Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
Here's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you're trying to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
MAGA Media. | ||
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vannis. | |
you you Okay, we're going to go to a live shot right there. | ||
That's called Action, Action, Action, folks. | ||
If you just listen to the audio of the podcast, what we're watching right now is, I guess, a bulldozer or an earth mover or a device that is moving things in Washington, D.C. Okay, you got a little ambient noise right there. | ||
The homeless encampments are coming down. | ||
President Trump is serious about this. | ||
He's going to take the homeless encampments down. | ||
He's flooded the zone with troops and also Park Rangers and others, Border Patrol. | ||
Judge Denine actually indicted a guy yesterday. | ||
He's in the process of a dying guy for a felony for throwing a sub-sandwich at a customs and border guy and calling him a fascist ripe in his face. | ||
President Trump said, no more spitting on him. | ||
Those days are over. | ||
President Trump's finished playing games. | ||
He's going to clean out Washington, D.C., and then he's going to get the graffiti off the buildings and the monuments. | ||
And people spraying monuments. | ||
Like he said, he went back. | ||
There's a 200-year-old law. | ||
It's 10 years in prison. | ||
He's had enough of it. | ||
Washington, D.C., and anybody will tell you this, progressive Democrats are right. | ||
It's a hellhole. | ||
It's become a hellhole. | ||
So the Democrats can argue on the marginal statistics. | ||
Argue your statistics all day long. | ||
Right there, it's coming down. | ||
This is action. | ||
Same action you got to take at these institutions. | ||
You have to go in, field strip them, purge them of all the bad actors, and then rebuild them, rejuvenate them, etc. | ||
We're going to have more about this. | ||
I got Wade Miller coming up. | ||
Alex Swarier. | ||
She's got the new book out also with the Washington Times. | ||
We're talking about major court decisions, everything going on. | ||
The Nixon film about the deep state taking down Nixon, and that's what they're trying to do to Trump. | ||
I think we have, I don't know, 25,000 downloads already, some amazing amount. | ||
We'll get to all that. | ||
Natalie Dominguez, I want to make sure we need people. | ||
And so a little bit later, Gavin Newsom is going to announce he's coming in because Texas was so slow and Texas was slow, not because of the war impossibility, because of Abbott and the Speaker of the House and Lieutenant Governor Patrick, just sleep at the switch, didn't want to do it. | ||
Now you're going to have Newsom coming in. | ||
He's running for president. | ||
He's going to top Pritzker. | ||
He's saying, hey, I'm going to take care of it all in California. | ||
We're going to redistrict the whole state and I'm going to have enough to stop Trump in 2026 and impeach him. | ||
Right? | ||
That's what they're talking about. | ||
Just understand that this is political warfare at its highest. | ||
And it's time now people got focused. | ||
So the second hour of the show is huge. | ||
Natalie Dominguez, I have heard such amazing feedback from folks on the $1 million triple lock protection of Home Title Lock. | ||
And the reason is we've tasked for us. | ||
They're working so hard, even in the big vacation month of August, making calls, sending text messages, getting people focused down in Texas. | ||
And we're soon to do Ohio and Indiana. | ||
I think Indiana, we're going to kick off this afternoon, Indiana, Florida, all of it. | ||
We can't have somebody lose control of their title and have some hard money lender get it, take out a big second, and then they've got to pay it off because your whole life will be revolving around getting your title back. | ||
And that's the opportunity costs we're trying to stop. | ||
Talk to us about how home Title Lock can help people preserve their title because I think a lot of people don't realize, hey, this rudimentary system we have throughout the country of monitoring it and holding your title is about as rudimentary as you can get in the age of cyber warfare and artificial intelligence, Ma'am. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
So, we actually have a perfect example of that for you today. | ||
A new report came in recently about a couple from Georgia, James and Lucretia Klucken, who discovered that someone forged James's signature against their family home, illegally transferring ownership without their consent. | ||
Their nightmare began in 2019 when they started receiving letters about a $50,000 reverse mortgage debt tied to the home that had been in their family for generations. | ||
So, just like you were saying, Steve, that's exactly what happened. | ||
The forged deed was dated September 3rd, 2017, which is two years before they found out anything about it, right? | ||
And it was allegedly notarized by an attorney who later in court actually avoided giving sworn testimony, which is a lot suspicious, in my opinion. | ||
The couple immediately filed a complaint with the Walton County Sheriff's Office. | ||
However, investigators ultimately deemed the situation a civil matter, not criminal, which, again, hear all the time, right? | ||
Eventually, and unfortunately, the fraudulent transfer led to a foreclosure, followed by the home being sold at auction to a company called Maverick Land Company LLC, who bought the home despite being warned that the mortgage documents were fraudulent. | ||
They later offered the Cluckens $300,000 to settle. | ||
It was sold for $500,000, which they refused because they just wanted their house back. | ||
And the Cluckens then had to have to file a civil lawsuit to try and undo the sale and reclaim their home. | ||
Keep in mind, they found out about this in 2019. | ||
It's 2025 and they're still trying to get their house back. | ||
Lucretia actually appeared on another Real America's Voice show just a couple of days ago, talking about their devastating experience that her and her husband have been through and is really urging people to just get protected. | ||
And Steve, I see this stuff all the time, right? | ||
My job is to watch the news, keep updated, have stories for you guys, and show how real it is. | ||
But don't bury the lead. | ||
I want everybody in this audience to understand something. | ||
