Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Today, Taiwan Semiconductor is announcing that they will be investing at least $100 billion in new capital in the United States over the next short period of time to build state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing facilities. | ||
I think mostly it's going to be in Arizona, which is what I understand, which is a great state. | ||
I like it because I want it. | ||
But I want most of them, actually. | ||
But I did. | ||
We won it. | ||
And we won it big. | ||
The most powerful AI chips in the world will be made right here in America. | ||
And it'll be a big percentage of the chips made by his company. | ||
But as you know, they're based mostly in Taiwan. | ||
And they're far and away the biggest. | ||
There's nobody even close. | ||
This $100 billion in new investment will go into building five cutting-edge fabrication facilities in the great state. | ||
That we just discussed, Arizona, and will create thousands of jobs, many thousands of jobs, and high-paying jobs. | ||
In total, today's announcement brings Taiwan Semiconductor Investments to about $165 billion they've started already. | ||
Welcome. | ||
I guess we're not going to have a show open, but that's okay. | ||
I'm always alert. | ||
Thank you. | ||
You're the second hour, Monday, 3 March, Year of Our Lord, 2025. Congressman Andy Biggs joins us. | ||
Congressman, we had this massive announcement today from Taiwan Semiconductor, the leading advanced chip design company in the world. | ||
$100 billion spent, I believe, over four years in the great state of Arizona. | ||
And I think they've already committed $65 billion up to that. | ||
Talk to me about how important this is for the state of Arizona, sir. | ||
Well, it's a massive investment for the state of Arizona. | ||
And Steve, you're right. | ||
They already have one of their fabs open. | ||
They've got a second fab plant going up right now. | ||
And this is a commitment for those other three fab plants. | ||
And that investment, think of it this way, just building there for the next five to ten years is really massive for the construction industry. | ||
It's also massive for the engineering industry. | ||
As they bring those up to speed and up to scale. | ||
And then the other thing about it, Steve, that most people don't realize is when Taiwan Semiconductor builds those, they bring a bunch of what I would call secondary jobs over where they need different parts, different machining done off-site. | ||
Those would be additional businesses that surround them. | ||
I've been to their facilities in Taiwan. | ||
They surround those facilities in Taiwan. | ||
This is going to be massive. | ||
And we're going to need more engineers, more construction workers. | ||
Then you move to the tertiary, and that's everything from restaurants. | ||
I mean, it's going to be a massive scale-up in the northwest valley of the Sun-Phoenix area. | ||
It's just going to be really something else to see. | ||
This is going to be more important. | ||
When you finish these, because this is the leading company in the world, you're going to actually have as much throw weight with advanced ship design as Silicon Valley. | ||
You're right. | ||
The ancillary businesses in tech and tech support, also all the services from the dry cleaners to the coffee shops, the restaurants, all of it. | ||
I mean, this is massive. | ||
You're talking $100 billion investment in capital equipment. | ||
In four years, and when it gets in running, I mean, this is going to be the biggest demand. | ||
Are you concerned, like has happened in Texas a little bit, around Austin? | ||
You know, when the two of the most progressive places on Earth are Route 128, the Silicon Valley, around MIT and Harvard, and around Boston, and also Silicon Valley near San Jose in California. | ||
Are you concerned, and they've had this problem down in Austin, are you concerned that this could lead to turning, with this great investment and all this fantastic stuff, that this could lead to a real political change in the state of Arizona, sir? | ||
Well, I do think that that's a consideration that we need to be concerned about. | ||
Well, look, we've been planning on, we've been thinking that California was going to turn Arizona blue now for 30 years. | ||
And what you saw in the last election cycle is that Arizona is turning red in a very big way again. | ||
The other thing that's very distinctive about the two Silicon Valleys and the Silicon Corridor of Boston area is that these folks that are coming in here are engineers that are going to be working in a different kind of environment. | ||
You're not seeing the startups. | ||
You're not seeing the Googles. | ||
You're not seeing the kind of left-leaning industry that you see in Silicon Valley and Boston area. | ||
What you're going to see is a well-established, actually quite conservative company, Taiwan Semiconductor, that's been around for a long, long time. | ||
And they bring their ethos with them. | ||
And so you'll see folks coming in from Taiwan, which, by the way, should lead to a direct flight from Phoenix to Taipei as well. | ||
So you're going to see that coming in. | ||
And I think it's going to be a much more centrist at worst and maybe even slightly right-leaning workforce there. | ||
But the other thing is, Steve, you need to understand, and most people don't understand this, but under Katie Hobbs' administration, she's messed around with some of the water laws. | ||
So in the area where Taiwan Semiconductor's coming in, they're focusing on only multi-housing as opposed to single-family dwelling. | ||
You can't even build them in the city of Buckeye. | ||
Which has enough land area to house 2 million people in single-family homes. | ||
