All Episodes
June 20, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:44
Episode 4574: Speedrunning The Iraq War Propaganda Train; Investigate Fox News
Participants
Main voices
j
jack posobiec
09:24
s
steve bannon
20:09
Appearances
g
gen jack keane
01:42
k
kayleigh mcenany
01:34
l
lawrence wilkerson
04:19
s
sean davis
04:10
z
zachary cohen
01:19
Clips
g
greg gutfeld
00:30
j
jake tapper
00:10
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Operating off of far more facts than we are.
So at the end of the day, as Craig said, we elected him, we gotta trust him, right?
But the immediate issue is furtile.
I mean, that's just it.
So you don't have to go all the way.
People talk about regime change and everything else.
You've just got to mitigate the immediate issue.
If you do that, like I said, take the deal off the table.
If you get rid of the immediate threat, well, then you've bought some time.
Now, ultimately, regime change is where this thing has to devolve to.
At the end of the day, whether you like it or not, you have an adversary.
Who cannot exist without that bomb.
The Mullahs cannot enlist long-term without that bomb.
They learn the lessons of Gaddafi.
We need this thing.
They're going to keep trying.
That's the source to it.
So, you've got this adversary.
They say they want to kill you.
They're trying to get the bomb.
At the end of the day, at some point, they've got to go.
But you don't need that right now.
You've just got to mitigate the immediate problem, which is Ferdinand.
What I think he's doing is, and that's why I think you can see this two-week window, the last thing he wants is any American blood here.
And right now, the Iranians still do have some offensive capacity.
They do have the ability to fire missiles, maybe hit some American assets, and in many ways, almost worse, almost worse, is hitting some of our adversaries, excuse me, some of our allies.
You get some dead Europeans and et cetera in some place inside the red zone in Iraq.
We got an international magilla.
That's the last thing he wants.
I think he's buying time, waiting till they are out of that capacity.
And then, my own opinion, I think that's when he moves.
And then ultimately, long term, if you notice, we hit their internal security.
That's the besiege.
That's the one who keep their people down.
The Israelis took that out yesterday.
They're also now hacking the media and saying, rise up, rise up.
Unlike what we saw during the Green Revolution, I think long term, that's the second stage.
But the first stage is fertile.
And from where I sit, you've got to mitigate.
lawrence wilkerson
Well, I'm surprised you missed the line that B.B. stole from George W. Bush in his 2003 speech to a joint session of Congress.
We must not allow the world's most dangerous regime to acquire the world's most dangerous weapons.
Bibi just takes the same sheet of music out anytime he needs it for whatever country he happens to be angry at at the moment.
And he's particularly concerned with Iran because it's the last one.
He will have a clean sweep of the Levant.
A clean sweep of all those who might oppose him in some way in Southwest Asia if Iran goes.
And he can't do it by himself.
In fact, I got videos this morning smuggled out of Israel showing me that Israel is being pummeled right now, pummeled in ways that Bibi Netanyahu probably never envisioned and certainly the Israeli citizens of Israel didn't envision.
So he's in a trick bag right now, and I think it's only going to deepen and get worse.
So he needs the United States, desperately needs them, if he's going to complete this mission, which is almost messianic with him, to destroy this final regime in Southwest Asia called Iran.
zachary cohen
Yes, sir.
These changes really do show how the U.S. military is making sure that it's not only ready to carry out military strikes, We're told that military assets in the Middle East, across the region, and have been moved in anticipation of potential Iranian retaliation should Donald Trump ultimately give that go order.
Obviously, we know that Donald Trump has said that he's going to make a decision on that move in the next two weeks, but the military is not.
Waiting on the decision to making sure that it protects and takes steps to protect its assets across the Middle East.
That includes moving airplanes that it can't protect in a shelter at its military base in Qatar.
They've moved those planes to a different location.
They've also moved naval assets from its base in Bahrain, which is also obviously in the relative proximity of certain Iranian proxy forces that we know have the capability of launching drones and ballistic missiles at U.S. forces.
You may remember in January 2024, an Iranian proxy group killed three U.S. service members at a U.S. base on the border of Syria and Iraq.
So that threat is very real.
And these changes reflect how seriously the Pentagon is taking Iran's threat to target U.S. forces if Donald Trump does strike Iran.
lawrence wilkerson
We saw how difficult Iraq became and we never really did conquer Iraq in the sense that we won over the people.
Iran is going to be 10 or 15 times more difficult.
They are far more capable than Iraq was, militarily speaking, and they have not been attrited to the point where I would say they were weakened severely.
So if you want assurance that you're going to eliminate a nuclear program that is so underground that even these B-2 bunker busters aren't going to do anything, think Al-Ansar and the Houthis, if you will, not going to do a thing except rattle the rocks a little bit.
If you want to assure that they do not have a program, you're going to have to invade and go root it out, limb and branch.
And that's going to require 10 years.
A battle with 90,000 people, all of whom will be steeled against you?
