Bartiroma yesterday. | ||
| President Trump used my famous, my best phrase, the best phrase ever. | ||
| He goes, hey, Maria, you do know that I'm the chief law enforcement officer of the United States government. | ||
| Baboom. | ||
| Baboom. | ||
| Do you got that one? | ||
| We can? | ||
| Can you go ahead and play that? | ||
| Man, what a way to start this. | ||
| Production team, production team back in their rocking. | ||
| Let's go ahead and hear the president from Maria Bartiroma. | ||
| I'm the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. | ||
| You know that, right? | ||
| A lot of people say, oh, he's the president. | ||
| He should, no, I'm the chief law enforcement. | ||
| I'm allowed to be involved in it, but I haven't chosen to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boom. | |
| Tonight, Rachel Maddow at your Monday night, suck on that, girl. | ||
| Yo, that's his Article II power, and he's using his Article II power. | ||
| And the appellate court just backed him up. | ||
| San Francisco, Portland, let's roll. | ||
| Let's stop the invasion and repel the invaders. | ||
| And let's lock up in a federal prison anybody who tries to get in your way, including people out there trying to dox ICE officers or the military or any of it. | ||
| It's time to stop playing games with these people. | ||
| President's got this great phrase, no games, no games. | ||
| When he says that, you know he's serious. | ||
| That something's going on in negotiation or some event or activity that he's just tired of it. | ||
| No games. | ||
| Kind of, I think, what he told Kushner and Witkoff when he put them on the plane said, I want a deal. | ||
| And tell Netanyahu, no games, no more games, no games. | ||
| The reason Marco wasn't on the plane with him was his disaster showing, as we highlighted a couple of weeks before. | ||
| It's time, of course, Netanyahu's in the Times of Israel today saying, Trump did not order me. | ||
| Trump did not force me into signing this. | ||
| Okay, Bibi, good try. | ||
| Let Tel Aviv Levin push that one on his radio show. | ||
| Let him push that one. | ||
| You weren't forced. | ||
| You did it willingly because all your, I forgot, all your objectives in the gods of war were met. | ||
| Unreal. | ||
| Historic today in the cabinet room with the Prime Minister of Australia. | ||
| Stan, you're with me. | ||
| And Stan, I'm going to let you take a crack. | ||
| It's too late on a Monday. | ||
| We've been too busy here in the war room. | ||
| I'm going to let you take a crack of your last name. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Stan Voyavatsky. | |
| And it's good to be back. | ||
| Hello. | ||
| Thanks for having me again on the show. | ||
| So listen, the reason I love having you on, you're my quiet weapon over there. | ||
| You did nothing but called shots. | ||
| You called the shot on the rare earth and you called the shot on the submarines. | ||
| Let's start with why was this so important a meeting? | ||
| And look, the president, we can be open about this. | ||
| He had exactly been leveling up on the Australian prime minister, had Kevin Rudd in there. | ||
| And we've had Rudd, we've got Rudd's book, who we love, the book on the Chinese Communist Party did a great job on that. | ||
| But he and Rudd have had disagreements. | ||
| And he had Rudd in there today. | ||
| He said, where's that other prime minister? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The one who says, you know, we've said bad things about each other. | |
| He had Rudd in there. | ||
| He had the current prime minister, which they've never been particularly close. | ||
| Today, they were like brothers in arms. | ||
| I've never seen such a positive meeting, a positive bylaw. | ||
| He also didn't do it in the OVA. | ||
| I think they did it in the cabinet room so you can get more media in there. | ||
| Why was this so important to get to sign right at the top? | ||
| That's how important it was for Trump. | ||
| They walk in, they signed this deal right at the top on rare earth because Besson is en route to go meet with the Chinese finance minister. | ||
| And Trump said at this meeting, which I don't know, the Beijing has not verified it, but President Trump said he's meeting with Xi. | ||
| Why was the Rare Earth such a big deal, sir? | ||
| I mean, first of all, I think it was a very good meeting. | ||
| It's definitely a win for Australia. | ||
| It took about 270 days since Prime Minister Albanese was re-elected. | ||
| And that's the longest, I think, in the last 10 or 15 years that the two heads of states took to meet on the heels of a victory. | ||
| So that left the door open for a lot of pundits and criticism that perhaps PM Albanese might not have the ear of President Trump. | ||
| Perhaps the AUKUS submarine deal might be in troubled waters. | ||
| And obviously today, for you and I, folks like us who've been paying keen attention over the past year on where this alliance might go, it was a confirmation that the U.S. remains a steadfast partner in such an important naval alliance in such a critical part of the world, that is the Indo-Pacific. | ||
| Additionally, and I think you're probably one of those that have covered the most some of the moves on the part of China and the CCP to play hardball in the rare earth space to try and corner the United States by limiting exports of anything that has remotely 0.1 percent of critical minerals or rare earth. | ||
