April 1, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:58
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish, in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
| Good evening. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in with a great Stephen K. Bannon and tonight in the A Block sitting in with a great Natalie Winters as well. | ||
| The War Room is shooting on all cylinders. | ||
| Never in my wild expectations, right? | ||
| I was in Congress 10 years ago, so 14 to 18. The border invasion, Congress and the Senate really didn't lift a finger. | ||
| The endless wars didn't lift a finger. | ||
| The budget The inflation piece, not too much. | ||
| Today, President Trump and the White House is hitting on all cylinders. | ||
| We're waiting for the House and the Senate to respond in kind. | ||
| They're doing great work. | ||
| But you have seen on this show and only on this show the scale and the scope of the resistance of the left. | ||
| We get the football. | ||
| We're trying to run down the field. | ||
| The left blocks us every inch of the way. | ||
| Deportation, 10 million. | ||
| They stop us at 100 with judges across the world now, as Steve's been showing on the show. | ||
| I want to dig into this, the deep state, the administrative state, that there's no one that has been better than this over the last years. | ||
| That our very own Natalie Winters, now at the White House, quite a shot she's got going right there. | ||
| Uh, coming up to you. | ||
| Uh, Natalie, bring us up to speed. | ||
| This morning you had a great piece, uh, exposing, uh, two of my favorites, uh, China, the CCP, and the Harvard Crimson all in one story. | ||
| Uh, bring us up to speed on these connections, uh, what they tell us about the deep state, and what, what, what can we do about this mess? | ||
| Natalie? Sure. | ||
| Well, just to, I guess, wash, rinse, and repeat in honor of Stephen K. Bannon, this morning, sort of springboarding Off of Rachel Maddow's show last night, Representative Pramila Jayapal going on there talking about this concept of a resistance lab, which is probably, I would say, the most aggressive tactic, not in protest, but in color revolution and full-blown regime change that the Democratic Party and their allies are engaging in. | ||
| We drilled down this morning on how the Harvard Ash Center, which is helping to carry out this initiative, is not just itself funded by USAID and the State Department, but also the individual, a they them pronoun user who runs it, while she herself is actually funded extensively by USAID, having lectured there repeatedly in addition to receiving funds from the United States Institutes of Peace. | ||
| In other words, I think the most important takeaway, you're not talking about run of the mill protests, civil disobedience, or disagreements with President Trump over politics. | ||
| policy disputes. | ||
| You're talking about people who study terrorism, violent protest and conflict to come to the conclusion that right now they might prefer nonviolent action, but that's only because they think it's more advantageous to their cause. | ||
| We ran out of time, but I want to get to these sort of other side of the coin, the I think equally important issue with this Harvard Center, which is that it is also now, despite the fact that the web pages are deleted, so they won't tell you this now, but they're actually funded by several Chinese Communist Party run entities, including, but not limited to the China Southern Power Grid Corporation, which is wholly run and operated by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Their entire board of directors is appointed by the CCP, in addition to New World China Enterprises Project, which similarly is one of these Chinese state-owned enterprises whose board is completely controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| But this Ash Center is particularly nefarious. | ||
| We've actually reported, believe it or not, three or four years ago, here in the war room, on this exact institute, because they were caught publishing pro-Chinese Communist Party propaganda. | ||
| They put out a report called Understanding CCP Resilience, Surveying Chinese Public Opinion Through Time, where they said that Xi Jinping was, quote, as strong as ever and under no imminent threat of popular upheaval. | ||
| This report was hyped by the Chinese I think, of the powers that the Chinese Communist Party weaponizes over their people. | ||
| Believe it or not, this very same Ash Center, which, like we said, is training not just Democrat activists, but members of Congress. | ||
| Well, they actually run, or used to run, it's now held over at Cambridge. | ||
| China's Leaders in Development program for over a decade, which was, quote, widely recognized by the Chinese government as one of the best overseas training programs for government officials. | ||
| continuing their description, taught both at Xinhua University, China, and Harvard Kennedy School. | ||
| This multi-week training program is specifically designed to help prepare senior local and central Chinese government officials to more effectively address the ongoing challenges of China's national reforms. | ||
| Some of the people that they lectured include individuals from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, which was actually sanctioned by the Trump administration for human rights abuses and their efforts to essentially repress the Uyghurs in Xinjiang. | ||
| Despite that, the same Ash Center that, like I said, is now training Democrat protesters was busy lecturing and even bringing Chinese Communist Party officials into meetings with Xi Jinping. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Natalie, it's just almost too overwhelming for the average American to take in. | |