Right now you can't even build a single-family home under this current governor. | ||
These things have to be changed because when you're working and you want the kind of folks that you're going to see working at Taiwan Semiconductor, they're going to want single-family housing. | ||
You talked about transformational change. | ||
I was in Texas over the weekend. | ||
Texas is projected by 2045 right now to actually surpass California as far as population. | ||
Texas is already the seventh largest economy in the world, the size of France, the economy. | ||
This transformational change, because I cannot emphasize enough how massive this is for the state of Arizona. | ||
The state of Arizona, and one of the reasons it's along with Texas, is kind of the railhead of the MAGA movement, and I say the hardest part, the hardest core of the MAGA movement. | ||
Is the frontier spirit, the great open spaces of Arizona, both the deserts all the way to the mountains. | ||
Are you concerned, particularly you've thrown your hat in the ring to be governor, are you concerned that, hey, all the stuff that makes Arizona great and makes Arizona, so many people are moving there already, that now that you actually become as important on the global tech area as Silicon Valley, particularly in advanced chip design? | ||
That that fundamental transformation is also about population, that all of a sudden you have 2, 3, 4, 5 million people start coming to Arizona, sir? | ||
Yeah, it will be transformational. | ||
Everything, like you say, from infrastructure to how it impacts our private property ownership. | ||
But most people need to realize this, Steve. | ||
Only about 20% of all the land in the fifth largest geographical state. | ||
I mean, we're there and it's edgy, but we're a massive geographical state. | ||
Only about a fifth of that land is privately owned. | ||
And so you're still going to see wide open spaces. | ||
But I still think we're in an independent, rugged state. | ||
And it is exactly what you say. | ||
That's the spirit of very Goldwater. | ||
That's the spirit that made Arizona great and strong. | ||
I think that you're going to see people come in and adapt to that a little bit. | ||
I always tell people, I get asked to come speak to new businesses sometimes, Stephen. | ||
I always say, you know... | ||
Look at what you have here. | ||
You have brand new infrastructure. | ||
You've got great education opportunities that are here. | ||
You've got educational choice. | ||
You have lower taxes. | ||
You have less regulation. | ||
Please don't vote to turn us into California because you get so many folks from California. | ||
And they laugh at first, and then the light kind of goes on in their head. | ||
And I remind them, this is why your company came here. | ||
Your lifestyle is going to be better, more affordable. | ||
You're going to feel freer and happier. | ||
Please don't make us California. | ||
It's shocking that they didn't put this in California. | ||
They put it in Arizona. | ||
I mean, that's a wake-up call. | ||
You talk about everything that you and the folks in Arizona work for. | ||
The payoff is that one of the most important companies in the world, and I would actually argue in technology, maybe the most important company in the world chose you guys. | ||
And I think that's pretty stunning, pretty shocking. | ||
You're running for governor. | ||
Why? | ||
Don't leave us now when we're just into the biggest fights in history on the deficit and you're one of the biggest hawks. | ||
Why do you want to leave us holding the bag in the imperial capital to go be governor of Arizona, sir? | ||
Well, for one thing, we are in the biggest fight in Washington, D.C., but I believe that if this is all going to turn around, it's going to be the states. | ||
And you need leadership in the states to come out and say to Washington, D.C. You can't continue going where you're on because, I mean, let's just face it, the projected national debt 10 years from now, which is, even if you impose the cuts and everything else that we're working on right now, you're still looking, my projection is about $72 trillion in national debt in 10 years, Steve. | ||
This means that the states have got to be strong, secure, have their economies going strong. | ||
I hate to say it, but when that pressure comes in at the federal government where the federal government's not prepared to continue and the markets actually impose the draconian measures which they ultimately will impose, you need a strong state to be in position. | ||
And that's one of the reasons I'm going back, because I think we can prepare Arizona. | ||
Arizona's a great state, as you know. | ||
And this TSMC coming in and all of the ancillary businesses that are going to come in with it. | ||
Arizona's going to be a dynamic economy, a world player. | ||
TSMC, they're working on AI. They're going to be a leader in that field. | ||
And we just need leadership in Arizona to get us ready for that and moving into the next generation of this country. | ||
There will be someone good, I hope, will come take my place. | ||
I believe someone will. | ||
But we have to keep fighting it in the federal level. | ||
But definitely, if this is going to be saved, this country's going to be saved, Steve. | ||
It's going to be because of the individuals who live in states and recognize that we have to get back to a federalist system of government designed by our Constitution, not that nationalist government that we have devolved into. | ||
And that's where we are right now. | ||
On the 14th of March, the games have got to stop because somehow we've got to come up with a way to finance this government. | ||
Speaker Johnson was on the show at first because we said, hey, look, if you just do a CR... It's Biden's budget. | ||
