March 25, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:20
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Through your leadership, you embody the values of our Christian faith and love for the Gospel. | |
| You remind me of the great Roman Emperor, Constantine the Great. | ||
| *crowd cheers* | ||
| This Emperor, dear Mr. President, Is the one who founded and built the magnificent city of Constantinople, my birthplace, known today as Istanbul. | ||
| It is my great honor to present you with this Holy Cross. | ||
| This cross is the very symbol that led this great Roman Emperor Constantine to victory. | ||
| As Christ revealed to him in a vision, he said, and tuto nica, told the emperor, means go with this and be victorious, Mr. President. | ||
| This cross is an everlasting symbol of peace and an invincible trophy. | ||
| A sign of divine strength and guidance. | ||
| With this cross, I pray you bring peace to the world and make America invincible. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| Here's one time I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
| War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| Monday, 24th of March, Airverlour, 2025. | ||
| Welcome to the second hour of our late afternoon, early evening coverage. | ||
| Um... | ||
| The patriarch of Constantinople right there saying President Trump is a great leader in the line of Constantine the Great. | ||
| How fantastic is that? | ||
| Make sure you don't go to our merch site and look for the free Constantinople t-shirt that went viral in Turkey and in Greece when Rahim took the photo of me. | ||
| Dave Bosses, I got a lot to go through with Dave. | ||
| Dave, first off, knowing that you're of Italian lineage. | ||
| And I realized the Romans have a real problem with Constantinople. | ||
| It's pretty amazing when you see President Trump when the patriarch says, you remind us of Constantine the Great, and the crowd goes nuts. | ||
| You know how the liberal media is just in full meltdown, particularly on a day like today. | ||
| Dave Bossie, your thoughts, brother? | ||
| Oh, Steve, they can't handle that. | ||
| When you put Donald Trump on the level, Of that kind of historic leadership. | ||
| Literally, their minds are melting down across newsrooms across America. | ||
| And it just makes us, the 77, 78 million Americans that voted for Donald Trump, incredibly happy. | ||
| Let's talk about what makes us incredibly unhappy. | ||
| People should know, Bossy was chief investigator for Newt Gingers, or Newt was Speaker of the House, many decades ago, so he knows about investigation, he knows about this. | ||
| Your assessment, Scalise just came out and said, hey, we're going to vote on this bill that ISA, I think, is putting up about the multiple, you know, one judge in San Francisco can shut down the entire nation with the TRO. | ||
| They are going to have hearings about that and maybe other things. | ||
| The Warren Posse has been on the ramparts bombarding Jim Jordan and the Judiciary Committee to get on top of these impeachments. | ||
| You heard the appeals today. | ||
| It was kind of riveting in that literally these judges, the liberal judges, want to step in and be commander-in-chief. | ||
| They want to recall from the El Salvador prison the terrorist organization invaders back here and ask them due process, are you really a member of a gang? | ||
| Which will say, no, ma'am, I'm not. | ||
| And they'll be here for 15 years as you work through their legal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Steve, this is a very troubling time in our country. | |
| These judges, these federal district court judges, do believe they have more power than Donald Trump. | ||
| This is, you and I have been talking about this now for many, many, many years, and that is Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
| Now it has reached the federal judiciary. | ||
| That's what this is about. | ||
| They believe that the last vestige of hope to stop Donald Trump's incredible momentum is through these federal judges. | ||
| So I'm interested to see what the coordination is. | ||
| I'm interested to investigate who they, their clerks. | ||
| And their families are talking to. | ||
| Who are their families employed by? | ||
| And so let me just lay the groundwork for everybody to remind everybody, a short four years ago, at the end of Donald Trump's term, the fake J-6 committee, this atrocity that America went through, led by Former member Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi led the witch hunt to impeach Donald Trump. | ||
| They imposed articles of impeachment on January 11th, and they voted on January 13th. | ||
| There were no hearings. | ||
| There was no fact-finding. | ||
| There was no defense. | ||
| There was nothing. | ||
| And they knew. | ||
| They knew. | ||
| Just like the excuse givers today on these judges, they knew then that the Senate was not going to come up with 60 votes to convict and remove then-President Trump in 2021. | ||
| It was never going to happen. | ||
| But that didn't stop them from doing it. | ||
| That is my argument. | ||
| My argument is that the Senate wants to say there's senators. | ||
| There's these theorists who say, well, we won't get to 60, so it's not worth doing. | ||
| Yes, it is. | ||
| These judges must be held accountable. | ||
| And by having an impeachment process that is short and concise, okay, we'll give them the same due process. | ||
| They set the standard. | ||
| They created. | ||
| Look, Congress loves to do what the precedent is. | ||
| Well, the precedent set by Nancy Pelosi is 48 hours from impeachment being drawn up to a vote. | ||
| And so why not allow a federal judge to have that same exact time frame? | ||