| And that means the entire technology and information industry across all sectors, strategic sectors, that is. | ||
| And so this technology prosperity deal that was signed right off the bat in the cabinet room between the two administrations first reaffirms AUKUS, but also paves the way for a long-term strategic partnership in sourcing critical minerals and rare earth. | ||
| And it's, you know, it's a chess move on China's attempt at pressuring the U.S. and its partners along the rare earth route, which is so critical to our national security. | ||
| So to the pundits back in Australia, which have had 270 days to undermine and criticize both President Trump from far, but also at home, their prime minister, that the Trump administration was in retreat and could not be relied upon. | ||
| I think it's a strong message to our allies and our adversaries in the region that have doubted that the U.S. would stick to its end of the bargain. | ||
| It's also a very strong message. | ||
| It reaffirms and reassures our allies, and it gives predictability, if I want to be politically correct, to our adversaries. | ||
| It projects continued naval supremacy and the notion that the U.S. remains the world's leading naval force, augmented now with Australia and the U.K. in this generational partnership that we've come to know as AUKUS. | ||
| Deterrence is, in fact, the name of the game. | ||
| I mentioned it in my last conversation with you. | ||
| Peace through strength is a doctrine, and stealth remains the most important element of both our nuclear triad deterrence. | ||
| Stan, hang on for one second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm going to hold you over to the next please. | |
| An ally, not a protectorate. | ||
| An ally steps up. | ||
| And partners with the United States today at the White House. | ||
| Tell America's Voice family. | ||
| Are you on Getter yet? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's uncensored, and it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | |
| Download the Getter app right now. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | ||
| You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
| Go to get her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
| You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, Jack the Soviets, and so many more. | |
| Download the Getter app now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sign up for free and be part of the news. | |
| To be fair. | ||
| And you cover it as well as anybody that's ever covered this subject. | ||
| You know, it's a very complex subject. | ||
| But China has ripped us off from day one. | ||
| And, you know, Richard Nixon, he allowed this to happen. | ||
| You know, he was the one who opened China. | ||
| And I said, is that good or bad? | ||
| You tell me. | ||
| He unleashed it. | ||
| And we have a very strong adversary, and they only respect strike. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| President Trump, give me a little real poloutique. | ||
| Stan, I would just want to back up for one second. | ||
| And this is why I loved your call, Sean, because this was very controversial for the last couple of years. | ||
| And a lot of guys like Stan and myself and others that were huge advocates of this, not just media in Australia, but also in the region and others said the day's over, Trump's, you know, Trump's an isolationist. | ||
| The CCP has intimidated the Australian people too much. | ||
| They got called out. | ||
| It was all proven wrong. | ||
| Just give me a minute of why this submarine deal is so important to show the strength of the alliance, really, Australia, United States, and Great Britain, to stand up to the Chinese Communist Party and to show the people in the region that are not Australians, not English, or not Americans, that we're not messing around here, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Thank you again. | ||
| I think as we discussed on the 250-year anniversary of the U.S. Navy, at any given time, on any given day, you have six, seven, eight nations and island nations in the Indo-Pacific that are being challenged in their exclusive economic zones, in their territorial waters, by an adversary, the People's Liberation Navy or its maritime militia. | ||
| And the Indo-Pacific has become ground zero of global competition. | ||
| Naval warfare capacity and projection remains the realm of global powers. | ||
| Australia sits in the middle of this body of water. | ||
| It is a critical partner. | ||
| And this generational partnership that was signed under a previous administration and that was reviewed under President Trump signals to our partners and our allies in the region that they're not alone in standing up to some of the bullying that the maritime militia or the People's Liberation Navy exerts on their fisheries, | ||
| on their territorial waters, on their territorial claims. | ||
| And therefore, it was of the utmost importance once AUKUS was signed not to pull back from it because both allies and adversaries have already computed and incorporated that into their war games. | ||
| And therefore, had we pulled out or had anything happen to this alliance, it would leave a massive vacuum which would be immediately filled by our adversaries. | ||