| Give us, you know, who's at the top of this? | ||
| Are they all in the top of this together? | ||
| This obviously puts Harvard in a terrible spot. | ||
| They've been caught. | ||
| The stuff you're pointing out, this is probably just the tip of the iceberg, like you always say. | ||
| How bad is it? | ||
| And who's running this? | ||
| Is Harvard You know, actually furthering the causes of the Chinese CCP. | ||
| It's not like they need money. | ||
| It really does appear that they're in this ideologically with a bunch of those grant foundations, some of the CIA cutouts you mentioned, and that there is an ideological war going on against the United States of America. | ||
| Is that what you conclude? | ||
| Well, of course it is, and I think they like to play a similar game that they did with the origins of COVID, right? | ||
| Whereby the Chinese Communist Party, their globalist counterparts, will delete the evidence, erase the evidence, or make it so we can't see said evidence that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology or that Okay. | ||
| bioweapons. And then they say, Oh, well, you're conspiracy theorists because you can't produce the documents or evidence to support your claims. | ||
| And it's sort of a similar thing, right? | ||
| That's what they do with dark money. | ||
| That's what they do with the NGOs. | ||
| That's what they do with the 990 501 C three forms. | ||
| But with what we're able to discern, it's extremely, extremely concerning. | ||
| And I want to really, I think, make this person, I won't say person. | ||
| I won't bend the knee and use the pronouns. | ||
| This woman, I think I don't even know, but Erica Chenoweth. | ||
| But this is someone who I think it it's really important to understand sort of where she comes from. | ||
| Her entire CV is really about analyzing not what is morally, ethically or politically just but what is justified by any means necessary to achieve not political change or paltry reforms but full scale regime change. | ||
| Okay, this individual has written about toppling dictators. | ||
| She has written, I'll read you the stuff she's written. | ||
| Quote, the role of violence and non-violent resistance, resilient republics, why terrorism does not destroy democracy, the study of terrorism, achievements and analytical challenges ahead, to bribe or to bomb, do corruption and terrorism go together? | ||
| Even lecturing on an event titled, Is Terrorism Ever Legitimate? | ||
| And I think the most, I would say, telling piece of work That's Her team compared over 200 violent revolutions and 100 nonviolent campaigns, | ||
| demonstrations, and came to the conclusion that at least through their metrics, nonviolent demonstrations were more effective. | ||
| Now, the buried lead in that is that they're studying tactics That are violent and this individual is studying tactics and how terrorism can be achieved to achieve political goals. | ||
| And I think it's really just important to stress and you can't be overstated enough, right? | ||
| This whole resistance lab that's being propped up, this is not coming from the far, far left, you know, Democrat Socialist of America, niche left-wing activists. | ||
| These are members of Congress. | ||
| This is mainstream Democrat resistance, and we are on the precipice. | ||
| I mean, you know me. | ||
| I spend most of my days, sadly, watching this stuff. | ||
| I have never seen these people be both so desperate But also so violent and so willing to say the quiet part out loud. | ||
| And like I said this morning, what they're doing to the Teslas at the end of the day is what they want to do to you. | ||
| They just know that luckily we have a DOJ that's actually going to prosecute them. | ||
| But make no mistake, they're coming for you next. | ||
| Yeah, so Natalie, I saw on that list some other, you know, very prominent names of, you know, Bloomberg, corporate figures, very wealthy individual figures. | ||
| These wealthy individuals, these foundations are funding Harvard. | ||
| The money just flows to and fro. | ||
| What's the upshot? | ||
| What's President Trump going to be doing on this front in higher ed? | ||
| To bring this nightmare to an end because I mean we've known like in philosophy. | ||
| There's deconstruction They're tearing things down, but now you say now it's become institutional. | ||
| This is in the Kennedy said This is one of the most revered schools in the country at Harvard and now seeping into the leftist the Democrats Who are full-on? | ||
| Deconstructionist right they I hate to say it, but there are some of them that just absolutely They obviously hate the country. | ||
| In my view, it's a reaction. | ||
| They hate God and family and country and all the fabric of American life. | ||
| So what's the upshot here? | ||
| What is the Trump administration going to do? | ||
| What should Congress and the Senate be doing immediately? | ||
| Well, look, you're so right. | ||
| And so many of those philanthropic entities, I'm being euphemistic in my characterizations. | ||
| But those are the same groups. | ||
| I think the most telling sort of split screen was during the DNC, right, where you had the people burning the flags outside. | ||
| And then you had the members of Congress and elected officials and whatnot, the rank and file Democratic Party inside for once in their life embracing the American flag. | ||
| But the funny part is, I guess the sad part, is that both of those entities are funded by the same exact people. | ||