It's a $2 trillion deficit that everybody agrees is already baked in. | ||
And worse, it's not just you don't get the doge cuts, but you actually underwrite and pay for what the doge guys found. | ||
Johnson says, no, we're not going to do that to Caitlin Collins. | ||
We're actually going to have these anomalies. | ||
We're going to put these doge cuts in. | ||
Now he's back with, oh, well. | ||
We're going to, you know, Doge, we just got to sign a clean CR. We're going to get to the Doge in 2026, exactly as I said was going to happen back in December. | ||
What are we going to do here? | ||
With President Trump trying to fight on all fronts, Congressman, people look to you. | ||
You're a straight shooter when it comes to the math, and you tell the hard truths. | ||
So tell me, what's the path through this so we don't shut down a government that's actually run by President Donald J. Trump, sir? | ||
Yeah, I mean, the theory that they're giving the strategy is that we'll send a clean CR over to the Senate. | ||
Chuck Schumer will try to shut down the government over that. | ||
And so if there is a shutdown, it'll be Schumer's shutdown. | ||
That never really works because the narrative builders don't see it that way. | ||
I mean, the narrative builders will blame the Republicans no matter what. | ||
My strategy is, I mean, there's a couple of different strategies. | ||
If you're going to do a CR, by golly, you better do your anomalies and take out what Doge has found. | ||
Maybe you also need to take out things like Planned Parenthood funding, right? | ||
I mean, why are we leaving that in there? | ||
So you would take out some of those things, and maybe you say, well, and then we're going to freeze spending so it can't grow. | ||
But that's betting on the come a little bit, Steve, and that's always a problem. | ||
I've talked to the speaker. | ||
I said, you know, I've been saying this for every one of the 37 CRs that have passed in the last 10 years. | ||
I've said, why don't you use the appropriations bills you've already passed? | ||
In this case, we did seven. | ||
Let's use those from last year. | ||
Put them down again. | ||
You've got policy in there that works, that goes after the Biden administration, and it reduces spending, and it funds 75% of the government. | ||
And then you can figure out what you're going to do with the other 25% in a CR that has some anomalies in it that make sure that you're not funding Doge and other crap. | ||
But the bottom line is, Steve, look for, quite frankly, a clean CR a little over a week from now. | ||
That's my prediction. | ||
And the theory will be, you know what they're going to say. | ||
They're going to say, well, we're going to deal with it in the BRB, reconciliation bill. | ||
That's not right, because the reconciliation package is something very completely different. | ||
And you know it, and I know it, and they know it, but they don't believe that the American people recognize that. | ||
Totally different. | ||
It's just a lie. | ||
Well, we're going to get into this after President Trump's speech tomorrow night, and Congressman, we'll have you back. | ||
Congratulations to the great state of Arizona. | ||
Everybody worked on this. | ||
It's absolutely massive. | ||
It's transformational. | ||
A state that's already trending towards becoming a tech center, this is transformational. | ||
So good luck, and good luck in your run for governor, sir. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
It's always good to be with you, my friend. | ||
Congressman Andy Biggs, one of the best. | ||
So we got out of New York. | ||
Some activity just happened with the FBI. I want to play that. | ||
I got Mike Davis. | ||
Big, massive news on Tina Peters. | ||
We're going to get to all of this. | ||
Let's go and play this clip and bring in the Viceroy, Mike Davis. | ||
But he didn't. | ||
This is real news, real breaking news in the making. | ||
When it makes me stammer, I can see the story coming out the printer. | ||
He's putting out publicly that he was forced out. | ||
I want to read to you from his resignation message. | ||
Eddie, you have that? | ||
Thank you. | ||
This is how it happens. | ||
Sorry, not so glamorous. | ||
In his retirement message to colleagues, former head of the FBI New York field office says he was forced out. | ||
Quote, I've been told many times in my life when you find yourself in a hole, sometimes it's best to quit digging. | ||
Screw that. | ||
I will never stop defending this joint. | ||
Full message, all. | ||
Late Friday, I was informed that I needed to put my retirement papers in today, which I just did. | ||
I was not given a reason for this decision. | ||
Regardless, I apologize to all of you for not being able to fulfill my commitment to you to serve as A-D-I-C-N-Y. What's that? | ||
unidentified
|
Assistant Director in Charge. | |
They're one of three people, the largest field offices in the country, New York. | ||
Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles. | ||
I can't stress enough how big and important a job is. | ||
But for sort of the director and the deputy director, I mean, this is the most important position in the department. | ||
Let me read his message in full then. | ||
As I leave today, I have an immense feeling of pride to have represented an office of professionals who will always do the right thing for the right reasons. | ||
Who will always seek the truth while upholding the rule of law. | ||
Who will always follow the facts, no matter where they lead, and be unapologetic about it. | ||
Who will never bend, break, falter, or quit on your integrity. | ||
Who will always handle cases and evidence with an overabundance of caution and care for the innocent, the victims, and the process first. | ||