| I have to maybe state that something you must know over the last two, three days, there's been a lot of noise coming out of the CCP. | ||
| I think on October 17th, the Defense Ministry announced that the central, the vice chair of the Central Military Commission, a member of the Politburo and eight other senior military commanders had been expelled from the Communist Party and the military for serious violations of party discipline. | ||
| So the lines are shifting. | ||
| It's very hard, very opaque, very hard to read what is going on behind closed doors with the party. | ||
| But certainly this peace through strength and this reassurance of our commitments to our allies, both within NATO and outside of NATO, but certainly in the Indo-Pacific is making the rounds and is being noticed by both our adversaries and our allies. | ||
| By the way, we're going to, we're going to, the 7 o'clock, 6 o'clock hour, excuse me, we're going to go through this even in more depth because President Trump, the Chinese Communist Party has thrown down an open, active, and serious economic war against the United States with these heavy rare earths. | ||
| And President Trump, this is why it's going to be Australia first, and next he's going to get one with Brazil. | ||
| He's fighting back and giving some ammo to Scott Besson. | ||
| He goes over, and President Trump announced that he's going to meet. | ||
| We're going to cover it all. | ||
| Also, the buried lead, President Trump goes, in a year, we're going to be fine. | ||
| In a year, just take that out in your number two pruncul and write that down. | ||
| That is 12 months. | ||
| That's a long time, particularly when people in your production, you know, the Ford Motor Company telling, we got to shut down the lines in six weeks. | ||
| This is what the CCP is trying to do to the United States, and it's what it's trying to do to President Trump as much as he's tried to, I think, accommodate them in some of their struggles with their economy. | ||
| Stan, what's your social media? | ||
| You've been ahead of this, and today was two called shots, one on the rare earths and the other on this massive submarine deal. | ||
| Where do people find you, sir, for your writings? | ||
| On LinkedIn or on your show most of the time. | ||
| Steve, thank you again for inviting me. | ||
| As I mentioned the last time, stealth is the name of the game, including in our advisory role. | ||
| We love guys and know what they're talking about and can get our audience information and knowledge well before it happens. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Have a good night. | ||
| Those are the guys you want to get on. | ||
| Guys will tell you weeks and months ahead, hey, here's what's going to happen, and here's why it's going to happen. | ||
| Very impressive. | ||
| Big day for President Trump. | ||
| Very big day. | ||
| And this Chinese Communist Party thing is only going to get uglier. | ||
| We're going to break it all down with various people at six. | ||
| I've got Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| I got to tell you, I've known Leahy for a long time. | ||
| He's a comrade in arms. | ||
| You've got to go pretty far in the woods to hit his tripwire. | ||
| But man, when you hit Leahy's tripwire, action's coming. | ||
| Last night on 60 Minutes, where I was obsessed with the Jared Kushner and Witkoff interview, which I thought was so much amazing information came out of there. | ||
| But Michael Patrick Leahy focused on another part of 60 Minutes, another interview. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play the cold open and bring in Michael Patrick Leahy. | ||
| I'm the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. | ||
| You know that, right? | ||
| A lot of people say, oh, he's the president. | ||
| He should, no, I'm the chief law enforcement. | ||
| I'm allowed to be involved in it, but I haven't chosen to. | ||
| And DOJ whistleblower Erez Raveni, who was inside the Trump Justice Department, pulled back the curtain on what it looks like inside and the Trump administration's open defiance of the courts in order to maximize mass deportations. | ||
| Take a look. | ||
| Felt like a bomb had gone off. | ||
| Here is the number three official using expletives to tell career attorneys that we may just have to consider disregarding federal court orders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then it really hit me. | |
| We really did tell the courts, screw you. | ||
| We really did. | ||
| Just tell the courts we don't care about your order. | ||
| You can't tell us what to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was just a real gut punch. | |
| Normally, people deported in error are returned, but instead, Rouveni says that in a phone call from a superior, he was ordered to argue against Abrego Garcia's return by telling a judge that Abrego Garcia was an MS-13 gang member and a terrorist. | ||
| And I respond up to Chain of Command. | ||
| No way. | ||
| That is not correct. | ||
| That is not factually correct. | ||
| It is not legally correct. | ||
| That is a lie. | ||
| And I cannot sign my name to that brief. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa, Michael Patrick Leahy. | |
| Okay, here's the thing. | ||
| Barry Weiss is very pro-Israel. | ||
