Sept. 30, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:21
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| Here's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And finally, the Trump White House and everything that's going on here in the United States and throughout the world. | ||
| My. | ||
| Part of my rant at the end of the show today is we tossed the Charlie Kirk show, Andrew Colvet and the team. | ||
| Netanyahu had just pulled up, I don't know, 30 minutes beforehand, but was very unusual. | ||
| Normally we get teed, you know, we get a heads up because they're supposed to happen at 11. | ||
| Normally they happen a little later. | ||
| But when it gets serious, the color guard comes out. | ||
| And since January 20th, particularly in the morning show, because most of these bylaps, 80% of them happen in the morning and usually entail a lunch or something in between and an open press available, all of it. | ||
| We didn't get any heads up. | ||
| And I kept asking the guys behind the scenes, the team, hey, you know, where's Brian? | ||
| Where's the camera shots? | ||
| How come we don't? | ||
| Because remember, they get out there at least 15 minutes in advance for the guard of honor to be there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We show the flags. | |
| You usually got the EOB. | ||
| I give you a little history of what the meeting is going to be about today. | ||
| None of that happened. | ||
|
unidentified
|
President Trump just kind of pops out on the West Wing. | |
| And next thing you know, he pops out exactly when the vehicle rolls up. | ||
| And then the White House puts out a video and it's got Netanyahu getting out and it's on this kind of weird angle. | ||
| It's not back over where the flags of the nations and states would be. | ||
| It's not anywhere where the color guard would be. | ||
| It's kind of looking at the EOB. | ||
| It's a weird angle for Netanyahu to get a card like they're right there, but they didn't want to cut and show the bigger. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Also, the comment section, if you have not seen the White House video on that, please see the comment section. | |
| It's pretty brutal. | ||
| So Netanyahu shows up and we've asked the White House since that moment over and over and over again, what's thinking, well, you know, not every state, this is nonsense. | ||
| Every time a head of state shows up, even at that working side, you've got the color guard out. | ||
| Now, maybe it hasn't happened a couple of times and I missed it, but I don't remember it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that was a signal that this was going to be a serious meeting and Netanyahu had to pay attention. | |
| You could also tell in the president, I say he looked tired. | ||
| He also, I don't want to say dismissive, but when Netanyahu's glazing him as he always does, he's the greatest friend to Israel, is the greatest man of peace in the world history. | ||
| President Trump was like, okay, let's move along. | ||
| You can tell his face. | ||
| Let's get on with this thing. | ||
| He's spent an inordinate amount of time on this. | ||
| And Netanyahu doesn't seem like an ally, much less a vassal state or a protectorate. | ||
| Does his own thing, including they just come out of the Oval Office where he had the game on the phone with the head of Cutter to have Netanyahu apologize in front of Trump about sending missiles in to kill the negotiating team. | ||
| Of course, he killed the negotiating team. | ||
| Just like on their strike, the first thing they went for is the negotiating team. | ||
| I think I see pattern recognition here. | ||
| I see a pattern. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's all about him to keep himself in power. | |
| And you got Tel Aviv Levin and these guys out there right now. | ||
| You know, Levin's got his big analysis. | ||
| Well, when you look at it, it doesn't say two-state solution. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It says, you know, aspirations of the people, and there's nothing about the West Bank. | |
| This is when Trump does something that he feels needs to be done. | ||
| You guys get in the middle and want to spin it and want to control it. | ||
| Okay, no to self. | ||
| Read the 20 points. | ||
| That is a beginning of a two-state solution. | ||
| So that's what you, Tel Aviv Levin, and Bibi Netanyahu have foisted upon the state of Israel. | ||
| Because if this deal gets done, if President Trump has anything to do with it, it will get done. | ||
| Because number one, he raised the money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Gulf Reims are going to put up the cash. | |
| Look, at least it looks like that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And whether you think Gaza is going to turn into some great beachfront property, it's going to be the Miami beach of the Mediterranean or replace Lebanon as the Paris of the Mediterranean, or if it's going to continue to be a hellhole. | |
| President Trump's put a lot of effort in this, and his vision is: hey, I've raised the money. | ||
| Now I just got to bring the parties together. | ||
| The rest of the parties are not putting in the money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And anybody's sitting there fantasizing, and it is a fantasy, and you know it's a lie. | |
| And I think, given the track record of Netanyahu, the duplicitous nature of him, the sneakiness of him, his cunning nature, and his bald-faced lies. | ||
| Oh, did I mention he's on Fox all the weekend? | ||
| So, yeah, we never intended to take out the entire nuclear capability. | ||
| Well, tell that to a guy named Donald J. Trump, who uses the phrase total obliteration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So Tel Aviv Levin and the America First Crowd now spinning this. | |
| Well, it doesn't really say nothing mentioned in the West Bank. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So that's good. | |
| No. | ||
| This deal, it is a condition precedent of this deal that Israel is not going to take over the West Bank. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Otherwise, this deal makes absolutely no sense. | |
