Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
Okay, Wednesday, 28 May, year of alert, 20, 25. Thank you for sticking around for the second hour of our late afternoon, early evening edition of The War Room. | ||
So much going on all day. | ||
Just insanely good content shows with top people because there's so much going on. | ||
And Ben Harner was going to join me. | ||
Ben, I just sent you a text message. | ||
If you can please read this tweet. | ||
I want to bring you in right afterwards because I think it reinforces my theory of the case from this morning. | ||
We had so much going on that we've asked Ben to join us in the 6 o 'clock hour to give us his perspective as our international editor out of Rome. | ||
One of my great fears – by the way, Dave Brat is going to join us as soon as we get him up here in a moment. | ||
And we're going to be talking about the situation in – with Peter Navarro who put this magnificent – Something we've been calling for. | ||
In fact, I think some of it is off some of the analysis that we've been putting out that you've got to look at the big, beautiful bill. | ||
It's part of whole cloth of what's going on with what else President Trump's got to do, and you've got to add those numbers. | ||
But I also want Dave Brat to comment on this geopolitical situation. | ||
Ben, here's my concern, is that we had Mark Mitchell on this morning, and Mark Mitchell Rasmussen goes through these amazing numbers of President Trump, where the American people now think the country's on the right track, and this is coming off of his Middle East trip, that people now are supporting Trump probably more than ever between an election day. | ||
And yet we're inexorably drawn in. | ||
And this is – over this weekend, and I drilled down on this thing pretty thoroughly, we are being drawn in more and more into the kinetic war. | ||
President Trump has made his number one priority to actually have people put their guns down and let's get to a deal. | ||
We're inexorably drawn into this. | ||
Moment by moment, one part of it is that the Americans' weapons manufacturers have used Ukraine as a lab in these drone strikes, which are very serious. | ||
And if you don't believe me, maybe I can play the Alex Jones clip either late in the show tomorrow. | ||
Alex does a great job of walking through how there was a significant assassination attempt on Putin by basically an attack, I think, of 500 Ukrainian drones with essentially American artificial intelligence and target acquisition and fire control solutions last night. | ||
In Moscow, 300 drones got through, I think, of a 500-drone attack and actually attacked the city. | ||
The tweet I just gave you is that there's a discussion. | ||
Look, you've got all these sites in this war that are false flag sites giving you false information. | ||
They're saying how Russia's had it, and with Mertz kind of driving this, that they're actually having discussions inside the Russian military about targets in Berlin. | ||
And this is my fear, is that just like in 1939, this war is expanding. | ||
It is not decreasing. | ||
Ben Harnwell, from your perspective in Rome, and someone who's been dead spot on in this thing since the evening before the invasion back in, I think, was it February 22? | ||
What's your current thoughts? | ||
Steve, well, President Trump, good afternoon to you. | ||
President Trump put out, I think it was on social media, that President Putin... | ||
Steve, I have to be honest with you. | ||
Look, I will defend President Trump till I'm blue in the face. | ||
In every way I can, I will always see how I might take his side in an argument. | ||
But I have to say, looking at the facts, I don't think it's President Trump who's playing with fire. | ||
I don't think it's President Putin who's playing with fire. | ||
It's President Trump who is playing with fire. | ||
With regards to the crazy accusation, I have to be consistent. | ||
As an analyst, Steve, coming on the show, I have to be consistent. | ||
I have to say the same thing that I said three years ago when Ursula von der Leyen and President Biden were pushing out this line that President Putin was crazy. | ||
And I said, I have to repeat now what I said then, if you guys really think Putin is crazy, Why are you antagonising him if you think he's crazy? | ||
And I have to say the same thing to President Trump. | ||
If you think President Putin is crazy, why are you dragging along the United States? | ||
No, he's not dragging. | ||
President Trump is not dragging the United States into this war. | ||
He's allowing himself by other actors to be dragged in. | ||
And that's worse, because it shows that President Trump isn't in control of the narrative here. | ||
Let me give the blinding example of how President Trump is not in control of this situation. | ||
Two days ago, on Monday, the new Reichskanzler in Germany, in Berlin, Friedrich Merz, had a press conference, and he stated that And you mentioned this on the morning show, that Germany, France, | ||
the UK and America had now removed all the long-range inhibitions on the long-range missiles that the various countries had provided to Ukraine. | ||
That was on Monday. | ||
Yesterday, Mertz walked that back ever so slightly, saying actually he was talking about things that had already been happening for the last couple of months. | ||
Also yesterday, I think a friend of yours, Steve, Tammy Bruce, was asked whether she's like, you know, does she have a statement to make on Mertz's declaration? | ||
And she said, we're not going to be commenting on this. | ||