| She was criticized about this a lot. | ||
| She's a Zionist. | ||
| She allows to go on, because this is her first week as executive editor of CBS News. | ||
| And the first thing she did was, as Michael Patrick Leahy knows, she called the 60 Minutes crew and then said, hey, you know, certain people think you're biased. | ||
| And they're like, what are you talking about? | ||
| It was a full meltdown. | ||
| They leaked everything to the press. | ||
| She allowed the Leslie Stahl interview with Witkoff and Jared go forward, which buried Netanyahu, buried him, full stop. | ||
| Yet this one pops up. | ||
| And Leahy, you more than any person in the United States of America is on top of the story. | ||
| Why is this story so outrageous, sir? | ||
| Well, this is Scott Pelley in 60 Minutes and the anti-Trump propagandists there, a throwdown, a challenge to the leadership of Barry Weiss, because the clips you played are biased, dishonest, and misleading. | ||
| Particularly that last clip of the Arez Raveni, who was fired by the Department of Justice for not zealously defending his client's interests, the United States government. | ||
| His claim that there was no evidence that Kilmar Obrego-Garcia had MS-13 ties is just a flat-out lie. | ||
| In fact, if you go to two immigration court judge decisions in 2019, they kept him in detention while his final deportation hearing was being held because the two judges concluded there was enough evidence that he was an MS-13 gang member. | ||
| Now, why didn't Raveni present that to the court? | ||
| He should have. | ||
| He didn't. | ||
| I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
| I'm going to bring you back because some of the audience may not understand that you're the guy that broke all this story down in Tennessee with your radio show and the Tennessee Star. | ||
| You went in, Leahy went in and did the pick and shovel work when all this was, this is just a Maryland father. | ||
| Remember, he's just a Maryland dad. | ||
| He's just some guy, a Maryland dad. | ||
| You know, like a former Colts fan that's now a Ravens saying he's just a Maryland daddy. | ||
| Nothing could be farther from the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And Michael Patrick Leahy exposed it. | |
| Now they're throwing down the, hey, the president's the chief law enforcement officer and chief magistrate of the United States government. | ||
| So I agree with you. | ||
| We're going to find out what the remedy is for Michael Patrick Leahy, his own self. | ||
| Gold's knocking on the door of 4,400 bucks an ounce. | ||
| It ain't the price. | ||
| It's the process. | ||
| Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at 98-9898. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Get the ultimate guide from Birch Gold today. | |
| People deported in error are returned. | ||
| But instead, Rouveni says that in a phone call from a superior, he was ordered to argue against Abrego Garcia's return by telling a judge that Abrego Garcia was an MS-13 gang member and a terrorist. | ||
| And I respond up to Channel Command. | ||
| No way. | ||
| That is not correct. | ||
| That is not factually correct. | ||
| It is not legally correct. | ||
| That is a lie. | ||
| And I cannot sign my name to that brief. | ||
| Okay, Leahy, we're always pressed for time, but I want you to tell the audience, because you're the guy, you're the guy that turned him from a Maryland dad to a gang member because of the research you did with the, I think, Tennessee State Police Records and others. | ||
| Give me the reasons why that is inaccurate, sir. | ||
| Because two 2019 Immigration Court judge rulings determined that there was enough evidence that he was an MS-13 gang member that he was not released during his deportation hearing order. | ||
| That was evidence that Ravenney should have, could have, and had a duty to present the court, but he chose not to. | ||
| He got fired because he didn't zealously represent his client. | ||
| Also, he failed to properly point out to the court this. | ||
| In that deportation order with the withholding of removal from 2019, the black letter of the order said you can't send him to Guatemala. | ||
| It's right there in black and white, like four times. | ||
| He didn't present that information to the court. | ||
| So that was another error on his part. | ||
| And number three, he violated attorney client privilege. | ||
| He's representing the government. | ||
| And now he's going and giving information to the other side. | ||
| He was really representing the defendant. | ||
| That's why he got basically was fired by DOJ. | ||
| Also, that CBS report, they failed to report that the case was brought in the wrong venue. | ||
| Those terrorists, those Venezuelan terrorists, were in Texas. | ||
| That's where the case should have been brought. | ||
| But it was brought to Judge Boesberg in D.C. Why? | ||
| Because he hates Donald Trump, and everybody knows that. | ||
| Finally, they also claimed that they violated court order. | ||
| A court order given verbally is not a court order. | ||
| It's got to be written. | ||
| By the time that written court order was delivered, all of those Venezuelan gang members had been deported to El Salvador. | ||
| So Barry Weiss showed courage in putting up the Netanyahu thing, which, you know, she's very pro-Israel, and this buries Netanyahu, a brutal interview with Witkoff and Jared Kushner. | ||
