March 21, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:43
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| You know, it's the first time I followed. | ||
| I like Ted Nugent as my opening act. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| I've never had that before. | ||
| Now I feel very special. | ||
| Eric Bolling and Brother Nugent. | ||
| Brother Nugent. | ||
| Eric, thank you so much. | ||
| Historic day. | ||
| Thanks for doing the handover. | ||
| All yours. | ||
| Very historic day at the White House. | ||
| Brian Glenn's going to join us shortly. | ||
| What I want to do, we have a cold open to commemorate this day and everything it stands for. | ||
| It's been a long time getting here, folks. | ||
| Let's go ahead and let it rip. | ||
| The budget plan I submit to you on February 8th will realize major savings by dismantling the departments of energy and education and by eliminating ineffective subsidies for business. | ||
| We will continue to redirect our resources to our two highest budget priorities: a strong national defense to keep America free and at peace, and a reliable safety net of social programs for those who have contributed and those who are in need. | ||
| Education historically was a state and local subject, and I think that what we've seen is, since we spend about $100 billion in the Department of Education each year, and that's been going on since 1980, | ||
| I'm not so sure we're better off than we were before. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you proposed a budget that would eliminate most of that, right? | |
| Well, what I would do is I would have it spend at the state and local level. | ||
| I wouldn't take it up there at all. | ||
| I'd leave it at home. | ||
| So you'd spend the money. | ||
| You might still spend it in your state government. | ||
| But education, even now, 90-95% of your education dollars are state and local. | ||
| That $100 billion gets swirled around in a big bureaucracy up there. | ||
| They send rules down that don't help education. | ||
| They hinder innovation. | ||
| I would cut them out of the loop. | ||
| I don't think you'd notice if the whole department were gone tomorrow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We might have a disagreement on that. | |
| I know you said you wanted to abolish the Department of Education. | ||
| Do you plan to, or what would you do with it if it stuck around? | ||
| We don't need a Department of Education. | ||
| It has some important functions. | ||
| For example, the student loan programs, the Pell Grant, we could transfer that to Treasury. | ||
| Other departments can run it. | ||
| My problem with the Department of Education is the federal government was never intended to be involved in K-12 education. | ||
| It was a limited government designed for the limited and specific enumerated purposes. | ||
| K-12 belongs at the local level because parents have much more influence over a school board or over a state legislature than they will ever have over Congress or over unelected bureaucrats sitting in a massive building in Washington, D.C. This is not about ideology. | ||
| This is about the practical reality that why do we have a Department of Education when the federal government really has no role to play in K-12 education? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In the days that follow... | |
| I will instruct the Federal Department of Education, which should be abolished. | ||
| APPLAUSE | ||
| Now, no modern American president has tried to do what Donald Trump is doing today. | ||
| That is, eliminate an entire cabinet-level department by fiat. | ||
| And technically, he cannot do it. | ||
| Trump does not actually have the power to turn the lights off at the Department of Education. | ||
| That can only be done by an act of Congress, and it would need 60 votes in the Senate to overcome any filibuster. | ||
| But the Trump administration, as they put it today, | ||
| Angela, there's a chapter on the Department of Education in Project 2025 that is not news to you. | ||
| You have read through that document. | ||
| You tried to warn people that this was the playbook they were going to run. | ||
| The first line of that reads, federal education policy should be limited. | ||
| And ultimately, the Federal Department of Education should be eliminated. | ||
| The administration can't actually eliminate it, as you know, as anyone who sort of understands the basic mechanisms of this understand. | ||
| What is it they are trying to win here, a symbolic victory? | ||
| No, they want something much bigger than that. | ||
| I mean, and they've sort of been pretty transparent about it, especially in the last few months. | ||
| They see the Department of Education and more broadly the education system as sort of indoctrinating people, young people, right at the beginning. | ||
| That it's basically creating a whole pipeline of, you know, liberal indoctrination. | ||
| And, you know, they've been pushing back at that on the edges. | ||
| You've seen this pop up at the States where, you know, they're messing with the curriculum. | ||
| They're replacing some books with, you know, PragerU. | ||
| You've seen it. | ||
| What they're really trying to do here is not just some, you know, very significant administrative bureaucratic reform. | ||
| No. They're trying to get rid of the functions that the Department of Education provides. | ||
| And that is, 30% of it is to Title I, which is for low-income people. | ||
| So that is designed to punish the school districts that have low incomes. | ||
| That's 180,000 teachers. | ||
| Bam! Right there. | ||
| That relies extensively or exclusively on Title I funding that they want to get rid of. | ||
| And then the other part of it, and this is sort of came up so far in the discussion, is through the grant-making programs for universities and loans. | ||
| To either reduce that and the stuff that you can't reduce, privatize that. | ||
| But this is about... | ||
| Culture change. | ||
| It is about eliminating and reducing an educated populace. | ||