Here's the buried lead: there are institutions out there that will look and say, you know what? | ||
I think these guys might have gun-decked the title. | ||
They might have stolen the title. | ||
However, for the price I can get it for, that arbitrage, the original owners will give up, right? | ||
It's just too tough. | ||
It's too expensive. | ||
They'll give up. | ||
And so for the 500 versus the 300,000, that 200,000 is value they're going to create. | ||
Create, you know, they'll, they'll, it'll accrete to them. | ||
And they'll just sit there and go, the owners. | ||
So you have financial institutions now are sitting there going, you know, this thing may be a little gamey and these guys may be a little gamey, but I can go in and do it. | ||
I at least got ownership, you know, possession is nine-tenths of the law, and I'll just browbeat the original owners and they'll settle for something less and I'll take the difference. | ||
This is this is why you need you need the free checking right now. | ||
The triple lock protection, the 24-7 coverage, they let you know in the middle of the night if something's up, if somebody's messing with your title, and you got the $1 million restoration project. | ||
That's why people need to go today because I think you give them a free assessment. | ||
Folks don't understand. | ||
This thing is so sophisticated between cyber, between rogue accountants, rogue lawyers, the collapse of values in our culture and the institutions. | ||
I talk about institutional rot all day in the show. | ||
Institutions sitting there going, hey, I think we can make some money. | ||
This title may not be 100% correct, but the original owners will just give up because they don't have the resources to continue on. | ||
Is that essentially it in a nutshell, Natalie? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
And I mean, this family has been doing this for six, seven years. | ||
They have a GoFundMe to pay for some of their legal fees. | ||
And if you think about it and what this costs, you can pay for our service for your home for 30 years and still not be paying the amount that you would have just as a retainer fee for an attorney to help you litigate this. | ||
And that's if it goes through relatively quickly. | ||
We have a team of legal experts throughout the United States so that you don't have to do this and it's no out-of-pocket cost to you. | ||
We cover you, we walk you through everything and we get everything reversed. | ||
So we fight for you so you don't have to fight for yourself and be bulldozed by giant companies that have way more resources than you. | ||
This is what I keep telling you: if you don't want to spend years of this arcane thing that just torture yourself and worry and everything like that, when you've got so much in your personal life, plus you've dedicated yourself to save your country. | ||
That's why go check out Home Title like that's where we're so proud they're a sponsor. | ||
Where did they go to check out the triple lock protection, ma'am? | ||
Hometied lock.com, hometitolock.com, promo code Steve, or give us a call. | ||
The numbers on the website or on Google. | ||
Talk to any members of our team and they can answer any questions that you have. | ||
We have a really great team here. | ||
We really care about people and we want to make sure that you guys are protected and really set up for success so that while you're fighting other battles, this is one less thing that you have to worry about. | ||
So, hometitalock.com, promo code Steve. | ||
Get your free trial, get your free title report, make sure that you're not already a victim. | ||
Thank you, man. | ||
Appreciate you. | ||
Appreciate the company, what you guys are doing. | ||
Thank you. | ||
You got enough to worry about. | ||
You got enough anxiety. | ||
You got enough worry. | ||
Don't take this one off the plate. | ||
Go talk to these folks. | ||
They'll make the case. | ||
And some of the stories are nightmares. | ||
I got the great Wade Miller. | ||
I want to play a short intro to him, and then we're going to bring it away. | ||
This one, he's making more radical changes to the country and to the White House that'll live well beyond his presidency. | ||
And I think part of it is because he now knows how government works. | ||
I think one of the things that really is the key difference between the first term and the second term is that he had a whole host of characters in the government that were trying to stymie his efforts to radically change the country. | ||
He's now surrounded by people that are fully supportive of his agenda and helping him do it. | ||
He is way more effective at accomplishing his agenda with having that time out of office because those a lot of his aides, Russ Vogue, those sorts of officials spent their time out of government planning for this term. | ||
And so what they've done is an onslaught of executive orders in the first six months that accomplished a lot of their goals very quickly because he knew what they wanted to do. | ||
We planned for this for years. | ||
This was the whole reason that CRA, Center for Renewing America, was established. | ||
Wade Miller, you're holding the fort down now. | ||
Some of your guys are in the government, but you guys still got a great team. | ||
I want to talk. | ||
We're talking about institutions this morning, seasoned institutions. | ||
One of the most important things to do, and we also tied to this massive redistricting battle we're going to have. | ||
We're going to get to that a little later in the show, including Newsom. | ||
He wasn't just going to sit there with the feckless nature of the Texas governor and lieutenant governor, Speaker of the House, right? | ||
Didn't get it done the regular session, didn't get it done in the first special session. | ||
They think this is a badge of honor. | ||
You're just going to do nine special sessions and eventually they'll give up. | ||
You got to take bold action and get it done at the beginning. | ||
This is the way you shut down the Gavin Newsoms in the world. | ||
But key to this, Wade, is the census. | ||
Am I getting a sense? | ||
Because I fought Commerce. | ||
It was Stephen Miller and myself that had, at the time that President Trump backed us, had not counting illegal aliens in the first term. | ||
Also, all the madness they do over there just at the census is not right. | ||
And Wilbur Ross and others just got around it and said, at the end of the day, we counted them. | ||