| But this somehow got under the radar scope, and you've got the facts. | ||
| You brought the receipts. | ||
| What are you requesting of Barry Weiss? | ||
| Because Barry Weiss, people should know, is like in, she's like Army command in Saigon in 1968. | ||
| She got nothing but enemy around her. | ||
| As soon as she went and talked to the 60 Minutes people about this exact topic, you're biased against the truth, against the facts, and they're all up in arms and they leaked it immediately to the New York Times before she's even out of the room. | ||
| What remedy are you looking for for this poor woman? | ||
| I have a direct message for Barry Weiss. | ||
| I want at the Tennessee Star and individually, Michael Patrick Leahy, I want 13 minutes of unedited prime time on CBS News to rebut this completely biased and anti-Trump piece of propaganda. | ||
| That's what I want. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| How about if you did that 13 minutes on 60 minutes with Scott Pelley interrogating you, sir? | ||
| Are you down for that? | ||
| I'll take it as long as I can have my own camera there. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And do your own editing. | ||
| Leahy, you're the best. | ||
| This is very important. | ||
| You called them right out. | ||
| I know the president of the United States is going to love this. | ||
| Where do they go to get you all your information, your show, the Tennessee Star, all of it, sir? | ||
| On X, you can find me at Michael P. Leahy and Tennessee Star.com. | ||
| Tennessee Star.com is a website where you can get all of this great breaking news. | ||
| You know, Leahy, you got like 50 jobs. | ||
| You're working 24-7, and then you went to law school at night. | ||
| You've been a man on fire ever since then. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The worst thing they allowed to happen is let Leahy go to law school. | |
| Sir, thank you. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, your polling here recently has been so profound and so deep in talking about where the country is in this crisis we currently have. | ||
| You've got something new and quite explosive tonight. | ||
| What do you got, sir? | ||
| I'm uncovering more stuff about COVID. | ||
| And we talk about how all the mainstream pollsters lie by fudging the numbers, by over and over again, misrepresenting things. | ||
| But one of the ways that they like to lie and to shill for the establishment is by carefully deciding not to ask important questions. | ||
| And so people who follow Rasmussen reports know that we'll actually dig into it. | ||
| We'll show that Americans want to deport everybody in the United States. | ||
| Imagine that. | ||
| That's what explains Donald Trump's win, things like that. | ||
| Well, one of the things that every single one of them, every single one of them, turned their nose up, decided not to go into was vaccine safety. | ||
| And as far as I know, in the entire industry, the only other pollster that polled at all about vaccine safety was Rich Barracks, the people's pundit. | ||
| And he told me personally, he lost clients. | ||
| He had people text him, what are you doing? | ||
| You're going to ruin your business. | ||
| What's going on here? | ||
| Why are you doing this? | ||
| But fortunately for America, Rasmussen reports had been so written off by the establishment that we decided to poll on this in the fall of 2022. | ||
| And we thought, you know, this might be one of those things. | ||
| It's a fringe conspiracy theory. | ||
| We'll probably find small numbers. | ||
| And the very first question we asked was whether or not people had a major or minor side effect from the vaccine. | ||
| And we broke the news on your show, 7% major side effect rate, another 31%. | ||
| It was massive. | ||
| So we've been asking about this time and time again. | ||
| And every single one comes back worse and worse and worse. | ||
| We asked people if they know something person. | ||
| Yeah, this is a don't bury the league. | ||
| Give me the, do they know something personally? | ||
| That number, I think, was even more shocking. | ||
| When you told me the other show, I was like, what? | ||
| Give us that? | ||
| Oh, I know, right. | ||
| And it's like, you probably had a cold open of some weather person dropping dead on air in front of America. | ||
| And 28%, 28% of Americans thought it was at least, you know, someone agreed that they know somebody personally who died from the COVID vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| The number kept going up. | ||
| And then we got a number, close to half of Americans who said it's at least somewhat likely the vaccines are killing a significant number of Americans. | ||
| Well, just recently, the number has still been going up. | ||
| We had 56% of likely voters said that it was likely the vaccines are killing a significant number of people. | ||
| Now, that's the thing is that Donald Trump won because of accountability, because of pushback. | ||
| A lot of it was because of COVID. | ||
| And Americans want all these wrongs righted. | ||
| And I'll tell you, we haven't really heard a whole lot about what's going on with this stuff. | ||
| And it pisses me off so much to sit here and know, well, trust in America's health industry is completely gone because of COVID. | ||
