All Episodes
April 23, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:32
WarRoom Battleground EP 752: SCOTUS Oral Arguments On LGBTQ Books In School
Participants
Main voices
d
dr naomi wolf
11:14
s
steve bannon
15:06
t
tiffany justice
09:40
Appearances
t
trevor comstock
01:21
Clips
b
brianna keilar
00:31
j
jake tapper
00:08
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
brianna keilar
The Supreme Court's conservative majority signaled today that it will require schools to provide opt-outs for parents who have objections to LGBTQ books read in elementary schools.
If they go that route, it would continue the court's years-long push to expand religious rights.
CNN's chief Supreme Court analyst Joan Baskupic is with us now on this.
Joan, these are parents in Maryland who want to be able to pull their kids from class on days where there are lessons using books with gay or transgender characters or themes in them.
Tell us how the day went.
unidentified
Sure, and you're right.
Religious conservatives have been at a roll at the Supreme Court, and it looks like they're going to be able to notch another case.
It looks like the justices, from the oral arguments that went for an unusually intense, passionate two and a half hours this morning, Brianna, it looks like they're going to rule with the parents who have challenged the Montgomery County, Maryland school district,
over books like The Knight and the Prince or Uncle Bobby's Wedding.
The school had said there's no opt-out provision.
And during the course of the Q&A this morning, it emerged that really Montgomery County stands alone in not having any kind of opt-out provision.
And let me give you a flavor of some of the back and forth among the justices.
Over the discussion of Uncle Bobby's wedding, Justice Sam Alito said, it has a clear moral message.
It may be a good message.
It's just that it's a message.
And Justice Sotomayor then countered, looking at two men getting married, is that a religious objection?
The most they're doing here is holding hands.
So they got down into the nitty-gritty of some of these books, but also the main thing they were concerned about, the majority, the conservative majority, is that parents' religious views were essentially being usurped by the discussions in the classroom.
And again, these are for elementary age students.
Maybe as young as three and four in pre-K that it emerged.
But Justice Elena Kagan was more with Justice Sotomayor.
Saying, you know, how can we start drawing lines if you allow for these kinds of books?
Will there be other situations that parents might object to?
And the school board is saying, if we have too many parents opting out, there'll be problems with absentees, problems with how the learning actually goes on in the classroom.
Just as Kagan said at one point, if you allow this, won't we have opt-outs all over the place?
So it was a very heated situation, but I have to say what was exposed was how there's a really strong sixth justice majority ready to side with the parents who have objected to this.
*music*
steve bannon
This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
Pray for our enemies.
unidentified
Because we're going medieval on these people.
steve bannon
I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.
The people have had a belly full of it.
I know you don't like hearing that.
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.
It's going to happen.
jake tapper
And where do people like that go to share the big line?
unidentified
MAGA Media.
jake tapper
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
unidentified
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
steve bannon
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
unidentified
War Room.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
steve bannon
Okay, Tuesday, 22 April, Year of Our Lord, 2025.
We know in the Supreme Court here in the war room has a particularly controversial case.
Everything that comes to the Supreme Court is obviously controversial.
They only take on the toughest, thorniest problems facing the nation.
But when they have one that's particularly on social issues...
It goes in lockdown around the Supreme Court.
I mean, real lockdown.
They bring out the blast shields, the federal, not just the U.S. Marshals and the Capitol Hill Police, but the Federal Protective Service.
They were all over today.
I had a couple of folks over for meetings, and they go, what in the heck's going on?
They hadn't been to Capitol Hill when that's happened.
I said, something big's going over the Supreme Court.
And it was.
Tiffany Justice is here.
So, what is this case about?
And my understanding from people I talked to during the day, this was kind of a knock-down, drag-out oral argument.
Most of these oral arguments are, you know, real professional.
It's about the law.
A lot of these cases are very dry about antitrust or, you know, contract issues.
This one was a Donnybrook, was it not, ma'am?
What's going on?
What's the case?
What's the controversy?
tiffany justice
So last year, Maryland parents had the opportunity to opt out of certain curriculum in their kids' schools, and it was a curriculum that included a Pride storybook collection that had been made a part of the English Language Arts curriculum.
So this isn't sexuality education or health education.
This is now part of English Language Arts starting at the age of three.
There was an opt-out, and then Maryland public school system decided that they were going to take the opt-out away.
Parents were up in arms about that.
There were books like Pride Puppy Steal.
That was being read to children as young as three in the pre-K program that was telling kids to point out leather and drag queens.
I think it was Justice Alito or Gorsuch today that was asking specifically about that book.
And so when that opt-out was pulled, parents were obviously upset.
This was a very diverse group of parents.