| We should be calling these federal judges up on impeachment charges and ramming them through the House. | ||
| Not ramming them through. | ||
| We're going to get the votes for it. | ||
| And then let the Senate do what they will. | ||
| But these judges will have been They will not be removed, but they will be impeached. | ||
| You're saying trust the process. | ||
| The process in and of itself is revelatory, and we should go through the process. | ||
| You're not going to get them removed in a trial in the Senate, but it's revelatory, this process. | ||
| Also sending a couple of shots across a couple of bowels. | ||
| That's what it is, Steve. | ||
| That's what it's about. | ||
| It's about setting the predicate. | ||
| That if you are going to take the law into your own hands, if you are going to stop the commander-in-chief, the head of the executive branch, for instance, from who can be hired and fired in the executive branch, if you are going to stop that like Judge Engelmayer did, that's outrageous. | ||
| This judge that tried to stop these terrorists, these Gang members from being deported out of the country. | ||
| These people need to be held accountable. | ||
| And so I wish that we could get 60 out of the Senate. | ||
| I wish we could get one of them removed. | ||
| That's not really the end goal. | ||
| The goal should be to educate the federal judges around the country that you just aren't going to get a pass. | ||
| You are going to be held accountable for your unconstitutional actions. | ||
| What you described at the beginning is quite detailed. | ||
| I mean, you would want to actually have this in the lead-up, in the investigation, because John Solomon at Just the News, it comes on, it's on right now on the other REV channel. | ||
| John, breaking this news today about, it was a Bosberg, went to a, after Biden, around the time of Biden's... | ||
| Stepping down. | ||
| He went to a conference of anti and never Trumpers, I think out in Idaho. | ||
| But you want to see who their staff's talking to. | ||
| You want to get the text message. | ||
| You want to see how much coordination there's been in this. | ||
| Because as Mike Davis is telling us, he's hearing nonstop that they're now bidding on who is the next person. | ||
| Absolutely, Steve. | ||
| Look, you need somebody who's, you know, on Jim Jordan's staff who is going to take this on as a project and uncover what they can. | ||
| But we shouldn't, my entire point earlier, Steve, is, and I don't want to get this lost, they did a presidential impeachment. | ||
| In 48 hours, with no fact-finding, no committee hearings, and no defense put on. | ||
| And that is the Nancy Pelosi standard now. | ||
| That's what that became. | ||
| That's the precedent. | ||
| So I don't believe a federal judge is on the same level as the president of the United States. | ||
| We must hold them accountable. | ||
| But we can, at the same time, issue subpoenas and get depositions of those. | ||
| Judges, staff, those law clerks, those staff members, the family members, if there's any connection, including the judges. | ||
| The judges aren't above the law. | ||
| So we can get them on the record, but speed is of the essence. | ||
| We should not slow down. | ||
| We should just hold these judges to the same standard that they held President Trump. | ||
| Wow. And by the way, Dave's got a big article up in Washington Times. | ||
| Grace and Moe, let's put it in all the chat rooms. | ||
| I want to play, we got a clip from one of your nemesis. | ||
| I want to show you how her current status is, sir, and then I want your observations. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And there was no winning them over. | |
| And it's beautiful to our ears to hear your protection, your self-dignity. | ||
| But I'm not. | ||
| I'm not. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
| Just stop it now. | ||
| All right. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That's great. | ||
| That's giving them a little bit back of what they are trying to do. | ||
| Look, this is a circus. | ||
| The Democrats are impoverished. | ||
| They're exploding. | ||
| They're eating their own. | ||
| They're eating Chuck Schumer's breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day right now. | ||
| Look, there is no leadership in the House. | ||
| There's failed leadership in the Senate. | ||
| They're eating each other alive. | ||
| And what we should do is let them. | ||
| We need to continue. | ||
| Those people that showed up in San Francisco for Nancy Pelosi need to show up in every Democrat. | ||
| District across the country. | ||
| They think that, oh, we're gonna get some paid activists to show up to Republican members' town halls and disrupt them. | ||
| I say we give them right back to them. | ||
| That's the only way to fight this, because only with Democrats feeling pain and having it on television is it going to stop the left from showing up to Republicans' town halls. | ||
| It's not representative of what those people are talking about. | ||
| You were one of the original founders of the Tea Party movement. | ||
| Do you believe that also Democrats at the Democratic base has had it with Hakeem Jeffries and the Nancy Pelosi's and the Chuck Schumer, and you're starting to see that anger, which is a civil war that'll take them many cycles to go through? | ||
| Yeah, and we should help them at every turn, Steve. | ||
| Here's the thing. | ||
| What I'm observing is they want to get rid of Chuck Schumer. | ||
| And put somebody more radical in. | ||
| They want to get rid of Hakeem Jeffries and put somebody more radical in. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| That is generational change for conservatives and for Republicans and for the MAGA movement. | ||