| Now, by a two-to-one margin, people say that they have to take their own health information into their own hands. | ||
| They can't just rely on a doctor. | ||
| And you have all these doctors still sitting at the top of this regulatory pyramid who have a revolving door to industry, who are running cover for industry, who are quite frankly siphoning trillions of dollars with sick care. | ||
| We all know it. | ||
| It's one of the reasons that our republic is going to die because we are funding massive amounts of people in a sick care system that is just basically legalized grift. | ||
| Like that's really what's going on. | ||
| There's so much corruption and we haven't heard any, really anything about it. | ||
| Well, I'm here to just stick one more knife in the dagger of this rotted corpse. | ||
| And that is nobody has pulled on the hospital treatment protocols for COVID, literally not a single person. | ||
| And we're talking about here the implications of over a million people died from COVID, most of them in the hospitals, most of them with a lot of questions about ventilators and Rems Desivir and other things. | ||
| You know, we heard the stories about how you lose your license if you let anybody get treated with ivermectin. | ||
| But without our polling, it would all be anecdotal. | ||
| It would all be super easy to sweep under the rug. | ||
| And of course, they'll still try to sweep this under the rug. | ||
| So here's the two questions. | ||
| And we literally just did this. | ||
| 1,400 Americans. | ||
| Has somebody you know personally died from COVID-19 while being treated in a hospital? | ||
| 32% of America says yes, 58% say no. | ||
| And then asked of those people, how likely is it that hospital treatment protocols for COVID-19 contributed to their deaths? | ||
| 30% very likely, another 17% somewhat for a combined total of 47%, almost half. | ||
| And only 14% say not at all likely. | ||
| Only 36% say not likely. | ||
| So it's plus 11. | ||
| So it's most people, most people who have an opinion on why that person died. | ||
| It would be a majority if you remove the not sures. | ||
| And there's a bipartisan signal. | ||
| 34% of Democrats think it's likely, but 58% of Republicans and 52% of Independents to only 33% of Independents say no. | ||
| So this is pretty solid. | ||
| People are like, yeah, there's reasons to question this stuff. | ||
| And what's really wild is you can even see the mama bear signal. | ||
| Women under 40 are overwhelmingly, overwhelmingly more likely to say this. | ||
| 56% very likely, 30% somewhat. | ||
| And the age signal is also incredible. | ||
| Of the 65 and older, only 21% say very likely, another 14% somewhat. | ||
| So that's 35. | ||
| But look at the 18 to 29s. | ||
| 56%, 31% very likely. | ||
| Really stunning signal. | ||
| It's almost two to one among 18 and 29 year olds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| So that also shows that, listen, establishment, you're not going to be able to run away from the internet. | ||
| These people are asking hard questions about literally everything, about the very capitalistic system that we live in, about foreign influence, about the ways that everything's been corrupted. | ||
| And I think that we are not hitting this idea of accountability hard enough because I'm telling you, I try and stay rooted in this like sort of Zoomer online culture more so than I think most people. | ||
| And what's being talked about isn't like, oh, isn't it great? | ||
| Republicans are giving us everything they voted for. | ||
| It's like, no, why isn't this system burning down fast enough? | ||
| That's, I think, accurately captures what I see anecdotally on the internet. | ||
| Let me ask you, is Bobby Kennedy, because recently, ever since they held back the 500 million in research for big pharma, and maybe it hasn't been pounded hard enough, but you can see he's starting getting traction. | ||
| Is that resonating with anybody? | ||
| Or because I keep recommending they got to go bigger on their media narrative. | ||
| You got Bobby Kennedy get the president, but it's not having the, it's not having the push that you have to do to get through the white noise. | ||
| Do you think that Bobby Kennedy's actions are enough, at least to turn it around with some of these people? | ||
| And do you think the messaging is amplified enough and at such a scale that it's going to break through the white noise and get to the American people? | ||
| Remember the days of thunder? | ||
| Remember the shock and awe as we saw USAID funding network piping all this money into leftist NGOs? | ||
| We automatically realized, no, it's not George Soros that's just doing this for ideological reasons. | ||
| It's a whole web of leverage, basically of arbitrage, of influence, arbitrage, and how when you and I were processing all that stuff, you probably knew about it. | ||
| But for me, it was an eye-opener. | ||
| This is way worse than we thought, but also more systematic and understandable than we thought. | ||
| There was like an aha moment. | ||
| Well, in the polling, it's almost like America reflexively felt that too, because we were setting right direction records. | ||
| Remember, 60% of 18 to 39-year-olds were like, yeah, we're going to get a second golden age under Trump. | ||
