Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
You're not going to get a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | ||
No, it's Thursday, 1 May, Euroville, or 2025. | ||
Folks, this is one of those ones you thought, hey, after the run-up to the 100 days, we're going to take not a break, but we're going to kind of regroup the morning. | ||
You've got the next 100 days. | ||
You've got all the legislation. | ||
We've got so much stuff to go through. | ||
I've got Walsh here. | ||
I've got Walsh here. | ||
I've got Charles Benet here, or Benoit here. | ||
We're going to go through de-industrialization and talk about the president's Executive War is how we're bringing the economy back. | ||
It's predicating on energy and manufacturing. | ||
And then kind of a little mini bombshell today, and we're trying to get to the bottom of it, but it looks like potentially a huge change over the National Security Council in the middle of President Trump trying to negotiate a Russian rapprochement and calm down these wars. | ||
And as you can tell, one thing has been quite... | ||
I don't want to say disturbing, but, you know, we've got our stink eye on it, is this continual bombing over in these two carrier battle groups, and what are they doing off southern Saudi Arabia and the Houthis, and now making analogies, President Trump and the great Pete Hegseth, | ||
about the Houthis are proxies for the Persians, which they are, so it's the Persians attacking. | ||
Folks, no way we can get in a shooting war on Persia right now. | ||
Too much on the plate. | ||
And we've got too many other alternatives. | ||
Let's go to medieval on the economic sanctions. | ||
Let's go to economic war. | ||
Let's be smart like the Chinese Communist Party is. | ||
What we need now is prayer. | ||
Mike Lindell, where are you? | ||
You're at a prayer breakfast, not at the White House. | ||
Where in the hell are you, sir? | ||
Well, actually, we're at the White House. | ||
I'm holding up a little bit. | ||
I got a meeting with the president this afternoon, and here I got invited to the prayer that we're going to do out here. | ||
I guess the president's coming out in a bit. | ||
It's very exciting. | ||
You know, Steve, I spoke from the Rose Garden about four years ago, and I said a nation had turned its back on God, and we need to get back in the Word, back in our Bibles. | ||
And of course, the media blew up. | ||
But I said, we prayed for grace for such a time as this. | ||
And we got five years, you guys. | ||
We got this was grace, and we're going to get to a great place. | ||
God uses all things for good. | ||
And Steve, it's very, very excited here today. | ||
Fantastic. | ||
So tell me, what the president's going to come out? | ||
We're going to be picking that up live. | ||
What are you guys going to do? | ||
And the president's going to come out and join you? | ||
Well, yeah, I'm not sure what we're all doing yet. | ||
We're all meeting in a little bit here. | ||
unidentified
|
National Day of Prayer. | |
It's the National Day of Prayer. | ||
I know it's the National Day of Prayer. | ||
Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
But, yeah, I don't know what we're all doing, but we have the National Day of Prayer, and I don't know. | ||
There's not too many people, there's probably maybe 40 pastors and I was invited and I'm very honored to be invited. | ||
So it's gonna be very exciting. | ||
But I wanted to get on here, too, and tell everybody I missed the last couple days, Steve. | ||
I wanted to tell everyone about our sheets before, because I'm not gonna be able to get on for the hit, you guys, on these sheets. | ||
And they're running out, so I want to get on here and tell you all, they are running out, probably the last day of $25, any size, any color for you guys, promo code WARROOM. | ||
And there it is. | ||
And normally, I wouldn't put that in there. | ||
But I'll tell you, they keep attacking MyPillow, everybody. | ||
And they keep attacking my employees. | ||
And you guys have made it possible to keep it going so I can be here in Washington, trying to help our country. | ||
And so go to MyPillow website, click on Steve, go to the closeout sale, get those sheets, any size, any color, $25. | ||
And all the other stuff, the MyCrosses. | ||
And that you guys, everybody get involved and pray on this National Day of Prayer and pray for our country and pray that these next four years are not in vain, Steve, that this could be, we're living in the greatest times to be alive, everybody. | ||
We're all part of this great victory that our country's having and is gonna have in our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. | ||
That's fantastic. | ||
Mike, that's one of the most beautiful shots I've seen of the wife. | ||
Is this the angle of the camera? | ||
Is your wife there? | ||
Is she your ringman? | ||
She's the one feeding the lines? | ||
unidentified
|
If it's shaking, it's me. | |
No, it's fantastic. | ||
Mike, hold it, Mike. | ||
Why don't you take the camera and let's get her on and have a few words. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
No, yeah, no. | ||
There she is. | ||
There she is. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, wow. | |
That's fantastic. | ||
That's fantastic. | ||
The president called us out at the rally, everybody, the other night. | ||
And he says, look, they're still holding hands. | ||
In the middle of his speech, he's got us holding hands. | ||
unidentified
|
No, no, no. | |
It was even better. | ||
We have that cut. | ||
We were going to use it the next time he became a regular. | ||
It was not just they're holding hands. | ||
It's like, how many couples that are, let's say, beyond teenage years are still holding hands? | ||
He had a whole editorial comment on it. | ||
It was great. | ||
Well, we could maybe do that this afternoon. | ||
I'll be back this afternoon after I meet with the president. | ||
Okay. | ||
Mike, fantastic. | ||
You guys are great. | ||
Glad to have you on here. | ||
Keep us updated. | ||
I tell you, Mike, keep in touch with the producer and camera. | ||
The president does come out. | ||
We want to cut to you guys, whatever you're doing live. | ||
So make sure you keep us in the loop, okay? | ||
That sounds good. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
Thanks for having me. | ||
Thanks. | ||
Thank you. | ||
MyPillow.com, promo code WAR, most powerful promo code in the world. | ||
I'm just repeating what Mike Lindell tells me. | ||
So, now that we know what the problem is, Charles, now that we know what the problem is, what is Trump, this piece, and Grace and Mo, let's get it out there. | ||
This is not a, in the American conservative, in the great Kurt Mills, we love Kurt, doing an amazing job over there. | ||
This is a piece you want to get your morning coffee and go through. | ||
It's quite detailed. | ||
It's not a pundit's piece. | ||
It's really a detailed analytical piece. | ||
Charles, what is the President of the United States, Donald John Trump, actually doing to re-industrialize America, sir? | ||
unidentified
|