That can't happen this time. | ||
But there's more fundamental problems than that over at Commerce with the census. | ||
So what are we going to do about it, Wade Miller? | ||
Well, there needs to be a new team that comes in at the bureaucratic level. | ||
We've got a lot of Obama-era holdovers. | ||
I don't have any confidence that they have the best intentions for President Trump's agenda in mind. | ||
So I think, one, we need a whole new team at the top brought in at the bureaucratic level, not just the political level. | ||
People who understand how the census process works, are supporters of President Trump and his agenda, and then will faithfully execute a republishing of the 2020 data. | ||
But you're right. | ||
I think that the Trump administration started to figure this out in the first term. | ||
They tried to attempt to fix this. | ||
I think they ran out of runway. | ||
There were some APA pushback, Administrative Procedures Act legal challenges. | ||
They've got plenty of runway now. | ||
So I think it's, but this is a key point. | ||
It's not just about asking the citizenship question. | ||
If you only do that, the census bureaucracy, and there's only a handful of them that have special clearance to the actual raw data, what's known as a tiger file. | ||
But outside of that, what they do is they run a differential privacy algorithm. | ||
And we don't have access to it. | ||
It's not publicly sourced. | ||
Other federal agencies don't have access to it. | ||
So even if the administration asks the citizenship question, these Obama era and before that bureaucrats could use the algorithm to manipulate the data and scramble it in a Way that we don't actually get as much effective use out of it. | ||
So imagine this. | ||
Let's say we know the number of illegals. | ||
That can feed into the apportionment conversation. | ||
But if we don't know where they're at in a state, that makes the redistricting part of this difficult and it plays into the hands of the left because that will concentrate power towards the cities. | ||
They use the population of the cities to then reduce the political power of rural red areas. | ||
And they'll do that all over the country. | ||
But if we want to counter Gavin Newsom, I think that the priority has to be a massive amount of census reform, republish the 2020 data, basically mandate that these states use that data. | ||
And then Gavin Newsom, it's going to be hard for him to do what he wants to do to basically try to undo the Trump presidency. | ||
Hang on for a second. | ||
Wade Miller's going to stick with me. | ||
We're going to go through this one more time. | ||
This is E.J. Antonio at Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wade Miller and the team getting into commerce, getting rid of these Obama appointees, plus some of these administrative state types. | ||
When you seize the institutions, let's seize them. | ||
This is what the left did. | ||
This is why the country is in such a bad shape. | ||
This is why the Republican Party for years has been the controlled opposition. | ||
This rot in our institution, you think it just occurred overnight? | ||
Decade after decade after decade, tapping it along. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
The Center for Renewing America. | ||
Kill America's Voice, family. | ||
Are you on Getter yet? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
What are you waiting for? | ||
It's free. | ||
unidentified
|
It's uncensored, and it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | |
Download the Getter app right now. | ||
It's totally free. | ||
unidentified
|
It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | |
You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
Go to Getter. | ||
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
Steve Bannon, Charlie Hurt, Jack the Soviet, and so many more. | ||
Download the Getter app now. | ||
unidentified
|
Sign up for free and be part of the Newport. | |
Okay, Wade Miller joins us. | ||
This is about seizing the institutions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and they're in full meltdown. | ||
Every show has a segment on our own E.J. Antony. | ||
Right now, NBC News got him in the crowd at January 6th, so it was terrible. | ||
He's just kind of walking by like many people were. | ||
I think it makes him even more based. | ||
I like him even more now. | ||
This is why, let's just go to recess appointments. | ||
Let's get thuning these guys on top of this. | ||
It's urgent. | ||
Every day is like a month. | ||
Every month is like a year. | ||
We don't have that much time, and they know that. | ||
That's why they're putting up all these blocks. | ||
Alex Swarier is going to be on in a minute. | ||
Talk about the courts. | ||
This is why they're fighting us in the courts because to delay is to deny. | ||
The way you get around delays is you hit it 24-7, like Trump is. | ||
You see his schedule tomorrow in the Alaska thing. | ||
It's insane. | ||
It's a one-day trip. | ||
That's Trump. | ||
Not going to take two days. | ||
Not going to go out the night before or stick around and come back the next day. | ||
No, one day. | ||
Fly out early in the morning. | ||
I don't know. | ||
Eight-hour flight with those headwinds. | ||
Let's have a six or eight-hour meeting with Putin, right? | ||
Norapprochement, and let's fly back. | ||
And with the tailwinds, I don't know. | ||
It's six back. | ||
That's a long day. | ||
That's a guy that's putting in, he's putting in seven days a week. | ||
Everybody ought to be working at that intensity. | ||
Working at that intensity. | ||
Wade, tell me, explain this, Saudi. | ||
First off, Howard Luttnick, note to self, the Census Bureau, clean them out this afternoon. | ||
Get rid of all the Obama guys, get rid of all the Bush-era guys, any Biden people, get rid of them. | ||
There are plenty of great statistical geniuses in the MAGA movement. | ||
Get rid of these people. | ||
Get ready to do a census. | ||
Now, what are you talking about sharing the 2020 data, even with the illegal aliens? | ||
Why do you think that would be that we could use that to thwart what Gavin Newsom is trying to do right now, sir? | ||
Yeah, so if you republish the 2020 data, account for the miscounts, the overcounts, the undercounts, which, by the way, like across the board helped the left in 2020. | ||
The Census Bureau admitted that they got it really wrong. | ||
It was the worst census in our lifetimes, I believe. | ||