| And of course, none of the Gulf Emirates, the Arabs are going to put up with that. | ||
| What brought the Arabs together? | ||
| They talk about it all the time now. | ||
| Was Netanyahu not asking the United States permission, going into doing a missile attack to take out Hamas's leadership so they couldn't negotiate? | ||
| Why? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So they couldn't get a deal. | |
| Why? | ||
| So Netanyahu can the war can continue and Netanyahu stay in power. | ||
| It's all pretty straightforward. | ||
| Now, what's the probability this happened? | ||
| I have no earthy idea. | ||
| What I do know is the president of these United States had put a lot of time and effort. | ||
| And you saw up there today a guy who's a little tired. | ||
| You know why? | ||
| Because he's got the weight of the world on his shoulders and every decision is a huge decision. | ||
| Oh, yeah, he only deployed troops last night to Portland. | ||
| He's deploying troops to Chicago. | ||
| He's trying to put down what is beginning, and I keep telling you, spinning towards the civil war unless we put it down now, now, now. | ||
| So, yeah, he gets the right to be a little tired. | ||
| And he doesn't need to put up a lot of crap. | ||
| And that's all he's getting out of the Israel First Crowd is a lot of crap. | ||
| So you've got a deal. | ||
| And President Trump's, he's not asking, it's interesting. | ||
| He didn't ask Netanyahu, what's your opinion of it? | ||
| What are your thoughts? | ||
| Can you give me some guidance here? | ||
| He didn't. | ||
| He says, this is the deal. | ||
| You're taking it. | ||
| Now, Hamas has got to meet the conditions they have for Hamas. | ||
| They're not looking for Hamas to negotiate. | ||
| Although Qatar, some of the big drivers of this, basically the sponsors of Hamas. | ||
| But Israel had no input into this. | ||
| None, zero. | ||
| Supposedly, Witkoff and Kushner yesterday told Beebe what was in what was officially in the document. | ||
| They could spin it all they want. | ||
| But this is how you treat a protectorate. | ||
| Hey, here's what we're going to do. | ||
| Here's why we're going to do it. | ||
| Here's what you need to do. | ||
| And by the way, if you want to do your own thing, if you don't like this, fine. | ||
| You're your own independent nation. | ||
| Go do it, but finish what you started. | ||
| Don't drag us back in like you did with your lies and misrepresentation on the Persian situation, where you started something that even the very basics on the nuclear program, which was not your intended goal, but even that you couldn't even do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you couldn't even defend your own people. | |
| President Trump had to bail you out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So the Israel Firsters should suck on that for a moment. | |
| And all this spin right now, this thing's great. | ||
| Whether you think it's great or not great, nobody gives a damn. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The deal's the deal. | |
| The deal's the deal. | ||
| Now, if Hamas, which I think knowing Hamas, their tendency to snatch defeat out of every victory, don't the bottomless pit of the Muslim Brotherhood, who are not great guys, their factor terrible. | ||
| And an enemy of the United States, and something from my first day in the White House to today, I've argued, just like Antifa, should be designated a terrorist organization. | ||
| Then we'll be getting somewhere. | ||
| Natalie Winters, as we slip to, as we are on the road to perdition, to a potential civil war in this country, now we're unmasking a lot of people. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And this thing's going to get very nasty, very nasty before it gets sorted. | ||
| And walk us through, because this, I think, shows you the level of depravity that we're up against. | ||
| Walk us through your report, ma'am. | ||
| Well, look, Steve, you were talking about the concept of a therapeutic society today earlier on the show. | ||
| And I think what is sort of incumbent for us to understand is that the people who are carrying out these heinous acts, whether it's right the assassination of Charlie Kirk, shooting up Christian schools, take your pick. | ||
| You know, yes, these people are mentally ill. | ||
| They suffer from gender dysphoria, but these are people who could also probably sit across from you and give you a three-hour moral justification, you know, replete with ethics that reek that they've spent four years at Harvard as to why they think they're justified in doing what they are doing, which is killing their enemies, killing their combatants. | ||
| You know, we talk about a civil war. | ||
| I think maybe the kinetic part hasn't totally started yet, though obviously what happened in recent days perhaps suggests otherwise. | ||
| But I think in all other areas, which we've seen certainly, you know, warfare traditionally expand, whether it's information warfare, the media warfare, the psychological warfare, certainly lawfare, I think that component of the civil war, I think it's fair to say, has already started. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And when you look at how much of this is hardwired in to both the Democratic Party apparatus, but also by extension, the dark money and the sort of NGO apparatus, you see how all of this comes together, right? | |
| These aren't random, isolated incidences. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And why I bring this specific person in school up is because it ties it all together. | |
| So I introduced to you a quote they them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think they're a non-binary, whatever professor who leads Harvard's nonviolent action center. | |
| It's hosted at the Ashe Center, someone by the name of Erika Chenoweth. | ||
| And why this person is important, this isn't just some rogue, you know, Harvard professor. | ||
| This is someone who is actively advising and hosting events with Democrat members of Congress, most recently Pramila Jayapal, who's out there, you know, grandstanding on everything that's happening in Portland. | ||