So what I go over in my article is it's called the Section 232 Actions. | |
That's the president's national security power to use tariffs to re-industrialize. | ||
And they're not getting any media attention, but they're really exciting. | ||
They even have boring names, so it is kind of stacked against them. | ||
But he's done now. | ||
We have the three that are in effect. | ||
So that's steel, aluminum. | ||
And automotive. | ||
But he's now launched six more 232 investigations after that. | ||
Now, one of them is like wood. | ||
And it sounds, okay, so we're just talking lumber or timber, right? | ||
No, no, it's everything downstream. | ||
This is a point that nobody's picking up on. | ||
So it's everything from timber to kitchen cabinets. | ||
And so with pharmaceuticals is another one. | ||
You know, copper. | ||
So we're... | ||
This is massive amounts of the industrial base that via the Section 232 process, the administration can come up with detailed plans for bringing those jobs back. | ||
It probably takes, give them about half a year, six to nine months is the average time to finish one of these. | ||
But the first three that are in effect now, he actually launched those in his first term. | ||
These are proven and they'll bring about a lot of success for re-industrialization. | ||
What are the other couple that he's named? | ||
And we had Christopher Leonard on when we were in Kansas City who wrote Lords of Easy Money. | ||
He's now doing a massive new book. | ||
It's going to take years to do on the military-industrial complex. | ||
But he makes the argument the defense industrial base is basically kaput. | ||
We've essentially... | ||
We've de-industrialized away from it and exposed ourselves to really the Chinese Communist Party that's become an industrial superpower. | ||
And we're in one of the most dangerous zones we could ever be in. | ||
President Trump is using this and part of it's for the defense industrial base. | ||
What else has he identified besides wood, automotive, steel, and aluminum? | ||
unidentified
|
So chips is a big one. | |
That's one that was misinterpreted, and the president had to post about it, and the media was completely dishonest. | ||
They're like, oh, everyone, Apple got a giant exemption. | ||
No, no, that's not what happened. | ||
A 232 was launched. | ||
A Section 232 investigation has been launched and is now underway on chips, but not just chips, also the derivative articles, so everything with a chip in it. | ||
This is a massive, massive deal. | ||
And this has to be done. | ||
I'm very excited about where it's going to go. | ||
We had the automotive one. | ||
There's also one on medium to heavy trucks. | ||
That's the latest. | ||
And the pharmaceutical one is not just drugs, but also all the active ingredients where we're totally dependent on China. | ||
Very dangerously slow. | ||
So it's almost crazy that President Biden ignored this. | ||
Maybe that's not crazy, but these are long overdue. | ||
We've got a massive section of the economy there. | ||
Agriculture, some other things happening, but for manufacturing, the actions that are there now cover a lot. | ||
I think you're going to see a lot more added to steel. | ||
So look for appliances, I believe. | ||
Some of the other industries I mentioned, bicycling, flatware. | ||
These don't sound like, oh, national security? | ||
No, if you go back and read the 2018 steel report from the Department of Commerce, Wilbur Ross's Department of Commerce, that actually said, Look, our defense industrial base, it needs steel, obviously, duh, but you cannot rely, | ||
the steel mills cannot rely on just defense procurement. | ||
Defense procurement is very irregular. | ||
They need the commercial market, and that's what all these new actions are doing. | ||
Charles, hang on one second. | ||
Okay, we see what he's doing to bring back and establish an industrial manufacturing base here. | ||
Does his plan on energy dovetail in with that? | ||
Completely, completely. | ||
You can't manufacture anything competitively without reasonable and efficient labor inputs to energy cost. | ||
Electricity is now a huge component of steel making, aluminum smelting, of course, cement making, petrochemical facilities, chemical facilities, pulp and paper, all the above, not just AI, server centers, all of that stuff. | ||
You're saying, even before we get to the new capacity we need for AI, you're saying basically to bring a manufacturing base back here. | ||
His plan right now dovetails on the energy side perfectly with that. | ||
So you see a coherent strategy. | ||
A foundation has to be abundant and low-cost electrification. | ||
He's way headed there. | ||
And available, not just abundant, but available 24-7. | ||
Abundant means full-time. | ||
Abundant means 24, two dimensions. | ||
High rating, but... | ||
All the time. | ||
And how much excess capacity over 100, like 120% capacity? | ||
Or if you take a society at full bore, how much above that do you need to make sure you've got enough ceiling? | ||
Well, this is where the narrative has changed. | ||
It used to be 25% was the target. | ||
That target in narrative by utilities has now moved on to 15%. | ||
We're now today, in actual fact, the way it should be calculated, the way it was calculated 10 years ago. | ||
We're down to about 13% now. | ||
That is in the danger zone of creating, for every percentage point below 15% excess capacity or reserve margin, you have a seven times factor of more exposure to brownouts, loss of service events, and blackouts. | ||
Below 15% is a huge threshold. | ||
As media loves to say, a tipping point. | ||
unidentified
|
A tipping point. | |
15% headroom minimum you need. | ||
We're below that now by 2%. | ||
It's a huge problem. | ||
Okay, hang on, both you guys. | ||
This shows you the immature, running around with their hair on fire, just lies of these airheads in the mainstream media. | ||
They won't do the work. | ||
This is actually a very well thought through, and this is why four years. | ||
Well, what we learned in the first term with President Trump's tax cuts, industrial policy become imperfected. | ||
That's why he had the convergence. | ||
These are not small things. | ||
This is not Clinton putting kids in school uniforms in his two terms. | ||
unidentified
|
This is a massive thing. | |
When Charles says, hey, I give the guy a 10 out of 10, when you talk about you haven't had a, actually a trade, somebody understands trade as a president, even the beloved Ronald Reagan. | ||
You know, in 100 years or more than 100 years. | ||
We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
Two things. | ||
The RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
Jim Rickards, who's now in tremendous demand, one of our contributors, trying to get him back on here in the next couple of days. | ||
RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
If you like the capital markets, the strategy, the intel. | ||
All the global politics, everything with U.S., national security, the intel community, all of it. | ||
Go to RickardsWarRoom.com. | ||