I have a war plan for the Zagros Mountains and those tough terrains in Iraq.
We were contemplating having to stop the Soviets in 1979 when they first went into Afghanistan, and we thought they might make a run down to Chabahar and Bandar Abbas, something the Russian Empire, Soviet Empire II, had always wanted, a warm water port in the Gulf.
Those are very difficult mountains to fight in, extremely difficult mountains to fight in.
You want a really long war that'll cost two or three trillion dollars, cost a lot of casualties on both sides, and not give you much more of a result than we got in Iraq?
Try Iran.
gen jack keane
This is a huge strategic opportunity here that we haven't had in 45 years.
We're talking about removing and ending Iran as being the number one adversary that has dominated the region in terms of instability.
They've been at this for 45 years.
And as you pointed out to our audience here, The history of killing Americans during that time frame is very significant, but their overall behavior.
So as a result of diminishing this regime, taking away its nuclear capability, taking away much of its military capability, weaken it politically, isolating it for the first time, as we mentioned in the last hour.
I mean, the proxies aren't helping them.
unidentified
Right.
gen jack keane
Their allies aren't helping them.
And China and Russia are not helping them.
And they expected, they funded Hezbollah, billions of dollars, for one reason only.
Yes, to do state-sponsored terrorism, and they were the best at it in the business.
But number two, and the primary reason, was to defend Iran in the event of a war with Israel.
And they haven't fired a shot.
They lost the political will.
So what that presents to us is our contribution here to end this.
After all, this is Israel's war.
unidentified
Right.
gen jack keane
And we're going to help end it and end the domination of the Iranian regime.
That is a paradigm shift that will reset the Middle East for years to come.
And it will likely be a catalyst for what we want to see, which is normalization of the other countries in the region with Israel, the so-called Abraham Accords.
That will put us on a pathway for that.
unidentified
What does a crippled Iranian government look like?
It's what comes next if a crippled Iranian government falls.
And as you talk to politicians in D.C., as I have, especially in the MAGA universe, that's their big concern.
It's not that we can't get involved in military with a pinpoint strike or even something more robust than that.
It's what happens if that government falls and how much are we then invested?
In propping up a new government, because that's the quagmire that happened in Iraq.
It wasn't necessarily the three weeks of the military convention.
It was what we tried to build after the fact.
So can you explain a little bit what might happen domestically in Iran if this government were to fall?
So a chaotic post-war Iran would be a threat of its own.
And you're right, the idea of the United States with its allies attempting nation-building in that.
I've been to Iran twice and I've seen the passion that Iranians that you meet have for a different kind of country.
This clerical regime is not popular with people.
So if that regime is crushed, if some kind of peace agreement is done in a way that gives More pragmatist elements in Iran, more power.
I mean, let's remember the entire IRGC military leadership has been wiped out.
So if pragmatists, if the people who want a different country have more power and then take action, you'd have a more hopeful scenario.
But no one should think.
It would be nice to think, you know, we think back to the absolute chaos that began October 7, the terrible loss of life across the region.
It would be nice to think of that cycle coming to an end with a process of rebuilding across the region.
I mean, that's a pipe dream, maybe.
But, you know, if people are going to try to think big.
That's the way they should think.
They should enlist people in Iran, Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, who have that belief in a different kind of region and will work hard.
It'll take many years, but that's something worth all the misery that's come.
steve bannon
This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people.
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.
The people have had a belly full of it.
I know you don't like hearing that.
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.
It's going to happen.
jake tapper
And where do people like that go to share the big lie?
Mega media.
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
steve bannon
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
unidentified
War Room.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
steve bannon
you you It's Friday, 20 June, Year of the Lord, 2025.
I start off the day with two hitters, Jack Posovic and Sean Davis.
Sean Davis, founder of The Federalist.
Sean, we did a little bit longer cold open this morning because we wanted the audience's head to blow up.
To start the show.
Your assessment of where we are, now that you've heard all the talking heads and propagandists overnight dealing with President Trump saying, hey, we're going to take a deep breath here and think this thing through, sir.
sean davis
Yeah, I was starting to get a little mad at all those clips because I thought, dang, I'm just getting dumber listening to this nonsense.
But where we are now, it seems like everything's still super fluid.
It feels to me as though the fever has broken a little bit.
I'd say midweek, the war drums were being banged so loudly and people were getting so hysterical that it felt like the whole thing might fall apart any second.
Thankfully, we have a president who's been through this stuff before.
He's seen all the nonsense that was done with foreign policy in the early 2000s.
I think he's patient.
I think he would much rather talk than bomb or go to war.
And so I think right now we're in a critical period where The president, to me, seems as though he wants to get a deal done.
He wants something that doesn't require yet another war in the Middle East.
And yet on the other side, I think we're going to have people and entities who are going to spend the next two weeks doing nothing but trying to blow up the possibility of any deal.
steve bannon
Let me ask you about, because this is what's most disturbing.