| And to the extent that you are keeping it in place by giving it back to the states, we know what that means. | ||
| It means more power for the already dominant right-wing narrative that we're dealing with. | ||
| Today we take a very historic action that was 45 years in the making. | ||
| In a few moments, I will sign an executive order to begin eliminating the Federal Department of Education once and for all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| And it sounds strange, doesn't it? | ||
| Department of Education, we're going to eliminate it, and everybody knows it's right. | ||
| And the Democrats know it's right, and I hope they're going to be voting for it, because ultimately it may come before them, but everybody knows it's right, and we have to get our children educated. | ||
| We're not doing well with the world of education in this country, and we haven't for a long time. | ||
| I was very lucky. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I shot another document that turned out to be very good for the country, and I said,"Let's use that same pen." I don't know. | |
| Is anybody superstitious? | ||
| Ron, are you superstitious? | ||
| Let's use that same pen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
you. | |
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mega Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| you | ||
| It's Thursday, 20 March, Year of Our Lord, 2025. | ||
| A historic day. | ||
| Mark it down in your book. | ||
| The day that Donald John Trump signed an executive order that started the process of shutting down the Department of Education. | ||
| Something, as you saw at the beginning, that people have tried to do since Ronald Reagan. | ||
| Ronald Reagan tried it, but done under pressure. | ||
| Or at least we start the journey. | ||
| I believe by the time the war room's over, the late afternoon and early evening show... | ||
| That someone will go into federal court, one of these lefties will go into federal court, you know, venue shopping to try to sue the administration to stop this and have a nationwide TRO. | ||
| So we'll see that. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to be here at 5.30 with an update on the judicial coup. | ||
| I want to go to Brian Glenn. | ||
| Brian, I tell you, Angelo Carousan... | ||
| The president of media matters, and he's done a good job of writing the ship over there. | ||
| They're one of the marketing departments of the war room. | ||
| I could just play that clip over and over again. | ||
| I mean, he's putting you and me out of business, brother. | ||
| There's no need for us. | ||
| He kind of nailed it, exactly what the problem with the education system, the problem we have with it. | ||
| Tell me, you were there today. | ||
| I was a little surprised the president didn't take any questions, but it was quite dramatic signing with the children in back, signing and holding up. | ||
| Put us in the room. | ||
| Well, he's that TV producer. | ||
| He is a... | ||
| Incredible TV producer, as far as the imaging goes. | ||
| We had an idea that it would look similar to that, of having the kids behind him, and obviously governors out in the audience, Governor Landry of Louisiana DeSantis, Governor Greg Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, among others, Ken Paxton there. | ||
| So it was kind of the who's who in Republican governors and lawmakers, and of course you had Virginia Foxx and some others in the crowd as well. | ||
| But just what a moment that was. | ||
| And came out, delivered kind of an opening statement about seven, eight minutes long. | ||
| And then sat down and used that pen he used the other day to sign this thing in order. | ||
| And, of course, your cold open is brilliant. | ||
| We don't even need talent anymore. | ||
| Just put a 45 minute cold open together and you can just fire the both of us and just let that roll. | ||
| That's what you need to do. | ||
| Now, that's good television, Steve. | ||
| That's good television. | ||
| But, yeah, what a moment to see this thing finally get inked. | ||
| And, of course, it does take Congress and Senate to really finalize this. | ||
| And, of course, Linda McMahon is going to put herself out of a job. | ||
| But I think she's okay with that. | ||
| Well, it takes Congress and them maybe to finalize it, but there's a lot you can do. | ||
| Remember, this is essentially... | ||
| A money laundering operation from taxpayers to the credential class and colleges. | ||
| And President Trump, he already cut off his alma mater. | ||
| I think you're going to be shocked at how many tens of billions, if not hundreds of billions of dollars, it's going to be shut off immediately. | ||
| Brian Glenn, your thoughts? | ||
| Yeah, that's a great point. | ||
| My question to him would have been, as a very successful business owner and a business developer, was this the worst ROI in American history? | ||
| $3 trillion to only result to the bottom of the barrel. | ||
| And if this was a business, you'd have an F by the Better Business Bureau, and you might be out of business already. | ||
| But he's reshaping. | ||
| He's really putting it a priority, and he knows the future of this country. | ||
| Not only lays in the office behind us with policies, but also lies with the kids right now in school, making sure we've got the best of the best in the world to take over these jobs that are coming. | ||
| So just a great day here at the White House, and very proud to be a part of the coverage, Steve. | ||
| Brian, you talked about the president producing. | ||
| He's both producing or starring. | ||
| I think Susie Wiles may be the director. | ||
| Trump's the executive producer, but he's also the star. | ||
| I want to ask you, because I think today was very... | ||
| Everything's information warfare, and Trump understands this. | ||
| My theory of the case is the reason he didn't take questions... | ||
| He would have people like you ask reasonable, smart questions that would have a deeper answer. | ||
| You'd get a couple of snarky... | ||
| But I think he just wanted this to be just so raw with the kids signing, holding it up, and basically the Rachel Maddow and the people at MSNBC tonight in primetime suck on that. | ||