You've got Strategic Intelligence. | ||
That's his newsletter. | ||
Get access to it. | ||
You'll get access to a chairman and CEOs all over the world. | ||
unidentified
|
So if you love the show, it's a great newsletter to follow. | |
Also, Home Title Lock, the $1 million triple lock protection. | ||
What is it? | ||
24-7 coverage. | ||
If anything happens to that little contract you have that says that you actually own your house, boom! | ||
You get an alert immediately to give you a heads up. | ||
And if all else fails, $1 million restoration to make sure you get it back. | ||
HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
Promo code STEVE. | ||
Short break. | ||
Back in the warm in a moment. | ||
So this morning, just to take you a little bit behind the curtain, I was headed into my location to do the program, and I got a text from a very nice source who said, you want to call me. | ||
And it turns out that... | ||
Three different people, the original source and two others, have confirmed that the plan now by the White House is to remove the National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, who was on Fox News this morning, just not that long ago, and his deputy, Alex Wong, and much of the member current staff team at the National Security Council because of unhappiness throughout the national security establishment of how they're doing. | ||
The West Wing's unhappy, the State Department, the Treasury. | ||
And of course, this was around before SignalGate. | ||
It was widely reported that SignalGate ironically may have saved Waltz's job because the president didn't want to be seen as if he were giving in to Jeffrey Goldberg, his new best friend. | ||
But there's lots of levels of unhappiness. | ||
And it's less about SignalGate than it is about, as I understand it from my sources, a general belief that it's not being run efficiently in an organized way. | ||
It may happen as early as today. | ||
It may not happen ever because it's Donald Trump. | ||
Soon. | ||
Maybe this weekend. | ||
One sort of says this weekend. | ||
We'll see. | ||
But the original choice to replace the National Security Advisor for many in the government was a guy named Christopher Landau. | ||
He's currently the Deputy Secretary of State. | ||
He is said to be doing such a good job and is so valuable to Marco Rubio. | ||
That Rubio says, no, you can't have my guy. | ||
So he's got job lock because he's doing well. | ||
Some people have experienced that. | ||
You know what that's like. | ||
So Landau, I'm told, will not get the job, even though he's very highly thought of because he's so highly thought of. | ||
A candidate that's being discussed who has support at very high levels within the administration is Steve Witkoff, the president's friend and special envoy to everything. | ||
Witkoff has a lot of senior-level support, but he also has enemies. | ||
And two of my three sources pointed me to this. | ||
A New York Post story that ran yesterday, a very strange story popped up in the New York Post in the middle of the day yesterday, savaging Steve Witkoff with anonymous quotes saying he's way over his head, he shouldn't be leading the Russian negotiations. | ||
Their countries are confused by him. | ||
The people in the government think he's amateurish. | ||
The story was filled with savage blind quotes. | ||
Do we have the money quote, Paul? | ||
I don't know if we do or not. | ||
There we go. | ||
Nice guy, but a dumbling, effing idiot, this person said of Witzkoff. | ||
He should not be doing this alone, meaning negotiating these deals. | ||
Now, will his critics be more happy with him as head of the NSC? | ||
Not not according to my sources. | ||
And they believe that that some people believe that the reason the Post story popped up was because word was beginning to spread that Waltz was out and that Whitcoff was his likely replacement. | ||
And what the speculation is, this New York Post story is aiming at stopping. | ||
OK, Halpern right there, that is called inside baseball. | ||
And that is also a guy like Halpern, because a lot of people were talking. | ||
What the hell is this New York Post story, which is literally a savage, savage attack on Witkoff, doing, you know, and Witkoff's in the middle of these, the Russian negotiations, and Besson's going to sign the quote-unquote, | ||
you know, minerals deal or economic deal with Zelensky's people to kind of lay a predicate over there. | ||
Jack Basoba comes in. | ||
So, Jack, the no scalps policy. | ||
I guess it was good for 100 days. | ||
Now we're in plan B. Maybe it's scalps. | ||
I'm a huge believer. | ||
But Halpern just nailed it right there. | ||
I think it's consistent issues with how things are just being managed and organized, not just the center of gravity being quite neocon and away from the core of America First policies. | ||
I think this also gets down just to the fact we're in it now. | ||
I mean, we're negotiating these massive deals, a Russian rapprochement. | ||
This is bigger than what Kissinger and Nixon did with China back in the early 70s. | ||
You're trying to stop two amazingly bloody conflicts in Ukraine and in Gaza, or in Israel, I would actually say. | ||
And then you're trying to, you know, voices are trying to say, hey, we can't go on a bombing campaign, you know, in Persia. | ||
At the same time, you're keeping the Suez Canal open with a couple of carrier battle groups. | ||
And, oh, by the way, the flare may go up in Taiwan. | ||
It's an organization, at least it has been the continual complaints of an organization, not on top of things, people not briefed, not the coordinating factor between state, Treasury, and obviously as Treasury stepped into what we call economic warfare, | ||
they're in the front lines. | ||
Jack Posobiec, you've spent a lot of time on this, plus over on the White House campus. | ||
Your thoughts? | ||
Well, Steve, thanks so much for having me on. | ||
And yes, I was at the White House yesterday for the new media briefing with Caroline Levitt. | ||
I asked a question about the domestic issues. | ||
I asked a question regarding domestic left-wing violence and the rise in support for these unhuman groups like MS-13, Trendy Aragua, actions like Luigi Miaggioni and others. | ||
You know, poked my head around a few times while I was there and had a few chats. | ||
But then I came back. | ||
And look, Steve, you and I were here on this program not, what, not one week ago. | ||
And we were talking about how there were forces within the administration and external pressure that was being put on President Trump driving these strikes on Iran. | ||
This idea that in the midst of negotiations where we had on Easter weekend, remember, Wyckoff was over there in Rome meeting with the delegation from the... | ||
The Iranian team, their diplomats, and their negotiators to try to figure out how to hammer out some kind of deal with the Iranians. | ||
But people have this, and I read that New York Post written, it was completely clueless, this attack on Steve Witkoff written by this guy, Douglas Murray, who clowned himself, and B-clowned himself on Joe Rogan recently. | ||