President Trump is very even-handed, thinks things through.
As Jack Spasovic said yesterday so brilliantly, measure twice, cut once.
But this whole drive, the war fever, and it's the exact Iraq playbook.
This is why I want you on.
You had this tweet where you said we segued from having to stop the nuclear program to regime change.
And you have all this loose talk on some of these networks and these pundits about regime change where you're talking about an ancient civilization, 90 million people.
You know, something the Romans, you know, have fought the Persians for 2,000 years, right, to a draw.
Just give me your thoughts there before we go to break.
Your thoughts about this drive for regime change by the propagandist warmongers that are amongst us.
sean davis
Yeah, it's interesting.
You know, before the the Iraq war, we probably had a good year plus, you know, maybe 15 months where they were beating the drums.
They were building their case.
It was new stuff every day, but it was a fairly like deliberate, long, drawn out process process.
This right now feels like they're speedrunning the entire Iraq war propaganda campaign and trying to compress it into like a week and a half and are using social media to create a hysterical hype cycle.
So much of these mobs are obviously false.
They're run by bots.
And they're meant to create this sense of chaos and panic to force you into an emotional decision right now because they don't want to give you time to think about the ramifications of any decision.
And to me, this type of increased tempo and pace in the propaganda suggests that they know they're in real trouble, that they know they have a problem.
And you could see that in how angry they got yesterday when that two-week pause was announced, because they had built up this hyper-frenzy campaign, and it clearly didn't work, thankfully.
unidentified
Yeah.
steve bannon
Sean, can you hang up for a second through the break?
the great Jack Posobiec.
Posobiec told us yesterday...
Create urgency and then upsell.
I think that was exposed, folks.
I think everybody did a good job.
Charlie Kirk, Benny Johnson, Jack Posobiec, all the different podcasts are just really, really, really amazing.
Short commercial break.
Back in the war, I'm in a moment.
unidentified
Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann.
steve bannon
Sean Davis brings up...
Maybe in Saudi Arabia, but I digress.
A year and a half, they built up the PSYOP.
Coming out of Fox News to sign up every day with guys like, and Jack Keene is a good man, right?
He's got the CENTCOM mentality, right?
That whole, just the way CENTCOM thinks.
They're obsessed by this, right?
And they're one of, next to the CIA, I think the Federal Reserve, the CIA, and the CENTCOM are the three most important and powerful institutions in the imperial capital.
That's really the home base with the CIA of the Praetorian Guard, right?
It was a year and a half, Jack Posobiec, of a buildup.
Here they had to rush it.
This is why there's been no justification.
Why was it have to be last Thursday night?
And remember, they had momentum because up on Fox, hey, this is the greatest military victory.
I think you can make a cogent argument, as Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson did, and Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson was Colin Powell's.
I think his military aid, that you can make an argument.
Hang on, let's play this for a second.
I want to play it because I think you make an argument the Israelis may actually be losing right now and they're looking for a bailout.
Let's go ahead and play it.
lawrence wilkerson
Well, I'm surprised you missed the line that Bibi stole from George W. Bush in his 2003 speech to a joint session of Congress.
We must not allow the world's most dangerous regime.
To acquire the world's most dangerous weapons.
Bibi just takes the same sheet of music out anytime he needs it for whatever country he happens to be angry at at the moment.
And he's particularly concerned with Iran because it's the last one.
He will have a clean sweep of the Levant, a clean sweep of all those who might oppose him in some way in Southwest Asia if Iran goes.
And he can't do it by himself.
In fact, I got videos this morning smuggled out of Israel.
Showing me that Israel is being pummeled right now, pummeled in ways that Bibi Netanyahu probably never envisioned, and certainly the Israeli citizens of Israel didn't envision.
So he's in a trick bag right now, and I think it's only going to deepen and get worse.
So he needs the United States, desperately needs them, if he's going to complete this mission, which is almost messianic with him.
To destroy this final regime in Southwest Asia called Iran.
steve bannon
By the way, they have been on a roll in southern Syria with Hezbollah.
Their defeat of Hezbollah is incredible, taking down the air defenses initially, what, 90 days ago or 60 days ago in Iran.
What they've done, look, they've got to finish this Muslim Brotherhood of Mosque.
They're far from doing that in Gaza.
But this is biting off more than you can treat.
Here's my problem with it.
It was always contingent.
Their plan was always contingent in sucking the Americans in here into a combat position.
And we're just not ready for that.
We're not ready for it because it's like, what is the interest, what is the vital national security interest of the United States in getting involved in another war that's going to take 20 or 30 years to resolve?
Jack Posobiec, with your knowledge as a naval intelligence officer, is Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson correct?
Did they bite off more than they can chew?
Is Israel actually now looking for a bailout?
Are they losing this war?
jack posobiec
Well, Steve, here's what's going on, and it comes down to basic capabilities.