| Like, this is happening. | ||
| He had a 60% approval rating among 18 to 29s. | ||
| Like, it was wild. | ||
| And it was because of Doge and it was because I think this idea of, I don't think there's any specific one thing that America knows, well, if I got that, we'll be happy. | ||
| Everything will be fixed. | ||
| But I think it's this pot of boiling water that we're still sitting in. | ||
| People, I think, will start to connect the dots and say, well, not enough of this has been changed. | ||
| And so, again, we need to see more. | ||
| And I can't specifically say what that is because I'm not looking at the grand juries. | ||
| I don't know what evidence they have on these people. | ||
| But we need to know because, again, I don't want to get anybody sued for defamation here, Steve. | ||
| But when you hear the story specifically about how that one drug used pretty ubiquitously in the hospital treatment protocols got its emergency youth authorization and what safety trials were done and the people involved and whether they used to be at regulatory agencies and then became not and they went to industry, it stinks. | ||
| It absolutely stinks and people in this polling are tying the treatment protocols to deaths, like real deaths in a nonpartisan way. | ||
| I mean, and again, people can say, oh, it's not polling. | ||
| You're just polling people who answer polls. | ||
| It's like, OK, I defy anybody in the industry to prove me wrong. | ||
| Hang on for a second. | ||
| I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
| Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Mitchell, we got to go and I want to get your coordinates. | ||
| But I have one question. | ||
| I think intuitively the 18 to 30 year old, 18 to 29 year old understand. | ||
| This is why I say the most based generation, particularly young men in American history. | ||
| They intuitively know why did people do this? | ||
| All the action you talk about, they did it for one reason. | ||
| What was that reason? | ||
| I mean, this is the system has been destroyed. | ||
| These people should be inheriting America in its golden age. | ||
| They should be the most optimistic and they think the system's failed them. | ||
| They don't look to their future with optimism. | ||
| Many of them are suffering from mental health. | ||
| They've been literally turned into the pariah of our modern society and they're angry now and they're not conservative. | ||
| We've talked about this a lot and I'll just say one thing for the Trump administration. | ||
| If anybody in the administration is watching you, watching me, go look on YouTube for Moist Critical's video and Asmongold's reaction to it. | ||
| Millions of people in the 18 to 29 year old bracket. | ||
| Most of the men are going to be watching that and they're angry. | ||
| And it's because they're not seeing enough accountability. | ||
| People on the right and the left are looking at it and saying, what do I see? | ||
| I see a lot of like paradoxes. | ||
| Like why was the Trump administration leaning into anti-vax stuff and now Trump just got a vaccine a week ago? | ||
| Like what's with all this, you know, crypto stuff? | ||
| Like what's with these business deals? | ||
| Like why are these people that we've been told are going to be arrested not being arrested? | ||
| And whether that stuff's right or wrong, it's the optics. | ||
| And people are asking hard questions about that and getting angry now. | ||
| So if you want to know the 18 to 29 year olds, like talk to Barron. | ||
| He'll tell you who to watch. | ||
| That's I think that's what it comes down to. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, what are your coordinates, sir? | ||
| Rasmussen underscore poll at YouTube. | ||
| We'll probably cover this polling on a stream tomorrow night at 9 p.m. | ||
| Eastern. | ||
| Rasmussen underscore poll on Twitter. | ||
| And I'm at Honest Pollster. | ||
| And please, like we've made everybody an enemy. | ||
| And so neither party is paying to, you know, have us help them win. | ||
| We're independent and basically all of corporate America despises us. | ||
| So if people want to support us, they can go to RasmussenReports.com. | ||
| Sign up for a couple bucks a month as a reader. | ||
| That's really where most of our revenue comes from. | ||
| And it's not USAID or the dark money NGOs. | ||
| So you're the perfect pollster. | ||
| You're perfect pollster for the war room posse. | ||
| All corporate America. | ||
| I hate you in both political parties. | ||
| Ungovernable outcast. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| What is amazing is the reason that now gold is knocking on the door of $4,400. | ||
| Like I said, it's not the price here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can tell. | |
| We have said that the Chinese Communist Party is outright in economic war with the United States and the people of the United States. | ||
| With everything President Trump's trying to do to accommodate them and to try to balance this thing out and, you know, start putting some logical tariffs in because of the trade so out of control. | ||