And, you know, it was this idea that they don't see the big picture, Steve. | ||
They don't see the Trump's grand strategy. | ||
They don't understand it. | ||
They're not interested in it. | ||
They're interested in pushing this neoconservative, neoliberal agenda that we've seen for the last 30 years going back. | ||
Yeah, but hang on. | ||
We've been discussed on the show all these times. | ||
But hang on. | ||
I understand that. | ||
And there's a neocon hit to them. | ||
But that's not about grand strategy or even chemistry. | ||
The National Security Council, people should know, is mainly housed in the EOB. | ||
There are the most prominent people down by the actual situation room, etc., the senior guys. | ||
It's a 250 person. | ||
First of all, it's way too big, but it's 250 people or 250 billets, 290 billets. | ||
Two-thirds of those people are seconded from the various operations. | ||
Its primary purpose is a coordinating effort, particularly in these complex topics. | ||
Forget that they're not part of the grand strategy because obviously you're not, and you're 100% correct. | ||
But you can't have two strategies running at the same time that are in conflict with each other. | ||
You can't have one guy running out there saying negotiation and another team working up missile strikes. | ||
Yes, I'm not so sure. | ||
That they're heavyweights enough to be considered strategy. | ||
My point is I think the reason this is expedited, because there has been a no-scalps policy, right, that you're not going to give the media any wins here, is because a basic level of competence that you're supposed to coordinate with all these complex things going on. | ||
Everything from the Venezuela situation to what's happening in the Caribbean, to the Panama Canal, to Greenland, to the Three Island Strategy, to the Middle East, to Ukraine, to what's going on with the economic war. | ||
We are fighting like five-dimension warfare in a most sophisticated, quite frankly, third world war that if any false step is made could spin out of control. | ||
And as a coordinating factor, they're taking incoming from state, from DOJ. | ||
From Treasury and from others that the job's just not getting done. | ||
Do you buy that argument? | ||
Or are you still that, hey, they're just so neocon that they're just not in the room? | ||
What I'm saying is those aren't necessarily separate arguments. | ||
I would put them together. | ||
Because when you've got one group of people that's on your team... | ||
And by the way, I'm not saying that this wasn't the case. | ||
I'm just saying in general that you need to have... | ||
Look, President Trump... | ||
He's the commander-in-chief. | ||
He's the one who runs the play. | ||
He's the one who gets to make the assignments. | ||
He's the one who decides this is the strategy that goes forward. | ||
That's the strategy that goes forward. | ||
And so, with Besant getting the deal signed... | ||
Yesterday, having that inked, and he's going to be doing press, he's already doing press today. | ||
That was the deal when I was over there in Ukraine with him that Zelensky originally reneged on. | ||
Then he comes to the White House, he reneges on that. | ||
That signals that the path forward isn't necessarily going to be this kinetic, driven, you know, having the B-2 bombers down at Diego Garcia and flying them up to Natanz and Tehran and taking out all these underground bunkers with the bunker-busting bombs like the New York Times wanted and as other external world... | ||
We're going to have the negotiations. | ||
We're going to have the strategy. | ||
Actually, Steve, what this shows is the grand strategy is working. | ||
That's what's coming down. | ||
And the people who have the vision of the grand strategy are the ones that are currently in the lead. | ||
How much of this is going to be the biggest, I guess, I don't want to say controversy, but if you have to go through everything that's working. | ||
Everything that people are working on. | ||
The biggest gap in belief is the situation in Persia. | ||
The constant drumbeat of there's got to be a military intervention solution now. | ||
That instead of going up an escalatory ladder in economic warfare, you just jump right into let's do bombing runs and have the 101st and 82nd Airborne ready to go in. | ||
And we know where Waltz comes down on that. | ||
How big... | ||
How big a part of that drove this decision to happen now? | ||
I haven't heard any direct sources on that, so I couldn't confirm nor deny, but I do know that Tulsi Gabbard, the DNI, so Lieutenant General Gabbard was out there with the intelligence estimate that said that they were not imminently about to roll out these nuclear weapons, that in fact this wasn't necessary, | ||
and then of course Wyckoff was making... | ||
Iran, part of the leverage point, the inflection point with Russia. | ||
So if you want to put leverage on Iran, you know who's got that leverage? | ||
Russia does because they're the ones who built Iran's nuclear program. | ||
And then China does because they're Iran's largest customer for their oil sales. | ||
The economics and the military geopolitical strategy, it's all connected in the grand strategy of Trump's doctrine for the Second Amendment. | ||
And I think, unfortunately, there's people who are, you know, maybe watching too much other networks that don't quite get that. | ||
Jack, you can hang on to the break. | ||
I know you're jammed, but I just need you for a few moments. | ||
Tax Network USA 800-958-1000. | ||
If you failed to file, contact them today. | ||
We don't want anxiety. | ||
We don't want angst. | ||
Tax Network. | ||
TNUSA.com. | ||
Promo code Bannon. | ||
Get a free consultation today. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
Okay, there's so much going on. | ||
Charles, where do people go to get the article? | ||
Where do they go to get all your information? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, so for the article, it's on the American Conservative. | |
Google Trump's first hundred days of tariffs. | ||
That's the article. | ||
And check out prosperousamerica.org. | ||
That's the website for my group, Coalition for Prosperous America. | ||
We are the leading pro-tariff group. | ||
We are supporting President Trump's trade agenda 100 percent, and you'll find tons of economic research there. | ||
And my ex-account, Charles underscore Benoit, feel free to reach out. | ||
I'm happy to talk trade any day. | ||
You're amazing. | ||
Definitely will. | ||
Jack Posobiec, this is getting out. | ||
Everybody's reporting at Fox. | ||
Everybody, the no scalps policy lasted 100 days. | ||
Not too shabby. | ||
100-day policy. | ||
But this, folks should know, this was an issue way before the signal thing. | ||
And I want to go back to the difference between America First national security policy, which is not isolationist and it's not dovish, but there's definitely kind of a way you look at the world. | ||
And you don't want to be bombing everywhere. | ||
You don't want to be sending American troops everywhere. | ||
Let me give you an example, Poso. | ||
