Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This morning the Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law. | ||
In striking down the excessive use of nationwide injunctions to interfere with the normal functioning of the executive branch, the Supreme Court has stopped the presidency itself. | ||
That's what they've done. | ||
And really, it's been an amazing period of time, this last hour. | ||
There are people elated all over the country. | ||
I've seen such happiness and spirit. | ||
Sometimes you don't see that, but this case is very important. | ||
I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers. | ||
It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation. | ||
In practice, this meant that if any one of the nearly 700 federal judges disagreed with the policy of a duly elected president of the United States, he or she could block that policy from going into effect or at least delay it for many years, tied up in the court system. | ||
This was a colossal abuse of power which never occurred in American history prior to recent decades, and we've been hit with more nationwide injunctions than were issued in the entire 20th century together. | ||
Think of it, more than the entire 20th century, me. | ||
I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple. | ||
I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas. | ||
Great people. | ||
Americans are finally getting what they voted for. | ||
No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation. | ||
No longer. | ||
Today in the 6-3 opinion, Justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions. | ||
These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court. | ||
As the Supreme Court held today, they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary. | ||
Active liberal justices, judges have used these injunctions to block virtually all of President Trump's policies. | ||
To put this in perspective, there are 94 federal judicial districts. | ||
Five of those districts throughout this country held 35 of the nationwide injunctions. | ||
Think about that. | ||
94 districts and 35 out of the 40 opinions with nationwide injunctions came from five liberal districts in this country. | ||
No longer. | ||
Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis. | ||
And some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes to the fore. | ||
That was meant for the babies of slaves. | ||
It wasn't meant for people trying to scam the system and come into the country on a vacation. | ||
This was, in fact, it was the same date, the exact same date, the end of the Civil War. | ||
It was meant for the babies of slaves, and it's so clean and so obvious. | ||
But this lets us go there and finally win that case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason. | ||
It was meant for the babies of slaves. | ||
So thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous other priorities of the American people. | ||
unidentified
|
If you have an undocumented baby, would that baby then be an enforcement priority? | |
The violent criminals in our country are the priority now. | ||
Let me put it in perspective. | ||
Today marked the 2,711th arrest in our country of TDA members, just TDA. | ||
Everyone in this room agrees they are one of the most violent criminal organizations in the world. | ||
And the Biden administration let them walk into our country, walk into our country for the last four years. | ||
2,711 of them today have been arrested in our country. | ||
That is the priority of Donald Trump. | ||
That is the priority of this country, of Homeland Security, of all of our lawyers, of FBI. | ||
That's the priority. | ||
That will be discussed in October when the Supreme Court hopefully rules in our favor, and we're very confident of that. | ||
But you should all feel safer now that President Trump can deport all of these, all of these gangs, and not one district court judge can think they're an emperor over this administration, his executive powers, and why the people of the United States elected him. | ||
I want to go back to what Andrew was saying about the silver linings. | ||
I don't think there are silver linings here. | ||
And I want to be very clear with the viewers at home. | ||
This is a really grave situation. | ||
This court has effectively taken the restraints off of this administration. | ||
We don't have a Congress that is stepping in to rein in this administration. | ||
All we've had are lower court judges who are looking at the lawlessness of this administration saying, not on my watch, imposing these nationwide injunctions to stop the damage in its tracks. | ||
And this court has now said that limited tool, that limited judicial remedy goes too far. | ||
And instead, what individual litigants are going to have to do is go to every district in this country to litigate, to stop the administration in its track, or somehow Find at a time when the administration has made the availability of lawyers scarce, find a lawyer who is willing to take on the challenge of mounting a class action to go and challenge this administration. | ||
This court has made it absolutely impossible to try and stop the worst of what the administration is doing. | ||
So there really aren't silver linings. | ||
Yes, there are some litigants now who have amended their complaints and filed class actions, but the idea that we are going to do this for everything is really just unfathomable. | ||
It's not just birthright citizenship that is at stake. | ||
These nationwide injunctions have been used across the board to stop this administration from firing federal workers, to stop this administration from rescinding funding from research institutions and universities. | ||
All of that ends now. | ||
The gloves are off. | ||
There are no restraints, no checks on this administration. | ||
We are entering a very dangerous moment. | ||
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies, because we're going to medieval on these people. | ||
