March 20, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
47:42
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| are acting erroneously. | ||
| We have judges. | ||
| Who are acting as partisan activists from the bench. | ||
| They are trying to dictate policy from the President of the United States. | ||
| They are trying to clearly slow walk this administration's agenda. | ||
| And it's unacceptable. | ||
| As the President said last night, we will continue to comply with these court orders. | ||
| We will continue to fight these battles in courts. | ||
| But it's incredibly apparent that there is a concerted effort by the far left to judge shop, to pick judges who are clearly acting as partisan activists. | ||
| We will not allow that to happen. | ||
| And not only are they usurping the will of the president and the chief executive of our country, but they are undermining the will of the American public. | ||
| Tens of millions of Americans who duly elected this president to implement the policies that are coming out of this White House. | ||
| 67% of all of the injunctions in this century have come against which president? | ||
| Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Let me say that again. | ||
| 60% of the injunctions by partisan activists in the judicial branch have come against President Donald Trump, and 92% of those have been from Democrat-appointed judges. | ||
| This is a clear, concerted effort by leftists who don't like this president and are trying to impose or slow down his agenda. | ||
| And I would just like to point out that the judge in this case is essentially trying to say that the president doesn't have the executive authority to deport foreign terrorists from our American soil. | ||
| That is an egregious abuse of the bench. | ||
| This judge does not have that authority. | ||
| It is the opinion of this White House and of this administration, and that's why we're fighting this in court. | ||
| And it's very, very clear that this is an activist judge who is trying to usurp the president's authority. | ||
| Under the Alien Enemies Act, the president has this power, and that's why this deportation campaign has continued. | ||
| And this judge, Judge Boesberg, is a Democrat activist. | ||
| He was appointed by Barack Obama. | ||
| His wife has donated more than $10,000 to Democrats. | ||
| And he has consistently shown his disdain for this president and his policies, and it's unacceptable. | ||
|
unidentified
|
you | |
| Okay, the first hour we talked about the color revolution, the escalation of violence you're seeing around the country, whether it's a Tesla dealership or right now, outside and often inside Trump Tower in Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. | ||
| Now we're going to talk about the main line of battle of these radicals, and that is the courts. | ||
| Julie Kelly is going to join us momentarily. | ||
| We have Laura Loomer, who's been on fire. | ||
| Also, George Fishman from Center for Immigration Studies. | ||
| A brilliant piece this morning in Axios about President Trump's legal team and what they're doing on the deportations. | ||
| Every angle of it. | ||
| So we're going to get to that in this hour. | ||
| We'll start with Julie Kelly. | ||
| I saw some breaking news, Julie, a moment ago. | ||
| Your favorite, Beryl Howell, is basically unwinding or trying to unwind. | ||
| I know you're shocked, Julie. | ||
| But they're trying to unwind the DOGE effort and the effort of the State Department over at the Institute for Peace to essentially shut it down. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| Correct. | ||
| So I'm just trying to catch up on this lawsuit, as you can imagine. | ||
| It's like every 30 minutes there's a new update or a new lawsuit. | ||
| But it looks like former chief judge, this is James Bosberg's predecessor, another Obama appointee. | ||
| So it looks like she denied a motion lawsuit for temporary restraining order to reinstall some of the board members and staffers. | ||
| I think this is just the board members who were dismissed by President Trump and replaced. | ||
|
unidentified
|
ST. | |
| So, and there's also other breaking news you've got about other in this process. | ||
| What do you have for us at the appellate level? | ||
| So, the court appears to the appellate court has been expediting the appeal of Jeb Bosberg's temporary restraining order, class-wide temporary restraining order against the president's Alien Enemies Act proclamation that was published on Saturday. | ||
| So, just breaking news right now, oral arguments in that case is scheduled now for Monday at 1.30. | ||
| I will cover that live as well. | ||
| And so, this will determine the appellate court. | ||
| And there's three judges. | ||
| And actually, Steve, this is the same three-judge panel that heard the lawsuit by now former Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, and this is the appellate panel who actually dismissed Hampton Dellinger. | ||
| Overturning Amy Berman Jackson's reinstatement of Hampton Dellinger, and now he is attempting to drop that lawsuit. | ||
| This is the same panel, Karen Henderson, who is a George H.W. Bush appointee, Patricia Millett, who is an Obama appointee, and then Justin Walker, a Trump appointee. | ||
| So, pull the camera back. | ||
| Tell us where we stand on this Wednesday afternoon. | ||
| We had Mike and the team on this morning. | ||
| People were talking about we're getting the Warren Posse is very focused on getting into House Judiciary Committee about impeachments. | ||
| There's all types of legislation going around. | ||
| This is the number one thing. | ||
| Everybody's up on the ramparts. | ||
| You've done the best job of everybody in this quite complicated battlefield because there's so many things going on. | ||
| Just where do we stand here on Wednesday afternoon, ma 'am? | ||
| So, what's happening now? | ||
| Now, there's a separate hearing in this Venezuelan terrorism case on Friday. | ||