| Look, we're not going to be perfect in every way, shape, or form over these next two years, four years. | ||
| They, the Democrats, the more that they are in disarray. | ||
| The more that they lose their way and have no leadership, the better off we are as a movement. | ||
| And so I say, if you are a conservative, if you are a MAGA Republican, if you are a Trump supporter, go out, make sure your voice is heard on all of these issues, and show up to your Democrat member of Congress town halls. | ||
| Because when they're there over the next couple of months, if they get an earful, It's going to change the dynamic. | ||
| And so I want Bernie Sanders and AOC to be their national leaders in this moron from Colorado. | ||
| It's insanity. | ||
| Yeah, let's pivot that. | ||
| AOC and Bernie are all against tariffs. | ||
| You can't have a populist movement. | ||
| You've got a great piece in the Washington Times on tariffs. | ||
| President Trump, one of the big things that happened in the cabinet today, he let Scott Besson talk for a couple of minutes about where the economy is and the changes. | ||
| President Trump, at the same day, down, and I know you're very close to the governor of Louisiana, Hyundai announces a $20 billion investment in plant and equipment starting in Louisiana, which is the most modern car production plant they've built outside of Korea. | ||
| Your thoughts on tariffs? | ||
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| It is an important leverage point for the president. | ||
| We'll use tariffs to make sure that he is negotiating fair and free trade. | ||
| Not just free, but fair and free trade. | ||
| So that if you decide as a company that is based somewhere else, if you are going to move your production facility, construct bases here in the United States and cities across this country, employ American labor. | ||
| To build your facilities and to then work at your facilities using American labor and American products to build American products, there's no terror. | ||
| That's the basis of what President Trump is negotiating from. | ||
| And you see it day after day, week after week, just in the last eight weeks, whether it is Tim Cook or Hyundai or any other company across the world. | ||
| They are deciding to come to America, employ Americans, build an America to get away from the tariffs. | ||
| And that is generational change for the economy. | ||
| That is going to rebuild the middle class that has been gutted by these left-wing policies over the last 40 years. | ||
| Dave Bossie, you got two big ones up in Washington Times. | ||
| Where do people get you on social media? | ||
| I want folks to read both. | ||
| Number one is about the judges, holding them accountable, leading to impeachment, and also then about tariffs and tariffs as leverage to bring high-value manufacturing jobs back to the United States of America and rebuild our industrial might. | ||
| Where do people go to get you, sir? | ||
| Yeah, David underscore Bossy on X and on Truth Social. | ||
| Please go follow me and get it. | ||
| David underscore Bossy. | ||
| Please get a read. | ||
| Look, it's important. | ||
| These pieces are important. | ||
| But they're just a piece. | ||
| They're a leaf in the entire tapestry. | ||
| So, Steve, what you're doing is so important. | ||
| Making sure that you're educating our movement and the American people at large every single day. | ||
| We're trying to, sir. | ||
| And I knew I had to have you on. | ||
| I got the patriarch of Constantinople saying Trump's in the lineage of Constantine the Great and Nancy Pelosi getting blown up. | ||
| What a day. | ||
| What a great Monday. | ||
| Thank you, Dave. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I love it. | ||
| I'm waiting for you to have me back. | ||
| Made a great film with Dave. | ||
| Shot in Greece with the Duck Dynasty crew. | ||
| It was insane. | ||
| I'll tell you the story one day. | ||
| Absolutely incredible. | ||
| Great guys. | ||
| Phil Robertson and the team. | ||
| Our own Natalie G. Winters is with us. | ||
| Natalie, we've got a cold open. | ||
| Let's play the clip and I'll bring Natalie in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
From David, what communication technology should we use? | |
| Oh, this is a great question. | ||
| Should we be afraid of malicious federal executive branch snooping on us? | ||
| Yes. Yes, you should. | ||
| Leah, we've talked about this a few times in prior meetings, some lessons learned. | ||
| Signal, would recommend Signal for folks. | ||
| If you are doing just communications, it's the closest thing we've got to something that we can trust. | ||
| So definitely recommend any kind of organizing conversations that you can switch over to Signal, do so. | ||
| That's like my top line, I think, in terms of... | ||
| Ezra, go ahead. | ||
| Well, I'd say Blue Sky obviously is an alternative to Twitter and to some extent Facebook. | ||
| I don't trust obviously Twitter and I don't trust Facebook as well or Instagram or WhatsApp because it's all owned by these Musk or Trump aligned techno billionaires. | ||
| Blue sky is better, is more independent. | ||
| I have less fear that it's being taken over by Nazis and people who mean us ill. | ||
| And that's not a private communication method as well. | ||
| If you're doing private, I would say signal is better. | ||
| But for coordinating between indivisible groups, for building relationships with your local press, for building relationships with your local elected officials, for talking to me or Leah, we're both on it, or for the national indivisible, I think it's a good place to organize and share information. | ||