| Right? No commentary. | ||
| No talk afterwards. | ||
| No Brian Glenn speech. | ||
| It's just, baby, it's yours. | ||
| You deal with it because their heads are already blowing up. | ||
| No, you're right. | ||
| And you know that you'd have some reporter talk about Gaza or talk about some unrelated subject, which he does not like to address at something like this. | ||
| He would even tell you. | ||
| It's inappropriate for that question right now. | ||
| I'm glad he didn't take questions. | ||
| And I love it as he held up the EO and was just like, you know, here it is. | ||
| In your face. | ||
| And of course, I can't wait to see the coverage of that tonight on the other stations, on the networks that a lot of our audience doesn't watch. | ||
| But unfortunately, we watch it for them, Steve, so they don't have to. | ||
| And you bring it to them tomorrow on The War Room. | ||
| Brian, can you hang on? | ||
| And I want to hold you through the break. | ||
| I've got some other questions. | ||
| There's so much going on, fighting on so many fronts. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to be with us at 5.30. | ||
| We're going to talk about new updates in what Brian Glenn, I think, has called a judicial coup d'etat. | ||
| An insurrection to a coup d'etat because now they're trying to drive Trump, I think, from office. | ||
| That's why this impeachment is so important. | ||
| Folks, they're going to come in hard on the Department of Education. | ||
| They're not going to back off anything. | ||
| These people are all gas, no brake right now. | ||
| Just like we are. | ||
| I think that means there's going to be a collision. | ||
| Neither side is prepared to compromise. | ||
| Because the fate of the republic hangs in the balance. | ||
| The unitary executive theory. | ||
| That's the idea. | ||
| And you're seeing the concept played out. | ||
| Thought through by Project 2025, but also others. | ||
| The America First Policy Institute. | ||
| By Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. | ||
| The American First Law. | ||
| From Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, Stephen Miller. | ||
| This was also all done work by Mark Paoletta, Jeff Clark over at CRA, Center for Renewing America, with the great Russ Vogt in charge. | ||
| Many, many years people worked through this. | ||
| Every detail of it. | ||
| The judicial insurrection, I think, is getting ready for a collision course with reality. | ||
| As the Trump movement, the MAGA movement, and President Donald John Trump, the 47th of the President of the United States, does not double down. | ||
| He triples down. | ||
| He took a pin out today and eradicated the Department of Education. | ||
| Suck on that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | |
| you you | ||
| Brian Glenn, our own Brian Glenn, is at the White House. | ||
| Brian, I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| I just want your thoughts. | ||
| I know today's a historic day. | ||
| We've been so focused on the Department of Education. | ||
| But everything else that's going on, every time President Trump takes an executive action, every time President Trump signs an executive order, virtually immediately, the only thing the Democrats have going for him is to jump right in to go to federal court and try to slow things down. | ||
| Remember, to delay is to deny, and that is your strategy. | ||
| Thoughts, Brian Glenn, before you take off? | ||
| Absolutely. That's what they do. | ||
| They head to the courts. | ||
| But the good news is, as far as the public opinion, the court of public opinion, some of the things they're standing for and some of the things they're resisting, they're not winning. | ||
| So they're not winning on the public court of opinion. | ||
| And I think when it's all said and done, Steve, they're not going to win in the courts. | ||
| We cannot allow, with the equivalency of your local librarian, controlling what the state does or even what the city does in that region. | ||
| So I think this is all good. | ||
| And it might go through the courts, but the Republicans are prepared. | ||
| Stephen Miller has been very vocal about that as well, prepared to win. | ||
| But right now, let the Democrats stand for open borders, letting, you know, murders and criminals roam the streets and also be against and actually encourage some of the violence we've seen towards people who even own a Tesla. | ||
| If that's what they stand for, Steve, let them go. | ||
| We stand for everything else. | ||
| And, of course, just another historic day here at the White House. | ||
| And we'll be back here tomorrow morning on American Sunrise. | ||
| And, of course, I'll see you back here tomorrow, perhaps on War Room. | ||
| We'll do this one more time, Steve. | ||
| One more time. | ||
| Brian, real quickly, I know that the FBI is looking into Tesla, and they're also looking to swatting. | ||
| Are you hearing anything from the staff about the huge protest at Trump Tower, other violence around the country against MAGA, Republicans? | ||
| Is the White House now starting to become aware of this, that this violence of the Democrats is starting to escalate? | ||
| Yeah, very well. | ||
| I think earlier, Pam Bondi, actually, they filed charges against a couple individuals in charge of these Molotov cocktails thrown at dealerships to burn cars. | ||
| They will be charged, and I think it's a minimum. | ||
| Of five years. | ||
| They're not playing around here. | ||
| Five years to 20 years, depending on what they're ultimately charged with and found guilty of. | ||
| But these individuals are taken very seriously. | ||
| They're not going to play around. | ||
| This cannot get out of control like the Summer of Love that we saw in 2020, where they righted across this country, burning down cities, looting businesses. | ||
| We cannot allow that to happen. | ||
| And then you have people on late night TV actually encouraging and almost laughing at the notion of Tesla dealers being, you know, victimized and really attacked just for driving | ||