| And most of them are what's on your screen right now, right, whether it's the Tides Foundation, the Open Society Foundation's blogging. | ||
| It's really just a sliding scale of who in the Democratic Party is more compelled or convinced in their sort of performative drag show act of pretending like they don't hate this country. | ||
| President Trump is obviously embarking, I think, on his sort of next crusade to go after the funding of these super radical radical left-wing institutions. | ||
| But I think stories like these are important because we shouldn't just be defunding these institutions because what is going on with the whole Israel Hamas thing? | ||
| Surely that's part of it, but that's tangential from this America first perspective. | ||
| Here's the case, President Trump, the foremost leading organization that is curating Democrat Congress sponsored resistance protests and violent demonstrations against you that are probably open to using terrorism to get what they want. | ||
| You should strip that funding immediately. | ||
| Yeah, right on the money. | ||
| Natalie Winters, spot on as always. | ||
| And, you know, the irony is this is happening at the most elite institutions. | ||
| The Chinese, the CCP, are very intelligent with their targeting. | ||
| They know the top schools that produce the leaders in this country. | ||
| Not only the linkages Natalie's shown, but training in the faculty and then training in all the students that are flowing out of these schools. | ||
| This is the mindset I'm happy to stay as long as you want me. | ||
| It's like I'm so glad Steve is not back in prison. | ||
| It's always an honor to do this show with you on better terms. | ||
| So as long as you want me, I'm here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's good. | |
| Good. All right, Natalie, we'll keep you over the break. | ||
| We got a great show, folks. | ||
| We got the border coming up. | ||
| We got some economics on the tariffs coming up. | ||
| None of us can do justice the way Steve Bannon does. | ||
| But Natalie and I are going to do our best. | ||
| And we're thankful for you. | ||
| Please help us spread the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| The End All right, back in the war room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in with great Stephen K. Bannon and Natalie Winters is sticking around with us. | ||
| There is a lot of attention on the White House press corps right now. | ||
| The war room's lucky to have Natalie and her team right in the perimeter. | ||
| It's just a treat. | ||
| We get to have the inside view. | ||
| And so, Natalie, one of the things that bugs me is the mainstream media. | ||
| There's really a moral piece here. | ||
| Their refusal to cover the main issues of the Trump agenda, right? | ||
| There's no economic analysis. | ||
| There's no mainstream coverage of the border invasion, of the massive debt, the inflation, the weakness of the economy. | ||
| Now they're saying the weakness of the economy all goes on Trump, right? | ||
| Four weeks in. | ||
| And then the endless wars, right? | ||
| The war room, you, Steve, everyone's been right on all these issues. | ||
| And so give us a peek behind the window as you go into the White House with the correspondence. | ||
| What's it looking like? | ||
| Are we going to finally get the information out to the American people? | ||
| Well sure, I mean every day braving the smugness and pseudo-intellectualism of the class of people who have done more damage to this country than maybe the Democrat Party, though I guess they're really just an appendage of that whole institution. | ||
| It's honestly disgusting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I hate the fact that they're even technically my colleagues. | |
| But all that aside, I mean, I think why I'm there, why it's so important, obviously Democrats lost all institutional power. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| that people would have compassion for illegal aliens who like may or may not be a part of MS-13. | ||
| How about this? | ||
| If there's any question about whether or not you engaged in human trafficking, maybe you shouldn't be in this country to begin with. | ||
| I'll just put that on the front door of the Atlantic magazine's headquarters because apparently they like to depict MS-13 members as fathers. | ||
| Right. Thank you. | ||
| is currently duking it out over the Gulf of America. | ||
| But to that point, obviously just my presence in there, I think, triggers that, which I take great pride in. | ||
| But more precisely, the efforts to redo the seating chart are sort of the latest, I think, front in the war against the White House Correspondents Association. | ||
| With a lot of these legacy media people, who I guess don't quite know how to read or understand charts or numbers, because I don't think they quite know that they're actually doing significantly less views and inferior in terms of viewership than most of the people who are likely going to actually take their Okay. That's true. | ||
| I think that we should call the same people, what was it, from Doge, who raided the United States Institute of Peace, and have them remove the White House Correspondents Association from their seats that they will hopefully soon no longer belong in. | ||
| But these people are just so entitled. | ||
| The point, right, the reworking of the pool, this is about democratizing, and yes I use that word intentionally to troll MSNBC, the flow of media. | ||
| And you know what? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what? | |
| I'm sorry. | ||
| You did it the first term. | ||