You're going to have not got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
Mega Media. | ||
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
Friday, 27 June, Year of Our Lord, 2025, a historic day in the Imperial Capitol of Washington, D.C. The Supreme Court ruled on so many cases. | ||
I want to bring in Mike Davis. | ||
Mike, you have followed this now for years and gave us a heads up about this. | ||
Put it in perspective of exactly what happened today and how important is this for President Trump's second term and for the nation overall. | ||
Yeah, these conservative justices may get weak and wobbly from time to time, but overall, this was a very good term. | ||
President Trump's biggest and most consequential accomplishment of his first term was the transformation of the Supreme Court to the first constitutionalist majority in 90 years. | ||
And we're seeing that today. | ||
We saw that earlier in the term when the Supreme Court ruled 6-3, that states can regulate trans surgeries on minors. | ||
We saw it today when the Supreme Court held 6-3, that these nationwide injunctions by these activist judges are not lawful. | ||
They likely violate Article 3 of the Constitution. | ||
We see this today in a 6-3 ruling that parents can opt out for their kids when their kids are being indoctrinated with LGBT anti-religious nonsense in these schools where they're brainwashing these kids. | ||
We saw it with another 6-3 ruling where the Supreme Court held that states can have age verification to make sure that people who are going on to these porn sites are actually 18 years old. | ||
It's very confusing to me with these left-wing judges, these three Democrat left-wing judges, Soda Mayor, Kagan, and Katanji Brown Jackson. | ||
I just, I don't quite understand what they stand for because they pretend there is a constitutional right to murder kids up until the moment of birth. | ||
They pretend there's a constitutional right to mutilate these kids with trans pills and trans surgeries. | ||
They think there's a constitutional right to have kids go onto these porn sites and watch porn when they're young kids. | ||
I mean, these women need to reflect on their legal philosophies, and really they need to reflect on their lives because this is sickening what they're doing. | ||
This is not our parents' or grandparents' Democrat Party. | ||
And frankly, after analyzing these six to three decisions, I don't know what the hell these three women are thinking. | ||
Let me ask you specifically, I know you got a bounce, but I want to get you right here. | ||
Because you and I have talked about ACB, et cetera. | ||
She took the gloves off today on Katanji Brown Jackson and did it in a thing that looked like other justices signed off on. | ||
Given the inside baseball, that's not, you never really see that in a Supreme Court opinion, do you? | ||
This is what so it got very personal, like saying, what do you stand for? | ||
Judicial imperialism? | ||
But have you ever seen it get that personal in an opinion from the Supreme Court where the other justices signed off, sir? | ||
No, I have not. | ||
And, you know, frankly, I've been pretty rough on Justice Barrett. | ||
Maybe feeling the heat has helped her see the light. | ||
I'm not sure. | ||
But I would say this. | ||
I never thought she was a liberal, liberal. | ||
I never thought that she was Justice O'Connor. | ||
I always knew that she was conservative. | ||
Sometimes you need people like Justice Katanji Brown Jackson to go in there and figure out, help Amy Coney Barrett figure out whose side she's on. | ||
Is she on the side of these three leftists who want to murder and mutilate kids, or is she on the side of Team America? | ||
I think she decided that Team America is probably the better place to be. | ||
No, Mike, I think that highlighting this as we've done over the last year or so, I think clearly that, you know, get somebody's attention, and particularly the other justice signing off on this. | ||
Article 3, you've just done such a magnificent job. | ||
And I think today we've got Terry Schillings in studio. | ||
Julie Kelly's going to join us as we're going to go through all of it. | ||
But I wanted to get Mike. | ||
And Mike's actually Out on the road today. | ||
But, Mike, I had to get you here to take a bow and everybody go to Article 3. | ||
If it had not been for you and your leadership, I don't think we'd be here today, brother. | ||
And it's really, I just want to get you on to say thank you from the audience. | ||
Thank you for the fight. | ||
And we've got to drive it next session, but pretty damn good results today, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
I'm in Martha's Vineyard for Alex deGrasse's wedding. | ||
And I think the lips here are sending the military to find me and deport me. | ||
It's going to be the fastest deportation in world history when they find out I'm here. | ||
Hang on, hang on. | ||
Alex deGrasse and the crowd that's going out there for that, Martha's Vineyard is never going to be the same again. | ||
Edgartown, they're actually, the governor's going to deputize the National Guard to go down there and clean out all these right-wingers. | ||
They've never seen anything like it. | ||
unidentified
|
It's an infestation, infestation of right-wingers. | |
They'd rather have the Haitians here than the populace from Iowa. | ||
unidentified
|
So they're going to send the planes quickly to get the hell out. | |
Okay, Article 3, where do people go? | ||
And your social media ought to be on fire this weekend, sir. | ||
Where do they go? | ||
Article3project.org. | ||
Article number3project.org.org. | ||
You can donate, follow us on social media, take action. | ||
One last thing I would say to the Democrats, maybe it wasn't such a smart idea to pick Kitaji Brown Jackson for that seat. | ||
There were other people like Leandra Kruger who would have been a lot more effective and would not have repelled Amy Coney Barrett. | ||