Now, why is this important, folks? | ||
Because November last year, Biden, you might remember, I remember this very well, Biden announced that he was removing the distance inhibitions on the Atakums missiles that he had provided Zelensky with. | ||
And I remember there was a specific weekend that I actually thought we were going to possibly see some kind of nuclear exchange. | ||
About 30 hours after that, But he said, hang on, hang on. | ||
When I said that Zelensky could use these Atakums missiles inside Russia, I was simply referring to the Kursk region conflict. | ||
Now, Kursk, as the war impasse will know, is on the board. | ||
on the Russian side of the Ukraine-Russian borders, where Zelenskyy And he said only there, not deep within Russia, and absolutely not towards Moscow or St. Petersburg or anything like that. | ||
Only on that border. | ||
The world released a sigh of relief. | ||
And that has been the official position, Steve, of the United States since that moment. | ||
So what is now happening is that Germany has said that the US has removed its distance inhibitions, its limiting inhibitions on the attack of missiles, and the US isn't making a comment. | ||
Now, there are two possibilities, Steve, to this. | ||
Either Merckx is right, and that at some point, presumably from the inauguration to the present date, President Trump has indicated behind the scenes... | ||
Or Mertz has got it wrong. | ||
If Mertz has got it wrong, I don't understand why Tammy Bruce won't walk it back. | ||
If Mertz is telling the truth, however, Steve, that's terrifying for a number of reasons. | ||
Firstly, firstly, why is President Trump allowing a European leader to announce what the United States policy position is on an issue that could lead to a nuclear element to the kinetic stage of World War III? | ||
Point one. | ||
Point two, as I said, if Trump is putting out on social media that he thinks Putin is crazy, as I just said in my introduction, Putin is the most nuclear-armed country on the planet. | ||
Why are you authorizing Ukraine to use long-distance missiles that could potentially reach Moscow if you think President Putin is crazy? | ||
Jim Rickards said this morning, do you agree or disagree? | ||
He said, hey, this clearly has the implicit okay by the United States because Tammy Bruce didn't come out. | ||
The United States is allowing Mertz to say this and going quiet publicly, but they would have had to approve it for Mertz ever to include it because Mertz said France, UK and the United States all agreed. | ||
They were all given permission to strike inland to Russia. | ||
Your thoughts? | ||
Look, Steve, I've been involved in politics for 25 years. | ||
My first rule of thumb is never underestimate the degree of incompetence that takes place at the highest levels of government. | ||
So there could be, at the moment I'm leaving space for the possibility that Mertz got ahead of himself on this. | ||
But I don't understand, you know, Jim Rickards makes the point that right now, tacitly at least, the fact that the United States hasn't walked that back, hasn't explicitly contradicted Germany on this, does indicate a sort of degree of permission. | ||
But I have a wider question on regards... | ||
If you are giving Ukraine free reign to use US-provided long-distance missiles to attack deep within Russian territory, you are effectively outsourcing Your own role in a war of which you are not formally a part to another country. | ||
Another country that has the most massive vested interests to drag you into it. | ||
Steve, I can make that point. | ||
Ten times in a row, literally repeated. | ||
It's absolutely terrifying. | ||
If President Trump has given this permission to Zelensky, he is allowing Zelensky to dictate whether America is now formally involved in a war with Russia. | ||
Let me go to Brett. | ||
Brett, polling is out on Lindsey Graham in South Carolina in his re-elect. | ||
I think he's got 37% approval. | ||
Among Republicans. | ||
And as you know, South Carolina is pretty MAGA. | ||
Are we following Lindsey Graham's policy in Ukraine right now? | ||
Because I say we're getting sucked into this war every second of every day. | ||
Or are we following President Trump's? | ||
And is it he downloaded 100 guys out of the NSC because they were all detailees from the deep state? | ||
Is President Trump now overwhelmed by deep staters? | ||
And really not following the policy that he's advocated from day one. | ||
He wants a peace deal. | ||
He wants the guns laid down. | ||
He wants to stop this nonsense, sir. | ||
Yeah, well, I want to know who's around him and who's advising him. | ||
And you mentioned Lindsey Graham. | ||
Congress is given the unique role to declare war, the War Powers Act. | ||
The president has, you know, limited powers in the short run. | ||
Where is Congress? | ||
You've been on this for years, right? | ||
Congress still has not made any definitive statements. | ||
The Congress or the Senate, the foreign relations committees, the Senate is supposed to be the, you know, the old gray-haired wise men on these matters. | ||
And if they make one mistake, they lose their next election. | ||
So they're quiet, but it looks like all All of it. | ||
The whole thing, all the economic stuff, all the tariff stuff, all goes down in flames if this war lights up, right? | ||
And that is the deep state objective. | ||
Hang on. | ||
Slow down. | ||
Hang on. | ||
Slow down. | ||
Hit pause. | ||
Go back and explain that. | ||