| But this is someone who called on during these events being done in conjunction with Harvard, telling supporters, activists, guerrilla troops, whatever you want to call them, that they need to be, quote, strike ready and really understand the time that they're living in. | ||
| And for their risk assessment, sort of coded language saying, you know, maybe it's worth getting violent sometimes. | ||
| And I think the crux of this, why this individual, why this lab is so important, is because they're explicitly talking about how to use political violence to advance their agenda. | ||
| And I know the left loves to hurl around the term stochastic terrorism, right? | ||
| The idea that you can sort of be subtly pushed or normalized in the direction of thinking violence is okay. | ||
| But this is pure evidence that that's just projection. | ||
| Erika Chenoweth not only is funded by USAID, lectured there, lectured at the United States Institute of Peace, this Harvard Center in and of itself is funded by USAID and the State Department. | ||
| But their most recent study was focused on quote youth and LGBTQ participation in nonviolent action, where they focus specifically on how trans youth can get involved in making political realities more favorable to them. | ||
| And like we always say here, if you have to specify that your political activism is nonviolent, that's probably a bad sign that the people that you're rallying up and riling up want to go there. | ||
| And this individual, Erika Chenoweth, most of her work, her canon of work, is focused on terrorism and violence in other countries, specifically how these have been used to achieve regime change. | ||
| And there's not a moral objection in any of her work and any of the documents or research or activist calls that the Democrats, in conjunction with this lady or man, whatever she wants to be, are putting out. | ||
| They just view violence as an okay political tactic. | ||
| Some of the research that she's done is quote, the role of violence in nonviolent resistance. | ||
| Try to make that one make sense. | ||
| Quote, resilient republics, why terrorism does not destroy democracy. | ||
| Another one of her works, quote, to bribe or to bomb, do corruption and terrorism go together. | ||
| Also works including quote, how to topple a dictator and quote, youth and LGBTQ activism as a strategic roadmap, right? | ||
| This is just toying with playing the blurred line game, moving the goalpost of what pro-democracy political demonstration looks like. | ||
| This is full-blown regime change and providing the ideological, cultural, and moral justification for the acts like we saw against Charlie Kirk. | ||
| And my final point on all of this, which I think is very important to take away, it goes back to what you were talking about wonderfully this morning, which is this concept of unity, right? | ||
| This is who we're supposed to unite with, right? | ||
| As Republicans are busy pushing that, Democrat senators are busy plowing hundreds of thousands of dollars into these very same groups that are in bed, like Indivisible, like we were talking about with Chris Murphy, that are propping up this entire ecosystem and infrastructure of organizations that is extremely violent to their core. | ||
| That is their raisin d'être, right? | ||
| And it goes back, Steve, to what we were forewarning about before President Trump was even sworn in the second time. | ||
| When you deprive the Democrat Party and the left of their traditional institutional levers of power, which they exploited for four years under Joe Biden, right, they weaponized the government against you after the Jan Sixers. | ||
| These people are desperate and desperate times call for desperate measures and existential times call for existential measures. | ||
| And that's why you're seeing this uptick in violence. | ||
| Like Axios said, right, left-wing violence has hit a 30-year high. | ||
| And we're told that this isn't a problem. | ||
| It's absolutely absurd. | ||
| We don't want unity with these people. | ||
| Like I said, it's a dog whistle for complete and utter submission. | ||
| We saw how that worked out with Islam. | ||
| What is it? | ||
| NHS over in the UK is busy saying that marrying your cousin is actually good and healthy and okay. | ||
| You can never compromise with these people. | ||
| You can never compromise with the left. | ||
| And I wish, I know I left for three weeks. | ||
| It seems like nothing changed. | ||
| We're going to shut down the government and Republicans are still feckless and they don't understand what accountability is. | ||
| And Real America's voice is still having sound difficulties and I'm getting bumped to the six. | ||
| What you, Benz, and Beatty have been the folks over the last couple of years that have walked us through this concept of color revolution. | ||
| In the color revolution that's being foisted upon us in the United States right now, the violent aspect of this, because when Axios comes out, because Axios is Mike Allen and Jim Vanderheg, that is the Washington consensus. | ||
| If you want to know what the Washington consensus is on any topic, that's it. | ||
| When they put an article to start the work week that talks about left-wing political violence at a 30-year high and numbers, and even in those numbers, something nobody could comprehend. | ||
| Where in the chart of the color revolution to really have regime change in this country are we right now, given that a certain aspect of it is the violence. | ||
| And you also see the political figures on the Democrat side are instigating more of it, talking about Trump is an authoritarian. | ||
| We're all fascist, right? | ||
| I think Gavin Newsom put out a tweet that called Stephen Miller flat out. | ||
| This man is a fascist, right? | ||
| Understanding how that word triggers the left. | ||
| So in the color revolution arc, where are we in your assessment? | ||
| Well, look, it's why they went after Charlie Kirk. | ||
| Is it partly because of what he said on the Culture War stuff? | ||
| Sure, but it's because he's hardwired into the Trump victory, right? | ||
| Into the Republican Party, into the grassroots, into the get-out-the-vote stuff, into the youth vote, which really is, I think, one of the most powerful cudgels against what the Democratic Party was trying to do. | ||