| I like that Pam Bondi and this Trump administration is getting out in front of this and letting these people know if you burn down a dealership, you burn a car, you vandalize someone, that is considered domestic terrorism and we're going to throw the book at you and make sure that you pay the price for that. | ||
| So it's good that we're getting out in front of this, Steve. | ||
| Brian, what is your social media so folks can follow you? | ||
| Wonderful. You can follow me at BrianGlennTV across the board. | ||
| You can follow me at Brian on Truth Social. | ||
| And as always, Steve, it's a pleasure to come on the show. | ||
| And thanks to the War Room Posse. | ||
| I think we're moving the needle here at the White House. | ||
| And I want to thank everybody for watching and putting your... | ||
| Moving the needle. | ||
| Moving the change, too. | ||
| Brian Glenn, thank you so much from the White House. | ||
| We're going to go back. | ||
| I think we've got a special guest going to join us in a moment. | ||
| I want to play this. | ||
| I want to replay Alicia Menendez on MSNBC this afternoon with Media Matters President, because he sums it up perfectly, exactly what the case is. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Angela, there's a chapter. | |
| On the Department of Education in Project 2025, that is not news to you. | ||
| You have read through that document. | ||
| You tried to warn people that this was the playbook they were going to run. | ||
| The first line of that reads, federal education policy should be limited. | ||
| And ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated. | ||
| The administration can't actually eliminate it, as you know, as anyone who sort of understands the basic mechanisms of this understand. | ||
| What is it they are trying to win here? | ||
| A symbolic victory? | ||
| No, they want something much bigger than that. | ||
| And they've sort of been pretty transparent about it, especially in the last few months. | ||
| They see the Department of Education and more broadly the education system as sort of indoctrinating people, young people, right at the beginning. | ||
| That it's basically creating a whole pipeline of, you know, liberal indoctrination. | ||
| And, you know, they've been pushing back at that on the edges. | ||
| You've seen this pop up at the States where, you know, they're messing with the curriculum. | ||
| They're replacing some books with, you know, PragerU. | ||
| You know, you've seen it. | ||
| What they're really trying to do here is not just some, you know, very significant administrative bureaucratic reform. | ||
| No, they're trying to get rid of the functions that the Department of Education provides, and that is 30 percent of it is to Title I, which is for low-income people. | ||
| So that is designed to punish the school districts that have low incomes. | ||
| That's 180,000 teachers. | ||
| Bam! Right there. | ||
| That relies extensively or exclusively on Title I funding that they want to get rid of. | ||
| And then the other part of it, and this sort of came up so far in the discussion, is through the grant-making programs for universities and loans. | ||
| To either reduce that and the stuff that you can't reduce, privatize that. | ||
| But this is about... | ||
| It is about eliminating and reducing an educated populace. | ||
| And to the extent that you are keeping it in place by giving it back to the states, we know what that means. | ||
| It means more power for the already dominant right-wing narrative that we're dealing with. | ||
| Angelo Karusan from Media Matters. | ||
| About as articulate as you can possibly get in walking through exactly what the issue is. | ||
| Tim Wahlberg now joins us. | ||
| Can we get Congressman Wahlberg up? | ||
| Do we have him? | ||
| Okay, there we go. | ||
| Do we have Congressman Wahlberg? | ||
| Okay. Congressman, you're the chair of the Education Committee. | ||
| How big a day is this for you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, this is an exciting day. | |
| It's something I've dreamed about for many years. | ||
| While I was still on the education committee as a member and now as chairman, I'm hoping, like Linda McMahon being the last education secretary, I'll be the last education chairman in the House. | ||
| So this has an opportunity to turn education around, to take care of the student, the parent, and the teacher. | ||
| We get those things right. | ||
| We get education right. | ||
| So, Congressman, explain to people, because the left is already, you know, coming after us hard. | ||
| How can you have an education department that hasn't, I mean, why do you say it's a great day, that you want to get rid of the Education Committee, Department of Education? | ||
| You know, we've put $3 trillion into this. | ||
| I think the budget's, what, a couple hundred billion dollars. | ||
| Why has it been an epic fail in your eyes? | ||
| Because I know you guys are trying to work this program and monitor the budget and appropriate. | ||
| Why has it been such a failure that we had to get rid of it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, because we took it away, the real power away from the parents, the states, the local school districts. | |
| We put them under the weight of huge amounts of bureaucracy, red tape, paperwork. | ||
| We gave them a little bit of money. | ||
| Between 8 and 13 percent of the K-12 schools' dollars come from the feds. | ||
| But over 90 percent of their bureaucratic paperwork. | ||
| That all have cost not only dollars and cents, but also an impact in the classroom, allowing the teacher to do what he or she desires to do. | ||
| There are great teachers that simply want more student face time, that they can do the job they want to do. | ||
| And so while we are looking to remove a department, the bureaucracy, we know that some of the programs are good. | ||
| And that states will up them, and the competition between states and local school districts can provide an educational system that works. | ||
| Remember, we've had this Department of Education only since 1980. | ||