And there's an order of battle mismatch here, because while the Israelis did come in with a high technological advantage, and that has always been their advantage, if you go back to the Six-Day War in the 1960s, if you go back to any of these other recent skirmishes that we've seen, and the conflicts between themselves, Hezbollah, Hamas, and others.
Taking the Golan Heights and being able to defend that against the Syrian army.
It's always been the technological advantage.
However, that technological advantage can be blunted, as we've seen just up to the north on the arc of instability, by what?
It's a war of attrition.
That's what we saw between Ukraine and Russia because we heard the same stuff in the very early days of Ukraine and Russia.
They said Ukraine's got the technology.
Ukraine's got the tech advantage.
They got Starlink.
They got the drones.
They got everything out.
Russia's going to collapse.
Russia's going to slow down.
So what did Russia switch to?
Russia switched to a war of attrition.
Now, we haven't seen that yet here because this is an air war.
What we are seeing is a war of air attrition.
Look, the Iron Dome, as powerful as it is and as great as it is, It was not designed for long-range, high-intensity, sustained warfare.
It was built primarily for short-range, low-volume rocket attacks from Hamas or Hezbollah.
That's usually what came out.
The Iron Dome was not designed for full-scale, prolonged military campaigns.
And that's why Israeli officials came out themselves to NBC yesterday and said, look, we were at 90% interception rate.
Now we're down to 65%.
And so these strikes that he's seeing, and I'm looking at when I check my feeds from Tel Aviv and other areas, you are now starting to see more and more Iranian.
And so it's helpful against small barrages.
It has that defensive layer.
But these interceptor missiles that Israel is shooting up, by the way, same issue that Ukraine had.
The interceptor missiles are extremely expensive, and they are not unlimited.
You're talking $50,000 to $100,000 each time one is fired.
That doesn't even mean if it hits.
When it's fired, if it malfunctions, when it goes off.
50 to 100.
That's US dollars.
And so you're talking about an extremely expensive air net.
And of course, they're doing that because they want to protect civilians.
They want to protect infrastructure.
Absolutely.
But we're just talking about order of battle here.
And so, yes, Iran's munitions, they're not they're not as precision guided.
They're ordnance.
They're missiles.
A lot of this is old material.
There was a there was a missile, one of the ballistics that landed and there were some images circulating on social media yesterday.
And you could see this thing was built in 1981, a Shahad three.
This was a very old piece of ordinance.
This is Cold War material.
But for from Iran's perspective, the only way that you can beat the Iron Dome and the way you can fight back against it is by overcoming it and overwhelming it.
And again, draining those military resources and financial resources because of the great expense of the shoot down interceptors that Israel is having to use.
And this, of course, is what creates the sense of urgency.
It's urgent for Israel to have someone come in and potentially knock the Iranians out through a regime change operation or get one of the bigger power players in to backfill them, to backfill the ammunition, because otherwise they're going to run out.
They can't keep this up forever, Steve.
steve bannon
Sean, this thing of sense of urgency and then the upsell to regime change.
This has clearly been rejected by President Trump.
He couldn't be more adamant about it.
What are your thoughts on how this plays out going forward?
Because obviously the Fox News propaganda crew wants regime change here.
And they may feel that they took a licking yesterday, but they are far from finished.
This is not the way Murdoch and these guys roll.
They never give up.
Your thoughts, sir?
sean davis
Well, you look at people like Bill Kristol.
You look at what neocons have been pushing for a long time.
It wasn't ever just about Iraq or just getting regime change in Libya or just getting regime change in Russia, which they were talking about like crazy people for years and using the Ukraine war as a proxy to take down the Russian regime as if somehow it would be replaced by anything better.
I ran Regime Shame.
It's really the crown jewel.
That's the thing they've been going after for a very, very long time.
And I'm not that old.
I'm in my 40s.
But basically my entire life we've been told they're about to get a nuclear weapon.
They're about to get a nuclear weapon.
It's going to happen tomorrow.
It's going to happen tomorrow.
been going on since, you know, the 80s or 90s.
And so I think what we're going to see is a massive ramp up that, you It's about to attack our allies.
If we don't do this now, we might get nuked, even though Iran doesn't have ballistic missile capability coming at us.
I think we are going to see so much emotionally extortive threats about what could happen or what might happen if we don't do this thing right now.
And we know this because of just how quickly they went from – They've run out of tricks, really, at this point.
Like, they went from zero to 100 in a matter of seconds.
Once you get to that point, the only thing you can do past that is just make completely emotional, extortive threats, and I think we're going to see them go into overdrive with that over the next two weeks if they likely try to upend any deal that we might be able to get with the Iranians.
steve bannon
Sean, where do people, you're the founder of The Federalist, and by the way, it's a must-go-to site.
Where do people go?
Your social media is always something people should be on because you're doing great analysis and observations throughout the day.
Where do people go to get you?
sean davis
Thank you.