Always remain independent. | ||
With that, here is my final top ten list. | ||
Top ten things I'll miss about the FBI. The commute to work? | ||
Not. | ||
The investigations? | ||
Doesn't matter what squad you are on, the work is the best in the world. | ||
The intensity? | ||
You have to be in it to realize what I mean. | ||
But we all know how significant what we do is. | ||
The FBI brand. | ||
Do not fret. | ||
Those three letters still mean something. | ||
And there's only a select group of folks in this world. | ||
Past and present, who can say they're with the FBI? Be proud of that. | ||
The camaraderie within our own Bureau family and with all law enforcement, local, state, federal, and international, there is no better fraternity in the world. | ||
The opportunity to put on a suit and tie to conduct interviews in the morning, throw on some street clothes to conduct surveillance in the afternoon, debrief a sensitive source at a safe house overnight, and then get up early for a SWAT arrest the next morning, then rinse. | ||
And repeat the badge. | ||
What it took to earn it and what it means to carry it. | ||
Yeah, well, guys like this are what trash the FBI's reputation. | ||
And Weissman right there, he's shaking. | ||
This is probably the third most important job in the FBI. The Viceroy, Mike Davis from Article 3, the founder of Article 3, joins us. | ||
Mike, walk the audience through. | ||
This is Kash Patel starting to clean house, sir. | ||
Exactly. | ||
These FBI agents are going to learn very quickly that they work for the FBI Director Cash Patel, who was appointed by President Trump. | ||
Cash Patel works for the Deputy Attorney General, who works for the Attorney General, who works for the President of the United States, who's elected by American voters. | ||
And this Assistant Director of the FBI, who's in charge of the New York Field Office, Just proved with his political statement why he should have been canned for this job, because he's showing the world that he's a politician. | ||
He just got this job back in September of 2024. Chris Wray appointed him, and it sounds like Kash Patel doesn't want him anymore. | ||
And there's probably pretty good reason for that, because this is the same man in charge of this FBI field office that didn't turn over. | ||
The files, the Epstein files that the Attorney General of the United States demanded, they turned over about 200 pages of files. | ||
They told the Attorney General this is all the files they have. | ||
And then the Attorney General found out later that they essentially lied. | ||
They didn't turn over the records. | ||
There were thousands of more pages that they sat on. | ||
So maybe that's one reason that this assistant director of the FBI is now unemployed. | ||
Well, I want to get to that because clearly the bitchy comment he made at the end, that long statement that Nicole Wallace read, shows that he's unacceptable to be in that position. | ||
It's the number three. | ||
It's like being head of SDNY in the Justice Department, right? | ||
After you get through the top couple of guys at Main Justice, SDNY is kind of the Battlestar Galactica, right? | ||
Same with the FBI. But is this fallout, because I know, crash, these guys are thinking about a restructuring, and they're going to get their guys in, and they've got to think about the process. | ||
But to come this quickly, after the fiasco last week, do you believe this is directly tied to that fiasco about the Epstein files? | ||
It could be, or it could be the fact that this guy who was fired was the chief of staff in the national security branch of the FBI. Back in 2018 when the FBI was running crossfire hurricane and Russian collusion nonsense against President Trump when they politicized and weaponized the FBI and the broader Justice Department to go after President Trump. | ||
And so I would say to this James Denny here, whatever the hell his name is, is that you might want to just... | ||
You might want to just take your retirement and get the hell out of government because you could be on the receiving end of subpoenas for Crossfire Hurricane if you don't go out quietly like you should. | ||
Oh, I hope he's going to get those anyway. | ||
I want to go to something that on this Epstein situation I can't understand. | ||
And maybe you can enlighten me. | ||
You have the FBI, and supposedly they have files, and this guy was the head guy of the New York branch of the FBI, which is the most important. | ||
You've got D.C. and L.A., but this has always been said to be the most important because of all the world's capital markets and the spies and everything that goes on, right? | ||
Also, I think what Pambani said is that the SDNY held back files to the prosecutors themselves. | ||
One, would that make sense? | ||
And two, Correct me if I'm wrong, SDNY, and I realize we haven't gotten approved Jay Clayton from Sullivan and Cromwell that's going to be the head of SDNY. I don't think he's been confirmed yet. | ||
But can SDNY Southern District New York prosecutor hold back from the Attorney General of the United States if she's requested all files for Epstein? | ||
Is that even possible to hold it back, or isn't that a crime? | ||
Well, you know, actually, you haven't heard about this, Steve. | ||
It's not the Southern District of New York. | ||
It's the Sovereign District of New York and their delusional minds. | ||
They don't think they report to anyone, neither the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York nor the FBI New York Field Office. | ||
They think that they are... | ||
Reporting to whatever their thoughts are that day. | ||