| They have thrown down, they've gone up the escalatory ladder on this rare earth and president trump knows how serious it is you saw today out of nowhere where best is with australia now australia's been a long time ally don't get me wrong they're great my ship pulled into australia a number of times they're great people love it great ally in the pacific and the indo-pacific but this was different today and you can tell it was different um Gold is responding to that. | ||
| They're responding to the geopolitical. | ||
| There's also tons of articles up today about what we talked about weeks ago, about the asset classes, the asset kind of makeup on the balance sheets of big banks and central banks, all that is changing. | ||
| Away from, you know, you get government bonds and the Euro and all that. | ||
| It's changing and changing radically. | ||
| Philip Patrick talked about this a couple weeks ago. | ||
| This is why you need to go to birchgold.com, promo code Bannon, the end of the dollar empire, seven free installments over a four-year period. | ||
| You get everything kind of laid out to make sure you can understand. | ||
| You can start to see the pattern recognition. | ||
| You can start to connect dots. | ||
| Not Philip Patrick or Steve Bannon. | ||
| We're not here to tell you what to do. | ||
| We're here to provide you information so that you can learn on your own and think it through on your own. | ||
| Birchgold.com, promo code Bannon, end of the dollar empire. | ||
| Also, you can get the shorter version, which is just text Bannon at 989890. | ||
| You get the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals. | ||
| And don't forget the precious metals. | ||
| Silver's on fire, too. | ||
| Why people are looking for a hedge in times of uncertainty. | ||
| Times of uncertainty, Steve, what would that be? | ||
| Oh, the Third World War, both the kinetic part in the bloodlands of Ukraine and the Middle East and the economic part between the two greatest economic powers the world's ever seen, the United States and the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So go check it out. | ||
| Also, the budget gap, it's not going to go away. | ||
| The IRS, even under Scott Besson and President Trump, they're going to be looking for their money. | ||
| Tax Network USA, if you got a problem, by problem, let me define that. | ||
| If you haven't filed once or over the years, if some of your filings are wrong, you're upside down on some, you got a letter from the IRS, just don't think it's going to go away. | ||
| And don't think that Trump's in office is going to go away because it's not. | ||
| What you have to do is talk to the experts. | ||
| These folks have solved a billion dollars worth of tax problems. | ||
| There's nothing you have they haven't heard before. | ||
| Your tail of woe, they're going to understand. | ||
| What you need to do is talk to an expert. | ||
| Don't do it on your own, and certainly don't put it in the drawer and think it'll go away. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| It's going to metastasize. | ||
| 800, 958, 1,000. | ||
| Tell them Steve Bannon sent you. | ||
| The Warhammer sent you. | ||
| Tell me you're part of the posse and they'll give you a free consultation. | ||
| Mike Lindell, sir, couldn't get you on this morning because we had to cut to the Prime Minister Australia, but I got you now. | ||
| The audience was so angry they want to start a Monday off by knowing where the deals are. | ||
| Where are the deals, sir? | ||
| Well, I'm going to quick tell you that, but I do want to set the record straight. | ||
| Everybody's been texting me from around the country about the couple lawsuits that MyPillow is still involved in. | ||
| One of them is Liberty Vote that said they're buying Dominion. | ||
| They said they would drop the charges, drop the charges, the case against MyPillow. | ||
| That's a lie. | ||
| They have not dropped it. | ||
| It's still against my pillow, my employee-owned company. | ||
| And yes, the judge in Minnesota ruled against my pillow that they defamed him, but guilty by association. | ||
| So we really need your help, Warroom posse, to fight this stuff. | ||
| And the best way you can do it to support us is by getting our sales. | ||
| The three-in-one sale, the six-piece towels at $39.98. | ||
| You guys, the best, these are absolutely the best towels ever made. | ||
| The limited edition MyPillow premiums, best pillows in history, $17.98, $1998. | ||
| All the slippers that are in, $39.98. | ||
| You guys, get it by the supplies to us with your sizes. | ||
| The best slippers made with Impact Gel that work. | ||
| But go to mypillow.com forward slash warroom. | ||
| You see, we still have some of the sheets. | ||
| $29.88 close out sale. | ||
| You guys, I'm going to do it for you today because we need your help. | ||
| Free shipping on your entire order with that promo code Warroom. | ||
| I don't care if you order one set of sheets or if you order those Big Matt Meeting the USA mattresses or mattress toppers. | ||
| It's all shipped for free. | ||
| It's on me. | ||
| It's on my employees. | ||
| We need your help. | ||
| Mypillow.com forward slash warroom 800-873-1062. | ||
| And I will tell everybody out there, I will never, ever, ever settle with any of these voting machine companies ever. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amen. | |
| That's a fact. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stick around. | |
| Mike Lindell. | ||
| See you tomorrow morning. |
Export Selection