| Okay, let me go out and first say, Natalie G. Winters, you're not trolling us today with the signal clip on individual. | ||
| The day of all days to put that up. | ||
| You're not trolling the National Security Council, are you, ma'am? | ||
| No, indeed I am not. | ||
| I think this is an important story. | ||
| You know we like to get very granular with all things indivisible movement. | ||
| Of course, they're responsible. | ||
| One of the key organizers and frankly funders through sort of being a conduit of George Soros and other left-wing mega donors for so much of these anti-Trump protests, even in some cases the violent Tesla protests. | ||
| But what I just played for you, I think, is a testament to how deeply organized and systematic they are in their organization tactics. | ||
| That's a weekly mass mobilization phone call that they have with their thousands and only growing numbers of activists, that they have sort of, I guess, guerrilla warfare troops just ready to be weaponized against whatever the issue of the day is. | ||
| But they're advising them, I guess the question would be, what are they hiding, to work on encrypted messaging apps, to plan their protests, to plan their events. | ||
| But I think that this... | ||
| The concept of secrecy, them kind of running behind closed doors to do a lot of their activism, is a really important developing trend that I think the posse should be very attuned to. | ||
| If we can put the picture up on screen, the end of February, if you went to the Indivisible Movement's website, they still proudly displayed their board members. | ||
| You could see all the people who were on there, which we'll get into who exactly these people are in a second. | ||
| But interestingly enough, Steve, right as the violent Tesla protests started to break out, all of a sudden they wiped their board members, the names, their identities, from their website while demanding that, what, Doge and the Trump administration engage in full-blown transparency. | ||
| But hypocrisy aside, I want to call out one person who's on there, which is... | ||
| Fatima Goss Graves. | ||
| People may remember her as the spouse of none other than J6 extraordinaire, assistant attorney in D.C., Matthew Graves. | ||
| Make that, let that sink in for a second. | ||
| The wife of Matthew Graves is on the board of Indivisible, the foremost anti-Trump advocacy group. | ||
| Certainly makes that previous lawfare, I think, look at an interesting light when you analyze it through that lens. | ||
| But this is what Indivisible is about. | ||
| And the last resistance update that I'll give you is that a lot of these Tesla protests, the really violent ones, are emanating out of Seattle, a group called the Troublemakers. | ||
| And I know that the left sort of likes to... | ||
| I would say outsource and act like these groups are not affiliated with them, right? | ||
| Oh, they're violent, sort of. | ||
| It's really a stochastic terrorism, and I use that term in its true jurist sense. | ||
| But one of these groups, it's called Common Power, which is, as you can see, the green pamphlet up on screen if Denver wants to toss that up. | ||
| It's their organizing call to stop the Trump-Musk coup, whatever they want to describe it as. | ||
| But if you look in the bottom right, one of the co-sponsoring organizations is a group called Common Power. | ||
| Power is represented, if not advised, by none other than Mark Elias of DNC Lawfare, election lawfare fame. | ||
| So don't fall for the limited hangout that what you're witnessing is something that is super non-mainstream Democratic Party, not just because no one in the Democratic Party is disvowing it, but whether it's financially, personnel-wise, or even lawfare-wise, it is hardwired into the Democratic Party. | ||
| So what you've laid out, you've told us the elements for the color revolution, and you have three big elements, because what's not working is the traditional political with Pelosi and Hakeem. | ||
| They've got to go through changes. | ||
| That thing's a mess with them. | ||
| And polling's dropping through the floor. | ||
| But in your theory of the case, they've got the indivisible mass mobilization part of the color revolution. | ||
| They also have the judicial insurrection now trending towards a, which is delay is to deny. | ||
| Trending towards a judicial coup. | ||
| And they've got the cosplay, phony populism of AOC and Bernie. | ||
| They're going around and they've fenced who's there. | ||
| And it's the Antifa crowd. | ||
| It's the same crowd that goes to the mass mobilizations. | ||
| But they're trying to put forward that there is a very tough and dedicated effort to thwart President Trump. | ||
| Is that basically your theory of the case here? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I think what's the narrative that we've been hammering since day one of this? | ||
| This idea of astroturfing and enlarging the size of opposition to President Trump. | ||
| And what was the data that they were caught manipulating? | ||
| How many people were attending the rallies in Arizona, the rallies in Colorado, right? | ||
| They were amplifying it by tens of thousands of people trying to, I think, spread this idea. | ||
| That the Americans really detest what Trump is doing. | ||
| And you can tell every night, Rachel Maddow, Natalie nails it. | ||
| Rachel Maddow starts off with a big screen to show. | ||
| We got this in Lawrence, Kansas, and this in El Paso, Texas. | ||
| Natalie, hang on for a second. | ||
| We also have to talk about another signal chat today. | ||
| You saw Indivisible right there and the most mass mobilization calls they have. | ||
| We're going to talk about the National Security Council and kind of this I don't know. | ||