We had Mark Mitchell on this morning of these unbelievable numbers, not just the MAGA because we love it, but now people are waking up to what he's doing, Middle East, tariffs, the economy, all this. | ||
You've got – he's on a roll on so many – we just got the – we're going to – We're supposed to spend the whole hour on Peter Navarro. | ||
We are going to get to it, this incredible piece in the Hill to talk about the economic upside of where we're going. | ||
What do you mean? | ||
It's all in jeopardy. | ||
Do you think he loses all of that if we're drawn into this war in Ukraine, which obviously we're being drawn in every second of every day, sir? | ||
Yeah, if you just look at any information source, right? | ||
I was looking at the conference board today, whoever runs that joint, right? | ||
It turns consumer confidence has jumped up spectacularly. | ||
You wouldn't know it. | ||
And expectations, consumer confidence up 12 points. | ||
Expectations on the future is up 17 points. | ||
What do you think a war does to those expectations? | ||
What do you think a war does to Wall Street, right? | ||
They're walking a tightrope right there, right? | ||
Trump's throwing spaghetti. | ||
Getty out there on the wall just brilliantly. | ||
And he's searching for that golden sweet spot, that equilibrium between the bond market and economic growth and the big beautiful bill and monetary policy and geopolitics and the labor force and education and Harvard and all of it, right? | ||
And so a war disrupts all of that. | ||
A war. | ||
The headlines are shot. | ||
Nothing trumps existential threat to life, right? | ||
So the team better figure out every lever we have to pull with respect to- And pull it immediately. | ||
Trump's out there sending all the right signals. | ||
What are you doing? | ||
I'm not happy. | ||
I'm not happy what you're doing over there, buddy. | ||
But it needs to go to the next level. | ||
Congress and the Senate need to step up to the microphone today and take a little risk on themselves. | ||
And you lay out what is the consequence. | ||
To Russia for these actions, right? | ||
Hang on. | ||
Let me get Harnwell in here. | ||
Because, Dave, correct me if I'm wrong, this audience turfed out Mitch McConnell as leader two years ago when he had to make or break Ukraine. | ||
He sacrificed his time as leader. | ||
He knew he was doing this because it's the only way they could try to get this huge bill passed to support Ukraine, which turned out to be an epic fail. | ||
But you got so many out of control, deep state hawks in the Senate that I don't know if you're going to get it. | ||
Ben Harnwell, your thoughts on Brother Brat? | ||
Steve, they're not deep – Steve, they're not deep state hawks. | ||
They're deep state snakes. | ||
These people are snakes. | ||
To give them the magnificence of referring to them as hawks is slightly misleading. | ||
Look, I want to come back to something that Dave mentioned about the Constitution. | ||
Just put this to the side about the fact that Congress actually has the role here over declaring war. | ||
I want to make a philosophical point. | ||
Congress, it's a nest of vipers and snakes. | ||
The present Congress, as it is constituted, is the last organisation on the face of this planet that I would delegate war-making authority to. | ||
I would trust Donald Trump. | ||
Donald Trump is at his best when he's communing with this movement, this vertical communing with MAGA. | ||
He's at his best. | ||
It's when he gets wrapped in and sucked in and encapsulated and surrounded by Congress. | ||
That I think there are the issues to behold. | ||
And the big, beautiful bill is just an example of that. | ||
Any organisation that presents to the American people this big, beautiful bill and say, "We've done a great job," is the last organisation I would let anywhere near to this war with Ukraine. | ||
Donald Trump needs to, you know, MAGA effectively, with all the agency that this great movement has, that the war in posse has, MAGA, with this agency, needs to hold Donald Trump's He promised to do something, which was end this war within 24 hours. | ||
He started to walk it back saying he was exaggerating, you know, and this movement, if I can say this ever so gently, with all love and respect to POTUS. | ||
Fundamentally, the president, Donald Trump, is responsible to this movement. | ||
He works for this movement. | ||
He is there to represent this movement. | ||
And when he said, sorry, I'll give way on this point, Steve. | ||
When he says he will end that war in 24 hours, that is exactly why he was elected into office. | ||
And, you know, that's when he needs to return. | ||
I know, but you heard Rickards. | ||
I got that, and this movement knows that. | ||
But you heard what Rickards said. | ||
We could end the war immediately, but you have to give in to the Russian maximalist. | ||
And remember, we have been against this war from the beginning. | ||
We've been against the party of Davos, Brussels, the whole EU, what they've done to instigate this. | ||
But to solve it now, you would have to give in to Putin's maximalist positions on everything across the board. | ||
Do you think President Trump should do that? | ||
Or he's trying to work to get at least a fair deal. | ||
We oppose, as you know, the economic deal with Ukraine, but President Trump is at least trying to get something that appears to be fair to both parties. | ||
Do you think he just ought to cave to Putin and say, hey, it's yours and move on? | ||
Well, you know, in a sense, the suggestion is a false dichotomy, because this reality that Congress believes that it can somehow manipulate the outcome of this war without entering into full-on kinetic Third World War level is false, right? | ||