The 1990 one was not great either, but this one, I think, by far outstrips it. | ||
In 2010, they were off by 36,000. | ||
In 2020, in Texas alone, they were off by 560,000. | ||
So it was just a terribly run census. | ||
And if you account for all of those corrections, if you account for swings and voter tendencies, especially amongst Hispanics, if you account for the illegal population, and then you republish those maps and then mandate a reapportionment, that will then bleed into redistricting. | ||
If you know where the illegal populations are and you don't count the illegal populations for the purposes of redistricting, it pushes political power into rural red areas because the vast majority of these illegal populations, especially in blue states, are in major cities or suburbs of major cities. | ||
So it makes it harder for Gavin Newsom and the left to write these maps because the population, the weighted population, moves out from the cities slightly, or significantly in the case of California. | ||
So it's just harder for them to write a map that accounts for all of that that benefits them. | ||
It's a much harder road for them to do that. | ||
And if they republish the census and then mandate reapportionment, it takes the ball out of Gavin Newsom's hand. | ||
And he's sure, you can go ahead and redistrict, but good luck doing that. | ||
They might actually end up with fewer Democrat seats if you republish the 2020 census and they still try to redistrict. | ||
Miller's all over this. | ||
Stephen Miller, he's one of the brightest guys that we got. | ||
He's all over this. | ||
How do we get Lutnick? | ||
Congress has got to take some action here. | ||
I mean, like action today, today. | ||
It's taken way too long. | ||
It's too sluggish. | ||
Step one, fire the Obama guys. | ||
Just walk them out of the building today. | ||
Let them take their plants, let them clean at their desk, go today. | ||
Then what do we do? | ||
What's the next step we need to do, Wade? | ||
Well, we've got to get spun up and educated on differential privacy as it pertains to the census. | ||
If you look that up, most of the references you'll see will be with regard to social media companies. | ||
Disregard that. | ||
It's a different application. | ||
Basically, it just scrambles the data. | ||
And I don't fault political appointees and cabinet heads of not understanding this is a very technical thing. | ||
And we, as a movement, really haven't dug into this in a long time. | ||
But now that we know, I think, one, get educated on it. | ||
And then, two, we've got to account for. | ||
We have to not scramble the data with regard to population and with regard to illegal aliens. | ||
We have to know where they're at, and we have to know exactly where they're at to account for that in redistricting. | ||
We're going to get the whole movement's going to get deep in this like we're doing at BLS with EJ and Tony. | ||
I need to shift topics because I can't scream at Russ because Russ is not here. | ||
You are. | ||
You guys are the railhead of rescissions, pocket rescuions, impoundment. | ||
Where are we? | ||
You just had the inflation print today. | ||
We need to cut spending. | ||
President Trump promised we're going to have rescissions, pocket rescissions, impoundments. | ||
I don't really care how you do it. | ||
Just we got to do it because they're coming. | ||
You know this, Wade. | ||
They're coming with an omnibus. | ||
They're up there right now. | ||
Those staffs are up there working in the Senate. | ||
They're going to come with an omnibus. | ||
We got to cut them off at the pass. | ||
One way to cut them off of the pass is to start talking rescissions. | ||
Where do you think we stand, sir? | ||
I think there's still a good chance we'll see something. | ||
I think you've highlighted one of the major hurdles, which is that some senators, a few of them, really don't like the process. | ||
In fact, they, I think, unconstitutionally took away impoundment power. | ||
And now that they have this rescissions process, they don't even like that. | ||
And they don't like not having ball control when it comes to spending. | ||
And I think that if you look at it historically, the moment that the president lost the ability to look at the appropriations as a ceiling and not a floor and make rational decisions on cutting, things have gone awry. | ||
And so I think we will still see it. | ||
I think that there's a lot of pushback from the bureaucracy on these cuts and they're putting a lot of scare tactics. | ||
You know, if you do this, it's going to take out this important thing. | ||
And, you know, we really need that. | ||
And it's hard for the political teams to understand that. | ||
But I think that there's now a calculus of where are we at on rescissions, pocket rescissions, and then what is the conversation on the second reconciliation bill. | ||
And I don't know what the White House is going to ultimately do on that. | ||
Okay, War Room Posse, take your number two purnal out and write this one down. | ||
This is a phrase that sends chills down my spine. | ||
Bipartisan appropriations process. | ||
I notice Russ, every time he's on TV, mentions that he's got like a tweak, right? | ||
It's a reaction. | ||
Bipartisan appropriations process. | ||
There should be nothing bipartisan about this. | ||
This is where we're headed. | ||
This means they're going to jam us in the third week of September. | ||
They're going to jam us with a, they'll call it an omnibus, a minibus, whatever. | ||
They're going to jam us. | ||
If you want to keep Trump's government open, this is what you got to suck on. | ||
We got to get ahead of that. | ||
Wade, you're doing amazing work. | ||
This thing on the census, you're on top of, and we got to get the word over to Howard Luttnick and the team at Commerce. | ||
Get to work today. | ||
Start step one, fire some folks. | ||
Get them all out of there. | ||
Get the bureaucrats. | ||
Get the Obama guys, the Biden guys, and the Bush guys, get them out. | ||
And then we can restock. | ||
Wade, where are the people go to get to CRA and how do they get to your personal Twitter account, sir? | ||
Yeah, we're at Americarenewing.com. | ||
That's the Center for Renewing America, Americarenewing.com. | ||
And then my personal ex-handle is Wade Miller underscore USMC. | ||
Wade, doing a great job holding the fort down there. | ||
You guys are amazing. | ||
CRA, one of the great institutions. | ||
Did I talk about seasoning institutions? | ||