| Before that, we had the Agricultural Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, and that all came with local control and education that made a difference in people's lives. | ||
| The bulk of this funding, I think a lot of it goes to colleges, and they're already complaining. | ||
| The credential class is already complaining, saying, hey, this is an angry populist movement that is vindictive, jealous of educated people, that the rubes of the MAGA movement, the rubes of the Trump movement, this is just to get even with people that happen to be their betters and were highly educated. | ||
| Your response, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, my response is that's wrong-headed. | |
| We're not opposing quality education or educational opportunity for everyone, whether it be in a trade school, apprenticeship program, a community college or a four-year institution, and graduate-level training, whatever is necessary. | ||
| But we want that to be education that prepares people, trains people, educates them for the real world experience. | ||
| And it also doesn't undermine the morality and the traditional values that has made America what it has become. | ||
| Really the focal point for the rest of the world. | ||
| So the educrats that are in some of these higher education institutions... | ||
| I don't like to see change because they have control. | ||
| If they lose control and have to compete, that's a challenge for them. | ||
| I'd like to give them that challenge. | ||
| Some of them will compete. | ||
| Others will have to go away. | ||
| You have some great universities in Michigan. | ||
| Do you think, you know, University of Michigan, Michigan State, have the heads of those universities come to you? | ||
| Have they said, hey? | ||
| This is the type of hit that we can't have this gap in our budget. | ||
| We know that you guys are also looking at cutting research, that we're not going to be able to go on, that we're going to be an economic extremist, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I see schools like University of Michigan deciding to compete. | |
| They're Wolverines. | ||
| They're tenacious. | ||
| I've had conversations with the top leadership, and they're willing to compete. | ||
| They've indicated that they will do what's necessary to make sure that any research that they do, if it's appropriate and the Fed funds are there to do it, it'll be done right. | ||
| Congressman, can you hear me one second? | ||
| I want to take a short break. | ||
| It's a short commercial break. | ||
| I want to ask you about this executive order and how it's actually going to be implemented in the House of Representatives and the broader government. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Congressman Tim Wahlberg is with us. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to join us. | ||
| We'll be back after a short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back after a short | |
| commercial break. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| So Katie, as you noted, the deadline was at noon. | ||
| There could be many reasons, or really two principal reasons that we don't see it on the docket. | ||
| One is the obvious one, that they haven't filed anything, and therefore they would be in violation of a court's order. | ||
| But there is a second possibility, and sources with whom I've talked today have acknowledged that particularly here, where you expect the administration perhaps to invoke that state secrets doctrine instead of providing the information that Judge Bosberg called for. | ||
| Those were the two options he gave them. | ||
| Answer my five questions. | ||
| Or invoke the state secrets doctrine. | ||
| If they're going to do the former, they may have done so. | ||
| Ex parte, under seal, and that means it wouldn't necessarily have hit the public docket yet. | ||
| There could be a filing in his hands, just not one that we can see. | ||
| When will we know whether they did file it? | ||
| Could take a couple of days, obviously. | ||
| The other party wouldn't know either because when you file ex parte, what that means is that that's a filing between the filing party and the judge alone and not given to the other side. | ||
| So we can't rely, for example, on the plaintiffs here represented by the ACLU and Democracy Forward to necessarily be the ones that alert us to the fact that something has happened. | ||
| The federal judge at the center of the court battle over deportation flights is again blasting the Trump Justice Department, saying the information that the administration handed over to Well, Judge Boesberg is chastising the Justice Department, | ||
| Casey, because he says that what the Justice Department provided to him today, which came... | ||
| After the deadline he had imposed, he had given him a noon deadline to provide information, some more information about these flights from over the weekend that carried these immigrants to the prison in El Salvador. | ||
| He had asked them to provide that information by noon. | ||
| He said they missed it. | ||
| They missed the deadline. | ||
| They actually provided information afterwards, but it was not what he had requested. | ||
| He had wanted more detail, more information about exactly who were on those flights, including a third flight that took off. | ||
| After the judge had issued an order saying, turn those flights around, do not deport anybody else until we have some more information. | ||
| And what he says he got was a written declaration from a lower-level person at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and it is not answering the questions that he was asking. | ||
| And so what now we have is it appears a bit of a standoff between the Justice Department and this judge, Judge James Boesberg. | ||
| He is the chief judge here at the federal court in Washington, and he says he means what he says. | ||
| He wants them to provide more information, and he's also giving them an off-ramp. | ||
| He's saying you can declare that this is a state secret, and I will go away, essentially. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| you Thank you. | ||