America has been, along with the European Union, these two blocs did everything they could already. | ||
To defeat Putin. | ||
And it hasn't happened. | ||
So you then fall... | ||
What has been tried consistently hasn't worked. | ||
In fact, it's impoverished Americans more than anything else. | ||
So there's Lindsey Graham talking about a new round of sanctions. | ||
It's just performative. | ||
He's shilling for the military-industrial complex. | ||
Everybody knows that. | ||
And you say to me, OK, Han, well, do we give in to Putin's maximist demands? | ||
Well, frankly, we create the way... | ||
The outcomes were either we would back down and after spending 200, 300 billion, we would end up backing down humiliatedly or we would go all the way through and have some kind of nuclear war with Russia. | ||
Or Russia stroke China. | ||
Those are the two cards on the table. | ||
I don't see what the third possibility is, apart from this long meat grinder type war of attrition, which we're not going to win for a number of different reasons, least of all because this is an existential war for Russia, as it's not for us. | ||
So those are the possibilities. | ||
Yes, Steve. | ||
Yes, yes, yes. | ||
To give you a yes or no answer, yes, we give in to Putin's maximist demands because we created this situation in the first place. | ||
Brat, your observations, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
...only increase over time. | |
Now it's four or five regions plus. | ||
And so, yeah, Trump is trying to be fair, as you said. | ||
But fairness in war, Putin holds all the cards. | ||
He's taking the ground. | ||
And you better make a deal of any sort before the terms get even worse. | ||
Ben Harnwell, can you give your social media, how do people keep up with you? | ||
Because do you agree with me that we are now in an absolute crisis mode in this Ukraine situation? | ||
What's happened over the last 72 hours, folks, if you're not paying attention, you better. | ||
Because they've got a full-scale air war, a modern 21st century air war. | ||
And I believe Alex Jones 100% on this, about this assassination attempt on Putin. | ||
You've had fleets, I mean 500, 600, 1,000 of these drones. | ||
It's highly sophisticated drones with advanced target acquisition, fire control solutions hitting on both sides. | ||
And it's only escalating. | ||
So, Harnwell, where do people go to get your blinding insights from our outpost in Rome? | ||
Look, Steve, let's just deal with this assassination attempt. | ||
Just 30 seconds. | ||
Let's assume it had been successful and they'd taken Putin out. | ||
What would the Russian military would then take control of the state? | ||
What would their next response be vis-a-vis Ukraine? | ||
What do you think it would be? | ||
unidentified
|
They would level Kiev. | |
Exactly. | ||
What would the United States military do if the president's plane, if Air Force One was taken down and we knew the nation that did it, right? | ||
What do you think the United States would do as a response? | ||
Russia will do exactly the same. | ||
This is the degree of folly that Zelensky's in, and President Trump needs to clarify this situation for the American people, whether he has delegated to Zelensky the ability to choose whether America gets pulled in against its will into this war even further. | ||
We are in a crisis situation, as you said. | ||
Do you believe this tweet that Russian military command is – not that they're saying to do it, but they're running alternatives about the targeting of Berlin? | ||
That's Russian media. | ||
Look, when you're talking about the drone attacks, I try not to form my analysis on the basis of these tit-for-tat drone figures and anything coming out of Russian media. | ||
The only reason I believe this TAS story with regards to Tammy Bruce is because it seems credible to me, but I haven't found... | ||
Why is there zero reference? | ||
To this Tammy Bruce declaration in any Western newspaper. | ||
Simply not there. | ||
Normally I don't allow myself to form my opinion based on Russian media outlets. | ||
The Tammy Bruce thing I think is credible. | ||
The thing that you're mentioning, the tweet, I don't know. | ||
And I'd hesitate to comment on it. | ||
Why would I hesitate to comment on it? | ||
Because a direct attack on Berlin would presumably trigger the Article 5 response from NATO. | ||
One last comment here. | ||
I made the observation of what's at stake economically for our lives here. | ||
President Trump and the Congress, right? | ||
Harnwell's right about the Congress. | ||
They're feckless on these matters. | ||
They've proven it over the past couple years. | ||
But the president needs to shine the light on Congress and make them come up with authoritative statements on all the pressure we can bring to bear on Russia. | ||
And we need to use the trade war. | ||
And every lever we have to go after China to put maximal pressure on Russia as well, as long as Europe and all our friends. | ||
Right now, we need to play very strong and hard. | ||
Okay, Brad, you're going to stick with me. | ||
We're going to go through the president's economic plan as outlined by the great Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
Ben, you're going to bounce. | ||
We want to thank you for staying up with us tonight in Rome. | ||
Where do people go to get all your great insights? | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
Thanks, Dave. | ||