These guys created all these institutions in the interregnum, those four years. | ||
All these popped up, led by great people. | ||
And that is what's informing the second Trump term. | ||
Alex Swarier joins us now, the author of Lawless Lawfare about how to use the legal system to take down President Trump and the MAGA movement. | ||
Alex, you got to help me out here, ma'am. | ||
I thought that gay marriage, as much as some of the audience may not like it, I thought it was what we call settled law. | ||
Right? | ||
When the Supreme Court justice got picked up, when the Supreme Court justice got picked up, it wasn't even a discussion because gay marriage, sacrosanct gay marriage, is settled law. | ||
Now I understand that they're going to actually hear a case in this session that could blow up gay marriage. | ||
Am I correct in this? | ||
They have been asked to hear the case. | ||
It's blown up all over social media after mainstream media picked up the petition. | ||
I actually reported on it about three, four weeks ago when it first got to the court. | ||
So if your listeners remember, it was 2015 when the Supreme Court issued the Obergefell ruling, basically upholding same-sex marriage. | ||
There was a Kentucky County clerk, Kim Davis, who basically became, I guess, the face of the pushback movement. | ||
And she refused on religious grounds to sign off on same-sex marriage licenses. | ||
She ended up doing six days in jail, and the state ended up passing a basically religious exemption, letting other people sign off on these marriage licenses when someone has a religious objection to it. | ||
So long story short, there was a gay couple who sued. | ||
They sued her personally and said, no, no, we want her signature on our marriage license. | ||
So a lower court actually cited for them on emotional distress. | ||
And Kim Davis has now, you know, like a decade since the Supreme Court upheld gay marriage, taken this issue to the Supreme Court. | ||
The two questions she's asked the justices to hear is one, can she dismiss this couple hundred thousand dollars that she's been fined for refusing to sign this one marriage license for this gay couple on the grounds that she's immune as a government official? | ||
And then two, will they overturn their Obergefell ruling? | ||
There are still three justices on the court who dissented in that case. | ||
So there might be at least three votes to take this up. | ||
The question is, is if there's another one, because it takes four justices to vote to actually schedule oral arguments. | ||
Oh, my Lord. | ||
Lord, do we remember this at Brighton? | ||
Pretty wild. | ||
This thing 10 years, 10 years ago, 10 years ago, this was big, big. | ||
It's ironic. | ||
Alex, you're going to stick with me through the break. | ||
Also, Jeff Shepard and Michael Patrick Leahy, guess what? | ||
The deep state film on Nixon is a hit and a big hit. | ||
We'll tell you why. | ||
Swarrier. | ||
So they try to be wise guys and force her to sign it because they had to have the Christians sign it. | ||
They had to rub her nose in it. | ||
unidentified
|
Looks like it came back to haunt them. | |
Looks like it came back to haunt them. | ||
Alex Swarier, next in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Alex Swarier, next in the War Room. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bass. | ||
Okay, we're jammed. | ||
We got a lot to get through and not a lot of time. | ||
We're going to be back live five to seven tonight. | ||
So much going on. | ||
We're going to go through a whole breakdown of not just President Trump's schedule, which is brutal tomorrow. | ||
It's a one-day trip, but also the stakes involved, the rapprochement, the games the Europeans and Zelensky are trying to play already. | ||
I hope Scott Besson's on that plane. | ||
Like I've been saying, this is primarily more of an economic deal than even, and Marco Ruby is doing a great job, but if you had to pick state or treasury, I'd realize state is important in this, obviously, in defense. | ||
But Putin's bringing his finance ministers, I said, called shot. | ||
They're looking at this through the economics of it, which are only massive, particularly when we talk about the secondary sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party on their Earl. | ||
You take the Earl, the oil gas that they're buying, you put secondary sanctions on that. | ||
That is a shot across the battle, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Let's go back to Alex Sorry. | ||
So, Swarier, are you telling me, and by the way, this is what's so ironic about it, because they try to be cute and go back and force the Christian to sign the gay marriage document. | ||
Let's rub their nose in this. | ||
They try to be cute. | ||
They tell you, you know, we're winning. | ||
Let's go back and force the Christian to sign. | ||
We only want it. | ||
If the Christian signs the document, she got to sign it. | ||
That's what an opening. | ||
Are you telling me that as gutless as Roberts is, that they want to redress? | ||
I mean, Lord, they almost burned DC down with the abortion ruling. | ||
You're telling me, because they're just getting worked up on MSNBC. | ||
This kind of came out yesterday, kind of with your reporting and others, kindly finally, they're figuring it out. | ||
They'll go nuts if you reverse gay marriage, ma'am. | ||
Oh, yeah, you're right. | ||
And so basically, Kim Davis, the clerk, has asked, can the Supreme Court take up her issue over immunity that she should not have been sued by this gay couple because she's a government official. | ||
And you're right, they could have bit off here more than they could chew trying to go after her in that respect. | ||
So the justices could just take that issue up and not go ahead and go all the way where she's asked the second issue of, will you overturn Obergefell, the same-sex ruling where you upheld same-sex marriage? | ||
There, like I said before, are three justices still on the court that dissented in that ruling. | ||
One is Chief Justice Roberts. | ||
I have covered the court since 2017, and I would be shocked if he's ready to go and do same-sex marriage and overturn that right after they just did abortion a couple years ago. | ||
It's the same legal principle, substantive due process. | ||
A lot of conservative lawyers say this reads rights into the Constitution that aren't there, like abortion, same-sex marriage. | ||
So we'll see. | ||