| You don't get to have open shots on goal against the Trump administration time after time to try to smear him for what? | ||
| His original sin? | ||
| His cardinal sin of trying to secure the southern border? | ||
| These people are despicable and the fact that they think dunking on the Trump administration comes in the form of saying, oh well, the multi-million dollar contract that you supported stripping for transgender musicals in Columbia, it actually came from the State Department. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Natalie, give us a little rundown. | |
| Back when I was in Congress, I had no recourse, right? | ||
| When I lost to a Democrat, the Democrat made the announcement plan in the Atlantic, which is a CIA cutout, and my opponent was from the CIA. | ||
| So I've since learned about all this from you and the other great people in intelligence. | ||
| And I mean, you just can't make this up. | ||
| And so back when I was in, you would just see the lead story would be generated. | ||
| Sometimes it was locally, and then it'd go up and bounce off the Washington Post and then make its way around the country. | ||
| And then other times, the Washington Post and New York Times would take the lead, and it would trickle down to your locals. | ||
| And this is not just true of me. | ||
| I mean, it was so blatant. | ||
| And we didn't have a bullhorn until Trump came along. | ||
| Then all of a sudden, back then, Paul Ryan, the Republican leadership, they wouldn't support us. | ||
| The Senate side, the same thing. | ||
| Right now, what is the order of operations? | ||
| Does the AP still try to kind of lead and trickle down the news to the other biggies, the New York Times, Washington Post? | ||
| How do they share information? | ||
| They're still using the same exact talking points. | ||
| So just give us a brief overview and then we're going to go to Rich Stern and do a little economics. | ||
| Well, I think just like there's sort of a diversity of, you know, right-wing outlets and I think the war room sort of has a comparative advantage in arming our listeners with actual action-oriented tasks, right, where you have agency, you can actually use something to change it. | ||
| I think a lot of these sort of older, more establishment left-wing media outlets are sort of still playing in the ideological frame, but I think the ones that we focus on, it's why we play MSNBC, it's why you keep hearing The Atlantic, right? | ||
| Those are not bringing knives to a gunfight, but bringing tanks to a gunfight, which is information warfare, right? | ||
| And when you watch Rachel Maddow, when you watch shows like that, you can see that she starts her show 20 minutes every night With extensive, extensive coverage, live footage of protest after protest after protest, trying to create this siphonment, this sort of astroturfed idea that the American people are in such staunch opposition to what President Trump is doing. | ||
| And like we saw last night, having on a member of Congress essentially calling for, like, pseudo-violent terrorism in the streets, predictive programming at best, an outright call to violence. | ||
| And I point people to, I think Steve and I are going to get into it tomorrow. | ||
| But MSNBC on Sunday had a scholar who used to work for the CIA in the January 6th committee. | ||
| So that shows you her repertoire, her resume. | ||
| But they did a whole 20 minute segment where this individual is essentially alleging that a civil war is going to start in the United States of America. | ||
| Because I didn't quite get the logic train, but essentially Donald Trump is an autocrat. | ||
| And what we're doing to this country is so reprehensible that it would be morally justified for Democrats to sort of rebel. | ||
| So this is what we're talking about, which I think goes back to the story we were talking about earlier. | ||
| There are left wing media outlets, much like there are right wing media outlets, who like to be performative or sort of controlled opposition, are okay with the strongly worded letters and the strongly worded tweets. | ||
| Then there are outlets like I think you see the Atlantic, MSNBC, certain hosts on that network really toying around. | ||
| And I'm speaking metaphorically, but with can only be described as the raw materials for kinetic particles. | ||
| political revolution, right? | ||
| And that's sort of the, I think not diminishing returns, but if anything, the inverse of that, which is the only expanded returns that of all the smears that they, they hurled against president Trump or the campaign painting him as a dictator, as an autocrat, as an authoritarian that is giving their audience giving, I don't know, would be Trump assassins, the moral, political, and ethical justification and cover to engage in outside the system tactics, outside the system change. | ||
| You could essentially justify assassination under the frameworks that they've put forward with the way that they smear president Trump, right? | ||
| But it's standards and they just don't care. | ||
| And I would leave it at this, right? | ||
| The same people who are apoplectic, apoplectic over president Trump wanting to take back or take over the Panama canal, the G I UK gap in Greenland, going after the Houthis or putting tariffs on the Chinese communist party. | ||
| Did any of those media? | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| Absolutely nothing, but President Trump talks about Canada and it's as if he's committed a mortal sin. | ||
| So these people don't care about the United States of America. | ||
| They are running dogs for a global elite, epitomized by the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, George Soros, and poor me that I have to deal with them every day. | ||