On Getter, my social media platform of choice, tap in my surname, at Harnwell. | ||
Got some great posts at the top of my feed awaiting you folks. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
God bless. | ||
Catch you tomorrow. | ||
Okay, we're going to take a short break. | ||
Dave Brat's going to stick with me. | ||
Two things going on. | ||
Number one, birch gold. | ||
Now more than ever, with these choppy financial markets, you need to understand gold. | ||
You need to understand gold, how it relates to fiat currency. | ||
You need to understand gold, how it relates to the dollar as the prime reserve currency. | ||
Where can you learn all that? | ||
Simple. | ||
The end of the dollar empire. | ||
This is Birch Gold. | ||
End of the dollar empire. | ||
By the Birch Gold and the War Room team. | ||
Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
You get it. | ||
It's all free. | ||
Seven free installments. | ||
The latest. | ||
The Road to Rio and the Rio Reset with the BRICS Nations. | ||
Get it. | ||
Also, MyPatriotSupply, which is one of the extraordinary companies in this country, the leader in the preparedness market. | ||
I call it the common sense market. | ||
This week, they have an extraordinary sale. | ||
I don't think they've ever done it before. | ||
Up to 60% off. | ||
Of all their different offerings, go to MyPatriotSupply.com today. | ||
Check it out. | ||
They've got consultants, advisors, all of it. | ||
Both companies. | ||
We deal at the highest level. | ||
We make sure that you get relationships with them. | ||
Short break. | ||
unidentified
|
The most important trial ever begins in Denver next week. | |
If that sounds like a bit of an exaggeration or perhaps a completely wackadoodle claim, you should know that it's coming from my pillow guy and election denier Mike Lindell. | ||
Now, in fairness to Lindell, I am sure that it is the most important trial ever to him because he is the one who is going to be on trial, accused of defamation for saying that Denver-based Dominion voting systems and one particular Coloradan rigged the 2020 election against Donald Trump. | ||
Truth is an absolute defense against defamation. | ||
So if Lindell can come to court and prove that he was telling the truth about election rigging, he's in the clear. | ||
I actually think that this upcoming trial deserves more attention than it's getting. | ||
Because this is the chance for election deniers to provide their proof of the alleged conspiracy, the one that the most powerful man in the world, President of the United States, will not stop talking about even now that he's back in the White House. | ||
But I think I know why this upcoming trial in Denver is largely being ignored. | ||
Let's start with the media. | ||
It seems like a lot of national journalists are just tired of covering Trump's election rigging lies. | ||
They're now five years old. | ||
I also believe that a number of Colorado's local journalists are skittish about covering political extremism. | ||
It draws accusations of bias and threats of violence. | ||
And if we're being totally honest, Now let's talk about the general public. | ||
I think a lot of Democrats are hesitant to talk about Mike Lindell's election-rigging claims because they don't want to give fuel to theories that erode faith in our elections. | ||
I think a lot of Republicans are hesitant to talk about this, too. | ||
Because while you see a bunch of Republicans nod along in agreement with Trump's election-reading claims, when people have to explain exactly how the elections are rigged, that's when folks start to sound goofy. | ||
Like the swirl of claims that Dominion is rigging the vote with help from Antifa or Venezuela or George Soros. | ||
The people pushing those theories for years have always said they want their day in court. | ||
Well, they're going to get it in Denver starting next week. | ||
Wow. | ||
We played that this morning and it blew people away. | ||
Mike Lindell joins us now. | ||
Mike, get us an update. | ||
You're ensconched in Denver. | ||
And I agree. | ||
I think they're not covering it because, first off, they don't want to see the facts out there. | ||
This trial could be a game changer. | ||
And you're an American hero. | ||
For pursuing it? | ||
Because you could have settled. | ||
Your folks should know this is a roll-the-dice move of a former degenerate gambler, Mike Lindell. | ||
Your thoughts, sir? | ||
Yeah, Steve, I'm the only one that my pillow is being sued, too, that has taken it all the way to jury trial now. | ||
Everybody else so far has settled their insurance company. | ||
We want to sell. | ||
Even though they're right, it doesn't matter. | ||
They're saying we want to sell because it's all about money or you're put out of business. | ||
That's what lawfare is, everybody. | ||
When SmartMedics sued Fox News on February 4th of 2021, that started lawfare in our country. | ||
According to Alan Dershowitz, it hadn't been done since the 1790s. | ||
And it was over 100 people or close to 100 in platforms that were sued and also threatening letters sent out to many, many individuals back then. | ||
But all these people, they got scared. | ||
And the insurance company said, we have to settle. | ||
This is so important. | ||
A couple of things. | ||
Just now, I was just looking over. | ||
I've been here with the lawyers and stuff for about a week. | ||
And they said to list all the experts that have worked with me on this and all the cyber people and the government and colonels and generals. | ||
Well, it's 38. 38. So when they say, well, how do you know this? | ||