| Obviously, everything that Turning Point was doing on the election integrity front. | ||
| I mean, I think if you really broaden it out historically, I mean, getting youth, young kids, young teens, specifically those that are suffering from, I would posit, mental illness and exploiting them and pushing them to the brink. | ||
| I mean, this is the sort of equivalent of the little red guard. | ||
| Maybe it's the little trans guard. | ||
| But these are people who've been indoctrinated for their entire lives. | ||
| Like I said, not just with the idea that transgenderism is something that is great, but that it is okay, right, as the strapline of the Democratic Party and Black Lives Matter is, quote, by any means necessary. | ||
| And you're seeing that, I think, escalate. | ||
| But I also think, too, it's something because the Trump administration is obviously going after who they view as sort of their sacrosanct idols, right? | ||
| Whether it's what's happening with Comey, what might be happening with Aview as the rule of law and the institution of the traditional levers of power, whether that's, you know, 100,000 government civil servants resigning or going after people like Chris Wright or sending out the National Guard. | ||
| So this is sort of, I think it's retaliatory and it's relational and reactive to what the Trump administration is doing. | ||
| Because like I said, these are like petulant children and their traditional sort of off-ramp for what they would do to silence us or censor us. | ||
| They can't censor Charlie Kirk anymore. | ||
| They can't silence his show. | ||
| They can't throw him in prison because they don't control the institutional levers of power. | ||
| So they're really desperate. | ||
| And that's why they're becoming so violent. | ||
| And I truly only think it's going to get worse unless the Trump administration really cracks down. | ||
| We'll handle that the rest of the week. | ||
| Natalie, social media. | ||
| Where do people, what are your coordinates? | ||
| Where do people follow you? | ||
| Natalie G. Winters on all platforms. | ||
| Thank you for having me back. | ||
| I look forward to coming on soon. | ||
| Yeah, we want to go. | ||
| I want to go through your, not just the trip, but all your analysis and assessment over in the most important part of the world outside of the United States of America, and that is Asia and East Asia. | ||
| Natalie winners over on a fact-finding investigative journey for us. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. | ||
| What Natalie talked about is, I think, and this is where you talk about the time and effort President Trump is spending on the Middle East. | ||
| I wish the Israel First Crowd spent as much time on what is happening in New York City with Mom Donnie as they're doing barking at people like Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly and others. | ||
| Because right now, the last time I looked, 30% of Jewish voters in New York City are going to vote for, wait for it, Mom Donnie, who is nothing more than Sadiq Khan. | ||
| He is a Marxist and a jihadist. | ||
| That's what he represents. | ||
| He puts on the happy-clappy face, right? | ||
| Doing his little TikToks and walking in the food, in the aisle of the Katsumate's food store, right? | ||
| And, you know, saying he has all about affordability, and the rent is too damn high. | ||
| The rent is too damn high. | ||
| Speaking of, there is, I think there's two pieces of good news politically. | ||
| When I say politically, I mean kind of the action-oriented, not we're passing legislation and polling everything like that. | ||
| One is New Jersey, and the other is California on this redistricting fight. | ||
| Of course, there's great news on the redistricting fight in other areas, some greater than others. | ||
| But I want to go, Sophia George has had you on Saturday. | ||
| It was a great report because I tell people, you told me six months ago that Steve, New Jersey is not, this is when people were down 10, 15 points. | ||
| You said is not lost because I'm knocking on doors of Democrats and they won't register as Republicans because they don't want the visibility of that. | ||
| But they will tell me I can't vote for Democrats anymore because of two things. | ||
| Housing affordability, a lot of that driven by property taxes and others. | ||
| And the other is utilities, particularly electric bills, which you said is like $900 a month. | ||
| People just can't afford to live anymore and it's going to become an issue. | ||
| And they're sitting there going, we've had Democrats run this place forever. | ||
| It's time for a change. | ||
| Now, what happened today? | ||
| They had a conference of real estate. | ||
| Was it brokers, dealers, and the candidate for the governorship showed up? | ||
| I heard he rocked the house. | ||
| Tell us what happened. | ||
| Yes, absolutely. | ||
| Yeah, so today the New Jersey Association of Realtors had a gubernatorial candidates forum. | ||
| So Jack Chiarelli was there. | ||
| Mikey Sherrill was there. | ||
| They had QA's. | ||
| They weren't there together to debate. | ||
| It wasn't a formal debate. | ||
| They came at different times during the forum and they each had the same exact questions. | ||
| Mikey Sherrill went first. | ||
| They asked her exactly what you just said, questions about housing affordability, utilities. | ||
| And she had a scripted speech that she read. | ||
| Somebody wrote it for her. | ||
| Didn't have much substance at all. | ||
| Spoke in platitudes. | ||
| And, you know, we had a few people clap, and then there were some pictures taken afterwards. | ||
| But when Jack Chiarelli came out, there was a standing ovation, a heavy applause from the audience. | ||
| The audience was made up of realtors, brokers like myself. | ||
| And it was a stark difference just on the entrance alone. | ||
| And Jack, I have to say, crushed it today. | ||
| He crushed it during his QA and during his speech before. | ||
| He gave a lot of substance. | ||
| He promoted his Garden State Affordability agenda. | ||
| He went down point by point how he was going to help this housing crisis that we have here, utilities. | ||
| He even spoke about the environmental aspects of things. | ||