| I do it for the audience, but these people do not love this country. | ||
| It is quite apparent in their questions, their actions. | ||
| And they're the scum of the earth, truly. | ||
| Yep, Natalie Winters, full circle, starts CCP, China, Harvard, Keynesians, big government folks. | ||
| Irony of ironies, President Trump is trying to take apart the regime, right? | ||
| He's not the autocrat. | ||
| He's not the one that's setting up a big government. | ||
| He's tearing it down and bringing it back to the founding principles and the founding virtue, among which the chief one is liberty and freedom. | ||
| And so that's what we're fighting for. | ||
| Natalie, thanks for the great overview, what's going on with the CCP, Harvard, and in our media. | ||
| Great job as always. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Thank you, Dave. | ||
| You bet. | ||
| Alright, we're going to go to Rich Stern with Heritage Foundation. | ||
| I'm not sure if we've got him up video yet or if he's just with us by radio. | ||
| By phone, sorry about that. | ||
| But Rich, we've got a minute left. | ||
| We're going to go into trade and tariffs. | ||
| Bob, why don't you give us your bottom line on what you think is coming from President Trump in the next couple of days and your reaction to it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Richard. Hey, well, always great to have you there. | |
| Always great to see you, but phone works as well. | ||
| We have two big things that are coming up tomorrow. | ||
| One is the auto tariffs. | ||
| President Trump intends these to design to defend the U.S. | ||
| auto industry. | ||
| And, of course, they're going to be imposed on foreign-made autos. | ||
| But we do have to be a little careful because they're also going to be levied on car parts that come into the U.S., even ones that go into U.S. | ||
| car factories that assemble cars. | ||
| So, again, this is part of his overall negotiation. | ||
| Yeah. Right on. | ||
| Right back. | ||
| Richard, we're going to be right back with you in three seconds. | ||
| Stay with us over the break. | ||
| Rich Stern, right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | |
| All right, back in the war room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in for the great Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| All political views are my own, but Natalie Winters hit it out of the park. | ||
| Now we got Rich Stern with us from Heritage Foundation, their economic policy expert. | ||
| Rich, thanks for being with you. | ||
| I cut you off in your summary. | ||
| You were hitting on the reciprocal tariffs. | ||
| First of all, the auto tariffs. | ||
| Secondly, reciprocal. | ||
| Keep going on that intro and then we'll get into some meat and potatoes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. So the important thing about the reciprocal tariffs is that, as we were talking about, all of these other countries we deal with impose quotas and tariff barriers, they tax our products, they regulate and make it hard for our producers to send things there, and at the same time, you know what they will do? | |
| They will subsidize their producers so that they can dump products from our markets through ill-gotten gains. | ||
| So what Trump is talking about here is Is using a strategy of meeting their tariffs or our tariffs, reciprocal tariffs, to encourage them to holding a mirror up to them to say, look at the trade barriers you've imposed and encourage them to get rid of those trade barriers. | ||
| But it goes beyond that. | ||
| It's also about making sure that they decouple from China the way that we are. | ||
| They remove Chinese communist influence. | ||
| And again, for some of these countries in particular, that they stop facilitating Chinese fentanyl Thank you. | ||
| the exact details on what the reciprocal tariffs are going to look like, but that's the goal, and those are the sort of things that Trump is intending to use them for to negotiate for wins for the American public and the American economy. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| Yeah, very good, Richard. | ||
| I'm going to put a couple graphs up. | ||
| You'll be familiar with them. | ||
| Denver, if you want to put up the first one. | ||
| Lighthizer was on the Tucker show the other day, Rich, and it made some, you know, just great points. | ||
| We're not talking about, you know, a few little tariffs against the US. | ||
| I don't I'm gonna skip | ||
| to a few graphs, but basically, Rich, why don't you just comment on that? | ||
| The size of the trade deficits, they're growing up and up and up by the year. | ||
| They're with every country. | ||
| You can put that chart up right there, Denver. | ||
| That's a good one on the far right. | ||
| It shows we have trade deficits with every country under the sun, and they're major. | ||
| And so, Rich, why don't you just, what's the consequences of that over time? | ||
| Lighthizer said, manufacturing, if you lose manufacturing, you also lose all the nice properties of research and development, innovation, the entrepreneurial spirit, you know, not to mention your inner cities. | ||
| So what's the, you know, in economics, you know, getting consumer goods and exchange back and forth as they teach you is kind of good, but what's the upshot of having huge deficits forever? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, and to your point on that, the story of the U.S.'s trade deficit is the story Of the destruction of the U.S. economy, of our entrepreneurialism, of our access to capital to build for our futures, and, of course, yes, the gutting of our manufacturing base. | |