It's yet to be determined if they're going to take this up. | ||
And conservatives are going through and trying to, they're doing what they should do. | ||
These conservative lawyers going through and trying to take the underpaintings this up. | ||
Real quickly, two things. | ||
Los Angeles, can the president of the United States not get to, there's two million illegal aliens in Los Angeles County, ma'am. | ||
How the courts holding this up on this one? | ||
One in 10 people, Bannon. | ||
So basically what happened was there's been immigrant right groups that have sued the Trump administration, representing anonymous illegal aliens that say that they've been improperly detained or contesting the way that ICE is doing its sweeps. | ||
So basically the Trump administration has had to go to the Supreme Court and say, please lift this injunction on ICE so they can go back and start doing their sweeps. | ||
What the problem was, according to these illegal alien groups, is that ICE is targeting workplaces like construction companies, landscape companies, car washes, if you will, that have had past citations for employment issues of illegals. | ||
And they're going in there and they're looking and seeing, you know, who's speaking Spanish, that sort of thing. | ||
And the administration says this is a reasonable standard, right? | ||
A reasonableness standard, more likely than not, kind of like a look at the workplace, the past violations, who's speaking Spanish, race, all this stuff. | ||
Well, the immigrant right groups are saying this is discriminatory. | ||
They can't do that. | ||
The judge actually sided with the groups and said, yes, this is too broad of a sweep the way ICE is doing this. | ||
And so they blocked the ICE from going ahead and doing their work that they've been doing over in the Central District of California. | ||
And as you mentioned, it's one in 10 people there are illegal. | ||
Unbelievable. | ||
We've got to give them up. | ||
We did have a victory, though. | ||
Talk about real quickly, the appellate court on foreign aid backed President Trump, his Article II powers, right? | ||
So this was a legal fight going on since February, basically over the president's attempt to freeze about $2 billion of foreign aid. | ||
Some AIDS group had sued and said, no, no, you know, you need to pay us out. | ||
We're going to go under without this money. | ||
Initially, Roberts and Barrett sided with the liberal justices on the court and said, no, the administration does have to go ahead and start paying at least the contracts that have already been fulfilled. | ||
But now on the merits of this whole issue, not necessarily the constitutionality of freezing aid, but the issue of can these groups sue the president's administration to block his decision to stop spending here, the $2 billion. | ||
The panel did rule and side for the president. | ||
So it's a big win. | ||
And I have to note that it was two GOP appointees that upheld the president's right to block these on the basis that these groups couldn't sue, that only the government accountability office has legal standing, meaning injury, after Congress approved these funds to bring the lawsuit. | ||
So there wasn't really a decision on how to freeze this. | ||
It was, you can't sue us. | ||
It has to be someone else. | ||
Sorry, where do people go to get the book and where do they go to social media to get all your writings? | ||
Your legal writings are amazing. | ||
Your analysis, where do people go? | ||
Thank you. | ||
Yeah, people can go get Lawless Lawfare on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Target, and they can follow me at Acewawyer on X. And then some of my reports for the Washington Times, as well as some of these lower court issues that you've brought up, are at theWashingtontimes.com. | ||
Thank you, ma'am. | ||
Appreciate you. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Do we have the short trailer? | ||
I'll call for gets ready. | ||
Hang over a second. | ||
Let me bring in Michael Patrick Leahy, Jeff Shepard. | ||
So we have a hit on our hands. | ||
Over 20,000 downloads. | ||
And you can download this film. | ||
You can download. | ||
Hang on one second. | ||
You can download this film by going to warroom.film. | ||
It's totally free. | ||
You just got to put in your email. | ||
Over 20,000, I think it's 20,400. | ||
So it's a pretty massive hit. | ||
And the feedback I've got is so powerful that we're setting up now. | ||
I think we set up starting last night to follow up on the email and have people write reviews because my phone's been blown up. | ||
Jeff Shepard, is this not the culmination? | ||
It's only a marker because you're going to continue on. | ||
But did you ever think you'd have a hit movie off of all those years you spent in the National Archives, sir? | ||
I've been trying for 10 years writing this stuff down, writing articles, doing programs, but Michael's approach is what's the different. | ||
Of course, the situation has changed with President Trump. | ||
There are clear parallels today with what happened to Nixon. | ||
But Michael's approach by isolating and focusing on a dozen due process violations makes it more understandable and the public can, your viewers can appreciate what was really done back 50 years ago. | ||
So it's really an exciting new time. | ||
I'm sorry, President Trump has had to go through, and you yourself tasted the whip on this, have had to go through this awful situation to enable us to say, look, this was there before. | ||
Lawfare didn't start with President Trump. | ||
Lawfare was this secret cabal of representatives from all three branches of government who got together, secret meetings, secret memos, and did things that couldn't withstand the light of day, but they were kept secret. | ||
And today with Trump, I mean, this morning, last night, more of these memos are coming out. | ||
Our really incriminating memos didn't come out except for the last 10 years because the top four prosecutors took their files with them. | ||
Now, we know today you're not supposed to take files, government files, when you leave office, but then they did, and they didn't begin to surface till 2013. | ||
So we didn't even know what the prosecutors had done in secret with the judges, in secret, with congressional staff until very recently. | ||
So this is all kind of unfolding in lifetime. | ||
But Michael gets it. | ||
And we would have never known. | ||
well, I'm going to get to that. | ||