They don't think that they report to the Deputy Attorney General who reports to the Attorney General who reports to the President of the United States who's elected and accountable to all Americans. | ||
And that's what makes... | ||
These prosecutors and these agents so dangerous because they actually prove what they laugh and say is a conspiracy theory. | ||
They prove that there actually is a deep state where this assistant director in charge of the New York field office, of whom no one's ever heard until he got canned. | ||
Thanks that he's not accountable to the Deputy Attorney General, the Attorney General, or the President of the United States, let alone Kash Patel, the FBI Director. | ||
This is dangerous. | ||
For the people who pretend like they're saving democracy, I don't think you can get less democratic than executive branch deep state officials who don't think they're accountable to anyone. | ||
Changing with the new sheriffs in town, with Pam Bondi as the attorney general, with Todd Blanche as the incoming deputy attorney general, with Emil Bove, his principal deputy, with Kash Patel. | ||
There are new sheriffs in town. | ||
This is not the Trump 45 Justice Department where we have a bunch of Ivy League cucks. | ||
These are savages, and they're not going to put up with this nonsense anymore, particularly in the Southern District of New York and the FBI's New York field office. | ||
So you think this will expedite the Epstein files getting to Pambani and then being released to people to the degree, I guess, legally they can be released? | ||
Yeah, I mean, what is this guy's excuse when the attorney general ordered him to turn over Epstein files and this guy did not turn over Epstein files and then apparently he's going to be released. | ||
That he even lied to the Attorney General about what Epstein files even exist and what was turned over and what was not. | ||
It sounds to me like that's obstruction of justice, which is a crime under our United States Code. | ||
Mike, real quickly, I want to hold you through the break because I want to get to this massive event about Tina Peters. | ||
Just quickly, and then I'll go to break. | ||
Tina Peters, this has the deal with the U.S. Attorney or the interim U.S. Attorney in Colorado. | ||
What happened today? | ||
Because Tina Peters is held on state charges. | ||
Right now, the U.S. Attorney is going to get involved in this, sir? | ||
Yeah, so Bishop Gruwell is the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado. | ||
He's a friend of mine. | ||
He's a former colleague of mine. | ||
And he just filed a statement. | ||
of interest today in federal courts in Denver, saying essentially that this 69-year-old woman is deteriorating badly in prison under these bogus charges where these Democrat operatives in Colorado put this 69-year-old woman in prison for nine years for merely challenging the election. | ||
And this judge was bad enough to come out and say that he imposed this severe sentence on Tito Peters. | ||
And let me pull up the quote so I get it right. | ||
It's so egregious. | ||
unidentified
|
Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. | |
I'm going to hold that as a cliffhanger. | ||
This thing is so outrageous. | ||
We're going to take a break. | ||
The Viceroy Mike Davis is going to be on the side. | ||
Folks, you should know that President Donald John Trump... | ||
is working very hard and very focused on Tina Peters. | ||
This is the first time I think people can actually say this with his action today about habeas corpus and Tina Peters. | ||
President Trump's Justice Department, his acting attorney, U.S. attorney in Colorado now engaged. | ||
The Vice-Roy Mike Davis explained it all to you. | ||
Go right now to your phone. | ||
Text Bannon at 989-898. | ||
Get Birch Golds. | ||
unidentified
|
Investing in gold in the era of Trump. | |
Do it today. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann. | |
Okay, Mike Davis, the viceroy, the founder of Article 3 and has done so much on so many levels for President Trump and the Trump movement and MAGA and we're sorting things out now. | ||
Mike Davis, I want to reset just for a second. | ||
Tina Peters, it's a state charge. | ||
It's absolutely outrageous. | ||
She's a gold star mother. | ||
This shows you how demonic and evil the left is. | ||
Polis and these guys, and Polis, I've got news for you. | ||
Bro, you think you're going to run for president of the United States? | ||
You ain't getting anywhere, and it's because of Tina Peters. | ||
Well, many things, right? | ||
You're a phony centrist. | ||
You're a left-wing progressive. | ||
But what you did to Tina Peters is outrageous. | ||
Now tell me, what's the importance? | ||
I know President Trump and others at this highest level have been working on this, Mike, yourself included. | ||
Why is this so important, what happened today? | ||
And actually, what happened? | ||
Because she's on state charges. | ||
She's in a state prison, right? | ||
How can a federal government get involved at all, sir? | ||
Let's talk about this. | ||
What has happened? | ||
Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous. | ||
It is a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. | ||
And that's going to be the next thing I push for. | ||
But let's talk about what happened here. | ||
Tina Peters was the Mesa County clerk in Colorado, 69 years old. | ||
She tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, and that is her job under Colorado statute. | ||
And she was able to access the tabulation codes in the voting machines, and she didn't jump through the right hoop when she did this, right? | ||
And so instead of giving her a warning or a slap on the hand, which is what they should have done, this Jenna Griswold, who is this big, fat, slob, Colorado Secretary of State, went to the Mesa County prosecutor. | ||