I find this revolting. | ||
I find this revolting for the audience. | ||
You remember the great video collections the morning staff did and the afternoon staff yesterday on the 50th anniversary? | ||
And we didn't get to spend enough time, and I will do it on Saturday's show. | ||
The 50th anniversary of the retreat of the fall of Saigon, and particularly the fact of the 58,000 American casualties. | ||
That's killed in action. | ||
That's not the wounded. | ||
The wounded and what it did to the country and tore it apart. | ||
Look what the Financial Times has on its cover. | ||
Every day you have the 50th anniversary of all Saigon. | ||
You've got the female branch of the army, right? | ||
Vietnam hails national revival. | ||
You've got essentially the Vietnamese, North Vietnamese army in your face about their victory. | ||
That's Financial Times. | ||
I want you to embrace that. | ||
You got the Murdochs, who, as you know, I think are some of the biggest scumbags on earth. | ||
Okay? | ||
The reason this country's in the shape it's in is because Fox News and the Wall Street Journal tapped along as controlled opposition. | ||
They let the radical Democrats, coupled with the lords of easy money on Wall Street, the global corporatists, and the apartheid stay of Silicon Valley, run the deal. | ||
And de-industrialize this country and make paupers out of the working class and the middle class. | ||
And look what they have. | ||
That's what Rupert Murdoch thinks of American valor. | ||
On the 50th anniversary, that they would copy the Financial Times of London and put the Vietnamese army up there in all its glory. | ||
These front pages and the reason papers... | ||
Or more important to look at than websites is they show you their editorial. | ||
They show you their thinking about the way they position stories and the way they write headlines. | ||
It's a key part of narrative war. | ||
That's telling you your sacrifice was nothing. | ||
So when you see Fox up there and they're waving the American flag and they got guys up there and they're saying, hey, this is so great. | ||
Let's go down to Texas and see some veterans. | ||
We love veterans. | ||
They don't love veterans. | ||
You know how much they love veterans? | ||
That is... | ||
Mocking 58,000 dead Americans in a jungle in Southeast Asia. | ||
That's what that's doing. | ||
These people are scum. | ||
And Paul Gijo and all you big talkers and Bannon and these populists, these nationalists, you're scum. | ||
The editors of the Wall Street Journal, you're scum for putting that up there. | ||
Scum. | ||
And you've shown People who sacrificed, people who sacrificed exactly what you think of their sacrifice. | ||
You could have had a million different alternatives on photos of either combat that took place there, the battle that took place there, any military cemetery, the children and grandchildren of those Vietnam vets. | ||
This is as bad, you know what this is? | ||
This is the equivalent of spitting on them when they came home. | ||
In the 60s and 70s. | ||
Driven by the radicals. | ||
They were spit on. | ||
They didn't get any parades. | ||
They didn't get any parades. | ||
There are no parades for the Vietnam veterans. | ||
They came back and people spit on them. | ||
The radical left. | ||
The people that are like the editors of the Wall Street Journal. | ||
Spit on them. | ||
You know what you just did? | ||
You just spit on their graves with that. | ||
You're disgusting. | ||
You want to know why I hate you people? | ||
And I do hate you. | ||
unidentified
|
It's because I don't like that. | |
You're revolting. | ||
And this is why the situation of the National Security Council is so important, because the National Security Council, back then, read the best and the brightest. | ||
Every day, George Bundy, his entire crowd, all these geniuses from Harvard, right? | ||
Got us in, got us in, got us in deeper. | ||
Did you see any of the Harvard guys over there getting shot up in those jungles? | ||
Did you see that combat footage we put up yesterday? | ||
Scare the living hell out of you. | ||
Just to even be in that jungle, much less having people shoot at you. | ||
Posobiec, your thoughts? | ||
Well, Steve, let's just go back in time here a little bit because this isn't the first time that we've seen the neocons backing a communist force in Vietnam. | ||
If you want to tell the true story about Vietnam, why don't you pick up a little book by DuBerrier, Background to Betrayal. | ||
The tragedy of Vietnam that tells the truth about who started the Viet Cong and who was supporting them in the early days up in the north to fight the Japanese and Ho Chi Minh was supported by the O.S. The precursor to the CIA. | ||
And the idea was, oh, well, we'll just build them up and we'll help them fight the Japanese force and this will be a great idea. | ||
And then they go and prop up Nodin Diem and he was a complete nobody the way they do this all over the world where they start a proxy war by taking a politician who's unpopular and then use them to fight against a force that's much bigger than them. | ||
I couldn't think of anything. | ||
Going on right now, that would be at all similar to that. | ||
Steve, it's the same playbook they do over and over. | ||
So Ho Chi Minh and the Viet Cong, of course, turn on the United States, turn on Diem, and we see the rest of that. | ||
And then eventually the CIA has to go and do what? | ||
They put him on the CIA early retirement plan. | ||
That's how No Din Diem went out. | ||
And so, yeah, don't be a U.S. proxy. | ||
And what does Ho Chi Minh do? | ||
He becomes the communist leader of all of Vietnam, which people won't even talk about the fact that the OSF... | ||
We lost the Vietnam War the day Kennedy knew this, sitting in the Oval Office, three weeks before he was assassinated. | ||
Far be it from me to say there was any linkage. | ||
When the CIA, when the National Security Council, the CIA came with their great plan, and what they always want to do, they want to cut and run. | ||
They prop somebody up. | ||
They go all in. | ||
And then when it doesn't work out, what's the first thing they want to do? | ||
To a problem they created, Steve. | ||
That's the point, with their great ideas. | ||
Yes, they created, and then when it gets heavy, then when it gets tough, it's just like these broligarchs all running around Trump, and they're all there for the inauguration, and hey, it's all great. | ||
I said, hey, give 100 days, look in the trenches. | ||
See who's to your left and your right. | ||
You know what you're going to notice a lot? | ||
The people that were there in 2021, that had his back. | ||
That's exactly how these Ivy Lakers work, these elites work. | ||
They create them. | ||
They create it. | ||
And then when it gets a little tough, you got the monks burning themselves in the street, putting gasoline on themselves. | ||
The cover of Life magazine gets a little uncomfortable. | ||
The cocktail party's starting to ask some tough questions. | ||
What do they do? | ||
They come to Kennedy. | ||