| So, the battle right now, and this unfolded today, we talked a little bit about it this morning, Jeb Bosberg asking, demanding from the Trump administration these details about the deportation flights of these Venezuelans. | ||
| And they are resisting, the Trump DOJ is resisting giving. | ||
| Jeb Bosberg, that information. | ||
| He came back and said, well, I want it in an ex parte or sealed form. | ||
| And the DOJ filed this real, this was a fiery response, saying that they were considering invoking state secrets privilege to keep this information away from Jeb Bosberg, | ||
| like we talked about this morning. | ||
| But also, and so now later, After we talked this morning about this, Jeb Bosberg gave only a one-day reprieve. | ||
| So he is going to demand this information by tomorrow. | ||
| But here are some of what the DOJ said in their filing this morning. | ||
| The court, Jeb Bosberg, has now spent more time trying to ferret out information about the government's flight schedules and relations with foreign countries than it did in investigating the facts before certifying the class action. | ||
| in this case. | ||
| That observation reflects how upside down this case has become as digressive micromanaged | ||
| Now, of course, that's true because we still haven't heard from Jeb Bosberg why he was justified in entering that temporary restraining order. | ||
| And as the DOJ has noted, Steve, there is precedent in this D.C. appellate court. | ||
| And this will be raised during oral arguments on Monday, that the Alien Enemies Act is not up for judicial review. | ||
| It's not reviewable by a judge. | ||
| This is solely within the president's purview. | ||
| And so this is one thing that they have argued in their briefs, and I'm sure will come up on Monday, that court precedent. | ||
| So look, but... | ||
| And I have a piece on my substack. | ||
| What Bosberg appears to be doing is establishing, setting up a contempt of court trap for the Trump administration. | ||
| He wants these granular details about the flights, not so he can determine how these terrorists were being treated or anything of that nature. | ||
| He wants it to see, look at the timeline and see if at any step. | ||
| They defied his order on Saturday night that prevented the DHS and DOJ from authorizing these flights. | ||
| That's what it appears he is setting up. | ||
| I'm sure that the DOJ is well aware of this. | ||
| And again, why they want to keep these details away from Jeb Bosberg. | ||
| He does not need to know about these flights. | ||
| It's way outside of his lane. | ||
| He has no justification for pursuing the granularity of how these flights are conducted, where they land, who was on them. | ||
| But this is, I think, I believe, his goal here. | ||
| Where else do we stand? | ||
| Because on the unitary theory of the executive, they're coming after President Trump of whether he's chief executive and he can make decisions on personnel or on money. | ||
| You've seen this now today on the Institute for Peace. | ||
| They're trying to come after him, Commander-in-Chief, the example you just brought. | ||
| They're also trying to come after his chief magistrate and chief law enforcement officer. | ||
| On the others, where do we stand? | ||
| Because they're also now, it's quite evident, and correct me if I'm wrong, any major action he takes They are ready to springboard with a lawsuit, with top lawyers funded by SORA. | ||
| So folks got to understand, to delay is to deny. | ||
| And that's the game they're playing now. | ||
| In their mind, it's the most successful thing they have so far against President Trump, Julie Kelly. | ||
| Correct. | ||
| So there was also appellate oral arguments yesterday morning on the firing of a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board. | ||
| This is the three-member board. | ||
| The president fired the chairwoman, Kathy Harris, from that board. | ||
| She sued. | ||
| She was reinstated by another judge. | ||
| She's a Biden appointee as well, so oral arguments were held yesterday morning. | ||
| Also, in that same oral argument preceding the firing of a member of the National Labor Relations Board, who was reinstated by a barrel. | ||
| So we should be getting a decision, you know, shortly about. | ||
| The reinstatement of those two fired board members on these alleged independent boards. | ||
| You know, all of a sudden, all of these boards under the purview of the executive branch are independent. | ||
| You know, the special counsel is independent. | ||
| So this will actually be a landmark decision what the D.C. appellate court comes up with. | ||
| But, Steve, a case that we have been talking about now for weeks, what happened last night. | ||
| As I predicted, and you and I have talked about Judge Tanya Chutkin, of course, who presided over Jack Smith's J6 indictment against the president, Tanya Chutkin overturning EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's freeze on the billions of dollars that were sheltered hidden at Citibank. | ||
| A few days before the election last year that were doled out to politically tied, politically connected climate nonprofits. | ||
| And so not only did Lee Zeldin freeze those funds, he ordered Citibank to return those funds and not give any of the billions of dollars to these specially selected climate nonprofits. | ||
| benefits. Judge Chuckkin last night entering another temporary restraining order denying | ||
| Lee Zeldin's demand to get those funds back, unfreezing the funds, ordering the EPA and Citibank to put out those disbursements to respond to any requests because these nonprofits are going to be harmed. | ||
| If the funds are frozen and not given to them as they demand with, of course, no congressional oversight and now no EPA oversight as well. | ||
| Not surprising. | ||
| We've talked about that happening. | ||
| But here you've got up to $20 billion sheltered at CityBank November 1 of 2024. | ||
| The terms of these grant agreements were changed twice, including a week before the inauguration, to make it harder. | ||