Yeah. | ||
I think DEI is blown back on them. | ||
I really do. | ||
I don't think that's working out. | ||
Mike Davis, have a good, give a toast tonight from the war room to all the great folks there. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Right-wing, a right-wing infestation in one of the most liberal conclaves or enclaves in the nation. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
We're going to break it all down. | ||
Also, President Trump, the peacemaker, all afternoon in the White House. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
Want to thank our sponsor, both for the Friday afternoon show, also Saturday morning, birchgold.com. | ||
We're getting ready to send a team down to Rio. | ||
I know, how did they pull that duty? | ||
That's tough duty. | ||
Go down for the Rio reset where they're trying to break the good old United States dollar. | ||
Make sure you understand everything about it. | ||
Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Make sure you go to the website. | ||
Here's what you do when you go there. | ||
You can get the end of the dollar empire. | ||
We got the seventh free installment, and this is made accessible to folks. | ||
People in finance like it so much, they're kind of editing it as addendums to courses to make it easier for finance students even to kind of get the nomenclature. | ||
That's why we've done it for you because we understand the warroom posse wants to see the receipts of what's going on in the world of finance. | ||
If you want to understand finance, one of the best places to start is to understand gold and how gold is a hedge against fiat currencies. | ||
Now, it turns out the fiat currency that is called the United States dollar happens to be the prime reserve currency of the world. | ||
That means every transaction basically in the world is converted into dollars to make it happen. | ||
The world, particularly the global south, has a problem with that because of the declining purchasing power of the dollar. | ||
Anyway, you'll understand it all when you go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Make sure you meet Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
Their team's going to be going down there, but Philip can help you out on everything you need to know about gold, how you can actually turn your IRA, your 401ks. | ||
All the methodologies are there. | ||
They'll walk you through the analysis and basically where gold's going. | ||
It's not just the price of gold every day. | ||
It's the process why gold continues to rise. | ||
That's what you got to understand. | ||
Virchgold.com, promo code Bannon. | ||
Man, this is amazing. | ||
I've got four of my favorite. | ||
I've got Mike Davis starting off. | ||
He's up at Martha's Vineyard for DeGrasse's wedding. | ||
Took time out to join us. | ||
I got two of my favorite people on right now. | ||
And then Julie Kelly is going to get, as soon as she's out of hair and makeup, because it's Julie Kelly, as soon as she's out of hair and makeup, she'll be ready. | ||
She'll join us here at the bottom of the hour. | ||
Tiffany Justice and Terry Schilling. | ||
The reason I wanted to have you guys on, ask Cameron, if we get you on together. | ||
You guys have labored in the vineyard on these cases for years, on the process of these cases, of building up public awareness of it. | ||
Tiffany, I want to start with you. | ||
Huge victory for you today. | ||
Terry, you've got a number of victories. | ||
But first off, Tiffany, I want you to give us the big picture here of the difference in the attitude of this court. | ||
And folks, this is part of everything we've worked for over the years. | ||
Today is kind of a culmination of decades of work and really the Trump movement for 10 years of President Trump coming down the golden escalator, the huge fight to win in 2016, but also the comeback, the massive comeback starting in 21 and 22. | ||
Tiffany Justice, the overall court, the attitude and the case that you work so hard on, ma'am, which by the way, has their heads blowing up on MSNBC. | ||
Even as we speak, they're pulling their hair out on this one. | ||
Ma'am, what do you got for us? | ||
The liberal media tried very hard to paint parents' concerns about the inappropriate content in schools as frivolous, that we were some type of helicopter parents, overreactive, right? | ||
Even Scott Pelley on 60 Minutes, they cut out all the porn that I read to him in that interview because they wanted to make it seem like somehow we were crazy people who had no reason to be concerned about what was being taught in schools. | ||
But today, a 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court in a case called Mahmood v. | ||
Taylor, the Beckett Fund brought this case in defense of parents' fundamental religious rights to direct the upbringing of their children. | ||
And Steve, I want to give you a big thank you to start off because the first time I ever came on your show, you said, Tiffany, explain what fundamental parental rights are. | ||
I want to make sure everyone understands that. | ||
And during COVID, to be honest with you, I think a lot of parents didn't realize, in fact, that the government was trying to have this overreach of their rights. | ||
So President Trump at the podium today, answering questions about the Supreme Court cases, and he said that he couldn't believe that parents had been in this position in the first place, but he was very happy to be a part of making sure that we were returning the fundamental rights of parents where they belong. | ||
What was the basic case about? | ||
What was this? | ||
You guys chose to take this one and take it all the way. | ||
What was this one about? | ||
And why of everything that happened today, you know, Trump's autocratic power and everything, this one, you stuck the landing Because they're big mad about this one. | ||
What is it about this case that was so important? | ||