Hey, we got this plan that we're going to have the generals. | ||
And Kennedy's like, I don't know. | ||
And he says, no, you got to do this. | ||
We're going to get generals. | ||
It's all going to be good. | ||
It's going to be perfect. | ||
And the family, we're going to get the family. | ||
We got vehicles. | ||
We got planes. | ||
We're going to get them out. | ||
They're going to go to Laos or Thailand. | ||
They're going to go somewhere. | ||
It's all going to be happy ever after. | ||
And they come in and tell Kennedy in the Oval, "Mission accomplished." | ||
That's self demolition, by the way. | ||
The self-immolation was because Diem starts cleaning up all the Buddhists in southern Vietnam. | ||
It was a Buddhist country, and he was a Catholic. | ||
I get that. | ||
But he's going after them. | ||
So the guy that we're supporting starts the religious cleansing of his own country while we are still supporting him. | ||
I can't imagine the United States supporting a guy who would go after a religious cleansing. | ||
It wasn't an ethnic purge. | ||
There were a couple of the monasteries and the Buddhists that worked on the North Vietnamese. | ||
Look, it's tough. | ||
The players, hey, they're shifting sides all the time. | ||
It's China and World War II, right? | ||
You know, ask the generals, ask Stilwell. | ||
Stilwell was Chiang Kai-shek. | ||
Hey, it's Chinatown, man. | ||
It's always shifting, okay? | ||
It's always shifting. | ||
So you got to... | ||
But my point is, you got to make a decision and stick. | ||
What they do, they tell Kennedy, and they lie to his face. | ||
They tell him, and then they walk in the Oval and said, hey, it's all good. | ||
The general's in charge. | ||
It's all good. | ||
There's just one small hickey, just one small hiccup. | ||
Oh, what's that? | ||
The entire family was assassinated on the tarmac in the back of the truck, right? | ||
He goes, what? | ||
There's not supposed to be an assassination? | ||
Yeah, yeah, you're not running the deal. | ||
The CIA's running the deal, okay? | ||
You can't trust any of them. | ||
And this is how powerful the National Security Council is. | ||
Back then was Mac George Bundy in that crowd. | ||
Mac Bundy got us in so deep and then walked away. | ||
Let me go back. | ||
I'll go be president of Harvard. | ||
I went to the world. | ||
They all go to the World Bank eventually. | ||
McNamara, all of them. | ||
They want to get out and go to some globalist institution. | ||
This is why this choice for President Trump is so important, so big, at least the interim discussion. | ||
It may be Whitcoff. | ||
Does Whitcoff have any national security experience? | ||
Zero. | ||
But throwing a few sharp elbows in New York City and close to the president. | ||
Remember, Jack, when Ronald Reagan came in, he picked Judge Clark, right? | ||
He had Richard V. Allen, and eventually when Richard V. Allen was bounced because, I don't know, Richard V. Allen had taken a refrigerator or something, I forgot. | ||
They got Judge Clark in there, which was his older brother, very close to Judge Clark. | ||
Judge Clark was somebody that was probably the closest person, and he was equivalent to Wyckoff in lack of national security experience, I would say. | ||
But he had the full faith of Reagan to tell him, "Hey, what in the hell are these guys doing?" | ||
Because that's the number one thing. | ||
You've got to say they've got a lot of guys running around. | ||
Exactly what are these guys doing? | ||
I want to make sure they're not cutting deals with the Contras and taking money out of here and doing stuff. | ||
Jack, we've just got about two minutes. | ||
You're closing thoughts on the NSC today. | ||
Big explosive story. | ||
I've said this so many times here on The War Room, and thanks, Ken, for having me on, Steve. | ||
It's the most dangerous words for the America First movement to hear about someone is that they're highly respected in Washington, D.C. The minute you hear that set phrase, this is highly respected, highly respected, highly respected in D.C., | ||
that means this is someone that has come up through the system, that has come up through the ranks, that has checked every wicket, that has checked every box, that is totally dependent. | ||
Dependent on the system for their credibility and for their authority. | ||
So this is a tough job that the president has to find people who actually have the expertise on these issues, have the clarity on these issues, but also aren't totally co-opted or perhaps well-meaning, but don't understand the grand strategy that President Trump is hearkening to, | ||
which, by the way, is the previous. | ||
National security, economic, geopolitical, geostrategic policy of the United States pre-globalism. | ||
President Trump is ratcheting things back to the pre-globalist era, and that's what a lot of people don't seem to understand. | ||
This is traditional American foreign policy. | ||
Where do they go to get you, Jack? | ||
Charlie Kirk follows us at noon. | ||
Jack at two. | ||
Gruber at three. | ||
Bowling at four. | ||
We do the handover. | ||
Five to seven is the war room. | ||
Where do people go and get you in the interim, Jack Pasovic? | ||
Yeah, well, the interim, I'll have the smash on this. | ||
I've been, even as we've been talking, my phone's been blowing up, sources hitting me up, Signal, all the rest of it. | ||
No, not those Signal groups, by the way. | ||
And, of course, I'll be up, Jack Posobiec on X, on Twitter, on Truth, and then Human Events daily, in case you missed the podcast live. | ||
Posobiec, don't accept any positions. | ||
I'm your agent here. | ||
I'm doing negotiations. | ||
Don't hit the bid on anything. | ||
Don't get crazy until we get to our regroup with you later in the day. | ||
Young man, do not be accepting any titles. | ||
Don't be accepting any billets until we talk. | ||
Jack Posobiec. | ||
No kings, no titles. | ||
Hell, I had Walsh back here to meet people. | ||
I guess I had to redo the schedule. | ||
Now, the president... | ||
It's not just the Mike Lindell thing. | ||
I think the president may be going to step forward here in a minute or two, maybe give us some explanations of what's going on. | ||
Big day in the White House reporting that the National Security Advisor, Green Break Colonel Mike Waltz, former member of Congress from Florida. | ||
I mean, this will be such a pity. | ||
We take him out of a locked seat. | ||
He's beloved down there. | ||
The guy's winning by 30 points. | ||
We get... | ||
Somebody that's maybe not loved quite as much, right? | ||
We have to have a tractor pull on that one. | ||
And now Waltz is out. | ||
Hey, you can't make this stuff up. | ||
Maybe even Alex Wong, the deputy. | ||
Let's go to Natalie Dominguez. | ||
Natalie, take it away, ma 'am. | ||
Everybody loves the $1 million triple lock protection. | ||
What do you got for us? | ||
The only thing that's going to stop you, Natalie, is we may have to jump in if the president steps to the mic. | ||
What do you got for us, ma 'am? | ||
unidentified
|
No, all good. | |
I'll make it quick. | ||
First of all, happy late one year anniversary. | ||