| Now, what I would say is this is a story that begins with liberals in D.C. trying to destroy our manufacturing base. | ||
| The EPA declared war on our manufacturers and miners long before China did. | ||
| But, of course, China and a lot of these other countries piled on top using their own currency manipulation, dumping all these other sorts of things to get in there and double down on the regulatory burdens of the leftist state within the U.S. to destroy our manufacturing. | ||
| So that trade deficit is also representative of this loss of jobs and communities and all of these things that have been done both by the U.S. | ||
| government itself and by foreign governments, global elites in both places that have put their aims square on and against. | ||
| Right. Yep. | ||
| But manufactured. | ||
| And if we compare what Trump is doing right now to deal with these foreign barriers, with also dismantling the deep state here and deregulation and tax cuts, then we can in fact have that renaissance and get back to an America that is the laboratory and the factory of the world. | ||
| Yeah, I know. | ||
| We've got to get back to it. | ||
| Rich, let me ask you one more question. | ||
| I'm going to go to the border, which is also related. | ||
| I mean, it's just a disaster. | ||
| Thank God we've got a window here to get things right. | ||
| Denver, if you want to put up the next chart. | ||
| So we covered the magnitude of the deficits. | ||
| They're growing massively. | ||
| They're with every country on the Earth. | ||
| And then Lighthizer's point number two, this chart, I hope President Trump hauls this thing out. | ||
| It's a graph we're looking at, Rich. | ||
| It's got tariff barriers and non-tariff barriers, and the G20, the richest countries. | ||
| And at the very bottom, the most free trade country is the USA, right? | ||
| So it's kind of stunning. | ||
| I'm dying to hear the Wall Street Journal respond to this type of chart, or The Economist. | ||
| Or Jamie Dimon or the major bankers who are all sharing mainstream media talking points. | ||
| It's just outrageous what they're doing. | ||
| This chart has Canada, Mexico, China, all the rest of the countries above us, two to three hundred percent double, triple the size of our tariff and non-tariff barriers. | ||
| And so it's a little ironic that the free trade folks should be on board here to level the playing field. | ||
| Rich, just a minute or two, what do you have to say about the magnitude of these tariff and non-tariff barriers being leveled against us and just trying to set a level playing field? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I'm shocked that these globalist elite bankers you're talking about haven't pointed out these things, right? | |
| But I think that hits the nail right on the head there. | ||
| And you have to remember the history of this, of course, is that coming out of World War II, the U.S. had something like half of all of the goods production on the entire planet and 70% of the oil production, virtually all of the car production, etc. And so what happened was the U.S. government, as a geopolitical matter, negotiated with these countries to allow them to have high tariff rates. | ||
| Sure. You | ||
| got it! | ||
| You got it! | ||
| Yep, Rich, I'm gonna come back to you with just kind of the moral question. | ||
| The U.S. has always tried to be the good guy for the whole world. | ||
| We get rolled. | ||
| Now we're talking to our friends, the EU, the Europeans, the Mexicans, the Canadians. | ||
| We're saying, come on, folks, you know, let's get it straight. | ||
| You know, you're not being fair. | ||
| I'm gonna come back to you with a moral piece, but right now we're gonna go to the border to Ben Burquham and Oscar Ramirez and talk about a moral Yeah, I know. It's great to be with you, Dave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're actually a little off the border in Sinaloa, in cartel country of El Chapo's hometown, and now that you've got the warring factions between the Chepitos and the El Mayo crew and all these guys, and it's just death and destruction everywhere, The bottom line, Dave, is what's shocking to me is as we were driving back to our hotel yesterday, there was a kidnapping that took place on the road we were driving on. | |
| We drove past it just minutes later, and there was no response. | ||
| There was no police response. | ||
| There was nobody there to pick it up and say, hey, something bad happened here. | ||
| Basically, the people live with Stockholm syndrome down here, and they've become accustomed to this. | ||
| But the reason we're out here, I just want to set the stage. | ||
| The governor of Sinaloa is actually hiding in that building. | ||
| Because he's afraid of the cartels. | ||
| He's living in the governor's mansion, the palace behind us, but the citizens of Sinaloa have to live with the violence. | ||
| And that's the reality. | ||
| The elites stay above, they get protected, while the citizens, the people, get screwed. | ||
| Yeah, Oscar, you want to throw anything else in there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the insecurity factor. | |
| This is really important for the United States of America. | ||
| Because the cartel has infiltrated now into the United States of America, and we have to show them. | ||
| We have to show the epicenter of insecurity which is happening on this cartel war between Los Chapitos and Los Mayitos, which just statistically, Dave, on the year of 2024, more than 1,082 murders, just on homicides and killings due to the cartel, and more than 1,600 people were missing. | ||