I don't know anything about this. | ||
I'm a numbers guy. | ||
I've seen deviations in the elections, all the elections. | ||
I mean, everybody's seen them now, Steve, where you see 81 million people that voted for Biden, 65 Obama, 66 or whatever it was for Harris, and going back to 65 for Clinton. | ||
You got all this in 81 million? | ||
Come on, that's a little bit of a deviation. | ||
Or a Democrat we're bringing up in trial that got zero votes in her own precinct or her and her husband live in Georgia. | ||
These are deviations that you have to explain that need explanations. | ||
It's like, you know, if you have a thing on your bank account, everybody, that doesn't match what the bank tells you, you know what they do? | ||
They go in and see if it's a computer or they open it up and say, oh. | ||
It was a computer error. | ||
Or you're wrong. | ||
But we've never been able to do that. | ||
Just this week here, it's kind of these blessings are coming in. | ||
Remember, everybody, this all ties to Tina Peters being in jail for nine years. | ||
This gold star mom. | ||
It's so sad that this attack and this suppression here. | ||
In the state of Colorado, everybody, in the spring of 2021, they did something called the trusted bill. | ||
Remember, I was sued by it. | ||
Dominion. | ||
And they did this trusted build. | ||
Well, that trusted build was deleted, you know, thousands and thousands of files that by federal law, you have to hold those records for 22 months. | ||
Here in Colorado, it's 25 months. | ||
So all these things were broken. | ||
And also, that's called spoiliation in my case. | ||
That was some of my evidence. | ||
You just deleted it. | ||
And so right now in Arapahoe County, this is two weeks ago, everybody, just two weeks ago, this is going to be brought up in the trial. | ||
This all came out two weeks ago. | ||
There was stuff that happened in the 2020 election. | ||
And everyone says, well, why do you keep looking back to that? | ||
Well, those are the biggest deviations, but it happens in every election. | ||
And as you all know, what have I been fighting for, Steve? | ||
To get to paper ballots, hand counted. | ||
132 other countries have banned electronic voting machines. | ||
What's wrong with the U.S.? | ||
And the stuff they're saying is that a reporter there that said that I accused or that it did this and this. | ||
One of the things, Steve, is when you have a case like this is defamation. | ||
I think it'll prove that I don't believe what I'm saying. | ||
Everybody knows I believe what I'm saying because it's true. | ||
Truth in absolute defense. | ||
unidentified
|
Take 60 seconds and sell me a set of sheets. | |
Yeah, you guys, we really need your help. | ||
Remember, MyPillow is soon. | ||
This of all time, we need your help. | ||
We need your help. | ||
We're bringing in experts. | ||
We're bringing in everyone next week. | ||
You can do this by supporting MyPillow. | ||
Go to MyPillow.com. | ||
I'm keeping the Giza Dream sheets on sale just for the War Room Posse. | ||
$49.98. | ||
Any size, any color, it doesn't matter. | ||
Split Kings, Cal Kings. | ||
And then you're also going to get the free commemorative MyPillow 2.0 with the American flag for any purchase. | ||
And I'm also going to match you if you buy $100 or more. | ||
I'm giving you $100 in free gifts. | ||
And Steve, we put up everywhere. | ||
If everyone just wants to go to MyPillow and learn about the trial, we have that posted there too, everybody. | ||
Promo code WARROOM. | ||
Promo code WARROOM. | ||
We'll see. | ||
We're our most powerful promo code in the world. | ||
Go hit it today. | ||
Support Mike Lindell. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
We'll see you tomorrow morning. | ||
Mike Lindell and Denver. | ||
I've got Brett. | ||
We're going to break down Navarro's report. | ||
Brett's going to do it for me, but I've got to get Brian Costello in here for a couple of minutes because this morning Brian was watching the show. | ||
Brian, you're our expert with Joe Allen on artificial intelligence. | ||
You really did disagree with Jim Rickards. | ||
I need to get that out there before I go through this economic report because I think the economic report is based upon advances in artificial intelligence. | ||
He said there's no creativity. | ||
All you're doing is history that the machine can't be creative. | ||
You vehemently disagree? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, Steve. | |
I mean, I sent you the perfect example, right? | ||
People need to understand there's different types of artificial intelligence. | ||
And we also have a couple things going on. | ||
We have artificial intelligence merging with autonomous technology and robots, right, at the same time. | ||
So there is a lot of creative innovation going on here. | ||
You know, this stuff learns on its own, right? | ||
Like, we know. | ||
That artificial intelligence, and this was a while ago, I forget the actual year, but there's something called Move 37, where a type of AI called reinforcement learning beat the best Go players in the world, and it did a move that nobody else didn't do. | ||
We're working with this stuff every day, Steve, and it has the ability to create unique information, discover patterns at scale. | ||
There's a reason. | ||
All these companies are throwing money into biotech, R&D, using AI. | ||
These guys aren't stupid. | ||
These are guys that have built some of the best companies in the world and deployed capital. | ||
So I think we need to be very careful as populists. | ||