What were the kind of the details? | ||
And why are they so big mad about it? | ||
They're really mad about it because they wanted to use America's public schools to indoctrinate children into gender ideology. | ||
This idea that somehow your biological sex might be incongruent with your gender identity. | ||
Let's be clear. | ||
There are two sexes, zero genders, and infinite personalities. | ||
There's no right way to be a boy or a girl. | ||
But in this school, they were reading books to students as part of this Pride Storybook collection, things like Pride Puppy, books where there were drag queens in it, talking about wearing leather and all kinds of things. | ||
Justice Alito in his ruling today and his arguments said, listen, you know, this is inappropriate content. | ||
Parents have a religious right to direct the upbringing of their children. | ||
And so the school had stopped allowing parents to opt out of this curriculum. | ||
And it was pretty crazy to see. | ||
Justice Kavanaugh in the oral arguments had said, wow, kind of hard to realize this is the hill you're going to die on. | ||
And so the school said, no more opt-outs. | ||
Your kids have to go through this. | ||
Steve, they want to do this on purpose. | ||
They want to indoctrinate your children. | ||
They don't want you to be able to pull them out of this instruction that they know goes against your family values. | ||
Why? | ||
Because they want the destruction of the family. | ||
They want to drive a wedge between the parent and the child. | ||
So the left is very mad. | ||
Public schools have been a huge battleground in the middle of this cultural revolution that they have put us in, and we are taking this cultural institution back. | ||
So no doubt that they are spitting mad over there because this is just the start of the winning that American parents are going to do. | ||
Remember, this case was ruled on religious rights of parents, but I believe that you're going to see other cases coming before the Supreme Court in the future that are going to really dig down deep on the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing of their kids. | ||
Wow. | ||
Hang on for a second. | ||
Terry Schilling, you've had some great wins here also, and this has been a big fight for you. | ||
Your thoughts. | ||
Well, Steve, I agree with Mike Davis at Article 3. | ||
This was a great term at the Supreme Court. | ||
The American family is 3-0 this term. | ||
And what I mean by that is with the Skirmetti decision that came out last week, our children in the 27 states that we've gotten gender mutilation bans passed are now going to be protected and not struck down by some stupid ruling that would have been struck down, by the way, just shortly before President Trump was elected. | ||
But then with the Mahmoud case that came out today, parents' right to fundamental, the fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their children is protected. | ||
But Steve, the even bigger victory, I think, than all of these combined is the first time in, I don't know how long the Supreme Court has ruled against the porn industry. | ||
The Free Speech Coalition versus Paxton decision came out this morning as well, and it ruled that states have the right to pass age verification to protect children online from porn. | ||
See, to put this in perspective, we had the ACLU versus Reno in 1997 struck down the Communications Decency Act. | ||
Every Supreme Court decision that's come out regarding pornography has expanded the porn industry. | ||
This is the first time that parents have had a huge victory at the Supreme Court when it comes to porn, but we're not just one victory. | ||
This is 3-0. | ||
I mean, every single term before this, it was 0-2, 0-5, 0-3. | ||
We are now winning at the Supreme Court level. | ||
And it doesn't happen without Donald Trump, and it doesn't happen without Moggan. | ||
It doesn't happen without the War Room posse. | ||
Give me that perspective again, because it seemed like that the First Amendment and freedom of speech, and it's interesting how the porn industry came about this as a First Amendment right, right? | ||
Is this the first time that's kind of been countered, that your right of free speech is kind of limited by at least the access to young people of what they can see? | ||
Because they tried to hide behind a First Amendment argument, didn't they? | ||
Yeah, they did try to hide behind a First Amendment argument, the porn industry that is. | ||
So, Steve, there's this really weird blip in American legal history. | ||
For the vast majority of our existence as a country, the First Amendment has never protected three things, libel, seditious libel, or obscenity. | ||
And essentially, over the last, you know, over the 20th century, the Supreme Court weakened obscenity statutes, and they basically gave pornographers and porn users a right to access it. | ||
It's totally crazy, but the reality is, is that the First Amendment cannot protect lies. | ||
It cannot protect, or deliberate lies, at least anyway, and it cannot protect obscenity because these things have a crowding out effect. | ||
That's the nature of lies. | ||
That's the nature of distortions and obscenity is that it will end up crowding out all of the speech that's actually meant to be protected. | ||
And by the way, Steve, I just want to say, this is the porn industry. | ||
It's a $100 billion industry. | ||
They have the access to the best lawyers in the world, and we're beating them. | ||
This is a historic term for the Supreme Court, and I hope that it's a sign that things are really starting to turn around. | ||
Tiffany, for all three of these, with the transgender here with the porn, at least the kids have got a verify that they're, or people have to verify they're a certain age. | ||
And then with the schools and the thing, is this all kind of, can you say this is all supporting parents? | ||