And this slob Colorado Secretary of State, who should be on a freaking diet, put Tina Peters in prison for nine years ago. | ||
And they went to this Judge Matthew Barrett, who is this partisan hack judge, and slob Jenna Griswold and this Matthew Barrett, this little Democrat cut judge, Put her in prison for nine years and he was dumb enough to say this. | ||
Quote, he had imposed the severe penalty because she had repeatedly advanced false claims about Mr. Trump's defeat and in doing so become a celebrity among those who denied that he lost the race. | ||
In other words, this judge with this fat slob Colorado Secretary of State Jenna Griswold. | ||
Punished her because of her First Amendment rights. | ||
She dared to challenge the election. | ||
She dared to think the election was stolen. | ||
So she got thrown in prison for nine years for this. | ||
And so Bishop Gruwell, who is the acting U.S. attorney in Colorado, he's my friend and former colleague, just Filed a statement of interest today in Tina Peters' habeas petition pointing this out, that this is a 69-year-old woman. | ||
Her health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished because of her protected First Amendment. | ||
These are thought crimes by this fat slob, Tina Peters, and this Colorado Democrat Judge Matthew Barrett. | ||
You mean Jenna Griswold? | ||
Tina Peters is not a fat slob. | ||
Jenna Griswold is a fat slob. | ||
Poor Tina is wasting away in prison. | ||
Let's go back to the judge. | ||
Why would a judge, understanding, you know, he's got to be smart enough, why would he ever say this when that goes to political dissent and proves the thing that we've been saying? | ||
Tina Peters is a political... | ||
He said it. | ||
Tina Peters is a political prisoner. | ||
Is she not, sir? | ||
She absolutely is. | ||
Look, I split my time between D.C. and Colorado, and I'll tell you, when they're not smoking weed here on the slopes of Colorado, I assure you that the legal community is not writing for the Yale Law Review. | ||
Let's just put it that way. | ||
So we have this judge in Colorado, Matthew Barrett, who was dumb enough to state on the record that he was going to severely... | ||
punish Tina Peters at fat slob Jenna Griswold's request because this Matthew Barrett and Jenna Griswold didn't like the fact that Tina Peters thought, knows, the election was stolen and actually said it publicly. | ||
Yes. | ||
Mike, how big is this? | ||
How important is this going to be, this at least opening salvo from the Trump administration's Justice Department, sir? | ||
Well, I would say this. | ||
This is step one. | ||
Step two is when Harmeet Dillon gets confirmed as the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. | ||
And I would say to this Judge Matthew Barrett, when you make... | ||
Statements like this, when you are very clearly punishing people for their protected political thoughts in their head and their speech, that's protected by the First Amendment. | ||
When you're teaming up with fat slob Jenna Griswold to do this, these are state actors doing this, you are committing a very serious federal civil rights felony, 18 U.S.C. Section 241, conspiracy against us. | ||
It's a lot in this show. | ||
And I imagine that Harmeet Dillon's going to take a look at this because I'm going to be very loud and vocal about this. | ||
And maybe this Judge Matthew Barrett and fat slob Jenna Griswold can share a prison cell. | ||
And I think this judge will learn very fast that there's limited food in the Colorado prisons when you're sharing a prison cell with Jenna Griswold. | ||
Mike Davis, where do people get you on Article 3 now more than ever as you go through the second and third phase of the confirmation process? | ||
You're needed more than ever, sir. | ||
Where do they get you? | ||
Where we stand out, where we're different, Steve, is when we get punched, we punch back three times as hard. | ||
We're not the Ivy League lawyers of the Trump 45 era. | ||
This is a different world. | ||
Article 3 project. | ||
Article number 3project.org. | ||
You can donate there. | ||
You can follow us on social media. | ||
And the most important thing you can do is take action. | ||
That top right action button with Harmeet Dillon. | ||
Let's get her confirmed and let's get these civil rights investigations going ASAP. Mike Davis, thank you. | ||
Cash Patel, Mike Davis. | ||
One thing I can tell you about these fellows having worked with them, having the pleasure of working with them the last couple of years, they are street fighters. | ||
Mike Davis, thank you very much. | ||
unidentified
|
Appreciate you. | |
Tina Peters and the Tina Peters folks ought to know that this is something that President Trump is top of mind with him with everything else going on. | ||
Todd Benson, I want to get you on tonight because at midnight, 25% tariffs. | ||
Come on, Mexico. | ||
And I've got to ask you, President Trump went to his punch list and he said not good enough. | ||
They're rolling. | ||
How big is this going to be? | ||
You've been the number one guy for the last four years telling the American people about what's going on here. | ||
This is pretty catastrophic to Mexico, is it not? | ||
25% tariffs? | ||
It ain't on an avocado and it ain't on a tomato. | ||
It's across the board. | ||
Todd Benzman, the geoeconomics of these tariffs with Mexico tonight, sir. | ||
Right. | ||
The tariffs are across the board. | ||
That means that think auto parts, think agricultural products. | ||
Remember that Mexico, probably a majority of its international trade is with the United States, a very significant majority. | ||