The case is Mahmood versus Taylor.
And it was Muslim parents, Christian parents, Jewish parents had come together and had said, listen, this is just not appropriate.
Antithetical to our religious practice and teaching in our home.
We want to be able to remove our kids from the classroom during this instruction time.
And the school system said, no, you can't.
And so it was a fascinating case.
Even Justice Kagan today weighed in at one point and said, you know, I would imagine that there were parents who weren't just religious parents, but parents that were concerned about the age inappropriateness of this content.
And here's the thing, Steve.
Maryland County, Montgomery County Public School parents can opt their children out of health and sexuality instruction starting in fourth or fifth grade.
So the idea that somehow this is part of English language arts now and they can't opt their kids out was something that the justices really weigh
So, a very interesting case.
This case is going to have broad implications for parental rights and education across the United States of America.
And we were happy to see this case finally brought before the Supreme Court so that parents could have their voices heard.
One last thing I'll say to you.
You know who wasn't being protected at the Supreme Court?
We're the moms and dads who are concerned about our children.
We set a good example for our children.
So there's no violence that comes from us.
But the trans activists, that's a different story.
steve bannon
Well, let's talk.
First off, why did it get so heated?
And why was this?
Was the oral arguments itself, did it actually go an hour and a half or two hours as it's been reported?
tiffany justice
It did.
It absolutely did.
And it was very interesting because the tone of Justices Sotomayor and Jackson were very different when they were speaking to Eric Baxter, who was the lawyer for the Beckett Fund that was representing the Montgomery County parents, versus when they were actually questioning the Montgomery County School District attorney.
The justices were very impassioned and very aggressive.
They interrupted Eric Baxter numerous times, wouldn't let him get a word in edgewise.
So that was very interesting to watch.
I think Justice Barrett really got to the heart.
Because she started asking about exposure versus coercion.
And what she said was, you know, the teachers are being instructed in the teacher's manual to get into the details of this subject matter.
And so the question really becomes this.
Is this really about inclusion and kindness?
Or is this about pushing an ideology onto students and the Maryland County public school system wanting to do that?
An interesting note.
One of the arguments that was used in the Fourth Circuit when the parents actually lost the case and was brought up again today by the Montgomery County School District attorney was the fact that there was so many opt-outs from parents when this material was being addressed in the classroom that it would be difficult
for the school district to handle all of the opt-outs.
I mean, what kind of a world are we living in when you have parents broadly coming forward and saying, we do not want this instruction happening with our children in schools and the school district saying, tough, we don't really care how you feel.
And so, you know, this is a religious liberty.
It was argued on that front.
But I really feel it's a parental rights issue at this point.
These are our children.
We do not co-parent with the government.
And I know I've come on your show many times and I've said to you, parents have the fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children.
This is a God-given right.
This is not a right the government gives you.
And that includes and is not limited to their education, their religion, their medical care.
And so this decision by the Supreme Court is going to be a huge decision that will have long-lasting ramifications.
steve bannon
Look, I think a lot of people are in the audience right now saying, hey, you know, years ago when the pandemic struck, we started having this movement of parental rights in which you were one of the leaders of.
Explain to people, I think people were kind of shocked when we heard what it was about that.
Actually, this is still taught in public schools.
In other words, they take these books.
I thought the libraries had them all out.
I thought this process, I think most people say, hey, we thought this was all gone.
And by the way, didn't the 24 elections settle it once and for all?
Because this is one of the big things Trump ran on.
I think people are pretty stunned to know that you need to opt out.
You need to take your kid and basically make him potentially.
A target of ridicule because, hey, my mom and dad say I can't stay for the lesson a day or are going to be taken out of school.
It's pretty stunning.
I don't think it has anything to do with religious liberties.
Doesn't this just have to do with common sense and the basic rights of the kids and the parents?
tiffany justice
It was an interesting argument that Justice Jackson made today.
She was really doing a commercial for school choice.
She was basically like, you don't like it, take your kids out of school, put your kids somewhere else.
But the bottom line is, in Maryland, there isn't a lot of school choice.
Justice Kavanaugh, a lifelong resident of Montgomery County, was shocked.
He said Maryland was founded on the idea of religious liberty.
And so the idea that now Montgomery County, which, as you and I know, is a bedroom community of the administrative state, so it's not shocking that this is where a, you know, A real hub of woke ideology is pushing this.
But he was really, he said, I think, mystified was the word that he used.
Justice Jackson tried to say that this is an issue of local control.
And she believes that there are safeguards that are being put into place of parents.
They should get involved in politics and run for school board or serve on school board and make these decisions.
But it's broader than this.
And so I think it's very important to understand that the fundamental rights of parents are being violated by what's happening in these schools.