| For the EPA to cancel those grants, which is exactly what Lee Zeldin did last week. | ||
| And so they did everything that they can to make sure that this $20 billion, no one can touch it. | ||
| Citibank has it. | ||
| And these climate nonprofits, including one tied to Stacey Abrams, can just put their hand out and Citibank will give them whatever they want. | ||
| That's what Tanya Chukkin endorsed in her ruling last night. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| Julie, can you hang her for one second? | ||
| Do you have a few minutes? | ||
| I want to bring in George Fishman from Center for Immigration Studies. | ||
| I just sent you, Julie, so you can catch up. | ||
| I know you've been swamped and everything else. | ||
| Mark Caputo, who's recently gone to Axios, has written, quite frankly, a breathtakingly brilliant piece this morning, Inside Trump's Supreme Plot on Immigration. | ||
| Where he goes through, and this out starts, President Trump has accelerated a multi-pronged, methodically planned strategy to push the Supreme Court to bless his power to deport vastly more people with vastly fewer judicial restraints, | ||
| top officials tell Axios. | ||
| So this was given by the White House to Caputo, who's one of the people that covers the MAGA movement and covers the Trump movement and the Trump White House, I think, as good as anyone. | ||
| George Fishman, you've had a chance to go through this. | ||
| Walk me through the case that President Trump's White House is making about the kind of multi-prong attack and strategy they have to basically get around the problem we've had so far, which is these federal courts to try to chop block us at the first step. | ||
| Just walk us through this, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think it's a fantastic move by the administration. | |
| We need Supreme Court decisions. | ||
| On these cases, and I think in the article, the administration said we don't want to put all our eggs in one basket. | ||
| We're going to pursue a multitude of strategies to deal with illegal immigration, and we needed approval from the Supreme Court on as many of these strategies as we can get. | ||
| I was in... | ||
| The general counsel's office at DHS during President Trump's first term, and pretty much everything we worked on got enjoined by a federal court. | ||
| So, yeah, we need Supreme Court decisions on these cases. | ||
| Why is this strategy different than others? | ||
| I mean, you know we tried in the first term. | ||
| We've also done this for a number of different agencies now. | ||
| You see how they're using these radical judges to enjoin everything we want to do. | ||
| What is different about this strategy? | ||
| Why do they think they're going to game the system to get to the Supreme Court and have the Supreme Court have our back on this, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think their best odds are with the Supreme Court rather than the appellate courts. | |
| And so instead of just appealing to appellate courts and going through a multi-year process, if they can get the Supreme Court to take up a case directly from a district court's decision... | ||
| They'll be able to resolve this much sooner than they had in the past. | ||
| And by going through the entire appellate process, if the Supreme Court plays ball, one thing they need to be careful about, Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh have turned down the Trump administration a number of times. | ||
| In his first term, the termination of DACA, that was stopped by Justice Roberts. | ||
| A few years ago, the state of Texas' attempt to force DHS Secretary Mayorkas under President Biden to enforce immigration laws. | ||
| That was turned down. | ||
| Texas was turned down by Justice Kavanaugh. | ||
| So, you know, in terms of not all eggs in one basket, they have to remember that these are not guaranteed wins at the Supreme Court either. | ||
| Guaranteed win. | ||
| So far, we've actually had a problem. | ||
| And I want to know from the article, because this is obviously Miller's thinking, why does he think he's got odds of them even picking it up? | ||
| I mean, we've seen, to date, a real hesitancy. | ||
| I think the only time they've gotten involved two times. | ||
| One is to reaffirm this procedural aspect, which Mike Davis and Julie Kelly tell us ridiculous. | ||
| The other is Roberts coming out yesterday and I think putting out this proclamation that only empowers these radical judges when he talked about impeachment. | ||
| So from the article, which is clearly Stephen Miller's and others thinking. | ||
| Why do they think they have a higher probability of even the Supreme Court wanting to get involved instead of just saying, no, it's not for us? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, you were definitely right. | |
| The Supreme Court, on a number of occasions, has been able to come up with decisions that don't really answer the base question. | ||
| You know, on DACA, they didn't determine whether DACA was legal or illegal. | ||
| They just, you know, made a procedural ruling. | ||
| Exactly right. | ||
| I would presume that the administration's goal is to, in essence, put the Supreme Court in a box where the Supreme Court has to make a ruling on the merits of the case that they have no other option. | ||
| And that would be my guess. | ||
| George, before I let you go, we know that in the supplemental or in the reconciliation, they're talking about $170 billion. | ||
| And Todd Benzman comes on here and breaks this down for it because the logistics chain's been broken, and this is what they need to set up the logistics, the actual logistical mechanism to deport up to 10 million illegal alien invaders. | ||
| We've seen now this firestorm, Julie, and she's going to come back with us right after you bounce. | ||
| You've seen the firestorm off of even deporting the worst of the worst. | ||
| The criminal gangs, the Venezuelan criminal gangs have been designated terrorists, and you have this firestorm on the left. | ||