| Also on the year of 2024, impunity, not even one case was resolved. | ||
| We're trying Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| Right. And we need the same thing in America. | ||
| Everybody who allowed the invasion into America needs to be arrested and held accountable. | ||
| And the same thing needs to happen down here or else it's just going to be a repeating cycle where you pick a new head. | ||
| In this case, where the president of Mexico is protecting El Mayo, you position him in position to take power. | ||
| And then you have the same problem over and over and over again. | ||
| Yeah, outstanding guys. | ||
| I want to push a little bit on this moral thing. | ||
| As an economist, our job is to explain the full cost and benefits of a policy, right? | ||
| So when it comes to the border invasion policy of the Biden administration, all political views are my own, the cost, I'd love for the economists to try to grapple with the cost of that little kid that was just kidnapped. | ||
| What's the cost? | ||
| What's the cost of all the 100,000 dead from fentanyl? | ||
| What's the cost of rapes and abuse of little girls and boys? | ||
| And it's just, it's just grotesque morally. | ||
| And then on top of that, that's their charge. | ||
| That's their job. | ||
| They know what their job is. | ||
| Then you have the mainstream media and the leftists. | ||
| And Natalie was just on reporting at the infiltration of the CCP funding Harvard and the Kennedy School. | ||
| Right? And so, you're right, it's the politicians. | ||
| But, you know, we hate to put it on the war room always, but it's on the people, right? | ||
| The people keep putting in congressmen and women and senators who just do not seem to have the moral backbone necessary for a fight. | ||
| But one minute in closing, guys. | ||
| Thank you for having the moral courage to do what you do. | ||
| Close us out here in a minute or so, guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, the cost benefit, you look at what's happening down here. | |
| You've got a country that lives with Stockholm syndrome. | ||
| You've got people that are screwed in between that. | ||
| Yes. Yes. | ||
| these people pretending that there's a value to this when the cartels are making billions of dollars. | ||
| The reality is that the sad thing is you drive across the city and you see the opportunity that could be here. | ||
| You see these businesses that could be in business that are all shut down now because of the violence that comes along with it. | ||
| The same thing happens in America. | ||
| You are replacing good value with bad value. | ||
| And that's what you have. | ||
| You have evil value being replaced where good value should be. | ||
| That's the bottom line. | ||
| The damage that the Biden administration did to Central America and South America is irreparable. | ||
| Right. Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. Right. | ||
| It's always the money. | ||
| Thank you, gentlemen. | ||
| Natalie, you start seeing why the media and why the economists won't cover this, because they're funded by everybody on that list that Natalie showed you. | ||
| Follow the money. | ||
| We got to replace the corruption, folks. | ||
| Back in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | |
| Back in the war room. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| Dave Brat sitting in with our great Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Today we have Rich Stern from the Heritage Foundation, our economic policy expert. | ||
| We've been covering the Trump tariffs. | ||
| No media attention to both sides of this issue, right? | ||
| There's just one side. | ||
| They're just trying to show the economy's in disarray. | ||
| In 30 days, right, the economy went from growth to disaster, according to mainstream media. | ||
| And so, Rich, in economics, sometimes it's what you don't see. | ||
| How did we lose our cities? | ||
| What's the true moral story? | ||
| The economy matters to President Trump, I think, more than the stock market. | ||
| The rich own the stock market. | ||
| The rich, 10%, own 90% of stocks, bonds, pensions. | ||
| And the middle class constantly gets left behind. | ||
| So how do you close this out on trade? | ||
| What's the moral case here that needs to be made, Rich Stern? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think you're exactly right about Trump's priorities, which is that, yes, the stock market is merely a capture of different price signals, and it's a future-looking device. | |
| But that isn't the economy. | ||
| You're right. | ||
| The economy is where you go to work, where you get the goods and services from that you need for you, for your family, the roof over your head and how it got there. | ||
| And it's exactly the point about economics. | ||
| You can always point to something that exists. | ||
| But it's hard to point to something that could have been, that was denied the chance to come into existence. | ||
| And you can't easily point to a place that was thriving 50 years ago and isn't now. | ||
| And the truth is, through this story we have talked about, through foreign government coercion, through our own government's incompetence and maliciousness, they have come together to deny many Americans a shot at prosperity. | ||
| Yes. Yes. | ||
| There's thousands of towns, there's tens of millions of workers who now can have a shot of prosperity because of what Trump is trying to do for them. | ||
| Yep. Spot on. | ||
| Rich Stern, Heritage Foundation, Economic Policy. | ||
| Great job, Rich. | ||
| Thanks for being with us on The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Always a pleasure. | |