Steve, there are all kinds of books that are in the public school libraries.
I do think that's an issue of local control.
The difference here was this was instruction.
This was actually being used as part of the English language arts curriculum.
Teachers had very prescriptive details about the way that they should engage with students in the book.
As I said, Justice Barrett actually read from some of the teachers' manuals that tell the teachers how to engage with the students.
And so, you know, there's one thing to say, oh, we want kindness and inclusion, anti-bullying.
It's another thing to say that there are going to be things that are taught in the classroom that are completely antithetical to the teaching.
And I'll just say this.
Gender ideology is a lie.
There is no such thing as a transgender child.
There's no such thing as a transgender person.
There are men and there are women.
Imagine parents and people listening if 2 plus 2 equals 7 was being taught in the public schools across America.
Well, now we have gender ideology that's being taught in public schools telling kids your pronouns can change on a daily basis.
Maybe you were born in the wrong body, that your parents or your doctor might have assigned you a gender at birth that might be incongruent with your biological.
This is just nonsense, hogwash, and it has to stop.
So personally, when I listened to the arguments today, there was a want for parents to be able to opt their children out of schools.
That's what this case is about, is to opt your children out of this curriculum.
But I don't think it goes far enough.
I'm not going to lie, Steve.
I think we have to stop teaching lies in school.
Gender ideology does not belong in America's public schools.
steve bannon
Is the parents' movement still on the move to make sure at the local level they take over all these school boards and rid their kids of this stuff?
I know the movement overall, but they still focus on this radical...
Transgender ideology to make sure that's taken out of the library so you don't have to be in a situation to have this taught to your children and have them have to have it opt out.
You have to go to some special thing to stay home from work to take your children out of school that day.
tiffany justice
Yes, I think the parental rights movement is going strong.
President Trump, since he has come into office, has been such an amazing protector of parental rights.
He has welcomed parents into the White House, and he has told us that he is going to fight for us to be able to have the choice to send our children to a school that we know meets their needs and our values.
And so parents are really emboldened by that.
Moms for Liberty is growing strong, still endorsing in school board races.
1776 action also endorsing in school board races.
And an interesting point, Randy, Weingarten was on with Martha McCallum today, beyond calling Martha sweetheart at one point, which Martha did not enjoy.
And that was fun to watch if you can catch that clip.
Randy was saying that she wouldn't even teach these books in classrooms if she was there.
So I think the tide is turning.
The one thing Randy did say was she feels this is also an issue of local control.
She doesn't think that this should be heard at the Supreme Court.
This is interesting because people need to know and understand that the left is coming for local elections.
They know that they can't.
We can't make progress at the federal level now.
We have President Trump in the White House.
We have the House and the Senate.
God willing, we'll continue to keep the House and the Senate through the midterms.
But the left is coming for your local elections and for your school board.
So parents, pay attention.
Don't let your foot off the gas.
You need to run for school board support candidates.
We need to stay engaged and involved.
steve bannon
Unbelievable. Very smart.
Last thing, you made a comment earlier about the violence of transgender.
Yeah. Ideology and the people that come to these things for transgender ideology.
Why were the guards, why was this in lockdown today?
Why do you think it was?
The parents, you never see the parents, the Tiffany Justice of the world getting up in people's faces.
Why was this in lockdown?
What is it about the transgender folks that basically makes it kind of scary or kind of violent to get engaged in this?
tiffany justice
Because the left is losing.
As you say, this is like the cry of a dying regime.
They are losing.
We have them backed into a corner.
And what happens if you back a snake into a corner?
They are going to lash out at you.
And so transviolence is violence.
We see horrible violence coming from the left.
All kinds of death threats and things happening to our parents and the kids who are standing up and speaking out.
They want boys on girls sports teams, as you and I have discussed before.
The issue is never the issue.
The issue is always the revolution.
And make no mistake.
We are in the middle of a cultural revolution in this country that was foisted upon us by the left, and the public schools of America are one of the major battlegrounds.
So parents, you have to pay attention, be vigilant, get in your kids' business, be on their phones, ask teachers what's taught in class, have family dinner, and talk to your kids about what they're learning in school, because there is, as we know, a real effort to indoctrinate our children in public schools, and we have to stand between them and our kids.
steve bannon
Tiffany, how do people reach you now?
Social media, the website.
I know you're a fire breather now to help us in all these causes.
Where do people go?
tiffany justice
I am.
You can follow me at For Tiffany Justice.
I'm a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
Steve, I'm taking this fight across the country.
We're going to take everything I learned at Moms for Liberty and help other organizations.
And tonight, there's a Twitter space, an X space that I'm running with Sarah Parshall Perry from Defending Ed.