| Oh, did they get due process? | ||
| What in here leads you to believe that this will give us a path | ||
| and the Supreme Court will want to take it up to actually deport up to 10, do mass deportations of up to 10 million people, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Alien Enemies Act has been... | |
| Essentially been used three times. | ||
| War of 1812, World War I, World War II. | ||
| You know, classic military situations. | ||
| The goal of the Trump administration is to use it in the context of these mafia states, governments such as Venezuela, where there's such a close connection between the government and organized crime or a terrorist group that... | ||
| When the organized crime group or the terrorist group acts, it's really the acts of the national government. | ||
| And you need to do that for the Alien Enemies Act, because it only applies in instances where there's an act by a foreign government. | ||
| So if they can get the Supreme Court to buy off on the theory that the Alien Enemies Act can be used against these mafia states, then, for instance, just... | ||
| Theoretically, if Mexico was determined to be a mafia state and actions of the Mexican drug cartels or actions of the Mexican government, that would theoretically give the president the ability to use the Alien Enemies Act against any Mexican national in the United States who is not a U.S. citizen. | ||
| So it has tremendous implications, but we need to get the Supreme Court to issue a ruin. | ||
| George Fishman, where do folks follow you? | ||
| You were part of Trump's first term. | ||
| You're considered an expert in this field and very close to the Trump administration. | ||
| Where do people get you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you so much. | |
| I'm at the Center for Immigration Studies. | ||
| Everything I publish is on the website of the Center for Immigration Studies. | ||
| And, you know, as is Todd Benzman and Andrew Arthur and other people, more expert than I am. | ||
| But I appreciate you saying that. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Julie Kelly, you're seeing the fight up close and personal on deporting as commander-in-chief in a national security crisis the worst of the worst that have been designated a terrorist group. | ||
| As you read this closely and think that Miller and these guys have worked on this now for years, it's going to be a tough...we're going to have to punch hard. | ||
| Well, I mean, I think reading through this quickly, the strategy was really smart to start with these disgusting lowlifes as the biggest example of something that's easy. | ||
| Use this rarely applied statute, the Alien Enemies Act. | ||
| To deport all of these Venezuelan terrorists tied to the Maduro regime and the TDA gang. | ||
| And it does, though, give the American people a glimpse of how the courts are going to handle this. | ||
| And even with what should be considered a layup case, the lowest hanging fruit, to get these scumbags out of our country who are here illegally anyway. | ||
| The little snippets of the five, the first five unidentified Venezuelans. | ||
| And, oh, you know, he's a tattoo artist. | ||
| And, oh, he came here in May of 2024. | ||
| They're being persecuted by this gang. | ||
| They're not members of the gang. | ||
| Well, okay, I am assuming that we're going to learn a lot more about who these individuals are. | ||
| But talking about them, having the ACLU defend them, Mark Elias defend. | ||
| This is a really illuminating glimpse into these judges and how they are going to handle this and defend these illegals being here and the American people having an opportunity to say, wait a second, how can a judge who's thrown J-6ers, | ||
| American citizens, in federal prison for doing nothing? | ||
| How can he swoop in and defend this? | ||
| So, I mean, to start with this, basically, aside from a few others, the Hamas protesters, etc., is a really interesting and, I think, convincing and smart strategy, if this is accurate, | ||
| how they're going to proceed. | ||
| No, I think it's very accurate, and I think it's very smart. | ||
| But you're already seeing the unbelievable. | ||
| You have the Democratic left and the progressive left. | ||
| Arguing about, as you said, all these guys tatted up all over. | ||
| Well, actually, he's an innocent victim of this group. | ||
| This group is a terrorist group, a terrorist criminal group from one of the worst regimes in the world. | ||
| And look at the fight we're going through on this. | ||
| That's why I think the WA has been very smart to line everything up. | ||
| Because then when you get to the mass deportations, I tell you, not just the media, but the left-wing legal apparatus is going to come. | ||
| What they want to do is destroy the sovereignty of this republic, and they will pull at any stop. | ||
| Julie, where do people go? | ||
| I know you're writing nonstop, trying to catch up with all this on your substack. | ||
| Where do people go to get the latest update so we can keep our head above order on this? | ||
| And also, I think I just want to say, putting Democrats in the position of defending these terrorists as well. | ||
| This will probably be, I assume, aside from what's happening in Doge, Doge and immigration, the two defining issues in the 2026 congressional midterm elections. | ||
| And so putting Democrats in the position of the only two groups of people Democrats will defend are federal government workers and illegal aliens, some of whom are suspected terrorists. | ||
| So this is this will be these will be two good wedge issues next year. | ||
| Of course, I'm on Substack Declassified with Julie Kelly. | ||
| I have a new piece up about this issue and there's new appellate briefs that were just filed. | ||
| I'll be posting that later tonight on X Julie underscore Kelly, too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, | |
| Julie Kelly working 24-7. | ||
| Thank you so much, ma 'am. | ||