This is all having, the courts are actually saying the parents actually has some authority here, ma'am? | ||
Yes, I feel like we're in one of those fairy tales where everyone was kind of in stone. | ||
And now all of a sudden we're all waking up, right? | ||
Everyone's waking up. | ||
And, you know, the two things that I think that are going to, that really energize voters and are going to continue to are Maha. | ||
I think it's a very important group of voters that came to President Trump and will continue to grow, but also parental rights and school choice. | ||
So yes, all three of these rulings are reaffirming the rights of parents in America. | ||
We had no idea that we needed to do it, but we certainly needed to do that. | ||
And we're so thankful that the Supreme Court has found the in the in support of parents, excuse me. | ||
The other thing I just want to say, Steve, because Terry touched on it, your war room posse, all of the funders of these organizations of the Beckett Fund, a law firm that has amazing, generous donors is what helps us to have these wins. | ||
So thank you to every person that has been so generous in this fight for the survival of the country and the future of our kids. | ||
No, today, those three are all grassroots victories. | ||
This kind of got created over the last couple of years, right? | ||
Started during the pandemic. | ||
This is the parents' rights movement. | ||
This is the Make America Healthy Again movement. | ||
Today, victorious at the Supreme Court in just a couple of years, three amazing victories. | ||
Guys, can you hang on? | ||
I'm going to hold you to the break. | ||
I want to add Julie Kelly to this because the left is just not going to sit there and say, oh my gosh, they're going to win and we're going to let them win. | ||
They're going to fight back and push back hard. | ||
But today, huge grassroots victories for organizations and little institutions that's set up over the last couple of years. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Modern day Holy War takes us out. | ||
Back in a moment. | ||
Back to what Andrew was saying about the silver linings. | ||
I don't think there are silver linings here. | ||
And I want to be very clear with the viewers at home. | ||
This is a really grave situation. | ||
This court has effectively taken the restraints off of this administration. | ||
We don't have a Congress that is stepping in to rein in this administration. | ||
All we've had are lower court judges who are looking at the lawlessness of this administration saying, not on my watch, imposing these nationwide injunctions to stop the damage in its tracks. | ||
And this court has now said that limited tool, that limited judicial remedy goes too far. | ||
And instead, what individual litigants are going to have to do is go to every district in this country to litigate, to stop the administration in its track, or somehow find at a time when the administration has made the availability of lawyers scarce, find a lawyer who is willing to take on the challenge of mounting a class action to go and challenge this administration. | ||
This court has made it absolutely impossible to try and stop the worst of what the administration is doing. | ||
So there really aren't silver linings. | ||
Yes, there are some litigants now who have amended their complaints and filed class actions, but the idea that we are going to do this for everything is really just unfathomable. | ||
It's not just birthright citizenship that is at stake. | ||
These nationwide injunctions have been used across the board to stop this administration from firing federal workers, to stop this administration from rescinding funding from research institutions and universities. | ||
All of that ends now. | ||
The gloves are off. | ||
There are no restraints, no checks on this administration. | ||
We are entering a very dangerous moment. | ||
Okay, this shows you, and I think this audience will sit there and go, well, this is what I voted for. | ||
You're damn right. | ||
I mean, this is a historic day. | ||
This was many, obviously, years in the making with the Trump movement to make sure that President Trump was elected and then re-elected, make sure he get these judges, all those tough confirmation hearings. | ||
This is what it's all about. | ||
Now, one thing that's, and they're in shock. | ||
There was no silver linings, but they're already starting to get their battle plans. | ||
I want to bring in Julie Kelly. | ||
I still got Tiffany Johnson. | ||
I still have Terry Schelling. | ||
Julie, you've been doing this now for years. | ||
Just tell the audience how big a win is this, ma'am? | ||
This is a big win for the Trump administration. | ||
There's no doubt about it. | ||
But what has been raised on both the left and the right, and we're already seeing court filings, I've got two in front of me, Steve. | ||
So while the court overturned the use of universal preliminary injunctions, meaning a nationwide ban based on one lawsuit before one district court judge on this issue, birthright citizenship executive order, what the court did open the door for was the designation of class action lawsuits. | ||
Now, this is what we've talked about in the Alien Enemies Act. | ||
And for states, and we saw several blue states who were involved in this preliminary injunction litigation claiming that they could be a harmed party if we take away birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants and women who are here on a temporary lawful basis. | ||
So they did open the door for these class action lawsuits, and we're already seeing filings today in New Hampshire by Norm Eisen, the ACLU, and NAACP, and then a continuation in the Maryland case, which was the case that was really brought before the Supreme Court on these preliminary injunctions. | ||
So I know it's confusing to people. | ||
I have a piece of it, my substat declassified with Julia Kelly. | ||
I'm going to have a lot more over the weekend trying to deconstruct it. | ||