| And it was just a clear, stark difference. | ||
| And it was really nice to see my fellow realtors and brokers out there having the same reception, showing him that kind of support as I know him to have because I know what he stands for. | ||
| So it was nice to see Steve. | ||
| Give one more time before I let your bounce about your go, because your campaign, you're a bootstrap campaign, as most of these are at the local level. | ||
| You're going door to door. | ||
| Give me the response when you knock, because you're knocking on everybody's door. | ||
| When you knock on independents and you knock on registered Democrats, what response are you getting as you make your pitch as a Republican? | ||
| Yeah, when I knock on their doors, the first conversation I have is about property taxes and utilities. | ||
| And as soon as I mention that to them, the first thing they say to me is, I'm a Democrat. | ||
| I've always voted Democrat, but this year I am not voting Democrat. | ||
| They have really taken it this year too far. | ||
| And people are starting to pay attention. | ||
| And the normal, you know, day-to-day, just, you know, they don't really get that involved in their local politics. | ||
| But this year, they're getting involved. | ||
| They're paying attention because the families are hurting and they're looking for solutions. | ||
| And Jack Tiarelli has been going out there and giving those policies and really nailing it home and very, very specifics. | ||
| And people are really attracted to that. | ||
| And I really think today was a clear and stark difference of how he's going to improve the housing affordability crisis here in New Jersey. | ||
| Folks, we got a dogfight in New Jersey. | ||
| I think we're about to have one in California, but this New Jersey race could be everything. | ||
| It could be a real bellwether for 26. | ||
| Sophia, where do people go to find out more about your race and where do they find you on social media? | ||
| Okay, you can go to ftgop.org. | ||
| You can read all about the campaign, some of these housing affordability issues and other issues that are hot topics in Franklin Township. | ||
| I'm running in ward number three. | ||
| There's also a donation link. | ||
| I appreciate everybody's support. | ||
| Anybody who can give a little, I appreciate it. | ||
| You know, we're in the last final weeks here and we need some help in that department just to get our message out. | ||
| You can also find me at realcyrealestate.com. | ||
| All my socials are on there and I talk about these issues there quite often. | ||
| So I'm glad people are paying attention, Steve. | ||
| Let's take it home for New Jersey. | ||
| No, you called it six months ago. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on here. | ||
| Scott Pressler was at Penn State, right, with Cliff Maloney. | ||
| And of course, Benny Johnson was up there. | ||
| They had this memorial for Charlie Kirk. | ||
| Thousands of people showed up to get the white freedom shirts that Charlie Kirk had on at the very moment he was assassinated out in Utah. | ||
| Scott Presser would tell you all day you saw the videos of Scott. | ||
| He's signing folks up in the parking lots, the parking lot out there with the knitting lions at the great stadium out there at Penn State. | ||
| And Scott Pressler will tell you Pennsylvania is the new Ohio, he believes, and New Jersey could be the new Pennsylvania. | ||
| That's where this governor's race is, everything. | ||
| Also, I got some great field reports of folks in California knocking on doors about this Proposition 50 that has to pass in order for them to get the five seats that offsets Texas. | ||
| We'll have to grass on the next couple of days to go through all that. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| They're having a reception for Gold Star mothers in the White House right now. | ||
| Tina Peters is not there. | ||
| Her lawyer's going to join us to tell us exactly why next morning. | ||
| Are you on Getter yet? | ||
| No. | ||
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's free. | ||
| It's uncensored, and it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | ||
| Download the Getter app right now. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | ||
| You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
| Go to get her. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| You can follow all of your favorites: Steve Bannon, Charlie Cook, Jack the Soviet, and so many more. | ||
| Download the Getter app now. | ||
| Sign up for free and be part of the new thing. | ||
| There's a Gold Star reception by the President First Lady happening in the White House right now. | ||
| One Gold Star mother we know is not there. | ||
| That is Tina Peters, who's in a prison in Colorado. | ||
| Her lawyer, Peter Tinken, joins us. | ||
| Peter, why are we having a reception in the White House for Gold Star mothers, which are equivalent to the Roman Republic's Vestal Virgins or the oracles in ancient Greece? | ||
| Like the highest, you can't get higher than that. | ||
| The Gold Star mothers are revered having their sons or daughters die in combat or in defense of this country. | ||
| Why is Tina Peters riding in a prison in Colorado and not at that reception today, sir? | ||
| That's a great question. | ||
| From our legal point of view, we're attacking it in three different ways. | ||
| You know, we've got our appeal going on in the Court of Appeals and the state court, which we expect to win, even though we don't look. | ||
| Once a state goes to the left, once the politics, once the election is fixed or whatever, and it goes to the left, then they start picking judges that are to the left. | ||
| Colorado, you know, there are a number of states, Colorado being one that is pretty well far gone at this point. | ||
| And so the judge that tried the case with Tina Peters, it was a kangaroo court. | ||
| She wasn't allowed to put on her main defenses. | ||
| And even if the Court of Appeals is a little bit to the left, as a matter of law, they're going to have to look at this thing because hopefully they are jurists and not just like the trial judge was. | ||