| Great work. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| The main line of battle through the federal courts. | ||
| It's going to intensify big league. | ||
| Laura Loomer is going to join us right after a short commercial break. | ||
| Soros is coming after her hard. | ||
| Why? | ||
| She's very effective in battle. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Go to, take out your phone, text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N at 989-898. | ||
| Get a free guide. | ||
| Investing in gold in the era of Trump, the ultimate guide. | ||
| The folks at Birch Gold walk you through everything you need to know. | ||
| Pattern recognition. | ||
| Price of gold a day, $3,047, another all-time high. | ||
| That's not the point. | ||
| The point is, why is it a store of value? | ||
| Why has it been a hedge against times of financial turbulence for 5,000 years of mankind's history? | ||
| Notice some consistency? | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| Find out today. | ||
| Talk to the folks at Birch Gold for an alternative to financial turbulence. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Laura Loomer on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You went and lost your pride, but I'm American made. | |
| I got American power. | ||
| I got American faith in America's heart. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | ||
| you | ||
| There was a report the other day. | ||
| There's a report the other day. | ||
| I think it was Citicorp reported there's 9 million Americans that have at least two jobs to make ends meet. | ||
| We know how tough it is to make ends meet nowadays. | ||
| Jillian Barbary from Done With Debt. | ||
| The pressure on credit cards, the pressure of payoff credit cards. | ||
| People get way over their skis on this. | ||
| Jillian, you've been there. | ||
| People think it's the end of the world. | ||
| One of the reasons we love working with you guys, we're trying to tell people it's not the end of the world, okay? | ||
| There are ways out of this. | ||
| You've got to put your anxiety aside. | ||
| Contact Dunn with Debt. | ||
| Let the professionals take over, and they will guide you out of here. | ||
| Walk us through it, ma 'am. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For sure, Steve. | |
| I wish I knew about Dunn with Debt a lot earlier because I think it would have taken, well, I know it would have taken so much anxiety off of me. | ||
| I literally, the... | ||
| The stuff that hung over me almost ruined my life. | ||
| So if you are one of those Americans that are in that position, don't stress out. | ||
| I know the letters are coming. | ||
| I know this phone is ringing. | ||
| A lot of Americans are with you in debt. | ||
| Not because you're over shopping and you're spending luscious and lavishly. | ||
| It's because kids are in school and you're trying to pay the rent. | ||
| And you've lost everything. | ||
| Look, for me, it was disease. | ||
| Death was at my door. | ||
| Taxes were at my door. | ||
| And I love repping this company, Done With Debt. | ||
| If you go to them, go to donewithdebt.com. | ||
| They will give you a free consultation. | ||
| And Steve asked me their number before. | ||
| It's 888-322-1054. | ||
| They're gonna talk you through a plan. | ||
| They have people. | ||
| You'll get your own team that will walk you through your own plan. | ||
| The strategy is simple. | ||
| They cut off all the They cut off all the letters. | ||
| They run defense for you, which means they find all of the great deals out there. | ||
| They can cut debt. | ||
| They can get amazing deals with maybe your credit cards. | ||
| They know the banking institutions. | ||
| They know all the credit card institutions. | ||
| They can sometimes flat wipe out your debt. | ||
| And in some instances, people go home with money in their pocket. | ||
| I know that sounds crazy, but the people that are the most honest. | ||
| And I was. | ||
| I laid it all out there. | ||
| I was like, this is my life right now. | ||
| And I was crying on the phone. | ||
| They were almost like a therapist. | ||
| So, yes, donewithdebt.com. | ||
| If you are one of those people, just go to them. | ||
| Tell them what's up. | ||
| I know you probably don't tell them. | ||
| They're the ones. | ||
| 888-322-1054. | ||
| They are the ones that are going to put your life back on track. | ||
| But here's the thing. | ||
| Time is not... | ||
| Time is not your friend. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And real quickly, are the phone calls going to stop? | ||
| Are the penalties going to keep getting added up? | ||
| Is the interest going to run up? | ||
| Is the fees, all of it, is any of it going to stop until you engage with the credit card companies? | ||
| The best is to do it with a done with that. | ||
| Is it going to stop until you engage with them? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| It will not stop. | ||
| It just goes up, up, up, the penalty fees, and your stress is going to go up, up, up. | ||
| People don't realize debt is also, it's numbers, but it's also personal. | ||
| And your stress levels go up every time it's a number. | ||
| But when you call these people at donewithdebt.com at 888-322-1054, they are going to relieve some of that anxiety and tell you, you have a team. | ||
| We are here to relieve your stress. | ||
| The phone calls stop automatically. | ||
| Next day, my phone calls stop. | ||
| Nails stopped. | ||
| It was like, it was about lifting. | ||
| So they are your team, your own personal team. | ||
| You just have to call them and just be honest. | ||
| Financially, they're amazing, Steve. | ||
| Jillian Barbary, thank you so much. | ||
| DoneWithDebt.com. | ||
| Check out the number there in the chiron. | ||
| It's not going to go away. | ||
| It's not going to stop until you make it stop. | ||
| The way you make it stop is you engage. | ||
| When you engage with DoneWithDebt, they'll give you a free consultation. | ||
| Nothing ventured, nothing gained. | ||