And so it's going to hurt the Mexicans far more than it's going to hurt the U.S. But if they do this, you will feel a pinch on this side of the border. | ||
It's just that we can withstand it a lot longer than the Mexicans can. | ||
So you'll hear a lot of squealing about, well, this is hurting American businesses and grocery stores and consumers at a time when we're trying to reduce inflation and prices at the grocery store. | ||
It shouldn't last very long. | ||
Mexico just seems to need to comply more with what the president is asking. | ||
I'm not sure exactly. | ||
But hang on. | ||
But what he's asking is this is all about immigration, border, and the cartels. | ||
It's very blunt. | ||
You talk about the company, the financial. | ||
He's got Pete Hexeth down there with 12,000 troops and strikers. | ||
He's got CIA guys going around doing targeting exercise. | ||
The kinetic part's about to roll, but this is about your part about the company. | ||
He's going after the finances of the political class in Mexico and the seven families that own and run the deal in Mexico. | ||
And he's told them, hey, I either got to see real changes, and I mean real changes, or I'm going to break you economically. | ||
This is economic warfare, is it not, sir? | ||
Yes. | ||
I mean, that's the leverage. | ||
It worked in Trump 1.0, and it's worked so far. | ||
Now, remember that Scheinbaum handed Trump 29 scalps, really good scalps, not that long ago. | ||
Some of them, the founding fathers of Mexico's cartels right now, were running everything from luxury prisons. | ||
Very powerful. | ||
But the part that maybe they're looking for is turn over your government officials, your senior ranking, high-level government officials that are running all of this and the lawyers that are running interference for... | ||
For the cartels that are inside the government. | ||
Remember, we have seen often very high-ranking government officials in Mexico get indicted and busted in the United States, sometimes in absentia, sometimes physically we lay hands on them. | ||
And maybe that's what Trump is looking for, but also I'm thinking, you know, there's 12,000, 10,000 Mexican troops have been I think the Trump administration is looking for some kinetic action down there on the fentanyl. | ||
They want to see fentanyl. | ||
He says he's doing this for fentanyl. | ||
Because Mexico, more than Canada, this will destroy Mexico's economy flat out. | ||
He knows it. | ||
This is a blunt force instrument. | ||
Is it because of fentanyl they just haven't taken action and it's still coming across? | ||
Because Trump is telling the world, I don't give two Fs. | ||
When I say I'm going to do something, I'm going to do it. | ||
In Ukraine, I'm going to do it. | ||
In the Middle East, I'm going to do it. | ||
In Taiwan, I'm going to bring $100 billion here and their factories back here. | ||
He's on a roll. | ||
And people got to understand, they listen to the media, what they say about it, and they should listen to Trump. | ||
Trump has said, you're going to stop killing our people with fentanyl, or I'm going to stop it. | ||
The Mexican government, the Mexican economy, and the Mexican people cannot take 25% tariffs across the board. | ||
It will break them. | ||
Trump knows that, and they know that. | ||
So what do you think they have to do in shutting down fentanyl to please President Trump and say, okay, we've done it, we've listened to you? | ||
For decades, we asked for the COPPA regimes, and they just blew us off. | ||
And it took Trump, the threat of these tariffs, to turn over 29, as you told some of the founding fathers. | ||
On the rest of fentanyl, what do you see as the key things that have to be done, sir? | ||
Well, for starters, there's a city called Culicon that is Sinaloa-controlled. | ||
There are more than 100 fentanyl labs there. | ||
Some of them are mobile. | ||
They're moving around. | ||
But some of them are stationary. | ||
I think that they want to see kinetic action on those. | ||
They want to see them blown up and destroyed and bullets flying. | ||
They want to see bodies. | ||
And I think they want to see lots of fentanyl precursor chemicals getting burned in big dumps. | ||
That's the thing that they want. | ||
So I'm going to guess maybe they'll get that pretty soon. | ||
Otherwise, it's curtains for the Mexican economy. | ||
I mean, estimates are that it would take maybe a month or two before the Mexican economy is thrust into deep recession. | ||
If these go through. | ||
So we'll see what happens. | ||
Definitely worth watching. | ||
So with everything, President Trump, militarily, intelligence, economics, diplomacy, is there anything he's not doing to basically stop the invasion on our southern border by illegal aliens and to stop the drug and human trafficking that's coming across? | ||
Is there anything, any box you see he's not trying to check, Todd Bensman? | ||
Well, like I said, It's early. | ||
The border is, in my opinion, is close to operationally secure on the illegal immigration part as we've seen it ever really in the history of since we've been keeping records. | ||
8,300 apprehensions for the whole month of February. | ||
It sounds like a lot, but that's like nothing. | ||
That was like coffee. | ||
A coffee break during the Biden administration. | ||
You know, 15 minutes, that's how many would come in. | ||
But the Trump administration probably is still gearing up and setting the table for the Mexicans to start doing more kinetically down there. | ||
I haven't seen a whole lot of raids. | ||
I'm not seeing... | ||
I'm seeing the Mexican troops are checking cars and trucks a lot more at all the big ports of entry, and that's good. | ||
But I think they want to see some body bags down there filled by cartel guys and some fentanyl labs going up. | ||
unidentified
|