But the idea that this is now closed litigation, that the president won in the birthright citizenship litigation is going away and that that executive order is going to go into effect, that's not the case. | ||
There's going to actually be a lot more lawsuits than the three preliminary injunctions that we saw resulting in the Supreme Court ruling today. | ||
This is why I want to get you on here and give, look, it's a day of celebration. | ||
It's a day that, hey, we got this done. | ||
But how quickly, they were ready to go. | ||
They went in and filed these lawsuits virtually. | ||
The press release was not, the tweet was not out for the Supreme Court. | ||
And Norm Eisen and these guys have raised a ton of money, have all these law firms. | ||
And this is the important thing about President Trump and the law firms. | ||
When you see SCAD NARPS $100 million, that means they're not putting it into these, backing these NGOs and giving free legal. | ||
So now it's harder for them to raise money. | ||
They got to raise hard dollars. | ||
So this war with the judiciary and this judicial uprising, this insurrection, it ain't over because these people understand, I think the one thing they understand is that this is the best ground they can fight President Trump and administration on. | ||
Politically, they're very weak. | ||
You know, their organizing has been very weak. | ||
New York City, the New York City mayor race aside, we'll get to that in the next hour. | ||
But this is the hill they will die on, right? | ||
They're going to fight this one tooth and nail. | ||
You can see today with the big, long, sad faces initially, but they're coming back and They're going to hit us with everything they got, right? | ||
They absolutely are. | ||
They already, now, here's the little upside, Steve: that War Room posse will be very fascinated. | ||
This is almost a bombshell revelation out of this litigation. | ||
The left, radical activist leftists, especially the ACLU, have finally found a right that unborn babies are entitled to. | ||
They don't have a right to live, but they do have a right to become a U.S. citizen if they are born on U.S. soil to a mother who is here illegally. | ||
So that is what is fascinating in these documents. | ||
And I was posting a little bit of that on X and will continue to do so. | ||
So now we're going to see this in multiple states, multiple jurisdictions. | ||
All this really means is now these judges are going to confer class-wide status, just like we saw Jeb Bossberg do in the Alien Enemies Act, and other judges have done that as well. | ||
They will then let the class-wide lawsuit move forward. | ||
Then they can issue a preliminary injunction in their district based on that class. | ||
So this really tends to create a hydra of more judicial and legal wrangling with the administration. | ||
But Steve, the end result is that this birthright citizenship question, the executive order, will eventually make it back to the Supreme Court. | ||
Again, the Supreme Court did not rule on that executive order today. | ||
They only ruled on the use of these universal preliminary injunctions. | ||
Very important to underscore that. | ||
But that question eventually will get to the highest court, and they are going to have to determine whether the 14th Amendment and the Citizenship Clause really did mean that babies born here on American soil to anyone, including those who crossed the border illegally, as soon, as early as last year, Steve. | ||
The Norm Eisen lawsuit specifically talks about a plaintiff named Barbara who crossed the border illegally from Honduras in 2024. | ||
This is one of Joe Biden's illegals. | ||
She already had three children. | ||
I'm assuming she brought them with her. | ||
Her husband is also here illegally, and she's pregnant due in October of 2025. | ||
So this is the essence of the anchor baby system that we've seen for decades that has been ignored by both Republicans and Democrats, not by President Trump. | ||
And so this is just one of the plaintiffs that the ACLU has plucked to use in this, in these lawsuits. | ||
How can the Supreme Court ultimately decide that this woman who came across the border in 2024 illegally seeking asylum from Honduras is married to another illegal and has a baby, that that baby is then a U.S. citizen. | ||
And of course, then that means the entire family has some basis to stay here. | ||
Insane. | ||
One of the things they were cheerling about today is that, oh, this is not automatic. | ||
Do you have to go back and now argue in front of every one of these judges to drop the injunction across the nation? | ||
Is that another slowdown tactic? | ||
Because to delay is to deny. | ||
So, and this is what I say about President Trump and trying to settle the war and negotiate all these things. | ||
He gets briefed every day on where these cases are. | ||
And the cases are, I think, at 200. | ||
Now does Bondi, because they don't have a huge staff. | ||
Remember, most people in the Justice Department are still deep state or administrative state. | ||
We have very few actual bodies over there. | ||
And you can tell on the legal side, we're struggling to put teams together. | ||
Do they have to go back now to each of these district courts and have another argument of how just to drop that injunction there? | ||
Not the nationwide injunctions that these three courts have imposed. | ||
No. | ||
Now, what will be interesting with the other nationwide preliminary injunctions that have been imposed, and I believe that we're over 30 of those, that they will now use the Supreme Court to go and vacate those nationwide preliminary injunctions. | ||
But the president and the DOJ won't really have to go back to these three judges on the birthright citizenship, nationwide preliminary injunction case. | ||
The litigants are, the plaintiffs, the ACLU and the immigrants groups are already doing that. | ||