| You've got to do this, because it won't stop. | ||
| Okay, we've got a cold open for... | ||
| Now, this is about the daughter of this radical judge that everybody is now up on the ramparts to try to impeach at the House Judiciary Committee. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play it for Laura Loomer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A loophole that lets prosecutors use different rules of evidence in court when they are prosecuting specific, usually black or brown people. | |
| Here's what I mean. | ||
| Most places around the country have some kind of gang law at this point. | ||
| And a lot of these gang laws are really loosey-goosey. | ||
| They basically define a gang as like any two or more or three or more people who have any kind of unifying symbol who commit a kind of crime together. | ||
| Now, when you think of how teenagers are and how often kids have unified, how often did we all draw that weird S in our notebooks? | ||
| And I don't know, like shoplift candy, whatever. | ||
| The point is, these laws can be very broadly applied because they are very, very vague. | ||
| Who are they applied to? | ||
| When we look at databases, for example, New York's gang database, it becomes apparent that these laws are almost exclusively applied to people of color. | ||
| So, for example, in New York, 99% of people in the gang database are not white. | ||
| This is really significant because what gang law is really intended to do is prosecute groups of people for doing crimes together, right? | ||
| We actually already have laws for that. | ||
| The law of conspiracy, for example, is intended to prosecute groups of people who do a crime together. | ||
| But conspiracy actually requires prosecutors to do the work of proving that the people had a common scheme and that they actually took material steps towards completion of their scheme. | ||
| Gang law? | ||
| They can just claim that people are all in the same gang, so whatever crime one of them does, the other ones must have wanted to do too and therefore be culpable for. | ||
| This opens the door to prosecutors using evidence in court that they would never be allowed to use in any other context. | ||
| So, for example, if I'm accused of a crime and I am saying, hey, I'm completely innocent of this crime. | ||
| I did not do this. | ||
| Most of the time, prosecutors are not allowed to introduce evidence that my friend committed a whole bunch of crimes and kind of imply to the jury that if my friend did a whole bunch of crimes, I must be a crappy person who does crimes too. | ||
| But in gang cases, that's exactly what they're allowed to do, Huge departure from the normal rules of evidence being applied only to black and brown people, which makes them more likely to be convicted because it's much easier to bias juries when you can say, | ||
| hey, this person's friends are crappy. | ||
| And then they are subjected to harsher penalties because gang crimes also confirm more alternatives. | ||
| Okay, there's whole tons of issues in criminal justice reform about these RICO charges and nonviolent drug dealers, etc. | ||
| But this is something quite different. | ||
| Laura Loomer, correct me if I'm wrong, but that woman employs the daughter of the judge that's basically making decisions about when President Trump as commander-in-chief is trying, has designated certain gangs to be terrorist organizations, | ||
| terrorist criminal organizations. | ||
| He's deporting them immediately. | ||
| And this judge's beloved daughter works for the woman we just saw. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| That is correct. | ||
| The woman who you just saw is a woman by the name of Emily Galvin Almanza. | ||
| And she's actually the founder of Partners for Justice. | ||
| And as I exclusively reported, Partners for Justice is a 501c3 organization that relies on federal government grants for most of their funding. | ||
| And they are the employer of Catherine Boesburg, who is the daughter of Judge James Boesburg, the federal judge who just struck down the deportation of all of these dangerous train de agua gang members, actually terrorists | ||
| is now what the Trump administration is calling them. | ||
| And you can see in the video that her employer, this group, Partners for Justice, they have an affinity for gangbangers. | ||
| And they think that gang laws are discriminatory. | ||
| And this entire organization focuses on helping people get out of jail. | ||
| Mostly, as she said, Black and Hispanic individuals. | ||
| And as we've seen, the Train de Agua gang members are not white people. | ||
| And that's not a racist thing to say. | ||
| Those are just the facts. | ||
| These are minority criminal illegal aliens, brown and black individuals who are committing heinous crimes in our country. | ||
| And organizations like Partners for Justice are getting a tax-exempt organization status so that they can help release these criminals onto our streets. | ||
| But hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| There's a whole... | ||
| There's a lot of stuff in criminal justice that can be reformed and needs reformed. | ||
| One of the things that needs reformed is this whole aspect of it, but that's different than the guy that is in charge of this and getting involved, and he's getting involved in the details of this case, like how money to plan, etc., that his daughter actually works for the woman that's one of the heads of this group. | ||
| Is that not, at a minimum, a grounds for recusal, for him recusing himself or being forced to recuse himself? | ||
| It is, and that's why I broke this story, right? | ||
| Because I investigate all of the family connections, just like I did with Judge Mershon and his daughter Lauren of authentic campaigns during the trial of President Trump in New York City. | ||
| All of these judges have massive financial conflicts of interest or massive family conflicts of interest. | ||