They can find me on X at Sean, M-D-A-V, S-E-A-N-M-D-A-V, or they can find us and all of our great writers and reporters at thefederalist.com.
steve bannon
Incredible.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate you.
sean davis
Thank you, sir.
steve bannon
Jack, can you stick around for a couple of minutes or you got to bounce?
jack posobiec
I'm here.
steve bannon
Okay.
We got D-Jack.
So we want to give a hat tip to Charlie Kirk, the great work Charlie Kirk has been doing, the great work that Benny Johnson's been doing, so many other people, just absolutely incredible.
The podcasters, this is a team effort just to present facts.
Remember, we're a week ago.
Think of where we were a week ago.
A week ago, the chest beating, the thumping, and I want to thank my Real America's Voice distribution partners and my crack team here.
I think we put a marker out.
When we finished the cold open last Friday morning, what did we end with?
We ended with the shock and awe of 19 March of 2003 and also the march up to Baghdad when all the people, you know, were beating their chest and this is going to be easy and what a victory.
Look, we still have, what, 25,000, 30,000 troops that are now exposed to the Persians for counterattack.
When you deal in the Middle East, understand that history can come up and grab you, okay?
It's unbelievable.
And quite frankly, it's almost criminal.
Criminal.
What is going on?
In fact, I think an investigation into, like, what is the information Fox News is getting?
Is money changing hands?
Are they getting ads?
I mean, I would actually say, you know, a FARA investigation should take place of Fox News, and it should take place of Fox News, like, starting today.
Short commercial break.
Back in the warm in just a moment.
greg gutfeld
Big difference of opinion here, but unlike the left, we're not afraid to show it.
And you know all the players involved.
So I guess I've got to ask you, I want to talk about that thing.
Should it matter that the mood of America, they voted for a guy who wanted to concentrate on America first.
We got the guy in and now we're here almost participating in a war.
How do you explain that, say, to your MAGA friends, you know, the Tuckers and the Bannons, you know, or.
How do you, what do you say?
kayleigh mcenany
So I observed America first, upfront and personal in term one.
And what I learned about President Trump, he's a man of action, not words.
He's not a Navelle Chamberlain.
He is a Churchill.
He is not someone who sits in a beach chair and lets history happen to him.
He makes history.
He acts strategically.
He acts when it's in our interest.
When he took out Soleimani.
When he took out al-Baghdadi, when he acted in Syria, when they used chemical weapons on their own people, every dictator in the world observed that.
And you know what happened?
Putin, for the first time in four presidencies, did not invade a sovereign country.
The last and final year of his presidency, not a single American troop ISIS dismantled.
He's not words, he is action.
How is Bannon and the folks that you mentioned and the people advocating for just sitting back and taking it easy, how are they any different than Biden's foreign policy?
Biden's foreign policy was, I say don't.
And Putin does.
I say don't, and the Taliban takes over Afghanistan.
I say don't, and two global wars start on my watch.
That is the Biden foreign policy.
That is by no definition America first.
Iran has had five decades, five decades, almost half a century to talk.
And what they've done instead, kill 609 American troops in Iraq.
What they've done is put an assassination plot on President Trump's head.
What they've done is take American hostages and wreak havoc.
America First is not sitting in a beach chair and using words.
It's taking decisive action when we can take out Fordow with one swoop of an airplane.
steve bannon
With one swoop of an airplane.
Of course, Kayleigh McEnany is infantile.
Let's be blunt.
That right there is dangerous.
That is dangerous.
And that is on Fox all day long.
I'm absolutely serious.
Why do you not think that they're representing a foreign government?
Hannity, Levin, the whole crowd.
There should be an investigation.
Has there been intelligence?
Are the guys taking ads?
You see the AIPAC ads all the time over there.
I'm a supporter of Israel.
And I believe in Israel first to do what they think is necessary.
And they've done a pretty magnificent job recently with Hezbollah in southern Syria.
I think even in Gaza, although it should be done a lot quicker and get it over with.
But this is different scale.
This is different level.
And in history, scale matters.
And this was rushed.
This was rushed to try to suck us into a military operation and get us entangled in regime change.
That is obvious.
The urgency last week, which still hasn't been explained, why they had to have a Pearl Harbor-type attack last Thursday night and Friday morning, right?
As we said, what do we say on the show, Jack Posovic?
On Friday morning.
We said this was just not to get, it was obvious, it was just not to get the nuclear program.
It was a decapitation move at the highest military command.
They were bragging about it.
And that's fine, but if you're going to do that, don't do it where you then got to upsell us for regime change or bring us in to finish, do the coup de grace.
If the coup de grace is needed by the United States of America, you should discuss that, and the American people need to be prepared for that.
What did Lincoln say?
If you have public opinion on your side, if you have the public's support, you can do anything in this country.
But to get the public support, you've got to be straight with the public.
We were dealt from the bottom of the deck in Iraq, and I might note, Kayleigh McEnany, if you learned your history, Iraq today is, I don't know, 50% Jack controlled by Persia for the simple reason is that the buffoons over at Fox that dangerously promoted into the Iraq war.