| Okay, that's better. | ||
| I don't mute myself. | ||
| Congressman Wahlberg had to bounce. | ||
| He's got to get to the airport, catch a plane. | ||
| We're trying to get him later. | ||
| But I'm going to ask Mike Davis. | ||
| I had some structural questions to ask Mike. | ||
| Mike, the attention on this deportation, this national security issue, | ||
| with the violent terrorist gangs being sent out of the country by the commander-in-chief, correct me if I'm wrong, brother, I'm not a lawyer, but it looks like it's heating up. | ||
| This judge is getting pretty nasty now in his responses and saying that the White House response is woefully inadequate. | ||
| What's the latest and where do you see this thing headed, sir? | ||
| D.C. Obama Judge Jeb Bozberg, who was the presiding judge over the FISA court during crossfire hurricane and Russian collusion. | ||
| The biggest scandal in American history is way out over his judicial skis right now. | ||
| He is ordering the president and his team to do things that this judge does not have the power to order them to do. | ||
| He does not have the power to issue an order from Washington, D.C. to tell the president and his team to stop deporting. | ||
| International terrorist, designated foreign terrorist, along with international criminal gang members. | ||
| Judge Boesberg does not have the power to order the president to turn around planes during the middle of that operation. | ||
| Judge Boesberg does not have the power to seek this secret information from the executive branch because it's not relevant to anything. | ||
| He has the power to decide and think about what this judge did, which is so both lawless. | ||
| He held a hearing. | ||
| He ran into his courtroom last Saturday and held a hearing during the middle of an ongoing military intel and law enforcement operation where we are getting the most vicious, violent terrorist and gang members in the Western Hemisphere out of our country. | ||
| And this judge exposed this ongoing operation which endangered American lives and the lives. | ||
| Of our allies. | ||
| This Judge Boesberg ordered these planes turn around in international law space, which he absolutely did not have the power to do. | ||
| Did this judge understand that maybe, just maybe, we didn't have the security footprint in America that you saw in El Salvador, where you had hundreds of military and police? | ||
| And other law enforcement officials ready to take these most vicious, violent terrorist and gang members and put them in prison. | ||
| We didn't have that footprint in America. | ||
| Did Judge Boesburg know how much fuel was on these planes when he ordered them turned around in the middle of the Gulf of America? | ||
| It is very, very, very unlawful and dangerous what Judge Boesberg has ordered, and now he's digging in and doubting. | ||
| I've never called on anyone to ignore a court's order. | ||
| I have called on the president and his team to ignore this court's order because it's both extremely lawless and extremely dangerous to our national security. | ||
| Why would a foreign country want to keep doing business with the president of the United States and take such high risks? | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| You've actually gone out of your way, Vice Roy, to actually argue the opposite. | ||
| You're saying, hey, even if some of these have been out of bounds, you have argued from the beginning of this entire thing. | ||
| You should comply with this because as it goes up the chain, you want to show that the White House has complied even if some of the TROs and injunctions have been outside the bounds. | ||
| Why is Mike Davis... | ||
| Choosing this one to actually argue to the White House, you should not comply, sir. | ||
| Because the president as the chief executive officer and the commander-in-chief has a constitutional duty to protect American lives from danger. | ||
| And this lawless order by Judge... | ||
| It's not just that it was lawless. | ||
| It was lawless and very dangerous to American lives. | ||
| And that's why the president not only should have ignored this order, he had a duty to ignore this order under Article 2 of the Constitution. | ||
| And I'm not saying that you should just ignore every lawless order from a judge because judges issue lawless orders every day. | ||
| It's the fact that this was a lawless order. | ||
| That dealt squarely with the president's duty as commander-in-chief to protect our country. | ||
| And again, think about what could have happened. | ||
| They turn around these planes to comply with Judge Boesburg and they don't have enough fuel and they crash in the Gulf of America. | ||
| Or they turn around these planes and the people on the planes see that the planes are turning around and they riot. | ||
| And it causes the American personnel on the planes to get injured. | ||
| Or killed. | ||
| Or they turn around the planes and they bring them back to America and land and they don't have the security footprints that we had in El Salvador. | ||
| And remember, Trende Aragua is working with Venezuela, a state actor. | ||
| And so... | ||
| Venezuela certainly knows if these planes are turning around and where it's landing, and it could have its own operatives on the ground to interfere with the landing. | ||
| We would not have had several hundred military officers and law enforcement officers on the return because we didn't plan on the fact that some crazy judge in D.C. was going to run into his chambers on Saturday and issue this completely lawless order, | ||
| right? Look, this Judge Bozberg has absolutely crossed the red line. | ||
| That's why we are calling for his impeachment at the Article III project. | ||
| We've never done that. | ||
| We've never said to ignore a lawless order. | ||
| We've never said to impeach a judge over a lawless order like this. | ||
| But this is so extreme. | ||
| It's so dangerous that it needs to happen. | ||
| Even if the House opens the inquiry, we need to make an example out of Boesburg. | ||
| Even if he doesn't get impeached and removed by the Senate, we need to make an example out of him. | ||