| And they will give credence to our arguments because the arguments are clear. | ||
| Any place in the country, you need to be able to put on your defenses. | ||
| And so we're hoping for success in that. | ||
| We're only hoping we're not expecting it. | ||
| The second place that we're going for help is to the federal court because actually Patrick McSweeney, John Case, Robert Sincar, and Stephanie Lampert, they formed the rest of the team that I lead. | ||
| And they did a tremendous job. | ||
| The petition for rid of habeas corpus in the federal court was a masterpiece by Patrick McSweeney's name is on it, but I'm sure everybody participated. | ||
| That was before I joined the team. | ||
| And we're expecting, we're, again, hoping, we have a judge that really seems to be a fair judge there. | ||
| And now we're talking about the federal court system, which is a little bit different. | ||
| We've got a magistrate judge, so he's not one of those that was appointed by the president and then approved by Congress. | ||
| But nevertheless, he really seems to look at this thing from a fair point of view. | ||
| I think we're going to get a fair shake. | ||
| And if we do, we'll get her out. | ||
| And then the third avenue that we have is working with the weaponization department of the Department of Justice. | ||
| And they had a pretty good plan as to how to have her moved from one situation to another. | ||
| And it ended up going to Todd Blanch, I understand. | ||
| And there it's at. | ||
| There, nothing happened. | ||
| He scuttled it. | ||
| I don't know why. | ||
| He just did. | ||
| So, I mean, this is something that Donald Trump has been very vocal about or very much in the news about. | ||
| You know, I tell you, we have a great president. | ||
| I mean, he sees it. | ||
| He sees the picture. | ||
| You call your show the war room or the, you know, and most people don't really get it. | ||
| They don't know that we're really at war. | ||
| But Donald Trump gets it. | ||
| You get it. | ||
| And what we had, by the way, the one thing she worked out, and what Todd Blanchard, I know there's something going on in Justice, and maybe that will become clear in the next week or so. | ||
| But the BOP, Bureau of Prisons and state prisons do swaps or reallocations of people, I think, all the time. | ||
| The Bureau of Prisons is always in conversations with states. | ||
| And I think you guys had an alternative that it was just going to be held in that regard, and she was going to get sent to a federal prison. | ||
| Yeah, Jared Polis, and the governors never get involved really in these things, in my understanding. | ||
| He stepped into the middle of it and said, no way. | ||
| Basically, Tina Peters is his hostage, right? | ||
| And he's going to hold her because he's going to run for president. | ||
| He's going to make a very big deal about us going after the stolen election of 2020. | ||
| He's on this new ad where he's running around with his buddy Cox in Utah, and they're trying to come up with a more sensitive way to discuss problems. | ||
| Does that make sense that he's out there as a spokesman for that when he is specifically the single biggest holdup for either the movement of Tina Peters to the federal prison system and/or the release of Tina Peters, who's in her 70s, has had some health issues, and is in a medium security prison in Colorado in general population, not even in an honor unit with all the danger that has. | ||
| And that Polis, who presents himself as just, you know, this wonderful guy that wants the country not to be at each other's throats, that he's personally the one that has deemed that she's going to be his hostage, sir? | ||
| No, I don't believe that. | ||
| I don't understand it to be the case. | ||
| And I've been very involved in the process. | ||
| It never got to the governor. | ||
| It never got to that point where he can say yes or no, or anybody ever brought it to him. | ||
| This was scuttled by my understanding is that after everything was set up and she could have been released on her birthday, she was 70, by the way, on September 11th, and she could have been transferred on her birthday. | ||
| Instead, she is still where she is. | ||
| And I don't think it had anything to do with the governor of the state of Colorado. | ||
| It could, you know, once he's given an opportunity, but that didn't happen yet. | ||
| But You're saying that the BOP didn't even gauge that the paperwork or whatever didn't even make it to Colorado for whatever reason, so the polis couldn't make that individual decision. | ||
| If that's the case, who's holding it up on our side? | ||
| Who's holding it up on our side? | ||
| Todd Blanch, the same guy that's holding up all the pardons, which we haven't had since May, a pardon granted. | ||
| The same guy that's holding up the J6 defendants are he's opposing them for getting any compensation at all. | ||
| So that's going to be gone if he's still in that seat. | ||
| This is what's going to happen. | ||
| He's interfered with our ability to get evidence in regard to the Dominion machines. | ||
| The man is an intelligent guy and he's an effective guy. | ||
| There's no question about that. | ||
| So I don't get it. | ||
| I don't understand. | ||
| It's not like I had a conversation with him and he told me that he decided not to do it. | ||
| But hang on for a second. | ||
| He's number one, the guy's, I know him pretty well. | ||
| He's the president's lawyer. | ||
| He did a magnificent job defending President Trump to even get us here. | ||
| He's kind of considered the workhorse inside of DOJ as what's called DAG, the Deputy Attorney General. | ||
| What is it about these topics that if you haven't had a conversation with him, the people who have had a conversation, why, since he's the, and he's touted as a guy, if Pam Bondi was to leave, he would be the next attorney general. | ||
| That's the level of confidence President Trump has in him. | ||
| Why has he been reticent or hesitant on the various issues you just brought up, including the one that's most important to us right now is Tina Peters? | ||
| I can only guess, but I just want to correct one thing first. | ||
| You're saying that Tina Peters is in minimum security. | ||
| That's not the case. | ||