Right?
Had not thought it through.
So Jack, where are we?
And look, Israel, we have a special relationship, which I unfortunately think is being broken right now by the way the Netanyahu government is dealing with us.
But that special relationship is they have air supremacy over Persia right now.
But if you look at the hits they're taking, you've got to ask the question, And they're running out of ammunition, which they're going to need us to do.
They're running out of the refueling operations.
They're going to need us to do.
We're already engaged as a combatant, okay?
Let's be blunt.
We're already engaged as a combatant.
Now they want to bring us into air operations.
As Hugo Lowell walked you through yesterday, it's not one swoop.
Her words at the end are damning.
Oh, it's just one swoop.
Get off your beach chair.
Just one swoop.
Well, lady, guess what?
The guys in the beach chairs right now are advising President Trump, think this through.
You're the commander-in-chief.
We will support you, obviously.
You're MAGA base, not Fox and the Murdochs that dumped him in 2021 and tried to get Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley and Youngkin and all that crowd, the neocon crowd, promote him over President Trump, try to crush President Trump.
Murdoch tried to make him a non-person.
Those are Murdoch's words, not mine.
So your rush here to basically jam the president of the United States and to jam the United States of America into a situation where we had to deliver the coup de grace on a military operation you initiated does not wash with the American people, does not wash with MAGA.
And I will tell you, I think the odds are now, hopefully, that the president thinks through and looks at other diplomatic and economic warfare possibilities.
to deal with the situation.
Jack Posovic.
jack posobiec
Yeah, Steve, I mean, there's just massive category errors there.
Talking about trying to compare this to ISIS.
ISIS didn't have a navy.
ISIS didn't have a ballistic missile force.
ISIS didn't have any of these assets.
ISIS didn't have control of 20% of the world's oil going in and out of the Strait of Hormuz.
ISIS didn't have any of these things.
So just massive category errors there.
One is a sovereign government, and the other one is a terrorist group.
So these are wildly different things.
It's just someone who really needs to go back and hit the books.
And when you look at also, you say, wait a minute, the one line that just sticks at me, Steve, is say, wait a minute, this is Joe Biden's foreign policy.
Joe Biden was not an isolationist.
Joe Biden launched a proxy war against Russia.
Let's not mince words.
There's a proxy war against Russia that Joe Biden initiated through his proxies in Ukraine that Fox News was cheerleading for.
And all the cheerleaders with the blowjob.
And Tucker Carlson, by the way, got fired over speaking out against the war in Ukraine and saying, hey, wait a minute.
This isn't a great idea.
We've got real issues here.
They've got real number issues.
They've got armament issues.
Maybe we should try to find a way to end this diplomatically.
Where's that going right now?
How's that going right now?
When they did the last troop exchange, the last troop exchange, And Russia turned over 6,000 bodies and Ukraine turned over 70. All right?
That's the numbers of ratio right there.
How many people got to die?
How many men got to die?
How many boys got?
Christian, European men.
How many Christians do you want dead?
Because that's what happens in every single Middle East war, too, by the way.
The Christians always get slaughtered by one side or the other.
Right?
All these areas used to be Christian.
They're all slaughtered.
And you say, oh, we pray for them.
We pray for them.
Or you could maybe not start a war and get them all killed.
So you've got a proxy war right now that is still unfinished, not too far, relatively speaking, to the north of Iran between Ukraine and Russia that all of Fox News was cheerleading.
And we don't talk about that anymore.
We don't have any conversation about that whatsoever.
Putin's up there.
steve bannon
He's saying, wait a minute.
Can we mediate?
Can we do any of this?
jack posobiec
China's trying to come in.
steve bannon
The same crew, Levin.
Levin, Hannity, Cruz, Lindsey Graham.
Lindsey Graham's over there for the assault.
The same exact crew.
The same exact crew with the blood on their hands of two million.
Let me be blunt.
Two million Ukrainians and Russians.
A million Russians.
jack posobiec
Christians.
steve bannon
Dead or wounded.
A million Ukrainians dead and wounded.
And here's the point.
On this show, as you know from the very beginning, talking about Professor Mersheimer.
They were leading the Ukrainians into a destructive war.
It's like World War I. The catastrophic nature of that conflict is revolting.
Who cheerleaded that, and where are they now?
Are they cheerleading?
No, because they understand the American people are revolting what's happening.
jack posobiec
They want a new proxy war before they even finish the last one.
steve bannon
Exactly.
It's revolting.
jack posobiec
And the one man on Fox News who wasn't cheerleading, they fired him.
steve bannon
Got rid of him.
Right?
Got rid of him.
Talk to me about also Charlie's being attacked because he used the analogy of the Persians and the Romans, sir?
It's true.
Look, look.
jack posobiec
You've got a Western power.
Think of it, right?
You say, oh, that's, you know, they're saying, oh, Charlie said the Romans couldn't even beat the Persians, right?