I've been with you guys for a year now. | ||
This came up because we actually have an update from one of the original stories that I reported on. | ||
So just to recap, there was a woman in Ohio that in 2023 found out that almost 10 years prior in 2012, a realtor that she'd been working with had transferred her home out of her name and she didn't find out about it until 2023. | ||
During that time, it was 2024 when she started the court proceedings, she actually ended up representing herself because she couldn't afford the $20,000 retainer fee to get representation. | ||
So this realtor had transferred the home into his company's name, had taken out a mortgage, and she found out literally because she was getting a foreclosure notice in the mail and she had to appear in court. | ||
So update, okay? | ||
So it's May of 2025. | ||
We just got this article that came out after two years. | ||
in her favor saying the document was illegitimate. | ||
And she started crying and she's like, I'm so relieved. | ||
I felt so violated. | ||
I felt abused, unprotected. | ||
Because as we all know, we talk about this all the time. | ||
The government really isn't doing much to change this just to be able to prosecute criminals | ||
That's right. | ||
But because this realtor, this criminal, had passed away prior to the court proceedings, the person representing the criminal's estate, after the court had ruled in her favor, are now saying, well, we're going to appeal it and we're still going to fight. | ||
So she finally gets everything back in her name, and the battle still has not fully been won. | ||
So the reason I thought this was so important to cover... | ||
Hang on for one second. | ||
I just want to tell people. | ||
This is what you're avoiding by having home title lock. | ||
Not just the fact they're going to take it. | ||
Once some process like that starts, your entire life is overwhelmed by that. | ||
That's what we're trying to help you avoid. | ||
It is because you're taking your freaking home. | ||
That is not just your castle. | ||
It's also your biggest financial asset. | ||
You become consumed by this and you don't want to be consumed by it with this very simple protection. | ||
Natalie. | ||
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
And this woman, two years she's been fighting this battle, and that's why our million-dollar protection, like you said, is designed the way it is. | ||
We're not just monitoring. | ||
We're not just alerts. | ||
Like, we fight for you, right? | ||
We provide restoration to victims at no out-of-pocket costs, no 20K attorney retainer fees, no court fees, no sleepless nights trying to figure out your next move. | ||
We take the burden of victimhood off of you and fight until everything is righted. | ||
Million-dollar triple-lock protection. | ||
You get 24 /7 monitoring, urgent alerts, like you said earlier. | ||
Go to our website. | ||
Use the coupon code STEVE. | ||
You get a 14-day trial and a title history report to make sure that you're not already a victim. | ||
Because for most people, why would you ever think that you would have to look at your title until things like this come up, right? | ||
We want to make sure that you're protected. | ||
We want to make sure that you know what's going on with your home. | ||
HomeTitleLock.com, promo code STEVE. | ||
Do it today, guys. | ||
Just try it out, you know? | ||
By the way, it's been so amazing. | ||
In the one year that you've been there, it's been amazing. | ||
I can tell you. | ||
The audience, people do it. | ||
Natalie, you've done a fantastic job. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
Happy first year anniversary, ma 'am. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
Hopefully many more to come. | ||
HomeTitleLock.com, promo code Steve. | ||
Go check out today. | ||
The $1 million triple lock protection, and particularly the restoration project, all of it. | ||
Natalie Dominguez, I hope you work through it. | ||
Natalie, thank you so much, ma 'am. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
Great work. | ||
I love these young people, man. | ||
They get involved and they get done. | ||
What you're seeing there, that is the Rose Garden, and it looks like the Mike and Lindell kind of mini-event. | ||
But now the president, looks like the president's going to come out. | ||
Can we go there and get the music? | ||
Yeah, let's... | ||
This is beautiful. | ||
unidentified
|
I love that. | |
Isn't that great? | ||
This is warling production right here, man. | ||
Rose Garden on a beautiful May Day with that music. | ||
And the President of the United States, right there, just so you know, right back at that podium where that flag is, that is the Oval Office. | ||
unidentified
|
The Oval Office looks out into the Rose Garden. | |
Okay? | ||
Now, if you see the picture right there, to your right, that's where the colonnades are that you always have that. | ||
There's no connection of the West Wing actually physically to the residence. | ||
That colonnade is where you go down to the residence. | ||
So if you're sitting here right there where the camera is, to your hard right is the beginning of where the residence starts. | ||
And the residence is what we call the White House. | ||
That's a massive structure. | ||
Now the residence has those, kind of the east room, and it has more the ballrooms or the rooms down below on that first level. | ||
Actually, you've got to go up a level, I guess, actually, technically. | ||
unidentified
|
You walk into the basement level where the, I think the map room's down there. | |
Every room is magnificent. | ||
In fact, last night they actually did the CEO meeting, his talk, in a room they don't use very often. | ||
It's quite extraordinary. | ||
The president's coming down, I imagine, and we're going to take this until it goes, and we're going to keep that shot up there. | ||
It's fantastic. | ||
We're going to go... | ||
This is going to go right through into Charlie Kirk. | ||
And so I imagine the president, and I think he's going to... | ||
Guys, you don't need me. | ||
Let's have the full shot. | ||
People see me enough. | ||
My beautiful visage is right here. | ||
In their heart, they've got that, right? | ||
In their heart, they've got that. | ||
There we are. | ||
That's a photo. | ||
That's a beautiful... | ||
An amazing spring day here in Washington, D.C. Mike Lindell's there with a bunch of folks, and they're going to have some prayers. | ||
I think that this was kind of put together over this whole week. | ||
In the run-up to the 100 days. | ||
They've had influencers come in every day. | ||
Eric Bolling's been over there. | ||
Jack Posobiec's there. | ||
Of course, we've got a permanent team of Natalie and Amanda Head and, of course, Brian Glenn. | ||
But they've been bringing in... | ||
D.C. Drano was in the other day. | ||
So they've been bringing in influencers, and particularly the new media ecosystem, to do all this. | ||
Dave Walsh. | ||
We always call on audibles here in the war room. | ||
But you're here for a couple of days? | ||
Yeah. | ||