Join us at 8 o'clock on X to ask questions about this case, to hear from Sarah, who's an expert in the field.
And we're going to try to help to embolden parents across the country.
steve bannon
Hang on.
It's 8 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Twitter.
Where do they go?
What Twitter handle do they go to?
tiffany justice
You can go to at the number four, Tiffany Justice, or at Heritage, and they'll be running that space.
And you can join us.
You can ask questions.
It's going to be a great hour-long conversation about the Supreme Court case today and parental rights across America.
steve bannon
Tiffany Justice, always on fire.
Thank you so much, ma'am.
Appreciate you.
tiffany justice
Thanks, Steve.
steve bannon
What I wanted to do, I have Naomi Wolf, and I got Naomi Wolf on Skype or on phone?
On phone.
Okay. Naomi Wolf, I want you to hang right there.
Something was on 60 Minutes the other night.
I was kind of giving a heads up about it.
I watched it.
I immediately thought, Naomi, we have to have Naomi Wolf on here to break this down, to tell me, should I be scared to death, which is what 60 Minutes wanted me to be at the end of their segment, or should I take a deep breath?
We're going to find out.
We're going to play.
We've taken some clips from the 60 Minutes segment.
The crack team here at War Room put it together.
We're going to watch this as you're cold open, and then, Naomi, we're going to bring you in.
unidentified
Bird flu has been circling the globe for decades, so the discovery in 2024 that the deadly pathogen had jumped from a wild bird to a cow came as a shock to virus watchers.
Now, in just over a year, the virus has ripped through America's dairy herds and poultry flocks.
It has jumped to other mammals, including humans.
Seventy Americans have caught the virus.
One has died.
Long feared as a possible pandemic, doctors and veterinarians fighting the virus told us Biden's government was slow to act, while the Trump administration has now laid off more than 100 key scientists.
All as the virus keeps spreading.
So what concerns you the most?
The pandemic potential for a virus like this one.
And that is the worst case scenario, right?
And ultimately one we want to avoid.
I can't say that that's going to happen, but we don't want to play with fire.
This is a threat that is very significant and very real.
And I recognize also this is a moment where it's easy to sound like an alarmist.
What I'm here to tell you is this is a very serious threat to humanity.
And the longer we let this persist, the greater the risks are going to be.
Dr. Cameron Kahn is an infectious disease physician in Toronto.
His company, Blue Dot, was among the first to flag the virus in China that became the COVID pandemic.
Kahn told us bird flu is just as concerning.
He showed us how fast the virus has spread among dairy cattle.
This seems like almost a wildfire to me.
Yeah, absolutely.
Now, add in poultry outbreaks.
So this is virtually the whole country.
Pretty much.
Next, Dr. Cameron Kahn showed us a map of all the confirmed human cases of bird flu in the last five years.
Most have been in Asia until now.
What you start to see around 2024 is you start to see a case in Texas and then you start to see this sudden rapid increase in cases across the country.
All over the place.
What's happening here is wild birds have infected cows.
Who have then infected other cows, who have then infected humans.
And so there's this complex web of all of these different animal species now passing the virus in different directions.
Is this one of those things you have never seen before?
The world has never seen this kind of situation.
And it's showing us that the virus is capable of adaptation.
If you allow it, it will just get better and better at infecting other mammals, including potentially humans.
Most of the confirmed cases in the U.S. have been farm workers.
Most had mild symptoms.
The one person who died had underlying health conditions.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say the virus still poses a low risk to the general public.
People are not generally getting very sick from this.
So what's the reason for all the alarm?
Influenza is a particularly formidable virus.
It is constantly changing.
And the more that we allow it to evolve and adapt by infecting people, I mean, this is kind of Darwinian evolution here, right?
It can change in ways that actually make it even more deadly or more easily transmissible or even resist against some of the antiviral medications that we have.
We are really at risk of this virus evolving into one that has pandemic potential.
And the reality is none of us know whether this is next week or next year or never.
I don't think it's never.
But it may be here far sooner than any of us would like.
Many scientists told us vaccines could be our best defense.
There is a vaccine for bird flu, but it has not been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration.
Moderna has a new one, but the Trump administration has paused its final funding.
There are vaccines for poultry, too.
But they haven't been used because many of America's trading partners will not import vaccinated birds.
A glimmer of hope?
The USDA's milk testing program.
This is repurposed from COVID testing from three or four years ago.
Dr. Keith Paulson is director of the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, part of the USDA's plan to test raw milk for H5N1.
Pasteurization kills the virus, but raw milk can be loaded with it.
The CDC is trying to ramp up its testing, but there's another problem.