| There needs to be a deterrence. | ||
| We need Judge Boesberg paying severe legal, political, and financial consequences for his dangerous, lawless order that put our national security at risk, that put the president's ability to conduct foreign affairs at risk, to deter other | ||
| activists. | ||
| I know this for a fact because these D.C. judges don't understand who's in the room with them. | ||
| I know this for a fact that they are giddy about who's going to issue the next so-called temporary restraining order to sabotage. | ||
| President Trump, because they have political and policy disagreements with this. | ||
| And the Supreme Court refused to stop this two weeks ago with Judge Ali, when this Canadian citizen ordered the president to send out $2 billion in foreign aid over the president's national security review to make sure we're not funding Hamas terrorists under the guise of, | ||
| you know, Gazan humanitarian relief. | ||
| We're not funding waste, fraud, and abuse like transgender mice research. | ||
| This Ali ordered this money to go out the door. | ||
| The Supreme Court refused to stop him because the Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett blinked. | ||
| And now that that happened, these judges are emboldened. | ||
| They are absolutely emboldened. | ||
| They are sabotaging the president. | ||
| And every day that the president is unable to perform his constitutional duty to take care that our laws are faithfully executed under Article 2 of our Constitution is a day too long. | ||
| They talk about it that Trump's the danger to democracy. | ||
| These activist judges are the dangers to democracy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Okay, so Roberts came out and had this guy's back. | ||
| The guy's dug in since then. | ||
| The commentator right there, the observer said, I see they're providing an off-ramp. | ||
| I don't see an off-ramp. | ||
| How does this proceed? | ||
| Because this guy's dug in, and one of the reasons he's dug in even more than when he started is Roberts came out and put a shot across Trump's spell when the president said, we ought to begin an impeachment inquiry of him. | ||
| And Roberts said that's completely inappropriate, that Mike Davis, the viceroy, the war room, the war and posse, we're out of line here. | ||
| So how do you see this one, specifically in this national security issue, how do you see this ending? | ||
| The chief justice is completely... | ||
| Out of line by coming out and making that political statement. | ||
| Impeachment is a political process strictly for the House and the Senate to decide. | ||
| And it's their decision whether to impeach and remove and no one else's. | ||
| And for the Chief Justice to come out and put up that statement isn't. | ||
| Is an outrage. | ||
| He poured political gasoline on a political fire, and this is what the chief does too often. | ||
| He makes these little chiefy political moves where he thinks he's protecting the federal judiciary's legitimacy, and all he's doing is harming it by putting the federal judiciary into the political arena. | ||
| Did you see the chief justice put out any statement condemning Democrats, when they were calling for the Chief Justice's colleagues' impeachment after the Dobbs decision? | ||
| No, you didn't. | ||
| Did you see the Chief Justice put out any statement when the Democrats were calling for Judge Eileen Cannon's impeachment after the presidential records case? | ||
| No, you didn't. | ||
| Why is the chief justice cherry picking Jeb Boesburg, his buddy on the D.C. district court, who the chief justice put in charge of the FISA court? | ||
| Why is he protecting his buddy in D.C. but not his conservative colleagues or Judge Kimmel? | ||
| Mike, can you hang on one second? | ||
| I want to continue this and put up the call to action over at Article 3 after a short commercial break about what you're requesting people to take a look at. | ||
| Take your phone out right now. | ||
| Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at 989898. | ||
| Request The Ultimate Guide for the Purchase of Gold and Precious Metals in the Era of Trump. | ||
| Find out why is a store of value in a hedge against times of financial turbulence? | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's take down the CCB. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | ||
| *Dramatic music* | ||
| We talk about the unitary executive theory. | ||
| Remember, we're a big believer here. | ||
| Ideas have consequences, big consequences. | ||
| One is modern monetary theory. | ||
| This is a radical theory came out of France that has been a big driver of nations that didn't think deficits matter. | ||
| Well, guess what? | ||
| They do matter. | ||
| One of the reasons inflation is embedded into the system. | ||
| It's $2 trillion deficits every year now for the United States, $37 trillion in debt, and it just keeps building. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Talk to Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Find out what gold's hitting an all-time high every couple of days. | ||
| It's not the price of gold. | ||
| It's what's driving the price of gold. | ||
| That's what you have to understand. | ||
| And that's what Philip Patrick, our End of the Dollar Empire series, all free, will help to explain that to you so you start to get some pattern recognition. | ||
| So go try it out today. | ||
| Modern Monetary Theory, the idea that broke the world. | ||
| You can get it at birchgold.com slash bannon. | ||
| And talk to Philip Patrick and the team about this. | ||
| We talk about deficits. | ||
| That's the whole reason, Mike, you know, we're back in this Department of Education thing. | ||
| Let me get to that before I have the call to action, because you're on a very specific call to action on impeachment. | ||
| This deficit, and what I was just talking about, Birch Gold, you can't have these massive deficits because you're going to have inflation like the Weimar Republic if you don't take control of it. | ||
| Part of that is downsizing the government. | ||