| And as I reported, Steve, in my report, the code of conduct for federal judges requires them to recuse themselves in a case that they are overseeing. | ||
| Interferes with the professional interests of a direct family member. | ||
| And I think that we can all agree here that the daughter of the judge is a direct- Family relations, Steve. | ||
| And so I don't know why the subject and the focus today during the White House press briefing conversation that took place, Steve, was around the wife. | ||
| I mean, yeah, we get it. | ||
| The wife runs an abortion clinic. | ||
| But this is far more egregious. | ||
| And I don't understand why the mainstream media refuses to talk about it, right? | ||
| I know my name is like Voldemort to them. | ||
| So they don't want to report on stories that I break because they have me blacklisted. | ||
| Regardless of whether they like me or not, Steve, these people should be reporting on the fact that this is enough to get the judge to recuse himself. | ||
| So we're pontificating and we're wasting all this time listening to all these ridiculous pundits on TV talk about how they're so outraged. | ||
| Wow, we're so outraged over the fact that a federal judge is blocking the deportation orders. | ||
| Oh my God, how can the judge try to create policy for the White House? | ||
| Well, then why don't you actually use information that has been uncovered by it? | ||
| Independent journalists to file a motion for recusal. | ||
| I just don't understand this dance that people engage in. | ||
| It seems like a waste of time. | ||
| I'm a very proactive person. | ||
| And if I was in the White House or if I was on the president's legal team, I would be using this information to immediately get this judge to recuse himself. | ||
| Well, listen, somebody's paying attention to you, and that's Soros. | ||
| Tell me about, they're coming after you today. | ||
| I think they just filed something. | ||
| Are they giving you a notice they're going to file? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Soros lawyers, what's this about? | |
| Breaking all of the stories that relate to the funding sources of these very violent Tesla takedown protests that you're seeing. | ||
| And Loomer Unleashed, we actually have created a community that is documenting all of the protests. | ||
| We are the leading investigative outlet exposing all of these people. | ||
| And we found that the Sunrise Movement was directly tied to donations. | ||
| Through the Hopewell Fund and the 1630 Fund, which are two organizations, radical leftist funds that are funded by George Soros that Reid Hoffman has donated to. | ||
| He's donated to the Hopewell Fund. | ||
| And I put out an exclusive report on X. Last week, and it got the attention of Reid Hoffman because it quadruple ratioed him. | ||
| And then Elon Musk replied because it was a fight between Reid Hoffman and Elon Musk where Reid Hoffman said, hey, Elon, stop accusing me of funding the protests at your Tesla showrooms. | ||
| I have nothing to do with it. | ||
| So I followed the money. | ||
| And then yesterday, my lawyer and I received a letter from the lawyers representing the Hopewell Fund and the 1630 Fund, which are two of the largest and most well-funded Soros entities on the radical left that are funding all of the protests against President Trump. | ||
| And they are threatening to sue me if I do not delete my posts and if I do not issue an immediate retraction. | ||
| And so that's really interesting. | ||
| I'll have to deal with that because they're demanding a response by five people. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| I'm kind of confused. | ||
| We had Alex Jones on at the beginning and then Natalie. | ||
| We're talking about... | ||
| Alex is talking about the rising levels of violence in this protest. | ||
| And we started the show with another protest outside of President Trump's headquarters on Fifth Avenue. | ||
| And it looks like police had barricaded it so they couldn't get into the atrium this time. | ||
| But Alex went through and Natalie went through this kind of color revolution. | ||
| Whether it's a Tesla dealership or some of these protests, you see a rising level of violence and implied violence. | ||
| You've got the swattings, you've got all that. | ||
| What are you saying? | ||
| Are you saying that you have a couple of major not-for-profits that are these institutions and foundations that are actually, you have documented evidence that they're funding some of these protests and now they've come to you to take down your evidence? | ||
| Ma 'am? | ||
| Well, I have a... | ||
| I have evidence that the violent groups, specifically the Sunrise Movement, this is the organization that was involved in vandalizing the Tesla showroom in the meatpacking district in New York City. | ||
| And they have been tied to all of these Tesla takedown events across the country. | ||
| They are a violent organization and they are on video, literally getting arrested in New York City for their violent vandalism at Tesla. | ||
| And so I- Looked at their financial records and saw that they have received funding from the 1630 Fund, which also received funding from the Hopewell Fund. | ||
| And Reid Hoffman, who funded, I'll remind everybody, the E. Jean Carroll Lawfare against President Trump, in which they falsely accused President Trump of being a rapist, a violent rapist. | ||
| Reid Hoffman is also an associate of Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| His name was on the list, and this is well documented. | ||
| He's also the founder of This is the same Reid Hoffman I'm talking about. | ||
| He has given massive donations to the Hopewell Fund. | ||
| What you have to understand it, Steve, is that- It's not just a single source of funding. | ||
| So the way that the funding on the left works for all these organizations is you have a mega donor that gives a large donation to a group like Hopewell Fund. | ||
| Then Hopewell Fund sends a lot of that money to groups like the 1630 Fund. | ||