| Screw up? | ||
| Would you call it? | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| I want to thank our sponsor, Birch Gold. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com slash war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I guess in this case, slash ban it. | |
| End of the dollar empire. | ||
| It's ending because of the massive federal spending, the 22% drop in purchasing power of the dollar. | ||
| Not because these institutions that the Financial Times and the Economist are still trying to sell us on. | ||
| Not working. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| And talk to Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| Natalie G. Winters, our White House correspondent, on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I suggest you take a look inside Cause I think you've changed already You went and lost your pride | |
| But I'm American made I got American part I got American made In America's heart Go on, raise the flag War | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Van. | ||
| Natalie, you're doing a fantastic job of covering this every day, and this is why having you at the White House is so important, because you're identifying this very sophisticated plan that's being executed to take down Trump's presidency. | ||
| And, you know, you're from the Michael Benz, Darren Beattie, that school of kind of cutting-edge thinking about how sophisticated these people are. | ||
| Would you agree, ma'am, As you've seen this from the day he won in November, when they really started getting, you know, they picked themselves off of the floor. | ||
| Do you believe that they're gaining momentum, ma'am? | ||
| Well, I think they have an organic sort of impetus and drive to want to present it that way, not just through, obviously, the politically powerful lens of wanting to expand and broaden their coalition, but I think it's more sort of in the color revolution framework where they want to look... | ||
| Like, they're, again, very clearly astroturfed political work, i.e. | ||
| the Families Over Billionaires campaign, for example, which if you really do the research, it's propped up by Arabella Advisors, the New Venture Fund, 1630 Fund, right? | ||
| It's not actually families who are propping up Families Over Billionaires, it's the billionaires. | ||
| So because it's so, I think, ideologically perverse but also paradoxical, there's this real stress, and as someone who's consumed way too much content from the Indivisible Movement and all these sort of left-wing organizers, there's always this stress, this idea that, oh, we're so grassroots, we're people-powered, we're people-funded, right? | ||
| That's the slogan that you always hear, whether it's AOC or Bernie Sanders taking the stage. | ||
| But the facts just don't really square with that. | ||
| Their movement is growing. | ||
| I'm not discounting that, but I don't necessarily think that it's at the rate that they're purporting it to be. | ||
| And I think when you see AOC, I watched her Tucson rally, right? | ||
| Standing up on stage when they have the fight oligarchy banners in front of the podium that she's speaking. | ||
| Her speech was truly not very intelligent. | ||
| They sort of failed to address the number one issue, the detrimental force, right, to the American working class, which is immigration. | ||
| Bernie Sanders, to his credit, spoke on the H-1B stuff. | ||
| But, I mean, you go to AOC's website, the first thing that you're hit with is a Know Your Rights campaign and how to avoid ICE deporting you. | ||
| Exactly. Right? | ||
| That doesn't quite help American workers. | ||
| It's cosplay. | ||
| It's cosplay. | ||
| You know, Natalie, I was stunned at how... | ||
| Because I pride myself in being able to give a stem winder. | ||
| I am shocked at the size crowds they have. | ||
| Once they start the speeches, I mean, Bernie's lost his fastball. | ||
| That kind of meanders and never really gets to the point. | ||
| AOC just can't pull it together. | ||
| I mean, they're screeching and she's yelling and they've got a couple of moments, but it's not an organized, drive you to a point where the crowd really understands what you're doing and we're going to march out of here. | ||
| And go hit it. | ||
| It's weird. | ||
| It's very cosplay, and you're right. | ||
| They've got so many issues that populists just can't embrace, like open borders and playing the zone. | ||
| Well, how can you be a populist nationalist if you don't even believe in the United States of America? | ||
| If you're opening your speech, your first line's delivered in Spanish. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. Exactly. | |
| This globalism thing's tough to sell as a populist. | ||
| I want to pivot to the news of the day that's blowing up. | ||
| Everywhere. And folks, you should understand, when I said earlier, having been with President Trump in the National Security, I do think that they need to sit down right away as a team and sit with President Trump and kind of walk through this. | ||
| But talk to me about the players. | ||
| You know, particularly the individual who was let into this chat on Signal, which is quite extraordinary. | ||
| And really, it definitely was a breach in the National Security, no doubt about that, particularly with a guy who's a true Trump hater. | ||
| But tell folks what his background is. | ||
| How big a Trump hater is he? | ||
| Ma'am. | ||
| Yeah, this is certainly an unforced error, right? | ||
| And I don't think either of us or anyone in the audience wants to be sitting here having to defend what happened in the Signal group chat. | ||