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| All right, folks. | ||
| We're going to pivot over to the elections. | ||
| The War Room's been covering these. | ||
| Florida, Wisconsin now. | ||
| We have Brian Scheming with us, Wisconsin. | ||
| Brian, if you want to give us an overview of what's at stake in your state, and then if you want to do a tour de force in a few minutes over the entire country, what's the War Room got to do? | ||
| We know the answer, but give us the most effective, efficient ways we can get out there. | ||
| Thanks, Brian. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dave, so great to be with you. | |
| The best thing that people can do that are watching you and I right now are, A, to go vote. | ||
| If you haven't voted, make sure you vote. | ||
| The polls close tomorrow. | ||
| at three hours from now here in Wisconsin at 8 p.m central. | ||
| The second thing and the most power you've got is right here in your hand and that is your telephone. | ||
| Go into your contact file And I don't care who it is, who's watching right now, there are five to ten people in your contact file where if you call them and say, I really need you to help me in the next couple hours save Wisconsin and help save President Trump, | ||
| be that direct about it and just go to your phone right now And call people who you know will vote with us, who probably voted with President Trump back in November when we won Wisconsin, where Wisconsin put the president over 270 electoral votes that night. | ||
| Those people, we motivate those people, Dave, to go vote and the conservatives can win in Wisconsin tonight. | ||
| Yeah, Brian, and what's at stake with a win or versus a loss real quick? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Two congressional seats that the Dems are targeting in Wisconsin. | |
| And if we lose two congressional seats because a liberal Supreme Court comes back and rewrites the congressional map, that can take the House majority down even closer, which we do not need. | ||
| So it's not only that, that's the most immediate, but school choice, charter schools, Governor Walker's Act 10 reforms, right to work, it's all on the line in the Supreme Court race in Wisconsin today. | ||
| Yep. Brian Schimming, you're a force. | ||
| I enjoyed talking with you about six months, a year ago. | ||
| You're a great guy, great leader. | ||
| You always got a positive attitude. | ||
| Thanks for being with us tonight, brother, on The War Room. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great to be with you, Dave. | |
| Thanks for all your leadership. | ||
| Thank you, Brian. | ||
| All right, now we're going to another American leader and patriot, the great Mike Lindell. | ||
| Mike, what do you got in store for us tonight? | ||
| If you want to throw in any commentary there and fire people up, but also sell us a pillow as well. | ||
| Right, Wisconsin is so important, everybody. | ||
| In our fight to save this country, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, they actually voted that there was all kinds of election fraud in Wisconsin, even though horrible Robin Voss shut it down, the Speaker of the House here. | ||
| But we need this. | ||
| We need you to all get out and vote in Wisconsin. | ||
| We need that conservative Supreme Court there more than anything. | ||
| So please get out and vote. | ||
| I can't stress the importance of that. | ||
| Everybody, this is the final day, the final hours. | ||
| You all know about when my pillow was cancelled again by the box stores with our percale sheets. | ||
| And we put them on sale directly to you, the War Room Posse, until they were gone. | ||
| They're gonna be gone tonight. | ||
| It's going away. | ||
| They're $29.98 for the queen size. | ||
| 14 colors were allotted for those box stores. | ||
| They canceled it. | ||
| That was your game. | ||
| King size, only $34.98. | ||
| If you guys go to the website, here's where to find them. | ||
| Click on Steve's face, go partway down, click on our leader, Steve's face, and this is gonna open it up. | ||
| There's the spring sheet sale that's going away in about six hours now. | ||
| We'll give it till midnight. | ||
| There you have the MyCrosses, 30% off. | ||
| And there's still some of those left of the MyPillows, the 998, MyPillow 2.0, the War Room Collection, limit of 15. But you guys go there now and get these sheets while they last. | ||
| Get on board with that. | ||
| You helped us all out by getting them. | ||
| The box stores didn't take them, so you got them for wholesale prices. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Also, there's the number to call, 800-873-1062. | ||
| Tell them, Mike, you just see me on the War Room, you want the last of the sheets. | ||
| $29.98 for Queen, $34.98 for King. | ||
| And I'll tell you, it's been great having the war room support us because MyPillow is the most attacked company in history. | ||
| I'm sure you see Tesla's probably, they're probably giving a big run at Tesla to see who's neck and neck. | ||
| But my employees don't deserve this and you guys have helped them all. | ||
| We thank you so much. | ||
| Mike Lindell, bunch of great Minnesotans. | ||
| I've called in myself many times. | ||
| He's a great supporter of the War Room, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Please go support Mike Lindell. | ||
| He's wearing the cross. | ||
| He's selling the cross. | ||
| Don't let people mock the cross. | ||
| Go support Mike. | ||
| Great products, great people, a great state, and just a great patriot. | ||
| Go support Mike Lindell and please spread the war room and go vote. |
Export Selection