| And then 1630 Fund sends a lot of that money to these other offshoot groups, these radical leftist organizations. | ||
| That's exactly the same thing that happens with Arabella Advisors, which is oftentimes described by myself and others as being the big daddies of all daddies. | ||
| All the slush funds within the Democrat Party, right? | ||
| You have these big umbrella organizations that then give one entity money, and then they funnel it to a million different groups through these larger umbrella organizations. | ||
| So that's how the money laundering in the left, in the Democrat Party works. | ||
| And so that is what they're threatening me to remove. | ||
| They are saying that I need to remove my post, in which I showed with irrefutable evidence, Steve, the funding pattern between Hopewell and... | ||
|
unidentified
|
But slow down. | |
| If you've got irrefutable evidence and you've put it up on a platform like Twitter, how can they demand... | ||
| Are they saying that you put up false information? | ||
| That you misinterpreted? | ||
| That you made a mistake? | ||
| Are you doing it maliciously? | ||
| What are they accusing you of? | ||
| They're saying that my posts are defamatory. | ||
| You can pull up the letter on the screen. | ||
| I tweeted it earlier. | ||
| They're saying that it's defamatory because they're trying to argue that, yes, we did give $500,000 to the Sunrise Pack, but that was in 2020, and the money is gone. | ||
| And so they've provided no evidence that the money that they gave this organization is gone. | ||
| You have to show me, with your financial records, that the $500,000, the half a million that you donated to this violent organization is gone, and they won't do that. | ||
| And so they're also accusing me of tortious interference because I guess they're pissed off that I tagged Reid Hoffman, who's one of their big mega donors, and he is one of the largest donors in the Democrat Party. | ||
| So in the letter, they actually said that they would sue me for tortious interference, which I guess they're trying to say that I'm interfering with their funding sources by naming and shaming and publicly exposing their big donors. | ||
| Okay, we've got about two minutes, and we're going to have to bounce. | ||
| We've got a hard stop here at the top of the end of the show. | ||
| Walk me through other things. | ||
| You're working on a ton of things. | ||
| You're unearthing more of this. | ||
| What is your main line of attack right now? | ||
| Well, we're exposing all of the lawfare and this judicial coup that is happening in our country where you have a barrage of judicial appointees, mostly Obama and Biden appointees, who are engaged in activism from the bench to attack President Trump. | ||
| They are trying to serve as the President of the United States. | ||
| They are trying to undermine the authority of the executive branch. | ||
| And so I'm focused on that. | ||
| And then, as I said before, I'm mapping out all of the domestic terror networks through this red Green Alliance, Steve, that we've seen gain tremendous force since the second... | ||
| Inauguration of President Donald Trump. | ||
| And what I mean by the red-green alliance, of course, is the Islamic and communist alliance that is happening where you have these radical leftists who are currently, as I speak right now, standing outside of the White House protesting President Trump's airstrikes on Houthi terrorists in Yemen. | ||
| And so the red-green axis is storming the United States Congress. | ||
| They are... | ||
| Going up to the gates of the White House where they were last night, waving the Hamas flag. | ||
| And so I'm very interested in identifying these individuals and then submitting their information to the DOJ and also Marco Rubio so that we can begin the deportation of many of these jihadist invaders who are violating the terms of their green cards and their visas. | ||
| So if you have any tips or if you have any information about any of these domestic terrorists or foreign terrorists who are Subject to deportation if they are identified and exposed for their illegal activities. | ||
| Please be sure that you DM me on Twitter@lauralumer. | ||
| You can also follow me and subscribe to me on Substack, lauralumer.substack.com. | ||
| You can subscribe to me on X. I'm an independent journalist, and now I'm going to have to assume enormous financial costs in litigation with these Soros-funded entities. | ||
| They are trying to silence my voice because I am probably the most- Effective investigative reporter right now when it comes to mapping out these financial networks of these domestic terror organizations and exposing the lawfare machine. | ||
| Real quickly, we've got to bounce. | ||
| Give us your podcast. | ||
| When's the podcast? | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
| It's usually every Tuesday and Thursday. | ||
| Not this week because I'm traveling. | ||
| But every Tuesday and Thursday at 9 p.m. Eastern on Rumble. | ||
| Rumble.com slash Laura Loomer. | ||
| My show is called Loomer Unleashed. | ||
| Thank you, ma 'am. | ||
| Laura Loomer. | ||
| A fighter. | ||
| Old school fighter right there. | ||
| Soros is trying to take her down. | ||
| No doubt. | ||
| We're going to be back at 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time tomorrow morning. | ||
| Show's already packed. | ||
| So much going on as we report. | ||
| The Trump administration, the second Trump term. | ||
| And the forces against it, they're trying to stop it. | ||
| Incredible. | ||
| What a fight. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| The end of the dollar empire. | ||
| Get the sixth free installment today. | ||
| Talk to you about why we're in the fix we're in. | ||
| Modern monetary theory. | ||
| The idea that broke the world. | ||
| We're about to have the world's largest margin call. | ||
| Find out what that is. | ||
| Go to Birchgold and talk to the Philip Patrick team. | ||
| Why is gold a store of value in time of financial turbulence? | ||
| See you tomorrow morning. |
Export Selection