| And Doge is out there in waste, fraud, and abuse, but there's also programmatic changes that can really take out big hunks. | ||
| And I keep telling you, you take it out by programs, and you take it out by billets. | ||
| It's not just individual people. | ||
| You've got to get rid of the billets and the programs. | ||
| Here's what I think, and on TV, on MSNBC, they're blowing us up. | ||
| Walk our audience through. | ||
| In the unitary executive theory, why President Trump can sign an executive order and therefore take a cabinet that was set up, a department that was set up as a cabinet official, I don't know, 50 years ago, | ||
| 40-some years ago, and just with the stroke of a pen, get rid of it, sir. | ||
| Well, first, it's not the unitary executive theory because we're not liberals. | ||
| It's Article 2 of the Constitution. | ||
| And the president has... | ||
| The executive power. | ||
| And under the executive power, he has a duty to take care that our laws are faithfully executed. | ||
| That includes rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| So if there is something created by statutes, like, you know, if there's a department created by statutes, the president can't just eliminate, he can't just overturn that congressional statute. | ||
| But that doesn't mean that we have to have 75,000 employees at a department. | ||
| We can cut down the offices that are not created by statute. | ||
| We can cut it down to size. | ||
| And so you're going to see President Trump do that on a lot of these departments and agencies, is that there might be a department created by statute, but that doesn't mean it has to have so much bloat. | ||
| So you can cut it back just because the president has discretion as the chief executive officer to manage these departments that are set up by statute. | ||
| And if he doesn't think he needs. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Whether it's USAID... | ||
| Our Voice of America and all these other grantees at Voice of America, or all these grantees that have tens of billions of dollars at DOE, those are all kinds of things. | ||
| You take it basically down to the deck plates, to the statutory minimum, right, that you're fulfilling that function. | ||
| And maybe over some time, Congress gets around that, but you take it down to the statutory minimum, and you continue to function that way. | ||
| And in these types of things that you're looking at, you cut out. | ||
| Programmatically, 90% of the cost. | ||
| Roughly. Something like that. | ||
| Is that the theory of how it's going to work? | ||
| It sounds like it is. | ||
| And so you're going to have Elon Musk and Doge and these agency heads as the wrecking ball. | ||
| And then the agency heads will work with Russ Vogt to clean up the mess. | ||
| And look, you see these mass layoffs in Washington, D.C. Has any real American... | ||
| and real america felt any pain from this or is anyone losing any sleep or not getting dinner on the table because we're not funding transgender mice and botswana or wherever the hell we're funding this stuff i mean that's the issue is that these government programs are slush funds for the uniparty elite in washington dc it takes money From real Americans in real America driving up the cost with inflation, | ||
| driving up interest rates so we can make people in Washington, D.C., fat and happy. | ||
| We saw this during recessions. | ||
| We saw this during COVID. | ||
| America was struggling. | ||
| During these recessions, but what do they do in Washington, D.C.? | ||
| They just keep printing more money and they get fat and happy when the rest of America, real Americans in real America, suffer. | ||
| So it's time that we put Washington, D.C. on a crash diet and Elon Musk is doing that. | ||
| Now, give your call to action. | ||
| You're very serious as the viceroy that this guy needs to be impeached. | ||
| We need to go through the process, and people shouldn't worry whether in a trial in the Senate he's going to be removed. | ||
| Trust the process. | ||
| So where do people go? | ||
| How do they find out more about it? | ||
| What's the call to action here? | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| You can donate there. | ||
| Follow us on social media. | ||
| The most important thing, again... | ||
| The War Room Posse does. | ||
| The superpower of the War Room Posse is teaming up with the Article III project and lighting up key officials. | ||
| And we're lighting up both of our home state senators and our U.S. House Rep to impeach D.C. Obama Judge Jeb Bosberg for his extremely lawless and extremely dangerous Where he exposed a national security operation on Saturday when he ran into his courtroom, | ||
| exposed an ongoing operation putting American lives and allied lives at risk. | ||
| He ordered planes, turned arounds. | ||
| He apparently, you know, I always say apparently Boesburg is a trans black woman because I didn't realize he was qualified to be an air traffic controller until Saturday when he ran in there and did that. | ||
| So Biden must have made him. | ||
| An air traffic controller because he ordered these planes turned around. | ||
| He didn't know how much fuel was in them. | ||
| He didn't care. | ||
| He didn't care if they crashed in the middle of the Gulf of America. | ||
| He was going to make damn sure. | ||
| He didn't let his terrorist buddies with Trendy Aragua and his MS-13 buddies get set to El Salvador. | ||
| Let's go to Article 3 Project. | ||
| Mike Davis, let's focus on the House Judiciary Committee. | ||
| Mike, what is your social media? | ||
| We've got about 20 seconds. | ||
| MRD. D-M-I-A-M, R-D, Michael R. Davis, Des Moines, Iowa. | ||
| And I come in hot, as you said, particularly late at night. | ||
| So, thank you, Steve. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Late at night. | |
| God bless you, Mike. | ||
| This is a big one. | ||
| The judicial coup d'etat. | ||
| Stopping it. | ||
| Right stuff's going to take his hour. | ||
| We'll be back in a moment. | ||
| Measles in Texas. | ||
| Kennedy's assassination. | ||
| Jackie Toberoff in Manhattan. |
Export Selection