We would have never known it if you had not dedicated your life to going into the files and extracting the receipts. | ||
This is why it's so important, audience. | ||
We got to get you in. | ||
Okay, this audience is the battle-hardened veterans. | ||
That's when it comes to something like to redistricting. | ||
It's the warrant posse up on the ramparts when it comes to any of these fights. | ||
We're going to have a fight on our hands on this seditious conspiracy. | ||
Just don't think they're going to sit there with some grand jury and all this. | ||
You're going to have the mainstream media because they're defending themselves. | ||
They're up to their necks in this. | ||
Look at the, when, when Jeff Shepard talks about the memos, it's coming out how the media was an act of participation and some of those people are going to be charged. | ||
Why are we doing this now? | ||
Because you can see, Swario just gives you a little taste of it. | ||
They understand that after in Watergate, they pulled off a coup using the judiciary, in the legal system, in the lawyers on the House staffs in Maine Justice and with the D.C., the D.C. U.S. Attorney. | ||
You ever heard of that? | ||
Like Judge Janine is now, why it's so important? | ||
And in the court, the corrupt courts in Washington, D.C. They did it in a template and it worked. | ||
That's what they're doing against Trump now. | ||
And it started back at the very first. | ||
So if you want to get into the, if you got to get into the mindset, this film puts you into the mindset to say, this is like your training camp. | ||
This is spring training for you to not just think about that, but to understand how they pulled it together. | ||
And Leahy pulls out 12, he takes due process and does you 12 kind of hit points to focus on Shepard's research, but it's for today. | ||
We're not having you do this as a historical exercise. | ||
We're trying to get you up to speed so that you're battle-hardened on this one because, hey, as we said, taking apart the deep state is the central thing that we have to do. | ||
If we fail to do that, if we fail to do that, all the great stuff on tariffs, all the great stuff on sealing the border, all the great stuff on Rapprochemn, it's all going to be reversed. | ||
We have to take it apart. | ||
Leahy, you did this film to show us what is actually going on today by showing what they did, what, 50 years ago, sir. | ||
Yeah, Jeff Shepard has spent his life putting the receipts together. | ||
After I interviewed him on my radio program a little over a year ago, it became clear that we just had to organize it in a way that the people could understand how egregious the deep state takedown was. | ||
And so we've got these 12, the dozen dirty, dirty dozen due process violations, one of which I just want to point out has an eerie parallel to what they tried to do in Trump in term 1.0. | ||
And that is Elliott Richardson, who was really a rhino Republican, in order to be confirmed as Attorney General, agreed to some ridiculous terms before the Edward Kennedy chaired Judiciary Committee. | ||
He basically said, I will bring in Archibald Cox as a special prosecutor, a Harvard Law School guy who was on Team Kennedy, worked on Kennedy's campaign, hated Richard Nixon. | ||
And I will agree to your guidelines, which means I and the executive branch can't control anything they do. | ||
Archibald Cox brought in 160 staffers, all of whom hated Richard Nixon. | ||
And their goal was to take down Richard Nixon. | ||
This was a constitutional. | ||
And take down Richard Nixon, they did. | ||
It worked. | ||
That's why they did it again with Trump. | ||
They avoided the biggest landslide election in the nation's history, and they reversed it by bringing in Democrat prosecutors to go after all the Nixon people. | ||
And what makes it so interesting, I mean, you've got documents coming out today, and they're scary documents that you have. | ||
I've uncovered roughly the same thing from 50 years ago, but nobody's that interested. | ||
I think the nicest thing you can say is, gee Jeff, you're a great researcher, but you're a very poor salesman. | ||
And it takes someone like Michael to make it understandable. | ||
You're a lawyer. | ||
Hang over a second. | ||
We'll take a short commercial break. | ||
This is why we showed the PBS special in its entirety on Monday and Tuesday and got tremendous response because they talked about this very issue: Trump's power in the rule of law. | ||
short break. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bass. | ||
We started the show with the hot print coming out today on inflation. | ||
I think now more than ever, take your phone out, text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N-989898. | ||
Get the ultimate guide, totally free from Birch Gold on investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump. | ||
Remember, to get the inflation out, our theory of the case, quite simple. | ||
You've got to cut massive government spending. | ||
This is why we had Wade Miller in about rescissions, pocket rescissions, impoundments. | ||
It's got to happen. | ||
They're going to jam us, folks. | ||
Take that number two principle out and just start the third week of September. | ||
You're going to get jammed with an omnibus. | ||
They're going to say, hey, we've got to do it. | ||
And Trump's got to keep, President Trump's got to keep his government open. | ||
This is the price you're going to have to pay. | ||
It's going to have a $2 trillion deficit in fiscal year 26. | ||
And we just hit officially $37 trillion, I think, last night. | ||
Make sure you go to Birch Gold right now, learn everything about gold as a hedge, and talk to Philip Patrick and team about the ownership of physical gold. | ||
Why it makes sense. | ||
But talk to Philip Patrick and the team about that. | ||
Also, I want to give a shout out to the folks down in. | ||
We're going to have a big update at the 5 o'clock hour on EJ and Tony, the fight there at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. | ||
Also, down in Texas, and we'll be putting, I think Real America's Voice is going to cover the Newsome conference. | ||
It should be, I think, at 1:30, maybe 2:30, 11:30, I guess, Pacific Daylight Time. | ||
It's going to be live, Gavin Newsome. | ||
He's saying he's coming out with his redistricting that he's going to jam through in California. | ||
Say it's going to reverse everything we've done in Texas because Abbott and these guys have been too slow. | ||