Like, we're not getting anything creative in it. | ||
It's very real and it's attacking the middle class. | ||
And our populist position can't be, like, AI just bad. | ||
There are bad things about it, right? | ||
Weapons more autonomous, as you talked about on the show earlier, that might make leaders more likely to use these weapons because they don't have to put people in arms ways. | ||
They can send drones or military robots and things like that. | ||
So there are some negative sides to it. | ||
But there's also an innovative side of it we need to embrace and we need to figure out how to take people in this country that this levels the playing field. | ||
So I know you're one of the few people that have covered it. | ||
I think I'll be the second. | ||
It's like, why have we left? | ||
Black and Hispanic populations down in tech. | ||
Now they have this tremendous tool. | ||
You don't actually have to be a software coder to develop software, right? | ||
So this should help us bring these populations into the tech world. | ||
And there are positive things that we can do with this. | ||
And we need to be careful. | ||
This stuff's very, very powerful. | ||
It's a huge change. | ||
Computers can reason now, right? | ||
And we can't ignore that. | ||
This is scary. | ||
I want to get you. | ||
I'm going to talk to you. | ||
I want to get you on a marshal. | ||
I got to go through. | ||
You have a model, the efficiency model versus the productivity model. | ||
We're going down the efficiency model. | ||
That's what the white-collar apocalypse is going to be. | ||
We got to bounce. | ||
Brian Costello, where do people go? | ||
Put your Twitter feed up, dude, because you come in hot on Twitter. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, on X. On X, it's BP Costello. | |
I've fully transitioned to calling it X versus Toyota. | ||
I can't. | ||
And by the way, every time Mike is on before me, my mom sends me some new pillows. | ||
So he's at least getting one sale out of this. | ||
Brian Costello, we'll see you tomorrow. | ||
Brian's coming up with the whole model. | ||
Efficiency versus productivity will blow you away. | ||
Dave Bratt, we've got 10 minutes. | ||
I need you to take it. | ||
Let's get it up, Denver. | ||
Navarro finally came out and wrote it. | ||
The White House should be pushing this hard. | ||
Walk me through the Dave Bratt analysis of Peter Navarro's full plan of this is what it is, not scored by CBO, but a real economic model, sir. | ||
Yeah, well, Navarro has his finger on it, as usual, and he's giving conservative analysis here, and the war room always brings receipts, right? | ||
So in D.C., everyone lies constantly, so you've got to check all of us out. | ||
I'm a pro-growth guy. | ||
I love it. | ||
But growing your way out of this, this is the problem, right? | ||
The dump that Donald Trump, President Trump has been left with is horrible. | ||
But Navarro goes through the structure of the big, beautiful bill, but he first lays out what's called scoring by the Congressional Budget Office. | ||
And that is dictated in law, in custom, through Congress. | ||
So it's very boring, but they use old Keynesian models. | ||
They don't like supply side, right? | ||
Shocker. | ||
They're all leftists and Democrats and quasi-Marxists now. | ||
So they're going to do everything they can to downplay the benefits of economic growth and capitalism and using free markets. | ||
Right. | ||
So what's the evidence? | ||
The evidence, Navarro shows in the article back in 2017, they scored growth at about 1.8 percent. | ||
And shocker, they were wrong. | ||
We outpaced that under Trump. | ||
Growth went instead of 1.8, 2.8 percent, one full percentage point higher. | ||
That is not a small thing in economics. | ||
When you get 1 percent. | ||
Full growth more, right? | ||
Then that brings us up to the big, beautiful bill. | ||
They scored this. | ||
Similarly, even worse, 1.7% economic growth scored out of the tax cuts. | ||
And it's like, you guys, how can you be this wrong over time every time? | ||
And so what does that matter? | ||
Well, the way it's scored, this big, beautiful bill is going to add, you know, $3.8 trillion. | ||
To the deficits over the next years. | ||
And Navarro shows, no, if you just score it with 1% higher growth, which we had in '17, it's fact-based, it's science-based. | ||
That 3.8 goes down by about $2 trillion at least. | ||
So you're down to half already. | ||
Then he throws in the tariff story. | ||
The CBO has refused to score the tariff story at all. | ||
And again, some of that's just legalistic, mumbo-jumbo, the way Congress allows this and not that. | ||
But Republicans have been sitting on their hands forever, not changing these rules. | ||
We need to change it. | ||
So Navarro shows, hey, we're going to get revenues, right? | ||
Even if you just do the very conservative campaign, You get about at least $300 billion all the way up to $2 trillion in savings. | ||
So if you get the $2 trillion savings out of the scoring and the $2 trillion out of the tariffs, guess what? | ||
The bill pays for itself and it's honky-dory. | ||
And you've sent the country on a positive virtuous cycle of growth, right? | ||
The tariffs, Peter is honest. | ||
He says the tariff wears off. | ||
But in the meantime, you brung all the capital back into the U.S. And any business guy, he says, any business person knows when you bring capital back, that's the best thing you can ever have for our economy. | ||
And then we're at it. | ||
And then your AI story, you mentioned the potential growth there is enormous. | ||