So what they're going back with, Steve, is they're asking for emergency motions, and this is what we're seeing today. | ||
We're going to see it all weekend into next week, is emergency motions to confer this class-wide status that would potentially cover anyone, these pregnant illegals within this jurisdiction, would cover all of them, then ask for a preliminary injunction, first a temporary restraining order, then a preliminary injunction that would halt the implementation of the birthright citizenship executive order. | ||
So I'm hoping that I'm explaining this clearly enough and accurately. | ||
I really think everyone, even close court observers, are sort of struggling with what the consequences of this opinion is going to be. | ||
But we're already seeing these lawsuits being filed. | ||
And I'm sure these same judges are going to come back and rubber stamp whatever Norm Eisen and the ACLU and all these immigrants' rights groups want. | ||
Because as we've also talked about, Steve, these lower court judges, these Democrat activists who are judges on the bench, do not care if they are reprimanded by the Supreme Court. | ||
They consider it a badge of honor. | ||
We have seen that. | ||
We saw that most recently with Judge Brian Murphy in Boston on a case there of illegals, criminal illegals who were deported to a third country. | ||
And the Supreme Court overturned him, and he continued to insist that he still had the authority to impose his first orders about that. | ||
We've talked about Judge Tanya Chuck, and I was in her courtroom in September of last year after the Supreme Court roundly rebuked her hasty presidential immunity decision, claiming that President Trump had no immunity from prosecution based on his acts while he was in office. | ||
And see, she walked into that courtroom. | ||
We've talked about this, like she had just won the Miss America pageant. | ||
She thought she was the victor there because they, these Democrat activist judges, view the Supreme Court as illegitimate. | ||
So they will now take these lawsuits. | ||
They will get their rubber stamp out again. | ||
They will move forward. | ||
Hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
Ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho. | ||
All I hear is about the rule of law, the rule of law, the sanctity of law on MSMEC and CNN all day long. | ||
They're rubbing your nose in it that we're the lawless anarchists. | ||
What did you just say? | ||
They think the Supreme Court is what? | ||
Illegitimate. | ||
These Democrat activist judges do not view the Supreme Court as legitimate. | ||
We know that because they are Democrats, and we could see this with their actions, especially Judge Brian Murphy. | ||
They consider any sort of rebuke or criticism or being overturned by the Chief Justice Roberts Court, that's a win for them because Democrats and their partisans on the bench don't view the Supreme Court as legitimate. | ||
Now, they're not going to be able to defy this opinion. | ||
They'll have to vacate their nationwide injunctions, but they're going to double up then, Steve, on whatever these activist groups, as I said, the Norm Eisen, you know, he's one of the puppet masters behind all of this. | ||
They're going to quickly greenlight whatever they want, meaning conferring classified status to these illegals who are pregnant or claim that they are pregnant, and then impose temporary restraining orders and then another preliminary injunction while this birthright citizenship executive order makes its way through all the courts and then eventually ends up back at the Supreme Court. | ||
Julie, hang on. | ||
They talked about it with the hangover because they talked about an October hearing. | ||
I want to get all this Tiffany Justice Schilling, Terry Schilling, and of course the great Julie Kelly. | ||
Take your phone out. | ||
Text Bannon 989898. | ||
Get the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals from Birch Gold in the age of Trump. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
Birch Gold, end of the dollar empire. | ||
Also, make sure you get the pamphlet, the brochure, about the handbook, about how to invest. | ||
They get all the details there. | ||
And most importantly, get a relationship with Philip Patrick and the team, the great team at Birch Gold that we're sending down to Rio. | ||
They're going to report live from the Rio conference, the Bricks Nations Conference. | ||
Just take your phone out. | ||
Text Bannon 989898 today to get the handbook on how you invest. | ||
Very simple. | ||
You understand, get all the methodologies in there and understand why gold is a hedge. | ||
Do it today. | ||
Birch gold. | ||
Tiffany Justice, can you draft off of what Julie said right there about the difference between these radical progressive justices at the district level and the kind of, you know, the prim and proper conservative judges, ma'am? | ||
Yeah, what I realized with the American public was that, you know, they really felt when things came to a judge in a courtroom that whatever was right would happen. | ||
The American people trusted in that. | ||
But the judiciary is captured, much like our public education system. | ||
And Julie is absolutely right. | ||
Moms for Liberty had a Title IX case, and the judge in that case was very concerned about having a very narrowly tailored preliminary injunction. | ||
Conservative justices don't want to want to be rebuked by the Supreme Court justices. | ||
They follow the rule of law. | ||
So it's the iron law of woke projection that MSNBC is talking about the rule of law because they violate it all the time at the district court level. | ||
Can you guys hang on? | ||
Because I got a lot to go through on this and particularly this back and forth. | ||
This was pretty brutal today in the opinion about this aspect of it with two of the justices. | ||
So I want to get back to you guys in a second. | ||
Catherine O'Neill, you're one of the mainstays. | ||