| Not that we are, but having to point out the obvious contradiction and hypocrisy in terms of this being an accidental leak or inclusion of the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg as opposed to, oh, I don't know, Hillary Clinton and people like Barack Obama intentionally leaking to dupe the American people or legalizing domestic propaganda or, I don't know, inviting Iranian spies. | ||
| But setting that aside for one second, I think it's just important to understand who Jeffrey Goldberg, the man who was by mistake added to this now infamous Signal group chat talking about what was going down in Yemen. | ||
| Really all the major heavy hitters being in there, Stephen Miller, Vice President J.D. Vance, Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. | ||
| But I think people just need to approach this story With nuance that it deserves, obviously the left-wing media is melting down. | ||
| Hillary Clinton has even weighed in, quote tweeting it with saying, oh, what about this? | ||
| I guess it's an ultimate troll, although I guess she knew better than to leave her comment section open, so she shut that off. | ||
| But Jeffrey Goldberg... | ||
| Not only is he someone who repeatedly lied and got us into the Iraq war, this is someone who, if you just start the clock at Trump times, he's responsible, not just reporting on, but breaking the story of President Trump wanting Generals like Hitler, | ||
| the suckers and losers commentary, and the idea that President Trump did not care or did not want to pay for the funerals of slain soldiers that was ultimately later, I guess, fact-checked by the sister of, I believe the individual's name was Vanessa, herself. | ||
| So this is someone who is essentially... | ||
| I mean, I'll be kind and charitable in my description, but a talking head, a pundit, if not just a full-blown prostitute for the military industrial complex has always parroted their talking points. | ||
| That being said, I think it's concerning that there would be anyone on the Trump team who would even have this guy's number in their phone and or potentially be talking to him about something related or unrelated, right? | ||
| The Atlantic as sort of the print version of MSNBC for a Pentagon that is priding itself from the press shop perspective of kicking out legacy media outlets and inviting, giving office space to outlets like Biosyn. | ||
| No, in the Atlantic, Steve Jobs' widow has taken it over. | ||
| She's bought it. | ||
| It's becoming a railhead. | ||
| They have hired a who's who of hate Trump talent. | ||
| Quality writers, just people that hate Trump and hate MAGA and hate our movement. | ||
| It's really become a consolation, like a dark star. | ||
| And she's adding all the time. | ||
| So I agree with you. | ||
| Whoever would have them in the file would be like, what are you doing here? | ||
| I'd also say on this that President Trump's got to talk to the team about, in the process of this, because I'm kind of confused about the process. | ||
| And Daily Mail people all over J.D. J.D.'s points he's making are simply the points we've made on War Room from the beginning. | ||
| Why do we have a carrier battle group here? | ||
| What is really our motivation for this? | ||
| What is, you know, only 3% of American trade goes to the Suez now, you know, 60%, he said 40, I think it's 60% of European trade from outside sources. | ||
| I don't think it's being disrespectful, but I think the whole process somehow, and that's why I think it's incumbent upon the president just to get the team. | ||
| Down in the national security space and just work out a modus operandi that can avoid this type of thing in the future. | ||
| Because the left is going to pummel us, and particularly Mike Waltz, the national security advisor, and Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| Folks, tomorrow I'm sure we're going to have to address this at the beginning of the show because, Natalie, you've seen already. | ||
| I mean, this is what they're jumping on. | ||
| They want investigations. | ||
| They want all of this. | ||
| So we've got to get ahead of this. | ||
| But I think the most important thing for President Trump is sit down with the team and figure this out of how communication is going to go, particularly open communications where people can say, hey, have you thought of this alternative or exactly why we're doing this? | ||
| I don't think the best place to do that is in a signal chat. | ||
| I think there's better ways to do it, particularly when you're starting to the types of... | ||
| The armament that we dropped on the Houthis, the type of involvement and the engagement. | ||
| Now you have two... | ||
| I said this was going to happen. | ||
| You got two carrier battle groups. | ||
| The Vinson's now down there, too. | ||
| Two carrier battle groups. | ||
| That is very unusual. | ||
| I was off the coast of Iran as a young sailor, young naval officer, and we had two battle groups up there during... | ||
| They had the Iranian... | ||
| You know, when the Persians had taken hostages, and we were trying to figure out how to get them back. | ||
| That's the... | ||
| You don't put two carrier battle groups unless you are really prepared to do something. | ||
| So this is a national security, I think as high level as you can possibly get. | ||
| Natalie winners, where do people get you and social media and, uh, in all of it, ma'am, uh, Natalie G winters on all platforms, not signal. | ||
| Thank you for having me. | ||
| I'll see you tomorrow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, ma'am. | |
| Appreciate you. | ||
| We've got more good news today. | ||
| I think it's good news. | ||
| My expert's going to join us here in a moment. | ||