Plus, it's going to set the predicate for impeaching Trump. | ||
This is what Newsome's running on in 28. | ||
You may not like it, but that's a reality. | ||
972 Patriot, the great team over at Patriot Mobile, have done so much to keep Texas red and make Texas the railhead of the MAGA movement. | ||
Glenn Sturry and the team, best service around 972 Patriot. | ||
Tell him Steve Bannis sent you your first month is free on the best mobile phone service alive today and done by people that have your values. | ||
Okay, I want to play a short clip. | ||
We want, look, audience participation. | ||
This film is totally free. | ||
Warroom.film. | ||
Go down, put your email in, totally free. | ||
The feedback I got is so extraordinary. | ||
We want reviews from everybody. | ||
We've got a little clip I think Grace put together and Dan Floyd. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's go and play it. | |
This is beginning to feel like the love wind and blues of the never. | ||
Barely controlled locomotive, consuming the picture. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Is that the Kennedy Center honors? | ||
Kidding. | ||
Dan Floyd, you join us. | ||
You're helping out and helping distribute the film. | ||
You're the head of War Room Films. | ||
Make sure you go to warroom.film to get the movie itself. | ||
It's totally free for two weeks. | ||
Just give an email, download it. | ||
The response is huge. | ||
Why are we doing this now? | ||
We're going back out with emails. | ||
You saw that little clip there. | ||
We're going to be putting more up on Instagram. | ||
The feedback from the audience will be central to driving this forward. | ||
Everybody in the country wants to see this film. | ||
Where do people go and how do they get a review in, sir? | ||
So it's, like you said, it's very simple to watch the film, but go to warroom.film and you just add, put it in your name and your email address. | ||
It takes you right to a link and you can start watching it. | ||
After you watch it, we'd love it if you would give us feedback because we like to promote that. | ||
And all you do is it's info.war at warroom.film, info at warroom.film. | ||
And just send us your reviews. | ||
And we're making all kinds of little promos. | ||
It's going to be all across the socials on the website and everything. | ||
You know, this project came together very quickly and we put it up just the other day with really almost no fanfare at all. | ||
And the response has just been incredible since it came up on just a couple days ago. | ||
So it tells me that there's a real hunger for this kind of information and that this film is really resonating, which is completely in line with the content that we like to create and promote and distribute on warroom.film. | ||
And stay tuned. | ||
We got a lot more coming up too. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Okay. | ||
Dan, so we're going to get, everybody's, you give your email, warroom.film, you get the film for free. | ||
Then we're going to come back. | ||
We're going to have another site you go to to give a review on all your views. | ||
And I might add, when Jeff Shepard talks about explosive information coming out, and John Solomon's got this whole timeline, this is about Peter Schweitzer's, a lot of it's Peter Schweitzer's investigation at government accountability office organization back 10 years ago about the Clinton Foundation, right? | ||
And the Clinton Global Institute and the corruption there and the film we made on Clinton Cash that went mega viral when we put it up free two weeks before I took over the campaign. | ||
Why? | ||
Because with Dan and Peter Schweitzer and others, we become specialists in taking hits at the corruptness of, wait for it, Hillary and Bill Clinton in their foundation. | ||
All coming back home, Drews. | ||
Dan, thank you so much. | ||
Michael Patrick Leah, I've run out of time. | ||
We're going to have you guys back on. | ||
Where do they go to get all your content, radio shows, social media, access to your film? | ||
Social media, go to X account, Michael P. Leahy. | ||
Give me a review there as well. | ||
And Tennesseestar.com and MichaelPatrickLeahy.com. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Appreciate you. | ||
Jeff Shepard, where do people go get your books, sir? | ||
They're the foundation. | ||
You're researching the books of the foundation for this great film. | ||
Where do they go? | ||
The books and the documents are on my website. | ||
That's shepherdonwatergate.com. | ||
All the documents we're talking about. | ||
If you really want to get into it, that's where they're posted. | ||
Shepherdonwatergate.com. | ||
Folks, these are all part of a whole. | ||
The reason we have the Swariers on to talk about Lawfare and the Viceroy on, Mike Davis to talk about lawfare. | ||
This film, what it shows about the Justice Department, what happened, the whole PBS special, the reason we broke that down for you, this film, and now everything you're going to see about these documents. | ||
It's all of a piece to make you battle-hardened veterans even harder as we drive this narrative. | ||
Mike Lindell, when sales collide, sir, this audience has been working all morning. | ||
They're looking for a deal. | ||
What do you got for them? | ||
We have the biggest deal ever for the War Room policy in history. | ||
You're right, Steve, when sales collide, because we're going to add one more to the two sales that collided, which was the free shipping. | ||
The free shipping on your entire order. | ||
And then you have the employee pricing sale, which I'm giving an example. | ||
The body pill is $29.98. | ||
That's what our employees pay. | ||
That's half price. | ||
You get it at mypillow.com forward slash Warroom. | ||
Now, I want you to take a look, everybody. | ||
You see that left corner, my store? | ||
There's over a thousand entrepreneurs and USA made products for the first time ever and the only time you use promo code Warroom and your whole order ships for free on my store. | ||
So we put them all in one spot for you, mypillow.com forward slash war room. | ||
I have never done this before. | ||
These are three sales that are colliding and it's for a short time here, but the war room, you guys deserve it at the war room policy. | ||
Call 800 873-1062. | ||
Promo code Warroom. | ||
It's the quantum mechanics of my pillow. | ||
When three worlds collide, Charlie Kirk is next. |