Almost half of farm workers are undocumented and may be reluctant to be tested.
If we're not testing people, if we're not looking...
For people who might get it, if we're not looking for evidence of an early cluster of human-to-human transmission, then we're going to miss it.
So we are now seeing the viruses spread from birds to cattle and now to foxes, goats, pigs, rats, cats, raccoons.
The fact that this virus can infect so many different types of mammals Is a huge concern in terms of its ability to infect people.
One of your colleagues told us that if this should spiral into a pandemic, this flu could make COVID look like a walk in the park.
I agree.
You're scaring me.
I'm scared about it myself.
I don't sleep very much these days, Bill.
Has the Trump administration gotten its arms around this problem?
No, I would say is the short answer.
But the longer answer is that I don't actually entirely know what is going on.
Why is that?
Many of the people who are working on this, at least at CDC, have been fired from the federal government.
So the influenza division at CDC has been decimated.
And in fact, there is a communications ban that has been put on these federal workers.
Well, what do you think of that?
I think it's insane, actually, that I have to have conversations on encrypted messaging apps with my colleagues who I would normally just send emails to.
Kay Russo and others told us they feel stymied.
The current distrust of science and vaccines is hurting their fight to try to prevent the next pandemic.
I would scorch the earth if this ends up in children deaths.
And so as a mother...
As a veterinarian, as a scientist, I'm just asking you, trust us, because I will do everything in my power, and there's plenty of folks behind me that will do the same to keep this from getting to that point.
steve bannon
Okay, I want to welcome Naomi.
We've got about a minute here.
I'm going to hold you through the break, so we've got a lot of time on the other side.
I got even more scared this time I saw it than the first time.
Should I be scared to death?
Or is this just a big one ad for the hire me for everybody getting ready to be laid off by the government ma'am?
dr naomi wolf
I mean, it's so transparent.
It's almost like they've got a template, right?
Like, you know, when Microsoft tries to help you write your resume and it's like, okay, COVID's over.
And I think really interesting timing is that RFK Jr. reportedly is talking about, it's not a formal announcement yet, but I believe Politico covered it, talking about taking the CDC recommendation for the childhood COVID vaccine off the schedule.
So they really need, and the childhood vaccination with COVID is now down to 13%.
People just aren't getting those boosters.
So big pharma really, really, really needs a new pandemic.
And big surveillance technologies need a new pandemic.
And so that's what they're creakily wheeling out.
And I'm telling you, if you Google bird flu cover magazine, you know, you get bird flu covers terrifying going back decades.
Time magazine, 2005, avian plea death threat, 1998, 2004.
They bring it back again and again and again.
I'm not saying it's not real, but I'm saying I have more to tell you about who the people are that 60 Minutes chose to interview.
steve bannon
Naomi, hang on for one second.
We're going to take a short break.
We've had a little technological problem getting Naomi up, so she joins us by phone.
Take your phone out.
If you haven't done this, get the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the era of Trump.
You're seeing gold hit the all-time high every couple of days.
It's not the price.
It's the process.
Make sure you understand why gold is a hedge against times of financial turbulence.
unidentified
Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, 9-8-9-8-9-8.
steve bannon
Do it today.
unidentified
Room.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
steve bannon
Okay. We're having some technical problems with Naomi.
We're going to get her back up because I want to get to the bottom of the situation with the bird flu because they're rolling hard on this.
Around that community, the same one that the CDC and all the people associated with the CDC.
Very explosive news coming out of the...
World Economic Forum.
I want to thank the engine room for bringing this to my attention as we were in the middle of the show.
Klaus Schwab.
You notice it was kind of quick on Monday.
The Pope dies and Klaus Schwab leaves, steps down from all posts at the World Economic Forum.
Breaking news tonight.
There's a major investigation of Klaus Schwab by the Board of Directors.
of the World Economic Forum.
I believe him and his wife for potentially, at least alleged, investigation into misuse of funds, luxury travel, use of different locations.
Sounds like that thing can expand to others.
But it didn't make sense while all of a sudden, you know, Klaus Schwab out of nowhere is stepping down.
So the World Economic Forum, which has been kind of crushed by the populist economic nationalist movement throughout the world.
You see right now there's some other issues that are dealing with this.
Also, President Trump in the Oval today, number one, was very clear about this huge controversy that's had an impact onto the markets about President Trump.
Is he going to fire the head of the Federal Reserve, Powell, Fed Chair Powell?
And in fact, Hassett, I think, said on TV the other day, we're looking at alternatives for that.
And he's headed NEC.
It was kind of an unusual thing to say, but he said it.
The thing was over on Fox.
President Trump today, pretty clear that, number one, he's not looking at alternatives.