I think you're the only person to be on the first campaign, first transition, first administration, second, all the way through. | ||
Now you're out there being an entrepreneur like President Trump wants you to be. | ||
What do you got for you? | ||
You got a 4th of July special for us, ma'am? | ||
Hi, Steve. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
If you go to our homepage, meriweatherfarms.com, you'll see the 4th of July box right on the homepage. | ||
The discount is already baked in, so no need for promo codes. | ||
We want to take care of the war room posse because you guys are so good to us. | ||
So get them while they're in stock. | ||
As you know, Steve, these go pretty quickly. | ||
So meriweatherfarms.com. | ||
So one more time, what are we going to get when we go there? | ||
I love your website, by the way. | ||
And I love the company. | ||
You see, Catherine came to me for advice, and I've known Catherine for years. | ||
I love the family. | ||
Her older brother was a roommate to our crack producer. | ||
I should say it differently. | ||
Our producer slept on his sofa for many years or he's between gigs. | ||
Catherine, and Catherine, she said, I'm going to do this. | ||
I'm going to run for Congress. | ||
I go, no, you're not going to do that. | ||
You're going to go West, young woman. | ||
She went out, she formed a great company, found a cowboy, turned him into a husband, got a baby, and now you're on fire. | ||
Now you're on fire. | ||
The company's absolutely on fire. | ||
I want everybody to go to the website. | ||
And one more time, give us the 4th of July special. | ||
Thanks so much, Steve. | ||
Yeah, it's meriweatherfarms.com. | ||
You'll get a combination of steaks, burgers, I think hot dogs, beef sticks in this box. | ||
It's a really great variety pack, our 4th of July box, which is coming up next week. | ||
So if you order them this week into the early next week, you'll get them just in time for the 4th of July. | ||
Now, Catherine, is it the reason that the beef is so great and every, I know you guys are especially, it's all perfect that goes into the beef, et cetera. | ||
But you did make a comment one time that got the war room posse down in Texas all worked up. | ||
He said, what is it? | ||
Up in Wyoming, what's better than down in Texas? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Our grass up here is superior to the grass in Texas. | ||
It's more nutritionally dense because, you know, we get less rain up here. | ||
So there's a huge nutritional advantage to the grass that we have up here. | ||
So I would hold that and say that our grass and beef is better than Texas. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Wow, man. | ||
Okay, that's a throwdown. | ||
I didn't realize that Wyoming gets less rain than Texas because I've been in places in Texas getting no rain at all. | ||
Ma'am, one more time. | ||
Where do people go? | ||
Yeah, absolutely. | ||
MeriweatherFarms.com. | ||
You'll see the 4th of July box right on the homepage. | ||
No promo code needed. | ||
We baked in the discount, especially for you guys. | ||
So we want to take care of you guys today. | ||
Make sure you go because every time Catherine comes on, every time she puts up a special, boom, it's gone right away. | ||
So make sure you go check it out. | ||
Dave, have a great 4th of July. | ||
Catherine, O'Neill, you're killing it out there. | ||
Really proud of you, ma'am. | ||
Really proud of you. | ||
Great to see you. | ||
Great young entrepreneur. | ||
Speaking of a not-so-yount entrepreneur, Mike Lindell. | ||
Mike Lindell, how are we doing at the company? | ||
We didn't get you this morning. | ||
I don't think we got to the factory floor, but tell me what's going on. | ||
Well, I haven't made it to the factory yet. | ||
I'm trying to get to the airport. | ||
Our flights were canceled yesterday. | ||
Tomorrow's my birthday, everybody. | ||
They're having a big celebration of MyPillow. | ||
But the best birthday present from the Warm Room Posse would be if you guys break records for my employee-owned company, MyPillow. | ||
And what we're going to do, the geezer are the, I mean, the Percale line of sheets. | ||
They just came in last week. | ||
These are the cool sheets for the summer. | ||
I'm going to put them wholesale prices just for the warm room posse, any size, any color, $29.88. | ||
That's king-size, queen-kai, split kings. | ||
Get them. | ||
They're so awesome for the summer. | ||
They're the Percale style sheets, bed sheets. | ||
If you go to the website, now break these records for these presents. | ||
It would be the best birthday present ever. | ||
And my employees feeling secure. | ||
The My Cross is 100% made in the USA. | ||
You've got the MyPillows there, the $19.98 and $24.98 for the King, 50% off. | ||
The blowout sale on the 1488 pillows. | ||
You've got all the kitchen stuff. | ||
Get all your kitchen towels, everything as low as $9.99. | ||
And then there's those big ticket items. | ||
We're leaving at 50% off or more. | ||
The beds, the mattress toppers. | ||
You guys, if you call my employees, 800-873-1062, I will thank you all tomorrow here on the war room posse. | ||
Let's see if you guys can break some records. | ||
And when I'm with my employees tomorrow at the factory, we'll let you know if you did okay. | ||
Promo code warroom. | ||
Promo code warroom. | ||
We'll see you tomorrow morning, Mike. | ||
Very special show we got tomorrow morning. | ||
We're on the road for a couple of days. | ||
We're going to stick around, talk more about the court and more about the impact of these because it's a historic day coming out of the Supreme Court. | ||
Also, the Make America Healthy Again, monumental changes, decisions coming out of Bobby Kennedy. | ||
And of course, geopolitics, all of it. | ||
Take a short commercial break. | ||
We're going to leave you with the right stuff. | ||
Stick around for the second hour, late afternoon, early evening. |