Some fentanyl labs would be pretty nice. | |
Give me that city right now, Town, because I want to get that in the people's minds, because you know this better than anybody, and I think there'll be some place that'll come up on the news screen in the week or two. | ||
What is it? | ||
And they have 100 fentanyl labs down this place, what's it called? | ||
Hulicon, Sinaloa Territory down in Baja State. | ||
That is the place where it's a very large center of fentanyl production. | ||
The stuff comes in from the Pacific Ocean by ship and plane, the precursor chemicals, and they put it all together. | ||
The pill factories, the labs, some of them are mobile, some of them are stationary. | ||
We know where they are. | ||
What do you think our spy flights are doing right now? | ||
They're all over that area. | ||
So that's just one area, but there are other locations, and they're probably moving them around a lot right now, too. | ||
One last thing. | ||
You believe, you believe, I know Oscar Blue Ramirez believes, that the cartels are not going to go down without a fight, and particularly they're going to strike back probably at civilians on both sides of the border. | ||
It's going to be quite violent. | ||
Do you believe this is upcoming cartel war? | ||
Because Trump's, it's going to go kinetic. | ||
It's going to go kinetic. | ||
OK, he's when he says and you got home and on TV saying he wants to total annihilation. | ||
Trump, when he says total annihilation, he means total annihilation. | ||
So what's your predictions on the violence here? | ||
Yeah, I think the Trump administration, DOD, Northcom, Southcom, all those intelligence groups are expecting cross border attacks on our side by the cartels. | ||
that the threat of that is elevated. | ||
I'm not predicting it. | ||
I'm just saying that I think that they think it's elevated. | ||
Otherwise, why are you moving in striker combat brigades with 2,500 soldiers? | ||
Those things are not there necessarily to stop illegal immigration. | ||
Those are combat brigades. | ||
And my feeling is that what they're doing is they're trying to project a retaliatory threat against that from happening. | ||
You got the 10th Mountain Division. | ||
They're not saying that, but they're also saying we're not bringing the striker brigade in to do interdiction or detention for illegal immigrants. | ||
They're saying flat out that's not what they're doing. | ||
They're there to keep an eye on things, to monitor. | ||
By the way, they brought in an error. | ||
A wing of air support with Chinooks and Black Hawk helicopters, but the Chinooks can pick those things up and carry them anywhere that they want on the border. | ||
Those strikers. | ||
The strikers. | ||
No, this is when you go and roll into Baghdad. | ||
They would kill to have this in Ukraine. | ||
This is when you... | ||
Up Armor and Let's Roll Boys. | ||
I'm telling you, they're putting... | ||
Pete Hegseth is telling President Trump he's putting the stuff down that President Trump... | ||
This is ready to go on offense. | ||
Where did they get this report today? | ||
I want everybody to read your report you just came out with, sir. | ||
Oh, I just have a piece out today where I'm just saying, look, the illegal immigration part is done. | ||
Border crisis over, I'm declaring it. | ||
The numbers are there. | ||
The policies are there. | ||
I don't think there's going to be a resurgence. | ||
I allow for the possibility of a resurgence, but Trump has got to keep the gas on, no brakes. | ||
Gas, no brakes. | ||
And by the way, I want to say one other thing. | ||
I'm starting to see in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and some of these other people that are quote-unquote analysts. | ||
Saying, what do we need 10,000 active-duty combat troops down there when there's nobody crossing, when the border is quiet? | ||
And the answer to that is credible retaliatory deterrence. | ||
That's what I think they're there for. | ||
I think that that is – if they're not there for introducing illegal – Hey, hey, here's a better answer. | ||
We want them there because we like them there. | ||
How about that? | ||
Suck on that, Washington Post. | ||
Suck on that, New York Times. | ||
You guys backed up Biden while the country was invaded. | ||
Trump shut it down in one month. | ||
We like them because we like them. | ||
Where do they go, Todd, to get all your writings? | ||
Yep, Benzman Todd on X. I'm also at True Social and Getter. | ||
ToddBenzman.com. | ||
You can sign up for my free newsletter. | ||
Whenever I write something, I let you know. | ||
You're amazing, sir. | ||
Look forward to having you back. | ||
I want to get your thoughts on the State of the Union tomorrow. | ||
Todd Benzman called shot every time. | ||
Markers were very choppy today. | ||
At midnight tonight, Eastern Standard Time, 25% tariffs on Canada, 25% tariffs on Mexico. | ||
I think there's 10% tariffs on China. | ||
Markers are going to be a little choppy. | ||
You want to know what a hedge has been historically? | ||
Wait for it. | ||
Gold. | ||
Birch Gold, take out your phone. | ||
Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N-N, 9-8-9-8-9-8. | ||
Get the free brochure, Investing in Gold in the Era of Trump, the ultimate guide from Birch Gold. | ||
You also get access to Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Contact Philip Patrick. | ||
Walk through why gold has been a hedge for 5,000 years of man's recorded history. | ||
We will be back tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. | ||
Eastern Standard Time. | ||
In the War Room, talk about the State of the Union message. | ||
We're going to leave you with the right stuff. | ||
You know why? | ||
Because you got it, and you know you got it. |