| There's only two women's prisons, two women's prisons in Colorado. | ||
| I didn't say minimum. | ||
| I didn't say minimum. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| I didn't say minimum. | ||
| I said she was in a medium. | ||
| No, I said medium. | ||
| She's in with murderers. | ||
| Security prison is quite. | ||
| Yeah, she's in a medium prison. | ||
| It's very dangerous. | ||
| And she's in general population. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Which is dangerous. | ||
| She's got murderers. | ||
| She's got some of the monsters that they put in MAX in her prison that threaten her. | ||
| Every night she goes to sleep and she'll tell you this herself. | ||
| I know you're in contact with her. | ||
| And she thinks you're the best, by the way. | ||
| And she's Peter, she's in danger. | ||
| There's no doubt she's in danger. | ||
| I was in a low, and lows are dangerous in the federal system. | ||
| A medium, that is like gladiator school, right? | ||
| Tina Peters should not be, and she's in general population. | ||
| She's not even in an honor unit. | ||
| They are purposely exposing Tina Peters. | ||
| My belief, I'd like to hear from you. | ||
| I think they're purposely exposing her to danger, intimidation, and outright terrorism every day. | ||
| Yeah, that's what I was going to say. | ||
| Every night, when the lights are off and it's finally in the end of the day, she's surprised. | ||
| She told me she's surprised every single night that she managed to survive another day. | ||
| That's what she's in. | ||
| And you're so right, Steve. | ||
| I mean, I can't disagree with you because that's what they're doing to her. | ||
| She's a political prisoner in this war. | ||
| Here's what gold is. | ||
| Because why? | ||
| Because she preserved evidence. | ||
| She preserved the truth. | ||
| So the person who preserved the truth is in prison. | ||
| And the people who wanted to hide the truth install a program that would have wiped out the Dominion Machine memory for the entire 2020 election. | ||
| They're the ones that put her there. | ||
| And that's the way it is. | ||
| We're fighting a war here in the United States, and we've got to win it. | ||
| Peter, what galls me the most is there's a reception today for the Gold Star mothers, which they obviously deserve. | ||
| I mean, it ought to be more frequent, hosted by the First Lady and the President. | ||
| And Tina Peters is in a very dangerous situation in a prison as a political prisoner. | ||
| We got to bounce, but the Tina Peters Legal Defense Fund, you guys are going to need some money. | ||
| Where do people go if they're so inclined to find out more and to pitch in for Tina Peters' defense? | ||
| Because you guys are fighting on multiple fronts. | ||
| And you just talked about, I know Pat McSweeney since I was a little boy. | ||
| His mom was my mom's best friend, and he's one of the smartest lawyers in the country. | ||
| But you've got a top-flight team. | ||
| They got to be paid. | ||
| So where do people go to pitch in? | ||
| Well, there's two places: the Tina Peters fund that you mentioned, and also which has different options on it, or the American Rights Alliance, A-R-A, AmericanRightsAlliance.com. | ||
| That would be the first thing. | ||
| American Rights Alliance or the Tina Peters Legal Defense Fund. | ||
| We'll get them both up. | ||
| People, you go check them out. | ||
| But Tina Peters needs some backup. | ||
| And I got to tell you, in a prison, particularly in the prison she's in every day of her life, she's in jeopardy. | ||
| She's a political prisoner, and they're trying to break her. | ||
| Now, you can't break Tina Peters because she's unbreakable. | ||
| She's one of the most amazing women I've ever met. | ||
| She's an American hero. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| American hero. | ||
| Peter, so are you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you so much for coming on. | ||
| We look forward to working with you to get this mess sorted. | ||
| And it is a mess. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Once again, Peter, Tina Peters, there's a reception at the White House for the Gold Star Mothers, which they so richly deserve. | ||
| Like I say, in the Roman Republic, it's kind of the equivalent of the Vestal Virgins or in Athens, kind of the equivalent of the soothsayers, the visionaries with the Oracle of Delphi. | ||
| That's the Gold Star Mothers. | ||
| And Tina Peters rots in a prison. | ||
| It's absolutely disgusting and revolting. | ||
| Ube Shandahar, give me your perspective, sir. | ||
| You've done such a great job for us for breaking down a very, not just contentious, but confusing part of the world. | ||
| Walk us through what happened today in the White House and kind of which, as you've been briefing me, the vast support this has from the nations, the Arab nations and the nations of the Middle East, because I say, hey, Israel is kind of given a take or leave it. | ||
| They weren't really included in the negotiations here. | ||
| So what is the 20-point plan? | ||
| How meaningful is it, sir? | ||
| Well, what we saw in the White House today is really textbook statementship by President Trump. | ||
| And it could very well be a historic day for peace, not just to end the war in Gaza, but to set the foundation for what could be a wider peace, a wider picture of peace in the Middle East and the expansion of the Abraham Accords. | ||
| First thing, first, we've seen an unprecedented Joint press release from countries across the Arab and Muslim world that was just released from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Qatar, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, all thanking President Trump for his leadership and for his sincere efforts to try to bring this horrific war in Gaza to an end to end the fighting, | ||
| to return the hostages. | ||
| We haven't seen anything like that before. | ||
| And we heard President Trump, the first thing that he talked about when he got up there with Bibi Netanyahu in front of the press was talking about how his meetings, President Trump's meetings in New York in the preceding weeks with members, | ||