But that's a deeper discussion. | ||
Simple summary of the Navarro piece. | ||
I think he's conservative in his estimates. | ||
The hard piece is the tailwinds we got blowing at us from the Biden economy right now. | ||
Dealt with CBO in your time in Congress. | ||
You know the restrictions, particularly on the reconciliation bill. | ||
He has added in everything. | ||
And listen, right now, Kobayashi has a tweet out. | ||
We're spending over 7%. | ||
I think a percentage of deficits to GDP, this is getting more and more serious. | ||
What Navarro is showing you with adding in the real growth rate, which means more tax revenue, adding the tariffs, which means more cash, actually trying to put a number around deregulation and lower energy costs. | ||
That $2 trillion deficits per year, which is everybody's concern until you get to the mandatory cuts, you could cut that down. | ||
you actually may be able to cut that in half. | ||
And if you cut it in half... | ||
We don't love it, but we can live with it at least for a while until we get some smart American people to see what we do. | ||
Then maybe you can go into the mandatories and make a case with, hey, here's what we need to do. | ||
But you need to build up trust that you actually can handle the discretionary. | ||
And growth and deregulation. | ||
Isn't that his pitch? | ||
And the White House – Hassett ought to be selling this. | ||
Scott Besson ought to be selling this. | ||
Russ Vogt, they ought to be on the shows 24-7 hammering his article in The Hill. | ||
Don't you think, Brett? | ||
Yeah, and I did. | ||
You should be yelling at me right now. | ||
I missed the buried lead. | ||
His whole thing was announcement to the bond market. | ||
He says, the bond market, you guys are smarter than this, right? | ||
Look at the evidence back in 17. So the bond market vigilantes are coming after the markets because the bonds, the 10s are up and the 30s are up. | ||
And that's scary. | ||
And Navarro's main point is you're thinking old. | ||
You're thinking old Keynesian terminology. | ||
You're relating your logic. | ||
To the CBO economists instead of to history. | ||
And so he's showing you have two major effects here. | ||
The tax cut effect is going to be a full percentage point higher of growth, which means more revenues coming in, like you just said. | ||
And then you're also going to have the tariff revenues. | ||
Those are guaranteed using a 10% baseline. | ||
He's not using the 30% or the reciprocal tariffs or anything. | ||
just a 10% baseline gets you some big numbers. | ||
And so the bond market is But they know we're not BSing here, and there's some real good news buried in how this all works out. | ||
It's just a matter of we've got to have our House and the Senate still cut spending. | ||
This in no way relieves Congress of the duty to cut spending, right? | ||
And the unsustainable piece, I've got some charts I'll do at a later date, but the debt blowing up and the consequences of the Federal Reserve and inflation over the years has just been horrendous and put us in this position. | ||
Dave Brat, where do people go? | ||
You're putting up charts all the time. | ||
You get down to the math of it. | ||
Because a lot of people think Dave Brat is just a pretty face. | ||
He looks like a movie star. | ||
You know, Brad Pitt. | ||
But actually he's a PhD. | ||
I don't call him Dr. Brat. | ||
Maybe I'll start doing that. | ||
Dr. Brat is a PhD in economics just like Dr. Navarro. | ||
He puts up the best charts. | ||
Where do people go on social media to get all your – You're one of the top economic thinkers in the country. | ||
I know you're a moral philosopher and you got all that. | ||
But Liberty is chock full of smart moral philosophers. | ||
Well, I'm following Adam Smith and trying to save Western civilization, the Judeo-Christian West. | ||
And once I do that with you and Navarro, then I cannot wait to get back in the classroom. | ||
Brat economics on Getter and on X. And I got 30 charts related to 1971, the start of the Federal Reserve System. | ||
You won't believe what you see. | ||
Marriage ages go way up. | ||
Childbirths go down. | ||
Black progress goes way down. | ||
Things you would not think related to 1971. | ||
I posted 30 charts. | ||
Now you told me I'm going to have to get your own. | ||
We're going to go through all 30. Dave Brat is going to make his case. | ||
One of the smartest guys I know. | ||
Dave Brat, thank you for being here in the 6 o 'clock hour to make it all make sense. | ||
From geopolitics to macroeconomics. | ||
My Patriot Supply. | ||
Very special company. | ||
Very special people. | ||
They will guide you through the process. | ||
They don't do this a lot. | ||
It's the Memorial Day for the week. | ||
A sale up to 60% off. | ||
This is the highest quality products you can get in what I call the common sense vertical. | ||
You know, we have people on here about energy. | ||
We have people on here about the invasion of the southern border. | ||
All of it. | ||
Make sure you get ahead of it with you and your family. | ||
Just go to mypatriotsupply.com. | ||
And talk to the consultants and advisors. | ||
They have a sale all week, up to 60% off. | ||
So go check it out. | ||
Also, the folks at Birch Gold. | ||
Find out why gold has been a hedge for 5,000 years in mankind's history. | ||
If you understand that, you will understand so much about politics, money, and power. | ||
And maybe your own personal finances. | ||
The team at Birch Gold can do that. | ||
Philip Patrick and the team. |