He doesn't intend to fire Powell.
He's not totally excited about the job he's doing.
He thinks he's late.
In other words, he thinks he always moves on interest rate cuts late.
It's no loss on anybody that President Trump's looking for an interest rate cut now.
But he said he wasn't, you know, wasn't researching alternatives, wasn't going to fire him, didn't want to fire him, and also kind of implied or essentially said he believes in an independent Federal Reserve.
You couldn't be, you know, to the point there.
Markets had already closed, but because we picked it up at about 5.15, markets closed at 4. Of course, the overnight market.
Tesla had a disastrous announcement after hours on their earnings and revenues and all that.
And, of course, there's discussion about Elon Musk going back.
To Tesla full-time.
I think there's some announcement, or at least talk, he's going to go back, or he said he's going back soon, but he'll still be involved, quote-unquote, a day or two a week, and that he will remain a day or two a week until the end of President Trump's this term.
You won't get many people in the White House or in the Cabinet or in Washington, D.C. to verify any of that part of it.
I think that people feel that.
To be blunt, he's played his hand out, and right now people are saying, we're the doge cuts.
We need to see these cuts.
We need to see where the money, show us the money because we are hurting.
As we showed from last night's Stephanie Ruhl show, the U.S. editor for The Economist brought up the subject that we talk about.
First time we've heard about anybody else bringing it up, and she's a heavy.
The market turmoil, and that was before today that we had a positive run, number one, and I think this has been misreported by Charlie Gasparino, and I'm no fan of Charlie's, but he's been doing a good job on a lot of these scoops he's getting out of the White House.
President Trump is not de-escalating.
Scott Besant didn't really say.
What they're saying is that they went up the escalatory ladder very quickly to 125% tariffs and then 145% tariffs because they told China.
Not to come back.
China did.
Now I think you do have, at least in conversations, because you've got a full embargo on all Chinese products.
We're engaged in the economic war that they've had against us, you know, for the last, I don't know, 20 years, but particularly after 2008.
And we know that they declared a people's war in May of 2019 when they tore up.
The deal that President Trump had negotiated with them and Lee He, their vice premier, for two years.
So it's not like President Trump's backing down.
I think Charlie actually said he's not backing down.
He's looking to step down or look for an off-ramp.
I think nothing could be further from the truth about that.
But there is going to be, and I think that has to do with...
These other deals they're about to announce, and even Gaspar is saying that, and right here on the right hand, Beijing warns of retaliation against nations doing U.S. deals.
Retaliation. U.S. deals.
That's economic war.
One of the reasons it's retaliation is there is parts in these terms agreed, and the architecture of these deals that say, in doing this deal and working through all these complex issues, You are going to the center of gravity of your trade is going to be with the United States of America.
President Trump's pretty smart about how he's doing this.
So the market turmoil that they're all over, number one, oh, he's going to fire the Fed.
Number two, he's just on a war of revenge against the CCP.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Nothing. This is why the bond market a little bit stabilized.
It is getting a little higher, 10 years of 4-4.
Gold came down to under 3,400.
As we said before, the important thing for you to understand is the process, the pattern recognition of why gold has been a store of value in a hedge for, I don't know, 4,000 or 5,000 years in a man's recorded history.
When something's been that long, it's good to know about it and good to know about the process.
You can do that over at Birchgold.
Birchgold.com.
Talk to the Philip Patrick and the team.
Get all the free information.
Everything you need to do to get smart, the whole purpose of the show, to give you more access to information.
That's where I go back to the amazing Naomi Wolf.
It's so good to have you back on here, Naomi.
So, Naomi, your communications expert, was that specifically structured by 60 Minutes?
To instill fear, not just in the American people, but also the political class in Washington, D.C., to say, you're going to be held responsible if you've been part of this Trump effort.
You know, Biden was late, but Trump is malevolent because he's getting rid of all these great scientists.
Your thoughts, ma'am?
unidentified
Well, I think it was probably a collaboration.
dr naomi wolf
I mean, we don't have the notes and we can't FOIA them, but...
It was so carefully laid out to start with, you know, problem, solution, villain, you know, hero, anti-hero.
And the anti-hero, of course, is President Trump.
And by implication, Mr. Kennedy at the CDC and HHS.
And the crime of having laid off, you know, 200 scientists who are represented in this narrative of being out in the field, daggers drawn, you know, with their armor on, fighting to defend us against this
new virus.
But it did read like a threat.
You know, it really did.
And it reminded me of the threat that was leveled at President Trump, you know, at the beginning of the COVID pandemic, by implication by Dr. Fauci and his team who were saying, you know, there's going to be a pandemic and then.
So, yeah, it seemed very carefully structured.