| with the leaders of the Muslim and Arab world really was the turning point that led to this agreement and led to this joint announcement by President Trump and Bibi Netanyahu for a historic peace deal that's now on the table for Hamas, the whole world waiting for Hamas to sign that deal. | ||
| Why it was so important for President Trump to get the buy-in of these countries is because they're the mediators. | ||
| They're the ones that you need to put the pressure on Hamas. | ||
| That's why President Trump sat down there with Bibi Netanyahu watching as he called the prime minister of Qatar, you know, Muhammad Al-Thani, and had Bibi essentially apologize to the prime minister of Qatar for launching that airstrike, attempting to kill the Hamas negotiators, ended up killing a Qatari national. | ||
| So President Trump essentially pressuring Bibi Netanyahu to apologize to Qatar for violating their national sovereignty and for killing a Qatari national. | ||
| That airstrike, by the way, failed to kill the Hamas negotiating team. | ||
| That was also a turning point because then that united the whole Arab world and key Muslim countries who for the first time got together and were able to agree on something and told President Trump, hey, we need to end this war. | ||
| And so now President Trump is able to unite those countries. | ||
| He praised the leadership of Indonesia, of the king of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the Crown Prince, and the Emir of Qatar and the President Sisi of Egypt. | ||
| And this is something we haven't seen a president do before, bring the Arab and Muslim world together and then to bring the prime minister of Israel to agree to a plan that this whole region wants in place to end the fighting and could then perhaps expand the Abraham Accords. | ||
| A couple of key points to this agreement that President Trump has negotiated for our viewers here. | ||
| One, it immediately returns the hostages, both the ones that remain alive and the bodies of the deceased back to their families. | ||
| It immediately ends the fighting and it sets a timetable for eventual Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. | ||
| A key point that those Arab and Muslim countries who had been meeting with President Trump that was included in the deal is that it does not allow Israel to annex Gaza or annex the Palestinian territories in the West Bank. | ||
| That was a key concession. | ||
| And even though there's no discussion explicitly of a two-state solution in this 20-point plan, it does set a framework for eventual reform of the Palestinian Authority, which even the Arab and Muslim countries believe is corrupt. | ||
| That could then lead to negotiations with Israel. | ||
| So President Trump has put himself as chairman of what he calls. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's supported pieces. | ||
| If they put this money in, I keep telling you guys, because I'm not a two-state solution guy. | ||
| I've always been the one state. | ||
| You can't have a two-state. | ||
| Right now, you've worked your way because back in Netanyahu, this is a framework for a two-state solution. | ||
| If they put the money in to do the stop the war, clean up the mess, redevelop it to the degree they want, that's going to be the foundation of the Palestinian state. | ||
| One last thing you brought up, which I think is very important. | ||
| When President Trump talked about the Abraham Accords, he's the one that mentioned including the Persians, get the Persians to sign up. | ||
| This has been something that really came out of the Gulf Emirates, who, as you know, are not friendly to the Persians. | ||
| He's saying the Abraham Accords, he wants to include Iran to actually sign it. | ||
| That puts to bed further potential regime change. | ||
| I mean, the Europeans have done the snapback right now, the economic sanctions. | ||
| I'm a huge supporter of cutting off the Chinese Community Party cash for oil that keeps the Mulas alive. | ||
| So maybe President Trump sees a way there to handle that without getting back to a kinetic side. | ||
| We got to bounce. | ||
| Where do people? | ||
| I want to have you back on it. | ||
| We're going to break this down further because right now there's 72 hours, and you're absolutely correct. | ||
| President Trump United, they put out this joint press release. | ||
| They've never done that in their life. | ||
| They're basically telling Hamas the game is up. | ||
| We're not going to finance it. | ||
| We're not going to do anything. | ||
| You've got to lessen up. | ||
| You got Trump. | ||
| You're only going to have Trump once, right? | ||
| So you got to do this. | ||
| But they got 72 hours. | ||
| And Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, has an amazing track record of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory all the time. | ||
| So don't put it past them that they could botch at. | ||
| And plus, the right wing that's seething about the West Bank, hey, they're going to try to do everything to scuttle the steel, too. | ||
| So there's so many movies. | ||
| No pieces. | ||
| Ube will have you back on. | ||
| What's your social media? | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
| I'm exclusively on Axe Formerly Twitter, OWASP26. | ||
| Trump will fix it. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Government shutdown. | ||
| Peace. | ||
| He called it eternal peace. | ||
| God bless him. | ||
| Did you see the effort he's putting in? | ||
| And tomorrow, every general and admiral, all of them, show up at Quantico. | ||
| Pete Hexeth is going to give him a talk about the warrior ethos. | ||
| And I think the commander-in-chief might have a couple of three things to say. | ||
| I'm just guessing here, right? | ||
| We're going to cover it all. | ||
| We'll see you back here at 10 a.m. Eastern Time, Eastern Daylight Time tomorrow morning. | ||
| We will be back in the war room. | ||
| Want to thank the sponsors, particularly Home Title Lock, Home Title Lock, Steve 60. | ||
| He still has a couple of days to enjoy one buck for 60 days of, how do I say this? | ||
| Buddhistic calm, but nobody's in your title. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| See you back here tomorrow morning, |
Export Selection