| But it gets back to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Remember, always, as Captain Fennell tells us, you've got to keep the main thing the main thing. | ||
| It's one of the reasons I have a big problem with two carrier battle groups off of the coast of Yemen doing airstrikes onto the Houthis. | ||
| That Arabian Peninsula is for the Arabs, it's the Saudis and UAE, and hey, they've been fighting there forever, but there's a reason they've been fighting there forever. | ||
| Ain't that easy to dig the Houthis out. | ||
| The Egyptians should tell you about it. | ||
| Back before the 1967 war in Israel, the Egyptian army, which is the best Arab army they had, had 75,000 men in Yemen. | ||
| 75,000 army of 75,000 men. | ||
| They're crack troops and the best army the Arabs had. | ||
| Guess what? | ||
| Many years, it was their Vietnam. | ||
| The Houthis are tough hombres. | ||
| They're bad guys, right? | ||
| Backed by the Persians. | ||
| I got that. | ||
| But we got to have some clear, I think, very clear thinking of this because this is another situation like Ukraine. | ||
| You get sucked in here. | ||
| One of the ones that's working in our favor is in South Korea. | ||
| In South Korea, this is why I want to make sure that Jayce, you talk to Jayce Medical because this situation with Korea, I hope, and with the Chinese Communist Party, that President Trump's able to insert himself and to calm things down. | ||
| In the South China Sea, in Taiwan, in South Korea. | ||
| But the Chinese Communist Party is full on. | ||
| This is a coup of a major ally, and an ally that we still have, I think, 28,000 combat troops, combat and or logistics troops, right outside of Seoul. | ||
| Chase Medical, they took the book of Rosemary Gibson that wrote about the supply chains when nobody knew it, the supply chains being broken that came out right before the pandemic, and they built, Dr. Sean Rollins then built a team of it. | ||
| Make sure you don't get hung up because the balloon goes up. | ||
| They're going to cut. | ||
| First thing they're going to cut off is active pharmaceutical ingredients and generic drugs going to happen. | ||
| And then where are you going to be? | ||
| So go to jacemedical.com today. | ||
| Promo code Bannon for a discount. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| And most importantly, you make contact with Dr. Sean and the team and walk through everything. | ||
| One is to be prepared. | ||
| There's also tremendous. | ||
| They got packages to get. | ||
| Specials they sell. | ||
| Go to the site. | ||
| Find it all out. | ||
| Jace Medical. | ||
| That's J-A-S-E. | ||
| JaceMedical.com. | ||
| John Mills, what we've done, and we haven't done enough. | ||
| We haven't done enough on Brazil and we haven't done enough on South Korea. | ||
| There's so much else going on. | ||
| But our message is getting out there. | ||
| Walk us through what's currently happening because I think we're starting to see a glimmer of rational and daylight. | ||
| And maybe the Chinese Communist Party coup is not going to actually take over the country, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, thank you, Steve. | |
| Momentum is toward the populace. | ||
| And what we've seen is there's 30 impeachments that the Democrat Party of South Korea has thrown at the populace party and the president. | ||
| So 30. Nine of them have already been overturned. | ||
| The most recent one today, now they're 13 hours ahead of East Coast time, but is Han, who's now going to be reinstated as the president. | ||
| So that's an important one, because they were down to an acting president. | ||
| Now they only have an acting president. | ||
| And so Han has been reinstated. | ||
| We have a chart there, Denver Control. | ||
| We have a chart with the names on it. | ||
| We got it somewhere. | ||
| There we go. | ||
| There we go. | ||
| So Han Duk Su, so he was the acting president. | ||
| He's now reinstated. | ||
| Now, President Yoon has been impeached, was arrested. | ||
| He's now been released. | ||
| And he's one of the impeachments being addressed. | ||
| The real sinister person is Lee May J. Moon on the left there, the leader of the Democrat Party and in the National Assembly. | ||
| So this is a big victory. | ||
| The momentum is on their direction, on the populist direction. | ||
| The key things to watch is a grave concern is we have There's Chinese police that are being flown in. | ||
| Now, I know this is a sensitive topic and triple cooperating this, but many reports that we have these mysterious police units speaking Chinese kind of indicates they're probably not Korean when they're speaking Chinese. | ||
| Many citizen reports, and there's been a great network that are just flooding me with reports on this. | ||
| And this is like Hong Kong all over again. | ||
| So the big concern is if they overturn the impeachment on everybody, including Yoon, is there going to be conflict in the streets? | ||
| Control, we also put up, we got the Chosin op-ed piece. | ||
| So this is one of the main... | ||
| But is this going to lead to – we have 30 impeachment. | ||
| Is this going to be a domino effect? | ||
| We're going to unwind. | ||
| Is this where it's going because of the momentum of the folks that are fighting for freedom? | ||
| Are we going to reverse all this and get back to some sort of at least stasis in the political system there? | ||
| Or is the CCP going to continue to run this deal? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The populists have been outnumbering the communists in the street. | |
| Traditionally, there's always been this hardcore communist element in the street, nasty and angry. | ||
| It wasn't in the DNA of the conservatives and the populists to get out there and get smash-mouthed. | ||