You're going to go see our AMC over at CRA? | ||
Yep, we'll be there. | ||
I think we may have to... | ||
Can we think about trying to get you back over here? | ||
Do some work, or is your schedule booked? | ||
I talked to your agent. | ||
I've got to talk to your agent. | ||
Friday, Saturday, I'm loyal to those who brought me. | ||
Give me a couple of minutes on where do we stand with President Trump. | ||
You heard Benoit saying that the re-industrialization is started. | ||
It's going to be tough, but we're going to... | ||
Are we... | ||
Is this energy plan in motion now to back that up? | ||
It's completely consistent with that. | ||
Like, he's talking the steel industry. | ||
We used to make 150 million tons a year in this country. | ||
Now about 50 million tons. | ||
Massive reduction. | ||
We got energy is at the core of that. | ||
Same as AI data centers. | ||
Energy is at the core of being able to produce steel. | ||
A core product, cost-effectively, 300-400 megawatts per steel plant. | ||
I just want the one picture. | ||
I don't need a box. | ||
I just want the one picture. | ||
He gets it. | ||
There we go. | ||
Now I'm happy. | ||
I'm going to stop whining. | ||
I'm going to stop being bitchy. | ||
A lot of people are a little worried about the slow walk on solar. | ||
I think when more of this kind of... | ||
What do you mean the slow walk on solar? | ||
We talk a lot about wind. | ||
He's all over that. | ||
Offshore wind is a big mess. | ||
Way costly. | ||
Solar is too. | ||
I think internally there might be a little pressure from Elon on, hey, if you love solar, it sells batteries. | ||
I don't know. | ||
We'll see. | ||
But you can't have reshoring, and you can't have manufacturing with solar as a major part of your electricity mix. | ||
It's too costly, and it's too part-time. | ||
Great opportunity to leverage off of a disaster this week, like the other guys do. | ||
Leverage off of it. | ||
Spain is a perfect example. | ||
Are you saying, hey, lesson learned from Iberia taught us we're getting out of here. | ||
Iberia seems to want to return to their agrarian history as Rome's breadbasket. | ||
Manufacturing, gone. | ||
Steel in Spain, gone. | ||
Ability to colonize third world countries, gone. | ||
We've got to remember, that's where the Gladiator, that's where Russell Crowe's farm was down there. | ||
Yeah, Hannibal walked through there, recruited a lot of men, took Rome for a while, took Rome, and then they became their breadbasket for Rome. | ||
Seemed to be wanting to head back to the same place, no manufacturing, because the electrification is awful. | ||
Three times more costly than here. | ||
You deal with these consultants, people all the time. | ||
How did they come? | ||
We were talking in the break. | ||
The globalization thing back in the 80s, it's a mindset. | ||
It's just a mindset. | ||
You had another mindset to de-industrialize and to use energy to do it. | ||
Have we broken that fever? | ||
No, I don't think we have yet, among Wall Street particularly. | ||
And I'm worried. | ||
Wall Street may not be a great owner of the steel industry. | ||
They're not interested in it. | ||
That's a side comment. | ||
Back in my day, running manufacturing businesses in Westinghouse, the company got in trouble through lending. | ||
Got in trouble. | ||
Bring in McKinsey, Booz Allen, Boston Consulting. | ||
All with the same message. | ||
Blade rings, turbine cylinders, exhaust cylinders, rotors. | ||
Buying from China, buying from Korea, buying from Hungary. | ||
I went to school with all those guys. | ||
They all had the same message. | ||
No original thinking. | ||
So it was sourcing and then it was develop your service business. | ||
Drove Westinghouse into getting into the lending business. | ||
Bankrupted them. | ||
25 years later, reproduced the same model of GE. | ||
Insurance and lending. | ||
Have tanked them, and now they've spun off all their units. | ||
To get out of the great manufacturing business. | ||
That came from McKinsey, Booz Allen, Boston Consulting. | ||
Walk me through the next hundred days, what Dave Walsh is looking for to make sure we got the same momentum and progress in energy to dovetail with the industrial policy. | ||
I think you're going to see a return to the use of the tariff weapon on solar and battery storage, which is critical to... | ||
Getting combined cycle natural gas back on the table as the dominant energy choice for electrification. | ||
It's the lowest cost. | ||
It's way the cleanest on real pollutants, NOx, SOx, and heavy metals. | ||
And then look at Zeldin's good work in the EPA on disabling, kneecapping the endangerment finding, then takes the legs out from under the further incentivization of part-time, irrelevant electricity supply devices that cost a fortune. | ||
And oh, by the way, all come from China. | ||
That'll be the keystone to go ahead and disable, incentivizing further, the meaningless electricity supply items. | ||
Where do people go to get your, where do people go to get your, all your content? | ||
You can find me on X, Truth Social and Getter. | ||
Dave Walsh Energy. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
Thank you, Steve. | ||
Appreciate you having me. | ||
How's X working out for you? | ||
Good? | ||
I'm pretty good. | ||
It's growing. | ||
Exponential growth from low numbers and stuff. | ||
We're moving up. | ||
Okay, fine. | ||
Your stuff's amazing. | ||
You're going to be here. | ||
He's here for CRA. | ||
I'm actually going to be speaking over CRA. | ||
We're going to do a hard flip right to Charlie Kirk. | ||
The president looks like he may come out at noon. | ||
As soon as the president comes out, we're going to go to the coverage. | ||
We're going to toss to Charlie Kirk here in about a minute or so. | ||
To the MyPatriotSupply, best company in the business, MyPatriotSupply.com. | ||
You got the new, you got the $200 off the three-month food kit. | ||
They do these specials every now and again, right? | ||
To make sure people get access to the kind of basic unit. | ||
The three-month food kit, unbelievable. | ||
It's kind of the basic starter. | ||
You get $200 off it, MyPatriotSupply.com. | ||
Put in promo code Bannon. | ||
This is the best company in the business. | ||
This company actually kind of originated the industry, and that's why it's so powerful. | ||
They got consultants. | ||
If you're kind of confused about what you do, what's in these kits, or what does it mean for you and the family, just talk to the consultants. | ||
Their power is the consultants that are on the phone, or you can get them online. | ||
MyPatriotSupply.com. | ||
$200 off the three-month food kit. | ||
Do it today. | ||
Also, Brickhouse Nutrition. | ||
The Field of Greens, I do this in the morning, right after I've had my first pot of Warpath coffee. | ||
I go to fieldofgreens.com. | ||
I get the energy boost. | ||
Also, I feel great because I'm getting all my fruits and vegetables because the production team here keeps me working all day, can't even get away for a break. | ||
Go to fieldofgreens.com, promo code BANNER for a discount. |