And the people, you know, you had to listen very carefully to hear them also say, the interviewees also say, it's the flu.
It's, you know, no one, maybe one person has died, but they didn't say died of it.
So I'm hearing the same kind of games that we heard in the COVID narrative.
You had this map, right?
And the maps in the COVID era caused a lot of frenzy and terror, but the data sets turned out to be faulty, and we didn't hear what those data sets were from, right?
And you also heard, if you listened carefully, that maybe it'll turn into a giant pandemic, maybe someday, maybe never, but you really need to prepare for the worst.
So, honestly, there's...
There's no new news, especially because they didn't show if the spikes that they claimed are seasonal, cyclical.
If you see the magazine covers again, we've seen this return every decade in the news as a scary thing.
So I'm not saying there won't be bird flu or that people won't get sick or even die.
I'm saying they haven't presented the evidence that there's anything...
Very out of the ordinary.
But what we do see is the same gearing up, A, of a political threat against President Trump, you know, really to kind of punish, to try to punish this administration for taking, you know, RFK Jr. is starting to take really effective action slowly.
It was slow gearing up.
Maha was getting frustrated.
But he started to say, you know, Vaccine, the word vaccine, he started to say the word autism.
He started to talk about ending the practice of advertising, pharma advertising direct to consumers.
These are huge inroads in the kind of wall of profit and wall of corruption that pharma has established.
So it does seem like an attack on that.
And lastly, I just want to say the people they chose to focus on in the 60 Minutes piece Are not, you know, your adorable local veterinarian looking after your pet chicken.
No, these are people deeply, deeply embedded in the belly of the beast of global, you know, the global pandemic cartel, for lack of a better phrase.
This Kamran Khan, this doctor, this Canadian doctor, actually has a company that uses AI for, guess what, pandemic surveillance.
Scanning the horizon.
I'm reading from his website, Blue Dot, you know, and risk assessment.
Always be prepared by identifying threats that demand your attention, anticipating how they will impact your organization and responding appropriately to your mandate.
Watch that wording.
Pharma and life sciences, infectious disease countermeasures, and global enterprise, global outbreaks, right?
So he's using AI.
To look for something that in the old days when we had epidemics, of course, people realized there was a problem because people were getting sick and dying, right?
And transmitting disease.
And it was obvious.
Well, now, you know, if you've got an enterprise like this, you really have to look, right?
You have to look in wastewater.
You have to look in mysterious maps with no clear data sets.
You have to have friendly scientists that have unfortunately just been laid off for your business model at the CDC to generate or outsource the indications that create so many profits.
And then this other veterinarian, this woman, Kay Russo, she qualified as a poultry veterinarian.
She got her poultry degree.
She was a veterinarian earlier, but she specialized in poultry nine months ago, according to her own LinkedIn.
And again, she's not looking after your pet chicken.
She was working at Purina, you know, massive kind of big ag enterprise.
And she consults for the biosolutions industry.
So they're gearing up to redeploy energies and resources.
The other incredible thing we heard, Steve, was...
This guy showing the testing for bird flu, and he said, and you almost could have missed it, oh, we've retrofitted this from COVID, right?
So they've got all these testing facilities that are useless now and not generating profit.
Well, you need to test something.
So, again, that's my analysis.
I'm not saying there will never be a bird flu issue, but it's very convenient timing, and it's definitely politicized.
steve bannon
In the way it was presented, it was kind of that same way of the same folks trying to talk down to you and force something.
It may be something there, but I just think if they're going to put that information out, they've got to do it.
It brought chills back to me of how they were trying to intimidate and scare everybody.
A couple things, Naomi.
You warned us about the WHO.
They actually did, I guess, pass the pandemic tree, but we're pulling out of the WHO.
Is this still something for us to be concerned about?
dr naomi wolf
I mean, I can't believe I'm saying these words.
I guess by now I'm used to it.
Thank God for President Trump, right?
Thank God for the Vice President.
Thank God for RFK Jr.
That this day would come that we would be pulling out of the World Health Organization.
I mean, it's a miracle.
Of course, it took a lot of hard work by the posse and you and people like Frank Gaffney and their colleagues alerting everyone to the threat of the WHO.
Basically teaching America from the start what is the downside of these global treaties via the WHO.
But the word got out.
Many, many, many episodes that you guys ran on War Room taught people what it means to them.
So I think it's a huge blessing to America that we don't have to worry about these psychopaths dictating our national policies.
It's a win for sovereignty.
For our being able as Americans to set our own course and not be subjugated to the minions of, you know, Bill Gates.
steve bannon
But you warned us about these passports and all that.
All the countries, if we want to travel, all the countries of the world will be around this.