| Well, they're learning it. | ||
| They're learning it. | ||
| They realize they're on the teetering on the edge of survival, so teetering. | ||
| So they are getting out there. | ||
| Got a big credit to the pastors who mobilize their flocks to get out there. | ||
| I think it's really—this is uncharted territory for the Constitution, and I think the courts are seeing what's going on. | ||
| They're seeing the energy on the populace. | ||
| I think that has had an impact. | ||
| The South Koreans are some of the most religious people. | ||
| When you're in South Korea, you see the churches, the Baptist churches, the missionaries went, and the people when they converted. | ||
| I mean, they are very religious. | ||
| I mean, very religious. | ||
| They're very religious people. | ||
| Protestant. Mainly Protestant, but very, very, very religious. | ||
| The ones that convert to Christianity. | ||
| And I'm telling you, they're hardcore. | ||
| This is the most unreported, Brazil being the second, but the two most unreported stories geopolitically in the world are now major. | ||
| This is a huge... | ||
|
unidentified
|
We got three. | |
| Romania. We got a trend line here. | ||
| Need three points for a trend line on USAID and malfeasance here. | ||
| Three points make a trend line. | ||
| Romania, South Korea, and Brazil. | ||
| Brazil. They got what's in common. | ||
| John Mills, where do people go to get your social media and everything you're putting up about South Korea, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, thank you so much, Steve. | |
| Colonel RET John 2 on X. Colonel RET John 2 on X. Colonel Rhett John on Substack. | ||
| Colonel R.E.T. | ||
| John on Substack, Getter and True. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| If they pull a color revolution off here, this is going to hurt us for decades. | ||
| The South Korean people is going to destroy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is so dangerous. | |
| This is so dangerous. | ||
| That would wipe out the right flank of deterrence to China. | ||
| They're trying to break up this burgeoning South Korea-Japan-America relationship. | ||
| The Chinese do not want that, so they are throwing everything at this. | ||
| And all the suffering the Korean people have gone through since the end of World War II, even during World War II and then afterwards, just never really peace. | ||
| It's not peace now, it's an armistice. | ||
| John, Colonel Mills, thank you. | ||
| Great update. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Steve. | |
| Folks in Korea that will get this later, we are with you, we have your back, and we have to do more, we will do more, because your fight is our fight. | ||
| Just the bravery and constancy of South Korea. | ||
| Spent a lot of time there, had businesses there, business partners there, just great people. | ||
| Can't speak highly enough about what a great country, and if you ever get a chance, go. | ||
| Seoul, Pusan, just fantastic, and great people. | ||
| Mike Lindell. | ||
| The state attorney generals, I think, are the most dangerous threat, even worse than these federal judges, to the Trump movement, to President Trump's presidency, and to Elon Musk. | ||
| And I'm telling you, these people are like harpies. | ||
| They're all over you. | ||
| Sell me a pillow today. | ||
| Let's sell some pillows so you have a little cash. | ||
| Make sure you can fight these guys because they're trying to put you out of business, brother. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| And when you attack my employees, you're attacking that country. | ||
| These are an employee-owned company, MyPillow, everybody. | ||
| And we even had box stores cancel on us. | ||
| They implied they were gonna order these great sheets. | ||
| We have the Giza Dream sheets and the Percale sheets. | ||
| And the orders we have set for them, we're gonna pass on to you. | ||
| We don't need them. | ||
| Nobody in between. | ||
| It's us and the War Room Posse. | ||
| The queen size for $29.98 in the Percale. | ||
| You save up to 50% on the Giza Dream site. | ||
| They're queen size $69.99. | ||
| King size Percale $34.99. | ||
| Go to the website, MyPillow.com. | ||
| Go down. | ||
| We got Steve right there. | ||
| Make sure you click on him so you get all the War Room specials. | ||
| The cross is 30% off. | ||
| There you see something very special to me, dear to me. | ||
| The premium MyPillow, $18.98 and $19.98. | ||
| Remember, that's the one with the gusset. | ||
| Now we're making it with our great Giza covering, the Giza cotton. | ||
| So that's the lowest price in history. | ||
| We still have a little bit of our blanket shell, flash shell left. | ||
| But use that promo code WARROOM and you guys are going to get what the box stores were supposed to get. | ||
| These are wholesale prices. | ||
| We're just passing it on to you. | ||
| Once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| The ones that were allotted for these two box stores that basically backed out. | ||
| Call 800-873-1062. | ||
| I'm right above my call center. | ||
| They're all waiting down there. | ||
| They love it when I get on the War Room Posse or get on the War Room and you guys all call in. | ||
| It's a win-win-win, Steve. | ||
| We're all winning. | ||
| The box stores are losing. | ||
| Same way with this attorney general. | ||
| What's the number? | ||
| Real quickly, again, maybe you'll pick up the phone. | ||
| What is it? | ||
| Yeah, 1-800-873-1062. | ||
| I'll go take a call right now. | ||
| Promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Right now. | ||
| Okay, tomorrow morning, 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. |
Export Selection