Well, understand, when Rome and Persia were fighting, that's because that was an expeditionary operation of Rome.
A Western power based, as we know, of course, in Italy, was fighting Persia.
So there were two massive wars between Rome and Persia.
You sit there and say, oh, well, that's, no, the geography hasn't changed.
The lift hasn't changed.
You still have to lift troops and materiel and sources.
You need all of this.
So you need your supply lines.
So you have to carry out those sustained supply lines, just like we're seeing this air bridge that's being built right now, right in front of our eyes, if you go look at the map.
So that's all being done.
And the Persians, what do they do?
They hunkered down and they kept fighting, they kept fighting, they kept fighting, they kept fighting.
And what did it do?
What did it do?
It sapped the strength of both Persia and the Western Roman Empire.
So the Roman Empire splits to West and East.
Byzantium goes on for much longer.
And then the Persian Empire collapses also internally.
And what did that give rise to?
all right the islamic They took the entire peninsula.
They took all of Persia.
And then they sweeped all the way through, and it created the Ottoman caliphate.
So all of this was done because they were able to break out because you weakened the empire by overstretch, by putting foreign interests ahead of your domestic agenda, the domestic agenda of your internal core.
And so if you think that there aren't any analogies that we can learn from that history and we should just shut up and stop reading those history books and telling Charlie Kirk to stop worrying about it, I would say I think Charlie Kirk is dead spot on.
steve bannon
Dead spot on.
Jack, also today it's pretty obvious.
President Trump has pivoted back to what his interest really should be.
The mass deportations, huge win in the courts.
Right, that President Trump's taken advantage of, but also the big, beautiful bill.
He understands he's got a lift here.
It's a heavy lift because there's a huge gap between the bid and the ask here to get a bill for him to sign on July 4th.
Talk to me about where the President's head looks like, at least on True Social and other messaging we're seeing coming out this morning.
He's back to business, is he not?
jack posobiec
Well, President Trump knows, look, this big, beautiful bill and the drumbeats were not beating for war.
They were beating for this bill just one week ago, about one week prior to last Thursday.
And that bill looked like it was working its way through, and Stephen Miller was up there on Capitol Hill, and he was working hard on it and getting into a lot of debates with some of the senators and the holdouts, etc.
But you need 50. So you need 50 plus 1 if you get J.D. in there, and that's able to be enough to get this across.
You only need a simple majority because of the way that they're doing this.
You want your deportations, and look, I've said day in and day out, support your local ICE.
That's where America's first focused is.
That's President Trump's number one issue.
And by the way, Kayleigh McEnany said that just a few nights ago.
This is the number one issue for American voters, for Trump supporters, and it's his most broad support is on that issue as well.
And Kayleigh, I applaud you for saying that.
I think she was exactly correct when she said that.
That that's President Trump's number one issue.
That's what swept him into office.
And that's what he's been fighting very hard to get across the finish line.
Number one, with the ICE raids.
That have been going on.
Fantastic ice raids.
Los Angeles, huge ice raids.
I love the videos coming out of there.
I can't get enough of them, Steve.
We got to set up a whole, you know, maybe a whole couple hours here on Real America's Voice where we just show the footage of the ice raids.
Maybe we get Ben Berkwam to narrate or something.
And that, you know, maybe in bed with those guys, Oscar Ramirez.
But then you got the big, beautiful bill that if you want to see these expanded, boom, you hit the bill.
Now they get the funding to do it nationwide.
It's incredible.
That's what President Trump's core focus has always.
steve bannon
Jack, where do people go?
Social media, the show, all of it.
jack posobiec
Human events daily will be up at 2 p.m. today.
We're going to be walking through all of this, the play-by-play.
We're going to have footage of these strikes hitting Iran, hitting Tel Aviv, hitting Haifa, places where a lot of people said that it wasn't going to come back to the backfield.
But this situation, unfortunately, needs a dealmaker in chief like President Donald J. Trump.
steve bannon
President Trump.
Thank you, Jack.
Short break.
Back in the warm in a moment.
Now that the president has set the course to let's think this through, as he thinks through, actually, Haley McEnany, it's just one swoop.
It's just one swoop.
It's just a swoop.
That's all.
It's just a swoop.
Get off your beach chair.
Let's have a swoop.
That type of infantile, Cheerleading is what led to Section 60 over in Arlington National Cemetery.
Yeah.
Remember Bill Kristol?
Remember that?
They're going to throw roses.
They're going to throw roses in the streets to welcome the American troops.
That was all in Iraq.
It's dangerous to put the pom-poms up.
And act like this.
Now, this is very serious, not just for this country, geopolitically, geostrategically, but also for the lives of men and women in combat and their families.
America first means also American citizens first.
This is why President Trump resonates so well.
This is why he has such a large movement that's growing.
David Drucker from the Dispatch is going to be up next, but a story he did on Bloomberg.
About how African-American men are coming to the MAGA movement and they're just not coming for a quick one-time vote, potentially permanently.