And can't these NGOs, can't they trap us with these NGOs?
I mean, we're not...
Look, first of all, we just started the process.
We're going to pull out the WHO.
I agree with President Trump, Herculean effort.
But these are...
Demonic organizations.
We just told you when you were trying to get hooked back up, Klaus Schwab announced yesterday, gone from WEF, you know, like out of nowhere, and now Wall Street Journal is reporting a major investigation by the Board of Directors of the World Economic Forum into Klaus Schwab for...
You know, fraud and misuse of resources, etc.
Really? Is there a trap still laid with WHO, through the NGOs, through the fact that you travel to other countries, they're going to get you on what you warned us about, ma'am?
Believe it or not, it was four years ago this month.
The vaccine passports.
Four years ago, Naomi Wolf came on here, some lefty, and saying, hey, they're about to take total control of the world with digital passports and vaccines.
Aren't you concerned about that?
dr naomi wolf
Yeah, I really am.
I mean, you're absolutely right.
You know, we're safe within our borders for now.
You know, we're safe.
I mean, it's pretty scary that our well-being rests upon really a handful of leaders.
And our willingness to continue to fight to defend our sovereignty.
But absolutely, we could, if we want to travel and there are mandates as there were before, you know, tomorrow it could be Italy not letting people get on public transportation or take a train if they're not vaccinated,
if they don't have their vaccine passport or whatever other kind of psychotic restriction these people want to impose on us, the WHO.
And, you know, remember that they've always expanded the definition of health and public health, right?
So right now I'm in Massachusetts and there's a family that had their kids taken away from them because they didn't want to give them a COVID vaccine.
You know, they fled to another state and now they're enmeshed with Child Protective Services.
So that kind of, you know, the expansion of what is health and what is the rights of the state, We're not safe.
And right now I'm also thinking about Britain, you know, where I visited recently and I was on a boat with a lot of free speech activists from Britain, well-known people, you know, distinguished people, a famous journalist, a famous actor.
And they were facing criminal charges, you know, like you, right?
They were facing jail time because of things they said on, like...
Very ordinary opinion type comments they've made on social media.
So I'm not saying that the WHO is responsible for the horrific censorship in Britain, but I'm saying that the WHO can continue to chew up and spit out human rights all over Europe through these treaties and through alliances with the EU.
And Europe is not free, for sure.
They are not free.
I mean, yeah, I mean, I'm just thinking lastly, and I promise I'll stop, like, racism and racial disparity was swept up by our HHS and the evil Biden administration as something that gave local health officials,
public health officials, powers.
And that's the kind of thing that in Britain and Germany and other places where, you know, The racialization of society is so weaponized, right, by globalists.
They could use that to strip people of their rights or restrict people's access to equality.
So it's really bad and scary.
steve bannon
Yes. Naomi, where do people go to find you, ma'am?
dr naomi wolf
My sub stack is called Outspoken, and you can support us and find us on dailycloud.io.
steve bannon
Ma'am.
Love you.
I'm going to have you back here talking about this autism situation with Bobby Kennedy.
Thank you so much for joining us today on a Tuesday.
Naomi Wolf.
Wow. Bird flu.
Make America healthy again.
Trevor Comstock, Sacred Human Health.
What do you got for us today, brother?
unidentified
Hey, Steve.
trevor comstock
Thanks for having me.
So today I just wanted to highlight one of our more popular products that we've also been having some great feedback on, which is our Natural Sleep product.
And what's unique about this product is that it's derived from four natural elements and also completely free of melatonin.
So all four of our ingredients actually work together to naturally calm you before bed as well as help keep you asleep during the night and also to prevent you from waking up without that groggy feeling that people oftentimes get when they take things like melatonin or other sleep medications for that matter.
But when we created this product, we were also searching the market to kind of see what else was out there that was natural.
And unfortunately, most of what we found were products that were advertised as natural or natural sleep formulas.
But then most of them had things like melatonin added or just other preservatives and chemicals that aren't ideal for health.
So also the issue with a lot of sleep products on the market is that it's designed to essentially get you hooked on them.
But because all of our ingredients are natural...
steve bannon
Trevor, we got a hard out.
Can the website people go to right now to contact you to find out more about this and to make direct contact?
Where do they go?
unidentified
Yeah, yeah.
trevor comstock
Everything I'm talking about you can find on our website at sacredhumanhealth.com.
If you click on any of our products, whether it's the sleep product or the beef liver, etc., everything that I talk about you can find directly on the product links.
But Sacred Human...
Sacredhumanhealth.com.
steve bannon
Go check it out today.
Dow in the future is up 400 points because of President Trump's discussion of the Fed.
Export Selection