Why is that?
One of the reasons they understand that President Trump is if he gets involved militarily, he's going to think it through and think through the second, third, fourth, fifth order magnitude.
President Trump has pivoted back this morning.
To focus on tax and spending.
Ray Dalio, and I'm going to try to play that.
If I can't play it this morning, I'll play it this evening.
Five minutes.
Remember, we got a lot of disagreements with Ray Dalio about China.
But he's now preaching from the gospel of too much debt.
And what did he say today?
Hey, I think gold has become your asset.
Ray Dalio, a hedge fund guy.
Why did we start the end of the dollar empire four years ago?
I know you listen to us and you watch us because you like the fact that we're ahead of the curve on so many things.
Well, we could tell you years ago, given the spending of Biden and what that illegitimate regime was prepared to do, that we were going to have big problems.
And that's why we said the pressure is going to come on the dollar as the prime reserve currency.
And people have to understand this.
It's not about the price of gold.
It's about the process of what drives gold as a hedge and therefore drives the price of gold.
If you learn that, you've learned so much about how finance works throughout the world.
And that's what we set out to do.
Birchgold.com slash bandit.
The end of the dollar empire.
Of what could cause it.
Of our elites.
Make sure you go.
Just to make yourself smarter.
If you never intend to invest in gold in your life, just get it.
Teaching it now in college courses is in finance.
Because it's accessible.
Very proud of it.
Go check it out today, but also talk to Philip Patrick and the team.
Or you can take your phone at 98, text Bannon, that would be me, at 989898 and get the ultimate guide for investing in gold in the age of Trump.
That's kind of a quick and dirty, but at least it gets you into it and you start to see all the methodologies.
Also, our guy with a tax network.
He gives you, right from the worm, he says, hey, it's $7 trillion of spending, $5 trillion of all revenues.
It's that $2 trillion deficit.
This is what Ron Johnson's all over.
And this is what they're trying to struggle with.
That $5 trillion, that's taxes, fees, tariffs, all of it.
If you've got an issue with the IRS, I can tell you right now, the IRS is looking for every penny they can get.
Why?
Because they've got to close that gap.
If you've not filed, if you've filed late, if you've got a letter from them, you can't screw around with this.
You can't.
And just hiding it in the drawer doesn't work.
What do you do?
It's simple.
Just take out the 800-958-1000.
talk to the folks over at Tax Network USA.
They've solved...
Right?
Don't be ashamed.
There's nothing to be ashamed of.
What you should worry, that angst and think, oh, I can't do it.
It's bothering me.
Hey, Lance the Bullock, make a call, and they'll tell you.
If they can help you, they can help you.
If not, they'll tell you.
Contact the IRS and get into it.
But they've solved up to a billion dollars of problems.
Tax Network USA.
TNUSA.com.
Give them promo code Bannon.
You get a discount.
Make sure you talk to them or call 800-958-1000.
Tell them we sent you and have a conversation today.
So we're going to have David Drucker is going to join us to talk about something important, this coalition and what's driving it and how important it is.
This is what President Trump has done.
And you can't throw it away with, oh, we're going to just jump into a kinetic conflict here.
Oh, yeah, we're just going to do it.
You saw Hugo Lowell yesterday.
The strike packages here are quite complicated.
If you decide to go the route, and by the way, he may decide to go the route of a targeted military intervention.
People have to be prepared for that.
He'll come back and he'll explain his logic.
But one thing you can see is that he gave them another couple of weeks.
He's trying to get a deal.
And if they're at all interested in the deal, something could be struck.
But if they're not going to have a deal, But even then, it's not easy.
It's quite complicated.
These strike packages are complicated.
It's not just the pilots' lives you're putting in jeopardy.
It's also the United States, because then we're a combatant.
We're a combatant.
We are a combatant in another war.
And maybe we can limit it.
But President Trump, I will tell you, will look through every alternative.
And he will make sure it's 125% that, hey, this thing can happen.
It's not one swoop.
It's very complicated.
So that's why he keeps telling on the show for the Israelis, finish what you started.
You say you could have taken this thing out.
It may take additional bombing runs.
It may take commando raids.
Get on with it.
unidentified
Whatever it takes, go for it.
steve bannon
Jim Rickards and the team.
Make sure you go to rickardswarroom.com right now.
If you like the geopolitics, the national security, the capital markets we talk about, he puts out a newsletter.
Strategic intelligence.
Not just intelligence, strategic intelligence.
The target is CEOs, chairman.
If you want to understand what they're reading and see what information they're getting, this is perfect.
Get the newsletter.
He throws in a free book, Money GPT, about artificial intelligence and currency.
And I came to Jim's thinking through his book, Currency Wars, which was brilliant and very relevant today.
Jim Rickards, RickardsWarRoom.com, Strategic Intelligence.
Go get signed up.
We're going to take a short break.
We've got a very special mystery guest in the second hour.
Export Selection